Trump Will Fight To Keep America Great

coming up on The Buck Sexton Show. Bucks Sexton Remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence mag no mistake, You're a great American again. This is the bucks Sexton Show. Activate CIA analysts. Remember an I can speak for three hours without a phone call. Try doing that. Sometimes. We're gonna keep it better than ever before. And that is why tonight I stand before you to officially launch my campaign for a second term as President of the

United States. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody was quite a night last night with the official launch of the Trump campaign twenty twenty. It was a reminder that he is the greatest, most talented public performer and campaigner of my lifetime. I mean, I can't. Maybe Reagan, but I was very very young when Reagan was doing his thing.

But I've never seen anything. I don't think anyone's ever seen anything like what Trump pulls together on that stage night after night on the campaign trail, and the energy in the enthusiasm. I only regret is that I wasn't there for it. But I will be sure in this election cycle to try to get there and see some of the the MAGA squad in action. The president is going to be in very good shape, I think going

into this reelection. Despite the fact that, wow, the media has learned nothing about any of this, they have not changed one bit. The mainstream media of view this not as an effort to meeting the twenty twenty election campaign, and this was clear from the way they did their

commentary afterwards. Their intention is not to make any changes or amend their behavior in response to the debacle of what they showed us their true colors were in twenty sixteen, but to view Trump's reelection effort as the mainstream media's second attempt. They're back in chance at defeating Trump and reasserting or re establishing the dominance that they have in the creation of political narratives in this country. Essentially, they're back in power. That's what they think. If they can

just defeat Trump, then they are the kingmakers again. There'll be a Democrat administration that they'll be super cozy with, super cozy with, whether it's Sanders or Buddha, Judge or Biden or Warren or you name it. The mainstream media will be will be snuggling up to whomever the Democrat is while simultaneously telling us, oh, we're just holding their feet to the fire, speaking truth to power. They won't be holding the Democrats feet to the fire. They'll be

massaging the Democrats feet. We know this. That's what they did with Obama for eight years. It was an embarrassment. That's what they planned to do again. So they haven't learned anything. They have. If anything, they're actually more ferocious in their partisanship. They will be more ferocious this time around. So worth establishing that right away. But it's also so reassuring that the president really he knows, he knows this opposition, he knows this enemy, he knows what he's up against.

And that's why I appreciate so much that he doesn't hold back. He throws punches we voted for a puncher to be president, and man, does he show up like Mike Tyson and his prime and just throw those haymakers play Clip seven. The Democrats don't care about Russia. They only care about their own political power. They went after my family, my business, my finance, it's my employees, almost everyone that I've ever known or worked with. But they are really going after you. That's what it's all about.

That about us, It's about you. Our radical Democrat A parties are driven by hatred, prejudice, and rage. They wanted to destroy you, and they want to destroy our country as we know it not acceptable. It's not going to happen. That's who we're up against. We're up against a Democrat machine that desperately wants to be back in power, that has no compunction, no hesitation whatsoever about trying to destroy

those who disagree with them. We're up against the Democrat machine that wants the president still to be ruined, to be thrown in prison, wants his associates, his family members to be thrown in prison, has no sympathy, no feelings of remorse when they destroy somebody who's a Trump supporter.

As an example to set for all the rest. They cheer as Manafort sits in solitary confinement, as though he's an axe murder or not a simple tax cheat who hasn't made an example of because of his Trump ties, not because of what he did to the United States Treasury Department. You know, That's one of the really unsettling realizations that I've come to is that I never hear libs. And I know a lot of them, and I talk to them, and there's a lot of libs in media

that I am in contact with. I never hear libs feeling sorry for anyone on the right who is a casualty of Trump's arrangement syndrome. They express no sense of remorse,

no common decency they have, They have no hesitation. They have no problem with what happens to Kavanaugh, what happens to the Covington kids, what happens to just people that are not even necessarily in Trump's inner circle, but who are generally associated with the right, and in this era of Trump, if you are on the right, you are tied to Trump. And they don't even privately express to me they're feelings of unease with what happens. I have

had I've had libs. I've had libs in media tell me that they didn't even have a problem with the shouting down and shaming of Trump administration figures at restaurants and in public, that that was a necessary corrective to the excesses of the Trump administration. That they don't feel badly for Tucker Carlson's family when a bunch of lunatic protesters showed up outside their home in the middle of the night and started screaming and yelling over megaphones at them.

Tucker wasn't even there. They don't feel badly about it. These people are sick. They've got a problem, and this is where wartime conservative mentality kicks in. I don't want to make deals with them. I don't want to try to reach an accommodation those who are so bereft of honor and decency that they can understand what is truly beyond the pale. All Right, the Trump Tower meeting is

not truly beyond the pale. Showing up at someone's home because you don't like what they say on TV and creating a menacing environment for their wife and small children,

that's beyond the pale. Having a bunch of obviously deranged liars show up and claim that a world class legal intellect and a family man of decades who's promoted women all his life, like Judge Kavanaugh, was actually some kind of secret rapist to smirk and smile behind closed doors, as I have seen them do, and suggest that even if that was playing dirty and unfair, it was worth it. Those are the Libs that we're up against. Now, that's the mentality, That's who they are. And so what do

we want in response to that? Do you want somebody who takes the romneyesque mccainlike approach of how do I try to meet them in the middle somehow, Maybe I'll get one nice thing set about me on the New York Times editorial page for one day. Or do you say, let's mount up, let's fight. Let's see what we got last night was a reminder that Trump is the latter.

Trump is the fighter, and he is not going to let the Libs off easier for what they've done for the last two years, because it has been a disgrace. There are a lot of areas of public policy and public life where I not only am okay with I mean I welcome good faith discussion and debate. I do think there are problems with the way that some aspects of our economic system are currently structured. So that, you know, the carried interest loophole is one thing that comes to

mind for hedge fund managers. I mean, this is just a carve out to help really rich people get even richer. There are things out there that are real that are problems. You know, how do we why didn't we cover prexisting conditions before? How do we best do this? There are real discussions to be had, but I refuse to be pulled into a discussion with the left over the price of my most basic freedoms and the American society that all of us have enjoyed up to this point in

our lives, because that's not negotiable. It's not negotiable. I don't want to live in a country where people activists can seek me out and then force me force me to defile my own deeply held religious or political beliefs on pain of public ridicule, economic destruction, perhaps even imprisonment. I don't want to live in that country. And the

moderate oh, let's find a way to get along. Republican Party, they had their chance, they had their chance, and we got stomped on for eight years of Obama, and we had the gleeful, self indulgent, self loving media running rampant without anybody really other than some conservative media personalities and outlets fighting back against them. You know who is the

great Republican defender during all those years? Who was really taking Yeah, I know people here and there showed up, and you know Ted Cruz would say something smart now and again and would say, well, at least Ted's smart, But who was really taking the fight to them? The answers nobody, not effectively, not like Trump ken, not like Trump does. That's why last night was so important and also super entertaining when he says that Joe Biden is

just not impressive because it's true. It's funny, and it's important because it's true. Play ten to support crazy Bernie Sanders socialist government takeover of healthcare. He seems not to be doing too well lately. Remember the statement from the previous administration, you need a magic wand to bring back manufactu You. Well, we'll tell sleepy Joe that we found the magic wand we found the magic wand my friends, you know, the truth is the magic wand is Trump.

Let's hope that it's enough to get us through to four more years. I think that it will be some more important points from from the speech last night I wanted to dive into, and then we'll move on. I know you've had a chance that had to digest a lot of a lot of you probably watched it already, and so we're not going to spend too much of the show on this. We've got immigration fights to get into. A really interesting piece on flight MH three seventy, that

Malaysia Airlines flight that disappeared five years ago. I'll talk to you about that, and African American gun rights and really freedom rights advocate in Philadelphia is going to join us later on the show, Madge Teray, really interesting guy.

I think you'll want to hear from him and how he's trying to educate the black community in particular and especially in urban areas about the Second Amendment and how it is it is the the right of all Americans and it and all Black Americans to be able to defend themselves and enjoy their Second Amendment rights and not to believe the left wing nonsense about gun ownership. We've got a lot of oh, and we also have a discussion coming up about slavery reparations, because there was a

capitalil hearing today about this. We'll get we'll get into that. And the short version, that's the bad idea. The long version is we're gonna have to keep talking about it because Democrats are using this as a as a way to to get the basse all riled up, the left wing bass. So that means we can entirely ignore it when we have a jam packed show, as we always do, so stay right there and as we fight to make

life better for all Americans. The Democrat Party has become more radical, more dangerous, and more unhinged than at any point in the modern history of our country. Does anybody really disagree with that? Who's paying attention, who knows anything, and who's honest? The Democratic Party has gotten more radical. That's just that's just a fact. The Democratic Party has

moved further to the left again, a fact. Democrats now embrace positions that ten years ago, five years ago, a majority of their party would have said, well, hold on a second, that that seems maybe a bit ext that seems a bit extreme, not extreme anymore, not in the era of AOC and talib and you know, Pelosi is just all about power. So you have to remember this, Pelosi isn't really a governor, a speed bump on the radical left. First of all, she's she's a progressive herself.

She's not, but she's not radical in the sense that she wants to continue things as they are in so far as they benefit her, her power, her prestige. And you know that's that's the first consideration Nancy Pelosi has. What does this mean for Nancy Pelosi? And so that's why she doesn't want to up end the system quite yet, because she's third in line for the presidency and she

likes things how they are. It's the younger lefty Democrats in the Congress that are the real They're they're the real Castro wannabes, as in Fidel not the guy who's running for president. Sorry, got gotta specify that one. At this point, about the radical, radical nature of the Democratic Party, this is going to be very important for Trump to hit on repeatedly because the Democrats right now they're showing us who they are because they have to, because the

base wants this. Trump's gonna go to prison and we have to impeach in and all this stuff that they say the base wants this. But when it comes time for the general election, you're gonna have Hey, here's my prediction. You're either going to have Biden running as the Oh yeah, I'm just you know, just a guy man who wants to just bring us back to the way things were and it'll be great, like the Obama years all over again. Or if you have Bernie Sanders, they'll say, no, no no,

I'm a cuddley socialist. I'm like a teddy bear socialist, not one of those scary ones who wants to take all your stuff, give it to other people and run the economy in the ground. No, I just I'm just the free stuff socialist, which isn't real, but that's what they will offer. That's the way they'll go. So very important to hit the radical nature of the Democratic Party,

which is the truth. And then there's the other part of this as well, which is the disparate system of not just justice, but the two sets of rules that we are always being forced to operate in or when it comes to Democrats and Republicans, whether it is the justice system or just public perception through the media. Here's

what he said about for example, Hillary's emails. Let's compare how they came after us for three years versus the free pass they gave to Hillary at a rates after they set up an a legal server, the acid washed thirty three thousand emails. If I got a subpoena for emails, if I deleted one email like a love note to Milannia,

it's the electric chair for Trump. Does anybody really deny that at this point that the the way that the media, the bureaucracy, the establishment treats Trump and the Republicans is different from how they treat Democrats. Does anyone really think that that's a particularly contentious point. I mean, the way that the laws were swept aside and law enforcement at the highest level was told to stand down to pave

the way for and Hillary Hello, and what happened. The way that the law was then just one hundred and eighty degrees, you know, switched around and weaponized and used to try to stop Trump from becoming president and then to end his presidency is the most breathtaking, absurd and frightening political scandal in this country of my lifetime. And the so called journos skipped this thing entirely It's pretty

stunning when you think about it. Visiting. Let's have a little talk about the reparations hearings today, Shall we happened on Capitol Hill? I have thoughts, many of them. That's coming up. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. Thirty one percent of black children live in poverty compared to eleven percent of white children. The natural averages eighteen percent would suggest that the percentage of black children living in poverty is more than one hundred and

fifty percent. The institution of slavery and subsequent discrimination directed against blacks is an injustice that must be formally acknowledged and addressed. I just simply ask why not and why not now? If not all of us, then who God bless us as we pursue the final justice for those who lived in slavery for two hundred and fifty years in the United States of America. So that's about reparations.

There's a big hearing on Capitol Hill today. I got a lot of attention and some important questions are raised. Here's the My quick reaction to this is, how can you achieve justice for acts committed against people who are no longer living at anywhere, and that we're committed by people who are no longer living. How could you adjudicate that without doing major damage to your legal system and to the undergirding moral values of your society. No one

seems to have any good answers for that. There were some very interesting stuff said that A Coleman Hughes of Quillette said some things. I mean Quilett's that, what do you call it as it's almost a contrarian ideas magazine, or just a magazine that's intellectually rigorous but unbounded by the dictates of political correctness. We've had Andy no On before who writes for Quilette, to some very interesting stuff on Antifa for them. Christina hoff Summers I believe is

associated with Quilette. She's a woman who's an academic who is not cowtowing to feminism all the time. But here's what Coleman Hughes had to say about reparations today and whether this is a good idea played twenty. The question is not what America owes me by virtue of my ancestry. The question is what all Americans owe each other by virtue of being citizens of the same nation and the obligation of citizenship is not transactional, it's not contingent on ancestry,

it never expires, and it can't be paid off. For all these reasons, Bill HR forty is a moral and political mistake. Thank you, thank you, mister Hughes. Chill, chill. He was presumptive, but he still has a right to speak. Oh, look at the Democrat there, Cohen Jrump coming at the end. He still has a right. He was presumptive, but he's a right to speak. He's yeah, sure, there are the people booing in the hearing room booing. What what what did you say to that so bad? What was so

incorrect that he should be booted? And people are just so childish, Mike, you got something. Yeah, as let's say, Cohen's the clown that brought the chicken, remember him, right, Yeah, he decided to chime in. Oh my gosh, I mean I interview that guy. I mean he kind of had like a little bit of like this kind of crazy like southern thing, but he's kind of just yelling all over the place, and he's just, you know, crazy. I got Cohen. He's off the wall sometimes. Oh wait, we

got more. Coleman Hughes, though I liked it, I like what this guy head to say, played twenty one. In two thousand and eight, the House of Representatives formally apologized for slavery and Jim Crow. In two thousand and nine, the Senate did the same. Black people don't need another apology. We need safer neighborhoods and better schools. We need a less punitive criminal justice system. We need affordable healthcare, and none of these things can be achieved through reparations for slavery.

If we were to pay reparations today, we would only divide the country further, making it harder to build the political coalitions require to solve the problems facing black people today. We would insult many Black Americans by putting a price on the suffering of their ancestors. What would that price be?

Let's assume him for a moment, and it's it is an assumption we should not make, but just for the sake of argument, that the American people are united in the idea of reparations, whereas in reality, over sixty percent of Americans oppose reparations. So is a It's a clear majority that are not in favor of this. What's enough what's enough reparations? A billion? No, of course, not ten billion, getting closer fifty billion. It seems like a lot of money,

one hundred billion, a trillion? You know, you just you work your way up. When does it stop? How can you put a price on the centuries of enslavement and the suffering, and the murder and the well, the truth is, you can never put a price on that, and how could any society really put a price on that? All right, but let's assume that we figured out what the price is. Who gets the money? Where does it go? How is this? What is the mechanism for dealing with this pain and

bringing us into a new future? Oh, let me guess. Is it to give a whole bunch of money to left wing organizations that agitate for certain public policies and create essentially a progressive left slush fund which will be I'm sure staff by many, many, many white liberals who will feel very, very virtuous for working at some institution that has something to do with you or has received some money from from reparations in order to right the wrongs of the past. But is slavery really the only

wrong of the past? We are to write, where does this stop and start, how much further does it go? I would bring you to an essay written by Kevin Williamson, whom is a little more quiet these days than he used to be. He wrote on reparations back in twenty fourteen, and here's here's what he had to say. Quote. The political interests of African Americans, like those of other Americans,

are best served by equality under the law. The economic interests of African Americans, like those of other Americans, are best served by a dynamic and growing economy, preferably one in which the labor force is liberated from the dysfunctional, antique Prussian model of education that contributes so much to black poverty. The people to whom reparations are owed are long dead. Our duty is to the living and to generations yet to come, and their interests are best served

by liberty and prosperity, not by moral theater. End quote. I think that's exactly right. That's what this turns into, folks, That's what this really is. Moral theater. This is an opportunity, especially for white liberals, to show how morally superior they are to those who don't support this idea. That's really what this all comes down to it, it's all for show. It goes nowhere. But that's what so much of the

Democratic Party is these days, just for show. It's a branding exercise for people who can't tell the difference between politics and their own personal virtue. I don't think this is going to go any further, but we'll see Democrats are more tenacious on this than they've been in a while. We've got much more common stay with me. Nancy Pelosi says walls are immoral. Secretary Clinton said she wants a

borderless hemisphere. Earl Blumenauer said abolished ice, and Stacy Abrams, who gave the response to the present's Day of the Union, Speed says she's okay with non citizens voting while the crisis goes on. The Democrats are radicals on immigration. That's not a surprise. I was talking on Tucker Show last night about this very issue. This is one of the areas of greatest radicalism you see on the left. Although they're now just open about how little they care for

the lives of unborn children. I mean, they don't even they don't even pretend that it's a it's a moral question for them anymore. They're just completely fine with the eradication of tiny babies in the womb, but on immigration increasingly they have just turned to either lies or obfuscation. They never they never really grapple with the facts as they are. And here's a perfect, a perfect example of it. So Solidad O'Brien, who is I don't know where she

works now. Where are Solidadd O'Brian working out? She used to be at CNN and had the worst morning show happs in the history of cable news. I mean it was. It was a terrible She was a shrill, nasty, dogmatic lib who brought nothing to the conversation other than being exactly that, the shrill, dogmatic, nasty lib who you know, wants to lecture people about racism and you know all that stuff. Great, you know, that's that's exactly what America

wants first thing in the morning. My former colleague Will Caine at The Blaze was a panelist on Solidad O'Brian's show, and that was one of the hardest jobs I think that any conservative has ever had in media. I will tell you that. To sit there and be browbeaten by Solidad uh the the great Ignoramus O'Brien on a regular basis, would you. I'm not saying there's no amount of money you could pay me to do that. It would be a lot of money, a lot of money, like like

Rush Limball kind of money. Like I had to be like like Lebron James kind of money. It'd be a lot of money from you. Okay, maybe not that kind of money. It would just be like, you know, I don't know CNN Morning anchor money, but just kidding. I would never. But Dan Crenshaw tweeted out the following, and this just gives you a sense of, you know how, the intellectual half of our side versus the intellectual deficit

on the other side. Crenshaw, in response to Okazio Cortez running the following for the shrieking Republicans who don't know the difference. Concentration camps are not the same as death camps. Concentration camps are considered by many experts as the mass detention of civilians without trial. And that's that this administration is doing. She's she's just lying about what she was saying. I mean, we all know she said never again. This is not this is not up for debate. This is

not hard. But in response to that, Dan Crenshaw, former Navy seal current member of Congress out of Texas, said, clearly, I need to explain that in concentration camps, people are our unjustly sought out and confined. This isn't what is happening at the border. Migrants are illegally crossing our border. Most are asylum seekers, thus pending trial. So your expert definition doesn't apply. Correct, Dan Crenshaw is correct. They are

coming to us and they are breaking the law. We aren't going to Honduras or Guatemala and scoopings them up. They're coming here and they're breaking our laws. Now, this is where it gets even more interesting because Solidad O'Brien chimes in on Twitter to say this about Dan Crenshaw. This is a good indication that this congressman doesn't realize that it is not illegal to cross the border in

search of asylum in America. He should also speak to a historian about historical roots of concentration camps because he's wrong on that too. Okay, let's just dispense with the second one first, shall we. She was referring to Nazi concentration camps. That's why she said never again. In the same sound bite this is this is not hard. All right, let's we're not rewriting history here, folks. We all know

exactly what she was talking about. And you have some libs and we'll talk about this later on the show who were straight up saying no, no, no, yeah, it is like the Nazi concentration camps, or we're getting close to it at least. But solidad on the first point, and we shouldn't expect anymore from Remember this was somebody who at one point CNN was paying seven figures to go on TV and just be a little lib talking head with the usual dogmatic lib talking points. Never insightful,

never gracious, just shrill, nasty. I'll tell you I actually saw the day that she got fired from CNN. I was a contributor and I was walking in the lobby as she was, I kid you, not storming out with her like box with her things and her little assistant sort of, you know, hurriedly trapsing behind her. And she had the scowl of all scowls on her face. You know,

usually I'm very simple. I mean, anybody who I mean, she's a multi millionaire, She's married a super rich guy, you know, it's a job that somebody else actually needs and wone do well. So you know she'll be fine. But I decided to chime in with miss O'Brien here because she's wrong, and that was what I tweeted to her. Wrong, Solidad. It is in fact illegal to cross the border outside a port of entry, even if seeking asylum. That's what about nine of these migrants are doing. They are breaking

the law. And then when they don't show up for their asylum hearing, they are breaking the law again. And then we get this from Solidad. Oh she wants to dig a No, she skips past that because I'm just right, she's just wrong. I'm right. Isn't that fun? It's illegal to cross the border, even if you're then going to claim a sylum. You can't just cross the border outside of port of entry. That's that is a that is

a crime unto itself. And so every migrant who shows up outside of port of entry walks across and I've seen them doing this, walks across the board her and says I want to claim asylum, has committed a crime, every single one of them. Okay, she responds, though she doesn't even touch on that issue. She responds, estimates, this is solo dad O'Brien estimates from an asylum judge in Virginia. Ninety ninety five percent show up for their hearing. This

is the process to being assessed and applying for asylum. Again. Wrong, So I responded to her. Wrong, Oh man, that's nice. Wrong Again, the Department of holand Security disagrees with the random judge that you pick to bolster the narrative you prefer, solo dad, ninety percent of these asylum seekers so far I have missed their court dates. And then I give her a nice little link to testimony from DHS Secretary Macalenan to that issue. So, I mean, I'm right, she's wrong,

she's not, but she has a preferred narrative. Right. She wants her audience to constantly no, I love the illegals. I mean, she lives in a I would guess. I'm just gonna put this out there. I don't know, but I'm guessing she lives in a three to five million

dollars apartment in New York City. That's right. I know these people, I know, I know what they're like, I know who they are, and she lives in probably a three to five million dollar apartment in New York City, and her only contact with illegals is either the people in fancy restaurants who are in the back of the kitchen washing dishes and busting tables and things, or cleaning up her home. That's her only no contact with illegals in a day to day basis beyond that. So to her,

it's just all virtue signaling. It's all, oh, okay, well, this is fine, this is great. We're just gonna let in everybody. And I want my audience to know that. And so in service of that, she's lying because let's just understand this, folk. Why would I mean, she's wrong on the numbers, but why would ninety percent of asylum seekers show up for hearing where they know when it is clear from previous hearings that less than one and

ten of them are actually going to get asylum. Why would they Why would they put themselves at risk of deportation that of course they're not going to do that, and everyone knows this. But you see, at each stage of this process of the crisis at our southern border, the Libs have been lying. They've been pretending that they care about the rule of law and the process when we all know that the rule of law in the process is being flagrantly and systematically violated, that there's a

fraud going on here. And we were right over and over again, but they never changed their minds anyway. That's Solidad got buck slapped, which is an important thing sometimes that needs to happen. So I'm glad I was able to present her with the facts and she is somebody who was in need of a little assistance on the factual basis for my claims. Wow, but that's right. But we'll come back in just a moment, team with a whole lot more on. We got more on the Trump rally.

What was This is what I really want to get into. What was the single greatest moment of the Trump rally last night? In your opinion? I want you to hold that thought, those of you that watch, those of you watch the campaign launch, I want you to hold that thought because when we come back, I'm going to play for you what I believe is the single greatest moment of that rally and maybe my favorite moment of Eddie Trump rally. Stay with me for it. Twenty sixteen was

not merely another four year election. This was a defining moment in American history. Ask them right there, this was our chance to reclaim our government. All right, we've been watching the president kick off his reelection. All right, all right, they're chat d s at ed sucks at the rally and they're chatting really loud and this is c at ed. So we're gonna stop covering the rally because there are chat Diggs sea it ed sucks. I mean, come on, Mark,

that's funny. It's funny. It's amazing. Producer, Mike, I know you think it's amazing too, of course it is, dude, this is this is phenomenal. I was watching that what had happened, and I wasn't like, sort of half paying attention, and then that got my full attention. I mean that was the highlight of the whole thing for me. That was amazing, just to have to watch at a excuse dam are that chat dig thought Wait, hold on a

tecond is wolfed down on the floor. Wolf Look you tell us, Uh yeah, they're pretty sure that, you know, Burman, they're channing. Uh I'm not sure. I'm trying to make it out now, but I have a feeling, and I have a I think they're chanting CNN sucks. It's amazing because CNN does suck, and they should be told that loudly and clearly and repeatedly, over and over again. So good times for everyone. That was the best. That was the best thing. I don't think MSNBC carried any of

this speech last night. They had more important things to do. So I did Tucker's Show, which was always fun, right before the speech. Those of who got to see that, I think we put it up on Facebook. It was pretty cool. But I did Tucker Show right before the speech, and then I went over to watch the speech because it's only about five minutes from the Fox studio at the Trump International Hotel, where I gathered with a coterie, a menagerie, a smorgess board of patriots and we all

hung out. And that's where I first saw the Keep America Great merchandise and flags and things that were being waved around. But that was the real highlight. And Mike, I can tell you I was in a room with a probably a couple of hundred people where they had this breakout room where they were just watching the speech at the hotel, and that was the best part of the whole thing. Because I mean and I want. I need to be at a rally when they chant CNN sucks,

because then life will be complete. Can we do a show live from a Trump rally? Please? Oh my god, I'd like to. We gotta figure out wait to do that. I'd be amazing. And I just want to have people come up and be like sure or false? Does CNN suck? Yeah, let's see what they have. It's amazing. He's it's this is one when people say, oh, the polls and this and that. I sit there, I say, guys, we know

this is Trump. Okay, there's no one else that's even gonna be in the same universe as this guy in terms of his campaign skills, and the Democrats just don't have a very good pitch. Ultimately, there's just what what

is the pitch? We're gonna stop all the good stuff that's happening and do bad things, but we're gonna do it in a way that uses more politically correct rhetoric and that that shouldn't be I mean, yeah, that's appealing if you're a smarmy left coast lib but for people that just care about results and want the best for the country, that's just not gonna do it. That's just not gonna do it. But yes, now CNN sucks. That

made me. That made me very happy. Um. And there was also Don Lemon monsieur Don Lemo may wear Leo. I don't know when he became a kind of cage. Actually he's not. I mean he's is he from Louisiana. I think he's from Louisiana. He obviously has no cagn accent though there I did get to interview a congressman I forget what his name is and Mike. This would be uh kind of fun to pull up from the archives from the Hill TV days, but it was. It was on Hill TV. He's a Republican, He's from Louisiana.

He's like, excuse me, madame madam, so excuse me. He had like this kind of cage in affect. He was this this uh this this a white dude from I think northern northern Louisiana. Um. Unlike see, there are some states where they want you to say the state the

proper way, like Nevada. Thank you all Nevadens for taching me, and an Oregon instead of Oregon, which I'm telling you is still very popular on the East Coast people say Oregon U. But with Louisiana they just appreciate if you say the name and just don't try to get too fancy. Same thing with residents of of of Louisville, where there's a lot of different ways that people say it, and they just are like, just don't don't hurt yourself trying

to say it. The same thing with Louisiana. But Mischigo Donment was on I don't know, just that's fun to say his name. He was on CNN last night. Of course, he's a host there. I used to do that. I used to do a show all the time until I realized that it was a dishonest trash bin and then I was like, I'm not doing this anymore. It got worse, though, in my defense, it got worse when I was there. It got crazier when I was there. It started out

somewhat normal, but U or normal for CNN. But here's what Donement said about whether or not they should air the Trump rally in Orlando. Play play clip three. I think about the despicable people we've had in history. Okay,

and I'm gonna use an extreme example. Think about Hitler, Think about any of those people, would you say that that person is allowed or let's put it this way, if you could look back in history, would you say, well, I'm so glad that that person was allowed a platform so that they could spread their hate and propaganda in Liza. Would you say they probably wasn't the right thing to do to spread that because you knew in the moment that that was a bad person and they were doing

bad things. Not only were they hurting people, they were killing people. So don Lemon is making a Trump rally to Hitler early days comparisons as if I mean, look this the media that they can't hide anymore. They can't help themselves. They're showing you who they are day in and day out with their tweets, with their commentary, with what they do. It can't we can't put a genie back in the bottle? Is that a micro aggression? By

the way, we not allowed to mention genies. It's like a cultural appropriation of a cultural appropriation of the Middle East, don't We don't want to talk about that anymore? So, Ohrabian nights, remember that. I cannot believe they remade Aladdin with Will Smith live action. Why why do so many people in Hollywood insist on trying to ruin our childhoods by remaking movies that should never be remade, or and then just remaking them really badly. I don't have creativity

come up with new ideas. You know. I'm gonna tell you, I'm gonna miss something. I watched something recently that was pretty I don't know, it's not good, but I watched it. An I was watching the Castlevania cartoon series on Netflix. Have you seen this? No? What is so? The only the only reason? So? It just I have so much nostalgia because the Konami video game from nineteen oh gosh, I can't remember the year, late nineteen eighties, maybe early

nineteen nineties. Castlevania was awesome. Do you remember that game? I love that game. I thought Castlevania was a really cool game. It's loosely based on the on on Bram Stoker's Tracula. You know, they've done a whole bunch of other stuff with it. But they made a cartoon, an adult cartoon. There's a lot of like heads getting chopped off, and it's it's very anime like in the sense if there's uh, lots of sword fighting and dudes getting their heads chopped off. But it's not good, Mike. That's a

long story short. I cannot. I cannot recommend this one. So it makes me sad, but I tried. It just was a little childhood nostalgia thing for me, though, where I'm like, oh, I remember Castlevania. I'll watch a little bit of this, But no, it's not terrible. I don't know, Mike, give it a shot and tell me what you think. Yeah, it's like a good thing to kind of just like

when you just want to totally zone out. It can be you know, when you watch The Office for the five hundredth time and you just don't want to watch Office in the background. All right, So all right, back back to center buck back in formation. Gosh Son is talking about we wouldn't have given Hitler a platform, so should we give the President of the United States, Donald Trump a platform? This is why CNN as a joke.

This is this is un serious and stupid commentary from an un serious and ignorant person, and this should be remembered going forward when he wants to be home. Just a journalist. I'm a serious journalist. Yeah, sure you are, buddy, Sure you are. But CNN sucks. Was the the highlight of this whole thing for me. I loved every second of it. Um, that was great man last night seeing

all these folks at the Trump. And for those of you who are a team balking to listen to the show, if you ever see me at the Trump or anywhere else, I always remutately do mean this. Don't ever be shy but coming up and say hi or whatever. I love seeing members of the team anywhere I am. It's never it's never a bother. It's never like you know, please, it's it's you honor me by saying hello. If you're somebody who listens to this show, so by all means,

feel free to come up chat. You know, we can hang a little bit, drink some mescal if you're into that sort of thing. To sit back, relax and let the Trump save America. That's pretty much. It's pretty much how it was going last night. It was great, and it was a really good energy, even at the Trump Hotel where you have a collection of patriots gathered on a regular basis, but especially when there's a big Trump event. So yeah, all at all. A fantastic launch, my friends,

A very strong launch from the Trumpster. It's completely inappropriate, it's reckless, it's irresponsible, it's misinformed, and it's flat out wrong. You go to these facilities, whether it's a border patrol facility, an HCS facility, or an ICE facility, that they will be safe and adequate conditions to detain individuals. Except for the one exception that I would make is the border patrol facilities. They're designed for adults. They're not designed for kids.

So regardless of where you fall on the immigration issue, the law right now says, if you come here as an uncompanied kid, you're allowed in the United States. They should not be in border patrol facilities. That's why we need Congress in part to pass that supplemental bill to get those kids out of border patrol stations into more adequate facilities run by HSS, and Congresses set on their hands for weeks and have not done that. Let me tell you what's really happening here, my friends, is that

the Left's Olynskiite overrunning of the border. And yes, they've been waving them in and finding, you know, representing illegals in the legal process and advocating for them, and the Democrats are holding up the funding and won't change the law. So yes, they are in fact waving them in. They are promoting this Olynskiite overwhelming of the system and then turning around and saying, how dare you allow the system to be overwhelmed? They are both the arsonists and the

criticizer of the firefighter. We are the firefighters in this case. We're trying to stop this from happening. They don't want it to stop, They're making it happen, and then they say, why aren't you stopping it in a better way? Well, the acting ICE director there, Mark Morgan, whom I've interviewed a few times, a very sharp guy, and knows this issue backwards and forwards. He's first of all furious with the completely idiotic and reckless comparison of attention centers of

concentration camps. I mean, do we really need to do we really need to sit down with a bunch of these moron democrats who have major platforms on TV, sit down with them and show them photos of what people in the Nazi concentration camps look like? Do we need to show them a photo of the thousands and thousands

and thousands of children's shoes gathered together? In the Holocaust Museum here in DC, or the eyeglasses that were taken for people before their march off the gas chambers, and then show them a photo of fellow American border patrol officers who are tending to the needs, bringing food, war remaining up themselves, handing it to the migrants who are showing up in these facilities, knowing that they are breaking the law, by the way, not caring about that one bit.

The border patrol officers who are not paid a lot of money, who are going into their own paycheck to buy extra blankets and pillows and toys for kids who are stuck in border patrol facilities. Because we don't have the facilities for this, we weren't built for this. They want to compare them to concentration camp guards. These people are disgrace the same Democrats. You know, this mentality has been around now, we've seen it before. Abolish Ice. That

was their chant, Abolish ice. They probably want to abolish border patrol too. They just won't say X. You know, it's political suicide, but increasingly they're pretty open about it. If they had their way, that's what would happen. I mean, if we're operating concentration camps. Doesn't that make border patrol? The concentration camp guards are our border patrol officers going to be getting tracked down into the into their eighties, even their nineties as war criminals decade in decades to

come by by psychopaths like o'casio Quartez. I don't know, she seems to think so. They just replace reason with emotion and wonder why they never get it right. The Left can't help itself. This is just who they are. They are unfair, unreasonable, and increasingly crazy. Here's MSNBC back in the day promoting this. The concentration camp thing is not new. I've been telling you. The former CIA director said it. I tweeted it. I should say this is not a new theme because they're just trying to what's

the maximum outrage they can generate for political purposes. What can they say to get the most oh my gosh, show my gosh response from libs. That's what they're going to say. Here's MSNBC back last summer promoting this idea, the kids that migrant kids are being put in concentration camps play seventeen and this is an important fact check. It is not the law to separate parents and children at the border. That is not the law. It is their interpretation of the law. We are used to be

America's greatest democracy. We can't find a solution to this problem without harming children, right, without putting them into concentration camps. It's not even an interpretation of the law. It is a policy, new policy. It is a policy that has been invoked by the President of the United States. I call this a concentration camp for kids because that's exactly what it is turning out to. When you give kids twenty two hours of lockup time and two hours of airtime,

what else can it be? And if this is where this country is going, the American people need to wake up and pay attention because your kids could be right. See they were saying it a year ago on MSNBC. This isn't new. We're operating concentration camps. You know, if what libs say that we are on a path of fascism, that we're operating concentration camps in the border, if they believe these things, then we have to be deeply concerned.

If the rhetoric that the left, that the Democrats routinely use in this country to describe the operations of the Trump administration to deride the character and intent of the Trump administration. If they believe these things they say over and over again, we should all be deeply concerned about what they're going to do the next time they're in power, Because what would you do if you thought that the opposition were Nazis? What would you do if you thought

that the opposition leader was basically Hitler? You know, I thought Obama was overrated, not nearly as smart as a left pretended. He was, not as wise, not as amazing. But I never thought the guy was Hitler. I just thought he wasn't a great president, wasn't somebody that would have voted for. I never hated Obama. I actually never hated him. I just disagreed with him. The Left hates Trump in a way that is its own form of psychosis. But then I give you the alternative possibility, and maybe

this is the more true one. I know a lot of you would say, Buck, both these things are true. They believe that Trump is Hitler, or they believe that Trump is a fascist and that the concentration camps at the border are real. But there's another option here, or another addition into this. They're willing to say anything, They're willing to go to any level of exaggeration, use any kind of overreach and insanity to make a point and to hurt their political rivals, which in its own way

is also very disturbing. In its own way, is deeply unsettling because it means that these people have no moral compass at all, that they'll say anything at any time, no matter what it does to the morale and the functioning and the tranquility of this country. We'll be right back. The United States is running concentration camps on our southern border, and that is exactly what they are. The fact that concentration camps are now an institutionalized practice in the Home

of the Free is extraordinarily disturbing. Wow, that is what AOC had to say about the whole situation at the border. One of the dumbest things I've heard in a long time. Indefensible, stupid, reckless, ignorant. This is not hard, folks, This is not a hard It's not a close call, not a difficult one. And I know that yesterday this god so much attention. But there's a lot here. There's a lot that's beneath the surface.

There's a lot on the surface too. There's a lot that's beneath the surface that deals with why a Democrat would say this, and also why so many Democrats and lib media outlets and big, overpaid, pompous, teamy news anchors would try to find a way to defend these comments. To defend this, let's let's first work on the fact that AOC has now claimed that there is a consensus, a consensus that she was correct in comparing what happened at our southern or with the detention of families and

migrants at our southern border too. It was Nazi concentration camps. We're not going to let her play this game. She said concentration camps and never forget, and she worked never forget into this, so we all knew exactly what she's talking about. But now she's claiming that her concentration camp comment that the smart people agree with her played thirteen very clear academic consensus on what constitutes a concentration camp, and that is the massed attention of a community of

people without a trial or due process. I think it's pretty universally and non controversial to say that the administration is doing exactly that and meets the academic requirement for what a concentration campus. You're not comparing this to what happened in World War two, No no I. While concentration camps were employed during that time, concentration camps were also utilized in a wide in all over the world, including

in the United States with a Japanese internment. Well, first of all, they call them, they tend to refer to them as internment camps when we're referring to the Japanese Americans in this country. But note how somebody who is by no stretch of the imagination and an academic or has an impressive academic pedigree in any way, and not that an impressive academic pedigree would even mean all that much,

but she has none of these things. Invokes the academic consensus about what she said, as though, yeah, the academy is on my side. Oh you mean that the tenured commies that teach at schools across the country. That's really impressive. AOC, it's not impressive at all. But she got dragged yesterday. That's what they call it. When you say something or write something, particularly on Twitter that's really stupid and then everyone just piles on you and talks about what an

imbecile you are. Call it getting dragged. It happens to people, sometimes fairly, sometimes unfairly. AOC was getting dragged and the left leapt to her defense. They really do have a particular defensiveness and a soft spot for backing up at all costs and any costs. Certain members of Congress. They do this for AOC, They do it for Ilhan Omar, they do it for Rashida to leave. They will go to the mat for these new members of Congress in the media, which tells you a lot, they will leave.

Certain you know, Debbie Wasserman Schultz back in the day could get hammered by the media. I mean, will you just see it here and be like, you know, Robot, Debbie with their the tachic pots about the Democrats that have the Republicans are so bad and Republicans are terrible, and I've just said the same day, go over. You know,

Debbie is just a little blabbering talking points. Robot and I could say that stuff and nobody was going to rush to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's defense the same way, at least the same way that they do with AOC and to leave. There's a real sensitivity here. I mean, I think it's one that these are that that the media is more left wing in their sense, in their sensibilities, and in their sympathies than they really want anyone to know.

I mean the media. We have a hard left media in this country that presents, you know, slightly left center right. That's they try or at least consider themselves left center, but they're they're really pretty hard left at this point. I mean, they want the president in prison, they want his family imprisoned and ruined. They are willing to lie about things to get there. They're willing to abuse the process, excuse all kinds of misbehavior, and invoke insane double standards.

I mean, the left now has radicalized. I've been saying it for a long time. The left is radicalized. But when you see radical members of the left all of a sudden getting dragged by conservative media on Twitter, by the radio hosts and TV shows, then you have this this what do they call it? They call it standing or just when you stand for someone, Producer, Mike, isn't

this what the kids say now? Like when you sta n isn't that like you're standing up for somebody in a big way because they're like super fanning for them or something. I don't know. Yeah, it sounds right, right, like you stand for someone. It sounds like they're saying stand, but it's actually sta n It's a new word that the cool kids use now. So they will they will stand for AOC, and they will back her up when she is not back up a bull. Really and this is not a close call, but here is AOC decided

to go after Liz Cheney on this issue. You know, she's just gonna she's gonna clap back even when she should just AOC, you should just take the l on this one. But she won't take the lum. She has been given way too much power. She has far too little knowledge for the power that she wields in the media and in our discourse. She is the Prince Joffrey of the Democratic Party. And that's why she thinks it's

okay to do things like this play clip twelve. She used the term extermination, which is co opting the language of that. You know that term implies that the people who died in the Holocaust. It doubles down on the rhetoric that justified it, and so I think it's I mean, I think she's the one that he's do her homework. She is a She is a dangerous moron, folks. I mean that. I mean that because she's just never No one has ever pulled her aside and really let her know,

you're just not that smart. She looks and presents and has a story that the left loves. I mean, they like the packaging, they like the superficiality of Ocasio Cortez. The it's kind of like a female Chegavarre in American society in twenty nineteen. You know, it's going to lead us to the socialist heights of a great new future where there's, you know, an elimination of white privilege and there's the radical redistribution of wealth and all this stuff.

They like all these aspects of her, but no one really has ever pulled her aside and said to her, you're really not You have a lot to learn, and you you would benefit tremendously from humility. She is completely lacking in humility. I mean the whole oh I was a bartender thing. This is a false humilator that she uses as part of her branding. She's gonna lecture Liz Cheney on this, and then this was this was a fascinating maneuver and Chris Cuomo, bro Cuomo, Yo, do you

even lift? He responded to someone on Twitter. I saw this today with the same extermination is for pests, not for people. So what they're trying to do is to switch the conversation. They've lost on this. I mean, they're they're getting pounded and they know they're they're trying to fight back, but they're wrong. What she said was stupid. What she said was wrong. You know Mike Hayden, former CI director. I worked for Mike. I've talked to Mike. I know him not well, but talk to him if

you briefed him a few times. Mike said something similar. And I can tell you that even people that I know in the Intel community, who are very senior, who are Trump Trump hating liberals, have said to me privately that Mike Hayden comparing what was going on at our southern border to concentration camps was was completely intellectually inexcusable. Inexcusable. They recognize that, like, you can't, you can't be doing that.

That's just crazy. Just like people who when I've asked them even Remember I'm talking about Trump haters, folks, I'm talking about deep staters who want to get rid of Trump. The ones though, who are not complete buffoons, who have like five percent non buffoonery left in them. They will say that John Brennan calling what Trump has done treason, I mean, that's just also crazy, that's just that's nuts.

But they will go nuts in their defensive AOC and what they've done, and this became the new talking point for today was to suggest that usage of the the quote extermination of six million Jews, that by using the word extermination you are in effect appropriating Nazi language and terminology.

Therefore you're the problem. Therefore you are the problem. This is this is the new the latest wow moment, the latest wow moment from the liberal left in their efforts to do everything they can uh to just distract from what's really happened. I mean, they're they're a complete and utter disgrace. Yet here we are if you want to know how wrong they are and how broke Cuomo and the others who are now trying to lecture us on the usage of the word extermination in reference to what

happened to the Jews and five million non Jews. I do think that that that's a part of the conversation too. This is just this is history, This is these are the facts. There were six million Jews and five million non Jews exterminated, murdered in the concentration camps, a million, a million Gypsies, two million plus polls, Catholic Poles mostly, and then six million Jews, which is this is all you can go. I mean, I live within walking distance to the Holocaust Museum here in DC, and that's the

number that they have there as well. And you know, to understand, we should never minimize the full scope and the full degree of the atrocities of the Nazi regime. But Cuomo, in response to Liz Cheney, that's I was trying to find this for a second there, tweeted out today Broke Cuomo exterminated question mark, we use that for pest, not people. See he is on the this is now the new LIB talking point. Oh, you can't use exterminated, and that this is such a distraction, This is such

an absurdity to even bring this up. But then, as many pointed out, like Phil Klein hat tipped him over at the Washington Examiner. Uh, you know, Phil Klein tweeted out, I confess I don't fully understand what Quomo was pretending to be outraged about. But the US Holocaust Museum and israel Yad Vashem both refer repeatedly to quote extermination camps.

So they didn't even think this one through. But they're so desperate on the left to find something, some smokescreen to defend AOC's stupidity, or just take the heat offer for a moment that they would say outrageously stupid stuff, doubling down on stupid. I mean this from Cuomo, and you know, oh my gosh, the whole what's his name? Chris Hayes over at MSNBC, And I can't even keep track of all the libs, Julia Yaffi, all these people saying moronic stuff here to defend AOC. Why are they

so willing to do this? Why not at least be if you want to be a little hypocritical on this and just play for your team, just be silent about it. Just wait, this will pass. Why gaslight us? Well, there's a real there's a real impulse here on the left to protect this new far left than guard of the Democrat Party. They're particularly sensitive about the far left, and I think there's real reason for that. This isn't just a byproduct, This isn't a bug, this is a feature.

They are hoping that the AOC wing of the Democratic Party will in short order become the mainstream Democratic Party. And that's why they'll make total idiots of themselves to try to make Okazi Cortez look like less of an Idiotio Cortez is under fire again for some comments to make about concentration camps. I'm wondering if you've talked to some of the freshman members about the power of their words.

These members of Congress are. They come and represent their district and their point of view, and they take responsibility for the statements that they make. The Republicans have no interest in holding the president accountable for his words. They will misrepresent anything that you say, just if you have one word in the sentence that they can exploit. Oh, now Pelosi goes with the classic At least give her

credit for this. Pelosi goes with the classics here, folks, which is that, oh, they're misrepresenting what she said, They're misrepresenting it. How how exactly are they misrepresenting what? What AOC says she said it it was dumb, and we're saying it was dumb. This is just again that they words have no meaning to these people. The truth is nothing. This is why when they're lectures about Trump and you know,

an exaggeration, here's some salesman talk. There a little bit of you know, coloring outside the lines when he speaks. I know Trump does it. I'm not oblivious, of course, but that's different than just up is down, down is up, and we're the guardians of truth while we're telling you that. But there's the defending AOC because of what she represents

for the party. Then there's also the even more troubling component of this, and that is that there are some who really do think that there is any mortal comparison or some rough approximation of similarity between what goes on at the US Mexico border and what happened in the Nazi concentration camps of World War two. And now it's not possible, it's not possible to be so very very stupid and to think this unless there's emotion that's also involved.

I mean, nobody really believes that these are the same things. But they have become so emotional about what's going on at the border that they put themselves in a position where they will say things that are just insane. You know, all this Trump has Hitler talk has finally got into their brains. Angela Rye Over at CNN is a very emotional person. To put her on CNN yell. She basically goes on TV and calls people racists. That's that's her job.

Here's what she said about this whole holocaust comparison about our southern border to play fourteen in nineteen thirty, there were concentration camps. In nineteen forty one, they were death camps. And that is where we are going. If our consciences are not quickly pierced, it is a problem. Let me let me tell you how to laugh it off. We're heading to death camps, she says. She's doubling down. She's tripling down on this. Not only is it, oh, it's

accurate to call what we have concentration camps. We are in fact, according to this paid CNN contributor who is presented in front of a national audience and treated with respect and treated like she's a star by most of CNN. By the way, she's saying that we are on we are on the same moral trajectory as Germany was in the nineteen thirties. That is a disgusting and abhorrent slap in the face to our men and women a border patrol, whom I know and who are good people, who are patriots,

who are a third of her veterans. By the way, do you think CNN is gonna pull her off the air? No, of course not. She can say whatever stupid crap she wants. Why because she's defending Congress people in the protected class And that's all that really matters here to the left and to the Libs. And we know it, we know it, all right, team, I want to introduce you to somebody who came on my radar actually via my friend Tommy larn and she said, you've got to talk to this guy,

Maj Torrey. I said, all right, let me look, let me look into this a little bit. Turns out masj is the founder of Black Guns Matter. He is running for city council in the great City of Philadelphia, producer Mike's favorite city because he's from there. And we decided to bring Madge on to tell us what he's up to. What Black Guns Matter is all about and what his politics are in the city council. Rays Madge, thanks so much for taking the time. Thanks for having me. Man.

All right, let's start with Black Guns Matter. What is this? So we're a firearm safety and training organization that has a heavy focus in urban areas. So most of the areas where it is high crime, high violence, the usually those places are urban and they have a lot of gun control because you know, criminals love gun control. So um, Basically, we go to those areas. We're completely crowdsource. We go

to those areas where those things are happening. And in essence, what we do is we give these free events or people pay pay it forward for these events for everyone to come learn, um, deal with conflict resolutions, conflict resolution, de escalation, so forth and so on and so um. I mean, we've been doing it since twenty fifteen. Us been it's been love. It's been a lot of people supporting and we just want to educate and make the

hood grade again. Basically, do you come across a lot of hostility when when you're when you're talking to to folks in the black community in Philadelphia or anywhere else,

were you doing these trainings. Do you do you just get the sense that the black community has been told by the Democratic Party, which as we know, as a majority of black voters supporting it, that that guns are somehow just even legal guns and legal gun ownership is bad or you know what, what's what's the perception that you're dealing with in the Black community of sec of the Second Amendment. So one, it is changing, so I'll leave with that, But there has been a concentrated effort

body left. Um, and and again, I have tons of friends that's on the left, and I love them dearly, but they've been thoroughly misinformed. Um, there's a there's a common theme to make sure that urban America is not armed. All gun control is racist from the very beginning. And uh, you know a lot of the areas that happen to be populated by melanated beings happen to be urban centers, and those policies, you know, reflect let's lock them up for just the simple possession of a firearm. We're talking

about guys. I've had scenarios with twenty five year old guys, work in a bank, regular job, living a rough part of itially, purchase a firearm lawfully, not knowing that he has to mind you Prinsylvania. Is the open charage stake, by the way, not knowing that he has to fill out paperwork, pay a fee, all of these other different things. He gets pulled over, it tells the officer he has the firearm located where it's located, and catches the felony.

He loses his job, he loses his apartment. These are things not because again this isn't clearly, this isn't the John Dillinger guy. This is the person that's saying, I want to fire arms to protect my friends, my family, and myself and my neighborhood. It's need be and we're locking people up for it. So the misconception is based on years of you know, negative propaganda telling people, especially black people, that you know, if you got a gun, you out of the bad guy, or you better be

the cops. And that's that's not the principles that America was built upon, but it's it's been a pervasive falsehood that the Left has thoroughly ingrained into urban America, especially black people. But we at Black Guns Matter are doing

the work to change that tremendousness. What are you hoping to do going forward with Black Guns Matter, or do you have events planned in other cities outside of Philly and what can folks do or listen thing who want to get involved and perhaps want to help, what can they do. So we've been on the tour for the last two years. Our goal is to hit every major

city in America, every state in America. You know, we've raised about We're only about eight thousand, five hundred and forty four dollars away from our goal for twenty nineteen, which is fifty thousand dollars for the whole year. We ask anybody that knows that conflict resolution is important, de escalation is important, and people from the right that specifically want to make sure that those lessons of the Second Amendment is available for all Americans, especially Americans that have

been tricked by the left. I mean, and I hate to say it in such a seemingly polarizing way, but the fact is the facts, you know. So if anybody wants to support that work these we make these classes available to everyone that comes out in registers for free by everyone paying it forward. They can hit our GoFundMe gofund me dot com forward slash Black Guns Matter if anybody wants to support. But really it's about again the conflict I don't want to overs shadowed is the conflict

resolution is a primary part. The de escalation is a primary part. And becoming this year, we've added political education. It doesn't make sense to inform Urban America about you know, firearm safety and knowledge in the Second Amendment if we're not going to galvanize that that demographic you know, to vote in a way that is in support of their freedoms. This is all for nothing if we just continue to you know, have Urban America voting in the same people

that are infringing and infringing and infringing, you know. So that's a major component of it as well. But everybody that pays it forward at that you know, our gofundi, gofunding dot com forward slash Black Guns Matter, that helps out tremendously. It removes that financial barrier to entry and we get people, get people's minds and hearts proper in regards to the Second Amendment. And match also want to ask you about your running for city council in Philadelphia.

What are you going to do to try to help clean up that city? You know, I had a brother one to a university there, and he would tell these stories. And we grew up in New York City, so we're not kids that aren't used to a fair amount of crime and urban decay. But he said that Philly was a whole other level. So what are your plans if you, if you get elected to help clean up in Philly? And you know, obviously that could possibly be replicated in other cities that are still be set with the crime

problems of a major city. So the three major platforms that we're running on they all tie into the same thing. But let me before I go to those three points. One, I gotta be very on city council. You gotta be very I want to see where all of the money going. Okay, we got forty million dollars that was earmarked towards anti violence prevention, but over the weekend we had thirty two shootings.

I mean, in this whole stop the violence, put down the guns thing, We've been talking about this for decades, we been having this conversation forever, But where's that money going? And then we're talking about spaces where even outside of just firearms, we're talking about soda taxes that were supposed to be helping the schools, but the schools still got twelve million dollar budget. You know. So as a city councilman, the first thing that I want to do is, okay,

we need to be accountable for all this paper. Now they can ignore me somewhat if I'm outside of the political sphere, but me being you know, on city council at large, now I'm want to appears. So that's one thing. The other three is getting civics back introduced into the schools K to twelve. As soon as they're able to read, they needs to be learning about civics. They need to know about the trisect that that is, the Declaration of Independence,

the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. Because when you want to you know, keep people feeling depressed and not feeling active or a part of a society, you don't tell them about their part in society. So that's one. The other thing is the decriminalization of you know, cannabis. Now I don't even smoke, but I smoke cigars, which means, okay, I'm fully aware as an adult what I'm doing. I'm

making the choice. I don't think that we keep locking people up for things that you know, forty six percent of people in jail, that overcharging people right, overcharged, overcrowded, forty six percent of people are jelity if for minor cannabis possessions. So I want to deal with that as well,

decriminalizing at least in Philadelphia. And the last thing is just making sure that our freedoms, you know, our urban centers, especially because a lot of times we leave that portion out, and making sure we're doing thorough representation of the people, all of the people that represent the city. And these are the things that I'm going to do as city councilperson. Madge tore everyone. Black Guns Matter is the organization. You can follow him on Twitter and manage. We appreciate you

coming in and give us an up. They come back soon. We'll do. I appreciate you man. All right, you two, you take care the team. We'll be right back night. Malaysian authorities are urgently studying the captains at home flight simulator for clues. The simulator was reassembled at the police headquarters.

Investigators want to know did the captain seen here on a widely circulated YouTube clip appearing to show him going through airport security practice them a new was that the flight made beforehand, and today we learned from Malaysian officials the potential critical importance of that last radio transmission from

the plane to air traffic control. Remember the flight that was That was a little bit of just newsreel from a couple of years ago, early on in the investigation surrounding this Malaysian Airlines flight that disappeared, Right, we remember when this happened. MH is the designation for Malaysia Malaysia Airlines and this is I mean MH three seventy one of the great aviation mysteries of all time. This was a certainly a shock to many people that you could have.

I meant, anytime a plane goes down and hundreds of people die, that's going to be a shock. But when a plane disappears and no bodies are found and no one knows where the plane is, that's going to have a profound impact on the public psyche. Right, people are going to say, what the heck is this? In an era of satellite communications and instantaneous transmission, How can hundreds of people effectively vanish into thin air at least as far as the authorities were supposed to track them, and

protect them and know what's going on or concerned. Well, that is what happened effectively on the night of March eighteen March eighth, twenty fourteen. And you know, so it was five years ago that this issue first happened, and I remember, you know, and just all the networks, CNN in particular, though, we're doing a lot of coverage of this issue because nobody seemed to be able to come up with a real explanation for what happened. There were

some really out there theories. People were talking about the plane being hijack landed in Iran. I mean, there were there were conspiracy theories that were way out there. Well, now, an article by William langevisha our Langa wish, I don't know how you say his name in the Atlantic, What really happened to Malaysia's missing airplane pulls together what I think is the most compelling version of events here. This pulls together, you know, what happened in a way that

makes sense and is utterly horrifying. Here's what he says, he Here's what he takes us through is that this the pylon command Zahari Ahmed Shaw fifty three years old, was one of the most senior people in the entire Malaysia Airline's fleet. And he was a married guy. He had a few kids, lived in a gated development. He owned two houses, and he had a very elaborate Microsoft flight simulator installed in his home so that he could

practice flying. And from looking at that, authorities have taken it as evidence that he was planning something like what

happened here. There were two hundred and twenty seven passengers on Malaysia Airlines flight Malaysia Airlines Flight three seventy and what happened after about eleven minutes after it was crossing, sorry, eleven minutes after it reached its cruising level thirty five thousand feet, it disappeared from radar and then there were no more contacts and there was just no sense of

where it went. Now they believe, and they've pulled together from satellite pangs of the plane and information that they've been able to gather of a technical nature, that the plane turned toward the southern Indian Ocean and just went on a six hour, six hour flight, and that six hour flight ended in catastrophe. That is believed that the plane broke up into many, many, many pieces essentially disintegrated on impact that had just completely crashed in the water

in the Indian Ocean. It's hard to even imagine. It's hard to conceptualize how an airplane could the force of an airplane hitting the water could be so much that it disintegrates, But that is what is believed to have happened. How did it get to this point though, well, there was no emergency distress signal. It's quite clear from what happened based on this report in the Atlantic, and this has been thought for a while that Zahari, who was the pilot in charge. There was another pilot at a

trainee of sorts. But it's believed that Zahari took control in the cockpit, locked the other pilot out, and then took the plant, switched off all the electronic transponders, all the means of communication and tracking for the flight, and that he then took the plane to a very very steep climb after depressurizing the cabin and took it up to perhaps forty thousand feet plus in the air and depressurized the cabin which would have very quickly incapacitated and

then killed everybody on the plane. Whereas in the pilot's cockpit. There would have been oxygen tanks that he would have had access to with enough oxygen for hours. So it is believed that he engaged in what was effectively a mass murder at forty thousand feet in the air, so all the people were likely dead from this before any

impact or anything else. He probably killed everybody on that plane by taking it to this forty thousand foot ceiling and turned off the pressurization in the cabin, turned off

the transponder. He would have had to know a lot about the electronics and the communication systems of the plane to do this, and he is somebody who would have known who didn't know that, and then took it on this route out over the ocean for six hours at least, it is believed based on the pings from the satellites and the other technical analysis of this that they can do, and that from there. From there he likely just buried

it in the ocean and the thing fell apart. There's another component of this story that is a reminder, and that is the Malaysian government, which is a famously corrupt government in Southeast Asia. If you want a little taste of how corrupt you can read The Billion Dollars Wail, a very good book about a massive financial fraud using the Sovereign Wealth Fund of Malia, with a guy named Joe Lowe at the head of it, who now is

hiding out somewhere in China. I highly recommend that book if you're interested in international financial fraud and intrigue and the US firms that were complicit in that whole thing. But Malayia's very corrupt, and initially there were, as there always are in these cases, government concerns and government efforts about what information they share, what they want to tell the public, what the public should know. How that slows

down the investigation. How there was always a concern that there would be some culpability found on the Malaysian government or Malaysia Airline side, and that initial desire to get the story right, that initial slowdown of the release of information, and the what should have been immediate calls for assistance

to try to track down this wreckage that is delayed. Well, when a plane hits the water, the wreckage begins to disperse and sink, doesn't sink right away, but waiting many hours before you even know where to look for this thing is going to mean that you have a much harder time eventually finding it. I highly recommend for those of you that want, and you know, we'll put I'll put this up on Facebook, and I'll do it right now. So I know I tend to forget things sometimes when

I say I'll put it on Facebook. But Facebook dot com slash buck Saxton if you want to see it.

It's Uh, it's one of these things that I just think it's worth worth reading through because this was such a fascinating and really frightening case and now I think they've finally been able to pull together what happened, and this guy just it's it's it's almost like a a mass shooter who wants to go out in it and a blaze of of of infamy and in this case, it was a crash of a blazing crash of infamy, and um, you know, it's it's just it's a fascinating

read and it's a little terrifying too, and just you know, there's a lot of a lot of what we deal with day to day is about trust. You know, do we trust each other in society? Do we trust the driver of the car, were in the pilot of the plane, we're in. In some cases it's rare, but in some cases the worst happens. And that's what it looks like. Mike. Mike just tweeting the eighty percent of airline crashes are due to pilots. Yep, it's not the equipment that fails.

Oh Man, shots fired, shots fired from one well, a titan of media to a Liliputian of media. See this on Mediaite, The the great, the one and only Sean Hannity here putting mister Jim Acosta in his place. Now a Costa and CNN is as an organization, and the whole thing is now just is completely absurd. It's my favorite. As I've been saying, my favorite thing from the entire UH campaign launched last night was Soon sucks. Seon sucks

and they turn it off. That's amazing. See, you know, I was like, oh, I got I gotta get off of this thing. This is bad, This is bad for business. And I guess it is probably bad for business. But Hannity on his blog and his you know, Sean is in many many markets across the country. The lead into this show, and I when I'm in New York, I generally do the show right next to Sean. He's a great guy. His staff is fantastic people, and I'm I'm

Team Hannity all the way. So I always get a little excited when Sean it's you know, it's like it's kind of like when, uh, you know, in the Lion King, when when Mufassa has to like slap around some of the hyenas, You're like, ah, yes, the the big lion comes over and smacks him around. But here's what he says to uh, a little Jimmy Acosta quote, as I said, the little fake news Jimmy Acosta, you have not earned time on the number one show and all of cable news.

You can tell all your reps to stop begging my staff. The answer is no. Unlike you, I don't pedal lies on the lowest rated cable network in America, nor I promote your lies on six and eighteen of the best talk radio stations in America. Nor has anyone ever provided me scripts or talking points another accost to lie For the record, I do not recall meeting you on a bus. Why did you miss your big chance to talk to me?

Now I do have good news for you. I will gladly meet you privately in a mutual, agreeable schoolyard alone, as you requested. My only condition is this meeting will have nothing to do with your failing book, failing career, or failing network. I'm free the week of the fourth. Oh my gosh, oh man, I'm feeling little Jimmy A. Costa is not going to respond to this one. Acosta had claimed previously that Hannity had ducked him in Helsinki, and Hannity retaliated by saying a Costas and begging for

a chance to come on his program. You know, one thing I'll tell you is that the conservative host who are who are big in this business are people that I know. I know them. I know almost all of them personally pretty well, or have talked to all of them at length. And some of them I know personally well. I don't know Rush the Great, the one and only. I've only filled in on his show. I don't know him personally. I've actually never met Rush, which is something

that hopefully one day I'll remedy. But Sean I know well, and obviously I spent a lot of time on Tucker's show, and they're all good people. You know, They're all people that you would enjoy sitting down and talking to Rush Shaun Tucker. You know, i'd Shannon Bream show Alat. She's one of the nicest, smartest, best people you could ever meet. And so many of these lib hosts. I know, I'm just telling you the truth. I know this is gonna

sound they're just awful. I'm just I'm just gonna tell they're they're snide, they're smarmie, they're arrogant, they're stupid, these left wing hosts. It's just true. I'm telling you the truth. Ain't no party. Look a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll Call, Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton for the roll call action. So yeah,

I guess what team Today. I get to tell you some exciting news coming back to NYC, and we will be streaming this summer. We will start and I believe in August that's the plan. We're gonna start streaming the Buck Sexton Show on video. We're gonna have a cool set, We're going to have all kinds of stuff, all kinds of great things going on for you starting the summer. And also the show. We're going to be putting out

the podcast even earlier. Get excited about it. You'll be able to see the stream very early in the day. You'll be able to see the podcast early, and then if you want to listen live on the radio, you can. But it's gonna be it's gonna be a game changer because I keep having people come up me and they say, Buck, you know, I really love I don't have a station that carries me in your area. I want to listen

to the show, But the show's not you know. It's comes out sometimes late in the evening and depends on how quickly the podcast uploads. Said, all right, the people have been heard, the podcast will be all of you listening will be able to will be able to hear the podcast. Starting in August of this summer, you'll be able to hear the podcast in drive time wherever you are. So I am psyched about that. And as for New

York City, my family's there. Uh, that's that's where That's where the Buck is most buck like, and I'm excited about it. So you're gonna get Buck unfilled. No libs that I have to be cordial too as part of my job which is nice. I'm excited about that. I'll be in my hometown doing my thing, trying to make sure that freedom wins going into twenty twenty and here we go. Ummm, let's see we get it. Adam Rights, Buck, do you think you could do a burnie in a

Hillary debate hosted by Commie Bear podcast? Short? Maybe and maybe it would go viral? I don't know. I mean, the Hillary voice is the only little snippets of it really work. But as for Commy Bear and all this, these are things that want now that I really bring the focus, the entire focus of what I'm doing back to this show A meaning that I don't have another serious, full time job I have to take care of. Then yes, yeah, then then in fact I will be able to do

things like Commy Bear. So that's that's going to happen. Let's see here, Jeremy Rights, I was a never Trumper in twenty sixteen. I was not a fan of Trump's personal and business character. While I still don't like a lot of his personal quirks, I like what he's been doing as president, and we're voting for him in twenty twenty. Well, Jeremy,

I approve of your decision making. My state is one that joined that state electoral compact, and I hope Trump loses the popular vote in my state but wins it nationwide and forces the Democrat powers in my state to give him the electoral votes as per their own law. Then we will see this state compact die. As always, She'll tie, all right, Jeremy, Well, you know, I totally respect that, and all along I've really thought that that it was the smart decision, or rather that the wise

decision for conservatives. I get that there's stuff about Trump the people really don't like in his personal life, and I'm not going to sit here and tell you that being married three times, and I think what has admitted infidelity at least in some of the cases. I'm not talking about the Stormy Daniel stuff per se, but some

of the earlier situations in Trump's life. But I also don't look to politicians as paragons of moral virtue, and I think that they serve a purpose beyond role models for the youth of America or whatever it may be. Because I've never thought the politicians and none of this is new either, And this is why, even talking about this, I feel a little bit like I'm playing into the left game here, because I mean, Bill Clinton was a was a morally repugnant human being. I can tell you this,

and this is an important distinction. I do not believe and would I would say so if I felt otherwise. I do not believe for a second that Donald Trump ever tried to force himself on a woman, assaulted a woman. I know they say this thing about grab them by the by the bad word. That's they're misconstruing what he was the tone and the tenor of what he was saying, which was essentially that he can be very aggressive with women sexually and they like it because he's famous and

he's a big deal. Now, you can not like that in what he said. But that's different than what Bill Clinton was credibly accused of many times over, which was forcing himself on women, sexually attacking women. And he was president for eight years and Democrats defended him to the HILP. There's a huge difference between somebody who is a sexual predator and somebody who is sexually a bit more free spirited.

I'm not even sure what you would call it, as as you know, somebody who is a sexual predator versus somebody who is aggressive in his pursuit of beautiful women, which is I think what Donald Trump could could be said to be anyway. I can talk about this all day, but these are the These are adult decisions that we all have to make. Do you really want to hold out? Do you want to allow Democrats to say your candidate's not perfect? And then we have some psycho lib kami

who is okay with murdering babies? Is that because someone that never Trump never answers that question? Is that really what we're supposed to have? Is that a better situation for America? Because that's the choice. We can pretend that there was some other choice, but that is the choice

that we all had then. And it's even more clear now what the choice is, because not only are those dynamics in play, but we've also had four years of a president who hasn't gone to war with a country for no reason, hasn't escalated a war in a country we're already in for no reason, has presided over a booming economy, and isn't trying to tell you how to

live your life every day. Isn't that refreshing? Isn't it nice not to have Obama talking down to you as though somehow he knows better about how you should pick your healthcare, about how you should you know whether you should be able to defend yourself. You know, I mean all you go through all these different aspects of obama Ism for eight years, and it was a lot of of condescension and lecturing. I I got sick of it. I don't need that anymore. I never needed it. I

never wanted it. You can tell this got me a little anyway, Jeremy, I see, Jeremy. I think you're making an adult decision. I think you're making a wise choice by supporting Trump, even though you have your misgivings, and don't we all have our misgivings about politicians. It's not like I thought Mitt Romney was the greatest thing since sliced bread. He was the best option we had at the time. I think he would have been a competent

commander in chief. I think he's been a little bit honestly, I think he's been a little sanctimonious in the era of Trump. I think he's lost the plot a little bit, but still better than Hillary or or Obama. TJ writes Buck. I've had this idea of floating around in my head for a little bit for the censorship by platforms, I would like to run it by you to see what

your thoughts are like. To preface by saying that it'd be awesome to see one of the platforms adopt this idea, However, the more likely outcome would be that a new platform would have to do this. Here it goes imagine being able to toggle the speech on the platform to confer a conform to a certain country's laws. So in most free speech countries like the US, there'd be little to

no restrictions. However, if you'd like to see the way some of the more restricted speech country's laws are, you would have that option to toggle that country's laws on. Along with this, the more restricted the speech is in the country you live in, the less options you would have to toggle on or off. Some of the USA would essentially be able to toggle on or off every other countrys speech laws, whereas someone in the Middle East or China may be very limited what they could toggle.

A lot of usage to the word toggle here this it would be a very good way to give everyone across the global perspective of just how free we are. Yeah, all right? T j that's interesting. Thank you for the thought. Always appreciate you right in, and thank you for in a Shield's high T shirt in your avatar on Facebook. That's awesome. A bunch of people wrote in last night, no podcast uploaded, No podcast uploaded, Guys, I'm sorry man, you know we upload it. I don't know what to say,

and we uploaded it. I gotta check this one out. Let's see what we got here, Taylor, what's up? Taylor? There were twice as many porta potties to support the crowd that waited two days to get into Trump's rally. Then there were actual people at creepy uncle Joe's rally. You lefties can keep your polls. Yeah man, that's right, Taylor. Don't want them to say all kinds of nonsense. Joey from Alabama, Right, you just said to message you and

tell you something good. Well, I just returned to work today after falling and tearing my ACL MCL meniscus and fracture my leg, having surgery and back in a month and a half. Joey, that doesn't sound good man. Are you all right? Team? Send Joey some love, send him some prayers for his knee and his torn acl n MCL. But Joey, what you do? Man? Were you repelling repelling out of a black hawk over the weekend. You gotta make sure you eat that harness is on tight, my friend,

be careful out there, good heavens Michelle Shield's high Buck. Sorry, I was just being silly with my message. Sometimes you get really silly with your imitations. Those that faithfully listen to you can get silly too. On a more important subject, I heard that other people in New England are having issues with your show where I live. You're not on

sometimes for two nights in a row. I know it sounds crazy, but you know, see if you can speak faster to get the whole show and Shields hime Michelle, Michelle, Yeah, I'm I'm working on it. I don't know what you know we got. There's all this people are trying out podcast now on different stations, and there's there's this whole change in the audio audio landscape that I'm trying to adapt to. So yeah, that is what I've got going on.

Let's see here, Nikki hey Buck waiting for my food and listening to your show, heard about you, miss Molly. I had no idea I'm so sorry. Break up suck, but it's always better to know sooner then later. I'm sure you have the ladies lining up and take a number. Good luck, keep kicking ass and taking names. Well, Nicky, thank you very much. And you know you know it's a it's a tough sport out there, dating, finding the one, getting married and all that stuff. It's not an easy thing.

I know a lot of you have managed to do it, and God bless and congrats. I'm still working on it. It's gonna happen. It's gonna happen. Marcella. Hey Buck, I heard you say yesterday you like opera, especially the genius of Mozart. You surprise me with that. It made me wonder if you've heard of the twenty five year old singer from Kazakhstan named Dimash Kudai Bergen. They'll classically trained

and offered a position with the Astana Opera Company. He prefers the challenges that neo classical singing offered to his unique abilities. Since you like the magic flute aria, which I had to say, I actually heard this guy sing brilliantly, I think you might like this performance from him in a more pop style, Wow, Marcella, a Kazakh pop singer who opera we're really really stretching this a little bit into an interesting place. I actually I said, the marriage

of Figure Oh, not the Magic Flute. The magic Flute's not really my jam, but the marriage of FIGUREA is pretty amazing. Marriage of Figure. If you listen to it should just put you in a good mood. So there you go. It's a great thing. I will say this. If you're looking for something to keep you company on, especially on a rainy night, if you're going to be in cooking or something, just put on one of the

great operas and just have it in the background. I don't know, it's it creates an atmosphere that just just give it a shot. Team, give it a shot and let me know how how you think that went for I went for you. Um. Karen Wright's talking about crowded NYC is versus DC. Here's a true story. My husband had a business meeting with a with a guy from Calcutta in Manhattan. Out on a sidewalk, he asked my husband,

where are all the people? Well, Karen, I think Calcutta probably is a little more crowded on the streets than Ahattan. But if you get into Manhattan in midtown, there are a lot of folks wore around. Where's in DC. They're empty streets all over the place. And this is a city and it's a swamp. You've got congressmen and congressional staffers and all these people running all over causing all

kinds of problems, doing all kinds of things. Anyway, Karen, thank you for writing in good to hear from your team. We're gonna have an amazing show tomorrow because we have amazing shows every day. Thanks for being here, Thanks for listening. Get psyched for this summer where you're going to Freedom Hunt two point zero status. Talk to you tomorrow, Shields High