You are entering the freedom hunt. Obama is back on the campaign trail. The Democrats think he's their secret weapon. But oh guests, who steps in to neutralize him right away? The actual President United States, Donald Trump. We'll talk about how this class of the Titans went down today, and also Papadopolis has been sentenced. Even bigger joke than we thought when you look at the Russia collusion delusion. That
and more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, let me bring you're a great American again. The buck Sexton Show begins. No and he said, what do you think of President Obama's speech? And I said, I'm sorry, I watched it, but I fell asleep. I found he's very good, very good for sleeping. Welcome to
the buck Sexton Show, everybody. President Trump responding today after we had a a a long dose of obamasm. Everybody, remember that, Remember when we used to have to sit there? And so I'm gonna set her, I'm gonna rid off a promper. I'm gonna talk to you him like this, I don't know what what I'm gonna say things. We're gonna be a lot of strawman. I'm gonna destroy the strawman. But you're to say that I'm brilliant, because if you don't say I'm brilliant, the media is gonna attack you.
I'm not gonna say that you're terrible. Oh my gosh. Obama speeches one thing I just I don't miss at all. There's not one days passed. I'm like, you know what, I could really use an Obama's speech. And it was a reminder today that Obama was effective at giving speeches to liberals that adored Obama. But you know, once you once you get a little a little blast of the past,
you remember what it was like. It was terrible all the time, you know, just creating these straw men, never really engaging in the other side, all kinds of bad faith, saying things that just aren't true, and just such a such a condescension, a constant condescension, uh, across party lines. And it's just not something we missed. And here's the big thing that I took away from today. We're gonna buy the way, We're gonna dig into what Obama said
because he's now supposed to be. I mean, look, the folks were in the last leg here before the mid terms. The House and the Senate are in play. You know, it could go either way with both of them. People are saying the House is a done deal for the Democrats, although I don't think that's the case. But this is important stuff. And they've brought out Obama because they obviously think that Obama is their secret weapon. You know, they know that maybe having hello, I want you to vote?
Do you like my pants suit? They realize that that may not get it done. That Hillary Clinton may not be the best possible option as brand ambassador for the Democratic Party. But Barack Brocket smooth brock is uh is compelling in a certain way, and you know he's he's also a winner. You got look, look, let's not let's not delude ourselves. You want twice. Hillary is a loser, Okay, Barack is a winner. So you know. But but they bring him out and they're assuming that he can help
reconstitute the coalition that voted for him. But they got some problems. One is a problem of history and the other is a problem that's us. Come along. Let me first over the problem of history here. Over eight years, Obama was very successful at pushing himself. What he was not very successful in doing was promoting the Democratic Party and helping the Democrats from whether we're talking about congressional seats.
Obviously the Senate was lost to the Republicans during his tenure, but the real damage was done to the state parties where you have Republican state assemblies and Republican governors just running the table against Obama for eight years, which is pretty astonishing. I mean he by the time Obama last left office, across all different elected offices, Democrats were in the weakest position they had been and I think in a hundred years, which is really saying something. So that's
the problem of history that Obama has. He has not been successful at pushing other candidates. And then he got another problem of the present, one that we haven't really seen yet until now. Trump versus Obama is something that I don't think Democrats really want to play out, even in a media sense. Now. What I mean by that is, of course the left is going, you know, the Democrats, they all know Obama was scandal free, and he was so you know, so eloquent and and decent and and
all that. You know that they come they're completely Obama's rewriting his own history. And we'll get into this and I'll give you a nice dose of truth as we go through it. But Trump won't play by the rules that constrained Mitt Romney, and yes, the rules that constrained John McCain, which was that you can't really go after Obama. You know, you can't make fun of him. Mitt Romney, John McKain. They never made fun of Obama. Never, oh
my gosh, make fun of Obama. How could you? And you all know that would have been the reaction, right, But things have changed now, you weren't a different political climate. We have a different president. He will mock Obama and I will I will tell you something. One thing about Obama that it was very apparent, was that he has no self of humor about uh, a sense of humor rather about himself. You know, he he very uh pointedly once told a bunch of reporters like there that they
he was very sensitive. They couldn't make any because you know, when they do these political cartoons, they would show his ears and he was very sensitive about his ears. Meanwhile, with Trump, they're making fun of you know, they're making fun of Trump's his you know, they say he's orange and he's fat, and they make fun of his genitalia in his hands, and I mean, you know, they completely they try to humiliate Trump and it doesn't really work.
It doesn't matter. Obama has never been exposed to that. He's never been on a big stage where somebody else can actually call him out and make fun of him, to ridicule him. And I think that Democrats don't realize what they're in for here, the same way that that Hillary became crooked Hillary and Trump just had her number the whole time and knew exactly where to go with Hillary and exactly how to how to position himself against her.
If they're really gonna use Obama as the rallying cry of the Democrats and if he's gonna be the primary surrogate out there, which I would also note is I think a little uh, you know, it's it's not I'm not gonna it's not dishonorable, but it's we We would like it if presidents didn't leave office and then still act like they're the president, or still act like they're the leader of the of the party that you know that that's that's there's a message there that's not one
that we want in this country. Right. We don't want a perpetual president. We don't want somebody that's always kind of at the head of government, whether they're officially there or not. George W. Bush stepped aside that was the president that he had. Now you could say that that doesn't mean that everybody else has to do it. But I think there's a wisdom in that, and clearly Obama has thrown that way out the window. But they think that Obama, the left thinks that Obama is invincible as
a political figure. I think you got your first segment and your first taste today of what would happen if you really had Trump and Obama go head to head. And this is one of the reasons why I think people are so so so many of us, myself included, are so enthusiastic about Trump is because we're sick of it. We're sick of the other side, whether it's Obama or
Hillary or anybody. We're sick of them being able to say any throw out any slander they want, throw out any uh, you know, any personal attack, you know, in any mockery, that they feel like they can get away with, which is basically anything. And our guy always sits to look, well, you know, I'm a boy scout and I don't really want to say anything mean. And you know, no, no, no, no more of that. You know, you you you want to play rough. We've got somebody, politically speaking, that will
also play rough. Obama has never been subjected to that. Think about who think about who ran against him, folks politically, Hillary in the primary and he beat her. Of course, you know she they could go after him, but there were some limits there. Hillary wasn't. Hillary had some red lines when it came to going after Obama and she knew she's running looks she was running against the first black president if he beat her in the primary. I mean,
there were sensitivities there that within her own party. She I'm not saying she totally respected them, but that she had to be aware of them. John McCain, you know, has had this whole approach of really the most important thing to John McCain was what the New York Times editorial board thought of him when all was said and done. Uh, in that in that campaign, you know that that was how that was what he really cared about and Mitt
Romney it's just not a rough and tumble guy. So who has ever been up there with similar uh, you know, with with uh there's the same level of political firepower. You know who who's been out there with a megaphone to match Obama's. Who will really call him out the answers, folks, It's never happened before. And I had assumed that Obama would kind of play the elder statesman of the Democratic Party, that he would, you know, play kingmaker, behind the scenes,
do media stuff. He's obviously gonna be He's already fabulously wealthy, but he's gonna be worth you watch, Obama was gonna be worth a billion dollars. I mean he's you know, he's probably worth a hundred million right now. He'll be worth a billion dollars. And just give it some time because people will throw money on him to do any everything and anything. Oh, I wouldn't note that, you know, he was gonna give a speech in Denmark. I think it was that they they we're going to um, you know,
the Obama speech everything. I think he's gonna have a speech in Denmark, and he threatened to pull out of the speech, if they made his contract public, I really want to see what that speech contract is like and how much you know, Obama is getting paid and all
this other stuff. Anyway, Um, this is this is kind of like, folks, you know, do you really want to put your prize fighter in the ring with somebody when you know, when when you you think that you know, Obama's got an undefeated record, and if they put him out through the public stage, look, he's never gonna get to run a campaign against Trump, and and so we're never going to see that. But in the camp, in the campaign of public opinion, I don't think this is
gonna go the way the left things it is. Trump is is a is a scrapper, straight up, He's a he's a puncher, he's a slugger. And they want to keep their undefeated prize fighter Obama. The Democrats should keep him out of this, don't you know, Because it's the myth of Obama's invincibility is going to go away very quickly if he starts tangling publicly with Trump. That's my prediction. And I don't think the left, because look, they've missed,
they've they've underestimated, miss underestimated borrow from a bush. They've underestimated Trump at every step of the game, at every at every juncture. So we can't put it past them and do the same thing here. And that that's my that's my sense after rest. Wow, they really they really don't understand that. You know, the the Obama era rules are gone. Now Trump doesn't have to say Obama is
the smartest person who've ever lived. Trump doesn't have to say that Obama is the most brilliant, elegant, ethical, amazing DEMI god do have ever run for America and has never been in an American office or run for an American office. That he doesn't have to say that he doesn't care. It's not playing by those rules. Uh, Obama is not ready for that. And now look, I I know there's a lot of other stuff that's gonna get
that's already in the mix for the midterms. And you know, who knows, this may be the one and only Obama speech we see, although I doubt that. Uh. And if I were advising the Democrats, I'd say keep these races local and try to fool you know, If I were advising Democrats, I'd be like, try to convince as many voters as possible that you're not really Democrats and get people to vote for you, and then, of course, you know,
do whatever Nancy Pelosi says, which you don't want. Is a reminder of what we went through for eight years. You know, you gotta look, there's there's a there's a lot here, folks. We're gonna we're gonna go We're gonna definitely work through this one together. Eight four four to eight to five eight four buck. It's like a it's like a tropical storm here in d C. The swamp is getting getting clobered with some kind of a storm around me. So hopefully we empower in the building stays on.
But anyway, Uh, it's gonna be good. Folks, got a great show today. Stay with me. Two d one thousand jobs added last month. It's a big number. Positive sign. Christ and Romans are cheap. Business correspondent here with me. Look it keeps getting better and better and better. Well, this is better than economist thought. It's pretty much in line with what we've seen all year. You've got two hundred one thousand net new jobs. And when you look at the trend, you know they always say the trend
is your friend. Here, and this shows more than two hundred thousand jobs on average for most of the year. That means unemployment rate is still stuck there at that three point nine percent. That is a generational low. That is what many economists consider are full employment. You have six million job openings today in America, six million job openings, and what you hear from companies is they don't have the skilled workers to fill them. So there's sort of
the disconnect. Disconnect. Yeah, here's the disconnect, folks, is that we got the media trying to say that Trump is a Kremlin puppet and that he's crazy and should be removed from office on mental fitness grounds. Meanwhile, they have to run these reports like yeah, it's better than all the economist thought, and it's like the best it's been in a generation. And the economy is like completely booming, and it's weird, like things keep just getting better and
better in this country. Like I don't understand, Like why, oh it begins with the T and ends with the P. They don't want to hear it though. They don't want to hear it, they don't want to believe it. I mean, like, folks, Yeah, it's funny that Obama comes out today how to give a speech, and of course he he tried to to take some he tried to take credit for the current economy. So he's been out of office almost two years and
he's like, yeah, it's because of me, right sure. Um. Meanwhile, when you when you look at what's happened over the last year in particular, uh, and what the tax cuts have done, and what how businesses, it's businesses aren't saying, you know, we've been feeling good for years and this is there saying, Wow, what a relief. Things have gotten so much better, almost like something really important changed about
eighteen months ago or so almost like that. I guess more now it's more like I don't know what the months are, but you know that's that's I think something that we all need to remember, your folks. Obama comes out, we were being told you can go back and see in the end of the Obama administration, they were editorials about how America should just expect low, slow, oh weak economic growth for the foreseeable future. Obama's economy was lower
your expectations. That was the message. Lower your expectations, and you're not paying your fair share and you're not doing enough for the poor, and you have, uh, you know, way too much that's been given to you by virtue of the fact that you're working, and there are a lot of people that don't work and they need more stuff. I mean, it's just it was bad, bad, bad, and
now we're getting a little reminder of that. Folks. Anybody here, anybody listening to this show right now, I think that they would be better off if Obonna was running the economy. I mean, maybe there're a couple of Democrats right now listening to think that. I know, we have some some liberals who listened to the show. Probably even have some hardcore leftis who listen to this show. They're like, I
don't understand. How does this guy know so much? But the Trump economy is irrefutable right now, and going into a midterm election where that is a that is a verifiable fact that the economy is in an irrefutably good, strong and growing position, should mean that the American people reward the party in power for doing such a good job on all aspects of government. To us that matter, things are actually going quite well. Um, but Obama doesn't
think so. I want to I want to take a little bit of a of a tour through Obama's speech that I just because of the rewriting of history that went on there. And then we'll talk about Popadapolis he got sentenced today, and the kind of uh, last bit of the Kavanaugh hearing good news is I think Kavanaugh is getting through, folks, the done deal at this point, all that's coming up. Stay with me. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton his back. It should not
be democratic or republican. It should not be a partisan issue to say that we do not pressure the Attorney General or the FBI to use the criminal justice system as a cudgel to punish our political opponents, or to explicitly call on the attorney general to protect members of our own party from persecution, prosecution because an election happens to be coming up. I'm not making that up. That's
not hypothetical. It shouldn't be democratic or republican to say that we don't threaten the freedom of the press because they say things are published stories we don't like. Oh boy, there's so much here, folks. Obama's back. I don't think it's going to have the intended effect. I don't think Democrats really know what what this is gonna mean for them if they keep going in this direction. We're in a different world now, we're in a post Obama political environment.
The rules have changed a few things. First off, when he said instead of prosecution, persecution of people in Trump's party, if there is such a thing as a Freudian slip, that certainly felt like one, because they are being persecuted. The Russia collusion investigation is persecution. Uh. And I will talk to you about the Papadoppolis sentencing that that will be probably the next hour, but we'll get to that.
All these Liberalsh is sentence, Susan isn't severe enough. That's right, because anybody who's near Trump should just have their life ruined. That's there. That's the way that we're supposed to deal with this. And any anybody who's ever been in you know, been in the same room as Trump should there should be no sympathy, no mercy, no decency extended to them. That's the way the Democrats wanted. But this this idea that that Trump is interfering, you know, obstructing in d
O J in ways that Obama never would. That's interesting because I seem to remember I seem to recall that Hillary Clinton was under investigation by Lauretta Lynch, attorney generally United States the time worked for Barack Obama, and Barack Obama decided. Barack Obama decided that he would share his thoughts rather freely on the issue of Hillary's emails. Remember, Hillary shared Special Access program data on an unclassified server. This is some of the most sensitive stuff the US
government has, folks. She just had her on our computer just you know whoop. See, she had over a hundred classified emails on her system. She did this because she was trying to evade the require firorenments under regulation to uh maintain her emails for public disclosure. She was trying to maintain control of a record. And I've always upheld that it's because she was worried that, you know, there'd
be one. All it takes is one person to slip up and say, oh, you know, we've got that big Clinton Foundation donor you gotta take a meeting with her at the State Department. Now, all it takes is one email like that and the whole game would be up.
So she wanted to control all the emails because she knows that if people actually knew what she was doing still running the Clinton Foundation or involved with the Clinton Foundation while she's Secretary of State, it would be obvious that it's a giant slush fund, and she was selling access and selling her office. That's why she had the private email server, folks. That is why. But Obama was very willing a numerous occasions to weigh it on this.
Here's what he had to say about Hillary's emails. Play it. Hillary Clinton was an outstanding Secretary of State. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy. And what I also know, because I handle a lot of classified information, is that there are there's classified, and then there's classified. I continue to believe that she has not
jeopardized America's national security. Now, what I've also said is that and she's acknowledged that there's there's a carelessness in terms of managing emails that she has owned and she recognizes. But I but I also think it is important to keep this in perspective, folks. That's essentially the the template of what Comey ended up saying. Obama gave marching orders to the Department of Justice and the FBI on TV
about Hillary's emails. Didn't didn't didn't threaten national security, classified class fied, you know, but you know there was a bit of carelessness, extremely careless. That's what Comey said. That's exactly what Obama said. Oh you mean that this is almost like the fix was in. Yeah, it was. And this all this other notion by the way of classified classified Special Access Program data s a P is very classified. And she had that on her emails. So she's just
this is a fantasy. And and liberals keep saying this, keep saying, oh, look at what Trump is doing the d o J too. No, I'm sorry, We're not gonna play this game anymore where they act like Obama was beyond reproach with came the d o J. Far from it. And on press freedom, I'm about to have a buck slap myself moment here. You've got to be kidding me. On press freedom, Obama was the worst president since FDR probably. I mean, he's the worst president we've seen in a
hundred years. Here's what he said about his about about him versus Trump in terms of the press. And here's what he said about Fox News. Play it, John, I complained plenty about Fox News, but you never heard me trying to shut him down or call them enemies of the people. It shouldn't be democratic or republican to say we don't target certain groups of people based on what they look like or how they pray. We are Americans. Okay. Yeah, he didn't say shut them down per se, but he
did take their phone records. He did say that Fox News was not a real news organization. He did claim that Rush Limbaugh and others were dividing the country and were dangerous to the country or a harmful to the country at least he did. I mean, you know, folks, when when you start to drill down to this, you see, you know, Obama had his Attorney general try to threaten reporters to give up their sources. Listed a Fox News reporter.
Oh wow, not a big shock there, listed a Fox News reporter as an unindicted co conspirator in a in an Espionage Act indictment and use the Espionage Act more than every presidency before him combined. And the press were a bunch of whimps on it. Oh, I know. They wrote a couple of editorials. Oh, we're very we're very troubled by this, and this raises concerning concerning questions about, well, what will the future administration do now that this precedent
has been set by Obama? A future administration, what's the Obama administration doing? The press debased themselves. The press gave Obama one long, eight year backrupt. It was an embarrassment. That's why we don't need to sit around and hear from now. But oh but you know, the press and we're the guardians, and we're the ones that are speaking truth to power. Everything and speak truth to power. They have power a foot massage for eight years, that's what
they did. Now they want to be you know, oh yeah, we're we're all about the guardians of the republic. We're all about just the facts and making sure that you know, there's accountability in government. It's just a joke, folks, it really is. But I mean Obama and Pres Obama has zero grounds to speak about what Trump says about the press, in my opinion, zero ground because he took actions against the press. Obama just says that, you know, Acosta is a clown, and he's right. I'm sorry. Trump says the
cost is a clown, not Obama. Trump says a Cost as a clown, and he's right. That's it. I mean, you know, he says it's CNN is fake. There's a lot of fake news. We're SNN. It happens a lot. It's a problem. They've got a real problem over there. Trump calls it out, and then he also just get into some other stuff that Obama says. Do you say to yourself, does he think this is smart? Because what he's saying is not smart? Play sixteen. We know the
climate change isn't just coming, it is here. So Democrats aren't just running on good old ideas like increasing gas mileage in our cars, which I did and which Republicans are trying to reverse, but on good new ideas like putting a price on carbon pollution. We know that in a smaller, more connected world, we can't just put technology back in the box. We can't just put walls up all around America. Walls don't keep about threats like terrorism
or disease. Wrong, Walls do keep out threats like terrorism and disease. Ever been to a quarantine area, there are walls prevent the spread of disease. I mean, walls don't keep out terrorists. Speak to the Israelis about that. Pretty sure. It keeps out a lot of terrorists. But you know, Obama is so used to everyone just saying everything he says it's brilliant. Everything he says is great that I do think that he's really just he's there's really a disconnect.
And when he's not the you know, he's not the president anymore. He's just another guy with an opinion, and his opinions are not very well informed. His opinions are not particularly astute. He also talked about I mean, you know what, I want to get into something because they're One of the things that really frustrated me is that everything that Republicans said about Obama's policies and their trajectory, especially on healthcare, was trip and we have confirmation of
that now and we were right. And I do want to take a moment for us too, because I remember I was part of the battles back in twelve over Obamacare and in the midterms, and and there were so much stuff that was said by the same media, by the way that now is pretending that they want to be, you know, they want to be really big serious journalists. So much stuff was said that was obviously false, but they didn't care. I want to address that um and
a bit more of this we come back. But I mean Obama really reminding us all why we voted for Trump. That's what today was. Wow, great reminder. Thank you, former President Obama. Why we have the president we do now. A lot of it is because the guy who has given a speech today. We'll be right back. They're not doing us a service by actively promoting the crazy stuff that's coming out of this White House and then saying don't worry, we're preventing the other ten. That's not how
things are supposed to work. This is not normal. So these are extraordinary times, and they're dangerous times. But here's the good news. In two months, we have the chance, not the certainty, but the chance to restore some semblance of sanity to our politics. What's the insanity? Because I think the insanity is a Russia collusion investigation that has
been a politicized which hunt from the beginning. I think it is the FBI meeting with and using opposition research and using journalists as cutouts to construe and and fabricate a narrative to make down a political candidate during a presidential campaign in this country. I think that's insane. So how are they going to restore sanity by putting those the people that that have been pushing for that and advocating that back into power. I need I need some
help with that. I need someone to explain that one to me. Although don't ever say explain it to me when you're talking about Obama, because he loves to explain it, to tell you everything. You know so much, you're so smart, so much smarter than new you don't know what anything a man. And then he also he wants to he
wants to mobilize the never trumpers. Of course not a surprise, but he wants to mobilize never trumpers play maintaining some phony version of civility that seems to me, by the way, the definition of savility offered by too many congressional Republicans right now. We will be polite so long as we get a percent of what we want, and you don't call us out on the very says that were sticking
a people. And we'll click our tongues and issue vague statements of disappointment when the president does something outrageous, but we won't really actually do anything about it. That's not civility, that's addicating your responsibilities. But again, I digress man. That sounds I say that sometimes I gotta stop saying again, I digress. Uh, forget about civil Let's talk about something else. Servile as in the way the Democrats were for all of Obama's time in office. They did whatever he wanted
them to do. They were on board with Obama all the time, every time. Obama never had to deal with any opposition from his own party. This is one of these things I tell you, folks, we have lessons to learn from the other side. One of the lessons Democrats stick together all the time, all the way we have to deal with the well. You know, I think I was if if Rubio one, I would have been Press secretary.
So you know, I don't like Trump. A lot of babies, a lot of babies in the Republican Party who are unwilling to see the greater good play the long game and play the long term. You know, we don't need to be constantly reminded by by Republican strategists who would have been in the White House if a different Republican had one that, you know, sometimes Trump uses vulgar language, or that sometimes Trump, you know, says something that we don't think is great. Whatever then again, Trump is saying
things that he actually thinks. Obama was saying what he thought he should say under the circumstances to benefit whatever he was trying to do. That's a different thing. Obama wasn't always telling you what he thinks. Obama was telling you. Obama was saying things so that people would go, wow, Obama is so brilliant and so wonderful, and also so that he could push through an agenda. But he wasn't being honest about what that agenda was of care for
all folks. He's calling that a good idea. Now, I remember back in when to say that Obama wanted medicare for all was a slander. It was terrible. How could you he doesn't want that. It's a free market system. He's borrowing from Mitt Romney, and all the Republicans like me were saying, no, no, no, it's a trojan horse. Folks. They're they're gonna this is the camel's nose in the tent.
They they want to get healthcare, that single payer and how you know that's terrible, that's a law, that's not fair. Obama would never do that. You're calling him a socialist. Now, Obama was like, Yeah, single payer is a good idea, we should do that. Because Obama always thought single payer was a good idea. It was always the plan. Obamacare was set up to fail, but it was set up to create a structure that could be built a top of with single payer. And that's what he's now openly saying.
Some of us saw this coming. Some of us are not surprised at all by this is in fact what we predicted. Myself included. But I liked Obama's out there reminding us of why we voted for Trump. So that's good news. Let's speak about what Trump as I say, that's coming up next. I know you've you've stuck through a lot of Obama this hour. I promise you we've got We've got some Trump stuff. Papadopoulos got sentenced, that
much more coming up. If you ever found yourself wincing at the weak sauce taste of coffee from one of those left leaning COMI corporate brands, you probably thought, I wish they spent less time on meaningless bias training, bathroom policy reform, and other things that defied common sense, and more time on their coffee. Folks, That's why you need black Rifle coffee. Every coffee drinker listening to this show needs to drink black Rifle. It is my coffee, a choice.
I get it delivered every month. I've got it at the office, I've got it at home. I'm making black Rifle converts. I've got a girl in my office. He goes, I want the coffee with the guns on it. I'm like, you don't even like guns, but you love this coffee. She goes, Yes, it's the best. All right. Check it out for yourself. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck received fifteen percent off. Your were great deal, folks. Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash Buck for fifteen percent
off again one more time. Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck. Order some for yourself and you know what, set up to have it delivered every month. Joined the coffee Club. Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck. Buck Sexton Mission Decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts, No, I'll be the only president in his They'll say what a
Jobby's done by the way where it featured him. Today's Democrat Party is held hostage by haters, absolute haters, left wing haters, angry mobs, deep state radicals, and their fake news allies. Those people are the best. They're the best allies. The last time Democrats weren't power, they cut Medicare by more than seven hundred billion dollars to pay for the scandalous Obamacare. Now Democrats want to steal trillions of dollars from medicare, going to ruin your medicare watch. They want
to turn America into Venezuela. I don't think so. Democrats would destroy Medicare with Medicare for all. You heard that Medicare for all until they run out of money, which will be like in the third day, and then it will be Medicare for none. Nobody does messaging the way Trump does messaging. That much is for sure. Welcome back the Buck Sexton Show. I gotta say you know that the President really I felt like he was back into his really back into his usual sweet spot last night.
He's just his ability to do live performances incredible. And I just mean that as somebody who's in the media business. He is amazing. He is a is a true phenomenon and and the fact that he's out there making this case the American people, I think gives us some hope that we may keep the keep the house. And you know that doesn't solve all of our problems, folks. I'm still I've got frustrations. You know, the wall is not
being built, and you know, I don't. Trump is like he's trying to sell us on that the wall will be built, and you know, you gotta give him time, right He's you know, Trump has there's a there's a bit of a showman in him and of course a bit a lot of a salesman and actually a lot of both a lot of showman and a lot of salesmen.
So we understand that when he says, you know, the walls being built, well, not really, but kind of he I do think he wants to get construction on it started, though, and I think that that would be a very good thing for the country. Um, but the notion the Democrats destroying the economy, people should be told this, I mean, this should be something that we're hearing about, because it's true. If we allow Democrats back in charge of even just the House it's not just that their ideas are bad.
What they're gonna do is stop the good ideas. They don't care that the economy is doing so well. In fact, it bothers them, it angers them. They don't want the continuation of what's working. They want to go back to where they get to make the decisions they're in charge. That people will suffer, that more people will struggle to pay their bills, that the there will be more people looking for work, and that doesn't matter to them because that's all a fine price to pay to having the
right kind of people in charge. In their opinions, that's the progressive mentality. The results don't matter. They are dedicated to the idea that they're the people who should be in charge. That's that's a fundamental characteristic of a progressive. They think that they're the ones and the only ones, and they do all this moral posturing. But how much they care about the poor, how much they care about minorities, all this stuff is just self justifying for them as
to why they should be the ones in power. And then, of course Trump did turn his ire to the media, which I always always enjoy Play seven and eight. John, You know when I won the election. The New York Times every all their subscribers were leaving. And when I'm ultimately no longer president, and hopefully about six and a half years from them, um, the New York Times will go out of business. All of them will be out
of business. CNN, We'll be out of business. They're almost out of business now if you look at their radars, the club side of business. But then we had a bust. But the New York Times, you remember, it's very famous. Nobody's ever seen it before, maybe never done before. They apologized for their bad coverage of me. They apologized to their subscribers because after I won, everyone said, what the
hell happened? What happened? We're reading this piece of garbage and the guy that they kill every day he won. So they wrote, does anybody remember there was a very big story. They wrote an apology to their subscribers to stop the flow of people leaving and giving up the subscription to the New York Times. New York Times still feeling pretty haughty about its decision to publicize that anonymous
editorial from the hashtag resistance inside in the administration. You know, one of the reasons I think, folks that they've moved to this notion of the Amendment is now now we know that the deep state is real, which is going to embolden all of us. And I shouldn't say we know,
we've always known. Now it's confirmed. Now we have we have clear, smoking gun evidence of a deep state by the deep State's own hand, no less, and the media collusion with that deep state to undermine the Trump administration. So there is no future in which those say the Deep States are stupid conspiracy. No, that's why. Now the Amendment is going to be what gets them all excited. Now it's just give us political power so we can
remove Trump. The narrative keeps shifting, and I just wish that the Republicans would come out and do a better job of explaining to the American people. Look at how crazy the left is. They're calling Trump insane, They're insane. All these different theories of why he's not really president, why he shouldn't be the president, this is just crazy talk. I have to say. Rand Paul has an interesting, uh interesting idea. He says they should use lie detector tests
to find the op ED writer or play twelve. I think if you have a security clearance, in the White House. Um, I think would be acceptable to use a lot of detector tests and ask people whether or not they're talking to the media against the policy of the White House. You've got a security clearance, you gotta subject yourself to
a lot of detector test. Now, legally you don't meaning that you could say I'm not taking that test, but guess what then you lose your clearance, And guess what then people also think, huh, won't take a lot of detector tests. Huh, I you know that that would be Here's what I would say about it. If you polygraphed, I mean that, Look, there'd be a certain degree of people would get upset about this, right, there's no question people in the White House would get upset abou this.
But if you polygraph people, which some process I've been through. I've been polygraphed by the Federal Gardment, I can tell you all about it. It is not fun. It is not an enjoyable experience. But if you polygraph all the top people who I believe, I mean they have to have high level clearances, well, actually no, Jared had an interim clearance. I don't know. I'd have to think about.
But at least you you'd be able to knock off a number of them right away, because anybody who wrote this editorial, trust me, they're not gonna want to take a polly on it because it's it would be a difficult thing, I think, to beat the polygraph on and they'd be sweating it out really hard. And when if you had some people that very rapidly decided to leave the White House, well then I think you'd know that that's somebody you might want to look a little closer at.
I still believe there's no way that this was a um. I still believe that as no where this was a household name, top level White House official. This is somebody who's kind of uh, you know, it could be it could be replaced tomorrow and nobody would know the difference.
That's how I would describe it. I don't think The New York Times is so stupid as too egregiously overstate the seniority and power of the person who wrote the seditory, because they would I mean, they they could never recover from that from a credibility perspective, although maybe they think they could because it's an effort to uh, you know, do the hashtag resistance thing, the same reason why CNN and Washington Post have gotten some major stories wrong, but
they hurt Trump in the short term, so their audience forgives them. So I I you know, I I go back and forth on whether The Times at least really believes I mean, I would, but I already don't trust the Times. You know, I already think The Times is a partisan rag and and I think it very obviously is a name who's being serious in their analysis analysis of it, what would come to the same conclusion. But Trump, Look, he's he's he's out there pitching folks. He's out there
making the case. And that gives me some hope that going into these mid terms, because it's gonna be here soon. I mean, we're really you know, we've got sixty days almost of the day with fifty nine days I guess, right or something like that. Uh, we got sixty days before this election happens. If they win, if they take the House of Representatives, it is going to be NonStop hearings. Imp They're gonna they're gonna have impeachment hearings, They're gonna
go through a whole investigation. They're going to dominate the news cycle with that all the time, they're gonna start subpoenaing different people than what. It's just gonna be a mess. And then Trump's not gonna be able to get his get US agenda through, which is a victory for the left, even if they can't do anything with the impeachment, even if they're not able to you know, they're certainly not
gonna be able to removing from office. They're not gonna have two thirds of senators even if they were to get a majority in the Senate. But it will stop Trump's momentum and then just becomes a referendum on all that. And we haven't gotten enough of the agenda through. Trump's doing a great job, but he hasn't gotten far enough yet. Uh. And I think we already looked at and think, hold on a second. We we we need, we need these two years because what they're gonta run Kamala Harris against Trump,
I don't think. So we got the end of the Kavanaugh hearings to talk about today. I wanted to get to that for a moment, So why don't we do We'll come back into that. And then I got some thoughts on the Woodword book. I want to tell you about my amor rosa interview. Today. I interviewed the I interviewed the founder of the Women's March, which is really
just an anti Trump, left wing lunatic fest. They're the ones that were the uh I I don't know, I am I, I don't know if I'm allowed to say it, but uh, you know, ear muffs for any of the young ones who might be listening, but the vagina hats, they're the ones that wear them, you know, that's that's the thing that they do. I interviewed the founder today. It it was not cordial, but it was it was illuminating. It was interesting to sit so close to somebody who's
so has so darkened her soul. We'll talk about that and then obviously we got road call some other things. If you want to chat eight four four to eight to five eight four Buck. Also, you can tweet at me at bucks X. And I remember, starting on Monday, we're gonna release an early podcast of the Buck Sexton Show every day. So we're gonna start releasing and we'll try that for you know, a few months. See how
it goes. Means you'll be able to hear for me all the day's headlines, all the latest analysis and thoughts. We're trying to get it done before lunchtime, is the plan. So I should be around eleven am eleven thirty am on Monday and every day thereafter that is our plan. We will put it into execution and with that, my friends, we'll be right back. You got a home security system, well you need a better one, and if you don't have one, you need one. Simply Save home security is
for you, my friends. I've known these guys a long time and they protect over two million people in this country. And here's what makes them so great. Simply Safe as comprehensive protection for your home with round the clock professional monitoring and police dispatch. This will protect you from intruders, fires, leaks, and burst pipes. Simply Safe. I've got it set up here. Let me tell you, you don't even notice it. And when you do notice it, it's really easy and simple
and streamlined. It looks good and it's so straightforward to use seven moniting only four a month. No contracts are hidden, fees none, all right, everything is very intuitive your cover top to bottom. Check it out. Order your Simply Safe system now. Listeners this show get free shipping and free returns. Visit simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash bucks. To protect your home simply safe dot com slash buck. So Papadopolis got sentenced to fourteen
days in prison one four fourteen days. You know, he lied about his contacts with Myth, sued to the FBI, and they hit him. You know, Muller wanted six months six months? Now? Was that because it was so bad? What he didn't know? It's because Mueller wants to just get scalps. Muller wants to rack up as much punishment for as many people as he can to justify what he's doing. Anyway, Papadopolis process crime, Folks, fourteen days they've been saying, Oh, Papadopoulos lawd Flynn, Flynn, I don't even
think really lied. So there's that. But papapis Laud and Flynn, Laud and metaphor. None of this is anything with Russia collusion. They're just they're just finding ways to prosecute people for crap. That's what they're doing. David and Mississippi, you've been patiently on hold that open rambling. What's up, sir, Hey Shield tide boy. Um. So you know how you've been saying for months now that sources will be blown. I've I've got I've got some I think would be some delicious
revenge Trump. He should offer a one hour exclusive to the first reporter to break the identity of the the anonymous op ed and literally the deep state in the the mainstream media would literally eat themselves. They would eat their young trying to destroy whoever the anonymous opped was. I understand your premise, but I'm not sure I would agree with the outcome because the I think to press, I think, well, no, actually, m no, you know, you
may be right. I'm trying to think about this, right because on the one hand, what is BuzzFeed and the Washington Post and huff Post and all these places, What do they want to out this person? Or not they do from the purpose from the perspective of getting the clicks and the attention everything else. So you're right about that, But would that be seen as a betrayal of the resistance.
But then again, I think the New York Times says that they have people that within the Times that are trying to find out even though their colleagues obviously no. So you know that it's an interesting you know, David May, maybe maybe it will work. I think somebody also is offering money. I think people are really there's like a bounty out there from what I saw on Twitter last night to try to get the identity of this anonymous op ed writer. So you may you may be onto something,
my friend. Okay, all right, David Chills, Hi, thank you for thank you for calling in. Uh who do we have John, our buddy Kenny up in Boston, Kenny b what's up? Hey? What's the funk? How you doing? Listen quickly? If Sessions is fired, are resigns right? Then I put Rosenstein fully in charge of the d o J. And wouldn't they try to steiny any of his future nominations approvals? And that that who I mean, it sounds like it's a bad thing to happen there, you know. And and
what about this threat to the freedom of speech? And Bob Woodward poks up this book and talking cordially with Trump on the phone. I didn't hear any threatening, uh statements from Woodward saying he was threatened by Trump or anything like that. And then of course this op ed thing, So I guess they dropped that. Huh, well, yeah, I mean, this is the thing about Trump. They keep saying, Trump is so terrible the press. Trump speaks to like Maggie Habram of the New York Times, or Trump speaking to
the press all the time. He just tells them and he thinks that they're full of it, and that he thinks some of them are acting irresponsibly, and that, yeah, he's calling me. He said, the fake news the enemy they people. Yeah, false, So it is the enemy of the people. That's true, right, So they don't they're their complaints don't measure up to reality. Trump has not taken
any action. Now, you know, people are saying, Buck, do you agree they've They've been asked me today to what do you agree with him trying to get the d o J involved in the anonymous I don't think so. I don't think he's got any grounds for that. I don't think you can start investigating somebody's op ed opinion. But he hasn't actually taken any action against the First Amendment, whereas Obama did. That's what I think doesn't get enough attention.
Kenny from Boston, did you leave to Kenney EVAs? All right, all right, so you like it all right, good things, Kenny shield Side, thank you for calling in. Here's what that Trump said about Kavanaugh, by the way, last night, important stuff. Play it. As you all saw this week, the Senate is now considering a truly exceptional nominee for the United States Supreme Court, Judge Brett Kavanaugh. And he's doing really well. But do you believe the anger and
the meanness on the other side. It's sick. The whole country has now seen his amazing intellect and his brilliant legal mind. Judge Kavanaugh deserves overwhelming bipartisan support, and I think he's going to be one of our truly great Supreme Court justices. I think so too. I think he's gonna get through. I'll talk to you more about the the insane and illogical, unfair viciousness directed toward Kavanaugh the
third hour. I spoke to a leader of the Women's March who was arrested herself three times this week, folks. Three times she was arrested, disrupting that hearing. I talked to her to I'll tell you what that was like in the third hour, So I stick around for that. We have much much more show coming up. Team uh you're right back. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops.
What's really going on here is that Bob Woodwards book, and the contents of what is in the anonymous piece in the New York Times is that those closest to the President of the United States are saying, we must save the country from the president of the United States.
What we need here are, finally, I think some hearings o congressional hearings in which an executive session or open session, those around the President of the United States are questioned about the fitness of Donald Trump to be the president
of the United States. I think we need to have a hearings about the fitness of anti Trump lunatics to continue pushing insane conspiracies and then using the mechanisms of government and prosecutors offices and others to try and just grind down the Trump presidency based on these insane theories. How about that? How don't we start to really look at what's going on here, folks? All this focus on the amendment, you know, would we're releasing the book before
the midterms? This is all calculated. Mueller's done zo, He's got nothing. Okay, Mueller's got nothing. It's not going anywhere. He's not gonna be able to stop the president. He's not going to be able to prosecute the president. It's that whole thing. That whole thing is gone. All right, that's all that's that's all gone. It's going to continue to Peter on Felow. But I mean, the notion that Ler is going to be the white Knight who saves the left from Trump is and that's gone, all right.
So now they're trying to come up with something else. We're back to this endment thing. And you've got Carl Bernstein. Sorry, I said Woodward, I think woodword Bernstein, you know Tomato, Tomato. I got Bernstein here saying, you know, the other Watergate guy, that we need to start having hearings on Trump's fitness. So we've gone from let's have hearings on Russia collusion and and all these investigations and the special counsel and all this stuff, and in the media, just the frenzy
around this has been absolutely insane. I mean, you know, if you've been pushing the Russia collusion delusion, the media should be ashamed of yourself. But they're not because it was useful to them. If you remember that, even though they're wrong, they don't care. Right. It's like it's like Harry Reid's Mitt Romney has never paid taxes or hasn't paid taxes in ten years. Thing. It was a lie, but it was a useful lie. So he doesn't you know,
Harry Reid is said it. I don't care. Did he win? No, That's how the Democrats play the game, folks, That's how the other side acts. So we need to understand that. Now we're gonna move to hearings on Trump's fitness. Come on, we're gonna well, how is that supposed to work? Exactly? You know, I had Alma Rossa, we had we had some a lot, we had some big guests on the On the Rising Show. Today we had almar ross on and I asked her straight up, I said, is the
president crazy? And she said yes? And then I said, okay, so you're telling me the president's you're telling me the president's crazy. How is it that we have a president who's crazy and the country is doing so well, and so many of the president's initiatives and so much of his decision making has been so spot on I need someone to explain that to me. And she said, oh, it's not doing so well. And I said, okay, almar Rosso and I should have probably pulled this audio again.
It's on the hill dot tv slash right. I think if you want to see it, um the full interviews up there. I think it might also be on YouTube. Now, I said, all And I said, all right, amor Rossa, you know, well, hold on a second. I mean, you know, let's be honest here by every and and then she went into the whole the usual thing. And you know, I looked, amorros is a very she's very engaging. She knows, you know. She it was. She's an interesting person to
talk to you, no question. Okay, she's somebody that's you know, the exchange is lively. But I said, you know, you're saying he's crazy, but the country is doing so well. She says, no, the country is not doing so well. He's divisive, he's nasty, he says things that are and I said, that's all rhetoric though, and and I don't
care anymore. You know, we tried Mitt Romney. We tried somebody who, yes, had all the skills and the resume, but was as as clean as could be right, as as as blameless ethically and personally as any politician you could ever find. And they trashed him, gave people cancer, binders full of women abusing dogs, the whole thing, just trashed him. Okay, so we're like, well, we're done with that.
We're not We're not gonna go through that anymore. But I said, no, no, what about what happens and what matters? What about policy? What about metrics? Amorrosa? And she says, well, if you other than the economy, And I said, okay, well that's like saying, you know, other than the play, Mrs Lincoln, you know, what did you think? I mean? Like,
this is the economy is? You know, if you if you include healthcare in the economy, it's everything, you know, it's what people really care about in their day to day in terms of government. You know, I don't really care. I'm not losing sleep at night based upon the carbon emission regulations and stuff. It just doesn't. I care a lot although that that affects the economy, and I know, I know. But then I said, okay, it's not just that.
We're also not fighting any wars, folks, I gotta say, the Bush administration anti Trump squad is so lacking in self reflection about what they did to the country. Yes, we got hit on nine eleven. Yes, Radical Islam. Now it feels like we were always gonna win that fight, or you know, we always were in a position. But you know, we didn't know. We didn't know how many more planes were gonna hit. We don't know what else they had planned. Me. It was a scary time, it
really was. We all remember it. So I give Bush credit for under you know, for bringing the country together and going into Afghanistan doing the right thing, you know Iraq, Whether you think it was the right idea to invade what we did once we got there, the strategy was was very flawed, very bad decisions were made, and we had a very costly war that you know, he looked back on a lot of people say, kind of what the Bush people have no, Yeah, no self reflection about
any of that, and how that's what brought Nancy Pelosi to power and gave the Democrats both housing, both parts of Congress, uh and and gave of you know, Barack Obama eight years to destroy the economy. But I, I just I never get real answers from people on this, I need someone to honestly tackle So Ammer and Hammers said, oh, he is starting wars. Look at what he says about Kim Jong gunn. I'm like, that's not now, We're just this is just not serious. What do you mean, what
do you mean that's that's not starting a war. And he's trying to de nuclearize at Korean peninsula, which would be the greatest foreign policy achievement if he gets there, which is not there yet, the greatest foreign policy achieving the post Cold War era. So it's a big deal. But you know that they don't They won't have a serious talk about this. How is it possible, folks? And you know Trump said it last night, you're gonna impeache somebody who is doing such a good job. I think
that's actually a very valid point. You know, they hate Trump so much, but the country is doing really well. We're gonna have hearings on whether Trump is fit to be president when I'm sitting here and I'm like, he may be the best president of my adult lifetime. In fact, so far, I think he is the best president of my adult lifetime. And the proof is in the pudding. But meanwhile that they put people on TV to to to supposedly educate us about this, like like this clown
over at MSNBC will actually double clown. You've got Chris Matthews and Steve Schmidt black clip too. Well, it could be the most powerful anonymous letters since American diplomat George Kent. I'm outlining the Cold War strategy, but rather attempting to contain the author in this case makes clear that the
objective now is to contain the worst impulse president. So the first thing I'd like to say, as someone in the resistance on the outside, is thank you, and it is nice to hear from you, but it is not enough. We are in an hour of national emergency in this country. We know that this administration is vile, corrupt, and likely criminal. We know that this president is immral, that he is
mentally and intellectually unfit for his office. And this vile, immorl corrupt, indecent, dangerous, intellectually unfit president is a danger to all of us, danger through all of duct. What the words unfit, vile, moral, corrupt, Oh gosh, I mean a danger to all of us? Well, we're all in, We're all in. Danger of of being able to pay our bills, and you know, millennials will be in danger of maybe being of the own property one day. Is that we're in danger of, because that's what it feels like.
We're all in danger of not having the government just turn us upside down and empty out our pockets all the time because hashtags actual justice. Uh. You know, these people keep calling Trump a danger and then they talk about a bunch of things that don't sound dangerous at all to me. They use all these words, there's all this rhetoric, and then I say, okay, make me care. That's there were ready to me? You don't care, you know, the Nazis and twenty foot men rus the clusion man. No, No,
that doesn't cut it. I'm sorry that that that is not convinced me one bit. Tell me why I need to care about all these crazy allegations you're making. I mean, they're saying we need to have hearings on Trump's fitness to be president. What does it say if he let's let's assume him for a second, he was you know, I don't know, he was suffering from some kind of you know, bipolar disorder something I don't know. He had some clinical issue. He's still doing a great job. So
what does that mean. I mean, let's just say we found out that Trump has taken, you know, pretty hefty dose of prozac every day and he's you know, dealing with some mental health issue. He's doing a great job. What's the problem. I mean, the amendment is for if Trump had a stroke or if he's snial. It's not for you know, he said crass things about women twenty years ago, and people who can't understand that. I think they're the crazy ones. That's what they don't get. I
think they're the ones with some big issues. Hey, it's really just folks, is just nuts, absolutely nuts, the stuff that they're saying. But we have to sit here and and act like these are the these are this is the political wise men class of the country. And for Chris Matthews. Chris Matthews, what how does this guy still have a show. He's loud, he makes dumb points, he has no expertise, He's just been around a long time and it must be friends with Andy lack Over at
MSNBC doesn't know anything. This guy is not impressive. I don't want to listen to him. I don't want to hear him, you know, m hm. At least the ABC News guy is super handsome, you know, Chris Matthews. I'm like, what is this? What is it with this guy? Anyway? Um, But the good news is that Trump is still going to smack them all around, so not literally, We'll be right back. The so called resistance is angry because their horrible ideas have been rejected by the American people and
it's driving them crazy crazy. They're the ones, honestly that have been driven crazy. The latest active resistance is the op ed published in the failing New York Times by an anonymous really an anonymous cutlers coward. You just look he was. Nobody knows who the hell he is or she, although they put heat but probably that's a little disguise that means that she. But for the sake of our national security, the New York Times should publish his name
at once. I think they're reporters should go and investigate who it is. That would actually be a good school. So Trump, you know, was was in fuego last night out in Montana, and I just have to note this guy. I'm not trying to look I'm not a throne shiner. I don't sit here and just talk about everything Trump does is perfect. I would say a lot of things
differently and deal with a lot of things differently. But you know, I I give credit where it's due and and the guy, look, the guy's a political phenomenon, and that he stands up and gives these hour and a half one. I mean, folks, what are things about Oba? I'm stepping up today to give his speech was Oh my gosh, do we have to go back to this?
Do we have to go back to this very sterile, haughty I don't just mean Obama, although he's really a very clear example of this, but essentially bs political talk. You know where you're you're just they're trying so hard to sound authoritative and smart and democracy and America and values and flag and you know, just just settle down, talk to us like normal people. I really mean this.
I don't want to go back to a world where politicians or where this case, where where the president is going to speak to us like we're a bunch of school children that need him or her to tell us it's all gonna be okay, It's all gonna be okay. Just listen to me, and it will all be okay. I don't need that, I don't want that. I like having a president who speaks to us the way the way a human being actually speaks. And Trump is incredible.
He gets up at these rallies, everybody around him is so, you know, there's so much energy, and there's so much enthusiasm and people people just love what he's doing. And he goes off the cuff. He talks about dozens and dozens of of issues off the cuff, and I don't know any other politician who can do with the way that he does. But the guy is incredible. By the way, I don't know how many of you saw, there's this
plaid shirt guy. Uh is apparently a meme now because of his reactions in the background to uh two, what is he doing? Um? Interesting? Plaid shirt guy is a meme? Um? He had to move all right? Anyway, Trump is amazing. Plaid shirk. I was behind Trump at the rally. It's so I'm trying to say Trump is amazing, and and yeah, you know, I saw some people jump on it because he said a mom, a mom in this or something. You know, he stumbled on a word. I sit here,
I do radio three hours every night. I will be honestly that there are very few people in the media that have greater comfort with words and speaking than me, very few of them. And I said that as somebody who had a speech impediment and had to get speech therapy and everything else. So I've trust me. I've been on both sides of this. But what Trump dries is unbelievable. And I sit here and I tell you I mess up words sometimes, and they're gonna call him out for that.
They're not gonna, you know, folks, I just if nothing else, I hope that Trump has at a president now where politicians will get up and just talk to people, tell people what you think, and tell them things. Don't stick a prompter. I'm gonna be really bored. I'm gonna tell you things to prove how brilliant I am. And if you're listening to me, things will be great. If you're don't,
thinkings will be terrible. We don't need that. I don't want to go back to that kind of People keep talking about Trump's rhetoric and the discourse and he's he's so coarse, give me course, but earnest, over overly polished and sterile and fake it's just fake. I don't want fake. And I want you know, the next the next Republican contender. I want him to get up there and and take the Trump approach, roll at the sleeves and talk to people. Tell them what you want to do, tell them what
you stand for, tell them what you believe. Now, don't always just turn around look for the political consultants. Speaking of which we had the organizer of the Women's March on my show. I'm gonna tell you what I have to think about that in just a moment. Do you
really believe in free speech? Do you want to share your thoughts and not have to worry about some left wing administrators somewhere, some so called algorithm run by a bunch of Bernie Sanders voting prius drivers, determining what you can and can't host, who you can speak to you, and what you see. If you want to enter the new world of social media, friends, snippy dot com is for you. Snippy dot com is a place where discussion is valued and your opinion matters. I'm on snippy dot com.
Let me tell you there is nobody on there that's enforcing any agenda. There's no censorship ever, step out of the Facebook left wing echo chamber for a moment and check out snippy dot com today. They'll let you follow your favorite writers. You can check out the news feed and see what's trending. It's totally free to join folks snippy dot com or download the app. Let's get the discussion rolling. Let's really exchange ideas, share thoughts, and connect
with like minded people without any left wing bias. Snippy dot Com. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America. You're a great American again. This is the Bucks Sexton Show. CIA analysts and Buck Sexton. No, I'm part of the Republican Party. Poorly and women when it comes to their right to shoot the Republican parties, the Party of Life, women are using coat hangers. They killed people for a living. There.
Since abortion restrictions have been passed in this country, many people are unaware of how restricted abortion has become. The legislative priority needs to be something that will stop abortions when and for women will have an abortion in their life. And when I think about how politicize this has become, I wonder how did this happen. It's the basis of democracy that you control your own body, the basis of democracy, folks.
That's from a new Netflix movie. And as you know, look that net Flix is a is now increasingly becoming a left wing outfit, just like all all. You know, they have total dominance in the cultural space when it comes to Hollywood, and it's it's near complete. The left gets to control what movies are made, who who gets a platform, who gets funding, all of it. That was
glorious Stein. At the end, they're saying that abortion is the basis of democracy, and and you know that's really also at the at the heart of why the anti Kavanaugh protesters were such a bunch of straight up maniacs this past week. And for those of you who uh didn't have a chance to see it, which I'm assuming is most of you today. On on on Hill TV, I think we're gonna stop calling it hill dot TV. It sounds like we're you know, not hip. You know, yes,
it's Hill dot TV. That's why, Hey, you write it, but a Hill TV. We had on somebody who's her name is Bob Bland and he's one of the founders of the Women's March which is this movement that gets women to get together and they you know, they will march through the streets, and they will wear pink anatomically suggestive hats on their heads, and they dressed in handmaids costumes and all this stuff. And and you know, the Women's marches is inherently also an anti Trump march. That's
how this goes. And the same media figures and news media figures and pop culture news pop culture media who were silent about Bill Clinton's sexual habits and proclivities want us to believe that all of a sudden now they've become particularly prudish when it comes to anything Donald Trump related. You know, Donald Trump is so terrible for for terrible, terrible for women. And and so I sat down and talked to Bob Bland today, and I'll be honestly, it
was tough. I mean it was tough because there are certain people who I think are misguided but fundamentally decent.
And then I think there are people who are just honestly damaging to the country, and people who are abortion extremists are are damaging to the country and are I think engaged in a in a great evil um And I know that there are there are areas of dispute on this issue, and there's and I you know, and I talked about this probably to my own at my own peril in the sense that people generally, especially I think late on a Friday, they don't want to hear
a discussion about abortion, aren't they. They probably want to hear some guys gonna come on here and talk about, you know, the big game or something. And I'm not putting that down. People need escape. I need escape. As soon as I'm done with this show, I'm I'm gonna plum plot myself down. And I was gonna say plump myself down. I think that was Freudian. I'm gonna plot myself down and order some or are some Korean food? Actually, I think it's when I'm planning tonight and watch some Netflix.
But I also think that I have an obligation to tell you about things that that really do matter. And it's it's been disheartened to see this week just how brainwashed a lot of women are. And it is mostly women that are that are the true radicals on this issue. You know, there are men who will talk about it, but they because of the the way that the feminists have positioned the issue that they've tried to silence pro life voices that are male by saying we were not
allowed to have any say. And so you really have the radicals are leftist females on abortion. I'm not saying there aren't men who are radical too, but but generally the loudest voices on this are our our female And so I spoke to Bob Bland today and and she comes out and says that Kavanaugh, that that Kavanaugh. Well, first of all, before I get the Cavana part, she says that if Kavana is elected, millions of women will die. And you know, this is one of the first I
I have my limits. And I'm sitting there on TV and I have a I have a very progressive co host. As you all know, it's not a It is a delicate dance that I have to do every day. No one else does this, folks, it's not And maybe there's a reason why, because it's it's almost impossible to do. No one else does what I do with Crystal every
day on that show. It just doesn't exist anywhere else in media right now where you have a real conservative and a real progressive who are trying to discuss things without with the understanding that we're not gonna make fun of each other and we're not gonna try to We're gonna exchange ideas and information without attempting to win every argument, because when you attempt to win an argument over abortion at sixty seconds, you just yell at each other. It
just turns into it just turns into nothing. So you know, we're we're operating on this. It's a tight rope act and in some ways, I guess it's very interesting, but in others it can be tough, and today was one of the tough days because the founder of the Women's Marching. You can go not that I'm trying to know I am, I guess pitching the show, but you can go to tow Hill dot TV, Slash Rising and watch it for yourself.
I had to. I had to enforce a boundary with Bob because Bob got out of line at one point. But she said that millions of people will die, and I'm sitting here, I'm thinking this is this is really a form of evil to suggest that millions of women will die because of Brett Kavanaugh, who's as we've seen this week, brilliant, honorable, decent kind. Uh. You know, he's everything that we want in an a neighbor, in a friend, in an American and they've been trying to trash this
guy in every possible way that they can. And what I see or what when she says that millions of millions of women will die, what she's saying is that because of botched abortions, they're all they're gonna die over this issue. Um one, that's a wild overstatement of the facts, meaning that even when you look at the number of women who die because of abortion, related abortion or related complications from it before it was legal, it it's you're looking at a couple. They estimate a couple of hundred
a year. Uh. And I just also know it's incredibly sad that anybody would put their life in jeopardy in that way too, and another life. I mean, it's it's it's a deep the depth of that despair is really hard to fathom. Uh. But millions of people are killed because of abortion and have been killed because it's not a theoretical it's going on still and it has gone
on in the past. And I have one of these moments where you know, you how do you try to be civil and and win an argument with somebody who not only is arguing in favor of murder, but in arguing in favor of murder is claiming that somebody who stopped the murder is the actual murderer. In this case, the theoretical proposition that Kavanaugh would be a part of of UH not even eliminating really abortion, just truncating it by overturning UH. It would really be planned parenthood v. Casey.
But the left doesn't They don't actually read these things. They don't know anything that now was It was quite a moment, folks. I I tried not to do what I you know, I had an inclination to just say, so you're saying there's going to be murders, but you're advocating murder. But then it would have just been it would have just been like rolling a stick of dynamite out onto the table of the TV show. And I
didn't want to. I didn't want to do that, and it it's I can't help but notice, I don't know if it picked up, but there's thunder and lightning going on here in d C, and that might have actually made its way over the radio waves. It's kind of fitting that lightning and under his happening as I'm talking about this. Uh so, and then and then it just devolved a little bit more from there. They said, Uh Bob Bland of the Women's March said that Kavanaugh believes
that all all birth control is is abortion. And I just said, that's why he didn't see no one says that, Like, no one says that a condom is the same as an abortion. There's just I don't know. People say that it's immoral to use, but they don't say it's the same as an abortion. That's not That would be unscientific and unsound. I mean, using a condom is not the same as an abortion. Right that no one, no one that I know, makes that claim. They make Catholics don't
believe in contraception. I mean, I'm familiar with the doctrine, but you know, they don't say that a condom is an abortion. Um, And and they this was the claim that the Women's March. This is all she's supposed to care about. And she made this claim and and I said, I really don't this is just not I don't know what to say to you. This is not what happened, and uh, you know, sure enough, we just kind of got into a squabble about what was really said or
not said. But then I just love I asking, well, how is this guy such an extremist? When senators voted for him to be on the DC Court of Appeals, none of them had a problem with him. Then now they all have a problem with him. No answer, I mean not even not even a smidgen of an answer. Uh. And and then all this stuff about just the all this language they used about women and autonomy in the body and ring. It's like if if you really think that you are a you are a slave to the
state or something. If you really think that you aren't free unless you have a medical right for what it's often a taxpayer funded crushing of a tiny fetus and dismembering of it. I don't know your your your your soul has been has been corrupted in a really profound way. And it's it's hard to you know, I'm not arguing with somebody here over the time over what the top tax rate should be that I know how to do.
I'm not argue with somebody over you know, the morality of of of particular military action or you know, that's complicated too, but that I know how to do. But somebody who thinks that murder is life and life is murder is very hard to have a civil conversation with. And what having this discussion with the founder of the Women's March, what it did was just highlight this for me, and this is not a thoughtful person. This is not
a kind person. This is a radical and and really the the synapses in her brain seemed to me to be similar to what you'd be dealing with with somebody who, you know, believes that, uh, you know, koufar nonbelievers should be killed, you know, in Islamic radical believes that right that your you can be, your throat can be split like cattle if you're a kufar. I mean, it's so outside your perception of what is moral and ethical and right that how do you even start to pull somebody
back from that? So while I have my fair share, and I think, oh and I also said, what do you think about the people dressed as condoms and handmaid's tale, uh, you know, women and all this stuff, And she said, well, I don't know about that. So well, now you're just a lot you now You're just making a fool of yourself. You're just a liar. So enjoy your lives. Uh, be on TV. Enjoy your lives. But you know, it was I know almost it felt it felt dirty afterwards, just
being the same Roman. And I've been around a lot of bad people in the media business, you know, high worked at CNN, folks. But today was was really something else. But while I mocked them and they are stupid costumes and there there are obvious political ignorance and the idiocy that's often on display, it was also um it was discouraging. It's discouraging that in this country and this time, when so much is going well and so much is going right, we have this great stain on the moral character of
this country. Not only is it there, but we have people who will go to any lengths to defend it. And that is troubling because when that has been the case in the past, it has led us to very dark places. All right, we'll be right back. Strike Force Energy is Veteran owned and American made, folks. This is one of the hottest energy products on the market right now, and it was developed by veterans for one simple reason. The fight will always follow you and it waits for
no one. Look, I invite you to join us this fall in giving back to Americans troops with Strike Forces help. Over the last three years, strike Force Energy has shipped millions of packets of this proven battlefield liquid to troops at home and abroad, and now they're going to bring it directly to your front door. It comes in four flavor, zero sugar, zero calories for fuel to power through your toughest fight. Just add some strike Force to sixty os
of water team lemonade. Whatever you got. Go to strike Force Energy dot com and received fifty off when you used the promo code buck at checkout. For every packet you buy, we will donate a packet to military members around the globe. Strike Force Energy dot com promo code Bucket checkout. Strike Force Energy is Fuel for the fight.
You know, the book isn't out, but we did read a long excerpt or a summary evident in the paper earlier this week, and it described one of the meetings that I know I was in, and it was sort of half accurate and half wrong. It described to the President being very concerned about strategy in Afghanistan and talking about going to Walter read and seeing soldiers who had lost limbs in Afghanistan, and really the President was pressing his commanders very hard, saying, what are we doing there?
This is America's longest war. What are we accomplishing? Our guys are dying, They're coming home without arms, without legs. I want a very clear justification before I agree to anything. Now. The in the story that's spun as very negative as you know, the president ranting and raving. Well, I was in that meeting, and what I saw was the President asking the questions that I think every American wants their
president to ask. If we're going to commit troops to battle, if we're going to risk our soldiers lives, there ought to be a very good reason. There ought to be a clear strategy. There ought to be an objective. And and you know, he was pressing his commanders to to give him that information, which I think is his job and he had every right to do it, and that's what we wanted to do. There's bs in the Woodword book, folks, not a surprise. You see. Woodword sourcing is very exact,
but his sources are not very exact. What I mean by that is that he will take information that is given to him from people who have access to the information and rely on them to be the arbiter of what was said how it was said. And you have Michael Anton there who was and Sea spokesperson UM and is a is an eloquent if uh self satisfied fellow, um. But he was in that meeting and he says that it's it's not accurate with the way that War writes
about that excerpt in the book. But beyond that, folks, I think this shows us once again what we're up against. The war in Afghanistan is not being one. We we are there. We were treading water, and the water is the seas are getting rougher around us all the time, and we're just trying to tread water. There is no possibility of the of a of a victory in Afghanistan defined along the terms of a self sustaining, self defensible UH pluralistic democracy in Afghanistan, which is which is really
how we have defined it. I mean, they've changed it a little bit here and there. It's just not happening. And the fact that Trump comes in and says we've got people who are losing arms, We've got people who aren't even coming back at all, what are we doing there?
And the media takes that as an opportunity in this case, would word, whether intentionally or just the other people relaying the information to him, take this as a moment to say that Trump is some kind of you know, he's some kind of maniac, that he can't be trusted, and that he's you know, um. The fact that he would go to that, that people would go to those lengths to try to undermine his message there just shows you that, you know, they really don't care that much about the troops, folks.
You know this is something you know, Democrats put on a put on a big, big show of this recently with you know, John McCain and how much they respect his service and everything. But if it's between trashing Trump and leaving our soldiers high and dry, a lot of powerful leftists in this country go with with choice number one. A lot of Democrats in Congress go with choice number one. Do not be fooled. Do not let them mislead you
on this. You know that they talked this big game, but when push comes to shove, Democrats care a whole heck of a lot about power and about in this case, getting power back in their hands. And if that means that they have to undermine a discussion that's completely valid where the commander in chief is saying, what the heck are we doing in Afghanistan. They're willing to do that, and I think that should be very that should be very troubling to all of us. And I'm gonna, well,
I can't say yeah. I mean, I think I've got an interview next week where I'll be talking to somebody about Afghanistan. That will be big. We're gonna break some some serious news next week on Afghanistan. I hope talk to somebody who has a plan for fixing Afghanistan, or at least fixing our role, I should say, fixing our role in Afghanistan. I don't know if Afghanistan is fixable, um, but you know, I want our I want our troops home.
And you know, my generation, those of us who either on the military or the civilian side, whether you're a you know, a door kicking marine or a state department, provincial reconstruction team guy or whatever, we've seen what it is to try to remake other countries and in the Muslim world. And you know what we've learned A lesson. We're done with it, never again, never again. All right, let's let's loosen it up. Let's get into a roll call here. I'll be right back. He's holding the line
for America. Buck Sexton his back. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real, It's time for roll call. Bad bad, bad bad. Hey, I hope you guys are all gonna have a great That sounded almost like I was doing a imitation of a radio show for a second. Hey, it's wild Bill on the radio, coming to you from w k K R T n T y Uh. I could do a whole show like that sometimes be kind of fun. Actually, go for all, go for all that good stuff. Um, let's get to it, shall we, Matthew.
This is the roll Call Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton starting on Monday. The show is gonna be earlier, folks, in terms of podcasts, not in terms of the radio show. Radio associate. Radio show stays the same, but we're gonna get the podcast out, hopefully before lunchtime. Every day. We're gonna a daily podcast of the show in advance of the radio show, so it'll just be top line thoughts run down with the news of the day that kind of stuff. We'll see how that goes. You know, we're
experimenting with the best ways to organize the Hut. Alrighty, Matthew writes Shields High brother, thank you for asking the tough questions. The interview with Bob Bland was hard to watch. Great hearing you asking the hard questions. She seems like a far left loon. Keep up the amazing work and the team at you, with the team of the Hut produce. We need you out there. Well, Matthew, thank you very much. You know it's it's hard, folks, and I've heard from
a lot of you about this. I have signed up to do a show that is based upon the premise is that the left and the right can speak and not agree, but can speak about things without yelling at each other. That's the premise of the show. And um, it's not easy for me, I'm sure, and some sometimes depending on the guests. I mean, I'm always cordial and charming and fun, but depending on the guest, it's not
always necessarily that easy for my co host. But as I've said, I mean, the Women's March founder was she was she was pretty crazy and and I I I would very rarely mean for me to have to take the tone that I did in that interview. And I didn't raise my voice or get well, maybe I raise your voice a little bit, but I didn't yell or get personal. But it was only in response to just I mean, it was just it was gross the whole thing. I mean, there's so much that was said that was
not true. Uh no answers to very legitimate questions. And it's because the left is is overtaken by emotions on these things. And that's why they'll say insane stuff like millions of women will die if Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court. That's just that's something that's so stupid to say out loud that a person, a normal person, should be deeply embarrassed to say that. UM. And and that's you know I did. I did as well as I
could today with the Bob Bland interview. Bob is a woman of those who don't know Bob Bland interview, UM, under the circumstances. And I appreciate that you write in about it, Matthew, because it wasn't it felt gross to have to sit there and listen to some of that stuff. And if I you know, some of you probably see Buck, why don't you just you know, own the lib, crush
the enemy, all that stuff. You know, then my co host is gonna be She's gonna feel like she has to defend the person, and it's gonna I'm working within a different dynamic there. That's why I tell you all, you know, listen to this radio. This is me. This is where I just get to tell you whatever I want. I don't have to worry about being polite here with the Hill. I have to maintain a certain decorum because
it's that is the agreement of the show. Right. It's kind of like I'm sitting at a debate and we've agreed to equal time. Well, if we've agreed to equal time, I can't you know, run rough shot on the other person and interrupt them and all that stuff, even if they're lying or saying stuff that I don't like, you know what I mean. That's kind of where it is, all right, Joe, are rights? Um? What else? Did you wait? Hold on a second? Two things? I'm a couple of
days behind, so I'm sure somebody has answered. The grave danger is a few good men? Correct jar to you said you're gonna start throwing out quotes and just seeing if people catch them. Saying there's a quote for you doesn't allow that. I think that the fact that you changed your inflection and gave two lines should have been more than enough to uh tip the hat that there
was a quote to be called on shields high. Okay, Jar, All right, buddy, you know you want you and the rest of the team gonna put on their big boy pants when it comes to quotes. Well, we'll see how this goes. Then I'm just gonna start slipping Him'm not gonna say that was a movie quote. You might just be like, why did you say that weird thing? Or maybe you don't notice it at all. You got Okay,
we're taking the training wheels off now. The quotes are just gonna get slipped into the show and we'll see. We'll see who can pick it up pick it out? All right? You you asked for Joe, you want it. You're gonna get it. You want it, You're gonna get it. Let's get amy. Who rights question? When do the actions of the deep state rise to the level of sedition? What is the difference between sedition and treason? Do either
apply in the case of our governmental situation. I don't think I can hear about John Kerry getting shot in the butt again. He needs to retire. Um. Well, you know, sedition has actually a very, uh a very dark history in our country in the sense that it is it is technically conduct that or speech that would bring people to rebel against the state. Uh. So it's you know, if you try to conspiracy to overthrow the government would
still be a crime. But but sedition in our history goes back to the Alien and Sedition Acts, and people, people forget this in this country. Folks in the early eighteen hundreds, there were some folks who are who were locked up just for having policies that were unpopular journalists, we're locked up for having policies that were unpopular with the government at the time because of the Alien and
Sedition Acts. Uh. And and that was let's just say that, we we have veered from the First Amendment and pretty dramatic fashion it numerous times in our past, and the Alien and Sedition Acts are certainly an example of that. So, uh, sedition isn't something that anyone's gonna get in trouble for right now. I don't even think sedition. I'd have to check. I don't think sedition is part of the Federal Criminal Code. I think that Yeah, I don't think that it is.
So there's that. Let's see what we have next here in roll call actually went hold on, let me let me check that. I don't I don't want to tell you guys bad information. Uh. Is sedition a crime in the US? You know I can do this in real time. Brandenburg v. Ohio Supreme Court case maintains its seditious speech, including yeah, no, it's not a crime. There you go, but you eighteen US Code Chapter Tree Treason, sedition, and subversive activities. Well, uh, seditious conspiracy? Uh? Okay, no, no, no,
it depends on how you define sedition, folks. Seditious conspiracy under eighteen USC. Two three eight four if two or more persons in any state or territory conspiet Yeah, this is what I said, conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroyed by force the government of the United States, or to levy war against them. Uh, then that seditious conspiracy. Twenty years in prison. Yeah, that's so so seditious conspiracy. If you're if you're conspiring to take action, to take
action against the government, that can be a crime. But just to say you hate the government, I think, and just to say that you wish the government would collapse, I do not think that. I don't. I don't think you're gonna you know, you're allowed to say that, uh Brandon burg O High of Ohio. The seditious seditious speech is allowed, so that that was interesting. Actually, I don't think we're gonna get so deep into that one. And we and we did we uh, we did dive into
that one quite a bit. Bart, Buddy Bart from South Carolina. He's always he's not afraid of Bart and afraid of no ghost uh buck. The type of hysteria that sprung up because the anonymous op ed and calling for is well known to me personally. Circ ninety one, I was a high school delegate to a regional model u N representing the United States on the Security Council. After a long heated debate, well we're talking about your un security counts,
I mean your U N model U N think. Uh, okay, I'm gonna let this one go for now, Bart, Bart, Bart, this got a little long, and I'm gonna read it, but I don't have to have to read it. All their Larry writes Buck Shields. Hi, I am a political junkie and subscribed to several podcasts, but yours is still my favorite. Larry, You're my favorite. I have noticed that the volume on your podcast has gotten lower recently. Could you please check on that? Is that right? John? Or
our podcast volumes lower? What's going on? John? Did did you order the code? Read? Also? One little nitpick, you frequently refer to the Democratic Party when technically it is the Democrat Uh, the Democrat Party. Keep up the good work, Larry. Well, Larry, Actually I'll tell you something, buddy. Uh, technically it's the Democratic Party. It's I actually try to call it the Democrat Party as a little shorthand a little bit of a an extended solitary finger, if you will. But they
call themselves the it is the Democratic Party. It is not actually called the Democrat Party. So I thought it was worth addressing that one. I don't know if you got John, are you here? I mean, we have a super loud New York, New York truck driving past the building right now. I have no idea what that's all about. I mean, are they really can you hear that? Okay? I mean New York New York and the whole thing. Right, I can hear it's coming through this. It's coming from
to come through the studio here. But anyway, Uh, they're trying to get me all excited about New York. I won't you won't break me. I've been I'm in the swamp for now. New York. I miss you. You stay alive. No matter what occurs, I will find you New York, no matter how long it takes, no matter how far. Alright, we're gonna hit a quick break. We'll be right back, Team Buck. It's time for roll call, more roll call.
We have adam rights. Lived by the store or die by the sword is biblical Matthew twenty six fifty two. I mean I thought it must be biblical, but I was not. Uh, let me see what it says here Bible Gateway. I didn't. John, did you know that for all who draw the sword will die by the sword? Okay, I mean it's close, it's not exactly so it's not an exact one. But yeah, put your sword back in its place. Jesus said to him, for all who draw the sword will die by the sword. Um, so it's
a kind of it's a close approximation. You're you're correct, Adam. Uh, Brian writes l O l on Rising. Well done, sir, he's such an extremist. I want to know why I can't answer that Women's March leader. Thanks Brian. Yeah, no, it got, it got. It got pretty wild in there. Um it was. It was not good from from the that's folks. It was the co founder of the Women's March, with the thousands and hundreds of thousands of people and the and the you know, the women's genitalia hats and
all that stuff. We had her in studio. I asked her very straightforward, very I mean when I say fair, we're you know, legit questions, not got your questions. It was okay, you're saying crazy stuff. Explained to me the crazy that you're saying. Uh, but yeah, you know, he's such an extremist. I learn know why I can't answer that. Yeah. Uh,
that's that's right. I think she it was. It was if you folks, if you haven't seen it, I mean, it's kind of hard to watch because it's it's so there's also a lot of there's a whole As I was saying, the old dishonest premise that gets thrown in the middle, and I'm being told something that's just flatly not true, and I'm kind of thrown off by how wrong it is. And Jason writes, heard the podcast Slam of the Firebird ouch, I got an eighty nine A lot of on if you don't mind rolling without airbags?
Are most of the electronics? Did I make fun of firebirds on the podcast? I don't remember that. Somebody must have. Judy writes Buck, What happened your web page right now? I'm getting an error message, Judy. We are doing maintenancetance to work on bucks x and dot com because we're gonna make it better than ever. It's coming back. So sorry about that, but we're on it. We are on it. Um Rob says, great call about Bloomenthal being a human.
Funeral home director shields, I you know what I mean, guys, he really does seem like, do you what to purchase a musoleum er? Perhaps three of our finest burial plats, And he's just so like, he's so gross. Bloom Who votes for that guy? Who votes for that guy? That's what I want to know. U. Karen writes Buck, I think you should have called your new show buck Naked. Uh. I don't know about that, Karen. I feel like that might be false advertising because there's no nudity, so how
can I call it right? And I don't think John wants to work on a show called buck Naked, right, producer, John? That's John likes it all right? There you go. That's because you know me. But I feel like if we were hiring you and it's like you're gonna work at a show called buck naked. Uh? Actually no, that does sound fun. Not to think about it, you know, it's definitely worth checking out. Um, so what do we have here?
Next up we have Dale, who writes, uh, movie quote you ever look across the lake and wonder what's buried beneath it? That's about as buried as you can get. Dale, I have no idea what that movie is. Action movie quote. Do you ever look over a lake and think about something? Quote? That's it? Wait, that's the same quote. Oh it repeated? Sorry I think you said. I think you double sent your message there, buddy. Uh, But yeah, I still don't
know the quote, so you got me. Yeah. I don't think that doesn't sound like an actually movie To me, it sounds like a movie with a bunch of British people sitting around rearranging matches. Oh is that right? I'm arranging matches? Hello, you guys remembered Eddie Izzard is a weird dude, but he actually had a pretty some pretty funny things. I actually did some pretty funny comedy back
in the day. Michael writes, no, please don't cover Russia gate more can't stand to hear it until something happens like McCabe today. Alright, Michael, that's good to know. And I definitely want more. I want more folks to weigh in on content that they either want more of or that they could do with less of on the show.
Just understand that. You know, if if if I get one person writes me that says I want less Russia and ten that say they want more, you know, the freedom hud is is is a well, I guess it's actually a republic, right because I'm kind of elected to run the show. But you all, you all get a vote, but no one person in the vote process gets to determined. It just be because sometimes people send me things. I told you about this, I said, yeah, but you know
you don't like the accents. But a hundred other people do, so I'm trying to. I'm trying to keep the maximum number of the team happy. Here. Uh Justin Rights, Oh my god, Buck, you've never seen Smokey in the bandit. You must watch it or we're going to have to temporarily suspend your man card. Alright, Justin, Alright, Smoky in the band and I'm on it. I'm on it. Um. I know I should have seen that one. Andrew writes, your show really shook the pillars of heaven, Oss, but
the first time messenger caller amazing show. Thank you so much, Andrew. I wanted to give a shout out to a problem you caused me recently. The other day, I received an almost full notification on my iPhone ten. I was curious because I don't download a lot of stuff, and then I realized I've got fifteen gigs of Buck Sexton podcast downloaded. I listened every day. Keep up the good work. It's
all in the reflexes, Andrew. Well, Andrew, your super oss, my man and your phone just can't handle all this awesome baby, So thank you so much for writing guys, Thank you so much for hanging out. Great to be
with you. I'll see you on Monday shields Hot. If you're a business and you're hiring folks, you want to make sure that people you're bringing in are representing themselves accurately, that you don't have any liabilities or any problems because of people with a record that they falsified criminal record even possibly. You need people you can trust who are efficient, who will do the background checks and investigating for you.
That's Global Verification Network. I can personally vouch for the CEO, Mark Buckman. Global Verification is his company and his team of risk mitigation experts are the best in the business. Whenever I've got a problem folks, I'm like, hey, Mark, you gotta be the guy that can answer this. And he gives fantastic advice. He knows this business backwards and forwards. He's the guy you want to go to the work with startups all the way to fortune one companies. No
data or client information they take is ever offshore. Call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Tell him buck Sex and Cents you eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine, or go to my g VN dot com. That's my g VN dot com.
