The Epstein Cover Up - podcast episode cover

The Epstein Cover Up

Aug 12, 20191 hr 45 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Jeremy Epstein was found dead of apparent suicide but something does not seem right. 

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

You are entering the freedom hunt. Jeffrey Epstein is dead. We will look at what the various conspiracies out there are and focused in on the fact that there was a conspiracy here. It's just a question of how far it goes and how up the chain we can get to figure it out. This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission where mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American. Again the buck Sexton Show begins. He's a

great guy now. Sex trafficking case was very important to the Department of Justice, to me personally, it was important to the dedicated prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, and to our FBI agents who investigated the case and were preparing it for trial. Most importantly, this case was important to the victims who had the courage to come forward and deserve the opportunity to confront the accused in

the courtroom. I was appalled, and indeed the whole Department was and frankly angry to learn of the MCC's failure to adequately secure this prisoner. We are now learning of serious irregularities at this facility. That are deeply concerning and demand a thorough investigation. The FBI in the Office of Inspector General are doing us that we will get to the bottom of what happened and there will be accountability.

Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. By now, you have likely heard many times over that the single most high profile inmate in federal custody in the United States right now, the one who has the eyeballs on him, the one that had the most conspiracies surrounding conspiracy theories, the possibility that he was going to name names, the information that had just come out last week. Everybody wanted to know

what was going to happen with Jeffrey Epstein. And now we may never really know because Jeffrey Epstein allegedly committed suicide in his cell at the Manhattan Correctional Facility where he was being held in New York City. How is this possible? How could anyone think that this would not raise so much in terms of suspicions. And you know, the problem that I have now is I'm reading all these different conspiracy theories because I do believe, I know

that there was a conspiracy. I don't know if there was a conspiracy to off Epstein necessarily, but he was a part of a massive international conspiracy involving hundreds of millions of dollars changing hands, involving the global elite, names

like the Clintons and many others coming up. I know they keep trying to tie Trump to this, And what you say is that Trump is the only person who was ever named in the Jeffrey Epstein debacle who stood up to Epstein and said that he was a dirt bag and a bad guy and banned him from his So the media can keep throwing Trump's there was the Trump and Clinton, Trump and Clinton. Well, Clinton is the one who was flying on his jet all the time. Clinton's the one who seemed to have much more, shall

we say, worthy of further scrutiny ties. But the global elite befriended a billionaire who made his money in ways that we still don't understand, and it wasn't just picking really good stocks, folks, while he was trafficking in underaged girls, having sexual relations with underaged girls, and engaged in the kinds of crimes that would send a normal person to prison for decades, if not for life, without question on a regular basis, and yet he had some quasi immunity

from the Department of Justice and certainly from the Florida State Attorney in Palm Beach County while he was doing this. One cannot help but remember the words of Alex Asar, the now resigned Secretary of Labor and the Trump administration, who was the US Attorney for the Southern District of Miami, who cut the deal that allowed for not just a sweetheart situation for him in Palm Beach with Palm Beach County, but prevented follow on federal prosecution. I mean, it was

almost like he got immunity. Why would he get immunity? Well, Azar said something if you were calling and during testimony about quote he belonged to intelligence end quote. What does that mean? I don't know, but I want to know. And that's where I am on so much of this.

Some of you will, no doubt point out that I have been giving you regular Epstein updates on this show, more so than I think you would see in the mainstream media, because I have been concerned along that this that we would never get answers and go back and listen to some of the shows, you know what I'm

talking about. I've been saying, I think that they're gonna make this whole thing go away, that they're gonna someone's gonna get to Epstein, or they're just gonna they're going to you know, he's gonna be either on an island in a non extradition country all of a sudden, or or either going to offer him or this is this is why I've been talking about this, because it's so clear that he was tied in with the most some

of the most powerful people in the world. And does anyone really think that he was the only individual involved with underage girls? Does anyone really think that. I have a very hard time believing that people referred to pedophile Island. They talk about these trips and the young girls and the planes, and he's entertaining all these global celebrities and political figures and scientists, and he had quite a rolodex. Some of them admitted to getting massages at his property.

Of course, the massages, they say, nothing bad happened, Okay, But people spend a lot of time with this individual. And I can tell you this, if anyone is socially associating with someone who is constantly surrounded by girls who seem to be under the legal age of consent, anyone in their forties and fifties was what we're talking about here. You would think that they would understand the red flags

that they're seeing a bit more. A lot of people turning a blind eye to this, a lot of people acting like, Oh, it was just Jeffrey being Jeffrey, and I didn't know anything. No one knew anything. Even after we did know things. There were names that we're going to come out. I'm very confident of that, and now they probably won't come out. There were stories that we were going to hear, and now I think we won't ever hear those stories. At some level, they have managed

to snuff out the truth here. They've managed to eliminate some of the justice that could have been achieved after this whole sordid tail unfolded. But now let's just turn our minds for a moment to the actual death of Epstein in prison, because so I still want to know, there's this overall conspiracy. How did this guy make his money? We don't have answers to that. We should know that right away. Oh, two of his lawyers this is broke today,

who are very involved in his finances. They've already hired criminal defense attorneys for themselves, so get ready for that. We know that he was involved with Wexner, the founder of L brands, but in a way that you don't he had power of attorney's This is something that you know you maybe would trust in an immediate relative with. I mean, this is very unusual, moving around eighty billion here, forty billion there, all offshore accounts, all that being hidden.

Why so much secrecy around what he's doing with his money unless it really wasn't about investments, There's something else going on. So that's the part of the conspiracy. And also who knew and who was doing stuff with Epstein that was illegal. I refused to believe that he was the only one. I refused to believe that there weren't very powerful people who were going to be implicated by Epstein. That's the only card that he had left the trade.

And now we get to, oh, but he's dead. You go down the list and the most sober and serious minded people I know, who are real legal experts and criminal justice experts are all completely appalled by this. So this is not there's no conspiracy here. When it comes to thinking that what happened is in outright debacle for our criminal justice, a system, for public faith in the institution of the Bureau of Prisons, our ability to keep prisoners alive. Epstein was somebody who tried to commit suicide.

They just took him off suicide watch a few days ago. They were supposed to have somebody monitoring his cell every and walk by his cell every thirty minutes. It didn't happen for two hours. He shouldn't have been taken off of suicide watch, but they did. His cell mate was suspiciously transferred out of his cell hours before this happened. The people who were assigned to watch him were running

crazy long overtime shifts. Now, is it possible that all of this is just the federal incompetence that we see in the bureaucracy time and again, there are really no limits to federal incompetence. That's a fair thing to say. Yes, absolutely, it's possible. I think it's likely. But how would you prove that someone got to someone inside this system and didn't I'm I don't think it's I don't think it's the case, And we have to see. We haven't even

gotten a full report from the corner yet. But I don't think it's the case that he was oft in prison, that Epstein was killed by someone, actively killed by someone. Do I think that someone got to his lawyers? I saw today on Fox Andy McCarthy saying he had read that the lawyer's request that he'd be taken off suicide watch. So that's interesting when your client has already apparently tried to commit suicide. So that's putting a lot of faith in your lawyer's discretion. Do I think that they got

they got him. No. Do I think that they maybe let him take care of it himself, because that was always what the plan was supposed to be, because maybe somebody on the outside had lever John Epstein. Yeah, that I could buy that, I can believe. I'm not saying I know it. I'm not saying it is. I'm saying I could see that realistically having happened here. I've seen that there's almost no suicides in this very high profile correctional facility in Manhattan for federal courts down at the

southern tip of Manhattan. I've I've seen people who work there saying that they're not aware of any suicides before this. Under these circumstances, in this facility. So the one guy who manages to suicide himself, which I know is a repetitive, but the one guy manages to take himself out inside this facility is the one who, more than any other criminal defendant I can think of in my lifetime, may have been in a position to bring down people who

are literally part of political dynasties on a globe. Will Scale the only one that you can think of who might have had information that could have taken down and one of the few areas of public life. And I've been saying this where if you're caught, you're pretty much done.

Is this kind of sexual predatory behavior involving underage girls You're no matter who you are, We had been led to believe at least you would be punished for this, and you certainly would not have your reputation intact in public if you're involved in this and you're a politician. That Epstein was able to escape serious consequences for this

as long as he did is simply inexplicable. You cannot come up with a real explanation unless you understand who brought pressure on the prosecutors, on the officials that were involved, or who tried to exert leverage on Epstein's behalf. That's what I mean by the conspiracy that we have to on earth, because it's there. Nobody gets the deal that he got. Even Dershowitz admitted that it was the deal of a lifetime, the deal of his whole career. Nobody

would get that deal. You're running essentially an underage prostitution ring out of your mansion in Palm Beach, and you get six months of house arrest that allows you to go work in your office and check in at a county jail once a week. Nobody gets that deal. Who would get that deal? Somebody who has a lot of leverage on some other very powerful people. Somebody perhaps who has blackmail of a level and degree that could completely destroy very powerful people. Somebody who I don't know belongs

to intelligence. There's a whole bunch of things that we need to track down here. Now. I know the Attorney General has said that we shouldn't think that this will just go now without punishment for those who are co conspirators. And if the point here was trying to silence Epstein before he was able to bring down the whole house of cards and to send an earthquake through some corridors of the global elite. That purpose has been met, They've

achieved that. Are we really going to have enough faith in the institutions of government right now that weren't able to stop the nonsense of the Russia collusion delusion for two years, in fact instigated it, ran with it. We trust their judgment, we trust their honesty and their integrity to pursue a case at this level implicating the kind of people that we know have already been implicated and chasing it down. I don't think I have that faith,

and I don't think many of you do either. More in Epstein and then also the worst lie that a Democrat presidential candidate has told them a long time. We'll get to that in the second hour today. It was told by both Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris, who should be ashamed. They are not. But we'll break down what that is. And then we're finally getting some distance from O Trump is a racist week last week, which what

the whole week was about in the media. We'll talk about how that factors into the Democrats strategy to win twenty twenty. They're not giving up on that, and much more coming up, team, So stay with me. President Trump facing backlash after tweeting a conspiracy theory linking the Clintons to Jeffrey Epstein's death. What do you think the President

was thinking here? What was behind us? I think the President was basically asking some of the questions that we saw millions of Americans probably asking themselves, whether it be on social media or just even in their own private conversations, about the very strange circumstances around around this person's death. You even had the Attorney General of the United States today say that there are some serious irregularities with this

case that need to be investigated. The President his entire administration are very firm in the fact we need to investigate not only the circumstances around his death, but continue the investigation into the horrible actions he was accused of and those who may have helped him. I will note that the this is an incredibly serious issue, and we're going to continue to drill down into into those aspects of it. And I do want answers. And there is a conspiracy here, we just need to figure out how

far it goes and who's involved. I mean an Epstein conspiracy, not just what happened in prison conspiracy that could be a part of it. Two, we have to find out what the answers are. As latter was just saying. But the Clintion memes over the weekend, I have to say some of them were pretty we're pretty funding him. And I saw it because look, there's a weird association here with people that are in the Clinton orbit who just

have an untimely demise. That's maybe you could say it's all coincidence, fine, But my favorite was there was a Chuck Norris meme where Chuck Norris says that even he checks in his closets and under his bed before he goes to sleep at night, making sure that there aren't Clinton's waiting for him. You know, there's a lot of that going on. And look what Trump did, He retweet it.

This is at some level, this is just trolling to Clinton's obviously by a lot of people that are enjoying the did they just like to get under the Clinton supporter's skin. But then there's also the whole Bill Clinton Epstein connection that I want more answers there. I'll just say that I want more answers. I'm not going to show you between but the spokesman for former President Bill Clinton responded to the president, retweeting it saying, quote ridiculous

and of course not true. And Donald Trump knows it. Has he triggered the twenty fifth Amendment? Yet? President Trump could use his megaphone for anything, but the President often uses it to amplify that which is the worst of US personal attacks, bigotry, and insane conspiracy theories. Officials say Epstein died by apparent suicide while in the custody of

the federal government. The Attorney General Will bar released a statement opening an investigation into how this happened, saying he was quote appalled and saying, mister Epstein's death raises serious questions that must be answered unquote. This is, of course, not the first time the President Trump has chosen to use his amplified voice to spread conspiracies. He lied about President's Let's not hear Jake Tapper's whiny and annoying voice anymore than we have to. I I'm out in the

worth time. Okay, that's great, let's just get into this Trump notice is the enemy here, right? Epstein dies in Bureau of Prison custody. There's all kinds of very real unanswered questions. This guy was able. Epstein was able to get away with terrible crimes for many, many, many years, and now we have to focus on Trump's tweet. That's the real that that's where the real outrage is. Good job Tapper really leaning into it, really shown us what

matters here. But Tapper's very indicuou of one of the lessons that we have from all of this as somebody who is very much part of the establishment, the elite establishment media, which really has no business considering itself to be elite in the first place. CNN is a mockery of what it once pretended to be, and the people who work there have become a mockery of the mission that they claim to fulfill, which is speaking truth to power. They do the bidding of powerful people all the time,

most notably Jeff Zucker, but many others. They are fighting for the Democrat Party and for the left and for the socialists in this country while pretending to just be objective journals. But this is all part of what we have been learning in recent years, and there's a lot that factors into this. I think that Trump's elevation is a big part of it. I think that quite honestly,

technology and the Internet are a part of it. But we have learned some very important things as I think Americans now are broadly much more aware of at least two observations. One is the very powerful and connected in this country, if they have the right politics, meaning democrat, can get away with almost anything. That the elite live by a different set of laws. That's real. That's a real thing, the truth, the the financial and political elite.

I don't just mean, you know, they always say this, oh, there's different justice for if you're you know, if you're a white male that in the justice system who is has some financial means you are, you have totally different justice than No. I mean, there's not a lot of guys who you know, are are are making one hundred grand working as you know, a car salesman somewhere, who

get away with murder. Okay, yeah, if you're somebody who's incredibly famous, connected, powerful and rich, then maybe you get away with things. But the global elite, and as evidence in this country specifically, they do live by a different set of laws. They live by a different set of rules. That's a real thing. Not all the time, but enough that it should be bothers into all of us, and then there's just the elite. Is not what we have been led to believe. They are our institutions, something that

Democrats constantly complain about. They say that Trump is eroding our institutions. I think a big part of the public's trust declining when it comes to these institutions is that we're just finding out the truth about them and who runs them. Just go down the list. Do you think that the FBI and the Department of Justice are more

or less trustworthy and competent? Now that you know the truth about people like James Comey and Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch and many, many, many others, does it inspire confidence? This is the chief law enforce and some of the chief law enforcement figures in the country for years. Do you do that makes you feel better or worse about the situation in this country? Look at the DNI, look at the CIA. Look at what do we learn about the biggest Wall Street banks in two thousand and eight.

They weren't so smart. They were just connected and greedy use political connections to avoid what should have happened, which is they should have been allowed to go under at least in a fair system. People say all would have destroyed the whole banking system, would have freeze, frozen up all credit and everything else. Okay, but you know if it was, if it was a real free market, guess what you would have had more than just leaving brothers fail.

The banks weren't so smart, they didn't foresee the future. They were just greedy, and then they use their political connections to save their butts. The media, as evidence by Tapper and many others, you trust the media? I mean, there are trustworthy people in the media. I hope you think you're listening to one. Now. I'm not perfect, b I am trustworthy. I do approach what I do, and more importantly, in many ways, I think I approach who I am every day with an aspiration of honor, if

not the achievement of it. But do you trust the mainstream media? Do you trust the major institutions of journalism out there? And that declining trust is the result of more information than ever before, more access to what's really going on, to what their journalists think, to what they're reporting is really based on, to what's going on behind the scenes. This is a recurring theme. The more you know about these elites and their institutions, the less you

tend to trust them. And you think back to the Founding, the genius of the Founders was largely rooted in distrust of human being who acquire power. Full stop. They understood, you give people too much power, bad things happen. That's why you have to have checks and balances, you disperse it, you have oppositional government, You have all these different components put together so that you limit the scope of what power can do, and you limit how much any one

individual can have or any group can have. So this is this for me, at least, what we've started. We see with a Bureau of Prisons and their inability to keep Epstein alive in custody. Yeah, we need to make sure that this isn't the result of a specific conspiracy. But there's also a reminder for all of us that the government couldn't keep this guy alive. How much incompetence are we really supposed to stomach? I mean, the government

couldn't prevent him from committing suicide. If they can't prevent him from committing suicide and custody, how can they prevent anybody. The Attorney General is rightly embarrassed because technically he is at the top of this command chain, and this was a big mess up. Some of your saying bucket wasn't a mess up. I know we will find out. We gotta. We shouldn't jump to conclusions, but I'm leaving open a lot of stuff here because it's all just too convenient,

too coincidental. How many coincidences pile up before you start to say that you're not going to accept the official narrative anymore. But I do feel like we are entering a period where being told, oh, this is the way it is because the right people are in charge, the smart people are in charge, just shut up and listen to them. That's getting to be a harder sell. And I think that's a good thing. I think that we

should demand accountability. We should hope for excellence, but we should always demand accountability, and we should not accept the narratives of those in power that are meant to keep I'm in power and keep them from being accountable. In every respect. Elite institutions have not had a good few years here, folks in the government, across the board, you

name it. There's there's a lot of necessary skepticism that we should all have in our day to day lives, and for me, this whole Epstein situation, it just goes to show you where are the limits? You know, when is it just too much? When is the abuse too egregious for those who have power, who have influence to be able to just make it all go away. They knew, people knew what this guy was doing, and they didn't care.

They weren't necessarily complicit. I'm not saying they weren't necessarily legally liable for assisting him, but they were turning a blind eye because this guy was moving around a lot of cash to the right people in politics, and who knows where else he was buying them off. Will we ever find out really what the full extent of it was,

I don't know. I'm you know that I was skeptical that we would get answers before he died, because I thought something was going to happen, And now something has happened, So it would be strange if I didn't think that it was likely much of what we were going to find out has now been forever lost. Doesn't mean we should give up, but I mean, this was the biggest and just one more thing about the media and how they're always, they're always, Oh, they're so great at pulling

apart Trump's tweets and calling them a racist. That's like their only job. It's so lazy, it's so worthless. But they've deluded themselves. I mean, they've created a cult of anti trump Ism that they cannot escape now, and their audiences have been brainwashed into thinking that anything that's anti Trump is worth hearing. But where are all these masses of multi billion dollars media conglomerates on this case about

Jeffrey Epstein? How was this not? You know, look at the flood the zone coverage that they created in what twenty four hours on the Covington kids based on a lie. I look at the other times that they've manufactured stories out of effectively nothing because they wanted to tell a

certain tale to the American public. Here's a guy who was all of the things that the journalist class and the elites in this country pretend they are there to protect us from a super wealthy, connected white male predator of underage girls, all these things, who was. There's political corruption involved here, there's financial crimes going on, their crimes against underaged girls, abusing women, all these things that they're

they're supposed to be protecting us from. And when it all came together in this one case, where were they, Oh, the elites were m I A what a shock. It wasn't until a lawsuit brought by lawyers representing one of the Bolts that gots on the documents out the Miami Harold said, Okay, I guess we have to actually look into this thing again. And all of a sudden, uh, but this case had been We'd known about this for years in the background. No, no investigative journalists assigned to this,

no people looking into what really happened here. That The New York Times did a whole piece today on how they can't tell you the reader, how Epstein made his money, or even where his money is, or even how much he's really worth. Folks, just because what he listed for the courts is what it is doesn't mean that's really the full I'm sure he's hiding money overseas. Will never find There are Epstein accounts we will never even find out about, and who knows how much money has been

hidden away in them. But that places like the New York Times, in CNN and these others, they've got all these people, these big fat salaries that they're reporting at this stage of the game, they don't even know how this guy made his money. They don't even know where he got. He lives in the biggest, most expensive single family home in the largest and richest city in the United States, and they don't know how he made his money. At this stage of the game, they should be embarrassed.

How can they not know me the first right, Everything that you're ever told about chasing down leads all. They got to follow the money trail. They haven't followed the money trail because they didn't care. Oh, but they're really good at telling you that Trump's tweets are mean and then lying to you about him being a neo Nazi supporter from a press conference at the Charlottesville years ago. We'll talk more about that. I dug into that again

over the weekend. It's shocking. I mean, the media really does just need to be scrapped and rebuilt from the ground up. Nine at ninety five percent of this country just need to be scrapped. All the journalism schools are a joke. It's completely out of control. So, yeah, the Epstein case says a lot more than just oh, this super connected rich weird Peto managed to offer himself in prison.

You know, let's just move on to the next thing. No, there was a lot going on here, a lot of people who didn't want the truth to come out, a lot of people who didn't do their jobs, who at best were wildly incompetent and at worst were corrupt complicit. We need answers, folks. I'll try to get them to you on this show as much as I can well

bear it back. This is somebody who not only is high profile, who not only knew a lot of high profile people, whose papers just came out of court just to let out some of the documents related to his cases that name high profile people, who was friends with the current president of the United States, who flew a previous president of the United States around on his plane, who was alleged to have trafficked girls to a member

of the Royal fan Emily of Britain. Okay, this is not a this is this is you know, on the same level like a Bill COSI. This is a famous person now who's now in prison. He knows a lot about a lot of people, and as you said earlier, his only out at this point would be to talk about those people. So he's in this very vulnerable situation. And then you throw in the fact which I did not know until thank god, Stephanie Goska is sitting here and told me this that this is now a facility

under the control of the Department of Justice. And this Department of Justice does not exactly inspire confidence. Let's just be blunt. William Barr's Justice Department is not one that you can readily simply rely upon and feel confident in. And so what do we make of all this? Now that in this federal facility, this person was allowed to be alone long enough to either harm himself or be killed by something. We don't know what happened, right, We just don't know. But okay, can we just can I

jump in here? That was That was Joy Reid, who you may remember from MSNBC. She's still there. She's the one who wrote the homophobic stuff ten years ago on her blog and then claimed publicly that she was hiring the FBI. Look at who hacked in and changed her blog from ten years ago and f and by the way m SMEs he kept her, didn't fire her. So wokeness has its limits. Apparently, so does reasonable and common sense. I like how she lays out this whole thing, and

then it's the real problem. You see, this is this is a trumped derangement syndrome symptom, is that all things go back to Trump or one of his cabinet officials. The real the real problem here is that you can't trust Bar at the top of the ooh, Bar is such a badman. Does anyone think that Bill Barr wanted

anything other than this guy too? I mean, now some of you might say, Buck, you don't know where the conspiracy goes, all right, But I mean, realistically, I don't think Bar is involved in any of the conspiracy folks. Doesn't mean he does deserve some share of the blame, as it's the buck stops with him, so to speak. But this whole oh, we can't trust Bar. That doesn't inspire confidence. See, this is what they do. And I'm asked and CNN, they always find a way to bring

it back to Trump bad. I mean, they could be talking about how it's raining right now, and you know it really is about how Trump bad because climate change or something. They'll always find a way this overshadowed. Something could happen over the weekend. You had the anniversary of the five year anniversary of Mike Brown being shot, and

you have some Democrats weighing in on this. It's really one of the most dare I say, pernicious, most mendacious things that have come out of a Democrat's mouth at a long time. I'm going to tell you what they said, but you have to stay through this break. Everyone's looking for a new guiding light. I personally think we should use science and so have a hypothesis like is what the President said true? And then give the reader some

analysis about that. But there are lots of different ways we could try to approach hypothesis, as in this assertion we believe and then see if the facts back it up, because that would be an inversion of what's true usually journalism was supposed to do, which is to follow the facts and then come to a conclusion based on that. Yeah, I mean, it's sort of two different ways of looking

at it. Right. You can look at all these facts, and I think a really good example of it is actually the New York Times when they put a list together of every lie that Trump had done, had said for two years that in twenty seventeen, and they showed the facts that back that up. And then after that, I think they felt comfortable, and anyone would feel comfortable saying, this is a man who's repeatedly and unabashably lies all the time, right, and so then that hypothesis is fully proven. Yeah,

they're telling you exactly what they're doing here. That was on CNN, a bunch of smug lib journals doing what they do. Why did I play that whole thing for you? Because that was giving you a peak into what they really think, which is that they first they start with the position, They start with the hypothesis Trump as a racist, Trump is evil. They go from there and then they find out it insta suit whatever they like, once they've already established what the main claim is going to be.

That's the game, that's what they're doing. This is advocacy journalism. This is what they don't understand. They pretend to be neutral. This is CNN. They pretend to be neutral. They're not neutral. And who says they're neutrals a joke to this day, I would love to have a debate with Oh, I don't know, let's say Jake Tapper, mister super journal over at CNN. Other CNN is a left wing propaganda organ

and effectively taking orders from the DNC. Would I would smoke anyone at CNN in a debate on that issue. There's not a stent because I'm right and it's obvious. They also they never let their pampered and overpaid anchors wander out of friendly venues because they would be shown to be the intellectual lightweights that they are. But they talk so much about fats, right, they think that this is oh, and I also like that, let's approach this like science. Just as an aside. We all know libs

say this. You know that they're the people that don't think that men and women are biologically distinct. But hashtag science man, you know, sure, thanks, that's good. Just call

it science, and then you're obviously right. But the unwillingness to stare at the rejection of fact on major issues national news stories on their side is one of the reasons why a lot of us give Trump some leeway when he's kind of you spouting off about stuff, We're like, all right, I mean, maybe he's playing a little fast and loose with some of his assessments or some of his analysis, but he doesn't lie the way Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren have just lied. This is an appalling,

appalling thing for two prominent Democrats to have done. But they're pandering their demagogues and they are deeply dishonest. On Friday, you had people commemorating the five year anniversary of Ferguson, Missouri, the Ferguson Zuri's shooting involving app officer Darren Wilson and Mike Brown. This led up to this led to hands Up, Don't Shoot, which became a rallying cry for leftist anti

police movements across the country. But there was a very thorough Obama Justice Department investigation of this that showed that Officer Wilson was defending himself, that Mike Brown was a thug, was involved in assaulting a police officer, and was not holding his hands up. This was according to African American eyewitnesses, by the way, cited in this DJ report. And yet Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren tweeted the following in commemoration

on August nine of the shooting of Michael Brown. The lawful, thoroughly investigated, lawful, and just defied shooting. That's right, according to Obama's DJ, let's just go over that one more time. A lawful and justified shooting of a person who has engaged in felony assault of a police officer, Mike Brown. It's not a martyr, he's not a hero. Ah, but the narratives he useful. He was useful for the movement, So they created this whole storyline around him. That was

just all a lie. Kamala Harris, though tweeted this out, remembers the former prosecutor Elizabeth Warren, a law professor. They're supposed to know the law. Harris wrote, Michael Brown's murder Forever change Ferguson and America. His tragic death sparked a desperately needed conversation and a nationwide movement. We must fight for stronger accountability and racial equity in our justice system. Well, equity means that if you attack a cop and try to get his he's going to shoot you. That is

equity in the justice system. I don't care who you are, what race you are, If you do that, you are likely to get shot and deserve to be shot. This is what we had a throw investigation here. Mike Brown. It's not some terrible tragedy. Mike Brown deserved to be shot by that officer in self defense. That is what the law says. But you might have to explain that. To Elizabeth Warren. Five years ago, Michael Brown was murdered by a white police officer in Ferguson. She wrote, Michael

was unarmed, yet he was shot six times. I stand with activists and organizers who continue to fight for justice for Michael. We must confront systemic racism and violence from the police head on. But just just all blabber, all propaganda, all lies. Michael Brown was not murdered. Elizabeth Warren is not a moron, Neither is Kamala Harris. They know he was not murdered. Why are they saying it? I would offer to you. I think this should be legally actionable.

I think Officer Wilson should sue them. Is this is libel. They are writing malicious lies about a private citizen who has been cleared by the Justice Department for any wrongdoing. If you can call Officer Wilson a murderer based on this, you could call somebody a child molester just because you feel like it running for public office. You could call somebody a rapist just because you know you feel like

it a private citizen without consequence. These should be actionable accusations, but more to the point, because that wouldn't stop them. And this is the left that you're really dealing with. They pretend to care about facts, They pretend to be the ones that are so focused in on the truth. Do you think that any CNN journalists are going to ask Elizabeth Warren or Kamala Harris about saying that Mike Brown was murdered? I mean, challenge them on this point.

What is it about the facts that we know that justifies saying that that officer Wilson, who was doing his job, doing a tough job in a tough neighborhood of an American city with far too much violent crime. As we know, libs don't talk about us very much. Vast majority of urban violent crime is not from cops to African American men. It is black men shooting black men in numbers that are tragic and we need to address as a country, but it's not part of the narrative. So we always

focus on the cop violence. We always focus on the cop violence, even though it's in the low hundreds as opposed to the thousands and thousands, and by the way those low hundreds. Most of it is exactly what happened with Mike Brown. Somebody's running out a police officer with a knife. Police officer has a gun for a reason, shoots the person. Black, white, any other color, doesn't matter. You come at a cop. There's a lethal threat against that all officer. The officer believes his life or her

life is in danger. Officer has to be able to draw down and defend himself or herself. That's it, or else we have anarchy, I mean, or else we have no rule of law in this country. If police can't use force even to defend themselves, what do we have left. Michael Brown was not murdered. Michael Brown was killed assaulting a police officer that he may have murdered had he not been stopped. He's not a martyr, He's not a hero.

Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren no better. The Obama Justice Department certainly knows better, and Democrats should hold each other to account on this, but they won't. Why because hands up, don't shoot is such a catchy slogan. That's why. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. One of the more frustrating I was gonna say most, and then I turned

it into more but more speak the English book. Something that bothers me about the Trump administration from the beginning it always has is that as much as he's a fighter and I appreciate his ability, his sheer endurance for the all outlib assault means that I give Trump a tremendous amount of respect and a lot of leeway to be imperfect, because I'm not the one who's on that battlefield, so to speak, with every LIB with a with a following,

with a microphone, with money, with access, with power, trying to just tear you down all the time, I don't know how he does it. It's and I get my fair share of hate. I mean I got people wrote me really mean things after the Bill maher appearance of libs. Of course, all of the conservatives were like, you crushed it, You're amazing, I love you. Not all of you wrote that, but some of you wrote that, And those were the

night those were the nice, slash astute observations. But I mean, I see what Trump does, and it is remarkable what he puts up with. That said, what am I What was I starting to lead into there? I just don't understand well, I mean, I guess it's loyalty based, and he people who around him that he thinks are loyal to him. That's that's priority number one. But some of the people that he has put around him, and we know this, it's admitted now. I mean, I don't think

anybody disagrees. We're just the worst. They're just just losers. And they have had really important roles in his administration. And you know, I will never Jeff Sessions is a good man and he's I feel badly for Jeff because he was put in a spot that he was not you know, he was not meant for Andy. And so he's on the same category as the mooch who we're about to talk to you who's I mean, there are grifters. They're just people that are Trump grifters. Uh, what's what's

prouiser Mark? What's the name of the lady from the show who? Uh? You know what I'm talking it's African American lady was on The Apprentice? Who was you know, she's the Cruella de Ville? Yeah, Samarosa Amarosa. You know she's the bad the bad person from the show amar Rosa. I mean, she was in the White House. She was had access to the White House, into the Oval Office, and this is like, come on, folks, and you know

I have nothing anyway. The Jeff Sessions thing, though, that would be like if you if you put me on a golf course and said, hey, buck, you gotta let's see what you got, I would be bad. It doesn't mean that I'm a bad person or a bad athlete. I just don't play golf. Right then this is not a great example, but you know, you know, Jeff Sessions was put on a golf course and it's like he'd

never held a club before. He was not meant to be the Attorney General, not under an administration, not with an administration that was under complete siege by the deep state, by the Lib media, all the rest of it. But then you got the other people like I'm talking about with the Mooch, would just come across as grifters. I mean, what the Mooch is doing now is to me class A one grifting, which is, you know, when when Trump was and this is what you see with Joe Scarborough,

you know a lot of prenny. I know he wasn't working for Trump, although he kind of wanted to it seemed like at one point, a lot of people when they have the Trump access, they love him. He's amazing to defend anything. But then if they fall out with him, then they run over and become best friends with CNN and MSNBC and the anti Trump resistance. So here's the mooch.

Who was I think this was on the Bill Marshaw. Actually, uh, this was the former White House Communications director Scaramoucci, Anthony Scaramucci, who had one of the dumbest blunders of anybody in a senior White House role I've ever seen. I mean to call up a journalist and go on some tirade about and say the kind of stuff that he said. It's just it's like he was begging to be fired, and he did get fired, as he should have. But here's now he's supposed to be the voice of wisdom,

but all things trump here he is playclip three. You know, I got fire or two years ago and have tried to stay very loyal to him and very loyal to the agenda because I think the policies are very very good for the American people. But the rhetoric is so charged and so divisive that we have to all just

take a step back now and say what are we doing? Actually, so one thing that I find reprehensible and the President continues to do this, and I think we'll end up happening is sound and reasonably minded men and women in the Republican Party will say, wait a minute, we can't do this. He is giving people a license to hate, to provide a source of finger to go after each other. And he does it on his Twitter account. So let's just stop for a second and think about this. We

ignore it. But he goes after people personally, going after me personally, no problem. I'm a big boy. I can take it. Donnie Deutsch can take it. But he goes after individuals as the president of the United States on his Twitter account, okay, which incites hate, which incites death threats, incites hate, incites death threats. I get hate and death threats. And I'm not the president, nor is the president coming after me. So that's I mean. Libs love to do

this thing of oh insights. There's hate all over the If you're on the internet, if you have any public persona whatsoever, you're getting hate. I don't care if your life's work is just making the perfect grilled cheese and your Twitter account is grilled cheese lover. People are telling you that you use greair instead of American. So you're an evil commie and you know you should be destroyed or whatever you know that you're using. You're using cheddar

cheese because you're a racist. Why is cheddar cheese rate? Ah, because you're a racist. You know, if people write crazy stuff all the time, makes no sense. But you know the thing about the mooch trying to be the conscience of America right now, at least the conscience of the Trump administration that he was ejected from it. Look, I still remember I met this guy backstage at Fox once and I could not believe that he was running the Trump transition. It was I was like, this is this

is a clown show, and I was worried. I was worried for how Trump would do just based on the fact that this guy was running things. I was like, I was like, do want Do I want to work for the Trump administration in some capacity? I remember thinking about this. I was like, well, this is the kind

of decision making they've got. I am concerned. To her credit MSNBC, Stephanie Rule decided that she was going to ask the obvious question here, which anytime journos asked the obvious question, I do give them credit because so few of them do. Which is that, Okay, mooch, you seem like somebody who's just desperate to be on TV. Desperate to be on television because for a lot of people, it's just an ego driven thing. There's a hole in their soul and that's why they want to be on TV.

She asked him, you're going out for Trump? Now? Is this the Scarborough when you love Trump when he's on your when he's on your personal side, but then you're all against him the moment that it's not that that way anymore. Blake let two, I can't think of anything less American, Stephanie than bullying people and being the American president. And you were using your Twitter feed to call out your fellow citizens on Twitter. But different today may that

he's going after you on Twitter. He started running for president calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers and criminals, and he was crushing he was crushing other people running for president on the debate stage. So what is different today? Well, again, like I said, you may not like my arrival to this moment and you may disagree with my arrival. I think I should have gotten there sooner. You may not like my arrival. I like that. This is gonna be

another line that I have. Hey Buck, are you are you telling me that you you don't like so and so because you know she she doesn't want to go out on a date with you? Or do you really just not like her? And I'm like, well, let's not get into how I arrived at this moment, shall we. Oh? Man, that's great, that's up there with That's not in my purview. Hey Buck, did you did you leave the milk out on the table so that it's now gone bad? Up? That's not in my purview. Sorry, can't answer that. If

it works for Muller works for me. The grifters the one thing that I've never really been able to stomach with this administration, some of the people that Trump has put in power. Look, he knows he's made mistakes. Giuliani told me once. I can't remember the word he used, but he said that they're something along the lines of their losers. I forget what the word was that he used. But it's true, folks, Trump does not pick the best people. Who is supposed to be the great savior of the country,

save us from Trump. Oh my gosh, Trump, what are we gonna do? What are we gonna do? How are we gonna save us all? Some Trump actually kind of sounded like a little bit of Remember when Hans Gruber switches out of his it's actually an English accent, it's supposed to be German. But he goes, oh my gosh, Oh my gosh, you're or one of them, You're one of them, And the rooftop scene where John McClean stumbles upon him and he convinces him that he's one of

the hostages instead of the hostage taker. That's kind of what Democrats have done with America. They're really the hostage takers, and that they're ruining this country in as many ways as they can. But then when we actually have them cornered on ourn issue with those oh my gosh, you're one of them, please please please, you know, they freak out and hide their accents, although they don't, you know, hide what they really want. That's what the metaphor is

supposed to be here. But they tell us that there's going to be a Savior's gonna protect us from Trump's destruction of America. You know that savior is supposed to be keep in mind that Trump's racism is one of the big problems we're supposed to do with. Here, the primary savior corner of the polls right now is Joe Biden.

We just wanted to just do a little reminder here, the guy who says, you know, we want truthover facts, and who just is constantly having what and I don't mean this to be agist and disrespectful in general, but he's having senior moments, folks. That's what The guy's seventy four years old. He's going to be president into his eighties if he were to win two terms. Really, here's just a little a little flavor of what Joe Biden.

The media always explained this is, Oh, it's just Joe being Joe, and they've created this the same way that Bernie Sanders is the cudlely mad scientist Kami from Vermont, which he's not cudly. He's going to destroy the economy and his ideas are horrific, and he's actually kind of comes across as kind of a nasty, get off my lawn figure these days. But Biden is always the uncle that just says the thing that's you're not supposed to say, but he just lets it. No, he's actually just a clown.

But Biden's racial insensitivity is always constantly covered up, Right, Biden's racial gaffs or something that we're supposed to say, Oh, well, he didn't mean it. They don't give that leeway to Trump. Ever, here's just a little little taste of a playlif nine. In Delaware, the largest growth of population is Indian Americans. Movie from India. You cannot go to a seven eleven or Duncan Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. We have this notion that somehow, if you're poor, you

cannot do it. Poor kids are just as bright and just as tall as white kids, wealthy kids, Black kids. What kind of a chance with a Northeastern liberal like Joe Biden stand in the South, if you were running in Democratic primaries against Southerners like Mark Warner and John Edwards, and you don't know my state, My state was a slave state, My state is a border state. They're gonna

put you all back in chains. When you've got the first sort of made American who is articulate and bright and clean who most foreign policy experts around the world say is the most the wisest man in the Orient, a large, very identifiable Somali community. I might add, if you ever come to the train station with me, you'll notice that I have great relationship because there's an awful

lot of driving cabs. Apologize for what former Vice President Biden Wednesday night stood by comments he made this week about his work with two segregationist senators. I was in a caucus with James O. Eastland. He never called me boy, he always called me son. At least there was some civility. We got things done. There's not a racist bone in my body. I've been involved in civil rights my whole

career period. But all the things that Biden says, those are not a big deal because he's Biden, He's a Democrat. Anything that Trump ever said. In fact, that they're willing to change what Trump says to make it sound worse or to make it sound bad when it wasn't bad at all. And this is what we should expect because of the media now sometimes slips it admits that objectivity in the era of Trump is just not acceptable anymore, which is hilarious because they've never been objective, and no

one who pays attention thinks they're objective. My friends, I ask you if you're not already there, and I think you are, because if you listen to the show, then you're you know what the real deal is. And I mean that if you listen to me, if you're listening to this radio show, you understand that the mainstream media is full of hacks and propagandists and people that are not honest what they're doing. And we are in the midst of a propaganda fight constantly between left and right

in the media. People are and there are those of us who say what side we're generally on, but at least are honest about where we come from and what our philosophy is and why we think what we think. And then the people that pretend to be neutral, objective observers, and they're not. You know, even when I was traveling with the Pompeo and the press corps that was with him, you know, they're from all the big publications that you would expect. They're all liberals, the whole bunk. I mean,

I'll was sitting there talking to them. I didn't look that stuff was I'm not somebody that would ever speak about social conversations, and you know with that, I don't do that. Some people will do that. They'll say I heard so and so say this, and they thought that they were just hanging out after work. I would never

do that. But they're all lives obviously. I mean, it was very clear from spending time with them that they do not like President Trump, and they're the ones that are reporting on stuff, and so, you know, not none of this should really be a surprised But Biden is

the great Savior or Bernie Sanders. Speaking of Bernie the guy who honeymooned in Moscow during the worst times of the Soviet Union or one of the worst times, I should say this, I mean the Soviet Union a lot of bad time, but you know, really the high I think he went in the nineteen sixty so it's when things were real bad. Here's Bernie Sanders, the other savior. To save us from Trump, they offer us this guy play.

Ten four years ago, I came here in Iowa and I was asked, what is the major national security issue we faced? And people thought I'd say, isis or alkater and those hall big issues. The answer that I gave in terms of national security? Is climate change? Climate change? What's the most frightening thing on the way I started to get into Cuomo. There, you know what's the most frightening thing? Climate change is? We could do Bernie arguing

with Cuomo. Cuomobil like, you don't understand climate change will kill all of us, that will destroy the world, And Bernie's like, no, you can't understand. If we don't take care of the next ten years, we're all gonna melt. It's gonna be super hot, Nomo, Ben and Jerry's ice cream. We're not gonna be a who wins that fight? I don't know between Cuomo and Bernie. You put in your queer girl, yes, you put it in. Yes, I'm white

and old. They call me all kinds of names, and so you think I would vote for Come on, you're smarter. You fill in the blank. Ye. No, I don't have to fill in the blank. Everybody knows we're the bad people. What do they call you? I'm a racist. I went to school. I shared my guard or the colored guy. I have nothing again for him. I grew up in the East, we grew up with people. Do you think the president is a racist? Though? Now I don't. I

really don't. When you's here, send them back. When you hear him talk about communities of color, do you see white people, do call him a racist? Yes and no, because some of those people he's talking about has said just as bad things about him that you can't say on TV. So that was an MSNBC reporter at the

Iowa Fair. And now we're going to get through all these the usual and unexpected campaign events, you know, the Iowa Fair, and you got up, all these different candidates show up there, do all the stuff that they do. This Iowa voter, you could tell, is a little defensive about what's going on because he knows. First of all, I don't know why he would. I don't know if he could tell that. The guy he probably had an MSNBC microphone out there. But you know, just here's rule

number one. Just don't talk to MSNBC, all right, unless unless you're a woke left wing bot and you're going to say exactly what they want you to say. I think it's a bad idea that you're you're not going to be You're not gonna make any friends speaking to MSNBC if you're a Trump voter. That's one thing. I mean, they, as we've been discussing continuously on the show, they put insane people on air on a regular basis who just bashed Trump. That's all they do. They just bashed Trump.

But he says, I'm old, I'm white. They call me all kinds of names. Who do you think I vote for? When are we allowed to have a conversation in this country about all this bashing of old white males all the time is getting really old and it's unfair, and everyone's kind of sick of it. Who's been on the

receiving end of it? You know, people who have been good members of their of their communities, who have been good fathers, who have been good earners and productive and law abiding and patriotic, and you know, many of them serve, but even you know, people serve in different ways, not just in the military. You know, many ways to be a patriot, in many ways to support your country. But they've been they've been good, honorable people, and they just

want certain economic policies. They support more conservative social policies, although Trump is not is not very socially conservative. And they made their pick and the guy won, Donald Trump, And now they're always being told that they're racist for that. I mean, we'll get into it. We got we had betto coming up here, He explicitly says it. I mean, if you vote for Trump now, you're a racist. This is what Democrats are saying instead of trying to win

people over. They've given up on that. You know why they've given up on trying to win people over to vote for Democrats because the numbers speak for themselves. Look at the economy. Who if you were just trying to have a more prosperous America financially, when it comes to freedom, when it comes to entrepreneurship, growth, prosperity, would you rather have the policies of Obama or the policies of Trump on those kitchen table issues that we're all supposed to

care about the most in politics? At least, that's what all the political pundits of nothing else to say will be saying in this election cycle. Who does a better job? Who has done a better job? Obama or Trump? And yet if somebody assesses that and makes a determination about who they're going to vote for based upon it, and the person that they assess as being better is Trump, they are being told now or the you're you must

be a racist. You must be a racist because you're voting for Trump, you see, instead of whoever, instead of whatever total lunatic Democrats are putting forward. I mean this, this propping up of Biden. You know, if this starts to remind me a little bit of of the ending of the movie El Sid, where you know, El Sid has passed away, but they put him up on the horse and they and they have him like lead the charge to get the Moors out of Spain. You know,

that's in fourteen ninety two. I think it was, Uh that's you know, they're they're propping up a very old and weak and not particularly with it, Biden, and they're wondering why people aren't flocking who would We're not just look there Democrats who are baked into the cake. They're always going to vote Democrat because it's part of their identity. They believe this stuff about oh, you're a better person if you vote Democrat, you care more about the poor,

you care more about minorities if you vote Democrat. Name I'll look at the elites of the the Democratic Party. It's all hypocritical, self indulgent billionaires, Hollywood celebrities, the people that really call the shots. The Democratic Party are not people that care about the poor. They're not people that spend any time dealing with the problems of minority communities. They just talk about it because it makes them feel like

they're so strong and brave and you know, virtuous. But the Democratic Party has done a good job of creating a certain brand for itself, right. The brand is the good, smart, nice people vote Democrat. We do break down why that's just not accurate on the merits every day on this show. I think that's part of what I do here. But you see, the Democrats are already, at least a number of them, are abandoning any hope of offering up a

more competent, governing alternative to Trump. That's now just that's gone. Now it's going to be vote against Trump or you're a racist. And they know that all the Democrats will already vote. You know, the people that are already on board, they're just going to come out to cast a vote against Trump as part of their virtue signaling experience. But for those who are in those states that are up for grabs, right, the states that matter, we all know

what they are. And for the undecided voters, and the enthusiasm component of this in those states where you need to see which side is able to do a better vote voter turnout operation. What are they offering up, Well, if you vote for Trump, you're a racist. So don't be a racist. Vote against Trump. That's that's all they've got, because what's the other case they're going to make. Hey, we're going to raise your taxes and destroy healthcare even more.

You know, there's a there's a really interesting stat out today actually, as I saw Axio shared at some study that looks at what's going on in healthcare. There's bad stuff happening in healthcare in this country. I mean there's and it's because of government intervention. But you've had an increase in a whole slew of really common hospital practices, hospital procedures, I should say, you've had in the last four or five years a twenty percent increase in the

cost of these procedures. Meanwhile, the doctors are not the ones that are they're getting more. This is all hospitals now have consolidated. They have brought doctors practices indoors, so to speak, inside their walls, so they now control it. And the hospitals are just charging whatever prices they want on this stuff. They fight like mad against price transparent. See, and you've got the government telling them to take money for Medicaid procedures that don't even begin to cover the

actual cost of the procedures. So they're operating a loss on that Medicare procedures don't cover the actual cost of most important procedures that hospitals do on a regular basis. So I'm trying to hear. I've actually hospital prices for inpatient services increased more than the prices paid to doctors between twenty thirteen and twenty seventeen. This was on axios today.

I mean this is real, folks. Yeah, nineteen percent over this period, where the increase in these services for things like childbirth, appendex to me hypertension, there's been no great improvement in these services. Why are they charging them? Was twenty percent more? Twenty percent more on average? That's a lot.

Is there already expensive procedures? Ah, because the government is very involved in determining who can do these procedures and what they can charge arge and what insurers can charge water, and there's all kinds of market intrusion. Those are real conversations. How do we make this better? I mean, the answer really is the free market and the stop with all the socialism. But instead of having conversations about how we can make things better that will affect you and me,

what do we have from the Democrats. What's the primary push for why you should vote against Trump? He's a racist? We'll talk. I mean, Betto takes this line, who's he's become among the most annoying of all the candidates by that he's not charming, He's not used to be like I was, like kind of nice and everything. But now that no one votes, Miriam getting really mean. We'll hear

from Betto in a second. I think it's really hard after everything that we've seen from his time as a candidate in twenty sixteen, to his repeated warnings of invasions, to his repeated calls to send them back, sending back people who are US citizens, sending back people who are born in this country. His description of white nationalists and klansmen and neo Nazi as very fine people. Stop right there, Stop right there for a second. I can't. I just

can't have this anymore. That's a lie. What Beto just said about the white nationalists is very fine people on both sides, or good people on both sides, that that that that infamous now statement that President Trump made after Charlotte'sville. He's trying to give up, He's trying to talk about jobs in New York City. I went back and read that transcript five times through this past weekend because I thought,

you know, I'm really sick of hearing about this. And I just remember at the time I was shouted down on Twitter at least by some other right wingers or at least former GOP people, for saying that that's not what Trump said. Oh, yes it is, Yes it is. It just turned into what always happens here, which is that the propaganda overwhelms the truth right, or as Biden would say, the truth over the facts, which as a classic bidenism, but it became a narrative that you could

not pierce with reality. Donald Trump did not say that there were good neo Nazis in Charlottesville. That did not happen. I read the transcript over many, many times and not mean.

What ends up happening when you look at it is that they're being First of all, the journalists are being incredibly disrespectful to President in a way where if they had peppered Obama with questions the way they were just going after going after Trump, we would have been told that it was so racist, and then it was terrible, and then it was off on all this other stuff. Okay, so start start with that. But they were going after

Trump with everything that they had. And in that same press conference where he talked about the good people on both sides, Trump said, quote, you had people and I'm not talking about the neo Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally. You had many people in that group other than neo Nazis and white nationalists, Okay, and the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now when he says this is this is where they kind of,

you know, burrow under the walls of reality. I mean, this is their their entry point. When he's talking about that group, he's referring to a group that was there before the Tiki Tiki torch, neo Nazi marcher, people who were opposed to taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee. And that's how this whole thing got started. There was a pro and there was a con And I would say to those who want to tell us that Robert E.

Lee statues have to come down. I do need to understand if that's the standard, why we aren't taking down the Washington Monument, why we aren't tearing down the Jefferson Jefferson memorial, Why we aren't renaming Washington, DC? You know, where does it stop? And Trump was making that point at his press conference. Where and that I think it's a completely fair question to ask. But the most important thing here is that Betto and these others in the media,

they're just lying. They're lying about what Trump said, and it's now become a lie that is so frequently repeated by so many people that they believe that it's the truth. I mean, I remember once or twice I was and you know, I'll tell you this in all honestly, I was on The Rising Show and somebody said, oh, Donald Trump, blah blah blah, good people on both sides, referring to

neo Nazis. That became a talking point that I heard once or twice, and I knew that it wasn't true, but I hadn't looked at the transcript recently enough that I wanted to really dig down into it. And now in retrospect. Of course I should have thrown down on that point, but it's hard because everyone around you look, so he goes, what are your Merian? You know, that's what he said. It is not what he said. Donald Trump did not say that they were good people on

both sides. Referring to neo Nazis in that same press conference, he said, I just read it to you that they should be con d totally. He was not referring to the neo Nazis. He was referring to the people who the night before or the day before this whole remember Antifa was there and it was a mess. I mean, there was all this protests and counter protest going on in the streets of Charlottesville, otherwise a pretty quiet town usually.

But he was referring to the people that didn't want the statue of Roberty Lee to come down out of this park and the park to be renamed. That's what he's referring to. And when you read when you read what he was saying the press, it's very clear. But he's going back between the group that group. Trump is not that precise always in his language, but I'll say that in that circumstance, it was confusing because there were multiple groups and multiple incidents. But that's why you have

to read it in context. And when you read it in context, it is very clear. But because it was open ended enough for the media, they just decided to infer. Oh, he's talking about Neo Nazis and this, this is one of the great talking points to left us is about how you can't support Trump. This is how Beto O'Rourke, who's just it just a real empty suit. Oh, it doesn't wear suits. It was just got a shirt on. I'm just wearing a shirt because I'm like one of you.

I'm married a super rich lady and like her family

is like paying all of our bills. But I'm also like totally the working ban to keep playing this clip though, this is what he says now that people who want to vote for Trump after everything that we've seen from his time as a candidate in twenty sixteen, to his repeated warnings of invasions, to his repeated calls to send them back, sending back people who are US citizens, sending back people who are born in this country, his description of white nationalists and klansmen and neo Nazis as very

fine people, his warnings of Muslims as being somehow inherently defective or dangerous and attempting to ban them from entry into thestry, his transgender troop band, and his attack on any one who does not look like, or pray like, or love like the majority of this country. Yes, Donald Trump is dangerous to the future of America and will destroy what makes us so unique and so special and the genius that we represent to ourselves. And I can't take. I can't take anymore. I don't want you guys to

turn off. I can't take it anymore. I'm sorry. I know this guy's running for president because it moron lies, lies, lies, completely and utterly, either misrepresenting what Trump has said. I mean, it just heres a perfet example of the Muslim band. It's not a Muslim ban. It used countries at the Obama administration singled out as being threats for Jehanna's terrorism and said that we're going to have more stringent measures

put in place. It did not limit Muslims coming from India or Indonesia, the two largest Muslim populations of the world. Didn't limit people coming from Muslim countries that are allied with us. The only exception of that was Iraq, and then they change that very quickly there after. So he's just it's just lies. They're just lying. If Trump is so bad, and this is what I really want to get to, I mean, Betto goes on to say in

that clip, and we want him to get to. He says, it's really hard to see people voting for Trump if they aren't racist. That's his that's his crescendo. I mean, that's his real what he's really going for, And it's just such a horrible smear. It's really hard to see people voting for Trump if they aren't racist. If Trump is so racist, Betto, he was really just a He's really just a himbo. You know, this guy is a

complete lightweight. Why why do we have to hear democrats lie about what Trump has said so many times or lie about his policies, If he's so bad, why do they have to make it up all the time. It's just so easy, isn't it. You hear this from I'm sure a lot of your lib friends or Lib colleagues, co workers, whatever, Oh Trump is racist, and oh the person saying this, they always assume, well, of course, you know they're they're not racist because they say Trump is racist.

This is the cheapest virtue you can acquire anywhere in American society now, denouncing someone on the right for being a racist. Oh, it's a racist. Oh you don't have to do anything to advance racial justice when you say this. You don't have to actually tackle the problems of inner city communities, or do anything to help our failing public schools, or limit violence in places like Chicago or Baltimore. You don't have to do anything. You are a good person

who's promoting racial healing in this country. If you just say that Trump is a racist, that's that's the Left's promised you. And I think it's grotesque. I think it's it's deeply intellectually dishonest. It's really unfair to the people who vote for Trump. And I think that they recognize that there's not going to be a a forgiveness for those who voted for Trump in the past, at least socially.

We're going to be told if Libs win this next election, if you have some Democrat kuk who ends up being the next the United States, because they're all pretty kooky, I mean, the whole Democrat crew that they've got running is really a bunch of jokesters. But trust me, they're going to rub it in your face and we're going to be hearing about Trump's racism for the rest of our lives. If Trump doesn't win reelection, well, I would say we can chalk a victory up for the outrage mob.

This time on the right. They won in this case. I think it's ridiculous. I was on America's newsroom last week and I said, pausing the promotions for the movie in the immediate aftermath of the mass shootings I thought made sense. But yanking the entire film because people got angry and the president tweeted about it. I'm not someone

who believes that we should go the direction of censorship. Also, to my Trump's supporting friends, if you watch the trailer, it is very obvious that the good guys are the deplorables who have been drugged and kidnapped and are being hunted by left wing elitists Like I feel like they like that totally misplaced outrage. And even if it was well placed outrage, I don't think we should be canceling. No, just don't see it, don't go see gotta say, I agree with my buddy Guy Benson, Guy and I go

way back. I think he's right across the board on this one. Why are they pulling the movie now? I look, I didn't I saw the trailer, and in the heat of a gun control discussion, after two mass shootings and all the you know, sometimes you might want to tone it down a little bit with your ad campaign that shows people of one political persuasion hunting another. And I also think it goes to show the in general, the double standard. Here's the real double standard. Conservatives aren't a

bunch of cry babies. Conservatives aren't running around yelling about boycotts all the time and saying that, you know, people need to be nicer to our our art or our stuff or else. I mean, we would like them to be more open minded, do creative conservative objects. But I'm talking about trying to use economic force to get your way. That's not how we roll. And in this instance, I've got to tell you, I'm I'm a little disappointed that they pulled the movie. I kind of wanted to see

this movie. I mean, it seemed like it might be reasonably interesting, and it is true that if you look deeper into it and I didn't see this the first day or two this is being talked about. You had to look at one of the there there were several versions of the trailer. The good guys or the people you're rooting for, well, I guess that's the same thing. Are are, in fact the red state Trump supporter types, and the bad people are the elitist evil Libs who

are trying to hunt them. So now is it sensible to pull that campaign after we've had mass shootings that are very politically facile. Yes, I think so, but just for a few that's just the ad campaign. And now I'll say, you know, that's a question of taste. It's not entirely necessary. I don't want the political climate as a general rule. I don't want the political climate to be determining what we can see and what we can watch and what we can hear. I would like the

market to determine these things. My problem with libs is that in this woke culture we all have to live in, they give no leeway to our side whatsoever. And in fact, they're so drunk with power all the time because they can shut down whatever they want, they can boycott whomever they want, that they will do it to their own side, because that's now who they are, that's what they have become. They can't even just keep it against us. So I would just note that this was not this was not

the outcome that I was looking for in this. In this circumstance, they should not pull the movie. I'm sure it will get released by someone else or by a different studio at some point. Probably maybe they're just maybe they say they've pulled it right now and have no intend to release it just because of what happened last week, and they're going to realize that that's that's excessive. But our side can our side can handle stuff. If they want to be a bunch of whiny little babies, that's

all on the left. But I do not walk conservative to start you the home. We can't. That's not where that's not the way we should go. Speaking of what we can watch, I was told over the weekend by some of my conservative media friends, and this was a discussion that occurred via Twitter as you can see it as public, that there's a movie that is a very good Western, but it is so disturbing that they more or less told me that I can't I cannot watch it.

Because it will haunt me. And it has Kurt Russell, who you know, I'm a Kurt Russell person because of Tombstone and Big Trouble in Little China. But they say that there's a scene toward the end of the movie that is so disturbing that you cannot watch it, and not to me, this is like telling a kid, whatever you do, don't go into that room. That room is the secret room when you can't know what's in there and you can't go in there. Right when you're a kid,

someone says that what do you want to do? You want to go into that room? Obviously this was Jesse Kelly and Matt Walsh to two great guys, and they were telling me about Bone Tomahawk, this movie from twenty fifteen. I don't know if any of you have seen it. They claim it is an excellent movie, but then it gets really like messed up at the very end in a way that it reminds me. I still haven't been

able to live down some scenes. Look, I know that I'm probably a whimp when it comes to the stuff, but The Witch really haunted me for a few days. That movie, The Witch about the New England possession and everything else. That movie scared the you know what out of me. And I'm not somebody that usually gets two into these things, but that movie released scared me. But but the Hills Have Eyes the uncut version of that movie. I don't know why it was on HBO one night.

I don't know why I decided, Oh, watch this movie. It kind of it's a pretty fast moving plot, like it pulls you in and then it's it's like a car wreck. You know, you don't, you don't want to look, but you find yourself in a situation where you know you don't, you don't turn away. So Bone producer Mark, have you seen Bone? Tomahawk? I have not? All right? So what is the one movie? This was how this whole thread got started? This was from Matt Walsh. What is the one movie that you wish you could if

you could unsee it? You wish you could unsee it because it was so traumatizing or you know, freaked you out so much, or just grossed you out? Whatever? What is it that I have to think about that one? The one movie I wish I never saw was the X Files movie because it was terrible, but for different reasons than disturbing me, if you know what I mean? Well, because the show was great? Right with this? You know, I didn't really watch the show. I saw a few episodes.

Do you think it holds up? Like if I went back to watch The X Files, now would that be? I never watched this, watch the show. One of my friends dragged me in the movie and I hated it. So now why would I watch the show? Oh? I thought you were because usually people who love the show said the movie was just like ruined the show in a sense for them, because you know, it's like when you watch the Indiana Jones and The King of the Crystal Skull ruined my childhood because I love the three

Indiana Jones movies. I love them. I saw them with my parents, I saw them with my siblings. You know, dozens and dozens of times each one of those movies, you know we had it on VHS. And the Indiana Jones movie with Shia lebuff or whatever just total trash. But really, you've never watched a movie or like, I wish I hadn't seen. I mean I could name a

I mean that that's definitely the case for me. With the Hills Have Eyes, I actually thought that pulp fiction was a little And I'm anti Tarantino, which I know some of you right now are like, Buck, how can you? But I'm anti Tarantino. I think his movies are overrated and they suck, I really do. The new one is disturbing at the end. Which one's the new one? The one that just came out Once upon a time in Hollywood. Oh, I don't even know. I didn't even know that that's

a Tarantino movie. I think he's one of the most overrated Hollywood people of any kind of of our generation. I think he's really weak sauce. But anyway, Bone Tomahawk, will I watch? Will I not? I do not recommend any of you watch it, because if Matt Walsh says that it freaks, it'll freak you out. Matt Walsh is no joke man. That guy's intense. So I'm just saying, I'm I don't know, Am I gonna watch it this weekend? We'll see a team. I'll let you know. We've got

more to stay with me. Farrell hog Man is now a thing. I don't know how many of you saw this. If you're not a person that spends a lot of time on social media. You may not have caught this, but Farrell Hawkman became a meme over the weekend. This was one of these earnest and unexpectedly funny moments that can happen in the midst of incredibly nasty back and forth over politics and gun control. There was a person

named Jason Isabel, who I don't even know. Let let me see if I can find out who Jason Isabel is. I absolutely no idea. Is a musician. Okay, he's with a band, the Ryman, I guess, yeah, the singer, songwriter, guitarist from Greenhill, Alabama. Anyway, Okay, so this guy's from Alabama and he put this out on Twitter. If you're on here arguing the definition of assault weapon today, you're part of the problem. You know when an assault weapon

is and you know you don't need one. And then William McNabb responded on Twitter and this then became a huge sensation legit question for rural Americans. How do I kill the thirty to fifty feral hogs that run into my yard within three to five minutes while my small kids play? And everybody was just completely take it in by this. That's a very good question. What would you do if you had a few dozen Farrell hogs invade your property and you have kids there, I mean Farrell hogs.

I gotta tell you. I saw photos, and some of you live in parts of the country where these things actually exist. I remember years ago I had someone on team back who invited me to do one of these, and it was very nice of him. I just could never make it happen. And if he's listening, I'd still be interested to come check out what they do. But they have these former military little bird pilots that more or less get you up in a helicopter and you go Farrell hog hunting with an aar. I think you're

allowed to. I think you're allowed in some states to hunt from the air and at night, like you're going after bitten laden or something, which sounds a little crazy maybe, although some of you're like, actually, bucket sounds awesome, true, fair point, but it sounds like maybe it's overkill until you see photos of these things and what they can do, these Ferrell hogs, and they're terrifying. Turns out they're also not even native to the US. They are an invasive species.

They're considered a public nuisance they carry all kinds of really nasty diseases. In fact, they're generally so diseased. I'm told that you don't eat them. They're not even really good for eating because they have all kinds of stuff that you don't want to get anywhere near. They will destroy habitats of other animals. They will eat ground nesting birds, they'll eat fawns and even the young of domestic livestock. So that's you know, this is what you're dealing with

with these guys. And they're very, very scary looking. So they're very scary looking. There's also that, So do you need an aar to kill your farreal hogs? I mean maybe you definitely don't want, like just an overunder shotgun. If there's twenty of those Farrell hogs, I don't care how good a shot you are, that's not going to get it done. And there's a photois on the Internet of one of these things holding a baby deer in its mouth like it had just grabbed one it was

gonna eat it. I mean, they're scary looking. So Farrell hog Man became a sensation over the weekend, and William McNabb it's good to hear good to hear from you out there. And now we've got more of the story. Folks. You need your aar to kill all the Farrell hogs in your backyard. Keep your kids safe. We got roll call coming up. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call all right, I did his roll call time Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton to get in on the

latest roll call action. Please do send me your thoughts, tell me your your I was gonna see your deebas darkst secrets. Don't do that, but you can tell me things like about the show or something I got wrong or right it went in doubt. You could also say Buck, your radio show keeps me safe and warm at night. It's amazing. Thank you. That's that's always a welcome message. You could send that along. Now let's see we have Sam who writes almost finished reading The Strange Death of Europe.

Thanks for recommending it. Everyone should read it before deciding on the immigration issue. Yeah, I didn't even remember that. I did recommend that. I think I did a while ago. Is that by Bruce Bauer I think his name was. Yeah, it's very interesting about the changes going on in Europe right now. So yes, indeed, see what we have next here,

my man, TJ. Buck, I don't get it. Everyone is two hundred percent certain that Epstein did not commit suicide, and now there's going to be this Boden guy who is a connected to three controversial conspiracy filled murders, the JFK, MLK, and OJ cases. He's going to oversee Epstein's autopsy. Can we believe these results when they come out? Why wouldn't they choose someone with a little less controversy connected to them. It's kind of like they're trying to pull the wool

over our eyes in real time. TJ. I don't know much about this doctor Boden guy. I can't speak to that very effectively. I just know that they need to do everything they can to try and re establish public faith in some of these things that have been going on here. That would that would be a big help. Institutions are not doing particularly well right now. I think that's for sure. Let's seem Daniel, right, a big fan of the show. Listen to the podcast every day to

start the morning. Well, the good news, Daniel is that you'll be able to listen to it in the afternoon. Very soon. We're gonna have the podcast out. I guess

maybe this is something of a big announcement. Starting after Labor Day, you'll be able to hear the Buck Sexton Show via podcast by three Eastern every day, So all of you who listen, I want you to know that you can listen still obviously live on your station, or you'll be able to listen to a podcast of the show even earlier, because we're going to be moving up the taping of the show so that you can watch a stream of it on a platform that is to be announced. So we've got some fun stuff going on

for sure. But Daniel writes, with all the recent mass shootings, I've seen people throw all sort of solutions out there. We all know it'll absolutely go nowhere. I feel I have a great idea for how we could solve this and in turn maybe make the big tech companies look good. For Once we know all these companies, especially Google, Facebook, and YouTube, know everything about us, why not do this?

Have these companies work on new algorithms that will spot certain makers of people that are going markers of people that are going down a bad spiral. They could work with FBI profiles, type psychologists and sociologists who identify them. I know this is not minority report. We don't send their info to a government agency. What we do is we have them put in an ad for the Jordan Peterson video and add about getting involved in the community.

We can make sure they get recommendations and suggestions to videos that encourage people to reach and speak to family, friends or faith leaders to help guide you. I think with these techniques we could put an end to shootings and maybe even people get mentally and emotionally better. What do you think maybe you can get my idea up on something. Keep up the great work, Shields Hide Dan, I give you points for creativity. I don't know how this would really work in real life and how we

could even implement it. But the more that we embrace using all of these different digital means to try and engage in pre crime prevention, we get further and further down what is the path to a full scale surveillance state? And we're not that far from it right now. So that's a reality that we have to be very aware of. John John has had to start off a message Buck absolutely love your show. I was listening to your show

from Friday in the Apple podcast apps. Sunday morning. You had a clip from the President to start the show. It was the President saying he doesn't like to be called a racist and saying the Dems call everyone racist when they run out of cards, which is true. Gave me an idea. Trump should tell the Dems that he will pass background checks. Not that I support further background checks, because I don't. If they stop calling him a racist, it won't stop them forever, maybe temporarily. I just think

it would be funny to see what they react. Would be well, John, I know that you're being tongue in cheek here, but they wouldn't be able to take that deal because they absolutely insist on calling Trump a racist, and they insist on lying about what he has said in the past. As I've told you, he did not say that there were good neo Nazis. That is not what he said. I read through the transcript about five times over the weekend of the press conference in question.

I watched the clip of it. He absolutely did not. And it's not malpractice, it's malicious, meaning it's intentional. It wasn't a mistake to say that Trump called neo Nazis good people that the media made by accident. They knew that this was a very important part of their narrative, and so they went with it. But yeah, they will not stop calling him racist. That's really the primary. That's their main reason that they give for Trump to for

you to vote against Trump, that's the main thing. Todd, Right's hey, bucket Sunday morning, I just that Epstein died in jail. I was out doing things Saturday, no news, so I just learned it this morning. Buck You called this spot on back on July twenty fifth. I drive a lot for work, and I remember exactly where I was driving, by Nebraska's Lake McConaughey, listening to you when you said you would not be surprised if he died

in jail. You said it might be suicide or it might be a hit, but there were too many high profile people connected with him that this would not go to trial. This is a disgusting story all around. But I appreciate your analysis and education on this topic and all the others you talk about. Shields high Todd in Nebraska. Well, Todd,

thank you so much. I do appreciate getting the high five from somebody who listens to the show so intently that they realized that, yes, I was very much calling out the possibility, the likelihood even of this Epstein case getting buried in Epstein dying under mysterious circumstances. Look, I don't have to tell you about the prediction really, because you can go and listen. I mean, Todd even gave the date of the show back on July twenty fifth,

so it's all out there. It's it's a matter of record. I've been worried about this. The reasons are pretty clear that I've been worried about this. I know many of you are worried too, so this is where it is. Thank you so much though, for writing in my friend Let's see here Chris Rights, Hey Buck, I love Mike Pence's VP, but do you think we could nominate Ron Swanson for twenty twenty Trump Swanson twenty twenty has a

nice ring to it. Secondly, I'm hoping to become a proud gun owner soon, both for sport and home protection. Do you know of any class one can take that teaches basic home protection and defense tactics like yourself. I love to learn and would love to have a plan to protect myself and my family and drill of what to do if an intruder breaks in. Thanks for all you do for your podcast. They keep me company during long drives for work. Well, Chris, first of all, it's

an honor to keep you company. And as for you know, the class, it's funny. I've been looking recently for a class myself like this, and it turns out that Tim Kennedy, who is a former Special Forces Guy MMA fighter, he has a a group called I believe it's called Sheep Dog Response. I'm pretty sure that's what it is. So, yeah, you know what, we should have Tim all the show. I'll do that all because I'm thinking about taking his class.

I've been talking to my two brothers about it and we're thinking about going down to to do Sheepdog Response class. I believe it's in Austin, Texas. So for those of you who are kl BJ listeners in Austin, I know you can go check this out. Just if you go check out the class, you know, make sure you like tweet at Tim Kennedy let him know you've heard about

it on the Buck Sexton Show. Yeah he's not, he's not a sponsor or anything, but I just, you know, like to get the credit for a tell it everybody, because I think I'm gonna go down myself hopefully this fall and do Sheepdog Response with Tim Kennedy and his whole crew down there, because it looks like a really excellent course and it runs you through some hand to hand, different firearms, just different training scenarios so you are as safe as can be in your home and you don't

rely on anybody else to defend you. That's the whole idea. Yeah, Sheepdog Response dot Com. So look at that. Maybe I'll see you with the class. Maybe. Hey, if I'm gonna go, you know, maybe I'll tell you guys and those of you who want to also sign up for a class that weekend, we can have like a whole team Buck extravaganza shooting guns and hanging out together. Now that sounds like fun. And those of you who listen on kobj Austen, come on, why not, right, you're right in the neighborhood.

I've got all kinds of fun plans, Nicole, Hey Buck, I'm a podcast listener. I love your show. I've been thinking a lot about the red flag laws, and at first I was pretty supportive of it. The more I thought about it, the more creating a mental illness database bothered me? Wouldn't it violate hippo laws about federal privacy and doctor's therapists are already required by law to report a patient that poses a threat to themselves or others. Would love to hear thoughts on this. Yeah, Nicole, I'm

with you. I mean, I think I admitted I felt a little bit of just the psychological impact of a two shootings like this. You think, well, maybe there's something, Maybe there's something that we need to do here, Maybe there's some action not just oh, grab guns and everything else. But let's try to be reasonable. Let's try to put in place something that is actually common sense that might be helpful. And keep in mind that we've already done

a lot of that. That's why we have so many of the laws, Like we already have background checks, and we already have, you know, restrictions on fully automatic weapons, and we already have you know, you can't buy a gun if you're a domestic abuser or if you're a convicted falon or all these different there's so many rules. Those are all common sense rules. Those are things that we can agree or common sense. So it's not that there's no such thing as a common sense law that

may be helpful in reducing gun violence. It's let's make sure it's actually in sense and not just some left wing gun grabb or excuse thing. But yeah, no, Nicole, I'm with you. The more I thought about it, and also some of my OG team Buck from back in the day, we're like, hey, hey, we know you and we know you know red flag laws will get abused. And I was like, all right, I think you guys are onto something here, So I'm with you. I thought more about it, and I think it's probably too like

I think the upside is outweighed by the downside. It would be abused, especially in blue states, and it's an infringement on a constitutional right and it's a bad precedent to set that kind of infringement. All right, team, it's been a fantastic Monday show. I hope you agree. Like I said, the podcast is going to start coming out in a few weeks by three pm Eastern, if not even maybe a little sooner, but definitely by three pm Eastern.

So what that means is, I'd like all of you to please subscribe on iTunes to The Buck Sexton Show, And once you've subscribed, it's totally free. Of course, even if you're a radio listener, subscribe just in case you miss it on radio. You can always listen to the downloadable podcast version at your leisure. And then if every person listening to this got one person to start listening who was new, put one new member of Team Buck on the squad, we would be an unstoppable national level force.

And we're already getting there, but it would make it really fast. All right, Team More tomorrow, Shield Hie

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android