The Left Sees White Supremacy Everywhere

leave to chance. Because the left views this as a vocation into itself, right, I mean, this is something that they do as a matter of strategy. They want to be They want to be in charge of things. They want to be in charge of the schools, of Hollywood, of the media. They want to make the decisions about who gets into elite educational institutions. They want to be the ones who hold the door, who are the gatekeepers,

and then they can mold society in their image. And we're just beginning to see now among conservatives, among Republicans are willingness to finally push back against this in a way that matters, perhaps because we're defending on our own five yard line at this point on these cultural issues, on schools, on so many things, but it has finally crossed over we finally seen that if we allow this to continue, politics is in fact downstream from culture, and

if they control the culture and the institutions of culture, we will be in a place we cannot win because the country will have decided to move past what we believe, move past what we think. And you know, one area where there's actually a lot of control that they're always instituting over us is on the Internet, which is the primary means of communication. It's how a lot of us not only do our jobs now but also talk to everybody buy things. But they watch everything you do. You

know that, right. But you can anonymize your connection so that you can serve the Internet freely without wondering who will get a whole of your search history or your viewing habits, or what they'll do with that information. Do you want these private companies that are now working closer and closer with the government to have the data on everything you type, every website you go to. That's why I use express VPN. These companies can't see my IP

address at all. My identity is anonymized by a secure VPN server and my data is encrypted for maximum protection. Beside hiding all my Internet activity, what I like most about Express VPN is how easy it is to use. I just download the app onto my phone. You just set it up and then you run it and you're protected. Stop handing over your data to big tech companies. This is a must, all right. This is something that you have to have. And think of it like insurance for

your home. Okay, you gotta do this. You must protect your privacy online with Express vpn. Defend your rights. Go to Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck. You'll get three extra months of protection. That's right, three three months when you go to express

vpn dot com slash buck. Florida Civics curriculum will incorporate foundational concepts with the best materials, and it will expressly exclude unsanctioned narratives like critical race theory and other unsubstantiated theories. Let me be clear, there's no room in our classrooms for things like critical race theory. Teaching kids to hate their country and to hate each other is not worth

one red cent of taxpayer money. So we will invest in actual, solid, true curriculum, and we will be a leader in the development an implementation of a world class civics education, a world class civics education. This is what Florida is on a pathway to you now thanks to

Governor Rond santists in public schools. That's right. People should learn the truth about how government works, how their country works, and we shouldn't allow for this brain rot of critical race theory to continue to spread all across campuses, all across not just high school, but now grade school, grammar school curriculum. Ronda Santis is increasingly feeling like the leader

of the Republican Party. I know that that Donald Trump still holds the for a lot of people, holds the reins of the GOP's future, but Ronda Santis is showing with his actions. Ronda Santis is accomplishing with his results so much that at this point you have to figure

that he's a likely twenty twenty four presidential candidate. But it's even more than that, he's creating a template for other states to follow, because now with the Democrats and control of the House and a day factor majority in the Senate, what we see and of course the White House under Biden, who everyone's realized now really is just a pass through for the left wing agenda. I mean, it's it's the Obama administration with Biden as a puppet, right.

Biden just sort of shuffles around. Yeah, you know, sort of just say some things, and then I kind of say things like this. I come down here and I read the speech, and I mumble some stuff, and then I say some things kind of loud. See you think I'm still awake. And then I mumble some more stuff, and I pretend to be a great leader because you know, I'm Joe Biden. Yeah, people are figuring out what this was all about. It's exactly what I told you it

would be, so you're not surprised at all. But we need states to step up and show a better way forward. You'll notice that it's also Florida that has taken the lead and trying to create protections for people social media companies effectively defrauding them. These companies were built on the

back of a promise. The promise was that you'd be able to share information, you'd be able to use their platforms without respect to your politics, that they were platforms for the free exchange of ideas, that they were First Amendment defenders, that they were nonpartisan, non political. That's an absolute lie, and it is shifting our national conversation about every issue on a day to day basis. And if we don't tackle this, we'll lose. If we don't change this,

we cannot win the future. It will already be decided for us. And this is also why critical race theory in schools. We are paying attention to this now because you see that the left has a need for an overarching narrative of hysteria. The left is defined by a widespread psychological defect right now, of overwhelming fear from things that are either a minimal risk or a very limited challenge,

very limited threat against them. I mean, the big example is white supremacy, which I'll be talking to you more about. As you know the term white supremacy if you just look for a Google search of white supremacy use in the media ten years ago versus now, it's just taken off like a rocket ship. This has become a narrative. And what they've done is just like in the nineties when racism was used as a club to beat people that you didn't agree with politically and on the right generally,

but also to keep people on your own side in line. Right, if you are a liberal now leftist, as I think the more appropriate terms, I'll use that one in place of if you are a leftist and you step out a line. You know, they sometimes will feed their own to the mob. You know, they'll feed their own to the wolves in order to show just how woke they are. This is a mechanism of control. It's a mechanism of achieving power and of control. And critical race theory is

an indoctrination. In fact, I wrote I wrote my college thesis at Amherst in part about Herbert Marcus and critical race theory and the way that it was used to justify campus speech codes, which have been around for a long time. But the campus speech codes were an early indicator at colleges and universities of where we were heading. We were going to a place. It's where we are now you say things I don't like. That's basically violence.

Speech equals violence. That took decades to create that perception, to create the groundwork so that it would finally take root, and we were warning about it. We're saying, look at how insane they are at Harvard, at Yale, at Michigan State, at Missoo, at Reed College, at UCLA. I mean, you go all over the country ut Austin, look at how

crazy some of the stuff on campuses. But because we are conservatives, because we're people that don't sit around constantly terrified about everything all the time, we said, Okay, they'll grow out of it. I think that was our attitude. They'll grow out of it. They'll recognize that this is foolish, they'll recognize this doesn't make sense. And now we live in a society where we see, oh no, they didn't grow out of it, and in fact, they run some of the most important they have seen some of the

commanding heights of our culture. Of politics, of the economy, of corporations, the nodes of control. Sure, half the country can be Republican and half the country is by party affiliation roughly speaking, But if they control the corporations, Hollywood, the news media, not just college campuses. Now law schools, I mean international relations school I can tell you because I've actually done some study at them, are are basically

like communist on claves. I mean, they're completely insane, And to get a master's in international affairs it means you're effectively you know, they're creating a stooge to go work for the UN and who thinks that America is really bad? All these other countries do great things for the world. America is really bad. But if they control all these things, and then they also control the credentialing institutions, so then it becomes a well, we're just the smarter people. We're

just smarter than you are. Now, it's just because you create the reality on these campuses of the people that you want, you decide that you are in a place that you can create a socially engineered future of this country. And that's what they've done. And critical race theory is essential in that. Critical race theory is a major component

of this. It's the it's the view if you were to just look up a definition of it, that law and legal this from Britannica dot com, law and legal institutions are inherently racist, and that race itself, instead of being biologically grounded, are natural is a socially constructed concept that are used by white people to further their economic and political interests at the expense of people of color.

According to critical race theory, racial inequality emerges from the social, economic, and legal differences that white people create between races to maintain elite white interests in labor, markets and politics, give rise to poverty and criminality in many minority communities, and giving rise to the CRT movement, officially organized itself in nineteen eighty nine at the first Annual Workshop on Critical Race Theory, though it's intellectual origins go back much further

to the nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies. I mentioned to you that I had studied Herbert Marc's back when I was in college, which now is about twenty almost twenty

years ago. And he is somebody who his ideas, his view of a society in which everyone is constantly competing with the I mean, he's basically a Marxist, and he's a cultural or a social Marxist or the Marks believed in his theories of course, affecting every aspect, every time, every facet of society, including family relations, including relations between husband and wife. Marks didn't think there was just some solely economic rationale for everything. It wasn't just an economic interest.

It was all of society. But this belief system. You'll notice that they really got it going on campuses officially in the nineteen nineties, which is also when you saw the rise of PC culture. PC culture was the precursor to cancel culture. PC culture led to everything is racist. Racism is the reason for all these problems in society. Even if you don't do something or you yourself are

not racist, you are a part of a racist system. Therefore, you are furthering racism by your very existence, unless you are, of course not white, or you are somebody who agrees with all of our doctrine. Oh and actually, if you're a minority who doesn't agree, they will take away your minority noess, they will say that you don't you don't really count. This is how the left has created a perception that, you know, Justice Thomas, for example, is not

really representative in some way of the black community. And they'll say really horrible things to that, but that's what they'll say. Critical race theory is the well spring for so much of our social misery and despair and so much of what tears us apart, and it undermines foundational concepts of what this American experiment is all about. That we are individuals alike in the equal in dignity and

grace and made in the image of God. That is all cast aside with this notion that wherever we are, whoever you are, your individual actions, your decency, your character, your ethics don't matter. You're part of a collective, a racial collective, and you have to either make amends or demands amends depending on where you are, and also be relieved of any individual responsibility. Notice that this is all just a way of shifting power dynamics. People aren't responsible

for their own life, for their own actions. It's the collective, it's society, and you can either pay you pay obedience to this. You can either make amends for this, or you can be one of the bad people. You can be somebody that has called out, you can be somebody who is considered a part of the problem. You must be not just non racist, but anti racist. This all comes from critical race theory, and this is pulling the

country apart. It is toxic, and I'm very happy to see that there are some states that are finally saying enough is enough. What happens when critical race theory goes unrestricted, when it actually becomes the doctrine what it's what people are taught there made to believe, or they're brought to believe. What kind of things happen? Well, it erodes your ability to think critically, which is of course the irony of this about anything, because everything goes into this framework of

a racial determinism. You're part of a racial collective wherever you are, and that has a pull on you, your worth, your decency, who you are in society is largely determined by whatever critical race theory says. So are you a good person or your racist? Not racist? Doesn't matter. You have to be an anti racist, which means doing what they say, and I means seeing white supremacy everywhere. For example, everything has some white supremacist angle. It means believing the

sixteen nineteen project is the true history of America. For example. It means thinking that America is an irredeemably racist and awful place. And it creates this vortex of bad thinking and resentment and divisiveness which marksist love because divisiveness separation of society especially is what is generally a healthy and prosperous and free society like our own. When you pull people apart, when you create balkanization, you can start to

establish control over groups. And then you put enough groups together and you have a collective, and then you can seize power which is the point of all of this. But how much can critical race theory change one's thinking? How much can this cultural Marxist approach change one's thinking. They have to get to a point, you see, where objective reality doesn't count anymore. They have to get to a point where you can't even sharing certain facts, saying

certain data is de facto racist. What's an example of this? Okay? In New York City, we will often see here a news report where there will be a male twenty four five foot ten wearing a hooded sweatshirt, be on the lookout because just trying to rob someone, or just trying to just trying to rape someone in an alleyway, or

just you know, shots at somebody. And you'll say, well, hold on a second, why I think we need a better descript can't we have a more of a description if we're supposed to help the police find No, because depending on the race of the suspect, that itself the facts of the case could be considered racist, could be construed as racist. This happens all the time. The show Cops canceled because they felt they were there was too high of a percentage of minorities involved in a rest situations.

Even though people's faces are blurred, their identities are protected, it doesn't matter, just becomes racist. So some aspects of objective reality are therefore racists. Some things that are just true or factual, cannot share, cannot say, you know, if you were to point out, I mean even there's so many aspects that you you could see all throughout society. If you point out that Asian Americans will be talking more obviously about this issue during the show. But Asian Americans

are discriminated against in colleges. Why is it that Asian Americans have the highest household income, higher than white Americans and a white supremacist society. Why is it that Asian Americans, including those who arrive as refugees from Southeast Asia, those who arrive penniless from East Asia, from or from South Asia, do very well in America, are prosperous, quickly find themselves

in the middle even the upper middle class. And what's different about the Asian experience in America in that regard than other minority groups that continue to struggle. You better only say the allowable narrative, or else you're destroyed. You'll be ruined. That's the way critical race theory works that you know there and the only allowable narrative is that white supremacy is the reason for all of this. Just

so you understand, that's where this is. And when up is down and down is up, and when we can't have agreement upon fundamental facts and it's just a contest of power. Senator Kennedy Yes today on Capital Hildering and centered Hearing, asked an LGPD lg BTQ activist Alphonso David how many biological genders are there? Very straightforward question. This is what he said. Mister David, let me ask you a question, how many? How many sexes do you think

there are? How many sexes? I mean there's a difference between sex and gender identity. If that's what you're getting, I'm asking biological sexes? How many do you think there are? Well, I would defer to the medical practitioners, but I think there's been studies showing that if you're talking about sex, sex is defined by many different characteristics and cooling chromosome are there more than there are? There more than two? You could make that argument that they might be. Are

you making that our individual but a center? I can't ignore the fact that they're individuals who are intersexed, and so so I'm just trying. There is not an out of time. Are there are more than two sexes in Europe? Is not limited to two? Okay, there are more than two genders. That's where we are now, you heard him. I mean that we can't get a straight answer them this other than well maybe kind of we don't. That's where we are. This does have a Soviet field to it.

I'm somebody who reads a lot about the former Soviet Union, the totalitarianism of it. Whatever the state told you, you had to believe whatever the party told you, or read nineteen eighty four orwell, and you can see what a fictional totalitarian state was like. But they actually enacted it in the twentieth century in some places. That whatever they tell you must not only you must not only accept it without challenging, you must celebrate it. It's not enough

to bend the knee. You have to proclaim your allegiance to falsehood now. Because if they can get you, if the critical race theorists, if the left in America, which is ascended and which is in control of so much, can get you to agree to falsehood, they get you to do anything. Terrible mass shooting in the Atlanta area yesterday. People still in shock as we as we see this, uh more information about Robert Aaron Long, twenty one years old, killed eight people, six Asian women, a white woman, and

a white man. Three hour crime spree, three different spas. I'm sorry, this was on Tuesday, and there's a lot there's a lot of video of this that's now circulating.

And this is one of those moments where you you have seen somebody who is clearly deranged and evil, and it's it's just an awful story where you live in a in a very big country with a lot of a lot of individuals who unfortunately, when you got three hundred and thirty million people, it only takes a handful of evil crazies to create an incident like this or or will continue to create incidents like this over the

course of a year. What do we do about it? Well, there's the first reaction, which is that we want law enforcement to take action and there to be swift justice. But then there's the immediate politicization that happens in the media now too. You see this all over the place. Let's just let's stick with the facts. Here shall we. Robert Aaron Long has said that he was a sex addict and that he was targeting these massage parlors for what was effectively a mass assassination because they were a

temptation to him. That's what he said. Now, I understand that you can't always take the word of a clearly deranged and evil person on their motivations, but this does seem to line up with his past. He did go see sex addiction treatment. This guy seems to be something

of perhaps an in cell have. It reminds me of that the guy who out in California wanted to wanted to shoot the Sorority, the Sorority sisters and who was a wealthy guy but would make the you know, kind of a well off, spoiled brat guy who would make these videos in his car and said that he was going to go shoot these women. So I believe his name is well, I'll look it up. I don't want to say the wrong name. But here's what the Democrats have turned this inju right away. I mean, and this

is where we're heading towards. We have a terrible incident of mass shooting. And now it's well, what are all the political lanes. And the first one that you see from the news media in an incident like this is that they still find a way to blame this on Oh, that's right, to blame this on Donald Trump. Here is

representative Chew on the murders in Georgia, Play three. Actually, this day was coming because it's been a whole year of ugly braderick by Donald Trump, who used the word China virus, who hunt virus, and even cool flu to

describe COVID nineteen. We saw a spike recently in places like New York and in California ugly actions against the elderly and the more vulnerable, including an eighty four year old time man who was assaulted and murdered in San Francisco, and ninety one year old man who was assaulted pushed to the ground in Oakland, Chinatown, and in my own city, a man who was beaten with his own cane and then lost part of his finger. So we need to bring attention to this so we can stand together to

combat anti Asian hate crimes. Anti Asian bigotry is absolutely disgusting. Bigotry of any kind against an individual for their ethnicity, of their skin color is the most disgusting immorality that you can come up with. And yet we're going to talk about the politics of this, and we're gonna say this is Donald Trump's fault. They're going to have to actually deal with the facts. We have to actually look

at what really happened here. And in some of the incidents that she names, it has already known that the

assailant was in fact a black male. Now I'm not saying because there obviously are people who are fit that profile who are Trump voters, but I have a feeling that there there's a pretty high likelihood that some of the individuals who are who are African American and who attacked in some cases killed Asian Americans, and some of these incidents it didn't have a darn thing to do with Donald Trump or the Wuhan virus or anything else. You see, when there's when there's an incident that they

can turn to their political favor, they are quick. They are quick to run with the story before they even let any of the facts get in the way. Now, that's what they did right away, That's what they did it at the first opportunity with this, the first chance they got. This was attacked Donald Trump. I mean, I could sit and just keep playing clips. It's all ab out. It's all about blaming Donald Trump, who's no longer president and who doesn't even really have that much to say

in public these days. Here's a guy over at MSNBC, same thing. It's the mass shooting in Atlanta. Is Trump's

fall play four. We've been talking about things that have been existent in America for quite some time, but enhanced over the last four years with the presidential seal of approval given to intolerance, given to fear, given to suspicion, given to anger, given to saying very little about racial strife in this country and the causes of it, never addressing it, of lying, of lying about nearly everything you can imagine, from the dangers of the virus to the

dangers of racial animosity and what it's doing to our country, and the root of it is in the form of presidents four years, in his language and his behavior, and we're still living in it, we're still playing it out and it affects us every day. Now. Donald Trump didn't pull the trigger in Atlanta, but Donald Trump certainly was responsible for the anger and the fear and the suspicion that exists in great degree in this country, much more

so than ever in the past. And he's not to blame for a history of racial strife in this country, but he certainly is to be blamed for enhancing it with his inaction and his cowardice in addressing it. Blamed for this shooting Donald Trump somehow. I mean, you've you've got a stretch very far to find a way to make this about Donald Trump. This guy had a sex addiction.

He's clearly deranged, he's clearly evil. But it's because Donald Trump. Really, I just want to know, in five years, in ten years, when there's another match, there have been mass shootings before this, and fortunately they'll be mass shootings after this, will it still be Donald Trump's fault? I mean, this is this is pathetic. I mean, this isn't a serious argument they're making, are they. Well, no, they they think it is. They

believe this. You know, what's notable is that we're told that there's this big spike of attacks on Asian Americans, and you know, Asian Americans predominantly sometimes Asians perhaps we're in the country who are not citizens, but Asian Americans. And it's concerning, and it's wrong and there needs to be action taken here, but we don't really hear very

much about who's responsible for the attacks. And what the media then does is they fill in this narrative of oh, it's actually white supremacy, and that's what they've been doing for the last week or so. There's been a huge

spike in attacks on I should say huge spike. There's been a surgeon attacks on Asians, on assaults against Asians in the last year, and most of the attacks that you'll see most of the news stories are involving individuals who are not white, so it's interesting that white supremacy

is behind this. In fact, I found a graphic of FBI data based on the number of violent incidents against people white, Black, Hispanic, and Asian, and then the offender, the percentage of offenders, and sure enough, it's it's unsurprising, I'm sure for you to hear that most violence occurs within ethnic groups. So white people are responsible for most violence against white people. Black people are responsible for most violence against black people, Hispanic and Asian, the same thing.

Black assailants, according to this FBI data, are responsible for twenty set. This was for twenty eighteen, so this is not for even this year in twenty eighteen, responsible for twenty seven point five percent I'm sorry, yes, twenty seven point five percent of attacks on Asian Americans. So there's a spike in that or there's a substantial number there. The numbers that you see here here I can give

you the rest of it. You have Asian Americans twenty seven point five percent, Black, twenty four percent White for attacks on Asian Americans, Hispanic seven percent, Asian twenty four percent, and then other fourteen percent. That's the FBI data on this. So the African American population of the United States is about thirteen fourteen percent something like that, the single most likely perpetrator for violent assaults against Asian Americans, based on

the FBI data from twenty eighteen. Now we don't have this year's data yet, but we're African Americans. That's just These are just numbers. These are facts. This is what the FBI data compiled says about this. And I think it's interesting because we're told and by the way attacks on Asians are there is a spread. I mean, it's pretty widely distributed. You have Asians attack Agians, if whites

attack Asians. You have Blacks attacking Asians. You have a very small number of Hispanics attacking Asians, but it does happen. But we're told that this is all about white supremacy and that this is Donald Trump's fault. Well, I mean, what's the data, what's the actual support for that in the numbers? Why would that be the case? Yes, I guess it's possible that a number of the the black

um and there's recent high profile cases. I mean there was somebody was just somebody just killed in San Francisco Asian American and what I thought was a hate crime attack, and the attackers were two black males, And it's possible that they're Trump supported, not saying it's not, but I don't think that if we're looking at the likely motive here, I'm pretty sure that it's not actually Donald Trump that has created this mentality. And that's a stretch where you

could you could say this about any politicians. You start blaming whoever you want for any violent act anywhere because they're being divisive. Someone saying things that are that are divisive can't then be used to claim that a person who attacks another human being who breaks the law isn't fully responsible. For their actions or isn't you know, shouldn't be viewed that their motivation shouldn't be viewed based upon the actual circumstances around them. Blame Trump, basic is well,

this comes down Blame Trump. Oh, and blame white supremacy, which we're supposed to believe is everywhere, our whole country is is just soaked in white supremacy. Now, what a horrible, awful thing, What a terrible way to view the greatest nation that has ever existed on the planet. But this is what the left believes now. And they'll even take a terrible, tragic incident like this and they will use it as an opportunity for politics, and that's what they're doing.

But before I begin, I do want to talk about what happened in Georgia, in Atlanta. It is tragic our country, the president of nine all of us. We grieve for the loss. Our prayers are extended to the families of those who have been killed. And it speaks to a larger issue, which is the issue of violence in our country and what we must do to never tolerated and to always speak out against it. The investigation is ongoing.

We don't yet know, we're not yet clear about the motive, But I do want to say to our Asian American community that we stand with you and understand how this has frightened and shocked and outraged all people. But knowing the increasing level of hate crime against our Asian American brothers and sisters, we also want to speak out in solidarity with them and acknowledge that none of us should ever be silent in the face of any form of hate. It is true, none of us should ever be silent

in the face of any form of hate. Hate is a terrible thing and is disgusting. I also think it's very it's worth noting that we have to have these conversations constantly about this from a from a politicized angle, instead of using this as an opportunity to bring everybody together on our shared common humanity. What you see are

people immediately retreating into their their preferred political narratives. Gun controls another one that comes up out of this, We're gonna hear and I haven't seen it quite yet because they went with the initial it's Trump, it's white supremacy, even though it does seem to be more a in cell slash misogynist evil hate lunatic situation. I don't know. I'm not a psychiatrist. I don't know how to specifically

diagnose this. But I also think that we have all these We're always told to have conversations about this, and that's it's fine to have a conversation, and we should have conversations about violence in society. But I get the sense that Democrats are never really serious about trying to address this stuff in a way that's actually going to fix anything. It feels like the immediate discussion switches very quickly to attacking political opponents to attacking political enemies. It's

like the Donald Trump situation. They go right after Trump people are shot. It's a terrible situation in Atlanta. You have an evil individual acting with hateful motives. It's white

supremacy and Donald Trump. Right away, it'll turn into gun control and you'll be hearing pundits going on TV saying for for quite some time after this that this goes in a sense, this incident goes in a column alongside, you know, other incidents that everybody who's supportive of Donald Trump, for example, or everybody who doesn't agree with critical race theory is responsible for at some level, Right that's what

will be said, that's what will actually happen here. And you'll notice that with the attempted mass assassination of members of Congress in twenty eighteen by Bernie Sanders support order, it was not, in fact create it did not create a whole narrative of the Democrats because they dehumanize Republicans because they say that Republicans don't want they don't want people to have healthcare, they don't care about people dying.

I mean, the guy was actually firing off an AAR fifteen it members of Congress yelling this, you know, this is for healthcare. That's what rand Paul said who was there. But that doesn't go on, you know, their moral side of the ledger as in terms of something baggage that the Democrat the left has to carry. But immediately it gets politicized whenever there's an ugly incident, even if it's not clear that it ties into the preferred narrative of

the left, it gets put into this situation. In this circumstance, the same way that when you hear about about anti Semitic attacks in New York City, we're told they tried for a while to say the anti Semitic and that was often Orthodox Orthodox Jews who were being attacked on the street or being assaulted. And you know Orthodox Jews, especially Hasidic Jews, Orthodox Jews that you can tell because of their dress and because of their appearance what their

religious beliefs are. And they're being attacked. And we're told initially this is part of the intolerance and the white supremacy from Donald Trump, and then it turns out that no, it's actually it has in New York City been predominantly minorities, black and Latino men who have attacked Orthodox Jewish people

in these in these anti Semitic taxies, hate crimes. But it's still Trump's fault and it's still white supremacy, which is It's a fascinating version of events, Isn't it Almost like what happens doesn't really matter to the people in charge based on the facts. The most important thing is how is this leverage for political purposes. It's Harsani time, our friend David Harsani in the mix. Go Nashalview dot com for his latest mister Harsani, great to have you, sir,

always great to be here. Thank you. So we have a terrible incident that happens in the Atlanta area, a mass shooting. You had I believe six of the victims were Asian, two or white. The individual who is in custody, whoever, is certain, I mean, the guys can fast he's the shooter, he's the murderer. Said that he had a sex addiction, and this was some kind of I don't know, in

cell rage, you know, murder spree or something. And yet yesterday you had you know, the root an online you know, web magazine, website say that this is part of the white supremacy pandemic. You had a lot of headlines about

how this is white supremacy, what is going on here? Well, every you know, when everything when when everything is synthesized through the prism of racism and race, and you're so used to relying on that as as the only kind of you know, view of the world, and you think everyone functions just like you and sees the world just like you. You know you're going to say things like that. And it's also, you know, a very easy way to

make appropriate a tragedy for your own political cause. You can bash people that you dislike and blame them for it. The world is not that simple. It's almost never that simple, and it's certainly in this case it's it's complicated and not complicated really in that it is a terrible tragedy no matter how you slice it, but it's complicated, and

who knows why this guy did it. And I sort of quickly said, even if he had it, done it for some dumb ugly political reason, the way that they take that and then blame mainstream Republicans or Donald Trump or whatever they're doing, it would still be crazy to say that. And now it's just sort of amped up crazy. And you know, the people you mentioned aren't the only one. I see all these celebrities doing it as well. There's no evidence. They can't even wait for any evidence to

appear before they say stuff like that. It's just insane. It's insanity. Well, I mean, by the way, the route the magazine actually the title or rather the line that got the attention, it wasn't that white supremacy is a pandemic. It is whiteness. The quote was whiteness itself is a pandemic. I mean, I really do think that this is now attacking whiteness as as a concept has become very fashionable and a lot of I mean you pointed out to celebrities and people in news media. You know, it has

it's pathetic to watch. But what you'll see are multi millionaire white CNN anchors, for example, who go on air to bash whiteness because it somehow gets them. But the points on the left, it gets them credibility. And to me, it just all seems so phony, transparent, idiotic, and also really damaging. It's racism. It's real life racism, and I judging people by this color of their skin, which doesn't

mean anything really. I mean that's like it never means anything in history, but it doesn't really mean define who you are, what you think, or what you do or believe. I know a lot of white people I disagree with probably most of white people I know, and you know we disagree on things. We don't you know, we don't share any kind of ideology because we're white. I mean,

we share an idiology because we believe certain things. So it's dangerous and it is all the things that people who fought against racism for real in the past fought against, and they embrace it. There's you know, it's a big joke. I know others have done this and there's memes about it. But the right sort of identitarians of the far right and far left, they sound almost the same. You just have to switch color sometimes, but they sound the same.

It is the most dangerous I think it's one of the most dangerous beliefs in idiologies right now in American philosophies. Do you think that some of the people who are speaking to David Harsani of National View You can go to National Review dot com for his latest David, do you think that's that some of the people who are professing this from the news media, from from Big Perchase on TV, or or you know, well known news or

journalistic organizations. Do you think they they don't believe it, but they just mouth the preferred slogans of the of the party orthodoxy Or do you think that this has really turned into a a moral panic that has convinced you know, you know, does Chris Cuomo really think that we're going through a white supremacy pandemic? I mean, does you know, does Rachel Maddow really think we're going through

a white supremacy pandemic? The New York Times editorial board, or do they just do this because it's popular right now to say this, I don't know, maybe a bit of both, but I think increasingly I believe people believe it. I think you can convince yourself to believe anything, especially when you start dehumanizing people you dislike, which is what

they're doing. And it's also I mean for someone like Cuomo, let's say, you know, he is not an intellectually curious person, so this is the easiest thing for him to do and to say, and he knows that he'll he'll have they'll be accolades for saying it, you know, from from people he cares about. He's a privileged life, and he doesn't just have a privileged life in the sense that he earned some privilege, you know, that he earned it, or that he's rich or whatever he you know, he

inherited it as well. So I'm not sure that he guy like that should be able to lecture anyone but about that sort of thing. But I think it is a world panic as well. You know, I used to not think it, but then I see the comments on like Twitter and elsewhere, and I think people are so tribal and so mad and so hateful of others that they want to bring everything back to something very identifiable like color about hating you know, Donald Trump and his

supporters of pretending that they're all white supremacists. I don't know. I've always said that this divisiveness doesn't really exist in the world itself as much as it does on you know, social media. But it worries me more and more that this ends in some really ugly and bad way, or it doesn't end but becomes something much uglier. And this kind of rhetoric is just terrible. Now. I don't blame people,

you know, they want to make political arguments. I'm a free speech guy, that's for sure, but I think that

people are really thinking through what they're saying. Now, David, I wanted to switch to the filibuster because I think that the thing that conservatives and Republicans have had to learn and in the last few months that they didn't already know it beforehand, which maybe a lot of people did in their own way, is that double standards are that that's not even something the left there they don't care, don't feel sheepish about it, they don't pretend they don't

have double standards. They just, you know, when they can do something, they want to do it, and I think that what we see with the talk of filibuster reform, I mean, this is just laughable. But it's putting the smallest of fig leafs over what would be if they do it. And I believe they are going to try to do it. I don't know if they'll be successful, but I believe they will try to do this. What would be an enormously consequential change to our Congress and

how it functions. I mean, and they act like it's there's some emergency, some reason it must happen. Now. We can't have obstructionism from the White House, I mean from the Republicans. Rather, that's what the White House is saying. This just seems like the most obvious stuff. David. Can you imagine complaining about obstructionism a less than a week after he signed a two trillion dollar bill that was

filled with all kinds of goodies for yourself. I mean, it is just it is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. But there are three things about this. One, of course, it's a huge double standard. There are a massive hypocrites. They used it, They used the filibuster Morgan's Donald Trump in one term that then any president has ever had to deal with and that's fine. They should be able to do that, but they don't care. It's

and ends justifies the means argument that they make. The second one, of course, is that if they undo this filibuster, which to me would be the worst thing they could possibly do that I can imagine because it would allow a slim majority to essentially pass gigantic federal direct democracy bills, and the rest of the country, it would I think create a lot of anger in a lot of red states because there's no consensus, no by genuine debate. You saw how that stimulus was passed, and imagine that over

and over again. It is just to me, I'm a real big process guy, and I know that's boring, and I know people don't care that much about it, but the stimulus is one of the few and it's not in the Constitution, but it is one of the few things still preserving the Temp Amendment and some basic federalism. The filibuster. You mean, yeah, the filibuster. Sorry. So the last thing, though, is I'm not I don't. I'm very worried that it's going to happen, but it might not.

I don't understand really why they're even bringing it up as much when they don't even have the votes to pass the bills they would need it for. They don't have the votes for a minimum wage. They don't have the votes yet as far as I know, for a for any of the big bills, for HR one, for

anything they want to do. Maybe they have it for some sort of gun control bill on a universal background checks, But is Mansion going to destroy the filibuster over a bill that gets them what is not a very big deal. I mean, I know they pretend that there aren't background checks, but most guns are background checks. So I don't know. We'll see what happens, but I really hope it doesn't. David Arsani everybody go to nash Review dot com to

read his latest there. David always appreciate a buddy. Talk to you soon. Thank you, talk too soon. Well, the situation on the ground is certainly challenging, in part because we inherited it, dismantled system that wasn't prepared for processing asylum requests that had left in place the remain in Mesic Mexico program. Yeah, it's because the people befouri You see, they did a bad job. That's why. That's why we are being told there's a massive crisis at the border.

We don't actually believe that. We know that's absurd, we know that's ridiculous, but that is what Jensaki is saying, and that's going to be the official line of Bide administration because with thirteen thousand miners, that's right, that's the latest number you've seen, thirteen thousand unaccompanied miners now in custody. They have got a problem here, They've got a problem. Why is this the that's the most I think that we've ever seen for un accompanied minors. Why are they

all coming right now? Because the things that the Trump administration did to gain control of the border, the Biden administration immediately came into office and right away undid them. That's going to cause a problem. Right when you come in when something has been fixed and you unfix it, you're back to where you were beforehand. And that is

what anybody who's being honest sees here. But of course the Democrats are not honest about this, and they will continue to just be absolutely full of it because this is a problem for them. And here's the White House Border Coordinator ROBERTA. Jacobson on well, well before I get to what she says. Do you really think that they're going to let people see these facilities? Do you think that they're going to this is our own federal government, now,

this is your tax dollars at work. You believe they're really gonna allow for transparency. You think that they're going to allow people from the press to get access to what's going on. Are they going to get numbers? Are they going to have members of Border Patrol and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement who will tell them what's really going on, who will speak to them about all of this. Nope, there is a lockdown. I've already heard about about this.

There is a total shutdown of communication between members a lot of members of the press, especially if you're identified as being from a conservative outlet. I mean, they're they're just going to give you the runaround. This is how it works if you want to talk. And I'm going through this right now because I'm trying to set up a border trip in the next couple of weeks. I'm trying to get down there myself and we're trying to set up conversations with members of Border Patrol, Immigrations and

Customs Enforcement, and as we do that. A lot of the time, what happens is there's just no response. What do you mean? This is the communications shop, right, this is the public affairs office of Border Patrol for a certain sector. I'm from a media organization. I've a nationally syndicated radio show. Can I can I get somebody to tell me if I can get an interview or sit down or at least some data. Nothing, you get non responses.

What's that all about? Now? This is the kind of situation where I know that as this, they can only do this for so long, and then what they'll start to do is give minimal response. They'll give you the running. There are a million ways the bureaucracy can play. We won't be held accountable game. We're not going to give you the facts and data you need a lot of ways that that happened. And by the way, I don't blame Boarder Patrol, Immigrations and Customs enforcement. This is from

the federal government at the very top. This from the Biden White House telling them this. But you've had NBC News reporting on it, you'd You've had many others who are saying, hey, they're just not giving us the information. They're just not giving us access. So how can we cover this crisis that the government is in the middle of it and supposed to be handling when government entities are saying, you don't get the numbers, you don't get the access you need for this. Here is for example,

well here is ROBERTA. Jackson talking about Jacobson rather talking about exactly this place. Six. I also think that it's really important that we be setting about the task of moving children to appropriate places. We're not hiding anything. We do want to be sure that the story is told transparently. But we're also in a situation of urgent need for children and need to move children, and that has to take first priority. Not a lack of transparency. No, no,

of course not. The Bide administration would never do that. Bide administration is all about presenting you with things that are really happening. Remember this is an administration that is the whole thing is a facade. The whole situation is the emperor has no clothes and they're all walking around acting like the guy who's naked. And now you're thinking about the emperor being Joe Biden. Walking around with no clothes is kind of a weird image, but you get

what I'm saying. That they're telling you that he is able to run the country and be the leader of the free world. We all know that's ridiculous. But that's just the first of many lies. That's the first of many things that you're you're going to be told for the next four years or until they decide that somebody else needs to take over for him. And everything else that you see should be through this prism of understanding that they're not telling you the truth. There is a

fundamental dishonesty at work here from this administration. On the border issues, on a whole lot of issues. They say that this is a crisis they inherited. That's a lie. They say that they are being transparent, that's a lie. They say that they want the immigration, the illegal immigration problem to stop. That's a lie. They say that they're trying to apply the rule of law. That's a lie.

I mean, you go down the list. They say that these are people that are gonna that that should be heard for asylum and they will show up for their hearings, that everything is fine. That's a lie. How much of it can you withstand? How much of us are you supposed to? Are you supposed to hear before you say they can't be trusted on any of these issues, and the truth is they can't. I think I think you

already see that. I think you already understand this. Oh, but Biden's not going to visit the border because he's

taking action. I mean, does this work with other crises when a Republican doesn't go if there's a big storm or if there's a problem, if a Republican president is not there while it's still happening, he's heartless and he's awful and he's But Joe Biden can't get, you know, on Air Force one to go on a quick flight down to the southern border to see what's happening, because Jensaki wants you to believe he's taking so much action. Play nine. The President said yesterday he does not have

plans to visit the border. Why not, because his focus is on action and taking actions and moving forward policies to ensure we are expediting the processing at the order that we are opening more facilities, that we are putting in place, policies that will move kids more quickly through the border patrol facilities more quickly into safe and secure homes. And that's where his focus is. Yeah, he's just getting it done. That's right, Joe Biden. He's a guy who

gets things done. Nobody believes this, but they like to lie to your face and smile knowing that the media is going to back them up, and that this is the ultimate gas lighting, is that Joe Biden should be, is capable of and will be a competent presidence of the United States. No one really believes this. No one really thinks this can be true. Who has good judgment, who pays attention, and who knows what's going on. Even the media knows it's a lie, but they don't care

because he's not the one really making the decisions. Well, what the president is not willing to do, Halle, is to allow progress and to allow benefits the herd of people to be help hostage in the process. And so they're going to be conversations. They're going to be conversations, and he's open to hearing different ideas. At the end of the day, his goal is to ensure that we can get things done for the American people, and he's

open to a discussion about what that look. So it sounds like what I'm hearing you say, is the door is not shut for the potential for the President to throw his weight and throw his support behind eliminating that sixty vote threshold. Is that fair, he said many times that's not That's not his preference. But he is interested in the conversations that are happening. There are a lot of different ideas out there. He again, as you said yesterday,

signals is openness to reverting to the talking filibuster. So he's open to the conversation. The preference is to continue to work in a bipartisan manner because he thinks that we're stronger and we're better served when we're coming together and working across the aisle. That's always going to be a preference. But he is open to ideas, and we'll see how that conversation developed. Yeah, we'll see how the conversation about nuke and the filibuster goes. Here. Nice Senate

rules he got there. Conn'll be a shame if something happened to it. That's how the Democrats play the game. This is White House. What if she comes director Kate Bettingfield on the filibuster? Will it go away? You know, it really depends do Republicans do everything we want. If the answers no, we might have to get rid of that filibuster. You know, do Republicans cave, do they bend the knee? If not, they're making us we don't want to do it. Oh no, they don't want to do it,

of course. No, no, no, they don't want to do that anything with that. Don't want to get with the filibuster. But sure enough, that is on the table. That is a situation. That is the circumstance that we see. And if they go with it, if they go all out and design that they're going to to get rid of the filibuster, I want to be very clear that we're in for a rough ride until at least the mid terms because the Democrats are talking a very big game here about the kind of things that they want to

get done. They want to do. We're talking about a trillion to two trillion dollar infrastructure package. Oh, I'm sure that's going to be really efficient and well that's not going to be a huge giveaway to the unions and no, no, of course not. Oh my gosh. Really, what they see this as as an opportunity to use the public public purse, to use the Treasury Department to shore up and buy off and strengthen the Democrat Party's political position, and to

just use taxpayer dollars to do it. That's that's how Democrats get it all done. That's that's their view. Look at what they did with at one point nine trillion dollars spending package. They gave all this money to cities and states, Blue states and cities, many of which were running huge deficits and having all kinds of financial problems before COVID. But they just want to funnel them a lot of money. They want to They want to use the taxpayers as a bailout for poorly run Democrat enclaves.

And that's what's going on here. But yeah, getting rid of the filibuster is something that they're they're very much considering. Depends on I think that with the phrase that the White House Comments Director there said was being held a hostage to the process. Oh so when the process doesn't give you the outcome you want. The Democrat version of this is you're being held hostage to it. Oh Okay,

isn't that fascinating. You know, if you don't get what you want out of this, you get to destroy the process. Because Democrats say so that's what they're that's what they're pushing. What that's what they're trying to do. It's stunning. Here is oh speaking of the of the Senate. I thought Mitch McConnell had a pretty good line here. It reminds me of what somebody on this show, namely me, said a few days ago, which is it's it's so not

a crisis at the border. It's not an emergency, but you have to send the federal Emergency Management Agency down there. Here is what he said, play thirteen. My definition for a crisis is when you send the Emergency Management Agency, which only goes to emergencies, down to the border, it is, by definition an emergency. This administration walked away from the policy the previous administration was able to negotiate with the Evectionum government where people are detained on the other side

of the border. They got rid of the solution. Hence the creation of the surge, the crisis, the emergency, whatever you want to call it. That the lawlessness that is rampant down there. Now, all of it. We see what happened here. We're all aware of how we got to this point. But they're going to keep lying to you. Better. They're going to keep pretending that there's some other reason, some other rationale for all of this, and we just have to keep fighting back against the lines. I mean

the Biden administrate. Biden said at so many times during all this that there was that he was going to do this essentially. I mean, he made it very clear to anybody who was watching that one of his goals and all this was to make the border a more hospitable at a better place for people to come to illegally, right. I mean that that's really been a central, essential theme of everything that he has said on the immigration issue.

And I think it's important that everybody understand that if you go back and you watch, you listen, you hear about it, there is nothing there is nothing surprising about this outcome. There there is nothing even a little bit um, you know, out of out of what was promised here, there's nothing out of line. You know. This is that that Biden is getting what he should have based on the things that he was saying about the border. And that's what that's just where we are with all this.

They can try to tell you other things as much as they want, it's total nonsense. And then of course there's the pushing on HR one two, which is another place. I don't think they're going to go for breaking the filibuster on this one. But you know, if you're looking for someone who's going to be particularly smarmy, disingenuous, and dishonest, I think it's hard to do better than Senator Chuck Schumer.

Here he is on what HR one's all about and why, Well, really Republicans oppose HR one and you know what that means. They don't want people voting, he says, play fifteen. These bills sadly are aimed at Americans of color, Black Americans, Latinos, Native Americans. Despicably, efforts to target these historic disenfranchised communities have become a central component of the electoral strategy of

one of America's major political parties. Shame on them. Shame is infuriating, infuriating that they are when you lose an election, you're supposed to win over the people you lost, not stop them from voting. That is unairb American, autocratic, and against the fundamentals of our democracy. But this is happening in states all across the country, all across the country.

Maybe the most reprehensible effort is underway in Georgia, where state Republicans are trying to limit absentee and mail in voting, make it harder to post a ballot by dropbox, and disallowing early voting on Sunday, a day when many church going African Americans participate in voter drives. Does anyone in this on the other side of the I'll think taking Sunday way voting in Georgia is not bigoted? What's the rationale? Stop it? If you want to stand for equality and justice,

why not early voting for six months? I just want why? Why not early running for six months? Let's ask the question of Chuck Schumer. How about that? Why why even even pretend that you know which? The whole thing should just be on the honor system. I'm a drop box is basically the honor system, right, I mean, you know you'll leave it, you drop it in there. No one knows you, know who you are, what you dropped off, you know, but there you go. Why have any rules

about elections? Whats Why have an age restriction? That's not fair? You know they're they're twelve year olds who have ideas too. Why not twelve year olds vote? We know, the Democrats are already advocating this is real for sixteen year olds to vote? Why not twelve year olds? At some point they're agreed upon rules, and the rules are in force so that we're on an equal playing field in an election. The Democrats are the ones who want to keep changing

the rules. States are supposed to be able to conduct elections in the way that the state legislature sees fit. That's how this is supposed to happen. And yet they want a national lies election process through HR one, And because Republicans won't go along with it, the Democrats are screaming about about things being about it being a bigotted situation, right,

that's what they say. Every every voter restriction. Notice how whether it's I D, whether it's not allowing votes to come in after voting day after election day, voting day, sorry, election day, that's a problem too. Well, you know, when you when you start to work through this, when you start to actually look at it and ask the questions and understand what's going on, you see that as far as they're concerned, there can be there's no rule that

can't be changing the election. Why why one person, one vote? You know, we've got what about disenfranchised groups? Why not count some groups as having two votes? Doesn't seem like it's that far away from what the left seems to believe these days anyway, Right, Why why not have some people have you know, they have additional voting time, but other people don't. I mean, they just they will blow out the rule book, do whatever they can, do whatever they want to do, as long as the final election

result is that they win. We all see it. We're all very aware of this. But it worked against Trump in twenty twenty. And men they want to hold on in those midterms to the power they currently have. They think that they between now and the next presidential election, they think they'll be able to fundamentally transform the country, something that Barack Obama promised during his term. He put it on a pathway to transformation. And now Joe Biden's supposed to take us, take us all the way to

whatever that transformation is going to be. I think you're getting a sense of it. Censorship, social justice, and socialism, that's pretty much gonna be that those are the defining characteristics of the new America that the Democrat Party is trying to create. Welcome today, three sixty seven of fifteen days to slow the spread. Proponents of the economic lockdowns promised it would be US fifteen days to flatten the curve instead of fifteen days. The lockdown has now gone

on for over a year. Early on in the pandemic, as we all remember, there were projections that hospitals would be full and have to turn away people. Medical equipment was in short supply. Businesses were closing what they hoped would be on a temporary basis as government started locking down their economies and telling people to stay home. At that time, when programs like PPP were created, no one was under the belief that we would still be doing

this a year later with no end in sight. This is something that we cannot let go without a real repudiation of the ideology, the mindset behind this, the idea that the government that it was okay to say, just do this for fifteen days and then extend it and extend it and extend it and then bring it back and then, you know, and then then bring it down a little bit, then bring it back, then dial it down a little bit, then bring it back for what for what? What was the benefit of this? Governor Rhonda

Santis says lockdowns do not work. It's a governor of a state of twenty one million people and he's straight up telling you they don't work. But yet we're still in a lockdown here in New York City. You still have all these restrictions in place. It's utter, utter madness. What has happened to this country? The greatest threat to our freedom in my life, on the greatest restrictions on our freedom in my life. Nothing else like this has

ever happened. It's not since since I've been on the earth, going on forty years here, folks, And guess what what we see is that the authoritarian left and a mass hysteria mixed with mass media created this willingness in so much of the population to just do what they're told, no matter how stupid it is. I mean, I was at a day, I was at dinner last night. I went out with the snow Princess and a friend of hers, and we're at dinner last night, and I'm telling you,

I sat down. There's no one around us. Where at the table, is no one anywhere near us. I sat down, and I know, Okay, I gotta go downstairs, gotta have to go use the restroom. I stand up, I have my mask in my hand, you know, and I'm unfolding it to put it up to my mouth, and a server comes sort of, you know, running over to me and says, excuse me, you really need to have your mask on, and I'm like, you know, man, I'm obviously doing it. This is obviously moronic, All right, can you

just but no? He's probably he probably watches a lot of CNN with the with the COVID ticker at the bottom, and oh my gosh, if we only massed up, we'd all be okay, you know. And I feel, on the one hand, I get angry. The other hand, I feel badly for people like this that they go through life with such a cloud of fear and anxiety all the time.

And doctor Alita, when this woman was formerly the head of Planned Parenthood, and then they got rid of her because she wasn't enough of a you have to be an abortion zealot to run Planned parent You have to think that abortion is something to be celebrated, which is a truly just appalling, an awful thing. But she was not to some shred of I guess credit on her behalf. She was not enough of an abortion extremist for planned parenthood,

so they pushed her aside. And here, I mean, really, the people that have run Planned parent in the past, if they're ghoulish, I mean they're they're awful human beings. Anyway, here she is though, she's a doctor, so they put her on She's a doctor who's famous, so they put her on TV telling us we're going to see a surge in COVID infections. Play five. Unfortunately, Chris, I think that we are on the cusp of that fourth surge

that we've been dreading. And we see that you mentioned fifteen or so states that are seeing an increase in the number of actions already. We're also increasing over a high baseline of infections, and we have the variable that we now have these more transmissible variants becoming dominant here in the US very quickly. Okay, we keep hearing this about the variants, we keep hearing this about the surge. We have to tune these individuals out. You have to

stop listening them, folks. I'm telling you I I just interviewed the governor of Mississippi, Governor Reeves, yesterday for my TV show on the first and I said, how are your number, you've reopened. How are your numbers? How's it all looking? Who wants to guess? Are things looking terrible? Are things all going in the right direction, It's all

going to be fine. Are things pretty much working as planned there with the reopen or are they about to go into a second lockdown because of the huge surgeon cases. We all can guess things are fine. The cases are still going down. They got rid, they got rid of additional restrictions, and it hasn't changed the trajectory toward lower

and lower case load hospitalizations and deaths. Now, when that's the case, a normal approach, a scientific approach, would be look at the data and then turn around and look at what's going on because of these restrictions. And when those restrictions go away, if the data tells you that you're still getting the same kind of numbers in terms of reduction, what were the restrictions doing for you? Not allowed to think about it this way, not allowed to

approach it in that manner. This is a religious belief. Now, restrictions work because they work, and if you challenge it, you don't take the virus seriously. What do we make of the political conversation out there in the aftermath of this a terrible shooting, this mash shooting the Atlanta area. We want to talk about that and if we also get a chance to ask about the change in critical race theory in the closs Us rooms in Florida. From our friend down in Florida, formerly of the NYPD, mister

John Cardillo. He is also a conservative commentator, TV and radio host. John Great to have you, always good to be with you, Buck. How's it going, good Man? So, John, you know you because you work in law enforcement side. You're familiar with you know, hate Crime task Force, and you know FBI statistics on this and and right now we're being told that there's a there's a particular there's a particular moment where it seems Asian Americans are being

the target of hate crime attacks. But there's an immediate shift to this is Donald Trump's fault and it's white supremacy. What do you make of this? Well, it's nonsense, right, So all this is stemming from this horrible series mass shootings in Atlanta. But investigators knew pretty quickly that the shooter, the killer wasn't motivated at all by race, but instead blamed Asian and a couple of whites were shot as well. Blamed sex workers for his sex addiction. This just looks

to be a really disturbed guy. He went out and he targeted sex workers, He targeted Asian massage parlors, slash prothels. It looks like that's the working investigative theory and the track they're going down. And those people within happen to be Asian. They happen to be the people that were

running and working in those establishments. The narrative that the left is trying to spin though, that white supremacy is now attacking Asians is because even some center left to left leaning outlets of the last couple of months have acknowledged a nationwide problem. And that's and this isn't a John Cardillo opinion or a Buck Sexton opinion. This is verifiable public record crime data. There's been an uptick in black on Asian attacks in cities like La San Francisco,

New York. Now, Buck, remember this goes back in nineteen ninety two, the La riots, which were over the Rodney King incident. But a byproduct that shook out of that, if you remember what they called roof Koreans. All these Korean merchants on their rooms with long guns. It's because the black community also had this problem with the Korean community at the time, gentrifying areas, and they began attacking those stores, merchants, people as a byproduct of the riots.

And so it's just the left way of trying to blame everything on Trump been quite supremacy and all these fabricated turns. But in the end, then attack wasn't about race at all. John, I've got to say, the hatred that is being put out there right now for anything Trump associated conservative, it hasn't it feels like it hasn't dissipated. I mean, the news media is clearly. I mean, you know, the liberal news media is in this place where they haven't gotten used to not having the great boogeyman that

they can use it to get ratings going. You know, CNN has lost I think I saw the headline was a million viewers a night on average recently. I don't even know they had a million viewers to lose, but apparently they do because Trump is no longer in office. I worry though that actually, as we see the continued absurdity of cognitive cognitively declining Joe Biden in office, that the radical left within the Democrat Party is calling the shots. There is no unity, there is no good governance from

this White House or return to normalcy. That the way they're gonna they're gonna try to keep their opposition off balance is by running these campaigns of anti Trump hate, even though he's not president anymore and they're in charge. Yeah, look, I think I think it goes even further than that. They're running campaigns of anti Trump hate, and they're doing

it knowingly, maliciously, and intentionally on bad information. The White House knows full well if the FBI director is absolutely in touch with authorities in the Atlanta area, Atlanta PD, Fulton County, whatever the lead agency is, they know full well that this was about killing sex workers because this guy had a sex addiction and all kinds of psyche problems.

But what is the administration due today? They lower the flags at the White House to half mast, and they imply, through Jen Psaki and their media cohorts on the left, that they're doing that in solidarity with the Asian community against white supremacy. So this is pretty chilling third world Banana Republic's type stuff. Buck You've got the White House

knowingly pushing disinformation. You've got members of Congress having uniformed National Guard troops march on Marjorie Jayler Green's office because she made a comment about Guam. You've got armed troops and razor wire outside the US Capital. I can't think of things more Unamerican than what the Biden administration is now journeying out twice a day, three times a day. It's chilling. Every American should be very concerned right now.

I remember when Trump pulling or the Trump White House pulling a CNN reporter's hard passed meaning that they don't have to check in, they can just go in and out of the White House at will. Was fascism, was a threat to our democracy. Was the worst thing that was going on in the country at the time. That he would actually have to, just like other people do, show an ID, get a visitor's pass. No, no, you can't. You can't pull a journalist who's acting like a jackass.

That was a big deal, and that was the fascism of the Trump administration. Biden's administration comes in, they wrap the Capitol in fencing and barbed wire, deploy thousands of

National Guard troops. And then you have official accounts from you know, under the under the umbrella of the Pentagon going after one of the lone conservative voices out there that's really a thorn in the side, that has the kind of a kind of you know, magnificant amplification of his voice to be a thorn of the side of the left, Tucker Carlson, and and they don't seem to see that, they don't seem to understand John that if if anyone has to be worried about where fascism is

going to come from it America, it's actually gonna come from the left. It's gonna come from the Democrats. Well, look, I can't recall it. I mean we, you know people we and I say we, I mean us on the right, people like you and I and media will mock, will beat up on metaphorically, people on the left will We'll mock Brian Stelter and Jim Acosta and Jake Tapper for their dishonesty. But there's never been as far as I

could remember. And then you and I are in this every day a campaign to cancel, to shame, to threaten the families of anybody on the left Look, it's the news business is a business. We know most of these people are opinion commentators posing as journalists, and we mocked them and we critiqued them in the public sphere. But what the left does they're doing a Tucker Carlson, what they did to people like Laura Logan, what they do to anybody that disrupts their narrative that that counters their

manufactured narrative. Is they really go to hurt these people. And I mean that in the physical sense as well. But they know Tucker Carlston has a wife and young kids. They want to put his address out there, and we all know why they want to do that. They love to see anti in Black Lives Matter outside of this guy's house, threatening him and his family because they hope that'll pacify Tucker Carlson and the rest of us into fear and into silence. This is the less It's beyond

fascism at this point. I've been saying for years we've been in cultural civil war, ideological civil war two point zero for many years now, before Trump, during the Obama administration it started, but the Left is the only one acknowledging it and fighting and they would love nothing more than the criminalize. You're starting to see some of the friend far love members of Congress. They want to criminalize conservative opinions. They want to equate conservative opinions with criminal

terroristic threats, and hate speech. I mean, this is really bizarre stuff we're living through and buck no one, no one, bar a few on the right, too few, far too q elective Republicans are opening their mouths, saying a word or doing a thing about it, and that's pretty disgraceful in itself. We're speaking of John Dillo, formerly of the NYPD and a conservative commentator. Follow him on Twitter if

you don't already at John Cardillo and John. To that end, I feel like we don't really have much of a CounterPunch of a counter narrative going on right now. I think people are really scared, including those who have pretty

big platforms, of having their sponsors attacked. I think people are worried about losing their social media access, which, as you know, in our business for a lot of folks, you know, there are conservative websites that would go out of business in a month if they if they couldn't push their content on Facebook. I think that we're going through a period where we're we're on defense in ways that we've never really even seen before in this country

on the right in general. Yeah, not only around defense in those wages or there was a right, but never before have we also had the referees acknowledge that they're rigging the game for the other side. And now it's playing as day. I mean, they're just coming out and staying So how do you fight that? I don't know.

I think conservative outlets are getting smarter. They're making capital investments in their own technology infrastructure, local, noncloud based, so that they can't be the platform by the Amazon and the big guys. But like you say, how do they disseminate their content and impart monetize the content to keep generating it if they're deplatformed off the facebooks, to Twitters, etc. So it's a really really scary place. And you know

that point book. One of the things that drives me nuts is when people say, well, we need a conservative Twitter. It's not that easy. It takes years and billions of dollars, and the biggest problem is you're not going to have enough influencers and enough personalities migrate off of Twitter onto a new platform to bring the masses with them to make it as powerful as a marketing, advertising and revenue

generation tools Twitter or Facebook. And so it's a much bigger problem than just the platitude of wellow which conservative should start a new ABC, then that platitude could ever solve. John I also wanted to ask about you know, I don't like to do too much of the you know, ra Ron descentis because I feel like I leave out a lot of the rest of the country. But I gotta be honest with you. A lot of us see

what's going on down in Florida, we say okay. So he kept the state open despite all the pressure and came out came out the big winner in terms of leadership from the pandemic. He is trying to protect free speech on these social media platforms by pushing for state laws that will create essentially a protected class for conservatives on platforms that are operating at least in the state of Florida. And now he's even saying that he's getting

rid of critical race theory from classrooms in Florida. Is this the model you think that other conservative governors are going to start to wake up and understood. Republican governors will wake up and understand that needs to be followed. What do you see happening? Yeah, I mean, if they want to win, it's the model. You know. The most interesting thing about Ron De Santis is what many of us here who backed him thought was going to be

a maze. Your weakness became his greatest strength. And it's that he was a relatively weak retailed Kennedy because he didn't care about being loved. But man as a governor, when when the rubber meets the road, it's become his greatest strength because the guy doesn't care about being loved. He looks at things with a very brilliant, brilliant guy de Santus academically, analytically, and he looked at these things

through that analytical lens. And when it doesn't make sense to him, like mask mandates and locking businesses down and slanted critical race theory, he has no qualms about saying, Okay, we're getting rid of this because this makes no sense. And the paraphrase him, it's not getting a penny attacks payer of dollars. And so, yeah, I think if Republicans want to get elected, they need to start following the RHN De santiss and Christy nomes of the world in

terms of how they're handling their states. And I gotta say, just before let you go, John, I don't know if you saw the photo circulating of John Kerry on an American Airlines flight in first class, no mask on, not even aun you know, not even like down around his chin or anything, just there, no mask visible anywhere, just

on the plane. This just goes to by theory you and I've talked about this, the people that are the most sanctimonious about telling everybody to mask up are the ones that derive the most joy from not wearing a mask the second they think they can get away with it. And he got away with it. And look, Americans now trying to deflect from this, and they're saying our policies having changed, and we're beating them up pretty good on

social media. But we don't know what happened here. I mean, I'm sure it was some woke Democrat flight attendant that was starstruck by carry and let him do whatever he wanted. They're probably serving fourteen marteinis if he asked for him and told people sitting next to him, you have to keep your mask on, and you can't have a drink, because the concept that equal anything is dead in this

country and it's being flaunted in our faces. John Cardillo, everybody, John, great to have you on man, Thanks so much for joining. Appreciate it. Always a great time. Thanks. This is still not a time to travel just because in the CDC has encouraged people to. Obviously you should check the CDC website. I think twice before traveling if you don't have to.

I'm among the many Americans who feels that that impatience, that urge to get out to travel to see people that we care about, to be able to travel for work more and more, and yet we know that we should do that only when it's responsible. This is no time to let down our guard. This is certainly no time to surrender to the virus. Don't surrender to the virus. Everybody not allowed to surrender to the virus. I mean

the rhetoric here, give me a break. People would just want to live our lives without being nagged, nagged into insanity, which is what the lockdowners are doing. Just shot up your way did not work. It did not stop the virus, the mass the lockdowns. It didn't work. We did all

this stuff. We've done it for a year. And you know that's why when I see this photo of John carry On American Airlines and that was the Transportations are or whatever Minister or not Minister of Transfer, which it called the Secretary of the Department of Transportation Pete Buddha judge U. I like transport transportations are sounds better though, but you know when you see John carry On that American Airline's flight, and it's so clear that he's just

chilling out in first class, no mask on, because he knows no one's gonna tell John Cary to put a mask on. You know, no one's really gonna tell him to do it. I mean, the reason they keep pretending that they won't let you unmask after vaccination because they don't really know. It's it's not because they don't they don't know if you're still going to affect people. That's

just that's not that's the cover story. It's because they know that if it actually turned into some people, if some people can start to not mask, everyone's gonna everyone's gonna unmask pretty quickly. Not everybody, but you know, fifty percent of the country be like, yeah, sure, I'm vaccinated. Good luck. That's what it's all. It's just about control.

They're not really worried at all it is gonna be so much spread because people are gonna say that they people who are vaccinated are are going to be able to spread this. No, they're worried that people are going to have an excuse than to not mask. I mean, you know, if it were more clear in New York, I would totally be one of these people that walks around with you. I have a health restriction that prevents

me from wearing a mask. Yeah, when I want to go on the treadmill and I'm by myself, there's no one around me, I would I would pull that card. I'd say, yeah, sorry, I have a mysterious health element that prevents me from being on the mask. But in New York you won't get away with that. I think in some places in Florida you can probably get away with that, and maybe in some other states. But you know that this or how dare you? And you know there's a hip hop privacy rules that they're not supposed

to be able to ask you, but they do. They do. Anyway. I had a friend who was in Florida. She went into a how she went into a grocery store without a mask. Oh no, this was I'm sorry. I wasn't a mask thing. It was a dog thing. She brought her dog and said that it was an emotional support dog. And then they said, or you know that it was a service dog, and they said, well you have to show us as she said, Actually I don't because it's there's a hip of privacy rules that you can't violate.

That could be applied I think to masking two in different places. But look, they that you're being trained to obey, like we're all a bunch of dogs, Like we're all a bunch of lab rats in an experiment. Obey even though it doesn't work. Obey, even though it hasn't done anything for you, even when it's unreasonable in every sense. After vaccination, it is totally unreasonable to expect people to continue to mask. All right, that is a that is a psycho thing to do. But that's the official policy.

It's the official CDC. It's official you know, control mechanism. So I'm sorry that we still live in a country that has not yet regained its senses. But we're still fighting. The show ain't over yet. Folks, It's time for roll Call. Roll Call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. You want to send me a message, please do and let's get right to it. Oh and also go to buck Sexton dot com. You listen to the podcast there, Laurie deer Buck started listening

a few months back. Really enjoy the mental engagement you offer. Credible, credible information presented in an entertaining manner. Rush would be proud of you. Well, thank you, Laurie. I appreciate that. Just to let you know, we are a military family with our fourth generation West Point grad who is now an infantry officer. We buy support, Black Rifle coffee, my pillow, and many of the authors you present us. Well, Laurie, thank you so much. That's what keeps me employed. So

really really does mean a lot. I just purchased and downloaded the audiobook of The Parasitic Mind after listening, then realist to you and your guest. God sad, just awesome presentation. As a former military nurse, I didn't have shields high, but I did have morphine and TLC many military patients needed.

God bless Buck. Keep up the great work well, Laurie, your your your role call message today has brightened up my day kind of a gloomy, gray, not great day in New York City, and you've certainly put a smile on my face. So thank you so much for that, Mark, and I really appreciated. God bless you and your family, and thank you for listening, for writing in, and of course for supporting our sponsors. I mean, that's it's absolutely critical for us. I mean, if we're gonna stay, we're

gonna stay on the air. We need people to to trust and try out our different sponsors. All those products that I say I'm using, I do, and I like them and they're a part of my daily routine. And if you want to help the show, yeah, I get people to listen. But the level even beyond that is to is to actually buy products from our sponsors with that promo code, Buck or whatever my promo code. It is, as I say to you, that's how you that's how you vote with your dollars to keep the show on

the air. It really, it really is. Sarah Hey, Buck and Mark. A report from Flyover Country. While Blue states continue to oppress their citizen reciting COVID nineteen concerns. Life just got a little more normal for us. The kids school district just announced no more mask requirement for kids

or staff. Hallelujah. Of course, there's always the possibility that requirements could be reinstated if the numbers go back up, but anyway, it's sad being allowed such basic inalienable rights, or it's sad when being allowed such basic unalienable rights like breathing feels like freedom. Still, I'll take it. I'm sorry for my friends in Blue States. Yeah, I think. Look, that's great news that there's no more requirements, a mass requirement for kids or staff. And I don't know where

you are in the country. You didn't tell us, but I think I might need to move there. It's just so it's just so absurd now, folks. I mean, I just have no tolerance anymore. It's not even about me being right and them being wrong or anything else. It's just can you stop being a bunch of crazy nags lockdowners, you know, just nagging everybody all the time, A bunch of hall monitors, yamp, are you making it? No? How about no? This is dumb? Leave me alone. But they

won't do it. They won't do it. They're so convinced when I can't wait for them, they're finally being the MSNBC credits. They will fout you says we can finally put our mess when I'll say, I'm sorry. Is the flu gone? Why are you subjecting people to the possibility of dying from flu? Why are you such a monster? By breathing normally? What could be? What really could behave more a more fundamental freedom than the right to breathe,

To breathe air normally. I mean breathing, even more so than food and shelter, and breathing is the first thing you needn't can't breathe comfortably or normally because the Libs say so. So really, it's really like a psychological warfare technique. Get everybody to start complying, obeying, get uncomfortable, do it because we say so, and if you don't, you're a bad person. They're arresting. I just had a new store I was gonna talk about. They arrested some lady recently.

Where where was it here? I'll track it down for you, so I'm not just talking about this in general terms. They arrested her for not putting um, you know, not putting on a mask. Where was this? You know, so they will do that. They will, they will actually take you here. Texas woman detained for second time within days over refusal to wear a mask. Here we go, Where was this? Texas woman was arrested on Wednesday or refusing to wear a face mask inside of business uh Texas

City Police just after nine am on Wednesday. She had been asked by employees at an office depot to leave unless you put on a facial covering the second time, and police have been called the rights refusal to wear a mask within six days, she was placed in handcuffs

by a police that's right there. They are arrested there. Look, I know you say it's a private business, but we all understand that we've been psychologically damaged by the by the grotesquely incompetent and moronic CDC and a little tyrant fauci, and so businesses don't want to be sued. It's not as simple as just this is what a business chooses to do. That's that's the excuse. If businesses don't do this, they may be subject subject to to the lawsuits and

all kinds of problems. So there you go. Uh, Sarah, Hey, oh no, that's that was Sarah h Adam Buck. Is the snow Princess a secret dad bob, A dad Bob enthusiast. You don't need the horror of the gym in a mask, She'll say, Um, Adam, I'd like to think no, but I think she you know, my I think my dad bot is Okay, that's what I would say. But then I really go to become a dad soon, because otherwise this is you know, you can't call it a really a dad bought. It's just that otherwise you're just a

pleasantly plump you know. So yeah, exactly right, exactly, Um, but no, she is a very fit um. She was a actually a professional on the side from her other job, from her corporate job. She was a professional yoga instructor for years. So she she is in excellent shape. I am trying to catch up, but producer Mark, I gotta I gotta ways to go. She'sn't good enough shape for the both of you. That exactly. She's got abs. Why do I need abs? The snow Princess has got abs.

If there's enough abs for one apartment, yeah, well shit, we can share her abs. That's my that's my story and I'm sticking to it. There you go, Frank, Right. I read the book The Power Couple by Alex Barrenson at your recommendation. Absolutely loved it. I didn't think I could appreciate Alex more than I already did. Thanks Buck for your excellent guest choices, and of course you're great show on podcast. Barely a day goes by that I

don't listen. Well, Frank, that means a lot. Thank you so much, And you know, I really really do appreciate that you. First of all, it's it's great you support my work, which is my primary consideration here doing what I do. But I also appreciate that you support the people that we have on because you know, people come on this show because they want to. You know, I can't pay our guests to come on. I'm not Fox News, so I can't promise them, you know, a three million

person video audience or something. You know, they come on the show because they appreciate what I do, and they know that it'll be a good conversation, and and they know that we've got a great audience of really engaged, intelligent people that that I honestly just have really good taste in radio shows. I'm just gonna say it. I mean, this radio show is better than I mean. I think this is the best radio show on the air right now. People can you know, they can disagree and they can

yell at me, and I don't care. I listen. I've heard everybody else out there right now, and you know, I think this is the best show. I'm entitled in my opinion as a host. So there you go. There are some other great shows, and I have total respect for the people that have great shows. But I think this show is as good or better than any other show out there. So that's that's my story and I'm sticking to it. Pablo Hey Buckshieldside. Oh wait, sorry, Frank,

one more thing about the Power Couple. I bought The Power Couple too, so I appreciate that you're supporting our friend Alex Barnson. I believe in doing that. I can get all these different books for free, usually from publishers because they want the pr that we can give them here on the show. But I like to buy people's books and I like to do show because I want to support them, and I just think it's a good principle.

You know, It's like an artist's work, right, You want to actually buy the painting of an artist that you really like, you don't just ask your artist friend, you know, give me your painting, because you know you want to be help helping them stay the same way I tell you, please buy stuff from our sponsors. You know that's a very important thing to do. I haven't read The Power Couple yet, but I did buy it. It It is on my kindle, So, Frank, now that you've said this, I'm

going to check it out too. And you know, I am very appreciative of Alex Barnson's work on masks and lockdowns, and he's still very much involved in the vaccine covered situation. I asked him to see you know, I've asked Alex a couple of times in the last couple of weeks. Well, I've asked him twice in the last month, I think to come on, and he keeps saying he will. He will. He's just working on some research. So we'll get him back on again soon because I want to talk to

him about the vaccine situation. He certainly has. Alex is more skeptical of the vaccine success from what I see than I am, and I want to hear him out of no. I want to know why, because I like, I trust that he's very astute, very honest, and does his research, so I want to hear him out. So I'm going to bring him on as soon as we can talk about all right. Roll Call continues here with Pablo hey Buck Shields. Ye. I was listening to you today and you played a clip where Biden mentioned the

MAGA people. I actually detected a disdain in his voice. I get the impression he doesn't like Trump supporters. He really doesn't care about half of the country. I think he may actually dislike us. On another note, as much as I want Donald J. Trump to be president right now, in four years, I'm not sure he will be a lame duc president if he can't get Mike Pence to

run with that would be bad optics. I believe you're currently correct about Government of Santist's chances for winning the presidency. I think his running mate should be Pompeo. Mike Pompeo talk about a power ticket. Just one more thing you and produce him. Mark had a conversation about Denzel movies. You didn't mention my favorites, which are Man on Fire and Book of Eli Shields High. Well, Pablo, A few things here. Man on Fire is very watchable for what

it is. I will say a book of Eli I found a little there's some very cool scenes in that, very good, very engaging sequences. I thought it was a little grim as a movie, like a little a little depressing for my taste. So there's that. And uh, what did Prince Mark? Did you say? What your favorite Denzel movie was? I forget? Now, well remember the Titans of course? All right, right, right, remember the Titans. Yeah? For me, it's I mean, his best movie, although he's not the

lead in it. Maybe Glory. But then there's also Training Day. He's amazing and Training Day. Uh, you know, Denzel, he's really good an American gangster too, which is another highly Why have you ever seen that one? Yeah? I think so? Yeah, very very good movie. Is The Taking of Pelham one, two three as well? I think he might be Is that with Ethan Hawk? I think so great movie. I love his thrillers. Whenever Denzel is in a thriller, signed me up. I've never seen that. Isn't that about? Is

that about a money train? Or is a different movie they stole a subway car? Okay, and then they're in the New York City subway state system and they can't stop them. I think Denzela is the operator who's trying to stop them, or he's involved in some he's a main character obviously, But why would you why would you steal a subway car? Like the whole plot, but I know it mostly takes place in the New York City subways. But I mean, like, wouldn't that wouldn't that not work out?

So well? You're going, you know, you're like posting on Craigslist. You know, hey, subway car fresh off the tracks, you know, a million dollars or I believe it was a getaway from a crime of some sort. Okay, it's like steal a subway car. You imagine this is like you post this online, you know, like on Zillo or something. You know, Hey, subway car can turn into a one bedroom apartment. Just have to deal with the rat feces, human urine, and graffiti all over the place. But once you take care

of that, you're good to go. I mean, plus you have to bring it above ground. A subway car is probably bigger than your apartment. That's that's harsh but fair. I mean, any NYC apartment. I wasn't. No, I know, I know it's true. I mean, you know it's away. Carp probably does have more square footage than the apartment I live in. So yeah, I think I think you're honestly. Wasn't there a movie? There was a movie called Money Train as well, right where there was some train that

was transporting money and they took it over. I don't, I don't know. I can't keep it. There's another Denzel movie about a train where the runaway train, where he has to stop it. He's in a lot of movies. I don't even I can't keep up with all of them. He's one of the more he's one of the more prolific actors on the scene. That's certainly true. So as for the politics that Pablo brought up here, uh, let's see Governor de Santists his chances for winning the presidency. Um, okay,

a few things. Governor de santists a chance for the presidency. I think that he would be at this at this stage right now, with Donald Trump's blessing and machinery behind him. I think Desantists is the best option we've got right now. And I think that Trump now look, you know, there are some other interesting ideas. What about the descantist ticket, and maybe, you know, you might you could have a member of the Trump family running as a VP. You

could have Junior maybe run as VP. That's a possibility. Who know, you know that may be a way that you bring the Trump machinery together with a descantist ticket. I don't know, I'm just I'm just spitballing here, but I do think ron Descantist is the best option we've got right now. You know, Trump, when you're when you're seventy four, three seventy four or four years a long time, folks.

We all know that four years a long time when you're that age, and and we would like to think that that Trump will still be the the dynamo of energy and vitality that he was U during his first term. But who knows, you know, I mean, God willing he will be. But we just got to see JR. Many of ponder the successful teaming of bucking producer more. I see this as a margarita. Well, the Buckster is the intoxicating elixir. Producer Mark is the salt rimming the glass.

One is incomplete without the other. Plus Producer Mark, being salteam makes you thirst for more the perfect margharita. What do you think, Producer Mark, that's a quite a description.

I like it. And then we both love margaritas, so that's also true in Producer Mark and Buck the Margarita Team in Pennsylvania, Governor Wolf is allowing you to drink the barb getting April fourth, All Pennsylvania Team Buck members should demand the podcast at their local bars and salute the best team in the business, shielding one end and glass raised high in the other. Well, Jr. I love this plan. I love this idea is fantastic, and thank you so much for Thank you so much, man, I

appreciate it, and let's get it going. Eric. I have to wonder how many people have left Facebook over the way the website treated people because of pictures of January six. My friends and I were discussing a picture of two guys hold flags with a guy wearing horns. We never said anything giving explicit or task it support or what was happening, and Facebook put me in time out. So I decided I was not going to waste more time

on the website, deleted the app off my phone. I haven't deleted my profile because I haven't figured out what to do with ten years of pictures yet. But that day of reckoning is coming. If more people would delete the app, delete their profiles, it would hurt them. I feel like I've reclaimed my life since leaving Eric. We are gonna have to take action against social media companies, and it's going to have to hurt them in the wallet.

Otherwise nothing changes. That's a continuing conversation we'll keep having here on the show. Team. Thanks is always for being here. God bless and no matter what comes your way, no matter what we face, you know what your orders are. Shield's high.