Trump The Counter Puncher

will be interesting. That and more coming up. Buck Sexton Remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence, Make no mistake American? Ready, great, You're a great American? Again. This is the buck Sexton Show. Analysts, I can speak to three was without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes? Would you believe? Said it's important to follow the facts.

We believe that no one is above the law and clean the president of Denunited States, and we believe that the president Denied States is engaged in a cover up and a cover up and that nation. I walked into the room and I told Senators Humer, Speaker Pelosi, I want to do infrastructure. I want to do it more than you want to do it, I'd be really good at that. That's what I do. But you know what, you can't do it under these circumstances. So get these

phony investigations over with. Let's have the meeting on infrastructure. Will get that done easily, That's one of the easy ones. And instead of walking in happily into a meeting I walk into Look at people that I just said that I was doing a cover up. I don't do cover ups. Welcome to the buck section. Show everybody la addition out here on the left coast. Oh man, looks like I'm missing some fun stuff going on in the swamp. Democrats,

you shameless, shameless bunch. You all the politics that are going on, all their efforts to try and use everything that they can to take down the president, to weaponize the federal bureaucracy, the Department of Justice, law enforcement agencies, the intelligence community, all that stuff. And now they act like Trump is the one playing politics. This is something that the left has borrowed from Obama. This is really

an Obama is um. You don't remember back in those eight years, the acting assumption of President Obama personally and for the rest of his administration around him was that it's only the other guy that does politics. Among my I was gonna say favorite, I guess it's really least favorite Obama isms were the creation of massive straw men. You know, some people say we should not need any fruit and we should all starve to death. But I'm a gunst that, you know, and you'd say, no, I

don't think anyone. I don't think any Republicans actually think that we should all starve to death. I don't know where that's a policy. So that's one obamasm, the creation of straw men that don't exist. And then he, you know, is a pyromaniac and lights those straw men on fire. And the other one that's kind of a Churchill a version of the Churchill quote. The other one that you see is, you know, the other guys engaging in politics.

Pelosi has borrowed a page from Obama's book here, or maybe it was Obama bar from her book originally, who knows, but it's the dishonest establishment leftist politician playbook. They're holding a meeting before the meeting with the presi United States, where they're discussing whether or to impeach. Now, on so many levels, I find this to be both disturbing and hilarious. For one thing, can they just figure out what it is that they would like to impeach the President of

the United States? For Can they just come up with what the specific item is that they could have put at the top at the top of the paper of impeachment the articles of impeachment. The answers, No, of course, is it the emoluments clause violations which didn't happen, The collision with Russia that didn't happen, the obstruction that didn't happen and was not charge you know, the tax returns that he shouldn't have to share. But now judges are

turning against him. What is it exactly? If Trump were as bad as they seem to think he is, or at least they pretend to think. That's really what Democrats do. They pretend to think the President of the United States is grotesquely incompetent, but also a genius. Somehow they did this to Bush to Bush was a moron, they said,

but was controlling the world. Or maybe Bush was a moron, but Cheney was using him as a as a hand puppet to control the world, and Cheney was evil, but he was an evil genius, but he was, you know, they never they just it's just it's just emotion. It's just spewing of bile. They're just it's like whenever I overhear a conversation here in California, well in Los Angeles specifically, it tends to be along the lines of Trump is like so bad, and I just like, he's like awful.

I always want to ask, but I know that it'll just stump them. What exactly has he done? What has he done that is so terrible? What has what has the Trump presidency done that? You know, I could sit here and tell you bad things about the Bush administration. I can tell you a whole bunch of bad things

about the Obama administration. You know, in normal times, the escalation of a war and the massive increase in US casualties and killed an action in war, in this case Afghanistan for purely political domestic political purposes would be an area of a lot of criticism. Obama got away with it entirely. Let's escalate Afghanistan, a lot more casualties, many more people coming home wounded, maimed, or dead fighting for this country overseas. Because Obama had said on the campaign trail,

that Afghanistan was the good war. That's a bad thing. There are There are those choices that presidents can make, that administrations can make, the policies they can enact that have truly negative consequences and should be fought against and should be pointed out. I keep asking the question, what is the terrible thing that Trump has done? The travel band? Who?

How many of you know somebody that their life is unalterably and horrifically changed because of the travel band, which the Supreme Court upheld much to liberals, All these liberal legal analysts who go on to be the same legal analysts that are telling us now that there was all kinds of illegality that Muller found but didn't charge because he can't charge a president. Well, then why was he going through this whole investigation? What the what's the purpose

of a special counsel? If the president can't be charged, If it's just going to be a political exercise, then why doesn't the Congress just do it? The executive branch, the Department of Justice, is charged with executing the law, so therefore it must be a criminal procedure. They are

engaged in a criminal investigative investigative procedure. But now all Mueller and his little Democrat cronies would have you think is that it's supposed to be an opposition research exercise to hand off to the Congress, so that now we can hear from Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democrat clowns about how they think that the president maybe they'll impeach them, maybe they won't. They got to figure out how this will blow back on them. First, I

thought this was all about principle. I thought this was the president is so awful, we can't wait. They actually cannot wait, meaning they lose, They lose greatly if they don't take this on with tremendous speed. They have to get rid of this president. M That's not the case, is it. They much rather know is this going to be bad for us politically? That's not a principal position, that's a political position. All you get from these Democrats

is partisanship. Is Trump bad orange man bad, must destroy, must take him down, must win back power. And then they turn around and say, why is Trump so partisan? Why is he being this partisan man says the mean things on the Twitter? What is he supposed to do? Pelosi today I mean, she's like the character and Casablanca who is shocked, shocked to find there was gambling going on. She is shocked that there is politics happening here. Playclip six.

Wasn't really respectful of the reason of the Congress and the White House working together. He took a pass, and it just makes me wonder why why he did that. In any event, I pray for the President of the United States, and I pray for the United States of America. I do think sometimes that Nancy Pelosi is so shameless and really so intellectually vapid that it's a big advantage for her in politics that essentially she's the equivalent of a mob boss who people sometimes think, Oh, mob bosses

are geniuses. No, they just have no scruples and will do anything and are willing to endure tremendous risks as a result of what they do. But she's not in that category. She's in the Maybe she's just so incapable of shame that she has a tremendous asset for the purposes of bare knuckle politics. She's really saying here that President Trump is being disrespectful to Congress Pelosi and all of her little Democrat buddies want the president in prison.

They keep talking about how he is a criminal. They're subpoena in the president's former top aids. They want to get the president's children under oath. I mean, I will tell you this, and you need to remember it because it can easily get swept up. And they, oh, this is just the usual partisan back and forth. That's not true. These people are broken by Trump. They have lost their minds. Pelosi and all of the rest really view him as some kind of existential threat, not to the country but

to their power. They worry that it will never return, It'll never be the same unless they annihilate the administration of Donald Trump, the legacy of this president, and certainly prevent him from another four years. Why can't they beat him at the ballot box if he's so incompetent, If the country's in such bad shape, which no serious person can really argue, is the country better right now than it was under the Obama administration? The answer is yes.

We have a better economy, more prosperity, less government interference of no massive military operations ongoing. We're in a better place right now. It's just a fact Obama had his eight years, wasn't very good at the job. Everyone talked about how he was a genius, the most super amazing president ever, really some kind of a demigod, you know, somebody who was more than just human. Obama was a celestial presidency as far as the media was concerned, a

divine incarnation in the White House. Didn't work out for the rest of the country that way. You had a very slow economic recovery, you had the Obamacare disaster forced that on all of us, Benghazi, race riots, and all kinds of really nasty stuff happening. But they thought it was a divine presidency. Now with Trump, they tell us that it's the opposite. Trump is the kind of democrat I'd say antichrist, but I don't know if they like that.

The religious overtones there, that Trump is the epitome of evil in a political office. That's what they believe. But they can't even bring themselves to have the courage of their convictions and say we're going to impeach him. Why not, because really this is about power. It's about their power, and they know it. And the case to the American people that Donald Trump has been in an apt president,

a bad president. They don't have the skill set to make that strongly enough that they are confident they can prevent him from four more years. You know why, because it's been good so far. He's doing a good job. And maybe you could argue aback he hasn't done as much as he said he would and everything goes well. Perhaps a good president is one who only gets a few things done and just doesn't mess everything else up.

Perhaps they do no harm. Presidency should be the first principle for those in the oval office instead of what Obama did and what Democrats want to do now, which is do everything presidency, a green New Deal presidency. Let's just let's fixate on every aspect of her life, tell you what to do. Let's just jam virtue signaling hypocrisy down the throats of the American people. Make it harder to start a business, make it harder to pay your mortgage, Tell people that the only reason you can pay your

mortgage is because you're oppressing them. That's what Democrats want to do. And with all of that happening, Pelosi says that the president is the one who's being disrespectful. She says he's engaged in a cover up after going through a two year long investigation where Muller and his little Democrat hitmen had to know, had to know that there was no Russia collusion almost from the start, and kept this thing going, and kept this thing going. The process

was the punishment. This is what Fitzgerald, the Special process secutor under the Bush administration did in the whole Scooter Libby case. Just keep putting people under oath, keep looking for something, keep looking for someone to hit. They knew right away this wasn't actually a lead case. But keep it going, keep it going. This is what Democrats do. The process is the punishment. Pelosi and the Democrat left are using all the processes of government against this president

and doing so in a vicious manner. Really want to ruin him and his family. The media is cheering them on like a bunch of idiot jackals, because that's what most of the mainstream media is. And she has the hootspa. I wanted to say something else, the hootspah to say that the president is being disrespectful when he says this isn't gonna work. We're not We're not doing this bipartisan dance right now, Please Pelosi. He really is appalling really is.

But you know what else is appalling? Michael Avanati very appollock. We'll get into that. Got some immigration stuff to discuss. It is a jam pack day here in the Freedom hut La edition. I do want to tell you that we are going to open some lines. I like to keep you on your toes. Some of you're like wait lines phone. Sometimes I do it. Usually I'm a zealously guard my time on air, and so I don't take

many calls today. We can take some calls if you like, or if you don't call in, I'll just keep talking. Eighty eight nine hundred two eight two five. That's right, that's the phone number. It's my show. I do remember it. Eight eight eight nine hundred buck eighty eight nine hundred two eight two five. If you light up the lines, well, then we'll know that we want to do more calls going forward. If you don't, well, then I know we're just gonna hang out you me. We'll be right back.

Or the question to judge to the temporary restraining order before that money is redirected is inappropriately taken. Coffident will win in court. Current project as planned would cost too much, and respectfully take too long off, there's been too little oversight and not enough transparency, hundreds of millions over budget, totally out of control, and which we're not gonna We're not gonna do it. I mean, we're not gonna spend

under construction forever. Wait a second, you mean that this absolutely heralded by the left high speed rail project in California means they love this idea to connect La with San Francisco. Ye, then you wouldn't have to be on the one who won the FOO five, the two five two one nine seven. You know you just got on the train right. High speed rail small, small carbon footprint for folks, although they always forget that electricity is a

secondary power source, not a primary power source. You have to generate electricity somehow, and finding the ways to do that is the problem. Just driving an electric car doesn't mean you're saving the planet. Does that electricity come from coal? By the way, you're not saving the planet regardless, because climate change catastrophists are insane. Nonetheless, this project is everyone

understands a fleet tobacle. And I'm here in California, I'm in Los Angeles talking to you, and I can tell you that I'm sure if I walked around and ask people about the project, they'd say, yeah, yeah, like he's naci'l good, like all, you know, if we're gonna have his dream. But the moment that Trump says, all right, so we're not gonna we're not gonna put a billion dollars into something that everyone knows can't happen, and they're benchmarks that they have to hit anyone to get the money.

Gavin Newsom is, Oh, it's terrible, and Trump's just doing this because he doesn't like this state and because we don't back him on immigration. No, maybe maybe the president's trying to make a sound decision, but also shouldn't the president be able to fight back? I always find this fascinating that the Democrats complain about this, like they're allowed that this is supposed to be a one way street.

Pelosi can say the president's engaged in a cover up today as she did, and then the President's supposed to be really nice to her, you know, uh, you know, Gavin Newsome in the state of California can actively undermine federal immigration law and worsen because that is what they do. I mean, they pass state laws that undermine federal laws. And then complain about how you know that the Trump administration doesn't want to play all footsie footsie with the

train situation. Guess what Trump has feelings too. Trump's allowed to fight back, darn it, and he's doing a good job. And I love it. Trump fighting back, Trump punching back is my favorite. Trump eighty eight nine hundred two eight two five team, take some calls to that if you want eighty eight nine hundred buck, that's right. Eighty eight nine hundred two eight two five. We will beat right back. Remember when the left called the Green New Deal bold?

Or how about their bold defensive anti semitism in the House. I think they're mistaking bold for something else, because the way I define bold is the taste of freedom I get every morning with my Black Rifle coffee. Black Rifle delivers the best roast or coffee right to your door,

and Black Rifles Coffee Club makes things easy. Just pick your blend and the amount you want, and Black Rifle ships your coffee right to your door every month, hassle free, no lines, no running out, just great coffee ship right to your door every month, hassle free. Plus, when you join their Coffee Club, you'll receive discounts and offers not

available to other customers. When you drink Black Rifle Coffee, you're supporting a company that gives back to veteran and first responder causes, and serves coffee and culture to those who truly love America. For a bold cup of America's best coffee, visit Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck and get twenty percent off your first purchase. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash Buck Black Riflecoffee dot com slash Buck for twenty percent off. He's holding the line for America.

Buck Sexton is back. Would you believe? He said, it's important to follow the facts. We believe that no one is above the law. I'm clean as president of the Nine States, and we believe that the President of the United States is engaged in a cover up and a cover up and that vit the nature. Last night he put forth the letters saying that unless we passed the US Mexico Canada for trade agreement, there was no reason for us to you know, we couldn't go for it

was infrastructure. We didn't see those two as related. But the fact is hopeful, optimistic and seeing the necessity for a big infrastructure initiative for our country. We went in the spirit of bipartisanship to find common ground with the president on this. He came into the room made a statement that he made was but I won't even characterize it. What a fraud. I can't tell if she's an idiot or a fraud or both. But what a ridiculous, a ridiculous day for Nancy Pelosi today. Here she starts out

the presidents engaged in a cover up. That she's saying the president's engaged in a crime. She's never it seems registered that the two year long investigation into Russia collusion, the hysteria that the president the United States was working with the Russians to steal the election from the queen elect Hillary Hillary Clinton, that that was all a fraud and the President's already been put through that and unfortunately

has had very real negative ramifications for his presidency. Pelosi doesn't take any of that into account, just doesn't care, just doesn't care. Now it's now it's the cover up. You know. The Democrats kind of remind me, I don't know how many of you have older brothers or sisters, and if they've ever done this to you. But you know, you remember when you're a kid and they grab your arms, you know, if one of your siblings will grab your

arms and hit you with your own hands. And then to add insult to injury, they say, you know ed, do you like? Do you like that? Stop hitting yourself? Do you like it? Stop hitting yourself? And you know, of course then you have to like either you know, rally and take your older sibling out or maybe call for mom or dad. You know, depends on how what the age difference is and who's got the weight the weight advantage. But they're basically telling President Trump, why don't

you like hitting yourself? Well, why don't you enjoy these processes of investigation and smearing? And why do you object to our leveraging of the federal federal bureaucracy which voted ninety percent plus based on donation records for Hillary Clinton. I mean, I'm assuming if you donate to Hillary, you're gonna vote for Hillary. Plus federal bureaucracy being utilized as a weapon against this president. The judiciary increasingly used as

a weapon against this president. Bill Barr is absolutely right, you want to talk. They use the word unprecedented about Trump all the time. It became funny. After allus it's like, oh my gosh, this is unprecedented. The president is issuing a pardon. No, that's not that's not unpress attented. It is literally not literally true, it is literally not unprecedented. Trying to avoid the use of the word literally. Now I hear it out here a lot. People need to stop.

I'm literally like going to the store now, but actually I'm walking my dog. It's like, well, then you're literally not going to the store. They think they think the president is supposed to sit by and take all of this, and now they are so brazen that the suggestion you get from Pelosi and from others is that even though all of the all the stuff they've been saying about him is a lie, and they already had a special

counsel and it didn't give them what they wanted. And Democrats are just weepy with disappointment because Muller was not the savior that they had anticipated. I thought it was also Pelosi said she would pray for the president. Now she won't. First of all, I thought that thoughts and prayers were now out of style on the left. Tweet thoughts and pryers, good band guns. You know that's what

they always say. Now, Thoughts and prayers do nothings. As Democrats being really, really kind and helpful to their fellow human beings in the aftermath of Treasury thoughts and prayers, go thoughts and prouse yourself. You know that, really, But Pelosi says she's praying. I don't know. Maybe Pelosi should pray for guidance as a prominent politician and a self professed Roman Catholic for why it is that she doesn't think that babies are babies when they are in the womb.

Maybe she can get some guidance from above on that if she were to actually pray. But I digress. President Trump doesn't sit around and take this stuff lying down, and so that then becomes evidence of his guilt. This is the old, the old trials by ordeal, Remember your trial by ordeal. They'd make you do something and depending on how it turns out, they'll decide your guilt or not. So you know, you walk across hot coals, do your feet get burned? You you're They weigh you down with

rocks in a lake. Do you you sink? Well, if you sink, you're guilty and then you're dead anyway, So look at that, you must have been guilty. This is the stuff they're doing to President Trump. He tries to tell the public that he's not guilty of Russia collusion. They say that that's effectively obstruction, that that's a crime, even though there was no Russia collusion. So what he's

doing is telling the people of America the truth. But you see, for Democrats, when the President speaks the truth about what they are doing to him publicly, that really upsets them, and so they view that as a crime in and of itself, making them look like the bunch of foolish imbeciles that they are. That's criminal. And the contortions they go through here to find ways of looking at the law such that President Trump is in violation

it should. It's embarrassing. It's embarrassing. They say, Oh, but what about luck. We're up with Hillary. Hillary broke the law. Hillary. Anyone who ever wants to argue that with me is welcome to They're wrong. Hillary broke the law many times. What should her punishment have been. That's up for debate. How you know, should she have face real prison time or just lost her clearance? Or but she broke the law, no question if words have meaning. Hillary Clinton broke the law.

And yet James Comey said no, no reasonable prosecutor would have brought charges against her. That I've not forgotten that, I've not forgotten how James Comy was really a comyist all along. But I don't want to get too deep into tomy. At this moment in time, President Trump is fighting back and saying, look, I didn't do anything wrong. This is nonsense. There is no cover up. There never

has been a cover up play clip fourteen. So I came here to do a meeting on infrastructure with Democrats, not really thinking they wanted to do infrastructure or anything else other than investigate. And I just saw that Nancy Pelosi, just before I made being made a statement that we believe that the President of the United States is engaged in a cover up. Well, it turns out I'm the most and I think most of you would agree to this. I'm the most transparent president probably in the history of

this country. We have given on a witch hunt on a hoax. The whole thing with Russia was a hoax. Instead of walking in happily into a meeting, I walk into look at people that had just said that I was doing a cover up. I don't do cover ups. How could it be a cover up when they've already had teams of prosecutors, pull all the documents, interview all the people. The Congress just wants to do this again. This is effectively the political version of what in the

criminal justice system would be considered double jeopardy. The President's already been through a full investigation of all these Russia matters, and they're alleged instruction tied to it, and it's done. It's over. They need to move on, but they don't want to move on. People that talk about Benghazi don't know what the heck they're talking about. First of all, people died in Benghazi. Second of all, the administration at the time, the Obama administration was darrow in their duty

in Benghazi. And third of all, there was no special counsel that had prosecutorial authority and investigative powers and an unlimited budget to go after everything in Benghazi and was given by the administration of the time, complete and open access. Oh no, no, that that did not happen. There was no special Council for Benghazi. So this is a this is a red herring. This is a nonsense comparison from

Luka Old the hearings over Benghazi. Yeah, there needed to be hearing is because the Democrat Obama administration pretended like nothing went down that night, nothing happened, didn't want people to pay too much attention to how we started a war in Libya for what What did the US gain out of that situation? This is double jeopardy for political purposes. The president knows it, that's why he's fighting against it.

And they hope that Americans, at least enough Americans that they can get their way in the next election, aren't paying attention to it. These people do violence to the law in the name of upholding the law. It's a very disconcerting tendency you see among Democrats. I mean, here's another example you've got I mentioned before, these lower court injunctions.

This means that a federal judge anywhere in the country right now feels empowered and knows that he or she will be a hero to the left by just giving them what they want through a national universal they call it a universal injunction. One federal judge can say the president can't do that, and then the president is unable

to do it until an appeals court hears it. And in some cases the appeals court will hear it and there are a bunch of partisan hacks Obama appointees whatever the case, maybe or bad Republican appointees, which often happens too. I think suitor, was it a republic Republican appointee if

memory serves on the Supreme Court. And then you have to get you have to get around the fact that the executive branch doesn't really have any authority that is directly left to it, because there's always some federal judge somewhere who wants to be a progressive hero and give some dick tot from the bench about how the president

can't do that. A great example of this, and we'll be talking about immigration the next hour, is defer Action for Childhood Arrivals DACA right so called dreamers, which is we're going to talk about politicized terms of an immigration They just stack it. They stack the immigration discussion with as many words in terms as possible that are meant to get you to concede that their side is right

before you've even had the discussion. Oh, I just want to help the dreamers and get documents for the undocumented, and they're doing the jobs Americans won't do, and you know, Nation of Immigrants, and they just string all this pablem together, this claptrap. But these judges won't allow this president to undo Daca, which the justification under the Obama administration for

it was purely executive prosecutorial discretion. So this is the judicial equivalent of one prosecutor looks at something and says, I'm not going to bring charges, and then another prosecutor comes along and says, you know what, Actually there's a reason to bring charges here and says, nope, sorry, you don't have the right. That's not how the system works. And these judges, especially in the Ninth Circuit, keep getting overturned. But it takes time. It takes time. They know it does.

The process is the punishment. This is hashtag resistance. This is the anti Trump judiciary getting through the judicial branch what they can't get through the ballot box and through the presidency. This is fighting against the president by turning the system against itself. It's a Lynsky really, I mean, this is the Olynskyite approach to judicial resistance to a presidency.

Remember some of the Olynsky tactics, like just you know, go and do an establishment and have everybody that you know stand in all the bathroom stalls and stand at all the bathroom so nobody in that building can go to the bathroom all day. I mean, technically there's no law against using a bathroom all day, but there's no

good faith right the way that this is all. This is all premised on taking advantage of other people who are acting in good faith and using the system against them to get which you should not what you should not be able to get. That is what these judges are doing. We'll get it. This is going to turn into a discussion a moment here about Trump's taxes, which Libs are obsessed. The Libs are obsessed with Trump's taxes.

This is going to be a nothing burger. But this is now something that you can't have a rational discussion with most Libs about the president's taxes. They think that there's going to be a handwritten note from Putin that says, you know what, election interference. We'll talk about that when we come back. Stay with me Joe in San Francisco. He's calling in from California, where I am my friend, I guess I can't take the high speed rail to see you, but good of you to call. She'll die, buck,

she'll die. Any chance you're gonna make it up here while you're out here, or I gotta get back. I gotta get back to the swamp. Got to clear out the methane from the Democrats. Yes, the swamp need you to clear it out. So well, anyway, hasten back. But I hope you survived while you're out here, and good to have you out on the West coast. Well, you

know about the whole Trump investigation. I mean, you do have to remember that there were Trump employees who were smashing phones in the parking lot where there haven Oh wait wait wait that was Hillary Clinton. That's right. You do have to remember, though, the time when they talked about the not having backups to the emails and there were no take Oh wait wait wait, that was the irs. L man, that's right, that was the irs. Or what about the time when Rump he was bleached but oh wait, wait,

it wasn't Trump using bleach pit. It was Hillary Clinton used bleach pit on her serve. But wait wait, he's so corrupt, he lies so much, you know, I'd have to say though that you all. Honestly, the thing I like the most about Donald Trump, and you can really see it out here in among the lunatics in San Francisco, is that he really smokes these people out. And oh, yeah, I told you this. Oh it's so true. I mean,

he's Trump. Trump arrangement syndrome has has a clarifying and really a cleansing effect because it shows you who all the loons are. Yes, and um, you know, I think I told you this before. We haven't spoken in quite a while, but I've told you this before that I was a reluctant Trump voter. But now in uh, in two thou twenty or twenty twenty, I'm going to crawl over broken glass with acid and antsport on it in order to vote for Donald Trump. I'm with you on that,

by the way. I mean I wasn't of it. I mean I definitely voted for the guy and told others do. But since he's been in office, what I've seen is one he's actually done a pretty good job. I mean it's not it's not perfect. I didn't think it would be. It's not even great, but I'd say it's it's good. But the other side, I mean, they're just un serious. They're a serious threat to the economy and a lot of other things, but they're unserious as people, and their

ideas are are whacko. They had a lot of wacko ideas, and there's a there's a fundamental dishonesty, not for the individuals necessarily the Democratic Party though that's true too, but I think that democratic ideology is imposed. I think you cannot be a Democrat without holding a lot of mutually contradictory positions and engaging in a whole lot of virtue signaling and hypocrisy. That's that's so. I think there's there's deep fundamental flaws in the thinking of the American left.

No matter who you are, Obviously you often ask the question are they dishonest? Or are they stupid? Or I would add to that, are they insane? You know, I think the answer almost always is they're all three to be perfectly frank. So, oh, man, Joe, we better get you an alias up there in San Francisco, because you're you're dropping way too many truth bombs to stay to

be able to deal with all those commies. Man, be careful, all right, you keep your head down, don't don't step in any of the any of the human waste on the ground there, and avoid Antifa, My friend, shield Side, thanks for calling in San Francisco. San Francisco is it's a pretty town with great food, but it is not well run these days and it's really expensive too. Exsitioning, you had Gavin speaking of California. You had Newsom today saying that it's a national disgrace that there's all this

homelessness in California. I'm like, why is it a national disgrace. It's not Texas's fault. Yeah, it's not. It's not South Carolina's fault. It's not Florida's fault that there's all this homelessness in California. Maybe the California governor should take a little bit of responsibility for the problem in his state, which is a very wealthy state at the top end.

But oh, I got to talk to you. What is a bill of a tainder, A little bit of a history, deep dive, little tiented today that's coming up in a moment, buck Sexton, permission to coding the news and disseminating information with ashionable intelligence, Make no mistake American bring You're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Shows, CIA analyst a Bill of a Tainda. Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. This is the latest chapter in the Trump's

Taxes mania, Trumps taxes. They want Trumps Texas so badly they need to get a grip. Federal government already has New York State government, as we will discuss already as Trump's taxes. But now this has turned, this has turned into the latest shiny object. It was, Oh, the Southern District of New Work. They've got Trump, They've got him right where they want him. Oh, it turns out they don't one part of the whole get Trump saga that get There's a lot that gets skipped over by the medium.

And the media is a joke. The media is preposterous in this country. For the most part. There's some great journalist, there's some great outlets, but ninety percent of the media could go way tomorrow and the country would be better off as a result. But the one thing that they just managed to pretend like it never happened, the president's personal lawyer and buy their own accusation, his personal fixer, his consoliary. Oh I know, people pronounce it consigliari, but

the g is silent. YO. His consoliary Michael Cohen didn't have the goods on him. If the president's personal attorney, who also strikes me as something of an idiot, if he didn't have what it what they were looking for. They really think that they're going to get him with the documents that have already been submitted to the federal government and are looked over by federal government officials. Do we really think that the IRS gives Trump like the

soft treatment. I don't think so. No, No intelligent person believes that right that Trump is somebody who would expect the benefit of the doubt from the IRS. But they're obsessed with Trump's taxes, as you know, and they still and what I think happens here is they just keep moving on to the next Cohn. They are conning the left, They are conning Democrats into thinking that there's this this magic pill they're going to give them that ends the

Trump nightmare. Just just stay with us a little longer, a little longer. Here's the magic pill. If the emolument's clause, it's the twenty fifth Amendment, it's you know, Trump is a racist it's Trump is a sexist, It's Russia collusion, Moscow Tower, it's you know, all these different things it's supposed to, oh, the payoff to Stormy Down annuals. These are all promised as the magic pill to end the Trump nightmare. For Democrats were so shook by this whole thing.

That never ends the nightmare, does it. The pill never tastes the way it's supposed to, It never has the intended effect. It's the sugar pill at best. Libs can get a placebo effect from and the placebo effect is like, maybe Trump won't be president again for four more years. That's not gonna work. That's not gonna be enough. They know that, which brings me to the Bill of Attainder

or private bill discussion here they want Trump's taxes. Now, taxes are a protected category of information within the government. There's a good reason for that. The government forces you to give it a lot of personal information. How much money you make, how much you give a charity, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, all the way down the line. And it's one thing if you wish to share that with the public. But for the government to force you to give that private information and then to release that

against your wishes. This is an invasion of privacy. And this is not going back to the concept of good faith. This is not a good faith exchange with the government because we give them all that information under the belief that they will keep it secret, they will maintain the confidentiality of and there are criminal statutes that apply here if you if some of the IRS leaks tax returns, they can go to prison, just like somebody who would

leak classified information. Why does this matter so much, Well, because the New York State Assembly has passed a law that clears the way for congressional committees to skip through the security of tax return information and just hand it right over to the president's political enemies. Here's some CNN reporter or analysts talking a little bit about this, and then I'll dig deeper play to be clear. What this would require is the state's tax commissioner to go ahead

and send Congress the president's state tax returns. It would be stripped of any federal information, and the request would have to come from one of three specific committees, one from the House or the Senate, or a joint committee. But it would have to be from those three committees, and it would be devoid of any federal information. But remember the president does have substantial business in New York, so we could get a very clear picture of his

business in New York. He has buildings in New York, residential buildings. He also has a few one hotel that he collects management fees from, so we could see probably the most information specific information. You know. If Congress goes ahead and makes the request, the state tax commissioner would have to give it. This is a law passed by the legislature in the state of New York, my home state, that is meant to target one individual. That's what this is.

We now have reached the point where you have state legislatures that are passing get Trump law. These people have no respect for the rule of law. They have no respect for justice as something that is above and beyond the reach of partisanship. This is a complete disgrace and it is going to raise issues from from a perspective of the constitutionality of passing laws that would some would argue a bill of a tainder. Quit a quick review here in case you like bill of a tainder that

sounds familiar, Well, it is constitutionally prohibited. But a bill of a tainder, people also refer to it as a writ of a tainder, is essentially a legislative act that goes after one person says, one person did this thing, and we're going to get them for it. It is a legislative act that punishes and singles out and punishes

an individual. And these became best known in history perhaps because Henry the Eighth used them back in the mid sixteenth century to execute a bunch of people he didn't like and take all their stuff and dispossess their heirs. Pretty nasty guy that Henry the Eighth. The Christopher Hitchens used to say about England, the Church of England founded on the family values of Henry the Eighth. Henry the Eighth is a guy who used bill of attainder very infamously.

But the basic legal principle is that you have to pass laws that are universally applicable. You pass a law because this is a thing that should be done or should not be done. Not we don't like this person, we're passing a law to hurt them. Now what they've done. In New York, in Albany and the state legislature as they've opened this up so that it's enough, there's enough room that it could pass muster. But it's not done once again in good faith. They're not good at congressional committees.

Aren't going to request the state tax returns of your average official. They're not going to request the tax returns of other people in government other than Trump appointees and executive branch officials. This is being done to open the door to get the information that they cannot otherwise get.

They are changing law to get Trump. That is what is happening now that they don't understand how damaging this is to the public's faith and the rule of law, just goes to show you that they're once again either just partisan zealots or idiots or both. I think both is most likely here attained or comes from being tainted by the way. So the very passage of this law taints the person because it's meant to go after them.

And as was pointed out there by that CNN, whoever it was a bill of attainder in this instance would give the information, well, they won't call it a bill of attainder. It's also sometimes referred to up a private bill is one that goes out for an individual but does not have a punishment specific to it. That's called a private bill, but a bill of a tainer actually

establishes that somebody needs to be punished as well. The information that would be in Trump's state tax returns, the numbers that this that the other thing would be very similar what you see in his federal return. Right if you make if you make fifty thousand dollars in New York State, you report that same number to the federal government as you do to the New York state government. There's no difference. So this is an end run on

the federal privacy of tax returns. All because Democrats have a bee in their bonnet about Trump notch not sharing his taxes. Keep mind, he has shared all kinds of records financial records already, that there's financial disclosures he has to do. This is now where we are. They will change the law, They will ignore laws in order to obstruct Trump, to stop Trump from doing what he should be able to do with prey of the United States, and they will pass new laws to help them hurt Trump.

That is what they're doing. And yet they think they're the good guys in this whole process. Oh, we're gonna get Trump's taxes, they say, And then what what other laws are they willing to change or to get this president? I would wonder, I wonder where they draw the line. But at least we got to talk about a bill of a tainder today. But the founding father is very worried about this. There were there were there as specifics

in the Constitution about it. What it's forbidden? No bill of a tainder ex post factor law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts shall ever be passed. And no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate. Article one, Section nine, Article one, Section ten of the Constitution vans spills of a tender boom constitution. That's right, We'll be right back. I cannot emphasize this enough. The track record demonstrate he does not actually want information. He

wants to fight, but not the truth. The closer he actually comes to obtaining information, the further we run from it. Whatever your opinion on the Mower report, great, glad you have it, which you didn't get it here today, and you're not getting it from this committee because this committee undouted doesn't like the author I want to talk to the author of the report. They just want to talk about the report and make innuendo and attack the president.

At the middle of the day when this committee who has charge of immigration, who has charge of intellectual property, who we've touched none of with a crisis at the border, we have an admission that the economy is good, jobs are happening, unemployment is his lowest rate. I guess at the end of the day, we can't find something that the MOE report lets them hang their I word impeachment on, which they can't even agree on because the president is continuing to do his job. And we're here again with

the circus in full boors. And yet despite all that which is which is true, I'm seeing here this this poll circulating around about the historically strong opposition to President Trump at this stage of the game. This is at Quinnipiac Quinnipiac Pole, and you have here the date the president and the question is will you definitely vote against this president in the next election. The polling here and essentially without going through every everything here, I mean, you know,

Carter Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama. Everyone's in the thirties, although George HW. Bush was twenty one. He didn't win. That's noteworthy. He didn't win. He was the kind of Republican that Democrats pretend to like, even though they kind of hated him at the time. But now they pretend to like him, and they pretend to like him because he lost gracefully. That's the way that they like it. They like Republicans who say, oh, I'm gonna be really nice and you know,

I'm sorry that I'm just not gonna win. But that's not good. Donald Trump, as of May twenty nineteen, has fifty four percent of people who were polled here saying that they will definitely vote against him in the next election. Now that's that's the possibility, of course, is that this poll will one, that sentiment will change. There are a bunch of possibilities to the polls not very good, which

is also very much a chance, I think. And then there's maybe the media has been successful, successful in you know, creating this perception of an unsuccessful presidency, even though look, the results speak for themselves. The results should speak for themselves. I don't even know what unemployment is right now, three point five, three point four percent something like that. Lois it's been since nineteen sixty nine and fifty four percent of people say that they might vote against Donald Trump

or died this poll. It could just be the media trying to convince everyone constantly that the president is some kind of heinous monster, and yet they're the ones complaining about how he won't reach out and buy partisan fashion. You know, Lindsay Graham at a moment that day where he said, you know, Trump, so Trump won't work with you on something, or you know, or Trump says things

that you don't really like. Here's how you should handle that as adults play six team to have the president essentially saying I refuse to work with the Democrats and tell you know, they stop investigating me. Is this President Trump triple daring Democrats to impeach him? I think it could. I'm sure there are some Democrats on the Hill that think just that. Um, you know, but this is right out of the art of the deal. In some ways, he was known to walk into boardrooms, throw a fit,

walked out. But the difference here is, um, he can't go to another real estate, uh, you know person to deal with. There's only one Congress he has to deal with them, and you're already seeing his congressional allies starting

to appeal to him to maybe rethink this decision. Lindsey Graham tweeted just a couple of minutes ago something the effect of, I know they really mean, but you need to rise above it and be the better person, and to try to coax him back, because, as Phil Mattingly said, there are a whole slew of bipartisan legislative issues that um, the president is going to need to engage Congress on, Like does that tweet enough of good? God? See an report talking about Lindsay grahamtreet soho I read that. I

read the verbet. I thought it was Lindsay Graham talking about his tweet. Uh, but I think that this is serious that they present this as the problem is that President Trump isn't bipartisan enough. The problem is that President Trump doesn't want to play nice with the other side. I mean, the Democrats still don't accept that he's the president. And the comparison to the Bertha movement under Obama is ludicrous. The Republican Party wasn't running around saying that President Obama

wasn't born in this country. The Democratic Party is has been running around saying and the media has been magnifying it, although they also started the whole thing. They've been saying the president is a traitor and worked with Russian install the election, but he needs to be nicer to them, he needs to work with them. This is oh man, this is really going to be tough to get through. The next the next election, the next year and a year and a half now roughly not less than that,

sixteen months. It's gonna be tough to get through. I want to talk to you about the other Nazi debacle. I was going to get right into immigration, but I'd rather spend some time with you discussing the latest on Michael Avanati. Here. See, I remember, as somebody who works in the media, I remember when Michaelavonati was being harolded as some kind of a second usage of Harold Today,

being hailed, being louded, fetted. It's fe with the French thing on a ted, not fet id, although that would work too, being fetted and celebrated as a kind of anti Trump feminist hero Michael Abanati. There was a time when Avanati was on CNN so often I figured Anderson Cooper must be a little nervous that Avanati might take his job. Oh no, without Anerson Cooper would see an NBCNN. Yeah, I think somebody else could read the prompter. It would

be fine. Oh no, Avanati was on all the time, in fact as a little oh no, we don't have time for it. We will will come back to it though. See this is a perfect little teaser. We're gonna give you a little taste of what it was like back in the day with Michael Avenati, the way the media was talking about him, possible twenty twenty presidential candidate, Michael Avanati.

And now it turns out that not only is he a really bad lawyer and an early scummy guy, he has allegedly because I don't want to sue anybody here, allegedly stolen, according to a federal indictment, three hundred thousand dollars from Stormy Daniels. Oh good stuff. We will get into this and the media's complicity, the Democrats complicity in this whole thing in a moment. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the

fuck never stops. Michael Avanati also referred to as the creepy porn star lawyer, a guy that you probably know of because the media made him famous. They made him famous for a while. He was more than a regular in the CNN green room. He probably had his own green room at CNN. They loved Avanati. Why because he would go on TV and just slam and slander and defame the president. And for people that have Trump's arrangement syndrome, that is a kind of drug that they need. They

have to hit the pedal and get the pill. Hit the pedal and get the pill. Avanadi made that happen for them. Do you think that that's any exaggeration We pulled for you just a little a little bit of a throwback, a little bit of a go back in time, a way back machine here to I don't know, maybe about a year ago, forget when when Avanati was effectively the savior of the Republic, the man who oh that's right. He was the human embodiment of that pill that would

awake libs from the nightmare of the Trump presidency. That was Michael Avanati. He was the pill for a while. He was the one who was going to make it happen, going to destroy Trump, not just end his presidency, not just harm him politically, but also to go even beyond that and to get him, perhaps thrown into prison, to get him into all kinds of trouble, to take down his family. So Amanati was the savior of the republic in terms of our democracy, the sanctity of our democracy.

All that sanctimoni is crap you here from libs all the time. Turns out, well, let's get into what really happened in a moment. But here's what they used to say about him. Just a little trip down memory lane, Play twenty Donald Trump's worst nightmare. Michael join us once again. It's Michael avanadis bringing Michael Michael Avanadi, thank you very much. He's out this contry, says he may be the savior of the republic. If you are something of a so

so we get it. We got it. So you get the idea, You get the idea, You get the idea, right, you get the idea. Michael Abanati is the savior of the Republic. I mean, they just they ran all this stuff, you know, Oh my gosh, Michael on CNN every five seconds. They absolutely love this guy. You know, I thought he was thought he was just just totally fantastic, And it turns out he's not so fantastic. Here's what we have from this guy today. I'm trying to pull this. Oh yes,

here we go, prosecutors. This is from NBC, very favorable to all things live. Prosecutors have accused Michael Avanati of spending money from his client that he took from his clients lavishly, including monthly payments on a ferrari. Of course, ambulance chaser. Abanadi had a ferrari. Of course he did. This is from the Southern District of New York. Oh right, where the really good lawyers are, right, the ones that

are that. We're also going to take down Trump at one point, so we know we can trust the Southern District quote. Michael Abanati abused and violated the core duty of an attorney, the duty to his client. As alleged, He used his position of trust to steal an advance on the client's book deal. As alleged, he blatantly lied to and stole from his client to maintain his extravagant lifestyle, including to pay for, among other things, a monthly car

payment on a ferrari. Far from zealously representing his client, Abanati, as alleged, instead engaged in outright deception and theft, victimizing rather than advocating for his client. His client in this case, Stephanie what's her whatever, Stormy Daniels, I forget her real name, Stephanie Clifford. I think, yeah, Michael Abanati took three hundred thousand dollars and use it for his own purposes from the publishing company that was putting out the Stormy Daniels

Full Disclosure Book. This is the kind of stuff that is either provable or not. I think Avanadis did a whole lot of trouble Stormy Daniels, right, I think now former porn star, although I don't really know if I don't mean that to be I'm not being supercilious. I don't know if she continues to work in the field

or not. But Stormy Daniels was given three hundred thousand dollars, or was supposed to get three hundred thousand dollars from a major publisher, and there are communications, according to the Southern District of New York, that show that she was saying, hey, where's the money, and Avanti's like, I don't know, I'm gonna keep asking them for it, but he already had it. And you'll see this stuff about payments and emails and communications.

Federal prosecutors live for that stuff, the text messages, the emails, the money transfers, because that don't lie. That's either it is or it isn't. And from what we can see here, unless the Southern District is or way off base, it is. And then and now he's got problems, my friends, he's got problems beyond that. He's also charged with trying to extort n Nike. I mean this came out I think

in March. The formal charges were filed today extorting Nike of twenty trying to get twenty million dollars, saying that there were Nike essentially high school athletes were getting payments and it was coming through Nike somehow, and you know, bad things were going on. So this was an extortion scheme. I mean, this is this is a bad not just a bad lawyer, but he comes across as a really bad guy, someone who will exploit anyone and use them for his purposes and just has not an ounce of

integrity or decency. And yet how many times was he on name, name your show? You know, and you look back now at when he went on, for example, Fox News, he went on Tucker Carlson's show, and Tucker asked him some real questions and it was, oh, you know, Michael Avonatis so brave going into Fox News where they're just being No, it's just Fox wasn't part of this embarrassment.

I mean, every journalist on TV or whatever they call themselves, anchors on TV who had Michael Avanati on and treated him like royalty should be very should be deeply embarrassed by their role in this because they played a major role in elevating this guy. They created this character of Avenati, the great white Knight who was going to save the country from the evils of Trumpism, and it turns out

the guy is scummy, totally unethical. But here's this other component of the story that I assure you you will not hear from anyone else in certainly in the mainstream media and maybe not anywhere else other than me today. Let's also not forget something Michael Avanati tried to try to cement his reputation as a possible candidate for president in twenty twenty by involving himself very directly in the massive campaign of lies and disinformation to destroy now Supreme

Court Justice Kavanaugh. During those hearings. Avanati was the one who represented and supported and advocated publicly for Julie Sweatnick, who was a crazy person and a liar, said that Kavanaugh was part of these high school rape gangs that were going around and just all these gang rapes happening in these high school parties. She was in college mine at the time and still going to these high school parties where there were gang rapes, where no one ever

said anything about them. And then she gave an interview where she was smiling and looked like a complete an utter buffoon, and may have in the process save because at that point, if you didn't under stand that this was this was a hit, this was a set up on Kavanaugh, you're you're just blinded by partisanship or not very smart. At that point, it could not have been

more clear. A woman came forward, represented by an attorney, swearing, you know, signing sworn off at effidavits that things happened that no serious person really believed happened. Avanati was the one who did that. And now that we see where his integrity really falls on the spectrum, we see who this individual is and what he represents. I just would want to say, doesn't that also shouldn't that also factor

into what was going home with Kavanaugh? That Avanati was the lawyer for one of the three women in the effort to destroy Kavanaugh. Doesn't that show you how underhanded, how slimy, how disgusting the Libs were willing to be to take down Kavanaugh. I think that that's I think it's worth remembering to be sure. I think it's worth keeping that as a part of the conversation. I know I had said that we would talk about immigration. We

will get to that. There's some new stuff going on there for sure, some ICE detainer request information I want to share with you. Man, I got a lot. I got a lot to do, a lot to get through today. It's a busy show out here in California. If you want to line up the lines for a second, we could take a call. Eighty eight nine two eight two five eight eight eight nine hundred buck. We will hit a break. We'll be right back. Yeah. I don't know.

I agree. I don't know if it's a good thing that star power and TV savvy is required for the job, but I think it is. And by the way, I think President Obama also had a lot of TV star power and that helped him pre Trump. But Trump is more evidence of this and looking ahead to twenty twenty. One reason why I'm taking New seriously as a contender is because of your presence on cable news. There is is he's speaking to Michael Avanati there. That was Brad

stout Overs. Whatever there is is to take you serious is because you're out of about those and oh the sterious babe, look could do that. Okay about this? It is dark power, Delavis. That's why I am I television because bad Stelter is star power. Oh Man, Stalter. He walks around in a suit with these goofy new balanced sneakers on all days. Yeah, bad Stelter, it's got reliable

voices today, is it? Oh Man? I'll never forget, never forget when when good old Stealthy tried to ambush me on a terrorism interview and got got buck slapped, oh so thoroughly, and then they refused to ever air the interview. That wasn't good. I wish you guys could see it. It was good. Excuse me, explain to me why you were able to say this is terrorism? Well? I was right, So are you asking me how I knew something was true before you imbeciles at sea, and I knew it

was true because that's gonna be a longer conversation. Excuse me, sir, Yeah, that's why they had to take off and Audie seriously for president, folks Avanati for president. This is the Democrats. They complain about Trump all the time, say that he's unethical, he's a bad guy, he's a liar, all these things. They have all these complaints about moral character, they have all these complaints about the substance of the of the

presidency and the man who holds the office. And then then they want to put forward better a Rock or Michael Avanati or look at all these candidates in fact we have. This is when this is when I start to think that Kamala Harris. The reason she hasn't done well so far, even though they really wanted to, the establishment media and the Democratic Party really wants Kamala Harris to break out, it's because there's some political skill that

she just doesn't have. It's lacking. He doesn't have that X factor, that connection thing with people, I mean, which can often be built on a really on a fraud, or it can be a facade, but some at least can do it. I don't think she can even fake it. I don't think she has it. She was on an interview I don't even know who. Oh oh, well, all of a sudden Camorado see it. I'm really I don't know. I didn't mean for all the clips that ABCN and I swear I wasn't on the CNN website today just

looking for clips to bash, although I did miss. I'm I'm a little let me, let me just revise this. I'm a little bit perturbed by CNN right now because I had to watch I had no choice when I was in Beijing if I wanted to see any news on television, and I couldn't use the internet, so I really was out of luck. I had no choice but to watch CNN International. And it's anti American propaganda. That's it's really worse than what all the stuff that RT puts out. I mean, what is more anti American? You're

seeing an international editorial decision making or Russia today. It's a close call. It's tough to say, and CNN's coming from Americans. Russia today is not but Kamala. So that's why I'm my tolerance for CNN right now is at a particularly low level. As you can tell. I promise tomorrow I'll lay off the CNN basher. Although it's just so fun, I mean, does it ever? I don't know, it never tires for me. Kamala Harris with all of some Camarada over at CNN. Here's how it went. Play eleven.

We have a little fun kicker that we like to do with all of the presidential candidates that come on. It's called candidate Mixtape. That was the musical sting for it. And we like talking at about music here on this program. So what is your favorite musical genre? Oh, I mean I'm I'm hip hop and reggae and as um those are those are some of my favorite. Okay, do you have a favorite band or a favorite musician. I'd say one of my favorites is Bob Marley. Good choice, you

can't go wrong with that. That's a crowd pleaser. And on your mixtape, like your favorite three songs? Oh, okay, let's see, um I Aretha Franklin, Um, Uh anything Aretha Franklin. Um. How about a song? I would say Bob Marley and then um, I don't know. I love Cardi b how about a song? Okay, okay, you get the idea. It's kind of like Alison Camerata is talking to a robot. Like there's no there is no authenticity at all you get from Kamala Harris. Not Yeah, I like reggae and

like hip hop and stuff. Maybe I don't know. Uh, I was just waiting for, you know, for Reverend Reverend al Sharpman to come in with Aretha Franklin ri ees pr CT. You guys remember that ri ees b r CT that happened on television. There are clips. I'm I'm making it up. Yeah, but that is actually my favorite reread regulent song is rsp ict. But Bob Marley, you can't think of a Bob Marley song. You probably haven't listened to that much Bob Marley, that would you would?

What I heard there? And I could be wrong, although how often does team how often does that really happen? We know very infrequently. What I think happened there was you had Kamala Harris getting asked questions about something that she was processing, not as what she likes, but what do I think the audience? What will sound authentic? What does the audience want to hear from me, and she was trying to go into her memory banks to find

those things instead of just what music she likes. You know, if somebody asked me on the fly, I would name a bunch of bands that probably some of you would be like, Buck, why are you so weird? You know? Why do you bring up the Google Dolls at every opportunity and say they're an underrated band? Because they're not that great, but they are underrated, and I think that

people should celebrate their music a little bit more. You know, why do you admit publicly that you still listened to Dave Matthew band, for example, and have no shame about it? That's right. If I'm in a bad mood, I can listen to Dave Matthews and it makes me in a slightly better mood. Do I think that sometimes Dave sounds like somebody is strangling a cat? Yeah, sure, but still listen to it. I own that. I own that, So that's kind of where I am. I don't have to

search deep into the memory banks. I'm not running for her office. But you know, this is like Kamala Harris. She's a second offender of this sort because when they asked her what she listened to in college. She said Snoop, and she was in college before Snoop had any of the songs that she was talking about. So it's a little bit like when Hillary Clinton told reporters that she was named for a name for Sir Edmund Hillary, who climbed Mount Everest. Turns out that she was born after

he climbed Mount Everest, So that would be tough. But the authenticity thing is Kamala Harris's problem. Otherwise she'd have, I think a clear path of the nomination. Really, I think Democrats wanted to be her in a lot of ways, but she just isn't. It's kind of like Hillary all over again. Doesn't connect, doesn't resonate, and you know, hasn't yet said anything as crazy as Elizabeth Warren in terms of hurting your chances, but isn't doing a good job

all right. Immigrations coming up next hour. Buck Sexton Remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts. No immigration for in the left is a very straight forward concern, very straightforward issue where on the one hand, you have Democrats

who um love immigrants, especially from the Third World. They they want to increased diversity of the Third World into America large number, and they want people to be able to pursue their dreams and do all these great things. And they're the nice people. The Democrats and immigration are

the nice people. Republicans are supposed to be the big, mean, meanings, the bad guys, the nasty people that believe in enforcing the laws that are on the books currently about immigration, that think that we should have a process that brings in higher skilled workers to benefit the Americans already here, that there's an assimilation process that can be overwhelmed if there are too many legal and illegal immigrants put together

in the country over a period of time. But we're basically the mean people and the Democrats are the nice people. That there's no downside to what Democrats want, which is a broken system where the only certainty is there'll be more and more and more illegals coming to the country over time. That's the only thing we know for sure. What else will happen, we're not really clear on that,

but we know they'll be more illegals. But there's no downside to this, they tell us sanctuary city policy, for example, no downside. They will often say, you'll hear this said that cities with more immigrants are safer. Well, the whole country is safer than it was thirty years ago. And so there's a lot of statistical fallacies that are bandied

about about immigration. But you'll hear you'll hear people say things that are just flatly and obviously untrue, but they keep repeating them, and they must believe them to be true, or they think that we're too foolish to understand that what they say is not true. But on sanctuary city policy, for example, you'll be told that this promotes safety, the

Democrat position. I mean, I'm here in California, which is a sanctuary state where you have laws that the California Legislature has passed or whatever, the California State Assembly, whatever they call it here that make it a crime for a private business owner to voluntarily comply with immigration and Customs enforcement efforts in the state to California that refused to allow, that would not allow contractors from within the state of California to bid to build the extension or

the really the replacement fence at some places. It's additional fencing social an extension of the border fence that exists in the San Diego second couldn't bid for that. You had to bring in a Texas firm. Go Texas, bring in a Texas firm. It do that because State of California wouldn't allow it. So we know where they stand on this. And they say that the sanctuary city policy is a good thing because if you and I've never seen anything to support this other than just it's just

a statement that is made and repeated a lot. They say, Well, if you enforce immigration law in cities, illegal immigrant communities are less likely to go to the police. Therefore we're all less safe. That's what they say. I don't believe this, but this is still what they say, right, That's what

the storyline is. Well, I want to give you a different perspective on this one that looks at the reality of what happens when you have one political party that from the federal all the way down to the local level, Democrat Party no longer believes in enforcing immigration law and no longer believes that there should be any assistance and has not for a long time believe there should be any assistance from state and local authorities to immigration authorities

on no other matter of criminal law. Is this the case? You know, if someone in the d EA asked for an assist from local law enforcement to do a drug bust, guess what they're going to get that assist. I mean, unless there's some extenuating circumstances that doesn't come to mind. But they're going to help them out because law enforcement tends to want to help out law enforcement because they're they're on the same team. And you think the team

is rule of law on the American people. But because of sanctuary city policies, the hundreds of jurisdictions across the country that have some variation of we won't help and will even actively obstruct federal enforcement efforts when it comes to illegal aliens. That's the proper term. By the way, undocumented is a nonsense term that does not exist in law. But when cities do this, there are consequences. And here's here's an example of the consequences. Two teenagers. This was

the NBC News Washington to teenagers. This is right in my area. This is near Swampville in DC. Charge in the death of a fourteen year old Maryland girl were arrested by Prince George's County police in another case last

year and should have been detained. According to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Salvadoran's Jose Fuentes Ponce sixteen and Hoel Escobar seventeen were in the country illegally when they were arrested twenty eighteen on several charges included attempted first degree murder, attempted second degree murder, and participation in gang activity. They were released despite an ICE detainer. Let's just unpack this

for a moment, shall we. You've got a couple of illegals, all right, both of whom are right near the age of you know, the age of adulthood where they could where they would be tried as adults. But they both could be tried as adults sixteen seventeen. That's not that

unusual at all, especially for these kinds of crimes. Attempted first degree murder charge attempted second degree murder believed to be members of the MS thirteen gang, which gang members is what President Trump referred to as animals, not immigrants, Even though Beto O'Rourke this week went back to the well on that one and lied about that that's a lie. Were all the pinocchios from the Washington Post fact checker on that President Trump called immigrants animals, And it's so like,

not cool. No, that's not what happened. You're for to MS thirteen murderers, rapists as animals. So let's at least try to get our facts straight. Democrats, and we're going to when we're going to, once again, in unhinged fashion, criticize President Trump for some reason or another. But here you had these two illegals. That's what they are. That's what the terminology is. Despite what Democrats want you to believe, you have two illegals, very serious charges, attempted murder charges.

Immigration authorities say, hey, can you hold on to them. We're coming to get them. That's what a detained request is. Federal authority has the right to take them. Can you hold them until we get there? Can you give us an assist on this? And you know what, you know what the Maryland local authorities did. They released these two gang bangers, right, they released these two emissed their team members in the country illegally, never should have been in

the first place. I mean, I guess I wonder if they ever applied to be dreamers, And I mean that seriously. I'm sure they're probably near the age where they could have said their dreamers. But we're always told the dreamers are just Valedictorians. Now, I'm not saying that there aren't

a lot of Valedatorian dreamers. I'm just saying, if they're going to tell us about the cases where someone gets a four point zero and you know, discovers a new kind of rocket fuel in high school and everything else, can we also then be honest about the cases where there are so called dreamers who were actually gang members and attempted or real murderers. Isn't that? Isn't that fairness?

Isn't that If you're going to get a real sense of what's at stake and what's going on, don't you have to look at it as it is, not as the media would like to present it. But so they released and it was almost exactly a year ago they released these two guys despite the request. And you know what has happened since then? These two individuals have been arrested last week again. Oh, I'm sure they were. They were upstanding citizens, just wrongly arrested the first time around.

Arrested again last week and charge with not attempted but actual first degree murder and related charges in the death of fourteen year old Arianna Funez Diaz, whose body was found in a creek on April nineteenth in the Riverdale area of Prince George's County. The suspects were fearful, according to police, that this young woman, a fourteen year old girl, folks, was going to go to police about a robbery that they had all committed back in April. So now let's

be very clear about this. This fourteen year old girl is dead and I don't even know what the specifics are about how they killed her and maybe what they did before they killed her. I'm sure it was heinous and awful. I mean, her murder alone is hainous and awful. But if we know what we know what MS thirteen usually does. But this fourteen year old girl would be alive. But for the bleeding heart libs who believe in sanctuary city policy, you can draw a straight line here. This

is not a hard one to figure out. A year ago, ration authority said those are MS thirteen gang members. They're bad news. They're not legally allowed to be in the country, please hold them for us. And you know what, Prince George's County Maryland authority said, Nope, sorry, can't do that. Sanctuary city let them go. So they let them go, and now they killed a girl fourteen years old, dead, family never gonna get to see her alive again. Does

that get factored into our discussions about immigration? I want to know, you know Kate Steinley and San Francisco on that pier staring at her father as a bullet takes her life away, a bullet shot by an I legal alien who had been deported seven times. I think San Francisco very proud of it's illegal alien status. Does that get brought up or not? Are we not allowed to discuss this? Is it somehow racist to talk about sanctuary city policy and the downside of it? I'm sure the

Lib media says, yes, it is of course racist. You can't discuss any bad parts of sanctuary city policy. That's just a manifestation of your white privilege. You have to ignore it. You have to pretend if you're a good person in the immigration debate, now, if you're a good human being, you must ignore the very real human cost in lives. Never mind the costs in educational cost, healthcare costs, rule of law, all these things that come from a legal immigration not allowed to talk about it. You're a

bad person if you even speak of these things. So I would like to know that the next time some lib wants to have a debate on TV about, you know, the dreamers and sanctuary policy, will they say, even if it means MS thirteen gang members are not transferred over to federal authorities for immigration purposes, and that results in people getting raped and murdered, I like sanctuary city policy.

If libs would at least say that, I would give them credit for being open and honest about their intentions. But they won't say that. They'll they'll say that that's that this doesn't really happen. That's not a real concern. This is not something that we need to discuss. They're all valedictorians, they're all dreamers. It's all amazing, there's no downside. They're lying to you, They're lying to all of us.

They lie about immigration all the time. In fact, the entire immigration discussion has been infected with so many lies from the media and such a left wing bias that, if nothing else, Trump has done us a great service as a country by finally kicking over the log and saying, this is what's really going on here, this is what is really happening now. I am not happy with what's

going on at the southern border. Obviously, situation the Trump administration is in right now, with one hundred thousand plus illegals pouring in every month is unacceptable. Some of it is the administration's fault for not focusing on immigration right out of the gate, right after the Trump presidency. But you know, they're trying to throw this guy in his family in prison with the Russia stuff, and you got judges that overturn every action that Trump takes at the border.

You got Congress, including Republicans and Congress who are whimps on the border. I mean, it's not fair to say this is all Trump. He has taken action to show that he is serious on the issue, but it has not been successful yet. The results are not there. The border is worse in many ways than it has ever been. And it hurts me to say that, but it is true. But liberals can't even have a real discussion about it.

If you if you brought up with any of your little friends, what happened here in Prince George's County and said, what about that aspect of sanctuary city policy? Does that make us safer? Does defying a federal law enforcement request when you yourself or in law enforcement. And I know, by the way, I know that I'm not criticizing the local cops who in some cases have to release these individuents. This is their chain of command telling me you got

to do this or else you're going to be in trouble. Right, this is a political decision that's made at the top of the chain of command for local and state law enforcement, by state legislatures, by elected politicians. They're the ones that say we are a sanctuary You know, we are a sanctuary city. Remember that guy in Philadelphia a little dance? Got more on the border? Coming up, your team, We'll

be right back. So here's the Prince George's County jail director who is telling people, remember I just folks you about this case. The two MS thirteen alleged MS thirteen gang members now believed to have committed first degree murder of a possible witness against them in other crimes. During the crimes Americans won't do. Apparently, they they were released killed this young girl. Here's the county jail director for Prince George's County responding to the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement

slam of them. Here's what they say, play fifteen and a detainer is not a warrant, it's a civil detainer. It's actually a request for localities to hold inmates till I decides whether they want to come form or not. And following that guidance, Prince George's County does not notify ICE. Yeah, guidance from the Maryland Attorney General says nope, you don't notify ICE. Don't help him out, no detainer. Sorry, So

let's understand this. It's a decision, a decision made in this case by the Attorney General who's an elected official in Maryland, a Democrat, of course. I'm sure. I'm just guessing, but it's Maryland, come on. Although I know the governor is technically a Republican, so maybe I'm wrong. Whoever it is, they've got this now on their record. There are real costs.

They are real costs to ignoring the law, to violating the law, to being complicit in the abandonment of principle because it is politically useful, and a young girl lost her life. It was taken from her viciously by a couple of thugs who never should have been in the country in the first place. But local law enforcement acting

on Democrat advice wouldn't help out. Meanwhile, if you think that Democrats really care about law enforcement, here's what a refreshment member of Congress says about what is going on at our southern border right now. I mean, this is stunning. So you Kevin McLean and who was accused by a representative Lauren Underwood here of well, you can hear it from Democrat Underwood herself. Play eight. Why do these tragedies keep happening? So they're happening because the crisis is exceeding

the resources provided. That's why we've asked for more and we've asked for a more authority to deal with it, to prevent this crisis from happening in the first place. But at this point, with five kids that have died, five thousand separated from their families, I feel like, and the evidence is really clear that this is intentional. That's an appalling accusation. Our men and women fight hard to protect people in our custody every single day. It isn't

appalling and stupid accusation. There is not a single person who works for Customs and Border Patrol who wants to see little kids die in custody, not a single one, I can assure you, and you already know that. But that's the degree of Democrat demagoguery is so extreme that a member of Congress thinks that she's going to score points with the far left constituents by suggesting that there's an intentional policy of letting kids, letting little kids in

custody die. Little kids die in custody because they're brought over a dangerous journey, because they're in stressful circumstances with parents in some cases who are not really their parents. They're part of this recycling of children program because of all the fraud that's going on in our border, and they get sick and immigrations of Customs and Border Patrol is not the Red Cross. They're a law enforcement organizations.

They're not standing at the border with vaccinations and children's tail in all, although they're increasingly having to do that. Hundreds and hundreds and hundred showing up at one time in one place, they're trying to process them and if a kid fall sick with a fever in the first hour, they've got him in custody and they don't take him to the hospital speedily enough. That's not trying to kill a young kid. That's just they don't have the resources

to handle. You know, a million people from a third world piling into America and making a mockery of our system. But Democrats like the mockery of the system. They think this is great. They don't want to they don't want to change it. They want to want to make the processing even faster. Appalling, appalling, But on many things Democrats are appalling, So I suppose we should not be surprised. More thoughts coming, including roll calls. Stay with me, he's

holding the line for America. Buck sex in his back seams. You know, I just got back from a China a few days ago. It's why I was died last week. I really appreciate one all the well wishes for my return and also your your feedback on the various and a very talented guest host that we had over the course of my my absence. Needless to say, very glad, very glad to be back and plan to zealously guard my time with you for the foreseeable looks. I feel like I was. I think that's the longest I've been

out from the show since I started the show. So China, China, do we have it? If we got the drop, Inta, you gotta just let her China, China, there we go. Don't whenever you hear a man mark, don't be shy because you know it's China time. China, there you go. I told a bunch of my colleagues over there, I said, have you got seen big trouble in little China? And

none of them had, which I was shocked. Which has nothing to do with China, by the way, But it's just an opportunity to bring up a great cult classic. But you've been asking me what do I think about some of you have been writing me, but what do I think about the intellectual property theft component? As I mentioned to you, there are whole There are whole stores that are out operating the open in Beijing and Shanghai.

It's a little more under the radar, a little You have to walk through some shady not that I know about this, walk through some shady parking lots and go through some side doors and you know, they kind of just show you some of the wares in a dark room, but in Beijing it's right out in the open. They'll selling fake Rolexes, fake Paddock Philippe, fake Panorai or pan or Ray. I mean these very very expensive watches for the ladies out there. Louis Vutan handbags. Not to be

gender normative about handbags. Maybe you want a man bag, I don't know, but Louis Vuitton handbags? What else? At Channel? All these famous and they just all fakes. They're selling fakes all over the place. Some of them are pretty good fakes. They actually have different degrees of fake. So there's that kind of ellectual property theft. Then there's a much more concerning kind, which or at least more concerning

to a national security side of things. And we see another story about this now, Huawei executive accused by UF startup of involvement in trade secrets theft. This is from Cnex Labs claims that a top Huawei executive, remember Huawei is a major Chinese telecommunications company, was part of a conspiracy to steal it's SSD computer storage technology with help from China's shiam In University. I don't know how you say that early, but you get the idea. There's allegations

now made in a lawsuits. This is a civil lawsuit that's heading the federal court, but they're saying that Huawei engaged in a multi year conspiracy to steal the San Jose, California companies solid state drive computer storage technology, and that they used the Chinese university to help in this process. This is happening, folks, every day. It's happening all the time. They're hacking there, stealing, the are finding ways to enter in and suck up as much information as they can.

And the economy of the future is going to be I mean, the economic advantage of the future is going to be mostly in information and natural resources, and those are the two things. China has a real strategy that it is executing on to eliminate any advantage that we have. All right, China is voraciously stealing intellectual property voraciously. And

China is also doing everything that I can. I mentioned this, you think yesterday on the show with its Belt and Road initiative to get access to natural resources in the Third World, to set up these pipelines and these ford operating bases for economic purposes with the idea that they'll be follow on bases built that are military in nature, and this is how they extend the Chinese imperial reach

that they're going to grow around the world. But the theft of intellectual property, the theft of trade secrets, this is where we're going to look back at this and say, how could America have been so asleep while this was going on? And if nothing else, Trump, with his punch him in the nose mentality, has raised this to the

level where it is finally getting national attention. He has raised this to the point where we now talk about it openly and expect the Chinese to at least look us in the eye across the negotiating table and we say, you have to knock this crap off. I don't think they're going to knock it off. It's too valuable to them.

But the scale of the scope and scale of this is so vast that if we do not get a handle on it, if we do not work very actively against it, we're gon we're gonna find out much sooner than we think that we no longer have in a technology advantage of the Chinese, and we don't have a population size advantage if we don't have a technology advantage, and if we don't have a wealth advantage, what do we have? So I've got a lot of thoughts on China.

We'll keep working through those as we go forward, but I also want to get to your thoughts, which means it's time for Roll Call. You're right back, hey, team Buck. It's time for Roll Call, La La La and Los Angeles edition of Roll Call. It's nice out here. Oh look, today it went from beautiful Sonny fell very very much like a West Coast guy, you know, getting a little bit of a little bit of color, and then all of a sudden it started raining like a monsoon and

there was hail. So you never know what you're gonna get out in this place, at least when it comes to weather. When it comes to politics, you pretty much do you know? All right? Laurie kicking us off roll Facebook dot Com slash buck Sexton, Laurie writes, Bucks, so glad you're back. My podcasts are not automatically downloading, despite subscribing, on subscribing and resubscribing and all kinds of other tech tactics. Is this a conspiracy, a shadow band? What is going on? Well, Laurie.

That's very, very disturbing for me to hear, and I certainly hope that that's not a widespread problem. I don't know what could be going on there, but if I hear from other folks, we will look into it further. Maybe it's your connection, I don't know. Yes, please do subscribe, folks, subscribe to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. That would be fantastic. Brian writes, Glad you're back home safe as always. You

left the Freedom Hunt in great hands. Interested to hear your analysis on the government surveillance culture that is China. See if you can get Ammi Horrowitz on your show for a quick interview. Smart guy running on the Democratic ticket for the sole purpose of talking truth to the socialist gibberish during the Democratic debates. He needs sixty five thousand unique donors to get on the stage at the debates.

Hopefully his sane rational points will sway some die hard liberals who only watch MSNBC to think outside the box of Orange Man bad. Sorry I missed you in DC. You missed a great week to be there, and more and more stuff here. Thank you so much, all the best, buddy, Brian. Brian, thank you so much. Man, appreciate you writing in and all of your helpful thoughts, pithy quips, witticisms, all that good stuff. Wade, Hey, Buck, I'm a reporter with media eye.

Oh oh not, that's that's a different kind of that's a that's a media request. Whoops, sorry about that. That's let me see, let me go back. Wait, I'll try to get back to you offline. Josh right, Buck, no Tuesday podcast? What happened? Please post the show? All right? Producer, Mark? Do we did? We not post a podcast? It was? Why? Why is everyone saying there was no podcast? I can check on that. Let's check on that, because that's very sad for all involved. I mean, I finally come back.

It is the return of the Buck. Return of the Buck. That's not even close. Return of the Mac is a great song. That's all you need to know. Let's figure out if the podcast actually went up, because if it didn't, that makes me sad on the inside, which we do not want. Michelle heard your show today. You were spot on regarding Buddha Judge. I thought the same thing. You were spot on regarding every point. However, you sounded very, very tired or or relax, like you had a bit

of wine. I was drinking wine myself as I listened, so it could have possibly affected my audio intake. But everything sounded as it was touched by a good spot of good natured inebriation. No, Michelle, what that was was jetlag. I mean I tried to get on a good sleep schedule and everything when I came back, but it's it's too twelve hours. It was a twelve hour time difference. So when I was finishing up the show yesterday, it was like I had basically gone through the night without sleep.

You know. It was so what felt like nine pm for all of you felt like nine am with no sleep before it for me. So think of it like if I just stayed up all night to do the radio show and it was, you know, four or five am instead of six pm when you were listening. That's so if I sounded at all different, it was just it was just the jet lag catching up with me. No wine tomorrow, I can tell you, although that would

have been fun. It'd be nice if I could do a show with a little wine to me once in a while, just just to give it a go, just to see what happens. Sarah totally agree. Buck, Aquaman movie was awful. Waste of time watching it, Sarah. Some people gave me a little heat on this, including producer Mark. I gotta tell you, I just thought it was just completely unwatchable. And there are all these moments where Aquaman's like, yeah, look, I'm just a bro even though I'm an Aquaman, and

he had these one liners that were cringe inducing. I did not like it. I did not enjoy the Aquaman. I did enjoy as I said, they will not grow old and a star is born. John rights, Our country's tax code, especially in California, is clear as muddy water. All right, my friend John, I agree. He also sent me a very nice recommendation on tequila Terrence. Hey, Buck,

welcome back. Just a guess regarding Tianamen Square. But could it be that we're in the middle of the thirtieth anniversary of the eighty nine protests fifteenth of April to June fourth of nineteen eighty nine as an expat living in Korea. In the case of Michael Spevore, a Canadian detained in China on charges more more talked about in Canada than the Western media, perhaps you could keep his

situation public awareness shields high Terence. I don't know anything about Michael Spivore, who is detained in China right now, and nothing about the guy, so I have to look into that. But in terms of the closure of Tenneman Square, it is I think it was because they said they had some high level visitors there. But it's China. So one thing that's interesting about it is the government will lie to you in a way that they're not even trying to be honest, like they know that you know

they're lying, and they don't care. That's a difference between the way our government lies to us. I mean, our government has to at least pretend that they care if we're being lied to, worth their line to our faces. The Chinese government, it's like, nope, we're just gonna say. In the Soviet Union back in the day, they'll just they just lied. Did not matter Bill Rights, Hey Buck or Buck Sexton show staff. I used to listen to the show of the Android app podcast Addict when it

was offered via Blazed TV. My wife still listens via the Apple podcast, but I can only sound find your show, it seems via iHeartRadio. Is there anything your staff can do to get it available via podcast addict or is it something exclusive? I get all the usual podcasts via their services yours apps and thanks, oh disregard. I found that after traditional searching. All right, Bill, will you found it? So I'm glad we made it through. I'm glad we

made it through. That. That is a good thing. Michael rites WHP Radio Harrisburg replaced your first hour again tonight with some podcast. The podcast is females talking about history. You may have forgotten. Just wanted you to be aware of this. It's the second time I've noticed it. Oh, Michael, have is this things you may have missed in history class? Is that the podcast that they're running there? I don't know. That's I've tried to listen to that podcast. I tried once.

That's all so, Pablo rights, hey back. I just saw a cut scene from the View with Bato. All I could see when he spoke was Jonah Ryan from VEEP. I don't know if you've ever seen the show, but the character is tall gangli and is a complete narcissist. Shields high. Yeah, Pablo Betto is done. He's like you could put a fork in him. He's done. He's like toast. He wanted to bring together America and just give us

all a hug and make our spirit rise. But instead he's just not going to even come close to winning the presidency, not even close, not even in the realm of realism. So that that didn't last very long at all, did it. I guess there's only a room for one young, youthful media darling candidate, and that role is being filled by Mayor Pete Bouddha Judge Boota judge excellent. Woo, let's see we have Sean Ahi Buckbeard. Keep me in your thank you for inadvertently help you lift My rides are

getting rides for my lift job. Rather, whenever I'm driving, I want to catch up on your podcast, but in the interest of seeming politically neutral, I pause the show. It seems that whenever I listen, it's not long before I get another ride. This also keeps your show going for me for most of the ninth Thanks and shields Hi, Sean a fan since real News. Well, thank you, Sean. And yeah, maybe it's just your time between rides flies by because you're listening to the most fantastic radio show

slash podcast in the country. At least in its time slot. So yeah, man, check it out, listen to it makes the time fly, everybody. If you've got long rides ahead, down on a bunch of the Buck, sex and podcasts. It's like we're hanging out. But also if you need to take a potty break or you want to go get a beer, you can pause me, and I have no say in the matter. I don't get to be like, wait, I'm not finished. So it's even more fun. It is even better, Eric, I hope you had a good time

at China. Buck, Beware of the geopolitical foe of our time that hands out one point five billion dollar loans to our former vice president's child. We're in real trouble. If we'd begun peddling the Biden narrative that China, who has been wargaming preamptive strikes on our ford operating basis, is no threat to the US and our influenced throughout the world. I fear that they're involved in Venezuela is being ignored by our media, who China watches and listens to.

We would become involved militarily. The actions would likely be a political loser here at home, and the media would likely completely ignore the proxy war with China that it would become. You know, I've been skeptical along that we were going to be able to get what we wanted in Venezuela to happen. The Maduro regime has lasted this long, does not care that. They do not give any consideration

to the misery of the Venezuelan people and despots. One thing that despots have to be good at is staying despots, otherwise they don't last long at all. They stand atop a mountain of force. There is no consent, not even the real facade of consent in a despotism like Venezuela. So that means that you got to be good at force if you're going to force everyone to do what you want, and that tends to be the case. Unfortunately.

As to China, yeah, China is a the geo political foe of our time, and there are ways that you can frame that discussion that make it seem a bit less ominous. I mean, I do think the Chinese want continued prosperity. So there are economic ties, and there are economic areas that are crossovers where there could be good things for both sides. But you can really tell when you're there. The Chinese feel like the world is theirs for the taking. I mean they think that they will

be the global hedgemon. That China's influence way of looking at things. You know, China is going to become an imperial power instead of a regional power very soon. That's going to be the next step. And then it's doing it right now with economic ties. It'll eventually do it with Ford operating bases and military ties and a blue water Navy. All right, that's it from Los Angeles today. I'm gonna go have some fun on the left coast, maybe drink a couple of mohitos until tomorrow, show my

friends you have your orders. Shield tie