Trump Terminates Summit

are you not? A debate, a discussion based on what happened at a concert in Atlanta. We'll talk about that and more coming up. This is the Bus Sets and Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable and intelligence. Make no mistake, America, you're a great American Again. The Buck Sexton Show begins. No, Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, great to have you here with me as always. Oh boy, quite a day.

This is one of these days where you see that one story break and you go, all right, it's gonna be what everyone's talking about all day. That isn't an amazing everybody's a North Korea expert today or even an international relations, international affairs expert. Lots and lots of opinions

on this one. People getting into the Wikipedia, the deep dive analysis of Wikipedia going on with with North Korean nuclear negotiations in the past, and I mean journalists must just be wearing their fingers down to the bone doing Google searches over this stuff. What have what have we been saying here all along? Team less than fifty all along? It's a gamble. It was a long shot, long bomb into the end zone, however you want to phrase it, and doesn't look like it's going on ahead right now.

That doesn't mean now this is some kind of uh disaster. It doesn't mean that anything has been lost. By the way, I completely uh disagree with those who are coming out and saying that this is we we've lost something here, anything else but play sixteen and seventeen John just to folks and hear from Trump himself. Based on the recent statement of North Korea, I have decided to terminate the planned summit in Singapore in June twelveth Well, many things

can happen in a great opportunity lies ahead. Potentially I believe that this is a tremendous setback for North Korea and indeed a setback for the world. I've spoken to General Matters and the Joint chiefs of Staff, and our military, which is by far the most powerful anywhere in the world, that has been greatly enhanced recently, as you all know, is ready if necessary, if and when Kim Jong un chooses to engage in constructive dialogue and actions. I am waiting.

In the meantime, our very strong sanctions, by far the strongest sanctions ever imposed, and maximum pressure campaign will continue as it has been continuing. But no matter what happens and what we do, we will never ever compromise the safety and security of the United States of America. There you have it from the President. Look tried, Still a lot of pressure in North Korea. They may, they may come back to the table. Did anyone think this is gonna be easy? Now? At least we didn't think it

was gonna be easy. And I can't speak for Democrats. They were just rooting against Trump, which in this case really does mean they were rooting against America, though its tough to separate those two things. Right when the president United States is approaching a foreign country about an issue of such critical national security importance. It was pretty clearly we should all be at least hoping for the best.

That wasn't the case. In fact, there was a lot of media chin wagging and chest dumping over this whole situation. Plate The art of diplomacy is a lot ard than the art of the deal. Nobel Peace Prize. He was there. The letter that the President said is it sounds like a thirteen year old stream of consciousness in a breakup letter from Overnight Camp. Failure of the Trump administration's approach,

it's impulsive actions is the big winner. When you run international affairs like it's a TV reality show and you don't prepare, things fall apart. I mean, what are they basing any of this on? Every administration before Trump has been completely swindled in schooled by North Korea, every single one. There has not been a presidency that has had to deal with a nuclear North Korea that hasn't failed to do anything meaningful to stop their missile program, to stop

their nuclear research, and just their general hyper militarism. So you know, they can trot out as many I mean the Democrats, right, Obama's foreign policy legacy is a joke. It really is. It's just a joke. It's garbage. A lot of people sitting in a room with around Obama think they're really smart. They just weren't that smart, used to being in the faculty lounge, used to getting a lot of cheering for them on various left leaning news networks, which is basically all but one of them. No real

world successes to point to you. A foreign policy team of the likes of Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, not brilliant people, not trustworthy people, not honorable people. We're going to listen to what they have to say, and their supporters and their enablers, the Nancy Pelosi's of the world. You know, I just want to hear from Nancy Pelosi about where I can get the best butler service. You know, she really doesn't have anything to add to this conversation.

Oh but she thought she did, didn't she weighing in on this one a lot Blake. Clip six. We got the President's letter. The copy of the President's letter, um chumming up. It's kind of like a Valentine. I think it's a good thing for Kim Jong un here you had a thug, a person who killed his own family members, a person who has runs a police state, being legitimized by the President of the United States. They were on a par with each other. He got the global recognition

and regard. And when he got this letter from the President saying okay, never mind, he must be having a giggle fit right there now in North Korea. Nancy Pelosi has a long history of rooting against this country. By the way, I remember what she was like during the Iraq War. I remember what she was like during briefings

from senior government analysts during the Iraq War. And let me tell you, it was hard not to feel a little twinge of rage when you got the sense that she didn't want good news, even if that good news meant lower casualty numbers of US troops abroad, meant stabilization of provinces in Iraq. That would mean yes, lower casualties for Rockies, but also a few of our guys coming back wounded and maimed. She just wanted to make sure that come back. In being the majority, keep her seat.

Hang out with fancy types out in Marin County in California, I'm rooting for the country. I mean, she's a hack and it has been, but she doesn't know it yet. It's very frustrating to see her waxing philosophical on this issue. Let me just tell you this. The the whole oh, you can't meet or you can't even do any outreach to Kim jong and keep him on. The sanctions were

all in place. Nothing was given to Kim Jong un here all right, people, Let's say, look Whoabama and in raw and look what how the Republicans are so mad over that. Yeah, that's because we showed up and said we'll do anything to get a deal. We'll just give you all this stuff. You don't have to do anything painful. Iron Obama really wants this. Trump says, you want to talk, let's talk. I'm still gonna keep all the sanctions on. It's still gonna have the most crippling sanctions against your

regime ever. But we'll talk if you want the whole legitimizing Kim Jong un thing. It's a pariahs state already. How how are we going to chip away at this problem by by what pretending it's an even worse country or having more u N summits orre we talked about how bad North Korea is, legitimizing it. That's been the talking point for those with nothing better to say, stretching back for multiple least three administrations, three different presidencies, both parties.

I don't want to legitimate as Kim joung owned, don't want to legitimize them. Well, while we're so worried about legitimizing him or not, the guy's getting missiles that are he's gonna be able to, you know, drop a nuke in the middle of Kansas By the time we finally figure out, well, maybe we should have tried the legitimizing talking to him process. What they've done before hasn't worked. We really don't want to have a military incursion, which is a general way of saying military strikes to what

degree and how? And I I don't know. I'm I'm an academic on the subject of of Korea. I'm not a former practitioner. Right, this wasn't part of my AO back in my government days. What would a strike looked like? How bad would it be? We know it would be catastrophic. We know a lot of people would die. And you also know that any time you engage a military conflict like that with a country with a vast military apparatus.

You know, yeah, a lot of their stuff is old, dusty a K forty sevens and artillery pieces from you know, the fifties. Those things still fire, still kill a lot of people. So it would have been a really great thing if Trump had been able to move the football down the field here. It would have been And it really wasn't about whether you get a Nobel Peace Prize. And I know people like to mock him and Joey Behr, who I don't think could find Pyeong Maang on a

Pyongyang on a on a map. Um if if you just you know, gave her the Korean peninsula, Where's where is pyong yang? Joy, Well, I know where it is. I'll tell you where it is. Imbeciles all over the place that are celebrating the failure of a diplomatic initiative that one hasn't even failed yet. Just this is where it is right now. It's eighteen months into the Trump presidency. Unlike Obama, we don't get to look back at eight years of failure and make a declarative and final judgment that,

oh yeah, it's a failure. This is different. This is something else. This is the early stages of what will certainly be I've told you all along and I know you know this too. It's a process. It is a process. There was no way this was going to be a short, easy win. No one thought that was going to be the case. But they're trying to hold Trump to this and and it's just so frustrating to watch them gloat over America's loss, because that is what they're doing. That

is what's happening today. It's not the end of the world. We didn't legitimize anything. Trying to talk you know, the same people I I just I have to point this out. The exact same people right now who are all ha ha ha ha nanna a boo boo about this summit getting called off, are people who would tell you, well, anyone who has anything about Afghanistan says, we need to talk to the Taliban. You know, you know this general and that general. They say, we have to talk to

the Taliban. Okay, So that doesn't legitimize the Taliban in the Democrat foreign policy media industrial complexes eyes, right, that doesn't somehow give it. But talking to Kim Jongan, who who is head of state of a country with nuclear missiles. Folks, we can pretend he's not, but he is, and we can act like he's he's as I legitimate as you want to. But it doesn't change the situation. But just note that inconsistency. No, the only consistency that liberals give

you is their hypocrisy. Right, smart people, I e. Obama's foreign policy team and generals that Obama was working with in his administration, and I'm sure some generals now I'm not I'm not saying that this isn't. This has become kind of a consensus issue, but the Democrats will certainly defend. Yeah, talk to the Taliban affixed Afghanistan, I can tell you right now, and I don't care in any general says

that's preposterous. U never gonna work unless you think working means eventually the Taliban runs Afghanistan, because that's what's gonna happen. But that they think is okay talking to Kim John Owner, even trying to talk to him face to face, that's legitimizing him, undermining our authority, all all all that stuff, all that stuff. Oh, or maybe it's just because they hate Trump eight four four eight to five eight four buck. We're going to talk about some other subjects here today

beyond just North Korea. I promise you that. But we have Michael also enjoining us. He's one of my favorites on on all issues of East Asia geopolitics. He's from the Hoover Institute. He'll be with us probably the next hour. Uh. Not having Gordon Chang on today just because we couldn't get him, but we'll get him. We'll get him, come hang out with us another time. Um, you know, Gordon's always welcome. And Uh, this traffic stoff that I want to tell you about is it should be a national

media story and it's not. And I find that very very frustrating. And then some footage from a concert where where a young woman said something and got called out for it because of the rules we have around who is allowed to say what words. So we're gonna get into a whole bunch of different stuff today, but we're still sticking sticking with North Korea for a bit more. Eight four four to five, eight four buck, Stay with me, team.

This takes preparation, This takes the knowledge, this takes judgment, and clearly it takes preparation, which the President didn't make It's clear he didn't know what he was getting into and now he's walking away from it. In this very chummy palsy wellsy letter to Kim Kim jongman, Kim Dan is the big winner. This is a blame America first statement.

Financy Pelosi. When she has a choice between playing Donald Trump and Kim Jong in, she picks Donald Trump to blame for no reason other than she's a Democrat and she wants to score points against Donald Trump on an issue where Americans should be unified against Kim Jong un. She's so anti Trump. But there you could tell there was a tenor to this. And I said this last week that if Trump cancels, the press will blame Trump, and Kim Jong ung chancels, the press will blame Trump. Yeah,

Fleisher's right on that one. It's true if they can pick. I've said to you before, I think that there are a lot of liberals. If I walked around washing d C. And asked them who's a bigger threat to world peace? Trump or Kim Jong n, They'd say Trump. Who's a bigger fascist? Kim Jong Under Trump? They would say Trump and think they're smart for saying it too. This is just yet another sign of Trump arrangement syndrome. But let's hear you know who's I like on this. Let's hear

from the DIRSH on this one, play fifteen. This is playing into Donald Trump's strong suite. He knows how to make a deal, he knows how to walk away from the table, he knows how to offer to come back to the table. I am certainly not going to second guess our president when it comes to negotiating with North Korea. I don't think he had any choice once he heard.

But I think once he heard what the leader of North Korea said about the United States said about our vice president, he had no choice but to walk away. But he's walked away in a conditional sense, and he said, I welcome you to come back, but on my terms. Remember, we have most of the cards in this negotiation, and I think the president's playing them. Well. Yeah, I think so too. I like I like that. I like what the DIRSH has to say on this one, not not

just on the legal stuff. He's good on North Korea to look at that. I agree with them on this one. Trump administration is playing the cards that they have. I think they playing them pretty well, on the circumstances, I think it's so funny. You really have to be his worically, either ignorant or just not care about history to look at what Trump has done so far in North Korea and say, oh, yeah, he's failed. Oh really, what do we get with eight years of Obama? Let's be honest,

what we give it? The eight years of Bush? And what we get with eight years of Clinton? Massive fail? As the kids say on North Korea, no question, no question at all. Oh is it epic fail? Gosh, whenever I say as the kids say, there's a good chance I'm getting it wrong. Um eight four. If you want to chat, what do you think about Trump and North Korea? And uh, then we got some other stuff to discuss as well. He's holding the line for America buck sex in his back. All right, we got lines lit here

in the freedom hunt. Let's get chew it? Uh do we in Georgia? Welcome sir, Hey, bug Shield time? How are you doing, buddy Shield time? My friend? I'm good, Thank you for calling in. Uh yeah, I just wanted to make a comment on what you were saying about the Taliban and Afghanistan and North Korea. Now you're right on the fact that if we if we talked to

Taliban Engram do nothing but run Afghanistan. And I think that if we would have march to Korea instead of politicizing and the way we did, we wouldn't have to be talking to him. Now. It's the same thing they do over and over and over again. They politicize wars and still letting people fight them. And we would have this problem if we could take care of stuff at the beginning. Well, I I think that the Democrats legacy in general, on national security, on on issues of war

and peace. Uh, it's it's really bad. So there you go, I mean, on on their positions stretch back in dealing with the North Korea. In fact, you go all the way back to the Korean War. I think it's interesting when you see some of the debates and discussions around what should happen there and people forget. I mean, it's called the Forgotten War for a reason. Right, this is under a U. N mandate. We lost large numbers of soldiers. It just gets for whatever reason, lost by the wayside.

And you know, that was a conflict that very easily could have spiraled even beyond what it was had had we decided to retaliate against China more aggressively than we did on the Chinese and go after them the Chinese mainland. But but do we I hear you? Man? I mean, this is stuff we're seeing from people now about how it's legitimizing Kim Jong un. Do we think that he's gonna just crawl up into a ball in the corner and cry himself to sleep because we're delegitimizing him all

the time. I mean, this is nonsense. Indeed, well, shield side, do we thank you? Thank you for calling him man? I appreciate it. Bobby in Mississippi, you're up, sir, Hey, but sheels high fields high listen, Uh, I gotta something to tell the lift. In order to fail at something, you actually have to have a negotiation first. Nothing ever got started, So how can it be a failure? You know? I mean they're just they're nuts, Yeah, I mean, what how do they think this is gonna get any better?

But we've had sanctions for a very long time. Trump has put on even more sanctions. But if you don't open the purpose of sanctions, I think the Democrats forget this, or they don't understand this, or it could be all the above, or they just pretend not to know the purpose of sanctions is to create the circumstances for dialogue on favorable terms for us and our partners, and the sanctions right, it's not. You don't just sanction people because

you feel like it. I think the idea is to get a change in their behavior, and to get that change in behavior, you have to have a negotiation. Well, if we're if our negotiating point is we won't talk to your leader because he's a you know, a big fat dummy head, we're not gonna get anywhere. The rocket man, yeah, rocket man no, But I mean, you know, Tremmy, you you make a very valid point. What I'm saying is, Okay, he'll call him rocket man. But if rocket rocket man

there there you go. You know he'll he'll call him that. But the moment he wants to stop being a little rocket man and start being the guy who could lead North Korea away from being a a ghoulish relic of the Cold War and the world's largest freestanding goolag, I mean that's he could be that guy if you want, you know, Kim Jong und could or he can be a little rocket man, right, But Trump opens up those

those pathways. I can't even remember the Obama administration having a serious moment in the national conversation about how to deal with North Korea. It was like, yeah, sanctions, you know, sanctions, and the Democrats gave him everything they wanted and that was to them, that was a big win. But the United States really lost because they've gotten so far ahead the two to four billion dollars we gave him, and only in one area to be more against United States.

I hear you, Bobby, thank you for the calling and good to talk to you down in Mississippi. Ah yeah, there you go. Um go to uh. We'll talk more about this later, but play eleven for me for a second. One one more thing on North Korea. Well, I'm just interested in Wait, Donald Trump did not explicitly answer what changed.

It makes me think that's not just a straight United States North Korea matter, that there's something involving China and North Korea that the President doesn't like, but he's not ready yet to come out and blame China for That's just my guests, based on what the President said and how he said it. Because it's logical you should explain what changed? Why didn't he? I I've been saying that all along, all day to day here in the office, and China is not helpful, not helpful on this one.

Cannot trust the Chinese to have never mind the u S interests, but the world's interests at art on North Korea. You just can't um they They're playing their own game and they're playing for keeps on this one. So I think that's that's important for us all to keep in mind. I do want to talk about the the situation with the NFL. This is getting so much tension everybody. You know, it's sports, it's politics. What do you what do you guys think about that. I didn't really ask for calls

on this earlier. I'm curious if any have thoughts on this one. I feel like this is I gave you a straight up analysis of it yesterday. It's a private organization, it hurts ticket sales. A majority, a huge majority of Americans don't want them to be protests during the national anthem. It's not preventing protests in a public park or a public square. This isn't government action. This is private party action.

They're allowed to set their own rules for conduct. Just as I said that the same way they're allowed to say no excessive end zone celebrations, they can say no messing around during the national anthem, and that this is a sensitive area for a lot of players or a lot of people watching, or whatever the case may be. Doesn't negate the rights that the owners and the people involved in the private enter enterprise the National Football League.

Half I don't understand. I'm seeing some other folks out there saying, oh, this is like the right now acting like the left, and it's d platform ng no, no, no, why. I mean, I won't say this isn't that complicated. It's a complicated issue, but I also think it's a clear issue right once you think through it. Maybe I'm missing something. Usually when I say that, though I'm not missing anything,

I'd just like to say that. So it seems like I'm willing to be intellectually humble about the subject at hand. Um I have other things I say when I really don't know, but maybe I'm missing something. Is like, we know I'm right, But feel free to challenge me on this one if you want, or or feel free to tell me what I'm missing. Eight four If you want to call in on those lines talk about this and

some other various topics. I really, you know, I almost lad the show today with this uh traffic stop, because these stories never get the attention they deserve. And police have been so unfairly treated in general, law enforcements so unfairly treated in the media, with the exception of the FBI and FBI spying stuff that is like sacro sanct. I think we all know why. But actual law enforcement.

Forget about the James Comeys and the mccave's, the guys who are walking down the street keeping people safe, making sure that you know, nobody comes breaking into grandma's house with a baseball bat or something. They get treated very badly by the media and their stories don't get told when it doesn't fit the narrative. And I have I'm telling you when you hear what went on and what's gonna be in the next hour, This this case in

Texas just happened this week, just happened. It's just eye opening about one how the media is almost complicit in the lie that law enforcement, you know, gets away with all kinds of really bad stuff all the time. Well, we're learning because of the information and and basically the constant surveillance state we now all live in. But learning is that a lot of citizens actually mistreat officers and

lie about officers. Jarring there. What a shocker, that is, right, lie about what happens to them during encounters with police. And this is why I'm I. You know, body cameras and dash cameras everywhere everybody. We should have a record of all this. No more guessing, no more insinuations from you know, either civil rights groups or pro police groups

or anything. Just just facts that we can sort out. Um, alright, eight four nine Buck, I gotta talk to you about this NFL thing though, just because I guess for North Korea, this is like the primary thing that people in the country want to talk about. So this is the freedom of We will talk about what the folks want. We'll be right back. I would be more okay with it if they had consulted with the players. This is over. I didn't think the players agreed to this. This is

the owners. And by the way, the owners, who would be fine talk a little bit about what the national anthem protests actually refers to their an expression of paint. I think we have to understand the notion that the protests are saying, we have something happening that does not conform to our American values and has to end and

can end. Nobody likes to be ordered around less you're in the military, and they feel like this is being put upon them, and it's putting a lot of pressure on them to choose between something that's constitutionally protected and going with the team. And I understand teams of corporations, but right now we're living in a time where um, nobody, especially on the right, it's standing up to the statement

that he put out today. That's Joseph McCarthy. I mean, wow, First of all, whenever you have somebody talking about the First Amendment and they do this, I understand lobbity, lobby law, First Amendment, but you know, you know you're not gonna hear anything particularly insightful after the butt, right. I understand the technically they have a right to do to butt. Well, yeah, you have a right to say that you wish that this rule didn't exist, but they have a right to

make the rule. This is people are trying to make this a much more ah difficult issue to understand. I think just because it's there, there's a lot of clarity here.

I also just can't help but point out that these protests were occurring before Trump came into office, and then Trump said something about them, and then you get all these players, much larger numbers of players who were taking a knee, and also the media's interest in the taking a knee by players became, you know, infinitely more intense all and now they really want to see what's going on, was all taking anything or a lot of interest in that.

I really want to know, And I just can't help with but sit here and say to myself, Okay, so, how much of this is really just become not even a proxy for police brutality or whatever they say it is, how much of this is really just about protesting Trump? Now for a lot of players in the media, this has become a proxy for that, I think. And I don't follow the NFL all that closely. It is one of the few professional sports I will tell you. I mean, I'm not actually a communist. I do watch the NFL.

But that's my sense of this is that this is one of these issues where people have now wrapped this up. This is the same way like why are there women's marches now, Women's rights haven't been changed. The women are you know, better off now, more of them in school, more them in grad school, more CEOs. Women are literally in a better position now, at least economically and rights wise speaking, then they've ever been in the history of

the United States and the history of the world. Why are the women's marches, Well, because it's just an emotional response to Trump, and Trump is um right, and and that third wave feminism or you know, left wing feminism whatever we want to call it. Right, the stuff you see in and Mary Claire and that's uh Democrat Party dogma about women, that is gathering people together and mobilizing

them against Trump. That's what That's what's happened, Okay. But on the NFL side, I think that you're seeing a similar thing that the kneeling, because Trump mentioned something about it, and kneeling was a time when players all of a sudden felt like they needed within you know, their own communities, their circles of friends, to show that they will not cave to this Trump awra. I guess, I mean, you know, that's how I that's at least what I see happening here.

But I also think that the players don't understand you know, you may view this one way, but a lot of people viewed it another way. And I would just note that a lot of the same people that I hear who say, for example, who will bring up, oh um, the Confederate flag may mean states rights, or it might be historical symbol or it might be all the things that people say about the Confederate flag to you, but two people from its heart and communities in this country,

it symbolizes, you know, racism, slavery, segregation. When the national anthem is being played and you take that as a moment to make your own political statement in criticism of the country, you may think when you're doing that players

that you are protesting in justice, inequality, whatever. But a lot of people watching who have had family members killed in combat in recent years, who have had family members that will carry the wounds of warfare psychological and physical with them for the rest of their lives, or who themselves watching served and lost friends, lost lost family, they see this as blatant disrespect for their service and their sacrifice.

And I gotta say, you know, you can't it. You can't make the one claim and not see how people can make the other claim. Right, You can't say, well, you may think of it as this, but to the rest of of this community, on the Confederate flagpoint, it represents all these really really hateful and destructive and bad things. Therefore it should be banished from the public square. The same people that make that argument seem completely unwilling to

understand it doesn't matter if they think that. And now I'm I'm talking about this on the the ideology involved, right, not on the legal the legality as clear as day. They can tell them to stay in the locker room, they can they can tell them they can't play football anymore, they can fire people or you know, based on whatever

the contracts allow. Uh. It is really disrespectful too. And I know this, and I've seen a lot of people speak about this, a lot of current and former service members, like it just comes across as really disrespectful during the national anthem because of what it means to all the rest of us. And by the way, because the NFL has made a very conspicuous effort have military president games, to have military flyovers during games. You know, they were

not stretching here to connect these things. The beginnings of the beginnings of NFL games are treated largely a lot of it is like a rally for our rallying support of our military. I've been I went to a game this past year. That's what I saw, right. They bring service members out, They go to service members in the in the audience, and they salute them, and they as they should. And I think there's all great. I think it's the right thing to do. I think it's brilliant

for the NFL to do it. But because they're doing that, to cause a scene and make a scene of yourself during the anthem, when other people watching and in that audience are having flashbacks to Fallujah and Hellman's and you name it, I think it's time for these NFL players to get a little of a wake up call on this. One's got a lot more coming up. I bet there are a lot of people listening to the show right now who drink coffee. And maybe you've been drinking the

same coffee for a long time. Maybe you like drinking coffee that is basically brought to you by Bernie Sanders supporters. But I've got a much better idea for you, and that is Black Rifle Coffee. You should just go online check it out for yourself, go to Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck. Once you see what they've got, I'm telling you this is going to be your coffee company of choice. By the way, they've also got apparel and gear up there on the site. But they have

a K forty seven espresso blend. They've got a blend that's literally called Freedom Blend. What could be more perfect for their freedom hut. Just go check it out and you'll see for yourself. Make sure you use the coupon code Buck fifteen for fifteen percent off. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck coupon code Buck fifteen for fifteen percent off. Join the Coffee your Diet Revolution, Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck. Buck Sexton Mission decoding

the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, Rank, you're a great American again. This is the Bucks Sexton Show. Analysts No, welcome to our two of the Buck Sexton Show team. I'm gonna tell you about this, uh, this traffic stop. It's quite a story and it should be a national news story. I think Fox News did pick it up today, so it's getting more traction. But this

would be wall to wall. If it were a different narrative, this would be something that would be the lead story and a lot of networks if, for example, the accusations level against the officer were true, but because they're completely untrue, as proven by the video evidence, you want to hear much about this case at all, and this needs to stop there. There is a a real, uh slew of

these kinds of cases. I mean, I really wish that there was a better database out there of how many accusations false accusations of racism or level a level against police officers only to be found out to be untrue later because of dash camera bodycam footage, and then how many assaults uh and sexual assaults alleged against officers turn out to be fabricated later on. But we'll get to

that in just a few moments. We have a couple of calls here I wanted to take so I always enjoy hearing from all of you, and then we'll move on to that story and uh and a whole lot more in just a few moments. We have Jackie and Idaho. Hey, Jackie, Hi, hi h. I wanted to comment on what you were saying about the women's march in the women's lib movement. Um, you think that Trump appointing the first female deputy director of the CIA would be a major deal director actually

director of the CIA. Yeah, and no one's saying anything about it. It seems like it's not even about women in general anymore. It's about certain women in particular with ideals the media agrees with. Oh yeah, the left wing media thinks that they can in this in a sense, you know, take away a woman's woman card. You know what I mean. You don't count anymore if you're not part of the left wing feminist agenda, which increasingly, by the way, is just is just incoherent, nasty, and I

think self defeating. When you when you see a lot of what's promoted these days as what would essentially be radical feminism, it's really destructive and it is actually expressly anti male as well. Yeah yeah, I mean they talk about toxic masculinity. What does that even mean? I'm sorry, go ahead, Jackie. I'm just saying I love your show. I listened to it every day. Well, thank you so much, Jackie, I appreciate it. She don't say thanks for calling. Hi

from Wydaho. Good to hear from you. Dan in Detroit. Up. Dan, how you do a box? It's great to talk to you too. I listened to you a few times on in the Blaze and then you kind of disappeared, and then I found John iHeart radio and I'll tell you what. I've been listening daily for about the last two three months now and I and that's the three best hours of my day. Well, thank you so much, Dan, that's really kind to you. Thank you. So what's on your mind?

I was when you came back in with the Nancy Pelosi comments about well, I wish they would have consulted the players. It's like, well, I guess that's how we should run our jails and our schools, and you know, we'll consult the inmates and see what the rules ought to be. It's just such ridiculousness coming out of the routes now. And oh yeah, look, I would love it if if my boss is that I've always had, would

consult me on every ruling regulation. But you know, if they tell me to show up at eight o'clock in the morning, guess what I don't get to say, whoa, whoa? Did you insult me on that beforehand? I mean I could say that and then they could fire me, all right, exactly exactly exactly. Yeah. I mean people are so desperate to find a way to twist this, to make this a big First Amendment issue. It's not. This is a

this is a an employment issue. So I think it's pretty straight for but Dan, thank you so much for the kind words. Man, I really do appreciate it. She'll tie it to you well. But he mentioned Pelosi, by the way, and I wanted to get to that before we switched to a very very serious topic, which is

what happened to this police officer. And I just in one of my missions here is to tell you all stories that you won't hear elsewhere, or certainly won't hear in the same way elsewhere, and this falls in that category. But for first, let's just have some fun with with where Pelosi is on things. Play clip five Plaseosi. More than half of the Senators running through re election this year are over sixty five years old. If they win, their term of service will be six years. Their constituents

are about twenty years younger. Isn't it time for some members to return to private service and to encourage younger folks to run for office? For me, I don't think age has that much to do with it. I think it wor out and especially as a woman. I know as I want women to know that whether they're going from college to Congress, well they can't really do that.

But twenty five years old to congress, Uh that whatever you're bringing, it's new and fresh and different because you're a woman talking to like the ultimate swamp creature there. Or Nancy Pelosi, Uh, you know she she doesn't want to give up her power, her prerogatives, no interest in that at all, and she doesn't want any of the other big name long term congressman congressman the Democrat Party

stepsode either. I mean they think that this is this is where I get into my whole term limits discussion, and or I'm just I just get so agree. You know, it shouldn't be that you're a legislature for thirty or forty years. I just really don't. I don't believe in that. Um. I think that it would be better off to have people who come and serve and do their time in the legislature and don't view it as a means to

be famous or means to become rich. Even I really would like to see that change, and I think I think termoments would be great idea, But then we always running a buck. We won't get term limits because the people that would have to vote for it. I know, I know. But it's nice to dream, isn't it. Team. It's nice to have those moments where we can wish

for something a little better from our elected officials. I'm gonna tell you about the story in Texas with this highway patrolment, very very important story and it's a it's a much bigger problem even than this one incident. Uh, stay with me for that, But first I want to talk to you about our sponsor team. Or sponsor this half hour is your one stop shop for polo shirts, hoodie's jackets, fleece headgear, athletic youth, infant, women's, all the

apparel needs you have. If you're into patriotism, supporting veterans, and really fresh designs that are going to be the envy of all of your friends, go to nine line Apparel dot com. Nine Line is a veteran owned and operated patriotic lifestyle brand. It tries to bridge the gap between civilians and service members, whether military, law enforcement or first responders, and encourage a conversation between those who serve and those who support them. Plus they've got fantastic gear.

Go check it out for yourself. They've got pro Second Amendment, pro patriotism, pro America designs a plenty. Go to nine line apparel dot com use the coupon code buck twenty to save twenty per so off. It's a great deal. Nine line apparel dot com coupon code buck twenty for twenty percent off. Ye. Body cameras. Some people talk about them like they are controversial. I see them as an unmitigated good thing when we're talking about police officers and

police citizen relations. I keep coming across these cases of I mean when I say bodycam, by the way, dash cam, body cam just video footage of law enforcement activity that is on the on the vehicle and on the actual officer. It's a good thing. Protects a citizen, protects the cop. And you keep seeing these cases though, of people who lie about cops. You know, we've played recently. We had the uh woman in Oh gosh, where was it now?

I can't even remember. It was a New Jersey Thank you, John in New Jersey, who you know, referred to the cops as a skin head, and you know it's it was threatening the officers. And there's all these different cases that come up and people say, oh, well, I was racially profiled, that's why I was pulled over. What turns out, actually, no, you were speeding and the officer pulled you over didn't even know what what skin color you had and until they pulled the vehicle over. So and the officer is

completely respectful during the encounter. Anyway, there there are lots of these cases, lots and lots of them, but generally they're not as serious as this one. And I have to just note that this would, if the situation were different, be a national news story. But because it doesn't fall into the narrative that the mainstream media prefers, you won't

hear about it except here on this show. Uh you had just last week a woman pulled over in Texas named Sharia Dixon Coles thirty seven, just about my age. She was arrested for a d w I and charged and just we we have there's over an hour of this just happened on May twenties. This is last week, Folks, is a very new case, and there's about an hour and and change of video of the event. So from the initial stop all the way through the arrest and processing, it is all on video, all of it. I don't

think that this woman knew that. I'll get to that in a moment, but here's how some of the exchange went. It's a pretty boring d you want d w I stop, but play the audio. Where are you coming from? That man? Okay, what are we doing it? Downtown bellas friend? How much alcohol you consume this evening when this one? What was it? Ck on? Okay? What time did this drink? Have this drink? Do not know where you driver license is? Okay? So she sounds not not where he did, but it sounds

a little tipsy, right she slurred her s there. I mean it's and she later on was just below just below um the level needed to pass the breathalyzer, but it had been two hours had passed, so she was actually considered drunk at the time of the incident because she did have alcohol in her system. Anyway, we'll get to that in a moment. But this officer, it's about as routine a d w I stop as you can imagine. As I said, all on video. But here's what I

end up happening. This is from the office of Lee Merritt Esquire and he held a joint press conference and this is what the press conference said. On May twenty one. This office has been retained to represent Miss Sharita Dixon Cole concerning certain civil rights violations arising from sexual assault allegations she has levied against Officer Daniel Hubbard of the

Texas Department of Public Safety. MS Cole was pulled over on suspicion of d w Y. She alleges that while Officer Hubbard administered a field sobriety test, he suggested uh She suggested that she could go home in exchange for sexual favors. According to her statement, when she declined, she was taken to Hubbard's cruiser and forcefully groped, fondled, and and penetrated sexually during a prolonged arrest that including assaults

outside and inside of the police vehicle. And then he continued to make sexual advances and suggested he would take her to a remote location where he could where she could provide sex in exchange for her release, um et cetera. It goes on in some greater detail here. So this is an allegation against a Texas police officer of what would constitute kidnapping and rape. So this law enforcement officer, if if those things were true, is probably facing twenty

five years in prison, maybe life. I mean his life is over either way, right, I mean, his his career is over. He's spending decades in prison because the statutes for law enforcement officers that sexually abused people in custody. I don't know what it is specifically in Texas. I know in New York you you go away for a long time, as you should if you're guilty of it. But see, here's the problem. Remember this was they hailed a press conference about this one. Uh. Shaun King, the

Black Lives Matter activist, tweeted this out. This got a lot of traction, and national media people were really talking about this case for last week. It was just beginning to become one of these national causes, right, police brutality, police violence, sexual violence, African American woman at the center of this white male police officer. Oh, but then the do came out. There aren't any gaps in the video,

there are any questionable moments in the video. The video is comprehensive and it is conclusive, and what the video shows is a completely professional and by the book d w I stop and arrest in in every way I mean textbook like they could use the way the officer spoke to the woman, the way he went through procedure, everything about it completely by the book. And now the police have come out with a statement. Here's what they say. On and approximately one two a M Texas Highway Patrol

officer observed the vehicle, etcetera, etcetera. She was charged with d w I. Following the arrest, Spurious and false accusations related to this traffic stop were made against the tech his trooper. Upon learning of those allegations, the Texas Department of Public Safety immediately took action to review the video. The video shows absolutely no evidence to support the egregious

and unsubstantiated accusations against the trooper. Department of Health is a pall that anyone would make such a despicable, slanderous, and false accusation against a peace officer who willingly risks his life every day to protect and serve the public um. They've reviewed this, etcetera, etcetera, and and they've decided to I I agree with this, by the way, release the tape. It's probably it's you know, it's public record release that tape.

So stop with law enforced, and they did. And what you have here is a woman who is not just a liar, but who tried to ruin a man's life. And I mean absolutely and completely destroy his life. Even if he wasn't found guilty in a court, just the accusation, without exonerating proof, would have would have effectively destroyed and ended this public servant, this law enforcement officers. Uh day to day existence be all over form, folks. I mean,

I don't know. I didn't look up his background. I'm gonna assume he's got a wife, kids, family, and this woman almost took all that away from him over a d W I stop now. Few thinks here one. People that make false accusations about serious crimes should be held accountable. They should be held accountable. It should not just be swept under the rug. Because bearing false witness in this way could send somebody to prison for the rest of his or her life. You can't let that slide. You

can't let that go. This has to be prosecuted. It is a crime to knowingly accuse somebody else of a crime against you, especially one where there's no question. This is there's not a gray area here. It's not like, you know, this was a who started it fight or something. She just lied, just lied about this. And I have to wonder what would make a woman in her position

do that? What is going on right now in our culture that when somebody has pulled over by a law enforcement officer, the response is not what have I done? Have I broken the law? How can I comply and be respectful with this officer, assuming the officers engaging in a professional manner, but instead what can I do to even the score or or get back at this guy?

Where can you know she had to have this thought process, folks, where could she take this right away where it was essentially that the nuclear option for her, you know, to ruin this officer's life, to ruin his career. Just because by the way, that that lawyer the office of of Lee Merit, that lawyer that really released that statement initially um has come out and said that quote, the body camera footage directly conflicts with the accounts reported to my office.

And so he's, uh, you know, he says, we are thankful the members of this community for demanding transparency and justice. However, it seems you were righteous vigilance was abused. Yeah, that's correct, Lee merit esquire was abused. Maybe it's a bad idea to try officers in the court of public opinion before

any facts are really in. Maybe we shouldn't rush to make every lawn for every accusation against law enforcement if it fits a certain narrative, particularly one of racial bias, a national news story, without waiting for any of the facts, any of the facts at all. In this case, I'm just glad that this officer is, you know, sleeping soundly to night, as he should. But this is a real plague, my friends. False accusations against officers are much more widespread

than a lot of people realize. And thank Heavens, there are body cameras increasingly present with these departments to make sure that these allegations can be rooted out and officers don't have their careers in their lives ruined over lies. Overlie. He's back with you now, because when it comes to

the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. So the dialogue was good until recently, and I think I understand why that happened, and I won't say that some day, l we'll give it to you can write about it in a book, but I really believe we have a great opportunity. We'll see whether or not that opportunity is seized by North Korea. If it is great for them and great for the world. If it isn't, it'll be

just fine. Thank you all very much. All Right, So President has made it quite clear, as we've been discussing, the summit for now is off. But what does this really mean and what can we expect going forward. We've got Michael Oslin on the line. He is a fellow at the Hoover Institution and author of the End of the Asian Century, which I have read. By the way, I can commend it to all of you, and also coming out in paperback this summer. Michael, great to have

you back. Thanks, great to be with you. All right. What do you make of where we are right now and these much anticipated and now at least seemingly much delayed talks between Trump and Kim Jong un? Well, you know this was also unprecedented that I think you could have been surprised either way. You would have been surprised if it had actually gone forward, given the decades of mistrust and enmity between North Korean America, and you would have been surprised that, after all the hype and the

build up, that it would have been canceled. Honestly, I actually thought the North Koreans would probably be the ones to pull the plug. But you know, you could look at it and say that if if they were starting to get cold feet, if they were feeling that, uh, they weren't getting from the United States beforehand what they wanted, then they were just going to ramp up the rhetoric and the insults and the outrageous demands and essentially forced

the Americans to cancel it. And you know that's what happened. What would it take for there to be an actual chance of success here, Well, if you mean success by the actual d nuclearization, right, depends what what you're talking about. Who wants what? Right, What the Americans wanted what the North Koreans want is very very different. And that's of course the nub of the problem. That's why we're talking

about this after a quarter century, why we haven't solved it. Uh, If you're talking about what the Americans want, it's essentially for Kim Jong into accept that the fact that he's got these nuclear weapons doesn't help him that the Americans are very serious about denying him the ability to keep them, and so they better cut a deal that preserves the regime and preserves Kim Jong un today in exchange for

these weapons. And and so from the American perspective, it would be anything that forces the North Koreans to say, we don't know what the future is gonna hold, so we better make a deal today. For the North Koreans, of course, it's to get the Americans to say, well, the North Koreans have these weapons, and there's nothing we can do about it anymore. They've got them, they're going to keep them, and so we've got to figure out

a way to protect ourselves. And maybe that means getting out of Korea withdrawing some of our troops in order to have a quote unquote peace treaty, and maybe the North Koreans will agree and at some point in time to to cap these weapons or something like that. So what you can see is that the two sides were as far away yesterday uh from getting an agreement as

they were twenty five years ago. Nothing changed except our perception that Kim Jong un serious about sitting down at the table and As it turns out, we were really a long way from getting to that table. Speaking to Michael Osland, author of End of the Asian Century, which comes out in paperback, he's a fellow at the Hoover

Institution that comes out in paperback this summer. Um, Michael, the way forward now for the Trump administration if they want to resurrect the prospect of these talks or what could they do? What should they do? Yeah, that's that's a great question, right part of it. You know, the letter that President Trump wrote to Kim Jong un that was released left open um the possibility of having this

summit somewhere down the road. And obviously, uh, the prerequisite of that is that the North Korean stopped making demands, Uh, stop these outrageous insults. You know, you can't really go into a meeting like this after they've insulted your vice president, called him a dummy and the like. You know, that would have shown Trump is just eager for any type of meeting, and that would have put him on the back foot. So in a way, whether the norths wanted this or not to go through, Trump was right to

pull the plug at this point. And in essence, if you want to go forward. It gives you a breathing time to see how the North Koreans are gonna act. So there's there's basically three things that can happen. Number One, the North Koreans decide, you know, we pushed too far. Trump's not like the other presidents, so we better cool it and and try to get him back to the table. Number Two, they ratchet up the rhetoric and maybe even try some sort of aggressive act against South Korea or

Japan or who knows more missile launches for example. That that's an easy one to do, uh, in order to basically try to blackmail the Americans to come back say, see, it's worse if you don't talk to us, we're gonna act worse. And that's something they've done many times in the past. Number three is that the two sides decide quietly behind the scenes to continue high level talks, you know, Mike Pompeo or or a very senior member of the administration, to try to figure out if they can get to

a starting point. And the starting point would be a mutually agreeable definition of the nuclearization at least the rudiments the outlines of a timetable in an agreement on when USAID would be given. And if you can get that behind the scenes, then you can come back and say we've we've you know, smoothed out the bumps and and figured out these problems. Now we can go forward with

a meeting. Is there any situation in which you could see Kim Jong un shocking the world and agreeing to de nuclearization as I think all Americans at least understand it, which is he allows inspections, no more nuclear weapons, no more missile program. It's just it seems, even as I'm saying it to you, like it's just not gonna happen. And this has been my concern all along, although I think it was it's worth trying. I think it's worth

continuing to try. But I can't see that future. Yeah, I mean, look, if if they were going to happen, it would have happened, right. He doesn't need an inducement really to give up the weapons. And if he really wants to give up the weapons, and he'll he'll take a deal that's offered him. Uh So we don't see real indications of change in the nature of the regime. And if that's the case, you know, this is not East Germany, where the whole regime was beginning to liberalize.

And if that's the case, that there's no change, then it's highly unlikely to see Kim deciding to give up these weapons on his own accord. The only way he's going to do it, obviously, short of a of a change of heart, is if he feels threatened enough, if he feels that his future as leader of this nation uh is in doubt enough that he has to cut

a deal. Now, that's the type of message that Secretary of State Pompeo was giving, Mike Pence was giving, John Bolton was giving, And there's gonna be a lot of debate as to whether they overdid it, whether they stepped over the line by sort of embarrassing in a sense, if you can put it this way, embarrassing the North Koreans by saying, look, if you don't do this, remember what happened in Libya. Remember what happened to Momar Ghadafi.

You know, they know what happened. And I don't think that they need to be reminded all the time of it, meaning I don't think the administration had to necessarily give that message out in public repeatedly that back to the

North Koreans into a corner. But you know, short of of any sense on the North Koreans that these guys are serious, serious about taking this regime down in fire and fury or whatever it's going to be, Uh, then they've probably figured they can just play them the way they played Obama and Bush and Clinton, which is to drag out negotiations for years. Trump may have upset that calculus again by saying he's not going to go along

with that script. He's not desperate for a meeting at any price, and so he's canceled the summit for now. What we'll have to see do you think that China, if we could get insight, which of course we won't be able to, but if we could get insight into what was said in those two meetings between Kim Jong owen and Es and Paying of China, were they on the whole constructive from the US position or do you think that they were basically scuttling this from behind the scenes.

You know, that's a great question because you have the foreign minister come UH to the U. S and and and talk very openly about or make statements openly about Uh, they really want this to go forward and the two sides can come together, and you know, we have to keep this moving forward. Um. Given the fact that the Chinese have been extremely unhelpful overall in the past twenty five years with North Korea, I think you have to

take such statements with at least a grain of salt. Now, they may have wanted these talks to go forward because they thought Trump was gonna cave. Maybe they thought that with the right type of pressure from North Korea and some support from Beijing, Uh, that Trump would agree to some sort of grand bargain and pull the troops out or something like that. Um. But I think your question is the right one. Uh. Can we believe what they say? Um?

They certainly don't want to see the US take a harder line, They don't want to see the US more engaged in the region, and this might in fact be the result of that. But do they want to scuttle the talks outright? You know, it's an open question at best. I think we can say they certainly didn't want anything that was going to make the US stronger in Asia. Michael Osla and everyone he is the author of the

end of the Asian Century Fell at the Hoover Institution. Michael, really appreciate you joining, and good luck with the paperback release. Thanks Buck anytime. Yeah. See, like I was saying, folks, it's it's not really it's not a loss. It's not a win at this point with North Korea. It's just it just didn't happen. You know. It's like it's like applying for a job he didn't get. I mean, it's it's largely at this point, I think, no harm, no

file situation. But to that question that I posted Michael on China, I just I think that they're working against our interests in ways that if we were fully aware of it, and I don't know where the I don't want the administration our administration really thinks about this question. But I get the sense that if we were aware of what China is doing behind the scenes, they are much more favorable towards the status quo in North Korea than certainly they will outwardly say. But then I think

a lot of people are even willing to believe. You know, the Chinese government is not a moral entity. I don't know how to put the Chinese Communist Party. It's not moral they do not care at all about the misery in North Korea. That they do not care about you know what Kim Jong un is doing anybody. They just look at this purely as a power play for them in Asia and and visa VI the United States on

the world stage. So I just don't see how you know, they're gonna talk to us about how they're gonna be so helpful and they want things to get better there. But the end of the day, that the Chinese really wanted to create change in North Korea, they could do it. In fact, China really just wanted to topple the regime in North Korea and install well they already kind of

do have a puppet regime there. But if they wanted to install something that was not quite as belligerent and crazy is what the current Kim dynasty is, I think they could do it. So I just have a feeling that those two meetings with China it did not help us one bit. All Right, I gotta move to uh a different topic here. We're gonna we're gonna switch it up in just a moment, So um, stay with me, team, I'm gonna talk to you about other things. I've got

some news for you from the world of cuisine. I can't say it's prickly good news, but I've gotta tell you, a team, I feel like I have an obligation to bring you the truth about what we are putting in our bellies. Come with me. First of all, you have this report out of the United Kingdom that says, quote no amount of alcohol, sausage or bacon is safe. This is according to the War World Cancer Research Fund, which has to update its guidelines every decade, and they have

a ten point plan to cut your cancer risk. They say buy up and that includes you know what's coming, folks, cutting out bacon, ham burgers, hot dogs. And I just want to say to this organization and to the authorities in the UK who are pushing this, what good is waking up every day if you can't have a little bacon, a hot dog or a hamburger. I mean, let's be real here, folks. I'm sure steak is on there too. Oh, red meat, so bad for you. The dietary wisdom of

these big organizations is just so full of holes. It gets very tiresome after a while, it really does. And I'm telling you you know, we're gonna keep digging into this on the show. We're gonna keep looking at what the truth is of a catosis diet, it and all this other stuff. Ketogenic diet rather ketosis is a different thing, and and the paleo diet. I'd love to actually have a paleo expert on at some point talk about this.

But this notion that your body couldn't process even small amounts of these different meats and alcohol, it just strikes me as well. First of all, you know that when you whenever you see one of these people that's like she's a hundred and forty years old, chased the oldish person on the planet. Uh, and they asked, you know, are great, great great on Dethel? You know, Ethel, how what do you think the secret is to living so long?

I find that a lot of the time in those news stories which you end appearing is well, I start every day with a big bagel or toast with bacon, and uh, sometimes I smoked some stogies, you know, some cigarettes. That's it, not not like healthy of it. I don't remember hear like, oh she lived a hundred and twenty and all she drank was soy milk. You know, you never hear that it's always like, yeah, I live life

pretty hard. You know the truth this, folks, are Genetics play a much larger role in all of this than any of us are told or even want to believe. That's the real that's the real legit, honest. What's what of what's going on here is that these things affect people in different ways. But I just can't imagine cutting all sausage, all bacon, all ground meat out of my life entirely alcohol. I'm not gonna lie. I could probably go.

I could probably go without any boast if if I could cut alcohol out of my life and not really. I drink maybe once a week, once or twice a week. That's why I make it count with G four tequila. But I really don't. I drink very infrequently. I don't find it to be It's just not my thing. I don't know, it's not my thing speaking, and not my thing. Also in the food realm. I'm not making this up, all right, and I'm not trying to gross you out, guys, but there is a new health craze that is uh.

I can't say it's like sweeping across America like that, but it's definitely a thing that has been happening. I just gonna tell you that cockroach milk is now a new thing. Cockroach milk is comprised of the nutrient rich milk crystals found inside the Pacific beetle cockroach, according to Mary Clare Magazine, and people believe that it might be very,

very healthful for humans. It is quite high in calories, four times as much protein as cow's milk, and contains essential amino acids that promote cell growth, lipids that keep our bodies healthy, and sugars that fuel energy. Can I just say drinking cockroach milk? And I'm a milk drinker, as you know, drinking cockroach milk is the start of

either a sci fi or horror movie full stop. If you drink cockroach milk and all of a sudden you start growing six legs out of your now hardening thorax abdomen that is from a insect, you know what I'm talking about. That's on you because you're not supposed to drink milk from a cockroach. I'm just gonna say it. There's just no way that that's a good idea for anybody. I don't care, I don't care how how healthy it is supposed to be for you. But yeah, cockroach milk.

As if it wasn't bad enough that soy milk is out there, they've doubled down. They've made it even worse. They're destroying the concept of milk entirely. You know, it has to come from an animal, that is a mammal. That's those are the rules. Okay, cannot from a fruit, it cannot come from a nut, and it cannot come from a cockroach. Buck Sexton mission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. No American rank, You're a

great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show activity Former CIA analysts remember the Sexton It is Buck Sexton. No, you're ready, lay right? Scene like the whole City Gone. It gives meet wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait? What's up? Bro? You gotta bleep one single word? Oh I'm sorry, don't do it. Yeah, I'm so sorry. Should say so. That was at an Alabama concert for

the the hip hop artist Kendrick Lamar. I can't say I'm particularly familiar with Mr. Lamar's work, but I'm sure I know his name, I know who he is, and yeah, uh what happened there, and producer Mike make sure I don't get this wrong because I've just seen this clip and I I'm not familiar with the full you know,

maybe the full context of everything that happened here. So Lamar brings this woman and sorry if the audio sound a little choppy there, but instead of bleeping, we cut out some of the profanity because the song has some profanity in it. And he brings a woman on stage, she's white, and invites her two wrap his lyrics, write the lyrics to his song. This is a fan Okay, this this has been like if I said to one of you, you know, like shields high and like I

expect you to say shields side right like you. This is supposed to be kind of within the within the family of your supporters and the family of of fandom. And what ended up happening, as you might have gathered there, was that she uh, she said, because it is one of the lyrics in the song, the N word. Now this I am different than other folks on this issue.

As you know, I I uh, I bend the knee to this convention, right I I say in reference to that word, I will say the N word to there are also our limitations on radio for me, of course, literally regulations, because this is broadcast on twenty terrestrial stations across the country. But I gotta tell you, I think that banning words for people to say in any context is intellectually inconsistent. I think it's inherently problematic. Um. And I think you see this here. So he wanted her

to self censor. She was supposed to rap. He invites her to say, you know, his rap lyric, and she says the rap lyric, but then because she's white, she's actually not allowed to say his lyrics. That's what happened, Mike, Am I getting all this writer? I'm missing any important details? Now, you're right? Um? And in the actual written lyrics, the the N word is written four times, and there's also an F bomb in there in in the actual written lyrics,

So you're right. Okay, So so this is exactly So he invites her on stage, says, you know, what would you like to uh? Would you like to be a part of this? And and you know it's supposed to be fun for her. She's at a concert, she's trying to have a good time, and I gotta I gotta imagine, you know, he called out Kendrick Lamar is probably you know, if not her hero, I mean, somebody that she admires, looks up to. She's paid money to be at this concert.

And there is no way you can tell me that she was in any way trying to be disrespectful, derogatory, even provocative. Like she just thinks, okay, well, I know the lyrics to the song. I'm supposed to say the lyrics to the song. And then he calls her out, you know, you know, the music cuts off and she says, you know, you've got to bleep this word. And then she clearly feels a little embarrassed, and the concert goers are booing her and telling her not to be on

the stage anymore. And and now she's you know, now she's like getting some heat for this. Now, to Lamar's credit, he allowed her to perform the song again end this time without the alert, so he wasn't he would. He didn't come down on her super hard. I don't want

to overstate this. It's not like he turned on her and you know said, you know, bleep you, and it made a big thing of it, but it was, you know, it was one of these things where clearly she was a little embarrassed, and clearly there was a a problem here. And I just do not believe that there are words that, because of your skin color, you are not allowed to say. And I keep in mind, I wouldn't say it right because I understand the way that we are now, all

the social conventions, the expectations that are in place. I'm also like, Okay, you know, I'm not going to be the guy. It's not worth running up the hill and getting mowed down by the machine gun. So to speak on this right doesn't serve anyone, That doesn't serve any purpose. What I'm talking about is the usage of the word

in specific context. Right. So if if I, let's say, was in a uh in a classroom setting and we were reading Um Inventors Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, for example, or if we were reading Richard Wright, by the way, up celebrated African American author but also a former communist,

which is very interesting discussion for another time. He's profiled is one of the writers that leave Seven writers in The God That Failed, which is one of the most important ideological takedowns of communism, Marxism, redistribution, and state is um you could ever read? It's really profound, really important. I think it's like you can get it online for free. It's one of these books where you I don't think you can even get it these days in print, but

you can download a digitally for free. The God That Failed. It's very very important work anyway. But if you were some of richard writes books, the N word appears. If you were in a class and you were told, you know, we're all reading from this book. You know, we're all reading from this Are you supposed to if you're a white student say the N word? But if you're a black and you can read the full word as written, what if you're a Hispanic student? By is it only?

Are we really now saying that there are words that only some people, by as determined by skin color, are allowed to say in any context? Okay, I can take this even a step further, and I know that this is Look, it's a sensitive issue for people. I understand all this. What about in a court situation if if someone is going to read, you know, let's say there's a fight and someone says that the one person claims the other used a racial slur in fact, that came up.

I can talk about that in just a moment, but in a court situation when the you know, if a white lawyer is reading the accusation, if a white prosecutor is reading the accusation, does he have to say he called her the or he called him the the N word. But a black prosecutor would just be allowed to say in an open court. You know, I really, I really mean this, like I'm curious to know what we're supposed to because keep in mind, if you make a mistake

on this, you your grounds of forgiveness are are very slim. Right, You're you're the chance of you being given either not just not being given a pass, being given a second chance. You better hope that you know you're you're lucky that day. And I I think that we're inherently in a problematic zone of thought when we can't you and I sitting here, maybe you have an answer to this, and by all means, send me on Facebook or call in and tell me.

But when we can't even determine what the expectations are for the usage of or or for what is acceptable usage of the N work, you know, I feel badly for that woman. I think she was She clearly when she realized what happened, was really embarrassed. I don't think she said it to be disrespectful. She was invited by

the rapper to say it. And I'm sure she's probably listening to his songs hundreds of times and it's just steered into her brain that what the lyrics are and everything else, and it's just it's just another example is by the way, there's a story out of an I'm not gonna play this audio for you because it's so heinous, but this is this is when you find out are you really in favor of free speech or or not?

Meaning free speech in the government intervention sense. I don't mean free speech as a concept, because this is about government action. A guy on the Long Island Railroad in New York, Um who was on a we're not playing the audio for it's out there if you want to see the audio, uh, Edward Ruggierio. He was having it. He had a dispute on the on the Long Island Railroad with an African American woman. I think I might have actually been two women, you can't really tell from

the video. And he said the stuff that you can never you know that you can never say that, no human beings should ever say really vile racist stuff of the kind of things that would be and should be a reputation destroying for someone to say to another person. Uh And and I won't repeat them on air, but they were on video that all said. He is being charged with third degree menacing as a hate crime and second degree aggravated harassment, punishable by up to a year

in jail. He did not physically hurt either of the women he argued with. He did not threaten to physically hurt the women. He just had a dispute with them. And I'm sorry, but no matter how much somebody says mean, nasty things that cannot and should not be a crime, there has to be more than just it's really mean. There has to be more than it's just really racist, because once you start to walk down that path. Okay, so if I say abortion is murderer? Is that am

I now committing a crime? I mean, we we don't even get me started on this one. Right calling someone an a legal immigrant that's mean? Is that a crime? What's the boundary here? If it's not about the about actual force or the imminent threat of force, If it's just gonna be saying something really nicet. This case was just this week. I mean, this is in the headlines. Queen's DA in New York City charged this guy up

to a year in prison. He is being threatened by a state or you know, state authority with imprisonment for saying nasty, racist things. I'm sorry, but hate speech is in fact protected under the First Amendment. We've been through this, the Nazis marching and Skokie, Illinois. We we've been through this. But right now, in our current moment, there's an effort to try and use the law to police speech even when it's the worst. And this guy said the worst stuff,

by the way, the worst, no question. I mean, he's this guy's scummy, but he shouldn't face prison for saying bad things. And I don't believe that some people should be allowed to say words and other people are literally never allowed to say it, because it's going to create inconsistencies that lead to further problems and a lot of aggravation on all sides. We'll be right back. Morgan Freeman is the latest person to get caught up in the

me too movement. Uh. This is courtesy of CNN. A young production assistant, I thought she had landed the job of her dreams when in the summer of two thousand and fifteen, she started work on Going in Style, a bank heist comedy starring Morgan Freeman and some others. The job quickly devolved into several months of harassment, she told CNN. She alleges that Freeman subjected her to unwanted touching and comments about her figure and clothing on a near daily basis.

Freeman would rest his hand on her lower back or rub her lower back. In one incident, he kept trying to lift up her skirt and asking and asked if she was wearing underwear. Okay, pretty amazing. Um that this kind of stuff was kept quiet as long as it was. Once again, I I gotta tell you, eight women came out here, eight different women accusing Freeman of stuff that this is not like oh maybe there was a misunderstanding, or you know, maybe he thought that there was that

this was all in good fun. I mean, this is this is harassment. This is abusive stuff. Yeah, eight eight women have come forward. Freeman has uh sense apologized. I'm not sure of the specifics of his apology. Um, but he definitely, uh, he definitely got caught up in this one. I gotta say, I wouldn't have guessed, you know, but yeah, you have no idea with with these actors. You know, you don't know who's who's being a good who's a good guy, and who's actually a creep until you find out.

Speaking of creeps, though, this big, big headline on on Drudge and other places to Harvey Weinstein, I mean, this is the Remember the Morgan Freeman stuff is bad, But I don't think anybody's alleging unless I'm missing something, any kind of criminal conduct. So while that falls into the very broad umbrella of me too, when you look at what's going on with Harvey Weinstein, that is as serious as it gets, and it looks like he may finally

face the music. Looks like Harvey Weinstein is expected to a surrender as as early as tomorrow in New York City to face sex assault charges in connection with an attack on a student actress. According the Daily News, he is expected to be charged with praying on Lucia evans Um for forcible well forcible sexual act in two thousand and four. So there you have it, looks like he

he could in fact finally go to prison. We'll see. Um, I don't know if he's He hasn't even been arrested yet, so we can't even say whether or not he has been, whether or not he has been is likely to be found guilty. More than fifty women, by the way, over fifty have accused Weinsteine of sexual harassment. I mean, this is that's an astonishing list. I mean, it's reminiscent in the sense of Bill Cosby, who just went uh just went down and and is facing really really long stretch

in prison. So the you know, the this me too movement, it's not just it's not just people that are being held to account in the public square. It's not just that now they're they're reputations are having to come to grips with the reality of their actions. But but there's real criminal ramifications for some of the people that have been outed as as part of this whole situation that is now unfolding, which I gotta say, you know, these are people who are really protected, had been really protected.

Weinstein is another example. Oh Schneiderman, by the way, I don't think he's facing any criminal stuff, but Schneiderman was the Attorney General of New York, New York State, and you know, he's a guy who's holding himself off as a ME two hero. A lot of this stuff coming.

I know, people are gonna say it's not a partisan issue, and you know they're they're they're gonna point at conservatives who have been involved in you know, when you when you look at the conservatives and media, I mean, I know what, I know what the left would say here, but when you look at the really uh really egregious cases that have been recently in the last twelve months or so that that have come to light here, there's some very prominent and very well, very connected left dists

in this in this whole. I mean, Weinstein is the best example. And I gotta think that, you know, if Harvey Weinstein isn't poling around with the Clintons and engaged in all kinds of fundraising and doing things that he would have gotten jammed up sooner. I really think. So this is a pretty incredible turn of events here where you have very rich, very powerful men. It's really predominantly in media and politics that are finally having to uh own up or at least finally being held to account

or what they've done in the past. Yeah, Weinstein, we might be talking about it tomorrow. If we do, UH, let's get on one of our favorite legal and us. We'll reach out to UH. I will reach out to Emily Camponior. Maybe the dersh will come talk to us about it. But that would be that would be quite a trial, my friends. If Weinstein actually ends up facing charges, assuming he doesn't take a deal, which who knows, but hasn't been arrested yet. Well, he's gonna turn himself in,

they say, But that hasn't happened yet. We will have to keep an eye an eye on that one. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton his back, so Jane Buck here on the show. We have some fantastic sponsors and partners, as you know, and one of them is nine Line Apparel. I've been talking to you about the upcoming race where nine Line has partnered with Angels of America's Fallen and Jeffrey Earnhardt altogether here to raise

money for the children of America's fallen service members. We actually have the NASCAR Cup driver on the line with us now, Jeffrey Earnhardt, to talk to us about this partnership with nine Line Apparel and Jeffrey Earnhart and NASCAR with it. Uh So, Jeffrey, thank you so much for calling and we appreciate it. Yes, sir, I appreciate you

having me on. All right, so the first we'll tell us about this race and and what what's gonna be on the car, what it represents to you, and how Angels of America's Falling plays into all this well, and uh, everything kind of came about with you know, uh Mon and Nonline Apparel's partnership and uh and seeing what we could do together, and um, you know they're they're an amazing company. Tyler Mary the owner, he uh he continues to try and give back. He's a he's a service member.

Uh what was the service member? Now retired? But um, you know their whole entire company, Matt Latta, everyone there, they're all they're all veterans and um, you know they continue to try and give back. So, uh, this whole deal came about with you know, partner with Angels Angels of America's Falling and uh trying to help raise money and raise awareness for you know, those who paid dultimate sacrifice, and uh what better race to do it on than

the Cocola six hundred on the borial day weekends. So, uh, it's an awesome opportunity. Really looking forward to our partnership together and and help them bring awareness to uh to those people, and and and continuing to show our respects and uh our our thank yous to all these men and women who who have paid ultimate sacrifice and their family and and your your car driving in this NASCAR race this weekend, you're going to have the names of

falling service members represented on the car. And what's the actual representation going to be as part of this partnership with Angels of America's Fallen Yeah, so we uh we did a fundraiser deal where you could go and purchase a Niline T shirt and submit a name and that name appear on our car for this weekend race and you would also receive a T shirt. Has we we've we've been partnered with them as well that to get

the word out about this. But so that's so those names are going to be on your on your car this weekend. So, I mean, how many people, Jeff watch a NASCAR race like this, By the way, you have some rough idea uh shoot, uh, millions, right, I mean it's gotta be millions. Yeah, it's Uh, it's a ton of people. You know, NASCAR obviously got a huge following, huge fans support and UH and you know what better what place to show respects than than a sport that's

so patriarch and American as Nascar now. Jeff also, is there gonna be a presentation of of funds in partnership with nine Line for America's Falling or is there gonna be some kind of a ceremony, a big check or something? And what can folks see? Yeah, we're gonna be doing uh presentation of a check for Angels of Americans Falling for fifteen thousand dollars. UH presented their their foundation on Saturdays.

Really excited to present him with this check and um, you know, show our our appreciation to to what they're doing and what they continue to do with trying to support and take care of the family members and kids of this who paid the ultimate sacrifice for our country. Jeffrey Earnhardt, NASCAR cup driver and UH partner of Nineline Apparel and Angels of America's Falling. Jeffrey, appreciate you joining us, my friend. Good luck this weekend and thank you for

all the work you're doing on this. Yes, sir, I appreciate your having me on. Thank you. We'll team. You know, We're gonna talk more about UH what's happening you know this this coming weekend. Tomorrow. I'm hoping to have on some friends from the UH, from the Armed Forces community, former military and talk to us about what memorial they means for them. You know. I I I think we're gonna have a show. We cover a lot of ground tomorrows, we always do, but I think some degree of reflection

going into the world weekend is a good thing. So that's that's our plan. Um. But that's one of the things I really like about some of the sponsors that we work with is that they have such a a focus and look there their partners with this show they've got, you know, we we really believe in their mission overall. But the mission goes beyond just a great product and

a great company. And when you can combine support for veterans with a great veteran owned company, and and and support for the families of the fallen with a veteran known company, I mean, I think that there's just a lot of this is win win all around. So, um, we're we're gonna go into a roll call here in just a few minutes. So that is that is coming up. But I wanted to share with you that we can. You know, I I'm gonna watch this NASCAR race. I am gonna be honest with you. I'm not somebody who

watched this a lot of Nascar. I don't know if I've ever actually watched a full NASCAR race all the way through. Um, but I'm gonna check it out this weekend and support of our our friend Jeffrey Earnhardt, Angels of America's Fallen and uh, of course our brothers and sisters over at nine Line Apparel. Roll call coming up. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Whoa funky Beats?

Please do not forget that coming soon to a theater near you. We will, in fact have the Freedom Hunt with Buck Sexton first week of June. Gonna be a fun show, a little little more of a laid back vibe, more characters, more voices, more just random thoughts and stories, a little less traditional radio feel than this show. And I'm really hoping all of you, especially those of you who are currently not even podcast listeners at all. I'm I'm asking you as a as a favor to the squad,

as a favorite of Team Buck. Please, uh just when when I when I give you the go word, go on iTunes, subscribe to that podcast and give it a shot. It's gonna be quick and easy, thirty or forty minutes roughly of content once a week. But i really want everyone listening to this show to be a part of that Freedom Hunt experience. So I'm gonna keep talking about it until we get there. But um, thank you for letting me do my thing. Okay, here we go. First,

up Patrick for a roll call. Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton, if you want to be included, Buck, you asked last week what generation we are associated with. To answer and us you already googled it. We are Zennials. It's a micro section of kids born from seventy three. We are a crossover that grew up with the first Apple computers and we're the first to experienced dial up Internet, yet still retain the social skills of our parents to

not be unkind to others. We were the first to use the internet, yet last to use it as a bullying tool. PS. You never gave me your view of Springsteen's Nebraska. Did you listen to it? Patrick? I have not listened to it yet, but I will give it a shot. And yes I've I've been told a little bit about this zennial phenomenon, and I will certainly look into it some more. So with that now established, let's get to uh Amy, who writes, don't lose the Valley

Girl voice. It's perfect for reading Comy memos and book X serves, uh, we must have this read the one where Comy talks about the size of Trump's hands. Also, Hey, Buck, great show. I've got a question. What kills more Americans each year? School shooters or illegal immigrants? Shouldn't we ban illegal immigrants using their logic? I mean, if it would prevent one senseless death of a child, isn't it worth it?

Just curious because I suspect liberal hypocrisy. Um Amy, you raise an interesting point, and it's I think related to what I was saying, which is that I don't get into the debate or the discussion over who or what what the percentages of illegal immigrants that are committing violent crimes. The point is that the percentage should be zero because they shouldn't be in the country in the first place. We should not have a problem of massive illegal immigration.

So another way of saying this is if we have ten million illegal immigrants in the country and they are responsible for year in and year out. I'm just picking a random number, folks, So this is not based on any Let's just say a grand total of fifty thousand relatively, you know, serious crimes, right, not parking ticket stuff. And I have no idea. That could be very low, that could be high. I don't know. I'm just picking the number at random. Uh, that's fifty crimes that shouldn't be

happening in this country. So that's how I look at it. I have a different perspective on this. H Paul writes Buck fantastic show. Only been listening for a few months, but I'm a dedicated podcast listener and have already recommended your show to some friends. Well, thank you so much, Paul, I really appreciate it. That means a lot. And by the way, that's how the show grows and it's successful. I really when I ask you, I hope you don't

a team. I hope you don't view it as a throwaway, And especially in the weeks and months ahead, I'm gonna be carrying a very heavy load here on the content side doing I got a TV project I'm announcing for you. We're gonna start live streaming the radio show. I'm gonna have the Freedom Hut podcast. I mean, we're really ramping up. So you know, when you're watching Fox News with a friend end or if you're just you know, having a chat about politics with somebody, try to try to throw

the Bucks x in podcast in the mix. You know, it's try to say, hey, check out the Buck Sexton Show, check out the Freedom Hut. And it really does help anyway. Paul writes, the best recommendation I've ever received about instincts is this. The hairs on the back of your neck are there for a reason. That's from a buddy on the Secret Squirrel side of Ops Shields High Paul from Team Buck Korea. Thank you so much, Paul, and I totally agree. Uh, do not ignore. You ignore your instincts

at your peril. Remember that doesn't mean you're a slave to your instincts. It doesn't mean that you give your instincts priority and your decision making process. But it is a data point that should be used for the purposes of decision making. And and you're getting those feelings for a reason, whether it's about a person, a place, a situation, do not ignore them. Next up, Paul Buck regarding the judge ruling that President Trump cannot block people on Twitter.

The First Amendment only protects free speech, but does not protect having to listen to speech. Just because you can say something doesn't give you the right to have it heard. Otherwise, the government could mandate that we must listen to all government mandated speech. Can you imagine being forced to have to listen to Nancy Pelosi speeches? Yes, everybody should have to listen to Nancy policy. Uh. Another thing I didn't get into yesterday on the whole Twitter judge ruling is, uh,

it's not a government platform. Twitter is a private entity, and so the fact that the president is engaging with a private entity, he doesn't really control anything. The government does not control anything with Twitter. Uh, He's only interacting with Twitter as an individual. Under their terms of service, Twitter is in control. If if Twitter was a government on enterprise, then yeah, there would be a problem with blocking people because they're you know, the the government can

engage in that kind of speech selection. But you know, the president can watch one channel, he can watch another. That's up to the cable companies. He's opera, he's he's interacting with them as an individual. All right. So there you have it, Ah, there you have it. Next up, Brian writes, heard you talking about the ketogenic diet. My daughter's doctor put her on a due to some health issues. In a show of support. My wife and I are joining her. Downside for me is that I like beer,

which is a no no on this diet. However, I can drink vodka, jin bourbon, Scotch, whiskey and tequila, so I am good shields high well Brian, hopefully hopefully you're drinking some of our G four tequila if you're gonna be trying some tequila, and yeah, let us know how the ketogenic diet goes. I know for some people it's works. Wonders. Really interesting book that I read when I first got diagnosed with Celiac disease, gosh, six seven years ago now,

is called wheat Belly. And I'm not gonna say that this is necessarily a balanced perspective on it. You gotta

read it's written by a doctor. But man, there are some people think that genetically modified wheat also known as dwarf wheat because it's very short and thick and grows very quickly versus traditional wheat, which is longer and looks And by the way, if you look at photos of what genetically modified wheat stalks look like now grain you know, wheat stalks versus what they looked like before the genetic modification looks like an entirely different plant. So there's something

going on. I can't say that I have all the answers, but it is worth looking into um anyway. That wheat bellies an interesting book and makes them pretty astonishing claims. Here we go. We have hold on a second slurpy slushy? You say tomato, same differences from Michael Um. Okay, So slurpy and slushy are the same. All right, there we go. Bub If you ever had a fresh gen bang utah from a sidewalk cart that has washed down with warm doujiang,

you wouldn't say, soy milk is poison. My wife makes her own doujiang with a machine that grinds up the soybeans, adds hot water and produces the real deal. American soy milk you buy in a carton is a pale imitation. Not sure I'd ever take food advice from a guy who ate sticks of butter. Also, don't think I'll take your advice on natural history. A civit doesn't look like a bat without wings. It's a freaking cat. Well, excuse me, Michael. Of First of all, I think I ate a stick

of butter when I was like four. Okay, so I don't think that's really fair. And the civit, I I will leave that to the judgment of the audience what a civitt looks like. But yes, civit coffee comes from their poop. It's very very expensive. And homemade soy milk I will I will concede this. Homemade almond milk, homemade brazil nut milk can be absolutely delicious. Um. Stuff you get in the store, though, with soy milk is really gross. Just I'm just saying, does not taste good. You know,

soy milk is poison. I stand behind it. Uh Mary. Next up here, mass State Senate, Massachusetts just voted to make us a sanctuary state, be as something called the Immigrant Civil Rights Protection Act disgusted and disheartened. Well, Marie, it's it's just lawlessness. And and you know, I don't know how people can see there's anything other than that. You're you're trying to you're using state and local government to obstruct a lawful exercise of the federal government's law

enforcement authorities. And that's what that's what it is. So the Massachusetts not surprising, Massachusetts very blue, you know, but you know, sanctuary city, we will be a sanctuary city. We will not allow to cause to um can't do a Boston. I know. We got a very robust team Buck Boston contingent, and they're like, Buck, come on, keep keeping in your wheelhouse on stay in New York. Uh, let's go to Jen who writes great show. There you go,

Jenuine learning question. If Trump cannot block people harassing him on YouTube, then uh, why can't YouTube, Facebook and Twitter defund and terminated accounts of conservatives because they feel it's hate speech. It's also absurd, Jen, I agree, it all is absurd, And you're raised some very insting points. All right, seem it's gonna be for today. Thank you for being here with me. In the Freedom Hut tomorrow a freestyle Friday in advance of the holiday weekend. Get into that

and much more until next time. Shields Hot. When you're at work, your dogs are cooped up all day inside, so you know when you get home they want to burn off some energy and start running around. But you know what if they get under your fence, now you've got a safety problem. The dog can be running around, who knows how close they are to the spree. That could just disappear into the woods. You don't want that headache. You don't want that problem. That's where dig Defense comes in.

Dig Defense is genius. It solves the problem that pen others have of digging. It also means by the way that predators like boxes, raccoons, skunks, you name it, they can't dig under the fence to get into your yard. It comes in a bunch of different models. It's easy to install with the hammer and pair of gloves. It's available right now at Loews Menard's Way There and online. Check out dig Defense at stop the dig dot Com. That's stop the dig dot Com. No more pets going

out under the fence, no more predators coming in. Dig Defense