"Two-Faced" Trudeau Strikes Again

Add and Moore coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake, America, You're a great American. Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy, is no. Welcome to the Buck Sex and Show, everybody, in honor and a privilege to have you here with me today. And yes, in fact, bon Jovi is down the hall, so Brandon and I right now are living

on a prayer. That's I will say. Bon Jovi's still looks good, but I think he's like one hundred and five years old now, full head of hair, full head of hair. I respect the hair game on mister Jovi. It looks like maybe you in thirty years. Well indeed, sir, well play give this man a raise. All right, let's get right into it today, folks. You have the most it's it's different emotions that keep coming up for me with this nonsense going on a capitol hill. So let's

just do a quick review of where we are. Remember, you have the fate of the leader of the free world at stake here, and this whole thing is a clown show. I mean, this is absurd, it's ridiculous. That's one set of emotions. And then on the other side, I have my god, the Democrats have completely lost their minds. The media is dishonest, is to be distrusted, and wow, what we are seeing today certainly goes right to the heart of all of that. It is stunning, it is astonishing.

Here's what's going on. By way of quick review. The Democrats launched their series of impeachment hearings last what was it last month, and we've been forced to sit through all this series of state department bureaucrats who have come forward. I mean, because if there's one thing that's finally going to convince Ross Belt voters and independence and purple States to turn against Trump. It's having some pompous tenured professor from Harvard Law School give America a boring lecture on

the constitutional origins of Orange Man. And that's what Democrats have switched to. Now. We went from state department bureaucrats to law professors. Look, there were four. I watched the testimony this morning. I do this so you don't have to. Don't worry. It's one of my jobs here. Three of the four are rabid Democrat partisans. I mean just could not be any more frothy mouthed libs so to speak. I mean they are just they hate Trump. Oh, they

hate Trump. This is completely unsurprising. It shouldn't be a

surprise to anybody watching this. And I think today is also a good reminder, as we have these law professors on Capitol Hill telling us why the President of the United States should be impeached and removed from office, Let's make sure we're clear on that this is not just a question of whether there should be an impeachment vote to show that Trump has aired, those who are advocating for impeachment do show with the clear understanding that the next step is supposed to be removal from office by

the Senate. They want to undo the results of the

twenty sixteen election. So as we have these law professors up there on Capitol Hill today, is a good reminder for all Americans that law schools now overwhelmingly reflect the absurd left wing dominance that you see in undergraduate institutions, colleges and universities across the country, And in fact, professors at Harvard Law School usually have the same politics as gender studies and diversity assistant teaching professors at Woke You University,

the University of Wokeness or wokea Stan or whatever. Oh my, that's what you're seeing today, these professors, with the exception of Professor Turley, who the Democrats don't want to talk to at all. And I'll get into Turley's argument here. And I also want to tell you something, because I'm receiving a lot of feedback from you. I am sensitive to the fact that there's more going on in the world. There's more for us to talk about than just impeachment.

So every day I'm going to make a real effort, including doing deep dives in subject matter that I think is important that goes to not just the twenty twenty election and the political conversation in this country. But that is of interest, is worthwhile for us to dive into apart from this, just this impeachment cycle, impare eachment every day.

I mean, we have to do some of that because we have to also not just understand what's going on, because this is the primary political story in this country. We also have to push back against the other side.

We can't leave the propaganda entirely unanswered. There will be people out there who, especially if we just tire of the defense of reason, sanity, rule of law, constitutionality, rationality, decency, godliness, all of these things, if we abandon the front lines of that, then people will be some poor souls will be dragged over to the side of the left and believe all of this nonsense, believe all of this absurdity.

Which reminds me my favorite part of the democrats impeachment theater is when these petty demagogues pretend they really don't want this. It just pains them to impeach Trump. It makes them so sorrowful and prayerful in fact, for the nation. Only a moron believes this, my friends, and only a fraud would say it. But here we are Pelosi chif they all Nadler, they all go through the motions, Oh, it's a solemn day for the country. We really don't

want to have to impeach this man. These people are flatly, clearly, blatantly absurd and dishonest in all of this. They are power hungry and power mattered. And remember, they feel affronted by the President of the United States personally. They do take this quite personally. They think that this president is an insult to their very existence. And so it's more even than just making sure that they regain power. There's also the repudiation of everything that is trump They insist

on that they need that. They don't just want victory, they want victory, and then they want to salt the earth afterwise and tear down every structure and make sure that there's nothing left of Trumpism. But here is the big problem that they face for those of us who are trying to be honest and serious about this. They keep changing. What it is they're telling us is so terrible that has occurred, and that's because it's not working.

They change tactics and strategy every day because trying to convince the American people that the president did something terrible isn't working. There are about forty percent or forty five percent of Americans who will believe anything about this president because all they care about is how much they have been trained, like a bunch of seals to hate this president.

You know, everybody has to hate this president, and everyone has to sort of clapped together, you know, past the beach ball on the nose, from one to another, like the seals. They have to those kinds of seals, not the elite commandos. I mean, I think that was clear, but just just to be so there's no just so media matters can't pull that out all. Is he mocking

our warriors? No, I meant the the aquamarine mammals with shiny coats of fur and blubber, which I can tell you is probably very handy in this time of year for any for any mammal. All right, back to why their story, sorry as a buck diversion, not to why their story doesn't hold up here, why the Democrats are in trouble. Professor Jonathan Turley, whom I've interviewed many times, I will say, very very gentlemanly fellow and a scholar, I mean, and by the way, a Democrat. He is

a Democrat. He do not vote for Trump, but he's not an absurd leftist. I do believe we have to remember that that exists. Not all Democrats are lunatics. Lunatics run the Democratic Party. Now unfortunately they've they've taken over. I mean, the inmates in the Democratic Party do run

the asylum. But there are still Democrats that you can have reasonable conversations with, that will agree on some matters and disagree on others, but can also and this is the key, you can see eye to eye with him on a basic framework of what is true and what is not, what is real and what is not, what is fair and what is not, which has now been with these Democrats and the sham proceeding this has been completely abandoned. No one, no serious person thinks that that's

what's really going on here. This is all meant to destroy the President of the United States. Here's what Turley points out, for example, in an editorial in The Hill, I used to be a Hill employee, lunched Hill TV in fact, so you know, NBD got that going for me, which is nice quote the knicks in it. And so this wait, hold on before I get to this quote. They're saying that and this is a common refrain that this is that which Shift. I'm not just saying, general people,

this is beyond anything Nixon did. That is a line from Adam Shifts yesterday. He gave this sort of semmatia. This, Oh, I'm Adam Shift, and I'm giving my grandiose closing arguments about how you should get rid of the present for the United States. He doesn't sound that cool. I was sounded way better than what Shift sounds like. But you know what I mean, a pompous jerk giving his speech.

But the present should be gone. But this is beyond We've We've gone from this is Trump's water Gate to this is worse than water Gate, and back and forth many many times. But now we're in this is worse than Watergate. I mean, does anyone Does anyone really believe this? Does anyone take this seriously? I think people do believe it, which is which is troubling, which is a bad sign for their judgment of their ability to decipher basic facts and understand the world around them. But this is beyond

anything Nixon did, is what Chip says. Let's just take a little momentber Nixon was not, in fact impeach and removed from office. He resigned. This is what one of the professors who's on Capital one of the four, the only saying one. The others are crazy. They're leftists. I mean, maybe they know what they're doing is absurd and they're just doing it for a purpose. But here's what he

writes of the Nixon impeachment. The Nixon impeachment quote began with a felony crime with the Watergate burglary, then swept to encompass an array of other crimes involving political slush funds, payments of hush money, maintenance of an enemy's list, directing tax audits of critics, witness intimidation, multiple instances of perjury,

and even an alleged kidnapping. In the end, there were nearly seventy officials charge and four dozen of them found guilty, and Nixon was named as an unindicted conspirator by a grand jury. End quote, Adams ship if the point man, handpicked by Nancy Pelosi, the point man for this entire impeachment effort, is looking at you, the American people, and

trying to keep a straight face. I think Adam Schiff doesn't really do much in the way of facial expressions, but he's staring at you and telling you that all that Nixon stuff, what Trump has done is worse than that. What honest reasonable person could take that statement seriously? I sit here and I tell you that Trump has committed no crime zero with this Ukraine debacle mess. Oh and by the way, no crime zero with the Mulla report, no crime zero with the Stormy Daniels payoff thing that

they were obsessed. I mean, yeah, just go down the whole is the emoluments close, amoluments clause, all of this, no crime, no crime, no crime. And they say that this is worse. How is it worse? They keep making accusations and allegations that are false against Nixon. At least a lot of the stuff was true, And this is worse than that. These people are trying to throw your

sense of reality into disarray. They're trying to just engage in such a fierce campaign of propaganda that you no longer understand what is true and what is not, and you just do what you're told because that's what the good people do. They are absurd, but unfortunately they are all so dangerous. What they are doing to the country right now is troubling, and it goes beyond your usual political back and forth. They are kicking at the load barren walls of this republic, and they do so with

self righteous smiles. This is not a good place for the country to be in. I do think that Trump is winning this impeachment battle so far, But this impeachment battle actually is about a lot more than Donald Trump. This is not about Ukraine. This is about our democracy. This is about our national security. This is about whether the American people have a right to expect that the President Nited States is going to act in their interests, with their security in mind, and not for some illicit,

personal or political reason. So Americans should care deeply about whether the President Nited States is betraying their trust in him, betraying that oath that he took to the Constitution to protect our country and defend its institutions. There you go, that's classic Adam shift in his little closing argument. Shifty shift. What is he even saying betraying our institutions, betraying our

national security? But just how by doing what? When they say things like demanding dirt on a political rival, or when they say things like interfering in our election. That is a lie. The president did not demand interference in the election. The president mean getting an answer about corruption in Ukraine, which is a legitimate foreign policy interest. If what he did is so bad, why do they have to lie about it. He did not say give me

dirt on Joe Biden. He said, if you can get some answers about this barisma situation, Hunter Biden, let me know. I've heard bad things. Presidents allowed to say that. There's the flat I mean, is it tough politics? Yes? Do we want the president not to engage in tough politics? Do we want the president to back down from this?

Because let's understand, the Democrats are used to operate in a world or Democrats don't get investigated, and if they do get investigated because what they do is egregiously criminal, like Hillary Clinton, then do you know what they do. They make sure that the system is rigged so there is no accountability, there is no justice, there is no punishment. That's what they do. So now all of a sudden Trump comes along and says, no, Hunter and Joe Biden

don't have special immunity. There is plenty of reason the same people. Let's Remember this, friends who tell you that there was reason to investigate a presidential campaign, not somebody who maybe was going to be running for president in the future, an active presidential campaign, one of two people vying for the presidency based on what someone said to

someone in a bar. That's someone being George Papadoppoulas. Those same people now tell you that the son of the person who is in charge of foreign policy in a country under the Obama administration getting fifty thousand to seventy five or eighty five thousand dollars a month to be on the board of some company. When the guy's an imbecile and a derelict clown, there's no basis to look

into whether there's any corruption going on there. There's certainly the appearance of corruption, and whether there's the appearance of corruption, there can be an investigation of the same. These people constantly change the rules. They have no principles, they have no standards. They have a relentless pursuit for power. Don't make any mistake about that. They will do whatever they have to do in order to get the outcome that

they desire. They profess that the other side is tearing down institutions while they're gathering to dynamite themselves and putting the foundations of those same institutions. They just don't care. This is the instinct of the totalitarian. Whatever they need to do to get what they want is inherently justified, because what they want is good and the people who oppose it are bad. This was the same mentality of the Bolsheviks, and, by the way, the Mensheviks leading into

the Russian Revolution and then the Soviet Union. This is the same mentality you've seen with Paul pot the same you see today in North Korea. Anything that the ruling regime wants must inherently be good. Therefore any opposition to it is bad. And whatever rules you have to change, whatever injustice is you have to abide, or encourage or inflict, those are all also apparently just fine, because you are achieving a righteous ends through your much less than righteous means.

That's where we are right now in this country. Adam Schiff and the Democrats are an abject disgrace, and yet they cling to this notion that they're the good guys. President Trump's conduct, as described in the testimony and evidence, clearly constitutes impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors under the Constitution.

In particular, the memorandum and other testimony relating to the July twenty fifth, twenty nineteen phone call between the two presidents, President Trump and President Zelenski more than sufficiently indicates that President Trump abused his office by soliciting the President of Ukraine to investigate his political rivals in order to gain personal political advantage, including in relation to the twenty twenty election. Oh,

Professor Feldman, you're doing. That's a fantastic job, auditioning for MSNBC or perhaps CNN. There might be a bidding war for your services after this absurd Like I said, I mean, just just go to Professor Lawrence Tribe of Harvard Law Schools Twitter feed and you will see the grandiose idiocy that is often rewarded at the most elite institutions in

this country. The elite institutions, we've found more and more exist specifically to prop up many people who don't deserve it in the least, and the second you begin to challenge that, they get very irascible. They don't much appreciate the truth being exposed, whether it's elite journalism, elite academia, go through the ranks of all of it. Frauds are plenty good people, of course, and some I assume are good people, but mostly frauds. That was Professor Noah Feldman.

Notice how we have all these statements, all this conjecture, all this analysis. It certainly constitute high crimes and misdemeanors. That this guy thinks that what the president said is an abusive power based upon the supposition, based upon the assumption that there was going to be a follow on of pressure to get Zelenski to present information that was not true in order to harm a political rival here in the United States. I have a point of not a point of order that would be like can I

have a bathroom break? But I have a point of discussion, and I like the parliamentary procedure stuff. And they all bang the gavels in Congress. I'm like, here, ye, hear ye, it's time for lunch. You know, they do that parliamentary stuff. I have What if just just stay with me here for a second. What if there was, in fact a corrupt arrangement involving the bides. People who tell me that this is settled are running cover. We don't know. How would we know how would President Trump know unless he

asked and got a sense of the investigation. Keep in mind, when you ask a foreign government about possible corruption involving that foreign government, when it's one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Guess what, Maybe you have to push a little bit. Maybe the first answer you get is not factually accurate. Oh good heavens, who could think of such a thing. Maybe you have to dig, Maybe you have to exert some pressure, use some of your

connections and influence to get answers. Everything that the Left tells us has premised here upon many things, but one of them is that clearly Hunter and Joe Biden did no wrong here. We saw this with Anderson Cooper at the debates. You know, these frauds at CNN frauds, Tapper and Cooper and Lemon and Cuomo bro Cuomo, I'll wreck your bib Cuomo, that guy aka Fredo aka bro Cuomo frauds.

But Cooper, just to show us that you know, he's playing for playing for Team Biden as much as he can right now, said you know, there's no evidence and it is not true. However, he phrased the question that there was anything wrong going on in Ukraine, see an end on a lot of investigating about that one. I don't think so. Also, why can't we ask questions here?

We had a we had a number of people at the top level of the United States government, based on the flimsiest of evidence, using FISA procedures to go after the Trump campaign, And now we are told that there can be no investigation of anything involving Democrat Joe Biden. There was investigation of lots of stuff involving President Trump when he was running. Why is that okay? But the Biden investigation is not. I mean, I fight this battle on a different level than many of mine. Oh no,

but can we prove the quid pro quo? No? No, no, excuse me. There's no immunity for Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. There is nothing wrong. I don't care that there is a peripheral or secondary political benefit. There is, in fact, nothing wrong with saying can you get answers for me on whether there was corruption here? Can you look into this? Yeah? The answers, Yeah, you can look into this. Now. People have asked me this, What would make me change my mind?

What would make me change my mind on this? Is if Trump had said, oh, really, there's nothing on Biden. Make something up or else you're not getting the money. Now we have a problem, Now we have abuse of power. Now we have a president. But that's not what happened at all, and no one even suggests that's what happened. The mere request to get answers about the the bidens you see, because he's the Democrat front runner, which is a complete absurd should be slapping the face to how

stupid the Democratic Party has become. But anyway, because he's a Democrat frontrunner, he has a special immunity, can't ask any questions about him. He's their best hope to defeat Donald Trump, which shows you a lot about the Democrats. But we found out something very interesting when she was

doing his little press conference. We found out that, for example, Adam Schiff has subpoenaed not just witnesses, and I have to come back to this witness point for you in a second, but Schiff has in fact subpoenaed phone records too, phone records of one of these associates of Giuliani. Believe it's Parness lef lev Parness, who have been in contact with who was in contact with for example, Devin Newness of Congress, and Rue Giuliani and John Solomon, my former

colleague at the Hill. So now we have schiff pulling phone records. Now I understand there's we can do this. People are gonna make all this. Oh but he didn't go after the It just was you know, excuse me. It's called reverse targeting. I worked in the intelligence community. I know how this. I also worked the NYPD Intelligence Division, where we used to pull phone records all the time. It's not hard when you know some people are in contacting your like, well, we can pretextually pull this guy's

phone records and maybe we see who his psychiatrist is too. Yeah. So now whether it's strictly legal as a different question from whether it is ethical and whether if the shoe was on the other foote. The Democrats would be accepting of this. I mean, of course this is absurd. So we can now see, and they released without redaction, that there was a member of Congress, that there was Giuliani and Newness all in contact with this individual, and this

is now being used. So I mean they're treating that they're using the powers of a criminal investigation proceeding in order to go after their political vendetti here understand that too. This is not a minor thing. This is where I turn on and say, where are you, Senate Republicans? Why aren't you going to subpoena Adam Shift's phone records? He

has no special immunity here. If Shift can subpoena of the phone records that includes members of Congress, why can't Why can't, oh, Oh, I have an idea subpoena Eric schery Mella's phone records. How about that? Let's see who the alleged whistleblower has been talking to and did talk to before the report came out. He has there's no special protection for his phone records. We don't even know if he's the whistleblower. How could they block it? Riddle

me that, my friends. I'm enjoying taking a rhetorical sledgehammer to the absurdity on Capitol Hill today, and I felt like I should bring in somebody else who wields a battle axe of experience and rationality at all of these matters. Our friend Sean Davis is back in action here on the show. He is, of course, at the Federalist. He's a co founder of the Federalist. It is one of my favorite websites. He already knows that, and he joins us now to talk about all the things. Sean, thanks

for making the time. Thanks for having me, Buck. I mean, I am just talking about what's going on on Capitol Hill today. Try to give me your sense of what is the Democrat play here to have a bunch of constitutional law professors, three of the four who were clearly anti Trump partisans, and one who just didn't vote for Trump. Right, but it's not a wild eyed Trump pater tell us that the founding fathers, what they really meant when they wrote the Constitution was orange man bad. Yeah. I think

I think he nailed it. The one thing that you know, the Federalists and the anti federalist could agree on is that the bad orange man has to go. And you know that's really what the Constitution is subordinate to, is getting rid of the orange bad man. I mean, I gotta be honest, I don't know what they're doing. I didn't really understand the purpose of all the intel hearings

that Schiff ran I thought those were silly. They clearly had nothing other than leftover residual anger from how the Mohler probe blew up in their faces, and you know, inviting up three completely looney left wing law professors, one of whom said, I think a year or two ago, that you don't even need evidence to impeach Trump. He's just bad enough as is that he needs to go. But the only thing I can think of that they're trying to accomplish here is just boring America to death.

And then you know, once we're all gone and there's no accountability for them, they could do whatever they want. When I was watching him this morning, I felt like there was a point at which there was at least the one of the professors made an allusion to or it made a reference to, Well, yeah, and the president with this phone call kind of committed treason, and I was I know, they said bribery, but I mean they said that he's committed effectively all of these crimes. I

was waiting from a throw piracy and counterfeiting in there, Yeah, exactly. Well, you know, everything he does is treason because he's an illegitimate president. And if you're an illegitimate president, then you have no right or authority to use the presidential powers

given you in the Constitution. And I got to be honest, watching this whole thing and dealing with all of this, it's like being a house guest at a at a dinner party where the food's awful, but you kind of just gotta like keep, you know, stomaching it and shoveling it down to be polite. I kind of feel like being in the political news industry. That's what we're having

to do with this. We're having to like pretend that this is serious and you know, really well and put together when it's really just a complete disaster politically, legally, the Democrats I think are going to rue the day they started this, and at this point I'm not even sure they end up actually impeaching him. Giving Wow, you and my friend Rahim Kassam have both become I mean, I've been saying one hundred percent day impeached for weeks. I'm not between you and Raheem. I'm I'm gonna I'm

gonna wratch it down to ninety five percent certainty. But I because I can see what you're saying. I mean this, I don't know how anyone can hear. My favorite thing is when Schiff Pelosi, Nather they all do this. We really wish we didn't have to impeach this president. Like, who believes this? Nobody? But even people I know who

hate Trump aren't aren't so silly that they believe that. Well, right, my my colleague Molly Hemingway actually sat behind Jerry Nadler on the Acela train shortly after the Democrats took over Congressman twenty eighteen, and he was blabbing on his phone to a close compident about how, yeah, they were all in on impeachment. This is what was going to happen. So this idea that there's somehow just doing it in sadness, not an anger, and we didn't want to have to

do this, it's total poppycock. This was the plan from the very beginning. It was actually the plan with Bueller. The problem was that, you know, even with that sprawling, forty fifty million dollars multiyear investigation, even they couldn't find anything on Trump. So now they're left having to pretend that some phone call with the Ukrainian leader is impeachment. It's if these people were capable of feeling shame, they would just be horribly embarrassed now, but clearly they're not.

Now here's somebody that understands from actually doing it Senate investigations. Right, you worked for Senator Tom Coburn's office. I want to ask you about shift pulling phone records, subpoenaing phone records. I know it's was for left parness, but it also has included now phone contacts with a journalist, with a member of Congress, and with the president's personal lawyer. How does that strike you that there's not going to subpoena records. And I got some follow ons on this too, man,

I think that it's really really concerning. And look, in general, I don't have a problem with congressional subpoena power, and in fact, it's that power that they delegate to the executive that allows a lot of the law enforcement functions we have some in principle, I don't have a problem with committees being able to do that in practice. In this case, if indeed he did get these via subpoena, I'm not quite sure he did, but if he did, it is extremely troubling to be pulling up the phone

records between the president's attorneys. You know, phone calls between Jay Sekulo and Rudy Giuliani ended up on there pulling up phone calls from members of Congress from their staff members. And this is coming from a guy who secretly colluded with the whistleblower, who lied about his interactions with Shift, and then Shift later lied about those interactions, and today

it is refusing to answer any questions about him. This is a huge, huge abuse of power in the midst of a process that isn't of itself a massive abuse of power. I was really really concerned when I saw that. Not it's bad that they did it with noonez and his staff, but getting the phone records between the president's attorney that get getting the attorneys of the person you're

accusing of high crimes and misdemeanors, that is unconscionable. Now I want to know where's the Senate on this, Sean, and you know we have a Senate majority of republic Republican majority, Why don't they subpoena ship's records? Because I want to see if you talk in fact, is there explain Is there any legal reason why they couldn't subpoena Eric Scherremela's records? No, none at all. Procedures are a little different in the Senate. It tends to be a

more bipartisan operation there. I think often you have to have a certain vote, or you have to have the the consent of the ranking member. So it's it's not as easy in the Senate to do its House, but they can do it, and the personally, I think the reason why they haven't is the two committees who would do this, Intel and Judiciary, are not run by Republicans with any sort of reputation for having a stronger work ethic or you know, really dogged investigative skills. You know you.

Burr has turned over his committee to Mark Warner entirely. He's been a complete non entity and Lindsey Grahamwall We all enjoyed the show he put under in the Kavanaugh hearing. He seems much more content to expound in green rooms than he is to write letters and demand answers from the agencies he overseas. Yeah, I have to say, I'm I'm disappointed so far at what we've seen from Senate Republicans in the midst of all this in general. But maybe I just my expectations, which were low, should have

been should have been even lower. What, by the way, what comes? What comes next? In your mindment after they have this Judiciary hearing today, what should we all be waiting for what's supposed to be the next trick Schiff have has up a sleeve. Well, I think next we'd

actually have to see some articles of impeachment. So obviously what they all are wanting to head towards is a formal vote on the House floor to impeach the president, which is to indict him of specific high crimes and misdemeanors and then send it to a trial in the Senate where he'd either be convicted or acquitted. I think they're struggling with this because there aren't actually any specific crimes, and they're going to have to come up with more

than just Orange Man bad. So that's the next step. But I really think there's a chance here we don't even get there. In fact, one of Philosophies leadership team members told a Fox News reporter Chad Program the other night that you know what did to really pack the legislative schedule from here to Christmas? And we don't even know if we can be a bit impeachment in so we might not even get to it until twenty twenty.

So I think the longer they kick that can down the road and drag it on, the less likely they are to finally pull the trigger on it. Now, Sean, I want to keep you if I can, for a moment, because I did want to touch on this story involved a convicted child porn trafficker who's bundling millions for Hillary Clinton. We're going to get to that in just a second. Global Verification Network is the only dual certified, veteran owned

background investigation and vetting company. They are federally certified as a vetitown small business and headquartered in Chicago with offices throughout the nation. Their risk mitigation experts can work with startups all the way up to Fortune one hundred companies,

and no data or client information is ever offshore. Unlike a lot of their competitors, Global Verification Network has all employees located throughout the United States and they do not outsource or offshore any of the work you give them. Give Global Verification Networker call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Again that's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. You can also go to MYGVN dot com. Again, that's m y GVN

dot com. Global Verification Network for all your background investigation and inventing needs. Leave no stone on turn. Okay, we're back here with my friend Sean Davis. He's a writer for The Federalist, co founder of the Federalist dot com. If you're not already, you should be making The Federalist part of your daily read in to get up on all the day's events. Let's go now, Sean, tell me what happened here. This just there's there's an indictment that

came down. This is a little complicated, some backstory, but walk us through this fellow who was a part of the Mueller probe, used against Trump, bundling millions for Hillary Clinton, and has a record of trafficking in child pornography. Tell give us the necessary details here. Yeah, so I'll have to start with the disclaimer that everything I'm about to say is true. It's not made up. It's not a conspiracy theory. It's not a film script for a late

night Lifetime movie. This all happened. So an individual by the name of George Nader was indicted with several other individuals for fraudulently funneling illegal contributions to pro Hillary Clinton Superpack and to Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen, so I means they were using Strawman to do donations to hide

the true source of the money. Which George Nator's an interesting character because he was actually deployed by the FBI against the Trump campaign back in or i should say, the Trump transition, back in twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen. In fact, he was traveling around and setting up meetings for Eric Prince, who has a security business all around the world, and was rumored to have been a private back channel for Russia between the Trump transition and the

Russian government. We know that none of that was true, but Nader was actually a witness for Robert Mueller and his investigation, and he was given them all kinds of dirt on the Trump transition and on Eric Prince. But the weird thing is things we never heard about while he was working for Mular was that he is a pedophile and a child porn trafficker. In fact, he served prison time in the Czech Republic for having sex with minors.

He had been repeatedly arrested by federal authorities in the US and eighty five and ninety one, I think again in two thousand for child porn trafficking, and in fact, when Mular's agents picked him up during the course of their investigation, they found on his electronic devices all kinds of various illegal child pornography for which they never charged him.

And it actually wasn't until Muller finally closed up shop and apparently had no more use for Mular that bars DJ finally came in and wrung him up and charged him for possession of child pornography. And then yesterday, as you said at the beginning, this guy was indicted for an illegal contribution Schome to cuff Hillary Carton. It is so wild that you have to constantly remind yourself that

this isn't fiction, this is reality. This actually happened. So the part of this, I mean, there's the Hillard Clinton connection, which we'll get into in a second, but just on the Mueller side of it. So Mueller knew about all had to know about all of this, and usually, I mean, the FBI is very harsh and understandably so on anybody who is violating children and possessing and transferring child pornography.

Muller just didn't think that, I mean, Mueller sent thirty armed agents to arrest It was really Weisman, as we know. But let's say it was smaller to arrest Roger Stone for like lying about a Twitter conversation you have with somebody. But they let this guy Nader. They let it go until Trump's dj actually came down on him. That seems quite strange. It's insane, and it's not the kind of thing you would expect from a sworn officer of the

law to do. I mean, think about the potential for people to have been exploited and harmed by this individual while he was given a free reign by Mueller. That's not too hard to imagine that they allowed him to keep doing this just to get his cooperation because it

happened previously. In fact, in previous court transcripts, his defense in previous cases argued that he should be treated leniently because he had been working with various government intelligence agencies, you know, ten twenty years ago to help them with their efforts in the Middle East, and if the details of all this were to get out, if you were really to have the book thrown at him, it could

really harm his relationships with various Middle East leaders. So it's clear to me that this guy, for years, if not decades, has been used as an asset by our government intelligence agencies that were more than willing to look the other way when this man was literally raping children and in trafficking child pornography. It's just stunning pickening and the Hillary Clinton bundling, Right, So if that's you know,

that just means for everybody that that's he's pulling together donate. Well, he's illegally let's be clear, I mean essentially fraudulently bundling large amounts of money for the Hillary Clinton campaign. I just think it's worth noting Sean. I mean, what's the purpose of that. Well, so Nater is an interesting character. So he has been working at the right hand of I believe, the Crown Prince of the United Arab Emirates.

And when he was allegedly taking part in this scheme, it was clear that he was trying to buy influence with his donations to whoever he thought was going to win the election. So if you read a whole bunch of press reports, they'll say, oh, he was Hugh was Trump connected, he had Trump Trump ties. No, no no, no, this is a guy who was very much cultivating access to the Clinton camp so that he could then go back to his Middle Eastern paymasters and say, hey, I'm

really in good with these guys. You know, keep paying me. I'm so influential. And then as soon as Trump won, the guy turned on a dime in beat feet over to the Trump transition to do the same thing with them. So it's clear to me that he was absolutely part of a foreign influenced scheme meant to curry favor with whoever it was he thought was going to be in power and just and just one one more point of clarity or for everybody, and his connection to why did

Muller find him useful? The child pornographer uh Nader was loosely connected to Eric Prince, the founder of the firm formerly known as Blackwater, who had been rumored falsely to have been set up by the Trump transition as a secret private back channel between the incoming Trump government and the Russians. And it was Nader who helped set up meetings overseas. Naturally, you can do certain things overseas with our government that you can't do, uh, within our boundaries.

So he was setting up certain meetings overseas for Prince and in emerates and various Arab leaders, and it was at these meetings where there just happened to be Russians there, and so he said he must have set up to Seychelles meeting. Then yes, Nader set that up right, So he's this like influenced peddler because that remember that there was a time when that was oh that was where the Russian collusion really happened. Yet I view Nader honestly

as an analog Stephan Helper. You had Stephan Helper going around and setting up these meetings and making sure Flynn was seated next to certain people so then he could go rapport back and say, oh, yeah, he was talking to Russians the whole time. I think he might be a traitor. It appears to me, based on the facts at hand, that Nader was doing something extremely similar. Wow. I mean, you know this is just remember everybody here, Mueller, your tax dollars at work. This is the guy that

he was was leveraging in this whole process. Sean man always illuminating. Thank you so much for joining us. Everyone check out the Federalist dot com. Sean's latest will be up there shortly. Sean, thank you so much. Thanks for having me about our constitution and its values. And my

review of the evidentiary record. And here, mister Collins, I would like to say to you, sir, that I read transcripts of every one of the witnesses who appeared in life hearing, because I would not speak about these things without reviewing the facts. So I'm insulted by the suggestion that as a law professor, I don't care about those facts.

But everything I read on those occasions tells me that when President Trump invited, indeed demanded, foreign involvement in our upcoming election, he struck at the very heart of what makes this a republic to which we pledge allegiance. There you have another one. I'm probably the most hysterical of all the lawyers today, or professors, I should say, I don't know how many of them have law degrees professors on Capitol Hill. This teardown Trump effort, and I got

a note that she has problems with reading comprehension. It seems saying that the President demanded for an interference. That's just taking words and then pretending words mean things other than those words mean. That's all she's doing. The President did not demand, and the President did certainly not demand f interference. This is only possible if you take this expansive definition of things like foreign interference to be anything that would be good for Trump and bad for Democrats.

That's now foreign interference in the election. This is absurd, it's bonkers. Well, this is where we are, but I wanted to switch gears here for a second. I know we've talked a lot about the nonsense going on in Capitol Hill and all of the Democrat hysterics around how the president's the worst president ever and the most clearly you know, impeach, impeachment worthy, and all this other stuff foreign. You know, where there is real foreign interference that has

been going on in the United States in Iran. Now you won't see much news coverage of this. It's much more important to have these want to be MSNBC pundits telling you that the worst state, the greatest fear of the Founding Fathers was Donald Trump. I think they have that quite backwards, by the way, but that's much more important to most of the media than, for example, what seems to be the beginnings of the greatest challenge to the Iranian Mullahs, to that theocracy and kleptocracy in Iran

in forty years, which is going on right now. Gas prices there have spiked. The economy is in bad shape, it has been contracting. They are in recession, and the next year's recession is expected to be even worse. And the Iranian people are fed up, so they have been protesting. They've been protesting in such numbers that the Iranian thugs, the regime's own version of the brown Shirts, that go around beating people and shutting down Descent. And they have

killed at least two hundred people. Looks like it'll be more like three hundred here when they finally start, when they look at the body count as of today, opening fire on demonstrative live fire bullets, just just mowing down protesters in different places across the country. And as you know, you don't have to kill a lot of protesters who are peacefully expressing their feelings on something in public before other protesters get scared. So killing a few hundred protesters

is meant to shut this whole thing down. But you have a hike in fuel prices about fifty percent over the last month, you have hundreds of protesters killed, and here's what. And this was a fantastic piece today in the New York Post on this issue from Leal Leibovitz. While Iran right now is perhaps closer than ever before to ousting the authoritarian, the fascistic moulocracy that's in place, Here's what the so called geniuses in our media, the

policy experts in our media, were saying. Quote. Writing in February New York Times, Tehran correspond and Thomas Arnbrink described a nation standing behind its government, braving a drenching rain. He wrote, Iranians came out in droves to march up Revolution Street to the capital's Freedom Monument for a huge state backed rally commemorating the fortieth anniversary of the Islamic Revolution.

Erdbrink also described Iranians parading effigies of Trump, but a reader would get a little sense, a little sense of the regime's brutality and its internal crisis of legitimacy that would explode a few months later. You could hear a similar story on public radio, where PRI's popular show The Conversation warned this summer that Trump's sanctions would prove catastrophic. The president's hard measures, the show suggested, would yield the

classic rally around the flag effect. Iranians are critical of their government's economic policies, but they also blamed Trump for the hardship from sanctions. Same conventional wisdom came from newsweeks David Brennan predicting just last month that Trump's treatment of Iran will ensure America remains the Great Satan for many

years to come. Colum Lynch, foreign Policy senior diplomatic correspondent, touted an academic poll in October that found conclusively that Trump's sanctions had increased Iranian hostility toward the United States and boosted the popularity of Iranian hardliners. Gordon, Philip Gordon, the Council on Foreign Relations, et cetera. I mean, we'd start on this whole list. The foreign policy establishment had no idea that the Iranians were about to rise up

against their own government. In fact, we're predicting the opposite would happen. And we're making that prediction clearly because it was a way of saying Trump has done the wrong thing. Here's how the thinking of the foreign policy by the way, I worked at the Council on Foreign Relations, and I know how these people do this stuff. Here's how the

thinking of the foreign policy echo chamber works. A few people who almost always are left leading and Democrat shills will come out with something, and then other people try to parrot that, maybe add a little bit to it, put their own spin on it. But they want to be within that consensus because that's what the smart people are saying. That's what the dominant narrative becomes. Okay, Well, in this case, what was driving the narrative. Trump got us out of the Iran nuclear Deal and put sanctions

back on Iran. What was the single most important foreign policy decision of the Obama administration. The single most important move was the ironnuclear deal. Trump has gotten us out of that, I would say foolish and eventually catastrophic deal. But because they're all little Obama partisans in the foreign policy echo chamber, and do you know what happens, they have to come. They know what the conclusion must be.

Trump is wrong, what Trump has done is bad. Therefore their analysis turns into well, clearly, the Iranians will rally around their regime. It'll strengthen the Iranian regime. What Trump did will strengthen the Iranian regime because what Obama did

was going to somehow weaken the Iranian regime. What Obama did was through the Iranian regime and economic lifeline, give it access to foreign currency reserves, much better economic prospects, international banking system, selling its oil, of it, all these things that need that the Iranian regime needs to stay in power. How could anybody not see that Obama's catastrophically stupid Iran deal was going to do only one thing,

help the Mullahs. Whereas Trump putting sanctions, what I'm saying, sorry, we're out of this thing. You guys are a pariah state again. The people in that country are going to look around and say all this because we have a regime that refuses stop being a terrorist, pursuing nuclear ambitions and violation of treaties and in violation of international law. No,

the people in Iran are like, this is crazy. You have to remember Iran is a sophisticated country with you know, centuries of cultural cohesion and you know people that are very They do put a premium on education. I mean there's a sophistication. There's an urbaneness to the Iranians, and

the Iranian people would be if given the chance. Allies of the West, not all of them, of course, they're people that are parts of the regime and people that are little stooges of the regime, and you know, the military and every but you know, there is this youthful

movement in Iran to get something better going. Here we are at a point where perhaps the regime is facing a more direct challenge than at any points since two thousand and nine when Obama, or was the two thousand and ten when Obama basically didn't do anything to help them, the big champion of freedom but didn't do anything to

help the Iranian Iranian anti Molo movement. But here we are, and the experts got the whole thing wrong all along, because what was more important to them, what made them seem more sophisticated to their peers, What was more likely to get them published in the New York Times or Foreign Affairs, the publication of the Council on Foreign Relations or any of these places. What was more likely to

advance them personally? Orange Man bad Trump is wrong. Iran is going to rally around its leadership now Iran Iranian police and security forces are mowing down protesters because people are so fed up with their stupid and competent regime. Nobody in our intelligencia, noboding the foreign policy establishment seemed

to see this coming. Why is that, because, my friends, whether it's domestic or foreign policy, if it's any matter, trumped arrangement syndrome blinds people to what is really going on, and it becomes all encompassing. It is the gateway drug to a totalitarian mindset. That's what Trump's arrangement syndrome really is. Eleven months ago, at the launch of our campaign in Oakland, I told you all that I am not perfect, but I will always speak with decency and moral clarity and

treat all people with dignity and respect. That I will lead with integrity, and I will speak the truth. And so that's what I've tried to do every day of this campaign. And here's the truth. Today, I've taken stock and I've looked at this from every angle, and over the last few days, I have come to one of the hardest decisions of my life. So here's the deal, guys. My campaign for president simply does not have the financial resources to continue and the financial resources we need to continue.

I'm not a billionaire. I can't find my own campaign. And as the campaign has gone on, it has become harder and harder to raise the money. We need to compete in good faith. I cannot tell you, my supporters and volunteers that I have a path forward if I don't believe I do. Kamala Harris, my friends, the most overhyped candidate with the possible exception of Beto O'Rourke. Her campaign is no more. For some updates on that, and also look into what's going on on the Democrat campaign

traw where she just was. We have our friend Tianna Lowe back in the house. She is a commentary writer at the Washington Examiner. Tiana, good to have you, Hi, Buck, thanks for having me. All right, let's do a little autopsy of the Kamala Harris campaign. Shall we tell me

what happened here? What happened with Kamala So, Kamala was always a paper tiger, you know she it was kind of dumb luck and good connections that enabled her to win her original district attorney reef in San Francisco, and then you know her and Newsome have been kind of backed by the same physic hype machine the catapulted him for the governorship and her to the Senate. You know,

she was pretty untested politically speaking. She was who was a pop cop, an aggressive prosecutor who spent her time locking up the mothers of Truman children and incarcerating non violent, first time drug offenders. That was her legacy in California. But she had the attractive assage and the relative um you know, complicants on stage gave it good. She questioned people well. But as this on the debates, once she

was the one under fire, she completely crumbled. Do you think do you think the Tulsi moment was something that she just couldn't really shake off? Oh? Absolutely. That was the turning point because you know, at early on the media was fully in the tank for Harris. You know, they were counting this this first term senator who wound up pulling sixth in her own state as as presidential material. And really, what was she famous for? What has she

done in the Senate? Nothing? It's not like she was Barack Obama, where she had already had this national career thinks to incredible book writing. She was really just being counted as the next big thing because she looked the part and she could speak the part when she was untested.

But she would always crumble under fire, you know, I mean she came across more looking like a bully during the Kavanaugh hearings, whereas someone like Amy Klobachar used it your advantage to come across as very careful and prosecutorial,

Kamalo just seemed like a cop. And so what Tolsi managed to do, she managed to take the talking points did all of us in California news for years, which is that she was deeply corrupt, deeply carceole, extremely hostile towards non violent offenders of all kinds, including sex workers and drug addicts, and she managed to force the mainstream media to address I mean, I mean, it's kind of

remarkable because what I know, you're from California. Well, what you're really telling me here is she wasn't even really popular in California. She wasn't, but she was. She was very popular with a kind of champagne liberal who can sit around sipping sharpening in the middle of the day because they don't have a job to get to and

moaning and fulminating that Donald Trump's president. She was not well liked by the working class in the middle of the state, by the working class in Oakland, that is not who she favored, because those of the people who was trying to lock up. Now I'm glad. I'm glad you have here because you know you you are going to be more of an expert on the particular subject of sexism than I can be because of course I'm a male, so I can't speak to it from the Yeah,

I'm not allowed having a padio. I can't speak from the eye perspective. But I did think it was just so classic that there were there were a lot of allegations of sexism about why her campaign didn't catch on more. I even saw some allegations people were saying about well racism and other Democratic Party although Corey Booker is still in this and Tulsie Gabbert is still a minority, which I think is fascinating. Democrats kind of take that away

from her too. But but I thought it was really interesting because when you look at Kamala's campaign, she wasn't even a to dent the support among African Americans that Joe Biden had. So how is her lack of success having to do with racism? It makes no sense. No, I mean, if anything, in the person with the most legitimate acts to grind about the media coverage other than Tulsea and I would say, Andrew Yang is Joe Biden.

Think about it, Kamala was able to instigate an entire two week media cycle about federally mandated bussing because she smeared the first vice president to a black president as racist for not mandating and endorsing forcible like federal bussing. She got all the media treatment she could have possibly asked for. Everyone was fawning over her as though she was Hillary two point zero, and thus that's how she

fared out. And now the deflection acting as though is the product of racism when actually, if anything, got more favorable coverage. And I'm not sure I don't think it's because of her race, but there's no question that she in particular got more favorable coverage than let's say a

Cory Booker type figure. Yeah, I mean, let's be honest. Also, like if sexism was was the issue that prevented Kabla, I mean, Elizabeth Warren is crushing her in the polls, and it's not you know, Elizabeth Warren is kind of like everybody's you know, hectoring librarian. I mean, I'm kind of amazed that she's done as well as she has, but clearly sexism is not the problem. Yeah, no, it's

definitely not a sexism thing. And also consider the Democratic electorate was more than help you to make Hillary Cleansing their nominee just three years ago. So we're speaking. We're speaking to Tiana Low. She's a commentary writer for The Examiner. Guys, and Tiana, you were just up in New Hampshire covering

the Yang Gang. Tell us what's going on there. Yes, I'm still sawing out from the first nister and the season apparently, so that is kind of incredible that there were fat of snow and people were still driving out hours and hours and hour. Of the amount of people I saw in western New Hampshire who had driven all the way from Massachusetts just to see Yang in a brewery, just to see Yang out of college doing these town halls.

You know, he is. The way he delivered as a stump speech honestly reminds me a little bit of Donald Trump. Like the President, Yang reads the room extremely well. He knows how to sort of incorporate a little bit of stand up while his issue, extremely dire warning is about

automation and about the future of our workforce. I would be shocked if he doesn't wind up overperforming the polls in your Hampshire at least because that base is extremely motivated and they'll be opening up their tenth field office in the state this week. Now. I don't want to make you speak again from the eye perspective all this, but I guess I'm about to because I know you

have some a Asian parentage. I would ask you to explain to me if you think that it's fair to criticize the Democratic Party, for it does not ever seem to me like they think of Yang as a minority, which is fascinating to me. Like when they talk about diversity and minority, Andrew Yang is never they don't get excited about the prospect of the first Asian American presidential candidate,

never mind possibly president. Why is that the intersectional left, so not all liberals, but the intersectional left, has never been able to reconcile two pivotal minorities, Jews and East

Asians because despite both facing wild amounts of adversity. I mean, consider it's within the century that Japanese citizens of the United States were interned without any due process, and it's well known at this point that elite institutions discriminate against Asian Americans when it comes to college admission in the same way they did to Jews one hundred years ago.

They've never been able to reconcile the Despite that level of discrimination, Asian Americans and Jewish Americans outperform every other demographic on almost every measure when it comes to income, when it comes to professional achievement, and so because they see those outcomes, they just, you know, Jews don't get the minority card, Asian Americans don't get the already card, so they're just kind of left out to dry and

much less. I mean, we see this a lot in corporate America too, and in academia there is sort of an expectation that Asian Americans will be successful, that they'll get the McKinsey job, but they'll never get the top McKinsey job, That they'll get into Harvard, but they won't be the head of the poly side department. Instead, they'll

be relegated to a quieter field like sten. So it really is quite remarkable and I think a positive sign of progress that Andrew Gang is running for the top job, and he's doing so as an actual entrepreneurs, someone who understands how jobs are made, rather than these other candidates who have brad they haven't worked a day in their

life creating another job for another American. Now, I mean, I would assume that certain I mean I know this from friends of mine who are recognizable as conservatives, particularly

people who for example, work for Fox News. You're around certain Democrat constituencies and there's a there's a tremendous there's a hostility, you know, and if you're considered from a right of center publication or channel, there's a hostility from Bernie's and Er supporters, certainly from Biden supporters, from Warren supporters.

Did you feel at this when Yang's people were around, did it feel a little bit more inclusive of at least alternative points of view opinions, Because one of the knocks against Yang and Tulsie from the left has been their willingness to engage at least not to agree with because they're both very left wing, but to engage with the other side. I just want to know, from your first person perspective of being out there, did you feel like you could actually talk to the Yang supporters and

they weren't going to throw anything at you. Oh, absolutely, and I think it's because you know Yang's hoole pitch. He's obviously very anti Trump, but Yang's hole pitches that Trump was focusing on problems that clearly the Democratic establishment were ignoring. The correct response to make America great again was not America is always great. It's focusing on the problems that are affecting Americans. That's something that Yang really cares about. It's very interesting I met. I met a couple,

a husband and a wife. She had voted for Hillary in twenty sixteen and him for Trump, but they were both so disaffected by both parties. That's why they were there. There There were a lot of Bernie Bernie supporters, former Trump supporters, from Hillary supporters. It really was a hodge punch of people who just felt failed by the system and failed by the lives of politicians. And it was very, very open to media and it was not hostile at all.

It was quite hurting to see people who really hadn't had a horse in the race saw a candidate they liked because of his ideas, not because of his demagoguery any predictions. As we go into the Democrat December debate, here for who you think either might really have a moment, or who you think might make it on that stage. It's a surprise, just what you know, give us anything,

Gianna's look into the future of this Democrat field. So, assuming that both Yang and told Zie get their last required pole to make it to the debate, this will be an eight person debate stage, which I think will be a good thing because I'm sorry these debates with twelve people screaming at each other, no one cares, no one hears anything of substance. The eight people is a lot more manageable field. This is kind of the do

or dietime. Honestly, I think for Elizabeth Warren, who's been trailing somewhat in the polls to Bernie, and Bernie's you know, had the support of the squad, and he's coming back better than ever, even though he's a seventy eight year old who just had a heart attack and he freeds to release his medical records. So Elizabeth Warren, if she wants to dominate that progressive lane, now is the time

to strike. She needs to make the case that she'll do a better job actually getting something done, Unlike Bernie, who's spent forty years in Congress, doing nothing except for pontificating, as I think that's obviously a big deals. Just give me another instance of confiding. Managed to make it three hours without talking about corn Popper of Harry Legs and hopefully. I mean it's a candidate like Amy Klobucher who also

could occupy that center lane. If she wants to make it to the top, she needs to start throwing some punches. Gianna Low everybody Washington Examiner for her, ladies. You can also follow her on Twitter at Tiana Low. Gianna. Thanks so much, great to talk to you. We'll have you back soon. Thank you. Buck. I watched his team's jaws dropped to the floor. Monsieur Justin Trudeau says, so we would play that audio for just because it's everywhere all over the internet right now and all the news cycle.

It is a number of leaders. I think it's Trudeau and Boris Johnson and somebody else who mel Macron, Macron who actually does kind of sound like this, so dude, but he's like French, He's not. Trudeau is like I am chopping down wood in a lumberjack shirt in the far north of Canada, right exactly. But but mac Cron is like I am spitting in your cafeole while I give you the most old croisson we have because we hit you American swine. You know it's a different, a

different variation of the French thing. I know Trudeau doesn't have an accent. Don't send me the people sending the most of his book. You don't sound Trudeau at all, of course not, it's ridiculous. Don't sound like Hillary either. Hello, but everyone knows exactly who I'm talking about, what happened. She might still come back. Do not, do not think that Hillary is totally dunezo, because she may still will say,

well whatever, We'll talk about that more another day. But you had a bunch of world leaders here who you know, count came together. It looked like they're being a little gossipy about how Trump took a forty minute press conference before they even sat down to do the real press conference. And now the president left, and he left a little bit earlier, and yeah, I don't look, he doesn't he doesn't like what he heard here from Trudeau. And I think it's a fair thing to say that this president

does not look. He does not take personal insults or criticism well or lightly. That is all true. Here is what Trump says, play clip three. If you would my man Brandon, well, he's too faced, do you think deservings too name? And honestly, with true, he's a nice guy. I find him to be a very nice guy. But you know, the truth is that I called him out on the fact that he's not paying two percent, and

I guess he's not very happy about it. I mean, you were there, A couple of you were there, and he's not paying two percent and he should be paying two percent. It's candidate, they have money and they should be paying two percent. So I called him out on that, and I'm sure he wasn't happy about it, but that's the way it is. Look, I'm representing the US and he should be paying more than he's paying. And he understands it, so I can imagine, I can imagine he's

not that happy, but that's the way it is. And I'm troubled, but not surprised to see that there are a lot of liberals who when this happens, they take the position that, oh, isn't it great that these world leaders would be mocking Trump in this way? You know, when you're talking about the presis the United States and his counterparts for foreign countries. It would really be nice if you if your first impulse was to root for the home team a little bit libs, just a little bit.

I'm not saying all the time, but you know, at some point there there does need to be this restoration of the sense of our country, our people, our guy, our leaders could be our gal at some point in the future. Um. But Democrats know they would applaud, they would laugh, they would love um mockery of the president. That's not even in a just a strictly personal sense. This is the president representing our interests at NATO and a bunch of world leaders are caught, you know. And

by the way, what they said wasn't that bad. I'm not I'm not trying to be you know, we shouldn't be babies about this either. But you know they like mocking the President Trump a little bit. But what's so interesting is do you think any of those world leaders would ever ever have the I have to find a better word, but gall to say that to his face. I don't think Trudeau would be leg excuse me, Trump, but I want to say this to your face down.

Black rifle coffee is celebrating it's fifth year anniversary. So to celebrate, they started Black Rifle Friday. Look, I know it sounds like a fictional holiday, you know, like Valentine's Day, which is just a cast grab. But you know you wouldn't be wrong. But since it's actually Black Rifles fifth year anniversary and the spirit of radical transparency, which is a think black Rifles really into. Black Rifle Coffee is making an early play for your holiday spending with new products,

special discounts, and extra perks for coffee club members. Not a coffee club member, no problem, sign up and see all the great benefits you get when you belong to the most patriotic coffee club in the country. Let me tell you, I start every day with a delicious cup of Black Rifle coffee. My favorite roast is silence or smooth, but I also like Freedom Blend or caffeinated as blank. Check them all out. They're delicious. Don't choose basic batch coffee,

go with America's coffee, Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck together twenty percent off your first purchase. That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck again twenty percent off your first purchase Black Riflecoffee dot Com, slash buck. The ceasfire is holding very much so and I think people are surprised, and maybe someday they'll give me credit, but probably not. But I worked out well. They've been trying to do this for one hundred years.

That border is a mess for a long time. We pulled our soldiers out, We took over the oil. We have soldiers where the oil is and that's the way I like it. And they can police their own border and that's what they're doing. They can use other countries if they want, if they want to spend the time and energy, they can do. But this is a border that's been underseage for many, many decades, and it was time for us to leave, and we left and it's been holding very nicely, so we're very happy. We talked

about that. So Trump was talking to Angela Merkel. Hello, everybody, I have missed you. It's Angola Coot and talk Angela Sittings out. Was Trump and are talking about Syria, And a lot of journalists, of course, decided that they would bash Trump for saying that they've they've got the oil or what Trump? What Trump is saying, and we you know, this is one of the more frustrating and childish things

that you continue to see from the media. What Trump is trying to say here is is that they have secured the oil fields so that they cannot be used by the Islamic State, because the Islamic State needs money to pay its fighters, to buy weapons and supplies. So what he is saying is that the Islamic State won't be able to do that because we have soldiers that have grabbed the oil fields in eastern Syria to secure them, not to plunder them. This isn't I'm saying. You will

say this is colonialist. And but one of the annoying games that the left will not stop playing is that they act like they can't understand what Trump is really saying. They pretend that they have no ability to understand intent when he speaks, and it's oh yeah, Trump, just whatever he says is what he says. And now there's all this media focus on this. This is on Drudge right now.

Matchrome blasts stolen gossip footage filmed without permission. Now Trump caught on hot mic gossiping about Trudeau and Boris plays it safe, My friends, I sit here, and I say to you, nobody will remember any of this in a day or two. This is just a media This is

a media obsession. What I am hoping they will remember is that there will that there will be a time at which we can go back and look at the way the Trump administration has gone about its foreign policy, and its foreign policy is just frankly superior to what we saw for eight years of his predecessor. And I would argue what we saw under the ssh administration too. The Bush administration made decisions on the foreign policy front that are very hard to defend in retrospect. And you know,

Trump comes back from this NATO summit. What really matters, and this is a recurring theme whenever we talk about this country, it's politics and how President Trump plays a role in all of this. What really matters that there

was this little interpersonal spat involving Trudeau and Trump. And you know, who are these other macron Macron Trudeau, I wonder which one of them if they have a contest to see who is more beloved by the left and a fancy European type, who is more I think they like, you know, Trudeau has got a little more left wing glamour,

they like him a little bit more. But when you look at the way that NATO contributions are going to be up over already up over one hundred and twenty billion, I think might be one hundred and forty and will be hundreds of billions when it's all said and done, because of pressure that Trump put on the Alliance, essentially by publicly shaming them. You know what happens when you point out that people aren't doing what they're supposed to do. They tend to get a little bit upset. They tend

to be unhappy with that. And so that there would be pushback from some of these leaders is not in the least bit surprising because they're the ones being called out by a president in front of their own constituencies. So you know, that's the reality that they're going to, of course be upset about this, and we should not be in the least bit surprised. So I think that Trump is doing a pretty good job when all said and on foreign policy, and he's not getting any credit

for it whatsoever. He's doing a good job with NATO as well. People are saying that Trump is the biggest I want to say people I mean like the heads of the Democratic Party. I mean the biggest media outlets in the country. I don't mean random you know people. They're saying that this president is at a threat to NATO and the NATO may not survive beyond him. Meanwhile,

NATO is actually thriving. Once. One thing that I wanted to return to here for a second, that I hadn't had a chance to spend as much time on as I did, as I as I had initially intended to remember when there was this gun case the Supreme Court heard last week. Okay, now that this hits kind of close to home for me because I'm here in New York City and i don't own a firearm here because the process is so annoying and I'm busy, And then

that's that's what they hope. They hope that the process is so annoying and busy that you won't enjoy your Second Amendment rights. And for those of you that say, oh buck, how bad is it, No, it's really bad. It's a lot of paperwork, it's expensive, it's time consuming. You have to show up in person to one place in the whole city, and they you gotta wait until the person that doesn't even care to see you, sits

down with you and finger prints and everything else. And this is a perfect example of the way that liberals like to view the law. This was from the oral arguments about this New York City gun case. And you know you won't see you. There won't be much media coverage of this, and nobody will really nobody will really particularly care about that on the left, of course, because they don't want people to understand how absurd this is.

But remember this law that New York passed at the then with Drew because I knew that the law was garbage, was that in New York City it would be illegal for you to legally own a gun and leave the city with your gun to go to anywhere else in New York State. So they're creating this little special category of law where you can only have your gun in New York City. You can't have your gun in New York State, even though New York City is a part of New York State. So you know how, and you

have a Second Amendment right to have a firearm. So how do they square all this? And they pull the law. But what's so interesting is that the City of New York It's lawyers were asked the question as to whether or not would be You know what the law actually means, when you're traveling with your firearm to go to a range, you have to take the most direct route. You have to take the most director route. And so theoretically you

could be arrested. You know, if you're staying at your buddy Bill's house and they find you with your locked, remembered legal firearm there, you would be in violation law and could be arrested if you said, well, no, hold on, I'm going to arrange tomorrow, you know, because that would be an end run on their bizarre law, right. I mean, if it's just you can have a premise permit to the range and back, well, what's to the range and

back is it? What's the timeline? And this seems like it's in the minution of the law, but it's really not at all, because the whole notion that this is you can only have it in your home. It can't leave your home. Well, then how could you ever fire your gun? No, you need to be able to carry a weapon on you, folks. This is what this really comes down to. You need to be able to either open or concealed carry, but you have to be able to carry or you have to at least be able

to transport your weapon. This in this case, it's not even opener until carry. It's just locked in a box and locked ammunition box. But Justice Gorcich asked this. This was from the transcript when the oral arguments were heard last week at the Supreme Court. I just want to circle back to the direct and continuous travel requirement of the current rule and Justice Alito's question about visiting your mother. Is it now the city's position that any reasonable stops

are permissible? City's lawyer, mister Deering, that is our enforcement reasonably necessary stops in the course of travel, Justice Corsage, reasonably necessary. Mister Deering, Yeah, permissible, Justice Gorciers, Now, does that include stopping to visit your mother? Deering? I haven't Justice Corsage or used the endearing says. I'm not sure I know the answer to that, Justice Corsage. What about getting a cup of coffee? I mean, is a cup

of coffee reasonably necessary? Daring depends on who you ask, But the police department has affirmed and we have made clear the enforcement position is that a stop for a cup of coffee is not a problem. Okay, what I know what I can represent because it's come up before. Coffee, restrooms, food, gas, and kinds of things that you ordinarily would stop for in the course of travel. I haven't considered the mother in law example before. I think that's going to need

to play out in the courts. This is how liberals like laws to be my friends, especially in an area where they want to create a perception of possible criminal jeopardy beyond the actual text of the law, beyond the

initial intent of the law. One of the ways that they prevent people like me, and this is the same you'll see in many other cities and counties across the country, One of the ways they prevent people like me from getting a firearm is because when you understand, when you really know, the way that the left approach is firearms ownership and the law, they want it to be murky, They want it to be precarious. They want it to be unclear, uncertain whether in fact you are in compliance

with the law. They would prefer that it be left up to your up to their discretion, whether or not you get prosecuted, because then somebody who is cautious and especially if you're conservative and openly so and don't feel like you're going to get a fair shake in the judicial system on an issue like this, which I do not believe that. I would you just say, well, if they can't even tell me what's legal and what's not, I don't want to subject myself to well, go fight

it out in court. Understand this, It needs to play out in the courts. Is the city's lawyer. This is of course a liberal city, liberal lawyer on a liberal anti gun policy. What that means is, yeah, we're going to arrest some people. And when those people, after they've been arrested, facing felony gun charge, by the way, go to prison. They can take you to prison for this, probably get processed. You can get taken down to what

they call the tombs here. Maybe you get Center Rikers for the weekend, if you got to get held, if you can't get balent On and I who knows. Rikers Island is the major prison facility here in New York. It's a scary place. But you know, to play out of the courts. This is capricious judicial tyranny. Oh, this is capricious legal tyranny. This is what they want. They want you to never really know if you're in compliance or not, because then you err on the side of well.

I just don't want to I wouldn't want to be involved in this. I don't want this to be something that I have to even think about that I have to deal with. It's unacceptable to me to have to make these allowances for the state to imprison me. This should be I hope the Supreme Court just slam. I mean, it's by the way, of course, it's gonna five four because the liberals in the Court don't like guns. Doesn't matter. They don't believe the second time. They don't like guns.

It doesn't matter what the law says, it doesn't matter what the precedents are, anything gun related. You know, Sodomayor and Kagan and Ginsburg. You know, they're just gonna just every time. It's it's like clockwork. They hate guns, they hate gun owners, they the whole thing. But I hope that the conservative, alleged conservative majority, though Roberts yet another

who are the really good judges? Thomas Alito? You know, I think you could argue that Gorshitch is really solid, and I think that we'll have to see, but I think the cabinal will be very good. We have to see. We don't know yet. But Roberts Iffy Trump's judges I think better than the judges that were appointed by Bush, which is something we should all keep in mind. But I hope that they slam this down because there's a

there's a principle at work here. The states should not be passing felony statutes, or the city should not be enforcing felony city ordinances. I mean sending people to prison, or taking away people's freedom, or even just taking away their firearm or giving them a fine, doesn't matter. They should not be able to punish people under laws that they themselves do not know the extent of and are

not certain about how they would be enforced. It makes a mockery of the law, and that they know is such a shaky law that they'll even pull a part of it before the Supreme Court can even review it. They shouldn't be playing these kinds of games. This is the part that the most intrusive part of the state of government in your life has to do with criminal law and regulations. With the force of criminal law, that's the one place where you should be the most concerned.

You know, they talk about Trump, but Trump is not going to lock you up local police in a blue majority city in order to make a point, especially if you're like a reasonably you know, reasonably successful, middle class tax peg individual who happened to be a Republican and owns firearms, if they can make an example of you, and I know, I remember the Winnishet case in DC. I remember talking to that guy. Or they wanted because

DC New York, same politics. They wanted to send this father and businessman with no criminal record to prison because he had a spent shotgun shell cartridge in his home and I think also replica fifty caliber ammunition for a you know, a flint lock or black powder rifle, so essentially a little ball like a lead ball. He had that just as a as a keepsake from when he went shooting in Virginia. They wanted seth to prison for that. This is idiocy, this is but it's intentional. It's it's

viciousness too, because they know that that's what happens. And that's that's why when I saw this. You know, you're asking the city of New York, Hey, if if you have your firearm, your legal firearm that you've gone through all the hoops to get and you stop to get a cup of coffee. Can the cops arrestue if they find out that you've got a firearm and you're stopping to get a cup of because that's not going to the range. No, we've told the cops they probably shouldn't

arrescue for that. Okay, what if you stop at your mother in law's house, you've got to bring your medication. Let's let that play out in the courts. Oh okay,

so you get to get arrested. If you're that guy someone out there, it's going to get arrested under this policy, and then it's up to them to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and go through all this nonsense so that eventually the city could be like, Okay, well, you know, maybe we won't ruin your life and throw you in prison, you know, with rapists and murderers because you stopped at grandma's house or your mother in law's house on your way to the range with your gun

in a lockbox. Welcome to the left wing here, and that they want for all of us. I understand it. Can be a little bit awkward when you have to think about life insurance. You don't want to have to consider what would be unthinkable, but you have to prepare for an uncertain future and make sure that your family is safe and secure. I've gone through this process myself. It's something you need to do and you should go to the place that makes it easy for you, no hassle.

That's Ethos Life Insurance. Ethos is modern life insurance for people who just don't want to waste time with fine print, extra appointments or fees they really just can't afford. Ethos has a simple approach. They take industry expertise and they blend it with technology so that you can find the right policy to protect your loved ones in just a matter of about ten minutes and you can apply online.

You should check it out for yourself. You'll be taking the first steps to ensure that your family has the financial security they need in case of the unexpected. This is the responsible thing to do. Get a fast, free and personalized quote right now at Ethoslife dot com. That's Ethoslife dot com life insurance that actually fits your life team. I'm sorry to inform you all that we let and if you're watching on Pluto TV you might have even seen it. We let producer Brandon try to set up

so that he could say hi to bon Jovi. Because producer Brandon is living on a prayer right now. He's very happy about this. We had bon Jovi in the vicinity. Does have good hair, I will say, gray, but flowing, luxurious, and producer Brandon tried to get it, but he disappeared on us. Man, I'm sorry, it's okay, it's okay. You got out of here before you can get that selfie with him. You're gonna get a selfie for Team Buck. Didn't manage to get it done next time, though, I mean,

I don't know. I'm kind of like a like a fanboy, I guess, even though I've been in radio for like fifteen years, so who I like to get photos of people. That's what I do, right, I mean, the only thing would gets me get me excited is when you know, when hopefully newly divorced Jessica Bill comes in here. I'm not gonna ask for selfie' gonna ask for a phone number. She'll say no. But hey, uh, Brandon, I gotta ask you.

Man if if there's one rock star that we could make appear only one in the iHeart offices here in New York City for you to meet and selfie with. Who would it be Axel Rose? No question, number one, number one. I'm talking we could what if we could even resurrect some members of the Beatles if necessary, Elvis, Presley Lennon probably wait, John John Lennon show, Okay, John Lennon, that would be your al so all time with John Lennon. But right now living would be axel Or. I will

say bon jovis age better than Exel Rose. Yeah, bon Jovi gets a lot of ready fair enough man. All right, Well, anyway, I hope you're enjoying the show today. Folks, make sure you check out if you're listening to this on radio, Pluto TV, download the app. It's totally free, Channel two forty eight Pluto TV. Please do check us out. I'm on Jesse Kelly's on. We're gonna have some new shows

joining in the weeks ahead. And also, if you are listening on radio and you want to listen earlier in the day and you want to always know that you can listen whenever you want on demand, subscribe to the Bucks Exton Show on iTunes or on the iHeart Radio app. We watched those podcasts. Now they're going up, up, up each month because of all of you. So please also tell somebody, Hey, check out the Buck Sexton Show. It's a huge That is my Christmas and Birthday gift this

month from you guys. Tell one person to download the Buck Sexton Show. You know, I gotta say, I was watching, just trying to because I'm writing this book crushing the Commies. I can't call it that. We're gonna have to. It's gonna be something about socialism in America. But the book is more than halfway done, so it's it's coming along. I gotta write a lot this month. I took a little break and I flipped on the TV and I saw Golden Eye of the of the James Bond, of

the James Bond series. And I gotta tell you something, The Golden Eye video game is better than the Golden Eye movie. The Golden Eye movie is really corny, but the Golden Eye video game, my brothers and I played that thing on ninten to sixty four. I mean I was, I was incredible. I would play as odd job, but I'm telling you I could have beaten, like at those little tournaments where they have people that actually play for money.

I feel I feel like in my heyday, I would I would have been able to win a Golden Night tournament. Because of course, my little brother, if he's listening to this right now, I would claim that he's better than me at it, which might be true. But hopefully he's missing out on this part of the show today because he'll call me out because he was good at it as well. But I just was watching that and then I saw today that there is advertisement finally for the final,

the Final. What's this guy? Who's this guy's name? What's his name? The One? The New Bond, Daniel Craig. I got a Daniel Craig no time to die, So that the trailer is out for it, maybe we'll have on I don't know, he'd be fun to have on Jesse Kelly later on in the week to talk to him about The One Only. Jesse Kelly is also on Pluto TV channel two forty eight. The first plug it because I think that Daniel Craig, the first James Bond he did was kind of new and fresh, and it was

a nice restart of it. I think it's just gone pretty much downhill from there. I thought that they're the plots the bad guys have been kind of ridiculous. The plots have hard to follow. The one where there was like a water he's in South America. There's like a almost like a climate change theme to the whole thing was just absurd, just absurd. It wasn't a very it wasn't a very good one. But I'm hoping, do we know who the new James Bond is going to be?

I remember it was going to be Idris Elba for a little bit and then they and then it wasn't right. Who's producer Brandon? Tell me who the new James Bond will be? Because I think this is a this is a series that you know, people should remember and all that stuff. It's you know, there's there's some good there's some good episode either. Is the discussion always abo whether Sean Connery or Roger Moore or Timothy Dalton. I think he was weak. It's James Bond. But do we know

who the Bond's number is? Up? Wait? There is rumors that it's going to be a British actors. Was it less Shana Lynch. I didn't know who this is. So they're they're going so a theme male African American. Yeah, I'm sorry, pardon me, a female uh black British actor. That's the rumor right now. Okay, all right, interesting I did I did not know that, so let to see how it goes. I'm also producer, Brent. Are you gonna watch the Irishman? This is the other thing I've kind

of got to think about. I don't know, I don't know if I I don't like all it's like, hey, little thing with the thing you go to a place with the person. Hey, you talked to Vinnie, you talked to you know, Vinnie two fingers about about Tommy five fingers. I mean, I mean, I feel like I have to because everyone's time. You haven't watched it yet, not yet. I get to invest a lot of time because this

isn't it like four hours or something. Yeah, people are saying that it's a real it's a haul, a long haul. They get through. They might as well have made that like a series, not a movie. I mean, I will say, I'm see I respect good Fellows like I will watch Goodfellows is on, and I feel like it's one of these movieses on TV all the time, wherever it's on. I don't watch it all the way through now, but I'm like, all right, it's good. I gotta watch like

twenty minutes of this though. I've seen it so many times. And it's funny to me too, because I really don't like any of Like I don't think any of the characters. They're not good people. They're all bad people. There's really no one to root for. Like even Henry Hill's a bad guy, and if you know his story, he did bad stuff even after he kind of got out and was in witness protection and all this other stuff, so he's not These are not good people, but it's very entertaining.

It's just really well written. It's like the sopranos. Yeah, I mean it's the Tony soprano. Wasn't a good parson, I guess. But now these mob guys are all really bad. This is what people kind of forgetting these antihero Yeah, well, but but they're not. They always do this thing in these movies where they have the mob guy, but he's got a code and he's really just going. It's actually not true. These mob guys like go into you know, Delhi owner's own you know, Delhi owner's place of business.

If you don't pay the protection money, they like break your fingers in front of your wife. I mean, they're not good people. So I feel like there's a you know a little bit of a hero worship around the mob stifs you might like, you know, yeah, like everyone knows, Like the Russian mafia, it's like you pay or you die. Like no one no one's like, oh yeah, the Russian mafia is like no, we don't involve civilians in our you know, turf Wars or something. Italian mafia did bad

stuff too, very bad stuff. This is not good people anyway. I'm a little I'm a little off the you know the tracks on that when everybody else is like, oh, I just love I just love all this stuff so much. I don't think these mom movies are made. And I think Casino is it's a very, it's a very. It's an entertaining movie. It's a really depressing movie. They're all bad people. These mobsters are bad people. I don't know this.

This is what I kind of get a little, you know, I get a little bit people look at me like I'm the home monitor here of media. But I'm not saying don't watch these movies. I've seen them a ton of times. I just sometimes feel like there's not enough of an understanding that these characters are really bad guys. It doesn't remind me of how when the movie Wall Street came out, Oliver Stone was very upset to find out afterwards that people like love and idolize Gordon. Gecko's

supposed to be the bad guy in the movie. It everyone's like sky walks around with suspenders and French cuff shirts. He's got fast cars, beach houses, and beautiful women at his beck and call. I think I want to be Gordon Get Go. People did not did not have the intended uh moral takeaway from that movie. I mean that is, by the way, Michael, I think Michael Douglas's best role of all time. But so I'll let you know, I'll probably bring somebody in here and maybe talk a little

bit of Bond stuff, you know. I just I haven't really thought that Daniel Craig movies recently have been particularly worthwhile. I got asked, you know, what are the best CIA movies? I think the best CIA movie for me, well, the most I really like Spy Game, which was actually a Redford and Brad Pitt, right, Robert Redford and Brad Pitt movie. I think Spy Game is very entertaining for what it is. Well done. Um, I think that you the Bond series is iconics. You can't you add it together as a

totality of work, it's pretty incredible. Then I would I would say Zero Dark thirty is really good, um, really good movie for what it is. I enjoyed it, and there's enough realism that it's not completely absurd. Don't even get me started on Jack Ryan season two. I haven't even finished it yet. I'm done. I can't do it, can't do it, can't do it. I've tried. It's just too bad. It's it's too crappy. John Krasinski whatever, really let me down on that one. So it makes me

makes me sad. And I don't know. I don't think I think we're gonna have to just I don't think I'm gonna watch The Irishman. Don't think I'm gonna get around there Anytime's en have too much other good stuff, you know. I haven't even gotten a Peaky Blinders season five yet. Peak Peaky Blinders an amazing show. I'm a I'm a big peak. It is hard to understand them. You probably should watch it with subtitles. It's a little

bit like when they interview the guys from Oasis. They're like, you know what I mean, Bibby Blood, you know what I mean? You know what I mean. You're like, where are you guys from? You're from England. This is where the language comes from. And this is the mumbling that you do is supposed to be English. It's absurd, you know Liam and Noel Gallagher, right, those guys, Yeah, like that don't speak English. I don't know what they speak.

You watch like Lockstock too smoking barrels you don't understand or Snatched. I remember that. Yeah, I actually thought that when Brad Pitt did his accent and Snatched, I was like, this is absurd. Nobody sounds like that. And then Travelers as they prefer to be called travelers, not Gypsies, travelers in the UK. I actually heard interviews with you know, they became more of they became i think, in part

well known because of that movie or better known. And then he's like series, there's like a TLC series like Travelers with you know not the gypsy. Don't say gyps. That's bad. They don't like gypsy. They they punch people over that and apparently they're very good fighters. You don't want to get into it with them, um, but they do sound that that is the accent. His accent was actually the way that he speaks. That movie is kind of the way that they speak, which is not strictly

speaking English. Gets some Virgil, some version of English. All right, that's our little pop culture diversion today. Let's get to roll call Buck. It's time for roll call. Roll call. You know it, every body. Let's get to it in the roll call Tom, which is always fantastic. So let's see what we got here. All right, Well, that one's too long. Carolyn, big fan from Canada. You are so funny. You make me laugh out loud. I hope one day you do marry. You seem like a catch. Cheers well,

Carolyn from Canada. Thank you very much. This is a very nice message to start the show with today. And I also hope that I marry. And I would like to thank of a catch, perhaps a handful put a catch. I'm glad that you laugh at the show. We try to have some fun. I know, we do serious stuff. We try to have fun on here too. I mean it's people spend they spend a lot of time in the Hut. I mean we hang out together a lot. And I love it when people will send me emails.

Let's say they've downloaded, you know, a whole week of shows and held it until they had a long road trip or something and they just wanted to you know, they just listen to like seven or eight hours the Bucks Exton Show while they're in the car, like this is great. It's like I'm hanging album. It's like we're road tripping together, except I get to sit at home in my pajamas, watching Netflix and ordering Thai food, two

of my absolute favorite activities, and going to the gym. Theoretically, let's see here, Erica, right, I like your insult of aggressively aggressively stupid, but try my favorite version, extra special kind of stupid, Erica. Perhaps I will manage to work that one into the rotation. Thank you so much, Roger. The Young Turks also deny the Armenian genocide happen. Does that make them deniers? Yeah? The Young Turks is not

an honorable not an honorable organization. So do not I mean I I I do not find that Jenk is unwilling to talk and exchange the other side, and he can show manners when he chooses to. But some of his employees are are just horrible individuals, they really are. And the people that like that site are trash trash. Not all of them, of course, I'm sure there's some nice people, but like mostly bad people, and some of

them I'm sure are nice people. I think it's the second time I betage to work that into the show, tod I like that. Yeah, Um, Michael Ment just came across men at work on YouTube. Now the whole team can weigh in on its merits. No, man, we know that we come from a landown under where women something in men plunder whatever, you know, whatever the whatever, the lyrics something about a vegemite sandwich. Vegemite is disgusting by the way it is. You know it's disgusting too, It's appalling.

I got to see Holland Hay, who's the lead singer a minute work. He's part of Ringos All Star band this past summer. Really just a little while, just a little tidbit showing that with you real quick Ringos obviously alive. Oh yeah, he's alive. He is an all star band, people with from Sticks and just like a lot of random you know, all stars in the rock and roll world. Look at that man, Look at you. We gotta put

out a call. We gotta like somehow get someone in the Freedom Hut to get Axel Rose to come in here for an interview. Jes so we could watch Jester. We can watch Brandon's like whole universe, you know, like Cross the Street and everything. Like we won't real fine, I mean, do we have enough reach. I mean we got to. We've gotten to you know, cabinet members, I've interviewed the president. Well, well, we'll get Axel Rose at some point. I'm sure you too. What's your birthday? September?

So just pasted, all right, we got time, We got time. Then maybe maybe next September. Oh, we get Axel Rose to come in here, you would man do headlines everywhere? Well of course, but also we just get him to weigh in on his face. I don't even care if he hates Trump, doesn't matter me. Just get him away it on politics for fun. Be like you know, if Welcome to the Jungle came out today. Would that change the political discourse? Sure? You know, just add like try

to bring him into the conversation. Would beat all right? You know, well, we're going to work on it. I'm sure somebody out there, Axel Roses, freedom loving all American grandma probably listens to the Buck Sexton Show and right now she's like, I'll get young act should will come on into the show. We could totally get this to happen. All right, all right, I'll dream We're working on it. Rayer. We tried to get bon Jovie from the day. Bon Jovi is too fancy. You had to run out of

here whatever. Uh Um, I do not have wanted me to go here. I do not have Okay, Yes, sorry, Tim, you nailed it yesterday on the social credit score Tyranny. China is all over it. Yeah, I no, Tim, I know it's It's true. Man, China is doing some some very scary stuff these days, and I wish people would pay closer attention to it. China is the real concern for US. Russia is a concern. But we could bring what we could over time. Think of where this is.

I meant to bring this up yesterday. Actually, look at where Russia is now look a where the Soviet Union was thirty years ago. If you look at the trajectory of US Russia relations, we're much closer to Russia than we were in living memory. The US Russia relations have gotten leaps and bounds better. We were staring at each other talking about annihilation in living memory and for a

long time. Now you know, we Yeah, we have our differences with them, but like we would like to be America in twenty years being friendly with the Russians the same way we're friendly with the French or friendly with you know, would be a good thing. That doesn't mean that we can just concede on everything and let the Russian do whatever they want, of course, but if you're talking about what would be in America's interest, that's in

America's interest. Trying to like have this continuous showdown all the a suage the ego of Hillary Clinton and her voters from twenty sixteen is a very bad idea. But now I'm getting away from roll Call, here we go, David writes, I'm watching on Pluto TV. You and Jesse are great, but turn up the volume. Please normalize your shows to match the commercials in the channel. I hope you get this mention. Something can be done. Why don't we have all these volume issues, Producer Brandon, What is

going on here? Man? They got to give me in Mark, like time stamps of when this is happening, because when I load stuff in, when you load stuff in, it's a nice brick of sound. I mean. I also, I just want to take all the complaints and just I want to print them out and then I want to air drop them on the beach while producer Mark is sunning himself with his new lovely bride. You know, he's all having fun. Who's here manning the front lines? Or

Freedom Producer Brandon? That's right, this duo right here. I mean sometimes, like you know, when you watch TV, the commercials are louder than the show, and sometimes it's on our end, but on our ends, I mean, unless it's like one of your soundclips. I wish somebody could fix this time stamp. Speaking of producer Mark Stephan rights, congratulations to producer Mark. Indeed, Producer Mark, at least somebody in the Freedom Hud is well you're not married yet right now?

At least somebody in the Freedom HUD's married. Well, you know one of US is doing the whole adult thing. Sarah, right, Hey, Buck, love the show, great work. My question for you is what would it take to start a social media campaign to demand an apology from the DEM's for President Trump. I know he'll never get it. Um, yes, Sarah, he'll never get it. That's never gonna happen. I gotta tell you their Uquinian quid pro quo fishing expedition is also

a hoax. They got nothing, and out of pure shame, they should be compelled to apologize for the smear campaign that they have had against President Trump. Sarah, I agree with your sentiments. I am frustrated too, but it is what it is. So thank you so much. Team. That's going to be the show for today. I hope you realize this is like the best podcast slash radio sho slash simulcast on video ever. Tell your friends about it. Shield Tie