The 1000 Mile Caravan Has Arrived

matters with actionable intelligence. Mag No mistake, American Rank, You're a great American Again The Buck Sexton Show begins. No, Welcome to the Buck Sex and Show. Remember when we were talking a lot about about the caravan. Remember we were hearing about this one um constantly, right day in and day out. There was talking about this caravan. Well, the media was saying there was this refrain. You kept hearing there are thousand miles away, they're nine miles away

like that. That means that they're never gonna get here. There's not a problem. Well, well there is a problem, of course. The problem is that when you actually drill into this a little bit, you find out that, oh, hold on a second, um, they can take buses. They can actually get here. But but here's what the media was saying with this playli migrants still have a very, very long way to go, more than a thousand miles.

That's roughly equivalent to the distance from Miami all the way up here to Washington, d C. To give its perspective on how far we are and how long it will take them. When they hit Mexico City, many will try to catch train. And while Brownsville is the closest entry point, which is, you know, a thousand miles from here, the safest they tell us is to jump a train and go over to Tijuana on the Pacific side as well, even though it's twice as long. Caravan of Central Americans

traveling through Mexico have briefly halted their journey. They are about a thousand miles from the U. S. Border. Remember that song I wouldn't walk five thousand or five hundred miles, sorry, not not five thousand. It was one of the most annoying songs in the nineties. And then it turns out they're not gonna walk five hundred or thousand miles to get across Mexico. That they're walking to a train or a bus, and that is why we can report the

filing from San Diego. Quote. People on the Mexican side of the border could be seen climbing the fence near border Field State Park Tuesday afternoon, after part of the Central American migrant caravan arrived in Tijuana. Several people scaled the fence and sat on top of it. A few jumped or crawled to openings in the fence onto US soil, but quickly ran back as Border Patrol agents approached. Several border agents were seen patrolling the area in trucks, helicopters,

and on horses. US Border Patrol sent a news release stating it believes some of the people at the fence are from the caravan that has been traveling through Mexico from hon Duras. Oh you mean they're not gonna walk at thousand miles? Oh wow? You mean that? Yeah? What a shock. They're able to get to transportation and now they're already at the border. Who has been telling you

this all along? I know, I'm just saying I've I've been telling you that this is what was going to happen, And sure enough, here we are and this is what's happening. They have already arrived, at least part of them have arrived at the border. But we've been told all kinds of lies by the US about all this, Like, for example, there's just no evidence of criminality at the border. Remember Chuck Todd saying this play thirteen. Well, there's a lot to unpack in that. Keep in mind there is no

evidence of any criminals in the Central American caravan. Criminals is everywhere? Okay, uh is criminals here? I mean it is. I mean clearly that guy must be some kind of right wing operative with his Criminals are everywhere. Clearly that guy is uh. You know, he's telling people what what he thinks they what he thinks the right wants to hear. And I don't I don't think so. I think he knows the criminals because he's in he's in the caravan and he sees the guys with MS thirteen face tattoos.

That tends to be a tip off. You tend to get a sense when you see some MS thirteen face tattoos that maybe the person maybe it's a style statement, I get it, but maybe they're actually an MS there team. Maybe that's what's really going on this caravan, which has led to so much clothing On the left, they're saying, oh, it was a big it was a big mistake for Trump to talk about this, a big mistake for him to make an issue of this. I disagree with that.

I think it would have been an even tougher night for Republicans if there had not been this juxtaposition on what the left stands for here and what the right stands for. What? What do conservatives believe when it comes to our border? What do conservatives believe when it comes to our national sovereignty? You know, I mean the President speaks about this in no uncertain terms play clip twelve.

But certainly have people coming up through the southern border from the Middle East and other places that are not appropriate for our country, and I'm not letting them in. They're not coming in a right, they're not coming in. We're gonna do whatever we have to, they're not coming in. Now, this is where the fight really intensifies, because what the left says is, oh, they're all just trying to claim a sound. They know they're scamming, they know they're frauds.

This is fraudulent. This notion that all these people call qualify for a slum. Do all six million Hondurans qualified for asylum or maybe it's eight million, I forget the number. But to the many millions of Hondurans qualified for a sound the answer is, Well, if you're on the left, if you're a Democrat, and you realize that there's a likelihood of them voting for you, then I guess the answer is yes. Then I suppose the answer is yeah, sure they qualify. Uh, you know, the more the merrier.

But for the rest of us who have real concerns about this country and who believe that our sovereignty and our security is something that the government is tasked with, and then it matters. This isn't some secondary concern, This is real. This is a giant loophole, and it is slap in the face to American sovereignty. The whole thing is a a giant game that the left and these activists. And we're gonna talk, by the way, that somebody, a friend of mine, has been down embedded with the caravan

recently about what he saw. Here's a short version. A lot of activists, a lot of international money coming in. What a surprise that is to none of you, right, we knew that was coming. But this is going to turn into a nasty political fight. Make make no mistake about it. Um. Here, here's what happens. That they will

show up at the border, they will claim asylum. They'll all be saying exactly what they think, what they've been coached to say at the border, so they have the greatest likelihood of being able to stay in the United States. And from there they will go into the interior of the United States and they'll have a court date. Even if they show up for the court date and they failed to get asylum granted to them, they will not suffer interior enforcement. That's not gonna happen. So yeah, there

you have it. That means, in short, they get to stay. Here's a former Acting Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Holman, for example, talking about this play three game on. I mean, I think that the administration is ready. Uh CBP has of course got a lot more resources down there, you know, with the military building the infrastructure and in the fencing. You've got a lot more inspectors and a sideum officers

down there from cis ready to start these interviews. If they come to a port of entry if they decide to enter this country legally. Of course, the president's proclamation not gonna be a lot of claim asylum if these people do come in the United States and and they'll be detained until they see a judge. Because back in when this first started, when they were detained long enough

to see a judge, more than lost your cases. They got put on planes and sent home, would sent a strong signal Central America in the crossings depleted it way law. So hopefully we can send another message they'll get to do process. But if in order judge organism removed, they gotta go. That is the key. That's where the Democrats get all slippery. You can't let him evade the center of this argument. The problem is not that there's an asylum system. The problem is the abuse of the asylum system.

Assylum system and the lack of a willingness to send people back home who fail to qualify for asylum once they go through the process. If there is no enforcement mechanism, then guess what, They're not going to stop coming across the border. And this then becomes a way to leap frog the entire legal immigration system in a way that incentivizes people to engage in really bad behavior, to lie, I mean, to commit fraud. You know, it's on the books.

For example, in this country, folks, if you have a fraudulent marriage to get a green card, you know what the penalty is for that, up to five years in federal prison. And once in a while they'll actually enforce that against somebody. Once in a while, they'll they'll press criminal charges against somebody for a fraudulent marriage. At least somebody's got to go through the whole process of getting

married for that right. You know, that comes with its own headaches, so I'm told, so, I'm told a lot of your like buck watch yourself. But you know that that's that's where all this starts to fall apart. On the enforcement side, you either enforce these laws or the

laws cannot be considered to be serious. You know, you either have interior enforcement of whoever comes in as part of this caravan, or just understand that what you're doing here is allowing whoever can get to the border to stay in the United States and to get around the rest of our legal immigration system. And this just cannot be allowed to stand. This is completely unacceptable. It is

an end run on our system. It means that we do not have effective control over who comes here, and that the Democrats are so complicit in this whole thing they're encouraging. It just tells you everything you need to know. I mean, they are not about the rule of law. They are not concerned with what the long term implications of this will be for the country. In fact, they welcome it. I want to know why, you know, I want to force Democrats to start having to defend certain propositions,

like why is illegal immigration even bad? Democrats can't really answer that question for you because they don't think illegal immigration is bad. You know. They may say, oh, well, we have laws and say, okay, but you won't enforce those laws. So and whenever we try to enforce those laws, you act like we're a bunch of big, mean meanings.

So why is illegal immigration bad? Democrats? Let's ask Nancy Pelosti, Let's ask Chuck Schumer and all the rest of them, what is it about illegal immigration that you disapprove of? I don't know that they could tell you. I don't know that they would have an answer for you. I think that it would just be a bunch of well, I don't know we're gonna have again, I said. My friend Army Horrowitz will be joining us here. He was down with the caravan. He's got some very interesting stuff

and firsthand that he picked up. We'll get to him this hour for sure, and Armies, you know, entertaining guy, really smart guy, and and he'll tell us what's going on with this caravan. And it's a lot of the stuff that you and I have known. But the media tells, us, Oh, no, we're we're crazy for thinking this stuff, right, We're we're

bad people for believing these things. And uh, you know, it's on us for being such a bunch of you know, evil right wing Republicans who who don't just want to take in the tired, the poor, the weak, and the hungry of the whole world that our southern border. Maybe it didn't prevent some or rather maybe didn't prevent the loss of the House in the midterms. I think it prevented. I think it had a big factor in the whole Blue Way not being a real wave. I mean it

was something, but it wasn't a blue wave. But we've got more on this coming up this so our team stay with me. You know, it's funny to me, I keep having to remind myself that, yeah, of course the media is lied about the caravan. Media is completely in

meltdown mode. They think the president is a level of evil that is unprecedented in this country, and they are they really believe that, And I guess they also believe that the the president specifically doesn't want thousands and thousands of people to abuse our asylum system, which I would not it. Also, if you really want to look at it, those numbers. The more assilis we take in through the southern border that are doing this whole Oh, I'm from Honduras.

I don't want to be there anymore. That also affects our perception of how many people are getting asylum every year, and that includes from countries that really are in the midst of a terrible war, that really are in the middle of a situation where if they do not get out, they are going to be uh, they're going to be murdered,

which is really not the case. And I know people, oh how it's really not the case with most of these Nicaraguan's They're just saying what they think they have to say in order to, you know, be be led into the country. In order to be in America. They are claiming to be fleeing. But but here's just a sometimes like your mind, you all. And by the way, we've got Ammi Horrow. It's I know, I want to bring him in right away. We're gonna get to him in just a minute. Here. He's been down there with

the caravan. He's got incredible stuff to tell us. You're really gonna want to hear about this. But just here's the way. When you think about how the media covers the caravan, just remember how they cover the administration. To play play eight, is this president trying to impersonate Hugo Chabez rescept tie up earliwan Vladimir Putin. What a great case officer Vladimir Putin is. He knows how to handle an asset, and that's what he's doing with the president.

When do we see almost a shadow government come out and say we cannot side with the government. Why is President Trump showing sympathy for white nationalists and other hate groups. We can surely say his words have absolutely emboldened white supremacists. He has given oxygen to racists. He is clearly trying to ignite a civil war in this country. There's a sign out there that's been on and the white houseler outside the White House say, if you're not white, you're

not especially welcome. The president gets two scoops, you know, everyone or else around the table gets one. Uh no word if there were sprinkles. Sixteen tweets today to start the new year, some of them deeply disturbed. But these are the messages from a person who is not well, from a leader who is not fit for office. Yeah, he gets more scoops of ice cream than other people. What else do you have to know that? It's really, it's really all there is to say. He gets he

gets too many ice cream scoops. He's a he's a terrible, terrible man because of that, with his ice cream scoops and his meanness and all. I mean that they're just there's nothing about the way the media talks about this president when it comes to this presidency, that is is fair,

that is objective. I mean, they are just constantly trashing him, and I and I wish, I wish we could just force them to realize that if they want to regain some of the credibility that they've lost, they could start by Oh, I don't know, reporting on the administration like they would any other administration, and that includes the way

they've talked about the caravan. They keep saying that Trump fearmongers around the caravan, when the truth is that they've spent so much time convincing us that Trump, out of just sheer racism, opposes this caravan. It's just madness. He's trying to re establish sovereignty at our southern border. We have a huge problem. I was telling you about this yesterday. Two thousand people a day on some days caught aren't across in the United States. That's a lot of people

and those are just the ones who are caught. You know, no other country would allow this, No other country accepts this. But we're supposed to accept this. And I was gonna ask the question why, based on what you know, under what rules, what rubric are we supposed to sit around and say to ourselves, you know what, we don't We don't get to have a border anymore, we don't get

to have a country anymore. So these leftist radicals can just do whatever they want to the country, and and in every way that they can try and uh, you know, undermine the principles of conservatism that so many of us believe in. I mean, that's it's just amazing. Um It's it's a really frustrating situation. It really bothers me. But we got Amy, Um Amy calling in just a moment here, he's gonna be joining us. He's actually at the Freedom Hunt at n y C. I'm down here in d C.

We're else gonna talk about Florida. What's the latest there? The election showdown? And some do process stuff on college campuses for sexual assault tribunals that are more common up Team Ever. Present among the thousands of Migraines are workers of Pueblo sin Fronterras, clad in black T shirts and colored vests. Pueblo sin Fronterras means people without Borders. They're the ones that seemed to be most involved in organizing

and mobilizing this caravan. The organization, as the name implies, is looking to create a world without borders, which seems to be one of the reasons why they organized this caravan the first place to flout American sovereign. Team Ammy Horowitz is a documentary filmmaker that was from his latest in which he goes down and gets us some some ground truth on the caravan. I'm a great to have you back, sir. How you doing. It's always a pleasure. It's great, too great to be here. He's going great,

thanks man. So what did you tell me about this Pueblo sin front terrast not speaking in Spanish? That was good, was very good. So they are technically a Honduran based group. Uh, And they're really the ones who are this this whole notion. This thing is an organic event that kind of you know, spur out of the ground. Is such a load of bs. This was a highly is a highly organized event that was spearheaded by this group Fronterras Fronteris. And what that means,

first of all, is people without borders. And I think it's an important thing to note because what if that it says it all in the name. They are looking for a world without borders. They find the idea of sovereignty and nationality to be some kind of weird sin Now they have a number of front groups actually based in the United States, and those front groups are where we think the money is coming from. But it's difficult to know exactly where the cash is coming from. I'll hey,

where it's not coming from it's not coming from Honduras, right. Uh, this this, this operation is a multimillion dollar operation, between the water, the the mobile hospitals, the chartering of buses. Uh, this thing, this thing, I estimated around ten million dollars to to to ferry these people from Honduras to the US border. So I can guarantee you one thing. This is not coming from Honduras. So there's definitely outside money at work here. We don't know where the money is

coming from just yet. And you're saying really serious levels of cash here, I mean ten ten million dollars. There's a lot of money no matter where you are. But I know you have that layer around Buck, but not me. Yeah, I wish I had that in the couch cushions. But today I'm seeing reporting that some of the carrols got into the border, and there's some reporting that a lot more caravans could be on the way, a bigger one in the future. What you what can you tell us

about all that? Well, the caravan they reached their earlier is kind of almost from what I understand, is almost like a an intelligence operation. They're going there to kind of probe and see what the reaction is going to be before the larger group gets there. And and yeah, listen, there as many as much my assumption, as much money as they can they can round up is as many they're going to send over to the US. Uh. This is not this is the beginning. This is not about let'

let's be honest. This is not about this one group reaching the border. It's not about that. This is about the idea of undermining our ability to police our own border. This is why Brexit occurred, right. Brexit occurred because England said, hey, we want control of our own borders and we don't have it because we are beholden to the European Union.

This is no different. Uh. They are looking to disrupt our borders, disrupt our sovereignty, disrupt our nationality, and they're going to do that as often as they can with as many peoples they can because they want to upend this idea of nationality of sovereignty. So it really is that an an internationalist, one world government kind of project. I'm just wondering when you when you so, where were you with the caravan and you know what, can you just tell us about the day to day that you saw?

So we were in a southern Oahaka and that's um, the central southern part really more of the southern part of Mexico. Uh, it's it's very very isolated. It's it's actually an area that's riddled with with narco crime, very very poor area. We also, which brings another on another one lies is that again all of the stuff that they have is kind of like mona from heaven. They're like, oh my god, you know, all this water, all this food, these palettes of gatorade, it comes from the Mexicans living

in the area. There's literally nothing there. There's nothing there but poverty. So it's it's it's out of hand, it's it's it's a ludicrous notion. And they listen. Also want to make clear one thing, the people who are going to the US, I I hold nothing against these people. If I were in their shoes, Frankly, I do the same thing if I had the extreme poverty and the and the hard life that I that they haven't Honduras, I want to get the hell out of there also, So I don't I hold them no, you know, I

don't begrudge them for what they're trying to do. Um. Now, there is there are elements in this group who are violent, there's no question about that. People. There are people we interviewed who are victims of violence. There's a transgroup of people who were beat up repeatedly during the course of their travels. But um, it's a it's an extraordinarily large group. And kind of the way they travel is, uh, they rent, they charter these I don't call the luxury busses, but

there's those big tour buses that you rent. They chartered dozens of them, and they kind of ferry them. They go back and forth, faring them from the first one location the next location, usually roughly between sixty and seventy five to maybe a hundred miles in between each of

the locations. When you get their final resting spot at night, like they have like a campground, if you will, and they have these massive, massive, sort of like circus tents you'd call them, two or three of those where thousands of people can sleep under. There's probably thirty forty fifty little individual tents that families or individuals can can sleep in as well. One thing I'll got again there there's

a lot of layers this onion. The most significant layer of this onion I think is the essentially the partnership that these groups have with the media. The media has essentially created one large lie after another when it comes to this caravan. The largest lie, if not one of the largest lines of my my views, is the demographic makeup of who is in this caravan. So if you see, you know, any image on CNN or on BBC or MSNBC, A New York Times, the Washman Post, what do you see?

You see families. Just every single shot you see his family. If you ask anybody what percent of this group caravan is made up of families, most people tell you, oh, six, because of what they see on mainstream media. It is the it's not even the polar opposite. It's way more than the polar opposite because it mail mail between I would say, seventeen and forty, okay, And so it's it's a bunch of men who are sitting around a lot of guys playing soccer, and they're eating They're very well fed,

three meals a day. There's always they're always hydrated, literally with palettes of these electrolytes, these you know, kind of uh bargain basement gatorade water. Um, it's it is a it's akin to moving an army, moving a division of an army. That's kind of what it feels like when you're there. Is there any do you get any sense that there are people that are kind of in charge of message discipline here? I mean, you know, are there

organizers who are talking to the press. How how are they presenting themselves to folks like you who are obviously uh, you know, there to figure out what's going on. Absolutely, this is again it's a highly organized affair, and pueblos in Fronterras, there's there. There are maybe fifty to a hundred. I think of these people who are on the ground

with them, they are absolutely keeping message discipline. First of all, whenever they see you speaking to a migrant, they will hover around you to see exactly what you're asking, what they're answering. They will try to interject and speak for them. And they also are spending time training the migrants on what to answer. They said, if you if you want the video on camera. These guys are admitting to me that, yes, we are training them to speak to the press. There's

no question about it. Because one of the things they want to do is they want to make sure these guys are they're trying to gain the system essentially right. So the way for them to enter the US is a very simple path. It's asking for asylum. Now whether or not they get it isn't even the point, because once you have said I want asylum, we have to take you into the u S. We let you go into your court date comes up. But they're also training

them in Mexico City. They've had these massive like you know, you know, migrant ted talks where they have these huge UM screens with presentations and in these presentations, and by the way, these presentations are run not only by POPUS in front Terras, the u N is also very very involved in the ground with with helping organize and moving these guys from Location eight Location B. It's important to note, I think, but yeah, they're trained on exactly what to say,

not only they the press, but what to say when they get to the US to make the sure they get the best case possible to qualify for silence status. Here it starts to sound a little bit like some of the things that I saw with the big Occupy, all street rallies where it was all grassroots, except there were a lot of organizers and a lot of people showing up with all kinds of food and and you know, an organized media effort, and you know it wasn't just

people hanging out in the park somewhere. No, No, it's it's it's similar. Very they want to they always want to make it seem like a grassroot with that term AstroTurf. That's that's sense, you what it is, But in a much much larger scale than we saw at at Occupy Wall Street. This is this actually seems very very similar to what we saw with the migrants from Syria, and actually they were in the camps in in in um in uh Syria and Turkey and sorry in Jordan's, but

very similar to to that. The way the media is collaborating with these organizations is striking le similar. I think it's also important to note that um one of the one of the again, one of the main themes that the mainstream media is trying to get across is that why are they leaving Honduras. They're leaving Honduras because there's just it's it's everywhere you go is a is a

day you could die. It's violence is everywhere. I'm not saying that Honduras is a safe place, it's clearly not But south Side Chicago is not safe either, But nobody there is looking for saw in Canada. But the notion that they're leaving because of everyday violence is again one of the big lies they're trying to perpetrate the American people. Couldn't be I wouldn't say further couldn't be further from

the truth, but it's not true. In the video when I when I ask these people a simple question, why are you looking to leave Honduras? So why are you looking to come to America? All their answers followed the same exact theme, job, opportunity, education, that are life from my family. That's it, okay, that's what they told me. They would only mention violence after a peblist in frontis person will come up with in the whisper in their ear and they say, oh, yeah, by the way, I'm

also suffering a lot of violence. We saw a lot of that. By the way, if it was it was so dangerous and so violent there, why are they not saying their their children and their wives first. Why the men going first and leaving their children and their wives back in Honduras to face death. If that was the case, it's not. These people are not psychopaths. These people don't have they have they have empathy for their family, They love their family. They're looking for this is nothing more

than they want an opportunity for a better life. Again, don't get me wrong, I I don't hold I don't begrudge that for them. But the thing is, do we have responsibility taking every person on planet Earth who's looking for a better life? I mean, is to be the end of the US if we did, they're billions of more before and tell everybody else about this, this documentary you've put together. Um, are you hearing there's gonna be

another bigger caravan? Did that come up? Uh? It didn't come up, except that the organization made clear that there's going to be as many caravans as they could afford to to push across. So I would not be surprised if if that was the case, not at all. The first of many Where can people go to watch your documentary? Amy? They can go to my Facebook page, Amy Horowitz. They go to Ammy Hordes on YouTube or on Twitter and you can find it all there. Ammy Horror. It's great.

Talk to the the army. Thanks for coming by the hut and we'll talk to you soon a pleasure. Remember Betsy Devas, she's the Education Secretary's a billionaire philanthropist, seems like a nice lady. Of course, she's for charter school. So that means the left hates her with the burning passion of a or fiery whatever of a thousand sons. Uh. They hate her for that reason. I'm sure a bunch of others that I can't even think of. But she's done something else that's going to get the left all upset.

You see, because of much of the mythology, many of the lies that I've been told on the left for years about what is considered or called campus rape culture, which I would note is not a thing, does not exist. There is no such thing as campus rape culture. It is a construct of the left. Nowhere are their college students gathered together in large numbers who go, yeah, let's go commit a felony sex crime and you know, and come monsters who also will lose their freedoms and destroy

their lives in the process. That that's not a thing. It does not exist, even though the left will pretend, and I think I think CNN a while ago did a documentary series called The hunting ground about college campuses. Wow, so you have that, and then you've also had some prominent leftists in recent years say things like, well, you know, there's there's gonna be some innocent people who get caught up in this whole thing, and you know, that's kind

of a shame for them. But you know, ultimately, the most important thing is that white males are scared, scared that they could get caught on the wrong side of this. And if if that's the case, well then innocent people getting in trouble is a is a small price to pay. I mean, that's really the way they feel that. That is the left perspective on a lot of this stuff. So you've got the the Washington Post reporting on the following and this is gonna get the left really upset.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is going to release a sweeping overhaul all of how colleges and universities must handle allegations of sexual assault and harassment, giving new rights to the accused, including the ability to cross examine their accusers. The proposal is set for at least before Thanksgiving, possibly this week, and replaces less formal guidance issued by the Obama administration.

The new rules would reduce liabilities for universities, tighten the definition of sexual harassment, and allows schools to use a higher standard in evaluating claims of sexual harassment and assault. Wow, look at this. You mean that we're gonna turn this

back from where? What? Where? What was made into during the Obama administration, which was really just an effort to get the left wing base excited, to get the feminist left in a frothy rage about rape culture on campus, and then to say, oh no, don't worry, Obama is dealing with it. Obama's handling this by essentially making it impossible to prove your innocence, including some of these cases.

I mean, you had Kirsten Gillibrand, for example, invite Mattress Girl, I forget her name, m A something or other Mattress

Girl to a State of the Union address. Mattress Girl was a Columbia University student who carried her mattress around with her all over campus as a form of protest over what she says was a sexual assault, a sexual assault that when the NYPD investigated, including looking at text messages between her and her supposed assailant, who, by the way, she had had many consensual sexual encounters with but just so happened that then there were something that she did

that she didn't say, we're consensual. Uh. The NYPD is like, we can't we can't prosecute, we can't even arrest there.

There's no proof here, there's nothing. Uh. And and yet she became something of a of a folk hero on the left because even if you're lying, if it's about sexual assault and the target is a white male, the left things that you're doing a service, even if you're fabricating evidence or even if you're changing your story, it raises awareness of the broader problem you see of sexual assault. And so in that in that sense that they're they're fine with it. They don't see a problem with all

of this. So uh And I think Betsy Devas is going to get a whole lot of pushback, obviously from from the left. They're they're going to freak out about this. But in the post Kavanaugh era, I'm glad that there is finally some sanity that is being restored here. I'm glad that we are just beginning to see that people have had enough of the nonsense. All right, we don't

want to be told anymore. That the accused have no rights and that these kangaroo courts that operate in colleges when it comes to sexual assault, they're going to continue. So high five for the Department Education. Good work, Betsy div Us. Online security is essential. You're doing so much important stuff on your computer on your smartphone all the time, and if you're out there using public WiFi, you don't know who's looking at your stuff right there, hackers and

bad folks out there that want to access your information. Oh, by the way, some of those social media platforms and internet browsers used, they're also basically spying on you and sharing your information. Express VPN locks all that down, my friends, and keeps you secure online cost less than seven bucks a month. Express VPN is so easy to use and it is the number one virtual private network service by tech Radar. Okay, so you've got to check them out

for yourself. Express VPN is the answer. Protect your online activity today and find out how you can get three months at Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package. Again, visit express vpn dot com slash buck to learn more. But I believe the law hasn't been followed from the beginning. You know, those early votes, the last time they were cast was the Sunday before

the election. By law, those are supposed to be downloaded and sent to the state at by seven thirty pm on the night of the election. It's a regularity after a regularity. And as far as stealing is concerned, let me just make this one point on that that's what election lawyers. The election lawyers are not coming to Florida to make sure every vote is counted. The reason why election lawyers get involved is to make sure as many votes as possible for their client is counted and as

many votes as possible for their opponent is disqualified. And when you have an office, this in an office, an election office, this incompetent and this law breaking, it creates enormous opportunity for those sorts of arguments to be made and suddenly the elections decided by a judge or by lawyers, not by voters the way they're supposed to be. Margot

Ruby o' nails it here on Florida. I mean, he's completely correct, and yet there's there's there was a effort to discredit him from the very beginning, like, oh, how could Marco Rubio say such a thing? What do you mean this Broward County office, in particular lieutenant the election with Brenda Snipes the top. Well, by the way I think I started earlier today, is not willing to rule out a possible political career beyond this. So to me, that says that she knows the Democrats are pretty happy

with this whole situation. At a minimum, these irregularities leave open the possibility of a Senate seat going for the Democrats that would not have otherwise, and a governorship, So you know, they're perfectly happy with her. They're extending this thing out there, adding she's she's adding time to the clock and that maybe all that's necessary, or that may

be all they need to do. But back to back to Rubio's point, you know, there are all these irregularities, and they're the very irregularities that you would need if you were trying to engage in fraud, if you were trying to sheet and do shady things here. So why is it at all strange for us to sit here and say, well, we'll hold on a second. And I can't be the way that this goes. This this is unacceptable.

This isn't a situation where we can all sit around and say to ourselves, yeah, you know so, there's a little problem here, a little problem there, No nobody, they'll excuse me. They have yet to come up with any justification as to why they have not been able or we're not able to finish this process in a timely fashion.

And on top of that, when you look at these areas of discretion that are gonna be open about overcounts and undercounts, or over votes and under votes rather, uh, that just means that you're gonna have people, and they're gonna be partisan lawyers who are showing up in this whole process and saying, well, I'm going to argue that that's for my side, and I'm gonna argue that that's not for the other side, which changes this whole process. This is supposed to be a neutral process. This is

not supposed to be. Oh, I'm gonna try to advocate for my side through the process. The votes are cast, there are guidelines for how they are cast, the votes are counted. But what the Democrats are doing is trying to confuse things by making it sound like Republicans say don't count the books. No Republican has on on record in public that I am aware of anywhere in the country said, don't cast legally, don't count rather legally cast ballance. I don't know if a single person who has done that,

I don't know of one, not one. But they talk about it like that's going on all the time. Um and and they also talk about any election integrity measures, any rules and regulations that are in place as somehow uh racist or an effort at voter suppression, and all that, all that kind of stuff. I mean, here's the Florida Attorney General, Pam Bondi, on what the law actually is

in Florida. For example, some interesting details here play for Florida law expressly and unambiguously states that you must have signature verification. They want to change the law after the ballots have all been cast and go back retroactively and and change our law, which is it's it's ridiculous. And Bill Nelson just needs to take a deep breath and concede. Yes, Bill Nelson does need to take a deep breath and concede.

But you know what he's not. He's not going to I can assure you he is absolutely not looking to help the process come to a conclusion that would allow the American people to feel confident that the results are the real results. Um. By the way, the media coverage of this all has been fascinating. They focused so little on the irregularities and so much more on just this count every vote, count every vote, as we played, Yes,

I mean, they're they're part of the chorus here. They are adopting and have adopted the talking points of the left on this election because they understand that there's there's at least a chance here anything other than what they had the first night, which is their candidates losing they think is a better thing. And that's where you get, um, that's where you get into all of this partisanship dressed

up as journalism. By the way, speaking of that, we'll talk more later on the show about this lawsuit from from CNN saying that you know, you can't pull Acosta's hard pass. You're you're not allowed to do that, which I gotta say is you know, pretty pretty remarkable. I mean, I mean, maybe I'm I've heard from some people that I actually respect that this lawsuit may go against the White House, which just shocks me. I That to me

is just crazy. There's just no way. But it's really going to turn on whether or not this is arbitrary because they have to be able to pull the hard pass of somebody who's a correspondent White House for unruly, for out of line behavior. But otherwise the whole thing turns into a free for all. Right, so that has to happen, and then it's all gonna be about, well, is there is there an objective standard you can apply here for basically, is a Costa a jackass and is

his jackassory? And the answer is yes, But is his jackassery so egregious that you could say it is not arbitrary to say, all right, jackass, no more of this for you. That's what this will really all turn on. Um play kIPS. We we wanted to give you a sense, is to if we're going to look at this through the lens of whether or not it is an arbor trade decision for the White House to pull Acosta's credentials years what what he sounds like when he's using those credentials.

Play seven. I'm not sure this press conference was ever on the rails, as you heard numerous times during this news conference, the President was just not in touch with reality. All could be different than the border security, Sir. Border security can mean agents that could be more fencing. It doesn't necessarily mean a physical and that's part of the negotiation that we expect Congress to have. Jim. I'm not negotiating with you. I'm gonna let Congress take care of that.

But we're witnessing right now is just this erosion of our freedoms in terms of covering the president United States. Last three news conferences, Wolf, all of the questions to the American news media have have been handled by conservative press, and I think will if there's no other way to describe it. But the fixes in it was that your liberty. But let me ask you a question home to the world for people to session. Do you believe to this country?

And they're not always going to be highly skilled Jim, Jim, Jim, I appreciate your speech. I think we saw the president's true colors today, and I'm not sure they were red, white and blue. Yeah, there you go, there's your objective. White House corresponded for c ITN mouthing off all the time and and getting aggressive with various members of the White House staff. I just gotta say I'm fine with

the questions being I want to say fine. I don't think you can pull his credits for annoying questions, obviously, right, But when you are refusing to respect basic decorum, when the president says next question and you keep yelling and you won't give up your microphone, that's really almost like a civil disobedience act. You know that that's a Lynskyite in its approach to getting your name and your face and your point of view out there, which is to

just gum up the works. Reminds me of the old O Lynskey idea that if you really want to mess up a a facility, a government facility or something, just have people sit in all the bathroom stalls all day and then see what happens. What are you gonna do tell people they can't take all day in the bathroom. I mean, you know that this is the kind of stuff that the activist left will pull and they'll say,

we're not doing anything. You know, it's really it's really concerted passive aggressive ism, and with a costa you have passive aggressive garbage going on all the time. Anyway, this guy part of me really doesn't want to discuss the situation because it's just he's just now way more famous. I mean, this guy is this guy could be doing local news in you know, Tuscaloosa or something. I mean, this guy is not somebody who has any no offense to Tuscaloosa. It's great stuff going on there. Uh, this

guy is just some rando. And yet now because of his hashtag resistance theater, he's he's a millionaire and he's famous. So I don't know, maybe he know of something the rest of us don't, but at least the rest of us aren't a bunch of ass clowns. That's important. Team. By now, you've probably heard me talk about snippy dot com, a new social media site. If you looked at snippy dot com and left, look again. Thousands of my listeners have joined snippy dot com, expressing their opinions and stirring

up lively conversations. Snippy is an unbiased social media platform. It's all about conversation and community. Snaby not only encourages freedom of expression, but guarantees its users the ability to discuss topics freely without suppression from administrators. Look. I just boasted on Snippy earlier this week. And let me tell you, it's fun to see how much interaction I'm getting there, at how much people are really appreciating that there's no

nonsense from administrators. Snippy is a place where everyone is free to express their thoughts and share their opinions. It's totally free to join, open to everyone to join us at snippy dot com and let your opinion matter. No shadow banning and no suppression of conservative thought ever. Now with an updated user interface and exciting new teachers. Also available in the Apple App Store and available for Android, Snippy your new alternative social media. Hey, this is Hillary

Clinton coming to you on a very important day. Last Tuesday, on election Day, you voted, you got your sticker, you posted it on Instagram, and you felt great about doing your civic duty. But today is a national Run for Office Day, and I'm here to ask you to think about running for office. There is no better way to make an impact. Be the voice for your neighbors, your family, your kids, even your dog or your cat. And take it from me, it's not always easy, but it's always

worth it. What the heck does that mean, Producer Mike, Did she just say be the voice for your dogs? And your cats? She sure did. How does one be the voice? I mean, I love dogs, cats are okay? How is one the voice for one's dogs or cats? I'm just wondering, what what do you think? Hillary? Hello? What was she going for there? I don't know. They're trying to get you know, illegals and felons the vote. Maybe she's angling to get animals the vote. Now, be

a voice for your dogs? And I mean, you know, is that I want to start a conspiracy theory that with Hillary? You know, she says the dogs and cats like that's a sign to her little bot believers that you know, the eagle has landed. What what you know? It's I guess that's more like a parrot than an eagle, But it's Hillary. Nonetheless, she's still There's only the only reason she's still out there is because she's running everybody. Okay,

can we just can we just stop the nonsense? Can we stop pretending that that is not what is going to happen here? It's very clearly what's gonna happen. And just for a little a little trip down memory lane, because you know, there's a Monica Lewinsky documentary coming out on a and e. So if we're talking about the Clinton's, we can talk about what it was like back in

the day. Ah. Yes, those those glorious time times when the Oval Office had an occupant who you could trust and you knew was ethical and decent and and fit for the role of commander in chief. Uh, ladies, and I lock to grab ladies. That guy. Monica Lewinsky spoke about this for the Any documentary and you know it's it's a it's an important reminder that I mean, this guy really took advantage of this young girl. I mean this was I know she was of age, she was

in her early twenties. But he's the president of the United States. He's a leader of the free world. Never mind the fact he's also married and has a kid, and he uses that power dynamic in order to prey upon somebody who is an employee. By the way, I mean it is a white house intern. I mean a white house intern, folks. Woof and no wonder, no one takes the Left seriously on their moral scolding playclip nine.

I just I felt terrible. I was scared, and I just I was mortified and afraid of what this was gonna do to my family, and you know, I still was in love with Bill at the time. Um so I just I felt really responsible. He destroyed this woman's life that often gets left out of here. I mean the late night comics made it all. Uh ha ha oh Bill Clinton, Oh just Bill being Bill. He destroyed her life and Hillary was the henchman helping in all this.

You know, they always cover up that part. Hillary was a tremendous enabler of all the worst stuff that Bill Clinton was doing, all the worst stuff that he was up to when he was in the White House. And before then, you know, she was out there trashing women that were coming full word with allegations that we're true. We're not talking about like Havanaugh thirty six years ago bs allegations with no proof. We're talking about this happened last week and here's the dress check the d n A. Sorry,

but that's what happened. And you know, Lewinsky is finally now. I think because the Left is trying to come to terms with this, they're willing to accept her, and they're not coming to terms with it because of the moral implications. They just know that they have to kind of purge this from the system because otherwise, especially if they think that there's gonna be a Clinton dynasty. Maybe it's Chelsea.

But they have to deal with this so that it can't be used again to offset the Clintons, you know, to offset the Clinton approach to politics. Um, but there there was real there was a real human toll here in all this. There was real damage done. And that's why finally, it's interesting to see that the left has to come to grips with it at some level. Though, as I said, I think this is really in their interest. I think this is a function of they. Um, they

really know that this is a liability. It's a political liability. So now Monica can be portrayed as a sympathetic figure, whereas before, you know, they would make jokes about her, and I mean it was just all haha, Bill Clinton, Oh it's just his sex life. Oh, back off the whole thing. This is while he's president. By the way, people compare some of the Trump stuff to the Bill Clinton stuff, and I would say, hold on a second, Phil Clinton was doing this stuff while he was president

in the oval office. That is different from anything that that Trump is even alleged to have done. And there's you know, there's nobody who's They would say, oh, Trump's sexual assault. They they use sexual assault in the broadest sense to mean, oh, he tried to kiss a woman, or oh he tried to grab it a woman, which you know, if she doesn't want you to, it's not okay. Bill Clinton is accused of holding somebody down and and

and and raping her. Bill Clinton is accused credibly on the record by a woman by named woman of raping her, and journalists who have interviewed her have finally come out and said, yeah, she's she's credible, and that Now this is when we finally get the the Oh, let's let's take a look at what really happened here, and let's see. Please, this is this is the the whole thing. But the Left is a moral abomination. That's that's really the truth. In general.

They pretend and the sick thing is they pretend to be the ones who care so much about the poor, to care so much about minorities, and to care so much about the downtrodden, and reality, the left is amoral at best an immoral on many issues. It's just about the pursuit of power for what is a a worldview

dominated by a collectivist ethic, a collectivist mindset. Oh, by the way, if we're gonna talk about coming to turn arms with this and finally getting past what happened there by going through having some form of psychological reconciliation for the for the Democrat Party. Here is Bill Clinton during an interview in June on this whole Lewinsky situation. Played ten. But you didn't apologize to her, at least according to to folks that we've talked to, there was never an apology.

I have not talked to her. Do you feel I thought, doesn't or an apology. It's a scummy guy still celebrated by Democrats. They'll still talk about him like he's some great political map. By the way, you want to talk about votes and sketchy things happening. I didn't get fifty of the vote the first time around, and making president, I couldn't even get half the country to vote for him. But oh yes, he's such a great, a great and

a brilliant mind, brilliant mind. How why I mean, quite honestly, the guy just is a talented on tour and b S artist, brilliant mind. And it's amazing with people, you know, when they're forced fettered enough, they'll believe. We also will never give in a senator card and said we'll never given on voting rights. We have seen what if Stacy Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it. It's clear. It's clear, and I would say I say that publicly.

It's clear. There you have Shared Brown speaking in Georgia and doing something that I thought was undermining democracy. I thought you weren't allowed to do this. Oh my gosh, you're not allowed to hurt the integrity of elections by making accusations. By the way, he's not even just making general accusations. He is straight up saying if Stacy Abrams doesn't win the Georgia gubernatorial race, there had the Republicans cheated.

This is straight up sore loserism. You know, this is straight up somebody who doesn't care, um, doesn't care what the heck is really going on on the ground. He's just you know, Shared Brown from Ohio here is being

a demagogue and saying stuff that's a disgrace. But his whole, his whole speech that he gave here, this is just earlier today where he's talking about what's going on in Georgia, and and essentially what his version of the Republicans stealing an election is like, you got to hear the rest

of this. What they're trying to do in Florida, to the gubernatorial Canada, and to the Senate candidate running for reelection, what they tried to do in Ohio with some success by voter perging, what they did in Georgia when they shut down rural precincts that were predominantly African Americans, where many people simply don't have transportation to get to the polls. That's what they do. They can't win elections because there's

way more of us than there are them. So many falsehouits from Sharad Brown here, so many lies, mistruths, half truths. This whole notion of a stolen election because you don't like the laws that are in place is doing violence to the notion of a stolen election. If the laws are obeyed, the election is not stolen. If you don't think that access for minority and rural communities is perfect,

that doesn't mean that Republicans stole the election. This notion also that they are automatically more of them than us. Democrats love this. They always think there's more of them than us. Whenever they lose the election, it's never because they just don't have good ideas. The American people just don't want them to be in charge. There's always some procedural problem, there's always cheating from the other side. These people are babies. The Left is a bunch of babies.

When it comes to elections, they just are wow wow. He goes on. They can't win elections fairly. They win elections by redistricting and reapportionment, in voter suppression, in all the ways they try to scare people, particularly people of color. How they make it hard for people in college camps is, especially community college, where they were more low income people and more people of color. We know those despicable laws are often aimed that way, and we must make sure

obviously that every votes counted in Georgia and Florida. Yeah, of course, back to the back to the talking points here about oh, we just want all the votes to be counted, and then back to the the favorite argument ender that Democrats are ever able to offer up, which is that they they really do believe that they are the ones who are not racist, and that Republicans are racist. That's what That's what it all comes down to. All these arguments over Florida and over voting and voting rights

and all this. They just think on the one side you got the good guys, and on the other side you got the bad guys. And the bad guys are the Republicans who are just oh so racist, always so racist. I'm just wondering when they take note of the fact that the Republicans in Florida gott of the Hispanic vote. But but I guess it's just all racism. It's all

racism Republican side. When are we allowed to talk about what is very clear in the Democrat Party, by the way, which is an open animosity toward white males as a group. There is this thing. Anytime you want to say something and get applause from a bunch of left wing morons, all you have to do is look at that room full of white males. Is that okay? There happened to be white people and there's a room of them. Why is that bad? You can make any disparaging remark you want,

if you're a lefty about white males. You you can make any jokes you want about white males. And not only do people let it slide that they think it's great, they think you're clever, they think you've really added something interesting to the debate or to discourse, or whatever it is. They love to just pound white males whenever they get a chance. And this is really political analysis for idiots, which is what you see more and more on the left.

And they wonder why there are some people who say, hold on a second, maybe the really, maybe the really destructive thing in our politics right now is not Trump. What if I know, stay with me here for a second. What if the reason why people in this country over politics, more than in any time in recent memory, perhaps in

fifty years, are at each other's throats. What if the reason is the very identity politics and left wing intersectionality that progressives push at every opportunity, celebrate at every turn. What if that's what's really exacerbating the divides in this country. Is it just possible that that if we're going to have this conversation about irresponsible rhetoric, which they always want to put on the president, right, Oh it's the president,

maybe it's irresponsible for the left. And I know the left is run by predominantly white male Still, although you of Nancy Pelosi and about to speak of the House. But a lot of very prominent white males on the left too, But they're just espousing the ideology. Doesn't matter they're white males. There is an anti white male bias and anti white male animosity that is one of the

defining characteristics of the American left. Now, you know, this is why when they talk about the patriarch, or they're not talking about men of color, they're talking about white males. When they're talking about white privilege, they're obviously talking about

white males. All these things. I mean, they throw around the term white supremacy now for any government policy that they think has a disproportionate impact on minorities that is negative, or even when people try to push back against the racial entitlement state that has been created by the left, where you get racial benefits like affirmative action and special hir rank, etcetera, etcetera. Even that now that effort to have the law be race neutral or color blind, that

is considered white supremacy by the left. Now, it is hard to keep up with these people and the changing terminology that they utilize. But Sharad Brown there gave you a real sense of what the whole line is, which is that elections that the Left loses are inherently illegitimate, that even when the laws are adhered to, the laws

themselves are illegitimate. And this is when they'll say an election is stolen because of voter suppression, even if the quote voters suppression resulted from entirely legal means, even if the voters suppression was lawful in the sense that it was just things like voter I D or we're not going to operate a polling place in that place, you got to go to this other place. But Democrats rely on the mob, as you know, they rely on rabble rousing as a central theme. This is what they call

it community organizing, and I'd call it rabble rousing. Uh. And the Democrat belief is that whomever they can get to cast a vote for their cause is somebody that should be brought into the faults, should be should be voting. They don't make any distinctions here. They don't make any distinctions about whether or not somebody is a citizen. That don't care about that. If they had their way, they would change the law such that you would have non

citizens voting. I'm sure of that, And I really wish that question would get asked if some prominent Democrats, because they wouldn't I can tell you this, they wouldn't even want to be on the record opposing non citizens voting, so they would give you some kind of mealy mouth well on the one hand, on the other they wouldn't want to answer that question, I assure you. So maybe that's something that I'll try to get and and push

to some Democrats that I know. Maybe that would be That would be a very interesting thing, I think, to be able to um get them on the record. Only the American people could really know the extent to which Democrats don't care about the laws, not just when it comes to immigration, but I think also when it comes to laws that govern elections. It really just does not

matter to them. They do not have much of an interest at all in adhering to election laws because they view their cause progressive is in the transformation of America as so righteous and the rules that are in place as just being put it put there by the white male patriarchy, that there's no need to adhere to any of that. That they would be they'd be suckers to adhere to that. That's how they really feel. Just wish the American people would know that, and then we could

try to tune out all this. Oh, just count the votes. That's not what they want to do. Our focus has put a knife through the heart of that argument. You won't see the Republicans doing that very much anymore. What it did do. What they did do is explode the deficit. As a result, people saw it as selfish, narrowly focused, dangerous, and irresponsible. And so with the Senate map wildly tilted in republicans favor, we're at worst only one seat worse off than we were when we stood here two years ago.

And if Bill Nelson wins, which I believe he has a very good chance of doing, will be even Ah. Chuck Schumer, my gosh, I can't believe we got to just keep hearing from this guy forever. He's gross so do puplicit is so full of crap. A few things here. First of all, whatever Democrats complain about Republicans and the depths, to just remember the Barack Obama of our twenty two trillion dollars in debt. Barack Obama is responsible for about ten trillion of that. And remember the debt is something

that's been accumulating over many, many, many decades. Barack Obama is responsible for almost half, almost half of our massive national debt. So Democrats lecturing anybody on this is is just laughable. It's just completely and utterly ridiculous. It is in fact preposterous, and we should all be clear on that. Now. As to his point about the Senate, this is concerning election night. It seemed like it was better for Republicans

on the night. Then it turned out to be the fact that Cinema, who is a pretty bizarro candidate in many ways, someone who has said incredibly stupid things publicly in the past, including about how an American going to join the Taliban is no big deal, and lots of stuff like that. But Cinema is now the Senator from Arizona.

Although I heard today I don't know if this is gonna happen, if it has happened when I go to air, that they're going to replace the um McCain's seat, that they're going to put mc sally in that seat until there until there's actually a special election, so mc sally may actually be the Senator from Arizona. That's what I heard today from some sources. I'm not sure if it's broken yet as a story, but I was hearing that

in the newsroom, so mc sally maybe the centator from Arizona. Anyway, that all said, Democrats managed to hold on pretty well in the Senate, despite the fact that, as Chuck Schumer says, I love this a map tilted towards Republicans. The states are what the states are. Every state has two senators. He just means that this time around, it was it just happened to be pretty favorable in terms of the states that Republicans were able to try to win. But

there was no you know, chickannery here, there's no mouthfeasans. Well, what he's doing there is he's playing in. Chuck Schumer is trying to play into that suggestion of, oh, there's jerrymandering, because I love it when liberal journals all of a sudden they're jerrymandering the states. You know with the senator the Senate elections where jerrymandered. No, I'm pretty sure there's only two senators per states, so there's no jerrymandering. It's

just who lives in that state. But who cares about the facts when there's a narrative to run around where it cares about any of that. But this is just another another moment where we gotta take a step back and realize that, um, we are If there's a Supreme Court vacancy over well, who knows who it will be, But if there is a Supreme Court vacancy, it opens up the next two years, which is possible. I don't think it's a certainty by any stretch, but it's definitely possible.

You're gonna have a fight over Amy Coney Barrett that is similar in ferocity to what you saw for Kavanaugh, because they're gonna be a few. They're gonna be a few, um female Republican senators you know Collins comes to mind, who might not be willing to vote for Amy Coney Barrett. This is just gonna turn into a pure debate over abortion. It's it's gonna be ugly, it's gonna be nasty. People don't want to be told that they've been advocates for

murder for going on now what forty some years. That they don't want to be told that, even if that's what they've been, They do not want to be told that they have been advocating for the genocide of the unborn, that they've been using taxpayer dollars to do it, and that the left wing Democrat Party of America is defined now more by its solidarity over abortion than any other issue, and therefore the very foundation of the Democratic Party is immoral and evil. They don't want a court to reinforce

that notion. They don't want a court to come along and say, you know what, that's actually true. You guys have been advocating for something that is horrific, that is immoral,

that is that is disgraceful. So you can imagine how ugly things are going to get when there is that assuming there is before the election another Supreme Court seat that opens up, and that the left is gonna they're gonna pull out all the stops and do everything that they possibly can on that, but also is going to be viewed as a chance by the left to not just win the presidency, but to flip the Senate as well, And that means that we need to be prepared for

a possibility of assuming that they're able to defeat Trump, which I don't think they can. But Democrats aren't just looking to get Trump out there, looking to have unified Democrat controlled government once again like they did for the first two years of Obama. What they see at the end of this this political war, this political trench warfare that's just beginning to just beginning to show it's it's

earliest state is right now. But what they see down the line, I think is unified Democrat control of the House, the Senate, and the White House. And if they get it, my friends, they will pass amnesty, they will pass single payer or something closer to it. Maybe they won't get all the way, but they'll move is closer a single payer. So after all this to get to this point with Trump and the Trump movement, we face political calamity in already, make no mistake about it. Be aware of it, and

Chuck Schumer knows it. You know what's not smart posting randomly on the Internet and hoping when you've got a job opening that you're gonna get the best applicants. But you know what is smart going to zip recruiter, dot com slash buck to hire the right person. Zip recruiter doesn't depend on candidates finding you, It finds them for you.

It's powerful matching technology scans thousands of resumes and identifies people with the right skills, education, and experience for your job, and it actively invites them to apply so you get qualified candidates fast. That's why zip recruiter is rated number one by employers in the US. This rating comes from hiring sites on trust Pilot with over a thousand reviews. Right now, my listeners can try zip recruiter for free at this exclusive web address, zip recruiter dot com slash buck.

That's zip recruiter dot com slash buck. I have used zip recruiter. I've used my own account there to hire great people for the hill where I work, where I've got my TV show. Try it for yourself. You'll see some of my favorite people came to us via zip recruiter. Go to zip recruiter dot com slash buck because it's the smartest way to hire. Let me walk you through the timeline. So today we're we're in the filing going through the paperwork that the case will get assigned to

a judge. We've asked for an immediate hearing, either today if we can do it. We gave the White House notice this morning um or as soon as possible tomorrow to get a temporary or that would would immediately restore Mr our costs credentials. Then the way the process works, there's a it has to be within twenty five days of hearing on what's called a preliminary junction, which is

another temporary but longer order. And if at that point, if if we prevail on the White House is still fighting it, then you go on to a trial on the merits and hearing on the merits. So that can unfold over a period of months um or or even longer. But that's why we need immediate relief because, as you know, every news is happening every second, every minute in a White House, you never know what's going to happen. And every day that a reporter can't be they're covering the news,

they're injured in the public's deprived of important information. The public isn't deprived of anything other than a bunch of jackassary because Jim Acosta does not have the privilege, and it is a privilege of a hard pass to the White House, meaning that he can get into the White House any day he wants, with the rest of the

press pool come and go as he pleases. So that was CNN's lawyer here CNN has filed the lawsuit as I met you yesterday, where they are claiming that there is you know, harm done to the First Amendment, did Jim Acosta's career and all the rest of it because he does not have on a temporary basis, at least now it's been temporarily taken from him. He does not

have a so called hard pass anymore for the White House. Now, what what I would note about all of this is, first of all, they are pretending that this is something that you just get to have as a journalist, and that if you don't have this, you're replutely harmed. I don't get a hard pass. I'd love a hard pass. I go to the White House every day if I could, but I don't have the connections. For whatever reason, I do not manage to qualify via my job at the Hill.

I don't think it would work on radio. But at the Hill we do reporting and have reporters out on Capitol Hill and covering all things going on in the world of politics. And I don't get a hard pass. So is my First Amendment infringed? Folks? And if not, everybody gets one. And there are a lot of news organizations who don't are all of their First Amendment rights infringed by the government. You know, there is some degree of discretion here. You do not have a right to

be given access to the White House pressipool. In fact, the President does not have any constitutional or legal duty to give press conferences at all. Period. This is where the left starts to do their whole Oh, it's about a substantive right, which is a fancy way usually of saying the right gives me things that I want that I can pretend full under the right. You have a substantive right because of you know, the right to uh, the pursuit of happiness or whatever. You've got a substantive

right to free housing. You've got a substantive right apparently to have the White House invite you, Wayne, if you're Jim Acosta. This whole thing is ridiculous. But you know, I gotta say I'm surprised at some level to see that Fox News has joined along with many other news organizations. That does not surprise me. But but Fox News is officially joined and amicus brief here and they're standing in solidarity with Jim Acosta and CNN on this one, at

least in out of corporate level. I'm surprised by that. Maybe there's something here that I am missing, Maybe maybe there's some aspect of this that I'm not aware of. But from a pure First Amendment jurisprudence perspective, I don't understand that this is even a thing. I don't understand that this is even a case. There are I think fifty other CNN journalists and reporters who do have a hard pass in the White House, and there are dozens and dozens of other news organizations that are there that

have free and unfederal access. This is about punishing one individual for unruly behavior and for hijacking essentially some of these some of these press events and trying to get them to stop. And they think that there's a First Amendment issue here. I mean, I gotta say, there's a there's a really good piece uh in in the Federalist Today that you know, and and it's it's sarcasm, right, I mean, this is this is just making a case by going in the opposite direction. Here's here's a here's

an example of it. Um. This is by Neil Pollock. The Pieces Act now to save the free press before it's really truly desperately too late. Uh. Whether you cover the white House, big farmer, or the local water board, it's time to hide your belongings and kiss your children, for the Gulag surely awaits unless we act now. This is Neil Neil Pollock here he writes quote. It's long been said, especially by me, that I'm the leading advocate and protector of the freedom of the press in this country.

I've covered every president since William Howard Taft, though admittedly I haven't left my house on Mount Winchester since two thousand and three because that's where they deliver the plasma. And I can say with a certainty that the fourth the state is under assault in America like it's never been before. Whether you cover the white House, big farmer, or the local water board, it's time to hide your belongings and kiss your children, for the Gulag surely awaits

unless we act now. Um, he's just making fun of this whole thing. Uh, you know, he says, look around you. We live in a society where citizens, whether employed by press outlets or not, don't have a right to speak their mind at all times on multiple platforms to as large an audience they could possibly muster are every utterance is being monitored. People disappear constantly because they have the

courage to criticize the government. Soon, nothing will remain but coal working yes men in maga hats, while the rest of us try to work up a sweat in the re education camps. Journalists and journalists dis is. Fellow loins of the press rally around my game. But we cannot let Trump waited the sort of hercules over our heads. It's time to raise up and take a and take a stand. Uh, what are he's saying? Here's what a joke?

What a joke? These press First Amendment martyrs really are? Okay, the entirety of the press corps hates Donald Trump, with the exception of about fifteen or of it. In total, I mean, the press is completely arrayed against this guy. They pretty much openly despise him. They can't think of

enough ways to say that they hate him. Not a single journalist, unlike in the Obama years, has been prosecuted for doing his job in this country or had any adverse government reaction taken against him in the course of his normal First amun protected duties. A lot of work, but we're supposed to believe that Trump is such a threat to the press. Criticizing the press is not the same as being a First Amendment threat to the press.

And this is where you see the journals are really a very thin skinned, whiney bunch of cry babies, and especially the TV journals are really overpaid and incredibly self indulgent. They believe this crap that they're the guardians of the Republican without them, what without them, we wouldn't be able to instantaneously share information and gather news in the hundreds the thousands of different local news bureaus across the country.

We really need the left wing cable news networks to be weighing in or else we'll all just be lost. Oh my gosh, what will we do. The patriarchy, Oh, the humanity, it's terrible. I just think it's a cust thing. It's so old. And look, he's he's like the trumpy bear of journalists in that it's all marketing, baby, it's

all promotion. And he knows that he knows that what he's doing here is establishing himself forever as a hero to the hashtag resistance, that he's making a mockery of journalism in general, and more specifically of CNN's claims to being an objective source of news that he doesn't care about any of that. All that matters to him is this gives him an opportunity to build his brand, and that CNNs filed this lawsuit. Look, maybe I mean they've

got Ted Olsen, who is a Supreme Court solicitor. I mean, he's a guy who's dealt with very big cases before he signed off for this. Maybe they're gonna make some

big First Amendment issue of this. But all I can tell you is that if if it's a First Amendment issue for a constant to have his press pass taken away, then I better file a lawsuit because I've never been given a White House hard pass, and lots and lots of my colleagues who are much smarter, much more diligent, and much more objective in their reportage than Jim Acosta

have never been given a hard pass. So I think this is something that we we really need to keep an eye on, because if this is just yet again the hashtag judiciary getting back at Trump, that does violence the first ambent, because then the first aments just starts to mean whatever the anti Trump folks say it means, and that in and of itself, I think is really problematic. I think that leads us down a very dangerous path because you know the same thing will not be extended

to a Democrat president. Just look at Obama, the stuff that he got away with, the worst president when it comes to press freedom in a hundred years, and the press was just constantly giving him a BackRub on national TV every day starts the same way. Team for the Buckman Black Rifle Coffee. I drink just black. I think it's delicious, and I drink it black. I don't need any coffee. I certainly don't need any coffee that has lots of creamer in it. Right, I want black rifle coffee.

I want the best coffee you can get anywhere, and I'm not putting soy milk in it. I'm drinking it as it is as nature intended. Drink coffee from a company that is all about freedom and America. Black Rifle Coffee is roach to order, guaranteeing you fresh, delicious coffee with every order. They send it right to you. And by the way, they give a portion of their sales to veteran and first sponder causes nothing cures a bad attitude, quite like starting your day with the most American coffee ever,

Black Rifle Coffee? Is it Black Rifle Coffee dot com? Slash Buck and receive fifer cent off your order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot Com, slash Buck for fent off again Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck. What do I mean when I say that the left is crazy? Am I just exaggerating for effect? Am I just frustrated with their policies? You'll hear me say this, sometimes the

left is crazy. Some of you may take from that that I'm just finding a term of disparagement for bad ideas that they have, or that I just disagree so so strenuously from their position on something, that I'm just calling them crazy because how can they Only a crazy person could not see it my way. No, in fact, I actually mean they're They're wacko. There's something wrong with them.

They they have a problem that the left wing ideology that is ascendant in this country among Democrats it has been for a long time, has brought people to abandon common sense, to become little automatons that spew talking points and support ideas that no normal rational reasonable person ever could Let me give you some examples of this. This from the Federalists piece by Joy Pullman. We're a school in Florida. We're talking with Florida a lot these days,

but this is a very different kind of story. The school in Florida has punished a teacher because of a transgender student policy that went into effect that no parents were told about, that not even the students were told about. Let me give you some of the details here. A transgender female at a Florida school district, the Pasco County School District, had declared herself to be a transgender and the school district gave her unrestricted access to the boys

locker room. I guess we're supposed to call her a him, although I challenge the activists on this one. How do we know a her that is transitioning doesn't want one of the other terms that the left sometimes uses. I I don't want to be gender normative in my in my description. If that's what's not called for here? Is it a Z? Does she prefer them a plural pronoun even though it's a single individual. What level of insanity do I have to comport with here in order to

avoid getting offense. I'm just wondering, you know, I'm just asking questions. So this young woman was led into the boys locker room. The boys figured this out when somebody who was obviously physically female was changing next to them, and they were changing as well. Okay, so that's a thing, that's that's happening here. And there was a gag order put in place by school administrators that forbade teachers from even talking about this. So no one's allowed in this

school under pain of suspension or termination. I'm sure no one's allowed to say, hey, there's a girl in the boys locker room. Now. The reason for this is that they don't think that it's really a girl in the boys locker room. I guess it's just another boy in the boy's room. But she's got female genitalia, is biologically female,

she's a young and she's a young girl. They don't give the ages here exactly, but I think we're talking about, you know, probably either early in high school or maybe even junior high based on the way they write this piece. But then that's not that's not enough. So you've got these boys who now are changing with a girl, which I could by the way, that, you know, there's a lot of people are going through a lot of changes, especially early on in high school. There could be some

embarrassment about things with the body and everything else. You know. I guess the left now embraces this idea that boys and girls should just have the same locker room. Why not? I want to know why they think that shouldn't be the case, because they certainly think it's the case here.

But that's not even enough, that's not even something that we need to you know, we we can say that this is all we're focusing on here, because there's also a male pe teacher, male physical education teacher, who refused to observe this very young right, this this would be somebody who is uh, you know, clearly below eighteen, this is a minor, would not observe this naked female minor as part of his duties. And he's a bad guy

according to the school. For this, he was removed from his job and transferred for another to another school as disciplined for quote, not doing his job in the locker room. This is the kind of stuff I mean when I say that the left has lost its mind. This is the kind of policy decision that I'm sorry, They're just

wrong and this is not okay. It's embarrassing to those young boys who are here getting completely undressed in front of a biological female, a female, and if they aboloshed a female to young girl, and even worse, they expect a male adult to be comfortable observing and underage female in the locker room just because she happens to believe

that she is in fact male. I'm sorry, but you know, if I were this p teacher, I coached high school soccer, all right, I just take this from the eye perspective if my high school and Heaven for big because I don't think they've gone this far left Jesuit's running, although you never know what the Jesuits if. If when I was coaching high school soccer, I was told that that I had to be in the locker room while there were you know, while my team was changed, I mean,

you know, obviously we would change the locker room. That's fine. If I was told that I had to be observing as part of my job in the locker room, and there was a fifteen or sixteen year old or fourteen or thirty year old girl who was also changing in there, that would make me very I mean I would refuse to observe. That would make me very uncomfortable. I don't

want somebody know what happened. The school changes the policy, and now you're the guy who's been observing the girl who is a young teenager undressing in a locker room. Now I understand that you're not there. Obviously, the pe teacher is not supposed to be gawking at anybody has their dress. But you know you're seeing. You're in the locker room, You're seeing stuff. That's why we sex aggregate the locker rooms. But this is a perfect example of

the left has gone insane. The left no longer adheres to any norms of rational discourse on issues like gender gender identity. You know, this all came about with the Obama administration. Up until the Obama administration, the left had never really been able to get its way on this radical gender identity stuff. You know, Obama was a far leftist. You know, you just had the degrees and the the general approach of a of an elitist politician. But he was a far left guy. I mean ideologically, he was

the most left wing senator in the Senate. When he ran for the presidency, and he pushed very hard on this issue. I will never forget when I believe it was South Carolina was told by the White House, by the Obama administration, you either implement our our preferred transgender rights policies in your school, or we are going to cut off federal funds for your school. And that they were.

They were pulling out all the stops to make sure that girls could use boys bathrooms and lockers and vice versa. This is something the left is really focused on. By the day. I think it's really important. I think they're really crazy. If you're a patchy and impatient, you may be suffering from acute scruffatosis, also known as baby beard. Every year, millions of men suffer through the slow growing,

patchy facial hair known as scruffatosis. But you don't have to Hi, I'm Chris here at the Beard Club Institute. We are dedicated to curing baby beard. That's why we've developed these growth oils and supplements. They're carefully designed to help men like you achieve the full luscious beard of your dreams. Should I grow a beard? A lot of you are like, should we care? The answers probably no, But I was thinking about it today. I was thinking about it today because of this A a study that

fox eight Cleveland sited here way better than fox eight Columbus. Uh. Here's what they say here. In the Journal of Evolutionary Biology, researchers asked more than eight women to rate men based on their attractiveness as a long term romantic partner. Here's how the facial hair rated number one heavy stubble ten days, two full beards, three light stubble, four clean shaven. Quote.

Beards maybe more attractive women when considering the long term than short term relationships, as they indicate a male's ability to compete success successfully with other males for resources, according to the study, Beards, the researchers researchers said are associated with a man's age and masculine social dominance. A lot of you, for a lot of you fellas out there with your very manly beards right now, I know what's going on. You're shaking your head saying yes, indeed, buck.

We have long known about the awesomeness of a beard, and there's clearly a pro beard movement growing in this country among the ladies out there. Now, do I have to ask Ms Molly if she would like a beard on me. I think the answer is most definitely yes. I don't think I can just go all wild and wooly on the face and assume that that's a good move for me, that everything's gonna be okay. I think that I've got to think this one through a little bit.

The other alternative, however, to going with a beard, would be to go with a Magnum p I style mustache. Now can I practically grow either of these things? Is it really even possible for me? I have almost votes as I go on air right now with a Twitter with a Twitter poll here, and thirty nine of those polled when I asked the question, should Buck grow a beard? Said yes? Man up said no, You're not hip enough and would like me to try the Magnum p I mustache. Now,

can I pull off the Magnum p I mustache? I don't know. That's a That's a tough one. That's a tough one for me to tell you right off the bat. And is anyone ever really able to pull off the greatness of Tom Selleck's mustache from the eighties, I don't know. It was a magnificent thing in its day, but a beard would be fun. I'm gonna be honestly. The problem I have with grow to beard is I get into the itchy phase. I don't know, I guess itchy face, itchy face phase. How do I get around that? Because

that stinks? And then the worst part is if you get the itchy face phase and then you shave, then you look like your face is just it's not good. A lot of a lot of bumps and redness and bad things going on there. So I guess I'm I'm asking because we're going in a roll clothe here in a second. I know there's a lot of fantastic beards out there in Team Buckland. I know a lot of you listening to this show have great manly beards. I'm wondering if you have some advice, but one how to

grow the most fantastic beard possible. And two, if you're gonna grow that fantastic beard, what in fact do you need to do so that it comes in without undo hardship? Right? I mean, so that you don't have to go through the period of, oh my gosh, my face hitches so much, I'm gonna scratch my own face off. And then I gotta get into do I have to some of you.

Years ago, they took some photo promo photos of me and I had unshaven photos and I didn't shave my neck, and a lot of you went all crazy about neck beard, which I don't even know it was a thing. And now I'm told that, actually, if you're a Brooklyn hipster, neck beard is fine. So which is it? Do you have to shave your neck even if you're growing out the beard or his neck beard the oh natural way and therefore that is superior. I'm gonna have to do

some beard research. I don't think I'm going with the zz top folks. I don't think I'm gonna be able to go to that extent, So don't don't get too crazy here. Probably gonna end up looking like an eighteen year old kid he's trying to buy some perhaps blue ribbon from the local seven eleven. I think that's most likely what's gonna happen. But nonetheless I'm giving it some real thought. Should the buck Beard death himself, it is

a question for the ages. I'm hoping to have an answer for you by this Friday, so you can weigh in at facebook dot com slash buck Sexton and up next roll call Team, Buck, it's time for roll call. It's gonna be your last roll call for a full day team because I gotta be out in Illinois, out in Central Illinois for a little speech tomorrow. I we'll miss you all very much, but you will be in excellent hands with the one and only Rahim Kassam filling in for me. I'm sure you're all looking forward to

hearing from Raheem again. He does have a cool accent and also has a lot of incipful things to say with it. Um So, and I'll be back Friday, not to worry, so we'll have a freestyle Friday to other Andy rights. Hey, Buck Shields High, still catching up on your I Heart Radio podcast. I know you're a fan of medieval type war movies. I just saw the movie Outlaw King on Netflix. It was fantastic and based on

the Scottish King Robert the Bruce. Great acting and the final battles on the most tense i've seen a long time. Keep it up, Andy, Andy, thank you so much. It's funny you bring it up because that is my next film that I plan to watch when I'm really kicking back and have the time to enjoy and watch something I'm gonna watch Outlaw King, So I'll have to give

you my recommendate or my review, rather not recommendation. You've recommended it once I've had a chance to check it out, but I'm definitely looking forward to it, really want to see it. And Chris Pine I haven't particularly liked in anything in the past, but I'm open to a breakthrough performance from him with this one, so I will certainly be watching it. Paul writes, Hey, Buck, how about a comedy segment like Rush does with a song or SNL

knockoff impersonation? Uh, Paul, I really liked that idea. The only thing is everything I do on this show, I do so when I write comedy segments, if I do something like Commy Bear, any of that kind of stuff, it's me and it's tough to keep up with all the news to all the analysis and right in some of that those comedy segments that all said, I am certainly going to try to get more of that worked into the show and maybe do some more fun impersonations

here and there. You know we haven't done you know, David Gergen Shoe and Are Nixon, Rigor Fox News White House strategy schessions. And those of you who don't who David Gergan is, you have to just go and watch so you can hear how accurate my impression really is. It's it's quite good. Uh. But yes, I would like to do more comedy like bits on the show, so thank you. Worthy reminder, g I writes, since every vote counts,

can we start making ballots now for Trump? Well, g I, you raise an important point here, which is every every vote is not supposed to count. That's not how elections work. Every legal and in the time frame vote cast counts. So I just wish that the Libs would get the talking points a little more in order here. It's not as simple as just every vote counts, justin right. Movie correction, While die Hard is an amazing movie, I believe you

misspoke today Leo gets was a character from Lethal Weapon. Yes, you are correct, Dustin, I misspoke. I obviously meant Lethal Weapon. And yes, I don't even know what to say. I feel like I might be demoted from a black belt in action movies to a red belt. Right. The red belt was the one before the black belt, at least in the eighties. That was what I thought even though I always thought the red belt looked cooler. You know

the red belt is scarier than a black belt. Uh, Tyler, Right, Joe Pesci, Leo gets It's equals lethal weapon, not die Hard. Don't worry, I won't tell any when you messed up shields, Hi Tyler. I know you guys, all of you got me. I mean, I make a movie mistake, and I get pillaried Ford as I deserve to lethal weapon while a great action movie is not one of and I believe it's lethal weapon to where we have where we have Leo gets making an appearance, but lethal weapon is not

in the same category of action movie greatness. The same degree of action movie greatness is die Hard. Um. I know some of you're gonna disagree with me on that, but I still have my action movie red belt. So hoya, Timothy, same thing, Joe Pesci was lethal weapon. I know, I know, I get Gosh, man, you guys light me up on this one. I know you're correct. You're correct. Chad Rights, Hey Buck, would you please stop labeling neo Nazis as far right wing? They have nothing to do with conservative

or libertarian principles. Heard you describe them that way in

a recent podcast chat, It's It's complicated. Obviously, the Nazis were national socialists, and they were ideologically of the left, but the racial component of national socialism, the racist component of national socialism, has been associated with the right in uh, in common discourse for a long time now, and neo Nazis in the context of this country tend to be about racial purity much more than they are about social welfare programs or collectivism or other things we think about

is on the left. But I'm actually planning to do some research on neo Nazi ideology and uh, well, I've got some plans for a bigger project on radical ideology in this country, but I'll have to save that for another time. Josh writes, buck Brenda Snipes is where she is because of a rhino named Jeb Bush. Yes, she was elected after and since, but this is a story

about a man named Jeb exclamation point. Josh also writes, can't the President and the current Congress passed an amendment to the fiscal year twenty nineteen budget to cut the houses budgets so they couldn't conduct endless investigations. Uh, I don't think so, but I'd have to check I mean budgetary matters in parliamentary procedure around them is a pretty specific and somewhat arcane area of congressional stuff. Congressional stuff, so I can't answer that question definitively, but I don't

think that that would work. Kevin my man, Kevin, absolutely love listening to you on both Rising and your nightly radio show. I was browsing my eighties playlist and couldn't help a laugh because I think you may have been the guitar for Breathe. That head of hair shields high. Kevin, Well, you know that guy in the eighties did have a great head of hair. Eighties hair was a real celebration of hair, my friends. You know. It was thick, it was luxurious, it it was all about the actual hair,

you know. It's not about having a very specific kind of faded in bladed cut here and there and short on the sides and long on the top. And although there were mohawks in the eighties, which when you think back to it, some of those eighties punk rocker mohawks were pretty much the wildest looking hair I think you could ever find anywhere. But indeed, um Laurel right, dear Buck, nothing screams beta male louder than no Trumpers in someone stating profile. It's not just a problem for men, even

women have to deal with those in tolerant thinking for oneself. Ironically, the same profiles usually proclaim how menis the suitor is us swamped? While I really need to think about our dating network, Laurel. Yeah, Laurel, you know it's it's not not a good scene, not a good scene out there for conservatives on the dating scene. I got a bunch of single friends right now who are guys, and finding attractive conservative ladies in Washington, d C. In particular is very,

very difficult. And you get a lot of reasonably superficially at least attractive women who are just hashtag resistance maniacs, love watching Rachel Mattow and tuning into young Turks on YouTube, and they're not gonna like dudes, well, at least like my friends, the kind of guys that I hang out with here who are awesome patriots um and uh and love their country and love freedom in America. It's hard

of the man. A lot of a lot of women have no Trump supporter dating rules now, which is it's really just so the whole thing's just so close mind, and it's kind of pathetic. But that's that's what's going on, that's what's fashionable on the left. Stephen writes, Hey, Buck, listening to the comments about election results, one thing comes to mind. If not for the electoral influence of Madison

and Milwaukee, Wisconsin would be a red state. We have a saying that Madison is five square miles surrounded by reality for a reason, shields high Steve from Wisconsin. Yeah, Steve, I'm sure that's true. We used to say that about Amherst too, that Amher's College was or Amer's town was four square miles surrounded by reality. Emer's town once had an ordinance banning the usage of nuclear weapons within town limits.

And I'm pretty sure I'm careing of the town council reached out to the Iranian government and Akhmadena Jod, or if Akhmadena Jod reached out to the town council, I forget what the specifics were, but the town council of Amer's College did have some kind of Iranian connection. Should at one point, if I from memory serves, unless I'm starting to get old, forget things, uh Alan writes buck Bell, Canyon, the neighborhood when you were you were in when visiting.

Elissa Milano has been hit by brush fire and several homes. Bert not sure about her house. Fires out here are really bad. Yeah, Alan, I think that Elissa Milano's area has been hit really badly. And I was pleased to see the actor James Woods trying to rally his social media following in order to save some of Lissa Milano's animals. She has horses on on her farm, So you know, I think that that's that's obviously the approach that everybody

should take. Anybody who needs helping to fire, whoever they are, we should all give them that help a S A P. No questions asked, obviously, and it's good to see that at least we can all agree that fires are bad and we need to help our fellow human beings and and animals whenever we can get away from fire. Brian right Shields high Buck. You know what these recounts and lawsuits going on, Democrats should consider pushing for voter I

D laws. Well, I can just tell you, Brian, they don't like they don't like voter ID laws because they don't like anything that makes it harder for there to be shenanigans when it comes to voting. UM team, that's gonna be it for today in the hut. I'm traveling tomorrow, so my buddy Rock, he's gonna take the hell. I'll be back Friday though, So until then, shields high. Who you hire is essential. But how do you know you're hiring somebody who is the way that they've presented themselves? Right?

How do you know if their background is what they've said it is in resumes and interviews over the phone. You don't want to have a problem on your hands. You don't want somebody you can't trust. You sure, they don't want somebody who's a liability. Oh. Also, by the way, if you're renting out your property to a prospective tenant, this also all applies. You need Global Verification Network. Global Verification Network is the only dual certified veteran owned background

investigation and vetting company. Okay, they're federally certified as a don't own small business and they're headquartered here in Chicago. All work done in the US of A. None of it, like a lot of the big background check places sent overseas or outsourced. You don't want some call center handling the sensitive stuff in the background investigation you have to have done. You want global verification, call eight seven seven six seven nine, or go to my GVN dot com again my GVN dot com