Whiny Acosta Gets His Way

to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake you're a great American Again, the buck Sexton Show begins it Bucks Now, welcome to the buck Sexton Show. I am back here in the swamp. I missed you all very much. Although I did, I did here as always that my main man, Raheim did a fantastic job in for me. So I'm really glad that you guys are enjoying the Some of the new guests we're gonna have, guest hosts we're gonna have in the rotation, Rahim of

course high up on that list. With the holidays coming, might even have some other some other new special exciting folks who knows. I like to keep you all on your toes. Um, But I was out in Springfield, Illinois, landa Lincoln. It was Um, it was really fun. I gotta speak some really great Republicans. You know that that part of Illinois, Sangamon County is pretty red, which is nice. It's like, Oh, I'm on I'm on home turf here,

home team. I'm so used to living among the LIB team that when I when I go to a place where there are conservatives with our Republicans, like wow, So this is what America feels like for a lot of people. I'm so used to walking around like, oh, is that Antifa around the corner? All No, I have to always keep that in mind. I've got some really interesting stuff to get into together today. Obviously, gonna get a chance

talk to you yesterday. Some updates on the Georgia and Florida races, which are still the twenty t mid term still going on. Haven't figured that out, Stacy Abrams. Apparently we're gonna Phil Kirpin join us to really walk through exactly what's because he's all over this election low stuff, and he'll give you the full run. You'll know more to listen to that guy than I think you will listen to. There's very few people that really drill down into the way that he does that I see out there.

But Stacy Abrams is she said she can't defeat Kemp in Georgia, but she also plans to sue to essentially get a totally new election. I mean, this is just crazy. This is a whole this is a whole other level of Shenanigan, a whole other level of Shenanigan's from the from the Democrats. So not really not really all that surprising, but nonetheless, this is this is what they do that, this is you could say, how they roll. Uh. And then in Florida, obviously there's still all kinds of stuff

going on there that we will discuss. We got the caravan, whereas the caravan going, what's going on? Any of the big news for today, and I will discuss with you, And don't get in a little bit of the it's not a legal opinion, that's a final it's a preliminary legal injunction. I'll get into it. But Jim Acosta gets his pass back. Oh you know, Son now has fifty one people with White House passes. Oh my Oh, good heavens, the Republic was in jeopardy before they were all so

upset about it. Oh, it's terrible. Look, I'm I'm not with not all conservatives with me on this. I know that you know, Fox News actually back to Costa up in this one. So and I'm not perfect, I'm a human being. So the fact that Acosta is an untalented clown um definitely probably weighs in on my definitely probably oh man spoken like a spoken like a liberal pund to definitely probably uh ways on my judgment of how

acceptable or unacceptable what he did really is. So I will admit that, I mean, well, what he did was jerk stuff. I'm not saying that, you know, the jerk store called and they say they're running out of Acosta. So, but what I mean is that the procedural reality of Kenny be kicked out. Well, we'll get into all that, because this is the biggest new store of the day, the biggest new story of the day, only because it

involves the media. And I try to be self aware about this because technically, yeah, I know, and some of the some of the emails like you're in the media, yeah, but like not really, you know, I mean, yeah, but kinda I'm I'm I'm some other some other type. I'm not your your typical media dude. Um certainly didn't go to a school. So we'll get into some of that, but it's because it involves the media. The media cares about it so much, but it really cares. And we'll

make fun of a cost a little bit. They'll be good times. Oh. Also, Kamala Harris thinks that people should know. I mean, she's not saying it, she just wants people to know what a congressional hearing death. You know, Democrats kind of think that immigrations and customs enforcement is the KKK, you know, kind of kind of similar. She's not saying that, she says it. She just wants ever to know that she hears people saying it. If you you can't make it, you can't make this stuff up. This is this is

who wants to run the country. By the way, these the Democrats, I think they should be in charge. But all right, so I think this is actually a much more interesting story than any of that, which is why I'm I'm starting it off with this today. And it's actually a New York Times piece and it's called a look inside the tactics of Definers, Facebook's attack dog. Now, yeah, you have to get into weeds a little bit on this one for it to really the full impact at home.

But let me let me walk you through this. So Facebook hired this group called Definers Public Affairs, and their whole thing is that they yeah, they working in PR, but it's kind of aggressive PR. It's really more propaganda for hires. So Facebook hires this this group, and they, for example, compile information on senators that's derogatory information about particularly their use of Facebook. Um. But they they use software tally what the fifteen members of the intelligence community

used to track visitors to their Senate websites. They also looked at how much easy or rather how much each senator spent on Facebook ads, and how much they received

in campaign donations from Facebook. So they're doing OPO research on senators right for Facebook at Facebook's BEHS, right before Facebook is going down to testify on Capitol Hill about how according to Cheryl Sandberg, the ce chief operating a chief operating officer rather obviously Zuckerberg's CEO, they want to work with senators, right, They wanted to work with the Senate Committee but oh wait, they were compiling oppo research on those senators. That's that doesn't seem like a very

good faith action, does it. And they're tracking the tools that senter websites you So what they're essentially saying is you want to regulate Facebook, but you use Facebook, so you're a hypocrite, Senators. Okay, this is and by the way, Facebook, since this has come out, it's completely backed off and be like, oh, we we don't want to do that. We you know, we don't want to be involved in that kind of stuff. Yeah, that's that's what we thought.

It's a feeling and a feeling, that's the case. So you look a little deeper into it though, and the way they went about this is particularly interesting. Definers. Remember Facebook hires definers to compile opo research on senators who are going to be in a committee with a senior Facebook officer talking about, you know, what they could do about Russia collusion stuff and and should they be regulated and so you know, they're basical getting ready to go to war with the Senate if they have to in

public and public relations stuff. And then there's some more details for I think conference thing about this, so quote Facebook initially hired definers this this PR group to monitor news about the social network. It's really a private intelligence firm. By the way, it's really not a PR. Private intelligence is the way we should describe as it expanded its relationship with the firm. When scrutinyum Facebook was increasing over how Russian agents had used this site to sow discord

before the United States election. Should be discord, discord or discord? I probably say that one wrong define has began doing

some general communications work. Blah BiH blah. It also undertook more covert effort to spread the blame for the rise of Russian disinformation, pointing other fingers, pointing fingers that other companies like Google, Oh wow, you mean Facebook, which just wants to be your buddy and it's such a great, wonderful, friendly, big hug of a company hired another company to spread disinformation about that company. When it came to who's responsible

for Russian disinformation? This informazia, I don't know. I don't speak Russian. Some of you do. You're always like buck, your emphasis is on the wrong sillaball. That's probably true, But this I just like to say it, like my name isia. Then it sounds close enough right, or is its Informazia. I'll keep switching syllables till I get it right. It goes on, though, folks. Not just trying to throw Google onto the bus here. Facebook hired this private intel

firm to do the following quote. A key part of Definer's strategy was nt K Network, a website that appeared to be a run of the mill news aggregator with a right wing slant. In fact, many of nt k's news stories were written by employers employees rather at Definers and America Rising, a sister firm to criticize rivals of their clients. According to one former employee not allowed to speak publicly, Folks, Facebook hired a private intel firm to spread fake news about the fake news that was spread

by the Russians. You can't make this up. They appeared to be conservative. They're they're spoofing conservative websites affect a conservative opinion in order to throw people off the scent of how responsible Facebook was for this. This is pretty I mean, come on, this is pretty amazing, right. Think about this for a second, um, And they went after people.

Quote in an email days before the hearing, a definer's employee, Press of Times reporter to write that Facebook was talking to senators talking taking the senator's concerned seriously, while Google was irresponsible. The day before the hearing, this fake news network that was actually this definer's group hired by Facebook, said that Senator Marco Rubio had suggested that Google was

possibly a monopoly. The next day, shortly after hearing ended, Anti k Network posted another story highlighting Rubio's criticism of Google during the hearing. My friends, Facebook hired this company to spread fake news about senators while they're meeting with senators to discuss the problem of fake news. Come on, people, this is beautiful, right, this is amazing Silicon Valley. They're all a bunch of libs. You can't trust them. Can't trust the libs that you know. This, can't trust the

Libs should be a song. I should write a song called Can't Trust the Libs. And then it goes even a little deep. But this gets even more interesting. Definers distributed memos that sought to layout evidence for angles that it wanted reporters to pursue, According to The New York Times. Here, the memos were typically based on public information etcetera, etcetera.

Definers urged reporters to explore the financial ties between Mr Soros, that that Judge Soros, Hello Sotos is here, and Freedom from Facebook, a coalition of groups that had criticized Facebook. The idea was to persuade reporters that the coalition was not a sincere movement of like minded groups, rather an

orchestrated campaign by a rich partisan opponent. A two page document that Definers distributed about Freedom from Facebook noted that at least four of the groups and the coalition received funding or are aligned with George Soros, who has publicly criticized Facebook. The four groups named the document appear to have received do appear to receive funding from Soros is open Society Foundations. That's right there, blaming Soros. Facebook blames

Sorrows for for some of its public relations woes. Uh. It says that these these anti Facebook groups are receiving their funding from Sorrows. Wait I thought I thought saying that you received funding from Sorrows was anti semitic. That's what That's what we're being told by journals like a

week ago. But now Facebook will do that. So so somebody tell me, what are the new rules here when a bunch of Silicon Valley libs with tremendous UH resources and reach and power Facebook and others, when they say, but Sorrows is behind this stuff? Is that anti semitic?

Or is that okay? You mean that Soros actually does fund a lot of these groups to make it seem like they're more grassroots and organic than they are and that they're pushing a left wing agenda or in this case, is just an anti Facebook agenda and they're willing to pretend it's coming from fake conservative groups. By the way, we we we weren't supposed to find out about any of this. This all just came out. If this is what's going on in this one case, what else do

you think Facebook is up to? You know, I've been telling you for a while. Those you listen have been listening, have been with me for a while. It's only a matter of time before you see the weaponization of social media platforms not just for propaganda purposes, but to target individuals. Facebook and Google and Twitter, these places they have information on so many people, and people use them for private conversations,

for sensitive business conversations. They probably shouldn't, but everybody does because it's so convenient. There will be a time mark my words. There will be a time and it might be when, at a critical moment, one of these social media companies will say, you know what, we have this information. We just have terms of service. We're not contractually bound

to keep it all secret. And here's what candidate so and so was saying to his mistress, you know, before he visited his you know, his wife at the hospital or something. I mean, that's gonna happen. That is going to happen, and that I think is something that you know, we we all need to be very aware of. Here. Um, and we got more on this and uh and a whole on more. We'll talk about the accost of situation and all that coming up. So stay with me. In the midst of all the whining coming from the left,

I mean, it's just crazy these days. They're chasing people out of restaurants, yelling at you in the coffee shop, acting like a bunch of maniacs. You have to wonder why in the world would anyone act this way. My guess is they're just not getting their daily dose and black rifle coffee. I drink black Rifle every morning. In fact, it's such delicious coffee that I'm usually a guy that likes a little can lache in my coffee. But guess what, I drink it black because it's Black Rifle for one.

And also this is delicious, small batch, roast to order coffee. Alright, I am a salente for smooth blond guy, but their entire catalog of different beans and blends is amazing. Black Rifle is roaster order and is guaranteed fresh right to your door. Nothing cures a bad attitude like starting your day with the most American coffee ever, Black Rifle Coffee. Visit black Rifle Coffee dot com. Slash buck received fifteen

percent off your order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash Buck for fifteen percent off Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash Buck. Okay, before we get into a Costa's hard pass, which every and now the media is obsessed with a lot of you like Buck. Who cares? I know, but this is one of these problems where I can't determine the news cycle right and I can't be my own final news gathering organization. You know, you know the Freedom Hunt reports, you know, I mean, I did other

people to actually do some reporting too. I can't just pull it all together myself. Um. I mean I can tell you what it was like at the airport in Illinois at five am this morning. I mean, you know, that was exciting. But other than that, I've been in the air most of today. Um. But we'll talk about the cost of thing a little bit. Then we'll move on to areas that I think matter more to you. What's going on the Muller pro what's going on with immigration,

the elections Florida, Georgia. So we'll cover all that, all that good stuff, and then we'll send you off with some fantastic roll call and chit chat and the most important question the moment, which is should pickles be on burgers, not next to them? On them? We'll get into that. But I saw this, and this is just a reminder of how skewed these social media platforms have become. This woman, Megan Murph, I don't know who she is. I think

she's a liberal tho. I think she's a lib. She calls herself a pinko and her Twitter bios I think that's a lip thing. It's basically saying she is a comedy. She and she's a feminist. She got in trouble with Twitter. She Twitter Center. This was on Twitter today. She got a note from them saying that you are violating our rules against hateful conduct. This is official from Twitter. Do you know what she said? How are trans women not men? What is the difference between a man and a trans woman?

And then said men aren't women? I am not exaggerating, I am not making this up. I am not taking it out of context. It is now considered a violation of twitters terms of service to state the following men are not women. Let that sink in for a moment. You can be deep platformed, you can be called out for abusive behavior and violation of rules for saying that

men are not women. I don't think I don't think that it's too much to say that we're living in some kind of bizarro left wing delusion now, because I'm gonna go, I'm gonna go on record. I'm not afraid to say it. I don't care who yells a better. I'm darn sure that men are not women. That this is a thing that you and I know, And I don't care how many progressives, how many on the left, how many Democrats, try to tell me otherwise. Great day

for the first eventment in journalism. Very excited to happen his prepossibly be able to go back and get his heart passive report the news about the White House. I'll turn it over to Jim. Thank you, Hi, everybody, thanks for coming. I just want to say something very briefly, and that is I want to thank all of my colleagues and the press who supported us this week. And I want to thank the judge for the decision he made today and let's go back to work. Acosta got

his hard passed back. Man. I gotta tell you this one is this one is annoying. This decision is annoying. Acosta is annoying this whole, this whole thing. Man. So let's just like, let's take a little trip down, a little trip down, well at all. Before we take a trip down memory land, I'll tell you what happened. So you had a judge issue a preliminary injunction today, federal judge.

It's a Trump appointee. And the longer and short of it is, he said on fit Amendment do process grounds, they must give a Coste his press pass back because you know, inhibits him from reporting and blabity blah First Amendment stuff, but he didn't make it clear for Amendment ruling as to whether or not they could restrict his access based upon how much of a jerky's being because he's definitely being a jerk, but the judge didn't really

weigh in on that one. The judge says there's a lack of due process here um and and what that means now is that Acosta, the hero of the resistance, left the well. This guy has never said an interesting, smart or witty thing on his life on television, and it's just he's he's one of these guys who would be lucky to be like the local news anchor in some you know, small town in Massachusetts. And yet now he's this guy who's the First Amendment martyr for CNN.

It's just so frustrating. But you know, look that they the problem here is that they didn't have the due process concerned. And there's a previous court ruling from I think back in the Set and Easy that that somehow influence that influences this decision. They do. Process component of it is well, there's not rules and so it's arbitrary and they have to give him the right to respond.

They have to give him essentially written notice. Um. I mean, I I complete just for the I completely disagree with this. I mean, I think it's crap. Whether on a on a purely procedural basis, this judge ruled the right way. I mean this, this is it's getting down into the weeds. Oh, it's not a final ruling, its preliminary injunction. Um. But you know, because what I say is all right, So

there's not official rules. If a Costas stood up and started just screaming curses at the president, they wouldn't give him written notice. They would just escort him out of the room and take away his hard pass and take away his access to the White House. Can they not do that? Oh, I'm sorry. They have to give him written notice of that. They they have to say, Mr Costa, you have violated the following rules and then let him respond in writing. I mean, you know, at some point

the process. And by the way, there's a lot of abuse of this due process concept. Now, whenever there's anything that can be done to stick a thumb in the eye of the Trump administration, you see a lot of this. So huh. Obviously, very very frustrating. But Trump is saying, and now they're gonna write up rules on decorum so that they have a codified Hey, don't be a jerk like a costa system in place, play Levin John regulation three US Decora, you can't take three questions and four

questions and you just stand up and not sit down. Decora, you have to practice Dacora. You were there, You understood, and you understand. We want uh total freedom of the press. That's very important because they it's more important to mean than anybody would believe. But you have to act with respect. You're in the White House, and when I see the way some of my people get treated at press conference isn't terrible. So we're setting up a certain standard, which

is what the court is requesting. And always free to the press, always first Amendment. But that's the way it is. And we always have the option of just leaving, you know, we feel that things aren't being treated properly, that people aren't being treated properly, we always have the right to leave. And I think the other media, the other press in the room will not be very happy if that happens. But I've instructed my people when they're not treated properly.

You have the right to just leave anytime you want to do. Yeah, so now they're going to have the rules in place. Now they're now they've they've decided that you know, this is gonna be a situation where in the future they'll be able to take away costs. Is hard passed, but just just as a little fun, a little fun, uh, as I said, a trip down memory lane here when when you have always was like, oh the cost there's a victor of the first m And this is how this jerk acted back on November se

John play the Trump via Costa throw down. I think you should let me run the country. You run CNN, and if you did it well, If I may one question, if I may ask question, are you worried? That's enough? President asked one of the other folks. That's enough. Pardon me, ma'am, this president. That's enough, this president, I had one of the dosens. If I may ask on on the Russia investigation, are you concerned that that you may I'm not concerned

about anything you have investigation because it's a hoax. Are that's enough? Put down the mic? This president? Are you worried about indictments coming down in this investigation, Mr President, I'll tell you what. CNN should be ashamed of itself having you working for them. You are a rude, terrible person. You shouldn't be working for CNN. Go ahead. I think that's your very rude person. The way you treat Sarah Huckabee is horrible, and the way you treat other people

are horrible. You shouldn't treat people that way. Go ahead. And Peter gun in Jim's defense, I've traveled with him and watched him. He's a diligent reporter who bustle. I'm not at so let me ask you a question. If I can't you repeatedly, Mr President, you repeatedly over the course. I mean, look, Trump can handle these guys. Obviously did a great it did a great job. I really I really like the Peter Alexandra thing. You know, Yeah, you're

not so great either, dude. Just just calm yourself. Calm yourself. I mean's this notion of of solidarity in the press. By the way, let me tell you for a second, a little bit of an inside peek here. Most of these people the press hate each other. Most of them are eyeing each other's jobs, most of them talk smack about each other all the time. And I'm not guessing. I know because I hear what they say. I see

what they say. A lot of people in the press corps, it just attracts the the the biggest egos with the thinnest skin. I mean, that's what you generally get, especially in the traditional mainstream mainstream media TV journalism side of things. I mean, you just get the worst, the worst people. And I just think it's so funny. They're like, oh, yeah, we're all standing together at the first time, and please,

this is now. This is now. The press his own version of this is a special version of virtue signaling, you know, the the First Amendment, the First Amendment martyr pose that they're all taking here. Meanwhile, CNN has like fifty other people with hard passes. The the idea that Jimmy costas not even lack of access. He wasn't even banned from the White House. He just wasn't able to walk in and out whenever he please, you get to

stop in and get a pass. By the way, I've had to do that when I interviewed the President, I stopped and get a pass. You know, you don't see me walking around with some scarlet letter on on my chest. Oh my gosh, what am I gonna do? I mean, give me a break. It's so ridiculous. The whole thing is so completely absurd. And I just want to know you. When is Info Wars gonna say that they should get White House press credits? On on what First Amendment basis?

Can the White House deny them press credentials? Somebody answer that and answer me that question. I'm not aware of any First Amendment basis that they can be denied, because apparently you have a due process right to be told why you can't. And the only real way they could tell them they can't be given a pass to Info Wars, for example, would be to say because you're a bunch of you know, maniacs, and that's that's viewpoint discrimination folks.

So the White House doesn't get to make these kinds of designations anymore, if you if you really continue people right now, Oh, it's through process. Yeah, but there's still a First Amendment question and they may have to look at this. They're gonna force the issue, you know what. A lot of what this comes down to is that journalists realize that there's no secret sauce to what they do except for access. Access on the platform is everything.

Access to newsmaker. Anybody sits down with a newsmaker and they get ratings. We all know this. Anybody gets access to the president or whatever you're gonna have. If it's written, you're gonna have a lot of clicks, if it's a video, you're gonna have a lot of views. Right, I mean this is and so there's real money at stake here, and that's that's once you start to think about it in those terms, it all makes a whole lot more sense.

You go way hold on a second, Access to the White House is really a monetary issue for media organizations. So I'll just I'm just point out that this whole thing, man, it is so off the rails. This this a cost of nonsense, and I think it's going to create a lot of problems, you know, a lot of problems down

the line. But you know, here we are, here we are with with CNN just doing what it does, which is acting like they're they're just they're just there to protect the First Amendment, man, like they just want to make everybody like you just want to take care of everybody who's jury. It was out there please. You know, I give credit to Major Garrett, who I think is over at CBS now, who said that when he was at Fox, Obama used to trash Fox News all the time.

And and remember, you want to talk about a threat to free expression, free in the press. Half the country only as one news channel to watch one half the country, and that channel was just completely maligned by Obama because Obama was so used to everybody telling him how brilliant, what a genius he was, what a what a pile of garbage that was. Anybody who would stand up and say, you know, maybe Obama is not perfect? Pretty much? Was it Fox News? With with a handful of exceptions, what

was that Fox News? And Obama would Obama ascentually said they're not a news network, as well as calling out talk radio and talk radio host by name with the President did that and the opposition to him in the media was was a fraction of the support that he had in the media. You know, Oh, the First Amendment wasn'tunder assault then when Obama used the Espionage Act to go after reporters and listed a Fox News reporter as an unindicted co conspirator in a federal criminal espionage indictment,

you know. The press, Yeah, they there was some criticism of but but it was all kind of like, come on, Obama, you're so amazing. Don't be not amazing on this one because you're the greatest, Obama, but this one wasn't the greatest, but you're still the greatest. That's basically the tone they take. Man. You know, I gotta keep an eye. I gotta keep an eye on these lefties. They're a kg disreputable, dishonest bunch, especially at Costa Wiki leaks back in the news today.

Looks like there's a legal battle brewing right now because the founder of Wicked Eggs, Julian Assange, has said via his lawyers today that he will not at least willingly go to the United States because it has come out that and and this is let me, let me just tell you what the Associated Press reported here that'll make make more sense. Um. In an errant court filing in an unrelated case from prosecutors, it was inadvertently revealed that

there are sealed charges against you an Assange. The filing, discovered late Thursday night, said the charges and arrest warrant would need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges in the criminal complaint, and therefore no longer evade or avoid arrest and extradition in this matter. A person familiar with the matter, cording of the Associated Press, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that charges had

been filed under seal. The exact charges of Sage faces and when they might be un sealed, remained unser hurtin Any charges against him could help illuminate whether Russia coordinated with a Trump campaign to swear the sixteen presidential election. They also would suggest that, after years of internal Justice Department wrangling, prosecutors have decided to take a more aggressive tack against wiki leaks. This is very interesting. This is

very interesting. This is going to face quite a challenge because here's the problem that we're gonna come up against here. Now. I mean, I think, as san just, I think Assan just got some very shady, very shady connections. I think he's got shady and to think he does have shady connections to the Russians, I think he's a he's not a not a good not a good guy in that sense.

But we in this country allow American citizen journalists, American citizens who are journalists to publish classified information, including very damaging classified information, with impunity. And that's not a special constitutional protection that they have that does not exist. They live under the same laws as all the rest of us. The notion of them being pressed versus you being pressed in the era of the Internet isn't really a separation

that courts could adhere to. If you have a Facebook account and you you know, you're basically pressed to now, anybody can publish, anybody can be pressed. It's probably why every when the press is so insecure these days, but they publish classified information and are not punished for it.

Assange is not even a US citizen, and now they're claiming that he uh now clearly that they're going to try to prosecute him under violation of r Espionage Act laws, which is gonna be very interesting because why is why would he go to prison? But the New York Times can publish classified information because they're journalists. He says, he's a journalist. Is he a dirtbag? Can he be trusted? Yes, he's a r back. No he can't be trusted. But

is what he does in some ways journalistic? I mean, you could say is a non state intelligence uh, you know actor, you know, kind of a nonstated hostile intelligence agency. I know people call them that, and there's certainly truth to that the way that he operates. But what's the principle here? Is publishing classified illegal or not? If it's not illegal for The New York Times, I don't know how it's illegal for Julian Assange other than people don't

like him. Oh and that's right. Here's why the journalists are not going to close ranks around to Sange because they're perfectly happy with him during Uh, you know, they're perfectly happy with him when he was publishing stuff that they like to see in the public. Right when he published all that stuff about the the the the Chelsea Manning releases, all that diplomatic and military classified cable traffic, they were fine with that. They were defending that as

radical transparency. They made a movie, an award winning movie about about him and about what he did. I mean, they've made movies about this. But then there was the whole thing about the emails from Podesta and the d n C. Then there was the whole problem of oh wait a second, you mean to say that he's hurting a Democrat that became unacceptable. That is why the press

will not close ranks around him. And when you look at how this plays out now, just remember that they would rush to Osanga's defense in the American media, I think, except for the fact that they blame him in part for Hillary losing. That is his great sin, not espionage. The press could care less about espionage. They do it themselves. Every time you sign an online there's the possibility that some bad actor is gonna try to get your information.

But you know there are companies that are constantly trying to buy the information that you put online. Via the social media platforms you use, the Google search engine you use, all those things can be liabilities for you. Well, I'm telling you you can take back your security online. Take back your privacy from hackers, spies, and thieves. Use Express vpn. Express vpn has easy to use apps that run seamlessly

in the background of my computer, phone, and tablet. It takes one click to do it cost less than seven dollars a month. Express vpn is what you need to take back your online privacy protect your online activity. Today found out how you can get three months free at express vpn dot com. Slash buck that's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package. Visit express vpn dot com slash buck to

learn more. The results where Pride risk. When I came out and made a statement, the results were being uploaded as I came out to speak to you, according the word we would tell from the division of the election. Our completion was three o two and you should have been three o'clock on the button. They have Brenda Snipes now famous or perhaps infamous for election and competence at a minimum, perhaps election mouthfeasance, and and even some some

worse stuff than that. What the heck is going on at this point in the Florida election with Broward County and with a Senate seat and a governorship hanging in the balance, and also what's going on with Stacy Abrams the governor's race in Georgia. We've got somebody who's all over this gonna walk us through all the nitty gritty so we actually know what the heck is going on. Phil Kirpin is with us. He is the President of

American Commitment. Phil Happy Friday man, Thanks for coming on my pleasure buck, Thanks for having me all right, let's start with Let's start with floor ord to because just tell people what what has happened in the last few days in this Florida election that we need to know about. Well, um, on election night, it looked like Republicans had swept all of the statewide races, uh, not by a lot, but

by a relatively comfortable amount. And so it was something like eighty something thousand votes in the governor's race, fifty something thousand in the Senate race, and I think it was twenty or thirty thousand in the Agriculture commissioner race. And what happened And several days after the election, two counties, Broward County and Palm Beach County just kept counting and they kept counting and camp counting for two or three days.

I think it was three days after the election. They just kept posting more and more ballots, and they wouldn't say how many they had left to count, They wouldn't say where they were coming from. They didn't have They weren't complying with any of the transparency requirements of the law, or the requirement of Florida law that said that all of the mail ballots had to be posted by within half an hour of the polls closing on election day, and some of they just coming kept coming and coming,

and those margins got smaller and small learned smaller. Governor Scott, who's a candidate in the US Center race, Rick Scott got a court order requiring those counties to comply with the transparency rules of the laws in Florida, so they would have to post the numbers of outstanding ballots they had left, of the number that had come in after the deadline, all that kind of stuff. And magically, as soon as he got that order, they said, okay, now

we're done counting. So then the then they didn't have any more ballots appearing after the transparency order was issued. But we had pretty much closer margins at that point. So you know, at that point, the governor race was down to thirty something votes. I think the center race was around thirteen or fourteen thousand, and the Agriculture commission race has actually flipped, so the Democrat is now ahead by four or five thousand votes in the Agriculture commissioner race.

And we went, um, you know, the Nelson people, the the Senator Bill Nelson people hired Mark Elias, the famous Perkins Coy attorney who has stolen a number of races in the past and recount. It's the famous Minnesota Al Franken race. The that was straight up stolen, by the way, right, I mean when I read about that, I'm like Al Frankie, who by the way, was the sixtiest vote for Obamacare, did not win that election. Oh no, he definitely did

not win. But you know, they there's Mark elized that the difference thereis it was, you know, I think it was three or four hundred votes that Norman had going into the recount, and Elias worked his magic. But the the other one, they're more fame, the most, the uh most outrageous. One of Mark Elias's greatest hits was probably

the Washington State gubernatorial race. I don't remember the exact year, but it was between Dino Rossi and Christine greg Ore and Rossi won like the initial count, he won the first recount, he won the second recount. In like the third recount, they discovered enough votes somewhere out of Seattle King County to change the outcome and the Democratic one. So so you know, the Democrats brought in the master, the recount master. He's filed like a million lawsuits all

over the place. Only one of those lawsuits really has been successful. They did extend the cure deadline for provisional ballots if you have voted provisional and your signature doesn't match or there's some other problem with it. UH. That was supposed to be resolved by the day before the election, of judges now said they have to this coming Saturday. So I'm so sure Democrats are going wild now trying

to get as many of those as possible. And we've we've found out that part of the Democrats strategy, and this story was actually broken by the Naples Daily News yesterday. The Democrats actually created phony cure forms for the for mail in ballots, which is a much much larger pool of ballots of than the provisionals. UH. They created phony forms with a fake deadline that they made up mail

in ballots had to be cured before the election. They created a phony form saying that they could be cured after the election, and they were going out and trying to get people to cure their defective mail ballots in the hopes that they would then find a judge who would extend that deadline and they would already have done all the work, whereas Republicans would then not have nearly as much time to catch up. And I don't think that's going to happen now because the scheme has been reported.

Naples Daily News broke the story, and Florida election officials have actually referred that to federal prosecutors for investigation, and so we could actually see a federal criminal investigation around the fake forms that they were trying to use to get mail in ballots cured in the hopes of getting a joke to let then let those in UM. However, it looks like, notwithstanding these various democratic efforts, uh the the governor's race and the center race should both go

to Republicans. The machine recounts have been completed. They were doing the hand recounts today it looks like those are only going to shift numbers, you know, by the hundreds, not by the thousands. We're still waiting on the overseas absentees and military absentees. Those are going to be finalized and I think tomorrow, so we'll get final counts on Sundays when it's going to be certified. And I do think that the Senate and the governor's race are both

going to go to the Republicans. But I think, you know, the big loser and all this is called Well, the Republican candidate for Agriculture Commissioner, who I'm pretty sure should have won. Um, he stands to be a loser right now because when they were farming those votes in Broward in secret for a few days, UM, that slipped the outcome of that race before they were able to put a stop to it. And he actually has an ongoing lawsuit in state court in Broward County. It's called Well

versus Snipes. A former Senator, George Lemieux is his lawyer in that case. And and they say, I watched I watched some of the video of this case from yesterday. They say they've already identified over six thousand ballots that Broward counted that were not received until after the deadline. So I don't know if they're actually going to be able to prove that, you know, I don't know how they would prove that. So I just I mean, this is all, this is all really important and relevant information.

I just want to jump in to ask you, you know, at what point is incompetence fraud and at what point is fraud cheating? I mean, you know, have we seen any places here with all this stuff in Florida where it's clearly gone from into the other because it sounds like I was like, yeah, elections are complicated. Well, it seems like there's more than just that going on. Well, the scheme, the scheme that involved doctored state forms that changed the deadline as to when people could file a

cure on a defective mail in ballot. Uh, that I believe is pretty clearly criminal. And you know, they weren't able to actually implement that scheme, probably because they got sort of busted before they did. And you know, how are they going to find a judge to let them get those ballots in after the stories everywhere of what they were trying. So I don't think they're going to succeed in that scheme, but what they were trying to do with that was clearly criminal, and you know they

are under federal investigation now for that. Um some of this other stuff. You know, if Broward really did count ballots that arrived after the deadline, well you know that's a pretty severe violation. We'll see if that can be proven or not. UM, But I don't know. I mean, it's a hard question of the President of the United States that he doesn't think Brenda Snipes is incompetent. He

thinks she's highly competent at cheating. Well, I don't know, she seems pretty incompetent, and to me, to be honest, I mean, she's she's pretty corrupt to but she also seems to be pretty incompetent. So it's hard to say. You know, when they did the whole recount of Broward and found that it actually helped Rick Scott, that he was supposed to gain seven d seventy nine votes for it, and then they said, oh oops, we didn't submit it

on time. We missed the deadline by two minutes. To me, it's pretty hard to believe that that was an accident. You know, you just assume if that had been the other way around. If Republican County did a recount that helped the Democrat and then they said, oh, I'm sorry, we click send two minutes too late, no one would believe it. The media would report it as a as

a as a scam and a trick. And you know, when the Democrats do it, you look at all these headlines and it's like, you know, Oopsie Broward does it again? They failed a lot of whoop sees that go in one direction. That's what I keep saying. I think Democrats, honestly, Phil, they just need to throw one of these so it doesn't look like every time this is what happens. You know that they need to just have one where the

Republican with all the shenanigans, actually comes out ahead. Because I think since two thousand there have only there have been three elections that have been changed via recounts, and they've all gone to Democrats. Of course, the two thousand thanks to the Supreme Court, one for Republican. Can we

ask you also about what's going on? We're speaking of Phil Kirpin, President of American Commitment, Phil Georgia another place where it's it seems to me that I get I get, you know, I'm up my eyeballs and reading about this stuff. I'm like, oh, can we just make this end? It seems Stacy Abram's whole plan is I'm just not gonna stop sewing. I'm just not going to concede. Well, it's actually even past that, because um, you know, they've got certified results in every single county in the state has

certified their results. She lost by over fifty four thousand votes, so, I mean it was close, but it wasn't particularly close. I mean, can you imagine if everybody lost by fifty thousand votes or less tried to contest the election and claim they didn't lose. I mean, that's that's that's an awful lot of votes. That's a real margin. That's that's

real people voting against you. Yeah, right, And so, you know, I don't know, the ap AP, the Associated Press is still saying they will will not call the winner yet. And even though every single county certified the results and they ran an exclusive today about her her litigation plan to demand a new election because this one was supposedly so marred by voters suppression or what have you. I mean, it's it's really bizarre, you know, because they had record

black turnout everywhere in Georgia. I mean, her her strategy of registering more Democratic voters than anyone's ever seen and pumping turnout through the roof by sort of bashing Brian Camp and saying he was trying to suppress them. You know, it worked. The threat, you know, scaring people about suppression

worked and they had massive turnout. So I don't know how you turn around after you get your massive turnout and say, actually, everything we were saying about suppression was true, and now we're going to call for a new election, which is what she's trying to do. Well, what do you what do you assess as to whether there was you know, what, what was Kemp actually kind of playing a little fast and loose or was he just let her the law all the suppression stuff. Well, I mean mhm.

The big thing that the national media made a story about was this exact match provision of Georgia law that said that if you didn't have an exact match between the information they had on file uh and your voter registration, then you went into a special list you had to vote provisional um or you could bring an I D and if your i D match what they had, then

you'd be able to vote a regular ballot. And so yeah, I don't you know, if people have a problem with that, it's not really a problem with him because that was the Georgia law. I mean, you have a problem with the legislature that passed that law. But a lot of this stuff the states are sort of forced to do by federal law because of the Help America Vote Act that was put in, you know, after the Bush v. Gore stuff. There are a lot of these rules that are federal, and I kind of question also, this is

a little bit strange to me. The federal judges in both Florida and Georgia required, uh required ballots to be counted even if the birth date on the ballot did not match the birth date on file. And I don't wonder how common it is for you know, states that the wrong birthdate on file for people, because I can't imagine someone actually writing their birthday wrong. I mean, everyone knows their own birthday, so a real voter is not

going to write their birthday wrong. Um. I kind of need to learn a little more about why they think that that, you know, why the judges keep finding that that, you know, it's unreasonable to have to require a birthday match. But I think that I think that there was I think that there was nothing particularly egregious through out of

the ordinary. In Georgia. It was probably a bad decision by Brian Kemp not to resign as Secretary of State before the election so that there wouldn't be the appearance that he's overseeing the same election that he's running in. Uh. You know, the Democrats I think got a lot of uh you know, they made a lot of noise on that point, and it sort of makes sense to say, look, if you're running for the you know you and I was saying on TV. I was like, yeah, it doesn't

look it doesn't look good. Whether it's right or not, it doesn't that, you know, I mean. And then right after the election he resigns and he says, Okay, now you someone else can count the votes. I don't know, I don't think he did himself any favors. I mean, Georgia is not a state where you know, fifty votes that we're saying. It's not that smaller Martin. But it's like, you know, it's like one percent basically, you know, Georgia and White. It's like one and one and a half

percent basically that he won by Georgia. She is she actually gonna lose that we gotta go to break here in second film, but she she actually pretty much done in your opinion, Abrams, Is she gonna lose? Yeah, So, I mean they'd say it's certified and she lost. It's just a matter if she might have some you know, legal theory about something, but it's it will not succeed.

I think more than anything, they're trying to keep Democrats stoked and fired up because they have a runoff in the Secretary of State race and they really want to elect a Democrat to that. All right, Phil Kirpin, President of American Commitment, Phil, great information on this man, Thank you so much for joining us on the show. All Right, have a good one, Zame. We got more coming up.

Stay with us. Background checks are a necessary part of the hiring process, and if you want to make sure that the people doing your background checks are not only the best in the business, but also all based here in the States, all American made and operated. That's Global Verification Network. Okay. Global Verification Network is the only dual certified and veteran owned background investigation and vetting company out there.

So whatever size company you run or are working with right now, small company all the way up through a fortune one hundred called Global Verification, and say look, I want to set up with you to be my background investigator. It's not hard to do and you'll be so happy you did. Call eight seven seven six nine five one seven nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Tell Global Verification that Bucks Sexton sentius.

They'll know you're part of team buck or if you wanted to do this online my GVN dot com again, my GVN dot com. You almost couldn't make it up if you were writing a novel. This is the second time him that Broward County has been a total disaster, and every time you turn around there's something weird going on. I mean, how do you I almost feel sad for him. How do you miss a deadline by two minutes? I mean, you know, you mess with by two hours for five hours,

but two minutes. So the whole thing is a fiasco. In those three counties, there's just consistently a mess, and I hope that the new governor and the new Attorney General are going to take steps, along with the Secretary of State to clean it up before the presidential election in two thousand twenty. There's been so many egregious acts out of Broward County. I wanted to be here for

the handry account today. It's going well today, but we've had to bring in tons of attorneys and be here to make sure that we could oversee this process that it was done fairly. It's not just that Democrats have done things in Florida and in Georgia that are unseemly. It's not just the Democrats have taken actions that are in violation and Florida and violation of state law. When I say violation of law, right, it doesn't it's not a criminal statute necessarily. But they've they have not done

what they're supposed to do. There there's you know, the government has or rather the election body such as it is in Broward County, has failed its responsibilities. But you have to remember that they also would be okay with cheating. And I don't I don't say that just to get a rise out of people. I don't say that they don't care and and there's a very important reason for that. They have told themselves, this is why their narratives matter

so much. They've told themselves that the election was stolen. So if you really believe the election was stolen, would you mind? I mean, how many Democrats that you know would be really upset if they found out that there was actual, active cheating going on in Florida to try to give you know, Gill him the governor's mansion and try to give the that that Senate seat to Nelson over the Santa I mean, how many people are over

um Scott. How many people do you think that you know that our Democrats would be really would be upset if they found out there was cheating and that the cheating help the Democrat win. I know very few Democrats, you know why because they think it's evening the score. This is why these lingering delusions that Democrats have about things like election was stolen, the oh the two thousand

election was stolen. They think to presidential elections were stolen. Well, if you're operating in that world, if if that is your mentality, as it is for mainstream Democrats across the country, not all of them, but a lot of them. I mean to say that if you walk into a room full of Democrats and say Trump still the election, I promise you not a single person and there will say that's just that's terrible. You can't so that. In fact, I guess about check their heads, Oh yeah, he stole it.

If you watch the HBO movie you know, recount from the two thousand election, somehow the Democrats who were clearly trying to cheat. We're the good guys, and that's what people really believe. The Supreme Court handed Bush that election, that's what they believe. Every recount that was done Bush one, but somehow Bush was the bad guy. This is why they're their lore. Really, Democrat mythology is so important because it creates an environment where, you know, they feel pretty

okay with cheating. They feel like they feel like it's justice. You know, you could almost feel, you could almost call what the Democrats are doing these elections redistributive electoral justice. You know, you guys cheated in two thousand, you guys meeting the Republicans. We gotta cheat a little bit, now, you know we got we gotta we gotta spread the

cheating around. That's there. That's how they view this. I'm telling you, Ah, Yes, the caravan, the border, board, of security, immigration, these are all things that we continue to talk about because we do not have resolution here, my friends. None of these problems have been solved, and in fact, I think they are getting worse. We are joined now by an expert in these matters, marcret Corey, and he's the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, Mark Great

to have you back on the program. Glad to be here. Thanks all right for first let's talk caravans, because because I was here in you know, right after the election last week at beginning this week, oh, no one talks about the caravan anymore. And then whoa, all of a sudden, the caravan, at least part of the caravan is at the border. Uh, should we expect that that a good contingent of the several thousand or so that we're part

of that initial caravan, we'll get to the border. And oh, by the way, aren't people showing up to the border illegally every day anyway? Yeah? Exactly. I mean there's two questions there, and the answer is, yet substantial portion of the people in that caravan are going to make it to the border. Some of them won't. Some of them will just stay in Mexico and it has an asylum system and they may figure, Okay, that's just easier. Some

of them have given up and gone home. But the last caravan, the one in the spring that was smaller than this but was the first one that really got attention, that started out of people, and five hundred of them made it to the border. So if you figure this caravan was, you know, seven thousand. If it's something similar the you know those share that get here, you know, could be two thousand or something like that. I mean, we don't know, but yeah, a substantial number are going

to make it to the California border. And the issue here about about asylum and asylum seekers, nothing has really changed your other. I mean, the administration has said, and Jeff's sessions that d o J has pushed that you can't you can't just be fleeing domestic violence, right. I mean there's some things now that they're saying, all right,

well you're that's not a valid asylum claim. But they're being told I mean I had a friend on a few days ago who's down with the caravan, and he says they're organizers and there are essentially workshops where these people are being told this is what you say to get into the country. I mean, how is this not an obvious scam at this point, Mark, I mean, what's the argument in favor of just letting anybody who claims to be from Central America, claims to be fleeing violence,

to jump the asylum process. Yeah, of course it's a scam. I mean if they're using asylum as a kind of ruse, a trick to get into the United States, because once they get past the border patrol um, they're basically home free. Because what they do is it's not so much that they're sneaking across the border and then asking for asylum. Some people do that, but the large bulk of people who do this just wait in line the inspection points, you know, the port of entry is the technical term

for it. When they get to the head of line, there's our immigration inspector and they say, you know, I fear going back to my home country, or I um, I have fear persecution in my home country. Again, like you said, they're coached on this. They have seminars on what are the things they're supposed to say, what not to say, and then they have an initial interview. And the law requires this. This is one of the problems.

It's called a credible fear interview. And what that basically means is they you know, I mean, the only way you fail that is if you say, you know, Mickey Mouse is communicating through my dental work, you know, that sort of thing. Any other plausible story you can make up, you pass that first hurdle. And that doesn't mean you apply for asylum. It means they let you into the country, they give you, you know, a court date, and then

they drop you off at the bus station. Uh. Sometimes they give you a goodie bag, uh, and then let you go. Half of those people who are let go with the understanding that they will apply for asylum, half of them never even bother to apply. The whole thing

was a scam, and they know it's a scam. The other half also, it's a scam for most of them because very few of them get asylum, but they'll go to a few hearings in order to actually get a work permit, because if your asylum claim stretches out more than six months, you get a work permit and a social Security number, and then after that you cannot show up anymore. You know. It's that's I mean, it's just the whole thing is absurd. It's scams. These are scams.

I mean, I you know, these are straight up scams, and everybody listening, I think knows that. And it's never talked about this way. It's always, oh, there are asylum seekers in most of the media, but as you know, and I know, these are scams. Uh, how do we fix this, though, Mark, I mean, how does this get

changed in a way that matters? Unfortunately, Chuck Schumer is the only way it's gonna get changed, by which I mean, Congress has to act, and the Republicans have uh introduced a number of measures that would plug some of these loopholes. The problem is the Democrats won't vote for them, and starting in January when they have one, when they also have the House, They're simply not gonna there's literally not going to be any possibility of keeping an effectively unlimited

number of Central Americans from coming into the country. I mean, the Democrats refuse to take the steps necessary to plug

these loopholes. I've been saying to some of the Democrats that I debate on this, Mark that under the standard, and I've spoken to both the current and former ICE Director and and Border Patrol director about this issue, and I didn't get to ask them this, but I've been I've been putting this out there, one of your take under the current standard, if they say the right things, all seven or so million Hondurans can get asylum basically or not so much. They may not get asylum in

these I'm sorry. I'm sorry they could show up and claim asylum and get in the country, is what I meant to say. Probably, you know, I mean, you know, nothing's ever perfect. Maybe there're only but I mean it's absurd. You know, it really is a completely ridiculous situation. The whole asylum system was never designed for this kind of assault. And you know, this is this really is um. It's not just Congress as fault, but it is the Obama

administration's fault as well. They basically got this going. They sort of primed the pump by UM letting people who were you know, Central Americans, especially if they had kids with them or if they were kids smuggled on their own up here. Uh, they let them in, no questions asked. Really, and that the word got back. I mean, you know, travels on the Grapevine. In fact, even back I sent

one of my UM team down there. Guy speaks Spanish, journalist at Politzer Prize winner, in fact, has lived in Mexico. He was talking to people at the McCallan, Texas bus station, which is where the border Patrol drops a lot of these people off if they crossed in that area. And the woman from Guatemala with her kids. She she came with a friend who brought her kids. They said, yeah, we were back in Guatemala and we were We saw it on CNN that if you brought your kid, they'd

let you go. And then we heard that somebody in our town did it, and they got and they did it, they got away with it, and so we figured he was worth to try. So that's why we're here. Wow, Mark, I gotta ask you. We're speaking to market Corey and executive director the Center of Immigration Studies. How is the Trump administration really done on the border, because this was a lot of promises. Obviously the wall probably the most notable one in terms of what people remember what was chanted.

But it feels look, it feels like very little of substance has been done. But maybe I'm just and cynical. You'd tell me there's a lot. There's been a lot of small improvements, even some big improvements in the sense that ice and border patrol now are allowed to do their jobs in a way that they really weren't under Obama or they had to apologize for it and look over their shoulder. But the real challenge now with the border is not something the wall could fix even if

Congress gave the president money for it. The problem is this asylum issue, and the president can't really fix that. There are some things he can try to do to tighten up. They've done some stuff. There's really not that much more they can do. And the President, rather than boasting that, you know, these people will not be allowed in, you know, I'll make sure that the caravan doesn't get in, he needed to be saying from day one, I'm gonna I don't really have the power to keep these people out.

You need to call Chuck Humor. The Senate Democrats have filibuster the changes necessary, and it's their fault. And every single one of these people getting in is getting in because of Chuck Schumer and he should be down there every day, Uh, you know, hammering Congress to do something about this because they cannot be let off the hook.

This is their responsibility and their fault. And the President by saying, you know, I'll be able to stop this, is giving people the impression that he has the authority to stop it, and then they're going to be disappointed when he can't. Yeah. Absolutely, Look, Mark, thank you for all your work on this. As always I'm getting pretty frustrated with the state of things, uh with with this administration in the border right now, but you know we'll stay on it. Cee I s dot Org right for

all the latest. You guys are doing a Center for Immigration studies. Yep, we got a blog every day and all our pubs and for people who like snark and sarcasm, I'm on Twitter at Mark s as In, Stephen Mark s pricorim alright, Mark, thanks so much, team, We'll be right back. Are you aware of the perception of many about how the power and the discretion at ice is being used to enforce the laws? And do you see any parallels. I do not see any parallels between I'm

talking about pipers and agents. I'm talking about perception. I do not see a parallel between what is constitutionally mandated as as it relates to forcing the law. Are you aware that there's a perception. Are you aware that there's a perception in the same category as the KKK? Is that what you're asking me? No, I'm very specific about what I'm asking. Are you aware of a perception? Kamala Harris is deeply unimpressive to me. I mean, even as

somebody that I disagree with on everything. I just everything that she says, everything that she doesn't like, she's just it's she's just be team, maybe even c team. And that was a complete outrage that whole situation there. So she was and look, she's a likely contender for the Democrats, as you know, already being talked about as oh Kamala

I was gonna run. She was comparing in that clip on a hearing on Capitol Hill U s Immigrations and Customs Enforcement to the ku klux Klan the k k K. During that hearing, she was asking Ronald Vitiello, the man at President Trump is hoping will lead ICE, whether he shares the whether he is aware of the perception that ICE is similar to the KKK. So this is such a slimy Democrat construction of the issue, right, this is

so underheaded, so grotesque. What they're really doing is saying, oh, well, we Democrats, who, by the way, last summer, we're chanting about the need to abolish ice, Abolish ice, abolish I remember those chants that sounded just like that. We Democrats created that whole movement of abolished ice because of what

was going on at the border. We Democrats created this ground swell of antipathy, of of disdain, of hatred for immigrations and customs enforcement because it serves their political needs, because because immigration and more specifically racial agitation. Because remember, whenever they're talking about immigration, they're really only talking about immigration from south of our border. I mean that they don't Democrats don't spend a lot of time on immigration

from the rest of the world. They're really just concerned with immigration from south of the border, and they view any effort to make that immigration orderly and legal as racist. That's what they're always saying. It's about the quote, you know, it's about the quote administration, the Trump administrations not liking brown people, right, that's what they always say, and Trump supporters not liking brown people, which is a hideous slur, but that is what they do. That's that's the storyline.

But Kamala Harris here is asking him. So basically, we've we've created that. Have you heard this rumor that ICE is as bad as the KKK KKK, which was responsible, as you know, for horrific lynching and mutilation of black Americans also people, I forget. KKK was very anti Semitic, anti Jewish attack Jews, very anti Catholic as well, but primarily and predominantly opposed to and you know, viciously targeted African Americans. And oh, by the way, they're Democrats, right,

the KKK were Democrats. That always gets left out of this conversation somehow. But who who what was the part of the KKK? Oh, that's write democrats. What was the party of of slavery in the South, Let's write democrats? What was the party of segregation? And Jim Crow, Oh, my gosh, who could have guessed Democrats? And now they're now they're the the heroes of of the of the story when it comes to minority rights, at least in their own telling of it. It's an amazing It's an

amazing turnabout, isn't it. Well, that's that is where we are now. Um I would just note that what Kamala Harris does here is is similar to say, it's similar to if you were the person in high school that was responsible for spreading a rumor and then you went up to the and it was a really terrible, nasty rumor that was meant to you know, hurt someone's reputation and and then you went up to them and I'm just like, well, I just want to know, do you

know about that rumor? Do you know about that that's basically Kamala Harris is doing. Do you know about the perception created by Democrats that ICE operated away some of the k A. By the way, this is a stupid thing to say. Anyone who let me just go and look for that. Anyone who believes that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is similar to a racist paramilitary organization that was ascended predominantly around what the nineteen twenties into the nineteen thirties,

forties and fifties. Uh. Anyone who believes that though that the k k K is in any way similar to ICE is a moron is a moron. Do you know that there's a large percentage of veterans who work for ICE. I think it's about twenty of ICE employees are actually veterans. So that that doesn't get brought up enough because they're trashing Democrats are actually trashing veterans who are now serving their country in another way. Um, So that that's one

part of this. And then also you know there's ICE has a diverse makeup and there are a lot of people in ICE who are of uh Latino or other minority extraction themselves. Right, So this idea that the KKK though, and this is a stupid point, but come out Harris uh pushes it because trashing ICE is good politics for Democrats,

but it's we're taking a step back from it. What does that say about the Democratic Party that a a completely legitimate and necessary law enforcement agency is something they're willing to They're willing throw in the bus. Meanwhile, the FBI, which did at the top level engage in a complete abuse of power to try to stop Trump from being president the whole and the and the c I a

my former agency, right that group of international nerds. Uh, you know, they they did stuff that was egregious and the and the Democrats will go, oh my gosh, they're serving our country, the FBI and CIA. How dare you only now? I mean that they'll trash the FBI and c I at the first side. And that's the thing with Democrats where they're talking about ICE or anything else. They have no consistent principles. They only like lawn for worsenon when it suits them. They trash law enforcement when

it doesn't. And Senator Harris. It's just a perfect example of this. You've probably heard me talk about snippy dot com a little bit, which is a new social media site. Well, if you've looked at snippy dot com and left, I'm telling you you've got to go back and look again. Thousands of my listeners have joint snippy dot com and now they're expressing their opinions and stirring up lively conversations. Snippy is an unbiased social media platformat's all about conversation

and community. Snippy not only encourages freedom of expression, but guarantees its users the ability to discuss topics freely without suppression from administrators. Snippy is a place where everyone is free to express their thoughts and share their opinions. It is totally free to join, open to everyone, and unlike Facebook, they're not hiring APO firms to check out what's going on with senators and trying to smear their arrivals these days, folks. So trust me, Snippy dot com is a place you

should check out. Let your opinion matter, no shadow bedding, no suppression of conservative thought ever. Now with an updated user interface and exciting new features, also filmed on the Apple App Store, and available for Android. Snippy, your new alternative social media is agitated about which TV I'm not agitated to. The whole thing is a hocus. There was no collusion, No, not at all. No, I'm very happy. I'm very happy with the White House. I'm extremely happy

with our country. We're doing better when the economy. Maybe it's the best economy we've ever had. They may be the best unemployment numbers and employment numbers that we've ever had. There are more people working in the United States right now at this moment that have ever worked in the United States by by far, by far. I'm extremely happy. I'm very happy with almost all of my cabinet. And you know, changesn't made because they're always made, especially after

mid terms. But it's all fake news. It's all fake news, folks. This whole Maller probe things garbage, absolute garbage. And the journalists, the people who have been pushing this so hard, they should honestly be embarrassed. They should, they should receive a real repudiation from the general public for their work on this issue. But they won't because the Malla probe all along has been about one thing and one thing only,

just hashtag resistance, stop Trump, hurt Trump. Many many powerful people have decided that this was the this was the path to do it, and the whole thing. It's just it's just hurt the country. By the way, we've learned these people who took it, Oh it's about election security and stopping the Russians. That that was all. That was all nonsense. We're not stopping the road. You can't stop

the Russians from doing that. Facebook, by the way, you trust Facebook now, Oh yeah, we're gonna trust Facebook to be the ones that are policing this stuff. Good luck with that. I think. I think with the news of the day, news for this week, we're all a little more aware of Oh maybe Facebook operates like a very self interested private corporation with way too much power. And it's not just some like oh gee, like we're just a Silicon Valley companies started by some college kids that

you know, it's just been so successful. It's not that simple. It's not that simple at all. In fact, Facebook has a tremendous amount of power as a media platform. It is not a utility. It does not act like a utility. It does not see itself as a utility. We all have to remember that. You know, Trump was was going after them a little bit on Twitter, which I I can appreciate. I was this was yesterday when I was in I was in Springfield, but I saw these tweets.

Here's what he wrote. The inner workings of the Muller investigation are a total mess. They have found no collusion and Canna have gone absolutely nuts. They're screaming and shouting at people horribly, threatening them to come up with answers they want. They are a disgrace to our nation and don't care how many lives they him. This is from Trump himself, Folks. These are angry people, including the highly conflicted Bob Muller who worked for Obama for eight years.

They won't even look at all the bad acts and crimes on the other side. A total witch hunt like no other in American history. All caps on those universities will someday study what highly conflicted and not Senate approved Bob Muller and his gang of Democrat thugs have done to destroy people. Why is he protecting crooked Hillary Comey McCabe, Lisa Page and her lover Peter Struck and all of his friends on the other side. The only collusion is

that of the Democrats and many others. Why didn't the FBI take the server from the d n C. They still don't have it. Check Out how biased Facebook, Google, and Twitter are in favor of the Democrats. That's the real collusion. You know. The President, I like when he lets it ripped like this. I like when he decides that, you know, it's it's time to take the gloves off a little bit and and let people know what's what's really going on, what's really on his mind too. And

I know he does it on a regular basis. I'm just saying I like it. I like it. Meanwhile, you got, you know, on the on the other side, Schilmer, track Schumer. He's out there and he's saying that they should pass legislation. You want to talk about a constitutional crisis. Now the Congress thinks they get to dictate what the executive branch does within its discretion. Play play the Schumer clip, please.

We should pass legislation now in the Lame Duck to protect the Special Counsel's investigation from the President and from his woefully unqualified henchman, Mr. Whittaker. Woefully unqualified. This guy has been d O j Attorney general, chief of staff, has been a U. S. Attorney for a state, and he's woefully unqualified. Democrats and they just make it all up as they go along. That doesn't really matter. I'll just say what they'll say, whatever they have to say.

In the moment, you get the intended political effect, the intended impact on their base for their base, that's that's the game that they play. That's what they are up to. And the whole thing is absolutely preposterous. But you got these questions, and so this is the big looming thing right now. You have these questions that originally they thought maybe Mueller was gonna try and force the president under oath, essentially forced the president into a perjury trap, and that

was the ideal. That's been the idea along. And now you've got written answers coming along. And Trump got quite a bit of attention because he spoke about this. Is when when he's asked about the written answers that he's going to give to the Mueller probe, here's what the President says, play clif nine lawyer. Yeah, my lawyers aren't working on that. I'm working at that. I write an answers. My lawyers write answers. I write answers. I was asked

a serious of questions. I've answered them very easily, very easily. I'm sure they're tricked up because you know, they like to catch people. G you know, was the weather sunny or was it rainy? He said it may have been a good day, it was rainy. Therefore he told a lie. He perjured himself. Okay, so, uh, you have to always be careful when you answer questions with people that probably have bad intentions. But um no, it's uh, the questions were very routinely answered by me, by me me the

special thing, and you you submitted. I haven't submitted him yet. We just I just finished him. As you know, I've been a little bit busy. He has been a little busy. Bres In tends to be busy. But they're they're making a big deal of this too with the questions. Uh, they're they're saying that you know, he's you know, he's lying about answering the questions. They just can't they just can't let it go. My friends, they won't. They won't let it go. Oh. They they're very disappointed by the

press corps. They're very disappointed that Mueller is not forcing a real constitutional crisis and a showdown by sitting down with the president trying to get him in a perjury trap, because that's the only way they're gonna get him. I I repeat, I know I've said this too so many times, but Russian collusion is a dumb idea. Even if somebody was willing to do it, it's not even a smart plan. Never mind all the risks and all the stuff that comes.

It's not even something that Russian collusion was such a threat to our election integrity that while this so called collusion was going on, the people were looking at it. Everybody was a suvier. Hillary was gonna win. It was only a problem when she lost. Don't lose sight of that. This was this was a nothing burger, and they knew it was a nothing burger till every lost. You see the same mentality in Florida. You see the same mentality

in Georgia. They can't accept reality. There's always an excuse for they didn't get their way, always an excuse for why they didn't win every single time. So that's what's going on with the smaller problem. I hope it ends soon. I hope it ends before Christmas. But I think it's going to extend pretty deep in the next year. It's just a shame. It's a shame. But the good thing is Trump's a brawler and he's gonna come out on top of this. When you watch it's so easy for

hackers to get your information. All it takes is one little slip up on your end, My friend, they get all your stuff. If you're using public WiFi, who knows what the security protocols are in place? And never mind if you travel a lot, you really want to be protected because you've got important financial information, personal information, all that going over your phone, your laptop. Use Express VPN.

A VPN is a virtual private network. Think of this like a security system for your computer or smartphone, and Express VPN is the best in the business. If you want to keep hackers and spies from seeing your data, you need Express VPN. So protect your online activity today and find out how you can get three months free at Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package. Is it Express vpn dot com slash

buck To learn more. Seam one of the trends that I've noticed takular the last couple of years. Is that the stuff that we used to say during the Obama era, early on in the Obama era, the stuff that we used to bring up as this is what they want to do, this is where this is going. We always end up being right and they say, oh no, no, and the left, the Democrats, they claimed that's a strong man. That's not a real thing. They're not gonna we would

never do that. And then you fast forward a couple of years, maybe three or four years, and all of a sudden, oh yeah, I know they want to do that thing. That thing that we used to illustrate how state is or authoritarian or destructive of their argument is that that thing that we're all concerned, they want to

do that thing. And then we're supposed to pretend like we didn't see this coming and that we don't believe that we can tell the next step right, because it's one when when you keep getting it right, because remember, it's not really so much about predicting the future as about assessing the trajectory. That's a different thing. You know, if I see a car that's driving down the road and I say, well, you know, I think that car

is going to be approximate. If it's going sixty miles an hour, it's going to be a mile ahead in one minute. You know, I'm just taking a pretty good educated guess on how things are going, and the same

things to a progressives. You can't tell everything they're gonna do, and we can't tell the future in general, but you know, the overall direct and something's moving, kind of like how even the smartest people that I know, for the most part, in the stock market, they can tell you where they whether they think an investment will work, but they generally can't tell you in exactly what time frame. That's very,

very hard to do. We can tell where Democrats are going with stuff, whether it's on transgender rights, it's on healthcare. Oh my god, it used to be um that they would never push for single payer. Oh no, remember earlier two thousand nine, that's a strong man argument. Obama didn't want single pair of healthcare, and now our's now they're saying,

oh yeah, no, single pair, that's that sounds cool. We like single pair, and many of us, myself included in two thousand and ten and eleven and twelve, well not ten, because I was told in government but eleven and twelve and we're saying this is all heading a single pair. Obamacare is not that good. There's actually some interesting new studies that show that, yes, some people benefit, but most of the people affected by Obamacare get kind of screwed

by it. So it's a bad law on balance, is bad. Um, But we've been saying for a while that it's heading toward a single party, and sure enough, now that's what they're pushing for. We've been saying for a while they want to give illegals, uh, not just in state tuition and driver's license, which now they're doing, but also Obamacare access for illegal aliens, which which was a part of Hillary Clinton. So so we can usually tell where this

stuff is going. And then with transgender rights, as you know, oh, we would never we would never tell twelve year old you know, girls, they have to shower with the twelve year old boy in school. We would never. Oh no, they are doing that. Now they are doing that. And we would never encourage people who are miners who are still adolescents to get a you know, sex change. Uh, you know medicine started for hormones. Oh no, they are

doing that. They in fact to push for these things. Well, guns is another place where one of the reasons that the debate over guns breaks down so quickly, and there are many of them, um and and in recent years at least, the left is finally figured out that they can't just keep trying to put these people forward as anti gun spokespersons who know nothing about guns or gun laws. They're they're just now they still do it sometimes. I mean, you'll see things written by David Hogg, who is now

an activist. He's no longer just somebody who you know is under eighteen or just eighteen or no, he's an activist. He's held up by the media. He's part of the public discussion. He says a lot of dumb things. Uh. But you look at what's been said for a while now in these discussions, and we always say, look, the only way you can realistically even hold these positions, you know, an assault weapon restriction, for example, is a joke. It's

not gonna stop anyone from doing anything. In fact, in New York after Sandy Hook, they passed these regulations that that changed the cosmetic features of some so called assualt rifles, and now there's assault weapon and assault rifle and these can be different designations and they are sometimes legally codified. So now we do have to refer to an assault weapon or assault rifle. And you know, yeah, it gets very you know, there's a lot of a lot of

detail and complications on this. But what they did in New York, which brings you back to uh Cuomo, nobody needs a thousand rounds to kill a dear. No one must have a heat seeking stinger missile to shoot quail. It is not necessary for a gatling gun to be in your hands to go shoot a squirrel. Those that you might remember, You might remember that speech um back in the day. But anyway, John, do you don't know what I'm talking about? The Cuomo speech about the name

you were? You were with me it was remember remember that. Yeah, nobody needs a nuclear missile in order to stop a number of these ten violets to kill a deer. There we go, Oh man, maybe the deer's moving kind of fast. Maybe that deer, you know, it took a little PCP beforehand, it's got a little extra oomph. You know that deer

has been working out who knows. Anyway, the assault rifle restrictions they put in place in New York involved changing the stock and the size of the magazine, so that does nothing, and that that does not make it less lethal. It it does absolutely nothing. And and then in Connecticut, which is where Sandy Hook happened, they they they essentially outlawed unless you register different assault rifles. So that really just a R a R fifteen type rifles. Um and

I know that's not even really a thing. It's a buck. There's semi on a semi o a matter hunting rifles that nothing like the A R. I know, but we can't. You know, we'll go to ammal Land and talk about this another time. Uh. But it didn't do anything and make anybody safer. We've been saying that they're gonna push for more bands because only all out bands are going to do anything, even theoretically. In reality, bands don't work either.

And now here we are. The news that makes me think about, uh, think about this is that you know, you've had people like Eric Swallowell, for example, who has proposed um A is essentially just that, you know, forcing gun owners to uh, forcing gun owners to sell their firearms. Now, I gotta tell you that that was back in back in May that this first came up that Swallow who's running for president by the way. Um, but you're gonna

hear more about this. You're gonna hear more about the assault rifle, assault rifled bands because people are uh, you know, people are are focused in on guns as the enemy, guns as the bad guys. But we can always tell. So so there's this, there's this bright Sorry I got I got jammed up between two different pieces of This is Breitbart piece, uh that talks about how Eric Swalwell on you know, on Twitter, was talking about an assault

weapons buy back program. This is this is in California, and you know that you're you're going to hear more of this. Um, you're going to hear more about about how the left wants to ban right, you know, because this is all part of what the base. But I just wish we could be more honest about it. I just wish that they would just say this all the time. We just want to ban guns. Stop saying it's about background checks. You want to ban ownership of guns. Swallowell

and others want to ban ownership of guns. Swallow on Twitter, this was just oh, this is this morning. That's what came up my feed. Joe Biggs wrote Representative Swalwell. So Swallow wants a war because that's what you would get. You're out of your mind if you think I'll give up my rights and give the government all the power. Swallow'll responded to them and it would be a short war. My friend. The government has nukes, too many of them, but they're legit. I'm sure if we talked we could

find common ground to protect our families and communities. And then Biggs rope back. I don't know who this guy Bigs is. So our government with nuke it's own country to take guns away? Wow? Oh to be fair. Um, So Swallow is the guy who back in May was pushing the assault weapons ban and now he's it's come up once again. This is a stupid position that these people in government take. Oh, well, the government has nukes, so a R fifteens don't mean anything. Nope, that's not

how it works. Um. In fact, look at places around the world where the government has been unable to subdue an insurgency or subdue a rebellion, no matter what kind of firepower and has I mean, look at the Soviets in Afghanistan, and look at us in Afghanistan. And we're not willing to kill masses of civilians and destroy entire cities and villages the way the Sylvie It's were. But you know it's not. If you've got an armed populace,

it's a very difficult thing to control. But we're heading toward more talk of just outright bands because they've lost the arguments over background checks and everything. That's just window dressing. They want to take your guns, folks, They want to take your guns. That's where this is heading. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. Oh, team, I missed you so indeed, I was out in the home of Lincoln himself,

Mr Mr Abraham Lincoln. Although if you've seen the Lincoln movie with Daniel day Lewis for sure reason he thinks Lincoln shounds like this, like why is his voice so weird and high? I never under stood that. But anyway, yeah, I was in I was in Springfield, Illinois, had a very good time. Went to Malden Nurse, which those of you who know Springfield know what I'm talking about. It probably the most most famous restaurant in Springfield. I had a burger no bun. What's up? Oh, that reminds me.

I started quite a a frenzy online. John, I'm gonna need you to weigh in on this one. I like pickles when they're good. Some pickles are low quality, and pickles can be very tasty. I obviously love burgers. They are a gift from God to humanity when it comes to cuisine. I don't understand why people think that you should just put pickles on burgers. I think we need to just all finally come together and accept that pickles don't go with burgers as an addition on top of them.

On the side, I'm fine with it, but when I get my burger there's already pickles on it, and I'm like, I don't want pickles, John, where do you weigh in on this one? I don't mind pickles on my burger, but I just realized when I get a burger with pickles on it, I'll take the pickles off and eat them first. Of course you do, John, You're not a savage. See, That's what I'm trying to say. You brought this up, and I never realized that I was doing that until

just now. Yeah. You always get You're always like, oh, pickles, Okay, I'll get rid of them. Nobody really wants pickles on their burger. Some of you are saying, oh, no, Buck, I love pickles. I'm like, no, no, it's pickle propaganda. You've been lied to all these years. They forced fed you these pickles with your burger. It's like Pavlov. They've trained you. You salivate when you see the pickles on the burger, But no, you just want the burger. I got a lot, a lot of intense opinions on this one.

That happened, a lot of intense opinions. All right, Catherine, First up in roll call, We're gonna do a double roll cos I missed you all very much. I didn't get a hang, although of course I heard Raheem did a great job, and yes he has a cool accent. I'mna have to ask him for permission to just so I can keep up, be like Raheim? Can I do it? Can I do at least part of a show in a British accent? Just because that would be fun for me? Right, would be like, get out of you? What are you

talking about? Crazy man? Uh? Catherine writes, Hi, Buck, love your show and I got my sister hooked on your show too, well, Catherine, love you too, thank you so much. We both listen to podcast. However, she is not happy with you right now since it appears that there's no longer the ability to download older podcasts from your website or even download podcasts under an ancient MP three player.

He does not have iTunes, that is not it does not have the capability download apps and just I heart help unless you bring back that capability of loss as a listener, can you help us out here? John, I don't know what's going on. Have we changed the way we put our podcast stuff up? I don't know. Everything is the same. I don't know if the platforms have changed as the website. Did we do something on the land of the websites under maintenance right now? So I

don't know what's going on. Yeah, it's up to the platforms to allow you to download, I think, but I'll look into it and now I'll confer with Quinlin and see what's going on. Yeah, we gotta check out with Quinn. Alright, fair enough, also known as Mike, producer Mike who is that a he's tonight? We gave producer Mike the day off because the the wedding. He's gotta be there, you know, he's gonna show. He's gonna show some moves on the dance floor. You know through some Mike you move pretty good?

Saw you on the dance floor, you move pretty good? Uh, Catherine, thank you so much for turning your sister onto this one. I promise we we'll try to address this. I'll up pass this to Mike and we'll send it to the people who actually understand technology and see we can get this one fixed. Because every every listener counts, every listener matters, and I want all of you listening, please, when somebody brings up podcasts, you gotta be like, do you know

the Buck Sexton podcast? You've got to listen to it. I really hope that's what happens. Ryan writes Buck, these guys are the best live bearded dot com. They have great products and tutorials, how to videos in the whole nine yards, beard oil, butter wash, and other beard products. Wow. First of all, you guys can't see Ryan. I can. Ryan has an incredible beard. Ryan has the kind of beard with a guy some duck dynasty would look at

them and be like, have beard, that's real beard. I mean they would really respect the beard because the serious beard he's got um as to whether I'm gonna grow on or not, I don't know. I gotta I gotta give it a little bit of thought. Um, it depends, I don't you know. Grow First of all, it's red, so i'd have a red beard. Think about that. My my facial hair grows in red, which I think is some kind of a there's some kind of a genetic trait that you can inherit red beard, red bearded nous.

Because my hair is my uh, my head hair is not red. I guess what you gotta call it, right head hair instead of my face hair. Uh. Michael, Wow, Wow, Michael sending in a photo. I wish I could show this to you guys. Hey, buck, listen to the podcast on delay, as we don't get the show in terrestrial. I just know that I know of here in Houston. I listen to Second on facial hair. I feel that the standalone mustache a winner. That said, only Tom can really pull off the magnum p. I as a firefighter,

we can't grow beard. So I am any of my brother's rock the handlebar, I say go for it. Michael has what Ryan had in a beard just a moment ago from the photo Michael has with a a a rocking mustache. I mean, this guy's mustache is he looks like one of those old posters of the shirtless guys who are boxing, you know, with kind of the hands put out in front of him. You know, wanta wanta want to be pugilists from the nineteen twenties. He's got that kind of a mustache. It's legit, very very very

well done, Michael. I have to say, I am I am duly, duly impressed with your your facial hair prowess. Leanna. Right, so Acosta gets his pass back, But does President Trump have to call on him? Why doesn't he mix it up and call on a reporter two to three rows back? Now, Leanna, I think you're right, and that's probably gonna happen here. They're just not gonna give a Costa the ability. They're gonna have to set the rules, which I'm amazed they

didn't already have rules, but apparently they don't. Uh, They're they're gonna have to set the rules for what is acceptable decorum, and then they'll have to call on other people. And if a cost Of throws a tantrum, then I think they can give him his due process and say by he wasn't even kicked out of the White House. But this whole thing is such a non story story, it really is. But you know it's because it involves You always gonna remember anything that involves the media, the

media cares a lot more about. That's just that's just the way that we are. I mean, yeah, I'm technically part of the media. You know, the little radio about a hundred twenty five stations across the country, you know, it is what it is um as well as obviously the Hill dot com Rising every morning. Uh by the way, those of you haven't checked it out of if you

want the Hill dot tv slash Rising. And the truth is, you can just look at the segments and click on the ones that you look at the guests or you know, look at the panel and see who's on it and click and see if you wanna wat You don't have to sit there while the interview like sorrows if you don't want to, because we do have some of those, and when we do have some very left wing well that would actually be a great segment, but I mean left wing opinionators that come on. You don't have to

sit through that. If you don't want to, you can watch all of Rising a la carte. So but it is a bipartisan show, so just be prepared. You know, you know this, this is pure buck on radio. It's only fifty percent buck on because I got a co host and she's she's great, but she's a liberal, So it's only fifty percent pure buck there, Uh, Stephen, right, buck Listen to comments about the Wisconsin election. One thing that comes to mind, if not for the oh no,

you already read that one, sorry, Stephen. Stephen also said should go for a full out battle beard shields high. Well, you know, Stephen, I remember when I was told when I was just a we just a wee CIA analyst, you know, trying to trying to find his sea legs.

I was told by some very here in c I A folks, not actual veterans, but veterans in the in the CIA, Um, don't be the guy who shows up into the war zone when you're gonna be doing you know, analytic uh, analytic assessments and reports and yeah, you know, get outside the wire a little bit. But you know you're not You're not a door kicker. You're not You're not a snake eater, not by a mile. Don't be the guy who's like, I just got here, time to

grow a beard right away? You know, there's something if you're interacting with locals in Afghanistan, it makes more sense because they look at people without beards kind of like huh. But yeah, I did not. I did not go for a battle beard then, which I think was clearly the right move. Um then as to going for a battle beard, now, I do battle the libs on a regular basis, So I feel like I feel like that gives me some some leeway on the subject matter. I think that's possibly

something to consider. I just don't know how to get None of you have told me how I get past the itchy phase? You know, John, did you ever grow a beard? I have a beard? Now what? John? You just blew my mind. I haven't seen you in weeks. You saw me last Friday. Because now you just blown up my night, just blown up my spot and make me see him like you know, self involved talent over here doesn't pay attention to his below. You were two into your black Rifle, coffee and h Man New York

and looking forward to seeing everybody. DJ John is lighting me up. All right, Well, I'm gonna you know what I'm gonna. I'm gonna throw a towel here, take a quick, quick pause, we'll come back. We'll finish rod call. Stay with me. The show ain't over yet, folks. Keeping it real, it's time for roll. Call that bad. That's why I think that might be my favorite role call. It just it sets us off the way. Although we did just play dub separal call, which is funny because I don't

even think dubstep is a thing anymore. Like other people listening to this show, I bet less than one percent have listened to dub step in the last month. I remember for a while that guy scrill X with a little cigarette dangling out of his mouth, was just you know, blasting out people's ear drums all across the country. But things change, all right. Joe whoops, Sorry I hit the mic there, Joe right stashes Buck. Oh wait, we got a lot from Joe here. Buck. Listen to your recent show.

We talked about beardness and opinions. Here it goes scratchy beard chin. Yep. The first two weeks are the worst. Once the hair grows out enough that it's not constantly poking you you're in the clear. Beard hygiene is also important. It's like washing your hair, decent shampoo and get in and give the skin roots a good scrub. It sounds gross and silly, but it gets overlooked by some people. Huh, interesting stashes. You could totally roll the nice handlebar, nice accessory,

that badass quaff on your nogging. Although the whole wax thing is a pain as well as the period of time, and it's too short to shape wax, but long enough to get into anything you're eating drinking. My humble opinion, it's just one more thing to have to do. But I'm an old curmudgeon. Now, wow, Joe is like Joe is like, you know, ninth degree black belt in in

beard and stash. I got a lot I gotta I know, I knew this audience there there Look, there's some things where I can crowdsource at a world class level every time to this audience. No question right. Questions about American history done, questions about World War Two done, questions about meat the proper cooking thereof done? Firearms done? And yes, facial hair. Facial hair also falls into the category. Here, could I pull off a handlebar? I don't know. I

don't know. Some of you should just send me your your favorite periods where you had facial hair, you know, So you should just send in to the Facebook and facebook dot com slash buck sex and show me your adventures and facial hair and maybe that will inspire me

team to engage in my own facial hair adventure. Although I will tell you that there's a part of me that worries a little bit that if I did get this whole thing going, that management at the Hill where I have to appear on TV every day would be like, uh, you look like a cross between a toddler and a lumberjack. So we're gonna We're gonna cut, We're gonna shut this one down. Um yeah, Mike, right Buck, it's Mike from Canada picking you up on podcasts and loving it for

close to three years. Now, well, thank you, Mike. I like you and a chocolate lover. Indeed, Mike, chocolate is one of my weaknesses. Where we really differ is that I enjoy it wrapped around nuts. I know you don't, and I was very close to triggering when you dissed those of us who do. Now I see you don't appreciate a good deal. Pickle on your burger side? What up? Can we agree at least in the fact that Krispy

Bacon takes a burger to the Promised Land. Anyway, Beyond all that, I truly hope you in the other conservative voices can begin to sway millennials to the light. Cheers and godspeed buck Um. Okay, Mike, First of all, I love you, my brother up from the North, so thank you so much for writing in. As the chocolate and nuts, I'm I'm not. I'm not always opposed to chocolate with nuts. I do like a good chocolate bar with some almonds and a little sea salt. I can get down with that.

And chocolate covered nuts. I'm actually fine with it's nuts in brownies. Where I throw a red flag, I'm sorry, I throw a flag. We are civilized people, We are not savages. We did not put nuts in brownies. Nobody wants nuts in brownies. Nobody. Okay, this is just a fiction that we've all been led to. Oh, somebody will want them, so I'll put them in and ruin the brownies for everybody. No, false, do not do it. We

do not want it's in the brownies. Um. And as to the pickle on the burger, Mike, you're Canadian, so I guess that's how they do it up North. That's all I can say. Man, Here in America, we don't. Actually I'm wrong, because they put pickles and McDonald's and put pickles on the burgers all the time. But it's a salty vegetable you're putting on top of your burger. It interferes with the taste of the delicious burger. I know.

As to bacon, Mike, of course, of course. My burger that I had out in uh Springfield, Illinois yesterday, of course it had bacon on it. It was it was an option. I said, Bam, make that happen. Bacon is one of the foods that I honestly eat most commont I I eat bacon of different kinds and varieties. I even have I even keep some panchetta, which is very versatile in the fridge. Pancetta is fruit fruit bacon. But you can't make fun of it because it's still bacon. Debra, Right,

why is Judge Kavanaugh being replaced already? I didn't know where to put my question, Debra, I don't know what you're talking about. But thank you for the question. Taylor writes, Absolutely, grow a beard and a mullet if you're feeling a little rednecky. Um, I could definitely do a mullet. I'm pretty sure my parents, God bless them, let me have

a mullet for part of my grammar school years. I definitely had the hair that kind of like flipped up at the bottom, you know, not not really a full mode, kind of a baby mold baby mullet. Um. But yeah, there you have it. But asked to that, wow, wow, Taylor's beard. Taylor's beard is zz top level. Taylor's beard is and he's posed with a large ant lurd animal that I'm assuming he killed himself so or he just really likes to wear the color orange and found some

road kill. But I'm gonna guess that he killed this very very impressive. Is that a prong horn? I can't even tell what it is? But well, don Taylor. Taylor's beard is amazing. Erin rights, hey, buck, do the beard during the itchy leave a little conditioner in neck beard's okay if you grow it long, if you keep it close crop to bass business attire, no neck beard if all else fails asked Mr Mola Shields. Hi, well, Aaron,

thank you so much. Oh even John just sent me a photo because I'm down in d C is up in New York. Thank you John. That'll keep me safe and warm, knowing that John's beard is fully grown in. All right, everybody, have a fantastic weekend, have a great time. I will see you Monday. Shields High, Facebook, Google, Some of these companies we're finding out and have kind of known for a while. They've got agenda's folks, and they're

not conservative that much is for sure. Do you really trust the corporate types over at Google to protect your Gmail or Yahoo to protect your hotmail account? I don't know. You can check out I patriots dot Us, however, which is a new conservative alternative to those liberal based email services. I patriots dot us is secure, private, and includes more of what you want without all the ads and spam. With I Patriots you get thirty gigs of cloud storage,

larger attachment sizes, and much more. They've got great encryption and they won't sell your information or support liberal agendas like a lot of those other free email providers. I patriots dot Us emails compatible with most mobile devices. Show your Patriot. Go to I Patriots dot us now, choose your membership program and input your desired I Patriots email addresser and check out. Enter promo code buck that's b u c K for ten percent savings during your first year of membership