The Malevolent Seven Impeachment Managers

and more coming up? This is the Buck Sexon Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence, magnor mistake America. You're a great American. Again, the Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. Now, Welcome the Bucks Extent Show, everybody. Because I am a devoted host, because I believe so strongly in spending many, many hours of my time to distill the most important information,

analysis and thoughts. Because I know all of you are quite busy with your lives doing things other than hosting radio shows. I try to make the best use of your time and this day will be no exception to that. As I can tell you having sat through the Democrat debate last night, there is very little, very little of substance to get into. I'm going to save you two hours of time right now in case you haven't watched

it or thinking about it. The Democrats want to take more of your money and freedom away to give stuff inefficiently to other people who did not earn it through corrosion by a government that cannot afford it. That's a Democrat debate. Save you two hours. You're welcome, team Buck, That's what I'm here for. Help you out be a good guy like that. It was. It was quite quite

a mess up there last night. And I'm sorry, but I can't help but get a little bit of a chuckle out of the Democrats who have created this wokeness culture, cancel culture, hyper political correctness that no one can even really define, that changes day to day, and the obsession with diversity that pushes so much of it, that is such a central part of political correctness. And you had

a whole bunch of old white Democrats on stage last night. Yes, I know Mayor Pete was there, he's not old, but the rest of them, it was quite a boring crew. And also we have seen that Tom Steier is perhaps the world's first billionaire who seems only able to afford one tie. This producer mark, this guy was wearing. He likes this tartan plaid tie. You know, that's the only thing that is gonna apparently get it done for him. He wears the same tie at every debate. Maybe that's

his style, Maybe that's like his signature, his thing. Yeah, fair enough, but I feel like he could does he have many of the same tie though. That's what Sometimes people see me wearing, like a blue shirt or a white shirt more than once on TV, and I want to tell them. I know, I'm not like, I'm not making like the super big Bucks. But the Buck can't afford more than one shirt in the same color. I'm not just wearing the same blue or white shirt every time I go on to you. You know, we'll have

to I just like the classics. I like the classics. I'll get Tom Steyer on, We'll ask him about his ties. Yea. Some of you may be saying, wait a second, Buck, this isn't a show that I go to where I want to hear banter about fashion choices. I'm just trying to tell you that's probably the most interesting thing from the debate last night. Okay, there's like nothing that is worth the time. You've heard much of it before. The

only part that was interesting. And we set this up yesterday our show was called Comrade Warren Versus Comrade Biden. And by the way, if you're if you ever want to, you should send us. If you send us a great show title, we do reserve the right to borrow it and name one of our shows after the title you

give us for something. So if you have some really clever impeachment title that you want to share, because we're you're talking about impeachment a lot of the days ahead, please, by all means, do let us know what that would be. We love, we love relying on the genius of team Buck to make our show look better than an otherwise would. So, okay, what's the most interesting thing from last night? I really do.

I want to move on to some other things to talk maybe a bit about the economy, about the general Flynn situation. Looks like he's trying to withdraw formally withdraw his plea. And you know, there's a lot more going on here that we need to we need to dig into than just the socialist Democrats. And I really want this to be a change or the way we talk about the Democratic Party. There they are a socialist party.

Now they can say they're not socialists, but they are, and I don't think we should allow them to define language. One of my big problems with the way that American political discourse functions is that those on the right, conservatives, we often seed so much ground in the way we talk about things, and it might seem small to you. In the earliest days of the bucksac And show, I used to say that liberals are not in fact, in any way liberal or centered or focused on protecting liberty.

There in fact statusts. They are authoritarians. There are many cases aspiring totalitarians, and so why would we give them a name that is really the opposite of what they are? It dead and reminds me of the doomsday culled the Reasonable Lists from the show Parks and Wreck. If you call yourselves the reasonable lists, well, then how can you be crazy? If you call yourselves liberals, then how could you be authoritarians? How could you be fascists? Right, that's

part of the game they play. And then also the blue and red, the colors I've talked to you before about the history of this just comes from TV news.

The Republican Party is read because of election night Democrat controlled stations, by the way, I mean stations that were left wing deciding, Okay, we're going to make the Democrats blue and the Republicans read, when, of course, the Democrats are much closer and always have been, to socialists, and the color of socialism is red and Republicans should be blue. But I won't get too deep into that for right now.

What's the most interesting part of last night. I just wanted to say, I'm going to call them socialists, and people challenge me on this, and that's fine. They're wrong. They've become a socialist party. A degree of socialism we can argue over. But the Democrats are socialists. Okay, just remember that, because socialism has also able to destroy no matter how wealthy a country is, no matter how successful it has been relative to others in the region, socialism

can destroy It can destroy any country. Central planning, government control, cower by committees can destroy any economy, any free society. Just remember I'm telling you that now, All right, now, let's talk about Bernie and Warren. This was a great one. This is fantastic. CNN, which is the worst cable News Network in existence. CNN was running this debate last die with a des Moines Register and they had to touch on this issue because everyone's been talking about it enough.

Did Bernie Sanders in fact say that a woman can't win the presidents now? As a matter of fact, meaning that factually speaking, a woman has not been able to win the presidency yet. And there is certainly room for discussion if we're going to be honest about it, as to whether or not it's an advantage or disadvantage to run as a woman for the presidency. This is the

reality of the world we live in. But the allegation here is that in a private conversation Bernie said this to Elizabeth Warren as they were talking about things really as colleagues. I mean, this was the equivalent of sitting down having a beer with somebody that you think you're on the same team with and then you think you're in the trust. Try. Bernie thought he was in the trust try he's in the nest. I thought I thought it was safe, And it turns out that no. Elizabeth

Warren decided to use this against him. And so this is how CNN frames this exchange. This was the only really worthwhile part. We're not going to spend too much time on the debate today. I'm not going to go through every policy because you know, we'll talk about the broad strokes of their socialism, their insanity, their lack of understanding of math and markets. But here is what CNN did to set this thing up, Played thirteen producer Mark

Senator Sanders. I do want to be clear here. You're saying that you never told Senator Warren that a woman could not win the election. The Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders told you a woman could not win the election? I disagreed. Bernie is my friend, and I am not here to try to fight with Bernie. But look, this question about whether or not a woman can be president has been raised, and it's time for

us to attack it head on. And I think the best way to talk about who can win is by looking at people's winning record. So can a woman beat Donald Trump? Look at the men on this stage collectively, they have lost ten elections. The only people on this stage who have won every single election that they've been in are the women. Ah of a feminist girl power rallying cry here from Elizaeth Warren. But notice at the beginning of that exchange, she and then said, so, Senator Sanders,

did you in fact say this thing? And he said no, And then they went to Eliza's Warren. Since we know Bernie Sanders said this, why don't you tell us what you said in response to him? They're basically calling Bernie Sanders a liar on National TV. I mean, I don't know how else you could how else you could see that? What else could you really say about it? And now it has come out? And does this surprise anyone? Oh here, I'm gonna look, I'm just look at producer Mark you

can you can mouth the word to me. Who is responsible for putting the story out in the media. Who is the one that thought maybe people should know that Bernie Sanders, Yes, Elizabeth Warren. Turns out that Warren leaked this herself. Oh what a shock, What a shock. Elizabeth Warren wanted people to know that Bernie Sanders is maybe kind of a misogynist, but she doesn't really want people

to know that because she likes him. But just you know, stabs him in the back and puts her arm around his shoulder right right after she pulls off the maneuver. I mean, just classic Elizabeth Warren. Not an honorable move, Not an honorable move at all. Does that surprise us that somebody who had faked being a Native American for

decades would then go after somebody in this way. I'm always, I will tell you, I always am a little offended, and I know I shouldn't be because people think of me as a member of the press or even though I never would really use that term. I certainly when you use the term journalist, because I'm not. But people feel like they have to tell me, hey, we're sitting down, we're having drinks, especially if it's somebody who's tied to

the administration or if they're in politics. They say, you know, we're off the record, and if we have a personal relationship, like if we're friends, which is the case with many of them. I understand why they say that, but there's a part of me that's like, if you know me, you know that I don't I don't do that thing. I don't talk to people when they think they're talking

to buck. And then all of a sudden that that story for my own purposes that they thought was being shared just between two friends, two colleagues is now going to be broadcast, you know, everywhere exactly what. Some journalists, by the way, do operate that way, and that's because journalists are discussing people worse probably than anyone and anyone in any business except actors. But Elizaeth Warren did exactly

that to Bernie Sanders. Because now is the time there's really only going to be one progressive candidate, and there's only going to be one main choice for the Democrats. Which socialist is going to be the standard bearer? Who of the socialist candidates Bernie Sanders, Elizeth Warren and quite honestly may Or Pete Boodha judge too, who did it? Who did a pretty sound job last night? I mean I can't see there, and you know who else does

a good job? And I make fun of her because she eats salad with a comb and has her staff like helped groom her in ways that is surprising. Kloba Shar Clobashar's not not actually a crazy person. I mean, she may be a craven Democrat, but she operates a little bit more in the realm of reality than some of these other Democrats. I mean, Bernie Sanders, the stuff

that he's saying is insane. People who think that Bernie Sanders has any idea how any of this would really work and what this would do for people don't know what they're talking about. If Bernie Sanders becomes president of the United States, you will be poorer and less free. I guarantee it. I'm not saying that it'll be mad Max, but things are going to get rougher for you in ways that matter to you. So at least with someone

like a Cloba shar or a Biden. Biden is just going to do whatever the party apparatus tells him to do. The party apparatus of the Democrats has further left and it has been at any other time in my lifetime. But he's not really an ideologue. He's a Bidenist first and foremost. What does Biden have to do to win? What does Biden have to do to have nice things said and written about him by the elite media? Clobish are a little bit more normal, a little bit more reasonable.

But can any of them win against Trump? I think we all know the answer to that. So far, you're in the free him. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast, and I want to say that's a night for me was dispiriting. Different guys got to do better what we saw a night. There was nothing I saw at night that would be able to take Donald Trump out. And I want to see a Democrat in the White House as soon as possible. There was nothing to night that.

If you're looking at this thing, you say, any of these people are prepared for what Donal Trump is going to do to us. I think Van Jones is wrong on policy matters, and I think if I think he's an ideological opponent on most things, not all things, but he is one of these smarter democrats of the political analysts out on the scene. I'll tell you I've worked with Van. I know Van a little bit, and he's actually some of you will get mad at me. I

don't care. He's actually a pretty charming guy if you if you get to chat with him a little bit, and he's completely right here, He's completely right. There was nothing, There was nothing. I know. He's far left, radical and progressive and all this stuff, and I think that he's wrong and all these things. I'm just saying he's a smart progressive who sometimes does call it the way it is instead of the way the CNN audience wants to

see it. You know, I think it's important, by the way, that you understand we should we should seek as conservatives, you should seek out who are the best of the left, who's the strong who makes the strongest arguments. I mean, yeah, I'd like to see it here. And you know, I talk about like Maisie haronos the you know, one of the dumbest people I've ever heard, and you know, Biden

is a dumb ass. And this is important for us to talk about because these people want to control aspects of our lives and have power over us, and so we should be honest about what's going on. But there are democrats who are skilled in the use of rhetoric, who understand how to manipulate emotions, who are in fact knowledgeable about the areas they talk about, and it's him

coming upon us. And I think there's not enough of this in conservative media, by the way, to deal with the smart leftists, to defeat their argument, and also to elevate leftists on certain topics and issues when they're correct. There are real far left journos out there who have been some of the most ardent critics of the whole

Russia collusion nonsense. I mean, you will come across people that I think are wrong on ninety percent of things, but within that ten percent, they'll be saying that the you know, MSNBC and CNN for example, have made mockeries

of themselves on Russia collusion. We'll get into more of that later, but I do this is a bit of an aside, but you know, I don't like to just play the dumb the dumb Democrats here and just make fun of what a clown show most of the Democratic parties become because there are there are smart Democrats, and they can still win folks. They can still make compelling arguments. They can get over fifty one percent of the aggregate vote in a presidential election. Do not underestimate our opponents.

Do not underestimate them. But there was nothing less now that I've said that, there was nothing in that debate that you could look at and say, oh, that person is going to be really challenging for Donald Trump. That person is going to be able to defeat the incombent president of the United States. I'm not saying that means it can't happen, but as a deeply unimpressive field who has who has real momentum. Think back to the twenty

sixteen election. Early on, even Trump was a phenomenon. And if we're gonna say this, we're gonna be objective about this, you know, I know there's so much I feel like these days everyone's just oh this, tell everybody what do you think they want to hear. I don't like to do that here. I like to tell you what I think is true, and you tell me the same. That's why some of you, you know, like my impressions. Some of you don't. That's fine. But Obama was a phenomenon

when he was running. Let's just be honest about that. Defeated Hillary and everything goes. You know, there was a sense that this is a candidate, this is a person who has got something. Which are these Democrats? Who among the Democrats last time on that stage, has really got something. I mean, you have to say at this point it

might be Bernie And that's in scene. That's absurd. Although if you're if you're picking a sort of a dark horse candidate, if you're picking somebody to come from behind, and I gotta think, if you're asking me to pick a long shot right now, who might actually pull it? Off among the Democrat primary. I gotta think it's mayor Pete. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or

wherever you get your podcasts. I sent thirteen years ago. It was a mistake to give the president the authority to go to war if in fact he couldn't get inspectors into Iraq to stop at what's thought to be the attempt to get a nuclear weapon. It was a mistake,

and I acknowledge that, but right out. And the man who also argued against that war, Barack Obama, picked me to be as vice president and once we be kept will, once we were elected president, he turned and vice president, he turned to me and asked me to end that war. I know what it's like to send and a son or daughter, and like our colleague has gone to war in Afghanistan, my son for a year in Iraq. And

that's why I do it, very very reluctantly. That's why I led the effort, as you know, Wolf against Surgey tens of thousands of Trics in Afghanistan. Biden has a remarkable gift, and his gift is to think that a very long legacy of being on the wrong side of issues and being ineffective and pushing his side is somehow evidence of skill and wisdom. Biden, it seems to me, is really so dumb that he thinks that his failures

are evidence of him being smart. And when he talks about ending the war in Iraq, for example, that the way that that was done, the circumstances under which that happened with the Obama administration did lead, I mean directly to the rise of the Islamic State, which keep in mind, really was a Syrian entity that then swooped into Iraq, went through Mosul, and then we had that situation where you had the US have to launch airstrikes to prevent

a continued onslaught into deep into the Kurdish areas of Iraq by the Islamic State. That was a disaster, a disaster, and Biden points to this like somehow he knows what he's talking about, or he is the wise elder statesman here that will get things done. What does Joe Biden even really stand for. It's not clear to anybody who's being honest. Joe Biden is just whatever the Democratic Party wants at any point in time, he'll go along with it. Which way is the wind blowing right now? And how

does that affect the prospects of Joe Biden? A deep he's just a deeply unimpressive fellow. Oh and by the way, you know, you had Mike Pence, who Mike Pence said something funny. Mike Pence had a funny last night. Who would have thought, here, he's got it, you know, strutting stuff a little bit. Here you go, here's here's the VP play clip eight. You know, the choice in this election couldn't be clear, and the stakes couldn't be higher. Today we have a president who loves this country, who

stands by our military, our workers, and our freedoms. He never quits, he never backs down. He believes in you, and he fights for you every single day. And then you got this group of Democrats running for president and I heard they got another debate tonight. If it's anything like the other ones, those people are going to be standing so far on the left, I think that stage

is going to tip over. I think he's right. The Democratic Party because of the loudest voices within it, or the furthest left, the media is so much an appendage of the Democratic Party, or maybe the Democratic Party is such an appendage of the media that the echo chamber of journalists as left wing cheerleaders has really influenced I believe the platform that the Democrats now support. And oh, by the way, I see here talking about how leftists

sometimes are right. Michael Moore, who I think is really a lot of his positions are odious, and I think he's I think he's gross. I don't. I don't think he's a fellow who comes at things with good faith or good intentions. I mean, I could use much more colorful and salty language to describe what I think of Michael Moore, but we are on this is a family friendly show, so I'll just leave it there. But she even I see the headline and Drudge Warren stuck a

knife in Bernie's back. I mean, everyone knows, that's exactly what happened here. You know, everyone knows, And you know, I think this is gonna this is gonna go against her a little more. They they thought this would be the war on women. Remember Mitt Romney Binders full of women.

That was what they said about him. They took him, and they took a a completely understandable phrase he used about how much he wants to hire women when he was running for presidency and made it sound like he was collecting women on sheets of paper and locking them in a little canvas folder or something. I mean, it was it was just insane, but that became a tali haha, binders full of women. It was a talking point that

they used. And this whole war on women meme because Democrats create, i mean, identity politics is so central of them. They believe that a person's gender, skin color, ethnicity, religion is determinative in many ways of who of what that person's politics should be. So the Democrats do make these judgments and distinctions based upon superficial characteristics. But here we see that Warren thought that she could get the war on that, that she could create a war on women

via Bernie meme, and it did not. It did not work out. And it was also it was really a Candy Crowley moment between Warren and Bernie. There. The Candy Crowley moment you remember was the CNN moderator and between Trump and I'm sorry, between Romney and Obama back in

twenty twelve on Benghazi. They did Obama call it a terrorist attack, and no, it was kind of vague in general, and you know, down in the speech that he gave about Benghazi, it was, you know, these acts of terror, but it was generalized and he did not really refer to Benghazi as a terrorist attack. But even still, it's not the job of Candy Crowley to do the interpretation there. But she did exactly what Zucker and the rest of the CNN crew would want, which is help Obama. That's

the point, that's what they're really there to do. They go Obama look good. So this seemed like another instance of it. Because Bernie's not of the establishment in the way that the elites want him to be. I mean, I will give him credit for this, some of the Bernie bro supporters or lunatics and his ideas, his policy ideas are deeply troubling. I mean, here's just one example, by the way, and this is Bernie and an Elizabeth Warren.

They think this is so simple. They're just gonna They're just gonna say that prescription drugs cost X. Price controls are a destructive mechanism within any market right the moment you start saying the price is X, when it's really why you create because of that intrusion into the operations of the market, you create problems. You create problems, You create issues in the supply and demand, You create issues

of who's going to make this stuff. And pharmaceuticals is an excellent, excellent case study of this, because yeah, there are some You got this guy, what was his name, Screlly, who was buying up different patents for obscure but very important, you know, drugs that don't have a lot of usage cases, but for those people that need them, they're incredibly important and just jacking up the price. And you know, there is the same thing you can say about like war profiteering.

Sometimes times things are more important than than just the bottom line. But you've also got to understand, as I don't think Bernie and Warren do that the bottom line matters, or else you're not going to have the things you want. If the government came along and said, hey, it's wartime, you guys, you can't charge more than this amount of money for ammunition to make, you know, ammunition, you can't sell it for more the next amount of dollars. That

would create problems in the market. They said, all right, you're gonna make all you're gonna make this for us, and it's gonna be free for the government. Well, those places would go out of business right because that you can't do that. There's a limit to these what these price controls can get away with. With medicines. It costs over a billion dollars right now to take a drug from the R and D from the origins in the R and D phase all the way through to the

FDA has said you can sell this to people. There are some things where they'll have a case if it's necessary for you know, pediatric cancer or something that there are ways that they will escalate it through the process so some people can use it. But until it's really available at your pharmers, it's a cost over billion dollars.

And the fact that other countries don't respect the intellectual property rights of these pharmaceutical companies the way that we do in this country isn't evidence of how great those countries do things. They're getting a free ride off our back. Who's going to come up with do you want them me? I'm somebody. I want ciliac disease to be cured. I want the person who or the company that comes up with a cure for ciliac disease. To make billions of dollars,

the money's going to come from somewhere. And if they're not going to make billions of dollars, they're not going to spend a billion dollars, especially because the failure rate for pharmaceuticals, which we all look. We all want to know that there's that drug that when we really need it,

we've got it. Right when you've got some rare infection or some inflammatory condition or something, you you want to go to your dock and they've got some little magic script that they write out that they give you the pill that's going to fix you. Right, we all want that. Unfortunately, it doesn't always really happen that way. But if you listen to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren last night, I mean they beat up on arma and the rich people

and corporations, and of course there are excesses. I'm not saying the market functions perfectly. It's not a perfect market. It's not entirely it's not even close to a free market even right now. And you add in all the regulations and government distortions. But who's if you're not going to be able to make money doing this and your failure rate, which I don't want to give you the statistics on because I don't know offhand, but a vast majority of drug cases, or rather of drugs that they're

trying to develop don't work. That's just some cost now, just didn't work. Phase two clinical trials come back. Nope, sorry, I don't have it. So removing the profit motive from these companies or lowering the profit motive because it sounds good, we're going to make this drug free now. Look, insulin. There are some things that have been around a long time that should be off patent that companies play games with and they overcharge, and Trump is already trying to

do that though. See this is what they're not telling you. In the places where there are abuses, where we can all recognize that something funk is going on, there is room for action, but just to say that you're gonna with us, you know, the stroke of the pen. The drugs are going to cost X. This drug is going to be sold for this amount of money. That's what they did in Venezuela with consumer products, and that's why people are literally waiting in lines and can't get fresh

milk or toilet paper. I when I was in a Ruba a while ago, they said there are people who are showing up to Ruba from Venezuela to buy household items because they just could not get them in Venezuela, and it's very close off the coast. So I know it was a little bit of a digression there, But this is the problem you have with these individuals who don't understand or don't care to understand the workings of

a free market. And what Bernie Sanders is suggesting is disastrous for what would really what would really happen if he got if you were to get his way. And now you have to take very seriously what the ramifications would be, because Warren Sanders, they're looking for areas where this just becomes an executive action. They're just gonna say, you know, this is Obama's pen and phone routine. Congress won't act, so I will you know all you need

or enough people. And we also don't have a tradition of having our ideological side in the judiciary invoking universal injunctions against the presidency the way that they do against Trump. So our judges go all right, I mean, you know, maybe maybe we gotta let this thing play out a little bit. You know, it really is executive prerogative, even if we think that it might be a bit of an excess or you know, this is not something we should shove. Their judges, I mean, left wing judges are activists,

so they'll just say you can't do that. So we can't count on that same thing on our side. But there was nothing. I see your people saying clobish are actually did really well last night. It's not really all that surprising. There's nothing to look at here, and few as particularly new. We have to see how the shakes out in Iowa. I certainly hope that. I don't know, there's a part of me that wants Bernie Centers to

be the nominee. There's a part of me that wants Democrats to have to really present and you don't have to present and defend this lurch toward this jump towards socialism, and that becomes an inescapable national conversation. I'm not sure that it's better for us to allow them to evade accountability for this. I want them to have to say, yes, that's what we're going for. You're in the freedom hunt.

This is the buck Sexton show podcast. You ever noticed what Biden He's always go on the wrong state and then you're a great state of Iowa. Iowa, Yes, Iowa. Right now it's Wisconsin. Oh I meant Wisconsin. No, I didn't know I was in wiscons That's fine. How many times has he done that, by the way, lots of times he said it's great to be in the state of Ohio. No, sir, you're in Florida. Drum's right here. And Biden gets away with a lot of the immedia

just pretends that these are normal mistakes. These are normal mistakes, but they're really not. Biden doesn't have it. Biden is too old for this. Maybe Democrats refuse to accept that reality. Maybe Democrats refuse to deal with the truth of the situation and put him forward as their candidate. The guy's too old. He simply doesn't. He simply does not have it. But yeah, Trump had a rally last night. He had some funny lines from it, obviously, as he tends as

he tends to do. Democrats simply don't have anyone who can stand up in front of a crowd of fifteen or twenty thousand people and just riff for an hour, an hour and a half and get the crowd totally fired up and have memorable moments. And no, I mean, they just they they don't have somebody who can go toe to toe with Trump. And they know that, which is why there's such a hesitation right now for there to be a real true front runner, even though I know Biden's in the polls, but he's the he's the

default front runner. He's just Okay, I guess it's Joe Biden. I guess that's what it's going to be. And then he also made some jokes about that, and I you guys know that I hate recycling. I mean I legitimately and truly think recycling is the most annoying thing. It's not It's not nearly as helpful for the environment as people are led to believe it is. In fact, there's

plenty of reason. There are plenty of studies that show that a lot of recycling is bad for the environment by the time you've actually gone through the whole process.

But this is this is the reality of when the Democrats allow this climate change absurdity to get to a certain point, you're just you're just gonna deal with with annoying inconveniences in your day to day that are a reminder of what these petty little statusts are all about, which is making sure that you can't have the light that you really want because they think they're saving the planet.

Play play clips six here. But I'm also approving new dishwashes that give you more water so you can actually wash and rich your dishes without having to do it ten times, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten. Anybody have a new dishwasher. I'm sorry for that. I'm sorry for that. It's worthless. They give you so little water. You ever see it, air comes out so little water. So what happens You end up using it ten times and the plates that you take them out and do

them the old fashion way. Right, Just think about what's going on in say California, where now you have per person limitations on water usage in households in a place that, as a as a function of its geography and its natural resources, is among the most blessed corners of the entire earth. But they've got idiot liberals running the state without any opposition of any real kind from Republicans, and things just keep getting worse. You know, it takes a while.

You know, if you take over, whether you're talking about a state or a company, really bad leadership will destroy anything. I mean, libs can ruin any city or any state, but it takes a while. We're finally seeing that play out in California. And that's why someone like Trump comes in and says, you know what, I want you to be able to wash your dishes because I'm a normal person and understand things. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the

iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Do you guys all remember when Michael Avanadi was a hero of the resistance. I do. I remember there was a time when you couldn't turn on CNN or MSNBC without seeing his very you know, aggressive ball a theatrics on television, right. I mean, he was just constantly a presence on the

cable news circuit. I think he was on CNN more than any non contracted or contractually obligated contracted that's different, contractually obligated guest for a period of a month or two. Michael Avanati was so beloved because he was just vicious and nasty about the president and really was willing to go deep into the gutter to go after this president. He was so beloved by libs, by leftists, you know. Anderson Cooper used to have Michael Avonati on his show

all the time. The serious news people over at CNN, Jake Tapper took him very seriously. Oh, Michael Avanati, He's a lawyer who's really worthy of putting on television all these different Rachel Matt Avanati was something of a folk hero to leftists. He was the Robin Hood of the hashtag resistance for a while. And it turns out that he is, according to federal authorities, one of the scummiest

lawyers you could find anywhere. But we all already knew that, right Why would we already know that without even getting into the specifics of these charges, which I will in just a moment. And I'm sorry, I know that this might seem like buck, Why do we have to waste your time with Abanati? Because the people that are telling you to vote for Biden and vote for Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren is the savior of America or whatever.

The same people, the same news anchors that want to constantly wag their finger in your face, tell you Donald Trump is boorish, a philistine, disgusting, you know, a horrible person whatever it may be, a barbarian. That the same people that say that to you treated Michael Avenati very well. The same individuals who would say that someone like me is always as in the tank for tromp Oh, you know, never refuses to be honest with people. They thought that

Michael Avenati might run for president. That was being talked about that this guy, maybe Avana. There were articles written you can google, you'll see maybe Abnati is the guy that they need to beat Donald Trump. I mean, I think he might have a better shot than some of these Democrat candidates even still, but that's just a function of how terrible the Democrat candidates are. But we knew that he was a disgusting and dishonest fellow because he

was the lawyer. And you must remember this for people always want to talk now about the Stormy Daniels thing he did the president before he was the president, having fair with a porn star. You know, I mean, I leave I leave this to your own your own discretion and judgment. But that was what everybody was talking about at the time. You know, the President, as we know, has a he's an imperfect man and has a an interesting history when it comes to women and his relationships

with them. But he's not the first. Of course, with JFK it was all like, oh, he's just such a you know, it's just roguish charm and everything else. I mean, yeah,

with Trump, it's oh my gosh, he's a monster. But the more important of a Nati incident was always his willingness to try to use Julie Sweatnick as the final the final you know, shoe to drop or Domino to fall or I don't know, pick an analogy, the final last straw, the last straw for Judge Kavanaugh, Julie Sweatnick, who was a who was a visibly and clearly disturbed and deranged person, put on national TV by a whole bunch of different news outlets, of course, because anything to

destroy Kavanaugh was consider justified. Avanati was her counsel. He sat with her, He had conversations with her in much

greater detail than we even heard on TV. He had her sign a sworn affidavit alleging that Brett Kavanaugh was part of a secret gang rape ring that nobody ever heard of before while he was in high school, and that Luie Swetnick, who had graduated and was already in college, would go back to hang out at the high school parties where these gang rapes were occurring and never thought

to say anything to anyone ever about it. And Avanati believed her to the point that he would tie his professional reputation tour and would feel like it was okay to use these absurd, clearly defamatory allegations against Kavanaugh in a legal proceeding. Avanadi is really the modern Democratic Party, though. That's what you have to remember, the will to power, utter ruthlessness, do whatever you have to do, destroy the other side. There's no honor, there's no decency, there's no

fair play, there's no obeying of any rules. So in a sense, Avanati is really the distillation of the modern Left. Useful when he's useful, and they don't care what happens after the fact, you know, a pit bull for their side and nothing else matters. Well, the good news is not only did he probably remember hearing from people that were involved in the defense of Kavanaugh in DC talking to them that week when the when the votes were going to be cast by the s by the Senate.

Avanadi with Sweatnick may in fact have saved Kavanall's nomination because if you think Julie Swetnick is telling the truth, you're a moron. You're just not You're not. It is not possible to be an intelligent human being and know about what Julie Sweatneck's allegations were and see her interviews and think she was telling the truth. You're just you're not the dumbest person ever, but you're not smart. Not possible. But he therefore might have I think saved Kavanaugh's nomination

because then it was clear was a hit. It was a hit. Don't never for they always want to talk about Blasi Fork because you know, she cried, and she seemed a little bit more like, you know, sort of a little bit of a you know, believable in the emotional I mean, and she's also she's also full of it. Don't even get me started. But here's here's the problem. Now,

this is why I'm bringing this up right now. Afinati was at a discipline or hearing in California where they're doing the what is effectively the predisbardment proceeding of involuntary

inactive status as a lawyer. So this is the hearing where they're like, you're not really a lawyer anymore while this is going on, because oh, by the way, we're going to dispar you in the state of California's about to get dispart But he couldn't even finish that, my friends, without federal officers showing up to arrest him at that civil hearing about his law license. Left wing hero Anderson Cooper, Jake Tapper, Rachel Maddow's favorite lawyer for months, Michael Avanati

favor the best. It's gonna run for president. He's an amazing fellow. Here's from the charges, the unsealed charges against him. Uh, you know, the United States of America versus Michael John a naughty and just if you just look at the recitation of why they've picked this guy up, I'll just give this to you. This is from the kind of table of contents of the charges. Because they got a

big case they're bringing against him. There is probable cause to believe the defendant has committed federal crimes while on pre trial release. Mail and wire fraud that's one of them. Structuring that's another one. There is probable cause to believe defendant committed state crimes while on pre trial release. Defendant's violation of California law. Defendants violation of Washington state law. There are no conditions or combination of conditions that will

ensure the safety of the community. Defendant is a danger to the community. This is in if this isn't the federal filing that just came out while they arrested him. Defendant is unlikely to comply with the conditions of his release, and the issuance therefore of an arrest warrant for the defendant is appropriate. Who avanati, my, my, my, This fellow, this fellow is going to find himself has found himself

on the wrong side of the law for sure. But these are things that are very hard to you know, when you're cheating on when you're cheating on taxes, when you're defrauding clients, when you are lying to investigators all charges that the federal government has laid against them, when there's a case against you in New York, when there's a case against you in California. These are things that

either did or did not happen. They either have you on this stuff or they or they don't, and they tend not to bring these kinds of charges unless they've got you so CNN Hero, MSNBC Hero Resistance icon Michael Avanati is on the precipice of being disbarred and spending quite a bit of time in federal prison. Ge. They have some heroes on the left, don't they. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast

around hit Back Who. We're grateful that no lives were lost, and we will never downplay the serious of any attack on the United States or its forces. But judging from the type and intensity of the strike, the regime certainly must now understand well we will do if they ever again post risk to American lives. If rand escalates, we will end it on our terms. That, my friends, is a description of the new calculation that the Iranian regime has to make any time now they think about threatening

American lives. This is changing the red line. This now shows that there will be more severe consequences that the United States government under President Trump will take action against any Iranian, any Iranian government of shoal who is actively threatening the lives of Americans. That's a change, that's a difference from what had been the case on a bipartisan basis, stretching back for decades. And it's why the media has moved on from this Iran story quickly because Trump won.

Trump stared down the Mullas and won. He was right, the calculation was correct. That's where we are. Notice how for a few days it was Trump is reckless. Trump is horrible. Trump is terrible. He's leading us into war. It's a war crime. He's threatening war crimes. All of the criticism against Trump. How much criticism during that period.

Were you really hearing from the media about the Mullahs about what's going on in Iran, about their murdering of hundreds now coming up on a few thousand protesters in the last few months alone. Who did the journalist sound more upset about? Who did the journals shed more tears when they're talking about Trump or the mullets. You already know the answer, You already know what the problem is here with the way the journalists talk about this. There's

also this is this is stunning. There is new footage out that shows, I believe it or not, the Iranians they didn't shoot that airliner once. There is video. Wall Street Journal has it posted. Now it seems to show that they hit it with a missile one time, and then they hit it with a missile again, they hit

it again. I mean, unbelievably horrific, unbelievably incompetent. I can't imagine what it would be like to be on that you know, on that plane, on that civilian jetliner, in that moment when the strike happened, and then for it to happen a second time. The Iranians couldn't figure this out. Killed one hundred and seventy six people, and guess what, the Iranians lied about it for days. This is showing this is the nature of the regime that Trump is trying to stand up to, that they would kill and

they didn't just kill Iranians, they killed Ukrainians. They killed a whole bunch of Canadians. These are people whose families are never going to be the same. I mean, this is a major loss of life. How could they have to this question? But how would Iranians be so dumb? This isn't over, you know, this isn't in an area of active hostilities. There's not you know, you look at for example, what happened, and this was a terrible tragedy too,

but it was a slightly different circumstance. If the shootdown of MH seventeen, that flight that was shot was a Malaysian Airlines flight that was shot down over Ukraine. There were some differences there. For example, there were cargo planes that have been landing support for the Ukrainian military, and so the Russian backed separatists were trying to send a message that they couldn't use those, so they mixed up.

There were, but there were there was reason for them to think it was possible that it was an enemy aircraft. I mean, obviously it was a horrific mistake there too. In this case, this was a plane taking off from a civilian airport in Tehran, the capital city of Iran, and there's there's no there's no US incoming, there's nothing going on, and they shoot the plane once and then they shoot it again. The wonder the people are out

in the streets. Not only you know, it's the Iranian regime is not only vicious, the Iranian regime is incompetent. The people in charge. You have to remember this, they draped themselves and all of this ideology and about the revolution and death to America, and this is straight out of the old Soviet playbook too. It's all about the revolution.

It's all about, you know, the glory of Lenin or Stalin or whatever, slogans and statues and protests in favor of the regime in the street, you know, in marches and displays and pomp and circumstance. But the people that are taking for themselves power to make decisions that affect people's lives. The people that think that they should determine who gets, what gets made, where it goes, they're morons, utter morons. They're not accountable to the people. They're not

chosen by the people. Why would they be good at their jobs. Their job is just to do whatever the other idiots who have seized power want them to do so they can keep their job. It doesn't matter what happens to the people. They don't They don't care how

miserable and how oppressed the people are. They never do because they convinced themselves to justify I mean, if you are part of the regime, if you're a member of the IRGC, if you're a member of the Iranian regime's upper ranks, never mind, all the way up to the Guardian Council You don't care how much suffering the average Iranian goes through. It doesn't matter to you, because that's just the price you pay to support the Islamic Revolution

of Iran. That's just the cost of doing business. You know, you shoot a civilian airline round of the sky with one hundred and seventy six people. Yeah, it's a it's a mistake. But you know they're defending the Iranians against the Great Satan and against Little Satan Israel. Right, That's

that's the justification I'll give themselves. They are imbeciles. One of the real turning points in the Soviet Union was more and more people figuring out that the party bosses are the party bosses within the party, the Communist Party, not like there are more parties, but the little commissars, the little petty dictators running different areas of the bureaucracy with the government and control of so much, were complete and utter buffoons, self dealing, self interested, not good at

They're not even good at implementing their incredibly flawed plans, not even able to keep the trains running on time, while they were the ones making sure that the trainings were crappy and slow and Rickety in the first place, and that's that's what the Iranian, the Iranian youth are reacting to. You know, they're not the mulas, aren't even aren't even efficient tyrants. They're not even good at tyranny. Oh, they're good at oppressing people, but they're not good at

making all the decisions for those people. And you'd think there'd be opportunities here to tell that story more for journalists. You think they would care more about that than they do. But no, it was always about the whole dust up with the ram was really about getting Trump. For the journalists and what happens to the Iranian people. It was a deeply secondary, a deeply secondary concern. That's also a reminder as we sit here and think about you know,

everything is a question of degree when you're talking about governance. Okay, in Iran, people can't protest, there's no free press, and you can disappear in the middle of the night. You have no habeas corpus, no rule of law, no individual rights,

and the people in charge don't care. Here we don't yet have it like that, obviously, but do you think the idiot democrats in charge care that you know your dishes can't get washed that you don't have good light on your good light to read with at night because they have to use the light bulbs aren't as good. No, because they've got an ideological excuse for all the inefficiencies, all the stupidities that they inflict upon you. So it's

the same mentality. This is why government needs to be limited. This is why enumerated powers matter. You don't want the people, You don't want the imbeciles to be able to make more decisions that are absolutely necessary, whether it's in Iran or here. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. The Department of Justice was consulted, and frankly, you know, I don't think it

was a close It was a close call. I believe that the president clearly had the authority to act as he did on numerous different bases. Now their questioned whether the president was even allowed to do that strike, and they're they're going after Bar. There is a I think

it was in the New Yorker. There's a profile of Attorney General Bar written that you should be It's long and it's a little bit, a little bit dry, but it's a hit piece on bar and it tries to claim that he has a he's effectively a toady of the president, that his sense of the law is entirely part is in that they're just trying to tear this guy down with everything that can. Because I think that the Attorney General may have saved the Trump presidency, and

right rightfully so. But he may have saved the Trump presidency because he understood the game that they were trying to play with the special counsel. He knew that it wasn't Mueller, that it was Weisman, that Weisman was going to try to just smear and slime the president in every way that he could and just attach attach this ten things that maybe we're criminal. We can't charge them though,

but we're saying maybe they're criminal. We'll leave it to the Congress to decide trying to do this Alley you for impeachment. Barn knew exactly what's going on, so he just said, Nope, that's not how this that's not how this is going to go. Didn't bring charges. We don't see any basis for charges. Dunzo. The bar from John Matten. Just just wap it down. Just wap it down in the end zone. Don't don't try to freiser Mark Lows and I use I want to use more sports analogies

so people think I'm like a normal American. I know I play sports. I just don't watch enough professional sports. I know very much about these days. Um Anyway, there's a real effort on the left to defame and destroy Attorney General Bar It's a very sussful. He's actually a very wealthy lawyer too. He's done really well for himself, lives in a big house in McLean, has a nice family,

nice family life, you know, successful daughters. You know, this is the guy that you want to be your neighbor, although you'd have to be making a lot of dope because he's got a giant house in mcclan, which those of you don't know. McLean is like, oh, very fancy expense where it's where a CIA headquarters is. So I've spent a lot of time in McLean, Virginia driving around there and there's some very big houses. They hate Bar because he's very effective, he's very successful, and he knows

the games they're trying to run. So they put out this piece, and also Bars Catholicism comes up for a bit of a bit of open season on that too, and they say, they bring up Opu's day, and they make it seem like Bars some kind of religious zelat or extremist. I mean, they can try, but all this really is is a reminder that anybody who is effective at stopping the scorched earth campaign of the Democrats, anyone who understands that to be an effective defender of this administration,

you have to be a wartime conservative. You can't be a Mitt Romney, John McCain political go along to get along guy. Anyone who understands that it is going to come under a withering, withering assault. And that's what's happening with the attorney attorney general bar right now. All right, I haven't even gotten I know, I kind of went into a different direction to that because the impeachment thing I don't find quite as as exciting as I guess some other people do, just because I think that this

is I think it's ridiculous. I think that anybody who is being even a little bit honest about the situation knows that this is absurd. I mean, Pelosi gave a press conference this morning. I watched it before before the show, and she said, all you really need to know about Pelosi and the whole impeachment thing is this, this one line, this one charge. Producer Mark plate clip eighteen. Please on December eighteenth, the House of Representatives impeach the President of

the United States, an impeachment that will last forever. Since December eighteenth, there have been comments about when are we going to send the articles over? Well, we had hoped that the courtesy would be extended, that we would have seen what the process would be in the Senate. Short of that that, time has revealed many things since then, time has been our friend. No, that's the opposite of reality. Time is not a friend. But she said, the impeachment

will last forever. This is what I've been telling you all along. They're impeaching the president. So the president is impeached, so that you can say that, so that will be a fact. Remember, Richard Nixon was not impeached. People keep bringing that up to He knew that he was going to be, so he bailed. But now Trump is an impeached president. Right, he joins Clinton and Andrew Johnson and third time in history does anyone even really know why

he's being impeached. They're going to send over these articles about abuse of power and about obstruction specifically on the Ukraine issue. They didn't add more articles. That was thought

that that might that might happen. But here she is telling you what this is really all about, which is just to paint him with the brush of impeachment to stain him forever he's been impeached, which is meaningless because the way the Democrats approach this, if they really really don't like the president and they have a majority in the House going to impeach him, let's impeach him abuse of power. You could Oh, you could say that about any president, any president. Because said it about Obama, he

said about Bush, said it about Bush Clinton. I'm sure they'd come up with the way to say about Reagan Ron Contra. I mean, there's all the all the so many ways you can go without about this. Everybody's going to get impeached now. Democrats have and I really mean this, they have debased impeachment as a process. They have made this now a petty partisan tool, and they want us to believe it's something more than that. That's why when Pelosi goes, hey, the founder said, you know, go back

to the Earth. You know, George Washington and Thomas Payne. And she she had this whole thing where she started rattling off a bunch of the of the Founders, And I gotta tell you, Pelosi speaks of the Founding Fathers with all the reverence and familiarity of a space alien whose ship crash landed into America yesterday. This. Yeah, that guy, you know, Benjamin Franklin or whatever, you know, the guy from the Money, He totally would have liked this impeachment.

Like what I mean, if she's gonna constantly claim that this impeachment force is about the Constitution, I think she needs to do a much better job of at least pretending she has even a passing familiarity with the Constitution. That would be nice. I would prefer that this is like when I mean, the two funniest things you see Pelosi do is but she's she's all the Founding Father's

way of part of this. That's that's amazing. And then the other thing that she does that's that's pretty amazing is when she claims that she's really sorrowful, a sorrowful and prayerful about this when she can highly hardly gosh, I don't know why my words ability right now is not buck with the words not good. Um, she can hardly hide her glee at what is going on here. And that's the truth. That's the truth of what is happening. Um. They're already trying to tell us by the way, that

Hunter Biden is not irrelevant. Whitney. You know they want witnesses, but only the witnesses they want. It's not I it's gonna work that well. They named the seven, the Big seven, the impeachment managers. It's a shift. Nadler, Jeffries, you know a few others, same basic, same basic nonsense. Schiff and Nadler as the house manager, as the house managers for this. Here is Nadler, for example, telling us all that everything

we need to know about Hunter Biden. Of course, Play nineteen, the President betrayed his country by trying to extort the Ukraine by withholding three hundred ninety one million dollars in military aid that Congress had voted in order to get Ukraine to announce an investigation of a domestic political opponent. That's the allegation. Any witness who has information about whether that is true or not true is irrelevant. Witness. Anybody like Hunter Biden, who has no information about any of

that is not irrelevant witness. Any trial judge in this country would rule such a witness as irrelevant and admissible. Of course, betrayed his country. They love to say that, which is a horrific charge. Right. I mean that's effectively effectively saying that in the common parliance understanding of treason, I mean, that's what betraying your country is, right. I mean, the treason as a legal matter is giving aid and

comfort to the enemy. But treason as a as the way that we understand the terms to betray your country. This claim now is being made by Democrats that the president, by not giving money fast enough to Ukraine, a country in which we have some but pretty minimal interests, a country with which we are you know, we are not at war with Russia, we are not fighting. We don't have an active conflict going on with the Russians in Ukraine. But he betrayed his country by not giving money to

to Ukraine fast enough. I need to know how it's not a betrayal then of this country that Obama was too much of a whimp as commander in chief to give the Ukrainians the weapons they said that they needed. Didn't he betray his country too? Oh, it's because it's for personal gain. Obama didn't. Why do we think Obama didn't want to take the risk to give those javal and anti tank missiles to the Ukrainians because he didn't want the blowback at home of the Russians escalating and

thus getting deeper into this. And you know it was. Yeah, they every decision of president makes at some level you can tie back to his own interest. Trying to be a good president is in his own interest. This is ridiculous. This whole thing is a flatly absurd And you know, they're just using a lot of a lot of big words, a lot of weighty allegations, because this impeachment is a joke. It's a joke. It's not funny, but it's ridiculous. Here's Nadler saying that McConnell better do what we tell him

to do or else this is a cover up. That's the word you're gonna hear now Play twenty. The Senate isn't intended by the Constitution to conduct a fair trial the American people know, and in a trial, you permit witnesses, you present the evidence. If the Senate doesn't permit the introduction of all relevant witnesses and of all documents that the House wants to introduce, because the House is the prosecutor here, then the Senate is engaging in an unconstitutional

and disgusting cover up. Nope, sorry, Nadler, Now there's a disgrace disgusting. There are all these Democrats, they're just odious Democrats. But let's let's let's take a look at what he's really saying here. Um, it's the Senate is allowed to just do this the way the Senate wants to do this. He's claiming it's unconstitutional if the Senate doesn't do what they say. But guess what, this isn't a criminal proceeding.

The Senate gets to decide what the preceding will be, just as Adam Schiff in the House, the Democrat controlled House got to decide and control what the preceeding on that side would be. So they had one set of rules when Democrats had the votes, and now they have one another set of rules when Democrats don't have the votes, and they expect people people of any intelligence and any seriousness to take them seriously. I don't a well one of the thing is really going to happen here and

understand how how serious this though really is. I mean, Nancy Pelosi is suggesting, is suggesting that the president United States, and I'm sorry, not suggesting stating openly, not forget suggesting stating the president should lose his job, should be that the people who turned out and voted for Trump in twenty sixteen, they can't have the president they voted for for four years. And now they're even bringing up other

are completely extraneous things here too. Now now they're they're trying to throw in all but it's a cover up and that in Russia, Russia, it is utterly bizarre. It is absurd. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. And it's important to see that the president to know and putin to know American voter, voters in America should decide who our president is, not that or no Pluton voters, not Vladimir Prutin, should determine

the election. This is from a Speaker of the House. My friends still clinging to this Russia collusion, delusion fantasy. It is. We have to start drawing some firm lines here. One that I saw last night, for example, the debate they brought up fracking. In a ban on fracking, it is not possible to be an informed, intelligent person I know anything about the economy and the energy industry and think that a total ban on fracking in this country

is a reasonable or good idea. It's not possible to think that and be smart to know what the heck you're talking about. It's completely insane to think that's a good idea. Okay, Pelosi repeating that Putin could determine our election. It is not possible to be a serious, fair minded person and believe that Vladimir Putin determined the twenty sixteen election or could determine the next US election. It's not possible. If you still cling to that, you have a problem.

You're either not very bright or not very honest, or a combination thereof. This isn't a oh but they have their opinion. I have my opinion. And this isn't chocolate or vanilla or god forbid, strawberry ice cream. This is just reality versus unreality, truth versus falsehood. Vladimir Putin did not determine the last election. Nancy Pelosi bringing this up and pretending that in some way he may have determined

the last election. To use this smear continuously is just on just another data point the Nancy Pelosi is a deeply dishonest person, and that this whole thing has gotten just disgusting the way the Democrats are approaching it. We're an election year. Beat Trump, beat him, Let's see what you got. He's such a terrible president. Meanwhile, they keep saying he's terrible. Guys, what's so terrible again? The economy, the huge, bloody, costly war we're in. What's what's the

terrible thing with Trump? Again? I need someone to come up with what's so awful? Oh, he said a mean thing three years ago that Libs don't like. That's what I'm supposed to be so worried about. He calls out journalists. He's right, what he calls out journalists in't the worst journalism needs to be. You know, nuke from orbit just so we can all be safe, just so we can be sure. It's a line from aliens. Metaphorical. Okay, journalism isn't a person, it's a it's a it's a profession.

Oh but cocaine, Mitch understands what's going on? Play Fi play fifteen. Last weekend on television, the speaker bragged that this president is impeached for life, regardless of what the Senate does, regardless of what the Senate does, as if the ultimate verdict or a start of an afterthought. Likewise, Senate Democratic leader recently said that as long as he can try to use the trial process to hurt some Republicans reelection champs this quote, it's a win win. That's

what this is all about. The Democratic leader just laid it right out there in case anybody had any doubt. Yeah, notice how what the House does. We're all supposed to care a lot. And it's really a rhetorical game. Oh he was impeached. Well, when the Senate does its thing, he will be cleared, exonerated. There you go. What else is there to say? The Senate is supposed to have

every bit as much authority in this process. We should treat the Senate with all the solemnity that Pelosi is wanted us to treat the House, even though the House deserves the Democrat controlled House deserves nothing but our complete and utter contempt because what they've been doing is so contemptible. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Special treat for all of you.

Our buddy and my fellow. The first host, Jesse Kelly is with us now. He's the host of the Jesse Kelly Show. He's got his own showdown in Houston. He's on the first on Pluto TV channel two forty eight, and we have things to talk about, mister Jesse Kelly. Good to have you on the program, Sir, It's good to be here in the flesh man. So let's just

let's just hop into something right away. Red meat is very expensive in New York City, and it's it's a special thing when someone else is purchasing that perfectly charred meet for your consumption. So I wanted to I want to just lead with I appreciate that you will make good on your bet with regard to Pelosi and the articles of impeachment as soon as possible, because I might go tomahawk, Jesse Kelly, I might not even might not even just be ribby. We're talking bone and ribby that's

gonna be like a seventy dollars steak. I hope you're aware of this. It is the problem. Yes, I'm aware of it. And here's the issue, because I don't think you're perfectly aware of the situation. I owe you a sneak for losing our bet with Nancy Pelosi. I owe you a sneak for at least two other things that I can think of, just favors that you've done me. I'm this is no exaggeration. I'm four or five steaks and that I owe you at this point in time. And now I'm starting to look at my bank account

and thinking I even afford to meet Buck again. I don't even know what I do here. But yes, obviously it's throwing ahawk. You got kids too, so I know you gotta get them like the little mini air Jordan's and stuff. So we'll just we'll just we'll do one steak. But it looks like the one steak covers at all, Jesse. But it looks like they articles of appeachment are are

going to get trends transmitted after all. But now let me ask you for real, as somebody following this very closely, I saw these press conference this morning, and I just

cannot imagine. I cannot imagine you are someone who is not a staunch Trump hater or someone who's a real Trump defender, Right, if you're somebody who happened to be in the middle, and you just look at this impeachment process, I don't know how it's possible to come away from going to think anything other than the Democrats look like utter buffoons. But I don't really mean, well, the pool numbers say that's what happened, but the poor numbers say that.

I mean, look, the Democrats aren't stupid. Well, I take that back, they are stupid. They've been polling independence, They've been pulling Russ bells sweet voters throughout this process because it's all about the twenty twenty elections. And they've had polls where they've published, and they've had secret polls where they've tried to keep it quiet, impudent, and they have taken a beating with Rust Belt independence throughout this process.

It has been the worst political miscalculation I have ever seen in my entire lifetime, which is why I always believed, albeit stupidly, I always believe that Nancy Pelosi actually wouldn't send it at all because the Democrats need this thing to stop. They needed to stop. It has been a disaster for them. And you're right the press conference today,

even today, they couldn't be on message. That's up there talking about we have to impede him more, helped cheating the election, when the impeachments nothing about the elections that it is awful. You have Nancy Pelosi who cannot even get through a sentence and a lucid manner anymore, and no reporter wants to address this as if it's not a story that the speaker the House might be mentally degenerating.

It's amazing what's happened at that part. I just you mentioned the Russia, Russia, Russia stuff, which has come back into fashion for Democrats. I mean this was just in the last twenty four hours. Representative shift A Prouser Mark, would you play a clip eleven please? Certainly he looks like they're at it again, and with nine towards helping this president. We all have to announce any further meddling

in our elections. Americans should decide American elections. Americans do decide American elections, and anyone who thinks that Putin's deciding our elections just watches too much. Rachel Maddow, I don't know what else to say. That's the funny thing about it, bug. I mean, honestly, if you get past all the Twitter noise and Adam shifted is lying about it than Nancy Pelosia. I believe she called him Vladimir Plutin today. It was

just kind of strange. But if you get past all that, all Trump has really been accused of, or all Russia has been accused of six Trump assign all Russia has been accused of is running some Facebook ads. I mean, and there are people out there because of the Democrat Media Alliance's messaging for the past three years. There are people out there who, seeing Vladimir Putin low crawled into voting booths and changed votes for Donald Trump from Billary Clinton.

In the last election, Russia ran a few Facebook ads people. That's all. Yeah, And there tense here. Seems very clear that they have learned nothing from the Mulla report. They have learned nothing, you know, none of that matters. Just bring up Russia again and Democrats will think that there's some really big here. Anyway, We're you're not on the same page on this one. I just wanted to kind of get your oh, and I also want a quick

reaction from you. First of all, did you watch and this is I'm not trying to call you out because I mean I missed the first like twenty minutes of it. Did did you watch the debate last night? Okay? For one, that is calling me out because I'm embarrassed to say I did watch this one. I have not watched a single Democrat debate. Also the highlights outbuild the people and all all that was said, but I've been avoiding them.

But now that the field is nailed down, I was like, yeah, the two minit, maybe the knives will come out to night and whatnot. Maybe there's something interest single happened and it was a disaster. Not a single one of those people one even come close to competing with Donald Trump,

not one who had the best night. For you, I mean, if if you if you just looked at that, apart from everything else that those candidates have said and done up to this point, if you're just saying, okay, I gotta pick you know, if you were a paid Democrat consultant, which I know you know, you'd have to hit the bottle really hard at night just to sleep. But if you were a paid Democrat consultant and you had to pick one just based on the debate performance last night,

who would it be? Joe Biden? Joe Biden. People think that other people, you know, we we all focus. You and I both did. Everybody does this. It's human nature. This sound bid or this moment you know when you think, oh, that was the moment they won that debate, or that was the moment you lost the debate. Joe Biden is in the league. Joe Biden is the clear front runner

still at the thing xact moment. If the other candidates are going to continue to have public debates and not go after Joe Biden, and Joe Biden is going to win every one of them. Nobody went after Joe Biden last night. So Joe Biden. I don't care about Bernie saying is you know, comming lines. I don't care about Pete Badug or whatever its name is. Any debate where Joe Biden does not come out bleeding. Joe Biden won. Now, I also want to ask about nineteen seventeen, the movie

that you and I both saw. I saw them my birthday. I actually went with my family, which is kind of an intense birthday movie. But I wanted to see it and it was out. I know you've just recently seen it. It's nominated for a bunch of stuff. First, we've put aside the nominations and all that nonsense for a moment. Just what do you what do you think about this World War One movie? Well, I should qualify this by saying I am a World War One I know you are.

I'm a World War One three. I consumed everything I can on it. There's a hardcore history podcast on it's called Blueprint for arm Again. That's seriously like twenty hours long. I'll read every book I can. I just I love World War One. I find it to be an infinitely fascinating conflict and this movie did it justice man, and it was. It was different than other war movies in that, you know, there weren't a bunch of you know, cheap scenes. You know, you can throw in cheap scenes for a

quick gas from the audience. But you felt like you were you felt like you were a World War War on soldier walking from this place to that place. That I don't want to give lay too much, as I hope people are still going to watch the movie. But you it felt real, man, and the intense moments were

extra intense because of how real baby did it. I was so far away impressed what you Yeah, No, absolutely, I thought that the you know sometimes when whenever there's a movie that has a has a ploy to sell it, I mean, for mind, the one that comes a mind for me is everyone's like, oh, Avatar, you have to see it in three D. It's life changing. I'm like, it kind of made me want to vomit. And the movie is terrible and it's like COMI propaganda and James

Cameron hasn't done anything good since Aliens. But anyway, you know, and this time it's because it's all one shot, right, there's no breaking from that one shot in the entire two hours plus of this movie. I thought, oh, is this just gonna be a gimmick effectively? Right? Is this the gimmick that? But it actually I agree with you. It's almost like it because of that first person perspective that you're in the whole time. It feels like you are traveling along with this guy on his mission, and

did add to that sense of intensity. It really took on the feeling of like a first person shooter, except you were just watching you weren't you know. It wasn't like some some corny action thing. You're a first person shooter just hoping you weren't going to get shot. It is so funny brought that up, because that's the first thing I thought when I heard, Oh, it's all one shot.

I rolled my eyes and it's not. Okay. We finally have a World War One movie and some fancy schmancy Hollywood directors get to ruin it by trying to be a special butterfly and do it different than everything else. But you're right, and to explain it more shotting, because I gess some people they may not realize that they're not cutting to this guy's space in that guy's face, and then you're zooming over to this part of the

battle and that part of the battle. Cameras are surrounding these guys on this mission, and they're walking with them the whole way like that. I don't know how the actors did it, buck I mean, clearly they had to have cut scenes at some point. I don't know if they didn't, but it was it was a great movie. Experience. And I'll tell you I hope that this is about a bunch of movies. Highly recommend people see this in the sea. I have a feel in the movie theater

experience with adds something extra. Yeah, and the set designs incredible. I mean the production value. They spent over one hundred million dollars on this movie. And you can tell from from just the way I mean the the the production value that you see on the screen. You know, Jesse, everyone thinks for you now as a as a radio host host on Pluto TV the first channel through forty eight of course, um, and you're also a former marine. If I have to ask you for is this is

this in top ten? And this is a tough one. I mean, I didn't we didn't coordinate this before. And is nineteen seventeen for you a top ten all time war movie? Oh, no question, it's it's honestly, it's probably top five. I mean it was just because honestly, and I have it's so real and it really I mean it. You know, all of these people it's been the war. It brings the things back for you, not the terrible way,

but it does. But it gives you that feeling of this is how these guys lived right down again and again. I'm not going to give away ending major right down to him stabbing his hand in barbed wire like and that's that would be a minor nothing seen in most movies. But the way they did this, and you saw it and you just thought to yourself, oh that it sucks. Now his hand is going to hear the rest of the movie there and it? Did you know? I just

had added, No, I don't want to. I don't want to also force you to make something too on the spot here for us, but I you know, so we're not going to go in order. But if I ask you for five of your top ten five all of your top ten greatest warm movies of all time, what do you got for us? Man, I've got something. Gosh, I've got some weird ones in there. Oh man, I've stop ten war movies. Uh. Platoon is on everybody's shortlist. It's also on my shortlist, There's no question about it.

I hate that sound like my grandpa, But Dirty Doesn't is still on that list. That's a great movie, dude. And I don't even like old movies. I'm not one of these people who hate Oh you have to see you know, one Flaw over the Cuckoo's Nest, and though Dirty doesn't, is absolutely on that list. Uh, probably Saving Private Ryan only you gotta put you gotta put Saving Private ryant on the world. Ye, come on. The Normandy

experience has gotta be on there. And this last one, I don't know if most people have heard it, heard of it, or seen it, or even really call it a war movie, even though I would. It's called start, it's with Val kilm Or, it's called Spartan, And I actually think, and I may be wrong about this, I think Peter Jackson is the one who made it the same Peter Jackson who made you know, the Lord of the Rings movies. Most people have not seen this movie Spartan.

But Val kilm Or did extensive special Forces training before the movie, and he even talks like those guys, and it is it is one of these people have not seen it is awesome, one of thout paper movies that I've never I've never even heard of that movie. So you're you're your list, I gotta say, has some has some surprises of interesting stuff. Do you have asked, because we brought this up, have you seen Master and Commander

with that with Russell Crowe, that movie is horrible. Please go, Oh my gosh, Jesse, Kelly, we were doing so well today, we're doing so well. You don't like Master Commander. I don't even know. Now, what are you gonna tell me next? You don't like black Hawk Down either of me? Jesse. We we're gonna have to post lists on Facebook and cross reference and both agree and then make fun of, where necessary, each other's choices on the top ten All

time War movies list. I can't believe you'll like Master Commander. Some members of my audience right now are They are throwing their powdered wigs on the floor and discussed with you. No, I don't like Master and Commander. And on top of that, I love the Solid Ship, the Age of Exploration. I love that type of battle. I love that era. But I thought it was criminal. You could take Russell Crowe and it's flading like that and make a movie that

freaking slow and boring. And I'm judging you right now, and we're absolutely doing that. We gotta have dueling, dueling top ten war movie lists. And before we let you go, Jesse, we got one more thing. Um, there's some exciting news on Pluto TV channel two forty eight the first. I'll let you make the announcement on my show. Why not go for it? Oh yeah, we are adding the very own Data Lash on our show right here on the first or on our channel, I should say, on the first.

That makes a lineup. Now, a buck Stext and Data Lash, me and Mike's Later. That is quite a line up, I'll tell you that much. The first is shape enough to be appointment to Yeah, I gotta say, I actually like everybody who's on the first. So this is a rarity I can tell people in the media game. It's a rarity that you get a bunch of different personalities together and there's not at least one person that you're like.

I mean, you know, maybe they decide that they want to just open a little sweet shop somewhere and not do this anymore. So I'm very happy that we've got we got you, we got Mike's Later, and now Dana Lash. Everybody. Dana Lash has joined the mix. If you have not already, download the Pluto TV app channel two forty eight the first. Also check out my man Jesse Kelly's podcast. He is a very funny and very insightful individual, despite the fact that some of the warm movies he likes, or actually

some of the warm movies he hates, are amazing. But we'll leave it at that for now. We'll continue this feud in the future. Mister Jesse Kelly, great to have you, sir. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I promise I'm not going to spend a lot of time talking about the Royal family in the UK on this show and the trials and tribulations. Good heavens, what's going on? Are we? Are we losing some members of the royal family? Oh no, excuse me, Reginald. Reginald,

bring me my tea. My throat is feeling rather dry because I'm so anxious about what's going to happen here. Where are the servants today? The royal family? What's going on here? M Yeah, there's the whole Meghan Markole and Prince Harry thing that's everyone talking about. And I should have known this, but now now we're being told that this is this is a result of racism. That's why Megan Markle no longer is not comfortable in the Royal family.

I don't even I don't know or care enough about the royal family even assess why this is happening, but I found this fascinating. An expert on racism and race relations went on the BBC doctor Shola Moss shag bomb memo, shog bam me moo, yeah, chuck bama moo. I think I got that right. She wanted to tell folks about

what racism really is. Play clip for producer Mark and I'm not a racist, and I understand that for a lot of people who are triggered about the truth of racism, they can't handle the truth, and because they can't handle the truth, they would look to displace to distract. I am not anti white. It being anti racist means being anti white. There's just no correlation. That makes no sense.

And the fact that not just me, for a lot of other people, including white people, have called out racism, not just within the context of what's happening with Harry and Megan, but that it is a cultural issue in the United Kingdom tells you that it's something that people are really uncomfortable about talking, really uncomfortable talking about it.

I feel like I can't speak to the UK context of this, but we have to talk about race and racism in this country so much that it feels like it's it feels like it's been mandated from on high. I feel like this is a conversation we're constantly having play club five. I find it quite interesting that people are more outraged about the so called race card being played than being outraged by racist behavior. It begs the

question what kind of society are we? Why is it difficult for you to understand except that it's also your responsibility and the fact that a lot of people, like myself, there's black people, I think minority are done with having to bear the burden of not only nat oppressed by racism, then having to defend ourselves from the racism, then having to explain what that racism to people who perpetuate the racism, and then be at the brunt of the denial from

the same perpetrators that our lived experience of racism doesn't exist. People. Yeah, we're done with that. That's right. You can be totally you're racist, even if you don't do anything wrong. If you object to that, that is in itself racism. And people who only want to talk to you constantly about racism are sick of talking about racism because it's too much of a burden. I'm glad we cleared all that up.

Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Buck turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call, Roll call, but first a little bit of housekeeping. We gotta code. We got a code read via the audience for producer Mark over here, producer Mark, Yes, where

is Clemson located? Producer Mark, I have learned that's in South Carolina. It's kind of awesome to be fair. I'm not a college football guy. We're in New York. There's no college football team anywhere near here. Rutger stinks. Yeah, I mean, yeah, we've got basketball a little bit with college, but not really. You're I mean, you got a ranger's hat on right now. I'm a hockey guy. I'm a baseball guy like the NFL, but we don't. I mean the culture of New York, we don't have a college

football team. So well, it's okay, that's all right. Producer Mark MAYACALLPA. On this one, A lot of people have pointed out there I missed. I was thinking of Auburn rival with Alabama, not Clemson, that I would have that. Actually, I think I didn't know about Auburn um. So I'm glad that we Glad we've established this. I admit my mistake. When your mistakes, it's fine. A ton more about sports than you do. That is accurate. But yeah, we had to clear that up because some people were like, what

is going on in the Freedom Hunt? I'm sure every message you read is about here we go. Let's see what we got here? Uh, Sandy? First up? This is on Facebook dot com, Slashboxxon. Hey Buck. Now, I'm not an OSS member, I do remember the early days before your show was three hours. Thank you for keeping us safe and warm at night. You are the only show I subscribed to and recommend you to friends often. As a I thought maybe you were going to escape this

with producer Mark. As a Clemson graduate. I want to let you know Producer Mark, that the Clemson University's in South Carolina, we played football the original Death Value Stadium. I love your show and with you, Mark, all the best. That was a very nice one. That was a very supportive. She likes you. She's on team Mark. You know, some Team Brandon's about to chime in, So there's gonna be some Team Brandon today. It's okay, though, it's okay, but yep,

it happens. It happens. Daniel, Hey Buck. I love the show and it is the one podcast I try never to miss. I want to let you in on a Vince Vaughan movie that I'm pretty sure you haven't seen and will change your mind about his range. It's called Return to Paradise and co stars Joaquin Phoenix, not Vaughn playing himself at all, and his pure drama and excellent film. You should check out Shields High Well, Daniel, thank you. I I've never even I've never even heard of that.

I've never heard of that movie, so I can't comment on it. All I can comment on Jesse Kelly is a great man. I really do like Jesse Kelly a lot. I cannot believe he trashes Master and Commander like that. I mean, we're gonna have to ward. This is a feud that's going to extend for quite some time now. But anyway, The Dirty have you seen The Dirty? Dozen. I've never heard of that. I mean, I'm sorry, I've never seen it. I've heard of that one. Matthew, here

we go, Buck. I listened to you through Spotify. I hope you get to see your ratings through Spotify the same way you do with radio and Pluto TV. I discovered your show when an ad play while I was listening to Sean Hannity. I've been a huge fan ever since. Granted that was a few months ago, but I plan on being all through season four and beyond with you. I still like Hannity while I'm waiting for your show to update. His interviews with higher ups are interesting, but

you cover broader topics and you're actually a pretty funny guy. Thanks. A question that has been rattling around in my brain for a while is in regards to Andrew Yang and more recently Elizabeth Warren, in respect to their plans, Yang with his one thousand dollars a month and Warren with wiping out student debt. It seems to me that that is less a campaign ideal and more just an attempt outright to buy your vote. What do you think you up the great work? North Carolina has got your back

well Matthew, thank you for the very kind note. It's great to hear you heard about me from listening to the Hannity podcast and now you're listening to the buck Sexton podcasts. So thank you so much. And yeah, the show is very different is you know. We do very few interviews here and have far fewer guests because I always have a lot of things I want to say

to you guys. As for the buying of votes, I mean, yeah, but you could always say that, I mean, Matthew, I think that's true, and it seems a little bit more obviously true insofar as the buying of votes with cash in this case is not through some welfare program. It's not something that anybody would look at and say, oh, well, you know, it's it's like, in this case, it feels almost like you're getting a check sent to you for

a vote. But you know, that's kind of what happens with a lot of the welfare states as it exists. I mean, people are getting money, although in this case everyone gets some money. It's just a little different. I mean, I see what you're saying. Also, Andrew Yang is not going to become president, so it's never going to happen. So that's also something we should keep in mind here and Warren wiping on student debt. Yeah, that's a payoff. But a lot of things are pay off the voters.

And look what Trump is doing with farmers as a result of the trade tensions with China. People would certainly claim is a payoff, and they would be not you know, they wouldn't be crazy, wouldn't be silly for them to do so, Matthew, thank you so much. Great to have some new some new folks listening on the podcast. Our podcast numbers are going up, up, up every month. By the way, I'm gonna have my friend Ben Weingarten in tomorrow and Friday and Monday for me here on the show.

So you got a few days of Ben, and that's the biggest break I'm planning on taking from the show until the election. So just know that that's the idea right now. And Ben'll do a great job. He's already lining up all kinds of fantastic guests and we're looking forward to having him in here and hanging out. Jason Clemson and Alabama. You guys are killing me. Jason, Yeah, man, I I gotta say you're You're right, So we producer market and producer Buck had a well producer Mark and

host Buck had a little wampwomp yesterday. I mean I even should have probably caught that one. He also sent me a photo of Pensacola Beach, which looks really nice. If I'm looking for a low key beach with beautiful sand, huh, interesting Pensacola Beach. That's my thing. I just I love beaches.

I can't handle a beach where there's um. I can't handle a beach where there's too many people on the beach, Like when you see these these photos are like Rio de Jannarro and everyone's in the water and you're like shoulder or shoulder with everybody. I like to stay away from crowds at beaches. So you got to find how we find where that stuff is. Wow, I'm trying to skip. Okay, I'm gonna skip. We have we may have gotten more messages here from people angry about the clubs and thing.

Why do you think I told you in advance? We have to address it. Yeah, that's a thing that happened. Hey, Buck, Gary and Shannon on sixty four KF I have a huge list of amazing hangouts in La. Love the show shield Sigh. All right, thank you, Angela. I'll have to check that out. I got a pretty busy schedule and I'm out in LA. But if I get some time to go see some cool things, I will definitely do so. John, there were women in uniform in World War One, research

the Hello girls who were the telephone operators the front lines. John. I know there are women that took part in the war, and we weren't trying to minimize that, but there were not women running across no man's land with rifles with bayonets on them, trying to storem enemy trenches. So that's what we really and that's if you see the movie, you'll see that. That's all that. That's all there is. There's no like back in the rear with the gear stuff.

You're on the front line the whole time, moving with the front line. So yeah, American female switchboard operators in World War One, the Signal Core female telephone operators unit. Interesting, I got, John, I didn't know about that. I can be honest. I'm gonna check that out. Kyle four row call, Well, thank you for specifying. What's up, Buck, I've always wondered why legalizing marijuana is considered a left wing or liberal argument. It seems like more of a conservative libertarian idea of

individual freedoms with less government overreach. And not only that, but it's a pro small business stance as well. A lot of the businesses that have opened up have been wildly successful. I just nu understand why Republicans are so scared on this issue. Kyle. A few things here. I would say. First, if you're going, you can take a position that I think is very much conservative about marijuana that would result in the at least the limits nation

of federal law that makes marijuana llegal. And it would take you all the way back to the Supreme Court case the origin of so much federal overreach. The Supreme Court case then is Wickered v. Philburn, and in Wicker v. Philburn, it was decided that someone who even sold wheat within his own state, because wheat is a cross state product,

it affects the price of wheat in other states. And therefore, even if the wheat is for your own consumption, because you would not be engaging in commerce within your own state, that could affect commerce in other states. The interstate commerce clause says that they can regulate wheat that you're growing for yourself, which is stunning. Even if it's not in interstate commerce, it is considered to be a part of

interstate commerce. And under that very expansive and very wrong headed interpretation of the Commerce Clause, you now have the federal government able to involve itself in effectively whatever the federal government wants to involve itself in as far far too much of that to be sure. As for legalizing marijuana, just as a as an idea, I you know, there's a very it's very hard to make the argument to me that marijuana should be illegal while alcohol should be legal.

Both are substances that have you know, health effects. We just are socially much more inclined to be accepting of the downsides of alcohol. Um. But that's that's really where I come to. And and then also you look at the realities of prohibition and what they have been for marijuana and what they were for alcohol from the you know whoever it was nineteen twenty something to nineteen thirty something.

So yes, there you have it. H We'll see though, I mean, the real argument would be that the real argument for me would be that it's really more dangerous then people realize. Steve Rights buck Ster, you have the best show on radio. Steve, you have fantastic taste in radio shows. You just said that miss McConnell should just shut the impeachment hearing down without any witnesses. It occurs to me that the Democrats have strategized this out already.

If the Senate does that, Schumer will say Trump has something to hide if witnesses are allowed to be called. The house managers have that covered. Two. Everything is geared toward November, Steve Oss and you rock well, Steve, thank you so much for the kind note. Yeah, well, the Democrats are going to have a line of attack here no matter what. If you don't bring the witnesses, there

will be a line of attack. If you do bring the witnesses, they will seize upon some aspect of the witness testimon and say, ah, see, the Senate was unwilling even when presented with the truth. The vote based upon the truth of these witnesses. So you can't avoid that, you can't escape that. But nonetheless, so yeah, I think I still stand by my sense that that McConnell should just take this and just he should just take the football and spike it say nope, we're done. It's been real.

Exonerate and then just have Trump tweeting exonerated in all caps every day for like a month and just go without that'll it'll trigger the Libs and it'll give us the counterpoint to what they're really trying to do, which is all about messaging for the twenty twenty election. We're

aware of that, we understand that. So that's where we're at, all right, skipping past all the helpful reminders about about the geography of Clemson, oh Man producer Bark, you know, the good news is as long as you don't, you know, mix up uh Wayne Gretzy with Mark Messier, you know, I think we can forgive you. I'm honestly shocked. Look at that, though, right, that was pretty good. You struggled.

It seemed like, yeah, the first one's easy. I mean, yeah, yeah, but I remember he was the best ranger for a while when I was growing Mark MESSI yes, yeah, he was like the super well known ring injury. He brought a cup to New York and a no big deal. Oh we did, really? Yes, really you didn't notice a parade in Manhattan? No, you lived in Manhattan. It probably went past my apartment. I don't even realize. Yeah, all right, Beth, Right, it's just found you on Pluto. I've seen you on Fox.

Was throw the Fine your show on the first yesterday. It was the first time I checked out Pluto. I've been searching for a substitute for Fox. During the day. We'll watch faithfully each day. Love your show from Beth Well, Beth, thank you so much. I really appreciate that. Please, please do spread the word. Tell people they can watch us

during the day. We got Dana Lash in the mix. Now, Jesse Kelly, Mike Slater, more fantastic conservatives, young, vibrant, fiery, principled, funny conservatives will be joining the line up here on Pluto TV channel two forty eight, the first in the months ahead, and we're gonna put on some really good stuff for you. So I think you're really good. You're We're gonna like it. Tell people spread the way. It's free.

You download the app every it's free. There's no there's no subscription, no cost, no nothing for you to be watching us. On the first on channel two forty eight, Dennis Buck I found that insurting that there wasn't more comparison to Trump taking out solomany As to win. The USA shot down Admiral Yamamoto's plane in nineteen forty three. Really enjoy the show, shields high, Dennis writes, Dennis, You're yeah, we we shot down a general's plane and he died.

So generals are combatants, folks. I feel like we don't really think about it. Used to be the general was on the horse with everybody, you know, with everyone else around him. And if you got through enough of the other soldiers, enough of the foot soldiers, you know, the cavalry or whatever, you get to the general. Guess what. The generals are combatants. Unless he surrenders in time, he can be he can be killed. I mean, this is just because he got four stars on your shoulder doesn't

mean that you're not a combat right. I mean there's a reason why you know, officers, you know, even very senior officers carry weapons in war zones. A very good point, though people forget about the Yamamoto shoot down. Let's see here, Vincent, right, hey Buck, it sucks about California's insane water fines. In a totally unrelated subject, A fun experiment is putting a large neo neodium meum neodymium. I already know what that is. Magnet neck. I am ron burgundy next to metering devices.

It's like freezing them in time. Godspeed, CALLI conservative shields High. Well, thank you, Vince. I didn't know about that, but I could definitely check that out. Peter Wright steer back. I'm a fairly new listener, and I really enjoy your show. That being said, I have been missing your German accent lately. It is my absolute favorite and I can't stop laughing once you launch into it. We need Markel to step up and start meddling in our elections. I enjoy most

of your other impressions as well. Otherwise, very good stuff. Thanks for the incident entertainment. She'll say, Well, Pete, I'm so glad Peter, you enjoys the Angler because she enjoys telling you what to do all the time, all day long. Oh are you going to be using that light bulb that endine has too much energy? I don't think so.

Not an angler's botch No, not allowable. Make sure you tell everybody's that Angler is part as a box exton sean they s your download it or else Schnell download It's a box exton show she'll tie