Tearing Down Teddy Roosevelt

Make no mistake America great here, great American again, The Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. No welcome the Buck sex this show, everybody, thank you very much for being here. An honor and a privilege, as always to get a chance to speak to you all across the country, all across the nation, in some cases all around the world. What's up, Team Buck Global. So we are in a fight, a fight that we should have been expecting all along. In fact, I don't find this

even the least bit surprising, the ferocity, the nastiness. It's just the tactics and the timing that perhaps has caught some of us off guard. What really are the Democrats trying to accomplish right now. And let's understand, this is a Democrat movement. This is not something that we should just generally refer to as protesters. We should not allow this to be somehow taken off the ledger of American

politics that would go under the Democrat side. What's happening right now is a Democrat cultural and political revolution, and that's why they're adopting the very tactics of revolutionaries past. In fact, much of the same rhetoric. And some of this has been a repetition of what we've seen. I've been mentioning this to you for weeks now, the Occupy Wall Street movement, the first Black Lives Matter movement, the Antifa in the early months of the Trump presidency. They've

recycled a lot of what we've seen before. But the additional reasons for their power and their rise right now are we are going through a pandemic that has empowered government beyond what would have been our wildest dreams. Even six months ago. Nobody could have thought, or perhaps we should have, but nobody did think that we would go through so much tyranny with barely a peep from the general public. It seems about what's happening about the seizure

of rights, the virtual suspension of the constitution. People don't seem very much bothered by this at all, but there was a tremendous amount of rage that was bottled up over time. Anger and frustration and forty million plus lost jobs and the lack of human contact, and the misery and the lies from the government, the transparent and obvious lies that we have been forced to stomach. And then you add all of that to a period of political lunacy from the left, the anti Trump delusion, the anti

Trump derangement syndrome that's out there. You put these things together and you have a very combustible mix, and we are dealing with the explosion right now. It's best that we understand that, it's best that we are clear about how we got to this point, and we see that we are up against a very tenacious and a very

challenging enemy here. If Donald Trump has one tagline that is most associated with them and is, of course the initial campaign slogan of twenty sixteen, Make America Great Again, which has now transitioned into keep America Great, but I think a lot of us still have a much greater affinity for the original one, make America great again. That's

where the President has positioned himself right now. He talks about he told me in the Oval Office but a few weeks ago, about his plan to transition us to greatness, that we were going to get back the America that we had become used to for three years with Donald Trump as presidents. But now we see the Democrats have taken up the opposite side of that bargain, and they

have no shame about it. The Democrats have decided that the inducement of misery, that widespread dissatisfaction, despair, rage, division on cultural, class, race, ethnic lines. Whatever they can do to exacerbate any sore points in the American polity, whatever they can do to make us hate each other, mad at each other, and just feel like things are going poorly,

that's what they're going to do. None of the proposals that Democrats are talking about right now, you'll notice that none of the things that are of interest to rational, reasonable people as ways to really bring about a better country. That's not what they're focused on. The Democrats don't care about that. They're not trying to fix all of these problems. They're proposing things that are even more divisive. They want further lockdowns because of COVID. They want more statue toppling.

They want less police, more defund police, and a greater leeway for criminals on the streets to terrorize law abiding people of all races, backgrounds, creeds, and colors. That's the position of the Democrat Party right now, because they understand that they can't inspire. There's nothing inspirational about their Marxism, their leftism, their revolutionary rhetoric which is so empty when you push on it a bit. What do they really want?

Who are we going to replace with all these statues or we're just going to have Jimmy Carter and Barrocco, Obama and Bill Clinton statute as well. Bill Clinton might be a bit too me tued, But who's going to be acceptable to celebrate in the public sphere when they're done. We'll talk more today about who the latest cancelation figures are, who they're going after the explosion of this movement and the expansion of the targets just keeps going with every day.

But remember this, the Democrats do not present you with ideas to make you happier and freer they present you, if you are a Trump supporter, if you are a moderate, if you are not a part of a left wing base of the Democrat Party a party, they present you with a poorer, less free, less happy, less safe America. And they want that right now. They're actively rooting for failure. I'm not shy about this. I'm going to say it.

They want this country to suffer because in their minds, that's the only way that that they can force us to expunge the sin of the Trump presidency. And that is a sin for which they will not give us forgiveness. Forgiveness, there will be penance required of us. They will demand that we suffer because and they don't care that there are people who are going to suffer that didn't vote for Trump. Collective guilt, collective suffering. This is the order

of the day for the Democrat Party. This is what they believe in. They want all of us to go through this, They want all of us to be caught up in this. And yes there are people who are chanting for it. Yes there are people that believe the police are the enemy, and that bringing back what is really just critical race theory stretching from the nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies, that race is the single defining characteristic of everything in our society. More so than anything else.

Race influences our ideas, our politics, our culture, and that the only way to confront this is to accept that anyone who is white in America has an original sin, again, one for which they must be punished. It's not even enough to ben Venie. You have to suffer, and our communities are going to suffer. Our cities are on the decline.

The American metropolis is something that will be looked upon fondly in the future as a period of history, a period of time when we could all live together with declining crime rates, with increases in household wealth, with overall prosperity, better cleaner streets, better cleaner services. You know that this was what we were seeing for the last twenty years, not in some Democrats cities, but there were some major

exceptions to what things were going. Pretty well. We'll look back on that and realize that this was all taken from us and was taken by choice. And the Democrats are willing to burn down the village in order to save it, and that's what they're doing right now. If they can and have control of America. No one can. And if they can't find a way to get control by promising better ideas and a better future, they'll just make this one so miserable that people will be desperate

to vote for an empty suit and nothing. As a leader like Joe Biden, it doesn't matter anything but what we have right now. Bring the country to its knees, and then make it vote for someone other than the person who they will claim is responsible for all of this misery. Meanwhile, if we had serious adults and positions of power in the media and the Democrat Party in corporate America, we would all be coming together saying, how do we get back to our lives as quickly as possible,

as effectively, as safely as possible. Right now we should be entirely focused all the transition to greatness, or just the transition to normalcy, which would feel pretty great these days.

But instead of looking at the forty plus million Americans without jobs, instead of looking at the millions of small businesses that may never open again, entire sectors of the economy that are at risk permanently, and finding solutions for this because there are lives in the balance futures, happiness, health, all of it. Instead of focusing on that as a country, what are we doing right now? Drag through another social studies social justice class courtesy of the psychotic left. The

whole country is focused on this. This benefits no one except the people using it to seize power. This makes everybody feel less safe, less proud, less free in America. Who isn't a part of this radical movement small price to pay as far as they see it, this gives them an opportunity to do what they've been seeking to

do all along, humiliate their enemies. Because you see, you have to remember, at a very fundamental level, Donald Trump is largely felt as a humiliation by the left that this and saying the things he does, believing the things he does, could turn the Republican Party away from the mechanism and romneyism of the past, just you know, using

the poll tested slogans of the GOP. Basically, so we can get to progressivism, leftism and the revolutionary nonsense we say see today just a little bit slower, but we're still going there. But you know, we'll beg forgiveness a few times along the way. So The New York Times doesn't savage our leadership quite the same way they do with Trump. But that was an unforgivable sin. The rise of Trump is something for which we have to be punished. In fact, we have to be humiliated. That is their plan.

They are not looking for for converts, my friends. They are seeking heretics to burn at the stake, so to speak. The left is not trying to make friends with you. They don't want a concession. They don't want to convince you. They don't want to bring you along to their side. They are true far left radicals, and they run the Democratic Party right now. So we can either accept that they are motivated by a luss for power, a rage against what is good and true and right and righteous,

and we can fight back. We can be the wartime conservatives of whom I often now speak on this show and understand that we should not bend the knee, bake that cake, use the made up pronouns. We should not do this. Or we can just hope that Donald Trump is able to carry the entire movement on his shoulders and beat all of this back by himselves, by himself. I worry that that's the plan for a lot of

people It's tough out there right now. There's a lot of risks in speaking out There's a lot of risk in being honest and standing up for your principles and trying to promote in trying to organize conservative and constitutional ideas. Even just reason and rationality is under assault, evidence, rule of law. These things are being discarded. Fundamental tenets of Western civilization have come under full scale assault by the left.

And what do we do? Not nearly enough. I think more and more people are coming over to my side on this from the right and understanding that the time to fight back is now. We can't wait until September to figure out that this is all political, that this is all planned, this is coordinated, This is part of a movement by the left to seize power and have created the underlying political conditions through all the silencing and the canceling, to force us to bend us to their

will once they have puppet Biden in place. Do you want to live in a country where you have freedom. Do you want to live in a country where you're allowed to say things that you should be able to say because they are true, or do you think it's just better to hide, to duck down to run for cover. This is the decision we're all making every day right now.

And if we're going to rely on others to fight this battle for us entirely, we will lose, and Joe Biden will be president and the Democrats will take the Senate unified government at a time of left wing mass hysteria, viciousness and score settling. How do you think that's going to look in twenty twenty one? You're in the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. So who's the

latest in the list of cancelations? Oh? My, an expanding list with one very, very big name that the left is clearly going to celebrate as an enormous victory for their side. You have Oh, let me see here, who are the latest to get canceled? Woodrow w Wilson Monmouth University is going to rename a building that has been called the Woodrow Wilson Center or something like that. In France, Voltaire, perhaps the greatest and most beloved French language writer, at

least globally speaking, he's getting canceled. Saint Junipero Sarah. I guess it's Junipero Sarah canceled. Albert Pike canceled, Ulysses s. Grant canceled, and oh yes, that's right. The one that's getting a lot of attention right now, a statue of Theodore Roosevelt out in front of the New York Museum of Natural History that also has got to go. That decision has already been made. This is not even the mob pulling it down. You see. The mob works in

concert with the establishment and institutional left. The mob is not doing these things on its own. We've seen political and revolutionary movements in the past adopt a very similar position. This is what you should be expecting. The Democrat Party is just the entity for the political concessions to come through, right. The Democrat Party is they're ready to seize power. But the vanguard of the far left, the shock troops, they are doing all of these things knowing that they're trying

to get the Democratic Party more. That's why fundamentally this is an anti Trump movement. This is all about power. This is not about what's right. It's not about all of a sudden a moral awakening in the country. Think of this a bit like the IRA in Ireland and shin Feg and this is true of many places. You could pick any number of political parties that also have

a militant wing. I've been saying for years that Antifa is just the militant wing of the Democratic Party, and they understand that they can go with force and destruction up to a certain extent. You know, if Antifa was blowing up town squares and killing a lot of people, that would be harmful to the movement. Do I think that that's beyond the immorality and insanity of Antifa? No, But it's counterproductive to their aims. So what do they do. They use force that goes up to street violence, right,

punching people, throwing bricks, attacking cops, destroying stores. But they're still effectively the militant arm of the Democratic Party. So you have these militants that make these extreme demands and do all of these violent and illegal and destabilizing things, but behind all of it's the Democratic Party there to just sort of pick up whatever they can to use this as leverage. Hey, you know, sorry, America, nice constitution

you got. There be a shame if something happened to it from our buddies in Antifa, right, be a shame if something happened you know, Oh, black lives matter might have to come cancel you, but you could just vote Democrat. You could just give us a more in the Democrat Party and maybe then BLM will stop trying to cancel you, stop trying to ruin your life. I wouldn't anticipate that this is ever going to get better unless we stand up to it. Because it's working. And that's what we

all have to understand. They are winning right now. And you know, people are entitled to their opinions from within the right. Of course, I can't see here a n advocate for free speech and the freedom to dissent and all this. But if I have one more person, tell me, you know, with an email or a message, don't worry. Trump has been expecting all of this. Guys know he hasn't. He is not winning right now. We are not tired of winning. We are not winning right now. I think

we will be soon if we wake up. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Well, that statue, that specific statue, you're right, it does portray usation of Native Americans and African Americans and it's not an appropriate statue. What we need to

do is have a conversation. As a country. We need to have a conversation and go through a process where we have to come to terms with some of our monuments, our statues, the names of our streets, the names of our bases, and what's appropriate for our values. And actually having that conversation. Going through that process is really important. It allows us to educate ourselves on our history, educate ourselves on the complicated course that our history has gone through.

We need to go through that process and have that discussion. That discussion is valuable, but the results of that will also be valuable. Blather, abject moronic blather from a New York City councilman there on the Teddy Roosevelt statue coming down. It's been there since nineteen forty and Roosevelt's family was instrumental in the founding of the New York Museum of Natural History. I used to go there as a kid. In fact, I remember going to birthday parties that were

held there. The coolest thing was I had a giant blue whale that was the actual size of a blue whale suspended from the ceiling. I always remember that. I thought that was really neat. I loved animals as a kid.

I still love animals today, but it was that was that was a museum when I was really young, before I could understand what was going on in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which has paintings and sculptures instead of lots of very large stuffed animals and things like that, I was a big fan of the Museum of Natural History and this statue of Roosevelt. He is on a horse, he is on horseback, and there is a Native American

and an African American on both sides of him. I do not really understand why this is now all of a sudden, although it goes back to twenty seventeen. They threw paint on the statue. I mean, the left has been agitating about this for a while. But see now they're they're proposing this as it's just this sculpture, it's just this. They're they're tearing down Church, They're tearing down Woodrow Wilson, who is actually a bad guy in a

racist but you know, as a Democrat. But they're tearing down Junipero, Sarah Juande Onnate, They're tearing down Voltaire they're tearing you know, go to Ulysses Grant, George Washington, for heaven's sakes, they're tearing down all these statues. But this time the people in power. It's not about pulling the

statue down, it's making the decision to remove it. And Democrats, of course, remember, the Democrats are the political party that waits to exploit for power and for their own political ends. What the mob and the anarchists and the BLM movement are doing out there in the streets right, their militant wing is terrifying people, destroying things, breaking the law, and the Democrats sam back and say, yes, well, just do what we say and perhaps some of this will stop.

We're here to negotiate. We're the civilized ones in this conversation. We the Democrat Party. We're not Antifa. Yeah. Do they condemn it, Do they take action to stop it? No, of course not. They benefit from it. They like it. Let's be honest. The Democrats like their militant wing, they like the BLM movement, they like Antifa. They think all

of this is fantastic. Otherwise, they've got a bunch of in their leadership ranks, super old, out of touch, rich white people like Nancy Pelosi right, like Joe Biden, and they've got a bunch of young, up and coming leftists. This is the AOC and the squad who most of the country does not agree with on most issues, and that's putting it mildly, and who are just ignorant of economics of American history of society. But they've been trained in the left wing agitation and the rhetoric of the

diversity and inclusion movement, which isn't about inclusion. If you think that some of this stuff is a bad idea, if you think that watering down standards is wrong, if you think that we should have objective metrics eristspective of race for admission into universities or for hiring, no, no, none of that is acceptable. It's inclusive except four ideas that they deem to be excluded from the conversation. And that's as we know that the continuing reality of this.

But let's just go back to this Teddy Roosevelt statue for a second, because this is, dare I say, symbolic of how they're going to approach everything from here on out. They're saying it's just this statue, But if you look at what the New York Times right up of this ruckus is all about. It's much more than just this statue. But they want to see if they can get one time a cancelation of this, Well, then what else can they get canceled about? Teddy Roosevelt? What president is safe

from their cancelation efforts. It's fascinating, But give it time. Even Barack Obama in time will come under stronger criticism at the left. At the logic of the left continues to be applied in this way for Obama's opposition to gain marriage as a president, not once but twice running

for office. Now they'll always make excuses for Obama. Don't get me wrong, but you know, when when you look at where we are now, anybody who is not woke by today's standards from history, including on the left, including Democrats, can be attacked. No one is safe from it. And that's how the mom blanks it. No no level of heroism, no reform of one's ideas or ideology throughout one's life. You know, if you were born to a family, let's say that was supportive of slavery, and then spent your

life as an adult freeing slaves and as an abolitionist. No, sorry, still still unacceptable even to celebrate that portion that was clearly righteous and moral of one's life. You know, can you celebrate someone's acts, someone's works for what they were without having to take on the defense of the individual as a whole. These are real questions we have to ask. Now they tell you that this is all about just the statue of Teddy Roosevelt, and just give it time.

They're gonna have to Japanese Americans interned by FDR. They're gonna have to rename the FDR drive here in New York. You have to rename a whole bunch of things that are currently named for that guy, the other Roosevelt. Remember, the Roosevelt who didn't intern Japanese Americans is the one who's under under the scrutiny of the left currently. But they're saying it's just the statue. That's a lie. They've already started to make noise about about how Teddy Roosevelt.

So if you want to say, oh, but just this, just this depiction is bad, just this depiction is out of touch. That's not what they're going to claim. They'll say this today so that you bend the nance fine, fine, pull this statue. Just as we said, you know what Confederate generals, those guys fought for the wrong side, and

slavery is an evil. We all know this. So you know, I know a lot of people, I know a lot of conservatives, especially from the North, who are saying, you know, I kind of understand this, and I'm sympathetic to the impulse to fully confront the history of slavery and the Confederacy and the racism there. And I'm sympathetic to that too. I'm not sympathetic to mobs lopping off the heads of

statues that are public property. And I'm not sympathetic to people making demands based upon the implied threat of mob force, even if they are right on the merits of a historical argument. Let's say this should be done through a process, but here in New York City now they are doing it through a process. I know that's going to be the transition. We'll buck look at what they're doing. Why do you oppose this because they're not being honest about

what's going to happen. They're not being honest about what's next. Oh no, just this statue of Teddy Roosevelt is coming down. But they already say that Roosevelt in his later life was a eugenicist and a racist, and a certainly a colonialist. There's a lot of anger at Roosevelt for the expansion through the Spanish American War, the expansion of US territories

and possessions. People look at the Caribbean, they look at the Philippines, and they say, well, hold hold on a second here, Teddy Roosevelt was an expansionist, a colonialist, So he's a bad guy too. Well, I just want to know, do we do we allow the left to just go straight up Taliban. You will recall it was years ago. Perhaps it was I think nineteen ninety six, maybe it

was ninety nine, I forget. It was the late nineties when the Taliban, as part of its cleansing of society of anything deemed not Islamic enough, destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan, which were thousands, these massive Buddhists, thousands of years old, considered a global heritage site, I mean, considered something that all archaeologists and we were practically a wonder of the world. The Taliban barbarians came along and they didn't like this,

and they felt that it was un Islamic. And so instead of just saying, look, you know you cannot go check these out for historical reasons or religious reasons, they blew them up, mostly with RPGs. They fired RPGs at these statues to destroy them, and they did. I want to know how far we are from liberals effectively arguing that we need to use RPGs to take Teddy Roosevelt's face off of Mount Rushmore. I don't think it's far away.

Maybe they won't use RPGs because they're scary, but they'll bring in demolition crews, they'll bring in construction crews no more. But if you're going to take down Teddy Roosevelt, you're going to leave Washington. You know, think about this promote who gets to stay? What president are we allowed to celebrate? And what really ultimately is the purpose at this whole project. It's not to bring us together, it's not for reconciliation

and national healing. This is all about division. This is about undermining fundamental, historical, historical figures that were an enormous that had an enormous impact on the country we live in today and our rights and our beliefs, and that shared idea, that is America canceled erased. Who are going to be the acceptable statues of the future. It is fascinating that this group seems to always leave anybody who

is a communist alone. If you're a communist, if you're a Marxist and a white Marxist, even no one has any problem with you. On the left, the millions and millions of people murdered, the hundreds of millions of people enslaved by the communist system, stripped of all rights, stripped of all autonomy, all freedom, forced to work for the state, gunpoint, forced to have family, turn on family, which liberals now are advocating for. Make no mistake about it. They want

you to inform on relatives. They're telling young people to call out publicly their own loved ones. Anyone who supports a political ideology more than their own family is morally corrupted and lost. Family first, my friends. Always, the left seeks to destroy the family. Why is that? Because there are two pillars of our society that act as a

bulwark against the on rushing insanity of the left. Religion and family, belief in God, a relationship with God, and the understanding that we are all here just for a temporary period and it goes very quickly. And also that we have a family, that we have people that matter more to us than anyone else in the whole world, that matter more than any political ideology or political party or program of reform. Anyone who's willing to turn on their family because the woke mob says so is lost

and we have to understand that. I don't know if we can bring them back into the light of sanity and normalcy and being reasonable. I don't know. I don't know if it's possible. But the mass hysteria that we are seeing now is a function of massive forces that have come together, the COVID pandemic, democrat hatred of Trump, and also the elites who are desperate to maintain their position. As we were increasingly aware in this country of the

massive failure of those in the elite classes. They're also seeking to use this as a moment to build the to burnish their credibility with the masses after what we've seen as largely a sellout of the American people to international corporations, a sellout of the American people to on citizens who are here illegally. You know, you go down the list. What really is your allegiance to this country?

If the Democrats have their way, If they if they can violate laws with impunity, they can dictate to you what you can say. They can tell you to stay in your home. Are you really free? Do you think you're free in this country? Right now? I think we are going through a massive red pilling. And I will tell you right now. I use the term red pill on my show back in twenty twelve before I had

ever heard of anyone used this before. I'm not saying I was the first, but I was a big fan of the matrix, always had been, and I know now it's been coopted by other people, but I said it before any of these other groups and any of these other people I see out there were using the term, and those who original Saturday Squad know that. So hearkening back to what I said in twenty twelve, now eight years ago on this show, I do think that we

are going through a mat of red pilling. I just don't know if it's too late for those who see this for what it is to be able to rally and stop this movement from doing irreparable damage to the country. You're in the freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. If Joe Biden were to become president and emboldened left will launch a full scale assault on American life. You know that. They'll expel anyone who disagrees with them. Look what happens when you disagree, You use the term

that's perfect, and they're not happy with it. They call you a racist, they call you a horrible person. They want to crush religious liberty. They don't want religions, silence religious believers, indoctrinate your children with hateful and vicious lies about our country, subsidize late term abortion and after birth execution. The President is right, so that's good. I mean, he knows what's going on here. He understands what the left is trying to accomplish. But right now, the momentum is

against the Trump movement and the president. Look, that executive order on law enforcement last week was a bad idea, and I said it was, and we all know it now. It was feeding the crocodile, hoping it eats us. Last bad move No more appeasement, no more concessions. The other side is not operating in good faith. Let's all remember that. But then there's also how do we get the Trump message out there more. I'm doing what I can here

every day. Right we got hundreds of thousands of people listening to this show and the podcast and the stream all across the country. I'm hoping they share it. I'm hoping you share this show with as many people as you can so they feel like our voice on the right is being heard, that our argument is the correct one, and here's how to make it. This is what what I'm trying to accomplish with what I'm doing every day. But I also think the president has to go around

the gatekeepers even more. Twitter is not enough. I'm seeing these days all these senators and congressmen have got their own podcasts, which I would like them to be focusing probably more on legislation than being podcast hosts. But you know, okay, they're more the merrier, I suppose in this business. Why doesn't Trump have a video podcast every day or a video clip he's putting out. Why doesn't Trump just start

his own podcasts, his own TV channel? Right now? I mean, if this is what's going to happen, Democrats Republicans are all doing it, the president has to get out there and give people the message and the inspiration to fight for his side. And we can't rely just on these rallies. As we see the Democrats are trying to subvert the rallies using TikTok, the social media platform to take seats and tickets for seats that they're never going to actually use.

Thanks for listening to the bus Stson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on ample podcasts, the radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Joe Biden and the Democrats want to prosecute Americans for going to church, but not for birding a church. They believe you can riot, vandalize, and destroy, but you cannot attend a peaceful pro America rally. They want to punish your thoughts, but not they're violent crimes.

The Trump rally over the weekend was on point when it comes to the messaging and got much is clear, and that's certainly encouraging. But there was a smaller crowd than was anticipated, and the media has made a very big thing of that. There's been a lot of discussion about it and they're saying, oh, it shows the Trump movement doesn't have quite the same focus, doesn't have quite the same fury and support this time around. I don't see that as the case. I just think it a

reminder that we are up against an opposition here. A democratic party will do whatever it has to do. And if they can scare people away by physically having psychonic, anti fostile protesters at every rally, if they can scare people away by saying that it's going to be a COVID super spreader, I mean, over the weekend, I tweeted out that I thought CNN was a BS super spreader when they started sharing that story. I think that's certainly true.

I think that's a very defensible position. CNN is appalling, as are many of these other liberal networks, but the president understands what the issues are. Right now, it just doesn't feel like enough is being done. It doesn't feel like the actions are being taken that are necessary for protecting the system as it is right and I mean the system that keeps us all safe and keep society functioning.

Every day. Democrats are tearing this down there, They're van guard, their radicals are doing whatever they can to undermine core aspects of our society. The Democratic Party gets to stand behind all this and be like, WHOA. That's kind of interesting, but to just bend the knee a little bit more. Just vote Democrat and everything will be better. Producer Brandon, if you would please play clip, Please play the Trump Biden clip. Joe Biden is not the leader of his party.

Joe Biden is a helpless puppet of the radical left. And he's not radical left. I don't think he knows what he is anymore. But he was never radical left. But he's controlled by the radical left. And now he's really controlled. He is controlled by the radical left. The President's right here in saying this. He has no choice. Joe Biden is a machine Democrat politician. He's very old and very white, and that's not going to be good enough for the woke left. That's not going to be

acceptable at all. So what does Biden have to do? What ever the heck they tell him to do, And that's what we are likely to see. But just understand right now that there will be no rules, there'll be no quarter, there'll be no good faith, there'll be no sense of fair play from the left going forward. Just understand that right now, whoever they have to destroy, whatever they have to, whoever they have to cancel, whatever previously

held positions. The Democrat Party will have to abandon all of that, all of that will be done in this effort to defeat Trump because right now the radical left is ascendant, and if they can get Joe Biden to be the president, then they know that they'll be in a position to use this current momentum to the benefit of the benefit of the Democrat Party and really the socialist Democrat crowd left. We're not hearing enough about that.

There are all these Marxist agitators and organizers running around. That's clear. That's obvious. They'll even say it on video. I mean, this is this is Captain obvious. Yeah, these are Marxist leftist agitators, but they are using this moment in time as well to push socialist policies, and we should not be surprised as that continues and they add, they add to this over time, they push even further. So I want us to be very clear about what the stakes are in all of this and what they're

willing to do. You know, you have this moment of hashtag resistance from the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, which is a very storied prosecutorial office here in New York, city, and this guy decided the current US attorney decided that he wasn't he wasn't going to leave his position because he was an interim appointment, and he said that he wouldn't leave. He would not leave until there was a Senate confirmed replacement for him. And I just got to tell you, you know, this

stuff did not happen. I mean, to my point about how they'll undermine the day to day workings of the system, this did not happen under Obama. You never had somebody who was a Republican long term public servant and say, oh, I'm sorry, you're you're just not able. You the Attorney general. And with that, really the president, you're not able to

fire me right now. No, it turns out that he was able to be fired, that he was fired the moment that he released this press conference because Attorney General Barr decided that he wasn't going to sit around and allow this nonsense. Jeffrey Burman, Jeffrey Burman is the US attorney in question here, and you know, you have to wonder how much more of this do we have to see before we understand that at the very top of the legal profession. And I mean this for legal public servants,

but also at the law firms. Now the left has infiltrated them now too, this idea of George Soros and his foundation and the money that he spreads around on the left to get these to get radical policies, and acted that they're doing this by pushing for incredibly far left district district attorneys in places like Philadelphia, but also in other places and throughout the federal government. I mean, the legal profession has been infiltrated by far left activists

at the very highest level. And this is where you get the much of what we saw with the deep state at the DOJ. They view Trump as a threat to what they believe in, and so they'll take actions that would be unthinkable even under really a kind of a normal whatever that means, a previous to Trump Republican administration. But you're also seeing now that they're just going to refuse. They're going to refuse to allow the system to function

as it's supposed to. Sally Yates, who is a clear never Trumper, involved in the targeting of General in the ridiculous usage of the Logan Act as a pretext for that interview, she was in on all that stuff, and she refused to do her job when it came to the so called Muslim band, which the Supreme Court did end up saying was constitutional. She refused to your job

and had to be fired. Now, Jeffrey Burman, who wasn't going to be fired from his job at first, at least Bill Barr, let out a scathing, very strong and scathing letter about this whole fiasco. But what Jeffrey Burman did, because its career enhancing for him and it makes him a hero on the left, is pretend, pretend that he is doing it, that he's being removed from his job because of ongoing investigations of Trump and Trump associates. That's all you have to do. Then you get on MSNBC.

Then you become a hero to the left. Everyone will think of you as someone who has done his part for the hashtag resistance. And we keep seeing this happen and it is it's just you're gonna have more of this. Don't think that just because the Russia collusion force and the Ukraine impeachment fiasco did not work, that the Left is giving up any of this stuff, that they're changing their mind about any of this. Don't think that that's happening. It's not. We're just waiting to see who else will

come forward. What other you know, Lieutenant Colonel Vinman's are somewhere in the flabby folds of the federal bureaucracy. You know, who else is going to come forward and decide that they have something like Oh, you mean someone for example, like Bolton. Oh yes, indeed, speaking of the legal system and all these bombshell revelations from this Bolton book, I've got to tell you Bolton is done. He's done. No intelligent human being will ever give him a job in

government again after this. So I guess it's a thing that he got two million dollars. And I would note, you know, people were very nice to him, a very you know, always putting him on TV over at Fox for many years, and he was treated with real reverence based on what I mean. This guy's idea was more troops, more war, and more fighting all the time, wars that he was never going to fight it, never has fought in.

He's the quintessential arm not even armchair general, armchair military strategist. Yeah, that's right, Send more of your troops in there, stay there forever, fight in Afghanistan forever and President Trump and they had finally had enough of this and got rid of him. Now Bolton is in some trouble here. I think his book is effectively already published. So the demands from the White House to pull back its publication are not going to be successful because the book's already out there.

I know people with copies of it. I mean, you can't stop this the horses. The horse has left the barn, right, it's all over with that, But it does seem and a judge has said, okay, fine, he's published his book, but they're very well maybe classified in there. And I've got to say this, I'm not somebody that believes in

being unfair about this unduly harsh. And I know that the prepublication review process for people who have had security clearances and have national security responsibilities, I know that it can feel absurd, and it is absurd at some points. At sometimes there's stuff that gets blacked out of these books. You know, they put the they take the black marker, and they raise things that is you could find it with two seconds in Google search engine, and it's just nuts.

But if you're the National Security advisor and you're writing a book while the president you served is still in office. Sorry, you got to go through the whole process, just like everybody else. Federal government should seize all should seize all of what Bolton has has received for this book, assuming that he didn't go through the full publication pre publication process, which I think at this point has been established. So they should take the two million dollar advance. They got

to make an example. If you're not going to make an example of the most recent national security advisor writing a tell all book, why should someone who served in special operations who wants to write a memoir of combat, or why should somebody who was you know, a DIA analyst who wants to write about their time writing memos and making coffee because I know what that's like, That's

what I was doing. Why should they have to go through all this nonsense if the National security advisor, at the very height of the national security apparatus does not have to Sorry, rules are rules, folks. I know the libs are pretending it's not the case, but we're not giving up on this. Rules are rules. And if Bolton published classified he's got to face criminal prosecution for that.

You can't do that. Just because you hate Trump. Hating Trump is not an excuse to erase the rules on classification. So you know, I mean, here's for example, the left would normally hate this guy, but right now he's useful to them. Right now Bolton is their buddy because he says things like this. You described the president as erratic, foolish, behaved irrationally, bizarrely. You can't leave him alone for a minute. He saw conspiracies behind rocks. He couldn't tell the difference

between his personal interests and the country's interests. I don't think he's fit for office. I don't think he has the competence to carry out the job. There really isn't any guiding principle that I was able to discern other than what's good for Donald Trump's reelection. He calls you a traitor. I mean, he's definitely disloyal, and I think you can make a case that, I mean, he's not

a traitor. Well, he might have violated the Espionage Act by publishing classified information that's damaging the US national security interests. So that's bad. Other people get called very terrible thing and other people go to prison for that. You know, Captain Mustache Bolton over here. He thinks that he's just going to get away with this, and I really I

think he may be overestimating because he's not a leftist. Right, if a leftist wrote this book, if a Democrat somehow, kay, And now he is saying he's gonna vote for Bidens, And maybe you can argue a Democrat now, but he's They hate Bolton on the left, they'd like him right now for obvious reasons. But this is a big change. This is a big switch from what we had been

presented with as Bolton in the past. And I gotta say that you would if you were the national security advisor to a president and you really think he's unfit for office, and all you're gonna say all these terrible things about him, the lack of personal loyalty here, and

the lack of caring about the mission. And just from what I've seen the excerpts of this book, I don't have a full copy of it yet, but the excerpts that I've seen published are Bolton is so petty and such a prima donna and should never be listened to by anybody ever again about anything. He should go away from the public sphere. He should be done. And I give credit to Tucker Carlson who had a really contentious interview with Bolton years ago on TV. And Tucker looks

like he was spot on with all that. And you know, Tucker is the single the single most interesting commentary on Fox News right now in my for my money, no question about it. But I've also I've also got to bring this up because we believe in being truthful and being fair here in the Freedom Hud always. Trump has really bad instincts about people. I don't know who convinced him to bring in Bolton, you know, because he was an adult in the room or something. I don't know

who thought this was a good idea. Bolton as opposed to Trump on policy, and Bolton was not to be trusted period, and yet they brought him in at the very top level. And now he's writing a book trashing Pompeo and Tillerson and Haley and you name it, trashing these people, no personal honor, no integrity, a slimeball. That's the former National Security advisor. I mean, you got to look at who Trump has put into these places, from whether you're talking about the mooch to Ama Rosa to

Bolton to very bad choices about personnel. I think we should know who pushed for these personnel choices. Was it really Trump? I don't think so. I think we should know who in the White House was saying, Yeah, Bolton's a good idea, because I got a couple of guesses. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Now, this is just fascinating an example of the kind of extreme, dishonest propaganda that you will be seeing as we get into the height of this deeply

contentious election season. But this is what they're This is what NPR, which is getting remember getting funding from a taxpayer, folks. This is what MPR has to say here about a phenomenon of riotous protesters or just rioters. How about that Buck used the proper term rioters who surround vehicles, which is an obvious threat and deeply terrifying to people that

are stuck in the vehicle. Now, the bad guys they want the story to, that want us to believe are the people that are ramming the protesters to get away. And I mean, let me just give you the NPR version of this story. This was amazing. Over the weekend. Right wing extremists are turning cars into weapons, with reports of at least fifty vehicle ramming incidents since protests against police violence just against police actually violence erupted nationwide in

late May. At least eighteen or categorizes deliberate attacks, another another two dozen or unclear as to motivation. According to a count released by a terrorism researcher at the University of Chicago Project on Security and Threats, whatever the hell that is, these twenty people facing execution include a state leader of the KKK's well the California man who is charged with attempted murder. Video footage of some of the attack show drivers threatening protesters. You need to get out

of the streets and stop these protests. One of them said, Okay, look, are there some psychopaths who might try to mow down protesters with a car? Yes, but what do we make of the people who are gathering around vehicles bashing them?

Smashing windows are used to put just the left belief that if you're just a person trying to drive your car and the maniacs on the streets from whatever the movement is called today, but it's always democrats in the left, you're supposed to sit there and what let them smash your windshield, smash your driver's side window, pull you out of the car, and beat you to death. If I were surrounded by an angry mob in a vehicle, guess what. I would hit the accelerator to escape to save my life,

and I would not think twice about it. Maybe NPR should stop with the crap unknown motivations. How about not get beaten to death by a bunch of psychotic, whiney, cry baby left wing protesters. How about that is a motivation for the unknown motivation events. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,

the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well, I do believe there were two standards of justice during a period of time towards the end of the Obama administration, and all I can do about it is apply one standard of justice, the right standard of justice, and make sure we apply it to everybody equally. And that's what I'm trying to do. If we have two standards of justice, which we clearly do in this country for people based upon their politics, then we don't really have a justice

system worthy of the name, do we. So we need dramatic accountability and reform in all of this, and the first step in that is going to be transparency. You're going to be honesty, truth, what really happened here. Now. I know that Attorney General bar who is the single most effective cabinet member in this administration, Attorney General bar is willing to let the Durham probe out of Connecticut play out, which is a good thing. We want to see what that prosecutor John Durham, We want to see

what he comes up with. It was US attorney in Connecticut, and he's looking at everything that happened in the Russia Collusia case, collusion case, and we're going to find out very soon. I hope that the whole thing was really a sham. We already know it was a sham, but I mean, we're going to have the proof. We're gonna be able to point to the documents, the interviews, the intercepts, whatever it may be, to show that this whole thing was cooked up to undo the results of a presidential election.

The Democrats have faced no accountability for this whatsoever. And the people in the federal bureaucracy, whether it's a Comi or a macabe or a struck or a page have faced minimal, minimal accountability for what has already proven to be what has already proven to be misdeeds on their

part based entirely in politics that the president had. That President Trump had as effective a first three years in office as he did while there was a soft coup, a rolling soft coup attempt against him, is really remarkable, and I'm glad to see that at least now he has an Attorney general in place who understands this fight, understands the forces arraid against him, and will do what

is necessary to get something at least approaching justice. Because I'm telling you, they are cooking up the leftist cooking up in October surprise right now. I don't know what it is, but they are working, you know, behind the scenes. People hate Trump so much that they will break their oath to the tree. They will put themselves in legal and criminal jeopardy. They'll leak, they'll break agreements, they'll break protocol, they'll do whatever they have to do to take this

guy down. And that's why I'm at least pleased that the Attorney general is up for this fight. He knows this enemy, he knows who these people are and he understands what they're willing to do. There's also the latest on the chats, which the Attorney General waited. I'll get to his comments on this in a second, but I just first want to say that the Chatz in Seattle, or I think they were calling at the chop right the Capitol Hill Occupy protests, but now I'm seeing the

media is still calling at the CHAZ. Maybe they've decided that branding this as part of the occupy movement is a step back for them. That has a pr issue. This is not what they want to do. But I must say the situation in Seattle continues on. There was this video that went viral over the weekend of the of a few EMS people for the City of Seattle who were being told that there was a gunshot wound inside the CHAZ in the Seattle Occupied Zone autonomous zone.

No police allowed him, but they want MS to come in, and the EMS kept calling into dispatch and they were saying do we do we have permission to go in? And you had this this I think it might have even been this guy raz who is viewed as a leader of this autonomous zone, screaming at the people in the MS vehicles saying why woldn't you go in and save? And then of course it turned into oh, this is racist. It's because the person who shot is black. You're not

going in. No, that's just not true. The reason they're not going in is because you guys declared it an autonomous zone and police aren't allowed in and there's a threat of violence if police try to go in. Well, if police aren't allowed, didn't guess what. Ems don't want to go in because they have no protection. They have no sense that they're not going to come under assault if they go in there. Who knows. See, the left hates rules that are enforced truly and in good faith.

The left, Hey, whether it's just laws or rules or agreements, the left opposes contracts. They replace contractual agreement, They replace law with emotion. What do I feel? What do I want? This is the elevation of childishness above civilization. And this keeps playing out in different places all across the country. One of them is this Seattle protest movement. Attorney General said that he does not believe that this is going to be able to just keep going on as is.

Brandon play clips six, Please they took over an area in Seattle and they're guarding it with guns. They tried to do it in Portland as well. Does the federal government have a responsibility to protect citizens of our country if the cities and states won't do it because people's property have been damaged. There are people who don't want

this autonomous area in Seattle around their homes right. Well, in the first instance, it's the responsibility obviously of the local officials and then the state officials to protect the rights of their citizens. At the end of the day, the federal government does have a responsibility ability to make sure that citizens are not deprived of their federal rights. So will you challenge that autonomous city? Will you sue

the mayor? What can you do? Well? I don't want to get into specifics, but we're obviously keeping an eye on it, and as the President said, in due course, we may have to do something about it, but we can't let it go on indefinitely. Keep in mind, the Democrats are all about federal intervention whenever they want it, but then when they don't want it, the federal government's not allowed to do anything. You know, they want the federal government say to pass laws to override what states

have decided on the Second Amendment. They want the Supreme Court and therefore the federal government to weigh in, and it has weighed in on abortion as we know, and make that the law in all fifty states, or on gay marriage, and make that the law in all fifty states. When it's something that they want federal action, there's always a justification for federal action and the dictate of DC. But here when it comes to the fundamental safety and security of a part of the country that is still

under federal jurisdiction. Everything in the United States technically falls under a degree of federal jurisdiction because it's America. Right the Seattle Autonomous Zone, Yes, it's in the city of Seattle, in the state of Washington, but it is still technically America, which means that there has to be some understanding that

the people there. You know, if we had Americans in harm's way in Bulgaria or Somalia or Bolivia, the US government would be willing to or would be in a position to take action, right none, that would be a federal matters. It's outside US territory. But if people are truly in duress and in danger in a major US city and they've been abandoned by this state. What happens then the Attorney General is not going to show his cards here on what the specific the specific legal justification

for a federal action there would be. But I believe if this guy's saying this can't go on indefinitely and

they're going to do something, he means it. Now. I know Trump has been saying a lot about this, and I think part of the frustration that we see is that the President of the United States is saying the right things about these protest movements, is saying the right things about law and order and restoring restoring police as into their rightful place as the guaranteurs of our public safety, right especially in places like New York, Seattle, elsewhere where you can own a gun so you can't be that

you can guarantee your own safety. The Attorney General saying he might do something, I think he just might. And he also was asked this is all a Maria Bartaromo show on Fox Business. He also was asked about the

Bolton book, which I thought was interesting. Play clip eight. Brandon, I don't think it's too late, because what we're asking is for him to complete the process before the book is published, complete the process of taking out classified material, and in our view, there remains there remains very highly classified material in the book still and we would like him to address that. And so under the law where we are bringing a civil action to enforce his agreement

that he would do that before publishing the remedy. If he doesn't complete it is that he forfeits any money from that book to the government. That's what has to happen. There's no there's no leeway on this. There's no there's no two sides to this argument. He either completes the government process here or the government can see because it's a contract. This isn't just about your your First Amendment rights. This is also about you signed a you signed a

binding legal agreement with the federal government. You're violating that, so they're gonna take your money. They took I think it was seven million dollars in proceeds from the from the book written by that guy No Easy Day, where one of the Navy seals on the Bin Laden mission wrote a book about it and didn't go through the Pentagon clearance process. And guess what he sold a ton of copies of that book. He made millions of dollars

and they seized every penny. How can you seize every penny that a Navy seal who was risking his life and was on that mission made by violing this process and not seize every penny from Mustache Bolton doesn't make any sense, right, You can't have that can't be in that circumstance, in that situation. The double we don't like double standards. On the right, we conservatives object to double standards. Well,

there's a clear one here. If this is allowed. And I got to tell you everyone that I know who was supportive of Bolton to get this job in the first place should really be eating some humble pie. I mean that there should be accountability for the stupidity in pushing this, but I don't think that's I don't think that's going to happen. I do hope there's accountability for Bolton break breaking his contract in a well now Bar says he hasn't done it yet because they haven't. But

the book, the copies of it, are already out. So I don't understand what they think will be accomplished here, other than trying to seem like they're being reasonable. But the book that's already out because there are galley copies. I have friends who have copies of this book already. Anything that's taken out of the next version of the book, everybody would know what the highly classified stuff is, which is effectively the government admitted what is highly classified that's

already been published. That doesn't solve the problem at all. But they're gonna have to take They're gonna have to take Mustache Bolton's Winnings here or else or else. Nobody should have to submit their book for prepublication. Nobody should have to do that. That's what's at stake here. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Last week we talked about a few cases of people believing that a hate crime had occurred because of a

noose that was found somewhere. This happened in Oakland, and this happened here in New York City in Harlament what is called Marcus Garvey Park. And it turned out in both instances there was no hate crime at all. It was just a rope at a tree, not meant for a noose, not meant to be a weapon of terror. It was just a rope at a tree, and one case to haul up equipment, and in another case to

allow somebody to engage an exercise. In that instance, the man engaging in the exercises was himself black and said, this was not a noose, has nothing to do with that.

It's just ropes, five ropes hanging from a tree. And the City of Oakland continued with its investigation and made it clear to everybody that even if you have no intent when you have a rope near a tree or on a tree, even if you have no intend to terrify anybody, if someone can come along and say, oh gosh, that reminds me of a noose, even if it's not a noose, it could be a hate crime. Intent does

not matter. That was the statement of the Mayor of Oakland, which was just a shockingly absurd but also important for us to know. That's what they believe. Even if you don't intend for an inanimate object to be a weapon of terror, it will still be investigated as a hate crime if people who are easily frightened and who are acting in a kind of hysteria think that it could

be a weapon of terror. So okay, now, let's get to the latest instance of a noose being found, and it is in the garage stall of NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace, who, as I understand it, and I do not know NASCAR well, so apologies if I miss any of the backstory to all of this, because I don't know much about mister Bubba Wallace. But they found this new He's the most prominent African American NASCAR driver in the country and they say that they found a noose in his garage stall.

I'm so there are I have a few questions here. Sometimes when these incidents happen, I will just say no way because of X, Y or Z, because of the information we already have, I'm not there with this. There are a few possibilities. One, somebody would be heinous and stupid and evil enough to do this, although if that's the there are because of social distancing now with NASCAR and everything, there are very few people that have access

to this area. There are a lot of cameras around, and it would not be hard to find out who it is. I'm not saying it's impossible. I find it, though not probable, that that is what happened. Another possibility that this was someone who wanted to be raising awareness, so using the noose as a racist symbol, but putting it there specifically so that then we could all talk about racism, even though the person putting it there themselves, they would say, well, I'm not racist, if and when

they are caught. This has happened many times. There have been hundreds of hoax hate crimes where this was the rationalization of the person who did the who placed the news or whatever it was in a certain place in order to engage in a hate crime. One part of this. And I'm checking as I'm on area with you to make sure I haven't missed this. I have yet to see a photo. This was at the Talladega Speedway in Alabama. I have yet to see a photo of the news,

which I find very surprising. Now the FBI is investigating. The FBI is investigating this as a as a hate crime, and I have a feeling we're going to find out a lot more in the days ahead. I don't have a clear look if it is. If someone did do this, that's a grotesque and terrible thing. And we all know that that doesn't even really it doesn't have to be said on the show because you already know. That's how

I feel. But I'm wondering how this could happen given the very tight access into a garage stall for a NASCAR driver like this. And I'm also wondering why we haven't seen a photo of the noose. Wouldn't that be all over the place, wouldn't we see this? I have not yet, and I would just note that we've had a few We've had a number of noose hoaxes in the last week, so I'm not clear yet on what this is going to turn into. I'm going to watch

this closely. I have a feeling we're going to find out some very interesting details in the days ahead, and we're going to find out if this is real or not. I think that's true. Keep an eye on it, though, and keep an eye on how the media puts this forward. If it happened, it's terrible and people should be punished. But let's find out who it is and let's find out what their motivations were. Thanks for listening to The

Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, everybody back by popular demand, of course, our friend and fellow co host on the First as well as host of The Jesse Kelly Show. Jesse Kelly is with us now. He has been getting into some naughty stuff online to upset the liberals. Mister Kelly, welcome back. Well, I don't I don't see how it's naughty. We are out here. We're going to try to right the wrongs

of racism in this country. And there's no older institution that is built on the blood of black slaves, and the universities like Yale and Brown and Duke and Rice and several others. And I will not rest until these names have been torn off the walls and these buildings either raised to the ground or turned into low income housing. So Jesse, tell everybody how this all got started. You have a plan here to get Yale canceled, but you've now expanded and Yale. I've been mentioned this for a

while on the show. In fact, I brought this up some years ago that if we're gonna do this whole cancelation thing because of ties to slavery, Allie who Yale, the founder of Yale, was a slave trader. And there are others as well that have come up that are names as as you point out, very highly revered on the left, and so you got cancel Yale trending on Twitter over the weekend. How's this going so far? Well, it's going very well. I'm glad. People. Look, what what

we need right now is the country to come together. Bug, what we really need is more bipartisanship. You know, they love to talk about bipartisanship, and this is something people on the left and the right should agree on that.

The truth of the matter is this. Everybody who has a Yale diploma on their wall, everybody who's worn a Yale shirt, everyone who's graduated from there, everyone who talks about Yale, everyone who has Yale in their bioline on their social media account is out there promoting the name of a man who was a slave trader. There's no other way around that. If you're going to tear down the statues of Robert E. Lee, Robert E. Lee didn't have any slaves. All who Yale had lots of them.

The truth is Yale, the university itself, should change its name, become an all black college, and disperse its thirty billion dollar endowment to black people. His reparations, I'm just wondering has anyone in Brown University, also the founders of Brown University, we're slave slave traders. I want to know, has anyone on the left reached out to you, either publicly or in private, and said, you know what, Jessie, You're right,

we do need to cancel Yale. Let's get this thing going publicly, no privately, And I'm not allowed to say who these people are. Yes that they think one they see what I'm doing. Two they said it was hilarious, and three they actually said they're totally with me on this, even if they disagree with my motivations for doing so.

Let's get these names of slave owners and slave traders completely removed from our society, and maybe in so doing we can punish the people who are responsible for the fact we now have generations of Americans who hate America.

That's where people learned this. So turnabouts, fair play and you know, I'm here in New York and the Duke of York, before he ascended to the throne in England, was involved in the founding of the Royal Africa Company, which had a effectively a monopoly in British trade from West Africa, which included you know, gold Gems, Ivory Tusks, and yes, African slaves. So does a New York state also have to then change its name under the new rules? I mean, I mean to your point, Jesse, you're right,

these are the rules. So why should never live under the rules? But these are the rules? And Buck, I am sorry to say it. Man, it's not just New York State, it's any business that has New York and its title. Let's be honest. There's nobody who's been trying to lead on the issues of race than the New York Times. I mean they've They've been number one on this.

The New York Times must change its name. Every single print edition of The New York Times, every tweet, everything they put out there that has the name New York in it is celebrating the name of a slave trader. And that's absolutely true. Until we stop that practice, we will never truly be free. Yes, if they're so excellent at journalism, calling themselves the Midtown Manhattan Tribune seems like

it's a completely legitimate compromise under the circumstances. In fact, Jesse, if they won't do this, just as if Yale does not change its name, wouldn't we have to ask about their commit it meant to the cause of diversity and inclusion and facing up to our past and the inequities and the immorality of slavery. I mean, aren't they then suspect maybe they have a little bit of an affinity

here for some causes and beliefs that we're just unearthing now. Well, Block, I'm starting to have serious concerns that maybe these people on the left aren't genuine about race relations. Maybe they just hate America and want to rip it apart. I certainly don't want to accuse anybody of that. But if you can print the New York Times but you have to tear down Robert E. Lee, what else am I

supposed to think? Buck? We have Hillary Clinton who not only went to slave trade state, I'm talking about Yale. We have Hillary Clinton who has since returned to Yale to give speeches there. This lady is standing on the backs of dead black slaves giving speeches at Yale University. I don't know if she's serious about race relations in America. Speaking of Jesse Kelly, host if I'm right with Jesse Kelly on the first and also host of The Jesse

Kelly Show, on radio Jesse. Has anyone left tried to confront you on this and make a case as to why you're wrong, because I have to say, I can't even think of what a defense based upon, as you point out the rules as they are now established and being forced upon all the rest of us. I can't even think of what the opposition could to this movement to cancel Yale, to cancel Brown University, to cancel New York,

to cancel the New York Times name. I can't even think of what their good faith argument would be other than oh, no, we like this because we benefit from this name. Is there another argument? The only argument I've seen bug from this side is they'll do this thing where I got this one today where Brown University actually put out a report examining its own racist history, and

that's what they'll say. They'll put out a report. Well, wait a minute, everybody knows the Confederacy was fighting against slave We've we have our report there, we have the report knowing the Confederacy was fighting for slaves. So why do we have to then remove Confederate generals? Report is not good enough. The rules are as we currently stand. If you were involved in slavery, and some of these

people were heavily evolved. Your likeness, your name must be completely removed from the public square in every possible way. Those are the rules. I did not make these rules. I certainly would never have made these rules. But if that's what we've got to do, then that's what we've got to do. So it's time to burn down the

American university system. Do you think that this is the only way that we can, other than buy refusing to bend a need to the mob, that we can start to effectively fight back in a cultural sense of gain about this? You know, if effectively meaning that we have to turn cancel culture on itself, that the cancellers have to become the cancel ease. The truth is bug that we are. We like to comfort ourselves with the saying

that we're the silent majority. We are absolutely not numbers wise, we may be, the left owns the pillars of power in the United States of America, all of them. We even have a Republican president who's been completely hemmed in with one hundred percent bogus investigations for the first three years of his presidency. We have We're not losing the

culture war. We've lost it. We've lost it. We are now the rebel guerrilla force in the United States of America, and therefore we must conduct our battles the same way a guerrilla force does, and that is using the enemy's weapons against him. It is our only choice. That's the

bad news. The good news is it's a lot of fun. Well, General Jesse Kelly, what comes next in this war of attrition against the left, Well, once we have taken care of the American university system, the truth of the matter, as system, we're going to have to set our sights

on corporate America. Corporate America has been very loud, very loud about how not racist they are, recently about how woke they are, and so I think once we've taken care of the university system, we will find out these corporations, do a little digging and find out really where they come from too. Jesse Kelly got canceled ye out the trend nationally on Twitter. Everybody. He wants the left to live it's own rules. You should listen to what Jesse's got to shit I got to say on the Jesse

on the Jesse Kelly Show. Jesse, thanks so much, man, you're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I want to introduce this audience to a new voice from down in Texas, one of our absolute favorite states in this wonderful country. We have with us now, Will Douglas. He is a Dallas businessman who is challenging incumbent Democrat Retta Bowers for a seat on Texas' one hundred thirteenth district. Good to have you on, mister Will. How are you, sir? I'm doing well, bub Thanks for

having me on this afternoon. So you're you're running for a seat that's east east Dallas and going out a little bit into the countryside. First, I want to ask you. We're getting a lot of national press attention on the on what's going on with Texas with COVID nineteen and the reopening. What can you tell us about things? I mean, is this is this some fear mongering from the Democrat left or are you particularly worried about how things are

going in Texas and more specific in the Dallas area. Well, First, first of all, I think Governor Abbotston an incredible job here in Texas. We've we've really straddled the line on making sure that we're keeping people safe and at the same time making sure that that businesses are able to open back up and keep our economy going as strong

as we possibly can. I think the spikes that you're seeing recently, UM, a lot of them are are younger people, and as we know, as restaurants and bars open back up, younger people were the ones who were going into those establishments. And they're also the ones that are less likely to be impacted by um, you know, by systemic COVID. So UM they're they're asymptomatic, they're all, you know, wandering around going into places, and they're less likely to die from it.

So naturally there's there's going to be in Greeces as things open back up. And have you seen an influx into the Dallas area, because I talk on this show fairly regularly about how in New York you had four hundred thousand people who have left the city since the start of COVID, and many of them are saying they're not planning on coming back. They're trying to enroll their kids in schools Outside of New York City, where I'm currently doing this show. People are going to Texas, they're

going to Florida. They're moving out of this state. Have you seen someone that influx in the Dallas area or has it not really hit? I know it's hit Austin. Yeah I haven't. I haven't seen it yet due to you know, their reasoning being from COVID. But I know it's coming and I can't blame them. Why would you not? You know, Texas, You know, I guess we have a reputation as a flyover state, but I think Texas is the future of this country. You look at what Texas

has built here. I mean, we're a bashing a free market enterprise. I moved here from Oklahoma seven years ago with you know, nothing in my pocket except student loan debt and some fire my billy. And there's plenty of opportunities here. And you know, you come here, you work hard, you do the right things, you can live the American dream. And that's why I'm running us. It's important for me that Taxas stays red and the strong Republican leadership that

has built that built this incredible state. We have to keep it. Um. I was bucket. One of the reasons I'm running is I tried to do business in New York in Manhattan. I tried to acquire a pharmacy up there, and you guys, y'all make it really hard on small businesses, really tough to get small businesses off the ground. No, well we are excellent, come back, we are excellent New York City at crushing ingenuity, free enterprise and the operating of the of the free market. That's really where New

York City particularly does a great job. And really really high taxes. So there's that. There's that too. But if you're a huge corporation and you're connected, then you're in good shape. So that's so those folks can be very very happy about that. I mean, I just want to ask you, will before let you get back to running for your seat down in Texas east of Dallas one hundred and thirteenth Congressional district. So tell me this, what are you going to do and what's what's the top

priority if you beat the liberal incumbent in that seat. Well, you know, had you asked me that six months ago, um, you know, I would have said, you know, the focus would be on small business, the focus would be on education, on crime in that district. But now post COVID, the most important thing is jobs. I mean, we've got two to three million Texans without a job, and if a politician tells you that anything else is more important than jobs in the economy, I think they're lying to you.

And so that's why it's more important than ever for our state to have as many representatives with the small business experience as possible. I'm a small business owner. I have, you know, multiple employees. I had to file for PPP loans. I know firsthand what small business owners have gone through these last several months, and I have an idea of what it's going to take to get get our economy

warm back and thriving again. We'll Douglas. Everybody running for Congress down in the Dallas area, well, best of luck. We hope you come out on top, and we hope you'll come back on the show and tell us what your plans are once you do. Absolutely, absolutely, thanks Buck, I appreciate it. All right. So you're seeing so much

of this national reporting on the COVID situation. I just want to tell you it couldn't be more clear that they are they are drilling down specifically on Texas and Florida and saying that look at what's going on here. Oh my gosh, these these reckless Florida is not even a pure red state. Obviously, it's a bit of a purple state trending red. But but look at what they've got, a Republican governor and they've managed to beat the odds

here somehow. The bad guys in this story when you look at leadership are Governor Abbott of Texas and the governor governor of Florida de Santis, and really Governor Cuomo here in New York gets a pass wells a Democrat. The Democrat he's now saying that he blames the federal government because the federal government didn't focus on COVID coming from Europe. The focus was on it coming from China,

which he says was wrong, which is not true. Of course, it was from China to Europe then to the United States. But there are a whole bunch of very obvious political reasons why he has shifted that focus. But I keep looking at the numbers, and we had, at worst over the course of a week, about a four percent incline in cases nationwide. Hospitalizations for COVID, for serious COVID cases and deaths from COVID are way down, and continuing to

trend down. Do not believe the fearers out there, do not believe the people that will clearly benefit from trying to turn this into something that it's you know, and yet again, you know, lockdown two point zero to turn this into oh my gosh, we've underestimated this. Where is your mask? Why aren't you wearing masks out in public? Well,

because in open air, masks are effectively irrelevant. There's no reason that we should be forced to wear masks in sunshine, in the open, not in dense proximity to people and indoors. But this has become very, very political. It's also why there was such a focus on whether people were wearing masks at the Trump rally. Young people. We have data now. We did not have data in the beginning the way

we do now the beginning of the pandemic. The data tells us that young people, meaning people under forty, are at very low risk. People under twenty or effectively no risk. So if you're nineteen, you know, you want to be careful that you don't get COVID and give it to grandma grandpa. But your risk from COVID is most zero, which brings us back to the early days of the spring break situation with COVID nineteen, where they were making fun of these spring breakers for not staying locked at

home and everything else. Turns out they weren't really at high risk, and as long as they're careful about who they're around from the high risk population, you can certainly make a case that they should be able to live their lives again. But you see, the Left hasn't made this transition. People who were reasonable and look at the data understand that we can't keep doing the lockdown, and that has been from the beginning. You know, let's not let the cure be worse than the disease. Trump said it.

This goes back to Easter. I mean, this goes back for months now. But the Left hasn't been rulling to make this concession and say, look, no matter what, we should not lockdown again the way that we have, No matter what, we can't do this. We can't put society through this. Given what we know about this disease and the lethality and the risks from it. It would be reckless and irresponsible to lockdown again, even if there is a spike in someplace, even if it trends up in

some places. You know, you're you're putting so much pressure on society, and it's wrong. It's wrong that the government is making stupid decisions around this, and we cannot allow them to suspend the constitution, suspend our rights to spend, free enterprise and the huge sectors of the economy, because ultimately, this is about shutting down now so that Trump can't

win the election in the fall. They'll pretend that it's all about saving lives, but if you look at the national media giving Cuomo a pass on all this, it's not about live It's about beating Trump, just like so much else that we see. Thanks for listening to The Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, roll call time, everybody, And as you know, we don't have producer Marking this week. He is off

for the week. So if there's any you know, weird things that happened on the show, any weird hounds, if I forget what day it is or something like that, Mark's not here. Producer Brandon though, is keeping the house in order. But just so you know, we're kind of doing things a little differently right now, and let's get to it. Sarah is the first up. Hey Buck, thanks so much for your call for wartime Conservatives. I wanted

to share what has recently happened in Washington State. Our far left state legislature passed a partisan, middle of the night bill that requires all K to twelve schools to teach comprehensive sex ed approved curricular largely provided by Planned Parenthood. The people of Washington rose up against this lunacy. We began collecting signatures to put this bill before the voters in November. We needed one hundred and thirty thousand signatures

to do so. In the middle of the pandemic lockdown, we rose up and collected a historic number of signatures, two hundred and sixty six thousand, over twice what was in the highest number of signatures ever collected on any piece of legislation and virtual virtually zero coverage from the press, not a peep. Awake, Christians and Conservatives. Time to get busy and take our country back. Love the show. Keep up the good work well, Sarah, Thank you, and you

keep up the good work. Look at this, getting signatures, taking action, gathering together, having your voices heard, on an issue like this, Yeah, I don't even know what this sex ed curriculum is, but k through twelve schools. First off, I would want to know at what age do they start this sex ed teaching, And I would want to know what they are teaching. And I'm sure it's a

lot of stuff that people would find pre objectionable. Remember this for those who are wondering what the real implications are of that Supreme Court decision from last week, written by Gorsitch selling out constitutional conservatism so he doesn't have to be the bad guy on trans equality and trans rights and the LGBTQ plus agenda. I believe that is the I believe that is a full acronym of the movement. But what Corsage did means that you're going to see

a lot more aggressive teaching. And some would argue brainwashing of very young people into the belief that you remember it. Now it's not a belief anymore. Now it's a civil rights sision because of the Supreme Court decision, hasn't been delworth by the state legislatures, has not been allowed to

be voted on. No, no, no. Someone who decides without any physical or biological basis for it just because they feel someone who decides that they are a different gender is now to be, as a matter of law, treated and even spoken to as if they were that gender or else, You're gonna imagine what they're going to be teaching your kids. And anyone who brings up the science science, I thought we liked science, right. I thought the Left

was all about it. And when it brings up the science on this and for example, points to the contagion that occurs among young people. When there's one twelve year old who decides that, let's say he is transgender, then there are all of a sudden or other eleven and twelve year olds who decide that they are transgender. And statistically it is not possible if this is just a

pocket of transgenderism that has been discovered. This is a psychological contagious contagion effect that happens where people who are very young and impression will say, oh, that person is now getting a lot of attention, and they're all of a sudden very important to a whole bunch of adults around them. Maybe I am too, Or even if it's as simple as that person has certain feelings, I have those feelings sometimes too. But I'm not going to wait

for puberty and for growth and for maturity. I'm going to make a decision now about puberty blockers and hormone therapy and perhaps even relatively radical surgery that will affect me for the rest of my life. And don't expect anyone to present you with the truth about the happiness of those who engage who have gender what is now called gender affirmation surgery, when it is clearly it is at a minimum gender transition surgery. Okay, they call it affirmation.

This is a political trick. It's gender transition. And if you look at the happiness or lack thereof of people long term who have that surgery, the data is quite clear. But the data cannot be allowed to interfere with an important political narrative, and as we know, the LGBTQ plus agenda is essential to the left. There can be no challenging it. And now, as a function of law, you risk your career, you risk your money, You risk so

much if you try to challenge it openly. As I've said, now, now we're at a point where you better call someone who was a he, not just a sheet, but maybe Z or they. That's right, plural pronouns for individuals. You're going to have to do this in the workplace or else, and you're not going to be You're not gonna be viewed as a hero. You're gonna be one loan voice the media destroys. You will be charging the machine gun nests my friends without a plan to take it. So

don't do it. I had a friend recently asked me his company's coming under pressure from Black Lives Matter activist and he said, you know, what do you think I should do? And I said, I don't want your company to get in I don't want you to be boycott or something. You know, if this is not something where you're comfortable, if you don't have the ability right now to comfortably take that stand and you can't, don't get crushed to just be another example the left uses not

everyone should be in the fight. Everyone should be in the fight in the ways that they can that are sensible. But you know, don't don't sacrifice yourself to the mob for no reason that does that does know one any good? I know there's complexity here, it's very easy. He was like, yeah, you know, get in the fight. Do it? Would no, no, no,

be savvy about it. Be savvy about it. And but look, see Sarah is riding in from Washington, and she's telling us about an instance where they did they took public action, they were savvy, and they won the fight. Or they're winning the fight, I should say, so that's how you got to do it, Ryan Buck god Willing. After Trump wins a second term, is it time for him to pursue expanding the Supreme Court after the DACA ruling. I can't see any harm in the pursuit. The court has

to be fixed somehow. At the very least, it puts the left on record arguing against it. My shield has been taken away by those who are supposed to hold it high. Ryan, I don't think that the answer from our side should be court packing, because that's what the left always says they want to do when they don't get their way so effectively. Once you open that door, the left will do it. They'll they'll do it even more.

I don't have a good answer for you, though, about how do we deal with the fact that the left gets judges that are activist, leftist democrats and they are entirely reliable. You get a Democrat put forward a left wing judge. Guess what that judge is going to give you what you need on the big cases ninety nine times out of it, really one hundred times out of one hundred. With conservatives like Roberts and Gorcich. Oh my, it's more like a fifty fifty proposition on any case

where conservative conservatives and constitutionalism are at are involved. Right, it's a fifty fifty proposition. You know, the best judge currently sit on though. The two best judges currently on the Supreme Court are Clarence Thomas and Alito. They're the two best right now. They're They're the two that are

principled and stalwarts and they keep it real. Everybody else on that court, I mean, Cavanaugh's okay, He's been pretty good so far, but not great on process, though he at least is willing to say the left is insane and may it up as they go along. Like Kavanaugh will say, you're just pretending words have no meaning because you want a certain thing. That's not okay, even if I like the thing that you're trying to achieve with that. That's the Kavanaugh position. But he at least believes in

the law is a thing. I mean, the left is just like, whatever you want, let's do it, and Roberts goes along with it, and even Gorsiche will go along with it. So no, Ryan, I don't think that court packing is the answer. But if you're saying, Buck, what is the answer, I don't have it right now. I don't think anybody does. I just can't. I can't think of what it would be, quite honestly, Matthew, Buck, You're awesome.

Never missed the show the other day. You had an email that said Gorsiche had an ulterior motive for his ruling to define sex. You ask how that would ever come up. I think there'll be tons of lawsuits in the coming months. The biggest one that comes to mind is the recent law pass in Idaho that bands transgendered

athletes from competing in its opposite their biological gender. Now, I don't think Gorstich thought many steps ahead to plan this, but it is a certainty that case will eventually get to Scotus, and in order to settle it, they will have to make a ruling on the definition of sex. Stay safe in New York. Keep the fight shields high, Matthew, I'm familiar with this. I believe the Department of Justice under Barr has said that they will defend the ban

on the transgendered athletes in Idaho. But this is a very good example of just how aggressive and how fast the left moves on these issues, and how it starts with something that sounds somewhat reasonable and very rapidly changes

into something else. Right, all of a sudden, it's not, Hey, let's just be nice to people and be accepting of them, even if they're even if they're having a lot of you know, emotional and psychological difficulties with this position everything else, and you know, let's make sure that we're helpful and kind to them, which you know, I think we should

always be helpful and kind of people. But it goes from that to do what we say or else pretend that a two hundred pound male competing in you know, women's lacrosse doesn't have a biological advantage over all the women in that sport. You better pretend or else. Well, this is stupid, this is idiocy. You know, I see so many leftists who are so pathetic and cowardly that they'll even say things like, oh, you know this, you know, I know plenty of women Whenever a conservative brings us up.

This happens all the time. I know plenty of women who could kick your butt. And it's like, no, you really, if you're talking about a two hundred pound, six foot tall male who's in who's in reasonable condition, in his thirties or forties or twenties, you don't know plenty of women who could beat him up. Okays, to stop saying. That's not being an idiot. Men are on average for the same biological structure, meaning the same basic height and even weight. Men are on average double the upper body

muscle of women because of biology. All right, this is why it's so you know, it's so important to protect women. It's why it's such an odious thing for anyone to ever lay a hand on a woman. I mean, for there's a lot of reasons for it, but one of them is just that women are not able to defend themselves against even your average woman cannot defend herself with her hands effectively against an average male. Now, all policy is based upon what is generally true. There will always

be exceptions in any policy. But to find to be living in a society where the existence of extremes that exceptions as allowed to undermine policy that is generally to the good and true. Then we have a country. Then we have what we have right now, where you have madness. I mean, this is absurd, This is insane. Everyone understands.

I mean, if I was a decent, just decent high school athlete in a few sports, and I rode crew for two years in college, and I'm not trying to this is not about me, but I can just tell you having played I played soccer with the women's soccer team in the off season for funds. Sometimes, you know, they'd bring guys over to we do these you know, mixed team uh, you know, for exhibitions and such. I

played basketball at the women's basketball team. I would have been a three sport All American in D three women's athletics. And that's not bragging because anybody, any guy that I know, was a decent high school athlete, certainly the D three level would have been the same thing. Three sport All American,

maybe a D one three sport All American. Quite honestly, and we all know this, right, any any guy listening to this who's reasonably athletic, who was pretty okay at sports at the high school level, I'm not gonna talking about college, you'd be like, yeah, I could have played D one college athletics, and that's that's not bragging. This

is a biological reality, folks. This is why. And you even have the left so insane now that they'll say, well, you know, a transgendered MMA fighter, and that already has happened with fallon Fox. Transgender mma fighter just annihilating women in the ring. We're supposed to believe that this is like normal and safe and okay. The left, the left will sacrifice women and womanhood and femininity and the female gender.

And just ask JK Rowling about this. The female gender is being destroyed by the Left in the name of expanding gender equality. It's a I know, it's quite a conundrum, but that's what's happening. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, more roll call, come in your way now. And I just want to say that I always appreciate everybody writing in and sharing your thoughts here, and make sure you call into this week.

We'll get to voicemails on Friday, maybe even some Thursday voicemails this week eight four four nine two five eight four four nine hundred Buck. Also make sure you go to buck Sexton dot com. I will have an original editorial up, if not tomorrow, certainly by the next day. Going to be writing every week as well as posting more and more from the show pieces written by the team. You need to check it out bucksexton dot com. We want as many as possibly go into this site on

daily basis. You can also listen to the podcast there, and please do spread the word about the podcast. It feels like everybody and their grandma has a podcast these days. You got these major news networks that are releasing their broadcasts as podcasts. I don't know why anybody would listen

to this, I mean, it's but people do. So more than ever, we really need you to spread the word and get people onto Team Buck because we want to make sure that we stay well into the top one hundred podcasts where we currently are and really want to continue to push. We got down to about top sixty at one point about a month ago, I think, and we really wanted to break into the top fifty. So we're hoping to do that and we need your help to do that by just telling people, Hey, check out

this guy Buck Sexton. If every person listening to this just on podcast. Never mind the huge audience we have on radio. If every person listening on podcast across the tree shared it with one person, we would be in the top certainly in the top fifty, maybe in the top twenty five overnight. So all I need is everybody listening to the podcast. I got one person to start listening in with the team, and that would be fantastic. All right, let's get back to it. We were at

let me see, John, Oh no, we'll do Matthew. I'm sorry, Buck, you're awesome. Never miss the show. Well, thank you so much. I really, I really appreciate that. And we try to be awesome here, and we're doing everything we can to be as awesome as we can. What don't we got here? He shares. The other day he said that gorsh, Oh no, matt we already did. Matthew, my bad. All right, here we go, John Buck. If you don't, I don't know if you watched Trump's rally, but I'm assuming you did.

When it started, he seemed tired and somewhat defeated, but wow, once he got going, he was unstoppable. It was just what we needed. I loved his shots at the fake news, especially when he just tossed his glass of water the side to work the crowd. Feels like the tide might be turning back. Or in the worlds of Michael Scott. Oh how the turntables. Yes, indeed, John good, Michael Scott reference and God bless and thank you very much for listening to the show and honor to have you here

with us. All right, everybody that's going to be it for today, thank you so much for tuning in. Please do pass the buck. Get one person that's you know in your life, one conservative or just one moderate, one one individual who needs a little more political analysis in their life to listen. We'll be back with you tomorrow, same time and place. I know you all. Miss producer Mark, I'll tell him you said, Hi Shields, Hi,