Why Do 'Anti-Hate' Protesters Hate Police So Much?

I've got audio for you, and I'll break down why the media is lying about it. That plus a little bit of Omar Rose to talking a whole lot more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence, Make no mistakes America Great, You're a great American Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, remember no, it's about time. I mean, the American people deserve an FBI that's not biased. They

deserve an FBI that's going to focus on the truth. Obviously, Peter Struck wasn't that individual. And I think it's important to understand. He just wasn't any old agent at the FBI. He was deputy head of counter intelligence. More importantly, he was the lead agent on both the Clinton investigation and on the Trump Russia investigation. So you now have at the FBI needs something I've never seen in any federal agency. James, call me fire. Deputy Director McCabe fired, Jim Ribicki, former

chief of staff, has left the FBI. Jim Baker, Chief Council the FBI was demoted then fired. Lisa Page FBI Council, demoted, then left. And then of course you now have Peter Struck who was demoted and now fired. Today. These are the six key key people at the top of the FBI who ran the Clinton investigation and who launched and ran the Trump Russia investigation. I've never seen anything like that in any other federal agency. Hooray for an agency

that finally did something right, which is recognized. There's no place in the FBI for somebody who's bias, whose conduct, whose statements showed that they were not willing to be fair, and that in fact they compromised the very integrity or bring into question the integrator of the FBI welcome to the buck Sex and show everybody a lot of big breaking news today, and we're going to go on a deep dive together into what really happened at the so

called anti fascism rally this weekend. All the violence, all the bad stuff on the streets that the police had to deal with, surprisingly enough, had nothing to do with the white nationalists who were there, because they were like five of them. I mean, actually there were twenty or so. I'm not exagerly there are about towny of them. All the smoke bombs that were thrown, the punchers thrown, the pushing,

the violent it came from the anti fascism protesters. We will get their media move Wait, they blew past that story so fast they don't want to touch it. We'll do all of that and more, but first this uh, this firing of FBI agent Peter Struck. There's a a

meme that you'll see out there. It gets shared a lot where well, they'll show all of the different people that the Mother Probe has either brought charges against or have gotten a conviction against, and they'll just list them all out and they'll put like, you know, seventeen Russians, I mean they're not really, and that's a counterintelligence problem, not a pure criminal problem. But they know they're ever.

But then they're just trying to pad the stats there, So seventeen Russians and then it's Manafort tax fraud, and then Flynn Papadopolis, van Vander whatever his name is, the Dutch guy lawyer who got basically a few people lying under this very aggressive prob and but they list this out and say, where do you think this is a witch hunt? Doesn't look like a witch hunt to me. Okay,

so that's the game they want to play. Someone explained to me what the heck is going on at the FBI when Comy McKay, Paige struck Rebecca If you heard all those names fired or demoted, ignominiously ended careers, folks. And we're not talking about a few people in the FBI with its tens of thousands of employees who just

happened to get into some trouble. We're talking about the most powerful people in the FBI, all of whom were directly involved in what seems to now be clearly a concerted effort to stop Trump from winning the presidency by our own law enforcement and intelligence agencies. That's what we're talking about here. Yeah, Jim Jordan, who started off the show. They're talking all these names. He left off some important names. By the way, What about Sally it's fired. She's a

hashtag resistance person. Brennan, if he were still the CIA director, I promise you would have been fired. He's a hashtag resistance mainstay. Clapper would have been fired if he had tried to stay on her, if he had stayed on his director of National Intelligence. So what's going on to your folks? Why is it that the FBI is finding cause for termination, perhaps even in the case of McCabe and Comy, caused for criminal charges against people who are

just do they were just doing their jobs. If you're Peter Struck, he Kina was up there talking like this when he's giving his testimony and here never did anything wrong. He just wants you to know that he was trying to defend the country. Actually sounds a lot like Peter Struck. If you go back and listen to his testimony, you know there's something going on here, folks. It's obviously rotten.

When you talk about the swamp, and I know I joke around about the swamp, but there was a virus that had infected the upper reaches of the federal bureaucracy, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies under Obama. That they really thought that they were doing a public service. And I almost feel sorry for them because I think that they believed this. They believe that trying to throw an election and trying to overrule the will of the American people

and picked their president for them. I think that struck and Page and others, they thought they were doing a public service. And we see this from there their text messages, we see this from the information that's already come out.

And there's no other explanation for their actions. There's no other way to look at what they've done and come away and have some understanding of it other than they must have really believed that was a clear and present, clear and present danger to the United States, and therefore they were justified in extraordinary, extra legal measures to stop him from being president. And then once it had happened, once the unthinkable had occurred, well then they had to

find something to justify all the stuff that they had done. Right, once they had already crossed over to the dark side, there's no going back, so they might as well try to justify why they've done it. And that's what happened after Trump's election with the Mueller probe and all the rest of it. Yeah, that's right, Struck fired. Yates was fired. She hasn't got as much attention I've been telling you along.

She just strikes me as as a a central figure in the hashtag resistance effort from the federal government, always has her grandstanding on what was Remember now, folks, the Supreme Court said, yeah, actually the president does have the right to do this so called Muslim band. So you know, you're the attorney general, you're gonna refuse acting attorney general, you're Yates, You're gonna refuse to carry out the the policy of the president because you don't like it. Because

that's what she did. It wasn't unconstitutional, it wasn't unethical. She just didn't like it. She didn't like it, so she she refused to do it, and she insisted on being terminated from it, an act of pure grandstanding from a lifelong snide bureaucrat. And then there's one other name that has not yet gotten nearly the attention that I think it should in this now that's Struck has been fired,

which she should have been a long time ago. Now we have to look at or Bruce Or bruce Or is less known to us because he doesn't do public interviews. We haven't really seen him in in fiery testimony or anything before Congress. He's been keeping a relatively low profile.

His name comes up though time and again. In fact, my colleague here at the Hill, John Solomon, wrote a piece just last week about how Bruce Or, the number four person in the entire Department of Justice, an incredibly senior and powerful bureaucrat, was a true believer and Christopher Steele and Christopher Steele's mission of stopping Donald Trump, Or was having meetings with him, Or was bringing him in front of d o J, and then after he was fired by the FBI, Or wanted to bring him back.

This just came out in the last week. I wanted to bring him back into the investigation, use his services again. Oh, come on, no one's got no, one's got sources like Chris Steele. Does you notice that they've stopped folks with the whole Oh, the Trump Tower thing was illegal. The

Trump Tower they was illegal. You know why they've stopped with that because there's no way to make the Trump Tower meeting illegal without making Hillary's Christopher Steel Fusion GPS Russian fishing expedition also illegal, and while Hillary got to live by a separate set of rules on the emails.

I don't think they'd get away with indicting Trump for taking a thing of value from foreigners, or wanting to take a thing which is not even a crime in and of it, that wouldn't even last constitutional scrutiny, and not then go after Hillary for doing the same thing from foreigners. Oh, but she paid them. For usually paying people to do things for you, that's illegal, is worse, right, But no, No, with Hillary, she paid for it hollow and paid it was expensive. So she's got all that

going on. You're gonna see more of Bruce Or's name. I think he's the next one. I think he's gonna get fired. That's right. I think Bruce Or is getting get fired. His wife, Nellie Or, was a Fusion GPS employee. Right, these are not co incidences. We see the connections here, as I like to say, we see the connective tissue. It's very obvious that there was this cabal and they were working within the dj at FBI against Trump completely

abusing their prosecutorial discretion, completely abusing their investigative authorities. And once you start to add on to this the State Department piece, and this is where I think we're gonna need a lot more answers. This is where I don't think we've seeing even a fraction of what really went on. Then you're gonna see what the what the full extent of this anti Trump collusion from within our own government really was. Hillary Clinton was allowed to run the State

Department under Obama as as her own fiefdom. She brought in her own people, she you know, the Obama administration. President Obama himself was pretty hands off. He really gave not just US foreign policy to Hillary, which is part of why it's a disaster, but also gave the ability to really mold and shape the State Department as she saw fit. It was her place, it was her prerogative. And there's all this stuff. Now you're just seeing the early stages of it as well. Christopher Steele, he had

connections to the State Department. Well you know who else was pushing stuff there. Don't believe. I do not believe for a second that Hillary Clinton, with all of her connections, all of her cronies and leave behind at State who were crying when she lost the election, who have been crying. These are adults, folks that show up to do a job for the United States, for the American people, and

they cry at their desks. This has been reported because there's a thought about Trump because like it's such a bull here, like Trump's stuffs like may mean thing. Even I'm just like like why, like just he's just orange and THO mean, I hate it. Those kinds of people at the State Department would have had access to classified information, would have had contacts abroad, and would have had a very clear vested interest in doing everything they could just

stopped Frump. So I think that's the and that's part of the urgency for the Democrats to take the House. Yes, I know they just want the House because they want to be back in power, but there's also a sense of that they need to get to this stuff. They need to get this done now, because I think that you're gonna find out a lot of the rocks that was at FBI and d o J also extended to the State Department. And that's why you've had think of

all the defections you've had doesn't make sense, folks. These are bureaucrats. They're generally pretty you know, a lot of lethargic, punch in, punch out, folks, and you can get mad at me. I don't care. It's true. I spent a lot of time with people's State Department. I heard from a from a former ambassador who became a mentor of mine,

very senior invassad the United's government. He said, if State Department employees spend as much time complaining about who was paying for their home different home expenses as they did on you know, if they spend as much time worried about that as as they would worry about U s Foreign policy, we would solve all of our problems in a heartbeat. A lot of naval gazing and a lot of self looking ice cream cone stuff going onto the

State Department. Those people who have been in for you know, in some cases twenty year, they're all gonna leave because they can't handle Trump. It's not like Trump is calling all the shots at the embassies abroad. What what's the what's the problem. I think some of them left because

they had to get out of government. It would be easier to keep a low profile, keep their heads down and hopefully stay out of the spotlight if information comes out that the State Department was actually also trying to push this narrative to reporters from Christopher Steele and and working to undermine President Trump. I think that there were aspects of State that we're also You've seen some reporting on this, but I think it goes a lot deeper. I really do. Oh what do you think you think

the the CIA director is like a hashtag resistance lunatic? Okay, formercy I director Brennan, do you think that there was nobody at State who was like that? Come on, they live for this stuff, picking up foreign rumors about the incoming Republican president that they could use to trash him. Keep an eye on that one. We've got to get into this um this protest from over the weekend. I've got a lot to share you on this because I was there and there was so much dishonesty and the

reporting over this. There's so much, Uh, I mean, I don't what do you call it when somebody only gives you a part of a story. Is that fake news?

Is it? Is it just dishonest news? Because they were very clearly editorializing with what they showed you and what they didn't from this protest over the weekend, And and it is worth asking how it is that a protest with twenty people scheduled becomes a national media event with five different police agencies coordinating to get those twenty people into Washington, d C. With every news organization I can think of sending reporters to cover it. Hm hm hm hmm.

Maybe we should look into this some more, and we will eight four or four to eight to five, eight four four, nine hundred buck teams. Stay with me. We'll be right back. I wanted to move on from the Struck firing, but I just I got a note here for your friends that he's already got an anti Trump

Twitter account going. This is Peter Struck now formerly of the FBI before they kicked his butt out the door, and he's gotta go fund me page seeking a hundred and fifty geeze grand because he says he's legal bills. You know, Andy McCabe set up a go fund me page, got a half million dollars. You see, folks, being hashtag resistance does pay the bills. What have I always told you about the left? They're they're smartest policy. They're like

the the Democrats are like the Lanisters. You can hate them, you know, you can't trust them, but they always pay their debts, not the national debt, but they always pay their their debts. Two people. Uh, And that's a very powerful thing. If you go down on the field of ideological battle in service of the Democrat Party, you will

be taken care of. If you are a Republican or a conservative and you go down, whether they destroy your business, they destroy your reputation, or they throw you in prison for some trumped up nonsense. It's kind of like, well, you know, I mean, maybe he did something wrong. I don't know. I mean, Conservatives, we are we need to call each other out on this. We are whimps over this one. We do not protect our own Ca've got a half a million dollars after lying multiple times a

getting fired from the FBI. People just gave him money because they love him so much. Why because they know that he hates Trump. They know he's an anti Trumpster. Same thing with Struck. But I wonder how long it gonna before Struck producer, Mike, you want to give me odds on this? How long before Struck is on either c or MSNBC, like, I was just doing the best

icon to stop Trump. What do you think about twenty minutes? Yeah, I think yeah, maybe tonight, maybe by the time we finished this broadcast struggle or to be the hundreds mold my countries. We're trying to throw in loction. Um, we've got to talk about this Antifa stuff from yesterday. I saw it, folks. Here here's a short version. The media is lying to you about what really happened there, because I saw it. He's holding the line for America, buck Sexton,

his back. The phone is without that bad you have to have without that. That's just a little bit of what was going on at that so called anti fascism protests or anti hate that's really what they like to call an anti hate protest. I went over there because I live in the swamp. Now I'm technically a swamp creature, so I wanted to spend some time and see what's really going on. And wow, my friends, it was a remarkable, a remarkable example of just how deep the media bias goes.

How they are pushing narratives not based in the facts or what's going on, but based on what they want and what they want the facts to be and it was so preposterous reading because I was there and I was seeing the media coverage a lot of love Trump's hate and no fascism, and we just want to come together, And you know, I went through. Originally was thirty four and then a forty three photo array that the Washington Post had put together that was kind of its official

slide show of the protest. Forty three photos, folks, Not a single not a single photo that in that array dealt dealt with the signs that were all over the place, calling for revolution, calling for overthrowing the system in the American government, saying that America was never great, saying that all cops are racist. By the way, that's a chance. Producer might grabbed that one. I want to I've got We've got more chance all cops are racist. That was

a chance. That was a chance in Charlottesville as well as in Washington, d C. Over the weekend. So that was clearly planned. And this was thousands and thousands of people versus a little tiny group of twenty white nationalist losers. That's what they are there, losers. They want attention. This is the equivalent, folks of the media holding a massive uh counter you know, being covering a massive counter rally and being there there were there were a hundred to

one reporters to white nationalists yesterday. I'm not even exaggerating. I mean there are reporters everywhere. See them all at their own mic phones and everything else. Imagine. I mean you could do this with any number of groups. You could do this with with the Westboro Baptist Church and just give them blanket flood the zone media coverage and say, oh my gosh, look at this Christian sect that's overtaking America, that that is saying that, you know, troops are dying

because of of homosexuality in this country. They could do that, but that would be editorial malpractice because the Westboro Baptist Church is a bunch of idiotic losers and they're not important, and they're not powerful, and they should not be given a bigger platform in the media than the news warrants. Right. And there's there was another. I think they're called the

real Israelites. I used to see them in New York sometimes they were They were black guys who would stand on the street and read from read from the Bible and yell about uh, you know, the white man is the devil and all this stuff, and that they had they had a show for a while, I think on public access idiots clowns, not to be taken seriously. But there were a few dozen of them, and they were

pretty well known in New York City. But you you wouldn't act like there were some national scourge, like we're we're about to fall into the anarchy of the real Jews are Black Movement or whatever I think they're called the true Israelites. Mike, do you know what I'm talking about? You ever see these guys? Yeah? Right that, Yeah, they're they're they're a thing that people know about. I wouldn't

do that. And yet what happened yesterday was you had all of this talk about, oh, the we have to commemorate the anniversary of Charlottesville, in the rise of the alt right and white nationalism and all this stuff, and you got a handful of moron show up. No one knows what that, No one cares what they're saying, No

one even really knows what they're saying. I had a hard time finding just so I could see what they're doing, the white nationalist pen because they were penned in uh and with with huge police presence around them, and you just think, you know, what is this, What is the psychology of the press, what is their their political bias such that they think this is so worthy of massive media coverage, that the that the white nationalists were so

worthy of massive media coverage. And I would just add into this keep in mind is you know they do this with David Duke too every election cycle. That one of the favorite gotcha games that Democrats like to play is asking a Republican do you denounce David Duke? You don't. You never see David Duke, and otherwise you never hear about this guy. You know, he's just a racist clown and a loser. But they'll they'll try him back out. And even if you say, yeah, I denounced him, Well,

why do you have to denounce David Duke? That seems kind of weird. Why are we even talking about him on my show? That's what? Why do you wow David Duke? Huh? So you're denouncing David Duke? You Republican Canada. You see they try to they try to do are do you up with that? If you're a Republican. It's a it's just such a smear tactic. But unfortunately with a lot of idiot libs, it works the same thing with white nationalism.

They all right, I've been warning for a long time, and they were there trying to create a tremendous amount of fear around the alt right and then beyond that, uh, to create this perception of the alt right as what all conservative media is turning into. And it's just fearmongering. It's fearmongering because otherwise they can't win the argument from the American people. Otherwise that you know, the Democrats will have to actually come up with policies and solutions, and

they don't have that. So what do they offer you, Well, there's a a terrible, terrible thing happening in this country called the rise of the alt right. And who gets to determine what is all right? Who is all right? Oh? The media? Isn't that? Isn't that clever? Isn't that useful for them? So, as I was saying, there were no there were no media outlets that were showing the signs that were anti cop, viciously anti cop. Will get into

the anti cop computing this in a moment. No signs about the revolution, and you know, what's the solution revolution? What do we do with the system? Overthrow it? Although that second one I am paraphrasing because there's was catchier than that. But I heard them saying this. I have audio them saying um and and I want to also note that you know this, this whole storyline, there's so

much going on here. You know, Antifa hates cops and not just the Antifa guys wearing all the black and everything, because they were there and they threw some smoke bombs and they and they hit people. But the whole protest yesterday was supposed to be opposing white national supposing Nazis and fascism, so really it was a counter protest, but

it was an Antifa protest. Were with some of the street paramilitaries of Antifa there, and they're a little black get ups, you know, with the masks and the head to toe gear and everything. They were all black hand to toe. Makes it harder that they think it makes them look cool, but also makes them harder to identify

when they engage in vandalism and destroy property. But you know, journalists have been talking so much recently about how one, of course they're indispensable, right, I mean they're the you know, yeah, sure we we need like the Navy and the Marines and the army, but like we really need CNN. How else will we survive as a republic, sir without CNN. I think we'll be okay, thanks though. Um. But they they've been talking about Trump's rhetoric and saying that it inspired,

that it makes them fearful, it makes them afraid. And what I would just want to point out here is that there were journalists, just like in Portland a couple of weeks ago, there were journalists who were attacked physically brutalized, their cameras ripped out of their hands, their gear destroyed in Charlottesville and in ec by left wing so called anti fascist protesters, anti hate protesters no less, and journalists just pretend like it didn't happen. For the most part,

no coverage of it at all. Not not. I mean that the Washington Post, as I said, their photo array was so dishonest, and I'm not guessing I saw, okay, they were picking out the signs that were specifically anti Trump and seemed a little more hippie ish and you know, anti hate, and forgetting all the signs of radical progressive, authoritarian, violence inducing craziness. Because there was a lot of that stuff, folks. You did not have to look very far for it. It

It was all over the place. And they just don't want to talk about it. They just didn't want the American people to see what was really going on there because they liked to play this game of the crazies are on the right. The real crazies are all on the right. It's just not true. And it's not fair that they take this approach. It's not fair that they present the news narrative in this way. Um they attack reporters. In fact, here we have audio of of one of these.

Remember all the violence all came from the left wing over the over this past weekend, The arrests all came from the all involved left wing activists, the really nasty cursing and screaming and left wing activists. Based on what I saw and what's been reported, I haven't seen anything otherwise. Is that the sense you got from you know, they kept saying, oh, it kind of fizzled, fizzle, let's just move on. Oh no, No, I don't want to just move on, because we saw what the left really is

this past weekend. We saw who they really are. Was there a lot of support where there were there thousands of of white nationalists gathered together and getting a lot of you know, getting a lot of play from conservative media and everything else about all. Look, no, twenty or so idiots at most, you can get twenty idiots who believe anything, who want to go protests somewhere. This is

completely insignificant. But thousands and thousands of people proclaiming that they are against hate, who are screaming in in police officers faces, calling them racists and murderers, who were spinning on police officers, who were attacking people they disagree with and attacking journalists. And I thought journalists like Jim Accostas don't worried like I was at a Trump rally and

I felt unsafe. It's like, oh my gosh, there was like a woman in her sixties with a maga hat on, and she was so scary, and we're all supposed to go, oh no, the first amendments under a thought, what are we gonna do? You know what is really under assault journalists when they get too close to anti fascist protesters. They're really undressolved. Here's some audio of it played fourteen

what's that? That's right? Attack that that you kind of got the sense they attacked a camera, attacked the journalists, called them snitches, you see, because they don't really want the country to know about their left wing heroics, their left wing self styled activism, because the people, the American people, would reject it because it's it's it's moronic, it's grotesque. This is the modern Democratic Party. Though, folks, they believe

this stuff. They believe that a political revolution is necessary, if not an all out revolution. They believe that the cops are racist who murder black men for sport. They believe that Trump is actually part of a uh Aryan nation Russian conspiracy to take over the country. I mean, they have mainstreamed this crazy and they wonder why we don't get into all, oh my gosh, Trump lied about what he had for breakfast yesterday. What are we gonna do?

But I really want to dig into I wrote about this today on the Hill dot com Why do the anti fascist protesters hate the cops so much? Or I should have said, really, a better title would have been out to think about? Why do the anti hate protesters hate the cops so much? That would have been a better title. I just realized that now, damn it, buck uh, and I have some answers for you on that when

we come back, stay with me, you whatever. That was all directed at cops, folks, the police who were at the protest ensuring the First Amendment rights of all people there. That was all directed at them. I saw a woman walk up to a line of police officers. Uh, but not that it matters, but a diverse group of police officers and just yell fu fu fu in their faces. What's that all about, folks? What does that have to

do with being against hate in Charlottesville? What does that have to do with being against Confederate monuments or against the altread or whatever it may be. And I asked the question in a piece today, why do the anti fascist protesters hate the police so much? And it's because this is the truth of the left. They are violent, they are deranged. They cannot handle the world as it is, and they cannot deal with a successful Trump president presidency, which is what is going on right now. They just

can't deal with it. They just can't deal with it. I saw it, and it was a prominent part of the protest group yesterday. They're marching around with anti police signs, anti police banners, And why didn't that Kennedy coverage? All cops are racist? That's what the marchis saying. You know, my uncle's a cop lifelong now retired. I worked with cops. I know a lot of law enforce and listen to this program. Why should you all have to sit around and just listen to that in silence? I don't mean

the ones who were there, they were just doing their jobs. Yeah, they have to take it, Okay, they at the first Amendment. I get it. But all the rest of us have to pretend that the the only bad guys. This is what they want you to believe. The only bad guys were the twenty people who were in that protected Penden Square yesterday. Who were the white nationalists? What about the guys who were wearing black and headed toe who are

attacking reporters? What about the people that were marching screaming all cops are racists and the racist murders are they? Is that a positive message? Is that good? Is that fair? Where was the media coverage? I saw it, I have photos, I have audio. Did you see that covered in the New York Times? Did you see that cover in the Washington Post was CNN spending. Oh no, no, those are fizzle. It didn't really, not really happen yesterday. It was a

peaceful protest. Auntie, Hey, let's move on. They're liars, folks, They're liars. They're trying to pander to their own audiences and also pander to their sense of progressive, left wing superiority, and so they just do a little bit of editing. You know. They didn't want to give you the protest as it was. They wanted to give you the protests as they would like to pretend it was. But I was there, so I know what was going on. And people were making a mockery of themselves, thousands of them

making a mockery of themselves. And yeah, they were a bunch of idiot white nationalists too, but there weren't thousands of them. Buck Sextonssion decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton shown no. Welcome back to the show, my friends. Great to have you here with me in the Freedom Hut. So I wasn't the only conservative who was running around yesterday trying to

figure out what was going on at this rally. Our buddy from last week's Freedom Hunt podcast, Benny Johnson, was also out there. I want to we we got Benny actually joining us via phone in the second, But first I want to play for you some of the interview that he was able to do. Some of the interviews he was able to do with some of these. Remember these are quote anti hate protesters, folks. That's how they were being described by all the mainstream media, all the

big j serious fancy journos. This is what, this is what. That's what they were saying. And this is what Benny was able to pick up. Play clip ten, would you do? I dun't Trump shout up at the crop, hurd him, murder him for the people. Oh he's America's Caesar except Ted, So you gotta take him down Trump. True, it came down to it, and it was a group effort. You'd have to do him like a duct and you come up. Let's do that? Was that? I get a tatoo, come up?

I would come up. You wouldn't. Yeah, I will select the show him Son that like proof. Yeah, if the president shot up this march, what will you do? Sir, but that on his legs down here, I would tell his wife could go home and for him to get on his ja get yeah, and Anti Hate March. You got people there that have said some stuff I think also might cross some legal lines, folks. And we've got Bennie Johnson of The Daily Caller with us. Now. It's

been like Benny pelluting the Freedom Hunt lately. Benny. Good to have you back. Thank you. Yeah, man, So I was telling the folks before, I just took some video and some photos. I did not interview folks because I don't really know how to do that on my iPhone. You've got to show me some of these uh these uh these ninja skills that you have. Um, but what was it like for you? I mean, what was the craziest stuff that you saw that you were told that

you picked up? And and why do you think the Washington Post only showed people with like garlands of flowers around their necks or whatever with anti hate signs? Right? You would you would think that, well, you gotta speak up into your phone, buddy. We can't hear you. Sorry about that, Yeah, now we can hear you. Go ahead, buddy, Okay. So you would think that if you read you would think that this was like the Beatles needing the Maha

Rishi of a march. If you were to actually read the headlines of CNN and Washington Post, no seemed to understand the fact that there was a paramilitary force that was embedded within these progressive protesters, and this paramilitary force was armed. They were members of Black Block Antifa, they are members of anarchist groups. But ultimately they were dangerous. They wanted to commit violent acts. They did commit violent

acts against police. They were arrested by the dozen And what I wanted to reveal was how they would have treated the president where the President to have shown his face at this march. Of course, you and I both know that's not something that was going to happen. However, what would they do if they met President Trump? And volunteering to me, Buck, I'm not tricking them into saying, do you want to kill the President? I had nothing to do with the sort they volunteered to me Buck

that they wanted to murder President Trump. Not just murder him, they wanted to kill him like Gaddafi was killed. Uh, when the Libyan leader was taken out and and beaten and torture and then killed in the streets. Uh So what I chose to reveal here, what I attempted to reveal, and they gave it to me on a silver platter, was the true extremist and violent, ultra violent element within these quote unquote peaceful anti hate protests. Now, I saw

signs that were anti cop. I saw signs about revolution. I heard chance that were all cops A, racists overthrow the country, all this stuff, and Benny very little of actually, none of that made it into the photo arrays s on the New York Times, a photo arrays picked for the Washington Post. It's almost like they were sanitizing the left wing loons who didn't turn up in twenty and numbers like twenty or thirty like the white nationalist morons did.

There were leftist loons in the hundreds, probably more like in the low thousands at that rally. Yes, correct, Yes, And how do they get away with this? I mean, how do they feel, you know, the Washington Post in these places that they think that we're not there, they think that we can't see what's really going on. Well, such a confirmation bias. So if you're if you're protesting Nazis that means you must be good, right, But historically

that's not even historically accurate. That many people who protested Nazism or national socialism in Germany were communists and they were violent. They are cautlitarian, they're fascist. Fascists use violence and political intimidation to get their to to get ends, to silence speech, to compel speech of their political opponents, and to intimidate them. And and then both groups use that it's not both, and it's either or. The antifa leftist progressives that are ultra violent there scum and the

white supremacists are equally scum. And it's okay to say they're both scum because they both used similar tactics, they've both proven capable of violence, and they both have a worldview that is not American now. But did anyone, by the way, threaten you or were you ever feeling like this might go south for you? Yeah? So Daily Caller, so other people on my team, other Daily Caller reporters

were uh, were found out to be to be. No one was doing this subversively, right, but sometimes they asked outlet you're with And if people are familiar with the Daily Caller, they know it was founded by Tucker Carlson. They need they associate Tucker Carlson Fox News. That's all you need to do. And so members of our team were hits, had their cameras pushed away. Uh, we're surrounded

by groups. Uh. In the piece that I did, one of the men who said he wanted to f up President Trump had a large knife, a large switchblade down the front of his plant pants easily visible. There were bats with these masked Antifa members. They're wearing black masks over their face. There again a para military force. They have military grade equipment. They have helmets, metal helmets on um, black pants, black military boots. These I mean, it's it's a it's a it's a scary thing to be uh

encircled by a group of people like this. Benny has a Secret Service, as a secret service got involved because you have people on video who are standing there and saying that they want to they want to there, they want to assassinate the presidents. What I seem to hear

them say, am I missing something? The Secret Service was on the phone with me for approximately fifteen minutes today asking about any details that I have on the people, saying they want to assassinate the president, and the Secret Services also confirmed to me that they are aware of these threats and that they are opening a Secret Service

investigation into these threats. Do you feel like, Benny, they the decision was made very quickly yesterday, not just to sanitize the coverage of the looney left at the protest and the dangerous left at the protest, but also just

how quickly we've moved on from this. I mean, the the Amrosa book is not nearly as interesting as I think a lot of people are pretending it is today because that's the only other story that the Democrats have to run with to try to block this one out right, So buck you so you've got we got a minute before we got to run and run a break, Benny, go ahead, yep. So So here's because because the only person who would look bad if this was fairly covered

is the left, you're gonna have mute. The mainstream media is gonna be mute. They're not gonna say anything, they're not gonna cover it. They're gonna just pass along. Bryan's Delker had a hilarious tween last night calling them anti hate groups. Well, these anti hate groups were attacking journalists, they were attacking us, they were saying they wanted to murder their present, and now the anti hate groups are

being investigated by the Secret Service. Those are the facts, and it's incredible how quickly the mainstream media moved along. You and I both remember the tea party. All it takes is one one imbecile with a silly sign at a party rally, and that's that for months. That's right. And then, by the way, this is the real bias. It's not that they don't cover things, it's how they it's how CNN covers things. It's how mussy Coms MSMBC covers things. Benny, great work man, Thank you so much.

Appreciate you setting around that audio for me and others to use. Benny Caller the Daily Caller a Penny Johnson or Benny Caller Benny Johnson of the Daily call everybody, Betty my friend. Good to talk to you. Team. We'll be right back. Whether you have a small business or you're involved with a huge company. Maybe you're in the HR department, maybe you're the CEO. You know that the people you bring in your human capital are essential to

your success. But you've got to know if these people are who they say they are and how they represent themselves is accurate. Right. You need somebody who can do that work for you quickly because that's gonna be essential for your future as a company. And that's where Global Verification Network comes in. Global Verification Network is the only dual certified and veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. They're here in Chicago, folks. I know the CEO, Mark Buckman, personally.

He's a great guy. He cares very much about what he's doing and about showing the utmost integrity and professionalism with every case that they handle. Call them and tell them the buck sex and sent you eight seven seven six nine five seven nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Or go to my g VN dot com. That's my g VN dot com. That's what needs to happen to the Party of Trump.

Leased to burn to the ground is a total and complete violation of their oaths of office to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. You see the Republican Party now sadly a portion of its base moving closer and closer to Russia. Left to their own devices. They would just let Russia run wild throughout our democracy and throughout the democracies of our allies.

Should Congressman Nonez be removed from his chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee, Absolutely, he should have been removed a year ago when it was very clear that he was not working in the interest of Congress. If you look at Devin Noon, as you look at some members of the Freedom Caucus, they remind me of the people that we conservatives used to call useful idiots. So much bad analysis when it comes to Russia, folks, it's really almost hard to keep up with it. The Republicans are now

the party of Russia. You know what would have been just as easy to say for a long time that the Democrats were the party of al Qaeda, because they were doing a lot of things that made al Qaeda feel a lot better about themselves, including bashing books during a time of war, including uh making a huge deal out of every misstep in the war, whether it was Abu grab or water boarding or all this stuff. The Democrats were very useful to al Qaeda for a long time.

And oh, before people start running around saying, but Obama took out Osama Uh, that was only possible because of programs put in place long before Obama came into office. Part one, Part two. Do you know that they did everything that they could to make it seem like the information which has been released, by the way, a lot of it has been released from the Osama bin Laden raid. They really lied to the public about it. And I don't just mean the media, I mean the Obama administration.

They were misleading the public to make it seem like, you know, Osama was this uh was this figure that was you know, irrelevant and no idea what was going on. It wasn't true. It wasn't true. Uh. They a didn't want people to realize. I think just how much gee hottest activity was really going on and the role that Osama had in pushing strategies around the world with our

g hottest enemies. But yeah, you could have very just if they're going to say the Republicans of the Party of Russia, we could very easily say that the Democrats were the party of ISIS and al Qaeda. And when you look at the actual policies that are in place now on Russia, as I've been saying, and I know I don't like repeating myself on the show, I don't want to waste any of your time ever. Um, that's a mandate that I feel that I make the best use of every minute that you give me of your

time every day on this show. But they keep saying this on Russia because they're hoping that the repetition itself will overcome the reality and that people will start to believe this, that if they chant and bleat and yell and cry enough that republic Akins are the party of Russia, um, that people will start to really believe it. And I think that has been happening. Meanwhile, in what way is that the case? What are we doing that Russia likes?

Were sanctioning Russians more than ever. We've expelled Russians, We've shut down Russian consulates in this country, We've shut down Russian facilities. We've blown up hundreds of Russian paramilitaries in Syria and didn't think twice about it. We've sent sniper rifles and anti tank missiles to the Ukrainian military to fight against Russian paramilitaries in eastern Ukraine where exactly okay, because Trump won't just lay down and take it on.

Oh yeah, Russia through the election, which is a preposterous, a ridiculous assertion for which there there's this tiny, little, little little grain of possibility in the sense that you know, if, as I keep telling you, if there's one fraudulent vote cast in an election, was their voter fraud in that present noential election? The answers, yes, do you have to say every time you say who won that election? Well, there was voter fart in that election. There was voter

fart in that election. It's a propaganda trick that they're engaged in with Russia. And the interference, well there was interference, very little, and it didn't do anything. And it's really a slight against the American people that the Democrats are so willing to believe that we were fooled, that the Trump voters were fooled. I wasn't fooled by anything. The options were Trump or Hillary. I don't care what the Russians are putting on Facebook. I'm on team Trump. Amazing,

go to see all this happening. You know, that's they they speak about Trump and they say he's a useful idiot or other people to supporting him on Russia, useful idiots and Joe Scarborough's really one of the worst TV analysts around right now. I'm sorry. You don't get to go from being Trump's brunch buddy to being hashtag resistance hero in a year when it's clearly just a function

of professional self interest. That that's why Scarborough switched switched teams, and have anybody take you seriously at least on an ethical level, on on a level of of intellectual honesty. And the guy's a clown. But they're saying all of this. Meanwhile, this is what this is what Trump is up to play a ten and nineteen. But if conflict is forced upon us, we will fight and we will win. Betta believe in generals the other guys. We're powered by the

unstoppable force of the United States Army. Very special. We will replace aging tanks, aging planes, and ships with the most advanced and lethal technology ever developed, and hopefully will be so strong we'll never have to use it. But

if we ever did, nobody has a chance. After years of devastating cuts, we're now rebuilding our military like we never have before ever because we know that too survive and having that survival of our freedom, it depends upon the might of our military, and no enemy on Earth can match the strength, courage, and skill of the American Army and the American Armed forces. Nobody's even close. They

never will be. You know, a president who speaks that way doesn't strike normal Americans who are just listening to and paying attention to what's going on as somebody who is favorable to or or helping Russia. A president that speaks about his country that way and does it without feeling like it's forced. I mean, you know that Trump

does respect the military. You know that Trump really believes in US power abroad, Yes, to protect us and also to pursue US interests and and not you know, the US as some humanitarian police force running all over the world all the time. Serious strikes, separate issue fulfilling. Obama's

red line is different. I had Obama's national security advisor sit down with me, as former national security advisor or its former president Obama, and he admitted that the red line thing in Syria was a complete debacle, a complete

and utter debacle. And you know, Obama just didn't have the stomach for tough national security decisions, didn't have it and clearly took a view of America as often times damaging in the world, and and not a country that you can look to and and expect leadership from needs to need there needs to be a multilateral, collaborative collective if you will, effort at global leadership from all these different countries. That that was always the Obama approach and

it failed. But I just I can't imagine why these liberals who keep banging the Russia drum don't get that we see Trump building up the military, his support for the military, he's his belief in American strength across the board. And this is a guy who just exudes I mean, he's just he's just got patriotism, uh written all over everything he says. I mean, he's he's so pro America. And they're telling us that he's actually pro Russia. It just doesn't work. We're not gonna buy because it's not true.

But they stay on this because it makes them feel good, and they know it's a it's a snide, childish, nasty, little schoolgirl tactic to say, oh, he's he's doing all this stuff for Russia. It's such bad analysis. And people who say it honestly at this point that they're they're posers. There are people that don't know anything about geopolitics or the way the world actually works, but they know that their friends will think they're smart if they talk about

Trump and Russia in the same sentence. It's pretty pathetic. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the buck never stops. I had to protect myself and I have no regret about it. Let's listen to the recording. I think it's important to understand that if we make this a friendly departure, um, we can all be you know, you can look at look at your time here in the White House is

a year of service to the nation. Uh, and then you can go on without any type of difficulty in the future relative to your reputation. How did you take that comment about your reputation? It's very obvious threat. He goes on to say that things can get ugly for you, the chief of Staff of the United States, under the direction of the President United States, threatening me. Alma Rosa, folks, the Alma Rosa show is into down man. She is all over the place, all the different shows. She's got

a book coming out. You know, there's a lot of stuff where I could say, I get why the presidents in this position, or or you know, you gotta give him, you gotta gi him a little slack he's dealing with this or the other. The omar Rosa though, I mean, my producer, Mike, am I being too hard on him here? I just this one. To me, It's not a big deal. She doesn't have anything because there's nothing to have all this stuff. You know, this is just like fire and fury.

She wants I think that guy made twenty million dollars, by the way, she wants something like that out of this. And producer Mike, I feel like, you know, this is just not this is just not a decision that I would have made. Is that fair to say? Very fair? Yeah? I mean omar Rosa really all right, she's she's not just a reality TV show star. She's like the she's the villain of a reality TV show. Anyway. It's it's just disappointing to see that this White House has to

deal with this. But okay, so let's let's get into a little see. You know, I didn't start the show with this today. I know people are all, my gosh, omar Rosa, they're getting all all fired off ball excited about it. I don't see this as anywhere near as interesting as a lot of other people do. I think that everyone's gotten way way too intrigued by the omar

Rosa scenario. Um, and it's anything that bashes Trump. You see this now, right if you show up, if you're walking from the street and you're like, I've got a videotape of Trump, you know, doing crazy, weird sex stuff with a bunch of green Martians and outer Space, they're gonna, you know, the producers from these shows are gonna sit down at least talk to you. You know, they're gonna say, well, you know, maybe you know, I mean Trump does like Martians.

I mean, it's possible there. There's there's nothing that they would put beyond the president, and there's nothing that they're not willing to pretend at least is believable about this president as long as it's negative. And you see a lot of with with the Omar Rose recordings. But her whole thing here is like he's he's threatening me. Oh, he's threatening me with this. That sounds like every person

that I've ever heard of anywhere getting fired. That's how it goes, right the Hey, you know, look, you can leave you can resign and we all kind of part on relatively, uh, if not positive terms, at least they were giving her an opportunity to save face. That's what

they were doing. That's what John Kelly was doing, who is a no bs kind of guy, right, So he's saying, look, if you leave now, we can we can all just kind of move past this and you get to claim this year you had in the White House as a victory. If you have dragged this out and you fight us, then things are gonna be rough for you. That's not a threat. That's a statement of fact, and that's not

unusual for the water she goes. You know, well, there he is in the White House saying these terrible things to me in the situation room. This is the woman who brings a recording device into the situation room. And can everybody stop saying, oh, she might go to prison. Guys, It's not illegal to bring a recording device into the situation room. Okay, it's not illegal to bring a recording

device period into a skiff. It's a security violation. And if you record classified onto an unclassified device, that could be a crime. Certainly, if you transmitted it could be a crime. But just to be in there. I mean, if that were the case, every person that's ever walked into a secure facility with a cell phone on, which is pretty much everybody who's ever had a clearance, I think for what, I know, if you're if you're in the you know, if you're in the organizations of national

security long enough, you would have committed a crime. I mean, that's it's not a crime to have it on you. It's just incredibly uh disrespectful, irresponsible, and you know usually people do it accidentally. Obviously, to do it intentionally and then to record in there, it's just requas, but keep in one. Um Omar Rossa, Mike, I hear both ways. It's Omar Rossa amar Rosa. Right, yeah, I right. I

feel like she would correct you. It's my roast. With that air of entitlement she speaks with, I've never heard somebody so affected in her When she's sitting up there giving the interview, I'm like, is this is somebody teacher to present herself as as almost like, uh, you know, a a bond villain? Is this really the way that

she did? Do you ever notice in her interviews? You know, how as you conduct interviews there's a back and forth, and she'll say when she's not quite done speaking and the other person just starts to talk, she excuse me, I'm almost done. Oh yeah, oh yeah, No, she's very That's my favorite when she does that. She reminds me of my friend who who worked at Sienao told me that once he called Christian, I'm Christian, called her Christine,

I'm on poor. She's like, excuse me, excuse me, it's Christians. Just like that. I feel like christ and Oh Maroussa would get along very well. If I ever miss miss, I'm gonna put meat. Miss I'm a poor, I'm definitely on or Christine, and I got definitely call her Christie, call her Christie. She loves that. Hey, Chrissie, what's up anyway? So yeah, man, this this Omerosa thing, that the whole making the big deal out of Kelly firing her. Uh, of course she should have gotten fired. You know, I

think Trump one of his weaknesses. I'm gonna say it, folks after I take a simp of water, because that can be necessary. One of his weaknesses is except I think he wants to give people the benefit of the doubt. And I've known other people like this. He really does like to give people a second chance, and he likes to be in a position to help people who have come to him who have said, you know, maya culpa,

I'd like to do better in the future. Now, you might say, Buck, that's not a weakness as a as a human being, but it can be a weakness in business, and certainly, and you're dealing at the high stakes of government here, at the high end of government, um, that can be that can be a problem. Um. But people have been asking some questions of omar Rosa, like, Hey, you're saying all this stuff and you're claiming the president to use racial slurs, which, by the way, I do

not believe for a second. I don't believe it. I just don't believe it. I also, having grown up in New York, known the Trump's when I was a little kid and been around that family, there is nothing bigoted about the Trumps. Trump is not a bigot. He's a New York guy. He takes people for who they are, for what they are. It doesn't care about any of that stuff. That's just not He's not a This is this thing they try to make him out to be, which is a person that is always judging people by

skin color. Anything, that's just a lie. Um omar rosha though was was Well, let me deal with this first. She talks about the possibility of Trump saying racist things. Play clip four. Because you said, um that the betrayal, the idea that he might have used this word, Um that it would be this betrayal because you thought it would men mean that he might have used it about you. You believe he used it about you, possibly because Donald

Trump talks about everyone behind their backs. You either Rod Chuck. He has a nickname probably you. He is a nickname for everyone in his administration and in his circle. So I am pretty certain that he's probably had some very derogatory things about me. In fact, yesterday, on this moment before Charlottesville, the anniversary of Charlottesville, instead of talking about how to unify the nation, he actually insulted me by

calling me a low life. That is, a man who is inclined to start racially charged engagement and used race to kind of stir up his pace. Wow, look at all of the dishonest and really underhanded stuff. U marussa man just to get in there first of all, saying that somebody possibly called your racial slur is? Uh, this is the defamation equivalent of who are three people who have never been in my kitchen? I mean, yeah, anybody could have possibly said anything. So what you know? This

is worse than when did you stop beating your wife? Sir? This is is it possible that at some point in the future you may beat your wife? Well, anything is possible, so yeah, I mean I guess that's possible. Right, you have to answer theoretically, yeah, did Trump call your racial slurve? Well,

I think it's possible. And then the other part of this too is that she ties herself into the national conversation around Trump and Charlottesville and the the white nationalists and all the red eve and she she she thinks that somehow that's you know, the Trump calling her a low life is related to or should be in the same conversations and the same breath of air as the Charlotte'sville anniversary. I mean, she is utterly and completely shameless.

And the media was willing to say that a while ago, and they certainly criticized her as people criticize her for being inauthentic when she joined the Trump administration. That criticized her for being a social climber, I guess in a sense of government climber. But uh, and now they're all

let's let's have olmrossa on to discuss all of this. Um. I've got a little more here because I think there's something, there's something bigger at work with the media narratives around all of this, and I want to spend some time on that with you, So we'll do some omrose step

part two coming up on this phone conversation. I was told exactly what Donald Trump said, Yes, the in word and others in a classic Trump goes nuclear around, but that's not what she said in her interview with Morning Edition. And once I heard it, you heard you have heard this, heard this tape. You heard the president of the United States, President of the United States use not only the in word, but, as Bill Pruitt described during that interview, other horrible things

during the Protection of the Apprentice. You don't mention that in the book that you've actually heard the tape. Is this new? Oh no, it's mentioned in the book. Forgive me, though. That sounds like you just heard his account of the tape. Did you actually hear the tape? I did? Did you miss this hope, But girl, did you read my book? She did read the book, so did I. It's not there.

So there's a little bit of a discrepancy here with what Omar Rossa said and what's in the book apparently, and of course, the the allegation here that Trump used the N word. I mean, this is supposed to be something that the media is going to push as much as they can until it's discredited because they know they'll be lasting damage just from the allegation. This is meant to be smirched the present of the United States, and they don't care that it will never be corroborated, that

Trump can't disprove this. And you really got a sense of what's going on here with mo Rosa saying he possibly said it. Well, no, she said here and that and that. Remember that was the audio book, right, I guess that was the audiobook that was being read there that she heard him say it. Well, if if someone heard you say something and then was asked, did this person say that, the answer is not possibly, it's yeah, that's what happened. But that was not the way that

Omar Rosha handled the situation. That was not the way that she decided to go forward. I mean, I think there's a pretty obvious degree of of dishonesty with her. We all know that. Um, but she's useful for Trump bashing now and so she will be given. She already has been the biggest platforms and all kinds. But this brings you back. There's also the whole the fact that the recording so far are pretty mundane, and I have to I have to say, this woman's going to go

in the situation with John Kelley and record him. The best she could do is what we've heard so far. Here's she recorded Trump, Here's what Here's what he said about her firing, and what was known about a place clip six. Tom BROSSA, what's going on? Just so on the news that you're thinking about leaving? What happened General Kelly? General Kelly came to me and said that you guys wanted me to leave. No nobody even told me about it. You know, I think that's Trump trying to be like, hey,

you know, it's not my hello idea. He knew. But this goes into that category of being You can call it a lie if you want. The media will certainly say he's lying, although they can't prove what he knew when he knew it. But there's also a degree of lying that is necessary for being polite. Trump is trying to be polite here. He's he's not, in fact, uh you know, being nasty. He's not trying to be evasive

or or unfair to Omar Rossa. I think he's just trying to say, like, yeah, you know, I guess we can still be friends, because I didn't know about that. And then there's also the Omar Rossa's role in this whole thing and how she comes out now, and it just seems so self involved and so uh so self interested to be this anti Trump hashtag resistance figure now that she has a book out, if I know, do

you hear him act? You're like, I've had several books, Yeah, all those true literary masterpieces, you know, Omar Rossa by Omar Rossa. But you know she's she's Cashian obviously, and and it raises some questions about, well, what was what are really her motivations here? She's so shady. The whole thing is so shady. Play clip seven place being used by Donald Trump for so long. I was like the

frog and the hot water. You don't know that you're in that situation until it just keeps bubbling and bubbling. It's clear in hindsight, because hindsight, of course is but as I talked about and unhinged, you get to see from two thousand and three when I first met Donald Trump, the evolution of a very unique relationship between him. I and I talked very, very intimately about the things that he said that his has pledged to do more for the community, his as I said, investment in my own career.

But what I know now I didn't have the benefit of in two thousand and three or two thousand and four or two thousand and ten, and so yes, it is hindsight. But I will say this to you, I was complicit with this White House deceiving this nation. They continue to deceive this nation by how mentally declined he is, how difficult it is it is for him to process complex information, how he is not engaged in some of the most important decisions that impacts our country. I was complicit,

and for that I regret. This is like when that guy Richard Clark, who was like the counter terror some Zark comes out and was apologizing to America for nine eleven when he was writing books critical of the Bush administration. Well, isn't that convenient? You're not really apologizing, right, I mean, she doesn't really think she's complicit. She just has to say the things that she believes is required of her by the media to get on the platform she wants

to sell her book. And you'll notice also, oh, yes, Trump's mental decline. Trump says racial slurs. It's like she wrote a book, folks, And this is really what I'm trying to draw all of us to here. It's like she wrote a book that was just whatever allegations and accusations she would know that the anti Trump media would jump at and wanted to just tick them off one by one and then throw it together in some book

that there will be no verification of these claims. There will be no backs, backstories, or backstopping of this information. It will just be well, Omar Rossa said this by the book, and it hurts Trump. So the media goes along. And this, my friends, is yet another chapter in our book of why we don't trust the media. One oh one. Do you think that anybody could have written a book bashing Obama and gotten on the Sunday shows as Omar Rosa has with Trump. We all know the answer to that.

The bias is very very real. Are We have a big third hour coming up, including the possibility of Facebook giving information on you to your banks and the bank's doing the same. Sounds pretty big brother. That's coming up. Buck Sexton permission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American. Again, this is the Buck Sexton Show analyst. Their businesses surveillance,

They capture everything. And what's particularly galling about this issue with the banks is it's not like they're going to offer a new service. As a as a consumer to bank, you have access to web services to allow you to get all the stuff you want. But Facebook wants to get that data because with that data, they're going to know a lot more about you, and they're going to be able to manipulate your attention to their economic benefit, and they're going to be able to use that data

with third parties to get paid as well. And so my advice to everyone is if by some reason your bank used to go on is do not do this. This is just a really, really bad idea. My simple point to everybody is that the days of trust and tech companies to do the right thing are in the past now, and we all have to approach the stuff

with skepticism. You know, folks, I've been saying for a long time that the Internet is the greatest surveillance tool ever devised ever even a mad gend, because we are doing the surveillance really ourselves in a sense, we are we are offering up all of the information that these companies could ever want on us, the profile of what you like and don't like, what you do, your habits, your day to day rhythm that Facebook and these other

companies have. This this is beyond anything that marketing and advertising companies and even government surveillance would have thought was possible forty or fifty years ago, maybe even twenty or thirty years ago. This is changing so rapidly. I mean now that that that SoundBite we just played for you, it was about Facebook trying to partner with Wall Streets

biggest banks. This is a piece of in Barrens quote, the social media giants asked large US banks to share share detailed financial information about their customers, including card transactions and checking account balances, as part of an effort to offer new services two users. Um. And this is the Wall Street Journal also reporting on this. Uh, folks, this is this is something that we need to be very

prepared for because I think it's gonna happen. So Facebook is telling the banks, if you give us your data, will give you our our users. And because because here's the thing when Facebook that they know what you like to click on, They know what you like to like, what you share, what you do different things with But the most valuable information they can really have is what do you buy, what do you spend money on, how much money do you have in the bank, and what

kind of investments or other activities you do financially. You know, you really have to wonder that at what point do they have access to everything? What point do you come to recognize I think that Facebook is going to be able to come up with a profile of each and every one of us in time that would be more than most of our close friends know about us, maybe even a sense more than you know about yourself. Because it's gonna be analyzing, it's gonna be using algorithms to

go through everything that you do. And as I've been saying, we've had an awakening recently, because now we have an understanding that Facebook is going to use its power not for good, but for and not even just for capitalism, which that that I can kind of handle. Capitalism is rational trying to make money, there are certain certain barriers,

certain boundaries that are in place. You know, if you completely screw over excuse me, it's been along, if you completely mess up your customer base, you're gonna have problems. So it's not like you can get away doing absolutely anything. But if you are pushing a point of view, if you believe that your purpose is not so much just to make money, because you've already made so much money,

Facebook is a highly capital efficient business. It is essentially a giant a t M. At this point, they could always just you know, issue more shares and you but the stock out there and everything else. They can raise whatever money they want to raise. I mean, they got as much money as any company could ever need for any reason. What happens when some of these companies decide that their purpose is really social justice or and I

think this is more of what's been going on. What happens when we start to see these companies just telling us that they're operating more or less as utilities. But behind you know, so that so that that's just whatever gets posted and all that. It's a free for all for the most part, within the general guide posts of

their terms of service. What happens when they start changing this information, when they start changing what they're doing behind the scenes, we have no idea, You have no transparency into this, no way of knowing or even understanding quite honestly, these algorithms, and that Facebook has has gotten in trouble

for all this privacy stuff. You know, I know that for some of the folks listening in the in the in the generation that grew up without the Internet, and that also probably sees a lot of social media still it's just a fun way for people to waste some time and maybe now buy some stuff if you really want to. This is media in the future. This is going it's all going to be digital. It's all going

to be online and connected. There's gonna be the Internet of things, and there's gonna be the Internet of people. And the Internet of things is all of our interconnected devices. Right, So your smartphone connects to the knee bone, the knee

bone connects to the leg bone. No, you know what I mean that the smartphone connects to the thermostat, which connects to the front door, which connects to the TV, which but you also have all of us the people, the Internet of of of people, and and identity t and your online presence and your online um, you know, your online footprint. These are going to become very important going forward. This is going to be how people, by the way, get already more more than it is already happening.

Now people are gonna be getting jobs based on how they present online because you're just gonna have so much competition. Maybe you'll still get a face to face interview. Sure, I get if people want to meet, but there's not going to be such a focus I think on oh, well, you know what, what what were your grades like? And

where do you go to school. They're gonna look at you know, who you are online, what your social media has been, what you're saying, what you're doing, and the possibilities for political manipulation with all this are vast, are vast. And now that you've got Facebook saying you know, we we just want to we want some financial data. And by the way, they're going to give the banks as an exchange all the stuff they know about you, which will be very useful for banks purposes in terms of

marking and maybe partnering with other companies and corporations. So so we need to figure out what the reality is here. Here's what I think. I think most folks have decided that privacy is dead, that everything you do online is essentially public in one way or another, because somebody's transferring it, somebody's in charge of it, and somebody can sell it, they can collect it and then use it for their

own purposes. I think that a lot of Americans have just taken the position that, you know what, this isn't gonna change, so we might as well just lean into it a little bit and make as much money off of it as as we can, and get as much utility out of it, get as much use out of it. For a lot, I mean, it depends. Some of us operate businesses online. Some of us are just engaging with these platforms. But this raises very instant questions. You know. It also I think changes a lot of human behavior.

I think it changes the way that we view each other. I think it's been terribly damaging for a political discourse, and it's only gonna get worse in my opinion, but we lc Facebook teaming up with the big banks though, talk about too big to fail, my friends. I talked about simply Safe home security a lot on this show because it's a fantastic security system. It's really easy to use, and I've got one at home. I can tell you it is so straightforward. It comes out of the box.

You'll have it set up connected to your WiFi in minutes. And I'm not the only one who thinks it's a great company, because simply Safe is now valued at a billion dollars. I've known the simply Safe guys for a long time. They really understand what the core of their businesses.

They're trying to protect people protect their homes and do so in away with great customer service, no long term contracts, and cover you top to bottom eight z. You get protection against intruders, fires, leaks, burst pipes, everything, and you're in control. You can even download an app as I have, and see what's going on with your home while you're away from home on the simply Safe app. So check it out. Order your simply Safe system now. My listeners

get free shipping and free returns. Visit simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash buck to protect your home with simply safe today, simply safe dot com slash buck bootle talk and hello everybody, it's time for an update from Zakaiser of New York City Mayor Willhelm di Blasio. How many of you even know that build the Blasio, the mayor of New York formerly close confidant of Hillary and Bill Clinton. At one point somebody who would have thought he could run for national

elected office, but I think everyone realized that's crazy. Blasio's name was Warren Wilhelm until his twenties, but he did not sink it would be easy to win the elected office when's your name is varrenville Helm. And so he decided to do his time for him to change her name to Billy A. Di Blasio. But anyway, Billy di Blasio, Hey, Billy de Blasio from Bronx. He's out there and he

is making the case. At a time when we are hearing so much about the need to defend press freedom, the need to defend our our free press, Bill de Blasio is out there arguing openly for a political mono culture in the press. That's right, going after the only cable news outlet that can punch back and that can represent the views of oh about fifty of the American people Fox News. Here's what he said. Mayor Bill de Blasio joins me now here on set. Mary, thanks for

coming over. Thank you. Brian. What is your critique of Murdoch. You were quote recently by the Guardians saying, imagine the country. If Murdoch had never had papers or networks here, we would be a more unified country. There would be less overt hate, and there would be less appeal to racial division. I guarantee it, because what Murdoch did, through Fox News, the New York Post, among others, is to create a dynamic where that stuff could come out in the open.

We saw it in New York City for years and years, where race was infused into the dialogue in a very negative way, and it was a sort of an apocalyptic vision was created of the notion of going back to a time of crime and decay and always putting that through a lens of people of color as the villains when you're talking about Central Park five or so many other instances. Certainly, you saw that around the election of David Dinkins in New York the way he was vilified

by the Post throughout his mayorality. Let me just jump in here to say that I, as a native New Yorker, remember the Dinkins era, and I do not remember any of the racial animus toward the mayor of New York that Kaiservillehelm de Blasio is mentioning here. I remember a city that had far too many homicides. I remember city that was being uh run rough shot over by criminals and was completely out of control, and police did not

feel like the city had their back. And you know, I remember going home from school and having to be really concerned about getting mugged. And I wasn't paranoid. The school was telling us to be concerned. We were told when I was a kid to take off because I went to a Catholic school. We were told to take off our jackets and our ties on our way home so we were less likely to be mugged. Let me tell you something that did not have any prevented preventative effect,

but that's what they said. We had to station a security guard on our block so that we wouldn't have kids getting uh mugged, beat up, attacked, have their stuff stolen from them as soon as they walked out of the school building. And that was in a nice neighborhood of New York City. I mean, this was New York in the early nineties, folks. It was a wild place in all the worst ways. Dinkins was the mayor, is he not supposed to be blamed for the city being

in terrible disarray? Giuliani came in and things got a lot better. Juliani came in all of a sudden, the crime wave receded. And now de Blasio is in a position where, thanks to Bloomberg before him, the city is so relatively speaking, well run and safe that even an idiot like de Blasio couldn't ruin it. But of course he immediately, in his little pretense as a social justice warrior, the mayor of New York blames Fox News while he's

on CNN no less for inciting racial division. It's like, does he realize that there were race riots under the previous presidency, by the way, and CNN was covering those race riots with with just no integrity or journalistic responsibility whatsoever. In my humble opinion, feeling that Deblasio doesn't not much to say about that, but he he says more farther than that, they put race front and center, and they try and stir the most negative impulses in this country.

There is no Donald Trump without news corps. I firmly the leave that he never gets to the presidency because he would never have been elevated the way he was consistently for years and years. So I believe in a free, strong media with diverse views. I'll defend it with all I got, but we have to be able to call out when a particular company, as a corporate agenda, has a political agenda and has very effectively changed the American discourse.

Oh yeah, that's right, folks. Kasa ville Ham believes in

a bit of censorship. Yah. He believes in a free and diverse and open press except for the one news outlet that's effective in counter messaging on TV, except for the one place whereas a conservative you can turn on the news and not be constantly propagandized too, and not be forced to sit there and have a bunch of people sneer at half of the country act like they know so much more than you, and present this bizarre fun house mirror version of the America that you know,

they just can't get over at Fox News is one channel. ABC is liberal, CNN is liberal, CBS is liberal, NBC is liberal, MSNBC is liberal, PBS is liberal. I mean, do I have to go through all of them liberal, liberal, liberal all over the place. There's one channel, and there will be more channels, by the way, except that the politics of the different cable companies and the the content providers is such that they won't allow there to be additional channels. Oh that's right, people say, oh, Buck, but

what about One America and what about news Max? They're they're in a fraction of the homes that all cable news channels, that all the other cable news channels have access to. Never mind ABC, CBS, n NBC having the vast built in advantage of being at the very top of the you know, the cable lineup, and they are dominated by liberals. Let's stop allowing them to get away with the lies here about how oh the press is balanced?

The press is even of the press is democrat, and of that's democrat a big portion or activists more than their journalists. I mean, you got a media pretty Brad Stouter had Brad Stoles and I have a show and say, lad, I like to walk around all the time and a bunch of old bad sneakers because I think it's cool.

He's one of the few guys that he walks around in the suit with sneakers all all oversea, and I always thought that was so It's like, really, man, I mean, I'm all for comfortable footwear, but yeah, I like the way the sneakers and I do the show out Sundays. I have never once I tried to add bush Buck on terrorism, but he's really smart and I don't know anything about it, and so it cut the segment and

didn't even have the days that stay to Telhead. Anyways, I'm a Midia reporter and I have in front of me build about the other mayor of New Yarks today and I'm just not gonna ask. I mean, it's the whole thing, man, It's just drives me nuts. They're they're trashing Fox News while trying to pretend that they're for

an open press. What I mean, I would want a real media reporter would ask with the Blasia, well, if you were, if you were a Republican, what channel could you watch now and not feel not only that that there was a lot of bias, but that you are essentially actively being insulted on a regular basis if you're a Republican right now, what cable news channel is not insulting you constantly with its editorial line, with its uh you know, the analyst that puts on TV, the anchors

that puts on TV. The answer is the only one that doesn't insult you was Fox. The others are just constantly insulting you. CNN is a joke, it's a laughing stock. So how about that as a question, you know, maybe that's worth asking. That's what I said here at Bass Facts is because I had facts. Is the CNN has reporters whose full time jobs, folks right now, I know them, is to try and tear down Fox hosts, try to find dirt on them, try to get anything they can

on them. They think that's journalism, that's just character assassination. And they're they're looking and load or try to find anything. Because I can't compete in the ratings, that can't compete in the messaging. Not for a free and open press. These people are going straight out of the totalitarian media playbook all the time and claiming that they are for a free press. They want to shut down all powerful voices of opposition in the media while saying that they're

all about opposition voices in the media. They're clowns, they're jerks. It's completely ridiculous, and we should not let them get away with this pretense and Build A Blasio, who is a straight up an income poop, by the way, it really is, has no business weighing in on Fox for anything else. The fact that Build A. Blasio is the mayor of New York City and the city has not just caught on fire and burned to the ground yet entirely is a testament to the durability of the New

York City left to him by Juliani and Bloomberg. And the fact that really anybody could be the mayor of New York now it is so prosperous. But the subway is in disrepair. There's some bad stuff going on too. But but to Blasio wants to get rid of Fox and wants to pretend that in getting rid of Fox he's not engaging in censorship. Folks, these people do not want a debate. They don't want a battle of ideas. They want control and they want power, and that is

what the left is obsessed with. Everything else is a lie of pretense or just another opportunity for hippocrisy. He's holding the line for America, buck sex in his back. I saw this amazing chart over the weekend and it's from a professor of sociology at cal State cal State Los Angeles, Bradley Campbell, and he shares this chart and under the following headline this is all. This is from Twitter.

If you've read all the Vox explainers but are still having trouble distinguishing racist microaggressions from woke social justice talk, this cheat sheet might help. And it is this fascinating little chart of statements and then in social justice world what these things really mean or what they're supposed to mean. So the first one, for example, the statement is where are So it has a statement, and then it tells you microaggression, microaggression or social justice talk good or bad?

And then true meaning. So it breaks down different columns into these categories. First statement, where are you from? Microaggression? Bad because the true meaning of this is you are not a true American. So, according to the s JWS, where are you from? It is not something you're allowed to ask people because you're you're suggesting that they're not American. Of course, maybe they're not American, but you're not allowed to ask. The next statement quote kill all men microaggression. No,

this is social justice talk, good or bad. It is good and the reason is because the true meaning is it would be nice if the world sucked less for women. M hm. So you can say kill all men, and that is not a microaggression. Where are you from? According to the social justice warriors, is a microaggression. Next one here, I believe the most qualified person should get the job. Bad microaggression. People of color are given unfair benefits because of their race, is what the true meaning of that

phrase is. Um. So there you have that. One. Another one, cancel white people good social justice talk. Challenge the dominant power structure and culture, it says. So you can say that canceling white people is good, killing all men is good, but you cannot say that you believe the most qualified person should get the job. According to this chart from

professor Bradley Campbell, who's making fun of this. By the way, he wrote a book, The Rise of Victimhood Culture, but he gets it right here on these I mean, these are these are all situations. He actually has footnotes under them. These are situations where uh, the social justice left has weighed in on them. So he's not just coming up with this out of nowhere. Uh quote, when I look at you, I don't see color, bad microaggression. What you're

saying is assimilate to the dominant culture. So you can't say you are color blond under social justice talk. That's not allowed. You See, you can't say that you don't see color because that's just telling people, oh, you have to be like the rest of us. White men are bull social justice talk good because a power structure that favors white men continues to exist. You got another one here, Why are you so quiet? Bad microaggression? Because that's really

saying assimilate to the dominant culture. See. I don't even know how that. I don't even know how that one they get to. Really, they're just assuming what what if? What if someone is so quiet because they're depressed or there's something really wrong with them. I just don't see

how how that's about. Well, I'm not a social justice word obviously, which is why like I totally need, I total they need this chart looking like, tell me, like what the social justice wires, like think about this stuff, so then I can't think the same things, and I can think the smart things and be like totally smart and how and go to the mall and I'll be amazing. And then another quote here, dumbass white people marking up the Internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.

That is actually a quote from the newly installed and defended editor of Technology at the New York Times. So this is considered good and social justice talk because quote, non white voices often don't appear or get drowned out in social media discourse. See, folks, what you notice in all this, and I know it's a little tongue in cheek, what you notice is that there's really no basic decency

or basic standards that's being enforced here. It's just a leftist culture of victimology that is then weaponized into a hypocritical into a hypocritical means of of policing speech for the purposes of transferring power from one group to another, for the purposes of the consolidation of power on the left. But you can say nasty, racist things to white people

and that's considered social justice talk. You can in fact, ask very innocuous questions and be engage ging in a microaggression, even if you have no intention of doing so, because the social justice left says so, and you are not allowed to suggest that we are all just people who are equal in God's eyes, and therefore race is irrelevant to your thinking. Because if race is irrelevant to your thinking, why does the left have a justification for making race

so relevant to theirs. So there you have it, a little bit of a social justice warrior terminology cheat sheet for all of you. And with that we now go to roll call. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. Time for the role call. Oh yes, indeed, I had to say. I had a great weekend in d C. I have both of my brothers, my my fantastic brothers, older and younger, come down own spend the weekend with me. We had some great meals, we went on a little tour of the of the monuments in d C. And

we just had a lot of fun. And you know, family, man, it's it's family is a wonderful thing. But the Sexton brothers, the three of us united in in the swamp for the first time. My little brother went to Georgetown when I was at the CIA, so we used to hang out all the time, but older Bro came down for this one. We had a lot of fun. All right, Let's get to your thoughts. Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton if you want to be in on this action.

First up, we have Daniel hey Buck love your show heard you on the Friday podcast mentioned the terrorists training camp for school shootings in New Mexico. You asked where we have heard this story except from you and Fox News. I read about it on Thursday on Jihadwatch, who's founder, Robert Spencer, was a guest on your show not long ago. There are some other sources on the internet as well as Pamela Geller's site and many more who also had

the story. Like one is that these sources are available as well as your excellent show and Fox News, and I hope more conservative seek out these places. We can counter the left. We will work a little find more allies like you, and they are out there. Keep up the fantastic work and shields high. Daniel. Well, Daniel, thank you, Daniel, thank you very much for the kind note. Very much appreciated and great to hear from you. Aaron Rights, hey Buck I hope you're doing well. A huge fan of

your show. I wanted to get in contact with you about having a special guest interview with award winning speaker and author of a Call for Courage, Michael Anthony. I think he'd be a great guest for your program. I can send you a full background here. Uh okay, Aaron, let me look up who this gentleman is. I've never heard from him, and UM, I'll let you know if that's something we can do here. But thank you. I

like recommendations. I like when people give me thoughts for guests, So feel free anytime Peter writes buck, please start pronouncing minards correctly. The accident is on the second syllable, not the first. I know, guys, you're Peter. You're right. Everyone's been on me for this one. You know, once you get it in your in your head the wrong way, it's so hard to get it right. So I know that it's Minard's, but I keep saying Menards, Minard's Minards. There we go. I think I've got it now, I'm

gonna try really hard to get it right. I didn't know what minards was until recently, so I learned something new Evan Rights hey Buck, I heard the Roll Call comment about the movie Range fifteen. Not only is a guy from Black Rifle in the movie, it's actually created by Matt Best and the Article fifteen crew. Matt Best is Evan Hayfer's business partner in Black Rifle Article fifteen. UH teamed up with Black Rifle. The reason they created the movie Range fifteen is because of how wrong Hollywood

gets military attire and most military related material. They created it so that a real movie, real military movie, by actual modern vets would be out there for the public. It's really a military zombie apocalypse style movie, super vulgar and full of gore. Cool to see Iraq and Afghan vets get to play a role in the film. Definitely recommend you see it. Thanks Brother Shields High Well, Evan, thank you uh for bringing this to my attention. I did not know about this movie, Uh, Range fifteen. I

will have to check it out. I know Matt Best and Evan Heyfer pretty well. They're fantastic guys, uh, you know, really just really really good dudes. And also they've got a great company, Black Rifle, one of our wonderful sponsors, Black Rifle Coffee, Dot com slash Buck folks, don't forget that should be for all of you. The coffee that you are drinking. Do not drink comy coffee. Drink black

rifle coffee. We have now um Alex, who writes very inspirational to hear that you had a speech impediment and now make a live talking James Earl Jones also had a speech impediment, and look how successful he's been too. Keep up the great work from Alex. Well, Alex, thank you, and yes I did, in fact, I have a speech impediment. When I was a kid. I spent a couple of years in speech therapy learning how to pronounce things properly. And now here I am a syndicated radio host filling

for Rush and you know all the rest. And yeah, so always always always stay in the fight, right or if you're gonna talk to kids about it, tell him never ever, ever ever give up when you really want something, when you really want to achieve something. Aarin writes, Hey Buck shields high. I haven't seen anyone talking about the failure of movie pass and how it illustrates why socialism generally and single pale single payer healthcare specifically are designed

to fail. At first, a flat monthly fee got you into unlimited movies, but unexpectedly that led to dramatic for use in the system collapsed. Now movie Pass is rashing the number of free movies to which your flat monthly fee entitled you. It amazes me how people fail to understand the basic realities of economics and scarcity of goods

and services. Keep up the good work. From Aaron in Chicago. Aaron, I know nothing about movie Pass except what you've told me here in this note, So thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I appreciate you using opportunity to tell us a bit about movie Pass. Brittany. Right, thanks Buck. You mentioned a pistol chainsaw bayonet, and now my boyfriend wants one. He wants a picture of yours.

If you have one, I'm dying over here, Brittany. Um in Brittany, you know, a pistol chainsaw bayonet sounds awesome because think about it, there is such a thing, a modification for I believe, for a R the a R rail system a chainsaw bayonet. And it became famous after someone at USA Today put a chainsaw bay in that as a modification. In a national news story that people

people use for assault rifles. But now think about this, you could have a mini chainsaw bayonet for your your side arm, which pretty much would be useful, I think for being a can opener, you know. So maybe I actually would be something that's pretty good. Uh And yes, indeed, um, thank you Brittany for writing. Sorry if I cause a little bit of a tumult there, Alex writes, Occasio Cortez is so dumb, Alex. I don't think I have anything to add to what you've written. I'm just letting you

have your say. Rachel writes, Hey buck Shields High. My husband had a question that I'm going to relay since he doesn't have a Facebook account. He was wondering why no one has called out the liberals and the fact that abortion, which they wholeheartedly advocate, is worse than separating children at the border. We all know the progressives are hypocrites, but why has no one brought this up to them before. Also, my husband and one year old daughter and I drink

raw home milk every single day. Since it hasn't been pasteurized, all the nutrients and enzymes are still intact. However, since you do not normally drink it all of the alive nutrients, and it may have caused your stomach to hurt because it was cleaning out all the bad bacteria in your gut. I would encourage you to try it again, but in a smaller quantity and slowly built up to drinking more. The nutritional benefits of raw milk are phenomenal, especially since

you have Celiac disease. Keep up the great work on rising and with the upcoming Shield Hide podcast, Rachel and Jesse. Rachel, such a such a kind and thoughtful note here, really appreciated. As to raw milk. I don't know if I'm gonna be making that making that happen again anytime soon. Buck Buck's tummy was a little rum blue rumblot, Tommy. Uh.

It was rough, rough couple of days. And you know, when you're doing a morning TV show real early in the morning, and you're doing it with a very nice lady sitting next to at the table, you need you need your bowels to be behaved. That's all I can say. Folks. You need to make sure that you keep it all together up there. Yep, uh, here we go. Um Hold on a second, I'm I'm trying to find the next the next note here, William writes, once again, thanks for reading my note. Uh I played it for my wife

and kids. You made me feel important. Thanks bucking God, blessed well William. Thank you for writing to me. You make me feel important and you're the only reason I do this show every day. You and everybody else listening the only reason I have a show. So thank you for for all that you do for me. Cat writes, buck love the show. Heard you talk about checking out the series Battle Star Galactica. Highly recommend it, but make a promise to yourself to watch at least five episodes.

The series is dark, deep thought provoking at a time's hard to follow, but very addictive. You will find yourself hooked and when you get to the serious conclusion, you will be left wanting more shields high Kathy. You know, Cathy, I've got a friend that I trust. I think he's got good taste, and he tells me that Battlestar Galactica is the best TV show of all time, which seems like a crazy statement to me. I mean, really, Battlestar Galactica. But because he is so high on it, I am

certainly willing to give it a shot. I don't really know where to watch it how I can get it on my TV. I'll probably have to figure that out too, James. Next up, Hey Buck, I tune in late today and heard the guy from Texas saying something about you and Ostrich skin boots. Back in the nineties, when I was stationed around d C, I went through an urban cowboy phase and bought an eight hundred dollar pair of Ostrich

skin boots. I know I was single and stupid. I supersized myself over the years, and now they don't fit. I think they are nine point five or ten size. If you would, if it will fit you, I will send them to you. I don't have the heart to give them a goodwill. They're in great shape, shields high, James. James, you are very and for offering your Ostrich boots, but I'm sure I think you'll find a better, better pair of feed for them than mine. I am not a I am a very very particular about what I put

on my feet that have to be super comfortable. If I could get away with walking around all day barefooter or in socks, I would. Unfortunately, because you know I'm in d C. In their streets. I have to actually wear some form of actual shoe. That's gonna be it for the Freedom Hunt today, my friends, thank you as always for joining me here. I'm looking forward to a very robust week of shows. Don't forget Benny Johnson joined

me for the Freedom Hunt podcast last week. You can listen on iTunes or stitcher dot com or the I Heart app. Please do give it a listen. It's definitely worth the worth the thirty or so minutes and until tomorrow, my friends, Shields Hig