The Coup Is Faltering

This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Mag noo, mistake America, You're a great American Again the buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts remember the anid buck sext No, okay, they just hand me the story. Coup has started, whistleblower's attorney said in twenty seventeen, you know when that was. That was a long time ago. It's all a hoax, they say, January twenty seventeen. A coup has started and

the impeachment will follow ultimately. It's a it's all a hoax. It's a scam. And you know who helps them, these people right back here, the media, and then it said, up the light's going to go off. A CNN light is going to go up from the lawyer a slee's ball that said, I predict at CNN will play a key role in at real Donald Trump not finishing out his first time? Can you believe this? This is all and this was done a long time ago. Then he goes.

As one falls, two more will take their place, referring to outgoing Trump administration employees, who, by the way, have been put through hell by the sleeves back there and by trupkeet politicians. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, man, we have quite a day ahead of us. Here are you at President Trump last night at a rally in trumpy inform talking about not the whistle blower. We'll get into that. When should we know the name of the

whistle blower? Why should or should not this be confirmed? The media effort to restrict this information that's already out in public is absolutely astonishing. A media that you would think would understand that when the presidency of the United States is at stake, then the public should have a right to know. Isn't that what they said about publishing the Pentagon papers. Isn't that what they say about naming people who are operatives of the intelligence agency sometimes and

newspapers when they've been asked not to be named. Isn't this something that we all understand the press will just decide, Oh, we're going to talk about that classified program, We're going to write about this person and put them in jeopardy. Huh. But this whistleblower, which is not even really the appropriate term. Persons not legally entitled to be called a whistleblower. But

they've just rammed this whole thing through. They've gotten far enough in the process and enough people referred to him that way that this is what we are told we're

supposed to say. But do you think that the press would understand that this really matters, that the motivations of a person who is not a whistleblower, but who has called out a question of politics involving the president, but has tried to use tried to weaponize the apparatus of the federal government against a sitting president and cloak himself in the laws by expanding the meaning of plane statute

beyond what they were ever intended to do. You would think the press would understand that we should know everything about this person. I mean, CNN camps out on the front lawn of random citizens who post something on Facebook that they say came from the the Russian Internet Research Agency or whatever, and humiliates them. CNN threatens to docks people to expose private citizens who make memes that CNN doesn't like. Oh, well, you better pull that down or

else we're going to tell everybody who you are. Oh but this whistleblower is sacro sanct. This is also obvious, isn't it. This is why I don't give an inch. This is why I don't budge. This is why I don't flinch when other people say, Oh, but what about the phone call in Zolensky and pro quo quit pro quo. No, I smelled the coup coming a mile away, so should everybody else. This isn't the first time they've tried this. In fact, not only is it not the first time

they've tried this coup. It's by the same playbook as the Russia collusion. One stir up a bunch of nonsense, do it from hidden positions within the government, try to hide the truth in the public as long as possible, create a narrative that you cannot prove because it is

a lie about the president of the United States. And then the moment that people start to figure out what's really going on, claim process violations, claim that obstruction is occurring, claim that there's some tenet of democracy that isn't being respected by the president fighting back against this nonsense. I smelled the coup coming a mile away, and I know

you did too, And now they're upset about it. I think many in the media are feeling like, Oh, this isn't going to work the way we had planned it to. This isn't going to be the situation that we had hoped it would be that we finally were going to nail the president, even if they couldn't remove him via Senate two thirds majority vote after a Senate trial, that at least the president would be limping into the twenty twenty reelection fight after an impeachment battle that he had lost.

That's the plan. I don't think that's going to happen anymore. On the upside, it means that the coup has failed. On the downside, I would not look to see the mental health of the Libs improve in twenty twenty. As a general rule, I think they're only going to get crazier. The president there started out reading tweets from the lawyer for the whistleblower. In fact, the alleged second whistleblower also

has the same lawyer. To this, I would say the following, I think that I need to disclose this to you. I know this lawyer. I know him personally, I know him professionally. I don't know him super well. He is so and I would say this people who are my friends, I don't criticize. I would not get this guy and I are not friends, we are acquaintances. But I would also tell you that I've had to mute him on Twitter because he's so annoying with his Trump patriot So

none of this is surprising to me. None of this stuff. When the President's reading out these tweets about what was it kup has started as one falls, two more take

their place hashtag rebellion, hashtag impeachment. We're supposed to think that somebody who shares that opinion doesn't have a bizarre animus against the President of the United States that might influence whether he's willing to color outside the lines a little bit in order to get his way through the legal process here to try to take down the president. What we have here is evidence of Trump arrangement syndrome. Don't we think that Trump's arrangement syndrome is a hindrance

to one's objectivity or professionalism. Remember, lawyers are officers of the court. They are not. I know you're all laughing, because we all know a lot of shady lawyers of anadi comes to mind, among many others. Lawyers are supposed to act within the interests of the law, not just

the interests of their client. They're supposed to stay within the bounds of their professional obligations, not advance arguments that they know to be specious, not advance arguments that they know to be twisting of Now, most lawyers will do anything for money, we know that. But technically they're supposed to be a part of the justice system. And here we have somebody who is maniacally anti Trump. And I've known that all along, and I've had conversations with him

about his everything that does. He thinks he's terrible. Basically, he has believed every argument about how Trump has obstructed justice, about how Trump has violated the law. He believes all of it, all of it Now, are we really to think that it is a coincidence of all the lawyers in all the land, of all the lawyers in the swamp alone in Washington, d C. The whistleblower finds Mark Zaide, who is perhaps best known for being the guy you go to when you want to publish a book after

serving the government. The government doesn't want you to publish he which is a necessary service, by the way, And I don't think that that. I think it's good that there's somebody who specializes in that. But he's an anti Trump Zellot. He's allowed to be an anti Trump Zellot. That's fine. I don't pretend that lawyers aren't going to have opinions about these things. Congress is full of lawyers. But we should know, because this isn't a criminal trial.

This is a political question that is being processed through the United States Congress. We should know who the parties are. We should know who the players are, what do they think, what do they believe in, what are their motivations. To pretend that this whistle blower doesn't matter now, which is what you're hearing all these Democrats do, is preposterous. It is a farce. Initially it was all about how we

had to hear from the whistle blow. We had to testimony this person at firsthand, firsthand example of the president violating lumpy the president violating the law. If he had, he'd be hearing about it a thousand times a day from every news outlet in the country. Now they're saying it's abuse of power. Well, that's the most vague thing they could possibly come up with, isn't it. Abuse of power is what everybody says about a politician who does something they do not like when they cannot find an

actual statutory infraction. You can't do that. Turns out that they've said that about Trump how many times, and then the Supreme Court has had to weigh in and say, actually he can, like the so called Muslim band, you can't do that abuse of power. Well, the Constitution says he can, and in the realm foreign policy presence have a tremendous amount of deference. Now there's a political check on that. Congress exists in part to be a political check on the president of the United States. That is

one of its duties. And if people really hate the conversation that Trump had with Zelenski in about Ukraine. They are completely entitled to and really have an obligation to think about that and vote accordingly. I think the conversation was fine. It's a little rough in terms of political stuff, but bare knuckles the way you got to go if you want to deal with these crazy libs. Nothing the violation of the law. I've never thought there was a violation of law, and here we are now we have

the whistleblowers. Lawyer is other than the front of foxnews dot com right now. He's getting a lot of attention, and he is a not just a never trumper, he's an anti Trumper. I mean he's somebody who openly roots for people within the government to not do their duties. Sally Yates refused to do her job because she didn't like this president. That is what happened. Sally Yates also set up General Flynn because she is shameless and grotesque

in her abdication of basic morality and responsibility in her duties. Grotesque, but she was a little resistance hero for a while. Yet another, yet another self important, self righteous, sanctimonious bureaucrat says, I don't like Trump, I don't like what he stands for. I'm not going to I work for him, but I'm not going to do what he says. Okay, well she got fired. And now we see on Twitter for all,

and this is a reminder of some folks. Delete your old tweets, folks, you never know when they're going to come back. Now we see that the lawyer who is in some ways quarterbacking this along with Adam Schiff, and he does understand this very specific area of the law well enough that it's open to interpretation and therefore manipulation. Remember that you have a lawyer who is rooting for a coup. That's a coincidence. That's what the Libs are

gonna tell us. Now, that's what the mainstream media wants us to believe. This is a coincidence. You just happened to find a lawyer who's been screaming on his Twitter account about how there needs to be a coup and hashtag resistance and government officials need to end this presidency. Doesn't matter what the people voted for, doesn't matter what the system we have says. It's an interesting day, isn't It almost feels like the coup's falling apart slowly, but

surely I'm going to read these transcripts. The whole process is a joke. The whole idea that there's a qui pro quot based on somebody changing their testimony presuming there was. Focus said there was not. He's the special envoy. You just pick things you like, Oh, hate this guy, you want to get him impeached. I'm not buying into Schiff running a legitimate operation over there. I was impeachment manager. We did it vastly different. This is a political vendetta. Mueller,

to me, was the final authority on everything Trump. I've read the transcript for myself. I made up my own mind. Volker, the special envoys said there was no quick pro quo. Sunderland has changed his testimony to say he presumes there was. What I can tell you about the Trump policy toward the Ukraine, it was incoherent. It depends on who you talk to. They seem to be incapable of forming a quick pro quo. So no, I find the whole process

to be a sham, and I'm not gonna legitimize it. Yes, Lindsay, Yes, this is the Lindsay Graham that I like. He's right, This is like Kavanaugh era Lindsey Graham who just lays it down. This whole thing is a joke. It's a sham. It's not a funny joke. It's wrong, though, what they

are doing to the President United States. And it's wrong the way that Congress has now decided that without a crime, without a real violation to speak of, they're just going to make impeachment a process of the House majority deciding they don't like the president in an election year that they always talking about undermining our institutions. Think about the precedent that this sets. Oh yeah, ask yourself, what exactly are they impeaching him for. They don't know. They're going

forward with it, but they're not sure what. Just like with the Muller Russia collusion probe, why was there a special counsel in the first place? There was no There was no evidence of any crime that Trump committed with the Russians didn't exist. So why do we need a special counsel? Why can the DOJ handle it? Well? Get the whole thing going, Worry about the lack of legitimacy

later on. That's the game they play. I mean, at least with Russia collusion, the Democrats and the media lied about the certainty of forthcoming devastating revelations for two years. Any day now, any day now, Trump is going to be finished, they said. So that kept a lot of people. Oh and I kept them on the edge of their seat. Oh wow. Okay. With impeachment, however, the plan seems to be to just repeat the same story over and over again until we simply can't take it anymore and agree

to anything so that it stops anything. But this. Even producer Mark I come in, He's like, Man, impeachment stuff is boring. I'm like, I know we're gonna listen to these State Department bureaucrats like Coon. And then I was posted in Ukraine and I really thought that are de marsh with the deputy Assistant Secretary of the blah blah, I was gonna make this policy change happened, and then it didn't. And I just think that that was really bad. And that's my opinion. Who cares? You want to know?

You want to the difference in trumpet Obama era Ukraine policy. Obama was like, here's here's some meals ready to eat, MRIs and some blankets. I hope they'll keep you warm while the Russians are moving on your positions in eastern Ukraine with armor and slaughtering your countrymen. You know what Trump decided for you, Crane. Hey, we're gonna give you javelin anti tank missiles to hold off the advance of

that Russian armor. And so you're not losing countrymen day in and day out in a battle you can't win because you don't have the tools to do the job. You see, that's a policy difference that matters. The Oh, I don't know, but the corruption Trump and Juliani a bunch of nonsense, a bunch of absolute garbage coming out of all this stuff. For what And now we're supposed to believe this guy what salmon? He changes testimonial? Oh, I think there was a quid pro quo. What do

you mean you change your testimony? You've already given your testament. No, you're gonna chang your testimony. Remember the whole thing about I swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Now you're doing truth two point zero. Lindsey Graham got it right. It's a sham, a scam, a fraud, the whole thing. Folks don't get drawn into it. They're trying to play mind games with you, this is all nonsense.

It's anti Trump, is um on steroids. But first of all, I want to thank Ambassador Hale for for being here, for obeying the lawful falling the lawful subpoena that we issued. We wish others would show the same courage and dedication to the law that Ambassador Hale is demonstrating here today, courage and dedication to the law. Adam Schiff is really a disgrace, a disgrace to the role that he currently holds.

He's a disgrace to the legal profession. He was a federal prosecutor, which is a reminder of my friends that prosecutors. When a prosecutor goes bad, you have a lot of problems. You have a lot of things to be concerned about. There's not a whole lot, not a whole lot that can be done about it. They have tremendous authority and

can abuse the law and can really hurt people. But while he's talking about how great it is that people are coming forward, remember they can't have State Department lawyers with them, so they're not allowed representation. You say, wait, but how does that work? Congress just making up the rules? They go along here which also is a reminder, my friends.

They've looked for so many ways to contort, distort, and abuse the law in bad faith to go after to hurt this president, and they don't care that in that process they're showing us all one how dishonest the left is in its anti Trump machinations. But also other people see this and say, oh, so, the law really is just the tool of politics. There's no principle, there's no underlying foundation of truth or fairness or justice. It's just it says whatever I need it to when I want

a thing. The Democrats take this approach to anything involving Trump. The law is whatever they wanted to say at that moment that hurts Trump and helps them without exception. This is why you have the hashtag resistance judiciary, these federal judges appointed by mostly by Obama but some by others, who come forward and decide the law doesn't say what it says because Trump. What message does that send to

the rest of the country. And for a lot of people who support Trump, how are they not supposed to feel like they're being disenfranchised and that their aspirations, their political aspirations for the government are just being nullified by people who don't care what the system is, won't play fair, don't play by the rules. Democrats claim that they are protecting our sacred institutions while they are kicking at the load bearing foundations of those institutions. Here's an example of Oh,

Ambassador Shift was sorry, Adam Shift, not Ambassador Shift. Let's not elevate the guy at Schiff saying that, oh, Ambassador Hale's coming out to speak, and we can hear from all these Ukraine policy people all day long. It doesn't it doesn't mean anything. I don't care what they have to say because there is no crime that they are referring to. They're referring to their differences of opinion with

the administration. Here's a perfect example. This is from Ambassador Taylor's testimony, which has now been I can't I don't know whether it's leaked or officially put out or who knows, but this is the testimony. Ambassador Taylor says, September seventh.

Are we looking at the same paragraph, Congressman Lee Selden says, third paragraph down on page twelve, Ambassador Taylor right, in which he described a phone conversation with Sonlon and President Trump yes, sir, mister Zelden, this is the only reference in your opening statement to Biden other than your one reference to the July twenty fifth call. And this is

not firsthand, it's not secondhand, it's not third hand. But if I understand this correctly, you're telling us that Tim Morrison told you that Ambassador Sonlon told him that the President told Ambassador Sondlin that Zelenski would have to open an investigation, and to Biden, that is being treated as damning evidence in this My friends, you said this thing to the guy who said the thing about the guy who talked to the guy who heard from a guy who thought he heard from a guy that this other

guy had to do a thing. If these were sixth grade girls, we'd be laughing at how silly this is. They have no idea what's going on here. If maybe this is absurd, this is a testimony where all I heard from somebody who heard from somebody who heard from somebody who heard from somebody else that maybe this was happening. Oh what are we supposed to do there? We're going to pretend that perception doesn't matter, context doesn't matter, misinterpretation

doesn't matter. And then Ultimately, what are we even talking about? The aid went through to Ukraine, no investigation of Biden or his son began, and by the way, I think there should be an investigation of Biden at his son. Well why not? Was everybody on the and I credit somebody on Team Box for writing on this, was everybody on the Breezema board getting fifty thousan dollars a month? Can we find out the answer to that question? I

think that really does matter. Was everybody else getting like five thousand a month, but Hunter Biden was getting fifty Here's somebody I'm gonna put my hand up and say, I would make a bet that Hunter Biden's compensation on the Breezema board exceeded even that of other Breezema board members. They got him through through him a little extra, through a little extra extra cheese, the le extra scratch, a le extra you know cash. M interesting. So when do

we get answers to that? Journalists don't want to answer this, and that then brings me to well, there's a few more things I have. Well, the first of all, if you want to get a sense of illegal minds that are out there that are pushing this stuff, and also get a sense of how really shockingly stupid some members of Congress are. Here's Eric Swalwell on I think one of the late night shows which just provide a cultural laundering service for left wing politicians to seem like they're

cool and connected to the people. So they go on the Colbert Show, like Nancy Pelosi. They go on these different programs where the host is clearly on their side and they get to tell their little funny anecdote, and it tries to blur the line between politician and celebrity even more in favor of the person and forgetting that they're a politician and have real things to answer for. But you know, this is all these shows, clown nos on, clown nos off. Are they asking them serious policy questions

or is it all haha joke? You don't know. Depends on what they're doing. But here's Eric Squall on one of those shows, play clips six Please. It's an abusive power to remove an ambassador for political reasons because you don't like what they're doing. Period. It's a gross abusive power.

If you ask a political ally like the Ukrainians to investigate your opponent, it's a gross, extreme abusive power if you leverage a White House meeting, which may not seem like much to us as Americans, but to other countries, that's the most important thing. Again, it's an extraordinary abusive power if you unlawful or if you remove an ambassador the way the President did ask for investigations, leverage a White House meeting and three hundred ninety one million dollars

in taxpayer dollars. That's what we're investigating. The first the statement that he started out with, by the way, is one of the stupidest things I've heard somebody say, probably all week. It is absolutely not an abusive power to fire an ambassador because you don't like what they're doing. Yet, idiot, I mean, squaw another guy. I think he was also a federal prosecutor. We are not sending the federal justice

system our best. We are not. This is stunning. The president can fire an ambassador for any reason or no reason. The president can fire an ambassador because he thinks that he or she is just not enthusiastic enough about the policy. Really, legally, the president can fire the ambassador because just feels like the person isn't the right man or woman for the job, and that's an entirely subjective judgment that is not reviewable by a cord, that is not reviewable by the Congress.

The president gets to do this. This is the system we have. I know, libs or you know, one day they're talking about court packing. The next day they're talking about getting rid of the electoral college. You know, they only like the system when it gives them what they want. The second the system doesn't give them what they want, they're willing to just undermine the whole thing and say it's all crap and it was all put together by a bunch of racist white guy hundreds of years ago.

It's terrible, I mean, the whole system. They'll they'll throw out the moment that it doesn't really appeal to them anymore. But Swallow's thing about it, it's an abusive power to remove an ambassador for political reasons because you don't like what they're doing. No, that is a stupid, false statement. There's no person who will win this debate with me. He is wrong. That is a dumb thing to say. He is factually incorrect. The president can absolutely remove somebody

because of politics from a post as an ambassador. Let's also remember some people become ambassadors because they donate money and you get to be ambassador, or like nice little beach Paradise country because you raised enough money for the president. Let's stop pretending like all these oh, these ambassadors, they're all you know, central central pieces and our grand strategy. You know, these are the knights and bishops on the chessboard of our foreign policy. A sorry, plenty plenty plenty more.

Where that came from? What you learn about foreign policy when you've been close enough to it as I was years and years ago, is there very few people make decisions that really matter. Everybody else is just processing, and I mean part of the process. Everyone else is really just shifting paper around and making sure that the Secretary of States coffee is hot. I mean, it's not what

people make it out to be. And there are very few decisions that are made that are of any real consequence in most of these countries and most of these situations. So just just keep that in mind. Is there all, oh my gosh, are Ukraine policy can't know who the whistleblower is? Though? Ah Cano, that is, that's no interest there whatsoever. And when I think about how rapidly you had for example, journalists back in the days when Sarah

Palen was running as John McCain's running me. The way they descended upon was Silla, Alaska, And you would read these reports about how they were just they were asking everybody, you know, can you tell us a story about Sarah pale I mean, just throwing everything they could at what was just an oppo research effort, a democrat opo research effort under the guise of journalism. How many of our

intrepid journals. And by the way, I mean, I'm I'm now, I'm now Samson with his haircut in the journalistic establishment, and I just want to I just want to bring the whole journalistic establishment down at this point, I really, because we need to break it down and start a new We need to build something different. We need to build a journalistic establishment that is honest about what it's trying to achieve. Yeah, you have to have facts correct.

Propagandists have to have facts correct too. It's about editorial decision, it's about omission, it's about activism. It's about what are you trying. What is your view that you are representing to people? Where do you come from with your ideas? That's the journalism of the future. That's the information ecosystem that I want to be operating in, or rather I do operate in it now, I want everyone to have

to operate it. I mean this this. I saw this false front at CNN and New York Times, and the CNN is probably the worst offender in this regard now, but that they're just journalists, man, They're just doing a job. Lies. Lies. I want to bang on the table, but you'd hear it in the microphone. And if they're telling lies, doesn't that make them liars? And if they're liars, then why

should I care? And they're constantly in shrill, hysterical voices accusing President Trump I lying about everything, and President Trump lies about how awesome he is. If you hate him, if you love him, you think he's tell him the truth. He doesn't lie about things that matter to me. And I'm sure many others feel that way as well. This is this is quite a week we're seeing. The coup plot is already running into some real resistance. Dare I say, so, what are they going to do? Now? I would not

put it past them. You can expect they'll be some other trick up their sleeve. They've had months and months. Remember, they knew toward the end of Muller that it wasn't going to get it done, so they've been preparing for this moment. They have the impeachment preceding equivalent of a Billy Bush tape somewhere. They're going to have something that they have to drop here because right now it's sputtering.

There's a poll out that shows that a strong majority of the American people think that this should be left to the election, which any adult, serious human being should know. Trump is so bad. If Trump is so terrible for the abuses power so much, let's see how the next election goes. Don't try to just you know this is the Democrats are the kid who can't win the game, so they just want to take the ball and go

home with it, say it's my ball. That's what Chief and Pelosi and all the rest of them are doing. They're trying to disrupt the very process they claim to be protecting because it's not giving them what that because they're not winning. They're winning. And you know what our Democratic friends have done for him. Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to him pacing. I don't need any disrespect. But

it must suck to be that dumb. Now. I understand he's caught in a moment of rhetorical flourish there perhaps, But Senator John Kennedy there on Pelosi, I gotta say, Look, Pelosi is shameless. She's not a person of principle. Her ideas are bad, and she is first and foremost conserving Nancy Pelosi, She's not dumb. Though, Let's not underestimate our

opponents in this. And let's remember that while Trump has managed to continue to be president to do an effective job in the role, the left has Think of how much energy and effort in time they have managed to take away from the Trump agenda with all these schemes, all these artifices, Muller probe. Now this impeachment collusion stuff, I'm sorry, impeachment inquiry stuff, collusion, impeachment at all, it all blends together after a while. I don't want us

to underestimate the other side. Right now, it doesn't look like they're going to be able to get what they want through this impeachment proceeding. But what if the whistle blower And I'm not saying this is the case, I just have concerns about this. What if the whistle blower

is just meant to get this thing going. What if then the plan is to either release something else, or perhaps they even shift the whole conversation back to obstruction of justice after the Muller probe, or maybe they take just a kitchen sync approach of it's gonna be a little you know, a couple of dashes of Ukraine foreign Interference request, it's gonna be a little bit a few pinches of Muller report obstruction, and then it's gonna be Amalia men's clause, and then sprinkle a little bit of

you know, Trump is basically Hitler over the top and whatever it is they're they're going to try and reframe the narrative even if the facts aren't in their favor, leading into this impeachment inquiry. So we have to be careful. And I just I understand that Kennedy there was at a at a rally, but I mean to call Pelosi dumb. Pelosi is not dumb. She's not an intellectual, she's not wise.

It doesn't have good judgment, she's cunning. Though many of these Democrats are Adam Schiff slimy gross, that person fine, but a guy who understands how to attack people, how to smear people, how to abuse the law in order to achieve unjust ends. Yeah, so I just wouldn't. Don't just because I'm telling you it's not working right now that the coups seems to be faltering. Democrats are tireless, tireless in their scheming and plotting, and they've got something

else up there sleeve. I don't know what it is yet, but they're gonna unleash it. Welcome back the Buck Saxton Show. Outing the whistleblower who woo everyone's all. So the name Eric Scharamela, I believe it's how you pronounce it was reported by the Washington Examiner as well as links on Drudge Report as the individual that is believed to be the whistleblower. That is what the news report that is out there says. I'm just it is. You have a

First Amendment right to read it. What is it a newspaper? I am neither confirming nor denying that it is him. I do not know, but it is out there. How orwellian and crazy? Is it that now we have people in the media no less who are taking the position that now that news outlets. Some of them have dug into this and claim that they have they have verified that this is the whistleblower. That no one's allowed to say the name. It's a crime to say the name.

By the way, I was, I was concerned about this initially. I told you this is gonna happen. Up, they're gonna they're gonna go after people. They're gonna start to say, up, you can't say the name. You can't do it. You know, because the people that work in these bureaucratic institutions like the dj and you know, they the ones that will abuse power are the leftists and if they see an opportunity here to try to contort, try to twist the law so that it can silence people from saying something

that's out there. It is in public discourse right now. I don't know if it is true or not. I'm not reporting on it. I'm not claiming to have verified it. But they put the name Eric Scharamela out there and they say that he is the guy who's assigned to the NSC and that he works in the intelligence community. And this is what is out there in the Washington Examiner, in these other newspapers are is there a gag order on what is being reported? I need to understand how

that's supposed to work. If somebody has particular knowledge or background or like, let's say, they know if someone claims that they're verifying it and they had access to know this. I mean, maybe that's a slightly different situation if they

actually learned through that through special access. But if you're just reading it in the newspaper like everybody else, what what country are we living in if you are under a kind of gag order to not say what is the biggest news store in the country, to not name the person at the heart of it, or I should say, to not be able to say I read this in a newspaper, and for libs in the media to claim that this is a violation of law. Now, if you think I'm making this up, Donald Trump Junior retweeted an

article that named the whistleblower. You just said, here, here's the here's an article or there naming the whistle blower. And here you have a not just media person, but a so called legal expert. I actually done some workers of the past at CIEN and her legal analysis is horrifically bad, like incorrect, not that. I don't like it. It's just not good. Do not have her as your defense attorney? Trust me? Sonny Hasten on the view here she is telling a president's son that he is he's

a criminal for for retreating that. Please play the clip. I mean, did you advise um your boyfriend that it is a federal crime to out a way? I didn't advise him that it was a federal crime, but I did come out of the bathroom and say I left to them for ten minutes. What happened when mamma sees us gone? Because to do that's in the statute. So that's well, know that's that's true. That's a lie me. Okay, stop, everybody stopped this sting. It's hard to hear under fifteen

five it is a crime. It's not accurate. Law degree says it is. But nevertheless, but he's not the first time. My question, you did speak to him about that? I talked to him, No, not prior to after I said, oh what I said. Well, they're saying that I released this and I outed but if you look at the facts, and the facts are that the name was out there, I'm not saying, Okay, I understand what you're saying that, perhaps okay, wasn't the most prudent decision to retweet an article.

But I want to tell you something. We talked about transparency. The President of the United States released the transcript of exactly what happened in that phone call. Give me his upper canyon? Did do? We heard what just happened there. You had a woman with a law degree, he says, my law degree, says otherwise. She wants to drop the credential on the table, saying that it's a federal crime for Donald Trump Junior, which means it's a federal crime for any of you out there that this is now

her claim. It's a federal crime for any of you to say the name of this person. He is Voldemort. He is the name that cannot be said. This is not just coming from partisan Democrat officials. This is coming from people that are supposed to believe to live and die by freedom of expression, to believe in the First Amendment more than anybody. Just as a little experiment, while we were applying that clip for you, I typed in

the name Eric into Google. Didn't nothing else. Just Eric could have been Eric, The red could have been Eric. I don't know, uh, you know, I can't think of I can't think of a really famous Eric of Bruce Mark. What's a famous Eric like from sports? Give me one? Eric Dickerson, Eric Dickerson, I don't even know who that is. Who is that run running back? There we go. I'm sure he's fantastic. But you know what came up when I typed in Eric into Google the Google machine. Eric's

a very common name. Eric Scharamela. And then all this stuff about the news reports on this guy claiming, claiming, based on these news organizations, that he's the whistleblower. In what world does anyone think that it could be even theoretically prosecutable to say, hey, I just read this thing that is literally on the Internet that any human being with Internet access can go to and read and see. How could that be? How is that the case? I mean?

Oh no, if we've had the name up all this girl, oh, let's going to happen now, Eric's Oh no, oh so scary? What are we going to do? I'm so scared. It's fine, nohing's gonna happen to the guy. We're just gonna know a little bit more about him. By the way, every public this whole thing, but oh, his life is in jeopardy, which Mark Zaide was saying, Oh, Jake Tapper, that fraud, that nasty, petty fraud. He's all owe. Mark Zaide, the lawyer,

is saying, this guy's life is in jeopardy. Everybody who's ever stood up and defended Trump against the Russia collusion stuff, death threats, families threatened if you if you cross planned parenthood publicly, you'll have people threatening you and you know, to mutilate your kids and all this happens to every conservative. Oh,

this guy, it's so scary for him. I'm just wondering, was it scary for Kavanaugh's family when they were under constant threat from psychotic libs who were stupid enough and delusional enough to believe that he was part of a that Kavanaugh was part of a high school gang rape gang? Was Was that the liberals feel bad about that because it completely created that entirely false circumstance. Do you think any of them lost sleep and didn't cried tears about that?

Did liberals lose any sleep or feel badly when people showed up at Tucker Carlson's home and terrified his wife in the middle of the night, chanting and yelling and screaming outside as a mob. Did they feel bad about that? No,

I don't think so. I don't remember any liberals going on TV and apologizing for the rhetoric that is constantly promoted on the left without any compunction, without without any hesitation about how the opponents of leftism and socialism today are white nationalists, all of us, anybody, doesn't matter if you're white or not, you're still a white nationalist. You're

supporting white nationalism. It's appalling. These people are people are appalling, But that on the view, I have to say, that was one of the dumbest legal exchanges I've ever heard in my life. It's a crime, really, it's a crime to share a news article. You absolute just what a I mean, the stupidity. I sit here and I think that I understand the full depth of the moral and intellectual depravity that the left has fallen into in this environment right now, But sometimes they even manage to go

a step beyond. So I would want to ask legal expert on the view, which I know is it'd be better to go get medical advice from doctor Nick from the Seamsons. Remember doctor Nick Hi everybody. I'm doctor Nick. He's not really an expert in anything. Sonny Houston's legal expertise is not good. And I just think it's interesting that she took this position that Donald Trump Junior. But you see it. It's there are certain parts of liberals

brains now that have just become hardwired. Donald Trump Junior must be a criminal, and therefore any opportunity to present a case that he's a criminal is worth doing because we know he's a criminal. We just don't know what the crime is yet. That's their approach, their approach with Trump Senior, Trump Junior, all of them. But that was a stunning moment on National TV. Really tells you what the libs are here. I'm seeing that there are news

organizations that will not print the name. Now, is this now that you know how we don't want to print the names of mass shooters because we don't want to give them fame. And that never really works because some people don't agree with that the name is out there, they find out the name, you know. I think the way that you can textualize and you frame the issue of a mass shooting can really matter to the narrative and also the degree of specificity and detail that is reported.

But the name is going to be out there. It just is. It's part of illegal proceeding. The name will be out there. This name is out there too. But you see, I think the Liberals know that they can't stop this. They cannot put the genie back in the bottle. Is that like a microaggression against Middle Eastern culture? Now? I don't know, but they won't be able to stop

this thing from being out there. But what they can do is slow down the recognition among the American people that are paying attention to this, which is not everybody by any stretch. They can slow this down so that there's just more damage that can be done under the existing whistleblower narrative against Trump, the impeachment proceeding can get

further down the tracks. And if, in fact, and when we beyond any reasonable doubt recognize that this guy was colluding with Democrats behind the scenes to try and take down President Trump going into an election year, they'll have already gotten what they wanted. So delay matters here. You know. It's like why did Obama initially refuse to call Benghazi

a terrorist attack? And why did Susan Rice go on the shows and say that it's it happened because of a video because people were angry and they didn't want the perception to set in that Obama did not know what the heck he was doing on foreign policy. And when you let things laughs for a few weeks, are their stories come in. Delay is a strategy. They're delaying the recognition of who Charamela may or may not be. Again, I don't know. Is it beyond my comprehension or belief

that maybe they got the wrong guy. It's possible. I don't know, but it is being reported on by reputable news organizations, and I gotta say, if I'm this guy and it's not me, I think I released a statement saying it's not me. Right, so we can all put our detective hats on and come to some conclusions here. But I thought that that that moment on the view was it was mind blowing. It really was. Do you realize you've committed a crime by retweeting a news article?

That's it. That's a crime. Now liberals will say they'll criminalize anything they don't like. I don't like that. I don't approve of that criminal. She's got a prison. These liberals I'm telling you, there are just children drunk with drunk with power. It's really scary to watch the way that they operate. Then there's just there's no objectivity, there's no point of of agreement you can reach when it comes to Trump and his alleged criminality. Shocking stuff talking

about whistleblowers today. So let's continue on with that theme, shall we, because there's another whistle blows no blower story out there, a real whistle blower in fact. First, just a moment a little a little uh golf clap or what's the liberals now we'll maybe talk about this later, but they're like, when you do the like twinkly fingers or the jazz heads or something instead of clapping, because clapping can trigger people. I'm serious, Clapping can be a

trigger for people. So you're not allowed to do that anymore. But just kudos and props and all that to James O'Keefe for getting some great footage of a moment of we all know, we know what a moment of honesty is. We saw it. Amy Roebock, who is a journalist supposed to be presenting you with those moments of honesty all the time, unvarnished truth, speaking truth the power. Overwhelmingly, my friends,

corporate media is just a fraud. The corporate journalist media that is out there lies the whole mission statements, not what they say that or rather, the mission is not what the mission statement says. The mission is to protect their fellow elites, to unify with like minded liberal ideologues, to present a narrative to the American people that will influence them to certain beliefs and therefore make likely outcomes that are beneficial to one political party, the Democratic Party.

That is the real mission statement of most of the corporate media that is out there, not all of it. There's some people, and look, there are a good journalists at every People need jobs, right, so I don't pretend to say that every person works at this place or that place. People will trash on the left. They'll trash Fox News, and I would sit there and laugh. I'm like, oh, that's such a put aside all the ideological stuff. And they're a journalists who are world class by any standard,

that work at Fox. And yet their journalist colleagues will completely to people like Jeff Zucker all the place is all propagand the whole thing is propaganda? Really, I think zucker doth protest too much about propaganda, which is what CNN has entirely turned into. So let's now take a

step back into the James O'Keefe video, shall we. You will recall that Amy Roebock I think I'm saying her name right, she spoke about how they the brass, the chiefs, the higher ups at ABC decided that the James O'Keeffe video was I'm sorry, the Amy robot video that James O'Keefe's project Veritas put out there for millions and millions and millions of people to watch. But the story that they were going to talk about Epstein, who I'm hearing all these rumors from people that they think he didn't

kill himself, But I see that the story. We all could see that the story was shut down for reasons that had nothing to do with journalism and everything to do with don't want to upset certain powerful people, want access to powerful people, don't want to cause any problems. It was a statement, an honest moment, a statement of abject cowardice from ABC and the statement that they put out afterwards, Oh, we didn't meet our journalistic standards as the most boiler plate. Oh my gosh, what do we do?

Somebody just come up with some lie that we can try to tell people about this. It was so obvious, is that there were journalistic standards. They had witnesses, they had sworn testimony, they had photographs, they had you know, people on there. I mean the story was signed, sealed and delivered for them. Nope, didn't want to didn't want

to touch it. Don't watch out that story. Ah, but you see the media, they all pretend like their competitors, but really what's important to ABC and CBS and CNN and MSNBC that they don't watch each other's backs because they all know that they could be working at any one of those organizations. So it's like a country club for people who are liberals pretending to be journalists who want to make sure that they have lots of career options.

It is not about speaking truth to power. It's not about telling difficult, difficult stories that are going to make your life harder. It's about telling stories that make your life easier. That's what they all do, and that's why the whistleblower who initially put out or they believe shared that video. We have an update on what happened to him. It turns out that some blowers the liberal media doesn't think deserve any protection. So you might ask yourself. ABC

News has a moment here. And remember this is a huge company owned by Disney. Everyone there is making you know, they're all overpaid. It's very very cushy the whole thing. You know, all the anchors I'm talking about, and the senior producers and everything else, they're they're living. They're living very nice, comfy journal existences over there. And they won't even take this opportunity to take responsibility for crushing or

for quashing I should say, the Epstein story. They won't say there's no Mayakalpa, there's no you know, they're instead claiming that they acted with the best of intentions as journalists. And oh, by the way, there will be consequences for this lapse. The consequences will be visited against the person who leaked the footage of Roebok two projects very toss. That's the person that's gonna suffer here. No one else at ABC gets fired. No one else said ABC has

to take any responsibility for this. You know, Amy Roebok is out there acting like, oh you know, it's just I had a moment of frustration and this doesn't represent what really happened. Lying to us by this is lying to us just wants to keep getting There's my um my friend Chadwick Moore, you know, has hosted the show before. He has a fantastic piece out and I should really

try to pull up some of it. Um on Roebok and what the truth is about our corporate media because this if they don't take, if they don't take this opportunity, the mysterious career of Amy Roebock, he rights. This is from Chadwick Moore. The establishment can't function without its media army of spineless egomaniacs. It's totally true. It is totally true. These people are all so replaceable, and they even though they become household names, they become rich. They know there's

their their ability, What is their ability? What do they know that other people don't know? What can they do that other people can't do? They're like glorified catalog models. For the most part. They can read off of a teleprompter. Male and female. This is not a knock on any female specifically. There's some great stuff in here, though. Here's

what he writes at the end. Instead of attempting to make amends with the American people and earn trust, the American media is stuck in a psychotic loop of doubling down and further alienating themselves from the population. They continue to do it in the most petty ways. Mainstream media couldn't be bothered to even acknowledge the source of the Robot League Project verytas such a scrappy troll field operation is beneath men for those who have the Royal family

on speed dial, it would seem. In the rare instance the networks did mention Project Veritas. They couldn't resist adding a snide right wing activist group qualifier. Anyone who initially championed Robock has probably reconsidered she's not worthy of our praise nor condemnation as much as our pity. The establishment can't function without its army of spineless egomaniacs, spear a steered in any direction by a dangling a carrot, the cogs who will never know the joys of doing good,

only the rewards of doing good for one's self. End quote Chadwick Moore. Here in the Spectator mic drop really good stuff from Chadwick so now, what happened to the whistleblower? What happened to the whistleblower? I just want to know the one in ABC, the one who pointed out or rather went to somebody to expose, because this is clearly this is this is journalistic malpractice. You'd say, well, does he work at ABC News anymore? No he doesn't. So once ABC really good, they're gonna try to take him

to court. Theyre gonna assume him. Oh maybe they could be litigious. Oh no, What they do is they reach out to CBS Evening News, where I interned a long time ago. By the way, I believe it or not, I was an intern at CBS Eaving News. Horrible smug snyde libs everywhere. I was eighteen years old, and I was like, who are all the smug snyde libs in here? Where did they all come from? I didn't realize at the time. I didn't know quite how much of the of the media was biased. And this I was a

young guy. I mean, I knew there was some media biased, but I didn't realize. I was like, oh, so, CBS Eaving News, this is a Democrat propaganda operation. That's cool. I mean I'm not even I wasn't even college yet. I was a high school senior, but I knew what was going on there. But the whistleblower, the person who has come forward with or shouldn't they come forward? The person that released the allegedly, let's keep that in mind. Allegedly Releas works at CBC News, so ABC executives reached

out to CBS executives. You know, CBS executives did fired him, fired him. Now, let's unpack this for a moment. This person exposed something that was newsworthy malfeasance from a journalistic perspective, did not do anything to CBS Evening News, or didn't even do this wild employed I'm sure at CBIs or perhaps you know, didn't take the video while employed at CBS News and harmed what is supposed to be a direct competitor of CBS eaving news ABC News in the process,

and they fire him. Let's unpack that for a moment. Why would you do that? Why would you just concede to the wishes of a competitor that has just gotten a big black eye, and you're going to toss somebody out because of what they did to a former employer that really they were right to do. Who's the real victim? Here?

Is the real victim ABC? Or is the real victim the young girls whose stories were not told for years because ABC wanted to sit down with the royal family, which, by the way, there is no journalism that is more worthless, feckless, stupid, moronic than the American journalists who were so excited to sit with like Kate and whatever his name is, or the other one and the the American I can't remember her name either. I don't know who who's the one?

Who are the royal fam who's the two sons? And there are the Pete Kate Middleton and then there's the other the other lady? Remember her name? What I had? Producer Mark. This is the point whenever, whenever journalists and I'm like, oh my gosh, I mean it's fine, just do it on e you know, do it on a show where they're like, oh my gosh, like Christina Aguilera's latest fashion. It's just like setting the world on fire, like that's fine, but just don't do it and be like,

I'm a serious journalist. Let's talk to a member of the British royal family. Whoa do they serve really good tea in Buckingham Palace? Like? What is this tell me about what shoes you're wearing? ABC News didn't want to lose access to the How good is the t what shoes are you wearing? Omg is it's so hard having people take photographs of you all the time. They made sure they had access to that and didn't care about the pedophile ring involving some of the most powerful and

wealthy people on planet Earth. M Wow, it seems rather strange, doesn't it. That's quite a trade off to make. But then why does CBS fire this person? There are two reasons that I can see CBS fires this individual because these different networks CBS, ABCNBC, they really all act as they're really that. They pretend to be in competition with each other, but they're all really the same restaurants serving the same food. They've just got different physical locations, but

it's all the same thing. They're not presenting anything anything different from the perspective of perspective of honesty, truth, justice, any of that. They give you the same kind of water down left of center, pablem all of it. Yeah, Oh, we're the height of journalism. Yeah, it's gross, and so they protect each other and if you go after one, the others are like, hey, sorry, those are our buddies.

We know we're supposed to be wishing them, of wishing that they would collapse and go away, but that's not really true. We just we like this ABCNCCBS. We want to just all sort of be a unit. You know, we're the big serious TV journalism enterprises. You know, Okay, you know what the other problem is, and this is the bigger one. And I think a lot of you know where I'm gonna go with. This guy's not a trustworthy leftist. Guy is not a reliably left wing hack.

I don't even know what his politics are. We can't we guess that it would be possible to care more about an enormous story, a tremendously important story with real victims, real harmed on continuing victimization of young girls. Isn't that enough that we could assume that this this man who was just fired just lost his job as livelihood, probably along with it from CBS News. Maybe he didn't do it because he's right wing, didn't do it because he's

a conservative. Maybe he just did it because he was horrified at what a fraud ABC is. But you see, that's a problem for these networks. They have to be able to count on you if you're going to work there. They have to count on you to know that the cause of the left, the beliefs, the ideology of progressive democrats that run the media, that is more important than journalistic standards or ethics or anything else. That if you cross the team and you hurt the cause of a

left in America, you cannot be trusted again. It does not matter, it does not matter why you did it, and it does not matter whether the left abandon any pretense of principles in the process. They know that they cannot trust this guy to put the agenda before the truth, and that in the mainstream media is a fiable offense in and of itself. Oh and one more story that

kind of falls into the whistle lower category. Or you know, people that want to have a voice in politics, that want to really matter, but don't want us to know who they are. Anonymous. Anonymous has a book coming out and the book makes a claim according to some journalists who remember this is the So this is the anonymous op ed writer about the steady state and stopping Trump from doing what he's really supposed to do or really wants to do. We still don't know who that is.

That rule in the wall. I think it was Watching Post in York Times, can't remember. I think it was washing Whatever. I think Washing Post. We still don't know who that is. But that person apparently is writing a book, and the book is going to be anonymous. And in that book there are some claims that I mean written by anonymous. There's some claims that are made. Quote, senior officials had no doubt that Pence would support invoking the twenty fifth Amendment if the majority of the cabinet agreed.

Keep in mind here that the way that that is structured, senior officials believed that that Pence would this is there's all these conditionals, and it's just perception. There's a little bit of Look at the way that it reminds you of the reporting on Ukraine. This guy thought that this person said this thing that they thought meant. This other person said this thing that they thought meant that this person would. This is not a this is just nothing.

This is just it's just like your opinion, man, right, this is nothing. Katie Waldman who is the Vice president's press secretary, tweeted out in response to this fake news and I'm sure it is fake news. Does anyone really believe? I mean, and I am truly curious about the answers. I don't really believe that Mike Pence, of all people in this administration be like, yeah, let's have a let's have a removal of the president from office under the false pretense that he is crazy. Let's just have a

legalized coup. Yeah, Mike Pence would go along with that. This anonymous omp ed writer is almost certainly just peddling lies. But how can you challenge how can you challenge the access or the authenticity of somebody who's writing under the cover of anonymity? You see another parallel to what's going on with Ukraine and the whistleblower. How can we know

whether to believe something or not. I'm just wondering, at what point do Democrats start pulling random allegations off of Internet chatboards and saying, see, this person claims that President Trump really is the lizard King from the President, you know, from the planet Zargon or something. And so there are people out there who have evidence that the president is really not really a human beings. A lizard just looks

like a human. I mean, I know that's silly and preposterous, But so it is all of this, isn't it Isn't that kind of the point anonymous coming forward? Also, I will tell you this, if I believed, and I know it's easy to say, if I believe that the President United States was a like a crypto fascist who was trying to destroy this country and take us perhaps even up to and including a nuclear war, and that I had a way of stopping him, And if I really

believe that, I would need to maintain anonymity. People show up and fight and die for this country day and day out all over the world. You can't have people know your name because you don't want to deal with the mean emails. You want to save the country from the stalinesque hit Larry and figure of Donald Trump. Right, that's a you know, anonymous. Oh, this is a it's a risk to our now. They always talked about the risks to our national security. Why are all these people

that come that that, well, they don't come forward. Why are all these different individuals that are working so hard to destroy this president unwilling to stand up and be counted. There seems to be a plague here of cowardice, people that want to attack the president from behind, from behind cover, from behind closed doors. Why is that the case? Did this ever happen during the Obama administration? By the way, did you see people who were saying that Obama shouldn't

really be president? But no one can know who I am, can't, can't if anybody understand, no people stood up and they made their case about why Obama was doing a bad job or why Obama was In some cases, people made the case that Obama was not a legitimate president. There were people who did that. President Trump, we remember, did ask to see the birth certificate. And they weren't hiding behind the cover of nanimity, though the media should be.

If they were honest people, forget about ethical jour If they were just honest people, they would be all over this. Oh yeah, sure, you just get to tell whatever story you want about somebody and no one ever gets to know who you are. But we'll just assume it's true because we hate Trump so much. This is appalling, This is maddening, and yet it's not called out. It's not the problem. The journals run with this, they tell these stories, they don't seem to care about what it's doing. To

forget about a political discourse. I feel like people are just gonna start tuning out the media. They're just gonna say, I can't, I can't trust these people. Here's the problem, folks, For the most part, you can't. We will have confirmed, as I said, one hundred and twelve judges to the federal district courts, forty four judges to the federal circuit courts, and two outstanding judges to the United States Supreme Court,

and that numbers rapidly rising. Now one out of every four circuit judges currently on the bench was appointed by this administration, and that numbers now exceeded that by quite a bit. No president in history has confirmed as many circuit court judges, even close, not even close, in such a short period of time. The president is remaking in some ways the judiciary, at least the composition of the judiciary. This is one of the reasons. Well, there's a few

things here. You have Mitch McConnell, who knows that the machinery of appointing constitutional conservative judges to the bench, and I have no problem in saying that we should want conservative judges on the bench, people that believe the law is what it's says. The Constitution is a thing with meaning, it doesn't just change based on whatever you want it

to mean. That their role is not to come up with what is the best policy through the law, but what the law says, to interpret it based on constitutional jurisprudence, and to be fair and impartial in that process without ideology. That's what a constitutional conservative justice means. If you want liberal activist judges, we know what that means. Laws whatever they want it to be. It means whatever they tell it to mean. You know, it is whatever they wanted

to say. And Mitch McConnell, for example, understands that his legacy in this whole process is going to be increasingly cemented just based on the fact that he'll have all these lifetime appointments of federal judges and people all the up to the Supreme Court who will at least be at least be some greater chance that you're not going to have the activist left take over the entire day

of the the judiciary. I mean Trump has gotten a lot of is in place, which is which is important and for those and I put myself in this category some aspects of the Trump presidencies so far, of not he hasn't accomplished. I had to say that he hasn't done what he said he'd do. That's unfair. It's not over yet, and I think he is going to get four more years, but there are certainly things that remain unfinished. I think we could all agree there are things that remain unfinished

with this presidency. And the judges, though, that he has gotten in so far really matters. It really does matter. And that's one of the parts for those who were still troubled by President Trump's personality and the nepotism and some of the other less savory aspects of the Trump presidency. The judges have been great. And also I think there was a political awakening that happened on the right as a result of the fight, specifically over Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh.

Here's the President was talking about this last night. Play clip sixteen. Please, I said, Brett, let me tell you something. This approval process that you're going to go through will be so fast and so easy. You're perfect, perfect life, perfect family, perfect education, top scholar, best schools, Brett, this is going to be so easy. Little did he know, Little did he know? But I'll tell you what it

really represented something. It represented unfairness. And some of those people that came forward, to my way of thinking, all of those people that came forward, I thought it was disgraceful what happened. And I want to thank all of my Republican colleagues for standing up tall for a man who really didn't deserve what he went through. Nobody could have believed a thing like that could have happened, And

yet it was very instructive, isn't it. And the President's absolutely right, And we should remember that Kavanaugh wasn't just a guy who was up for an important government job. He was someone who an objective, thoughtful human being would immediately come to the conclusion, this is as honorable, decent, intelligent, and qualify a human being for this job as you could ever find with nothing in his I mean, think

about what they had. What they did presented lies from thirty years ago that had not a shred, not one piece of corroborating evidence or proof of any kind whatsoever, and the flimsiest of supposed witness testimony from people whose motives were obvious in the whole process. And I've said this before, and I think we all have to remember this, especially as we think about, well, we're going to vote for Trump at gang I mean, I mean, I am, but some people might say, well, you know, I'm like

a third party and independence and undecided. Remember this, whether you have Trump in the Oval office or you have Brett Kavanaugh in the Oval office. Just by way of comparison, both of them, the left has alleged our rapists basically or attempted rapist and no, actually no, I'm sorry a rapist with Kavanaugh too because of what Sweatnick said. Both of those people, the leftist said our rapists. So let's not delude ourselves into thinking that if we had a

more genteel and this is why they never trumpers. I just I've had it with them. I'm done, so I don't want to have them on the show and don't want to talk to them, or a bunch of babies who have not woken up to the reality of the fight we're in. I'm sorry, they're wrong. If you have anyone in this White House who is trying to accomplish the things that Trump is trying to accomplish, they would be saying he's hitler. They would be coming up with

stories from his past. Oh, he's a rapist, he's a racist, the worst. They would say the worst things about anyone. The mistake of the GOP in the past, in the Romneyite era, let's say, in the Bush era, which Bush was a little different because of the War on Terror, and so there was the focus went away from some of these more hot button domestic issues. But it was well, we will be we will conduct ourselves with decorum and decency,

and the Left will respond to that. You know that they will at least play by some If they can call Brett Kavanaugh a rapist, they can literally call any human being a rapist and not feel bad about it. There was a psychopathy at the heart of the anti Kavanaugh movement. They didn't care what they were doing to this guy. They didn't care about the psychological damage to him, to his family. They had convinced themselves that he needed to be burned at the stake and nothing else mattered,

nothing else mattered. I mean, these are the people who I mean the left. You see this in their eyes sometimes, you see this in the way they talk about these issues. They're the ones that would have been cheering as the wagons made their way down the chancelse in Paris, taking people to, you know, have their heads lopped off by the guillotine. The same mentality exists among leftists today, where it's like, yeah, we need our political enemies to suffer,

to be ruined, to be destroyed. I've yet to hear I stole this day, have yet to hear of anyone who is a prominent figure on the left really just feel rotten, feel badly about what happened to this guy. And the reason I won't let it go is because one they did. If you remember, they tried with that pathetic New York Times book, the New York Times reporters that put out this book, they tried to revisit the Kavanaugh thing and oh, maybe he really, he really did

do this thing. According Oh, here we have again hearsay on hearsay on hearsay on allegation, and all the people involved in it have political motivations. But we're supposed to ignore that. Oh, it doesn't matter, you just just believe them. I'd want to know, should we ask ABC News if believe women is a thing that doesn't apply to people who aren't over the age of eighteen. Why didn't they believe the women that Epstein had abused? Why? Why why is it that when they come forward and they were

gonna they don't believe those women? Huh because when had happened? Maybe their memories or well, what was the explanation? ABC News? I just wouldn't want to know. Why didn't meet standards? Of course? A bunch of liars, liars, cowards, liars. NBC News man, I'm really not gonna get a job in corporate media anytime soon, am I? NBC News liars Matt Lower. Oh,

they didn't know about Matt Lower. I mean there were people who knew, who were very powerful, who make a lot of money and didn't want the gravy train to stop period lying to you. They look and that they put these people on TV. They are supposed to be telling you the truth, supposed to be telling you about what matters, what happened, supposed to represent our ideals as Americans, and it's all that's all just it's all just crap. That's all crap. And where were these guardians of truth?

I told you I had I had people from CNN reach out to me and say, with this if you don't stop calling Christine Blasi for a liar publicly, if you don't stop saying that the other women are liars, you're never gonna You're never gonna work in a you know, a sort of a top tier media organization. Again, is what CNN people had worked with. They were telling me this.

I didn't care because what was happening was appalling. It was appalling, and I would hope that any person who has any judgment or common sense would recognize that if they can do that to Kavanaugh, and if they would do that to Kavanaugh, and they did, they would do the same thing to you, your dad, your husband, your brother, not think twice about it. Anything for the cause, anything for the cause. These people are. It's got a little

it's kind a little crazy. It's got a lot scared of the They keep saying all these things about how Trump supporters are horrible, and you know, we want these bad things to happen in the country. It's not true, and nothing horrible has happened, and yet they run around in hysterics all the time about how these terrible things are going to occur, and we look around, So when when do they just get when when do they exhaust

their hysteria. When can we sit down and have a conversation as a country, like adults who want to having a worthwhile exchange of ideas, because there are there are areas, you know, how do we fix healthcare, how do we fix the border? What should our immigration system look like? These are real content, These are real things where there's good faith discussion on all sides. But the president is a Russian agent who's a trader, and Brett Kavanaugh is

a serial gang rapist. And you know, these are things that bad people present as truth for their own purposes, and we should hold them accountable for that. And I mean bad people in the media. People should not They should not watch these shows. They should not support these endeavors. It's bad, It is bad what is going on out there. There is no truth, there's no honesty, and everyone is just doing what the what their paymasters tell them to do all the time. You know, these leftists, they pretend

that they are speaking truth to power. When was the last time somebody who was a prominent give me one anchor at CNN or MSNBC who stood up and during the entire Kavanaugh thing, one who was like this is wrong. I didn't see it. Did you see? Maybe I would bet a lot of money. No one primetime anchor on either of those networks, all the shows they have who said this should oh, they just all happened to agree that that was that was right, that Kavanaugh was a

serial gang rapist. And you know, they took Avanati's part in this whole thing because Michael Avnati is somebody that should be trusted. I'm all upset. Actually, he's never He loves to DM people and tell them how unimportant and what a loser they are on Twitter. I mean, he's a horrible human being. CNN put him on TV seventy times. Do you think they feel bad about that? Do you think they have any any sense of Wow, we're a gross organization. We really should do some soul search. No,

of course, not worked at the time. Put some guy on TV. Trash is Trump talked about the porn star payoff. Great. I think the trash is Trump is good. Jeff Zucker is sitting in his office, Yeah, get him. That's it. I'm explaining what I've been in these places. I know people who work at all of them. I have a lot of people who talk to me in back channel

about what's going on there. The things I hear about what are going on at CNN specifically are horrifying about what the editorial line is there now and how how it's a it's a get Trump operation. Everybody knows it, and the people that don't want to be a part of it are just told, you know, deal with it or leaf. I'm here to tell you the truth about

all this stuff. I tell you truth about this. I tell you to watch it the first also on Pluto channel two forty eight, because we'll actually say this stuff here. I'll tell you things you won't hear from other places. It's the way it is, my friends, It's the way it is. Senator John Cornyn, I looked at your poles. Nobody's beating you, John, nobody, And you don't have to worry about Beato anymore, that's for sure. From Texas, he liesn't like guns, religion, or oil. He knocked out all

three categorists somehow in Texas. That won't work. I don't think that works anywhere. I kind of miss Betto in the race. I gotta tell you and Trump that's a good line, by the way, but he doesn't like guns. Religion or oil. But I I wish Patou is still in It's like he was really this this uh like pure distillation of the sanctimonious, rich white lib dude who would like pretend to care so much and be so woke, but really it's all just like a fraud. And he

doesn't really ever think about anything. He just says a lot of stuff. I miss you. I miss him already. We still love Bertie Berties running around being crazy talking about health care of this and that and the other thing. But we don't have we don't have Bett anymore, which makes me a little bit on the set. That makes me sad. He was a fun one to to have in the mix. So Betto's campaign r I p oh.

But we do still have Ralph Northam running around trying to give us lessons in the way politicians should act and be. And this guy is going to be a running embarrassment for the Democrats for a long time. Play clip ten. This president has been an embarrassed to this country and sold ourselves to other countries, our allies. I mean, just it's one thing after another and I think it's catching up with him. So certainly was a factor, but

I think in Virginia. Yesterday people spoke about the progress that we've made, the progress that will continue to make. You know, another issue that is very very important in virginia's women's reproductive healthcare and also stopping the discrimination against the LGBTQ community. Those are important issues, and Virginia spoke to those yesterday and we're listening and we're going to pass some good laws in policy to move Virginia forward.

I just want to remind everybody that when you have your liberal friends telling you, how could you vote for Trump?

How could you? A lot of Virginia Democrats went out to vote for a guy who dressed in black face or a clan robe, and in fact did it so often that he had a nickname that I will not repeat on air in college because of his habit of dressing in black face, and who spoke openly about an infant that had survived an abortion procedure being killed, but to do so in as humane a fashion as possible. So the infanticide black face guy, who also refused to

even admit his black face passed. Virginia Democrats no problem showed up voting for that guy, But they're gonna lecture us all about oh Trump, Trump said him he had a mean tweet. Trump's a bad guy. Look at the liberals in Canada, justin Trudeau, who have not talked about in the wild. Liberals in Canada voted for Trudeau. The guy did blackface so many times. Can't even remember how many times he did black face. But they want their

ideas reflected in the corridors of power. They want their beliefs to have the power, the authority of the state. Just cram it down people's throats in this country or in Canada too. So I just I don't want to. I don't want to hear that. We're gonna have so much trying to push us from voting for Trump based on how it's just good people couldn't do that. Good people won't vote for trouble's. They'll try to morally blackmail you into this. Oh how could you? Trump is so awful?

All right, Well, what about all these democrats out there that seemed that there's no problem voting for them? What are these democrats and the positions that they support are awful? But also in a lot of cases, there their backgrounds, their backstories. You find out more about them, and you realize, oh, these are not good, decent, ethical people at all. They're certainly not like Brett Cavanaugh, somebody you'd want as a neighbor, as a friend, as a family member. They're not in

his category. But they'll tear the Kavanaughs of the world down ruthlessly, viciously, falsely. Welcome to the modern Democrat Party. Everybody. Wokeness, my friends, is not limited to the United States, as you know, the entire English speaking world certainly it has its own social justice movements, and there's this increase in the the desire to shut down speech that's offensive is happening in US and Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain, other

places too. Came and think about. But this was a new one for me. I didn't I didn't know about this. I know who played that that that women in Australia who's like, I want the I just want the patriarchy to fear feminism. I want the patriarch to be like, oh my god, him, I'm in a coolner and I'm like, I'm like shaking with fear because the I'm a patriarchy and feminism is like this giant, like it's like this giant person is really strong, right, it's strong, like like

a like an ox. It's threatening patriarchy. I don't I still don't know what she was talking about, but it's like island sometimes, what you've got to do if you're good, if you can't get what you want, get what you need. The rollings don't anyway say some nonsense there, Good morning Britain though that were leaved. That was now I know that wasn't an audi accent, but the woman kind of

sounded like that to me. But now now we're in Britain, so we have a a woman who wants to let you know about the danger of clapping twenty So it's actually not just some people with anxiety. It's also people who use hearing aids. Clapping can be disruptive to that. People who have sensory processing issues. It can be very distressing and overwhelming to have those loud, sudden noises. It's like, it's like, really, it's really terrifying if you've got sensory

deprivation issues that you do. I mean, okay. Also if I you know, I'm trying to walk past them on the subway, I tap them on the shoulder, it could startle them and they could have a heart attack. Like, we can't live our lives this way. Okay, we can't do this, dude. Hey, but what if somebody is like, really, look, they've got a little bit of a headache, and you just start clapping. It's like real loud. Then you all

of a sudden that headaches can't get worse? And I mean, how much tired and all couldn't one person take I was happy though. Wait, but I will say this before we have a gentleman who was on the panel. There was some sanity in the UK. There was no sanity in that Australia panel. I just want the patriarchy be terrified. I want the patriarchy to be like, oh but I can't deal with this anymore. I'm so sad on the inside. I don't even know what I'm talking about anymore. The

panel in this case had somebody came forward. He spoke a bit of sense. But before I get to that, I will say, oh, don't don't don't you don't play that? Are you playing the clip you're trying to? Okay, just making sure I got eyes on you, producer Mark. So there's a thing that people do and I just want to go on rec It's the most it is the most annoying thing on planet Earth. And it's when they're at a concert or a sporting event, or it's happened to me when I was a Broadway play person was

sitting right next to me. I wanted to dump a bucket of ice water on her head. But they do the thing where they put the two fingers in their mouth and they make the super high whistle noise to show their approval for something. I'm not an advocate of violence, but if somebody punches you because you're doing that, it's not like they didn't have some cause. I'm just gonna say it. It's the most annoying, lacking in consideration for other people noise that happens in public place all the time.

Don't do that thing. Yeah, okay, the people down on the field, you're up with the cheap tea making this. I can't even be I can't make the noise at all. They make the whistle with the fingers and maybe somebody on the field they'll hear the but you know who also hears it. The person who is who is eighteen inches away from you in their seat, whose ear drum. You have just punctured with your stupid noise. Are you with me? Producer Mark? That wasn't the right whistle that

I wanted. I was trying to find some whistling in the system to annoy you. But I was like, is that a bomb noise? Because because my comment bomb, I don't know what that was sound like a bomb? It did sound like that. It's like a roadrunner. But you know what, what do is there a word for that? Kind of like the fingers in the loud obnoxious whistle, A loud obnoxious whistle. Don't do the loud obnoxious whist.

That's actually a thing in ranger games, oh hockey, no wonder like they'll do a little little whistle thing like don't don't, don't like that thing, and then yelled pop

van sucks. I see, I wouldn't know about this. You're gonna take me to a hockey game at some point, sure, and we're gonna have a come on the show and talking about but you know what, but they put the fingers them out, they do the whistle thing, and it's the loudest, most annoying sound in the world, and yet people will just do it sometimes and I don't understand

why they think that that's okay. And I look at them, I'm like, do you not know that it hurts the ears of people that are like legitimately it actually hurts the ears of people around you. And you could say, oh, buck, I can make whatever noise I want to at a game or something. I'd say, well, what if I just got in your ear and I did the dumb and dumber noise, you know, as loud as I possibly could, wouldn't people be mad at me about that? It's no different.

It's like if you kick my chee oh oh my gosh, stop stop, turn off the Okay, I give, I give, I give anything. Uncle. I'm glad I finally found some good whistling. Oh I hate hate whistling of all kinds, but the fingers in the mouth sporting event whistle is the one that that drives me the most. And saying oh but okay, but back to sanity, because there's lady's like, oh but we don't want to clap because it's going to be hurting your ears. We can't clap too loud,

it's going to be bad. We have Andrew Doyle. I don't know this guy. I guess he's a Good Morning and host or something who was like, no, we're not going to all start doing instead of clapping, just do jazz hands, which is I guess what they call it, like jazz hands. We're gonna here's what he said play Club twenty one. When we saw that clip earlier, people people doing the jazz hands. The reason that looks really silly to us and we are instinctive to still laugh

it is because it's really counterintuitive. They seem quite intinctive about wanting to show your appreciation through applause. It's something that babies do quite naturally without us training them to do so, one of the first things that they do exactly. It's an old, old thing. It's part I mean, look, I can totally take your point that we do in a compassionate society which we are lucky enough to live in. We make sensible provisions for people who have various mental

health issues and disabilities and that kind of thing. But what we don't do is completely restructured society and completely change societal norms in order to accommodate the sensibilities of a few people. Who is that guy? Because you sound

smart and I agree with the one hundred percent. But we don't do is just turn society upside down because there's a few outlier situations for certain people, and the expectation becomes that you always have to act like the outliers are everywhere, you know, and you don't make case by case accommodation based on kindness and consideration. You make the policy based on the possibility of somebody not you know, liking clapping. No more clapping. You know what they used

to do. I remember for a while at coffee shops when I was in college in the nineties, or when they did, like the poetry reading, they would do the you know they would that's an old theater thing though, Is that an old theater? Yeah? I remember. Remember. It's like a lot of people who I knew who were in like the drama and stuff they do. Like some cool drama kids would be like, hey, we're snapping because we're just like snapping. They just think they're cool. It's

not there's no reason behind it. Yeah. I didn't really like the drama kids in high school as it grown up, though, I like the people that were the drama ladies in high school now that they've grown up. Some of them can be fun. I was a drama kid. I didn't act. I just did all the behind the scenes toll. Yeah, but that's cool. You're like one of the You're like one of the Union guys. It's like backstage playing guitar, hanging out. Those guys are always cool. Of course I'm

a cool guy. Yeah, that's true. So learning a little little fun stuff about producer Mark here. Um. But anyway, so the clapping thing is is going to be a pro I guess we don't, you know. I said we're gonna talk about our is Marvel cinema or these Marvel movies? Really? Are they cinema or not? Because they've got what's the super fan? The Good Fellows director? What's Scorsese? How could I forget Scorsese book? You forget Scorsese? You crazy? I think we'll hold that though for tomorrow. I want to

hold that one over. Here's here's what I would say. Um, I have to separate out the Avengers from everything else. Maybe I'm not gonna hold this for tomorrow. Um well, maybe I'll return to it tomorrow. I would just give you my my brief, my praise, ce my overview. Here is that superhero movies can be great. They can be movies like any other movie, with all the different the whole range of human emotion, and the acting can be excellent. The obviously can be very, very entertaining. I think some

superhero movies are fantastic. The Avengers movies, though, are like a threat to all that is dear in civilization because they're so bad. That's just I'm just here to tell people the truth. You'll notice a lot of truth bomb on this show. You have never been more wrong about something in your life, your entire life. You other ever get it. You know it's all right when you don't, and when you have a little more wisdom you know under your belt. My Fred, you know Avenger's End Game

is the highest grossing movie of all time. Obviously, you are in the minority in terms of this. Yeah, because everybody in Beijing saw it. It's not because it's a good movie in you in the US. It's the highest grossing movie of all time in the US because we didn't want to let the Chinese win, so we saw just embrace it. You are wrong. I'm trying to tell you this is a poor opinion, just like your opinion. I'm not liking hockey. You are not liking baseball. You're

racing the Bucks takes, not our movies. I'm telling you, Producer Mark's gonna send you astray. Oh you know you'll have like Hulk and Thorpe. You like who is booger biceps? Hah, so funny, this whole that has never happened in pretty much what happens? You haven't even watched them. See this what happens? When I opened the Scorsese can ors Martin Scorsese at true filmmaker, He's wrong. Also, cinema is anything you wanted to be bout? I mean, would you tell

Mozart he didn't know how to write a sonata? My friend? Yes, I didn't. Actually probably would no respect for my man Wolfgang on a dais zero. Yeah, roll calls up next to Buck. It's time for roll call. It is time for roll call. Let's uh, let's get to it show. We let's see what we what we have here? Um Julia with a fantastic comment. I can tell from the start. Buck love your show yesterday, And you are right. Producer

Mark is grouchy, Julia, making my day. He snapped at you when you mentioned it while talking about Camela's six PM disaster Shields High. What did I snap at you? I don't even know. But Julia's saying wrong's wrong as she agrees with the host, not the producer. She says, you're grouchy, oh without the producer that show. That's true. But Julia, you're on the right side of this one. You probably you probably hate Avengers, Ultra Marathon, Everlasting too,

or whatever it's called. Not even close, Yeah whatever. Richard Comment of the Day, Julia, thank you, Buck. I think you're missing something. On Virginia elections. Eric Holder has an organization that has been working on redistricting states, so they sued Virginia in twenty nineteen for the maps that were drawn in twenty ten. Then they got some California Live to redraw the maps and poof no more Republican majority

in Virginia. That election is more about this group than anything. Also, why didn' the Virginia Republicans hang the late term abortion issue on the dams. It's like they don't want to win sometimes. Richard, um, I have to I'm sure what you're saying about that rings true to me about Virginia Redistriching. I've just I haven't been following that part of the story closely enough to comment on it in any expert way.

I agree. I mean it's look, I don't think it really matters that much what Virginia, what the campaign really was from the Republicans at this point, because Virginia has been importing Democrats to work for the federal government and into the state, because Virginia has a very large and increasing immigrant population as a state. And that's just immigrants vote two to one for Democrats, sometimes three to one. Uh, let's see here, all the immigrants. I hate the little

book immigrants. I don't know if you have a green CARDI camp, but if you become, if you're a naturalized citizen, you can vote, so can everyone. You don't need to send me the assume assume Like like Fredo, I'm smart. I have ideas too, Not Fredo Cuomo, I mean Fredo from the actual Godfather, though I just love that I'm smart. I've got ideas. Jason and Rights, Hey, about the whole thing where the Democrats are keeping the identity of the

whistleblowers secret, It's nothing more than a game. There is virtually no way this deep state operator doesn't have to come forward to testifying the trial in the Senate if Trump is successfully impeached. Thus, they're trying to protect their partisan impeachment as if it's something they just have to do rather than something they have been dying to do since Trump won. Absolutely true, Jason ding Ding. If we had prizes to give out, we would give them to you.

But we can't give out prizes because we're on the radio, and there's like rules about that, by the way, right, Mark, And there are rules about this. You can't just like I can't just like send people T shirts if I like them, because we have if we have like a contest or something, right, I think you can give out T shirts. We just don't have T shirts. Wow, Christmas is coming, folks, So I just want to make sure if it's anything like above a T shirt, then then

the rules get a little weird. Then it is okay. So I can't be like I'm gonna give ten thousand dollars to somebody and then like give it to my cousin, right exactly. That's why there's rules for that. But a T shirt, you can help get T shirts probably all. Yes, that's good to know, Sarah. These guys really do oh, love, love love your voice impersonations, you're the best. No, Sarah, you are the best. As for eleven thousand scientists who

think we're overpopulated, perhaps they should lead by example. Scientifically speaking, at their various ages, I'm confident they produce more methane than the newborns would bum bum methane jokes, Sarah, well played, perhaps stinky, but well played. H And then these guys really do have a god complex? Do they not to think we humans can save the world. Yes, Sarah, they do have a god complex. They want to be important, they want to be powerful, all of that stuff. So

that is very much true. Doug Lass buck Water va Arson of his Douglas. I don't know why I said his name so weirdly. I'm just kind of in the zone right now. Buck Water vapor is the largest of the so called greenhouse gases. It is one hundred times more plentiful than CO two, but no one does anything about it because one we can, and two it would adversely, it wouldn't rather adversely affect western capitalist societies. Further More, the atmosphere has been point three percent CO two forever.

The hundreds of tiers of industrial oh years rather of industrial revolution and addition of six billion people to the planet hasn't budged the CO two concentration by more than point zero one percent or one one hundredths of one percent, even if you assume the entire increase is man cause, which is ridiculous. Where did the three hundred parts per

million come from? All the greenhouse gas is allegedly caused by mankind amount to less than point zero two percent of the atmosphere, less than two hundred molecules each one million molecule of air. How could any reasonable person believe that two hundred out of a million tenths of anything is going to destroy the earth. Yeah, man, I mean I'm with you, obviously. I think I think these people that think this stuff are absolutely nuts. So, and there's

a lot of math in there, Douglas. So thank you for handling the math, because I'm not If we have math problems or tech problems or tech you know, technology problems, math problems, audio problems, that's producer Mark. You send him the numbers to gear all that. I just handle the funny voices. That's my that's my job. So somebody complaining about my audio again? No, no, no, no, no, it's okay. It's easy, Mark the Grouch, don't worry about it. No one has to get no one has to get spanked today.

It's okay. I'll go back into my hole. There we go. It's all fine, all right, everybody that's gonna be the show for it today. I hope you're enjoying. If you're not already enjoying watching it on Pluto, please do check it out. Channel two forty eight, the first where we speak the truth, the first like the First Amendment, also the first channel you should be watching on Pluto TV every day. Also, download the Bucks Action Show on iTunes. Tell people about it. Numbers are going up. We love that.

Shields high