The Veep Flops In Guatemala

on results and ability? What has ever shown them any inclination whatsoever of Kamala Harris to get the job done, To just be Harris and have people push her along and vote for her and elevate her. Yeah, sure she can do that, But to actually get results that shows a skill set that shows inability beyond playing the system. This shouldn't be surprising at all. Right, it's not surprising. Well,

get more into this in a second. But you know, we're living in a digital age where your personal data is always under attack and your online privacy seems to be a thing of the past. There's a better way you can protect your information and privacy without worrying about the prying eyes of big data. Introducing Secure an encrypted instant messaging and secure email service hosted in Switzerland. Why Switzerland, It's where the world's strictest data privacy laws are applied.

By using proprietary technology and military grade encryption methods, a proprietary platform and servers hosted in Switzerland, Secure protects your data from the Invasive Cloud Act and other privacy intrusive laws. These are secure email and instant messaging services never seen before in the market today, and they're away from big tech platforms such as Amazon Web Services, Facebook, WhatsApp, Microsoft and Google. Take back your privacy and online security with

Secure by going to secure dot com. That's s e K. You are very important. With the spelling here. S e K you are dot com. Use a coupon code buck for one week free and twenty five percent off. Be sure to use that coupon code buck. Just go to the website now Secure s e K you are Secure dot Com and regain your privacy as well. Listen, I've

been to the border before, I will go again. But when I'm in Guatemala dealing with root causes, I think we should have a conversation about what's going on in Guatemala. What a disaster, Kamala Harris is here, What a disaster. Everyone knows it, everyone sees it, and they're being reminded of what was so apparent when she wanted to be the next president instead of vice president, an appointed position president of the United States. With even Democrat voters this

isn't a Republican. Democrat voters were like, I don't like her. US seems very staged, very fake obviously, so and here she is acting like everybody else is crazy. She's the borders are who will not go to the US Mexico border, And she's laughing whenever she's whenever she's challenged on this. It's pretty easy. Why not just saying, you know what, I'll go to the border tomorrow. Stop asking me this question. I'll go to the border tomorrow because she won't go.

She won't go because there will be a press corps that travels with her and they will have to cover the disaster and she will be photographed there. We all understand what's going on here. This is not actually that complicated, but she keeps making it worse because her answers are absurd. It's nonsensical. I mean, here she is telling everybody with no trace of irony. Here with zero self awareness, Vice

President Harris, who thinks she's soon to be president. Harris is out there telling people listen to this play too. I also believe that if you want to fix a problem, you have to go to where the problem exists. If you want to address the needs of a people, you must meet those people. You must spend time with those people, because the only way we can actually fix the problem is to understand the problem. The problem is at our border. But she doesn't seem to understand, maybe because she refuses

to go here. She's telling you, if you want to fix it, you have to go to where it is, exactly Kamala, and you refuse to do that, and then you lecture us as though you are doing that, which makes everyone think, is she just obduse? Is there some kind of a disconnect. It's as though she does not understand what is so obvious to everybody else. But she's

upsetting pretty much all sides on this border trip. I'm sorry on this immigration Central America talk about the US border without going their trip, and some of them are upset that she's even willing to say with The Democrats have to pretend they believe, which is that people shouldn't come into the country illegally. So, I mean, here's a here's a left wing media host on the View, the

dumbest talk show on television, Play seven. But I was a little surprised at the clumsiness of her language because she said, you know, don't come, don't come, and she was, I think, referring to illegal passage into the United States as opposed to seeking legal asylum, which is what Alexandrio Cassio Cortes is talking about. And of course this country was founded on immigration, founded on people coming here legally

and seeking asylum. But using those terms, so those words don't come, don't come, I think is pretty inflammatory, and I think that's why she's getting so much pushback because because of those words. I mean, the Supreme Court just ruled this week that people that come here illegally and stay here for twenty years still can't apply for a green cart because of the circumstances by which they came to this country, And so, of course you shouldn't come

here illegally. But our vice president could have done I think, a better job in terms of her language. Yeah, this is a legal analyst on the View, Sonny Houston, who seems to not understand immigration law. She notes at the end that yes, you cannot apply for legal status in this country if you came here illegally, even twenty years ago. We know a lot of people didn't come twenty years ago. They came, you know, now, year ago, two months ago now.

But the part that keeps getting left out and AOC and the other far left propagandists don't want you to pay any attention to is that the people showing up now at the border who are being apprehended, they are all breaking the law. They are doing what is the equivalent of trespassing on US sovereign territory over an international border. They refuse to go through the ports of entry. They don't want to have to wait, so they just show up and they walk, they literally walk into America and

say here, I am give me asylum. And they're not actually people that overwhelmingly are worthy of asylum. This is just the reality. I want to be an economic migrant, I want to have better opportunities for jobs is not an asylum claim. Lying to the border patrol, by the way, is also a crime. So people who say I am fleeing political violence, when really they're actually looking for a better job or they want to live with other family members who are already in the US are also breaking

the law. This is lawlessness and Democrats don't get to have it both ways. They don't get to have the state drag people, you know, by the scruff of the neck out of church for failing to dumble mask like a bunch of morons. The fact that we have to do that, the fact they ever told us that isn't an embarrassing They should be ashamed of themselves. Fauci, that little fascist the worst. But they want the state to drag you out for that because it's the law. It's

really an executive order, but it's the law. And on this issue, though, all of a sudden, immigration laws just don't count. Doesn't really matter anymore. And keep in mind, we have a de facto open border, we have coyotes, the cartels making huge sums of money over this. It's just an unsustainably lawless, reckless situation. And AOC, the radical left of the Democrat Party, which is increasingly calling all the shots, is out there complaining that the Biden policies

aren't humane enough. Play five. Well, I think the issue here, and first of all, you know, I think This is not just about the Vice president. This is about the Biden Administration's immigration policy writ large is not working. It's wrong,

and it's inhumane. Why what is inhumane about it? If AOC wants every Latin American, or for that matter, developing country all over the world migrant to just be able to come to America, she should be honest about that and say that she wants full on open borders and a dissolution of the current legal immigration system that America has.

That's the only honest position that she could have, because otherwise she's just another person who's complaining about a system that is failing, largely because Democrats refuse to enforce the laws that are on the books, and they keep saying it's inhumane. I just want to know, do you want to pay for every person from all over the world who wants to come to America in whatever numbers they

want to come to America? Do you want to be responsible for their health care, for their education, for the massive expansion of the welfare state that we all know is going to happen, is already happening as a result of a huge influx of illegal immigrants into the country. Yes, illegal immigrants are more likely to need state assistance, more likely to show up in an emergency demanding free healthcare, free health services. You know, there's just so much dishonesty

around this issue, and it's awful. And then there's the other part of this too, which is the so that the is the we're not humane enough because you know, taking two million illegal immigrants into America this year roughly, that's what the numbers are looking like. You know, that's we're not nice enough as a people. A million legal immigrants, two million illegal immigrants. Why not twenty? Ask AOC, ask a Democrat? Why not just let anyone who wants to

come into the country come into the country. And they don't have an answer for you. They'll say something like, well, you know, we have a system and we have laws. No, but you don't want the laws to be enforced. You oppose at every stage Democrats, those laws to actually be implemented. So that's just dishonest. You're just lying about what you really want here, which is what they do all the time.

AOC calls him inhumane, and everyone seeing that the Biden administration doesn't have any answers on immigration that it's willing to say out loud and that Kamala Harris is just flailing on this trip and everyone seeing this is the person the Democrats really want to make the next president of the United States. Please, when you've lost CNN and you're Kamala Harris, you know things are going badly. This

is a CNN piece. Unnamed White House insiders were left perplexed by the performance of Vice President Kamala Harris on a recent trip to Guatemala and Mexico to address the root causes of immigration problems at the US southern border. Early in the administration, Joe Biden assigned Harris the unenviable task. Oh yes, because that's notice how they make it sound like it's not Harris's fault. It's an unenviable test of

ostensibly overseeing the hot button political issue. Harris's team subsequently made clear her focus would be on these systemic issues at play, focusing on the Northern Triangle countries of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, from which a majority of border migrants come. Harris has been a lightning rod for criticism. Yeah you don't say okay anyway, I just even the White House is like, my gosh, she's making a mess of this thing. But notice that there's a trend here. It's important you

see this. The Left has a ideological framework that applies to many issues, and in this case, what you're seeing is this systemic, this systemic causes component coming to the forefront all over again. Right, It's just like what you see with the law enforcement crisis across the country, or the lack of law enforcement because we're undermining cops. We're undermining our law enforcement officers, and so you have spiking

murder rates. Instead of dealing with the problem directly, more cops on the streets, more prosecution of violent criminals, lock up violent criminals, longer, back up our cops when they have to defend themselves and others. Instead of going right to it, they want to take some roundabout politically expedient route. Oh, let's hire more social workers. Let's defund the police, which actually caused the problem. I mean, look at it. You

can line these two issues up. You can line up the border, and you can line up defund the police and the crime surge in this country, and you see a tremendous commonality here. It's very obvious. Right, how does it all start? Bid administration comes in. Biden administration comes in, gets rid of hermine in Mexico, speaks very differently about the border, doesn't want to do interior enforcement. Everybody knows

it's wide open, okay. Biden administration in twenty twenty is supportive in the campaign of the BLM movement, then comes into office, all the focuses on the January sixth insurrection and not on the riots that occurred then and the violence that's occurring now because of the undermining of cops.

So Biden's worldview. The Democrat Party essentially because Biden it just does what his handlers say, is responsible for the creation of a problem, right, making something substantially worse, and then instead of addressing it in the obvious way in the border, securing the border, turning people away, deporting those immediately who do not show up for their hearings, deporting those immediately who are on the list to be deported, and turning away people that have false asylum claims that

are obviously false at raising the credible fear standard to a point where it actually means something. Stead of doing any of that, they want to deal with the root cause of migration in Central America which on it in a best case is gonna maybe help the problem a little bit in a number of years if they put a lot of resources in time into it. Doesn't that sound just like their approach to law enforcement and defund

the police, adding social workers. You've got shootings and murders spiking fifty percent, sixty percent, seventy percent in cities across the country year over year. And instead of saying, let's stop the bad guys from shooting people, let's put more cops on the street, let's back them up, let's deal with the problem, the Democrats want to deal with. Oh, the root, the systematic, systematic or systemic causes of this. That's what we have to do. Let's have more social workers,

Let's have you know, more after school programs or whatever. Okay, I mean maybe we could even say that some of those things are are reasonable ideas or of the long run. Although I think the social workers instead of cops thing is just insane. But anyway, you know, because they're already are social workers. And I got news for you. Social workers don't want to respond to a domestic violence call.

They don't not without a cop. There. You know, Psychiatric personnel don't want to respond to an emotionally disturbed person call not without a cop there. But you see how they do the same thing. The same fundamental fallacies apply. Democrats have a worldview that is wrong when it comes to cause an effect, that is wrong when it comes to history, that is wrong when it comes to who the good guys are, who the bad guys are, who's

breaking the law, who's supporting the law. And this means that they're just making wrong choices over and over again on the border, on law enforcement, on any number of issues. Right, and this is you see what I mean. Though they cause the problem, then they won't address it directly because the indirect approach allows them to pander to their base and have this social justice first approach to something that's really a law enforcement issue in both cases, the border

and the murder rate spike in this country. And then when they really want to just push something that's nonsensical, they go back to the historical the historical framework for something. Okay, well, maybe we want to stop Central Americans from coming into America illegally by the hundreds of thousands a month, But it's really our fault, you see, It's our fault that people are leaving Central America. America's fault, your fault, my fault. Because of US history in the region. You knew this

was coming. Joy and Reid said over on MSNBC the following you got to hear at play six. There are seven countries in Central America. There's another dozen countries and two sort of arratories in South America. We'reking met four hundred and thirty three million people in South America. It's something like what forty four million people in Central America. The United States southern border with Mexico is not the

only important issue that matters to the world. Those seven countries have a long history with the United States, much of it troubling. The United States used much of Central America as essentially a giant plantation. Google the United Fruit Company. We have a long, sordid, torrid history with this region. The history does not begin at the border where people are showing up. That is not the only important thing

that matters. There's a whole history that long proceeds people arriving at the border between Mexico and the United States. I'm glad that she has Google and could do a quick search of the United Fruit Company and the history of Central America before she went on air to pretendially know something about these issues. But I will just say this, we want a secure border. I don't care what the US was doing in Central America in the nineteen eighties.

I want a secure border. I don't care what the US was doing when it comes to agricultural policy a century ago. I want to secure border. We've been to the border. We've been to the border. You haven't been to the border, and I haven't been to Europe. Go to the border as well, so then you do see the plague. Listen. I've been to the border before. I

will go again. But when I'm in Guatemala dealing with root causes, I think we should have a conversation about what's going on in Guatemala or so, can you commit right now that you will indeed visit the US Mexico border until you do it soon, Jeremy, let me tell you something. But yes, I will, and I have before. Yeah, she's really on top of the issue, folks, Really, she

really gets it. You know. It's funny too, is that is that the Democrats they can't get on the same sheet of music about this because while some are pretending you know the the Biden administration because at the national level, they know that fifty one percent of the American people are not down with an open border. They're not and

so they have to play this game. But those Democrats who get to be the far lefties because they either have a congressional district or even a state that's so blue that people are absurd and don't understand cause and effect and don't know anything about what's really happening at the border. You got people like Bernie Sanders running around saying, you know, we should actually make it even easier for

people to come into America illegally. Play eight. He said, the wall is symbolic and it represents so wouldn't it be proper to tear that symbol down in order to achieve that? It? Maybe, but you know, it's how much theise are gonna cost. They're dumb. Did you do that tearing down? I don't know. Maybe the answer is yes, that's something that's something you're willing to consider. Yeah, you're willing want to will tearing down exhibiting fencing between us.

But again, if you're it's going to cost me billions of dollars to tear it down, I rather invest that maybe and the needs for childcare in this country. But it's something you know, we can look at. It's something we can look at. Why would you look at that? What possible purpose could there be in tearing down a section of border wall that to a man to a person, border patrol will tell you walls fences help make their job easier. I've never heard anybody in border patrol say

anything different. Of all the people I have talked to you in border patrol, in in you know, customs and Immigration enforcement, never heard anybody say anything different than that. Who's a actual employee and civil servant of those organizations. Maybe you'll hear political people say something different. So why would you tear down some of the wall. Well, because you're trying to play kate the radical left wing open borders base. That's why. That's the only reason why. There's

no other reason that you could give. And if you're somebody who really believes that we shouldn't we shouldn't be able to have sovereignty, why is America I always want to ask these internationalist libs Marxists this question. Why is it that America is the only country in the world that anybody wants to go to that is not allowed to determine who comes and who goes. Try to just show up sometime in a country that requires a visa for a US entry and say no, but I really

want to be here. I think I have a better chance at a job here. I want to be here. Try to do that. You're going to be put on a plane, sent back home and probably detained for many hours, maybe a day or two, in uncomfortable conditions, and told you know, you're not coming in. That's what's going to happen. Are all those countries racist? Is it always racism that results in people not wanting an open border because the rest of the world is allowed to have borders. Somehow

America is not allowed to have borders. Why is that interesting, isn't it? And as we all know, if it were about safety, there are plenty of places in Mexico where Central Americans would have much eat and much easier time linguistically and culturally, and are perfectly safe. There are a lot of parts of Mexico, plenty of states in Mexico that people have low crime rates. And it's not you know, I know there are bad parts of Mexicans too, they're

bad parts of the US. Maybe you go go check out what it's like these days in some parts of Baltimore or the South side of Chicago, or there are parts of the US with really high crime rates too. But this is not about what's true, folks, This is not about what's really going on. This is about feelings. You see, Democrats are always motivated by how they feel on these issues and how it makes them feel about themselves. That's the most important thing. That's why the virtue signaling

impulse is so powerful among the Libs. That's why they believe so strongly in all of this. AOC is among the She's really it's like, it's like idiot leftists who just graduated college created a pseudo Marxist member of Congress and like, you know, on a computer and then built one you know, like like like like they created the perfect distillation of faculty lounge left wing idiocy and made it made an actual person based upon those upon those parameters,

you get AOC. And here she is telling everybody because again, part of this is there's a liberal guilt, like we have to take in as many people from the Third world as possible into America. Illegally. We're already were already taken refugees, We're already taken a million league immigrants. We have to just make it so that whoever wants to show up and can get her on foot can come into the country because we owe it to them. We've

the American people owe it to them. And remember you, your tax dollars will go to support these individuals, and those taxes are taken from you by force by the state, and that AOC and the rest of the Democrats ultimately will support men with guns showing up to your home to drag you away and lock you in a cell if you refuse to pay those taxes to support the massive welfare state and the monetary policies necessary for the bid administration to do what it wants with the incredible

spending increases that we're seeing. So you're not given a choice in any of this, and they will support men with guns locking you up if because the law is the law. Right, the laws the law, say the authoritarian Democrats until they don't like the law, and then you know, when it's immigration time at come on, laws don't count. And we say that's hypocritical, and they say exactly this

is about power. We don't care that it's hypocritical. Don't you see that It doesn't sting them, it doesn't upset them. They don't have any principles, so telling them they're unprincipled has no effect. So that's how you get where we

are right now. And it's also why there's so much virtue signaling among the left when it comes to the immigration issue, AOC citing how we owe it to these immigrants crossing into America illegally because America has done so much bad climate change stuff that the climate change has made it bad in Central America, and so that's why they're fleeing. So it's really our fault. Played then this is also climate policy that is impacting the global South disproportionately.

Even though these farmers and these folks in Central and South America contributed to climate change the least in terms of their carbon emissions, they are experiencing the ravages the most right now and first, and so US climate policy has contributed to this. US foreign policy, US economic and trade policy has helped contribute to conditions that that people are fleeing just not true. I mean and want to say it's not true. It's it's absurd. Central America is

getting the worst of the climate change brunch right now. Really, well, this is an argument that a person is making who expects to be treated like she knows anything and has and it has even a baseline of necessary intelligence to wax philosophical on these issues. Really apparently, Yeah, it's our climate policy that's making people leave from Central America. I just want to know. Was it our climate policy that was making things so rough in Central America in the

nineteen eighties? Oh? No, that would be our foreign policy. Somehow, It's always our fault, right, And it's not the communists. It's not the Sandinista's fault. What happened the nineteen eight it's not the Soviet Union's fault. No, No, it's all our fault. It's it's amazing how this sell this constant desire for self purification through showy victimhood. Oh we were so bad, Look what America did. I'm not one of those bad people, though, is central to the Democrat ethos.

It's just pathetic after a while, isn't it. The amount of impact you and I have had on Central America's climate is zero. I don't want to hear about it, it's absurd. This is crazy person talk o what AOC is talking about. Though, Yes, we have to look at root causes, but there's a crisis at the border right now today, and you have to address that today while

you look at the root causes down the road. I think also part of leading is optics and showing that and showing what you care about and what your goals are, and going to the border would have made a big difference. This has been a discussion for weeks. I'm not sure why it hasn't happened. It's a lot of easer you've said,

been done, but perhaps should have been a priority. Perhaps, yeah, yeah, when you've lost Micah, when people who will say anything on TV as long as NBC Universal keeps sending those big paychecks to them, when you have got somebody will say anything on TV and knows that her job is to just constantly pump up and praise Biden, Harris, all of them, and she's saying, yeah, maybe maybe it should have been a priority. I also think it's funny too easier said than done. No, it's actually really easy. As

the vice president, this is US soil. If everybody was saying if there was a huge crisis, you know, in in Topeka, Kansas. We're all worried about Topeka. Don't you think that the vice president would be expected to go there. No, we're not even asking her to go to a foreign country. When we say the border, it just means go down to a part of America that is closed to another country. This is not hard. So I think it's funny. She goes, Oh, it's easier said than done. No, it's actually easier done

than said. For Comla Harris, you just go, just go. It's not not challenging at all. But I'm sorry, I just, oh, my gosh, it's so pathetic. This administration is such a joke, such a joke. You know, there were things about the Trump administration stylistically and in terms of you know that my big beef, and I don't want to be a broken record on this, My big beef was a lot of the personnel tois and notably the my kids are

going to be my top advisor's decision. That was a huge mistake from the very beginning, totally wrong, totally gross, and people just didn't want to say. I said it on this show, and I got a lot of heat for it from folks. But I was right, and you know I was right. And if you think I'm If you think I wasn't right, go ask anybody who worked in this White House what it meant to have Jared Kushner have full determination on who got access to the

President of the United States and who did. Not a liberal, folks, a liberal, would you want Joe Biden or Kamala Harris to basically be the de facto chief of staff under the Biden under a Trump administration? No, So I was telling the truth and I wanted to do something about it. But so much easier for people in the media just run around maga. Yeah, you know conservative media. No what, no one everybody wanted to cheer for the good stuff. Nobody wanted to be the coach at halftime that said

I want this team to win. Therefore, here's what Trump needs to do. People didn't want to hear it, and we lost this last election. Ah, you can tell me o Bak you know they cheated or they who's the president now? Right? I still focus in on results first and foremost. We deal with reality. Friends. We're not liberals. We don't create an alternate universe. We deal with reality

Joe Biden is the president. There were things that could have been done differently that would have changed that, including fighting against the way that the Democrats were changing elections using the pandemic as an excuse to change elections in the actual height of the election season. But there were aspects of the Trump administration that, as you know, I

felt the need to sometimes criticize. Overall, I think the agenda was very powerful, and I think that's what we're going to return to, hopefully with a I believe a descentist twenty twenty four run with Trump's backing, and that's that's a winning a winning ticket, I believe. But we knew with Trump that there were some aspects of this that we're gonna be you know, it's gonna be a little bit of a show. You know, it's gonna be a little rough around the edges. Sometimes it was also

gonna be very amusing, and it was. And the way that he took it to the media was incredible. And finally people really understand that journalism is a fraud in this country. As a profession. It doesn't really exist. There are some people who can do journalism, but it's not it's not a profession anymore. It does not if you believe that journalism is people actually speaking without political impetus

and pushing agendas. But what's funny to me is that this Biden administration, given what we were promised and now what we're seeing, it's pretty hilarious, isn't it. They didn't say, yeah, Biden's gonna be too old and we're not really gonna hear that much from him, but you know it's it's gonna be Uh, he's gonna be a guy that relies on the advisor. No, we were told that Biden and Harris, we're gonna do a great job. Biden and Harris, We're

going to restore our democracy, our faith in government. They're gonna get all these amazing things done. They're gonna do all this great stuff. Like what I mean the people that are saying, look at the vaccines. Uh yeah, the operation warp speed of the Trump administration got a record time vaccine program done, and then the Biden administration inherited a vaccine distribution plan and just played out the plan. Yeah. I'm sure they made some adjustments anybody would have, but

that's it. I mean, this is like saying, oh, Biden, you know, funded the military. Yeah, okay, we kind of expect that. You know, what's the what's the difficult decision that's been made here? What is the choice that that Biden Harris has made that has resulted in a better America for a vast majority of the people who live here. They don't have it habit. You're starting to hear that the Democrats are getting frustrated because they can't get what

they want. Here's here's little Chuck Schumer talking about the GOP and negotiations over infrastructure bill play eleven. Well, look, we have we're proposing, we're pursuing a two path proposal. On the one hand, there's bipartisan negotiations and those are continuing the first world between President Biden and Senator Capitau with just Republicans. Those seem to be running into a

brick wall. But a bipartisan group led by Senator Cinema and I think Senator Portman as the lead Republican, are trying to put something together that might be closer to what the President needs. And so we're that's good, but that's not going to be the only answer. We all know as a caucus, we will not be able to do all the things that the country needs in a totally bipartisan in a bipartisan way. And so at the same time, we are pursuing the pursuit of reconciliation, and

that is going on at the same time. And it may well be that part of the bill that will pass will be by partisan and part of it will be through reconciliation. But we're not going to sacrifice the bigness and boldness in this bill. We will just pursue two paths and at some point they will join. Get ready for the partisan steamroller. Friends, whatever they can do, even if they have to abuse the process to use the process, the Democrats will. Fellow New Yorkers, it's time

to move on to unmask ourselves and our kids. That is the piece in the New York Post opinion section from our friend Carol Markowitz, who has been a warrior for the truth during this pandemic the whole time. Carol, great to have you as always, Thank you, Buck, thanks for having me. I gotta tell you the people that are still walking around with masks on this this is now and I mean this, it's an anxiety disorder. Yeah, this is a men. So this is now mental illness.

And I know they don't want to believe that because they believe the science, and they believe the science the whole time. But no, no, no, And those of us who were saying all along that anyone who's vaccinated really should have no concern about whether someone else is vaccinated or not, we never should have like, let this get conceded to the other side as an argument because it's absurd. And now there's all these problems. I mean, Carol did just give us a sense of some of the where

are some of the places where? I mean, this is true in New York, but it's true in Los Angeles, it's true in a lot of cities across the country. They're these like remnants of faucism. What's still out there? Yeah, So, you know, people say to me all the time, like why do you care about other people? Asking why why do I care that you know eighty percent of my neighborhood still walking around outside post facts in masks. Well, the reason I care is because it continues to affect me.

Last weekend, I took my middle son to a roller skating birthday party in Prospect Park, and the rules make no sense to pick up your skates. You need to wear a mask. To put on your skates. You can take off your mask, but when you're skating in the spacious rink with very few people in it, you need to put the mask back on. And we got told twice by the security guard to adjust our mask, even though his own mask was below his nose because it

was ninety three degrees outside. And then the kicker of all this is when it's time to have food and cake. It's a really tight area where there's like five birthday parties going on, and everybody's on top of each other and we're all eating and blowing out candles and singing Happy Birthday. And literally, if you had to design where masking would ever make sense, it would be in that area.

But obviously post backs and you know, in June twenty twenty one, we shouldn't be masking anywhere, But if anywhere, it would be there, and there you don't have to mask, so none of it makes any sense. It's completely mind boggling, And so I care. I care that so many people are still masking because it affects me. We still have these rules because all these people are still masking. Yeah, there's these these remnants, you know, in my building, for example,

where I am in New York City. For everybody listening there, I mean I lived in a building there are hundreds and hundreds of residents, so just to give you it's it's a very large building with a ton of people coming in and out all the time. And I've basically started the mask insurrection. Yeah, I will not tell everybody. Yes, I'm the one who has pulled down the mask signs in the gym. I'm the one who never wears a mask in the gym. And now others are finally joining along.

They come in, they see me because they don't want to wear a mask. No one wants to wear a mask when they work out. And these are some of these guys. I mean they're actually like and girls. They're like really good shape, and they're like twenty five or thirty, and I'm sure they're vaccinated. The idea that they should be on the treadmill like heaving into this cloth over their mouth is completely insane, and that anyone demands this of other people is insane. And they still do it

in a lot of places. In my in my lobby, they have a big masks required indoors. Now I don't comply. But there's this weird tension because the people that still think this stuff needs to be happening. They they don't want to be told that they're silly and kind of dumb. They want to still live in this fantasy land that they're the normal ones. And by the way, airplanes still require it. Cabs ubers any uber anywhere in the country.

If you're listening to this in Nebraska right now, if you're listening is wherever you are, UBER still requires you to mask up. Why, Yeah, yeah, it makes no sense, and especially you know in situations like airplanes. Again, yeah, we all wear our masks, you know, sitting an into part on airplanes, and then we all take off our masks to eat and drink because that somehow makes sense, and then put the masks right back on because you know, the aerosols we just we just spit all over the place.

Aren't going to affect each other. None of it makes sense. None of it's made sense for a long time. And I have to say that, Like in the winter and in the fall and last I made my kids mask outside because I didn't want to get yelled at by anybody. I didn't. I didn't want to get it into altercation on the street while I'm with my children. But now I'm like, bring it, bring it on, let's let's let's have a fight in June twenty twenty one about masking

on the street because I'm not having it anymore. I couldn't agree with you more. And I'm I'm starting to get to the point now where you know, my my local grocery store, because I like, you know, the I like, you know, fancy coconut waters and things like that. You know, So I go into a grocery store. There's two that but but but they both actually those kind of more standard grocery store and the more sort of health food you know, vegan friendly alternative grocery store I go to.

They both require masks, and I mean, I don't want to see. What I think is so unfair is that the way that they always move around the discussion, so you can never get accountability. Like if I go in there without a mask on and and somebody tells me and I cause a problem, you know that I'll be dragged if I like, bring this to social media. But people saying it's not the fault of the employees. I'm like, well,

whose fault is it? Like, you know, show me the person making the decision, right, Yeah, And I think a lot of it has this kind of you know, just taking the mask got off and waiting for somebody to say something to you, because that's the only way we really get out of this. I think so many people. Yeah, you know, we started this conversation with how many people are just have anxiety about removing their masks and how

many people are afraid. But I also think there's some large subset of people who are just following the crowd and they don't want to stick out, and they don't want to have an argument. They don't want anybody to say, hey, why aren't you wearing your mask, and so they're wearing it. So those of us who are open to having the conversation and open to having the argument, we should lead

the way on this. Speaking to Carol Markowitz, she's got a great piece in the New York Post, the editorial page in the New York Post, and she talks about what it was like taking your son to a party outside roller skating and sure enough, you have to wear a mask or in the rink, you have to wear a mask, yeah, which is completely bonkers. But you know, Carol, I you know, I have to say that as as far as I'm concerned, there needs to be a repudiation

of Fauciism. And this is what this is why, because I've had people say, oh, you're too upset about this or something I said, and I'm like, I don't think I'm upset enough. Actually, because we're while while the reductions are happening, and people who live in Florida are like, oh great, um, I was just in Miami. There are still plenty of places that do the whole the you know, the mask theater of you gotta wear it when you go to the hostess stand in the restaurant, but then

you can take it like there. It is not a mask free zone. People are are wrong when they say that it is actually still and we have to repudiate that this. There are a few things it did not work, and this is still considered a controversial thing to say, but mask mandates, mask policies did not work anywhere near

as advertised. That's one part of this. And the second part of this is that you know, they they've just begun to begun to see and we've talked about before natural immunity and how this doesn't really ever get discussed. The Cleveland Clinic, not right wing crazydoc dot com. The Cleveland Clinic just did a study of over fifty thousand people and sure enough, those who are vaccinated are vaccinated versus those who are have natural immunity, same level of

protection for them. What a shot. And this is another fight we need to have. It's not over. Yeah, absolutely, you know I have to My column in Today's New York Post is about New Yorker's please take off your masks. But I had another one two days ago on Monday, where I talked about how we must confront where Fauchi went wrong. He has to answer questions. We lived under his insane guidance for fifteen months and we did really crazy things over and over again, and we need him

to answer questions. And yet we have this media who's asking him like, Wow, how are you so amazing? And that's you know, that's what we get from our press. But we really need some answers. And one of the things I need answered from him is he did not think that the masks could contain the virus because the virus is too small, and he was talking about medical masks at the time, and then we all moved collectively

to cloth masks. So did the virus grow is without how the cloth masks were able to contain it according to his you know calculations. I want to hear it from him. I don't want to hear it from amateur you know doctors on Twitter. I want doctor Fautre to answer what changed his mind on masks specifically. It's just it's something that there will be so much of a of a fight over because it did become a cultural

and political symbol, as we all now know. It did become a sign of Democrat tribal allegiance and anti trumpism and all these things. And when you add all that together, that I mean it is it is my belief that mask wearing as people did it in this country, which is, you know, put a cloth mask on, take it off sometimes, yes, times know, whatever, touching all the time had zero appreciable effect whatsoever on the spread of COVID. That is my

honest belief. And it has been really all along. Although I was open in the beginning to okay, maybe like maybe this will actually really work the whay we're told and if we let this go, for everybody who's like, Buck, why are you still on this, You're going to be wearing masks on planes for the next two or three years minimum, folks at least. Yeah, because they must have places where it still goes on to perpetuate this fantasy

that what they did was worthwhile. Right, absolutely right, And I think that, you know, I don't understand the wanting to not talk about this anymore, like or just saying like, Okay, it's over, forget it, Like I can't forget it. I can't forget the fact that my five year old today is still in school masks my kid. You know, I have three kids eleven, eight, and five. They're all masked in school. They're all masked at recess. And it's crazy.

And we continue to do this, and I have no faith that we won't continue to do this in the fall. Where do you think where do you think we should we should draw the line on restaurants here, Carol, because there are some places that yeah, there are some places that are doing this separate on the honor system based on vaccine passports, but they're actually not legally allowed to demand but they're kind of like intimidating people into self segregating by vax status in restaurants here in New York.

I mean, I mean, I'm just telling everybody. I may end up causing a scene somewhere, like I might be some like right wing talk radio host goes viral because I'm going to lose my mind on these people, and I'm gonna say who's in charge. I want the manager, like I want the owner. I want to know who's actually making this decision, right right. It's also amazing, I'll

Appundon on Twitter pointed this out. But they're putting all the unvaccinated people together in one space, and a lot of places like here's the vaccinated area, and here's the unvaccinated area, and all the unvaccinated people are sitting together,

which is riscuer than just Prinson reading them around. Um, yeah, I don't know, and I don't I also don't know how they're going to enforce this, or how they're going to what about people who can't get the vaccine or you know, um, just for all kinds of medical reasons. Are they just never going to be allowed to go to restaurants again? Um? What about the fact that it is like the most easily forged piece of paper in

the world. This vaccine card that they gave us with our you know, the name of the the vaccine on it is, it's it's ridiculously easy to forge. I just I have no faith in this like insane system. I think we need to drop it as soon as possible. Carol Mark, what's everybody? Go check out her latest in the New York Post. She's been one of the very There's been like a handful of as Carol, and I got to say, and I gave you real, real props, real high five on this. There's the pressure to even

just bend the knee a little bit on this stuff. Well, yeah, masks, aren't that big a deal even if I'm a like you know and and and you know, oh, well, do kids really need to be in school? Zoom? Schools just as good. There were so many plays and you held the line, you stayed strong on it. So you deserve a lot of praise for that. Thank you, and thanks for coming on. We'll talk to you soon. Thanks so much.

It's about seven percent of people say, you know, only if needed, and thirteen percent of people say absolutely not. What holds the thirteen percent back it's really four main reasons up. Some of it's just logistics. I don't want to take the time off. I think there's really going to be costs, even if you say there's not. Another reason is safety. It was rushed. I think this is going too fast. They would actually be more convinced if

there was full approval. There's a group of people who say there's enough other people getting it, I don't need to get it. And then and then finally, the politicalization of this. You know, like we've talked about with so many other issues, it's affected vaccines. So ninety percent of Democrats have either received this or say they will, where it's about fifty percent of Republicans. So that's really broken

down quite significantly across political lines. What exactly is the reason that this CNN doctor leaves off natural immunity for the reasons people would get would refuse vaccination. I'm just wondering. He's a doctor, he must know that there are a lot of people out there for whom that's the reason they don't want to get vaccinated, because it is it

is probably pointless. And certainly this this is near and dear to me because I have very much as you know I had to miss a week of the show, which I always I hated doing, but I had no choice. I was super sick. I had COVID. It was confirmed by a test, no question, and I had all the symptoms. I lost taste, you know, the whole thing. And I'm supposed to get vaccinated. Why where's the science on that? Well, they say, shut up, get vaccinated. Stop asking so many questions. No,

I think, I think I want to ask questions. I think I'm I'm not done trying to track this down and figure out what's going on. And sure enough, you're not going to a lot of talk about this undo many channels. But the Cleveland Clinic, which is a very reputable, highly esteemed medical institution, the Cleveland Clinic studied this is this is from the Fox affiliate in I believe in

Cleveland studied the Yeah, it is in Cleveland. In fact, it's the COVID nineteen vaccination among people caught the virus. In those who haven't, the study finds that anyone who previously tested positive for a Star's cove to infection did not get additional benefit from the vaccine, which suggests the vaccine should be prioritized to people who haven't gotten the infection.

The clinic says this research provides insight into how the immune system protects the body once a COVID nineteen infection is confirmed. During the study that was conducted on fifty two thousand, two hundred and thirty eight employees in the Cleveland clinic, the clinic says not a single incidence of stars cove to infection was observed in previously infected participants

with or without vaccination. The clinic still recommends anyone who can get the vaccine should Why Okay, they can tell you that it's probably not going to you know, it's it's not going to hurt you, is what they'll say, right, Why not? They have a why not attitude? But my attitude is why give me a Why Why should I go make an appointment get a shot that I don't need? Does anyone have an explanation for this? They do not.

I'm sorry, I'm sick of do this because we say so, we have lab coats, or we're the media, and we have friends who have lab coats who come on who say things and they don't know what the heck they're talking about. They don't have these answers. In fact, here fifty two thousand employees of plus employees of the Cleveland clinic, not a ingle incidence of COVID infection among the previously infected with or without vaccination. Doesn't seem to matter. You

were infected, You're good. That's what this is telling you. And Fernauer says, Oh, we don't know how long natural immunity lasts. Guess what, we don't know how long vaccine immunity lasts. So, I mean, at what point is it just observed? At what point is it too much? This is why, you know, all of this fauciism, all of this belief in the infallibility of these experts, has been a disaster. It's been a disaster all along. These people have been making it up. They do not have answers

they pretend to have. Why is it that I've been telling you, I've been talking to you about natural immunity for how many months now as an issue that deserves so much more attension. They just suppress it. Shut up, get the shot, shut up, get the shots. There are one hundred and fifty million people in this country who have had COVID. A lot of them I know, have gotten shots. But and that's an estimate, of course, one hundred and fifty million. But how many people out there

fifty percent have gotten the shot? How many people haven't gotten the shot but have immunity. Do they even try to get that number for you, No, they don't. They just they just go go worship at Fauci's altar some more. That's what the media tells you. I know, you should be able to share your thoughts online without being shadow band censored, suppressed, and also without being tracked all the time with everything you're doing. But that's not the reality

of the Internet today. As you know, the big tech machines are always following your every move online and they're often shutting you down and censoring you. It's time you fight back against big tech with Express VPN, take back control of your privacy and your security. When you use the Express VPN app on your computer or phone, you anonymize much of your online presence by hiding your IP address. That makes your activity much more difficult to trace and

sell the advertisers. Express VPN encrypts one of your network data to protect you from eavesdroppers and cyber criminals. Revoke Big text right to your data today, Secure your Internet with a VPN I trust for online protection. Visit Express vpn dot com slash buck that's Express vpn dot com slash buck. To get three extra months free with my exclusive link. Go to Express vpn dot com slash buck right now to learn more. I said to Peter, at

some point she may go to the border. I don't have any trips to prevfore you or predict or timeline for that. But what I would reiterate is that her assignment was to work with countries and leaders in the Northern Triangle to address root causes, address corruption. I'm sure we're working together to address humanitarian concerns. I will say we're not taking advice from former President Trump or most of their publicans who are criticizing us on this, given

they were all sitting there. Well, we created this problem we walked into both at the border and with the movement of migration that has been growing over the last year. Utter bullcrap. You know it, I know it. Anybody who's honest knows it. But this is what you get from this White House. Now, Yeah, the problem at the border was created while Trump was in office. Really, no, there was a surge. Trump deal with it. It went away,

and then the Democrats came in. They removed the solution that Trump and the Trump administration put into place, and then the flood started again. Okay, it's like there was a crack in the damn. Trump said, whoa, there's a crack in the damn. Hey, how do we fix this? And then they plugged it. They plugged the hole, and then the Democrats came over and said, whoa, what's with this plug in the hole? Let's open it up. They open up and say, oh, look at the crack in

the damn. Trump Trump did this. It's exactly what's happened at our border. It's just it's absurd, folks, It is absurd. Anyway. I just I had to play that for you from Jen Jen Saki. You know, h man, it's just the lies, so many lies. But then there's the exaggerations. Senator klobaschar deeply unimpressive and nasty woman. From what I understand, Senator Kloba said this recently about the January sixth insurrection Play nine.

The Chief of Staff to the Head of the Army actually said, in one of our many interviews that we did for this report, said, you know, this is not like a pickup game. This situation where they just suddenly all come together and can do it. This was like the super Bowl of domestic terrorism, and there should have been planning ahead the super Bowl of domestic terrorism. So I just want to be clear. The super Bowl would

be the absolute peak of something, right. So so the January sixth insurrection, in which not a single government official or targeted person was killed. Only person killed was a protester, actually a rioter, Ashley Babbott, shot in the neck, unarmed through a door by a member of Capitol Police who didn't even didn't give any warrants, pulled his gun and shot on the neck. Okay, um, yeah, we're just supposed

to accept that. I guess you know that. Imagine that that happened with somebody trying to burn down the police priesting from Minneapolis on behalf of BLM. If a Coppet shot a BLM rioter in the neck, oh my gosh, person person be a martyr. They would be naming athletics stadiums after that person. They'd be. They'd be naming streets all across America. There'd be there'd be murals noticing quite

a difference here in the in the approach. Right, we see this, but calling the super Bowl of terrorism really more more so than than Timothy McVeigh, more so than all the ISIS inspired mass shooters and mass murderers on US soil in recent years. Really, the super Bowl of mass terrorism was January of domestic terrorism, rather was January six. Wow, Okay, what do they really wants to do about this? Let's just for the purposes of discussion. What would make democrats happy?

I wasn't at the insurrection. You weren't at the insurrection. I had nothing to do with it. You had nothing to do with it. Well, what is it gonna make democrats happy? When will they just stop their stop their whining and crying about this? Okay, we've we had an impeachment, We've heard about it a million times. Everybody on the right who knows anything right away knew that it was a just from a a pure optics perspective, never mind also a rule of law perspective, a disastrous and stupid thing.

And we've said so all along. Uh, what do they want us to do? When do we stop hearing about this? I don't support it now, I never supported it. I never would have thought it was a good idea of condemned it. Everyone else I respect on the right has done the same. Donald Trump has condemned the riot. What exactly do they think is going to be achieved here? A lot more than just accountability, That's what you have

to remember. There's this guy who's a former senior FBI vision, which the FBI is an institution, And I'm sorry because I know they're a good patriotic FBI agents who listen to this show and thank you for you know, locking up people that commit you know, elder fraud and you know an abuse and do a you know, cross state child abuse and kidnapping and uh you know all kay, you know, go after MS thirteen MS thirteen organized crime and cartels and all this. Thank you for all that work. Okay,

the good work that the FBI does, we appreciate. But

you know, you don't really hear about that. You know, you don't really hear about the FBI chasing down, you know, child molesters and finding cartel hitman and dealing, you know, bringing down cartel distribution networks that are killing Americans by poising them with you know what you what you end up hearing about, Unfortunately, are the senior FBI bureaucrats, you know, political folks who are always looking to get a pat on the head from Nancy Pelosi in the Washington Post.

That's what you end up hearing. And that's really troubling because it undermines, it rightly undermines our confidence in the FBI as an institution. Here is among the most lunatic people I've ever seen from any wing of the of the US government, any part of the US government. This former assistant you know, deputy assistant director or something. It's you know, he's maybe a top ten guy or top five guy or something the FBI. I don't even remember.

But Frank Figliuzzi, this guy's nuts. But there's a reason they keep putting him on MSNBC night after night to look into the camera and say shockingly stupid things that are also though concerning things, because the audience that hears it believes that this guy's not crazy. They think he is a reputable expert and somebody who should be listened to. He's going on TV and he is, well, you can

hear for yourself. Play three look or Chris Ray testified publicly on the Hill that what happened on January sixth is domestic terrorism. What have we learned from our experience with international terrorism? In order to address that problem? Arresting low level operatives is merely a speedbuck, not a roadblock. In order to really tackle terrorism, and this time domestically, you've got to attack and dismantle the command and control

element of a terrorist group. And unfortunately, and I know this is painful to hear, that may mean people sitting in Congress right now, people in and around be former president. That's how you do this. Otherwise, recruitment, inciting, and cult like leadership continues to recruit people to violence. This guy is a lunatic, I mean, and really is is doing considerable harm to the country that he supposedly spent his life defending in the FBI doing real harm, oh, the

command and control network. So under this framework he's just describe, there are Republican members of Congress who are like the bin Laden of the January sixth insurrection. This is what he's saying. They're like the Alaki of the January sixth insurrection. We just need to prove it. What a horrifying and clearly insane thing for a person to be going on

TV saying, remember this guy is. He's not just some crazy journo who you know, only only hangs out with left wing loons who watch too much MSNBC who live in Brooklyn or something. This is a guy who was a former senior FBI official, and he says this kind of crazy stuff, but he feeds into what the left, what the Democrats want to hear, which is that the other side, the Republican Party, is basically a white nationalist

evil party run by terrorists who want to destroy the country. Comma. Therefore, any level of viciousness, any level of authoritarianism, any level of crushing the other side is inherently justified, don't Isn't that so convenient? Isn't that so convenient? There's no need to think about decency, never mind fair play or the rule of law when dealing with Republicans, because they're the

insurrection party. Now, even they're elected members of Congress, even the former president's inner circle, they're the equivalent of domestic terrorist masterminds. This is what this psychopath is saying on national TV, and the audience that's hearing it. I can tell you this watching MSNBC. They're not very smart, but they're emotionally disturbed, but a lot of them have authorities. Don't of them have ability to really throw their weight around.

They think, Yeah, this guy figle Utcie, he's making a lot of sense. We do have to get the terrorist masterminds sitting in Congress. We got our friend Alan West with us now. He is the chairman of the Texas State GOP, also a former lieutenant colonel in the United States Military. Chairman West, great to have you. Gonna be with you, Buck, I'm on the road and down to San Antonio. I hear great things about that city, you know. I hear it's really up and coming. It's been been

on my radar for a while. Now I gotta go check it out myself. Tell me this, what do you make of the end results here of the Vice President's tripped down to Central America when it comes to doing something about our border. I think it was an utter failure that you actually had the president of the Tatemala scolding the Vice President of the United States America and undermining this whole line about that they're going down there.

She went down there to get to the root causes of the crisis that we have on a border here. He once again reiterated just the same as the leadership of Mexico reiterated that they're a problem. They're the reason why we see what's baught on by them changing the policy that we're very successful. Of the Trump administration, it seems like they're doing everything to try to avoid actually facing up to what has caused the issues at the border.

There's this there's this fixation. Chairman west On Root causes as if what will stop the almost two hundred thousand illegal migrants coming into the country a month between now and the end of the year is anti corruption coordination with our state Department and Guatemala and an infusion of cash to their government. It's just this is unseerious stuff,

isn't it. Yeah, it's totally uncostable. And for Kamala Harris to go down there and try to say that it's because of the weather that people are coming here, well, the weather was bringing myself maybe the same during the

Trump administration. It's all about the policies. But really and truthfully, I think we have to come to the understanding is that they don't care about what is happening at the border because the bottom line is they are getting exactly what they wanted to have what the progressive socialists left wanted to have, which is an open borders policy, and

that's exactly what they have implemented by executive border. So they're happy to flood the state of Texas with hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants and tie up our border patrol agents, tie the hands of the ICE agents so

that they can't deport people. Do you think that we're getting to a point now where the American people are seeing in large enough numbers, I mean enough Americans are seeing that the Democrats just always speak out of both sides of their mouth on immigration and really don't want the flow to stop. They don't want border security because

I can't imagine observing what's really going on. I mean, I know you're down in Texas and watching this issue very closely, but I can't imagine even a pretty casual observer of the situation at the border and the numbers coming away thinking anything other than this must be not a bug, but a feature, if you will, of their immigration desires. You're absolutely right. This is a pillar of their program. This is intentional in every way, shape, form,

and fashion. And if the rest of the country knew exactly what has gone on in some of these ranches and some of these areas. You talk to the mayors, you folid in Texas and what they're having to do to help us secure their schools, and the fact that we have illegal immigrants trying to carjack kids and the parking lots of schools. You know, this is this is just unbelievable that people have to live in this state

of terror. And what you are finding is that people in the state of Texas along the Royal Grand Valley down to the county level, they're going to take this situation under under control of themselves. And I think it's so important that the state of Texas steps up and resolves this situation and stop sitting around and waiting for the federal government because Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, they're doing

exactly what the left wants them to do. Treman West, one of the one of the things that I keep telling the audience is that if you were to ask, because I've done this before with Democrats, what is the downside of illegal immigration? What are some of the reasons that it is a problem that needs to be fixed, not something that just needs to be managed? And allowed. They sputter and they get angry and they say, oh, that's xenophobic, or you know that, there's never really an

answer from Democrats. I just want to pose to you, what are some of the downsides that people should be aware of, whether it's in Texas or anywhere in the country that's being affected by this of illegal immigration at the levels we're seeing at our southern border. Yeah, absolutely right. I think when you look at the flow Upconneil and the OPR crisis, so I mean there's having a harmful

effect on drug uses in Washon. The DC just recently saw the seizure of enough Fincinnil that killed twenty one million Americans, hundreds of millions of dollars, weapons, all types of the Cineloa drug cartail. It's a national security issue, Buck, We've had people from over one hundred and forty different

countries being apprehended crossing our southern border. It's an education issue because people are going to our schools, as they say, healthcare issue at a time when we're trying to turn the corner with COVID nineteen that we're allowing people to come in here, we're not doing the appropriate medical screening and even if we do know that they're testing positive, we're still releasing them out. We have a safety and security and local criminality issue that you can talk to

anyone along the border about that. So it is a plethora of adverse, second third, fourth order effects on here in the state of Texas and further internally into the United States of American. Speaking to Chairman Alan West of the Texas State g OP, also a former lieutenant colonel in the United States Military and a former member of Congress, Chairman West just wondering, you know, and I wondered, I'm hearing some things that you may have some thoughts about

running for high office again. What can you what can you tell us about that? Well, you know, when you look at where we are in Texas, Texas is the lynch and to hold the constitutional Republican we call American together and this is the front lines. And a lot of people have asked me to consider getting back into elected office. I have not been an elected office in a decade, and so we have resigned from being the

chairman of the Republican Party of Texas. We did that last Friday, effective the level of July, so that we can look at you know, continuing to serve this great nation, our God and to say the Texas and an elected position. So stand by for an announcement to be forthcoming Chairman West. Everybody, Alan West. Great to have you on, sir. We look forward to talking to you more about what you got planned. Thank you so much. I look forward to share it

with you up. Lawsuit alleges Dante Wright carjacked and assaulted a man three weeks before his death. Just as a reminder for everybody, Dante Wright was the man who was shot by an officer in what seems to be a case of negligent homicide. But the officer thought she was pulling a taser, she shot Dante Right. This is a lawsuit now that looks at well, what did Dante Right do before his death? There are people that want money from his estate, which has gotten a lot of money

from the state because of a shooting. Let's bring in our friend here, John Cardillo, former NYPD officer and conservative commentator, to weigh in on this. John. Always great to have you. Great to be with you, Buck. I think this is really interesting, John, because here we see and it's going

into the court record. It's a civil suit, but a civil suit against the estate of Dante Wright, who is going to as we don't always going to end up getting you know, the family will end up getting a huge, you know, millions and millions of dollars settlement, because that's what tends to happen in these cases of police What does seem to be in you and I've talked about actual police misconduct in this case, the woman thought she pulled her taser, she pulled the gun, she shot the guy,

But that doesn't prevent his estate for being from being liable for shooting somebody just weeks before his death, carjacking him and basically being responsible, you know, in a civil sense, for being a career criminal and a bad guy. Oh yeah, yeah. I mean, look, we know his history. He had a he had a violent criminal history. He was or is this thing that looked You and I have analyzed this case on air off air, I've done that with other

people looked bad for the cops. Like you said, I think that fact pattern is going to stand true even even under evidentiary scrutiny and testimony in court. She thought she was pulling a taser, she pulled a gun, thought it was a non lethal trigger. She was pulling it was lethal issue number one. I agree with you one hundred percent, book, his family's going to get big money.

But the irony here is that we may never have known about his prior history of shooting people had his family not been in a position to get this mega money, these millions, because they were uncollectable prior to that. Right, he didn't have money, so these people may never have sued, and have they not sued, we wouldn't know about his

violent criminal history. So in a really aut an ironic way, the improper actions of that female police officer or sergeant I think she was, is what led to us finding out about his background. Because now people saw some dollars signs and today this guy shot me. Let me collect

a few bucks. I just don't. I also think that it goes to something that we've discussed before, John, which is that every individual incident that the BLM movement wants to put forward as something that we all have to spend time as a nation talking about a national conversation about police brutality and all this, And yes, the facts of that incident matter, but that doesn't then mean that they can create a true cult of martyrdom around these

individuals as though their civil rights heroes. I mean, there are murals of George Floyd as though he's a great guy. Now, you know, people can say, all right, they disagreed with the use of force that an officer shown used. And obviously now he's got a murder conviction of his record, he's facing a long stretch in prison. But that's different from saying George Floyd is somebody who our kids should learn in schools is a hero, or that they should walk by murals of him. And the same thing with

Dante Wright. I'm sorry, but you know is this is now an active court case. These are the facts, and his history matters. Listen, if that stands true for most of the martyrs of the Black Lives Matter movement, go to Brianna Taylor. You know I travel a lot, buck you travel a lot. I don't know how many cars I've rented in my life, hundreds, maybe more. But I do know a dead body was never found in one that I rented for my drug dealing X. I mean, and that is an actual thing that occurred in Brianna

Taylor's life. She rented a vehicle for her X. It was a known drug trafficker and a dead body was found in the trunk. I mean the heroes that this woke movement, the Black Lives Matter movement, the anti Antifa movement of chosen would be anti heroes. There would be people that children will warned to stay away from at any other point in history. But now they're given the funerals of heads of states. Their families are given tens of millions of dollars before any evidence is presented. That

was the George Floyd's situation. There was an anecdotal video and the family was given twenty seven million dollars. Now, I don't want to get in the weeks legally, but find me the logic behind that. Right, you've got punitive damages compensatory damages. This guy was never going to make twenty seven million bucks in his life. Really, that was the punitive damage in this case, for a guy who was a career criminal who never gave his family anything.

That was the compensatory damage in this case. So everything is really upside down. But I think you raised the most important point. We are creating heroes that they're canonizing. They're making saints out of people that led horrible, horrible lives. That drove them into these interactions with the police. And I also think John, it's worth noting. I mean, you were, you know, for forever one listening. By the way, I was a civilian analyst detailed to the NYPD while a

CIA intelligence officer. It was a very peculiar arrangement. John was actual NYPD with a badge with a gun, arresting bad guys. Right. I was doing a very specific thing and really just responding to the Director of Intel and the commissioner. But so John did the real job. And you know, if you had brought a guy in, a really bad guy, you brought a cop killer in John, right, you arrested him and you have him in custody, and

you know you decided I'm gonna get even. And you know you you broke that guy's kneecaps with your nights Get nightstick while he was in custody, and you you know, you tuned him up really badly. Uh, you're gonna I mean, you're gonna go to prison for that, right, You're gonna

be held responsible. Nobody would then turn around though, and say, oh, well, this guy's this guy's a hero, meaning that the guy that you beat on they'd say, well, you shouldn't do that to him, But that doesn't make him you know, that doesn't make him a civil rights icon. You know what I'm saying. It's no, he doesn't look and that's a great example. So I don't know if your listeners

are going to remember about Geez. I don't know. Twenty years ago or so, fifteen years ago, there was a cop in Justin Volpi who did a pretty horrible thing. He sodomized a prisoner with a plunger handle. Because the case the Abne Louie m a case exactly right now this I went to the Academy with that cop, Justin Volpi. He was in my sister company. In the academy, we

knew this guy shouldn't have been on the street. We all expressed reservations, and when Justin Volpi was ultimately arrested for that he went to federal prison, every one of the cops I know said, good, that was a stain on the NYPD people, that weren't it, you know, the Police Academy's two thousand people. I just happen to have known the guy because he was in my sister company. I was in thirty two. He was in thirty three. But that being said, we knew and nobody came to

this cops defense. Nobody said, Oh, well, he's a great son, he's a great cousin, he's a nephew, he was a high school football star, he was an aspiring guitarist, he was an honor student. No, he was a bad guy who did a bad thing. Let's get him out of our ranks. That's also a real noticeable difference when a cop does wrong. Despite all the anecdotal lies, cops that get up and go to work every day and do the right thing want to see that person prosecuted. They

want them off the force. They don't want that blowing back on them. Morale's bad enough. And that's another really important distinction. We don't glorify the bad guys in our ranks. We're speaking of John Cardillo, former NYPD and conservative commentator CHNA. I gotta get your take on this. I've been talking about it. Deblasio is asking for help from the ATF. Now this is the this is the newest, you know, the newest tactic of distraction. Oh, I need defends to

come in and do a bunch of gun seizures. That's going to stop the crime surge in New York and is ignoring the eighteen hundred offers cut out of the forest by defund the police pandering. Yeah, oh yeah, and I'll take it one step further. He's asking the ATF Task Force to come in and do the exact job that precinct level anti crime and citywide street crime did that was eliminated. Those units were disbanded by the NYPD for being too proactive, and so he knows it works.

They were two of the most effective units in the history of the NYPD's street crime covered the entire city, and an anti crime did the same job at the precinct level. They got to know it a bit more microscopically. I worked on that team for a bit. Outstanding cops. They did outstanding work. They saved lives. Also important to notebuck stop question and frisk. It's not stopping chrisk. Stop question and frisk. This infuriates me. A liberal judge named

shursheinlandined stop question and frisk unconstitutional. Shortly thereafter, she resigned from the bench. Why because she knew herd decision was not valid. Stop questioning frisk was established under Terry v. Ohio in nineteen sixty four, the United States Supreme Court set followed properly, it is absolutely constitutional. People are dying in New York City because the Deblasio administration won't simply go to the Appellate Division and appeal Judge Sheinlan is

not even on the bench anymore, is ruling. If they did, invoking Terry v. Ohio sixty four, stop questioning frisk could be back in place. Bringing back street crime and anti crime used the Rudy Giuliani, Michael Bloomberg model, the the Rate Kelly model, to Bill Bratton model, to Bernie Carrick model, crime will plummet. The Blasio knows it, but he can't say it but the NYPD. So he's going to bring in the Feds to do the job the NYPD could be doing. John Ely got about about forty seconds here

before we got to jump. But just the belief out there with so many people is that stopping frisk was it only unconstitutional, but that it didn't work. What's your quick your quick response to that absolute best tool I ever had in my toolbox going after illegal guns and robberies. I mean that pretty much does it all. It's amazing. De Blasio. It had had a jihad again, stop question and frisk going, and unfortunately, I think that seeped into a lot of people's minds and New York City is

now suffering the consequences of us. Anyway, our friend John Cardillo always great to have you on these law enforcement matters. Sir, We'll talk to you again soon. Thanks Buck, great to talk to you. I think I am sympathetic to teachers and educators everywhere who are committed to doing our jobs. And our job is to tell the truth. Our job is to tell the good and the bad. Our job is to tell the light and the darkness. And I

think that's what students want. And I know I've had so many students who've come to my classrooms in colleges angry that they did not learn about systemic racism and even about slavery during the K through twelve years. Okay, I don't believe him, so I'll just start with that. I think he's lying. I don't believe that people have come up to them and said that they never learned about slavery in their K through twelve education in this country. I do not believe that, So I'll just start with that.

They didn't learn about systemic racism. Well, yeah, because systemic racism is a politicized ideology of racial Marxism that has no solutions and is really just a form of power transfer from a conservative, constitutionalist, rule of law based society which is based on the individual and individual action and a color blind society, to one in which you have intersectionality and the constant balancing and rebalancing of racial privileges in this country by a left wing racial Marxist elite

that now effectively controls not only the culture but the Democrat Party. Those are the options that we see right now. Those are the That's the situation that we face in this country. And I think it's interesting that he said he's sympathetic. Ibraham Kenedy is one of the most well known instructors out there. He gives these speeches. He makes a lot of money he goes give speeches about systemic racism.

I wonder what he thinks about situations like this. A teacher, this is the New York Post today at a posh New Jersey prep school quits overcritical race theory. I want to share some of this with you. An English teacher has resigned from a top New Jersey prep school that is using critical race theory to create a hostile culture of conformity and fear, causing white and male students to

believe they are oppressors, she said. Dana stengel Plow accused the Dwight Englewood School in Bergen County of forcing students and faculty to embrace a single set of beliefs, choking off free speech in the process. The schools ideology requires students to see themselves not as individuals, but as representatives of a group, forcing them to adopt the status of privilege or victimhood. Stengelplow wrote in her letter to school brass As a result, students arrive in my classroom accepting

this theory as fact. People born with less melanin in their skin are oppressors, and people born with more melanin in their skin are oppressed. Men are oppressors, women are oppressed, and so on. She continued. This is the dominant and divisive ideology that is guiding our adolescent students. You know,

there's so many ways to attack, that's all. A quote from this New York Post piece by Dana Kennedy and Tamar Lappin there's so much in the way of methods of approach to attack the critical race theory as intellectually bankrupt because it is. There's so many ways you can you can address this. I mean one of them is to say, all right, where is the actual racism in

the system? Now, if we're going to say that disparity of outcome is inherently racist when there are racial differences when you look at it outcomes, whether it's on you know, SAT testing, or on jobs hiring, or on getting mortgage, uh, you know, mortgage loans, that that excludes whatever other data that we can actually look at and say, hold on,

maybe it's not racism in this system. Maybe there's something else at work, or maybe something else is going on, and you know, you can start to look at this and say, okay, is it is it sexism that uh, you know, our laws against homicide, for example, sexist. Well you look at them and say, well, hold on a second. I mean men commit a five to ninety of murders in the country, so our laws, you know, so do you'd ask a whole lot of second, why is that

going on? Our laws against murder sexist against men? No, men are committing more murders. Are the SATs racist because Asian Americans, for example, do disproportionately Well, well, I can't tell you why that happens. We could have discussions about culture, we could have discussions about tradition, we could have discussions about a whole lot of things. But I don't think it's accurate to just say that the SAT is racist

because Asian Americans do disproportionately. Well, right, you'd have to show me where in the SAT is the racism that makes Asians do disproportionately. Well, just looking at results and declaring it evil and wrong and a product of racism is not intellectually honest. It's not because there are lots

of things. You can show lots of different situations where you look at an outcome, you'd say, well, this is you know that this outcome is is disparate among groups, and it wouldn't be the result of sexism or racism or anything. There are a lot of factors that go into it. There are very these are very complicated questions,

but we're not even allowed to discuss factors. We're just told you have a disparate outcome, therefore it must be I mean, you could take this too you know, people will say they'll they'll say, on any number of issues, um, they will point to a disparate outcome as as evidence of racism, and you'd say, well, we'll hold on a second.

You know, is there racism in Major League Baseball because you have a disproportionate number of you know, people from Latin America, Latino Americans and people from Latin America who are top baseball players. I don't think that's the result of pro Latin racism. I don't believe that. But you look at the disparate outcome, you say, well, clearly there's there's a problem here. You know, not enough Asian American

baseball players, So there's clearly a problem. Right. You see, once you start to look at this, once you move away from the framework that they always want to use, which is just meant to silence you can keep you in fear, you can have a more a more clearheaded discussion about these very complicated issues. Critical race theory wants to shut all of that down, that's the whole point

of it. I have a different take than you'll hear from most conservatives about New York City mayoral candidate Mile Wiley, who's something of a national figure as well, because she's a frequent legal analyst guest on MSNBC, which, as you know, is a far left channel of alleged news. It's really just amocrat and socialist and Marxist propaganda package through a corporate network. But Maya Wiley is getting a lot of attention right now for being a huge hypocrite. Not on

one but on a couple of issues. She's a big defund The police proponent wants to cut the NYPD budget, the largest police force in America, wants to cut that budget, buy a billion dollars. But it turns out that miss Wiley, whose husband is a multi millionaire investment fund CEO. Miss Wiley lives in a four thousand square foot three million dollar mansion in Brooklyn and pays for private security. She pays five hundred and fifty dollars a month, as do

her neighbors. They pitch in for private security to patrol their area, which is already a low crime area, very very safe neighborhood, wealthy neighborhood in Brooklyn. Here an NYC. Now, this is not anything to really be surprised about. This is classic lib stuff. This is what liberals do. This is what leftists do. They want to defund the cops. They want to disarm you, as a law abiding citizen,

from protecting yourself, your home, your family. They want less police on the streets because that will help the sensibilities of those who hate the cops, because of the BLM movement and the Democrat propaganda, and the fact that it means more violence, more shootings, more rapes, more murders. All that just the price that the social justice left is willing to have other people pay. That's the way this goes. You see, other people are the ones who will suffer.

It's not Mia Wiley or husband or earth family or their friends. No, no, no, they've got private security. They

live in a rich neighborhood. They don't care. It's like CNN anchors who go from Hudson Yards here in New York City when they're not working at home, which of course they've been doing for the pandemic, up to their two to three to six million dollars apartments, depending on which anchor we're talking about, on the Upper West Side or maybe down in the West Village, and then they go to their Hampton's houses sag Harbor or East Hampton Southampton.

You know, got a two three four million dollar place on the beach. They're not worried about what's happening out in Brownsville. They're not worried about what's happening in the South Bronx. The shootings that are occurring in numbers we haven't seen in twenty years in parts of New York.

This is true if libs all across the country, the elites, the ruling class, the millionaires who go on MSNBC to preach social justice and defund the police and all this, I don't care about what's actually happening to the people they allegedly are advocating on behalf. It doesn't matter to them because they're not in they don't live in high

crime neighborhoods. They don't have to worry about what's going to happen to their homes, their families, themselves when they're trying to get into their front door at night after a long day of work. They've got chauffeurs, they've got town cars that pick them up, you know, They've they've

got drivers that take care of all that. They're not riding the subway and dealing with the insane vagrants that are, you know, putting all kinds of human refuse on the subway and doing all kinds of disgusting stuff and attacking people. And no, they're not worried about any of that because it's not their problem. They're not speaking to the people that are suffering as a result of the permissive, pro

crime liberal policies out there. They're speaking to the other elites, the other people that watch seeing in an MSNBC and think it's gospel, who also live in safe neighborhoods. And then those individuals when they do speak to people that are supposed to be more in touch with BIPOC communities, right, Black Indigenous people of color BIPOC is now the non

white acronym that the left uses all the time. But BIPOC communities that are suffering from this crime wave in places like New York, the people that they speak with, who are the community organizers there, they're also millionaires. They're also not affected the same way by this crime. The everyday folks who are trying to pay their bills, trying to do the right thing, trying to live their lives and peace and trying to get ahead with some hard work. That's too bad for them. Maya Wili is too busy

preening for the cameras. Morally, Mia WII is too busy making a show of how much she cares about social justice and defund the police while she lives in a mansion with private security in Brooklyn. And this isn't even unusual. This is the classic story for Democrats who want to be an elected office. They pretend to be so disconnected, so dumb that they can't figure out whether it's Nancy Pelosi or name a prominent Democrat who's in favor of

defund the police. And I'll show you somebody who's probably got millions of dollars, maybe hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank, and lives in a in a wealthy neighborhood and has no concerns about violent crime in their own area. And sure the surge of violent crime in other places, that's not their problem. What is their problem is making it clear to their constituency that the cops

are the real enemy. Yeah, that'll get it done. Oh and if you thought that we haven't addressed enough of the absurdity in the hypocrisy of New York City mayoral candidate Maya Wiley, who is really the classic liberal elite, went to Dartmouth and then Columbia has you know, Columbia Law School has played the system to her advantage at every opportunity, that much is clear, and now has married you a multi millionaire Wall Street guy, lives in a

four thousand square foot mansion, pays for private security, has drivers taking her all over the place, and she wants to make sure that if you live in a high crime neighborhood, there are less cops, fewer cops on the streets, less likely for police to be able to intervene in time if you're the victim of a violent crime, less likely for the bad guys out there who are victimizing all communities, including communities of color, at higher rates than

we've seen in twenty years, less likely that police will be able to deal with that crime surge to bring it back down, to bring the numbers moving in the other direction. Because it's all about the liberal elites, you see, they don't care about the people they pretend to care about. This is one of the this is the fundamental fallacy

of the modern Democrat party. That the whether it's AOC who lives in a super fancy apartment in DC, and ado Is is driving around an seventy thousand dollars sports car and complaining about how the government's not fixing her Avola's ceiling in Puerto Rico. This, this is the way the Libs think they get to be rich, they get to be powerful, and complain about how everybody else isn't doing their part to to you know, to be to

be more devoted Marxists. Oh and as if it's not enough, Maya Wily also says that uh says that that talented programs, gifted and talented programs in the public school system are racially discriminatory. Now, I wanted I wanted to just ask you this. Do you think that she sends her children, she has two children. Do you think that Maya Wily would be mayor if New York sends her children to

the local public school. I'm just just take a guess, folks. Remember, gifted and talented programs are quote racially discriminatory, she says, end quote and by that in New York City, do you know what the Democrats mean. They're telling you there are too many Asians in those programs. That is the complaint they make about Stuyveson. Yes, this is true of

the left. They view it as a problem that Stuyvesant High School and other high schools in New York have such a high proportion of high achieving Asians because they're the dominant ethnic category in those schools, in these gifted and talented programs, in particulars places like Steveston Bronx High School of Science. But do you think that she sends her daughter to just the local public school, because come on, public schools are the backbone of America, right, that's what

the Democrats say. Oh no, she sends her daughter to a fifty one thousand dollars a year private school. Oh okay. But if you're a hard working person without RMIs financial means and your child happens to be talented enough, hard work enough to get into a gifted and talented program, Miya Wily wants you to know that those programs are racially discriminatory. Pace for private security lives in a mansion, wants to defund police. Says that gifted and talented programs

in public schools are racially discriminatory. Sends one child to a school for the gifted and another to a fifty one thousand dollar year private school. She's the quintessential Democrat. She's the ultimate, the ultimate liberal. In twenty twenty one, Maya Wily. So this is what the Democrat Party has become. I think we should all be very clear about that. Speaking of elite liberals, rock and roll, fellow patriots, it's time for roll call, Mom and the roll call. What's up,

Producer Mark? What's going on? Man? How are all the things? Oh, the things are going Yeah, their hatest and greatest. Uh nothing really just kind of in a waiting purgatory motives usual. I mean, this is really getting kind of crazy, you know, Buck, I was supposed to close a month ago. I don't. I don't even know what to do anymore. What do you mean to you know? Should I? Should I start sending some angry tweets at the homeowners Association? You know you can put it possible. I don't know if you

have to, Fred, Producer Mark. You can only mail them things, you can't tweet them. Come on, the rules were made in the nineteen seventies. So oh, that's right. I need I need to fax them something or get it, get a notarized letter sent to them. Fax is way way too high tech. You have to mail it from the post office with a stamp in the way they take it. Well, let's get into roll call for everybody. Facebook dot com,

slash buck Sex, and Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com. Also, just so you know, folks, I'm gonna be uh out next week. We're gonna have guest hosts in next week. So nothing bad has happened to me. I'm just taking some time to get geared up from the new show

June twenty first. But I also want to make sure you know that while I'm gonna be doing the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show twelve to three pm Eastern Time across the country four hundred ish three hundred to four hundred stations something like that, hundreds of stations across the country, I will still be doing the daily Buck Sexton Show podcast, So don't think that that podcast feed is going anywhere. We're gonna have the Buck Sexton Show podcast.

That is also where I will be putting specials and history shows and things like. I think We're also gonna do some long format interviews where I just if I have one really great guest I want to talk to, we might do you know an hour and drop it on the podcast. So that's the kind of stuff that we're planning there. I don't want you to think it's it's going away. And yeah, maybe a siege of Malta part two that needs to happen. I'm aware that that

needs to happen. Now, even snow Princess makes fun of me. She's like, are you still promising your audience and not delivering? She's like, she's like you now she's become their advocate. She's like what. She's like, I'm gonna stop, no more cookies for you until and I'm like, all right, fine, she's gonna have to carry it on. I only have a couple of shows left to be the ummudsman for. She'll be there in the background rooting for Team Buck. That's the way it's gonna go. So here we go.

Let's get into some of the things we have. Kiara, who writes, Hey Buck, I'm a thirty eight year old single conservative woman liming in Nashville. The only guys that ever asked me out end up being leftist. Starting to worry there are no single conservative guys close to my age. It really feel it's important to share the same values with a significant other. Where do I find these guys? Where do I find conservative guys? Well, Kiara, I would say,

and I hope I'm saying your name properly. I would say that anything that involves firearms is a good place. So maybe go to the range, go to some range events. Great place. People always say church, and I think there are some churches there's enough sort of young single people that you know, you maybe can kind of get to know somebody that. But I also feel like not a lot of folks you have to go to a church

mixer or something. Not a lot of people want to walk up to somebody in the pew and say, hey, stop your praying and start your drinking with me tonight wine. You know, that's a little that might be a little tough. So those those are ideas that I would put there. I'd put out there for you. And also I think, and I do not know about this, I can say from personal experience, I think there's like a couple of

MAGA or conservative dating apps out there. You know, that's another one you could you could try, you know what I'm saying. So I'd give that a shot. I'd give that a shot. But look, if you're in Nashville. There are plenty of guys. Plenty of guys the gym. By the way, here's a thing I'll tell you in my experience, the gym is a place where it is very hard for a guy to meet a girl. And some of you are going to simul Buck, I met my wife

of the gym. Okay, well, congratulations with your popeye forearms in your six pack. But like, the gym is a slightly intimidating place for a guy to go up to a girl. But if you strike up a conversation with a guy, then he knows it's kind of game on. So that's another opportunity I would say. So, I hope, I hope. Are those are worthwhile suggestions? Dale? Hey, Buck, I cannot begin to tell you how happy I am for you. I always felt like you were the true

heir apparent. I know that sounds like hyperbole, but there are a lot of people I know that I've been saying that too for several years. That's really kind, Dale. Thank you. I certainly will continue to be a loyal listener and wish you the best. Coming after an iconic legend is never easy. PS. I guess this means you won't read my stuff on air anymore. Kidding. Good luck man, godspeed Dale. No, I will be reading your stuff. The

Buck Sexton Show is continuing. For everybody who is listening to this on radio right now, please please subscribe to The Buck Sexton Show. You can download it on the iHeart app. You can download and listen on the Apple podcast Store in the Apple Podcast Store, you can listen on Spotify on Podbean. So those are all places where you can listen to the Bucks Exton Show. And I think you should listen to the Bucks Exton Show, so please check it out. Marcus right, Actually, this one's gonna

be too long. Mark. Let's hold Marcus for tomorrow because I will be able to get to this whole. It's a long, very nice note. We'll get to it. Pablo, Hey, Buck First, congratulations. I only listen to two radio shows during the day, you and Rush. I know you've been humbled by this opportunity. Therefore you and therefore you deserve it. I do not know what the new show will be like or if you will have roll Call as part of it, so I wanted to write in for possibly

one last time. I do know the new show will be informative and array of hope in the conservative world. Shield Tie and thank you, Pablo, Thank you so much. It's very kind of you, and I have always been look, I'm just gonna sid I've always been really proud of how many people say that they listen to two shows, Buck and Rush. There's a lot of you out there, and that is the highest compliment that I could possibly have in this business. So thank you very much for that.

But Pablo, I just want to reiterate for everybody out there, the Buck Sexton Show June twenty first until forever is continuing as a daily podcast, so you will have this show you're listening to now is going to sound very much the same. It's just going to be podcast only, not radio. Twelve to three will be the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. So that's the plan. Talk to you folks tomorrow. Shields High