Trump Derangement Goes Global - podcast episode cover

Trump Derangement Goes Global

Oct 16, 20181 hr 50 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Why the left is up in arms over Saudi Arabia. The Elizabeth Warren debacle. With no signs of a Blue Wave Democrats are losing their minds.

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

You are entering the freedom hunt. Left wing journalists are all upset about the controversy surrounding Elizabeth Warren. We'll talk about that, and also why is it that the left is all of a sudden so bellicos when it comes to Saudi Arabia? Is this really about security or is this something else? That and more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters

with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American. Again The Buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, No, welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody live from the Swamp Washington, d C. Actually got to spend all time over at the Trump Hotel today. That was That's always fun. It's amazing to be in a place where you walk around and people like, hey, Buck, keep up the good workman, love the show. I'm like, oh wow, in d C, in the swamp, no less, there are good There are

good hearted and and stout patriots amongst us. Indeed there are I've got to tell you. The possibility of the Republicans not just keeping the Senate but also the House, I think is getting bigger and bigger with every passing day, and I think that it has the left completely freaked out. I think that they're grasping at this point. Although there's a part of me, given their tactics in the past, given the way that we know they play the game, there's a part of me that has to think they

must have something else up their sleeve. They must have a plan that we have not yet seen but may Maybe it's just more of the same. Maybe it's just more dishonesty, more grasping, more puffed up nonsense about Russia collusion or uh these attacks on Kavanaugh and the Republicans being being rape apologists they say, although maybe they're learning their lesson, maybe they are realizing that this in fact did not work out well for them. I see something

happening right now that I it's not yet clear. I'm sure a lot of other folks that this is really what's going on, but I see the early stages of this. I think that they are trying right now. The left wing media is hoping to find a way to make Trump make a mistake when it comes to his dealings with Saudi Arabia. I think that they're willing to push as much as they can to get a misstep from the president, even if it means a problem that will haunt our Midi's foreign policy for a long time to come.

All of a sudden, they are rushing out with all the usual talking points. Right there, they're saying, Oh, Trump, Trump is too cozy with dictators, the same people that say that we're praising Obama's foreign policy. While Obama sat on his hands and not only did nothing, in fact made Syria worse, made a civil war that killed over five hundred thousand people worse. It was one thing to say that he did nothing, but no, we had a training program for the so called Free Syrian Army that

was a disaster. We had a red line over the usage of chemical weapons that was a disaster because Obama didn't enforce that red line. So in dead we had years and years of carnage. And that carnage, I would note, stretch far beyond serious borders and in fact led to mass casualty terror attacks in Europe and yes here in the United States, inspired by an Islamic state that was able to run wild because Obama didn't have the decision making capability, didn't have the strength of his convictions or

character to do something anything, the right thing. And now those same people want to lecture us all about how Trump is making a terrible mistake here with Saudi Arabia. He hasn't even he hasn't even taken an action yet, hasn't even had the chance to fully review all the facts of the case. But with the left and with the media united together in this effort to take down the President United States, it does not really matter to

them that they will rush well ahead of facts. It doesn't matter that they may be creating a kind of pressure around the decision making of the commander in chief intended to get him to mess up. They're looking for reasons to criticize him and undermine him. There is nothing

I can tell you this right now. If Trump sat down with the editorial board of the New York Times and the Washington Post, sat down with all the big name, overpaid, pompous hosts at CNN and MSNBC, and said, okay, everyone, what do you think I should do about Saudi Arabia. If he went and then did what that thing? Were those things? I assure you, I promise you, within forty eight hours, they would be saying, oh my gosh, look what Trump has done again. Look at how he has

made a made a mess of things. They have no interest in promoting US foreign policy and our strength abroad. Their interest is in undermining the commander in chief in whatever way they can get there. Here's a perfect example. You've got Joe Scarborough. How this guy is still considered a Republican anywhere. He's a question that I would like an answer to these days. He feels about his Republican or sounds about his Republican as Jennifer Rubin of the

Washington Post. But here's what he has to say about Trump and how all this goes play too. He is showing extreme naivete on the world stage. It hurts America and it certainly makes him look like a week later not just look he does look so weak and its sphetic. It just like he did in Helsinki. Here's a guy who just bumbling idiot. You have a guy who is scared of KGB agents, not man enough to stand up to former KGB agents, and not man enough to stand up to Sawty sheiks. I mean, that's what we have

in a president. Whatever they have on him better be worth it. Because he looks like a bumbling idiot. It's just money, I guess though, I mean, is this what Donald Trump promised people he was gonna I thought he was going to be a strong leader. Instead he's cow tell and let letting these people, letting these autocrats, letting these tyrants kill journalists in the light of day. All the sanctimony and blather, complete blather from these two pompous, overpaid,

overcloft clowns at MSNBC. They don't know a damn thing about what they're talking about. Oh what, because Mika's dad was Secretary of State, I'm supposed to listen to what she has to say. I don't think so. It wasn't a good secretary of state for what that's worth. Was actually pretty terrible at it. But discussion for another time. And Joe, when I say whose team is yawn, I know the answer. He's on Joe's team. It's Oh, it's

all about Joe. It's all about Scarborough himself. He doesn't represent any ideology, he doesn't represent any set of principles. He doesn't even represent being a journalist. He's just there to spout off and make sure his hair is swooped up as high as possible, you know, calm down with the swoop and the rock band Joe. It's a little weird, and you can tell they're trying to make this personal. They're trying to They're trying to personally goad the president

of the United States on this issue. What is he really going to do, folks? What what message is he going to send the Saudis on this one that would so that would so dramatically change their minds, that would all of a sudden mean they would never do this again, or they would think twice about doing this again. What are we really gonna do? This is not a US citizen, This was not done on US soil. The Saudis. Let's

break this down to what it is. The Saudi's killed the guy on the soil of another country in a consulate. Is it disgusting? And Barbara, yes, do the Saudis do disgusting, barbaric things all the time? Absolutely? That is nothing new. Why is this our problem? I keep hearing about how, what, what? What is Trump going to do? What is Trump going to do? What could he do? And why is it on him? Shouldn't this be don't we have a United

Nations for exactly this purpose. Don't we have this international community that I hear so much about all the time, so there can be multilateral and concerted action. So oh buck, But they won't do anything. Yeah, exactly, they won't do anything, will they? But when they when they don't like what the US is doing, it's, oh, why don't you wait for the international community, It's it's better if it comes from from all nations united together. Well what about this issue?

Well no, let's not wait for the United Community of nations to come together. Let's let's have the US do what I have to say. The the frenzy, the frenzy that the media is engaged in right now to make this the biggest story in the country, and to skip over what's going on with US troops, for example, in Afghanistan, a place we're still at which we're still in war. Um, we don't hear about it, do we. We don't hear about the fact that we're in the process of slowly

losing that war. They don't want to. They don't talk about that anymore. Uh. They want to focus on this issue. And I would say it's not just because they do feel journalists do feel a special affinity for other journalists, right, this hits home for them. Not so much during the Obama years when Obama was pulling the phone records of journalists and listing on d o J charging sheets unindicted co conspirators as you know, journalists. But you know that

was Obama. Oh that's right, you know, tough guy. Tapper would say, you know, Obama, do you think that that you're really the best This administration is the best messenger on that issue? Yeah, that's oooh tough talk. Tough talk to the Obama administration, which used the Espionage Act more than every other administration combined. Not a lot of talk about how they were destroying the First Amendment though, right,

Not not much of that. You hear that about Trump all the time because he tweets, because he tweets this this journalist, Koshogi. What happened to him? We still don't really know, and we should not lose sight of that. We don't know what happened to Kashogi. We have not been told what the facts are of this case. They're still trying to figure it out. But everyone wants Trump

to take action. They want to push the President United States, the leader of the free world to do something that could upset the balance of power in the Middle East, that could have long term ramifications, and they don't care about any of that. What they really just want is the opportunity to criticize the president for inaction and then dump all over him for whatever action he takes. These

people are disgusting, their disgrace. None other than chief National security propagandists for the Obama administration Ben Rhodes takes this to the next level, and you know, it's once again, it's always about Trump. It's all Trump's fault. Somehow, everything that the left doesn't like is Trump's fault. Place sixteen. And the message of President Trump is sending is that there's no consequences. And what you have to realize is there's nobody else who can play the role of the

United States to hold people like this to account. We are the world's oldest and most significant democracy, and if we're not a democracy, if we're not sending up for this, there's not somebody else who's going to do that. And the consequences of that are journalists everywhere are less safe. And let's face it, we have a president who says journals, so the enemy of the state. So values like freedom of speech and dissent suddenly are very endangered around the world.

And that's a tread line that I think is getting much worse. That is a giant pile of crap, A giant pile of crap from Obama's chief national security propagandist, a guy who laughed about creating an echo chamber of idiot almost entirely Democrat journalists during the Obama years to sell the irandal, laughed at their ignorance and their stupidity,

at least on that he was right. They do have a lot of idiot journalists at these media outlets, especially the young ones who are right out of college, who have just bought into this leftist nonsense hook line and sinker, but no notice how far this goes. I mean, this is Trump arrangement syndrome on the world stage. A Saudi hit team kills a Saudi journalist in a consulate in Turkey, and it's on It's on Trump to make this right.

It's on us to make this right. Let me tell you something, as someone who has spent more time than he ever thought he would in war zones alongside men and women who were wearing the uniform him to defend this country and to essentially rebuild other people's countries for them. I don't think we have to make everyone else's problems are problems all the time. You know, Saudi Arabia is a terrible, tyrannical kingdom that we have to deal with because of the realities of the world we live in.

It's a terrible place, by the way, in large part because of the prevailing ideology, which is fundamentalist Islam. That's why it's so bad and repressive and intolerant. That doesn't get talked about. You'll notice that's left out of the conversation entirely. And the criticism here is much stronger against Trump himself than against this the leader of Saudi Arabia, the de facto ruler, Mohammed been Solomon. That's right, someone somewhere gets killed by someone else, and it's Trump's fault.

You see, He's the one that we should all be angry at. These people are delusional, and what's worse, giving the length they're willing to go to here to try and push for presidential action, they're dangerous. Don't forget that. We've got more on this. And also, obviously the Elizabeth Warren Debuckle, which is amusing and also insane. Uh. And then just some issues some of the latest on the polling for the mid terms, where this is all heading how the economies look in We got a jam pack

show because that's how we roll. I'll be right back team, And so the implications are really really significant. Uh, because we've talked from the beginning of this presidency, Joe about the potential impact on human rights worldwide. Well, that begins with journalists. I remember vividly a train trip up on the Ascella when I talked to a group for International and International Group to Protect Journalists who told me it was within months of Trump taking office that they saw

of worldwide threats to journalists going up. And this is kind of the in the extreme, what is happening now in terms of human rights not only two journalists, but in several hot spots around the world. That's all bull That woman has no idea, that MSNBC analysts has no idea what she's she's talking about. I bring you to a piece written by yours truly in the age of Trump, that the press can't stop playing the victim. Yeah. I actually looked at the numbers, you know that from the

Committity to Protect Journalists and all that stuff. Who wants to guess how many journalists have been killed in America since eleven eleven? How many people in this country since two alright, stretching back now for all you know, going on three decades. Let's just what is it, eight eight, eighteen, twenty six years, for almost thirty years, how many people have been killed in this country who are journalists? And

they wanted to guess? Three? Three people have been killed for journalism in America in thirty years, and not by the state, but just by people that didn't like that the journalists were doing stories on them. And when you look at the numbers abroad, I'm not saying there aren't bad states and there aren't utalitarian regimes, but they've been bad all along. They've been bad all along. By way of comparison, we've had three journalists killed in twenty six

years in this country. You know how many cab drivers were killed last year? Sixty? You don't see cab drivers are going, oh my gosh, we can't do our jobs. All all journalists this journalist line that I hear about, Oh, Trump has made it harder for journalists. How the entire journalist apparatus in this countries against against him, and their ratings are going up and they're more famous than ever, They're making more money. There's no action being taken against them.

What because Trump makes fun of them, He hurts their feelings. Because Trump calls out Jim Acosta for being the clown that he is. Any time anything anywhere happens to a journalist in the entire world, it's Trump's fault. I mean, these are the same people that believe that Elizabeth Warren is actually a Native American, even after she showed her date DNA results which showed she is not a Native American. I don't know. I have a tough time our journalist delusional?

Are they just not very smart? I'm not sure which one. As the President said, we're gonna get to the bottom other it's important that the world know the truth. If in fact, h Mr Kashogi was murder, we need to know who was responsible. We need to hold those responsible. Uh and uh, it's just it's it's even more important that that he was a member of a free and independent rest. Any loss of life is grievance, Any act of violence that claims the life is to be condemned.

But uh, this was also an assault on a free and independent press. So um, we're gonna demand answers. The world deserves answers, and the President and I and our administration are going to continue to call for answers to see that those are responsible are held to account. Now that's the vice president who's saying pretty much all the things you would expect him to say. I think he's saying the right things here on this issue. Uh, But the leftist critics of the regime of the administration, Sorry,

that happens sometimes. They're not placated by this at all. They're not okay. They don't say all right, you know because Penn says, we just need the facts and we'll hold them accountable. They're not. They're not slowing down all. They want to jump all over them. That's their plan. They want to jump all over the president and the vice president on this issue as much as they can. And they're not waiting for anything. They don't wanta wait for the facts. They don't wait to see what action

he takes. They just prefer this notion that yeah, Trump is a bad guy. That helps them sleep a night it. Well, one other thing, though, I would disagree with Vice President Pence on on one matter, or the notion that this is an attack on an independent press. Okay, well he would write for the Washington Post. But Saudi Arabia doesn't have an independent press at all, not not even a little bit. Okay, there, there is not an independent president Sudi.

People say, oh, book, it's been getting a little better, and yeah, whatever. Turkey doesn't have an independent press. In fact, the country where Kaushogi was from what we see, from what we believe murdered, is one of the worst in the world when it comes to press freedom. Not Saudi Arabia. Turkey bad when it comes to press your freedom. So when we say it's an attack on a free press, yeah, we live in a world where the free press is

the exception, not the rule. A lot of countries have all kinds of constraints on what can be printed, what can be said, what can be shared. Lots of countries and even countries that you think of as having a free press, maybe some of the Western European states, for example, they have restrictions based on you know, hate crime legislation and all all kinds of stuff. In Britain, there's no oh you can print. You can print national security secrets

because you're the press. They have the Official Secrets Act. They'll lock your butt up. They don't care if it's a matter of public importance, they'll just lock you up. So I just think everyone needs to take a deep breath and understand that, yes, this is bad. Yes the U. S Should send a strong message, but it's not the worst thing that's ever happened in the history of mankind. We need to take a step back here and understand that people die all of the world under terrible circumstances

every day. Doesn't mean you ignore at all, but it just means that you need perspective here. And what we're going to do, even if we find out that the saudiast are as culpable as is as has been alleged from the very beginning, meaning all the way up to the top, maybe we'll not sell them some munitions we said we're gonna sell them. Maybe we'll send them a strong reprimand under. We have no legal authority to do

anything about this. We are not signatories. The United States is not a signatory to the International Criminal Court, so we can't go there. And we're not a signatory for a good reason, which is that the notion of an international criminal law it doesn't really exist. I mean, yeah, there's war crimes, I guess, but try and forcing those unless you've already beaten the country and brought them to submission that you want to punish people in because of

their work crimes. Right. It's just it's really easy to to bang the tough guy drum on this issue. It's it's a lot harder to sit back and actually come up with constructive ways to deal with all this. You know, It's really easy to say, oh, you know, I'm I'm all about a free press and Trump isn't doing enough? All right, what should we do? I'm not just saying, oh, we can't bring a Showgi back because we can't. But he's not he's not an American. Why why does it

fall on us? Why does it fall on us? I'm just wondering, you know, I'm wondering why that is. And I think it's because they see, they view this ultimately, this is just another opportunity to bash the president. That's that's what really gets them motivated. That's what gets them really excited about all this. Um I wanted to talk to you a bit about what's going on it comes to immigration. Right now in this country. We have another

caravan heading toward our southern border. I've had a chance to I I interviewed a Democrat congressman today on this issue, and I have many, many thoughts to share on this. We we will get a bit deeper into the Elizabeth Warren thing because she won't stop. She's already in a very deep hole, and she keeps digging and digging, and people are like, Okay, you really need to stop digging, or else you're gonna come out the other side of the globe or something. You know, you really need to stop,

and she won't stop. I'm not gonna stop. Keep just gonna keep digging, all right. So if that's her choice, we will discuss what it means. I think it does have some ramifications for the Democrats. Um, so we've got a lot to a lot to digest here together, my friend, let's talk immigration in just a moment. Stay with me. That's the same as the Obama law. You know, Obama had the same thing. It was on the books, but he didn't enforce it. You enforced it, You launched that

zero tolerance policy to deter families with children. But then everybody decided and the courts don't want separation. And frankly, when you don't do separate, when you allow the pair to stay together. Okay, when you allow that, then what happens is people are going to pour into our country. Are you gonna go back to them subsequences leslie for coming into our country illegally? That's right, There have to be consequences or else we're just going to have more

and more of this. Of course, the damns, the left, the Libs, they know that. They pretend that that's not really what they want, but it certainly is. It is what they want. It is what the Libs are hoping we get more of. And I think that Republicans need to start pushing back whenever they're asked this question about Trump and the border and set family separation and say, okay, what what immigration laws are we allowed to enforce? Who

doesn't get to stay? And say, oh, well not everyone can say all right, who tell me who does not get to stay? Those who are in the interior of the United States, according to left, legally alien they get to stay. Those who try to sneak into the country, are then caught and say they want to claim asylum that they get to stay. Who doesn't get to say, oh, I'm sorry violent felons, and even those Democrats have a

soft spot for even those. It's not clear that Democrats don't think that they should stay in this country because you know, the prison conditions and other countries are so harsh, so we should probably incarce rate them here, Thank you

very much, taxpayers. Right now, as I speak to you, there is another migrant caravan, as they call it, and this is just essentially a a large swarm of soon to be illegals making their way from Honduras up through Guatemala, through Mexico and all the way to the interior of the United States. It has over a thousand people in it. Some estimates go as high as three thousand, and it is a group of people who are marching to the

border to get into America. They're going to walk all the way, and there are shelters that are set up along the way. Now, this has become a process that these other countries are, if not encouraging, certainly turning a blind eye. I mean, I think you could argue they're encouraging it. Why well, because it means that they have a means of exporting there, in many cases poorest and

least educated to this country. It also means that there will be remittance dollars, huge source of currency in Mexico. Remittances will be sent back, So we are subsidizing those economies. And who wants to guess at what rate those remittances are being taxed, that's right, Probably not being taxed at all, are they. So there's this caravan that's making its way up into the country, and the Libs are gonna do what they always do. They're gonna respond to this issue emotionally.

They're gonna say, oh my gosh, what about the poem on the base of the Statue of Liberty? What about Ellis Island? What about giving me your tire your week? And blab all right, So does any massive people that shows up at the border now get to come in to the United States? Why do we even have immigration laws? Why do we have a border patrol? What is the

purpose of all this? If libs are just gonna grandstand every time and act like anyone who has any questions about just bringing it whoever wants to come to this country, can say, you see, ultimately, here's the problem that the leftist project the really the socialist uh the Democrats socialist project in Western Europe and in America, because there are Democrats socialists here as we know Berni Santis and others. They're Elizabeth Warren, but she's got other problems right now.

The problem that the Democrats socialist project has to face is that they believe in open borders, but they also believe in a welfare state, a massive welfare state that doesn't work. The math doesn't add up. And also people are willing to help the less fortunate from within their own community, from within their polity, right their political union. There is still a sense of nationhood, of nationalism. Should I say where you want to know? I want to

help Americans. First, If we're gonna have a welfare state in this country, it should be to help those who are Americans, all racist creeds and colors, help them if they're down on their luck and we're gonna have a welfare state, that should be. But if if we have a policy of essentially anybody who shows up and has a sab a sob story about how their country has not I'm not talking about people necessarily that are facing any imminent violence. They just say, oh, the jobs here

are better. Well, guess what if I show up in Switzerland and say, hey that I like this place better, it's cleaner, it's more civilized. I demand citizenship, They're gonna put my butt on a plane and kick me out of the country and never let me back, and no one's gonna feel sorry for me. There is an order that countries try to maintain. Other countries are allowed to

have borders. Not only that, other countries are not expected to take in millions and millions and tens of millions of people from a different culture, who speak a different language, and who, once they come to this country, increasingly claimed that this country is not fair to them because we don't do enough for them. I was on the impression

that became the America. You're supposed to feel grateful and legal immigrants, by the way, all of your listening, high five, thank you, welcome to being part of the American family. Legal immigrants overwhelmingly do. But I do see a trend among illegal immigrants where they think that we owe them something. We owe them not just citizenship, not just permanent residency, but also all the goodies that the state could offer, free healthcare, free school, free housing, free everything. Even America

with our incredible economy and our economic dynamism. And thank you Trump for showing us that growth growth under Obama for all the people who sing Obama coonomy so great. Growth under Obama in his last year in office was like one point something per cent growth under Trump's second year in office g d P over four the single best measure we have of economic activity and what's going on in this country. So all the people gonna go to Obama economy, we please, Yes, there was a natural

economic reset that occurred. Obama made it slower and more painful and less powerful than it would have been had he not gotten in the way. But he was ignorance of economics. I mean, Obama is just not somebody who understand business, not somebody who ever had a you know, look at a balance sheet for any length of time, not somebody who had to run a business of any kind. You know, he was in the business of Obama. It's different. But the facts facts cannot be allowed to get in

the way of the leftist narrative. With all this stuff, this group is going to come to the border, and they are going to be in a position where we can either let them in or not. And you know what, the liberals are going to say, let them in, and we're going to turn around and say, hold on a second. But if if their claims of asylum allow them entrying into this country, what we're really saying is that anyone

can come and stay as long as they want. Anyone is allowed to show up in this country, and we effectively have an open border because all that all that's required for asylum is to say the right is now, the word is out now, we know what the loopholes are right now. The people in these communities that are coming into this country know that all I have to say is I fear violence in my home country. I fear violence. I mean violence can happen in anyone's country.

There's asylum. It's supposed to for people that are fleeing either a horrific natural disaster, and by the way, they're supposed to go back. Usually we give them temporary status for natural disasters because we're we look, we're a caring country, but we're not supposed to be chumps. We're not supposed to just be you know, the the the fat cow to be milked by the rest of the world. And that's what's happening. The Democrats have no way of turning

this back. By the way they understand, Uh, they understand that, quite honestly, there is no way that they can explain to the American people what it is that they really want. If they told the truth to Americans and we'd have a we'd have a lot of folks would say, A hold on a second, I don't think that's gonna work. I don't think you can just bring in endless amounts of foreigners, not through the legal process, not go through the normal channels of assimilation that have been in this

country for centuries. Now, UH joined this community that now liberals speak to, specifically the illegal immigrants in this country the quote undocumented, joined the ranks of the aggrieved undocumented, and try to get them access to the public treasury as fast as possible. We are twenty one trillion dollars in debt. I'll talk to you more about that later on in the show. Bringing in people without a high school level education and without English language skills by the

millions is not actually making our economy stronger. That is a lie. It's an obvious lie. If if Americans are not balancing the budget at the end of the year, for the American people aren't actually paying as they go when it comes to government spending. We really think that bringing lot of foreigners who don't have skills, who aren't going through the member. I'm talking about illegal foreigners, they're going to be the ones that set the economy, right,

I don't think so. I know you know this too, but man, is it frustrating. It is frustrating that you're gonna hear so much. It's just gonna turn into one big media sob story too. Oh who would turn these people? Who would turn these people away? How could you so heartless? You know, the Republicans with your your top hats in your monocles, stepping over poor people on the way to work. It's crazy. We will talk about Elizabeth Warren Folcahunta says

she is called by our president. That's coming up. Background checks are essential no matter what size business you're in, you're gonna make sure that you've got people coming in who have represented themselves properly to you, don't have any criminal issues in their background, don't have any major financial issues, and lawsuits against them. That's where backgrounds are essential, and that's why you need Global Verification Network to be your

background investigation and vetting company. They have risk mitigation experts headquartered in Chicago, and they have offices throughout the country. All employees are located here in the United States, and Global Verification is a veteran owned and operated company, a veteran owned small business folks, So support them any company, any size. This is who you should have do in your background checks. Just call them. They'll set you up with a plan. You'll love the service. They know what

they're doing. My g VN dot com again, my g v N m y g v N dot com or eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. It is emphatically not the duty of the courts to manage the United States government to pass judgment on every policy action that the executive branch takes. To make matters worse, the idea that any district judge can demand to see the deliberations of the ecutive branch will also inevitably have a chilling effect subjecting the executive branch. So this kind

of discovery is not acceptable. It's just not and we intend to fight it. And we intend to win journey General Jeff Sessions. That's right. Hearing from Jeff a little bit. It's always nice to hear from the man. You know.

I think that he understands and has understood all along, that the judiciary is unfortunately a hotbed of hashtag resistance, and that you have all they have a lot of judges who for whatever reason, have taken it upon themselves that they need to stand athwart Trump and the executive power that he clearly has and do everything that they can to stop him. They view themselves as a check and not a check based upon constitutional interpretation. No, they

just don't like what Trump does. And these activist judges need to stop and this effort to try and get around executive privilege. You know, you saw this with the Kavanaugh hearings where they're saying, oh, they don't have enough documents, enough documents. Uh, they don't get to see everything that was ever done in the Bush White House just because they want to find something to try and slime Kavanaugh with.

And you know that all they really had to do is wait around until their nonsense assault allegations could be leveled. That was the whole point. That was the game they were playing, so why pretend like there was something else going on. Of course, as we know, they have no honor, so they have no honor to protect, and that gives

you a lot of latitude with these matters. But the whole issue of judges and activist judges is a reminder of both what was done to this country before by the Obama administration and what is at stake in the midterms in just a few weeks. President Obama was responsible in his eight years for stacking the federal courts with about thirty percent of federal judges became Obama points, a huge number, and those are appointments that will be around

for decades. So Obama left, and we see that mark on the courts now because they are standing in front of Trump's agenda and making ridiculous I mean, the Ninth Circuit. I'm surprised they're not gonna overturn whatever court told Stormy Daniels that her defamation suit with Avanadi wasn't going forward and actually Stormy Daniels might have to pay the legal fees incurred by Trump. That's quite a loss in the world of a defamation case. That is quite a SmackDown.

But judges matter. They matter even more to the left and they matter to us because we just hope the judges will keep things even unfair. They hope that judges will hand them what they could never get through the legislative process. So judges are essential to the leftist project. And that's why the more judges that we can get that are constitutional conservatives, the less they can put up there who are leftist legislators in black robes, and it

obviously really agitates them. That is which is fun. It is fun, you know, on the lib sometimes it's something you gotta do. It's fun. I am absolutely in favor of putting as many constitutional conservatives as possible in the court as fast as possible. And miss McConnell has been doing that, by the way, even more judges, I mean, they're just Mitch McConnell is a lean, mean judge confirmation machine. It's right arm and he's doing whatever he can to

get that done. And that's his legacy as a conservative. He knows it. You know, you say what you will about Mitch and the swamp and all that stuff. He has been a warrior for conservative judges getting on the bench, getting the highest courts as we know with Kavanaugh and elsewhere that's at stake though here, if the Democrats were to take control of the Senate, you could say goodbye

againting any good judges through. If the Democrats take control of the Senate, it's going to be a complete stoppage on federal judges unless you put forward Americ Garland type and anyone who you think might be kind of a centrist according to the way the media describes them. Trust me, that judge is a leftist. So you might get somebody like America Garland to come through it, but overall they'll

they'll bring it to a screeching halt. So so at some level there's there's a judge issue at stake here, or the judges are at stake. With the mid terms, I think we're good on the on the Senate side, but then you go to the House side of the equation, you realize that we will be subjected to a stoppage of Trump's most important policy agenda items. If the Democrats

take the House, it'll be over. You know, maybe they'll play a little play a little foot see with our side when it comes to an infrastructure bill, but it's it's over in terms of getting a wall immigration reform, all that that's not gonna happen, and we are going to be in a two year long grinding battle where all the media is gonna want to do is try to exact revenge on Trump and all his supporters for the humiliations that they've endured that the media has endured

for the last couple of years. You'll be treated to the most politicized and nonsensical investigations imaginable, and you will see sure enough that yeah, they're gonna make this about about impeachment. Even if they know they can't remove the president, they want to impeach him just to put a stain on his presidency that they can venue to try to run.

So now, the good news for us is that the Democrats so far have nobody realistic that they can run against Trump in I mean, it's this list that that I saw earlier this week that CNN had the polling on on who could be who could be up against Tromp. I mean, you had at the top of list Joe Biden. Come on, guys, Biden, that's the best you can do. Below Biden, you had Warren. I don't think she's exactly gonna be a threat. I don't think. I don't think Warren's got it. You had some other names on there,

you know, Kamala Harris. Why because she checked some boxes that the left likes. There's not nothing that you've ever seen her do legislatively or otherwise. That was impressive. And I've heard from people that it was someone on her staff. I don't know this, but the rumor that I'm reporting on a rumor right now. You can yell at me later. The rumor I he was that was someone on her staff, not fin Stein's staff, that actually lead that information. I

don't have proof of that. I'm not naming anybody obviously because I don't have proof of it, but that was what I heard, and I wouldn't surprise me. We had that other staffer, a congressional staffer who was leaking the personal information of Republican senators, dosing them straight up doc and he's facing real time in prison and he should go. But I hope the GOP has had a wake up

call here, and that's really what I'm focusing on. I hope that Republicans, that every person who voted for Trump understands that all the good things that are happening, come to effectively come to a if not a halt. Let's say they continue at half power at best. Sure there'll still be some executive orders still, they'll they'll be deregulatory stuff.

But we lose the House, you're gonna see that the resistance will dig in and all of the craziness that we've seen them engage in in the last years, all that anti Trump psychosis will be directed into the House of Representatives waging a campaign of just attrition against the Trumpet ministration, just just trying to tire them out in exhausted with subpoenas and all the grandstanding and all the media parents and they're like, oh, what's their agenda? Gonna be, Oh,

you know stuff, Russia collusion stuff. It's just gonna be crap. So America is really going to suffer. So this election, mat Mike says, the most important election of our lifetime, and I ever always says that that's garbage. It's an important election, though, And if you really think that Trump is part of a political revolution and what he's doing is as I really do believe, it's benefiting this country tremendously. We gotta go to the barricades on this one. We

gotta fight. Politically speaking, we got much more coming off teams. Stay with me. Every day starts the same way from me, my friends, with a cup of black black Rifle coffee. That's right, I'm drinking a black these days because it is delicious roast. To order small batch coffee that you're going to want to really taste. You're not gonna want to pour a bunch of creamer in this. Okay, you're not in the former so union you have to drown out the taste of the crappy beans you're drinking. Drink

Patriot approved coffee, Black Rifle Coffee. Go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck and you'll see you can get fift per cent off your order there. Okay, Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck, fifteen percent off your first order, have it delivered to you. Never have to think about buying coffee again. What brand are you buying

right now? I'm really asking you that Black Rifle tastes better than it and it's owned and operated by veterans who love this country and share your ideals and your values. Take action. Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck, you'll get fifteen percent off your first order. In New York's eleventh district voted for Trump by a huge margin. It includes all of Staten Island, and it feels nothing like where we came from this morning, especially here in New

dorth Or. Republican Congressman Dan Donovan asked us to meet him. Probably you want to meet a shop, right, Well, this is where you find out what was really on people's minds. What did it say that stand for the flag? For us? Absolutely? And if you don't like it, go to Venezuela. The congressional elections, all right, well, and what will be the things that are on your mind? The most voting president supporting your president? Same thing. I love Donald Trump. He's great.

A lot of Democrats out here feel the same way you do, especially after the Kavanaugh thing. So many women that work Kia, what outreach try that? Yes, the way he was treated, just just the treatment. What do you want from your congress? My god it. I would love to see a wall builds. I would love to see his agenda move forward. I love these ladies. Great stuff here. That was an NBC reporter. First of all, I love ladies,

like if you don't like it, go to Venezuela. She sounds like she's lives in in the New York area, so she reminds me a home. If you don't like it, you go to Venezuela. Uh, which you know that that should be a fun that should be a sign and a lot of Trump rallies. You know. If you don't, if you don't wanna maga, go to Venezuela. That John, I think we could sell that T shirt? What do you think? It's a little long though, but it's catchy. But you you noticed that there was that woman in

that in that montage. We need a montage who said that women were outraged by Kavanaugh. You don't hear that from the media, do you? You really never hear that. You never hear that women were outraged by Kavanaugh, meaning outraged by the attacks on Kavanaugh. They were outraged at him being treated so badly, treated so poorly, and so

unfairly by the Democrats and by the media. This is this is one of the the biggest miscalculations the Democrats have made since they all assumed that It probably is, in fact, the biggest miscalculation that the left has made since they assumed Hilary was gonna be Trump, which they did.

They assumed that that was happening. The biggest miscalculation that they've made is that going absolutely scorched earth to try to to try to carpet bomb Kavanaugh during those hearings, that that wouldn't have any backlash, or that at least if Kavanaugh got through and they put up the fight in that way, they would be rewarded by their base, but not punished by the average American. That's not the case. They are being punished by the average American voter. People

are not okay with what has happened here. They do not think it is acceptable that all this has happened, and and that's why you know they're they're having to deal with the reality of Hold on a second, maybe maybe this isn't gonna work out the way we thought. John Plakelip fourteen. I didn't accept the theory that there was a blue way, and I'm still of that opinion. We were in better shape had we not gone through the horror of the Kavanaugh activities. We lost on that issue,

were united the Republican Party. They are no longer asleep. They are energized. That's right, you know what it was, and this was powerful. It was more powerful than really any slogan the Republicans under the circumstances could have come up with the assault on Kavanaugh, which I am very proud of all the support that I got from all of you, all of you listening to this, because I took heat for that. We had a We had a show and producer, Mike, you can correct me what it was.

I think it was two or three days into the allegations. We had a show. They're lying about Kavanaugh was the title of it. That wasn't after the gang rape allegations. That wasn't after the Avanati clown show came into town. That was on just the Blasi four allegations. She wasn't. She was not telling the truth. She might have thought she was telling the truth, but what she was saying

was not the truth. I did not believe her, and a lot of you came came to came to my side there because I'm telling you I got I had people from other networks reaching out to me. You're gonna you're destroying your career. Don't do this, You're making you know, how dare you say you don't believe her. You know, I had people that were really, oh, I never mind. Also people oh, you know, you're you're an apologist for

rapists and all this time terrible stuff. But I knew, I knew what they were trying to pull, and I knew it was bogus. And you knew it too, And you listened to this show. You wore a part of team Buck made sure that I knew that you had my back through this whole thing, and that whatever you know, consequences I may have faced professionally, you were gonna be with me for doing the right thing, for standing up. And man, we made a lot of noise because I

also had people. Look, I had people in the White House say, really appreciate that you're you're willing to say what needs to be said about Kavanaugh. That's the truth. People in the White House, we're reaching out at that same time and letting me know that they noticed, and they were, like I said, there were a few of us on this one. But man, that was that was a dark time in this country's history. It was the most disgusting, most obvious smear effort anybody could have ever imagined.

And they almost they I keep wanting to tell everybody. You know, yes, we should be happy that he got through, but they almost got away with it. They almost stopped him, and we need to remember that too. We need to keep it in mind. And you know, they're not done with this either. They haven't decided to let this go.

So while right now they're a little they're a little bit caught flat footed because of what this is doing for their electoral prospects right there, there's a there's some I'm an understanding on the left that oh my gosh, we we overplayed our hand. We we made mistakes here. We shouldn't have done this the way we did. Uh. That's that's real. That sentiment is real. Um. They also haven't given up on the notion that maybe they'll maybe they will still find a way to get rid of

Kavanaugh somehow. I mean, the most looney left lawmakers, as a funneliteration, the most looney left lawmakers are still out there talking about this. And you know what I'm talking about looney and the left. It's very possible that Maxine Waters is going to enter the discussion played twelve never stop, and that is what we have to do with what happened with Kavanaugh and this confirmation process. It was heartbreaking,

But I think women are not going to recede. Women are going to continue to confront what took place in that confirmation and him and he won't rest easy in his guide. He won't rest easy in his job. What is that supposed to mean? You know, the Left is willing to go to these extremes whenever they don't get their way. They don't like what happens with the Senate. Maybe we shouldn't have a Senate. They don't like what happens in the Supreme Court. Maybe we shouldn't have a

Supreme Court. They don't like that it's a five four court. Maybe we should have eleven people on the court. I mean, whatever it is. They have no respect for the system whatsoever unless the system gives them what they want. They don't view the system as a necessary mechanism for managing our disputes and conflicts in a civil fashion. They don't seem to understand that the Constitution, other than yes, creating

the basic construct for our government. And when it comes to the Bill of Rights, is really just about processes and things that the government can't do to you. It doesn't just say the government has to be amazing. Government has to be wonderful, because what does that mean? Says the government cannot do the following, The government must respect the following, because we're trying to create a systematic approach to every individual system that the citizen rather that the

government must follow. But you see, the left, because they are both petty tortalitarians and statuss are willing to reform the system however they see fit, whenever they see fit, and they have no shame about this. They have no sense of their own hypocrisy because they only do this when they don't get their way. They only do this when they don't have the power that they think they deserve. And I would just note that this is problematic to say the least. We'll get into more of this coming up.

Stay with me. In China, the government is engaged in the persecution of religious and ethnic minorities. At least a million Weakers and other Muslim minorities have been imprisoned and so called re education camps. These detentions are being conducted under the guise of neutralizing extremist groups. Prisoners are tortured. They are forced to renounce their religion and to pledge

allegiance to the Communist Party. China is an authoritarian state. Now, I point this out not just as a reminder and also as a moment, taking a moment here to say that if we are concerned about national security threats, if we really want to talk about who we need to keep an eye on, China is far and away based on population size, based on economy, based on its military, based on its aggressive acts to try and steal our intellectual property in our government and military secrets. China is

our only near peer competitor period. Russia is not even the same ball game. Okay, Russia isn't even worth talking about in the same way. Russian GDP is one trillion dollars folks. Okay, it's one trillion. Chinese GDP as of sixteen was eleven point two trillion dollars. Okay it is. It's over ten times the size of the Russian economy, ten x. That that's not a gap that the that the the Russians are going to be able to make up for any time soon. So the Chinese are the real concern.

Why am I bringing this up? Well, as we've been discussing here on the show, there's a tremendous amount of concern about Kashogi and the Saudias, and I've I've told you why this is all of a sudden everyone's oh my gosh, so are you so brutal and so terrible? Oh gosh. And I'm not saying what they did wasn't brutal and terrible. It was, but the Saudi has been

brutal and terrible for a long time. They are, meaning the media, using this as an opportunity, not just to raise the issue because it's considered one of their own, so to speak, as a journalist, but also as a means of hitting Trump. What I think is so interesting is that if the standard is really that Americans need to be willing to take risks two risk their own foreign policy interests and everything else based on humanitarian concerns

in other countries, what do we do about China? Well, why is it that now we're hearing, oh, we need to take this really strong line against Saudi Arabia because of what it did here. China's one child policy is

more barbaric. I know they've changed it, but China has engaged in worse humanitarian repression than really any other country in the world except for North Korea and that's not something you're hearing much in the press right now, because no serious person is really going to say, oh yeah, let's let's go after China on this issue, and let's punish our own economy on a human chary. It's one thing to do it for trade, one thing to do

it for our interests. But you know, the idea of America first means that we're concerned with our own stuff first and foremost. We're not playing World police anymore. America Buck. Yeah, see Buck like my name. That makes a better song. Um, But we're really not supposed to be running around telling

everybody what what's the one thing? We can tell them whatever we want, but but trying to force them to act in a certain way, because that's all we'll be doing, and we will lose a lot in the process, and we probably won't even get what we want in the long run. And here here's an example of what I mean. You have Google Massive, its own alphabet is the parent company of Google. Now. Google is a massive company, right,

Google is huge. I mean we're talking it's a trillion dollar company now basically, and it recently refused to continue to work with the Pentagon. All right, The us UM the US project, US government projects with the Pentagon involved. Uh, they won't do that anymore, they they refused. So Google has a has a moral issue with working with the United States government, the Pentagon, even for technology that just is applicable to that. And so Google said, oh, no,

we can't do that. We're gonna step away from that. Meanwhile, this is this was in the Washington Post earlier today. Quote. Google finally confirmed a secretive project that's been fueling an employee led backlash for weeks at the company, an effort to build a version of its search engine that complies

with China's online censorship regime. The project, code named Dragonfly, is not only real, but it is already performing to the satisfaction of top Google executives, and it could pave the way for Google to re enter China's online search market after nearly a decade. If Google were to operate in China, what would it look like? What queries will we be able to serve? Chief executive Sundar pitch I said during an event hosted by wire on Monday night. It turns out we'll be able to serve well over

of the queries. The announcement could prompt more questions from US policymakers, some of whom have accused Google of being evasive about Project Dragonfly. Meanwhile, Google and its peers in the tech industry are facing intense scrutiny over its approach to use your privacy and data, with some lawmakers talking

about blah blah blah blah. Okay, well there's that, But the bigger backlash, as far as I'm concerned, has to do with Google and this this Pentagon project and why they won't They don't feel any any obligation whatsoever as a US company, UH to keep working on this out of out of patriotism. Um, here's here's the New York Times piece back in back in early June of this year.

Quote Google, hoping to head offer rebellion. My employees, upset that the technology they were working on could could be used for lethal purposes, will not renew a contract with the Pentagon for artificial intelligence work when a current deal expires next year. This is a perfect example of the deluded pie in the sky liberalism that defines the modern left today. You know, the the super elites at Google with you know, near unlimited funds and a tremendous amount

of power and reach. They have a big problem when it comes to working with United States government for technology that could have I mean, no one's saying Google has to build bombs, but they won't let them use AI because the AI maybe will help guide missiles or you know, No, they won't work with the Pentagon. No sense of patriotism, no sense of duty to country for people at Google. Meanwhile, Google couldn't have existed anywhere else. I mean, it couldn't

have been built anywhere else in the the world. Couldn't exist they where else in the world the way that does the United States. Alright, so it has benefited dramatically from being a US company and they don't feel any obligation whatsoever, which I think is really shameful. Meanwhile, meanwhile, they're perfectly willing to work on a project that is, oh, that is absolutely a part of Chinese censorship efforts, that is

meant to be a part of China's enormous surveillance apparatus. There, so that's okay, right, that they will work within They will work within the censored realm of China and say, oh, yeah, well tailor this so that it doesn't offend your your Chinese censorship sensibilities, but they won't work with the United States government. Let's let that sink in for a moment

and understand that this is not a one off. This mentality of acting like the United States government is the bad guy, and any foreign government, because it's not America, should get at least different treatment, you know, should get a pass on some of this stuff. This is not limited to this one case. This is prominent on the left and there's so much that you will see with the moral relativists because liberalism is based today and the libs left all about moral relativism. You know, what's true

for one person is not true for another. What's good for you is not good for this other person. Right, there's white privilege, and there's intersectionality, and there's all this different stuff, and they're really just making it up as they go along. But the moral relativism also extends into international relations, and it means that they're willing, for example,

right now, to call out Saudi Arabia because it hurts Trump. Meanwhile, they won't talk about what's going on with Islam in that country, that Saudi Arabia is the heartland of Islam. They want that that never gets brought in the discussion because that's not what the point they want to make. And they also won't in forced this new tough guy. Oh gosh, we can't allow human rights abuses mentality against China. They'll only do it against Saudi Arabia only right now

because it allows them to hit Trump. These people have no scruples, and honestly a lot of them have no patriotism either. We should just say that because it's true. I'm gonna take a d n a tist all of you have. I've been told that my grandmother was part Cherokee and Indian. It may all be just talk, but you're gonna find out in a couple of weeks because I'm gonna take this. You're gonna take it. I'm taking it, and the result is gonna be revealed here. This is

my Trump moment. This is reality TV. I just I'm dying to know because I'm dying. You know, I didn't really think much about it. But she's less than one tenth to one percent. I think I can beat her. I think I can beat her. Right, And if you do beat her, will you ask for a million dollars from the President to no I want a casino enemy, but come back in a couple of weeks in a like terrible. They have great people, just bad leaders. Bad leaders.

So I like everything that Lindsay Graham was saying there until the very end. I don't like he was He didn't mean it the way that it sounded. I could say that I he just misspoke. Uh, you know, he didn't mean that. He just meant Iran is a bad country.

Iran is not bad people. In fact, Iranians. I've had many Iranian friends throughout my life, and uh, it would be a great day to have the Iranian people in Iran able to have the same some of the same freedoms as the wonderful Ranians that live in this country. We've had a whole diaspora of Iranians here. Anyway, I love the other stuff he was saying. Thought I always

gonna take a DNA test. I mean, Lindsey Graham is now he's very much, very much a man struck by a kind of new swagger because I think that he really understands, uh, he really understands that you gotta be willing to fight the other side, you gotta be willing

to go to the mat. I mean, Lindsay, in his sense kind of mirrors my own feelings last few weeks, where I've just said in the last few months, you know what, as much as as much as I always want to leave the door open for the other side, and I want I want people on the left to listen to this show. I want, you know, honest good Democrats to listen to this show as much as they're willing to uh in terms of their of the ideas, we can't just oppose them. We we gotta crush the ideas.

I don't crush people, but I want to crush ideas, and that means sometimes, yes, as the kids say, we might have to own the Libs a little bit. So Lindsey Grahama, I like that he's been He's had a little more swaggers I've been saying. And I also think that, you know, on immigration, he has some interesting things to say. I gotta get him. I gotta get him a little more hard line on this stuff. Folks. Here here's what he said, play clip eight. There are eleven mainion a

legal prints here that came from Brittany poor countries. What do we do with them? I want a merit based immigration system. You gotta get Democrats some Republicans working together, build the wall, control who gets a job, more legal immigration, move to merit based immigration. You can't ignore the eleven million. They'll never be a deal with the Democratic Party that doesn't uh deal with the eleven million her non felons

who've been here for twenty and thirty years. Once you get them in a good spot, you can have a new immigration system. You know, I don't think he gets it on this. When you have folks, I think that Lindsay, he's a little a little too squishy on this issue. As I've been saying, thank you Yale University math nerds for backing me up on this. It's not eleven million, it's twenty million. It's twenty to zero at least. I don't know what we have to do to get people

to understand this. It is not eleven It is twenty million at a minimum, which is a vast number of people from a generally speaking, from one country from Mexico. I mean the vast majority number from Mexico, which also happens to be a neighbor of ours geographically with a with an enormous border, and you know, it poses its own issues for political unity in this country really does.

I know, people are not allowed. National security analysts will tell you that when you have a population that has that has moved across a border, that has fought wars over that border, we don't often think about that, but we fought a war with Mexico over that border. And then you have a population that maintains a tremendous and continuum tremendously you know, powerful and continuing tie to the the what's considered still the homeland of the mother country. Uh,

you have a recipe for destabilization, you really do. I mean, politically, at a minimum destabilization. And that's you know, that's something that I think is uh, you know, it needs to be remembered here. I think Lindsay Graham is might look. I I give Lindsey a lot of credit for the whole capital thing, But as much as I'd like to just look at that and say it's all fine, now, they're gonna get fooled an immigration again. They're talking about doing this deal, and the deal is gonna be amnesty,

and then we'll see what happens for your security. We'll see what happens with this request for a wall. And that's not good enough, that's not acceptable. Lindsey talked a little bit more about this deal that he thinks is gonna happen. Place seven the houses have been and a half for the wall. I mean, excuse me, five being in the Senate has a being a half will close the gap DOCCA. Remember that six hundred kids brought here on the average age of six, no place else to go.

Trump's gonna win in court. He can repeal DOCA the day he wins in court. What do we do with these uh young people? So I'd like to do a deal, full wall funding for DOCCA, full wall funding for DOCTA. That that I I think, I think you could sell that to the Republic, the gop BA. If it was full wall funding, you get that five billion, and it's just deferred actions. Still all right, it's not a but you know it can't be. It can't be citizenship, and

it can't be permanent. It's just okay, Well, we're gonna have a we're gonna see how this goes. And because you can't discuss what you're gonna do with the not eleven, but twenty million illegals in this country until you have a reasonable assurance that you're not going to be dealing with another twenty million in ten years. And if you by the way, I understand that the political sway that the Latino Democrat community in this country will have for

even more unrestricted immigration, particularly from from south of the border. Uh, that will skew the entire debate into discussion going forward. And all Democrats will see is that they will be importing masses of new voters who will essentially make the Republican Party a you know, a an afterthought, and they will they will be able to turn America into a one party state. That's the game the Democrats are playing. And Republicans keep thinking about this like, well, you know,

maybe we can deal with them. The Democrats are looking at the immigration issue is how do we make the Republican Party extinct? Republicans are all, you know, maybe there's a little here and there. We no no bad idea, very bad idea. Um, we've got much more coming up. Team, Uh, stay right there, stay with me. With all the recent news about online security breaches, it's hard not to worry

about where my data goes. Making an online purchase or simply accessing your email could put your private information at risk. You're being tracked online by social media's, it's marketing companies and your mobile or internet provider. Not only can they record your browsing history, but they often sell it to other corporations who want to profit from your information. That's why I decided to take my privacy back by using

Express VPN. Express vpn has easy to use apps that run steamlessly in the background of my computer, phone, and tablet. Turning on Express VPN takes only one click and cost less than seven dollars a month. It is the number one VPN service by tech Radar. Comes with a thirty day money back guarantee. Protect your online activity today and found out find out how you can get three months

free at Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package Express vpn dot com slash Buck. As a kid, I never asked my mom for documentation when she talked about our Native American heritage. What kid would, But I knew my father's family didn't like that she was part Cherokee and part Delaware, so my parents had to elope. Let me be clear, I never asked for

never got any benefit because of my heritage. The people who hired me have all said they didn't even know about it. She is such a fraud. I mean, she's such a fraud that she can only keep digging in deeper and make the fraud even worse. Elizabeth Warren, You, oh man, She's given us the most entertaining twenty four hours in the news cycle of of anything I have seen in a in a long time. She just keeps

digging in. I have other there's other audio too, of of how we heard this this story from her where she kept talking about how there was a a problem with her parents, right, a problem where her parents weren't supposed to be dating because their parents are wait a one set of parents thought that they were too Native Americans, So were they just mistaken all that time? The whole thing, it's just, you know, it really reminds me of It reminds me of the kind of narrative creation that Obama

had about his life. I'm not saying that it was false, but there definitely was. Although I'm not saying it wasn't there wasn't some false stuff in there. There's definitely a sense of Obama was making an autobiography that was a construct, and Warren, I think, tried the same thing here with Oh, you know, she had to deal with racism herself, you know, in her own family. And she is she is as white as white gets. She's the whitest white lady you'll

ever find anywhere. And we all know this. Let me tell you something, speaking from a white dude's perspective, I know a white dude or white gal when I see one, and lizz Is Warren is white. So this whole game she's playing is completely and utterly ridiculous. But she just keeps digging down. She keeps digging down, and and it just gives our president an incredible opportunity to just lay lay her campaign out and destroy it even before it happens.

For of all of the presidential tweet storms, and there have been a lot of them, this is among my very favorite. Earlier this morning, President Trump writes the following quote, Pocahuntas, the bad version, sometimes referred to as Elizabeth Warren is getting slammed. She took a bogus DNA test and it showed that she maybe one one thousand and twenty four, far less than the average American. Now the Cherokee Nation denies her quote DNA test is useless, even they don't

want her phony. So what he's referring to is that a representative of the Cherokee Nation went on TV on CNN and said that this was a disgrace essentially and that the DNA test doesn't mean anything, and that Elizabeth Warren should not be stealing their heritage of Native people's for her own purposes. That that's not something that should be happening. Uh And yet it did. But Trump was

not done with her. He also tweeted, now that her claims of being Indian heritage have turned out to be a scam and a lie, Elizabeth Warren should apologize for perpetua, for perpetrating or perpetuating this fraud against the American public. Harvard called her a person of color, amazing Cohn and would not have taken her otherwise. This is the only place where there seems to be some some really you know, some good faith or not even good No, not good faith.

Strike that from the record, some not laughable argument. I mean, the notion that Elizabeth Warren is a Cherokee or could consider herself a Native American is is laughable. To any serious human laughable. I mean, you should laugh about it. As the Wall Street Journal said, if she is a person of color, then words have no meaning. She is as far from a person of color as anyone could possibly be. And yet she's still kind of she's she still clings to it. But then there's this point of, well,

did she receive any benefit? My friends, there is so much circumstantial evidence that she received a benefit that it is also laughable to suggest that that she did not um that she did not have the and I'm not somebody who's a school snob, but she did not have the academic pedigree for her law school to then go on to be a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and Ivy League School and Harvard considered to be the number one school and really the number one law school

in the United States. No way that happens unless the hiring committees think that they can quo. They can. It's very important them. But they put out these reports, very important that they have a Native American on the faculty. That's a big big deal for them. They have their pick, they can have anyone they want. And that's why. Also, why would Elizabeth warrenant list her self as such unless it gave her some benefit. It's a bizarre thing to

do unless you were gaming the system. The only reason you would do that if you were Elizabeth Warren, and clearly not a person of color, would be to gain the system. So it just defies belief. It's completely ridiculous. I can tell you that I spoke to because I have access to a lot of Democrats at the Hill. Uh. And I spoke to Democrats today who are colleagues, and I gotta say they were all they were all saying it too. They're like, this is just there's no excuse.

There's nothing you can say about it. That she thought that this proved her case was completely insane. Uh. Donald Trump also we had one more tweet on this. He wrote, thank you to the Cherokee Nation for revealing that Elizabeth Warren, sometimes referred to as Pocahontas, is a completed total from

sometimes referred to as Pocahontas. He has defeated really the progressive front runner for before she was even able to get into the race officially, and he defeated her by getting inside her head and forcing her to make one of the great unforced political errors of all time. I have never seen anything quite like this. This, this is truly truly astonishing. But then the president had this thing today later on, and I gotta say, I don't know

what's going on here. I want the president focused on what matters, and I want the president on policy and look fighting back absolutely, But what is this thing about? What is this thing about? Oh? Horse oh yes, here's what he wrote. Federal judge throws out Stormy Daniel's lawsuit versus Trump. Trump is entitled to legal fees. Great Now I can go after a horse face and her third rate lawyer in the great state of tech. Sis. She will confirm the letter she signed. She knows nothing about me,

a total con. You know, it's interesting Trump really holds out here that that this is a lie start to finish. And I have thought that that that there's no way that she's lying about Trump just because of the detail. And they look, they do know each other, they have had contact. It's not like the Kavanaugh allegation. And one

it's nothing. There's nothing criminal about anything that's even alleged about Trump with Jommy Daniels, or I should say about his contact with her people are saying, it's oh, the campaign finance, that's just pathetic. The no no shot, no chance. Um. But I gotta say, now, I'm thinking, you know, is it? Is it? Why? Why do people jump at the conclusion that Trump actually had had this affair with her? Um? When I said, well, I shouldn't say jumped to the conclusion,

I think that's obvious. But why are we so sure? A lot of people I know seemed very very sure about it. I'm I'm just keep I'm keeping an open mind. There's no there's never been any proof offered that I'm aware of, meaning she's never been able to show text messages or emails or anything that you know that that that relates to the affair. She just gave this description of him, and you know, there's another part of this, And I'm just thinking through this, her whole description of

Trump in her book. It's like she wrote the description based on what she knew the media would want her to say, which would just be really, uh, lascivious and degrading and nasty toward towards the president. So I'm you know, I had thought that the president, this is before he was the president. I had thought that maybe he you know, had strayed from his marital vow here, and I was willing to say, Look, I care about what he's doing

as president and the political movement he represents. I'm not I'm not sitting around trying to judge all politicians by every every action in their lives. Um especially because as you know, they'll only do that. They'll only enforce that against Republicans. They want enforce it against Democrats. But there's all this part of me that thinks, well, you know, maybe there's something else here. It's just I'm thinking about it, right, I'm thinking about it. I'm not totally sold one way

or the other. But now they they they are all focused on the present, referring to a woman has horse face. You know, this is where I say Trump was winning and winning and winning this week, and this feels a little bit like it feels a little bit like an unnecessary distraction and and not something that I would really

want the president to say. But that said, maybe when you're when you're this, when you're this potus, when you're in his position and you're fighting against everybody and it's all an uphill battle, maybe there's just gonna be these you know, he's it's not They're not all gonna be hits, right, They're not all gonna be great. So that's a part of it too. And maybe he's human, which we all know he is. Maybe he's in per ficked, which we

all know he is. Uh. And I think that we should be able to have that talk among those of us who really support the president and his agenda, which I clearly do and still be going to say, Okay, I kind of wish he hadn't called some woman horse face on Twitter. I just I think that that's, you know, that's a little that's a little bit beneath where where our president should be. That said, he's been crushing everything else all week and been amazing, so you know, so

he's not perfect. He's pretty darn good though, so you know, I'll give it to him on that. And that's I think that's an okay standard to have for politicians. You know, it's not perfect, it's pretty darn good. He really is, um And I've seen recently some some conservatives, I think, start to come around to this notion of why do we have to why do we have to pretend like

any politicians perfect? Why do we have to pretend like anyone is beyond or not just pretend, but hold them up to this standard of of moral probity that isn't there for anybody else really in public life. Look at big Trump has made more mistakes than a lot of other folks in that area. But he's also clearly got a gift for politics, for entertainment, and he is he is the man for this era. Elizabeth Warren, Let's let me tell you why I said. Let me tell you

why I say that. Instead of just stating an hour, let me break that down a little bit. Why. Here's a perfect example of why I give Trump a lot of leeway. Why I cut this president a lot of slack on some of the tweets or some of the stuff he says about you know people here or there that I feel like, maybe or it's going a little far.

Here's why. If it weren't for someone like Donald Trump, if we had a Mitt Romney instead of Donald Trump and Elizabeth Warren was gonna be candidate, it would just be him getting attacked all the time, our guy getting attacked not fighting back, and Elizabeth Warren getting away with being a huge fraud who advocates for all kinds of class warfare. While she's making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year as a she was as a tenured professor at Harvard Law School. I think a quarter of a

million dollars a year. He's making plenty of money. She's got plenty of money, um, and and all of that falseness, all that falsehood that she's out there peddling to people, would really go unchallenged in a meaningful way. And then, worst of all, if she were to win the presidency against a Romney like figure, you and I would have a harder time putting food on the table, paying our mortgages or in my case rent, you know, paying our bills,

taking care of family, taking care of medical bills. It would all be harder because of Elizabeth Warren, because she has wrong ideas, because she's self involved, because she doesn't understand the way the world really works, and because she's benefited from this system, the system in place that the left holds up at all costs of some people, you know, get get special privileges. Some people will get pushed through now and on. Others are told, will you have some

form of privilege? So you have to just suffer in silence. I'm sorry. Trump has saved us from yet another progressive destruction machine, this case would have been Elizabeth Warren's. While I'm laughing about the whole thing, he's also done the nation a great service by making sure that Elizabeth Warren folk A hunt Is does not become president. What's going on with the debt, it's very disserving, and it's it's driven by the three big entitlement programs that are very popular, Medicare,

so Security, and Medicaid. That's se what we spent every year. The subject we were just discussing, the funding of the government, is about of what we've spent. There's been a bipartisan reluctance to tackle entitlement changes because of the popularity of those programs. Hopefully, at some point here we'll get serious about this. We haven't been yet. Merchant McConnell warned for look, I say it with love because Mitch Mitch is a boss. Mitch got it done. Mitch held the line for Kavanaugh.

There are some people now that you know. I will always have a soft spot for uh And because of that Kavanaugh fight, which was one of the nastiest political fights of my lifetime, okay. And Mitch McConnell, God bless man. When it counted, you were there when it counted, your shield was high. You know, there's a Lindsey Graham. I wasn't a huge Lindsay fan of the past, But first of all, Lindsay Graham has got a little saucy lately too. He's really letting the left have it. I like Lindsay unleashed.

You know, he's doing his thing. But another one who's in that category, and and I take a much a much softer tone on Jeff Flake to he he could have ingratiated him safe in himself to the uh MSNBC crowd, but instead he did the right thing and in the end he made a mistake. He could have cost us the whole thing. So I'm not saying he's not in the same category as McConnell and Graham for the the

special special folks, for this anyway. I just wanted to say, the deficit is the highest it's been in six years, folks.

And I came into this business of conservative media right at the height of the Tea Party's power in this country, the Tea Party as a movement, and I went to work for Glenn Beck, and Glenn was very tied in with the Tea Party, and you know, I saw this this wave of uh, just the restoration of concern, the restoration of concern for our financial future for just so many, um so many things that all of a sudden, we're at the top of the list, right, and and also

a restoration of the the American Founding as a topic of conversation at I'm just saying, we're not We have not done anything about this yet, and we've had a Republican House and Republican Congress, I'm sorry, Publican Senate and White House now for almost two years and we haven't

taken action. And I worry that we're not going to take act, and I worry that this is soon going to become one of these issues where, uh, we all talk a big game, we all talked, talked tough on this, but at the end of the day, nobody wants to be the one that says that we got to spend less. Republicans will talk about, Okay, we can't tax more fun, but the truth is we've got to spend less, and that means we've got to spend less on Social Security

and Medica Medicare and Medicaid. That's what it means. That is what it means, or else it has no meaning. And Republicans don't want to hear that. And I know a lot of the folks listen to this tonight have a tough time with that. They feel like they paid in and so it's not an entitlement. It's the government making amends for taking money from them for all those years social Security. That's pretty much true. We just need to change the structure of a long term with Medicare.

It's not true with Medicare. Your kids if you're listening to this, really actually your grand kids, if you're of Medicare age, they're the ones and your great grandkids are gonna be paying the financial price for the care that people are take it out of the system today. It's not right. It's intergenerational fifth and I know people don't want to hear it, but that's just the truth. Meanwhile, the Feds collected record income taxes in eighteen So you know,

we're always told, oh, there's not enough, there's not enough. Uh, you know, revenue, there's not revenue, it's there's too much. There's more than a revenue. There's too much spending. Government has got to rein it in and unless we're you know, we're either going to have a serious national conversation about this and take action, or we're gonna suffer some really horrific economic consequences. And by the time the consequences are obvious, it's gonna be tough to turn it around. And that's

just the truth. So anyway, Look, we'll continue to talk about this issue because it matters, but I won't harp on it too much. Talk to Ron Paul today for a little bit. That was interesting. He's certainly is a big believer in this, and we'll be right back. Yeah. I mean, one of my daughters is twelve, so she's very aware of what's going on. Um and my other daughter six, so it's different kinds of conversations. My daughter, my twelve year old, is an activist, she's activated, she's

a feminist. She ran into somebody recently who a little girl her age, whom who said she wasn't a feminist, and my daughter was astonished. It was hard to imagine, you know, And and you know, she came home and cried to me about it. This is a specifically liberal problem, and I don't ever like to be mean, even to silly libs, And I don't like to mock anyone's family, And I certainly would never mock a twelve year old

girl or twelve year old boy, twel year old anybody. Um, that's not cool, that's not nice, it's not fair, and it's unbecoming. So I'm not commenting on a twelve year old as somebody with strong opinions and who goes home from school and cries about them. That's that's not of any interest to me whatsoever. What is of interest to me is that that was a clip of Maggie Gillenhall, the actress on the View, and she seems to think that it is not just normal but expected for a

twelve year old to be quote an active ast. Kids should be allowed to be kids. And the only way that a a normal child would feel the need to come home and cry because that young girl met another girl who did not self describe as a feminist is because the parents are engaging in a really relentless propaganda campaign towards their own children. Now, parents can raise kids with whatever believes they want, but I would just note

that I think that they're doing a disservice. I think that anyone does a disservice to a very young person by really instilling in them a radical leftist belief and not letting them keep an open mind and develop their their own beliefs. But I also think that increasingly parents these days, and just adults in general in America who are libs, who are liberals, have absolutely no perspective on

these issues. They have no ability to stand back and try to be a little objective for the purpose of their kids and you know, letting their kids come to their own beliefs and not feel familial pressure to take certain positions. Because even as an adult, you should always be testing and re testing your assumptions. I mean, if you're someone who's going to be politically active, it's essential

to think, have I changed my mind? What? What evidence could be shown that would lead me to change my mind? Why do I not agree with the other side? Is there anything that could change that would make me agree with the other side? Am I sure I'm right about what I think and believe on every issue? Should constantly be doing that I think gets necessary for the intellectual life of the mind. And I think it's it's a

really a precondition for being a true and full conservative. Honestly, you have to always say, why do I think these things? Why do I think that the way that it has been or the way that I have thought it has been is the best way? What am I trying to conserve lives? On the other hand, love to do this thing of you know, my eight year old was like asking me about, like, why is it that intersectional politics have not been adopted by the mainstream media complex and

quite the way that I would expect. And they do this, lots of live journalists do this, and we know that that's not true, but they do seem to think that there's a kind of moral blackmail inherent in putting children into political debates, which is why they became so fond of using the park Land kids for political purposes. Right. That's why there were some very politically active Parkland teenagers who are all of a sudden being sent not just to make a case, but on search and destroy missions

in terms of politics against conservatives. That was what they were trying to do. That was what their their mission was. And the whole point was that they were victims and therefore could not be truly challenged on any of these issues. So you know, this is this is a very real tendency on the left to politicize children and then use children as political pawns in a way that I think

it's just really gross. And you know, it's just funny that they could say, yeah, like my twelve, you're all this like an activist, and like, how can anyone else not be a feminist? Your daughter's twelve, Maggie, all right, Far be it from me to tell you what to do as a pair, because I'm not even a parent, but I do know something about politics. Let your daughter be a kid. Let her wait a little bit before she has really deeply ingrained beliefs that come directly from

mommy about politics. I think that would be a more intellectually fair place to start. Roll call is next rock and roll. Fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Roll call, everybody. You know what that means. Time to get into that roll call action. Man. I got I finally got some energy today. I managed to catch a I'd call it a cat nap, but I guess it's more of a buck nap. This afternoon,

I am all about naps. I used to call it siesta in college, and I used to justify to myself that, well, Winston Churchill took siesta's, so why can't I take siesta? But then I thought more as an adult about countries where siesta is a part of the daily routine and realized that their GDP tends to reflect Yeah, that's right, I said, it tends to reflect that reality. I also like those naps though, when you wake up and you kind of have a moment of like, like where am I?

You don't really know, and you have that that kind of dry mouth drool thing going on. Some of you were making Yeah, I know, Mike, you're making fun of me right now. That's fine. That's fine. You guys can make fun of me. But you know it's true. You know you've been there too, all right, you get to that place we're just you know, you wake up and you're like, oh man, but you feel so refreshed. So I managed to get a little bit of a nap

in today. I recommend naps for all of you. Now I sound like Arianna Huffington's you have to do naps and take the yoga and the stretching and the naps very important to get all the sleep and the nap trop a day. Yeah, that's right, Arianna. I would take a lot more naps if I were a multi multi millionaire. Here we go, Chris writes book Love the Show, Chris Love the note, Ali Bucks, Since Democrats hold a few seats since nineteen and have been in a downslide for years,

why didn't we get much done in Congress? And report report totals of votes in sixteen came out three million higher votes than we have human bodies in the country. Um, I think your numbers are off, Ali. Where is it? Ali? I don't know. Get tough to tell. And as to why we haven't gotten more done in Congress, it's because there are a lot of Republicans who don't want to do more in Congress. There are a lot of Republicans who are happy with the status quo. So that's a problem.

And you see this in these these states where you have people like Susan Collins or the Susan Collins give her credits. You did the right thing on the Kavanaugh nomination, but you know you have these well dare I say, Rhino politicians and they don't want to necessarily push hard for a conservative agenda. And you also because of the struck sure of the Senate, now you need really a supermajority to get anything done. I love these think pieces of mead now about how the Senate is wrong and

mean and bad. The Senate has been so just just structured in a way that it thwarts the world of the people. The same left wing beta male writers who are putting that stuff together at vox dot com and elsewhere weren't saying the Senate was some big problem or some anachronism. They weren't saying that, you know, ten years ago. They weren't saying when the Democrats had a supermajority in the Senate. But consistency and principle is not for Democrats

as a general rule. Ian writes, here's an idea. Elizabeth Warren has less Native American DNA than the average American, and they say the DNA test proved she is Native American, which means that anyone with a higher percentage than her would be Native American. Does that mean that the argument all Americans are legal immigrance is over because we are all essentially Native Americans. Um, well, you're You're get into a lot of stuff here. Uh, you. I see what

you're saying. And yes, by by war in logic, we are all Native Americans, which means that in essence, none of us are Native Americans. So there you go. Um. And it was nonsense, And it was such a such an incredible thing to see people in the media saying, no, she proved it me and she proved her case like she just you know, you know, she's one one millionth

of a Native American, which means a Native American. It was really an astonishing attempt to justify what was one of the dumbest political moves I've I've ever seen in my entire life. You know, yeah, she's she's one one thousand and twenty four Native American, So yes, she's part Native American. This is this is this is actually taken straight out of the Dumb and Dumber playbook. You guys, remember that, what do you think the chances are of guy like you and a girl like me ending up together?

Not good? You mean not good? Like one out of I'd say more like one out of a million. So you're telling me there's a chance. That's one of my favorite, one of my favorite little sequences in Dumb and Dummer, which is a movie that at the time I did think was hilarious. I'm not sure it stands up quite as well now that I'm a little bit older and wiser, but but nonetheless I did enjoy it in its day. Elizabeth Warren, that's right. So you're telling me there's some

Native American in there. Yeah, like one in a million. There you go, Brandon, Right, the woobee is a poncho liner. It is every infantryman's best friend and or security blanket Airborne all the way. Brandon, thanks for writing in man. I did not know what a woobee was, and now I feel educated on the subject, So thank you so much for that. It is very, very appreciated. Caleb. Right, there's got to be a way to get the don

to take a DNA test. I bet he's more Indian than folk a hantas well, Caleb, considering that Poke, I mean, sorry, Elizabeth Warren, a k A. Pocahontas is less Native American than the average American. Based on genetic testing that we

know of. It would not be surprising, I think, to anyone to find out that she is in fact less Native American than President Trump, and that would be amusing but I think she's been thoroughly owned, as the kids say on this subject, I think she's been shown to be a political phony and a nube, and so there's no need for Trump to continue to uh dance on her burial ground, so to speak. Let's see what we have next year, Aaron wrote to just calm first glimpse

of rising on the Hill. It was incredibly refreshing to see you and Crystal speak intelligently without raising your voices. It gives me a small glimmer of a hope that maybe the only insane people on the left are the minority with the loudest voices. Tell Crystal she's doing a great job. Keep up the good work. Shields high well, Aaron, thank you so much. Man. You know what, I'll pass

them alongnder Crystal. I'm sure she'll appreciate that too. What we do very few people even attempt to do, which is have a conversation between a liberal and a conservative where the whole point is not for one side or the other to be made to feel bad or dumb or anything like that. We really are just sharing our opinions on this stuff. And I know I'm not gonna win the argument She's not gonna win the argument because we don't have the time, and we also aren't taking

this to the mat. We have to do a whole show together every day. Like I said, if you want to see the Libs get owned, uh, listen to this show. Or I guess if you want to hear the libs own, listen to this show. If you want to see how I wire act of bipartisan discussion, then I think you may actually enjoy Hill dot TV slash risings. You can all check it out whenever you like. It's the fun thing about doing Internet TV is it's up there. It's free. If you have an Internet connection, you can see it

whenever you like. Aries writes here we go Buck. I could care less that the Saudi's blundered and killed Jamal Kashogi. He should be killed anyway for making me type out this long ass weird name. There are a whole bunch of reasons not to like the Saudias, but I don't think we should lose a strategic asset all because the Saudi is screwed up and killed an American hating uh blankety blank. While the political class is panicking. This dude was a journalist and are willing to blow a strategic

asset against Duran. I only wish they had as much hootspa when regular people get beheaded, imprisoned, or killed. I guess American college boy Ottumn warm Beer's life isn't any near as valuable as this Jihada sympathizing journalist. So while our spineless, brainless politicians, to include Republicans, are going crazy to try and go to bad for this guy, a guy like this would have been happy every time Western

infidel got beheaded. Um, there we go. A guy like this would have cheered on nine eleven, and only disappointment would have been for him that Americans, more Americans did not die. Blank him all right, Aris, Aris, you don't you don't pull any punches man, and always good to hear from you. Thank you for writing in. Adam writes Buck.

Do you think that Donald could bribe a Senate sound engineer to add the sound bite Cherokee people, Cherokee tribe from the song at Funny Times whenever Folcohanna speaks in the Senate shields high Adam, Uh, you are an entertaining fellow, but I do not think that that is likely anything that President Trump is going to be able to pull

off any time soon. Uh. Next up here we have Michael, who writes, Buck, I never had any want to talk about what the polls look like before the red wave that put a lot of Tea Party candidates in Congress. What were the predictions back then? Um, Michael, that's a um, that's a good question. I don't know. I don't know. I'll have to check it out. I'm not really sure what their exact predictions were. That's that's a very good point. Um. Here we go. Michael writes, been out of pocket this week,

had a heart attack Friday night. Won't go home till Tuesday, some time after I get fitted for a life vest. Feeling pretty good, but I was certainly drain in the ambulance. I'm grateful to God not to be dead. Michael. We're all grateful. You're okay, too, big guy. You hang in there,

you stay tough, alright. I appreciate that you are such a stalwart member of the team Buck tribe, and uh, you know, just honestly, you know, man to man, I just I'm hoping you're okay, praying for you, and you just you stay in this strong, You stay in the fight, all right. You got a wife and a and a family that that relies on you to stay, stay in this game, so to speak, this this life that we all lead as long as you can. You got a man with a beard like that, Michael has got a

lot of time left. That that much I can tell you. So you're you're you're gonna be in good shape. Just stay strong, glad you're okay, and we'll all say a prayer for you. Everyone say a prayer for Michael. He's one of our Team Buck originals. And you know he's just been through a rough war. Deal sounds like he's gonna be all right, but he needs all the help he can get from the big guy upstairs, Rob Rights, Hey, Buck, the media are circling their wagons around Warren. Good show

tonight from Rob rob Man. Good to hear from you as always, thank you for writing in And yeah, the media did circle their wagons around Warren. It was a disgrace, but that's what they did. Gonna close up shop in the Freedom Hut tonight. Team excited to be with you every day this week, every day every week pretty much excepting when I gotta take a day off. But until tomorrow, one request, Tell one friend to download the Buck Sexton

Show podcast on Apple Podcasts, and then shield tie. Don't feel like you have to use one of these social media sites that you know is infected with all kinds of left wing bias, where they have all this conversational health nonsense going on and they are constantly trying to find ways to tilt the table toward the left. Go to a place where your opinion is valued and where you don't have to worry about shadow banning or any of the other nonsense that's been going on because of

the left wing dominance of our social media platforms. That's why you should check out Snippy. I've got a snippy dot com account. I was just posting on it today. Snippy dot com is a super user friendly, fun and easy going place where you can share your thoughts and opinions, post photos, do whatever you want. S n I p p y dot com totally free to join, totally free to use s n I p p y. That's snippy dot com. Set up an account, give it a shot

and I'll see you there. Friends, Let's get the conversation going

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android