When Will The Impeachment Charade End?

with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American. Ready, you're a great American? Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy? Is buck Sexton? No, Hey, everyone, and welcome to the buck Sexton Show. It's Madison Jessieto here in the Hut today for Buck Sexton in New York City. Thank you so much for being with us today. And we have a lot to get to, but you know, I got to start with impeachment. This might be the world's driest impeachment trial ever. The ratings are down. We've

heard it over and over again. Why because no one is watching. It's a joke, and the American people know that there's a million better things we could be doing than watching this because it has no constitutional grounds. I mean, there's no reason for it. And everybody recognizes. I mean, even many Democrats that I talked to have recognize the fact that since the day this president was elected, they

do nothing. Democrats have devoted all their time and their energy to try and to remove our duly elected president from office. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, they've all lied since the very beginning. And of course their behavior is despicable. But it's no surprise because as we've seen time and time again, the elite is left and the mainstream media have not only continually smeared in Trump, but

they smeared his supporters. Buck talked about this yesterday in regards to the Don Lemons, and they're totally out of touch with the American people. And I really wonder if some of them have even read the Constitution. But you know, we have to get real here. Why are they doing this? Their actions are out of fear, fear of knowing that not one of their Democratic socialist candidates has a chance

to beat President Trump. In November, and we watched President Trump's defense team and including Pambondi, dismantle three days of the Democrats case in just two hours, correctly pointing out, of course, the lack total lack of qualifications for Hunter Biden to serve on the board of Barisma while he meanwhile got paid tens of thousands of dollars a month. Insane. Imagine if this was Donald Trump Junior, what they do

to him. Pam Bondi, of course, also referenced clip of Joe Biden antagonizing Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who is looking into corruption or to lose a billion dollars in loan guarantees from the Obama Biden administration. And I have one question, you know, isn't that quid pro quo exactly what they want to accuse President Trump of? But now you know they want to say that they're going to come save the day with John Bolton. He's so credible, he's so great. What he has to say is so important.

But let's look back to two thousand and five, what did Adam Ship had to say about him. Then let's check out this clip the president and that is nuclear terrorism. Mister Bolton has been a wall. He's more focused on the next job than doing well at the last job. And particularly given the history where we've had the politicization

of intelligence over WMD. Why we would pick someone who the very same issue has been raised repeatedly, and that is John Bolton's politicization of the intelligence he guard in Cuba and on other issues. Why we want someone with that lack of credibility? I can't understand. Why would we want someone with that lack of credibility? I can't understand. This is Adam Shift two thousand and five talking about

John Bolton. Well, if you think that's too I'll let's take a listen to Adam Shift in twenty eighteen in clip three talking about John Bolton once again. Well, I think Bolton is not only a bad choice, it's honestly difficult to consider a worst choice. This is someone who's likely to exaggerate the dangerous impulses of the president towards belligerents, his proclivity to act without thinking, and his love of conspiracy theorists theories. And I'll just add one data point

to what you were talking about earlier. John Bolton once suggested on Fox News that the Russian hack of the DNC was a false flag operation that had been conducted by the Obama administration. So You add that kind of thinking to Joe Degeneva, and you have another big dose of reality in the White House. So the Bolton appointment really scares me on Iran, on North Korea, on feeding

this kind of conspiracy thinking about the President. But the firing of Doubt also ought to alarm all of us because it's yet another signal that he intends to have a much more aggressive approach to Bob Muller, and we're I think, a step closer to a potential firing of Bob Muller twenty eighteen. It's difficult to consider a worse choice. You have another big dose of unreality in the White House. This is what Adam Schiff had to say about John Bolton.

Credible not credible. It seems that it's a choice of convenience for Adam Schiff as to when he considers Bolton to be credible. But of course, none of this changes the fact that the allegations in the book don't even change the key facts and the impeachment. We have legal scholars across the country talking about the fact that nothing in the revelations, even if proven to be true, would rise to the level of an abuse of power or

an impeachable offense. And of course we have glaring issues in the New York Times story on the leaked manuscript. Not only does it omitdract quotes from the manuscript, it doesn't cite named sources. And of course, what a convenient time to leak the info the same day, same time pre orders are made available for John Bolton's book on Amazon. Not surprising. And if none of this is enough, let's listen to John Bolton himself, in the words of the

President on Twitter. Game over, We'll be meeting President Lensky. He and President Trump have already spoken twice. President called to congratulate President Zelenski on his election and then on his success in the parliamentary election. They were very warm and cordial calls. We're hoping that they'll be able to

meet in Warsaw and have a few minutes together. Because the success of Ukraine, maintaining its freedom, its system of representative government, a free market economy free of corruption, and dealing with the problems of the don Bess and the CRIMEA are high priorities here, obviously, but high priorities for the United States as well. No quid pro quo, there no concerns from John Bolton. We're going to be back with more on impeachment and with special guest Mark Latter.

After this break, you're in the Freedom Hide. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. It's Madison Jessiato in today for Buck and I want to keep talking about impeachment and I want to bring in Mark Latter. Many of you know Mark. He's the Trump campaign director of Strategic Communication and former special assistant to the President. Mark. Thanks for joining us, Oh, thanks for having so you know, the war over witnesses

has begune to monopolize both sides. What do you think we're going to see moving forward when it comes to this impeachment trial and are we going to see witnesses? Well, it doesn't look like it. And I think that the fact of the matter is what we've got to come to an understanding is that it does not matter who they may or may not call as witnesses. It's not going to change the fundamental facts of this case that we've read the trade, we read the transcript, there was

no quid pro quo. The Ukrainians admitted, there was no pressure, The aid was released and there were no investigations announced, and there is no witness that could be called that's going to change any of the fundamental facts in this case, right, And you know, we see that the president's defense team went up there, they delivered their closing arguments, which many feel, you know, really collapse the Democrats case for impeachment, of course, and a lot of people now are talking about the

fact that policy agreements don't merit the grounds for impeachment. And while this may be great for the president for the campaign, when it comes to people going to that ballot box November of twenty twenty, what do you think the long term implications could be for our country and for the pal of impeachment turning into a partisan tool or don't well, this is a this is a disastrous for our country long term. Never in the history of our country have we ever had a one party, purely

partisan impeachment. And that's what this was. Despite the fact that in the nineties you had Democrats saying you couldn't have a partisan impeachment. You even had Nancy Pelosi last spring saying you can't have a one party impeachment, and yet here we are, I think, you know, it's not only Nancy Pelosi Adam Schiff. I think you know, Thelma and Louise joined the squad, and they took this party right off the cliff. And it is a dangerous president

that they are setting here. And it will be even more dangerous if it gets to the point where any future president or this president cannot have a robust discussion and even disagreements with members of his senior staff or with a national security advisor because they're afraid that they're going to get hauled before a hostile Congress of a hostile party and have all of those disagreements exposed. It will put national security at risk, regardless of what party

future presidents may represent. But isn't the Democrats argument that this is in the interest of national security? Mark is now that we keep hearing from them. Apparently it was such a national security threat that they had to wait thirty days to even turn these impeachment articles over, and

that they could not use the tools at hand. I mean, as much as they're talking about complaining about witnesses, they didn't the subpoena of these witnesses, and they didn't want to avail themselves of the courts to decide on the president's right of executive privilege and having these conversations, which is something that presidents of both parties going back to the foundings of our republic have defended. I mean, it just shows you that if it weren't for double standards,

the Democrats wouldn't have standards at all. Sure, and you know, the polls continue to show mark that Americans are broadly opposed impeachment, while the support for the president can and used to grow. And so you know, as the Democrats impeachment sham continues, and you know, we're not quite at the end yet. But I think one of the things to note here, maybe you can touch on this a little bit for our listeners, is the scrutiny of the

Biden's family business practices. I think that's finally increasing. So this, you know, may have had backfired more than the Democrats had expected, you know, especially just days before we head into the Iowa caucus. It really is backfiring, and for good reason. I mean, the American people you don't have to know all to fine details, but you can understand when the sitting vice president of the United States is leading policy discussion and his son is getting paid by

whether it's Ukraine and or China. And now we're coming out and we're finding that there were even more sweetheart deals for the members of the Biden family, involving his brother and getting the land deals and contracts which he was not qualified to get. There's been other members of the family that have now just recently been exposed of also getting sweetheart deals. And the American people get that,

they realize that this spinks. We wouldn't tolerate a city councilperson who's getting their family paid on the backside while they're making these official decisions, and we shouldn't hope, we should expect the same thing, that it's wrong than vice president of the United States and someone who's running for

president to get those same sweetheart deals. And to put a fine point on this, you know, Biden is in trouble when they've actually had to come out and say, well, now, if if he's nominated or if he wins, we won't do that anymore, right of course, and you know when we look going back to impeachment, and you know how this has all kind of come out when it comes

to the Bidens. We see even multiple Democrats, of course in swing states coming forward saying they're undecided on the President's guild and they may even come over and vote with the Republicans. Joe Manson of West Virginia, Christen Cinema of Arizona, Doug Jones of Alabama, how do you think this is going to play out? And give our listeners a previ of what you think the next steps in the conclusion of this impeachment hearing and trial is going

to be. Well, I think there's no question that he will be exonerated by the Senate, and again then there's a very high likelihood that, just like in the House of Representatives, in the Senate, you will have a bipartisan vote of no. I don't see any Republicans crossing over, which means that this will have been entirely and engineered Democrat hoax that has been rebuked by bipartisan votes in both houses of Republicans and Democrats saying no. And so

I think that will obviously serve as a strong platform. We've seen the president's polls numbers going up, impeachment numbers going down, and there is not a single person on this campaign for President Trump that wanted to go this way. We'd rather talk about the issues, the economy, rising paychecks. But since Democrats went down this path, you can be assured that we're going to defend and maximize it to

the most that we can. And we're seeing it. Hundreds of thousands of people are crossing over and signing up to volunteer and to donate. And you could look at that rally we just had the other night in New Jersey, of all places, deep Blue New Jersey, most requested number of tickets ever for a presidential rally, And when we look at the data even further, a quarter of the people who were there were Democrats. I mean that shows you this president is bringing new people into the party.

It's one of those reasons why I think, combined with the fact that you've got a self about socialist and communist sympathizer and Bernie Sanders who's leading their ticket, I think every state in the Union is now in play, with the exception probably of being the People's Republic of California. Right. And you know, when it comes to this impeachment, what do you think the effect is going to be that

it has in the election. We're obviously seeing a lot of energy very far out from November for the president atleast rallies, which we covered on the first just a few days ago. Do you think that ultimate effects is going to be and do you truly believe that the Democrats are only doing this because they know they will lose in November. And we have American people, of course, very irritated with that because they see this and they

see the Russian inclusion hoax the same way. This is time and tax peer money that's been wasted with no result or direct benefit to the American people. Well, I think the American people are seeing it, and I think that's one of the reasons why the president support is rising to the highest levels we've seen since he's taken office in multiple goals. And the Democrats know that they're

in trouble. And yet you have to wonder because you've got crazy Maxine Waters and others out there who are saying, we're not done, We're going to impeach him again. I mean, they're already talking about going down this path, knowing they're going to lose this impeachment and openly talking about impeaching him again. I mean, this is just going to be

a never ending cycle. They wanted him impeach from the day he was elected, and they're not going to stop until the American people remove them from power in the House of Representatives and also send this president back to the White House. And before we close out, Mark, you know, I'm want to ask you a question. We're we're talking a little bit later in the show about the chance

of a broker convention for the Democrats. Obviously, you look at who's on the ballot for them and these primaries and going into Diowa Caucus, it doesn't seem like any of these candidates could beat President Trump. Do they recognize that? Do you think they're going to go to a broker convention? Is there even anybody out there that that could even

compete in November against this president? I mean, when we see the economic numbers and we see the promises made, promises kept from twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, all the way till now, hundreds of promises that have been kept, do

you think there's anybody out there? And could the Democrats even trying to Pulson make that this summer, Well, it looks more and more likely that they might, because you do have Bernie Sanders who's leading in the polls, and now you're seeing a lot of the DNC and the

mainstream Democrats coming out against him because they're afraid. It's almost like twenty six team again, where they're trying to gang up and keep him from getting the nomination, but they can't agree on who should get the nomination, and it's very possible that they could go into a brokered convention. But regardless, we really don't care which one of them

comes out of their nominating process. They're all going to have endorsed such radical policies as taking away people's private health insurance, eliminating the energy independence that our country has now achieved, and that's going to drive up people's utility bills. They're talking about eliminating millions of people's jobs and just telling them, well, you can learn to code. I mean,

that's not how we work in America. So it will be fairly easy for us to take on whichever one of those crazies actually comes out of their nomination, and we're fully prepared to go to battle again for them. Mark Clatter, thank you so much for joining us. We're going to have more on the twenty twenty elections coming up on the Box Exton Show. Thanks for listening to the bus Essence podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app four, wherever you get your podcasts.

Hey everyone, and welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. It's Madison Jessiato here in the Freedom Hunt filling in for Buck Sexton today and I want to talk twenty twenty. I want to talk about the Democrats, the potential of a Broker convention, and of course who's surging but Bernie Sanders.

We'll take a look at these poll numbers. I'm looking at the Real Clear Politics average right now nationwide, we're still seeing Biden up in most of the polls over Bernie just a little bit CNN poll though Bernie is shown up by three. But we're only a few days away from the Iowa caucus and we're heading into New Hampshire shortly after that. And right now we're seeing Bernie Sanders searching. We're seeing him leading in Iowa, We're seeing

him leading in New Hampshire. He's up in the betting odds. You know, is Bernie Sanders going to be that nominee? And who else is rounding out that top five nationally? Well, we have Biden Bernie the only ones in the twenties behind them down at around fourteen percent. Elizabeth Warren under her, we have Bloomberg in Buddha, Judge, is Biden? Is Bernie? Who's going to be that nominee? Could it be neither

of them? Because you got to keep in mind the reality of what the Democrats are facing right now, and the reality is that the Democrats are up against a president who is made and kept promises to the American people. Hundreds of promises made, promises kept. And the president has a website Promises Kept dot com I think it is, and you can go look at all of them and they're in categories the Economy Accords, the list goes on immigration,

and he's made and kept these promises. A lot of people, you know, back in twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, even a lot of Conservatives were hesitant to vote for this president because they didn't know if they believed he would do

what he said he was going to do. And we've seen it time and time again with politicians, both Democrat and Republican, for many many years, make all the promises in the world, get into office and forget who they're there to serve us, the American people, or you know on a more local or state level when it comes to Congress or other elected officials, but presidents all the saying they made all the promises and they didn't keep them. So people were hesitant, especially when we talked about pro

life issues constitutional issues. Was President Trump if he were to become president in twenty sixteen, people thought going to protect the lives of the unborn? Was he going to protect our Second Amendment rights? And ultimately that's exactly what he did. He not only performed, but he overperformed on these issues. And this is what the Democrats are up against. I mean, we had the first president Republican or Democrat ever to speak at the March for Life just last week.

People are really happy with what he's done, of course, nominating and securing two seats on the Supreme Court with originalist justices who believe in the text of the Constitution, not liberal activists on the bench. And of course we see that and I'm gonna talk a little bit more about this later, but we're seeing that in all levels of the courts, when it comes to the district courts and the Court of Appeals, circuit courts. So we're seeing this.

The Democrats recognize this, yet they've continued to do nothing. They waste money, they waste time. We saw what they did on the Russian collusion hoax and the Maller investigation, promise that they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump and the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. Of course we find out that's not true. They are now promising that he's in pete. He you know, he committed to pinchable offenses and that he should be removed from office.

Not going to happen. You see the energy. You know, we're months and months and months out from November and we covered just two days ago, we covered the rally in New Jersey, and there's gonna be a rally I think tonight today right now in Iowa. And thousands and thousands people not only filling the venue, but we saw thousands of people outside, people watching in the cold on screens outside these venues. Says something in politics we haven't

seen in a very very long time, if ever. I mean, you would think these people are there for the super Bowl or sporting event. Politics isn't supposed to be this fun, and people love going to Trump rallies. So he's been able to energize his base, energize his supporters, and make

it exciting. How can these Democrats compete with that? And I think the DNC and the Democratic Party they recognize that because the policies not only are unaffordable and unrealistic, but these candidates don't exude or inspire energy from their supporters. I mean, Women for Trump launched in the summer in July of twenty nineteen. The President wasn't an at the launch, and there was over a thousand women completely maxed out

capacity to be there for this. Some of Joe Biden's events where he's at the events himself, there's thirty people. I mean, how can you compete with that? And we saw Hillary struggle with this of course in twenty sixteen, and it's something that the Democrats have to face, and so they recognize that they're going to have to do something because none of these candidates are going to be able to beat President Trump. Could they go to a

broker convention the summer. I think it's a very real possibility, especially now seeing that we're going to see probably Bernie and Biden both win a lot of primaries, a lot you potentially Bernie of course winning that Iowa caucus. So could we end up in a broker convention the summer. Could Hillary Clinton come in and save the day for the Democrats? Maybe? Could it be someone we're not even

thinking about. Maybe will any of them, even Hillary, or someone that they could bring in the summer, be able to beat President Trump. I don't think so. And when we talk about you know, Bernie specifically, you know, you look back to sixteen people, a lot of even Democrats, they stonewalled him, they made fun of his message. Now they're all embracing it. They're putting forward the socialist policies.

Of course, none of them affordable. We saw Bernie Sanders grilled by CBS on his plans last week, estimates of sixty trillion dollars total spending over the next ten years. If Bernie were to implement some of these plans, he of course doesn't know or care what they cost. Some experts are saying over one hundred tillion dollars can't afford this. Medicare for all, a climate plan, forgiveness of student loan debt, free college tuition, and of course the best yet, free

healthcare for illegal immigrants. And it's not just Bernie it's Biden, Steer, Warren among others talking about this, and we saw them raise their hands at the I think the first debate or second debate saying that you know, they support this. But the funny thing is they want to say, you know, Bernie's not part of the swamp. That's what his team wants to tell you. You know, he's always held these positions. You know, I want to play this clip clip forum

Bernie where he definitely didn't hold this position previously. So that gets listening to the immigration. If poverty is increasing and if wages are going down, I don't know why we need millions of people to be coming into this country as guests workers who will work for lower wages than American workers and drive wages sound even lower than the All right now, I don't know why we need millions of people coming into this country as guest workers.

Isn't this what we've been saying? Oh wait, this is also what Bernie used to say, and President Obama used to say, flip flop, flip flop. Bernie Sanders is part of the swamp, just like the rest of them. He said he's going to change Washington, but don't be fooled by his message. He's just as much as much as part of the problem as his fellow candidates, just like Biden.

You know, these establishment politicians, they want to protect the swamp against President Trump, and he clearly represents a genuine threat to the racket that they've seen in their halls of power in Washington, DCA. And Sanders, you know, he's a self proclaimed socialist. He's called for a political revolution, but he's no different. He protects his special insider friends who profit from the culture of corruption and greed that

has long prevailed in our capital. You know. Peter Schweitzer's book Profiles Corruption outlines this quite nicely, talking about Sanders having used public office to siphon off millions of tax pier dollars to his own family and friends over the past thirty years. One of the things that really stuck out to me was eighty million dollars in payments to a media buying firm owned by two good friends of Sanders's wife. Of course, there's also the case of Burlington College,

which was forced to close down. Guess who was mismanaging the case. Sanders's wife president of the school. She secured expensive loans on inflated donor commitments, and some suggest that Sanders may have used his influence to pressure the bank into approving the loan despite several inconsistencies in the documentation. And so while the government investigated, they closed the investigation

on this, they didn't exonerate Sanders or his wife. Even Hillary Clinton, who is the queen of the swamp herself, thinks that the shick against corruption is a fraud when it comes to Bernie. She told the Hollywood Reporter he was a career politician and it's all bologny, and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it. Now. I don't agree with Hillary Clinton on much. In fact, I rarely agree with Hillary Clinton at all, but on

this one, she is one hundred percent right. Bernie's a career politician and people are getting sucked in to a

completely fake message. He's deeply immersed in the swamp. He doesn't even want to call out o Biden, who, as you know that former Vice President cozied up to Delaware credit card companies and banks when he was in the Senate leading the bankruptcy legislation that protected the predatory companies at the expense of the American citizens, and we all know about his efforts to protect his son from the

corruption probe in Ukraine. We're seeing it play out right now throughout this impeachment trial, and it's of course all thanks to a liberal crusade to remove our great president from office. We got to get to the bottom of this. But Sanders, of course refuses to call out Biden or a son by name. He insists that on many occasions that Biden's not corrupt, and he even repudiated his own

supporters that called Albiden for obvious ethical shortcomings. And even if you wanted to say Sanders is trying to avoid appearing too critical of his Democratic opponents, the timidity makes it clear that he could not be counted on to confront the corruption from the White House. And what do we want as American people. We want to see the end of the corruption, and our nation deserves better. Our President's been fighting, He's been fighting for us on this.

This is something that Democrats and Republicans let simmer for far too long. It's time to put the fire out. We can't afford any more corruption in Washington, DC. The times now, there is no more time that we can waste letting more corrupt career politicians go to Washington, and I don't just mean for the presidency. We need to be keeping an eye on this when we vote for Congress as well. But Bernie Sanders is definitely part of that swamp, and he's no different than the rest of them.

You know, We're gonna have more on this and so much more when we're back on the Buck Sexton Show. You're in the Freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. It's Madison Joy Seattle in today for Buck Sexton. Get this. An Iowa man convicted of sex crimes a felon, is no longer deemed a threat because of his gender change to a woman. So the officials and Iowa have determined that a convicted child molester is to be released from incarceration.

They explain that the offender's reduction and testosterone levels from his transition from a man to a woman puts the individual at a lower risk of reoffending. And people and Iowa are furious, and I'm with them. This is insane. It's something that I don't think ten years ago we would have even imagined. Now, of course, it's somewhat of a loophole when it comes to how this happened. But

people are speaking up about this. So a spokesperson for the Attorney General's offices, you know, they don't believe that they have evidence sufficient to prove that Josie Smith, which is the man's now female name, which used to be Joseph Matthew Smith, has a significant chance of reoffending. So they talk about those hormone levels. Now he's she's going to be released from confinement. But the costs for the motion to dismiss the case are going to be taxed

to the state, paid for by the people. I wouldn't want to pay for this. This is ridiculous. Now, there's one thing somewhat positive in this, and that's the fact that Smith is still going to be subject to strict sex offender reporting requirements for those that commit these crimes. But is this a loophole that people start taking advantage of. Any time that you commit a sex offense, you're going to change your gender and get out of prison. I

want to keep an eye on this story. And while this really bothers me, there's something out that else out there that's really bothered me. Super Bowl ad of abortion survivors. Take a listen to this clip we have of the ad. Will you look me in the eye. Can you look me in the eye and tell me that shouldn't be alive? Can you tell me that I didn't deserve to survive? One reality binds us together, share one choice, try to steal out lives. So we survived. We are the survivors

of choice. Are the faces of Choices. I am the face of Choice. If that doesn't pull your heart strings, I don't know what does. It's an ad from the pro life group Faces of Choice, and they're calling out Fox Sports for allegedly refusing to approve the ad that they wanted to run during this year Super Bowl. I'm actually heading down to the Super Bowl this weekend, but for all those that are going to be watching from home, they're not going to see this ad. Faces of Choice

submitted the ad to Fox didn't hear anything. They were originally told by Fox that they would receive word on whether or not their application had been accepted by October. Of course, no answer was given. They were repeatedly stone stonewalled. The ad was submitted in July and Gillett of the Faces of Choice group says she thinks it's clever or what they're doing. If they directly said no, then they

could say this. Of course, A z Ass and I look at the suitable ad that Fox rejected, but they didn't directly say no, and she's claimed that they've ignored them, wasted their time, and refused to give an answer to avoid having to run the ad. Abortion survivors once again being ignored. It's not the first time we've seen this, and we've seen the discrimination not only against abortion survivors

but against the pro life movement. This is something that many of you know, and I've talked about on Buck Show, that I experienced as a law student at Ohio State, even receiving threats of violence and threats of rape in death because of my views on abortion. And it's rampant in Hollywood, it's rampant in the television industry. There's no respect or protection for the lives of the unborn. It's

something we've been working towards. We need to see a change in I'm disappointed that we're not going to see this add on Sunday, and I think they should keep speaking up about this because I can tell you right now We're not going to sit back and let this happen. It's simply unacceptable. We'll be back for another hour of The Buck Sexton Show right after this. Thanks for listening to The bus Sexton Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on

Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcast. Hey. Everyone, we're back for another hour of The Buck Sexton Show. It's Madison Jessieato here in the Freedom Hut filling in for Buck Sexton, and we're gonna be talking about the economy. We're gonna be talking about millennials and socialism, the coronavirus, and more. But first I want to bring in a special guest we have with us in this hour, Kaylee MCKININNY.

She's the Trump twenty twenty campaign press secretary. She's the former spokesperson at the RNC and Harvard Law graduate. Kaylee, thanks so much for joining us. Hey, thanks for having me Madison. You know, I want to talk to you about women for Trump. So this Boston Globe article comes out a few days ago and they quote a woman named Alice from Michigan, and she talks about, you know, they ask her about the prospect of a female president. She says, you know, it would make me so excited

to vote for a woman for president. I do think i'll see one in my lifetime, and as the mother of a daughter, it would especially thrill me. But of course, as we hear all across the country, Aliston vote for Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen, she vote for Donald Trump in twenty sixteen, and she's expecting to vote for him again. And when they asked her why, she said, Hillary is an elatest Democrat who doesn't care about women like me.

She wondered if liberal women would even be willing to vote for female candidates like Nicki Haley of Uncle Trump or Condoleeza Rice if you know these were to be candidates in the future. Is this something you're hearing on the campaign trail when you talk to women. Absolutely. I mean she makes a good point. Look, if you are a person who cares about issues that women care about, which I would argue you are the full panoply of issues, but specifically issues like child care, pay family, he's an

issues that motivate new moms. For instance. You can't help but look at President Trump and see he is the most pro woman president we've ever had the results don't lie, and you're in it. I have to passy there because you're a new mom yourself. That's what you understand this.

You know better than anybody right now as to why women are thinking about out the future of this nation and why they're thinking about who's going to produce the most prosperous future for their children exactly, and on an issue like paid family leave in particular, which Ivanka Trump has heralded and President Trump has pushed forward two point one million federal employees, and I'll have access to it. It's so important. I know more than ever with a ten week old, how important it is ought to be

able to be with your young one. And now more women, more families have access to that because of this president. And so I think conservative voters around the country, conservative women look and say, hey, we'd love to have a female president sometime, but we want to president who implements results that best affect us in our families. And the answer is very clearly President Trump and none of the

crazies over on the Democrats side. Absolutely. And you know, since all the way back in twenty fifteen, there's been this narrative out there coming from the mainstream media and coming from the Democrats that President Trump doesn't support women. And as a woman who's worked you know, obviously with President Trump, I've talked about my experience as to why I don't believe this is true, and it certainly hasn't

been my experience. But I'd love for you to tell our listeners a little bit about your experience working for the President and how he's supported you and other women on the campaign trail. Yeah, he absolutely does. You know, he's someone who truly listens and takes counsel from all those around him. If you notice, the people he's put in power are women, are Kelly and Conway and Sarah Sanderstephanie Grisham all throughout the White House on our campaign.

The same thing. You know, he's someone who he really listens. When he talked to him, He'll ask for your opinion, he asked about your family. He truly cares about the individual and has chosen to empower women all throughout the White House in the campaign. He's someone who is completely demonized by the media. But you know, I can tell you firsthand as you can Madison, that he's truly a great guy who truly is motivated by working for the

American people as the Democrats pursue impeachment. Yeah, you know, and as someone who supports women. President Trump has has made it a focus to of course make policies and push policy that make the lives of American women better. And so since inauguration Day in twenty seventeen, what do you think have maybe been a few of the highlights of what he's been able to do, outside of what

you mentioned earlier, to benefit women in this country. Yeah, if you look at you first, the unemployment rate sixty five year low for women. Will always say I'm sorry about that. I wish it was an historic low, as it is for black and Hispanics Americans, But sixty five year low is pretty amazing for female unemployment. And if there is an article recently that more women are now being employed in the workforce and men, that's a huge deal. Women are really succeeding in the Trump economy. But at

the same time, I mean treasuring families. Another thing that he's done, which I think is so important is he's almost doubled the federal budget for childcare. So for women in low income communities who we all know childcare is exorbitantly extensive daycare or whatever you choose to pursue. And for him to double the federal budgets help low income women pursue their working professional goals, but also to have access to childcare a very big deal. I mean, those

are just a few. There's many more that the President has accomplished. And there's so many more. And one of the things I think the President has taken pride and is the fact that he's someone who stood up for the forgotten man and women of the United States of America. And so not only has he been there and of course supported women, but he's helping everybody rise. He's made the country a place where businesses and families can succeed, people off of food stamps once again feeding their families.

There's you know that's priceless. You've been traveling the country and you were, I think at the rally a couple days ago in Iowa. Today. What are you hearing? What are you seeing? I mean, it's incredible the energy I think that we're seeing when it comes to people at these rallies, not only filling the venues, but thousands of people watching from outside. And you've posted some really great videos talking to some of these people that wait for hours,

sometimes days to see their great president. Tell me about what you're seeing out there across the country. Yeah, you know, it was amazing, Madison, because I do go to every single rally and beyond that other events like bus tours and speeches, so I really do get to see a wide array of voters in the United States and talk to them. And I can tell you I have never before at any other rally seeing what I saw in

New Jersey. You know, it's it's routine for President Trump to pack a house with people waiting outside watching from a JumboTron. It's routine to see people camping out the night before. But what has not been routine is in a deep, deep, deep blue state like New Jersey to see literally thousands of people in sleeping bags the night before the rally. I showed up and it was just

so evident. You could feel that that something's going on in this country on maybe in nineteen eighty four type landslide like Ronald Reagan had where that map was just redder and redder and redder. Because what I saw, the kind of support he got in New Jersey is really something to behold you know, Joe Biden can't feel a front row in a blue state, but boy go to a red state, and I wonder, you know, who would show up for Joe or Bernie or whomever. But President

Trump doesn't matter where he goes. He packs the house. And you mentioned a little bit earlier about impeachment. Do you think part of this is a result of the way the American people feel about impeachment, about the Russian collusion hoax, about the waste of taxpayer time and money that's been spent in Congress. I have no doubt that that's the case. It's the contrast. You know, we just saw the President signs the USMCA a huge deal, ripped up NAFTA, and he negotiated a better deal with Canada

and Mexico. And you contrast that with what were then saw, you know, sut screen of Adam shifts up there. The House manager is trying to take down a sitting president, overturn the will of the American people. The contrast couldn't be more evident in this impeachment proceeding. I think I just put a lightning rod through the Trump base. I also think it's added to the Trump base. I think

there's more Democrats coming over, more independence coming over. Our polling show how vulnerable congressional Democrats are who are a district that President Trump won after their impeachment vote, So there's something going on. Impeachment certainly has been a motivator for the Trump coalition in a huge issue back on the campaign around twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, of course, was immigration, and this is I think something that's going to continue to remain front and center as we head

towards November. What do you think are some of the President's biggest wins on immigration? Of course, we had the Scotus decision come out on the side of the president just this month. So what do you think we can expect moving forward on that issue? Yeah, you know, I think the wall, certainly, you're going to see miles and miles of sensing and wall border barriers, you know, what is appropriate in the given area built by election day,

and many much of it already built already. So building the wall is big immigration enforcement, also making sure that the people coming into our country are good, hard working people who you know, are pursuing the American dream, making sure that legal immigration, that there's a place for that. You know, that's something that I think is under emphasized. You know, I was at the rally two nights ago in New Jersey and a woman came up to me and said, you know, my brother waited seven years and

lying again this country. He did it the legal way, waiting to come here, and just today he got his papers saying he's welcome, he can come to this country. And she said, my mom is just overjoyed. So, you know, there's a place for legal immigration, but there's a place, an important place for border security and finding that balance

is what this president has done. So I'm very proud of his accomplishments on immigration, as I think many across the nation are sure, and so many of us have stories of family members that have come and done it the right way, and you waited a long time to do that, and so we definitely sympathize understand, and you know, we're really proud of this president on the issue of immigration. Kaylee,

thank you so much for joining us. Congratulations to you and your husband on the addition to your beautiful family, and we look forward to seeing your videos from tonight's rally in Iowa. Thank you, Madison. I'm a show. Thanks. We'll be back with more on the economy after this break. You're in the Freedom mind. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast. Hey everyone, and welcome back to The buck

Sexton Show. As we had through another hour and we just talked to Kaylee MCKININNY and she mentioned a lot about the economy, but I think it's important to take it an even deeper dive into the economy. We've seen the president fight every single day since elected four American families, and what has been his strongest point the economy. The economic numbers. More than seven point three million jobs added since he took office. Of course, over half of these

going to women. One and a half million women alone lifted out of poverty in just two years of President Trump administration alone. And from the very beginning, we heard the Democrats talk about recession. We're going to see a recession three, four or five times. Everybody needs to brace for the next great recession. I'm still waiting. We haven't seen a recession. And as you know, the country awoke to the news that President Trump had won and guess

what happened. The stock market sky rocketed upwards. Yet we saw liberal economists Paul Krugman inexplicably prophesized in The New York Times that we're going to face a global recession with no end in sight. Less than a week later, he wrote about the impeding Trump slump. And he wasn't the only one. Matt Krantz USA Today thought a recession was on the way because Trump's Republican president. And that

was before Trump even took office. And you know, we come to his inauguration, we saw strong growth, impressive job creation, like I mentioned, over seven million jobs created. In the media continue with this pessimistic tuny for just a few months ago. Quinn Hillier was certain last year that the recession was on the horizon because of the tariffs of

the Trump administration. Get ready for rough times, he wrote, predicting the crash is going to come by this past fall and advising people to buy gold, horde cash stalked up on canned foods. Even when the end of the year came, no recession had arrived. Economist Evancraft absurdly accused Trump of readying a scapegoat for his eventual failure. During the whole time period, economic growth across the nation's been strong. Unemployment, of course, historic lows. We've heard it over and over again.

A fifty year low, overall, all time low for women, all time low for Black Americans, all time low for Hispanic Americans. Wages are growing at the fastest rate and over a decade, by virtually any conceivable measure of progress in the economy, in the labor market. The Trump presidency has been a resounding success from the beginning, from day one. But here we are again, and now we're seeing that

it's the inverted yield curve. And we heard about this, I think a year ago two on treasury bonds that has journalists convinced, of course their stock market experts now to all the journalists, but they're convinced that we're going to fall off the economic cliff. They're poorly concealed glee, which is I think the sickest part about all of it. You hear a lot of these mainstream media commentators and journalists talk about this almost as if they want to

see us head into a recession. Maybe it wouldn't affect them or their families. Maybe it's not going to affect Nancy Pelosi or Bernie Sanders who have become rich off of corruption, but it'll affect my family and your family, families across Middle America and the rest of the country. Recession could destroy us. So they're poorly concealed glee in the press corps at the thought of economic calamity is

just unconsciable. This just drives me, I think nuts more than anything else when it comes to their commentary on the economy and the idea that millions of Americans could plunge into hardship, really seems to do nothing but damn in their excitement over one thing that would give them a chance of defeating Trump in the twenty election. That's all they want. They know that with a strong economy and historically, knowing that people vote based off their pocketbooks.

You know, are you better now than you were three years ago? That's all to make question. And people are better now than they were three years ago. So I have some bad news for these folks. Trump has great odds of winning re election. There's no way that this is not going to have an impact. The economy, of course, moves in cycles, but we're seeing an economy that is so strong like really, nothing we've seen lead, nothing I've seen in my lifetime, nothing we've seen as a country

in a very long time. I want to hit these numbers one more time. Over seven million jobs created, five hundred thousand manufacturing jobs created since the president was elected. Remember when Obama told us that manufacturing jobs would never come back. Will guess what, America, They're back. Unemployment rate at that fifty year low of three point five percent. We had a highlight of you know, those recent jobs reports in November December, both higher than what had been expected.

African American unemployment record low around five percent, five point five percent, Hispanic unemployment again near record low four point two percent, Asian American unemployment two point six percent, a historic low. Women unemployment remained steady at that near record

low of three point five percent. And of course, the approval writing of this president among small business owners sixty in all time high Dow Jones industrial average records over one hundred times under this president six point two over six point two. Now million people have come off of food stamps, and the Congress, work with of course supported the President, passed the historic Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This was a relief not only for businesses, but for

the hard working men and women of our nation. As a result of these tax cuts, and in the Jobs Act, we were able to see nine thousand opportunity zones created in all fifty states, DC and five territories. So what are the opportunity zones going to do? Well, guess what. These are going to spur one hundred billion dollars in private capital investment and impact nearly thirty five million Americans.

We doubled the childcare tax credit, which was great for American families, and we rolled back, you know, those unnecessary job killing regulations. This is something as business owners, as citizens, we've been complaining about for a long time, all the red tape, all the regulations. So I was certainly happy when this administration cut eight and a half regulations for every new role, and that, of course, far exceeded their promise to us, which was to cut two regulations for everyone. Added.

As a result of this, we've seen regulatory cost completely slashed nearly fifty billion dollars, and it saved taxpayers two twenty billion dollars once all implemented. The deregulation efforts are even helping individual American households at an estimated thirty one hundred dollars a year. The economy is strong. The economy is booming. It's a result of these conservative economic policies

put into effect by our president. Economic confidence rebounded to a record high under our president, and we saw years of economic despair under President Obama. People voted in twenty sixteen for change, the change that was promised to them in two and eight. They wanted real economic change and they're seeing that under President Trump. We're going to be back on The Buck Sexton Show in a few minutes.

Thanks for listening to The Bus Seston Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jessiato filling in today for Buck Sexton. So this is a very interesting one. We have Elizabeth Warren unveiling her plan to police disinformation. She wants to make it a crime. She's proposed a plan that seems

to have two main parts. One promising to hold people who knowingly disseminate false information about when and how to vote in US elections accountable. The other promises is to hold social media platforms accountable, which of course is very sticky territory. So we'll see ultimately how this plan pans out.

But what's rich about this the fact that Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Center, has built her campaign on a foundation of misinformation, misrepresentations, and exaggerations the non native Native American Elizabeth Warren. You know it's common knowledge by now that Warren, one of the top four contenders right now for that twenty twenty Democratic presidential nomination, identified as Native American for personal gain? Was she Native American? One twenty fourth? Maybe

not even a percent? She had zero experience and tribal life. Of course, this isn't her only misrep presentation. But let's take a listen to this clip of her apology for this one and clip nine. I want to say this, like anyone who's being honest with themselves, I know that I have made mistakes. I am sorry for harm I have caused. I have listened, and I have learned a lot, and I am grateful for the many conversations that we've

had together. It is a great honor to be able to partner with Indian country, and that's what I've tried to do as a Senator, and that's what I promise I will do as President of the United States of America. You know, it still blows my mind that this didn't completely sink her in the Democratic Party. It's like they don't even here. If it were someone in the Republican Party that pretended to be a Native American when they weren't,

they'd be demolished. Elizabeth Warren goes on her interview before this apology saying that you know, she's sorry that at some point in time she identified as Native American, but that's just what she believed. She thought maybe she was Native American, but she knew it was wrong, but she did it anyways. Of Course, like I said before, it doesn't stop here. The non native Native American Elizabeth Warren

isn't the only lie. Let's talk about when she misled voters about sending her son to private school, repeatedly telling people her kids went to public school. No, her son went to private school. And of course this is a woman campaigning against the school choice program, which of course would give other children advantages that her children had. But you know, we see this time and time again with the elitist just like when we talk about the gun

control issue. They don't want us to have guns to protect ourselves, our families, our communities, they don't want people in dangerous areas to be able to protect themselves. Look at Chicago, look at New York City, look at a lot of these urban areas where people need to be able to protect themselves more than ever, and they can't,

but they have armed security to protect them. They don't want to put a border wall on her southern border, but guess what, they have fences and security around their homes. It's another example of complete hypocrisy. And Elizabeth Warren is one of the worst when it comes to this. And let's not forget the fact that she's repeatedly invoked tales

but her family's economic strugles. She talks about growing up, and she talks about this on the campaign trail, and of course she wants to win these blue collar voters on her appeal to the middle class. But she's now a multi millionaire. Elizabeth Warren isn't part of the middle class. She's fibbed more than once on her family's background. Her brother, Elizabeth Warren's own brother told the Boston Globe, my dad was never her janitor and said it makes him furious. Furious.

I quote him that Warren has repeatedly claimed otherwise on the campaign trail ask her constituents in Massachusetts, she promised to serve her full Senate term after reelected. Of course, she runs her president announces just a few weeks after, and let's not forget about this. Elizabeth Warren claims that she was fired for being pregnant, but her own interview from earlier on seems to say otherwise. Take a listen. So, my first teaching position was as a special needs teacher

there we Go. I worked. It was in a public school system, but I worked with the children with disabilities. I loved that job. But by the end of the first school year, I was quite visibly pregnant, and I was pregnant with my first baby. So I had a baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and I was really casting about thinking what am I going to do? And my husband's view of it was stay home. And the principal didn't invite me back for the next

school year. And I did that for a year, and then that summer I actually didn't have the education courses, so I was on an emergency certificate, it was called, and I went back to graduate school and took a couple of courses in education and said, I didn't think this is going to work out for me, and the principal didn't invite me back for the next school year. And the principal didn't invite me back for the next school year. I actually didn't have the education courses, so

I was on an emergency certificate. I didn't think this is going to work out for me. Elizabeth Warren fired for being pregnant doesn't sound like that was the case. You heard her in her own words. What is she going to do? Her husband told her stay home, and then she says she didn't have the courses, she had to go back to school. She has a history in a long time relationship with exaggerating the truth. But somehow

she's still up there. And we look back at those poles we talked about earlier, and I look at those Real Clear politics and we see Elizabeth Warren in the top four in Iowa, in the top four in New Hampshire, in the top four in the betting odds, in the top four in the Real Clear Politics average of all poles. It's unreal the hypocrisy on the left, because again, if this were someone on the right doing the same thing, if this were Ivanka Trump saying she got fired from

somewhere because she had been pregnant. They would destroy her. If this were any Republican saying they were Native American when they weren't Native American, it would be the end of their political careers. But somehow Elizabeth Warren has nine lives in the Democratic Party. It's just not right. We're gonna be talking about some more hypocrisy when it comes to millennials in socialism. After this break, you're in the

Freedom Life. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast. Hey everyone, welcome back as we finish out the second hour of The buck Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jessiato here in for Buck Sexton in New York City. I want to talk about millennials in socialism. I'm a millennial myself, and these

poles that continue to come out just astound me. Pew recently put out a pole where a third of young Americans say other countries are better than the United States, and nearly half of young Democrats in that same pole say that other countries are better than the United States. Of course, we need to couple this with the Yugov pole we've all heard about previously, where forty four percent of people between the ages of sixteen and twenty nine say they'd prefer to live in a socialist nation over

a capitalist country. But of course these people don't even know what socialism is. In the Ugov Pole, only thirty three percent of respondents we're able to accurately define socialism. Here in the United States, seventy percent a millennials say they'd vote for a socialist candidate. The reality is this socialism leads to destitution, it leads to misery. Socialism has killed millions and millions of people worldwide. Yet you have people like Bernie Sanders out there, and of course, as

you know, he's surging. As we talked about before, we see those poll numbers. His policies are completely socialist, similar to what we see in some of these failed countries. They would never work. She tries to point to countries like Norway, saying, oh, but look, socialism does work completely of course, annoying the failures of countries like Albania, Algeria, Angola, Burma,

the Congo, Cuba, Ethiopia, Laos, Somalia, Vietnam, Yemen, Venezuela. I mean, Bernie Sanders and all millennials have seen the effects of socialism on Venezuela. We've seen the people who have been devastated by socialism in Venezuela with our own eyes with news coverage just over the past year. Socialism is not the future of this country. We've heard our presidents say many times that we will never be a socialist country. And while of course this remains true, I don't believe

wherever going to become a socialist country. It doesn't change the fact that we're seeing many millennials supporting or saying that they support socialism again, seventy percent of millennials saying they'd vote for a socialist candidate in a pull from October. Why are we seeing this well, I think there's many reasons.

One of those reasons being misinformation fake news. We see the rapid spread of misinformation on social media on the Internet, of course, with many millennials going to places like Facebook and Twitter as their first source of news, having no idea where this is coming from, much of it being completely false. We've seen the studies done where fake informations put out there, and even after corrected, if it comes from a regular news source, most people don't ever see

the corrections. I mean, we even see that with some of the more famous rape cases where people were falsely accused of rape, the alleged victims are proven to be liars. That comes out that these guys never raped anybody, but still to this day their lives are devastated from these allegations. So the fake news is rampant. And we see this with socialism, and we see a lot of young people talking about Bernie supporters specifically talking about socialism on Twitter,

attacking those who don't believe in socialism. It's very cult like when you see some of the supporters views on this. But it's not just that. We have to take a look at our schools, high schools, college campuses and liberal indoctrination. No Bucks talked about this, We've all talked about this for many years now. In the liberal indoctrination that we're seeing.

I think we're finally starting to see the effects of that and the views of these millennials, because the reality is they're not getting an accurate lesson on history, not only on the history of our nation, but on the history of the world. They don't understand the dangers of socialism or communism the way that our parents and grandparents

understood these dangers. They believe the misinformation. They're not receiving any real information in their schooling and as a result, look at the poll numbers, look at what we're seeing. Of course, some people talk about the economic crisis of two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine that may have an impact on people wanting young people, I guess, wanting to shift away from capitalism. I don't believe that.

I don't buy that. I think it's a complete lack of understanding, a complete unwillingness to understand the real facts. And then when you have them pushing socialism, and when asked about it, of course they don't even know how you could pay for it. Take a listen to this clip. I feel like everyone should have like free education and healthcare. How are we going to pay for those? Oh? God, I mean us that gas. Who in your mind should pay for all of the free things? All of the

free things? Well, some of it should come from taxes, but the government should pay for it. But the government is funny by taxes. Yeah, I don't know where the money would come from, but they can figure it out. Okay. The people with a good idea and a good reason to spend their tax money. Wouldn't mind actually paying more taxes. They don't know where the money's going to come from, because guess what, there's not enough money to pay for all of the policies that people like Bernie Sanders are

putting forward. Bernie Sanders being slammed by his own party and some of the mainstream media over this over the past few months. We saw it an ACBS interview. Even one of his socialist proposals, like Medicare for all, estimated

to cost over thirty two trillion dollars. Even with an extreme tax on the wealth that the Democrats have talked about, you wouldn't even be able to pay for a portion of one of these plans, let alone all of them, which some experts estimate would cost over a hundred trillion dollars. They're unaffordable, they wouldn't work. They've never worked in other countries.

They're certainly not going to work here. And I can tell you right now, as much as we have a lot of millennials and a lot of people might just disappointing as it is, that are very misinformed and belate and believe this to a certain extent, this isn't going to be the future of our country, and we have to do more now to prevent future generations from falling into the same traps that some of these millennials have fallen into. It's more frustrating than anything. We have to

put a stop to this. And we're going to be back after this break with more on The Buck Sexton Show. We're going to be talking about the coronavirus. Stay tuned. Thanks for listening to The bus Sex and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app for wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everyone, and welcome back to The Buck Sexton Show. We're an hour three and we have a lot to cover this hour, but I

want to get started talking about the coronavirus. And we're really lucky to have a great guest on to share some very valuable insight with you. I have doctor Ray Kashari on the phone right now, Doctor Shari, internal medicine, physician, pulmonologists, intensive care specials. Thank you so much for joining us. Well the beat Her Madison. You know, so people across the country and across the world are very concerned about the coronavirus. First of all, can you kind of fill

people in what exactly is the coronavirus? Where to get its name? What is it? What should people be worried about? So this is a group of viruses that include the SARS virus and the mers virus. Both of those viruses occurred in the past, and they tend to affect people a lot like the common cold. The virus gets its name from the way it looks. It looks like a crown, So that's where the coronavirus comes from. It has absolutely nothing to do with alcohol or beer or Mexico. So

so let's get that on the table right away. That has nothing to do with that. Okay, So is this cause for alarm? Should people be as concerned as there or should they be more? We're concerned than what we're seeing right now. I think that actually there's been some sensationalism regarding the risk to people in the United States. The virus is new. It's called a novel virus because it doesn't it hasn't existed before this time. Therefore, nobody

in the world has immunity to this virus. So that's what gives people cause for alarm because they are concerned that they don't have immunity In addition, there's no vaccine for the virus, again because it's a new virus, and there is no treatment for the virus, so that all creates cause for alarm. However, and let's put the virus in perspective. In the United States this year, there have been fifteen million people affected with influenza virus. There have

been unfortunately, eight thousand deaths due to influenza virus. The coronavirus has resulted in seven cases in the United States. All of those cases have been due to travel. There's been no human to human transmission into United States. There's been no deaths in the United States. There has been seven thousand infections worldwide and one hundred and seventy deaths worldwide, all of those in China. So the death rate is not as high as it is with the stars virus.

So yes, you have to be concerned, but certainly put it in perspective. And this is not the apocalyptic event that is being talked about on television. Right now. We are getting a first report in that it has been confirmed that we've had our first human to human transmission

here in the United States. Is that something people should be worried about or do you still think this is an oversensationalized concern that people have right now, Well, human to human transmission is obviously the pivotal thing to be concerned about, because that is that implies the virus has mutated to that point, and it also implies that the virus has a high degree of contagiousness. So that's obviously

a concern. And the reports out of China that medical the medical personnel are getting the virus, that is also a concern. And the reason that's a concern is that medical personnel in general are very careful in terms of their technique. So when it's spread like that to medical personnel, it implies a higher degree of contagiousness than, for example,

the common cold or something like that. Right, And when we mentioned China, and we've seen that they've closed down an entire city and one of the largest quarantines we've ever seen. They have a news block out there. Obviously

the news is evolving daily on this. But do you think China is being one hundred percent honest about the number of cases they've seen or do you think there's a chance we'll find out that they're not giving us accurate information Here in the United states, Well, they did not give us accurate information with the Stars virus, and that was a problem. But we think that they've kind of learned from that and that they're they're being more

accurate with this. Now. There are reports that they delayed acting on this, and those delays may have been related to the kind of way medicine is practiced in China. I guess one of the health officials said that he had to get permission from the central authority to actually, you know, put into place some of the quarantine and to tell the world about it. You know, I'm not

in a position to comment on that. Obviously, we are depending on China to give us an idea about the incubation period, which is very important, and to give us an idea of the death rates from soa on. When you mentioned Stars back in two thousand and three, and I think it's very interesting when we look at then versus now, when we look at the Chinese economy. Back then was a one point five trillion dollar economy with

four percent of the global GDP. Right now, China is a fourteen point three trillion dollar economy with sixteen percent of the global GDP and a big change in China is the fact that sixty percent of people back then lived in rural areas in China. Now we're seeing a sixty percent urban Chinese population. They're very integrated, obviously as a country in the global process, a big point of demand for global companies, so we can see this effect

the economy. They're more densely packed, and they travel a lot more eighty million passenger journeys by air in two thousand and three compared to six hundred and sixty million now. And when it comes to air travel, people in the United States and across the world are very concerned about potentially contracting the coronavirus. What specifically when it comes to air travel plants should people be aware of or do to protect themselves. Well, of course, first I would not

go to China right now. I don't think that makes any kind of sense. When you get on an airplane, you don't know what biomass has been on that plane before you get on it. And years ago the plane used to sit idle for two to three hours before they reloaded them. Now they turn the plane over in fifteen minutes, So that means that the viruses, the bacteria, anything that has been on that plane is going to

still be viable. And that what that means is when you get on the plane, if you touch something, the virus is now on your hands. If your hands then touch your eyes, your nose, or your mouth, you have a chance of contracting that virus. So if anybody does plane travel right now, what you want to do is get on the plane, clean the area that around you, clean everything you're going to touch, and clean your own hands, and then keep your hands away from your face. That's

the best thing you can do right now. The other thing you can do is where cotton gloves and cotton gloves do a couple things. One, they don't tend to pick the viruses up from what you touch as much. And they also kind of prevent you from touching your face because you're aware that you have something on your hands, so you're less likely to touch your face, all right, that's the kind of the way it works, right And outside of plane travel, is there anything else people can

be doing to prevent the spread of the virus? Now?

Like I said, as we have reports coming in now that we've seen that very first human to human contact transmission of the virus, what can people be aware of not even just here, but you know, all around the world if they're traveling, even to other countries where someone may have come from China and you could be infected or not even know yet when we talk about not knowing the exact incubation period on this new virus, well, I think around the world people are screening everybody coming

from China, so that's a good thing. And the other thing, of course is if you're an environment where there's somebody coughing, sneezing, try to avoid the droplets and then practice the hand hygiene I already talked about. I think the World Health Organization is pretty much on top of this. The one thing they're trying to do, and the CDC is trying to do this too, is get a faster identification test.

Because right now, if you suspect coronavirus, you have to take a sample and then nail it to the CDC. The CDC gets a report and gets back to you. Well that's like a two day process. So they're trying to get a more rapid test which will help tremendously. Okay, now, when it comes to population specifically outside of obviously people, their populations that are at the most risk right now. Well, always with viral infections, it's the old, to the young,

and the infirmed. So people who are old over sixty five to seventy, and people who are young less than one year, and people who have illnesses for other reasons, certainly cancer, chemotherapy patients or patients who are on any kind of immune suppressants are the most likely to be affected seriously. Okay, And when it comes to the vaccine that you mentioned earlier, obviously we don't have one yet,

but I understand there's human trials starting. How long can people expect until they may be able to go and get a vaccine for the coronavirus. Well, normally vaccines take bunths to years to develop. Now they're trying to develop a rapid vaccine, and there is some technology that may indicate that this can be done, but at the moment we don't know if that technology will work. And gen when you get a brand new vaccine, you test it to find out are there side effects and is the

vaccine effective? Well, there won't be time for that, so this is all very new ground. They're trying to develop a vaccine within three to six months, and then they have to they have to do some kind of testing to make sure that it's at least safe. So I don't think the vaccine is going to work. It's going to get us out of this. It may get us out of the next one, but it's probably not going to get us out of this one. And until we have a vaccine, if young, healthy people are to get this,

can they fight it. Oh? Absolutely yeah. Most of the people who get this particular coronavirus have a very mild illness. I mean, over eighty percent have an illness equivalent to like the common cold. There's only less than five percent that actually die, and the remaining fifteen percent have a kind of a serious illness that doesn't result in any permanence. Equally, so the overwhelming majority of the people who get the

virus are recovering. That's definitely good news to hear. We're going to be keeping a close eye on this, and we appreciate you for coming on, doctor Kashari. All right, Madison, thank you, thank you, and we'll be back shortly on the buck Sexton Show. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show. Here in the Freedom Hunt, Madison Jusiato, I'm filling in today for Buck Sexton. USMCA signed seal

delivered finally free, fair, reciprocal trade. That's what President Trump has been pushing for since day one, and of course wanting to put America first instead of letting us continue to be taken advantage of by other countries, which is what we saw happen under both Republican and Democratic administrations past.

The President treated out, tweeted out. For the first time in American history, We've replaced a disastrous trade deal that rewarded outsourcing with a truly fair and reciprocal trade deal that will keep jobs, wealth and growth right here in America. After being on the table for almost a year, President Trump signed to the bipartisan agreement, of course, only having to wait the year because of the Democrats like Nancy Pelosi who held out on the trade deal, refusing to

bring it to a vote. And of course who did she hurt. The American farmers, the American ranchers, the American workers. That's who paid for this. That's who she did this at the expense of She didn't care. And of course Nancy now wants to take credit, but it only took her twenty seconds of talking about this to start insulting

the president. Take a listen to clip six. I want to say that the bill what the President will be signing is quite different from what the President has sent us, and because it's a work of the House Democrats under the leadership of Ritchie Neal with his task force and made tremendous differences and what was proposed originally. And the President will be signing today. I hope he understands what he's signing today. She hopes he understands what he's signing today. Sure,

he understands it. He's the one that got it done. He's the one that made the deal. President Trump, before he's a president, when he was just Donald J. Trump here in New York City, was known all across the world for being the best deal maker. He made deals in business, which is part of why some people voted for him and felt he was such a valuable asset to our government, to our nation as a leader as

somebody who could make deal. We saw Clinton, even George W. Bush in a lot of instances an Obama who promised to make all the deals in the world but never made the deals. Thanks to President Trump, We're getting stricter on trade deals. American farmers are no longer going to have to be taken. Advantage of this trade deal, the USMCA is expected to add sixty eight billion dollars into the United States economy and to add approximately one hundred

and seventy six thousand jobs. And so, while Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats wanted to play political games, Prisider Trump worked hard and he wanted to ensure that we'd have the best policy, the best deal for the American people. And here's what he had to say. After NAFTA's adoption more than twenty five years ago, the United States lost nearly one fourth of all of its manufacturing jobs, including more than one in five vehicle manufacturing jobs. Think of

that one in five jobs lost so needlessly. Thousands of factories were shuttered, millions of manufacturing jobs who were destroyed, and entire communities were devastated, from Ohio to Pennsylvania, Michigan to Maine, and California to North Carolina devastated. Two decades of politicians ran for office vowing to replace the NAFTA. And this was a catastrophe, the NAFTA catastrophe. Yet once elected, they never even tried, They never even gave it a shot.

They sold out. But I'm not like those other politicians, I guess in many ways, I keep my promises, and I'm fighting for the American worker. And we're all fighting for the American worker. Everybody here is fighting for the American worker. And of course USMCA is just one example of his fight for the American worker. Of course, it's a big improvement over the outdated NAFTA. Our trade relationship with Canada and Mexico is now going to be taken

to the twenty first century. It's going to expand market access and remove unfair trade barriers for our farmers. And what I think is really great is this isn't end. It just doesn't end with Canada and Mexico. But earlier this month, President Trump signed the monumental Phase one China trade Deal, and since October, President Trump has signed deals with our four largest trading partners, of course, China, Japan, Mexico, and Canada. This is something that just hasn't been done.

But I think the best part, in the funniest part about this is that he snubbed the Democrats at the signing of USMCA because of course, like I said, they delayed USMCA and then they wanted to take credit for it when originally they had no interest in pushing it through or calling it to a vote at all. So we had Democrats coming out on Wednesday slamming the President

from him not having them at the signing ceremony. We had a Richard Neil from Massa choose to say, perhaps we were not invited to today's event on the South Lawn because our presence would be a prominent reminder of our critical leadership in achieving this deal. I don't know what planet these democrats are living on. There was no critical leadership on behalf of Nancy Pelosi or Richard Neil

on USMCA. The critical leadership came from President Trump fighting for the American farmer, fighting for the American worker, and refusing to stop until he made a deal, a deal that produced free, fair, reciprocal trade and a better result for the American people. We're gonna be back on the Buck Sexton Show with Moore after this. Thanks for listening to the bus Sex and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get

your podcasts. Hey everyone, welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jessiato in for Buck Sexton. Back in twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, something that I really really looked at as a supporter of President Trump was the courts. And I looked at the state of where we were at and where we could potentially go, and we look at many people who support the right to life and are avid supporters of the pro life movement, and the potential of overturning Rov Wade, which at one point seemed

like it would be impossible. With the makeup of the Court, that might not be as far from reality as it once was. And that, of course was due to President Trump's commitment to putting originalist justices and judges on the bench. These are justices and judges. Of course, we have two amazing Supreme Court justices put in put in by President Trump, Justice Neil Gorsich and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who, as you know, was just treated horrifically throughout his confirmation process. But regardless,

we have two incredible justices now on the bench. And these justices are originalists. They look to the text of the Constitution and to what the founders put in the Constitution to make their decisions. It might seem like common sense to you and I, but to some people it's just totally crazy because guess what, some people support liberal activists judges. These liberal activists judges are more dangerous than

you can even imagine. These liberal activist judges put in reading between the lines whatever they want, so they come to the conclusion of what they want to see the result be, and then they find a way to get there instead of looking to the Constitution to determine what the answer should be. So, when it comes to the lasting legacy of President Trump, I really believe it's going to lie in his court nominations, in the judges that he put on the district courts, in the circuit courts,

in these Supreme Court justices. Yes he has two already, but there's a chance we could see one or two more if he's elected. So we look forward to November twenty twenty, and this is going to be a more critical time, I think than ever before, because he continues to reshape the federal judiciary, and he's doing it at a record pace, which is something I don't think many people expected. You know, there were people that doubted whether he would do it at all, let alone do it

at a record pace. He promised to appoint judges that would uphold the Constitution and the role of law, and that's exactly what he did. So the Senate's confirmed twelve more of his judicial nominees. As I said, he's continuing to reshape that judiciary, which is critically important to us when it comes to the protection of the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the lies of the unborn, all of the things that we as conservatives and as patriotic Americans

really care about. He's installed more Federal Court judges than any president in the past four decades forty years, we haven't seen a president put more judges on the bench. He's nominated and the Senate's confirmed a grand total of a hundred and seventy four Article three judges. Of course, you already know about those two Supreme Court justices, but on top of that, we have fifty Circuit Court judges

and one hundred and thirty three District Court judges. This is truly incredible, and two Court of International Trade judges. He's really made a substantial impact already. So what we have to think is what impact could he make with four more years. Relacting him could mean we see Rovie Wade overturned. It could mean that our rights will be protected for our children, our children's children, and for so much longer after that. Something we have to keep in mind.

And we're gonna be right back on the Buck Sexton Show. You're in the Freedom of Mind. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast. Hey, everybody, welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jesseato here in New York City in the Freedom Hut filling in for Buck Sexton. Listen to this a new gallop pull out saying race relations see a double digit improvement since Trump entered the White House, and I want to bring in my guest on this one.

I have Bruce Lavell here with me, executive director for the National Diversity Coalition for Trump and someone who's known Trump for a very long time. Bruce, Thanks for coming on, Hey, thanks for having appreciate it. Of course we're happy to have you. So you've seen this new gallop pull out and it indicates the satisfaction with race relations and the position of minorities in America have significantly increased since President

Trump took office. You know, they deliver a significant blow to this media fiction that President Trump is a racist. And you and I have heard this on the campaign trail for many years. You know, first touch a little bit on your experience personally with the president as a person of calling, what you're experience has been like, and then we're going to get into this poll. Yeah, well, yeah,

thanks for having me. You know, medicine is interesting because I feel like I'm like an expert on the subject, is I You know, I, of course I'm like yourself. I've did a little over four hundred shows, and probably two thirds of those shows from CNN, MSBCN or related to something race. So when I say expert, I think

I am in that category. But you know, interesting, I recall back in twenty fifteen on the twenty sixth floor, back in August, and I remember we were sitting at a round table about five one hundred plus folks that we're attending. Ninety percent plus African American were attending, mainly pastors. Pastor Darryl was there, my big brother from another mother,

love them to death. Is that I recall the presidents saying, well, at that time, Ken Trump saying he says, you know, the disconnect, especially in the black community, is the opportunity and hope and jobs. And he says, when I get become president, I'm gonna I'm gonna be a champion in terms of getting that unemployment down and watch this mess. And he said the other thing too, is restoring black wealth and generational wealth in these black communities, otherwise building

small business. So like some of the other other colleagues who have generational wealth through the business team out of his mouth Madison in twenty fifteen. And so in terms of you know, like yourself, you know the president very well, I know him very well, and uh, you know, I was totally just, you know, just really upset the fact that the mainstream media and all the folks are trying to paint a narrative as him being a racist when

he's not. So how does a man say forty plus years in the limelight for many years, Oprah actually telling him in nineteen eighty nine you should run for president on her show, viral on Twitter and giving Jesse Jackson, you know, rental space for his forty Wall Street. In terms of the Rainbow Wish Coalition helping you know, al Sharpton with some of his initiatives in New York. You know, the list goes on and on and on. Friends with herschel Walker, get friend of mine here in Atlanta. It's

a narrative change for the media. Bruce did it not because of the fact that he was running for president, because of the fact that he was running for president. As a publican. You have always said, it's interesting, Madison, one of the biggest voter suppressions out there in the land is to intimidate and persecute a person of color if they think anything outside of the Democrat Party. And it's a tool that's been used for many, many generations.

Because you know, I'm a lifetime Republican. I'm a Reagan Republican. You know, my first job in the campaign and high school was stuffing envelopes or rolla Reagan. So that's all I've ever known, and my dad and my granddad and so. But I recall as growing through the George H. Administration, the Reagan administration, when Bob Dole was on the ticket.

Of course when Clinton beat us, you know, it was always a constant persecution, intimidation, name calling if anyone of color even thought about the Conservative movement or the GOLP. So it's nothing new in that regards, but for some reason it was extremely harsh. You know, in twenty sixteen, it was like, oh, my lord, where is this coming from? Is because they saw there was an opportunity that when the president says, what the heck do you have to lose?

You know, it was very profound and you bring up a great point there, because he's right, what not only for minorities, but what did we have to lose as American people? After eight years of economic disparity the way I would describe it under President Obama. And when we look at the survey from Gallup, they demonstrate numerous categories in which the president has improved the lives of people in minorities status, you know, compared to Barack Obama, you

know when he took off in twenty seventeen. Here's all the way that life has gotten better, and of course some of those being economic related, and we know the economy has been strong. How how do you think this has played an effect on the president's support um and race relations when it comes to the rising, booming economy. Well, you know, black folk are waking up in the morning Madison, and there's there's like, you know what, I got a job.

They're starting to see, especially here in Atlanta and parts of Charlotte and Tampa, where I'm starting to see black business flourish, you know. And you know it gets down to this too. You know, when people are gainfully employed and they're taking care of their families and they're able to support their families, they're off food stamps. Yeah, essentially. Yeah.

And you know the thing is is that one thing I love about this president that people were given credit for when he first came out and he was campaigning, he talked about how vital and important the faith based community is and he knew that's why he met so many pastors from different congregations, methods, Episcopals, you know, Catholics, Evangelicals, and now I was there during the campaign just as

well as you are. He knew that that was essentially the nucleus of success of the community, not government, that right, and we saw him, as I mentioned earlier in the show, as the first president, Republican or Democrat to ever attend March for Life and support the lives of Ord Warren, which, as you know, we as Christians, you know, support here to me because I'm you know, I'm a I was rescued from an orphanage. I think I sent you that artistle I went viral about when the president just says,

you know, adoption, adoption, adoption. You know, I was in an orphanage and I was rescued. So you know, in terms of I tell people when something is a core issue in you and you're hired to be, well you're elected president or senator, or you've become a CEO of a Fortune five hundred company, that core value stays with you. And the great thing about President Trump is the consistency of saying, you know, this is how I am, and

when I become president, this is how I am. There was no wavering, there's no changes, and he mocks and makes fun I was like, well, I need to talk presidential and all that, and basically is what he says, like he is making sure that he keeps the organtic and authenticity of who he is. You know, it's kind of like, you know, if I'm a Christian, which I am, if I get elected something, I'm not going to just like, well, now that's an elected I'm not a Christian. No, that's

your value that comes with you. And I try to tell people, I don't understand why you didn't, Marshal, I said, because that's a core value. A core value doesn't change. It's because you get promoted or you get elected or whatever, and you need to understand now now. Unfortunately, Madison, historically the American people have been duped on both sides the aisle saying, well, now they're elected, I guess they have to change this way. And the president SHOs like, no,

be who you are. And I admire that, respectfully, exactly who he is, one hundred percent authentic, and that's I think part of why he's been so successful as president as a candidate before he was elected. And you know, you mentioned something a little bit earlier which I think was also reflected in this gallop pole, which we now know,

of course, have these hard numbers on when when. The narrative, of course is that this is not true and that you know, minority Americans, black Americans specifically hate the president and that their lives aren't better. But the reality is lies are better for many people. We talk about people feeding their families, we talk about people getting off food samps, getting jobs, people who hard working Americans who had been searching for jobs Bruce for many years that weren't able

to get jobs. And so we look at this report and Gallup reports an increase in the position of blacks and other racial minorities, the distribution of income and wealth and the opportunity for a person to get ahead through hard work. And isn't that the foundation of what our country is built on. That's certainly why my family immigrated to the United States. Is that not the case? Yeah, well, you know, it's interesting. Let's pivot on this for a second.

How many presidents in the past had come up and well, I don't even know if they even cared or promise anything. As it relates to prison reform, right now, there's no secret. Unfortunately our great nation has some some some wounds that we're trying to heal historically from what we've did, especially through segregation and some unjustice. As relates to our prison

system and our justice system. Do we have a seventy two year old New York and white man that becomes the largest champion in saying wait a minute, now, there's something not right with this. As it relates to the Clinton Crimeville in ninety four, which totally disenfranchised after American community. Oh absolutely, I mean devastated them. He jumped out there and look what happened in the Prison Step one Act.

And this is something he received so much bipartisan support on Bruce and I want to play a clip for you from CBS journalist Major Garrett, which I think is very interesting and really reflecting on the fact that I think even some Democrats, there's some Democrats at all, not as many as we like, are starting to recognize what's going on. And he got slammed for this. Take a listen.

This administration, because of President Trump's quiet prodding, has done quite a bit for funding of historically black colleges and universities. The first setback, which was a massive first step toward criminal justice reform just a couple of weeks ago, in this newly signed Defense bill, there is a law that says if you are seeking work for the federal government or any contractor, you don't have to be asked and you cannot be asked about your criminal history until right

toward the end. That's a significant change long sought by criminal justice advocates. Plus opportunity zones and the tax bill directed at communities of color, that is a legacy on the agenda side that almost any president after three years would want to claim. I'd like to get you to react to that one, Bruce. Yeah, Well, you know it's

interesting you heard opportunity zones. You heard to step one, which you've talked earlier, is that you know, there's really no one that's just literally stood up and speak it into existence. You know a lot of times, you know, the success for all of us in life is when our parents or someone speaks something into existence. The president speaks to the existence. What do you have to lose.

Let me tell you what's going on here. Let me tell you about how you can take an underserved community and build a business in in a forgotten area that's been left behind, which is the opportunity zones in terms of how you can go open up as we did here in Atlanta. A twenty six year old four months ago, first black young subway franchise owner under the Trump administration.

A young African American woman who owns the Slutty Vegan that makes the best veggie burghers and French fries on this side of the Mason Dixon line has a line out the door based on just the Oval Office and the administration and all the leadership, and these are just and these, Bruce, are just a few of the many stories that we hear from all across the country of opportunity that's been created by this present for minority communities. We're going to have to leave it there, but we

appreciate you so much for joining, for joining us this evening. Yeah, I appreciate it. It's an honor. Thank you so much. Thank you so much, Bruce. Well, it's been a great show. Thank you guys for inviting me in to your cars, to your homes here into the Freedom Hut as I fill in for Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Show. Have a great night.