The Left Wants This Border Crisis

over the world, things happen. We're gonna break down this border fiasco for you because it has enormous implications for the country, for politics, and then of course Biden forgetting

the Secretary of Defense's name. I mean, I don't know how much more of the cognitive decline has to be a thing that we all see before we can talk about it without being told that we're a bunch of big meanis we're being bad people about this and the one point nine trillion dollars of just larded pork spending unbelievable. But you know, first I want to talk to you about censorship on social media and what you can do about it. You see, the left really likes to silence

people like you and me. They do it to me all the time. I'm sure they do it to you too. Twitter and Facebook, we're supposed to be open platforms, that's how they were built. But now they've got these content moderators and fact checkers who are really just the op ed section of the New York Times with smaller words. So instead of letting social media sites revoke your right to free speech, I got an idea for you. How

about revoking their right to your data. Now you could just deactivate all your social media accounts, but that would be giving the left what they wanted in the first place. So I do something much better. I use Express VPN. Have you ever wondered how sites like Facebook make all their money? For example, they track your searches, your video history, everything you click on. When you use express VPN, you anonymize much of your online presence by hiding your IP address.

It's amazing. Honestly, you got to give this a shot. Makes your activity much more difficult to trace. So if you want privacy, if you want to feel like you're not being constantly surveiled online, express VPNs for you. And also the social media companies might think twice about the way they treat half the country because we're starting to say, you know what, We're gonna make it harder for you to sell our data. So this is a win all around.

Express vpn also encrypts one hundred percent of your data to protect you from hackers and internet bad guys. It's finally time to say no to censorship. Take back your online privacy. Go to Express vpn dot com slash buck. By visiting my special link will get an extra three months of Express VPN service for free. Again, that's Express vpn dot com slash buck. Express vpn dot com slash

buck to protect your data today. It's not possible, Okay, it's not possible that the Biden administration is surprised by any of the things that are going on right now at the border. Nobody is that stupid. Nobody is that dumb. We all knew that this is what would happen when we came into an administration that doesn't believe that there's such a thing as an illegal person. Think about the rhetoric, Think about the things that have been said by Democrats

in recent years. I'm never going to let it go that the Democrats on stage in night one of two nights of the debates in the primary all raise their hand for whether they would give free healthcare to illegal aliens, and I have to keep an eye on this. I'm not sure when they changed if they have yet changed the official terminology. I know they don't want you to say a legal alien, even though it's in the federal code,

but that's all part of it. You see. Now they want you to just say a non citizen or undocumented person, which is even more absurd and werewelling in. But this is entirely predictable. In fact, I would argue that many predicted it, including myself. The left wants de facto open borders,

and now we're seeing what that looks like. The US Mexico border is spiraling out of control because when millions of impover Central Americans have reason to believe they can skip the legal immigration process and stay in America forever just for claiming phony asylum, they show up in large numbers and demand processing as soon as they can. In case you're wondering whether this is really because of Biden, there are already photos circulating of migrant groups wearing Biden

let us in t shirts at the border. It's a completely logical response on their part to the open borders madness of the Democrat Party. Of course they want to get into America now. President Biden has no intention of sending them home. Ever, That's what this is all about. We understand what's really happening here. We can see it. This isn't all that complicated. I mean, the immigration topic is overall complicated, but what's happening right now the border

is actually quite straightforward. And they can say as much as they want about how it's not a crisis, but it is by any definition they have previously used about the border, clearly a crisis. In fact, there's a New York Times report that says it's akin to jails. What the children are being held in right now, akin to a jail. The number of migrant children, this is from that New York Times piece detained that the border has

tripled in the last two weeks. That's right, it has tripled in the last two weeks, more than three thousand, two hundred and fifty filling facilities, as I said, a kind to jails, as the Biden administration struggles to find room for them in shelters. According to documents obtained by the New York Times, more than one thousand three hundred and sixty of the children have been detained beyond the seventy two hours permitted by law. Remember kids in cages,

Kids in cages. That's what they were yelling at Trump, Abolish ice. They have kids in cages. The former CIA director Mike Hayden said that it was concentration camps. We're running at the border. Gene, Mike, where are you now? The concentration camps as you call them, are back up and running, and they're already getting to capacity. Former CIA director wanted disgrace. Turns out that it is a complicated situation.

And when you have children who are showing up and you have a humanitarian desire to make sure they're safe and take care of them, but you're also incentivizing further loo loopholes where people are unable to well, what's really happening here? And I was gonna say they don't want due process. Actually they're not trying to get due process.

They're trying to circumvent the process. You know, they're showing up and saying I want to claim asylum, and then later on they're saying, well, I'm not even going to show up for my asylum hearing and with the children that are being sent to the country. Why is this happening, Why are their kids showing up alone at the border. Well, because they will then be placed, usually with family members

already in the US. So this is a means of just getting them immediate, immediate, permanent residency in the US, and then those children, as you know, are likely to be used as a tether for the adults home in Guatemala or Honduras to bring them into the United States as part of family reunification under the Biden administration. That's what's actually happening here. So what we see our numbers that should show anybody that there is, in fact a crisis.

Seventy eight thousand migrants at the border in January, all right, that's that's how many of the border. This is all New York Times reporting. I'm not telling you anything that's not being reported as fact right now about when it comes to the numbers, and they believe over one hundred thousand was the number back in February. So you've got a lot of people showing up at the border and it's gonna just keep going up. The winter is not

the primary time for crossings. We're heading into the high season, right, You're gonna see a lot of people in April and May. That's the best time to try to make this journey. You don't really want to do it in the dead of the summer. You don't want to do in the dead of winter. So unaccompanied children who show up at the border are taken into custody there put into jail like facilities. The New York Times calls them, I mean, they're just holding facilities. What are they supposed to do?

Biden team hasn't really figured this out, But it's hard to have any real sympathy for the fact that they're in a crisis right now. It's hard to feel like I'm talking about now from the administration perspective, from the people who are in charge, because they want open borders, really,

and this is what an open border looks like. In fact, I think you could argue that to the Democrats it isn't even really a crisis because what's going on right now allows them to enlarge the apparatus for processing at our southern border to get more people in faster, more comfortably. That's really what this is all about. Now they're going to say, we need more resources. We got to spend even more taxpayer dollars to handle this influx of illegal immigrants.

That's what's going on. And people who say, oh, it's not illegal, they're not telling you the truth. You're not allowed to cross the border, not at a port of entry. These people are showing up at the border by and large and they are surrendering, meaning they cross illegally. They even will flag I've seen this, I've been there. When they do it, they will flag down border patrol because this was the same process that they were using back in twenty eighteen, but Trump put a stop to it.

But they flag down border patrol and they want, you know, they will they will demand a meal, they will demand their process, including the belief that they have the rights to immediate medical care and food and facilities in the United States. That's what they end up telling border patrol who have told me that sometimes it feels like there are a food delivery service for illegal immorants that are showing up and saying right away, you know, where where

is my sandwich. Essentially, this is the Biden administration deciding that what Trump did to stop this process, the remain in Mexico policy, for example, no longer counts, doesn't matter what is remain in Mexico. You want asylum, fine, we'll give you a whole here, will do the whole process. But so you can't just disappear into the American interior. You stay in Mexico. You wait in Mexico until your court date, and then you show up and then a judge will hear you. But you know they don't want

to do this because they're not a psiles. I come from a poor country and I want a better economy. Is a position that I have sympathy with. I don't blame the people who are trying to gain the system in this way. If I felt my circumstances were so desperate,

you know, I can see how this would happen. I continue, you decide to do this, But we have a system that is not supposed to reward that kind of gamesmanship in the system, right, we have a system that's supposed to take into account whether people will be immediately additive to the United States, whether on a merit based system that we want to include them in the American family.

We are already taking a million people a year and making them permanent, permanent residence citizens, Green card holders, a million a year. All right, that's the lead immigration system. Now we're going to have hundreds and hundreds of thousands showing up and adding to that number because they want to basically and because the Democrats think they benefit from

it politically. They got rid of them remain in Mexico policy because it showed that the people who are actually showing up at the border, we're not showing up at their hearings. They weren't really assile's that's the whole point.

And sending children to the border is just another means of getting around immigration system because without it used to remember the problem with Trump was the Democrats said that they're separating They're they're taking children from their parents, right, they're separating them, which is what happens when you process people for a criminal offense anywhere in the country anytime. But we decided, okay, for humanitarian reasons, we want we're

a decent country of decent people. We're going to keep the family unit together. But then you know, if the child stays with the adult, then they're processed within that system and can actually be sent back. No. No, now you send your kid, your kid gets immediately deployed in the interior of the United States, either with other family or in a group home or whatever it may be. But one of the big problems here is that the Democrats don't want the same thing from this that well

much a majority of the country does. They're not looking to shut down the crisis at the border. They've already had the DHS chief say that it's not that we don't want you to come. We don't want you to come. Yet they're using this now, this crisis that they've created is now also creating opportunities for them to create a day factor open border, which is what this looks like

a lot of processing facilities. You just show up, you go into the processing, and you're released in the US and there's some oh yeah, at some point maybe you got to show up in a corp, but we're never going to support you. And so that's what an open border actually looks like. And remember under Trump, there were loopholes being exploited that led to a similar circumstance to this, and of course the Democrats said it was Nazism and

kids in cages and all this. But then then the Trump administration, with Democrats finding them every step of the way, said hold on a second, Let's set up the remain in Mexico policy. Let's pressure Mexico and Central American partner governments to stem the flow. We don't want this, we don't want this to continue. And they got the number way down, so they secured the border, and now the Biden team comes in and unsecures it. That's what's happening

right now. Biden's border crisis is his most predictable debacle yet. Got the piece up on bucksexton dot com right now. Please go check it out. It's an editorial that I wrote. I am writing for Bucksexen dot com obviously on a weekly basis, and so this is my piece for you get into the details the numbers. Please check it out

Bucksexen dot com. And also, if you could give us a review in the Apple podcast Store for the Bucksexton Podcast, even if you're listening on radio, please feel free, I'm sure you've listened on podcast to give us a review five stars and write something that would really help us out with the algorithm, because this show is bigger than one would think based on the Apple podcast substantially bigger based on the Apple podcast stores way of presenting things.

But we don't I don't ask everybody for that call to action, and now I'm asking you please give us some reviews, give us give us some five star ratings, and that will really be a big favor to the show.

Would really really appreciate it. But I just want to finish up on this immigration point, because instead of trying to stem the flow, what you see is the Biden administration scrambling to find ways to make the most comfortable arrangements possible for anyone who is intentionally scamming the immigration system, which is what this is. You're going to see, I mean, get ready for this. You're going to see over one

hundred thousand migrants cross in February. I mean when they give the final number, when you see that tally, it'll be over one hundred thousand, and it'll be over one hundred thousand in March. And that number is just going to keep going until there's a reason for it to stop. Why would it stop. Isn't now the best time in recent memory if you're going to be an illegal immigrant in the United States? Isn't now the best time? So

this is likely to stretch on for months. But remember, well we can argue with the Biden folks about how they said before under Trump the situation was a crisis. They really view what's going on to the border as an opportunity. What's going to happen is that there will be a massive Biden, Pelosi Schumer push for amnesty, and as you know, if Democrats get their way on that, there won't really be any electoral consequences for the lawlessness

currently under way. It essentially nullifies whatever lawlessness the Democrats have encouraged at this phase because there'll be an an unassailable electoral position once mass amnesty goes through, because of what it will mean for the vote, particularly among the Hispanic community in this country, but also what it will mean when they are pushing for voting rights for people that were formerly illegal immigrants, which they will do, of course they will do. The question that I have right

now is what will they eliminate the filibuster for? Where will they decide they're going to make their post to eliminate the filibuster. I'm not sure yet. Will it be hr One, will it be on amnesty, will it be who knows. There's a number of I think those are two of the most likely. But that's where you'll see what the real agenda is and what they're really pushing for. And I think on the issue of amnesty, they may find themselves finally unify. The Democrats may feel strong enough

that they're willing to say, let's go for it. Let's do this thing where we decide that we're going to we're going to get get our way no matter what it does to the system. And at that point, if you do manage to see amnesty under this bid administration, it will be an enormous victory for the left. Remember, the border at that point will just be a place where people show up and they get They essentially get you brought into the United States. They're just moved into

the US. Because how can you stop Eddie? If you could show up at the border and say, yeah, I fear violence in my home country, and it's oh wow, that sounds like credible fear. Now you're in the US. Please show up at this later court date. But you're not a threat, so they're not really going to deport you. And even if they do showing up again at the border, you're not going to be penalized. You just take another

shot at it. Paying the cartels all the way. I should know, the cartels make hundreds of millions of dollars from this human smuggling. I know it seems maybe a little counterintuitive, but even though you can just walk up the US Mexico border, these are cartel controlled areas and to get up to the border in some places to pay off these smugglers, and there's a whole business, a whole black market that's being run here, an enormous one for bringing migrants to the border. As part of this,

they are paying cartels. Just remember that transnational drug organizations that are poisoning tens of thousands of Americans a year. I think almost thousand last year died from drug overdoses. Those drugs are coming from south of our border. They're coming from the cartels, and it is the cartels who are making money in all of this and getting stronger and more powerful. Don't forget that. But if we do get to amnesty, the GOP will effectively be toast. It'll

be done. And then if the border stays open. Once you get to that amnesty, which I think is likely, limited government conservatism and constitutionalism will be quaint relics of a past that we vaguely remember. It'll be all over. And this is the way the Democrats can essentially flood the zone with votes to cancel out the votes of Americans, because they're just going to make new Americans in a sense.

They're going to take people who are in fact illegal immigrants, who are not supposed to even be here, and say, you know what, you now get the same voting rights as people that went through the process to come here legally as immigrants, or people who have been born and raised here and spent their whole lives and this is

the only country they know. So someone's if Joe Biden has his way, the vote of somebody who shows up doesn't speak English, broke the law to come here, didn't respect our immigration laws, paid off the cartels, their vote will count as much as your vote wherever you are across the country. That's what Joe Biden thinks is fair. That's the democracy that he wants you to be living in.

And you just see it. You know, every time we push and push back and say this is where they're going next, they scream and shout and say that that's so unfair, it's not true. And they do that so that we can't mount the proper opposition to their policies in advance, and then they do that thing. They get what they want. They take the position on immigration, on a whole bunch of things that they said they never would.

And when we say, well, I said you were going to do that and you swore you promise you never would, Democrats, they say, yeah, what are you going to do about it? Now we move on to the next one. This is how they play the game. We sit around, you know, arguing about whether Mitt Romney is really a man of principle. They figure, how do we actually change the country so that the ideology of our political opponents, people that have a different vision of the future of this country lose

every time? How do we do that? How do we achieve that the annihilation of our political enemies. That's how the left seeks to conduct its business when it's in power. On the right, we sit around and say, maybe we could do some more tax cuts, maybe we could send around some think tank papers about the size of the debt, and people will start to pay attention to it. I've got news for you. Their way will win over the long run. Really, Representative Cheney was one of the very

few Republicans in Congress who did stand up. And I give all of them who spoke up, who voted for impeachment, who voted for conviction in the Senate, you credit for doing what was right. I just wish that more Republicans had had either the bridge or the understanding of what they needed to do, that they too had stood up

and spoken out. Right now, Jonathan, it is really troubling to see the Republican Party turn themselves into a cult and you know, basically pledge allegiance not to the United States of America but to Donald Trump, something I do not understand, I cannot accept, and I don't think the majority of Americans, as we have seen with the very large popular victory of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, the you know, the passage of the American Rescue Plan, which is so popular.

I don't understand why the Republican Party is so afraid of itself, because that's what it comes down to. I know you probably are thinking, why did you just assault my ears with that? What happened? Oh she's back? But I want you to I want you to hear Hillary Now, it's been a little while since you've been subjected to that. It's been a little a period of time here since you've had to actually here Hillary lecture the rest of the country on an issue. And what I would say

to you is this, She's awful. We've all known it all along. But they assured you in twenty sixteen that she would be a great president, that she would break the ultimate class ceiling, that she would bring forth all kinds of intelligence and good governance and all this. I mean, it's ridiculous. She's she's a horror show. I mean, it's awful. What happened? You know? She is. She is a disingenuous, smarmy, narcissistic phony. Just the whole thing is what Hillary Clinton.

You've gotta be kidding me. They wanted her to be president before. But I want you to remember that because you know I told you the Democrats their favorite game to play the progressives really who democrats? Progressive? You use these pretty interchangeably. The progressives love to say, how dare you say that I'm going to do this thing in this period of time? And then when they do it

exactly as you said. This happens to me with all the COVID stuff all the time, when they do exactly what you said, they're gonna do, but they didn't want people to know because they didn't want the opposition amount before it. Then that you're on look at you and say, yeah, that's right, we did it. What are you going to do about it? Now? Now on to the next one. We'll lie again, We'll get our way again. Look what they do with these political candidates. Hillary Clinton, Oh, the

great Hillary Clinton. She's amazing, She's gonna nobody really believed that. I mean some people did, but there they're delusional people all over the place. Right. And then you see this with the Lincoln Project. I know that's the political candidate, but oh, it turns out and the New York Times has the piece on this. It turns out that the Lincoln Project, which almost had its own show on MSNBC.

I mean, the Lincoln Project was getting so much attention in the media, and we were told they were the principaled Republicans. Right. Look, look what Hillary Clinton just did. Liz Cheney, she's the real principal Republican. Yeah, because she was useful for the Democrats. She allowed herself to be weaponized for the purpose of the Democrats against her own team. There's always gonna be a pad on the head for you if you do that for a day or two,

from the New York Times or from Hillary Clinton or MSNBC. Here, this is from this New York Time. So I'm gonna get back to Hillary and then Biden in a second. But this is from this New York Times piece. A few days before the presidential election, the leadership of the Anti Trump Lincoln Project gathered at the Utah home of Steve Schmidt, one of the group's co founders, and listened

as he plotted out the organization's future. None of the dissident Republican consultants who created a Lincoln Project a year earlier had imagined how wildly successful it would be, pulling in more than eighty seven million dollars in donations and producing scores of viral videos that doubled as a psy ops campaign intended to drive President Donald Trump to distraction, confident that a Biden administration was on the horizon, Mister Schmidt,

a swaggering former political advisor he's a moron to John McCain and Arnold Schwarzenegger, pitched the other attendees on his post Trump vision for the project over a breakfast of bagels and muffins. It was ambitious. Five years from now there will be a dozen billion dollar media companies that don't exist today. He told the group, I would like to build one and would invite all of you to

be a part of that. In fact, mister Schmidt and the three other men who started the Lincoln Project, John Weaver, Read Galen and Rick Wilson, had already quietly moved to set themselves up in the New Media Enterprise, drafting and filing papers to create TLP Media in September and October Record show it's aim was to transform the original project a superpack, into a far more lucrative venture under their control. This was not the only private financial arrangement among the

four men. Shortly after they created the group in late twenty nineteen, they'd agree to pay themselves millions of dollars in management fees. Three people with knowledge of the deal said, I mean, the whole thing was a grift. It was a scam for the benefit of the people involved, and of course the Democrat Party. But it was all by people claiming that they were the principled ones, and the media took it and ran with it. They loved it. Right.

The good Republicans are the ones like Steve Schmidt and Rick Wilson, who will be vicious in the pursuit of assisting the political party that they've spent their entire adult life trying to defeat. To help them, right, the good Republicans are the traitors and the turncoats. That was the whole purpose of the Lincoln Project until it wasn't until we saw that they were just lining their pockets and that John Weaver was allegedly trying to groom young men,

including some who allegedly were underage. And this is what the Lincoln Project was really all about. But notice there's no shame. There's no shame in how the Lincoln Project was used as a weapon against Trump in the most disingenuous and dishonest fashion. There's no shame in elevating Andrew Cuomo, making him a guy who gets an Emmy and a million dollar book deal for his leadership during the pandemic.

That's right, a million dollars, folks. I can tell you it's hard to get a million dollar book deal these days unless you're a prominent Democrat or celebrity Democrat. Then you can get whatever you want. Yeah, but they want you to listen to them now, they're all about being ethical. They're all about making the really the honest case. You see, they will gaslight you now and forever. If you let them get away with it, there will be no end

to this whatsoever. Lincoln Project, Andrew Cuomo. Hillary Clinton in twenty sixte I know, I started that club. It was tough to even listen to. That's what Hillary sounds like to me. You know, it's like it's like some kind of like a bobcat that's caught in a trap or something. I mean, it's really it's just awful. But she should have been president. She would have been great. They tell you. Yeah, anyway, it's amazing, isn't it. Get Ready for an even more

stunning version of this. I mean, the one that I think we can all see coming at some level is the one that involves the single most powerful person in the world right now, the single most powerful Democrat. But he's the most powerful person in the world right now, Joe Biden, the guy with the nuclear codes. And remember how they would tell you that Donald Trump was going to start a war with North Korea, who was going to start a war with Iran? They started out for

about two years, the media, the Democrats. They were telling you that Trump was a threat. Trump was the warmonger, And then it got tougher to make that case because no, he was actually the guy who didn't start wars. He was the guy who didn't send our troops in a harm's way without clear purpose, strategy and success in mind. Right. I mean, that's that's a tough case to make when you're just seeing the reality of what's going on. But

they tried that for a couple of years. Joe Biden is the guy with the nuclear codes, and you should know that because hopefully somebody else has those codes written down for him at all times, and he's not expected to remember very much at all because he can't remember the name of the secretary of Defense that he appointed. Who is his secretary of defense? This was yesterday, play one. I just want to thank you both, and I want to thank the former general. I keep calling him general,

the guy who runs that outfit over there. I want to make sure we thank the secretary for all he's done to try to implement what we just talked about and for recommending these two women for promotion. Thank you all. May God bless you all, and may God protect our troops. Yeah, does he know the name of the Secretary Defense? Does you know? Does he actually remember? Now? I know what they're gonna say. They're gonna claim that this is just

a lapse. Anybody can forget something. You can forget the name of one of your kids if you're in a you know, a heated moment and you're trying to get the van loaded up in the supermarket parking lot or whatever. I understand. But we've seen so much of this. Joe Biden's almost eighty years old. Those of us who have family members who are or have had family members who

were eighty we understand that. You know, we love them, we support them, We try to you know, engage engage them in day to day life and with us as much as we possibly can. But used are to slow down a little bit. That's what happens. We are all going to the same place, we are all aging, and we're all going to reach our our terminus in one way or another. And before the very end, generally there

is that slow down period. There is that cognitive decline now in so much much more serious, such much more stark than another's. But they foisted this guy upon America because they figured they could get it done. They presented a politician who's like out of central casting for a Democrat that what does he even stand for? What does he believe? And nobody really knows, but he's given a lot of speeches and he you know, he knows how to dress the part and sound the part, and he's

been around a long time. So what a great way to push for your push through a radical agenda have somebody who's a kind of boring mediocrity as the frontman for it while the system, the apparatus of the Democrat Party behind the scenes is pushing in every which way, in the most extreme ways they can or a lot of policy items and n issues, and then anytime we say wow, they're moving really fast on the stuff, they say, what do you mean? Joe Biden, Good old Joe. You

can trust him. He's the guy you can trust. It does remind me so much of that Eddie Murphy movie What Not, one of Eddie Murphy's most celebrated films, which are of course Beverly Hills, cop In forty eight Hours and and Coming to America and Trading Places, all great films. By the way, if you haven't seen any of them,

highly highly recommend. Eddie Murphy went through it went through a period where he was just just the golden touch of any movie that he was in, and then he had the opposite of that, whatever you would call that, that kind of touch. But you know, you see this, Oh, The Distinguished Gentleman is a movie that people don't really

know very well. But he runs for Congress, and the whole thing is he takes the name of a former congressman because his name is close enough to his and it's just, you know, Jeff Johnson the name, you know, and that's really with Joe Biden. It's Joe Biden the name, you know, I mean, that's it. That was the whole slogan. You know, Joe Biden. He's not Trump, and his name is Joe Biden. And you know, Joe, what a fraud

the whole thing is. And when eventually it becomes all too clear when Joe Biden walks out on the stage or has a candid moment, when he just starts wandering into gibberish, which he will do within the next four years, the Democrats will look at you like we never talked about this, like it never even came up, never even occurred to them, and they won't be shocked, they won't be angry that. They'll say, oh, well, who could have known, Hey, Kamala, we got a job for you, the big job, number

one president United States. We can all see it, we all And just like they do with everything else, they'll act like you're crazy for seeing what they want to do beforehand. And then when they do exactly what we've said they're going to do, they're gonna say, yeah, so what what are you going to do about it? Now? Follow that a different subject. I mean, you mentioned last week that the president is expected to give a formal press briefing the fresh conference. Yes, yes, before the end

of the month. So that is a commitment before in the next few weeks we will see him in give okay questions and follow us and so for it. Yeah, he has done about about forty q and as since he took office. But in terms of a formal press conference, which I understand there's a big focus on, yes, we will have one before the end of the month. And

what does it mean going forward? Will we see more of the president by end more than forty q and as in the last month, or you will be submitted to more extensive questions, follow ups, the kind of things we're doing today. We will we see him regularly. Well, I don't know that you'll see him more than forty times a month, but I'll have to tell I'm happy to a ask him that question. Listen to the smarmy gas sliding from Saki bomb. I'm sorry, you mean more

than forty times? Oh yeah, Oh sure, you wanted to do a thing that's more than the forty times. He's already done something that's not the same thing you're asking about. But I'm just gonna keep saying forty times. Do you know wait, how many times has there been a quick ask of a question and he's walking away? I think the numbers forty times? It is forty times. Jen Saki says, right, okay,

we all understand the difference here. Right, when Joe Biden is done with some scripted event and is walking off stage and can pick one or two people that he knows, you're gonna ask a friendly question and we'll just say, well, yeah, I did the thing with the thing with the thing, yeah, and just walk And also if he has a moment where it's not going well, it's not an official presentation of him on stage where he's expected to take questions for a period of time. So guess what he does?

All right? You later, everybody take care. You know, they just you know, Jill just shuffles him off the stage. You know, it goes to take him to feed peanuts to the squirrels in the park. Right. That's we all know this is a different thing. We're all very aware of this. But nonetheless, Jensaki wants to pretend that, you know, forty times he's subjected himself to this as fine. And oh, also on the is Joe Biden a centrist or not?

Play eight? First, let me say the president's position on the rights of transgender kids to play sports is clear. He signs an executive order and he believes transgender rights are human rights and wants to see kids have the opportunity to play sports and participate in a range of activities. Yeah, Joe Biden thinks that it's it's a human right for a sixteen year old boy who thinks he's a girl to play sports against sixteen year girls. I know it

doesn't happen everywhere. I know this isn't a widespread but democrat I think it's very important Day one executive order. But we're the crazy ones, not the Democrats, right, we're the radicals because we like Trump so much, not the people that think that. You know, if an eighteen year old boy wants to play against women on a competitive sports field, including what involved scholarships and their futures, that's fine, that's fine. This is your modern Democratic party, everybody, and

they made it an issue day one. Harsani time. Our friend David Harsani in the mix with us once again to talk about all the latest going on. He's a senior writer at National Review National Review dot com. You want to read his column, which I highly recommend because they're excellent. Mister David. Good to have you back. Always happy to be here. Thanks. Book HR one I view

as Nancy Pelosi's plan. I know she's not the only one pushing it or behind it, obviously, but she's Speaker of the House and they did just pass this in the House earlier this month. HR one is Pelosi's plan to create a permanent majority for the Democrats and effectively annihilate the GOP. As I see it, what do you see? I mean, that's definitely why she's doing it. And it's

definitely part of why she's doing it. But you know, just as on a principled level, it is it's an authoritarian bill that overrides and undermines federalism as it's meant

to be in as stated in the Constitution. It compels states to do all kinds of ridiculous things that they're voting law that of course helped Democrats because they wouldn't do it otherwise, But even just setting all that aside, it sets an immense and ridiculous precedent that allows, you know, if they mess with the filibuster, but even if they don't, let's Pelosi, you know, California, New York decide how the rest of the country is going to vote with a

slim majority and perpetuity. So it is in every way an Unamerican bill. It is, and when you read through it, all the things in it, it is just a disaster. One of the worst bills I've ever seen in my twenty five years of covering and they've already they've already got it through the House. I feel like there's very little media attention on this because I think they're just trying to slip this one, you know, through the through the back entrance or something, David. It feels like they

are only only the people. It's called HR one or you know, the For the People Act of twenty twenty one, so vague, and while there's big one point nine trillion dollars, you know, spending Colossus is getting all the attention. HR one is just a you know, Senate vote in a Biden signature away from becoming the law. And I feel like people don't understand that this is an imminent issue. This isn't like theoretically in a year or two, we might have to be concerned about this. Yeah, no, that's

all right. And the thing with this is that of course most of the media probably wanted to pass, but also that that you know, they get to frame it in ways like, you know, this is a voting rights bill. It will expand voting rights, you know, and if you're against it, you're a for voting restriction, which is insane. Um. You know, you have no right to vote days after

an election. You have no right even to get a paper ballot, You have no right to vote early even there is no right in the constitution for those things. Those are just extras And I don't know if I mentioned this, I think that when when when they use voting restrictions for things that you don't want, which is just open ended, and basically, if you're not driving your neighbor to the you know, taking his mail ballot and driving it to the mailbox, you're you know, you're you're

undermining and suppressing the vote. But it's like saying that every time you have to show a license, that's a voter restriction, or every time you have to stop at a stop sign that's a driving restriction. I mean, so it's just a lot in the wording and a lot in the framing, and it is you know, it's just it's disastrous because it actually completely corrodes the integrity of elections across the country, and it's just Banana Republic stuff and the way that it's all. I've actually read through

much of the bill. I can't say I read every single word. Say it's big, there's a lot, there's a lot in there, but I've read a lot of the relevant sections of HR one, and there's one there's a theme that keeps coming through, which is that anything that makes it anything that you could consider a regulation or

a safeguard for voting is eliminated. Whatever it is, whatever could stop someone somewhere, for any reason whatsoever, from casting a ballot is gone, and whatever would allow for the greatest amount of leeway to the point whereas you mentioned voting, you know, voting after an election, having one person. I mean, does anybody really think that if it becomes widespread practice, that you can go around and do ballot harvesting, which is illegal in twenty four states right now, you can't

do in twenty four. Twenty six states have different kinds of ballot harvesting. Some places it's a family member, other places it's it's a you know, an even bigger loophole than that. But you can go around and collect one hundred ballots at a time. People are gonna, you know, community organizers are going to go to seniors homes in places like that and they're gonna say, hey, I'm here to help you fill out your ballot. You want to

vote for that guy? As if, as if we think that's not going to happen, No one's gonna go to prison for that. If ballot harvesting is legal, No, no one's ever gonna get caught walking around saying, hey, you know why don't you put the ballot, you put the sig that you're there. Yeah, that sounds right. I mean, I mean the bill forces states to ban you know, voter ID laws like you know, photo ID laws, or tells them to ban you know, or to compels them to allow balance to vote, or and compels them to

allow ballot harvesting. Now, setting aside the arguments for those separate things and maybe your forum maybe or not that should be decided by states. You can't all have the same voting systems. It's clear clearly stated in the Constitution that states that up their votes, and I just I

just don't understand how we're going to it. Though. I will say, you know, when they pull and they ask you, are you for you know, expanding voter rights, and everyone's like hell, yeah, you know, but they never ask them specific questions like do you think that people should show a photo ide von voting? I mean Johnason Shade said, if you stop this, you know you're basically American democracy is finished, which means of course that until this point,

I guess we haven't had to American democracy. But more than that, in Western Europe, every single country you have to show state issues voter idea, you know ide you know, a state issued idea to vote. And it's not like this is some authorityarian thing to ask people to vote. This bill doesn't allow you know, election officials to even challenge someone's vote or signature at that, you know, the day of voting. And it was on on you know, regis registering to vote on the day of the election.

It's just insanity. Yeah, and yet it's hard. It's already gone through the House and Joe Biden is advocating openly for the Democrats to push this all the way through. And I think they also saw what they were able to accomplish with universal mail in balloting in different states and all the changes to election rules. And I still believe,

for example, what was done in Pennsylvania was unconstitutional. I know the Supreme Court didn't take it up, but I think there's a lot of cowardice in the judiciary about being willing to look at issues that affect elections, especially just the anti Trump mania that's out there and the concerns about what it would do to the country if we actually had a state like Pennsylvania where the Supreme

Court weighed in. But anyway, but let me just quickly say, but liberals argued that Pennsylvania should be able to do whatever it wants because it's its own state. Now they're saying the federal governments tell everyone how to do it. That's a great point. Yeah, they make any argument, you know, it's Calvin Ball. They make any argument that works at that moment, and then you can never hold them, you know, you can never hold them to anything because they can

always change their mind whatever they want. Well, this is what I've been I've been talking about really all this week, David, is that everyone needs to get used this. I've seen this a lot with COVID, and we're speaking to David Harshawnie. He's a senior writer at National Review, and go check

out his latest at National Review dot com. But David, the way that everything with this Biden administration has gone so far, and in my view a lot of the COVID stuff too, has been people make arguments about what they are going to do right, whether it's Biden or it's the Fauciite view of things, and then it's that's crazy, we're not going to do that, we don't want that, and then they do it, and then they turn around to look at you and say, yeah, well we got

what we wanted. Let's move on to the next one.

This happens time and time again. I mean, I feel like that's, in a sense, the defining mechanism of Joe Biden's presidency because on the one hand, they're always telling us Joe Biden's a he's a moderate Democrat, you know, you know, good old blue collar Joe, and then he's signing executive orders on transgender you know, sports events or you know, transgender men playing in women's sports, and the latest, I mean, you actually brought this to my attention because

this is getting no media coverage. They're going back to the absurd kangaroo courts for people accused of sexual misconduct in colleges now as a as a Title nine in Department of Education issue. Yeah, yeah, they're just stripping and tell everybody what that is, because then no one, no one's reading or seeing about that. Well. Title nine in twenty you know, covers colleges and equal equality among men

and win genders and things of that nature. But but obviously it's the mission creep is said in a long time ago in twenty eleven Obama administration, you know, it's it's difficult to explain, it's not an edict, but basically it is then that told colleges that they should no longer allow certain kinds of activities or certain kind of defenses and do basically, they stripped college students accused sexual

assault or misconduct of due process rights. They can't you can't face your accuser, you can't call witnesses, you can't, you know, just all the basics of due process that have worked for frankly for you know, hundreds of years, with thousands of years almost right, with thousand years almost so just stripped of them because you know, and destroying lives. Well anyway, So they did that, and Betsy DeVos came

in and changed it back temporarily and not fully. And but in between twenty eleven and twenty twenty one right now, there have been thousands of cases where they've gone to court either settled or you know, lost the cases. It's completely unconstitutional to do, but Joe Biden's going to do it again. And and what makes me really angry about it is that Joe Biden was accused of up raped and if he had to live by the standards, he wants to set for powerless usually young men in colleges.

He would be you know, he would be thrown out of office, and he would be thought of as a rapist. But he doesn't use those standards, but he wants those standards for others. And we're speaking of David Harsani here of National Review. Everybody, David speaking of those accused of sexual misconduct or sexual harassment. And I do, I do think it's important that you know, unlike what other people do when they just see a political target. You know,

Cuomo is accused of workplace violations. He's not accused yet of you know, criminal sexual behavior. I think that's important for me. You know, he hasn't forced you know, they haven't. David said he forced himself on somebody or anything like that. But it's still gross and it's not good, and you don't need somebody in a leadership position, the top position

in New York. I think Andrew Cuomo, though, is almost a remarkable case study in power today in the Democrat Party, because this guy's gonna he's gonna stick it out through this, isn't he, David? I mean that's my prediction. Yeah, that's what they do. They at least Listen. He is not liked, right. I don't think he's very held within the party in New York. I think people think of him as a bully.

But his usefulness as far as a political cudgel against Donald Trump has done so now we can move forward with this, even though I have to say his actions with the elderly in New York are to me far more consequential, and not saying that this isn't consequential, but I can't believe how much coverage this gets as compared to his actual killing people. But anyway, he you know, he will just stay in there and he'll probably be reelected, right yeah, you know, and because no one's going to

really challenge him. And that's it because they get away with it. Bill Clinton got away with it. Um, you know, others have gotten away with it, and uh, that's it. That's just how it is, because of the double standard and coverage. Why do you think, Why do you think? Because I've had this debate with some liberals recently and

they would say, but what about Al Frankin? And I feel like Frankin, there is no downside to getting rid of him, right yeah, because they could just replace him with another Democrat, they would when when the governor was his name, governor of Virginia who you know, was caught in his yearbook wearing a clan and or a black face, right, he didn't Northam Northamb Right, he didn't step down. Setting aside what he said about babies, you know who who

who had survived abortion attempts. But just setting that aside, you know, do you think that a Republican being caught in a clan outfit or black face would survive? No way. The only reason if if if they were sure a Democrat would take over for him, he would maybe not have survived. And that's only Al Frankin was gone, he would they would never have turned onto him if the

governor was a Republican and would have replaced him. It's a good point because yeah, I mean, that's he's really the only Democrat you could think of that got metued and not you know, not for the most egregious kinds of things. I mean, not including people like uh, you know, the Harvey Weinstein and those guys. But he's the only one that you've seen who didn't rise to the kind of criminal criminal level who lost his job that I

could think of. But Yeah, I know. I think I think Cuomo is gonna stay right where he is, and I think, give it, give it six months to a year, he'll be back on CNN and they're treating him like he's a he's a great leader and the whole thing. Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if that happened. You know, he is such an unlikable person in general though that I

don't know. He might survive it, but I don't think he's going to be as popular as he was, but others are, and you know, without Frankin, for instance, I'm not even really sure he deserved to lose his job over that. Paige. Yeah, No, that was the one that serves surprised me because I was I mean, he was before he was even a politician, and he apologized and I was surprised that that was. But Chris didn't cursed whatever. Karsten Jilla Brand of New York decided that it was

time Frohm to go, and so he had to go. Yeah, David Arsani, everybody sacrifice people. Yeah, David Arsani, you got a Nash Review dot Com forerce latest. David, thanks so much anytime, Thank you. What has happened with Prince Harry in this situation, he walked behind his mother's coffin at a tender, tender age in front of the globe that is going to shape a young boy for the rest of his life. So I think that we need to all take a step back. And I understand that you

don't like Megan Markle. You've made it so clear a number of times on this program, a number of times. And I understand that you've got a personal relationship with Mega Market or had one, and she cut you off. She's entitled to cut you off if she wants to. Has she said anything about you since she cut you off? I don't think she has. But yet you continue to trash her. Okay, I'm done with this. No, no, nor do you know what that's pretty good? No, no, no,

I'm sorry because absolutely diabolical behavior. You see. I'm sorry, but Pierce spouts off on a regular basis and we all have to sit there and listen. Six thirty to seven o'clock yesterday, Man, the Brits are really upset with each other over this whole Megan Markle thing. Here there you had an IV presenter very named Alex Beresford. I've never heard of this guy before. I've never seen this guy before, but very upset where where he and Piers

Morgan really going after each other on this one? Isn't it a fascinating to watch? There are people for whom, clearly Megan Markle is representative of something, you know, bigger than just the issue of the Royal family and Great Britain all this other stuff. I mean, there are people for whom this is a major This is a major wokeness moment the Royal family in sinu way, She's don't really accusations but just without any specifics of racism against

the English royal family. And some people clearly really want to take the Meghan Markle side in this, and Piers Morgan is taking the other side of it, does not like Megan Markle speaking of Meghan's Meghan Kelly has also gotten in the middle of this debate, this discussion about the Royal family feud, and here is what her take is on all that stuff that we saw Meg Meghan's

not pulling any punches about Meghan markol play nine. But what I saw tonight was somebody who's totally unself aware, I mean, completely unaware of how she sounded right, like, I wasn't planning on saying anything shocking, except for my husband's racist family almost drove me to suicidal thoughts while I was pregnant with my baby. And by the way, I had no idea what the Internet said about Harry.

Nobody believes that, And I thought meeting the queen was going to be just like meeting a celebrity in Los Angeles, like like meeting a Chris Jenner, right, like nobody believes that. Then she goes on to say, like I'm not, I

don't I don't believe in any of the grandeur. You know, there's an article already up on the New York coast here in the States saying this is the person who had Clooney and Oprah at her wedding even though she didn't even know them, and then covered herself in blood diamonds from the Saudi prince, so like Sparris that you're

not into any of the grandeur. And then while she's spinning this tale about how tough she had it in the castle, how lonely she was in the castles, she's painting herself and sort of these adorations like it was incredibly courageous of me to come forward about my depression and I just love saving things. And it was like it was just peppered with these compliments of herself while she was making these complaints that will be totally unrelatable

to ninety nine percent of people out there. It's true that we have a society now and I know to see this brings together a reality from the UK and the US all at once. That's why I think there's

been such a focus on this. But we now live in a country where if you are a child of let's say you have you have two I'm sorry, a child of two white grandparents on one side and then another white grandparent and a and a black grandparent on the other side, you can claim victims status because of your race, even if you are a globally recognized celebrity worth unbelievable amounts of money, with with tremendous influence, riches and all the benefits that come with that, based on

the narrative that there is racism against you, that's a pretty remarkable thing. I mean for a country where there are going to be a lot of people who are you know, of of all races, black, White, Latino, Asian, who are working you know, minimum wage jobs, or who are working really hard, as as plumbers, as welders, as truck drivers, as they get to see Megan Markle doing what we see so many other elite celebrities do, which is wine and cry about how hard everything is and

how they're oppressed. I don't think so. I have never seen a situation that even came close to this with regard to divisiveness over ideology, political ideology that actually swept over into the issue of public health, where people, as you mentioned correctly in your statement and your question, that health officials who push for common sense, well accepted public health measures of wearing masks, physical distancing, avoiding congregate settings

including indoor, are actually looked upon as the enemy, the enemy of getting the economy opened, the enemy of getting people's jobs back, when in fact the common enemy is the virus. No, Fauci's the enemy. Actually Fauci is the enemy. Want. I want to be very clear about this, not as a human being, but his policies, his role in all this, his politicization of this, his love of the spotlight. He has in his official capacity, been an enemy during this pandemic.

He's not even honest about what he's saying, no common sense measures. Really, Faucci mass masking is a common sense measure because a year ago, almost to the day, he basically laughed at the idea of mass masking March eighth, last year, Fauci said that you know, it'll make you feel better, but it won't actually do anything for the public to wear a mask. But now it's common and sense. If you have any if you have any concerns, any issues about this at all, you're just a science denier.

Where was Faucci on schools staying open the data? We're clear on that. Where is Faucci on outdoor mask wearing. Why won't he come out and say that there is no reasonable risk that you run, or that there's no reasonable concern you should have being outdoors by yourself without a mask on. You're not gonna get sick walking around

outside without a mask on by yourself. And even if you walk past somebody or you know, there's that casual contact where you're not touching them, you're not you know, having a long, close face to face conversation, You're not at risk. Why won't he say that? But we all know why he wants to be a hero to the left.

You want to talk about the politicization of this, This is this is fascinating to me, I have to tell you, absolutely fascinating when you see the data here on the breakdown of all of this, and you see the way the left and the right view this issue. Here's this is a Pew poll. Okay, a Pew poll, and it looks at where people were in March of twenty twenty versus February of twenty twenty one. All right, and in March of twenty twenty, Republicans and Democrats were essentially aligned.

You know, we're not the partisan lunatics. They can pretend we are, but we're not. We were aligned on Okay, we're all really concerned about this. Let's do what we have to do to try to get this thing under control in the early stages. Let's see what works and what doesn't. Requiring face masks for travel on airplanes and public transport wasn't even asked in March of twenty twenty because that wasn't thought to be something we would need

to do. Restricting international travel the US Democrats ninety four percent Republican I'm sorry, uh yeah, Democrats ninety four percent Republicans ninety six percent. So Republicans, because Trump said that he was restricting travel from China, were even more willing to restrict international travel than Democrats. But it's basically right

in line with each other, all of them. Everyone was saying restricted, asking people to avoid gathering in large groups, a little bit more Democrat than Republican ninety two to eighty two, but essentially aligned. Limiting restaurants to carry out only ninety one to seventy eight. Again pretty much aligned in March of twenty twenty, but clearly a little bit more Republican desire for normal life, and even closing K

through twelve schools for in person learning. This was again in March of twenty twenty, right when the pandemic was at its peak of panic and fear and everything else. Democrats and Republicans ninety four Democrats, eighty four Republicans. So I want, I want us to look at this and under stand that it's not like we've all all along been obstinate Fauci's terrible don't listen to them. No, we were willing to see how this goes. We were willing to listen to the so called experts in the early phase,

but we've seen what's actually happened. What's even more interesting to me is requiring face mask for travel on airplanes and public transport. Ninety six percent of Democrats they're obsessed with masking, seventy two percent of Republicans as of February twenty twenty one, So pretty high level of Republicans for public transport one masking. I was actually a little surprised by that. Restricting international travel the US eighty seven percent

of Democrats versus seventy one percent of Republicans. Asking people to avoid gathering in large groups ninety three percent of Democrats as of last month don't want groups to gather fifty six percent of Republicans. Okay, so Republicans are like, no, it's time for us to be able to be in groups. Again. This is you know about but less Look, it's less than half. There's still a lot of GOP out there that are really worried about this. Okay, but then you

get into these two levels. Limiting restaurants to carry out only seventy four percent of Democrats as of last month want restaurants to be carry out only. This is insane. This is insane. Twenty three percent of republic Republicans are finally figured out restaurants are safe. This is not where the spread is really happening. This is it's wrong to destroy the entire industry because of you know, one percent of cases in New York City, for example, which is

probably higher than it is elsewhere in the country. Not even outdoor dining allowed carry out only seventy four percent of Democrats, say, twenty three percent of Republicans. And here's the real key, this is the best one of all closing K through twelve schools for in person learning, sixty six percent of Democrats as of last month still wanted public schools to be closed for in person learning. Twenty

five percent of Republicans. Who's listening to the science? All right, it's a The argument for keeping schools closed is crap. There are schools that are open. They are fine, They are not super spreadors. It is very low, low, low risk. It is entirely acceptable risk. The arguments for keeping school closed are just pure political tribal loyalty. Democrats know that. That's what their leadership is saying, and the Democrat leadership

is saying it because they don't want to upset the teachers. Unions. That's what's actually happening. Here's a sake bomb though, telling you, oh, no, no, we really want to get kids back in the classroom. Place six, I want schools to open. Two. I have kids, You have kids. You know many of the hosts sitting around the table have kids. We all want our schools to open. And you set you touched on the mental health impact kids being back and learning. We're seeing that

all happening. But the President wants them to open safely. He's taken a couple steps. We want this to happen rapidly. The CDC has put out these guidelines which shows that teachers that one of the steps that can be taken is for them to be vaccinated, but there are a number of other mitigation steps that can be taken that schools can manage to do, hiring more teachers, hiring more

bus drivers, social distancing, upgrading facilities. And we also are on the verge as we've been talking about, of passing the American Rescue Plan that has one hundred and sixty billion dollars in it to help some of these school districts that don't have those resources get that job done. Thankfully, we also have a Secretary of Education. This is good now in place, confirmed, and this is going to be

his top priority. So you're absolutely right. We want these schools to open, but we want them to open safely. And we're encouraged by some of the progress we're seeing. There's a lot of schools that have opened around DC. I know that's happening around the country, and that we're going to continue to work with school districts to get this done and get kids back in the classrooms. Blather, blather wrapped in propaganda, that's all that is. Or propaganda

wrapped in blather, nonsense. Schools are safe, Open them tomorrow. You don't need to do this vaccination. You don't need to do this mitigation dance they're talking about. That's just absurd. Plus, there are a lot of teachers that don't want to get vaccina. What do you do about them? But there was something she said there. You want to know what's really going on here, she said she gave away the whole game. It's just in her long word salad. They're the saky salad of words that came out when she

said we got to hire more staff. We need to hire more teachers. Oh, the answer right now is to create an even bigger jobs program and Democrat political machinery funded with taxpayer dollars. That's the answer, that's what's necessary. Let me Let me also wonder what happens those teachers when they're not as needed because of the mitigation measures, when we actually when we're finally beyond this pandemic, when we do have her community. Do you think they're gonna

let them go? No, of course not. They're going to be administrators. They're just gonna lard up the employment roles with even more Department of you know, Department of Education for either the state or local you know, depends on where we are. But more people. That's what this is uses as a jobs program, hiring people that there's no need of them to be hired. But if they think about this, you get more teachers in the system than

you already have. Teachers already have summers off, folks. Okay, Oh, they do their lesson plans all summer. Some of them do. The good ones. The good teachers aren't the ones that are whining and say they don't want to go back to the classroom either. Okay, so we could just separate that out. This is the teachers unions trying to get

their way, holding kids hostage in the process. But if they have, what they're really hoping to accomplish now is create essentially an extended team of teachers at different schools, so that you could do one or two days in person learning and then it's somebody else's time for the other two or three day. What a great gig that is.

Think with this if I if I could get paid my full salary to do radio, but I could have some other radio hosts come in and do the show, you know, two or three days a week, you know, for safety reasons. Wow, that sounds like actually I would hate that because I want to always talk to you every day. But I'm saying if I wanted to do less work, if I were lazy, that's a great gig. Be amazing, Right, Producer Mark, We'd have a different producer Mark in every day and you and you get paid

your full salary. You only have to work one day. Wouldn't that be nice? It sounds lovely. I mean, you're already doing two or three jobs yourself, but imagine if instead of that, we just had you doing only one job and there are five people that are also doing that one job with you. Wait, you so you're saying I would manage a staff rather than being the staff. Yeah, no, no, but not manage a staff. No no, you only do your job, but you do it one day a week

instead of five. I'm down right, that sounds nice. I mean, I'm you know, it's a shame that would you know, it's a shame that that as a business model doesn't work. And the only reason it works for the teachers is because it's taxpayer dollars. They're not running a business, and so they are looking to just create This is just goodies for the teachers unions, that's all this is. The Biden administration is totally bending over backwards for them. We

can all see it. It's gross, it's wrong, and kids are suffering for it. But you know that whole thing about Fauci saying, you know, they're not the enemy, Yeah, actually they are. They've been horrible, all right, They've been absolutely awful during this The CDC is an abomination, an abomination, and they should be ashamed of themselves. All the politicization,

all the all the craft. Remember where we used to live, we like lived and died by the IHM and the and the ferguson this guy from the UK projections about COVID and cases and death, all wrong, wrong, over and over again. How many times do we have to hear the public health experts you know, we're worried about a not a project not a projection and the number could go up even higher if we had you know how many times we have to hear that from Fauci and

it was wrong. I have marked on my calendar, Remember I told you this, I've marked on my calendar that the states that reopened they're not going to have spikes. It's not going to go against them. It's all gonna be okay, And we're gonna go back and we're gonna revisit what they were saying and what actually happened, because they've been wrong at every step of the way. With today's initial guidance, it's important to note that we are focusing on activities of fully vaccinated people can resume in

private settings, such as their homes under two scenarios. The first scenario is fully vaccinated people visiting with other fully vaccinated people. In this slide, these individuals are represented by solid green circles. In this scenario, CDC recommends that's fully vaccinated people can visit with other fully vaccinated people in small gatherings indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing. Remember

here we are talking about private settings where everyone is vaccinated. Um, here's what I have to say to CDC Director Lenski about private settings, also known as like my home. They can all go fauci themselves. I don't care what they think about gatherings in my home. They can go. I mean, I honestly want to start dropping some language here. It's it's appalling that they think that they have some what oh people are gonna say that they're giving us advice

about this was if we need. I don't need to hear their advice. We've all been saturated with, you know, the the fear of COVID, the risks of COVID, all all this different stuff. And now they think they're gonna tell us who we see at our own homes. Remember they did go through a period in the late fall where there were some places in the country where if you were how to gather of more than six people, they were going to call the cops on you. This

is tyranny. It is tyranny. That's not an exaggeration. When the government thinks they can tell you who among your family you can see because of the vague threat of a virus with a ninety nine point nine percent survival rate, you are in tyranny. That is true. You can debate how serious the tyranny is, you can debate how extreme the overreaches. But this is outrageous, outrageous, and this has

been normalized. This is something that we accept. They've shut They shut down churches and synagogues and mosques and you know, wherever else you know, people go for their religious services for months and months on end. Sorry, too dangerous, can't go to church. Not too dangerous to you know, go shop at a costco. You're not too dangerous for people to keep the Amazon warehouses going, but too dangerous for you to go actually live your spiritual life. That's not

allowed because we say so. That's unconstitutional, that's wrong, all right, And the fact that we haven't had more people that are willing to stand up and take the heat on this in the name of rights and freedom and liberty

is really disconcerting. Don't ever forget who was quiet during this this great tyrannical overreach of the COVID nineteen pandemic, who was quiet and who actually held the line, who actually decided that they would take the slings and arrows to make the case publicly that we should have liberty and freedom, and that that's not just a suggestion, but it is a it is an order that we the people make of the government. I am angry about what

has happened in this country. I'm angry about what has been done to us, the dehumanizing effects of these idiotic policies about mask mandates and all social social distancing as a fancy way of saying, avoid other human beings. That's all it is. We all know somebody has a cold, stay away from them. We didn't need a government to come up with some plan to implement that. At the same time, you know, we want to make sure that

all these appointments are filled up. We want to make sure that everyone has an opportunity to get a vaccine

who may be at increased risk. And while eighty three percent eighty two eighty three percent of the COVID related mortality is concentrated amongst those who are sixty five and up, it is the case that people who are between sixty and sixty four are at an elevated risk visa VI those who are much younger, and so I'm happy to announce today that starting one week from today, next Monday, we will be lowering the age in the state of Florida to sixty plus for vaccinations, and that will across

the board at all of the state pods, all of the pharmacies, all of the different drive through sites that are being operated. So again, one week from today, if you're sixty plus, you will be able to get sign up and be able to get the vaccine. Thank God for a governor Ron descent as of Florida in so many ways, I mean one just being a more capable administrator, being a more capable leader has undoubtedly saved lives as well as businesses and futures and economies and hopes and

dreams of millions of Floridians. So, for all of our Florida listeners, you have been blessed with the best governor of the entire pandemic, and that has made a real difference to your state and to your lives and your family's lives. So there's a debt of gratitude that is owed from certainly Floridians, but also from the whole country, because without Florida, we would have no control group to

borrow from assigned to scientific experiment. We would have no method of really knowing did California do the right thing? Did New York do the right thing? Obviously not, and they'll never admit it. They'll never say, you know what, we were wrong because that would hurt their prospects for power in the future, and that's all that really matters to them. But now descentis is lowering vaccine eligibility people

over sixty. Once you get everybody over sixty vaccinated by the numbers, your risk of death and hospitalization you know in that group is going to go down eighty to eighty five. I mean that that pretty much destroyed. If everybody over sixty is vaccinated, it's no longer a pandemic. It's a it's a dangerous you know, virus for some people that occasionally will claim a life, but it's not really a pandemic anymore at that point, just based on the numbers. So, and this is I think where we're

going to be relatively soon. I don't want to note at that Wall Street journal piece where you had at Johns Hopkins University, MD and epidemiologist projecting that will be at hurt immunity by the end of April. And they said, and they fact check this and said it's wrong. It's making a prediction. They say, it's wrong. I think it

might be May. But we're going to get there, and then you're really going to see the shrill hysterics from the libs because they're gonna be like, oh my gosh, and I don't want to go back to normal life. I don't want to go back to normal. It's scary of the virus. They've become so hyper anxious, the hypochondria, right, the irrational fear of sickness that has overtaken so many people. But yes, there's a real virus out there. Yes it

has killed five hundred thousand people. But we know who's at risk, we know what the factors are, and we also know that all these things that we've been told to do, all these hoops we've been jumping through, really haven't done anything to stop it, really haven't haven't ended it. So you know, I just I sit here and and I'm so agitated by the way that people have been lying about this all along they've been lying about this

to you. One of the things that I always get is people who trash me online for my positions on and by the way I've said, I am, I am so proud. I think I have in some ways as proud of the way that we kept it real here on the buck Sex and showed her in the pandemic because I have everything, We've got, anything we've ever done on the show. Because the pressure to conform, to go along with the little fauciite whimps and just in their hysterics, it was immense. But I always people would say, you know,

they'd yell at me. I've had mds come at me on Twitter, for example, or these people that say they're mds. You know how many people have died because you deny the virus exists. It's like, if you say that to me, you're a moron. Never denied the virus exists, never denied it's dangerous, never denied it's gonna it has killed a lot of people, and he's gonna keep killing people for

a while. I look at the policies around this and the facts and the data around it and come to conclusions that are based in reason and logic and judgment instead of panic and hysteria and the desire to control. There will be some people who are going to start trying to rewrite their history during this pandemic, rewrite their actions.

You'll see this in the media for sure, especially among conservatives, because there were a lot of people that were, oh man, they were taken in by the virtue signaling of mask religion for a while. I gotta say, people that change their photos on social media to show that they're they're masked up in their photo, what the heck was that about? The whole point of the photo in your social media profile,

your avatar is people can see your face. You're going to put a big stupid mask over your face to show everybody, you know, how much you believe in the science. But it really belief in the science is really the key word, isn't. It's not about what's true, It's about what people believed, what they wanted to believe. Here's a Lib journal who's making the claim that there's some anti that Trump is part of the leader of an anti

science movement. Here play fourteen. Well, first of all, Nicole, think of the good that Donald Trump could have done had he taken his dose of the vaccine in public instead of having it quietly released through an aid during Seapack suggested, Oh, the President and First Lady Milania Trump had the vaccine behind closed doors the White House in January before he left office. Donald Trump is the forefront of an anti science movement that has swept through the

Republican Party. It's not a recent development, but it accelerated under Trump. And we know that he, of course is the one who disparaged the mask use. He played down of how dangerous this virus was. Had he been had put one a mass, you know, faithfully, had he encouraged others to do so, had he not had those super spreader events known as his rallies, things have been very

different from the start. And even then, had he simply done had put on a vent and used the vaccine as he's on his way out of office, that would have done some good too. So much bullcrap in this one statement here from this Jonathan Lemyer. I don't even know who this guy is, but you know, he goes on TV, and so we're supposed to believe that he's a person that we should listen to about any of

this stuff. A journal another journal. What the heck does the journal know about sign nothing, nothing, But it's unbelievable, isn't it. Yeah, if Donald Trump hadn't held his rallies, there wouldn't have been you know, one hundred million COVID cases in the country, right, Just blame Trump. If Trump hadn't downplayed that's their favorite thing to downplay the virus. Fauci downplayed the virus your jackasses a year ago. Yesterday, Fauci said, come on, don't wear masks, no need or

whatever it was in March. The virus had been circulating for months at that point. But it's all it's all blamed on trumpets. It's their delusion that Trump was really the problem. Like I said, journals are the worst people in America. It's really, It's really true. Journals are the worst because people go to them for truth, for facts, for information, and what they get is just bile and propaganda and lies. You know, people could say whatever they

want about this show. I tell people what I think, how I think, where I come from, who I'm rooting for. I'm honest about what I believe. Journals are a bunch of little petty frauds, and there are huge frauds when it comes to the issue of Donald Trump and what he did and did not do over the course of the pandemic, and what he said and the actions he took.

Trump let Fauci run pandemic response or really gave it, and Mike Pence who let Fauci run pandemic response, if we're gonna be honest about it, and now they act like he ignored the science. I mean, look at how Republicans are the ones who are a lot, a lot of ticke cases. They're saying, yeah, let's get those vaccinations out there sooner. Look at Rohn de Santis. We're not

anti science, we're anti nonsense. Okay, they've now said. Someone explained to me how we're supposed to trust the CDC knows what it's talking about on masking when mask mandates have, according to CDC numbers, a roughly one percent, which is within the margin of error, which means it could be zero percent effect on deaths in the United States from COVID nineteen over a sixty day period or you know,

over the period of masking in a certain region. And how are we supposed to think they have all the answers when doctor Auster Home weeks ago said wearing two masks is actually worse than wearing one, But the CDC says, no, you got to wear two masks. Well, is it obvious? Which is it? Their arguments are garbage, garbage. That's why you never see the mask proponents actually have somebody that has doubts about the effectiveness of mass masking as a pilot.

You never you never see these debates. You're not even They don't allow the debate to happen because this is so deeply rooted in the psychology of the left. This has been such an amazing mechanism for them to test out how much control can they exert over you? If the government can determine how you can breathe, if the government can force you to breathe with difficulty and in discomfort. Because they say, so, what can't the government do? Where

does the government draw the line? You know, whatever happened to my body? My choice only for killing babies, they'll say that for Oh, they're so into science, right, is what is a fetus? Oh, a fetus is a you know, it's not really a person who really it's a person. But oh, they're so into science. The democrats. But what a woman? I know what a woman is? You know what a woman is? Do democrats? Not clear? They won't define it. They won't define it. What is a woman?

Is a woman a man that thinks he's a woman. Because the answer that they give you is yes, that you know, the mother that you have, the the woman who gave you life. If you're listening to this, has no inherent distinction from a transgender male who believes that he is a woman. No, there's no difference in their woman leness. That is the official position of the left.

That is their position. They when you put things in very clear terms, they get upset about this sometimes, but you it is in fact their position is in the fact that there can be no distinction. Made I remember for a little while they were even trying to convince people that it was bigoted on on dating apps for guys to reject trans gender transgender females on dating apps.

Who you know, guys who are heterosexual don't want to date a or don't want to go out on dates, you know, romantic dates with a biological male who claims to be female. The Left went through a little period, but then they really, okay, we're not actually going to go to that length quite yet. They'll get there eventually. Again, don't think they won't, but they realized that was that was a little too over the edge for even where you know, the Huffington Post can go right now and

these other sites of left wing insanity, science deniers. Where's the science denying among among Republicans? Where's the science denial among people like Rhonda Santis who look at the data, look at the numbers, and make reasonable can take reasonable action and make reasonable conclusions from it. Versus the other side. The Democrats all of a sudden say, yeah, let's double mask. Really, why all of a sudden it's so obvious. Why wasn't an obvious six months ago. They don't have answers. They

want you to comply. You've been dehumanized. You have been trained by all of this to think the government has a right to do anything to you as long as the government says they have a good reason. That is the most dangerous thing that a free society could convince itself of the government could do whatever it wants to you as long as it's got a really good reason. Masking is the gateway drug for totalitarianism. We all know it. We all see it. And this is why the lib

why the left adopt this so thoroughly. Notice how Donald Trump is not president, hasn't be president for a while. Have I changed my tune at all in any of this stuff now? My Yeah, you know, it was never about Trump for me, masking and lockdowns, it was never about the press. I didn't care with them, honestly. I felt like the president was too down with the Faucci, the Fauci clown. I thought that it was too much belief in the experts from this administration and not enough

policy decision making. And I think that it probably caused Trump the presidency. I think it probably caused trump reelection at least was one of the major factors. And then there's going to be the rewriting of what people did and said and the finger pointing as more and more folks wake up to the truth of the lockdowns than everything else. Remember Oxyris Barbo, some of you remember her. She was the health director for New York City whatever.

She's the chief of the New York City Health Department, whatever the title is. And she was early on one of the people who were saying, oh, it's fine, you know, don't worry about the pandemic, just go out, go to the Wuhan Strong Festival and all these sorts of things. And now she's trying to tell everybody because she left her job and you know, wants to probably get a book deal and wants people to think well of her and wants to make money and advance herself, that she

was a hero in all of this. Somehow, here's the former city health Commissioner Oxyris Barbo in New York and behind the scenes, you know, we had talked to the mayor and his team that we could see tens of thousands of people die if we don't act quickly, and they're being sort of this panic in the room of like, oh my god, you can't say that to the public because we're gonna lose their trust, and me feeling really strongly that we needed to prepare New Yorkers emotionally for

what was coming. And so, you know, what I ended up saying was something to the effect of in a regular flu season, you know, there's anywhere from a thousand to two thousand people that die because of the flu. This is going to be much much worse. And what's going to make it even more. I'm trying to think of what the word was in my mind. I wanted to say, what's going to be even more horrifying? But what I think I ended up saying is what's going to make it even more challenging is that it's going

to happen in such a short amount of time. Yeah, the doctor Oxyrius Barbo, she was a pediatrician who hasn't practiced medicine in like twenty years, but she became a health bureaucrat in New York. She's a hero, hero and all this her and Deblasio, whom she worked for, who's a moron and the worst mayor in the country. I would argue, some of you, I know Portland, you're saying Ted Wheeler, I know what the Portland team Buck is saying. You're all yell like Ted Wheeler, And you may be right.

That's he's close. He's close. That's a fair point. But de Blasio is pretty damn awful. But Oxyrius Barbo, for those who are wondering, was also the woman who said when the NYPD, which is forty some odd thousand members, when the NYPDE was continue to do their jobs and wanted more ppe from the city. Her quote was, I don't give a rats ass about your cops to one of the senior members of the NYPD when he was saying that they needed more masks and more ppe from

the city health authorities. I don't give a rat's ass about your cops. That's you, that's your public. And then she apologized for that, because of course, when that came out, what are you gonna do? Not apologize? But that is

your health director for the City of New York. New York's, I mean, America's largest city, doesn't give a rat's ass about the cops or on the front lines of not just keeping her society together, but also are the true essential workers who during the worst parts of the pandemic kept showing up. They're not public school teachers. They didn't get to stay home. Sorry, they had to actually be out there dealing with the public doing their jobs. But

get ready for a lot of revisionist history. Many of the health experts who have been the worst in all of us, many of the health experts who were wrong in credible cool ways at key times, are now going to turn around and say, actually, I saw this all coming, and you should buy my book about leadership during a pandemic. You know the Cuomo maneuver. You could call it rock and roll. Fellow patriots, it's time for roll. Call Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton or Team Buck at Iheartmaty

dot com. You're going to email us and please Team I really would appreciate if you give us on if you listen, even if you're not a big podcast listener in general, but if you're somebody who has listened to the the podcast, give us a five star rating on the Apple podcast Store, and also write up a quick review of why the Buck Sexton Show is awesome, a couple of lines, two lines, a line anything. We need more reviews because we have, we'll get more love from the

Apple podcast Store. Based on our audience size, we should get a lot more love in the Apple podcast Store in terms of suggested listening things like that. If you do those reviews so that really helps us out those you just take it, take its twenty seconds. If you don't mind some of you listening to this, please give us reviews, give us five stars, help spread the word about help pass the buck an Apple podcast. And also you can always listen to the iHeart Radio app. Right

Producer Mark. Yes, we are the number one company for podcasts. Yes, indeed, and I believe on the iHeart Radio app we are in top ten podcasts for the month. So there's that. So listening on the iHeartRadio app, we are a show that is getting a lot of listeners there, absolutely, Yes, indeed, let's get to your thoughts in roll call, we get to t J. Buck. I'm of two minds about Biden's current faculty if any Like everyone else on the right, I want to know just how bad as cognitive functions

really are. However, I'm slightly concerned about the ramifications what they might be if everyone else the country, in the world come to know what many of us on the right I've suspected all along, that Biden is just not There a few worst case scenarios being a Harris takeover, some very aggressive action from some of our overseas adversaries, etc. All of which make want to say, for the love

of God, please keep hide and Biden. Regardless though, if he does actually have a press conference by the end of the month, can someone please ask him to show us the science of why he needs to be double masking If he's already vaccinated, Doctor Fauci's orders or what. Well, TJ. You gotta like you threw a lot in here, so

let me try to take these one by one. Yeah, if I mean, I guess you're saying if the world figured out somehow that the commander in chief in the United States that Hyden Biden was declined in, that there would be a bad outcome for us. You know, maybe our enemies would circle and try to do something to us. And to that, I just want to say, we're kind of already there. I mean, I think they already know.

I think China sees Hide and Biden and things, well, this is going to be a great four years for us. And look, I've been telling all my friends I think that I think the Chinese economy is going to have boom years going forward. Here. Now, there are some reasons why that may not happen, and I could be wrong, but I think the Chinese economy is going to be a real, you know, really get revved up as an engine.

And so, yes, TJ. I do believe that there's an issue here with the restaurant figuring out, but I think they already kind of know. So I don't know if it's going to make that much of a difference if there's a moment of recognition that would change that. And then about the yeah about double masking when you're Biden

is double masking after having been vaccinated. So he's really going around by the numbers, and he's taking the precaution that there's like a one in ten thousand or one in fifty thousand chance that he's going to infect somebody at any point in time, and so he's taking precautions. He gets that. No, what he would say is that what he would say is that he's showing other people by example. You know, surely by example, you're gonna see the left is gonna get crazy and crazier on this.

They're gonna say, even if it saves a thousand lives a year, we should keep asking forever. They're gonna people to take that position. They've gone. We've gone full circle in twelve months. Exactly the arguments that I was making, Why didn't we mask up for flu? Why isn't the speed limit fifteen miles an hour? All that was all valid and true, and they didn't have a response to it other than shut up and wear a mask. That

was their answer. That was what we got and yeah, and it worked so well, don't we all see that? The point is, if you wear a mask five days of the week and then on the sixth day you don't for a certain you know, and you get infected, you're only gonna get You only get infected once with this.

So if you wear a mask for five days, in the sixth day of the week, you get infected, and and you then pass it to one person three days later when you're also not wearing your mask, you've now created you know, you've sort of been a part of the overall chain of transmission for everything. I mean, the only real reason that you could think of where masking might have played a real role and bring down the numbers here would be would be if you thought that

it prevented super spreader events. But remember, you could be a super spreader for one day, one time when you're not wearing your mask enough or where you pull your mask down. You know, there's so much about this that we don't know. And look, there are things that I'll tell you that are theories that I have, and I'm there are theories. I'm not saying that the v of the data proves this or that I'm right but I think we're going to find out that there are very

specific genetic markers for severe reaction to this disease. That this goes. There's whole layers here of susceptibility that we don't really understand, but we will understand in time, even among those who are at high risk. You know, why is it that you know, you hear about seventy five year olds who have hypertension, for whom this virus is devastating and can be very deadly, But there are other seventy five year olds who get this and they're basically

am asymptomatic or have a very mild kate. Why is that? You know? There's a lot of factors that go into it. But I think that this is a prediction. I think we will find, and this might take a matter of years, that there were certain genetic predispositions of genetic markers for this disease. And also I think we'll find a lot more about T cell immunity that people had from other coronavirus infections that played a major role in this. But that's not even really talked about right now. Right it's

all just do you wear a mask enough? I mean, I'm going into the gym every day, and I wish every day I'm going to the gym two or three times a week. I really need to get up the four or five times a week promise. I know how to moderate my eating, but I'm hungry. I get hungry, and then I want to eat more because I got to do radio all. Then I get stressed. But I guess I gotta get more comfortable at it, because going

to the gym I'm fine with. It's the it's the changing my diet for health and fitness purposes that I find so very challenging. But anyway, I go into the gym and I throw the mask on and I'm sitting there. I'm like, I'm other people around me. There's only two or three of them usually at a time in a gym that's maybe twelve hundred square feet, and they're masking up and I'm sitting here, like we're really supposed to

believe this is this is serving a purpose. I think it's really I think it's really so stupid, as you know. But John Heybaker, producer, Mark, I love the show, and with Rush Gone, you are now my number one. I've appreciated your remembrance of Rush and the humility you show by giving him credit for your radio career. It's time to hit corporations where it really matters. I'm pulling my business from all left leaning commie corporations and putting my

money where things like free speech are still valued. I've canceled my Facebook and Twitter accounts, and canceled my Amazon Prime. I don't use YouTube anymore, and I actually use Duck Duck Go for search. When Google sent me an email letting me know that they now own Fitbit, I replied, and that's why I'm throwing my fitbit in the trash. Google pulled it's don't be evil model from the corporate handbook in twenty eighteen, and everywhere everywhere there seems have

gotten the message. Everyone there seems have gotten the message. Shield Tide Well, John, First off, thank you for your very kind words about me being your your number one in the radio world now really does mean a lot and uh and thanks also for appreciating that I do you know, I owe Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck a tremendous amount for my radio career, both of them, and I am somebody who believes in paying his paying his

debts and paying his respects. So that's one reason why, you know, even even in moments where I think that there would have been political disagreement back in the day, once I had my own show and Glenn had his show and about Trump, for example, never hear me say a bad word about Glenbeck because Glenn's a Glen's somebody that I owe a debt of gratitude too, and I believe in you. I believe in points of personal honor

like that, and you don't violate that. You know. I've seen some conservatives going after each other recently on different things publicly, and it's just I always feel like, come on, why are where are we doing that. We've got enough to fight with the other side. We're gonna fight with our own side publicly. We're gonna have our own spats, and look at it. I've you know, one day I'll explain.

I know I'm sort of cryptic about it, but you know, there are one or two conservatives, one in particular, who have just always made a point of coming after me publicly. I've never I've never gone after that individual. I've never reciprocated, I've never started anything. I'm just doing my I'm just doing my work in my job. But you know, there're people out there who are very petty and insecure and kind of nasty and not as good as they want

people to believe they are at something. And you know, so that's why some of you know I'm talking about. Very few of you do, though, So I'll give you that. And by the way, I'll just say like I've never had I I've no beef. Some people seem to think I have a problem with um that when I'm talking this way, I'll tell you it's absolutely not Ben Shapiro. People seem to think it's not Ben Shapiro. Ben and I don't know each other, really, never really met each other.

A lot of a lot of respect for what he's done and the businesses that he's created. I've never said a bad word about Ben, you know, officially or on a you know, openly or covertly. Never, I've actually never, I've never been So maybe maybe I'm narrowing it down for you. So I love Rush forever and owe him forever, and and oh Glenn, and appreciate Glenn, and Glenn is my friend, and appreciate Sean Hannity and what he's done for this business, and what he's done also for my

career on radio at different times. And I have no problem whatsoever with Ben Shapiro. I'm just saying those are all people that I respect and have nothing And you know, I like Dan Bongino a lot and think Dan Bongino is a great guy who's built a great business. You know, i'd go to but see, I'd rather talk about who I'm positively disposed to on the show. I'd rather say nice things about people on my side. And so that's

what I do. That's that's that's my approach. And if other people out there want to take shots at me for no reason other than they're kind of petty and realize that, you know, my talent is something that makes them upset for whatever reason, or what I do makes them upset for I can't even get into it. Well that's on them. I don't do that, and you listen

to the show. Know that. So as for John pulling all of your different pulling all of your different things, I would just say good for you that putting your money where your mouth is and actually taking action based upon all this stuff is a is a thing to be admired, and very few people are willing to do what. I will say that I'm not even at the point yet where where I'm able to disentangle myself from some of these big tech companies. I'm honest about that, because

I can't do what I do. I can't compete in the media marketplace without using some of these platforms as long as I can use them before I get kicked off of them entirely. So yeah, there that's John. You're you're a man who is taking action, and I encourage all the rest of you who can. Now there's again that's taking action where you're cutting off a company or you're saying, you know, you can always take positive action

like the sponsors on this show supporting them. You know, get on my pillow mattress topper and pillows, get you know, get black Rifle coffee, check out Express VPN. You know, do these things use my promo code. That's a way of putting your money where your mouth is too. That's a way of taking action based upon what matters to you. Continuing on with our roll call, remember Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton for getting in on the roll call. Love hearing from all of you all across the country.

Thank you, so much for writing in and let's see here Steve hey Bucket Mark a word of advice on the bobcat rescue leave them alone. A good friend found one in a trap, he released it and then fought with a thing for forty five minutes. By his account, his story was confirmed by all the damage done to his person and the dead Bobcat. Get an ocelot or an exotic cat hybrid. Check out Bengal cats both legal and Florida with a class to permit. So, Producer Mark, I don't know if we're gonna be able to do

a bobcat rescue situation. I never planned on it. Maybe you should just get a dog. But you you back to your producer, Mark, you back my play. So you know, if I had to, if you and missus Mark had to babysit my rescue bobcat for the weekend while I went down to you know, no, I'd leave you with the cage and some tranquilizer darts if need be, it would not happen. I would not watch the Bobcat for you yet. Dog in the shore anytime? Yeah, yeah, you

and the snow. This from the same page about this what she really she's like, what is it with you and thinking having like a you know, an exotic rescue pet would be so fun and great. I'm like, come on, who doesn't want to have a pet otter? I don't know. I think it will be if you want something to exotic, get like a husky. I have a Husky's exotic. But I hear what you I mean in terms of it's a lot of dog. Yeah they are. They're amazing animals,

very smart, very loyal, intelligent. But you know, it's a lot of dogs, all right, tiktoks of them howling all the time. Oh my god, I couldn't deal with that. Yeah, no, they're allowed too. I saw, I saw. You know, I've got dogs in the minkcause I actually went to visit to Lula last night. She's really back with my parents now because my parents thankfully are vaccinated, and you know, with the pandemic receding now, they want their dog back,

which is understandable. So now I can literally go visit her. She's not in my care anymore. But I'm definitely there's gonna be a Team Buck, a new Team Buck mascot here pretty soon. The other question is is it gonna be producer Mark Junior, who because he and missus Mark are gonna have a baby or is it gonna be buckets a puppy, which one happens, Let's not make any birth announcements on the air. There is no baby, there's no butN in the oven. I just want to clarify that. Okay,

that's a fair, that's fair, that's fair. I'm just wondering which one of these things is gonna it's gonna be the dog. It's gonna be the dog for both of us. We'll both get a dog before that happens, I promise. All right, Oh, are you do you have to get the hypoallergenic dog? Are you a hypo you know, does missus Mark have the allergy? No? Oh, we would just prefer to get a dog that doesn't shed a lot. Because my little brother who's in Florida, now, my brother

keats he got a cava pooh. And I will say, so it's a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel mix with a miniature poodle. And the thing is adorable. I will say, really cute dog. I mean, I'm a I'm a big fan and hypoallergenic for those who want that it's just it's just the sweetest little animal. So anyway, I'm a big funny dog that ends with a pooh. And I don't mean that literally is the cutest thing in the world. Yeah, no, they're good. They're good. Uh okay, so Steve says, no,

Bobcat rescue Dave hey Buck. Watch Murder among the Mormons on Netflix. It'll blow you away. Biggest counterfeiting scheme ever attempted, and this guy almost pulled it off. It's a pretty quick watch. Keep up the great work with the show. I listened daily and promote it to my friends. Well, Dave, thank you so much for listening daily and promoting it to your friends. That means a lot. That really helps us.

And when we when producer Mark gets to like his fourth and fifth kids, for example, it's gonna have a lot of mouths to feed. So we're gonna we're gonna need this show to be pretty successful. And I five would be a lot of kids, Mark, I would say, that's a lot. That's what that gives me. Harp palpetitions. Yeah, that's a lot. I mean, look now that it's great for anybody who does it. If I would, I'm one

of four but five's a lot of kids. I give you credit if you can do it, but I don't think that exactly like I give you, know, all all due credit and uh and you know, props to somebody who has five kids. Anyway, Um, yeah, what do we got here? Murder among the Mormons. I'll check it out. I'll check it out, probably faster than producer Mark checks out the always on Amazon Prime. Anyway, everybody, that's going to be the show for today until next time. She'll tie