What Change Looks Like

We'll talk about how that worked. And also a consent expert who says you need consent from a baby to change a diaper. That and more coming up. This is the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make No Mistake Academy, Great American Again, the Buck Sexton Show begins. For CIA analysts, it is more likely than not that there is a conflict, possibly a full blown war with

an emerging nuclear power. We're actually closer, in my view, to a nuclear war with North Korea and in that region than we've ever been. That we're probably closer to an outright war with North Korea than we have been in a very very long time. Got chance of war, I'd say, from where I sit right now, probably not that far off. Could easily construe what he's been saying as a declaration or at least a threat of war.

What is the ignition point for Kim and Moon's fuse with this provocative rhetoric, This escalatory rhetoric between the leaders of two countries that have nuclear weapons is slipping very quickly into something that could become very dangerous for the planet. I don't see the opportunities to solve this diplomatically. You have reason to be scared of a war that could wipe out five people. Think he wants to use nukes. That's what I think. He feels welcome to the buck

sex and show everybody here we go. I just think he wants to use nukes. Good call, Mika. I want to remind him of that now that he's brought three Americans home and is scheduled to have the first sit down between a president and the North Korean leader in history. Good call. Isn't it quite a week for the Trump administration. We had some fun there with that montage. Those were some of the revered senior figures of Democrat media and Democrat politics, and oh they were just so sure that

Trump is going to push US toward war with North Korea. Instead, they're having to think of ways to convince the American people that all stuff that Trump is doing, all the results that he's getting, are somehow a bad thing. We now have the summit set for Singapore. Talk a bit more about that in just a moment. With that, the backdrop that that is and why that's why that is meaningful in and of itself. We'll get into also the

Iran deal and many many other things, my friends. But I just have to note that at some point the rational response to so many not just missed but grotesquely wild of the mark, insanely off base predictions from the Democrat media establishment, at some point, you you've hear so much of it, you've got to say to yourself, I shouldn't listen to these people on anything. They really don't know anything. They they have no ability whatsoever to bring

together knowledge and experience to produce insight. They just produce nincompooper e on a massive scale. Uh. They're their predictions are kakamamie. They are not sensible when it comes to this president. I'm not saying on everything, you know, I'm sure, some of those folks are great at telling you about you know, I don't know other other things. I can't think of who it was specific enough. I think Dan Rather was one of Them's done here talking like this.

Somehow people still listen to him even though who journalism career ended and one of the biggest repudiations of integrity that I've ever seen. Uh, Trump brought background and I know, people, look, I I give you. I think I try to give you a a full and uh, multi fasciated perspective. Now it sounds like I'm the two Bobs and I'm selling you on why did TPS reports a multi faceted perspective? But really, I try to tell you what's going on from the other side too in some ways, so at

least we're not caught off guard by it. And they will tell you, oh, Obama got I think it was eleven prisoners released over his eight years, and it's like, yeah, but no one was saying Obama was about to start a nuclear war with North Korea either, right, Plus that was over eight years. It's been a year, so if you go by oh, I guess eighteen months or so. But enough if you're gonna go by by the numbers here, you could expect a couple of dozen hostages to get

for not hopefully haven't forbid. No one else taken a hostage. But you know what I mean, this is three in the early stages of year two of the first term. I think it's pretty good. But nonetheless, Kim Jong un could very well have held onto those hostages to give him a little extra leverage going to the negotiations, right

Why I let go of them now? In fact, wouldn't it be smarter if you were Kim, wouldn't you want to sit down with Trump and say, you know what, just as a good faith measure, you do X, Y and Z with the same actions right now, and we'll give you back these three guys. No, he gave back three before even sitting down for the meeting. So it's a good faith measure. It doesn't mean the North Koreans are acting in good faith. Though. This whole thing could blow up. Maybe that's a poor choice of words, but

you know what I'm saying. This whole thing could go south. I have no illusions about that. But I I start the show in the way I did today. I started the show the way I did because I wanted to really established what the baseline has been with this presidency and where we are now. And the truth is, they've been telling us that Trump is just a a crazy rogue elephant. There's no method to the madness. He's an ignoramis.

All he does is eat cheeseburgers and watch TV in his pajamas, and he's gonna start a nuclear holocaust that kills millions of people. That is what the people who are paid the most money from the biggest outlets in news have been have been peddling for going on two years now. And that's why I wanted to start that

with that montage. If you just start getting into a an understanding of how wrong they are and how if we're going to judge where Trump is right now, where the foreign policy of this administration is visa v all the biggest challenges that they've tackled so far. Oh, by the way, you know, they got like five of the

biggest ISIS leaders to just captured him. So Trump somehow is getting back hostages and capture and ISIS guys without delivering palates of cash, without bowing a lot, without apologizing for America all over the world, It's pretty remarkable when you think about that way, right, He's not using some of the old tricks from the previous administration. He's doing it his own way, and it's working. And that has the Democrats terrified. Yeah, they're saying yesterday that they can't

run on the economy. Can't. I mean, it's a joke. They're they're gonna try, They're not gonna work, and they can say whatever they want. Not gonna work, I think, And I mean they're gonna they're gonna lie about it, They're gonna do everything they can to misrepresent economy. But I just think that they're doomed a failure on that.

I think I think that they were acting under the assumption until pretty recently that national security and foreign policy would be a a week spot for Trump, right that that he wouldn't have enough accomplishments that counteract the narrative that they were going to craft of what what a buffoon he is, what a fool he is, all that stuff, Right.

They that they never anticipated, obviously, given what they were saying in the past, that this president would get to the place that he has gotten already on Iran, on North Korea, on a bunch of these problems, uh, dealing with the Islamic state. He doesn't really talk about that anymore. Yeah, people say, oh, but Obama did all these things with ISIS. Obama waited, he delayed, He was always he was always

behind whatever was going on in Syria and Iraq. With ISIS, the Obama administration was about six months behind where it should have been based on what was happening on the ground, sometimes more like a year behind. They eventually got to once they tried all the failed stalling and oh, let's go to the u N. Maybe they'll do something. A year later they started to do the right thing, and not even in a full measure manner. Trump came in.

He's just like, all right, we've got the best military in the world, got the best generals, colonels, non commission officers, up and down the chain, everybody. We got the best. Let's let them do it. Go take out ISIS. Do what you gotta do, and guess what the pace and the target. The pace of the air strikes increased dramatically. The speed with which our special forces on the ground with Kurdish militia were able to move against the enemy

increased dramatically. And who knows how any lives were actually saying in that process, because remember, it's not like in action has no costs. And that's one of the great

lessons of the Obama era. You see, a classic Obama ism was sit around, make sure you sound smart, make sure all the other smart people are gonna say that you're smart, and then just try to have your media buddies ignore the fact that not only was there terrible stuff going on in Iraq and Syria because of the Islamic State and because of the Syrian civil war with Assad, but they were building jihadest terror factories that were exporting

terror to Europe and through the cyber jihad, radicalizing people in our country that we're killing people. So this was not a problem that we could have ignored. We should not have ignored it as long as you ob administration did. But they thought in action. They always conflated in action with wisdom, right, delay with patients. These are not the

same things. Trump shows up and says, all right, let's see, let's see who's on her side, let's see who's not, and what are what are the problems we have to deal with? You know, why why should we why should the leader of the United States. I mean, given that we keep in money. The media is always saying Trump's not tough enough on Putin because they have this Russia obsession. Oh they want to they want him to, you know, call him out, call him a thug. The media is

always calling Putin a thug. But we have to show some weird deference in respect to Kim Jong un. Now, show him respect now, because he's gonna sit down and maybe we can get somewhere. But before that, he just wants to fire off missiles. He wants to be a little punk. The President United States said, all right, I'm gonna treat him like a little punk, and you know what, here we are. Was there any point in the eight

years of the Obama presidency. And it's not just that I'm trying to beat up on Obama and the and the clown car of foreign policy advisors he had, but I guess I'm doing that too, But also because I want to juxtapose what's going on now versus what happened before that. This is new, this is different. Trump approach is disruptive. Was there any point in the years of the obamaministration that anybody with a straight face was even talking about denuclearizing North Korea. I don't even remember it

as a discussion. It was just, you know, boxed him in isolate them sanctions, box him in islanom sanctions, but not even enough in terms of the sanctions, because you see, here's a critical component of it. Obama didn't want to have to deal with China in a way that was going to require any real statescraft. The state craft. The whole pivot to Asia was a fiction, right. It was just it was something that they talked about but never

really did. With Trump and with the sanctions we have in place now against North Korea, if if a Chinese flagged vessel or even a Chinese operator vessel under a flag of one of these flags of convenience from maritime nations, something to talk about with you guys at other time. But there's a reason why there are so many ships that are registered to these like tiny principalities, right, so many ships registered the bahamas Um. But we we we go after them and we sanctioned whomever is trying to

evade the sanctions that we have in place. So this is action. This is what happens when you actually tackle a problem instead of holding committees, holding meetings, getting the two bobs together, talking about the TPS reports, talking about how we're gonna have another meeting and another meeting. And you know, process cannot be the product for the commander in chief of the United States, right, we gotta leave that to the rest of them, slothful bureaucracy. But there

have to be things that are done. They're in the best interests of the American people. And I think that Trump sees that he's been doing it. It is It is a a an old maximum foreign policy that you should know who your friends are, know who your enemies are, and do they know the difference because of how you treat them? Guess what? I can't say it that's the Trump doctrine because it's been around for a long time, but it's certainly a doctrine that Trump has adopted in

large part as his own. And seeing the world with clarity and acting on that clarity can actually bring about results. Are we gonna do denuclear as North Korea? I don't know, Probably less than fifty fifties, just gonna be honest with you. But it's not zero, and it was zero for the previous eight years. While North Korea was firing off missiles and imprisoning millions of people in labor camps and engaged in weaponizing hunger and starvation and all kinds of horrible atrocities. Okay,

there was a zero chance under Obama. There is a real chance under Trump. And that's because of what this administration has done, the actions they've taken. We have so much more show. Stay with me. I really think he wants to do something. I think he did this because I really think he wants to do something and bringing that country into the real world. I really believe that, John, and I think I think that we're gonna have a success.

I think this will be a very big success. I think our secretary of State, despite the fact that the New York Times said he was missing, he was in North Korea. But I think our secretary of State has done a fantastic job. Mike, did you know that you were missing that couldn't find They couldn't find him. They couldn't find him because he was in North Korea. That's right, that a New York Times piece. I told you about it. They were they were angry or you know, Oh, could

the Secretary of Student not be around? Well, maybe he's helping get Americans free. Just just maybe there's some good things going on here. Herb in New Jersey has got some thoughts on the situation. What's up her good evening, buck, Um. You know, I'm I was very glad to watch this morning as the President and the First Lady greeted our fellow Americans being returned home, UH, and very pleased with the work that he and UH Secretary of State Pompeo

did to achieve that. UM. And like the President, I'm hopeful that maybe Uh Kim has decided that, you know, it's better to go along with the program and do some better things for his countrymen, UH than has been done in the past, because obviously that hasn't worked out real well. And what what we're proposing for him and his people would be a whole lot better than than

what they've had. But in that regard, UM, and there's also the possibility of the Trojan horse UH, and you, being a student of history, UM, are very well acquainted with the possibility that UM, this UH, this gift UH could be in fact a prelude to something that is reminiscent to me of the UH thing that happened to was that Kim's brother or uncle? And what Southeast Asian country did that occur? In Maia, Malaysia kind of close

to Singapore in general. Um, you know, I have to believe and I have to hope fervently that both the Secret Service and the company you used to work for, UM, I have given some thought to making sure that nothing of the sort could possibly happen uh to our president while he's in a foreign country. Yeah, no, I'm not. I'm not worried about that. I mean, look, Singapore is kind of a benevolent police state, so I don't I don't think we have any Plus we got us Secret

Service and everyone else. Uh, I'm not worried about that. But her By, I can appreciate that you you are concerned that there might be a might be a bait and switch, there might be a trojan horse. There's any number of uh construction and thanks for calling in her number of constructs here that could be in play where this North Korea thing is not really working out the way that we we are hoping it will. And like

I said, I think it's less than fifty fifty. So you're not I'm not the uh, you know, the Rosie lenses express over here or something. I just think that you've gone from a zero percent chance of averting a major conflict on the Korean peninsula to like probably a thirty percent chance in the first eighteen months of an administration.

It's pretty amazing. By the way, White House is gonna have one of its senior strategists for international affairs and agreements calling in a little bit to give us the White House perspective on this one. So I stay tuned for that and a whole lot more in the Freedom Hunt. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. Welcome back, everybody. I've been telling you what I think about the big moves on Iran and North Korea this week from the administration. Now we have someone from the

White House to weigh in. Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for International Negotiations, Victoria Coates is with us now. Victoria, thank you for making the time, Thanks for having me on bus. So what do you want the want the folks to take away from what's happened this week? What should what should we think about the trajectory going forward. Let's start first with what this means for Iran because I know a lot of people on the other side of the aisle are up in arms

about this. Well they are, and I think one of the things that's upsetting them is what you see manifest this week is American leadership being exercised in a resolute, clear way in the interests of the American people. And that is making people absolutely crazy because this president is willing to do things that they've told us for many years can't be done. He will say things that they they've said if you even mentioned that word, the sky will fall. Uh. And what has he gotten out of it.

We've gotten out of the Iran deal, which is disastrous. Uh. It was just to wait on our national security. We now have the opportunity to reapply pressure to irund We can use the model that we've been using on North Korea with some incremental success and really try to turn that situation around. What can we expect from some of

the now. I know that it's often left out of the mainstream media narrative that there are some allies little Saudi Arabia, the United Air Emirates that are at Israel that are quite happy with what's gone on here visa VI, the Iran deal. But you see a lot of the critics saying, well, what does this mean for our European partners that were part of the P five plus one. How do you think that's going to play out. What's

the White House plan to work with them? Well, we already are already are coordinating quite closely with them, And I just remind everybody that not three weeks ago, we had a seamless military action against Syria, closely coordinated with Great Britain and France, where all three nations participated, from ships, from submarines, from planes. We hit all of our targets, hundred and five Tomahawks deployed, and that was a tremendous

moment of unity. And that doesn't just go away. These are these are relationships and alliances of of decades, if not centuries duration, and that doesn't go away because we're not in one individual agreement. So we'll continue to work with them. The French, in particular, have been forward leaning in their public statements about their willingness to UH to look at an additional deal, and we're very encouraged by that. What would an acceptable renegotiated Iran deal look like for

President Trump and this administration. What are some of the key points that would have to be at it in Well, he really laid that out clearly in January when he set in May fourteenth to deadline um that he needs what what he would understand to be in the national security interests of the American people would be a deal that really did end Iran's path to a nuclear weapon, which we thanked thanks to the Israelis now definitively know this deal did not h We would have a deal

that addresses their pouring of resources into ballistic missile programs, their sponsorship of terror. I mean, they're basically, as a bastard, Bolton said in the Washington Post today, building this arc of death and destruction from Yemen to Syria. It's terrible. Everything they touch is a disaster um and we have to address all of this. Putting one little stovepipe in place that might delay their path to a nuclear weapon for a couple of years is a band aid on

it on a terrible wound. We're speaking to Victoria Coach, who is the Senior Director for International Negotiations at the White House. Victoria moving on to a North Korea for a moment. Uh, there are clearly positive signs. And whether people want to give this president to this administration credit or not, it's impossible to look at the return of three American hostages anything but a good thing and perhaps

a sign of good faith. In addition to that, we know when the summit is going to be between Kim Jong Own and President Trump, we know where it's going to be. What are the what are some of the expectations that we should have going into this. I mean, I know the administration has been saying they have very clear eyes. They're not promising the moon quite yet, absolutely, And I mean last night was a wonderful night. I

think you saw the best of President Trump. A huge success for him, um how much he cares about these individuals, and and this is this has been a top priority for our administration from the beginning. And we're going to continue to focus on all the other Americans unjustly detained from Iran to Turkey to Venezuela. There are others, of course out there. We're not forgetting anybody uh in in the course of this. But last night was was a

great victory for bringing folks home. And I just point out it happened before the meeting rather than having the release of the hostages be some kind of afterthought. It was very clear from the beginning that not much was going to happen until this took place, and so President just wants to make very clear that that he means what he says, and when he says he wants a verifiable, irreversible removal of North Korea's nuclear weapons, that that's his goal,

and that's what Secretary Pompeo expressed in his trips. You know that that that's what we're negotiating towards, and the North Koreans still want to participate, so we're encouraged. H We don't have any illusions, but you know, we're going to take each incremental success as it comes and hopefully

build towards success. How bullish are you that China I know that chis and Ping had his second meeting with Kim Jong ohen kind of a surprise meeting when it was first reported, at least to the rest of the world. How bullish are you that China is going to be uh A a completely constructive or let's just say it, a predominantly constructive partner in these talks with North Korea where they're clearly China client. China is clearly gonna be playing a role in the background. Oh, they have to.

I mean, you can't really separate North Korea and China out. And you know, China has their interests, we have ours. UM. We are interested in cooperation where we can have it. Obviously, they you know, they're quite aggressive in the South China. See they're doing things on trade that the President seems not terribly enthusiastic about. UM, and we're working on those issues.

But we're hopeful that this is a place where our interests in getting this situation resolved, uh is that our interests are mutual here and so we've been encouraged so far as I'm sure you know, the President and President g have a strong working relationship which is come in very handy and uh so we we are hopeful China will play They will see in their interests to play a constructive role. Victoria Coates from the White House. Victoria,

thank you so much for calling him. We appreciate it anytime. Alright, team, We've got a whole lot more coming up in our two if you want to call in and chat eight four to eight to five, eight four four nine hundred buck Later on the show, I'm going to talk to you about a story that you're gonna have to hear to believe. Is it in fact a reasonable position to take that one should strip down to one's underwear in order to protest the patriarchy. This is a real thing.

It really happened. The world's gone mad. I will tell you about that and more coming up. You are now entering the Freedom Technical Operations Center. Balls sensitive programs must be kept strictly. Need to know team buckets cleared and ready for the buck brief. So Irani and forward deployed forces in Syria fire off some rockets at Israel, twenty of them, as reported by the Israeli Defense Forces. Israeli's knocked most of them out of the sky and no

casualties suffered by the Israelis from that barrage. But perhaps there's something for America to learn in this, because the Israelis didn't just leave it at that, and they didn't respond uh in in similar fashion, they responded with an even bigger punch than the one thrown by the Iranian forces stationed in Syria. Dozens of air strikes over the course of last night, targeting all Iranian military infrastructure in Syria, turning much, if not most of it two ashes, just

lighting it up. The Israelis will aptly not tolerate Iranian forces using Syria as cover for assaults of any kind, and I think that this is going to affect the way that the I r g C conducts itself a bit going forward. Iran is not going to learn its lesson and that they're going to back off. They'll try to find other ways to hit it Israel, but I doubt they're gonna fire off rockets like that again anytime soon. Not worth it to them in terms of the cost extracted.

I do wonder, and I give give credit today to a David French, who says a sometime guest and friend of the show, for his piece on why is it that America seems to have a very strange almost tolerance of Irani and aggression. You go back in history and the things that Iran has done and been a part of against the United States have been uh barbaric in

many cases. And you don't have to go back far at all, in fact, just a handful of years, and many of you listening to exactly what I'm talking about because you were over there and you served, and so you know what I'm gonna say, the Iranians were actively sowing chaos and and murder and bloodshed as far as

uh and as often as they could in Iraq. You had Iranian proxies who were sending e fps explosively formed or these are Iranis, I shouldn't even say proxies sending explosively formed penetrators into Iraq specifically for the purpose of puncturing these You always could remember them when you'd see the aftermath UH photos and footage, These cylindrical holes in the holes of armored vehicles. Why would you be doing

that in the midst of a civil civil war? Oh, that's right, because they were trying to kill and maime American soldiers and we never really hit back at them for this, And it's something that you know, I think it's just because the Bush administration was so harried with trying to deal with the domestic political upheaval over over Iraq as well as a very complicated situation in the

Middle East. But remember there were some people who were saying that we should have also taken action against Syria, not to invade, but just punitive action for allowing all the suicide bombers to just the so called ratlines of suicide bombers from Damascus all the way to the Iraq Syrian border. Didn't really take much action there either. But with Iran, we seem to always want to back off, don't want to upset the apple cart even more, don't

want to do anything that would further upset them. And when you look at it, when you look at this country, that there is no more anti American regime on the planet. In a lot of ways, Iran's regime exists to threaten Israel's, threatened Israel's existence, and to proclaim it's hatred for America. Beyond that, it's not really that clear to me what they want to export. Remember, the Iran Revolution is not just for their own country. It's not supposed to stay

within their borders. The the Molas, the theocracy in Iran explicitly wants to export the Iranian Revolution to as many countries as it can. It's it's Islamic fundamentalist revolution, and that's why it uses proxies that are generally Shia across the Mid East. But it will also work with the Allo White Assad regime. He will work with Hamas, which is a Sunni terrorist organization operating predominantly out of Gaza

and trying to destroy Israel. It's time that we start letting the Iranians know there will be very severe consequences when they decide to step out of line. I mean, you will remember remember the Obama administration when the Iranians seized a bunch of American UH soldiers. Remember this, what are we doing response? Again? The Iranians lived by a very straightforward set of rules when it comes to how far they will push and what they're willing to do.

And it's when we sends weakness, we go on the attack. When we sense the attack, we go on defense. All right, they hunker down, they stepped back a little bit. There's no shared principle we have the Iranian regime. They don't care about life outside of their borders. They don't care all that much about life inside their borders in a lot of cases, and so we can't find common ground with them based on culture or ethics or anything like that. So I remember, we're talking about the boss is not

the Iranian people. An important distinction. Those who are running that country, though, are part of a totalitarian theocracy that brutalizes its own citizens and that engages in the widespread systematic murder of its political opponents abroad. Any anyone, for any government in any country, any regime the Iranians don't like,

they are willing to remove with force, with violence. So the the the break away from the Iran deal, I think is going to finally put us in a position to change not just the structure of the deal, which we were just discussing with our our frevoratory coachs who's a you know, from the White House on the international negotiation side as a special assistant the President, but but also to change our approach to Iran in a much

more wholesale fashion. No longer turning the other cheek to their attacks, no longer turning a blind eye to the mischief that they sew and the destruction that they are responsible for. I think that could really show also some of our allies the Mint East that we are we are more serious about tackling this problem this time, this time around. So I am I am somewhat optimistic about this. I'm so I'm optimistic about Iran, I'm optistic about North Korea.

I'm not the only one. General maddis my main man. He's optimistic about some of this stuff. Place six reasserted. Certainly their capability concerns us. On the military side, However, we see there is some reason for optimism. We said all along, this was a diplomatically led effort backed up by military force. I think there is reason for some optimism that these talks could be fruitful optimism. That's all

I'm saying. There is the possibility of things getting better. Actually, I really like Ari Fleischer had to say on this point of optimism as well. You know, he's the former White House Press secretary under Bush. Play eight. If Donald Trump is right that Kim Jong and wants to bring his country into the twenty first century, that is the

only reason North Korea would change its behavior. That is the huge reward, the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow for North Korea because they'll have a thriving economy and you look at South Korea, they're the same people. They'll take time with The North Koreans could be a very successful country, just as South Korea is. The questions do they want debate, do they have the

will to be? And when they give up the nuclear weapons, and the only precedent I can see for this summit meeting takes me back to the nineteen seventy eight or seventy nine, and it was Manacolm Bagan and Sadat who shocked the world once Sadat said Egypt will change each of one's peace with Israel. They didn't listen to any of the people Underneathan who said, don't have a summit meeting, it's too risky. They did it. That's the analogy I

have in mind here. And whether this will be successful or not, that's really gonna be up to King John. It is, indeed, so we're in a bit of a wait and see on this. I think Singapore, by the way, is a very good point, a very good place for the meeting to occur. Uh. It's from security standpoints great by the way, a lot of very fancy hotels there, so the delegation, anyone who's there is gonna have a nice time. But Singapore knows how to lock things down, and I think it's a very very good venue for

all this. It's also a place that you know, it's it's gonna set the stage properly in many regards. UM eight four four to five, you want to chat Team eight buck uh, let's maybe check in on what's going on, but more in the realm of domestic politics coming up here, what's going on with the Mueller probe and all the other things. Crack a locking in the background. Stay with me. When you're at work, you know your dogs are cooped up inside. So if you want to let out Fido

or Max or maybe Buck. But guess what when you let him off to burn some energy. They're running around the yard. Sometimes though, they start digging and they can get under your fence and you may have tried to even put stuff there to stop them. But you know what, you should stop all that and just try and dig Defense. It's genius and it solves major problems that a lot

of pet owners have to deal with digging. Dig Defense extends the protection of your fence underground, so no amount of digging is gonna let your pets out of the yard or let predators into the yard. We're talking predators like foxes, gunks, and raccoons. You don't want any of them there. Dig Defense helps you out with all that and more. It's available online at Loews Menard's Wayfair and stop the dig dot com. That's right, that's only need to go. Stop the dig dot com is a solution

to pets digging under the fence. Stop the dig dot com now, buck Sexton Mission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America great, You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts, No, Barack Obama created this problem because he said, hey, bring your kids here illegally. He never tried to do anything to legalize those kids that came here,

just a come here legally and will look the other way. Well, President Trump has said is we're getting back to rule of law. But we also acknowledge that there were six d and ninety thousand kids that came in under DOCCA, and we've to solve that problem. Let's address it in a way where you can get the president's signature, rather than some show vote where you're not solving the problem. Are you just actually making it worse. Here's one of

the problems. Rule law is not exactly enough here, because if you're not gonna have widespread deportation on the table for an an interior enforcement, if you're just gonna try to catch people at the border. Really, which is what now? So you can say, well, buck, now you're already discarding the law. I know, but is anyone talking about wide, scared, large scale deportation of illegal immigrants in the country. No, they are not, at least no one in knowing the

White House, no one in Congress. And then when you add into some of the loopholes and the current laws that are in place and how they can be exploited, you start to see, oh, wait a second, there's a whole lot of ways to come into this country and gain the system, scan the system. I mean, dreamers are are one of the best examples. I keep saying, guys, I'm telling you they do not have to prove anything. Really,

I'm sure they fill out paperwork. I'm sure technically on it it says, you know, you can't lie to the federal government. How many Dreamers do you think have or even would be prosecuted for falsifying any of the DOCCA paperwork? By the way, I don't like calling them dreamers, but DOCTA recipients? How many? I think the answer is probably zero. Maybe it's one or two, but I'm guessing it's zero. I have to prove that they came here through no fall to their own. They have to prove they came

here at a certain age. They just say, yeah, I follow within the basic parameters. You know, I'm I'm a an illegal immigrant from Mexico or Central America around a certain age where I can make this case, and so I'm gonna apply for doctor. Notice how we are led to believe that there are all these people that could have applied but didn't because they were roried about the

federal government. Maybe just a lot of people realize, oh wow, you mean I can just apply for this thing and then stay in the country, And definitely I'll sign up for that too. You mean, no one ever gets rejected from it, or if they're rejected, they're not prosecuted, So why not take a shot. It's a scam. Lots of stuff about it as a scam. I'm not saying there aren't any people that are brought here. Of course, there are people are brought here as kids. But I'm sorry,

I don't I don't think it's whatever that I mean. Officially, DOC recipients are in the neighborhood of eight hundred thousand, but the people that could be covered under doctors a few million once you started adding in these and then by the way, no one knew was related to somebody with doc is gonna be deported, You're gonna legalize them, You're gonna regalize them. Lawlessness on immigration begets lawlessness, and we got lawlessness all over the place, and we got

bad laws on top of that. It's a big problem. Kirsten Nielsen, DHS secretary, I saw reporting that she's been having some back and forth with Trump. And now I don't know is that this is it's anonymous sourcing, but it's coming from allegedly coming from the White House. But you know, Kirsten Nielsen is trying to tell Trump book, I'm doing everything that I legally can. What else do

you want me to do? Right now? With the people showing up with the borders saying that they are, you know, refugees from Al Salvador or Honduras, guess what we have to process them and that's what they're doing. And in terms of the illegals that are still crossing the border, and there's been a surge recently in those numbers, how are we're going to do more than we're doing right now? When we don't have a wall. Congress didn't get funny for Walt Trump didn't veto the omnibus bill without the

addition of a wall. You know, there's some very real concerns here about how affective we could even be if we had the political will to enforce our immigration law US. All right. You know, I think we we've been led that there's this perception that if only our political class uh would enforce the laws in the books, everything get a lot easier. There's still be illegals. I mean, we

get better, but there's still be illegals coming in. There still be And if you're not going to do interior enforcement, you still have twelve million illegal aliens in this country that are are de facto permanent residents. So this is why this is such a a thorny issue. Also saw this piece in the Washington Times that half, it's a lot, half of all Americans live under sanctuary policies that shield illegal immigrants for law enforcement. Think about that now, you

might be saying, punk, how is that possible. The single biggest illegal immigrant communities in the country are are this sing are the largest metropolitan area's largest cities Chicago, New York, Los Angeles. In fact, those states, which include two of the three most populous states California, New York, but California, New York and Illinois are sanctuary states. They're not even s.

Actually we're not even talking sanctuary cities anymore. So, just about just about fifty of the country's population lives in the sanctuary jurisdiction. Now and now understand that that then gets tied into the political base of the Democrat Party in all those cities, and the Democrat Party is if not open borders for a state of of poorout borders, quasi open borders and legalization and mass amnesty and poorest borders,

that is what they are in favor of. Because you can't compete with that if you're the Republican Party, if you're conservatism, you can't compete with new voters all the time showing up not picked by the immigration policy we have for their skills, for their ability to compete economically, and we're going to just as a matter of course, need more government assistance, government subsidy and expenditure than immigrants

who will be picked for their skills. This is not a complicated concept, but somehow it is really uh politically a third rail for a lot of folks, well for Democrats, not for Republicans, although I would note we could also toss into this whole situation. There's a lot of in fighting right now among Republicans in the Congress over what to do, if anything, about immigration, which I find troubling but not surprising tensions. This is a piece up on

the Hill dot Com today. Tensions on immigration erupt in House GOP, and this is what it says. House Republican leaders are scrambling to stop an effort by rank and file members to force votes on immigration, with lawmakers openly define their calls to stand down. UH. Centrist representatives Carlos Cubello, Jeff Denham, and Will Heard All Republicans facing tough reelection race, has introduced a discharged petition on Wednesday morning to trigger

a series of immigration votes. Discharged petitions are traditionally seen as a serious affront to leadership, making members reluctant to sign on. AH, so the GOP is not unified on immigration, and without getting in the specifics of who thinks what and where they are on one issue or another, here's what I can tell you. There are a lot of Republicans that don't want to be pushed on the issue too much. You don't want to have to say too much about it. But they also favor a highly permissive

approach to immigration. Highly that's their jam, that's what they want to do. I think a lot of Republicans, and we don't even really know because they haven't taken a vote on it, uh, would vote in favor not just of DOCA, but of actual amnesty across the board. That's a lot of them want it. However, many of you think there are there are many more that want it. And I think Trump I mentioned this conversations back and

forth with Kirston Nielsen DHS. I think his frustration is I promised the people of America that I would secure the border. We haven't done it yet. I promised them a wall. We haven't done it yet. You know, what can we do to get things going here? And I think Kirsten Nielsen is probably looking back and I saying, look, dude.

It probably doesn't say that. She probably says looked, Mr President, But you know, in Buck speaks, she says, look, dude, Uh, there's only so much we can do with the resources we have. The laws are the laws right now? And there are some loopholes and some some holes in them. And when you look at the sanctuary jurisdictions and how much political weight they have, there's just simply not the

political will in the Congress to do more. An absent legislation on this, Trump is not going to be able that. That's why the wall is so important. The wall is forever, right legislation, and it sends can kind of come and go, but the wall is forever. You get a wall built, it will change the game for enforcement at the southern border without a wall. Next time Democrats have the House in the Senate, we all know amnesty. They went for Obamacare,

but they could have gone for amnesty. And I think in retrospect some of them might feel like, you know what, maybe we should have done amnesty, you know, with Obama right away, because then we would have a supermajority of Democrat voters. Because by the way they they say, oh, they won't be able to vote lies, they'll be able to just give it time. We'll change that too. Who's gonna want to defy the uh the newly made twelve

million Americans. Who's gonna want to upset them and their children and their constituents and their you know, family members and friends and everything. They'll pass additional legislations, say oh yeah, and they can vote. If they had the House, the Senate, they would absolutely do it if they could. This is what we're facing here. I mean, you know, I I think we're probably going into the mid terms. Let's be realistic. I think we're going to mid terms without major legislation,

immigration passing, and without the Trump administration. I'm just gonna say it without achieving much on this issue, let's be honest. And it is a signature issue. Some would say the signature issue of the Trump administration. So I'm not I know, right now it sounds like I'm trying to balance out that Trump had an awesome week, which he did because of Iran and North Korea and a whole whole bunch of things which I'll probably run over, run through, run

over again tomorrow. But on this issue, you there's just not the there's not the movement, not the momentum we need to see. And you know, I don't want While I think the Democrats can't run on messages like the economy, I don't think I can run out successfully. They'll do it, but don't underestimate their deviousness, right, don't don't think that

the enemy is less capable than they are. Politically speaking, they will have some some narrative concocted here, and if they get in a position to push for greater ambassy, they'll use it. They'll use it the way you know it used to be. And I think Democrats are worried about losing certain members of their constituency. Notably, Democrats are worried twenty years ago about upsetting uh, Black Americans and people in unions with illegal immigration. And I'm not imagining

this or even you know, just surmising it. The New York Times to right editorials about this, about how it it hurts the organized labor movement and it hurts the black community to have a lot of illegal immigrant, low skilled the legal immigration. But now they realized, forget all that, because if we bring enough illegals, we can overwhelm, we can flood the system and then get anything else we want down the line, because they will change the demographic

makeup of the country to suit there political needs. Why convince the American people when you can change the American people. That has been the Democrat approach. Now for going on twenty years, and all the lip service about, you know, securing the border. It's just that was just to low list into a false sense of bipartisanship that didn't exist. And there are Republicans that were complicit in this too. I need Trump to focus on this, and I at least need to see the Republicans in the House and

the Senate fight on this. I mean, if they get blocked procedurally, okay, we can talk about maybe they have to go Newton. Maybe this is the issue where the Senators to say, you know what, no more of this we need, but now you need sixty votes to do basically anything that's not actually it's not in the constitution. That's not the way this is supposed to be. That's a self imposed constraint by the Senate that could be erased. We need action on immigration. We cannot wait until after

the mid terms. At a minimum, they need to pass legislation to show the American people what it is that the Republicans stand for on this and what it is that the Democrats do. Make the Democrats get on TV and and explain to the American people, Yeah, you know, we don't really think that there's anybody who's not a violent felon that should be barred from coming to and

staying in this country. Basically open borders, right. Yeah, maybe they have to check in with border patrol or with with Immigration and Customs enforcement before they come in, but you know, they've got to make sure they have access to different government programs. And I'm not saying they're not gonna stop and check to see who's coming in. They're just gonna let everyone in. Where is this team? Where is this Trump administration? Immigration? I need more than what

I'm seeing, and I think you do too. Well, maybe I'm wrong. Let me know eight four If you want to call in eight four or four five, we've got much more. Stay with me. So today we're here to send a message to the world that we are not going to let the country be overwhelmed. People are not going to caravan or otherwise stampede our border. We need legality and integrity and our immigration system. That's why the Department of Homeland Security is now referring of illegal Southwest

border crossings to the Department of Justice for prosecution. I have put in place a zero tolerance policy for illegal entry on Southwest border. If you cross the border unlawfully, then we will prosecute you. Is that simple? Well, they got to catch them first. It's not always that easy, and we'll see. That was our buddy, Jeff Sessions. I wanted to follow up on this though, because that the Republican few that's going on right now in the Congress.

It's over so called centrists, which are really just weak Republicans who are trying to force the House leadership to take up a vote to protect DOCA recipients. Oh yeah, that's right, These so called moderate Republicans, which I don't like that at all, right, because it makes Republicanism feel like some kind of a you know, uh an affliction, And it's only a moderately bad head cold, right, it's

a it's a moderate Republican. UM centrist is even better than that at least, right, But how about liberal Republicans there you go. Now we're getting closer. They want to get on the record voting for DOCCA. See, this is exactly what I'm talking about. We do not have a unified Republican front on this issue at all. There are plenty of Republicans that I think would vote for DACA

and DAPPA defer action of parents of arrivals. And now you're talking about five million people, you're already halfway there at that complete amnesty. And remember with each amnesty that actually happens, you get legal challenges and you get oh my god, go on and on and on people in the courts. Oh, I should have been covered under it. I should have gotten this. And you know, a c

L you'll just do everything in Canada. You know the a c L. You really exists now, along with Media Matters and some other terrible organizations, Southern Poverty Law Center, just to kick at the load bearing walls of Western civiliz Station. That's that's really what they want to do. Not helpful, not helpful at all. Disappointing to see some of these Republican members of Congress that that want to force a vote on on daka Ah because clearly they

just think that it's going to help them in their districts. Well, what about the rest of the country, guys, What about everyone else listening to the show, who doesn't live in a contested district, who doesn't care about the political future of a few people or a few dozen people even

in the Congress, does anything? Did they get their interests protected here at all, though, of course not What matters is the Republican machine that wants to make sure that it stays the Republican machine, then it stays in power, and they will abandon principles and sell out and do all kinds of stuff, very disappointing. We gotta watch them on immigration, folks. I'm telling you they're gonna pull us.

They're gonna pull a switch a rule on this one if we don't hold their feet at the fire Mueller probe. It's terrible. It's almost it's one year anniversary. We'll talk about it in just a few and how it should shut down. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops.

I want to get into all the latest on the Mueller probe with you, but before I do that, I just want to take a step back and discuss something else with you, and that is that you know in this business that I'm in, which whatever media, political punditry, analysis, politics, all different ways of describing what I've got going on here, right, But sometimes you get heated. Sometimes you feel like you're under attack, or you maybe feel like you've gone a

little too far on the attack, it's gonna happen. But if you're a decent person, if you're actually somebody who needs to maintain a certain level of character and just integrity in what you do, there's some things, some places you won't go in your public disputes with other political folks. There are some things you just wouldn't say. And I think it really exposes um a very common problem, not

among just Democrats in general. Look, I've got a lot of friends who are democrats, did a lot of Democrats, right, I don't. I don't hate democrats. Obviously that's crazy, But I do think that there's something in the Democrat ethos that is particularly susceptible to acting in a vile manner. I do believe that. I call me crazy, and I think it's reflected in the way that a lot of media media democrats act and how they treat people. You know, you also just see this for example, I mean, these

are what's the word I'm looking for? This isn't like a scientific study I'm doing here. These are just this is anecdotal evidence. But for example, whenever a liberal steps out of line, you can count on conservatives like me. But conservatives, uh like Tucker, Carlson and and and many many others to say, Okay, hold on a second, folks. You know somebody shouldn't lose their job for one mistake. Let's let's dial this back a little bit. You know this.

We don't want people getting fired for what they say. You don't really have that with liberals, you really don't. They're like Gay's conservative. Give him, finish him off and his career no more livelihood. You know, that's their approach, Just the way they do things. Happens time and time again. I mean, I think it's fair to say that that powerful liberals in the media and politics are nastier. They just are. And with all that, I then turn your

attention to Philippe Rains. I don't know if it's yeah. I has to be Philippe because he spells his name that way. He is very close confidante of Hillary Clinton, referred to as the gatekeeper in the last election for her, he was brought to the State Department. This is by the one of the reasons why I had to leave the federal bureaucracy under Obama, because yes, it did bother me that Obama was the commander in chief when I was at the CIA, I did tell you the truth,

not like that aspect of the job. Uh. I also didn't want to be in a position in the federal bureaucracy at all where I'd have to respond to, you know, taskings and questions and give briefings to people like Philippe Rains, who was brought in to be like deputy deputy UH secretary of his deputy assistant secretary of State or something like that. I think he was das level UH for strategic communications, so he was brought in as a senior

State Department person. This clown out and out clown, very very tight with the Clinton's, very tight with Chelsea Clinton and all the rest. Okay, why am I talking about this guy? You may have also seen some stories that uh, different gossip magazines have been running about the well they separated, or the separation of Donnie Trump Junior and his and his wife, which you look, it's always said, you know, I I don't. I never would be somebody who disagrees

with someone's pology. And I agree with Donnie Trump Junior's politics, and I liked Donnie Trump Junior. But I'm just saying, if it wasn't the other side if it was a Democrat, I don't. I don't dance on the grave of another man's marriage. You know, we're a woman. I don't do that. I don't. I don't cheer. This is also a problem I have, by the way, with the whole Democrat ethos when it comes to Mueller and the Special Counsel. I don't want to see all the Democrats get sent to prison. Look,

Hillary broke the loss. If you're channing lock her up, and she's broken a lot of loss, I mean, she's gotten a lot of passes, right, But so it's a little different. But in general with Democrats, I don't want them sent to prison. I don't want their kids to have to see them through like a plexiglass, you know, visiting room. I just think they're wrong and they've got bad ideas, but that they would, you know, cheer someone like me, Oh he fills in for Glenn and Rush

and Sean and nationally syndicated conservative talk host. You know, it would cheer no matter what I got sent to prison. Forth, I got to sent to prison for you know, uh, going over my allotted group er catch or something. You know, they'd be like, that's great, our fisheries are critical. Send him to prison. They don't care. I just want to

see the other side suffer. And I think you see a lot of the lack of character of people in the media too, with the pylons, and you know who's really not who really celebrates the downfall of public figures that are their political opposition. You know who really sinks their teeth into that, really kind of enjoys it. That's why I mean, I think media matters, for example, it's just a trash organization full of trash people. I could I could not do what they do and feel good

about myself. Look for the moment to pounce to end someone's career for mistakes real and imagined. By the way, I mean, I had to laugh and I it wasn't even Media matters. Was media which is a They have some conservative writers, some liberal writers, and that's just got a general media set. Only people in media go to the site, by the way, but we're all very aware of it. And they said that I compared John Carry to the Taliban. It's just laughable. And compare John Kerry

to the Talibana. Compared acting as a shadow government to what the Talibanda, which is set set up shadow governors. So I mean, they're just you know, that wasn't a big deal. And and and anybody, anyone left eevery wants to debate Afghanistan, foreign policy or any of these things, happy, happy to give them a free lesson and a buck slap at that. But you know, and that's one of the reason why I make fun of people here. But I look, I punch up. I don't go after people

that are in a really tough spot, you know. I don't go after people that are um suffering through an addiction or ill health or you know. I don't do that. And if I do, by the way, you always always keep me honest in that and I will uh either stop or apologize or you know, whatever is needed. Because I come to this show, my family listens to the show, my parents listen to this show. I come to this with an integrity and an honor. And that's a very

important part of what I do. And it's one of the reasons why I feel proud of what I do, regardless of the ratings and everything else, which by the way, are very good, but don't worry about that for now. Regardless of all that, it's important to me and So it's with that that I see a senior Clinton aide who in reading about the marital troubles of Donald Donald Trump Jr. And Vanessa um well, Vanessa Trump, I forget

what her original name was. And then this article about Vanessa Trump's high school boyfriend, who was, according to the New York Post, involved in gang activity. That Philippe brains a senior State Department officer, Okay, with close ties to the Clintons, buddy buddy with Hillary, close to Bill, close to Chelsea. I mean, this guy is at the top of the Democrat swamp pyramid. This is what he wrote to Donald Trump Jr. On Twitter. Quote, Vanessa being with

a Latin king must have driven you. This is he's talking about this man's wife, mother of his five children. Okay, Vanessa being with a Latin king must have driven you insanely jealous, the machismo, the passion, tough act to follow. Did you wonder if she fantasized about Valentine Rivera when intimate with you? She did every time? End quote. Now I'm just letting that, letting that sink in for a moment.

That is a dirt bag, scummy thing to say to anyone First of all, I mean, it's just it's you know, it's it's it's crazy on a whole lot of levels, right, Like for it's it's it's a pathetic thing to say. It's a deeply nasty thing to say. But do you think that Philip Brains will he won't be invited to like the next big you know, vanity fair party with

all the Democrats, Not he'll be there. Do you think that there will say that you know, he needs to go on the apology tour as though he maybe said a word you know, he referred to like transgender people in the wrong way. Has to go bend the knee and and kiss everyone's shoes until they finally, you know,

allow him back into polite society. No. No, because Democrats are nasty and Democrats don't feel bad about this, and in the era of Trump, anything they can do to attack anyone, especially someone in Trump's family, they go for it. They go for it. Um, Like I said, this is not some random troll on the internet. You know, left loves to play that game. Look at this racist thing that you know, this Twitter account. Racist clan member seven to five seven three said this guy has at least

fifteen followers on Twitter. Look at what he said. We need to tell CNN about this, you know, yeah, this is somebody who's important to the Democrat Party, somebody who's connected, who should know better who it was. It was this. I'm sorry, I'm just it was a guy in communications at a senior at the most senior level the state department. And this is how we would this is he wrote

this out. It wasn't like a spur of the moment, you know, said it during a heated debater, so not that that would be okay, but just a scummy thing to say, a lowlife loser comment from a low life loser person. Phillip brains. I've never met the guy and I don't care to, but this is just way over the line. And his apology, by the way, wasn't even really an apology. It's even worse, he wrote, with time to think. I regret the tweet, but I wrote I wrote it. I own it, so leaving it. Oh, he's

gonna leave it up. Friendly's I'm sorry to disappoint. It's a learning moment. Vanessa Valentine wrong to include you, Ma maggots, which is maga spelled with a T. Take your vitriolic hypocrisy and shove it, Junior. You ain't seen nothing yet. So he's not even apologizing to Donald Trump Jr. Uh. You know, folks, there there are there are limits that and every man I know listening to this knows exactly

what I'm talking about. It doesn't matter how big you know, it doesn't matter how big you are or the person saying it doesn't matter what the circumstances. There are lines you cross, and you do so much your peril. You make comments like this, like what Philip Rains did about a man's wife. You know, he just made said to hand you in a in a in a man way, however that may be, and you're asking for it. So uh. You know, I just I see this and I think

to myself, it's not even surprising. It comes from Democrats. This is just how they are, you know, this is how they operate. There's such a there's just a really a celebration on the left in this country of the of a lack of character, of dishonesty, of fighting dirty, whatever it is, as long as it's for the cause. As I say to you, it's it feels very Soviet.

You know if it's if it's for the betterment of the party, if it improves the standing of the party against its enemies, anything you do is okay, is excusable, and and he is even praiseworthy, no matter how grotesque, underhanded and disgusting. I mean, Philip Brain should be ashamed of himself. He better watch it with comments like this. Donald Trump Jr. Is obviously remember the first family. You know he's gonna just ignore this and take it in stride.

But he doesn't want to say this to some other Republicans about their significant others, their wives. I can tell you that much. This guy's a punk, a first class punk. I'll be right back. It's been about a year since this investigation began. Our administration has provided over a million documents. We fully cooperated in it, and in the interests of the country, I think it's time to wrap it up.

I gotta agree with like Pens. I know people are giving Pens a hard time in the press recently, but there there are competing This is one thing that gets left out of this whole discussion about Muller and everything else. There are competing goods here, competing goals. It's not as simple as just you know, were we got our ad justice. You're gonna gotta find out the Russia collersion, you know,

the stuff with its Russia collusion. No, there's a country that the president has to run, and they have provided no evidence of any kind that President Trump did anything wrong. And yet he has people all around him that are being pulled into perjury traps and spending hundreds of thousands and will end up being millions altogether on lawyers and going through all this. And you know it's the CNN is the Mueller Probe slash Stormy Daniels channel. That's all

they do. You know, I just I just watched the feeds all look at that more Muller, more Stormy Daniels. What a surprise. You know, this guy Avannadi is running around and being treated like some kind of luminary, like he's a thought leader on things. Meanwhile, who's some very good analysis today? By the way, is I'm making the rounds? Who's paying this guy Avanad? Stormy and Aniels aren't paying him? It's not that I'm aware. How's he getting information about

possible payments to Uncle Cohen? Who leaked that to him? Oh he won't say, because's a lawyer, right, I wonder, I wonder, I wonder if anyone who has say, subpoena power, maybe pushing some information to have a naughty and now I know, and he's even backed off saying that he had the right Uncale Cohen. But it doesn't make you wonder,

doesn't it? Who is paying for this guy? And and why did all of a sudden a lawyer come along who told Stormy Daniels to, yeah, go ahead, violate the n d A, that you sign the nondisclosure agreement, possibly subjecting yourself to millions of dollars of liability. Yeah, just go for it. It's almost like maybe there's some other agenda at work here, Right, we can see that this isn't really about and and and about what getting to the truth of whether the president had an affair ten

years ago? Who cares? At this point? I have to wonder if someone really supposed we're really supposed to dig down into that. And the president's dealing with forwarding a nuclear armed Iran, stopping ending in nuclear arm North Korea, a booming economy, record low unemployment, tackling the media, finally humbling many of the pompous jerks in the mainstream media that really need a good dose of humble pie. And we're supposed to be worried about what some stars ten

years ago. It just doesn't It just doesn't wash. It doesn't work. And like I said, there's the competing good here of the country and having a government that can actually focus and do its job, which is already tough enough, versus finding out more about you know, Russian stock puppets and Facebook trolls, and this is just lunacy. It really isn't. But I'm I have lost patience with it. I have to keep talking about it because we're in a fight and it can't be a one way fight or else

we'll just lose. Right, But I don't want to hear about this stuff anymore. Oh, I gotta talk to you about this woman who strips down to defeat the patriarchy. Quite a way to go. That's up next, Buck Sextons decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show set. No President Trump is speaking.

Let's go to them. We fight to build their borders, but we don't fight and spend no money to build our borders. Figure that one hour, we're fighting and we're finally putting America first. And remember the last time I did this, and this started two and a half years ago. When I just started, people were not saying Merry Christmas anymore. The big store chains were saying Merry Christmas, Mary Christmas. They weren't doing it. They weren't saying Merry Christmas. Now

they're saying Merry Christmas again. To bring back our jobs. Were cracking down on unfair trade. We want trade deals that are fair and by the way, reciprocal. And we love our farmers. We're taking care of our farmers, and we love our factory workers. We love our workers. Blog an Elkhart, Indiana. For decades, American presidents responded to foreign cheating on trade cheating. There's no other word for cheating. They responded with silence. They didn't do anything. They were silent, silentio.

Let's not rock the boat. Oh that's fine. We have a hundred billion trade deficit with Mexico. Think of it, hundred billion trade deficit a year with Mexico. We have a trade deficit with almost every country in the world. We're changing that around rapidly. We racked up trillions of dollars in trade deficits also known as losses, while other countries stole our factories, stole our plants, stole our wealth, and stole our jobs. But America's long silence is over.

And you see what's happening. Car companies are coming back into the United States. They're moving back in. Christ Are just announced. Japan is building big ones, were exp ending our plants. All right, So the presidents out there in El Car, we're gonna I want to jump in here because I was I still need to tell you about the woman is fighting the patriarchy. Uh, think about the

economic message you just heard there from the President. What are the Democrats gonna yield the mountain opposition to that going the mid terms? The answer is not very much. And think about the messenger versus whatever they're gonna bring up on their side of things. So I was interesting to the president out in Indiana, UM, and uh, we will maybe come back into it if there's some more stuff that we think is central to our discussion here. So I imagined that I did want to talk about

it because I got other things. This hour set up that I'm also gonna get to talk about Michelle Obama's recent comments on men failing up. We'll get to that, and the craziest consent teaching on TV I've ever seen. You need to ask your baby before you can change it Staper, I kid you not that coming up too. But first, Cornell probably best known as the worst of the Ivy League schools. I know who you could boo me, those of you who went there. You send me the

emails you can. You can trash stock Ambers for all you will, but it's that's fine. Cornell is the worst of the Ivy's. It's it's it's still a great school, right, It's just you're in a rich neighborhood and you got the worst house on the block. But it's still a rich neighborhood. I just like the needle Cornell people. I can't help it. I know, people you can. You can get mad at me for it. I know. I'm sorry. It also reminds you Andy from the office. It's like

I went to Cornell. It's an acapella group. Anyway, a Cornell senior was giving a uh giving a presentation in a class and the professor told her that she maybe professor mag Magore is the name or majure, don't know, masure Let's I don't know. Um, yeah, masire, let's just go with that. Told her that maybe her shorts were a little short, and then it might be distracting from

the presentation she was giving. So this senior at Cornell has gotta be twenty one or twenty two years old, decided to she said during her acting in public performance in Everyday Life class. Uh, you know what, guys, this is all I think there's all a high concept fraud. That's what this is. I don't think this was I don't think this was in earnest. But it's pretty fun I mean, it's kind of funny. Anyway. She now has gone viral in her underwear, so there's that. Probably has

a TV career ahead ever. Leticia Chai is her name. She set up a fit. Wait, we have audio of this, guys. There is audio play the audio of Leticia Chai stripping in her Cornell class down to her underwear. To quote ro test the patriarchy because this topic transcends all of our social identities and top right into the heart of who we are. Because I'm more an Asian, I am more than a woman. I am more than Letitia Chry. I am a human being. Is she in an acting class?

Do you think that was an artist? I can't really tell. This is during her thesis presentation to protest her professor. Who wants to guess that she got on a. I'm telling you she got it's a female professor. By the way, I'm not that's not a sexist comment. I'm just saying that the professor has got to give her an a now because it's become a big issue, become a big thing. She stripped down to her undy's. Now there's photos of her undie's all over the internet, and she says she's

protesting the patriarchy. You know, I got problems with us on a on a number of levels. One, somehow third wave feminist, radical feminist, whatever you wanna call them, take this position that you know, you're not allowed to discuss the appropriateness of a woman's dress in any issue at any time. Really. Uh, you know this is why you also get radical feminists that like to walk around just topless just because because they're trying to make some point

about being topless. But the but the but the point is if you're giving a presentation in a class. If you are actually in the workplace, there is such a thing as appropriate and professional dress for men and for women, and that's a legitimate discussion to have. And if you're wearing particularly revealing clothing in a professional setting. Uh, like the daisy dukes are the short genes right? Yeah? For

example male or female wearing the daisy dukes. I mean, you know, I feel like I can pull off daisy dukes under the right circumstances. Maybe maybe all of your wretched right now here we go, correct John, correct? Uh, but you know the daisy dukes. Uh, that would be not the thing. If you're going up to give up a presentation on your you know, neuroscience thesis, I think that the professor panel might not necessarily get the full

depth and gravity of your research and your message. If you're up there in a bikini or if you're guying, you're up there in uh a mankini, which is also a thing known as a bathing suit in Europe. You know people who say Speedo Speedo is a brand, It's not really. I feel like they said, are you wearing a Speedo? Why do we There's a lot of brands that make those kinds of of snug. Uh. I have a very very close for who insists, by the way, I'm wearing the more eurostyle uh bathing suits and I

can't you know, I'm sorry. I just always think it's funny. It never gets older. I'm just like, why do you choose to wear the supertight snug little you know? And he's just like, this is how I like to roll. And I said, all right, go for it. Uh. But anyway, so there's appropriate and inappropriate dress for different situations. This professor. People have actually stood up for her and said that she's um, she's trying to quote impart the importance of

professionalism in public speaking situations. Quote uh, masure is a gift to Cornell, and that shys post and the Shy as a student did not adequately represent Majour's past and continued advocacy for women and minorities, and that Majore apologized on more than one occasion. Eleven of the thirteen students in the class issued a statement saying they supported shoes protests,

but not her version of what happened. You know, this is what this is what you end up seeing this if your cause is righteous even if you're lying or making stuff up or misrepresenting it. If you are quote quote raising awareness, the left will come to your side and say, yeah, it's great, waits raise awareness. That's all you have to do. If you're raising awareness, you get a pass and everything else. Find this to be yeah,

a bit troubling. Also, I don't think the patriarchy gets upset if there was, if there was such a thing as the patriarchy, I think being a young, uh telegenic female twenty two who strips down to her underwear on video, I don't think the patriarchy is like, yeah, we feel really chastened, and we would we would really never do this again. I'd never want to see a lady in underwear again. So what we uh we are thoroughly uh

disabused of patriarchical motions. I don't think that's how they react to this if there were, in fact the patriarchy.

I'm just saying, I'm gonna tell you about some Michelle Obama comments when we come back if he as women are still suspicious of one another, if we're still if if if if we still have this crazy, crazy bar for each other that we don't have for men, if if we're still doing that today, if we're more comfortable with, if we're not comfortable with the notion that a woman could be our president compared to what you know, I wish that girls who could fail as bad as men

do and be okay, because let me tell you, watch men fail up. It's it is. It is frustrating, frustrating. It is frustrating to see a lot of men blow it and win, and we hold ourselves to these crazy, crazy standards. So that's Michelle Obama, who is who is treated as the closest thing that America has to royalty.

I don't think anybody would really dispute that. I mean, Michelle Obama is among the most uh I know, by not a lot of you are probably not all that impressed, but by the general media and Hollywood consensus and the Democrat Party. I think she's running, by the way. But we'll talk about that more another time, or maybe we'll talk about it now. She's among the most beloved figures in the country. That cross is sort of the political,

cultural and uh, you know, media sides of things. And I just have to say that whole slew of words she just put out there was blather. It really was. It was nonsense. And what I can see is that this is someone who won, is not is used to at this point just not being challenged. And I would really put that to you. When do you think was the last time somebody told Michelle Obama to her face

you're wrong about about anything. It's been at least eight or ten years, right, It certainly hasn't happens since she was the First Lady. And I've I've I've actually never seen her in a debate, so you know, I I understand I've never seen Milanny in a debate either, but that's a different thing. Right now, we're talking about somebody who's no longer the First Lady, but it's still out there and and it's treated like her opinions on everything

carry tremendous weight. And I would just invite you, and I would even say, if you happen to be one of my Democrat peeps who listens to this show, be honest about it for a second. Her whole thing there about women failing as bad as as men, I mean badly as men, and be okay, we're talking about half

of the world versus half of the world. I mean, you have to try really hard to take the culture of victimology when the Democrat Party and apply it to uh, all women against all men, and do it in a way that you think you're being constructive or or in any way helpful. Uh, this is just the the pandering of the politics of frustration from Michelle Obama. Right, crazy bar. I mean, I really I wrote down some things that

she was speaking there. I mean, I heard the clip last last night and I wanted to talk about it on the show. A crazy bar for each other than we have for men. So so she's saying that we have a lower standard for men than we do for women. That's just not a statement that has any intellectual worth in it whatsoever. Meaning there's there's it's not defensible, it's not a smart thing to say. It's so broad and so flimsy as to be really meaningless except it panders.

But but yeah, that's right. I'm frustrated because men are bad. Yeah, you know women in the crowd. Yeah, this is really toxic and for for Michelle Obama, who, as I said, is among the most revered and look now she's she's not just the member of the First Family. She's out there given speeches and interviews and very public person very much a part of the national discussion on a whole

bunch of political issues. For her to be out there and really playing to the resentment of women and a lot of the you know, a lot of you listening now, the women listening to show. By the way, we have a particularly strong contingent of women for the talk radio world who listened to the Buck Sexon show. So ladies, high five and thank you. People are like, oh, wow, women listen to Buck shows. Like, that's right because Buck

just does content for everybody. But you're probably thinking yourself, yeah, that's so, that's that's like, it's really you're like, you think you're talking to a room full of losers, in this case, a room full of women who are losers. You know, yeah, like men, it's so much easier to be men, and we don't hold them the same standards, and you know, men fail up. We got an opioid epidemic in this country where men are actually declining in

life expectancy, and we're talking about men failing up. I'm sorry, but it's just if she wants to talk about specifics, you know, you know, men are paid more than women in this industry or that industry. I'm happy to tackle that, but just to speak about it and just in such a broad way is not it's the opposite of helpful. It's actually hurtful. It's not smart. And I just get the sense from Michelle Obama that no one ever tells her that what she says is actually not profound at all.

It's really the opposite of profound. Sometimes I'm not some I'm not some Michelle Obama hater, but I'm not a fan either, obviously definitely not a fan. But you know, she's entitled their opinion, but we're entitled to say that's not a very smart opinion on some of these subjects, you know. And you can tell to there's kind of

a practiced tone and everything. And this is where I say I would ignore it for the most part, except for the fact that you know, Michelle Obama is I I would not be Why have her say it now? Why have her come out now when it's all there's all this focus on Kamala Harris and maybe Bernie Sanders. I'm still here, baby, I'm in the game. Put me in, coach, put the helmet on. Uh you know, well, there's all this focus with them. Who I mean, who else is

even really in the company. There's a bunch of other I'm not trying to be mean, but like be and even c team candidates on the Democrats side, I think they're gonna run in. I mean, I'm here at all kinds of crazies that Biden says he's gonna come back. Maybe. Uh. Michelle Obama has the name, recognition, the power, and the party behind her the day she decides she wants to run,

So she is a turn key presidential candidate. And what better way to un erase the erased Barack Obama uh policy legacy that remember what's going on with Trump right now, than to have Michelle Obama come into office and reenact a lot of it and push it even further. So I'm telling you you didn't hear it here first, but you're hearing it from me. Keeping on, I am Michelle Obama going forward. I think she's running. He's holding the

line for America. Buck Sexton his back. You know, sometimes there's a weird story out there that I just have to talk to you about because I don't want to be alone and knowing about it. So there is this uh, this sexual consent expert, which I didn't know. I'm being honestly, I didn't even know it was a thing. But she's down in Australia and and now a lot and a lot of your probably like how to spake Australian, and every Australia I know hates Fosters, hates the accents and

the commercial doesn't like outback steak house. They think that it's all just anyway. Um. But there's this woman who named Dean Carson or Deanne Carson, Yeah, Deanna, I guess who works for an organization which teaches children about consent. And she says, we work with parents. Well you know what, actually, let me just just play the audio for you. By the way, this woman, um, which I thought was interesting, has completely bleached purple hair, so if you see her

on the internet you'll you'll know who she is. Play the audio please, How young is some of the children you talk to? We work from children from three years old. We work with parents from birth. It's from birth. Yeah, yeah, just about how to set up a culture of consent in their homes. So I'm going to change your nappy now, is that okay? Of course the baby is not gonna respond, yes, mom,

that's awesome. I'd love to have my nappy changed. But if you leave a space and wait for body language and wait to make eye contact, then you're letting that child know that their response matters. What the heck is she talking about? And then he wants to change your nappy? Now, Oh, it's time to change your nappy? Do you want me to change? No, you don't want me. You can't speak yet, but perhaps you you will give me morse code through your eyelids as to whether I should change your nappy.

Babies they're like burping and farting up a storm, like what is this? This is? I understand that people will say anything pretty much if it gets them on TV, and she certainly has a unique take on things, but establishing a culture of consent when it comes to changing your baby's diaper, I I just I mean, it's it's crazy, but I even disagree with what she thinks she's trying to do, which is I think how weird that is

for the parent. Look like you're gonna create the this notion that like the baby, why is it just changing the diaper? By the way, the baby and I don't have one yet. So a lot of you have a lot more expertise than I do. But I actually visited uh my ms Molly's sister's baby recently. It's very, very cute. But you know, a baby is not gonna be you know, driving you around like a car with a steering wheel, right like, you pick it up, you move it around,

you feed it. It is completely reliant upon the adults to nurture it and and yes, to keep it alive. So there there actually is no consent when it comes to babies, because babies are not actually capable of consent and telling parents to ask for consent. It's just one of the weirdest things I've ever seen. And keep in mind, this isn't someone who just like went on TV and said something downb like, oh, like you're stopping in Times Square asking strangers let me say something crazy. No, it's

not that she is allegedly a consent expert who's teaching. Also, by the way, consent to children, I understand that it is so later on in life they understand what consent means. But you know, most senseient adults or or even young adults understand like it takes two to tango and the other person has to want to dance right like there, and you you have to make sure you know that and when you know, you know and then you go. But instead you've got this just completely bizarrely. If you

haven't seen it, you gotta watch. Just played John play at the beginning again, just so I didn't miss here. So just give me the first like twenty seconds of how young is some of the children you talk to? We work from children from three years old. We worked with parents from birth from birth, Yeah, just about how to set up a culture of consent in their homes. So I'm going to change your nappy now? Is that okay? To change nappy now? Is it okay? What? Thank you? Yes?

Stupid question, well played? What idiocy? But I'm sitting here and I'm like, uh, she's a consent expert and she thinks that this is it's just such a string. What's next? Like, you know, I just want to create a culture of surveillance and and lawfulness in the home. So we'll set up a little surveillance cameras in every room so the parents know they're being watched. Right, craziness. This this one kind of viral today because everyone's like, no, this is bonkers.

I'm pretty sure you know what the little baby should be thankful if someone's changing the stinky diaper. How about that? How about teaching the baby to say thank you mommy when you change a little diaper. It's craziness, it really is. It's uh. I had to play it for you. I had to. I couldn't deprive you of that bit of lunacy. I mean, it's one of the more crazy things I've heard all week. We've got roll call coming up here in a second. I don't know if we can top that. Oh,

it's well cool with your nappy? Would you like me to take your nappy and dabit around your mouth after your meal for roll call? Or Z? Are you going on stage later? We'll be right back. The show ain't over yet, folks. Keeping it real, it's time for role all. I just love that we got you, got our buddy Andy, our voiceover guy, to to say things like keeping it real. I don't I don't think he's gotten requests to say things like that before. They might. I think I might

be a first. Uh so, uh, here we have it. I'm getting used to the swamp down here. I gotta say it's a little steamy, a little misty out, you know, but if you embrace it, you can get kind of used to it. Just gotta keep lots of lots of changes of clothes on hands, you know. Undershirts don't last long in the swamp. Uh fun to talk to uh Neil Cavudo before today. I don't know if you call it that, we'll put it up on Facebook. But I got a chance to chat with our buddy Cavudo, and

I did not wear a tie, you know what. I kind of like no tie buck. I wonder what you all think about that, you know what I mean. I'm down, no tie, no shave. I don't have time for it today. I feel like it's a little more authentic sometimes just roll into the studio the way I am instead of like, oh look at me today. I've combed my hair and I have all can spam. I'm so ready to go. So yeah, a little bit of a different vibe. Alright, your thoughts not mine, Let's do this roll call. I

actually kind of like that jazzy beat. It's got just enough, just enough funk to keep it spicy. Uh, here we go. Michael writes about um Mr Vegan Muffin should have told them to turn the stuff off. What the hell is a vegan muffin anyway, I'm guessing he'd be a brand muffin kind of guy. Uh. You know, brand muffins are gross, so I agree with Michael here on listen. Brand muffins are are pretty gross, and I used to be able to eat them, so I know I know what they're like. Um,

vegan muffin just me wow, Actually that's good. That means they use a trying to remember there's something that like, uh, some kind of a baking powder thing they use instead of um, instead of well, eggs. I know they can't use eggs and they can't use dairy. Is it? Yeah, it's like it's is it a yeast that they put it in? I don't know. I don't know what it is, but one day I'll figure out what's in vegan. Vegan is the one thing I just can't do. Vegetarian I can't do either, but I could fake it for a

little while. But if you cut dairy out of my diet, I'm just gonna be angry. Seven Uh, Bob the next up here, Trump was right, I'm getting tired of winning. Well, Bob, I know the sentiment, my friend, I know what you're talking about here, and uh, I think it's I think it's quite a It's been quite a week for the trump Ster. I think tomorrow I'll do kind of a weekend review. This is not not Trump's best week ever. I think election week has to be his best week ever.

But this has been one of the This has been one of the strongest of the administration so far in so many ways. And yeah, there's a lot of liberal tears because of it, a lot of Obama It's are getting big shad faces right now, the very yead because Trump is just like swooping in here Conan style. What's that line about? Yeah, here, the here the lamentations. You

know what he takes. You know what I'm talking about from Conan the barbarian destroy your enemies here the lamentations up something like that, crush your enemies, see them driven before you. And they had a lamentation of the women. All right, we've got Greg up next, he writes, Um, hold on a second, hey, Buck, not sure you knew this, but they're making a sequel to one of your favorite movies,

Braveheart Shields High. What what is this for real? Producer, Mike, I need you to do a deep dive into this. Is there really gonna be a Brave Heart sequel? Because that would just be a great, a great thing for freedom and for the world. Um Angus McFadden or mcgea McFadden, who played Robert the Bruce, who is actually who Braveheart had the nickname Braveheart in in history, so it kind of makes sense that they go with the sequel. Heero the Yeah, kind of makes some sense. So I think

that could be very interesting. Um, the Battle of Bannock Burn, Hey, Bannock Bartern. It's a fun thing to say with the Scottish accent. Betty's next, she writes, enjoy you at night, suggest regarding podcasts that you might like to read this Silk Road did like I did last summer. Good read. Okay, thanks Betty, I'll add that to the list. I got a pile and I got a list of books. Paul writes, I'm looking forward to your assessment about the Iranian attack

on Israel shields high. Um, well, Paul, good call on that. I will certainly be talking about the Iranian attack on Israel more and uh we will continue to cover it. We have Next up here Chris, who writes Buck, do you have any discount code for a Mother's Day gift, say, flowers from a sponsor of your show. Chris, you ask a very good question, my friend. I don't think we have a specific Mother's Day gift promo yet on the show, and we really should get a flower sponsor, so I will.

I'll make some calls. I'll see what I can do on that one. So thank you so much, Eric. Next up got me with the Hilary thing again. Was already laughing at that, and then you mentioned maybe doing the whole list in her voice. L O. Well, thanks for the great laugh. Also, my favorite Buck slap sound effect is the he one she'll sigh. Thanks Eric, I'm I'm glad you like that one. Uh so, yeah it. Let's see what else next? Um, we have Chris Staffer right.

This is just an interesting thought from a total civilian. The Korean War is already officially over. This is an anecdotal historical realization in advance. The reason for Pompeio's visit must have been to sign and complete the paperwork in the interest of national security. Trump couldn't possibly be expected to meet the leader of a foreign country on foreign soil that we are still technically at war with. Just interesting.

If they didn't work that paperwork deal out behind closed doors, they should, um, I kinda I kind of got nothing on that one, Christopher, Uh sorry, I don't know. Interesting. Thanks for thanks for sending John up next year, he writes, Hey, Buck shield hie, you totally nailed it on the last Jedi, and I'm a bigger Star Wars fan than most Wow guys. John sent a photo of himself in a straight up movie quality Obi wan Kenobi costume, so he is indeed

a pretty big Star Wars fan. He goes on though in this note, But the worst aren't was that a ship with no gas in outer space would never fall backwards because you know physics and inertia. Keep up the great work, looking forward to your future projects, John, thank you so much, and thank you for putting out a little bit of the astrophysics knowledge there. I like it. Dale rights, Hey Buck she woke. Here we go, Hey

Buck shields hie. I caught some of your discussion last week regarding a request for tips of things to do in d C. You reply that you weren't that up on DC anymore, but you're certainly an expert on NYC, which obviously you would be as you were a man

of the city. As luck would have it, I want a hotel reservation for one night in Woodbridge, New Jersey, through my company, and obviously thought this would be a great time for my wife and I to visit Manhattan, one of the few places in the United States that we have never been. We're flying into Newark taking the train, and we're gonna take the train to Penn Station, etcetera, etcetera. I'd be really interested in hearing your thoughts. I'll buck

Secton's guide to a first time weekend in NYC. My major concern is not bitting off too much of the Big Apple, considering we're flying back Sunday. Ps. I had a friend who was on a business trip in the DC area, returned the car to b w I and realized they were supposed to be leaving from Dullis. They made their flight, though, Lord knows how well. Thank you Dale. Okay, so, Bucks, I think the New York Times does a thirty six hours or forty eight hours in whatever city. So let's

say a thirty six hours. So you got Friday night to Sunday morning Sunday afternoon. UM. I would say for a lot of you, obviously pick a show on Broadway that you want to see, because it's just an experience and there's a lot of them. Pick one that's that speaks to you. I would say you should definitely plan and plan the route beforehand. Plan a walk through Central Park. I personally advocate starting at the south end and then going north. The south end is the more tourist end.

Go for a nice walk through Central Park, make your way past the boat Pond all the way up to or the rowboat Pond, and then you can make your way to the sailboat Pond, which has these little mini sailboats in it. You can then cut out east and head over to J. G. Mellon's, one of my favorite haunts for a fantastic but small so you won't we might want to Hamburger. They also have excellent chili, and then I would say go for a walk around the Upper east Side, stopped by the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

That's all maybe something you could do, you know, Saturday during the day and in the afternoon Friday night you got the Broadway show. I would recommend going down for dinner to the West Village maybe Saturday night. I think that's the most charming part of the city. Also, people call it Greenwich Village, and that's also just where you'll see a lot of interesting stuff going on. It's the

most Uh, it's not only bohemian anymore. It's very expensive, but it's certainly a culturally rich and dynamic part of the city. And in terms of the big tourist e stuff like h Statue of Liberty Um Empire State Building. That's so I leave that to your own discretion how you fit that in. But that's that's an oh oh, and go up on the high Line and go walk in Chelsea Market, taste some of the food, and go

for a walk along the high Line park. Uh, those are my that's my thirty six hours in New York City. That's what I would do. And with that team, I'm gonna close up the Freedom Hut for the evening right in the middle of the swamp here. I feel like Gate isn'tna buy you all over the place here. But don't worry. I know I'll be okay because I've got the team by my side. So uh, please do some of your thoughts Facebook dot com, slash box sex and

tell somebody about the show. Until next time, my friend, no matter what comes your way, you have your orders, you have your destiny shields top. I've got early days and long days lately. But the good news is that I've got all the necessary caffeination I need from my friends, from my brothers in arms for freedom over at Black Rifle Coffee. I'm a subscriber. I get the cake cups delivered to me, so it's great because I bring something to the office or I've got Black Rifles cake cups

at home. Couldn't be any easier throwing a little bit of cream because I'm not a socialist with some kind of soy milk. And I enjoy my Black Rifle coffee at the office or when I'm just chilling out at home and having a great time. So check it out for yourself. Go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck that's Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck coupon code buck one five pipe that in because I've got

you fifteen percent off. It also tells the Black Rifle folks that your team Buck and that you're supporting them and this show Black rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck coupon code buck one five for fIF percent off