Trump Derangement on Steroids - podcast episode cover

Trump Derangement on Steroids

Jul 17, 20181 hr 52 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

The media goes hyper-hysterical over the Trump-Putin summit.

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

You are entering the freedom hunt. What a day of hysteria. You have the left, the Democrats, much of the media, including some of the more centrist media, saying that it was a treason summit between Trump and Putin. My friends, I will peel away the craziness, the historyonics the exaggerations, and discuss with you what really happened today, what did not, what it means going forward, and why everyone just needs to take a breath and take a chill. That are

more coming up from the buck Sexton. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins almost analysts no barer. Relationship has never been worse than it is now. However that changed as of about four hours ago. Nothing would be easier politically than to refuse

to meet. As president, I cannot make decisions on foreign policy in a feudal effort to appease partisan critics or the media or Democrats who want to do nothing but resist and obstruct. I would rather take a political risk in pursuit of peace than to risk peace in pursuit of politics. People came to me, Dan Coates came to me and some others. They said, they think it's Russia. I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia. I will say this, I don't see any reason why

it would be. But I really do want to see the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the d n C. We have great confidence in my intelligence people, but uh, I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial. Today, Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show, everybody. It was quite a health sinky summit. Oh my, watch the whole thing today. You saw people in in a

level of of rage. I mean, they have not been I think this upset at Trump since the day of the what was it the day of the the Muslim ban announcement? Right? That was maybe the last time I can remember this much. Oh no, Actually, they haven't been this upset at Trump really probably since uh, since the Charlotteville white supremacist rally. Um. They they are very angry at the president. A lot of Republicans. I saw the statement from John McCann. Everyone, everyone just piling on, piling on,

piling on. Okay, let's try to peel this back for a moment. You know, I know it's it's very easy to to at this point take the position of, well, you know, I love Trump, He's doing a great job, but you know, this was uh, this was a huge, huge, terrible thing and we should all be ashamed, and will you know, hopefully the president will get back on track

tomorrow or something. I'd say this said there was a an there were errors today, to be sure, I mean, I can't I can't say the President United States standing up, you know, next top Putin? Who can I just you know, there's some perspective like to add to this, like, for example, Putin is no worse now than he was four years ago, or eight years ago or fifteen years ago. Okay, he in fact, he hasn't invaded in any countries recently, and he has invaded a bunch of he did invade a

bunch of countries. But Obama was president and this is not what about it? And this is fair game because they're saying they're comparing look at Trump now versus what Obama said, look at Trump now versus previous presidents. Okay, well, Russia has gone way out of line with previous presidents in a way that we have not seen yet with Trump as president. Remember the election hacking, People get yelled at me for this election hacking happened on Obama's watch.

And by the way, this this little line that gets skipped over. You know, you'll hear people say, oh, well, and I saw someone over at CNN said, oh, you know, was it was the Obama administration to sleep at the wheel. No, that's actually a convenient narrative. It's not that the Obama administration was napping on this one. It's not that the Obama administration got caught off guard with Russia election interference, which went we're talking about Facebook accounts and Twitter bots, folks.

I mean, this is not this is not the you know, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and people are calling it that, which is just even crazier. The actual impact of this was almost certainly zero. What this did, as people say, oh, it undermine our democracy to you know it, it calls into question the foundations of the Republic, of the future, of the thing of the no, no, no, no. It

accomplished almost certainly zero nothing. All those things that Russians did it Maybe caused Podesta a day or two of embarrassment. It caused a little bit of infighting in the d n C. Find me one Democrat who changed his or her mind about voting for Hillary because of the Wiki leagues act. I mean, I have not met a single person. I haven't heard anybody say that happened. I also need

to know, hold on a second. So there's nothing There was nothing really bad in the d n C or the Podesta emails, right, Nothing to see here but the hack of those emails by a simple phishing scam, which you have probably been subjected to yourself and other auspices many times. I know I have. Is the is the cyber nine O level and of our era. This is this is hysterics, This is insanity. And I know that

right now. You know that they've created this, this narrative, the media has created this construct of you know, Trump is Putin's puppet. Why is he doing this? Look at what he's doing? And and that said, I wish Trump would make it harder for them sometimes to say these things. Right today, you know, today he's he scored a couple of own goals, no question about it. But he was being Trump in the way that he speaks. He was being imprecise and you know, the the the actual statement

he gave. I went back and read every word of the transcript twice the day after the press conference, so I didn't miss anything, and I want to make sure I saw everything that statement he gave us. Fine, he's meeting with Trump, he's trying to have you know, some I'm sorry, meeting with Putin. He's trying to have some rapport building, some relationship building. He said pretty straightforward stuff.

It was in the Q and A when they started asking him about all this you know, the you know, Russia and hacking and do you you know who do you believe in all this stuff? And the press they feel like they finally got him with this stuff. They finally got him. Now there there. I I find this bother some of multiple levels. As I say, I'm not gonna see here pretend that Trump didn't make their job easier than he showed up because he did. Okay, he knows better. But I also sit here in judgment of

a man who is completely undersieged by the media. I mean, the history onics you see from this media. Oh you cancel the meeting with us, or he didn't do this, or you know, he's destroying democracy with all this stuff that you're hearing all the time. Is it's just it's it's lunacy. They're not covering this president. They're trying to

chear this president down. Any abbey, any honest observer would see the obvious here, which is that the the media, by and large, I know, it's not Fox, it's not talk radio, it's not it's not the Hill, you know, but the media by and large is an opposition party to this president. That's it. They're not trying to tell stories about national policy. They're not trying to inform the public.

They're trying to propagandize to the public. And they want to destroy this administration and everybody around it and pretend like it never happened. And so the earth with salt and install Hillary as are you know, our great savior Hello, which I'm gonna have nightmares just thinking about it. I

will walk you through the good, the bad, and the ugly. Here, I'll walk you through all the different components of of what happened, because I think it's really important cause you're gonna hear a lot of stuff from the next few days about how you know this is such an outrage and how good Trump and and the primary area where where I do not like what Trump did because it actually is a little bit of Obamaism. Okay, so look

we're I'm keeping it real. I'm gonna tell you what I think is being overblown and over his stated I don't like the well, you know, we did beds. It was actually really Trump's tweet before the meeting, and and some of the insinuations or some of the suggestions when he says, you know, they've been dated bad stuff. We did bad stuff. It's kind of our fault, it's kind of their fault. No, no, no, no, no. Obama's Russia

policy was a joke, and it's bad. But Russia is in a class by itself when it comes to doing bad stuff. All right, you just run down the whole list. Russia currently has a defector, which is what Snowden is in their custody who God knows how much how much damage he's done to our long term intelligence and military capabilities because he wanted us all to know that, you know that the stuff we do online the Internet at the government's monitoring like great, I mean I thought everybody

kind of knew that already. I don't know really what's new. By the way, no laws have changed really because of this. Nothing is really been altered of any significance in your life as a result of what Snowden has done. But I know people get very mad about that a whistle er. No, Snowdon is a defector and he betrayed his country. So the Russians have given him, say harbor. The Russians they do in prison and murder journalists, they do act. You know,

it's a kleptocracy. I mean, you had a you had a country that went through that decided or that you know, had this process of privatization of assets where the people who you know, had the biggest clubs and the most guns basically got to got to privatize all the national assets. And that's how you got ali arcs and billionaires. These people are not geniuses who are in that country. They

didn't start Google, you know, they didn't start Apple. They were like, you will give me this little bust your skull, that's it. You know, this is this is one of the problems we have. All these Russian billionaires running around not so impressed. They were the guys at the top of the intel and mafia hierarchy, and they, you know, to the victor went to spoil, so to speak. So I have no illusions about Russia and no illusions about Putin.

Do not think he's a good guy. People love this whole thing, though, you know, every needs to chill with this. He's a former intelligence offic I'm like, whoa, whoa, slow your role. I'm a former intell this officer. You know, not all of us are bad. You know, let's let's not get all it's like a crazy here. Former intelligence

officer is trained the deception and lines. I'm like, hey, hey, hey, settle down still that captain um but now he is he's a KGB guy and and he's he's you know, the guy's got ice in his veins, and you know, you wouldn't want him to have power of life and death over here. How much is for sure? Okay? Fine. I don't like the you know, they do bad things.

We do bad things construct because that's what the left does all the time, and I think Trump fell into that today And that's my main point of criticism that that part of it is. But it's also rhetorical, which is why I sit here like Buck, Why aren't you as panicked? Oh my gosh, Pie, partisan backlash and all these Republicans on the hill just rogers, just you know, I just don't feel like anyone is supporting or you know, America because Trump in there just everyone who take the

temperature down a little bit. Nothing has changed because of Trump's beating. Today, I'm seeing all these people say, oh my gosh, decades to come, we'll be talking. No, it's just not true. Oh does anyone think that Putin now makes moves against the United States because he thinks he understands Trump so well? I don't mean this disrespectfully, but Trump doesn't understand Trump so well. You think Putin wants

to get on the wrong side of this guy. You know, I've said it before, but you know, those of you who are fans at Tombstone, you want Doc Holiday on the street Howitzer, if you know what I mean. You want the guy sometimes, the the one that has the most firepower, to be the one that nobody really knows, like, you know, they don't want to mess with him. So

that's another part of this. And by the way, I think that's a if this North Korean situation works out, it will be in large part because Kim John guns like this guy. I don't. I don't think this guy is playing. I don't think he's messing around when he says that. If we step out a line, and with Obama, what we saw is was it was messing around. It was all for show. It was all multilateralism and let's

all be friends and let's all chat. So but so when when we look at this, you know, on the one and my main point in criticism and this is what onces you take away from this, and then we'll get into the intel component of this. And John Brennan, the former CIA director, you know, tweeting out crazy stuff, and you know Anderson Cooper who's not an opinion journalist but says it's the worst thing he's ever seen from

a president. Well, John could grab that audio. By the way, I don't see that on our list here, and I definitely want that, um just to refer to it. Uh, here's what I'll say. I don't like the I don't like the we're bad, they're bad construct ever, because America is better than everybody else. Okay, so let's start with that. And I think Trump didn't mean it that way, but it didn't sound good and and it's not it's not helpful. Okay, fine, the other side of it. Let's just start from nothing

changed today. Nothing happened. You know, no terrible decision was made, no one started a war, no one fired, no one even fired off a limited missile strike, or you know, engage in some behavior that's going to be you know, haunting us for years or decades to come. That's all hysteria. That's all hysteria. That's all people unleashing all this pent up anxiety and craziness that's been built up by a media apparatus that just wants to see Trump destroyed. It's

all gonna be. Okay, I will tell you how and why. We'll look at what the he Here's the big point of contention that I want to get into. Now they're they're saying, look at what Trump said about who he believes his intel agencies are the Russians, and it's like, oh my gosh, he's undermine all the intelligence brom First of all, everyone I know who's a Trump supporter, and I have quite a few an intelligence he's like, da,

it's Trump. But anyway, I want to get into what's really going on here, why would Trump say what he said, and also what do we need to work into this conversation to really understand the full depth of it end. You know, I'm one advantage you have here listen to this show is I've actually been in the room with the cee I Director talking about top level intelligence policy. I've actually been the room with the President previously talking

about intelligence matters. I've run the briefing for the President in the Oval office. So when I'm telling you like this is kind of what I'm seeing on the intel world, not just some guy that read in the book somewhere, Although you can learn a lot in books, I've actually experienced it. So that's one fun advantage you have a listened to this show versus that versus pretty much every other show across the country right now on radio or TV. So I got that going for me, which is nice.

Eight four eight four nine buck more on this Helsinki summit when we come back. You have been watching perhaps one of the most disgraceful performances by an American presidents at his summit in front of a Russian leader, sly that I've ever seen. Shameful disgraceful treason US. I've never heard of American president talk that way on an international stage. That we talked about Hillary Server and what it's embarrassed Cilium is embarrassing. They came across as playmates on a

soccer field more than they did international rivals. What many would say disgraceful performance. He chose to stand with Russia and walk away from our rule of law and our system of justice. It's just pathetic. He criticized American citizens, Secretary Clinton and um others as opposed to really taking advantage of a world stage with all the world's eyes upon them to point out how unacceptable Russia's behavior and in appearance in our election and the elections of other

democratic countries around the quobe Is. But he just shirked those responsibilities. I just I cannot understand how the national city team can continue to abide by this, and how Pompeo and Bolton and Kelly can continue in their jobs. Uh. This I think rises to the point of good American patriots resigning. Yeah, that's right. Let's let's just have all the top national security officials resigned from the United States government.

That's a great idea. John Brennan, who formally voted for a communist by the way, Uh you heard it all their folks. Disgraceful, pathetic, treason us, even in fact Brennan himself, who was a super hack and a leftist extraordinaire, which now we know, right thanks to social media, we know who these people really are before things. Oh no, just look at my resume. I'm just I'm just a public servant, right. They used to play that game all the time. Same

thing with the media. Well I'm just Donald middle journalists. Well, your last ten tweets were negative to Trump, and you've never shown a tweet that was positive to him. So maybe we're onto something here. Here's what Brennan wrote, Donald Thomps. Donald Trump's press conference performance in Helsinki rises to and exceeds the threshold of high crimes and misdemeanors. It was

nothing short of treasonists. Not only were Trump's comments in basilic, he is holly in the pocket of Putin Republican patriots, where are you? How is it treas nous? What are We're not a war with Russia? He's not giving aid to the enemy at a time of war. Oh I'm sorry, Wait, no,

I guess we figured out what's going on here. To laugh, the Democratic Party really believes that hacking Podesta and the d n c's email accounts with a fishing scam, which is effectively a prank and propaganda via Facebook and Twitter is war. Well, they better strap on a helmet and grab the m for my friends, because war is a messy and dangerous business. We've got to talk more about this. We'll be right back. Liberty, truth, and great hair. The

Buck Sexton Show is back. Truly, truly extraordinary, very moment in American history, something I thought I would never see. Up first, the President of the United States delivering a stunning rebuke to his own US intelligence community, with the entire world watching, not just the intelligence community, but the US law enforcement community, including his own Justice Department and

his FBI. Standing right next to the Russian leader of Vladimir Putin at a joint news conference here in Helsinki, the President simply refused to side with his own US intelligence and law enforcement agencies in the Russia investigation. Let's engage in some forbidden thoughts here, my friends. Let let's do the analysis that we're not allowed to do. How about that? Why not right, Let's let's just go for it.

Let's forget about what they want us to think, what they want us to say, forget about all the things that they would say if any of them listening to this show or heard me talking to you, heard your thought in response to me. Let's just try to get right down to it, shall we? A few things that come to mind here? And I have I have so much on this. I mean we could spend gosh, we could spend not just the whole show. He's been a whole week he is talking about this, but I'll try

to cut down to the essential parts. I know your time is very valuable, and I don't want to waste any of it, but only forbidden thoughts out it. First of all, let's say Trump had said, yeah, I know what I I believe my intelligence community, and I think that that my distinguished colleague or you know, whatever distinguished

counterpart here. Mr Putin is incorrect in his assessment if he had said that, if he had sided with his intelligence community, do you think it would have resulted in any less of the history on its, the hysterics and the complete freak out we've seen from the meeting now. Of course, not would it buy him any goodwill? Would they stop saying his Putin's puppet? Would they stop saying that there's some mysterious information that Putin holding over his head. Right?

Trump's a billionaire, folks, He didn't need this, Right, he didn't have to do this. He's not like Hillary. It's not like this was you know, ever since he was ten, hag I got to be president. Right, it's not it's not him. We're lucky that he saved us from Hillary. I am grateful to this man for saving us from not just Hillary, but decades of left wing soda mayor style justices on the Supreme Court, who would just be just you want to talk about undermining institutions. So Mayor

takes a chainsaw to the constitution. It's a joke. Do you want to deal with that? That's the future you want, that's the country you want to live in. Join the never trumpers. You want to get down to some of the lost analysis here, some of the things that don't really make sense, we should ask some questions about. Well, then you know where you are. You're hearing the freedom of my friends. Let's get to it. So for so,

this whole notion of him siding. Oh, if he'd only like, like, if he had sided with the intel community, there be no problem. I mean, now, let's let's take a look at this for a moment, shall we. I am old enough to remember because I worked in the CIA's Iraq office. You can imagine that meant that I knew quite a bit about And now I wasn't in it during the whole w m D run up, but I knew quite a bit about how that went down. Who you know,

who was involved in what happened and everything else. And for eight years of the well, no more than that, for the eight years of the Obama administration, and for five years of the Bush administration, all I ever heard was, oh, my gosh, you see how stupid the intelligence community of the c i A was on a rock wm D. There are such idiots, and we went to war over that.

A lot of people died over that decision. Now I don't plan on relitigating the wisdom of going into a rock right now, but to be sure, there were problems in the analysis about the w m D, and it was a mistake that the Bush administration made because there was a case for regime changing Iraq that was not solely dependent on w m D. That could have been made and I think might have been compelling enough that we would have had an international mandate to do it, But they decided to go with w m D. And

that's a whole other thing. But they would say that the CIA was, you know, full of idiots, and we all they don't know anything. The intelligence community is infamous for its underperformance, etcetera, etcetera. Right full of idiots, c I a full of imbeciles according to the left and torturers.

They want to talk about undermining institutions. Well, what do you think it's like when your college some of your colleagues are worried that the Obama administration, the new Obama administration, might prosecute them for doing their jobs, including with a legal opinion from the White House Council about how this is how talking about enhanced interrogation, this is legal. You have you have the White House lawyers saying yes, this

is legal, and then you got a new administration. I was like, maybe we should throw you in prison forever, ruin your life and your reputation, because you know, the left wing wants some scalps. You think that, Oh and Buck he didn't do that. Yeah, he thought about it real close to do what you think that made people are working the talence community on the front lines feel good.

I'm playing on the front lines too, not the the the desk bound analysts of which I am quite familiar with, my friends who tend to be very left wing intelligence community wide. Just as I've been telling you about law schools and the penetrations of the left everywhere else across the country, which we are not paying enough attention to, the bureaucracy has gone hard left. And to that point, she's that that's a perfect transition. But let me hold

on the bureaucracy going hard left for second. This is important. It is important. This is a show that I hope some of you will play back and listen to more than once, or you'll listen to it more than once. Not played back. That might be a little intense, but you listen more than once. I think there's some very important arguments. You won't hear them anywhere else, at least not that I'm aware of. It's been all day going through the transcripts, reading the indictment last week. By the

indictment last week's a joke. It's a joke, punch of punch a Russian g r U officers. They are drinking vodka by the bottle, laughing their butts off at Muller is going to indict this. That's funny. It is funny. It's not gonna do anything. But I'll get to that. There's so much here that no one spent any time focus on. Oh my gosh, Trump is a trader, no false lies. Stop. But they said that back to just the undermining the institutions and the game's left is willing

to play. They said that that the you know that the w M d c I a intelligence community, intelligence community was was abused by the left and by the media for years because of what happened. They were rock and for missing not eleven okay, and but now we're told that they're infallible. The same thing you've you've kind

of seen a little different. But you know, for years under the Obama administration, the real story, I mean, the real the real ideology behind say, the Black Lives Matter movement and see and end which was gleefully covering like these protests and people burning down buildings and looting CDs s and selling all the pills on the streets, and you know, look at this fire and look at this

buildings behind us. It's on fire, gosh, but it's a mostly peaceful protest people mostly peaceful, only some buildings on fire, mostly peaceful. But the main storyline you'd get from the left was that cops, you know, of whom I worked with and have cops in my in my family, cops are racist basically and including just so we're all clear, black and Hispanic and other all cops, right, So that's at least I guess they were across the board on

this one. The cops are basically racist. That was the real underlying message of the Black Lives Matter movement, and that you know that they're hunting and murdering young black men. And by the way, I'll debate any I. I took Van Jones argument apart on this issue on TV on Wolf Blitzer Show, and they never had me back in Wolf Flitzer Show after that because he did the whole wall. That's not what they say. Actually, Van, I was at the Black Lives Matter protests. I have audio of it,

I have video of it. I was there, I took photos. This is what they say, this is the mentality, this is the ideology. Don't don't tell me I covered it. WHOA, they're not creating a climate of hate towards cops. Yeah they are, But notice how that was what they're doing

the A bombers And now with the FBI. How dare you All the FBI agents are looking at this and they're they can't believe the president is I want to ask you if if you get an FBI agent fifteen years in the job, doing the doing the real law enforcement work, not like hob nobbing with policymakers in d C, like out of the field office somewhere, what do you think theod chances he's probably more pro trumpety is pro Hillary. It just just put that out there. I think you

know the answer. You know, if you're a real law and order guy, are you you tend to be more on Trump side of the issue or you tend to be more okay, so, but the real issue here for me is that they degrade these institutions when it's convenient for them and end for political reasons. They pretend to care so much about them. And I speak from from

you know, I saw. I mean, the whole Scooter Libby thing was just a an effort to uh use, you know, use the intelligence community and use the feud over a rock as as a kind of as a political weapon, as a political catharsis for the left. They just needed to get somebody, right, That's what that was all about, the need to get somebody, and they want to get somebody now. But they're willing to undermine institutions, no question

about it. And they've done in the past and now on Trump's point, and this is what got them all so upset. Right. I know I haven't played that much sound from the press conference. I'll play more. We got plenty of time. I'm also gonna make fun of the left new superstar for being a complete ignoramus auntil politics. We'll get to that. Okazia Cortez quite an interview she gave folks the left new progressive star. Yeah, I just don't know about that. Really, we'll get there. But here's

what Trump said. This is the big the the oh my gosh moment or a couple of oh my gosh moments, I guess, but play clip twelve. I have confidence in both parties. I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server, what happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the d n C. Where are the servers they're missing? Where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's emails?

Thirty three thousand emails gone, just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's a disgrace that we can't get Hillary Clinton's thirty three thousand emails. I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but uh, I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today, and what he did is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with

their investigators with respect to the twelve phone. I think that's an incredible offer. Now you know it's it's not an incredible I mean it's incredible, and that he shouldn't believe it. It is incredible, as in, there should be lack of belief because you know, the Russian law enforce and Russian government and the rule of law is a joke. Okay, So it's like I said, folks, I'm not this is not the pro Putin zone. I no illusions about Russia. I'm just dealing in the reality of what we care

about and what's really going on here. And I think Trump got a little ahead, got a little over Skis on that one. And he's like, well, you know, he's trying to make a good impression on Poot and he's trying to mend this relationship, and he knows the media is just trying to play gotcha and antagonize him and have him and soul putin to his face and all

this stuff never before, is it. You know, for for decades the media when the Communists in in the Soviet Union, we're threatening to annihilate, truly annihilate ust, to truly actually destroy our country and our civilization and murder all of us in the process. The left was I was like, well, you know, I think they've got some good ideas and we shouldn't be so harsh with them. And you know now that Russia is like a is a a shadow of what it once was. And and we've had this

strained relationship with him for a number of years. You know, Trumpet shown to reach other Look, how dare you, sir? Russia so evil? But on this point about whether he believes the intelligence community believes the Russians. I'm just gonna put this out there. Not only have we had some intel community stuff that in the past is, as a left will tell you, under other circumstances, was a big problem.

You've got the former CIA director under Obama today calling Trump a trader, saying that he's treason us, which means he's a trader. You're the former FBI director James Comey under Obama sharing this. This was the day an American president stood on foreign soil next to a murderous, lying thug and refused to back his own country. Patriots need to stand up and reject the behavior of this president.

The head of the CIA, the former Director of National Intelligence under Obama Clapper, the former director of the FBI Colly, the former deputy director of the FBI McCabe from her acting Attorney General of the United States, Sally Yates. These are all people who are in the intel community world at the very top, who are rank partisans who want to destroy Trump, bring him down, ruined his presidency, and

end this. Are we allowed to think about that at all when it comes to how much Trump is this gonna say, Yeah, whatever, the intelligence community says, now, are we allowed to think about how a dossier became the basis in part for a FISA warrant from within this whole intelligence community process we're talking about here, Are we allowed to say, you know that that seems a little problematic?

Maybe that same I see, that same group of bureaucracies and agencies could use a second look when it comes to Trump related issues. And and that's what's really forbidden to say here, folks, That's what they really don't want you to get to. Who if you were Trump and I have we have to go to a break here, also gonna run over a station break, and we're gonna

get into problems. But if you were Trump, oh and Michael Hayden and there too, tweeting out photos of concert creation camp saying that's Trump's policy at the border, would you think that the assessments that these people oversee we're fair to you. Let me let me dig into that a little more. We come back, because I know this process, and I don't think anyone else you're gonna listen to on radio does quite honestly, I know it from doing it, from being involved in it. Stay with me. We'll get

back to it. Would you, now, with the whole world watching, tell President Putin, would you denounce what happened in and would you warn him to never do it again? Where is the server? I want to know where is the server? And what is the servers saying? Were that being said? All I can do is ask the question. My people came to me, Dan Coachs came to me and some others. They said, they think it's Russia. I have President Putin, he just it it's not Russia. I will say this.

I don't see any reason why it would be. But I really do want to see the server. You know, Trump doesn't also want to do what the media is trying to get him to do all the time, which is too insult Putin and just just play by their tune. He just doesn't want to do it. And why would he have any trust in the media. I mean, he he knows who's out to get him. I mean, they've staked their careers on it. What if they really think happens if if there is no you know, there's no collusion.

I'm gonna talk about Muller indictments little more coming up, especially in light of what happened today. What happens over at CNN, where everyone just kind of moves on, and actually the main story they've been running with for eighteen months now is yeah, you know, no big deal is that we were wrong with that one. There's nothing there.

I also can't help but notice that this phenomenon of every major former intel and law enforcement bureaucrat from a Democrat administration, how has come out forcefully and in every way possible against a sitting president you want to talk about undermining institutions. The former FBI director of, the former acting attorney general, the former deputy director of the FBI, the former CIA director of, the former director of National Intelligence.

They are all anti Trump zealots. This is not normal. It used to be the case that once you had served in these roles, you would, sure you go into private sector, You do some consulting, maybe you write a book, but you don't leap into the political fray, and you certainly don't let it be thought widely that you have access to inside information about you know, just how this

president is really a traitor. I mean, you're not gonna say you have it, but you know, you want everyone to think you got it, which Brennan has certainly done, which is completely unethical, by the way, and and and absolutely undermines, uh again, the faith that anybody, including Trump, should have in these institutions, given all the stuff the Intel community, even all the stuff that these see your folks, Remember it's not the rank and file analysts and officers.

But given what's been going on at the top level, wouldn't it be kind of crazy if Trump didn't have a little bit of like, yeah, those guys, you know, we'll look at it. He's not saying he doesn't trust their analysis of North Korean nuclear weapons. He's saying he doesn't trust their analysis of him. That's a big difference. If you want to be competitive in today's marketplace, you have to have the best information possible at your disposal.

My friends, that's where Global Verification Network comes in. They are the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. Look, I know the CEO personally, and I know how seriously he takes the work of his company, the risk mitigation experts that he has. They're based in Chicago, they're all across the country. They will make sure that your case gets the attention that it deserves, and that you get all the answers you need in a timely fashion.

They also make sure that the information they have on your background, investigation and vetting cases is kept here in the States. They don't off short in terms of the work. They don't off short in terms of the servers that's really important. They have total control the process. Go to my g VN dot com or call eight seven seven six nine five nine that's my GVN dot com or eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine Global

Verification Network. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, America, You're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show. Activity Analysts. No, let's go into clip fourteen. Chihlen's here what Putine had to say about an AP reporter and whether Russia chame dirt on Trump. I did hurt, We allegedly collected compromising material and Mr Trump when he was visiting Moscow distinguished.

When President Trump visit Moscow, back then I didn't even know that he was in Moscow. I treat President Trump with utmost respect. But back then, when he was a private individual, a businessman, nobody informed me that he was in Moscow. Let's take St. Petersburg's Economic Forum, for instance, and there was over five hundred American businessman the high rank in the high level ones I don't even remember the last names of which, and every one of them.

Do you think that we tried to collect compromising material and niche and every single one of them. Well, it's difficult to imagine another nonsense of a bigger scale than this. Well, please just disregard these issues and don't think about this anymore again, Welcome back to the box action show. So, so there you had putin apparently now the scariest man in the world for everybody, Right, he's been scary for a long time, or he's been the same guy for a long time, and now we're all supposed to be

really worried about him because Trump won the election. Because you gotta remember, this is all this is all just an extension of Trump as president. He wasn't supposed to be president. Hillary is supposed to be president. People lost power, lost prestige, lost jobs, and they're mad and that drives all of this. Now, the media thought they were gonna have eight years. If really think about what a think about what a fantastic media and nirvana it would be

for CNN and MSNBC if they had had a Hillary presidency. Oh, just strolling over to the White House, you know, Oh, yes, we're that's right, we're the media. We have no without without fear or favor. Hey, Hill, it's good to see you. I mean the whole thing. But yeah, you're here. We are now. And and the press asks a question before I get into Putin's answers. There here a Putin responding at this press conference today, the Helsinki summit, the Treason summit,

Oh my gosh, yeah, the hells Summit. And and they're asking Putin, do you have compromise information on Trump? That's a that's just meant to disrespect the president, our president. That's all that is. Is there any universe in which in which Vladimir Putin says, oh, yeah, yes, we've got the information on him. No, of course not. There's no universe in which that's gonna be a thing. But they want to push on this because the press believes this,

They think they have compromising information on Putin. And let me also say the Russians are, from an intelligence perspective, very aggressive, and it would not surprise me to find out that they do have comprom compromat as they called, uh compromat or however you say it in Russian. Uh, But it wouldn't surprise me if they had that on a whole bunch of businessmen. But what do what do we really think they could have on Trump that's so

bad that they could change his behavior? You know, let's even this thing, the dossier and the you know, the pe tape and all the stuff they've talked about, the media still believes that. I go, I guess they still believe this. I think what they also understand is, you know, there's nothing that is conceivable at this point that they could come out with as a story about Trump where people would say, oh, well, well now he's you know, now it's gone too far, you know. I mean, it's

just they're just grasping. They're grasping. There's nothing there. And if Putin had this information on Trump, Uh, what is what is really the endgame here? How does Trump think this really goes? He's he's gonna trust Putin? All why do you put himself in such a compromising situation the first But it doesn't have to do this? So and the whole whole thing that just strikes me as as

complete and utter garbage. But I wanted to get into something else here, um and that is the hacking and the propaganda has two different components of this, Right, there's hacking and there's propaganda. Let's now and and that was the whole the Russian effort that we know of during

the during the election. You also have this woman today arrested in d C for essentially FARA violation Foreign Agent Registration Act violations, Maria Boutina, who studied American University and as a founder of the pro gun Russian advocacy group Right to Bear Arms um and UH. She was accused of operating the direction of high level official who worked for the Russian Central Bank. And they're effectively saying she

was a Russian agent without declaring herself. And also they're charging her with conspiracy, which I will tell you is the most sweeping and malleable of all federal prosecutorial tools that exist. Conspiracy is like two people that have bad thoughts about something that the government doesn't like. And that's a little bit of a simplification, but they they conspiracy is you know a lot of things, A lot of things out there, But so what are we really talking

about here? What did she really do? Um and the just departments complained. It says that quote Puccino worked with two unnamed U. S citizens and the Russian official to try to influence American politics and infiltrate a pro gun rights organization. Um and Butina allegedly arranged dinners in Washington and New York and try to develop relationships with American politicians to establish back channel lines of communication to penetrate the U S National decision making apparatus. So she's working

as a as an as an agent. We would call this an agent of influence. And she didn't register nothing in this about actual espionage or trying to get classified information or like that. But she's working as an agent of influence for the Russians. Okay, so they're gonna they're gonna nail her now. But what did what did she accomplish anything? Did anything actually happen? And this is where you look at again hacking and propaganda. The hacking was

the DNC server, some state election servers. So and these are phishing scams which are very easy to put to pull off. I mean, they're illegal, but it is. It is prank level expertise required to do this. And then there's the propagandic component, which is Facebook and Twitter and the the pushing stories out there. You know, there's there's a part of me that just sit around and says, we're we're really talking about a whole lot of nothing here, and if people want to, they want to get all

energized about the Russians and interfering in our process. You know, this is a true thing. And I know I criticize the present before for a world we're bad, but they're bad. You know, everyone's bad. That's not that's not good. But I will say that we interfere and stuff all the time. I mean, we don't hack, but we we've got us based uh, you know n g os that go over and you know they're there, you're trying to undermine this

regime or that regime. We occasionally go in and we flip a government and you know, please, there's a lot of there's so there is a lot of stuff that we do that is interfering. I'm not saying it's unethical or moral. I'm not even saying it's bad that we interfere, but this notion of you can't you know, you can't spread anti government propaganda, or you can't spread you know, memes or things that favor one government over another. As

it's an interesting new standard were engaged in. It's also not new that the Russians have been doing this to us in all kinds of ways for a very long time. I'm just waiting to see when somebody decides to look into you know, how long have the Russians been doing

this Facebook and Twitter around a long time. Here here's a here's a prediction, if anybody really wanted to look under the hood, we would find that the Russians have done hacking and propaganda stuff stretching back for a decade at least, that they were you know, in flaming tension is in the US under the obomba just phrase that

they've been doing this for a long time. They've also created a situation where all they have to do is hack into one email account of one government official and maybe release some email that's a little you know, embarrassing. Nothing have to be that big a deal. And the election is now to be considered questionable. Right now, the election is maybe something we can't really trust. What could be a bigger victory for the Crumlin than that WoT

undermining or institutions. This is undermining at them very core, and and and in perpetuity. This is what I keep saying. I asked the Director of National Intelligence point blank, what could we do to stop this? You know what? The answer was nothing? Nothing, nothing. What are you gonna stop and tell people? Don't be an idiot and open a phishing email. Guess what, Unless you're gonna lock off the

US Internet, it's not gonna happen. Don't don't let people set up fake for you know, don't essentially let the Russians cat fish us. But on politics, never gonna happen. So this is not going away, right. This is the other part is that no one ever wants to, Oh

why isn't he saying more about prudent and drama? Gosh, all the media hysterics around this when you really look at it, one nothing really happened, which I know people lose their minds of me what I say this to them who are liberals, But it's true, nothing really happened. There wasn't some fundamental attack on our democracy. Unless you equate Podesta, the d n C server and some some Facebook memes with our democracy and I know we're not really a democracy, but we'll get into that another time.

But this is this is crazy, This is delusional. You know, nothing really happened, and and more maybe to the point right now, we don't have any idea how we could even change this going forward. People say we need to. This is the this is the dishonesty. Okay, let me let me look at the investigation top down, because I've seen a lot of Republicans saying, well, it's really about

the Russian interference the election. Bull crap. You don't need a special counsel for the for that, the Department of Justice and the ft they can do that, they don't need. You don't need any special Oh look at this, and look at you don't need Mueller for Russian interference. That's crap. The only reason we have Mueller, this is a fact, is because of the allegation that Trump's campaign was involved with the Russians. That's the only reason you have a

special counsel. Otherwise you wouldn't need a special counsel. You would have a special counsel. And you know, the whole thing is and I know people say, oh, Bak with the firing of Comy. Yeah, but what was that all about? Right? Well? What what? Oh? This allegation that Russia and collusion, that's why we we even got into this discussion with with Comy and can we trust them? And what's going on all of this right, it all ties in together. I know it's a big mess, but you don't need a

special counsel if it's about Russian interference. And Russian interference as an investigation has always just been an excuse to try and drag in the Trump administration and piling up all these indictments and had tip Andy McCarthy for writing this the National Review. I've been saying along to piling up these in the indictments are this is clown show stuff. This is a joke. Now of these Russians are every be handed over people like whoa, well maybe you have

Trump pushed him hard. Yeah, right, folks. This is essentially an intelligence operation and this is this is in the realm of espionage, not law enforcement g r U officers messing around online and personating people and hacking into accounts. Uh, this is stuff that one you generally don't want to expose that you're aware of it, and too, there's no universe, there is no reality in which landamer prutins like, Yeah, I'm gonna hand over some of my military intelligence guys

to you to see what goes on. So this is he was a look at it. More indictments, more indictments, more indictments. Um, are we gonna start subjecting our intelligence here? Here's here's one problem. John Brennan, one of who said one of the most idiotic things I've ever heard in my life about intelligence. And he was SEI director for four years, so this is really astonishing. Brennan said, and I'm not exacting the quote, but this is in substance what he said. We don't steal secrets in the CIA.

We don't steal secrets in the U S. Intelligence community. That's a lie or Brennan's a moron. I don't. I mean, it could be both. We steal all the time. That's what espionage is. We steal, we mettle, we mess around, we do underhanded stuff. We do it for the greater good. We do it to you know, help freedom and justice in America in the world. But we do break other

countries laws, folks. That's what espionage is. Are we now gonna sub subject our intel community to the laws of other countries when it comes to whatever stuff they may catch us on. Think about that for a moment, because that's really what this is. This isn't simple criminality. This isn't Hey, there's a murderer of the TIDG in Moscow, will you hand him over? They might actually do that. This is something else, and we have completely law side of this because it's useful for the left side. Oh

look at all these indpends. It's all this criminality. It's it's this is again a counter This is a counterintelligence investigation that they're dressing up as a criminal investigation for political purposes. And the political purposes hurt Trump, Hit Trump, That's what this is about. Man, We're covering a lot of ground today. I'm sorry. I haven't even asked for any calls on the lines. I'm sorry, eight four or four to five, eight four four nine. Buck uh. We've

got a little more on that. I do want to get to this Occasio Cortez and third hour. By the way, we're gonna get away from all this stuff. I've got to talk to you about a transgender activist who's telling kids that well, I can't even you're gonna have to listen to it. I'll tell you what it is. A third hour. Also, I'm talking to you about this new what is America show? That's uh or who is America? Show? Let's out with Saucer Baron Cohens some thoughts on that

and then just something that's that's something that's inspiring. It's gonna be a little sad, but it's inspiring. I think you should all hear it. So we've got to really un and different third hour of the show coming up, So please stay around for that, cause you a Cortez and oh so much more, stay with me. A single ominous question now hangs over the White House. What could possibly cause President Trump to put the interests of Russia

over those of the United States. Millions of Americans will continue to wonder if the only possible explanation for this dangerous behavior is the possibility that President Putin holds damaging information over President Trump? What a clown? No, millions of people do not, or only think that because you tell them this is crazy. There's no evidence for this, there's nothing. They have produced, nothing, have nothing. Trump is a is

an internationally famous billionaire. What what does Putin have on it. I mean, this is this is but they go out and say it, this is just like mid Romney's tax returns, right, remember that with Harry Reid. Just say a lie damage him doesn't matter. That's why when they say, oh, Trump line about this for that, I'm like, hey, lie about what he had for breakfast? Who cares you guys? Lie about real stuff. There's a big lie millions of Americans. No, Shumer,

they're not. But but I want to give you a little bit of honestly before we get through with Kasio. Cork has a little bit honestly and analysis here on the notion of pressing Putin on meddling. I thought Bolton was was very much correct on this is what I would have said, play a teen. I think it's pretty silly for the president to demand something that he can't get legally. Uh, and this is a very serious matter.

You know. The Russians take the position, you can, you can like it or not like it that their constitution forbids them to extradite Russian citizens. I think for the president to demand something that isn't going to have up and puts the president in a weak position. Yeah, but they just want to just antagonize him, antagonize him, just you know, let's get in Putin's face, you know, just maybe slap him a little bit. Just come on, come on, Trump, do it, do it, do it. That's what they're saying.

These people are, These people cannot be taken seriously. They are un serious. Rampaul crushing it today. By the way, great stuff. We don't have the audio, but producer, Mike, that's on me because I didn't ask for this one. Um, Rampaul said on Wolf Blitzer Show. Quote this is our Senator Rampaul from Kentucky. He gets a high five. Quote. Any country that can spy does, and any country that can meddle in foreign elections does. All countries are doing this,

rand Paul said. But we've elevated this to a higher degree, and we've made this all about the sour grapes of Hillary Clinton losing the election, and it's all about partisan politics. Now, this is truly the Trump derangement syndrome that motivates all of this. Amen standing ovations, Senator Rampaul, when everybody else is running for cover doing the high and mighty thing. Oh what is standing with America and Trumps too? With a dictator. Rand Paul's like, come on, guys, come on,

what is going on here? What we're gonna accuse you is Rand Paul and Asian? What where do they have on Rand Paul? And when do they have it? You know? But what kind of what kind of compromont does the Krumlin have on Rand Paul and police? By the way, I don't think that's beyond them. I'm sure give it time, we'll be hearing about all. You know, Rand Paul once went to a restaurant and ordered Borsch and it wasn't even on the menu. And you know, there's they'll come

up with something. But Rand Paul's analysis is spot on. I mean, it's it's what I think too, which is just that everything. It's also it's just hyperventilation for media over all this stuff. They've created this insane, hyper sensitive atmosphere over all things Russia, all things Trump and Putin, and it's just all nonsense. It's being a nonsense. The left new rising star who took out one of the most prominent Democrat machine, Congressman uh Ocasio Cortez. She's got

problems with stuff that involves, you know, knowing things. We'll get to that next. He's holding the line for America, Buck Sexton his back. The economy is going pretty strong, right, There's roughly four percent unemployment, three point nine percent unemployment. Um, do you think that capitalism has failed to deliver for working class Americans or is no longer the best vehicle

for working class Americans? Well? I think the numbers that you just talked about is part of the problem, right because we look at these figures and we say, oh, unemployment is low, everything is fine, right, Well, Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs. Unemployment is low because people are working sixty eight hours a week and can

barely feed their kids. And so I do think that right now, when we have this no holds barred wild West hyper capitalism, what that means is profit at any cost. Capitalism has not always existed in the world, and it will not always exist in the world. Now you may be thinking to yourself, who is that that that incredible in the pantheon of ignorance? Who is this person we have to add to the to the you know, add a statue. Uh, that's Okazio cortez one. I just get

annoyed because I don't like hyphenated. Last names. I know some of you probably have them. I'm sorry, I'm just not a fan. Okay, it's nothing. It's not about Okazi Cortez. I just don't like the last names. Period. Pick a last name, all right, I don't have to expand all this extra breath. Pick a last name. That's one too. Yeah, capitalism not so great, right, It's only elevated more people out of poverty, misery, and early death than any other

system devised in the history of the planet. But sure, capitalism hasn't always existed, so maybe it won't always exist. This is who the Democrats are elevating as the future of their party. I kid you not. I do not exaggerate the future of the Democratic Party. Uh, Alejandra alex Ocazio Cortez, Alexandria, pardon me, Ocazio Cortez. The future of the party, they say, just defeated Crowdley, the number four Democrat in the House. I guess number three Democrat whatever.

He was, been in there for like twenty or thirty years, A long time. Somebody's like, yeah, you know, capitalism not so great and just all of eighty hours a week. I'm gonna be honest with you, I've never heard of anybody who's actually working a job for wages at eighty

hours a week was trouble feeding themselves. I'm not saying it's impossible, of just saying wow, because that's usually a work ethic that people would you know, there there would be ways to capitalize on just that work ethic that would make you more money that I just but you know, you can't ever pin people down on this stuff, right Oh, you know they're working five jobs and can't feed. You know that this class struggle rhetoric is always about stories

that never are really about anyone. It's just about everyone, so that means it's about nothing at the same time. But she she got a little called up there beyond the usual social justice warrior rhetoric, and they love, they think this woman is incredible, right she ran she's just all about But I mean she's you know, abolished ice, abolished capitalism, all this stuff, all the things that there

I say have made America great. She's got problems with capitalism, free enterprise, private property, you know that kind of stuff. It seems she's got issues with that. I'm not saying she wants to get rid of all of it, but she's got issues with it for sure. And this is I remember the media owning profiles of her. Oh my gosh, Oh she's amazing. Oh she's the future. She's the female Bernie Sanders. That's kind of what they're female Latina, telegenic

Bernie Sanders, that's what they're going for. You canna see a lot more of this young lady. But she's you know, not even in Congress yet, and you're gonna, oh my gosh, she's gonna media superstar MSNBC is gonna put her in every five minutes. But the little problem because when she got when she gets away from the social justice rhetoric, he's gotta know some stuff and um, well, I'll let you decide for yourself, folks. Here's her version of what's

going on with Israel and Palestine plicklip one. But I am, of course that the dynamic there in terms of geopolitics and the war at least is very different than people expressing their First Amendment right to protest. Well here she is that. I also think that what people are starting to see, at least in the occupation of Palestine is um just an increasing crisis of humanitarian audition, and that to me is just where I tend to come from on this issue. You use the term the occupation of Palestine?

What did you mean by that? Oh? Oh, I think what I meant is like the settlements that are increasing in some of these areas in places where, um, where Palestinians are experiencing difficulty and access to their housing and homes. Do you think you can expand on that? Yeah, I mean I think i'd also just I am not the expert at geopolitics on this issue, that's for sure. Are you having a you know, just remember, folks, I can see Russia from my house is a line that millions

of Americans believe. Sarah Palin said. They're sure she said it, she never said it. Tina Fey, pretending to be Sarah Palent to skewer her on Saturday Night Live, said it, and Sarah Palin correctly said at the time, and look, I'm not I'm actually not a big Sarah Palin fan for whatever that's worth. So just put that aside. But Sarah Pillin correctly said that, you know, Russia is actually really close to Alaska, so I do have some you know,

there's Russian, you know, there's Russian. Uh, flights the test a radar defenses to come near her here, and she was making a you can see Russia from you know, across the baring straight. I mean, there were some She's trying to talk about her She's got a little bit of explained. Look, governors do this all the time, you know, Oh yeah, I can call the National Guard. I've got military experience, Like well, not really, but but you know, I can see Ratchef from my house. She never said that,

but they made it seem like she said that. You know, Kasya Cortez, what do you think about the occupation? Will Well, it's like that it's like the housing and like the access and you know, humanitarian and justice, social justice and you know, the community and activism and you know, just just blather, just blather, and why not just you know, I don't, I don't look, I don't really have much on that. I'll honestly, I'm focused more on my district than what I can do in Congress. Right, That's that's

an answer. I can't fault that answer. But you know, yeah, like those little jost is, because social justice warriors are just supposed to have a script. They're they're not supposed to know anything about these issues. They're just supposed to know what they're supposed to say. So she kind of knew what she was supposed to say, but she didn't know anything about what she was talking about. And that's what you saw there. And if it wasn't if it wasn't her, if it was a Republican, oh my gosh.

You know, all the jokes and the media you will see not a single you will not see a sketch about on about this interview on SNL. You will not see people making fun of this. They will move right on past this. Whereas here somebody who's running for Congress who doesn't even know what she doesn't know. That's my real problem. It's not that she has to be an expert in Israeli Palestinian politics. She doesn't know what she doesn't know, she doesn't know enough not to pretend not

to know, and she's hostile to capitalism. And this is the future of the Democratic Party. Folks, Hey, this is what they're offering up. Indeed, I pressing when you get into it, isn't it pretty much? Um? Speaking of Democrats and socialists and the left, what happens when your city becomes overwhelm with poop. The thing that's happening in a Democrats stronghold. We will talk about why in just a moment, your native of San Francisco, is this the worst you've

seen that? I will say, um that there is more. There's more feces on the sidewalks. And I've ever seen, you know, growing up here, that was something that did not wasn't the norm, But you've ever seen that, I've ever seen for sure, and that is a huge problem. And we're not just talking about from from dogs. We're talking about from humans. Poop on the streets, not usually what you would hear a mayor of a major US

city talking about. But sure enough, San Francisco Mayor London Breed is willing to admit that there's more poop on the streets now that ever before. And I'm going to

guess by a lot. You see here we we are once again treated, or forced to endure, probably a better way of putting it, the end results of liberal do good heurism at the expense of civic virtue, decency, public order, all of those things that sound like they're just for squeems man, like you're just doing like, why can't we all just like just be free, and they leave in

the streets. Man, they leave in the like tents and like go around with like my my adopted dog, and I just like bar from different friends so I can get more cash off at people when I walk around. I am not talking. I want to be very clear here about the homelessness epidemic that comes from people who are struggling with severe mental illness, severe drug abuse, severe alcoholism, or or any of those. That's real. It's it's been a problems for a long time, and those people deserve

as much support as we can give them. We as a society owe it to them and ourselves to do everything we can within our power to be as decent to those people as we can, because they're deeply struggling. I'm talking about those who decided to opt out of being productive citizens, who are able, bodied, of sound mind,

and they just choose vagrancy. This is a thing. I passed tents on the street on my way into work today here in d C. There is a park right near where I'm doing this broadcast that is effectively an open air UH camp site. Well, I guess all campsites are open air, but open air homeless shelter really, but a lot of a lot of the people you'll see are um there. Well, I mean, look, I've there's differences when you see homeless people of different you know, that

look like they're dealing with different things. I'm seeing people that have aspray camping backpacks, which which are fancy, which I know from my time when I used to go overseas with you know, legit camping gear stuff. People that have you know, our terrax and osprey gear who are traveling around and look like they've you know, have access to showers and look like they have access to clean clothing, and they just park themselves on the street asked for money.

A lot of them are able body, by the way, a lot of them are a lot of them are Caucasian twentysomethings that you'll see in in New York and d C. Yes, but much more so in San Francisco. And so you know, this is not your stereotypical problem of homelessness that is affecting, UH disproportionately those with UH you know, mental health and and UH substance abuse issues disproportionately affecting minority communities in this country. This is something else.

This is the choice of vagrancy. It's like homeless by decision, or homeless because we want to be because it's a lifestyle now. And you see this with with these campsites that are popping up all of their all over to Los Angeles or San Francisco is the worst now, to be fair, I haven't been in San Francisco number of years.

I've been in l A just a matter of months ago, and I could see it in l A all over the place in San Francisco, assuming it's even worse, but you see, you know, so there's that's the background for this. But the how liberalism comes into play here is as follows. You know how this goes. Oh, come on, they're not bothering anybody. Why are you being so heartless? Why they're down on their luck? Why are you being so mean? Why would you have, you know, law enforcement enforced vagrancy statutes.

Why would you tell people they can't amp out on the street. They're not bothering you, they're not causing you any problems, they're not causing the city any problems. And and you know, and then they get this whole thing about it's like a class struggle issue. And you know, like I'm some guy or you're some guy or gal who's walking around stepping over these vagrants with a top hat on a monocle. They like count they just get

them out of here. No, this is about do you want to be able to walk your kids to school in your neighborhood if you live in somebod these I know a lot of you're like, buck, we don't have this problem where I live. But you know, congrats. I know you also measure your homes in acreage, not in square feet like I do, because you know I live in a box. But the uh, you know, can you walk your kid to school without your kid being exposed to people who are urinating defecating in the street, which

is what we're talking about here right. You know, San Francisco is turning into Poopsville now because they've got people that just are going in the street all over the place, uh, urinating and defecating the street, having sex in maybe maybe in like a tent or some kind of a but you know, out in public. You know, you wouldn't be able to. You can't just park your car in a lot and just get busy in the back seat. You can't just have a tent in a public park and

just start going wild on each other. That's all that. That's a problem. People are having sex out in public squares, urinating and defecating, doing drugs because they're Look, there are drug addicts among I'm not saying that, you know, this isn't just the kind of vagrant by choice set or people that are also doing drugs, or some people aren't

severely drug addicted yet but will become. They're doing drugs, leaving garbage everywhere, which is also a problem, and think they're trash all over the place, and there are health risks from this. You know, there's the very real risk of spread of disease that you know, the things that you would see in close quarters, whether in a prison or in you know, a military and camp in the front lines. I think of like World War One era.

You know, stuff can spread very quickly. So you've got public health concerns, but none of that you you know, you have to suffer through it all before liberals will actually start to uh deal with the reality of because

they just want to feel good about themselves. You know, San Francisco, hey man, they we just say San Francisco, like we just went everything feel like they can be themselves and like wild out and they do every Meanwhile, here's what a preschool teacher at Delita Oriana, so not exactly thirst and how the third here's what she had to said. Quote, we see poop, we seep, we see needles, and we see trash. She says that our kids sometimes ask what it is, and that's a conversation that's a

little difficult to have with a two year old. But we just let them know that those things are full of germs, that they are dangerous and they should never be touched. There are seventy five hundred homeless people living full time in San Francisco, according to the city. By the way, I'm sure the numbers a law larger than that, which will spend two hundred and eighty million dollars this

year on housing services for the homeless. Breed said San francisco high cost of living cast the cities homeless onto the streets. Quote. About seventy of the people estimated to be homeless in San Francisco were actually housed in San Francisco before they became homeless. It's unclear how Breed will hold public defecators accountable She said Friday that harsher penalties for offenders are not on the table. Instead, she directed

her criticism towards homeless advocacy groups. It's all courtesy the Daily Caller, who's who, she said, aren't doing a good enough job teaching their clients how to keep the streets clean. Oh that's right, folks, like a classic liberal, instead of thinking about the overall policy, the ordinance of anything else. With the pool and the pee all over the streets.

Now it's the it's the fault of the people trying to help the homelessness epidemic for not doing a good enough job training the homeless people not to urinate and defecating public. This is liberalism, one oh one. This is what happens right, whether it's Venezuela or the streets of

San Francisco. It starts with when we just want to be nice and have the good ideas, and like, we don't want to be like you know, air and be tough on people or anything like maybe we can just give everybody what they want and nobody has any responsibility and nobody's ever held accountable on bad things happen when you apply liberalism, When you take the doctrines of the left and make them into a reality. Bad things happen, and San Francisco is just the the latest, very very stinky,

very smelly example of that. I now I've gotta I gotta go and do some Actually, I don't want to do this kind of field research. Sounds like it's not gonna be that fun. I want to talk to you about a transgender activist who is competing in the Miss Universe competition female male the female. Uh. And then I have something that's gonna hopefully inspire you a little bit coming up the next hour. Definitely works staying around for stay with me. I want to tell you what I

love about simply say. These guys are all about the details, and that's why the alarm system they give you is so good. Also, they're all about customer service. They're not locked you into a long term contract. We're not trying to trick you with fine print to make you pay and pay and pay. No. No, they want to help you be in full control of security situation at your home. I have a simply safe system. I can tell you it is so easy. It is foolproof. The entire interfaces

very straightforward. It runs off your WiFi and you can check in on it remotely, so wherever you are, it's like you're carrying your home security system in your pocket, so you know your stuff and your family is safe. Gives you seven monitoring and there's no contract at all. Go check it out for yourself. Protect your home today. Visit simply safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash buck, no contracts, no games. Simply safe dot Com slash buck for the best security system in

the business. Bussion decoding the news and disseminating information. Who is actionable and intelligence. Make no mistake America American again, this is the Buck Sexton Show. Analyst. No. You know, I try to have an open mind when it comes to the other side of the argument. You know, I really do, And I read a lot of Democrat left wing publications. I like to know what the other side thinks.

I like to be familiar with their arguments and have an understanding of them culturally as much as I can, which also it helps being a born, raised New Yorker, you get a sense of what democrats are like and what they think because you're surrounded by them. But but then I see things like this and I wasn't even looking for this over the weekend, and I should probably bring myself two just not look at Twitter over the weekend.

But I had to share this with you. Okay, this is This is a piece that the New York Times tweeted out. Here's here's the initial this is what they shared. Okay. This is from the New York Times, the premier liberal publication in the United States, and therefore I think you can argue at least in the world, and it certainly has among the largest circulations. They put out a piece. This is I'm reading this word for word. Okay, this is There's no exaggeration, there's no omissions. This is exactly

what it says. Quote. Spain's Beauty Queen is a transgender activist with a message for the school children she visits. There are women with a penis and men with the vagina, because the only key part of being a woman is to be and feel like a woman. There is so much wrong and that's the end of the quote. There's

so much wrong there. I I was somewhat flabbergasted by this um and I want to walk you through some of this because even even given that I'm aware of how the Left is undergoing a mass delusion right now politically, and they're out of power, and they realize that Americans don't really agree with them on stuff, and that they have to import non Americans to shore up their voting and there's all kinds of stuff that's that's going on here. Uh, but this is just crazy and and I I look

at there, there's a number of level of create. Let me just start with this. This is a a person who is visiting small children, a transgender activist who is visiting small children, who is promoting the message, according to New York Times, that women have a penis and men have a vagina. Now that is false, that is not a true statements. But the New York Times is treating it with with the utmost seriousness and uh and believes

that this deserves respect as a position. Obviously they're writing a piece on this, but just subject children before I even get it into the inherent falsehoods here. To subject children two, this should be be on the pale. I mean, I think this has told us something about where the situation is right now and how bad the situation is

that you have kids who are being subjected to this. Okay, you know, if people want to play you know, left wing progressive superactivists on their own time, that's one thing. But to go and be telling little school kids weren't talking about school children, okay, little kids, that men have that, that women can have a penist, that men kind of vagina one that is that is biologically and an anatomie. False and too, it doesn't it reek of brainwashing and propaganda.

I don't think we need to expose. I don't know of any other. I never had a beauty queen. I can tell you this. I never had a Miss America contestant come by my school when I was, like, you know, in the fifth grade, just to tell us about the birds and the bees or anything. Okay, that didn't happen. It doesn't strike me as normal in any regard. So first, the fact that they're going after kids with this stuff,

I find that, on its face very disturbing. But then you get into more of this, and you know this, uh, this particular uh person and I don't know guys, am I now? Am I now? Legally The New York Times refers to uh this person as she everywhere uh Angela Ponce therefore do as she do. I have am I now a bigot? If I don't say she am, I gonna get sued. If I don't say she am I in trouble? Are people gonna come to my defense if

I get in trouble for not saying she I? You know, I'm not gonna be the the lone guy who charges the machine gun nest on this one. If you know what I mean, no, thank you? You know. If ever, if everyone else is gonna sit back and say, yeah, she, well what are we supposed to do? And now I try to stand for the truth here, but I'm also not going to expose myself. Pardon the expression. I'm not going to uh put myself in a vulnerable position here because I want to tell the truth while everybody else

is already caved. So anyway, so for the purposes of now, we'll say she because I don't know much more about this person than that, and that's what they're writing in this piece. But let's just start with that Angela Ponce says about her to she she's gonna be the first UH person to ever compete in the Miss Universe contest, which is for women who as a biological male. So now we have a biological male competing in the Miss Universe competition, which is, you know, the the choice that

anybody's it's an organization. They can make whatever rules they want. Fine, But what I just find fascinating is the deluded rhetoric around a lot of this, and how The New York Times is obviously celebrating this, and you could say, oh, bucket doesn't matter, it doesn't matter. Well, actually, politics is

downstream from culture. And here I am reading to you from the premier publication of the the left in this country, the the flagship mainstream media news publication in the United States, and it's referring to a man as she everywhere and celebrating how he is now as she who is competing in a female beauty pageant and is telling little kids that this is great and that men have men have of a giant and women have a penis, and we're supposed to all sit here and clap and not our

heads and say, yeah, isn't this great? I mean, the left is the left is just lost it. I don't know. And I can sit here and have a talk with somebody about minimum wage and workers rights and voting rights and you know, the stuff where people can people of good faith can disagree. But if you're gonna tell me that there are thirty seven genders, you're gonna tell me that a man is a woman and a woman is a man, We're gonna have a problem. And I'm not

trying to be mean. You know that I'm probably too nice, if anything, is probably one of the biggest knocks on me in this industry. I'm too nice to people probably just start throwing haymakers all the time. But here's what ponce. We'll just go with that said quote. Her recent success as a beauty queen has brought her admirers, but also

plenty of attacks, mostly from other women. She said, what strikes me is that a lot of the criticism has come from women and people from my own collective, just when women are taking to the streets to ask for recognition, She said, I find it weird that some women don't tolerate that I go to a competition to represent my country as the woman that I am. She added, if we want progress, we just have to stop looking whether

what other women are doing is good or not. I don't know what that that doesn't that doesn't really seem to mean very much anyway, And then there are women with a penis and men with a vagina because the only key part of being a woman is to be and feel like a woman. You know, it's just not true. And I sit here and I look around and say, at what point do we did this person had had um genital recon you know, genital whatever they reconstructive surgery or I forget what the particular term is for it

um when when when she was sixteen? And hormonal treatment and vaginal plastic surgery and they have to call a vaginal plastic surgery because it's not they cannot create female biology, folks, This is where the science is. It is is what it is. We consider just like in every cell in your body, there's xx chromosome, x y chromosome, and you know, for all the little smarty pants. So we're gonna send me um but buck, what about when people are born with both sense of equipment or oh book, what about

the biological irregularity that happens? One of the bazillion times I said, okay, for those people, we can have a talk about the biological reality of being, you know, inter sex. But that's not we're talking about here. That's not the standard where that's not the transgender movement. It's not rooted in biology. They're saying it's a psychological disposition that determines the biological reality. Well, uh, well, so you know what does that mean? You can't have it both ways? Right, So,

because I've gotten already emails. You know, I had somebody had a doctor who's gonna come on the show, bailed somebody it's dealt with gender dysphoria in the past, bailed, wouldn't do it. Uh. And I've had people that won't write to me anymore, are used to write to me about this issue because they just you know, I'm I'm closed minded. I'm not closed minded. Just tell me where I'm wrong on the facts, not on the feelings. Tell me where I'm wrong about what's real, not what people

wish was real. Uh. But yeah, it's plastic surgery in the genital area because they can't actually make you a female. You cannot bear children, you you cannot undo God's Oh gosh, I just said it. You cannot undo God's creation in that sense. It's it's just we can't do it. Maybe at some point in the future will be able to, and then that's a whole other conversation about whether we should but also, well, at least then we'll be having

a discussion based in the facts. But to feel like a woman is not the basis of being a woman. That is not true. That is a false statement. Why does The New York Times publish false statements? Why does The New York Times agonize over using plural person plural pronouns for singular person because they want to be polite, but they don't, But they also don't want to be wrong them and there for one person, because they're multi

they're they're they're multi gender. Don't we understand that this is also becoming more of a fad now that that people are gonna be latching onto this and they're gonna be run you know, not just supporters of it, but young people are gonna be told people that are struggling with their identity. Look, it's hard to be a teenager.

I remember acne everywhere, and you know, no one likes you, and you have all kinds of problems, right, I mean, and everyone goes through all this stuff, and you go through a lot of psychological stuff too, especially as you mature, you go through puberty. And I just think this is so damaging hormonal surgery at sixteen. I didn't know anything at sixteen, and I know a lot more than these people who are changing their lives at sixteen. Right, But this is just And I'm not I'm not looking into

the bowels of the internet here. I'm not grabbing some random blogger from wherever I'm I'm pulling from the the premier newspaper of the Democratic Party and all the American left in this country and probably the most well, the most recognizable newspaper in the world. And it's saying he's a she and she should be celebrated for competing in a beauty pageant. And you know what's next, folks, And it's already started to happen a little bit, but just

get ready for it. They're going to tell people like you and me, for the gentleman who are on who are listening to this right now, They're gonna tell us that if we are not sexually attracted to a person who is a transgender female, because I look at them and said, well, that is a male. I can look at their foe arms, I can look at their neck, I can actually tell side note. I mean, but you know they're always say, oh, you can't tell. No, actually you can tell. You can look at their face, you

can tell. But if you're not attracted to somebody who is transgented, you know, this is a very personal thing, right, If you're not attracted to them, you're kind of a bigot. You're kind of bigot. It there they're mark my words. It's already started to happen. They've already been some fringy pieces on this, but that's coming next and the next. It's going to be if you're on a dating app and somebody pretends to be a female who's actually male when you meet them, and you have a problem with that,

it's not that that's your choice, you're a bigot. You won't let them live their truth. You're a ad person. It's they're going to make it like you are the the moral equivalent of a racist. If you will not date somebody as a heterosexual who is transgender, it's going to happen, mark my words. And then where are we? You know? Then we're right now. I'm talking about how

I gotta call people. She that I know where he just give it some time and I'm gonna have to say, yeah, if if he as she wants to go on a date with me, then V has the right to tell me that I can't say. I can't say boo about it. H crazy times. We live in folks, crazy times. Indeed, I this is just gonna keep getting worse and worried. I've got some thoughts on the this is America thing, that Sasha Baron Cohen thing. Let me let me tell you about want to come back. Sometimes you're gonna need

a pick me up. Sometimes you're gonna need a little extra energy, whether it's getting up in the morning for that early work day call, or getting fired up at the end of the day to go to the gym, or just to push you through that afternoon. Lull, I have the answer for you, Strike Force Energy. Strike Force is veteran owned and American made. I have been giving it out to my colleagues here at the Hill, and

let me tell you, people love Strike Force. They know they can give them that little extra boost and then it's all good for you. Ingredients, all the top kind of stuff. You can get, zero sugar, zero calories. They will fuel you through your toughest fights with Strike Force Energy. Try for yourself. You can mix it in with water, t lemonade, even a nice cold beer. Go to strike Force Energy dot com and or discount code buck that's b U c k at. Check out strike Force Energy

dot com discount code bucket. For every packet you buy, strike Force will donate a packet to military members around the globe. Strike Force Energy is fuel for the Fight. So this This is America is the new series from Sasha Baron Cohen, you know him best as and I thought about playing some fun clips here because there's some funny Borat stuff and I'm the only person that I've

ever heard say this Bora. The genius of Bora is that you got to make fun of essentially a regressive Islamic mentality without ever saying the guys a Muslim Okay, Kazak stands about seventy Muslim. So unless Borat happened to be some like minority Christian in kazakh Stan, guess what, he's a Muslim and he's running around saying really aggressive

stuff about women and regressive stuff. Uh. And that's the only way he could get away with it, right, is that they they just made fun of Kazakhstan and they never got into regressive Islamic fundamentalism. Or anything like that.

So there was some merit in the Bora character, and there were some funny bits, and I thought about playing as we came back on ear here, I thought about playing some of the uh you know, the man them a boot then all you know, and every every frat boy in the country, as I've said, has a borodd voice, and it's kind of easy to do. And so now Sasha Baron Cohen is back, and he's, from what I understand,

spoofed a lot of different people. I've gotten a lot of politicians too, ah, you know, to sit down for interviews and and make fools of themselves, and one way or another, this just been a commonplace thing, right. He's making people look silly, and everyone's saying, oh ha ha ha, He's making all these people look so silly. Okay, fine, um, that's set looking at all. That The majority of the footage I've seen so far, it's just in previews, is

him setting up a fictional program. He plays a what's what's an Israeli security specialist, and he does it pretty funny, like exaggerated, is really accent. Yeah, but he does this is really accent, and he's a you know, he's like you take the gun and you fight them with your hand, and you know, the whole thing. And and then he's gonna sit down and talk to members of Congress about

arming toddlers with handguns and stuff. And look, it's a it's a bit, and it works shockingly because people are you know, we're we're so binary and are thinking on this. We're so pro gun anti gun that I think people get caught up and they're like, well, I'm pro gone, so I guess this guy seems pro gone and they get coned, right, I mean, they don't really think it through, but they're getting conned. And there's some funny bits that come from it. I haven't seen anything that you know

so far. It's he plays the Israeli weapons expert, he plays uh and really sort of gun advocate, and then he plays a some kind of American Trump supporter character. And this is all based on just little snippets I've seen, so I have to watch more of the show. But here's just my my big takeaway from this uh so far, and if it changes, I'll let you know. I know, I just talked to you about a transgender beauty activists

essentially a man and a woman's uh beauty competition. Do you think that Sasha Cohen or any comedian in the United States for that for that matter, would make a single joke about this? Do you think they would ever make a joke about a a transgender activist, a biological male competing in female beauty competitions, going and telling school children that women can have penises and men can have vaginas?

Do you you will they ever see any humor in that whatsoever, or more to the point, anything worthy of derision and mockery and contempt even, no nothing, no jokes, no comedy there. You know. I brought it up today actually on on the show this morning, I said, you know, when when Sasha Baron Cohen is going to show up at the Harvard Admissions office and play and and play, uh you know, which of the thirty seven genders are you,

then then I'll start to be a little open. I just feel like this is the same old lazy Oh look in America, these you know, these fat hamburger eating, gun toting hillbillies that like Trump and they're so xenophobic, and you know this caricature and it's just not only is it lazy and unfunny, it's just cowardly. It's cowardly because we all know there's a lot that could be mocked out there, that would be edgy, that would be wow, pushing boundaries, and these comedians like Cohen and others will

not touch it. And let's try if I'm wrong on this one, if he goes for with some of us, I will come back and I will tell you. But so far, all I've seen is mocking the right and just gets like I wanted to completely change things up here, folks and just spend some time on what really matters. I know that we have all this today, I mean the political infighting and all the nastiness. Is is that an extreme which is saying a lot given the current climate.

But I saw this courtesy of of actually the New York Times, which still does do some very good report against some good writing here and there. But it's the story of a five year old boy named Garrett Michael Matthias who came home one day and had what looked like a stroke according to his mother, who said that his face was partially paralyzed, and it turned out that

he had a very rare form of inoperable cancer. And then five year old Garrett Matthias had to go through the battle with this rare form of cancer, one that he eventually lost um, but he left behind his own his own obituary which has been shared all over the place now and it's a it's a five year old's view of his life and what matters, and I wanted to share with you this. So this is young Garrett struggling fighting against cancer and what he wrote as his

as his own obituary. And it's and it's online. Uh, and we'll we'll put it on Facebook in other places you can see it for yourselves. But here's what Here's what he wrote. Garrett Michael Matthias, a k a. The Great Garrett Underpants. My name is Garrett Michael Buffs. My birthday is I am five years old. My address is I am a Bulldog. My favorite color is blue and red and black and green. My favorite superhero is Batman and Thor, iron Man, the Holk, and Cyborg. When I

grow up, I'm going to be a professional boxer. My favorite people are mommy, Daddy, my sister Delfina, and grandparents with the new house, the grandparents with the camper, my cousins, Grady, that guy I took down that one time, and London Marie, my entreetents, Sinky, Uncle Andy, those two guys you know,

my uncle's and Batman. The things I love the most playing with my sister, my blue Bunny, thrash, metal legos, my daycare friends, Batman, and when they put me to sleep before they access my port things I hate pants, dirty stupid cancer when they access my port needles and the monkey knows that smells like cherry farts. I do like the mint monkey knows like at mayor radiation and that one guy that helped me build legos. When I die, I'm going to be a gorilla and throw pooa daddy

burned or buried. I want to be burned like when Thor's mommy died and made into a tree so I can live in it when I'm a gorilla. Bigger. Small funeral funerals are sad. I want five bouncy houses because I'm five. Batman and snow cones. Emily and Ry Matthias honored Garrett's final wishes by having a celebration of his life this past weekend. So that was a five year old view of his life going through something that nobody should ever have to go through, particularly somebody so young

in life. And despite all the pain and the fear and the uncertainty and the grief, little five year old Garrett was able to find joy and love and a loyalty and friendship and decency and kindness and things that really mattered. It would have been so easy for a boy that age, I think, to be completely despondent and

closed off. But even though he knew he was writing his own obituary, folks, even though he knew his time was limited and so little time he had, he decided to make the most of it and love those around him as much as he could, enjoy his life as much as he could, and go out as much as anyone ever could. On top, I think there's a lesson in that lesson for all of us, not just today, but any day. We'll be right back. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. All right, time for the

roll call. You know it's your favorite, it's my favorite. Let's get into first up here, Jeffrey Rights, it is great to watch rising and see your restraint when conversing with Crystal. She is so sure that up as guilty of collusion, regardless of the evidence and you try to put a word in, but she just does not seem to care what you say. Well done, well, Jason, Uh, I'm giving her a shot. I'm glad you've tuned in for rising. Thank you very much for being a part

of the audience in the early days. Jason Wright's gotta keep you honest, brother, Ben Kingsley's real name is Krishna Pandit Baje. He is totally Indian, so your your critique about him playing Gandhi is misplaced. Just trying to keep you honest. Shields high, Um, you are correct. He's half He's half Hindu South Asian by his descent. I did not know that, so I had to check into this and yeah, his father is a Hindu from India and mother is a an Anglo English person, so he is

half I did not know that. I thought out he was stepping away up. But you know, the name kind of threw me obviously, I did not know you. But Jason, thank you for the always please I want to get it right. So when I when I mess one up like that one let me know and that that makes more sense because it seems like quite a stretch you just have. I thought it was just some I don't know. I don't know what else to say. I thought they just had some white dude playing Gandhi, but it turns

out that was not the case. He is half Indian. Uh, Joshua rights. Uh what do we have here? No? Whoops? Next up here? We'll go right to Don Hey buck. I was doing my daily devotion I came across a verse that sheds light on how disillusion from reality the left has become with Trump as our president. Psalms seven fourteen says whoever is pregnant with evil conceives trouble and

gives birth to delusionment. They've wished so much evil on this president, and every day to look for new way, they look for new ways to trouble him, which has them believing lies instead of truth. I know you're out of faith. Please pray for our president. Evil will not win in the end. I've read through the Bible, and I know how it ends. Well, Don, I hope you're right about even winning in the end. And Uh, I agree,

And I certainly pray for the whole country. I pray for my fellow Americans, and and the President is, to be sure, a part of that. Erica writes, a milkshake you can indulge in. Take over ripe browner the better bananas and put them in the freezer once frozen, peel and chop them into one inch chunks. Put them in some milk in a blender mix and you have a healthy milkshake at Peanut butter and chocolate syrup not as healthy,

but even yummier from Erica. Also, you mentioned mosquitoes, and I was wondering if we will need bug spray in d C to go out in the evening. Erica, if you are going to have exposed legs, then yes, absolutely you will want to have some bug spray for sure. So I think that's a good advice I'm giving you there. Jason writes, Hey, Buck buddy, you were talking of Friday thirteenth movies the other day. I have stayed at the

campsite that Friday Thirteenth, Part six was filmed at. It was a tradition that my fraternity did every year, and while there we watched the movie. It was great. Well, Jason, that is very cool. I did not know about that, and uh, thank you for sharing. All right, next up here we have Vince. You right say what you want about president at Kron, but I admired him for standing in the rain to congratulate his country's world champion soccer team.

By contrast, Putin had a guy with an umbrella, you know, Vince. I don't have any problem with Mt. Kron. Uh. He seems like a pretty the middle of the road centrist guy wants to do the best by his country and by his countrymen and women. Uh. And yeah, I think it was a good look for him to stand out there and just get doused in the rain and and you know, shake the guy's hands from his team. Look

a great day for the French. I know I like to make a lot of French jokes and French accents, but French national team really accomplished something and I'm happy for the people of France. I would also say that I kind of wish that people wouldn't celebrate a really joyous occasion by breaking things and lighting things on fire and acting like maniacs. But only I know some of the French are doing that, but why it just does not make any sense. I wish people would just get

a grip. Lauren writes, um I'm officially a comedy bear fan, and I totally remember Hanson. Well, Lauren, I'm glad you like Commy Bear and those you want to know Commy BERI is that say you have to listen to the Freedom Hunt podcast. We had an Colter as the guest last week. I believe we have jededi up Bila joining this week. We are going to have a great time chatting with Jedediah and we also just talked about whatever

else is on my mind. So if you have not listened already, please go and check out the conversation with a Coulter was a ton of fun. Jededia As an old friend of mine, you know, she was a host on the view. And we're gonna talk about what it's like to be a conservative in in these behind enemy line situations like d C, New York, and what's it like to be h a red state mind in a blue state place. You know. There you go, Candice Rights

falling buck. Have you noticed there hasn't been a whole lot of talk in the liberal MSM about the recent SCOTUS rulings favoring Trump and conservatives. I can only assume they're not covering these things because to do so would be to legitimize Trump his presidency. And conservative beliefs. Can you imagine the coverage these rulings would have received had they gone against President Trump from Kansas, Canas is a very good point. Uh, clearly, you know the most obvious woman.

Could you just think for a second, what would it be like with the media coverage of the travel band if they had ruled that it was unconstitutional? If the Muslim band came down by a five four decision quote Muslim band and they said, you know what, decision in fact racist and wrong and the president has no authority to do this. I think the media would have covered nothing else for almost a week, I really do. I

think they would have been all over it. So you're you're right that because these decisions when in favor of conservatives, you're just not hearing a lot about it. And that's because of the very real liberal media bias. Jeremy writes book I was introduced today to Sierra Leone by an amazing organization that is drilling wells for clean drinking water there. It's called let Them l O L If you want to give them a plug, I'd like to learn more about the country and its people. Do you have any

recommendations books, online resources? Et cetera. Thanks. Um, I gotta tell you, Jeremy, I don't and I don't have anything good for you on Sierra Leone. Um, I could you know I know a bit more about Nigeria because of things that maybe one day I'll be able to tell you about, but haven't been able to up to this point. You know, I I, uh, I don't have any good for you on that. I wish I could say otherwise, UM,

you know I could. The Biafran War on Nigeria's a book that I read and really thought was a really good It was a good rate. It's tough reading. I mean, it's when you learn about what's going on and in that part of the world. Obviously there's been a tremendous amount of suffering and violence. But Sierra Leone is not something I know well. So if I have any good suggestions and recommendations, I'll pass along your way. I will tell you. I am currently reading a book. I mean

I've I have several. I just finished Red Notice I think last week. Uh, and now I'm onto a couple of other things. One of them is I'm trying to finish Director at s, which is the Steve Cole book on Afghanistan. It's about six or seven hundred pages. I think almost halfway through it. I'm also in the middle in the middle of a book on Cortez the Conquistador, which is just incredible, And this is another one of these I want to I want to write a screenplay

of quartet that this is, folks. He showed up with five guys, give or take, and took on an empire. The granted didn't have steel or horses or gunpowder, but had millions of people, including hundreds of thousands of military age males, with spears and knives and swords, and you know, five hundred against in single engagements ten thousand, fifteen thousand, twenty thousand, five hundred. And we think about the battle of the three hundred Spartans at Thermopoli against Xerxes and

the invading Persians. This Cortez was a similar except these guys were on the move. It's five hundred instead of three hundred. But it's an incredible story. And also, and this is gonna be one of our writing history things. That's why why I'm reading about this, because I want to do some of this background. I'm gonna get back to Shield High as soon as I have time in my life to do it. I love it. I don't,

you know, no matter what happens. I mean, if I end up quitting this whole media life and becoming a you know, a poet farmer somewhere, I'm still gonna be doing Shield High. It's just I enjoy the history stuff

too much. But if if we're gonna writing history, one of the things that really comes up in these in this historical account of the conquistadors again versus the Aztecs Aztec civilization was was the level of brutality and violences is There's nothing else that I've ever read about her, see, I mean, maybe you could compare it to I mean, and I'm speaking out of cheer because it really don't know much about, you know, head hunters in Papua New

Guinea or that part of the world. But there was cannibalism that was that was common in the Aztec empire. I mean, and not because people were starving. They would eat people because they didn't like them. They would sacrifice slaves in numbers that are mind boggling, you know, brutally just just open them up like they're doing surgery without

the anesthesia. I mean, it's just there's there. There are these accounts of these Spanish conquistadors showing up at these religious sites, these religious temples, and there's just blood and entrails and intestines everywhere from human beings. Don't tell you much about that with the Oh yeah, you know, the the native populations of of the America's and and how oppressed they were. Well they were actually, in the case of the Aztecs, not just oppressing but mass murdering each

other and enslaving each other. It was bad stuff. I see. I'm already getting fired up telling you the story about I haven't even gotten through the book yet. Uh So, there we have it. Um, let me get one more role call here before we close shop for the day. Tracy Rights. Hey, Buck. First off, you have the best hair on TV right now, Tracy, you have the best eye of anybody watching TV. So now that I got your attention, Yeah, she totally schooled me. I just watched Rising,

which I am learning to love. I'm a bit perplexed at Crystal's reaction to Peter Struck's testimony. She makes a good point that there's no obvious effect on the investigation, but she fails to get the same justification to the long ongoing investigation led by Mueller that is being forgiven and even referenced every day. Typical liberal hypocrisy. I've turned quite a few of my friends onto you, and I'm

a faithful everyday listener. You are witty, smart, and you're gurgling with gurgling Gurgan literally makes me laugh out loud every time. The best analysis on television four nuction reagularscretions analyzing. Keep up the good work. You're changing hearts and minds every day. Shields High, Tracy, Old Tracy, thank thank you so much for your kind of marks and also for spreading the word about the show. That's a single, that and checking out our sponsors. Black Rifle, nine Line, uh

Strike Force go down the list, simply Safe. All of our wonderful sponsors, please do check them out and type in the promo code so they know that you found out about them through this show. That's how we keep this freedom hunt rocking. I'm excited to be with you all tomorrow. Until then, Shields High,

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android