Supreme Panic!

vacancy has been announced, Justice Kennedy will retire. This means it will be an all out political throwdown to see who will replace him. Coming on the heels of a very good week for conservatives at the Supreme Court and an overall fantastic week for President Trump, looks like the Libs are on their back heels. We'll talk about that and what's coming next next on The buck Sexton Show.

This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a great American Again. The buck Sexton Show begins. Analyst Kennedy is a swing boater, which side sometimes with the Democrats. So his vote is really important if you're on the left or if you're in the middle, But it terrifies people in the middle and on the left because it has the potential to

swing the Court in a different direction. Some friends say he's been thinking about stepping down, and if he does, that would allow President Trump to make the courts solidly conservative for decades. If he decides to retire, and there are signs that he would, it would be a war for this court like nothing seen in the past thirty years. Since the nomination of Robert Bourke was defeated and Justice Kennedy took his seat, everything changes in Washington. If he

retires would be just seismically. He a moderate conservative, So if he goes, that's gonna get President Trump a massive opportunity to move the court further to the right for generations, and Democrats would basically be powerless to stop it. The Democrats have to fight this tooth and now they have to use every process opportunity they have to stop this until next year we have a new center. Are you guys ready to maybe rip up some of the rules

that have limited Democrats. Democrats would digging fork here. You do everything they conceivably could do to block this nomination, any nomination for going forward. It's time for Democrats to throw down. We need to play by street rules. I think this is gonna be the fight of the century. I think the Democrats have to say no way, non pass Sario, no one passes this line. I think it's gonna be almost like Spanish Civil war stuff. Oh man, lives are terrified. Welcome to the buck Sex and show

everybody it has been such a good week. You know. They they thought they have the administration cornered with this whole parental separation at the border thing. They they thought they'd be able to just hammer Trump on that going into the fourth or July holiday and then heading into the recess. And we all we hear about is you know, Oh Trump is so mean, He's so evil, He's the worst.

We'll guess what. It has been quite a week for this administration for conservatism, and as I like to say, for America, it's a good thing, my friends, very very good thing. Indeed, you had this big decision come down today that, to borrow from the words of the left, gutted public sector unions or will gut in time public sector Unions, which I think is long overdue, very strong decision.

They're very much a worthwhile deep dive for us coming up on on some of those, uh, some of that, some of what came from from all of it um. And now we also have, uh, the Kennedy battle Royal that has expected you had big things happening today. You know, no one's even paying attention. I think, isn't Bolton meeting with the Russians, you know, to talk about US Russia policy.

I mean, there's there's other stuff that's going on that's not even on the radar right now because of what's happened at Supreme Court this week and and the panic over Kennedy. That what what is by the way, what is the strategy the Democrats have for trying to win in the mid terms. They had they had they had one thing they were gonna try to They're hoping for depressed Republican turn out and that they could get the base fired up for Democrats in enough places to take

at least the House. And now now that Republicans, by the way, no conservative, no conservative can look at what's going on right now and say, yeah, you know what, I don't like Trump still I'm still anti Trump. Oh really, you're gonna stay home with the Court at steak after what Trump gave us with Gorset, Now you're going to decide to be Mr. Principal or Ms Principal and allow the Democrats to take control and put some quote consensus candidate.

So here's the thing, folks, I can tell you from the history of the Court and the way that it has always gone, the left always stays left, just like the Democratic Party doesn't doesn't eat its own. They they have a unified front when it comes to the acquisition of power. I mean, they will squabble among themselves, but they always are unified against the enemy, which they view

as the Republicans. Centrist jurists are people that tend to be appointed by Republican presidents and then go against the right. But they they'll call them centrists right, um, and but but the left on the left, you got the Ginsburg's, the suitors, uh, the Soda Mayors, by the way, the worst justice on the Supreme Court. Right now, look Kagan, I of credit where it's due. You read Kagan, and you read her opinions. You say to yourself, all right,

this lady, you know she's she's making an argument. I mean, I'm I'm gonna tear apart her argument on the whole public sector union things. A little silly, little silly Elena, come on, but so do my Your stuff is just it's like I'm reading out of the teleprompter at MSNBC. It's just, you know, I hate this and I liked this other thing. So the law is whatever gives me the thing that I like. It's like you're on the Supreme Court, Justice Sodomoyer. Come on, you can do better

than that. It's not even making arguments. He's just just putting words to emotions and to preferred political positions. But this, this, this creates a whole different set of calculations for the mid terms. And I think that you're going to see uh this through that they should have been prepared for this a little bit. But don't be surprised if we are to find out that turn up the d n C is not really it wasn't wasn't really ready for this one. I've been alluding to this, by the way.

I've been hearing from my sources for many days now that this was coming. So I've been alluding to it on my new TV show at Hill dot tv slash Rising. But you can all check out at your leisure um and in fact, if you do, I'll even call it leisure because I'm not from the UK and that was weird. But the Kennedy retirement announcement has just turned this summer from a yeah, you don't have much in the Mueller probe, you don't have a lot of you know, to oh my gosh, this is the fight to end all fights.

Trump has already let it me know that he's got an excellent listed judges Blake clip fifteen. Please, we have a list of people that I actually had during my election. I had to twenty and as annointed a trial a little while ago. So we have a very excellent list of great, talented, highly educated, highly intelligent, hopefully tremendous people. I think you see the kind of quality that we're looking at when you look at that list. I added five additional people to the list, so it will be

somebody from that list. So we have now boiled a down to about you know, he's he's adding adding some amazing the list. It would be great to see see some names on there, some fun names too, you know, Supreme Court Justice Janine Pierrot. I don't know, could be he would He would defer by the way, if I were to say that, he would be like, oh, Buck, come on, you know, I just want to write Collins play baseball and go on TV from kind of time. You know, it would be a great Supreme Court justice.

Andy McCarthy, I want to start the Andy for Scotis Andy for Scotis hashtag. He's he's such a good guy, such a good legal mind and an honest guy. You know. One of the things I really like that Anie McCarthy. And you know, he's a Fox picked him up, which everyone it's it was amazing to see somebody get a contributorship at Fox, which is very hard to come by, and just see universal praise and acclaim for the decision

from the right. I mean, every every conservative note was like, yep, Andy, and he earned it, and he's and he's doing the work. He's a good guy. You know, he's about the contribution to the conversation. He's not one of these you know, dirty pool players or something out there in media. There's a lot of those. They worked for CNN, um, but you know, and he would be a great choice, I think for Supreme Court judge would be a lot of fun.

Judge Need is great man, she's feisty. Um, you've also got I'm not gonna say on a more serious note, but on a more likely note, the possibility of Mike Lee. I think Mike Lee be on there. You know, I interviewed Ted Cruz what a week or two ago. It all blurs together now, And I asked him about this and Ted crew said, no interest, no interest in being a Supreme Court justice. He wants to stay in the political fight, which I viewed as a Ted Cruise way

of saying he is going to run again. So there is that at which, you know, who knows where the party will be at that point in time. But I can I want to spend a little more time marinating in the in the general panic, in the general panic over at CNN when this was finally announced, please play seventeen. This could potentially transform the Court for generations. And you know, when you think of Justice Kennedy, you do think of someone who's a moderate. But his vote was crucial in

a few areas. And let me just tick them off. Same sex marriage, access to abortion, and affirmative action. Okay, so those are three areas in which he was a very key and deciding vote. And now with his retirement, of course, the president is going to get an opportunity to name another conservative to the bench. It will cause an uproar, I can tell you on Capitol Hill. You're heading into the mid to our elections here, Brooke, and so once again the Supreme Court will become a huge

issue Democrats. It is gonna be huge, baby, you know what I mean, it really is. It's gonna be gonna be gonna be crazy stuff over the Supreme Court fight. You'll notice what they're really worried about is abortion on affirmative action, because they're clinging to a very flimsy legal

fiction on both of those. Abortion is flatly not a constitutional right just and I know honest leftists who will say that, In fact, the most famous professor of jurisprudence that my own college would be like he he was, you know, abortion is absolutely a woman's riot. And you know, and even in college, I was like, I found the one pro life professor on campus to be my my mentor and friend. Right. I mean, that's so this stuff has all been obvious that some of us for a

long time. But This guy was rapidly pro choice. He was like, Oh, no, road you wait is crap crap law. It's not a good it's just not a good decision. It's just, Oh, I want this, so I'm gonna I'm going to right this in such a way that I can have what I want. Oh that's like what Soda Mayor does on every case, every case. I've never seen that she is the most consistently and completely wrong justice.

She reminds me of this. I had this teacher in high school, And do anybody from Regius High schools listening to this, you know exactly who I'm talking about? Who who would make this offer to you that on a multiple choice test, if you could get the most wrong answer every the most wrong, not just wrong, because there are four options, right, the most wrong answer for the whole test, I think you would get instead of a hundred points, you would get like two hundred or something.

But if you got uh more than two of them wrong, you got a zero. That was so it was quite a gamble. I never knew anybody took that up, but Soda Mayor takes that gamble all the time. In this sense that she's the most wrong on each Supreme Court decision that comes down. It's like you took a panelist from MSNBC and we're like, hey, just you don't have any legal training, just write something about this. What do you think about that? Well, who do you want to win?

You know, what are you thinking? That's what she does? Uh, So that's going to be very interesting, my friends, this is going to be very interesting. Oh but abortion, firm of action, those are both on legally flimsy ground and they know it. They know it. Um a firm of action in particular, gotta go, gotta go now. Abortion is

a more important issue. It has to go to. But just understand this, I believe looking into this now and we're we're about to get into the whole fight and oh, all the filibuster stuff and who's responsible for the propaganda effort that is about to be mounted by the Democrats on the issue of this judge is going to do it will, mark my words, the propaganda effort from the Democrats. All this Supreme Court nomination will make the Mueller collusion

fantasy look aine and rational by comparison. I mean, this is going to be the knockdown, drag out fight of the only I mean, the only I can think about that might come close would be the you know, the fights over the Iraq War. You know, I mean, I mean, it's this is gonna be a whole other level, folks of nastiness. I mean the fact that we were having trouble with civility before this came down. Think about all that. Do you think things are gonna get more civil now?

I mean we just if civility was at a was at one on a ten point scale, it's about to go negative five. This is gonna get crazy. But we should talk about the filibusters. We should talk about where this is all gonna go and what's at stake here for the left and for the right. Also, I've got some thoughts on the border still at cartels, the tying to cartels. You know, that's a topic I've been talking about here for a long time. I've got more thoughts,

more research that I've been doing into that. And we just have a rock and show for all of you. That's us promise eight or four nine to eight to five eight four four stare right there. We'll be back. The Senate should reject on a bipartisan basis, any justice who would overturn Roe v. Wade, or undermine key health care protections. The Senate should reject anyone who will instinctively side with powerful special interests over the interests of average Americans.

Our Republican colleagues in the Senate should follow the rule they set in twenty six not to consider a Supreme Court justice in an election year. Senate stands ready to fulfill its constitutional role by offering advice and consent on President Trump's nominated to fill this vacancy. We will vote to confirm Justice Kennedy's successor this fall. As in the case of Justice Gorsuch, Senators will have the opportunity to meet with President Trump's nominee, examine his or her qualifications,

and debate the nomination. You know, the Democrats are gonna get shameless on this one, more so than usual. So, I mean, there you have Chuck Schumer, who's they're just gonna rewrite history, and they're gonna shout down anybody that the talking points on this are gonna come fast and furious. They're gonna be re writing history on this stuff and acting like they didn't open the door to eliminating the filibuster for judicial nominees they did. It was them they

made the move. In fact, I know people say Mitch McConnell reminds them of like Myrtle the Turtle. You know, I know people say these things. You know McConnell, you know is you know he's But I gotta give the guy some credit. I don't know, I don't know where Myrtle the Turtle kim in my mind, but you know

it's there's something turtle been with the glasses. He just seems like if you had, if you've picked up a spirit animal for Mitch McConnell, I think a turtle would probably be in the uh in the mix a tortoise. John says, it's better. It's probably true. Now, remember the tortoise and the hair tortoise. Maybe slow, the tortoise may not be sexy, but the tortoise wins the race. And with Mitch McConnell, guys, I'm people, you know he's a swamp creature, blah b by blah and all that stuff.

Guess what, Mitch held the line on this, and you gotta give the guy credit. He got a lot of heat for it, and the Senate colleagues and all this other stuff. Whatever. Mitch held the line. You could say anybody would have, but I don't. I'm not sure about that. I don't Rebufflicans gave on a lot of stuff Mitch, Mitch. He could have gone along with a Merrick Garland thing. Oh he's a centrist. Let's go with Marrick Garland. It

will make everybody happy. Bipartisan. Yeah, right, So we gotta throw a little freedom on high five to Mitch McConnell everybody. He deserves it, just saying. Plus his wife is fierce. You see that, dude, that clip. You gotta find somebody who loves you like Elaine Child loves Mitch McConnell. When those when those thugs came near him, she wasn't she wasn't playing games. Proud. I was proud of her, proud to see that. H dude, she'd she'd be good by

the way. I actually, I'm not sure we'll get into because we're gonna have a lot of talk about the different nominees, different possibilities. But I actually think that, uh one of the very best candidates right now is in fact a very a conservative Catholic female. Uh. So, not that we pick people based upon their gender identity or just their gender. But just just saying that'll be interesting.

That'll change some of the dynamics because they are. There's gonna be all out of sault On if it's a conservative, and it better be by the way, I don't think it will. Trump knows. Trump does this, he seals his legacy no matter what. He's holding the line for America buck sex in his back. But if he gets replaced by a hardline social conservative, it is there. The Democratic leadership will have hell to pay. They cannot let this happen.

They have to play hardball. They've got to do exactly to the other side what Mitch McConnell did to them. Play hardball and win. They must prevent the Republican control. Send it to pick another justice on this hard right. Quick look at the decisions starting with Bush Gore. Look

at the decisions starting going onto the Howard case. They look at the case on citizens United with the people the most money when all the elections, and then that got off of the decision yesterday, which is based they voted right down the line and five for in every case. The Democrats have got a fight for that fifth sea with everything they've got, got a quiff Matthews to put down the bourbon. Why is he always shouting? Why is Chris Matthews always shouting because he have an inside voice.

Use your inside voice, Chris, use your words. He's just always bye bye bye, blah blah. I gotta get the guy credit that he's got a longevity in this business, been around for a long time. And actually met him once true story, cocktail party in the DC area. It was fancy. Uh, he was boring, but nice, you know, polite. We talked for like twenty seconds. So maybe I'm being too harsh on the boring this. He needs a haircut more than I do. Bam, Well, well played, John, True story.

So you know they're saying all kinds of crazy stuff. Now. The problem, folks, is that we live in an era when any of us who want can via the the the the Google machine figure out what the Democrats used to do and how they played this game when they were in power. And this is all part of the necessary corrective that the Trump administration provides after eight years of obama Ism. Obama went scorched earth first three first

two years. Not a single vote for Obamacare he put through sod Mayor and Kagan to just hardcore leftists as his Supreme Court picks. By the way, one of them was in a mid term election year and she was confirmed. So guess what this argument you're seeing about, how, oh, it's an election countal election. No, no, no, no, it's not a presidential election year, the mid term election year. And the Republicans did not try or did not, you know, lay down in the proverbial railroad tracks to stop Obama

from getting his picks. The people voted for Obama. Obama won those two elections, right, he got to put into Supreme Court justices, and they are they are hard left. As I said, Kagan has some intellectual heft, so do Mayor. You know. It's it's like you're stepping into the MSNBC green room to hear somebody give legal opinions who's never been to law school. It's just it's just the way it is. Uh. I'm speaking of that. We got to talk about this union case. I will get to the

union case. I'm not trying to delay on that. That will be coming up, if not right after this segment, that will come up in the next break. And yeah, uh, but Matthews knows that this is gonna be a huge fibe. And as I was saying a few moments ago, abortion and affirmative action are the two areas where they are they feel there the most vulnerable on abortion. What could happen? And it will take years, folks. And this assumes that

we actually get a conservative justice through. But if it is no longer considered a constitutional right, which it is not. I mean, technically they've made it one, but it is not actually in the Constitution, as we all know, it's not a constitutional right. If that happens, then it'll get pass back to the states, and you will have states

that will clearly outlaw abortion. In fact, Jeffrey Tubin, when I think, is a particularly unreliable legal analyst on CNA just in terms of his predictions, and and he's just a partisan, right, He's a partisan that they pretend as illegal analyst. But he said this, and I think this is true. You are going to see twenty states pass

laws banning abortion outright, just banning abortion. And because they know that, there are now going to be five votes on the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade, and abortion will be illegal in a significant part of the United States. In eighteen months. Row V. Wade is doomed. It is gone because Donald Trump won the election. Now, I want to be very clear about this. That is

another way of saying what he just said. And now, for liberals, by the way, this is this is going after their unholy grail, right, this is going after the most precious thing to modern liberalism, which is abortion. More than anything else, this is the one thing that is closest to well. To call it a sacrament is the opposite of what it is. It's really a right, you know, R I T e UM. But they they will fight with everything they have on this. They will go after people.

The nastiness, the incivility you've seen will will only escalate. But it's another way of and I want to be very clear on this now. I want to make sure that I get on the record with this. Now, this means that if Trump picked somebody that he says he will, and we have no reasonable believe that he won't, if McConnell in this and the GOP Senate holds the line. By the way, there are some Republicans I worry about defections from you. You have some totally unreliable punks on

the GOP side in the Senate. Jeff Flake, Oh, there's there's a number of them, folks. You don't know what they're gonna do. They might be willing to come up the works here just because they know. If Trump puts Corsitch and someone like Corsitch on the Court, his four years have been I mean, unless he actually does start a nuclear war with China over nothing, his four years will be worth it. And I think everybody knows that

his four years will have had real lasting impact. Never mind the fact he's crushing it on the economy, He's just it's just been a great He's completely put the left wing media on their back heels. He's changed the American conversation over politics and the media landscape forever. So that's all stuff that we have to thank as president for. But on abortion, and this is where I was going

a moment ago. If he if this happens, if we get somebody who is a conservative jurist on the High Court and Roe v. Wade is overturned, um, that will mean that Donald Trump will have saved countless, likely millions of lives. That's what that will mean. That is what his election. We'll mean. Think about that for a moment,

think about the impact of that. And for all of my friends out there who are conservatives who are not cautious on Trump, not calling balls and strikes on Trump, but are still dead set against Trump, think about what you're really doing. Think about what's really going on here. Play the long game. Lives are at stake. That is not an overstatement. If you are pro life, you absolutely

believe it with every fiber of your being. And President Trump, for all of his imperfections, for all of his locker room talk and you know which I know somebody you like, I actually kind of like it, But for all of that, for his lack of messaging discipline of although you know, people say that, and I was like, this is the guy who single handily has taken on the left wing media machine, and it's just giving them rhetorical, bloody noses day in and day out, rhetorical we don't actually believe

in violence, you know what I'm saying. He's slapping them around, buck slapping them left and right. And but that same president who has that ability will be will be in a position now to have saved going forward, untold numbers of lives. And by the way, some of you are saying, buck, but there'll still be states California, New York, They'll still have abortional monemnents. I understand that, but there'll be other states that don't. And that alone will mean fewer abortions,

which means more lives, more life, more babies. Um. So this is the stakes are very very high. And just one more thing, on one more note on this, on a firm of action, the the left doesn't have a leg to stand on anymore. Um, the cases that are being brought by Asian Americans on this about Harvard and you're just seeing this elsewhere. A firmative action is something that people like that is legally not justifiable. And when I mean people, Democrats and the left likes, and some

conservatives are not concerned. Some Republicans are kind of okay with it because they want to be accepted at cocktail parties. The same kind of Republicans that tell people their libertarians and cocktail parties because they want to have friends, they tend to be okay with a firmtive action too, because they don't want to seem or racist. Um. But affirm of action is on its last legs and this will mean the end of it, and what will really worry

liberals once affirmn of action goes. And I'm getting ahead of myself here, because they're gonna put up we're we're never gonna have seen a fight over a nominee like we're gonna see over this one. People say it would be like Bork. I wasn't around for that, so certainly not in my lifetime or not in my adult lifetime. Um, but a firm of action if it goes, people will have to think back to and say, hold on a second,

So was that really just unconstitutional the whole time? We're liberals just pandering to minority constituencies with a system of racial spoils, as Justice Scalia called it, a system of racial preferences because it was politically convenient for them and because there was a degree of you know, that's how liberals view the world, that's how they view things. Uh, there's gonna be a fight over the history here of the filibuster thing. I want to talk to you about

that because that's important. You're going to hear a lot of lies about it, and then we will get into this public sector union issue, which I have strong feelings about. I was not in a public sector union. But I worked for the federal government. As you know, I made a lot of coffee. But I didn't know about black rifle. Actually black rival didn't exist at the time, so I can't follow myself there. Drank a lot of Comi coffee during my CIA days. Uh eight four four eight to

five eight four four nine buck. We'll talk a bit about the filibuster history. It's very, very important because you're gonna see a lot of lies by this and I want you to be up to speed on how they're lying. And then we'll talk about that Supreme Court case about

thoughts on the border. The car tells. What they're not telling you is that human smuggling, include of families and of children, is a massive profit maker now for the cartels, and cartels are using those same smuggling rings to bring drugs, of course into the country. If you're moving people, you might as well move drugs. These are these are stories, These are realities that need a whole lot more attention. Um.

So there's that. By the way, if you want to send me some thoughts for roll called Facebook dot com, slashbox Sexton and also we've been doing some some fun Facebook Lives, which you can check out there too, which you'll see a little bit of an insider view of the Freedom Hunt team. Light up the lines, much more show coming. Stay with me. I think its the single

most consequential decision I've ever made. I felt very confident that had the shoemen on the other foot, a Democratic Senate simply would not have confirmed a Supreme Court nominated by a Republican president of the middle of election. In fact, Joe Biden said that the one who I could see

that he had offered that I'll be a suggestion. I was pretty confident that the complaints would be pretty rank hypocrisy, knowing full well that in the middle of a presidential election you're not likely to be able to confirm Miss McConnell. That was earlier today, Mitch taking a victory lap. Right now, my friends, Mitch is Mitch is pouring out Chris stal and hanging with all of his peeps. He he deserves it. He uh, good for mitch Man. You know, we gotta

get guys, we gotta give credit. I know, people go on radio they're like, oh, the Republicans sell us out in the establishment of bla blah. Yeah, I mean that happens too, But Mitch, he got it done on this one. On the filibuster though, remember Harry Reid back in tweeted this out thanks to all of you who encouraged me to consider filibuster reform and had to be done. They started this, folks, Republicans just finished it, you know, Democrats

when it comes to the filibuster and judicial nominees. Of the guy in the bar who pokes you in the chest and then you know, you lay him out with a haymache and he was like, whoa, you didn't have to hit me. It's like, don't don't push me, you know what I mean? They pushed. They started it, we finished it. So that's and and now people gonna say, oh Buck, but you know, just wait till the Democrats. Yeah, have you see It's gonna be a while, folks. It's

gonna be a while before this is a problem. We have to think about like six years from now at a minimum. I think, so there's that if Ted Cruz has his way, it'll be math. Buck is not gonna math fourteen years. It's weird to think about this. I'll

be an old man at that point. Son, Senator Harry Reid said that, and just you know, back in Mitch McConnell, on this filibuster reform issue, said the following play Please, democrats are threatening to break the rules of the Senate, break the rules of the Senate in order to change the rules of the Senate. And over what? Over what over a court that doesn't even have enough work to do? The majority of leader promised, he promised, over and over again that he wouldn't break the rules of the Senate

in order to change them. If you want to play games, set get another precedent that you will no doubt come to regret. Say to my friends on the other side of the all you will regret this, and you may regret it a lot sooner than you think. The words of Mitch McConnell. You'll regret this, and you may regret it a lot sooner than you think Democrats. And here we are prophetic stuff from Mitch McConnell. He is totally correct, He is right on this one. And good things, good

things are coming, my friends. I think that we're gonna see um although it's gonna be so ugly, I just also it's gonna be a good end result, I believe. But man, this is going to be so so ugly. In the meantime, people are just gonna they're gonna throw everything that and I'm telling about the filibuster thing, just so we're all very clear. They're gonna lie to you. They're gonna say, oh, there's a rule that Republicans know.

There's not there's not some rule. The the Senate majority leader, when it was Harry Read they changed this so that they could start court packing. Obama engaged in a vast campaign of court packing at the federal circuit court level, and I think a third of the federal judiciary right now. Obama pointees, all right, those are lifetime appointments. So now Trump is doing a good job too. Right now. But they started this thing, and we warned them, Mitch McConnell,

we just played you that sound. He warned them, and now here we are. You know, elections have consequences. It is true. This is the This is the counterweight to eight years of scorched earth obamasm. This is just the truth. They threw out all any sense, any pretense of bipartisanship, any willingness to work with the other side. It was gone for eight years. You know what it's not coming back for a while now either. Yeah, that's the truth. Fair Play is fair play, and fair play is not

gonna be fun for the other side right now. So I think that we were We do have an excellent list of judges to look at here, and I am very pleased about what we are seeing so far in terms of the possibles. And this is gonna drive liberals completely and utterly insane. They are going to lose their minds over this. I don't know what happens. I asked

this question in all earnestness, folks. Trump derangement syndrome plus open Supreme Court seat equals liberal def con Juan, I mean, they're they're just gonna be at I don't know, They're gonna be apoplectic over this. They're gonna completely they've already lost it over trust. What happens when you've already lost to what do you call that? You know? There, They're gonna be in some other stratosphere of freak out mode

and it's gonna get really, really ugly. I mean, if you saw the panic on social media, I was seeing tweets. He had a former Obama administration official just tweeting out the F word. I mean, that's what people are doing now. They don't even know what to say other than just start screaming and cursing. But you know that's what liberals do. Big justice, big Supreme Court decision, I mean, came down today about public sector unions that's coming up. Home security

can be a pain. You know you needed, but you also don't want to get locked into some long term contract, some expensive to install, an impossible to get rid of security system that you don't even really know how to use. Simply Save Home Security fixes all of that. Simply Safe got rid of contracts and hidden fees. I've got the system at home. Let me tell you it is so easy to use. It works off of your WiFi. You can download an app to your phone. You can control

all aspects of it from your phone remotely. And that also means that guess what, Not only is there a system at your home, but you are in contact with it wherever you are as long as you've got your smartphone on you check it out for yourself. Simply Safe is what home security should be. No long term contracts, by the way, no sketchy fine print. Simply Safe gives you the best protection period. Go to simply safe dot

com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash buck to protect your home and family with an A plus system. Simply safe dot Com slash Buck. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information to have actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American Again. This is the buck Sexton Show with a more sensitive view of the First Amendment and with a track record of labor of labor management issues that have not has not always

gone well for either side. The Court has said enough is enough. You have the right to join the union, and you have the right not to join, and the government is not going to put you in one direction or the other. Judge, have you considered the financial impact of a ruling like this on unions in America? The Court has not considered it, but for us to consider it, and the and the unions know this, the word is catastrophic.

The only reason, the principal reason I should say the public sceptor labor unions have survived to two thousand and eighteen, there are a hundred years old, is because states have forced employees to join them. Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show. I agree, Uh, I agree with Judge Napolitano. The Judge Napolitano, he's he's about a gentleman, very very nice guy. Um. I've always always found him to be quite pleasant and and very amusing backstage in the green

room and all the rest of it. Really really nice dude. But he's completely correct here. It is it is catastrophic for public sector unions. This this case that came down today, Janice v afs me. So here's the or state, county and municipal employees right here, here's here's what is that issue case? You know, just just give us a basis this and then I'll get into why it's a big deal.

But we also talk about this hour a huge progressive win against a very establishment Democrat in New York, which I think is it's much less interesting to us because of what it does inside the Democrat Party than it is about what it shows us about the trajectory of the Democrat Party, which is socialism, open outright advocacy for socialism. Now,

this is this is gathering steam. This is going to be something that they will no longer be able to hide behind the Demo democratic label as much when we say that they are pushing for European style democratic socialism. They will have to admit this, and I think the American people will reject it. But we will get to that in just a few moments though, in a little bit.

Very interesting political dynamics at play in those races. And then also some talk about the cartels, and just the media does not want to tell you about what's going on in Mexico. They don't want to tell you about human about human smuggling and the role of the cartels playing it, how much money is at stake here, the role of the cartels in creating this current migrant crisis at the border. They don't want you to know about this,

They don't want to cover this. So I just think that it's important to spend some of our time on that. But first, in this case, Supreme Court case another five another five four decision, another five four decisions, was a victory for UH free speech, a victory for free speech. Um. It was a situation where the left had once again positioned itself where it would compel speech. And this is

even a step beyond suppression of speech. Right, if you if you go to the the last words in orwell you know the last paragraph, the last words, you will call that the true victory of Big Brother comes not in the terrifying circumstances of the the omnipresent superstate and all that the true victory comes through a denouncing of the woman that he loves, right by by betraying his beliefs, betraying who he is. That is, when you have been completely stripped of your being, of your of your soul,

right of your conscience. And there are a number of liberals, liberal laws out there, and there is a tendency on the left to do just that. Bake that cake, you know, that's the shorthand for this. Bake that cake, right, what we tell you to write on that cake or else or else, that is their position on this. And in

Janice vfs Me we see this yet again. So there have been a few of these cases, whether you had Masterpiece Cake Shop, which went in favor of free speech, the Bisarah case where they were no, they're no longer able to stay to California to tell crisis pregnancy centers. Yeah, you gotta you gotta do a little a little advertorial here for abortion providers. All right, that's no longer, that's no longer a part of this that's no longer some

thing that has to happen. So Masterpiece cake Shop and I F l A v. Bass Era, and then the third one is uh, the third one is this professional sorry, this union issue back on track, This union issue where they will collect dues from you whether you agree with the union or not. That was the way that it had been. This is how they had sustained unions for a a very uh, a very long time. This is how they had sustained the unions. And now they've come out and they said, you know what, this is too much.

This is a situation where we can't have people that are forced to subsidize what is inherently a political activity, which is the bargaining of public sector unions in all respects right, because this is literally the government trying to get stuff for the government, and if you don't agree with that, you shouldn't be forced to take it, to

have money taken from you and given to it. Now, the reason the left gets so upset about this, the reason they become so very very fired up, is because this is what has kept teachers unions flush with cash, and who to teachers union support Democrats? This is where you have teachers unions able to draw upon vast reserves of cash that they can then throw into elections. This is the machine. This is the self locking ice cream cone of the left. Um. That is what's going on here.

That is the the stakes. And that's why they're so very very upset about this because a a key source of political power for the Democratic Party today is that they can count on public sector unions for donations, and then the Democrat politicians get into office and then they make sure there's more benefit, it's and more the cash keeps flowing, etcetera, and so on and so forth. So now you have a situation where they cannot compel that

speech anymore. Five four decision though, just going to show you how hostile the liberal left really is too free speech. Just go to show you how hostile the liberal left is to um people being able to have their own beliefs and ideas. And in this case, there was one. I'm trying to find the specific quote here, so we also, I had literally a an internet at something in this monologue. I have an internet outage. I get what I think is an emergency text, and I've been up since five

o'clock in the morning. So it's been it's quite a scene in here in the Freedom hud right now. But here's what in the majority opinion, here's what a legal writes. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. In that situation, individuals are coerced into betraying their convey actions. Forcing free and independent individuals to to endorse ideas they find objectionable

is always demeaning. And for this reason, one of our landmark free speech cases said that a law commanding involuntary affirmation of objected two beliefs would require even more immediate and urgent grounds than a law demanding silence. Suppression in some ways is even less odious than forced affirmation than forced celebration. And I've been telling you for a long time,

what is the game that the left place. The left will say we just want tolerance, and then they will say we want acceptance, and then they will say we want celebration, We want you to bend the knee. That's

always the continuum that the left wing operates on. And with this issue of compelled speech, we see that once again you will no longer have a situation where the um where these public sector unions will be able to be an arm of the d n C, which is clearly what they what that that is what they are. They're an arm of the d n C now uh, And they will not have the power they've had in the past. And so this is going after the Democrat

power structure. And it's also, by the way, a very important, a very important precedent I think going for I think this will also affect some of the some of what goes on with private sector unions. Will have a union guy joining us later on on the show to talk a bit more about this in some with some first hand experience, in firsthand detail. But first we got is Herban New Jersey still on. I know he wants to talk about this. I haven't taken a new calls yet,

Herban New Jersey. You're all my friend? What's up? What the buck is going on? Um? Not much? Herb? What are you? What are your thoughts on this one? Well? I have to tell you I'm a conservative Christian, Second Amendment and R, a member pro life, and I'm a teamster. So I have some um opinions about this case. And I also have some experience because for three years I was a union official and I was a business agent for a group of our members who worked in the

public sector. So I'm very familiar with the subject, and I can tell you that what concerns me about this. First of all, UM, when I was a union official, I was required to file information, along with the other officers in our union every year with the Department of Labor, part of an LM two report which we were supposed to differentiate how much of our time is spent on representational Tom, I think we lost her? Do we lose HERB Guys, I can't hear her? Go ahead, can you

hear me? Now? Yeah? We can. Hello, We're here. Um, we were we were required to differentiate how much of our time was spent on representational activities and how much was spent on anything of a political nature. And the percentage of our time factored into how much those who were considered agency fee payers would be required to paying union dudes. They were not paying full union dudes if they chose to be what we're called agency fee payers.

And um, anything that was spent from our local union on political purposes came out of a separate fund that was donated to buy members on a voluntary basis. There was no coercion involved. It was you had to designate that you want an X amount of money taken out of your paycheck. Uh, if you wanted it to be used for political purposes. Yeah, but it isn't money fungible herb. I mean, come on right, I mean if I, if

I get money, it's fungible. A meaning that if I give you, if I give you money to buy groceries and you say no, I'm only gonna use you know, and you say I won't use this to buy you know, I won't use this money from my house. Well, you got money to buy groceries, now, so you got money to you know what I'm saying that that's the notion of separate pools of money with these union dude, seems

to me to be specious. No, Unfortunately, there are very strict governmental requirements, reporting requirements that each union is required to file every year on those very funds. Look look up the LM two report and you'll see what I'm talking about. So what do you you can? I ask you? Do you do you? Do you disagree or do you agree with this decision that I have somebody that's dealt

with this firsthand. Uh? You know, I I agree with just about every of the recent Supreme Court decisions, but I have a problem with this one now has a caveat. I have to tell you I have not yet read the full decision, so I'm not speaking in details. I'm speaking in generalities. I'm concern learned about those people who we think of as freeloaders because if you don't pay union dudes, you're still required by other laws to be represented.

So the union is going to spend money to represent you. No. I know this has been the justification all along, right, but it's still it's that's still political activity, and that people if people are taking money out of someone else's bank account that goes towards an activity that is inherently political. That is, that is subsidizing political speech. I mean, this is why the Court ruled the way they did. No political, No, it's not political. If it's collective bargaining, that's different thing.

All to get out, well, I mean, I I hear you, hear, but the Supreme Court disagrees and working conditions. Not who you're supporting for political office, no, but for for government employees. Everything is a part. I mean, it doesn't matter if you're talking about overtime hours. If it doesn't matter what you're discussion. When you're talking about the employees of the government, there there is an inherently political component of all those negotiations.

I mean this anyway, her By, I hear you, and I before we got to run into a break here else our lines are in, our sponsors gonna get mad at us. Uh, we gotta go to break with herp Thank you for calling it from New Jersey. Um, I'll come. I've got more on this. I want to read you what Justice Kagan right here, because it's actually worthwhile and it was good. And then we'll talk about the left word socialist tilt of the Democrats we saw on display in the last twenty four hours with some of these

primary wins and cartels. We got a lot to talk about. We'll be right back. I just have my credit card stolen, folks. Someone tried to go on a fraudulent shopping spree in NYC earlier this week. Just as a reminder that you know your information is out there, people can steal it. But credit card fraud is nothing compared to the nightmare you're in for if an identity thief takes control of

your home's title. It's not a hard process. Folks. There are internet thieves all over the lobe and they want to go after Americans who have equity in their homes. What they do is take you off your home's title, replace it with an alias, and they borrow every penny possible. You know, when you find out about it, when you start getting payment notices for loans, you know, people start demanding the money that you didn't borrow, but so embarred

in your name. Don't let this happen to you. For just pennies a day, Home title Lock protects my most valuable asset, my family home. Register now for a free analysis and discover if your home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value. Free visit home title lock dot com. That's home title lock dot com. So this is from the descent. We had this big case about public sector unions. As I said, this is all about

democrat power. It's about compelling speech, meaning compelling people to engage in speech, not compelling like that's great speech you have. And a Justice Kagan wrote the following um its decision meaning the majority decision will have large scale consequences public employee unions will lose a secure source of financial support. State and local governments that thought fair share provisions further their interests will need to find new ways of managing

their workforces. Across the country, the relationships of public employees and employers will alter in both predictable and wholly unexpected ways. This is good that I'm glad that Kagan writes this here in the Descent, because it tells you what's really going on. It's about money, folks. It's about money for unions and money for Democrats and elected officials and the Democrat political machine. That's what That's what this really comes

down to. Why you might ask what a Supreme Court nominee care about who's getting you know, wh who's getting money out of this seems irrelevant to the question of should speech be compelled. There are a lot of things you could do that are unconstituted sational that would give money to you know, it would be unconstitutional. For example, for the government, I would think to you know, force you to donate money to a a certain a certain

religious group. That would I think that's pretty flatly unconstitutional. Right, might be good, might help some people, might you know, be the homeless somewhere or something. But they take money from you and they give they give it to the Church of the Freedom HUD. As much as that would

be amazing, it would be flatly unconstitutional. And Kagan kind of gives up the gives up that the truth here, give gives up what's really going on by letting it be known that their objection is about the fact that this is money for the left, This is money for major Democrat causes. So bottom line, you're, folks, a big week for the Supreme Court, for conservatives and and for the You gotta tip your hat to to President Trump here, you know. But gorcitch is not just some snide little line.

It's true because we have Gorsage now, we have some protections in play, some very important decisions this week from Supreme Court that went that went the right way, and after some of the decisions we've seen in years under the Obama administration that went clearly the wrong way. I mean, the Supreme Court saved Obamacare twice from itself, which is just appalling. It's nice to see the court get back

to the law. Isn't a crazy idea of Supreme Court focused on the law instead of what the political preferences are of the Democrat Party. I want to talk to you about some of these Democrat elections. I know, usually a fun Why do we care about it? Well, because socialism, my friends, is alive and well among the American left. He's back with you now because when it comes to

the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. The Senate Intel Committee with the House time that timeame in my time, reclaimer a time the secretary the time belongs to the general lady from California. Perhaps, Mr Chairman, I don't understand the rules because I thought I was allowed to answer questions reclaim in my time. Would you please explain the rules and do not take that away from my time.

With this kind of inspiration, I will go and take Trump out tonight, unveil the criminal activity, the unconstitutional activity of this president and his family. So I have dubbed them the criminal Clan a long time ago, and I will fight every day until he is Impeaceeds funny By, This is a bunch of scumbacks, That's what they are. Those are very strong organized around making money. The fact that he is wrapping his arms around Putin, uh, while

Putin is continuing to advance into Korea. Those are the words of an elected member of Congress, Folks, multiple terms at that Maxie Waters, and a lot of attention this week because of her call to action to what I'm now calling politically motivated stalking. That's what we're seeing. It's different than protesting, different than having your voice heard. It is politically motivated stalking, and it's going to lead to

very bad things. As we've been discussing here back today Washington Examiner, how to pull out fear violence from Trump haters and in this poll, fear we are heading for a civil war. Now, I do not think we are heading for a civil war, but I do think that we are going to see anti Trump violence. I think that there's no way that the left is going to turn back towards sanity without even further transgressions, without going deeper into the crazy. My expectations that we will see

Democrats engaging in behavior going forward. Now that the Supreme Court is also at stake, all bets are off. Who knows what they're going to do. And the more successful Trump is and the more unified behind Donald Trump the Republican Party becomes because of his successes, the more they will hate him the more they will find excuses in

their own minds to take action against Trump officials. And if you are willing to go up to a stranger and try to intimidate them by to pawn ideology, it is not a far leap for people to do more than that. Those same people. It's not you know, I keep saying this. You know, this is a combustible situation. This is combustible. You have aggressive, angry people confronting human beings on the street outside of their homes and restaurants

that can quickly lead to an escalation. And I was saying to you, I mean, I just think about it this way. If I were you know, if I were out with Miss Molly and look, I know I'm not a White House official and whatever, but I'm just I'm a conservative and people have come up to me, they know, occasionally, in in nice parts of the country where the nice people live, they've come up like, hey, Buck, it's very nice. By the way, if you ever seen me, please do

say hi. I love seeing members of the team, especially when i'm Miss Molly makes me look cool. So but but you know, if I were out and and a group gathered around me and they started yelling, you know, epithets at me and being hostile and everything I've I'm

not elected official. I don't think I just walk away from that, and that can get All it takes is one person to get a little too close in your face, you know, maybe spitting your face or just just take one little shove and things get out of hand really quickly.

And nobody wants that that's not the way they should go, but they're gonna push until that happens, and then they're gonna try to rely on their allies in the left wing media to say that it was you know, the confrontation was a misunderstanding, or it's not representative of the laugh. But they are creating the environment. They're creating the hostile environment and circumstances for violent confrontation between left and right

in this country. They're doing it. They're knowingly and willfully doing this, and it's going to have very very serious consequences, I think, and this whole Supreme Court component is only going to exacerbate the situation and make it worse. So keep that in mind. Now, there's also a strain of of extremism that you're seeing on the left, a more open and radical socialism that got a boost with the win of of a young woman. But the last name of Cortez, I can't it's actually a hyphenated last name.

I'm not big into hyphenated last name, so I'm just gonna call her Cortez. But she has a there's a name that's before I just can't remember what it is. But she beat this guy Crowley, who is a machine politician, really the third or fourth most senior Democrat in the House representative representing Queens, this guy Crowley, and now he's he's a lib. I mean, he's a big liberal, no question about it. But he's a machine politician, many many

many terms in the Congress. And this uh, young woman, Cortet, she's twenty eight years old. She beat him. So now she's the overwhelming favorite. Two uh to to whin the when the seat right? When this congression seating Queens, I mean, Queens is Democrats stronghold. It's one of the five boroughs of New York City. Um, and I wonder if it's well, I don't know if Manhattan her Queens is more more blue.

It's probably like comparing with a scent or something. They're very, very very overwhelmingly Democrat districts, but Crowley lost, which was a big shot across the Bounty, and Democrats are all, oh gosh, you know, because the machine politics, the Democrat Party, the Hillary wing of the d n C, and the Democrat machine. He's like, whoa hold on a second, you know, where this is not how they're supposed to go. Those who raise big money, those who have the political connections,

they're supposed to be the ones who win. And people are saying this is their canner, their Eric Cantor moment on the left where the grassroots can't be ignored everything else. But what I think is so interesting is that this candidate, Cortes is a a pretty radical leftist. She wants she she wants not just universal health care, but I think also universal child care. She is in favor of abolishing immigrations and customs enforcement, which I want to return to.

What that? What does that even mean? What? What would we replace that with? She wants a federal guarantee of jobs for everyone. How would that even work? Free college? Of course that's now become Democrats talk about free college all the time. Democrats are the party of Santa Claus Olho. They don't want to call him sat nick because you know that sounds too religious and stuff. But they're the they're the party of free stuff. Who's gonna pay for it?

Don't worry about it, you mean fat cats? Somebody else will not you. Uh. And she she also, i believe, is a pro universal basic income person. So she she wants the governm's gonna pay for your healthcare, pay for your school. Oh and housing too. She's a universal housing person. Do you have a right to housing, You have a right to school, You basically have a right to everything. And folks, this is getting real close to some of the stuff. And I'm gonna say the Soviet constitution, sovi

constitution said you have certain weeks off. You know, you get everybody gets weeks off. Every he gets housing, everybody gets everything. You get a car, you get a car, right, everyone gets whatever they need. But as we know, there's a fundamental flaw and socialist thinking and socialist logic which is that it privileges the group over the individual, and it tries or it is inherently a refutation of self interest,

which is a universal human constant. You are more interested in what you were doing in your day to day than what any group is up to. That's just a fact, that's just reality, right, And you are more more motivated by your own and this is not a bad thing, this is a good thing. This is the basis of human progress. You're more more motivated by what you are doing, what you're responsible for, than what other groups. And you know, historical grievances and all that stuff, and socialism doesn't take

that into account. It is essentially based on lies and illusions. And we're now seeing a rise of more clear and and radical socialist tendencies with the Democratic Party, which I think is indicative of just how you know, just how far gone they are because of their Trump's arrangement syndrome. They really have two choices here, and I think this Crowley loss, although he was also pretty far left guy, but this Crowley loss is indicative of which path of

Democrats are taking. Their choices are moderation centrism run candidates who served in the military. Run candidates who say their pro Second Amendment but anti assault rifles right, say there um in favor of life, but or they're personally pro life but policy pro choice right run these kind of hybrid head fake candidates. The Connor Lambs if you will or run these hard left Bernie Sanders wing free stuff

for everybody, Nobody's gonna pay for it. Abolish Ice. This is something you're hearing now, This is this is becoming a talking point that's spreading. Abolish ICE. So so we are open borders. Then people say, oh, well, no border patrol, but yeah, we know that. But the border patrol has to hand people over and the processing of who's here legal and who's not as handled by ICE, immigrations and customs enforcement. And if you were to abolish ICE, I would I would note think what that would mean for

drugs beingship in this country, for the cartels. You know this. This is which we're gonna talk about more in just a moment. But there is a a leftward lurch and the Democrat Party right now that is not to be ignored. And we should all remind ourselves, whatever imperfections you think the GOP has right now, whatever imperfections you think Donald Trump has, understand what the alternative is and understand what

the stakes are. And I could not have been more serious when I said to you that Donald Trump's victory because of the implications for the Supreme Court could very well mean that hundreds of thousand millions of lives going forward will be saved. People will have lives that would have had their lives taken away because of what Trump can do. That is that is powerful, that is profound. It is a deeply meaningful reason to push and to

fight for what is right and what you believe in. Remember, the other side is the radical party of abortion all nine months of a pregnancy. They are completely unreasonable. They are extremists on this issue. They are vicious in the protection of this and you will see that come up with this Supreme Court nomination fight. They are vicious over the issue of abortion, and they're also going to be more open about pushing these radical ideas, like in limitating

immigration and customs enforcement. This is the this is the beginning of the dissolution of this country. When people start to start talking about getting rid of our southern border, what they're really saying is we're going to dissolve America as we know it. And that they're saying this openly now, not just two donors behind closed doors, and not just to whip people up into a frenzy on Twitter. That we are hearing this from people winning elections the Democrat

Party is a sign of how troubling things are. Think about it this way. You know how crazy the anti trumpers are right now. Imagine what they'll be like if they actually get a taste of power again. Do you think that they're going to actors though they have been chasoned by Trump's victory over Hillary. Do you think that they're going to take the approach that they should try to bring us back. No, They're not gonna bring us back to the center. They are going all in in

the opposite direction. They will do deeply destructive things to this country. The midterms are important. I'm not gonna sit here and say it's the most profound important every says about every election, right but this midterm election coming up is going to be very important for the reasons I'm stating, and I don't want us to lose sight of that. We'll have a lot more on the specific candidates, and I'll probably have some candidates, you know, calling it a joy.

I really like this guy, uh Crenshaw, the Navy, the former Navy seal down in Texas. Get him to come on and join um. But we've got a lot of people to talk about talk to here on the show by the Way Hill dot TV slash rising tomorrow morning. We've got a tremendous line up a guest, so get ready for that. You can also watch it on demand anytime throughout the day, so I don't think you have to catch that live. And your Freedom Hut podcast will

be out tomorrow. Um, sorry about the delay. I know I said today, but uh, you guys heard me almost pass out on air before. It's been very It's been very tiring week. I'm going from five am to nine pm pretty much without a break. Maybe I got an hour during the day to kind of regroup, set my engines back to neutral, kick back, relac and relax and let the good times role. So we've got more of that coming up eight four four to five, eight four nine hundred buck stay with me. The liberal tears today,

we're flowing like a river. There was so much sadness and really rage all over social media over the Kennedy the Kennedy announcement because they know they're worried now and this, and they forgot very quickly about children were separated the border right all of a sudden, that goes rear view mirror. Folks, I thought that was the great moral crisis of our time. I thought that was modern Nazism. Oh no, no, Supreme Court vacancy opens up. Oh my gosh. A lot of cursing,

by the way, as well, a lot of profanity. Liberals like to curse a lot. You know, I cursed in my private life, as some of you know. If you ever meet me and I start talking to you, I may drop a little salty language here, and they're not in a bad way. But you know, I think cursing can be a colorful part of discourse, but obviously not here on my show, and I've avoided it thus far.

Some people have deserved me to curse at them publicly. Uh, some mainstream news folks have deserved me to have been deserving of a buck slap that could start with a you know, with with different letters and different words. Um, but I've I've refrained. But I'll just note that the left does not have any have that issue. By the way, the woman's name, because I wasn't trying to. I'm not somebody who makes fun of names. That's for clowns. Alexandria

Ocasio Cortes was her name. So Ocasio Cortez is actually her last name. Oh, by the way, she wants to uh impeach Trump. Keep that in mind too, So we already know they're gonna try to do that, folks if they win the House. Not only will they try to keep abortion going no matter what, they're also gonna try to impeach the President United States, who is doing a great job for all Americans, no matter how much or whatever, if the country hates him. John and Delaware, you've got thoughts,

we've got ears. Let's hear it. But how are you doing, shield side? Thank you for the call. I'm good. Yeah, I just wanted to mention the fact that I'm I mean, if Donald Trump does elect wanted his picks to the Supreme Court as a justice, what will the left really be able to do to stop it? Absolutely nothing, right, well, not necessarily, Um, they will cry about it for about It's yeah, they can, my friend, because there's something called

weak Republicans out there. And if you have a few defections and already uh Collins for example, then there there's some Republicans in the Senate who are getting who were getting weak on this one, then you got a problem. Right. So that's how this becomes an issue. Um So that's what I think you need to keep in mind here. You know you got you got Murkowski, Collins Lake, any of them could be an issue. There's gonna be a fifty, fifty or fifte situation for this nomineque folks, John, thanks

for calling in. It's good to clarify that point. Our three coming up. Information is power, and with Global Verification Network you have a powerful information ally on your side. Global Verification is the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. I completely trust these guys and you should too. They are headquartered here in Chicago. Unlike a lot of their competition, They're not some huge, nameless,

faceless conglomerate. They don't send your casework to be done overseas by people you can't reach on the phone, and having your information stored in servers that they can't honestly tell you where they are. Who's even securing them? Go with Global Verification Network for all of your background investigation and vetting needs. If you are trying to think about a new tenant for a property, a new hire for

your business, you need Global Verification Network. Go to my g VN dot com it's my g VN dot Com. Them were called eight seven seven six nine five seven nine eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine Global Verification Network. Leave no stone unturned buck Sexton mission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake Americans. Ready great, You're a great American again.

This is the buck Sexton Show for analysts. No, the rhetoric we hear from the other side on this issue, as on many others, has become radicalized. We hear views on television today and that are on the lunatic fringe Franklin. And what is perhaps more galling is the hippo hypocrisy. These same people live in gated communities, many of them, and are featured at events where you have to have an I d. To even come in and hear them speak.

I like the little security around every says, and if you try to scale defense, and believe me, they have h be even too happy to have you arrested and separated from your children if I would like to say that, so they won't borders in their lives but not in yours. Turn in general, Sessions is totally spot on when it comes issue of border board security. And I know that there have been some issues with him and with the administration because of his recusal decision from the Russia probe.

But by the way, I think that Russia probe is gonna be over by the end of this year. I don't think there's not a meaning that the the meaningful part of it. For political stuff. They can keep talking about Russian Facebook trolls and all that's that's not I'm talking about looking at Trump collusion and Trump campaign collusion. I think it's gonna be over by the end of the year. So the nightmare will end, folks, I'm pretty sure of it. Got some sources here in DC either

telling me they're at that phase. I've even heard from some never Trumper deep never Trumper deep state types that they realize now there and they're not. There's no they're there, and we've I've known this all long, You've known this

all long, and they're gonna figure this out. But isn't it remarkable to see how quickly the liberals have shifted from the most important issue of of of our of our time right now, the the internment camps, the prisons for babies, the Nazism, all these horrible, overstated, exaggerated, just untrue things that they've been saying about what's going on

on the border. Isn't it fascinating to see that now that there are judges and there's a judge ship at the Supreme Court on the line, we kind of forget about the border. Well, I'm not forgetting about the border. And there's a part of this that does not get nearly enough attention, and that is these human smuggling networks that are bringing these people into the country, bring them

up to the border. Remember, a lot of these quote migrants that are being caught and then are subject to family separation, they've already gotten into American that they've crossed in illegal in American charactory and they've been picked up. Some of them are being grabbed at checkpoints. And then you're seeing liberals say, oh my gosh, we have checkpoints. Yeah, that's right, we have checkpoints to stop people from illegally coming into the country. That's why they exist. We went

from don't separate families to don't detain families. It's like, well, if you don't detain families, guess what you've got. Effectively that you've got a porous border. Maybe they'll say it's not open, but it's poorest. This means all you have to do is find the opening in it. But the car tells have a hand in this, and this is being downplayed because this the narrative has to be at our border for the for the left to get their way, for the Democrat Party to be successful in its demagoguery here,

and it's propagandizing on issues of the border. They have to make sure people don't realize that the cartels are making hundreds of millions of dollars that right, hundreds of millions smuggling people in the United States. It's not really that hard when you think about the numbers here, right, you got tens of thousands, maybe you know, hundreds of thousands of illegal crossings. A lot of them are you know, are through coyotes. Right, that's the way to do it.

And the coyotes are just the human smugglers that are gonna, at a minimum, have to be paying off the cartels, if not actively working for the cartels, which means the cartels are making money either way. The political violence in Mexico right now also something that no one seems to really want to get into. Is completely out of control. And at least there's five Mexican states UH, Mika, Khan, Sinaloa, Guerrero, Talma, Lipas, and Kalima that the State Department has issued do not

travel advisories for. And the violence that has occurred recently, even UH involves assassinations against politicians. Oh, almost thirty thousand people killed last year. You're probably gonna break thirty thousand murders this year. In Mexico. Cartel violence totally out of control.

Cartels are more powerful than they have ever been, and this border issue right now is enriching them through the human smuggling and through the drug smuggling that yes, is a part of the illegal immigrant pipelines into this country. So think about all the ways that Mexico is causing real problems for us. Forget about just the economic stuff and the economic drain and all that. Look at the security issues. Okay, Mexico has cartels that are running out

of control right now. Mexico is bringing illegals into our country, including illegals who then go off and either join or recruit for gangs like m S thirteen that all also have cartel connections and they're bringing drugs into the country that lead to thousands and thousands of overdose deaths a year, and all we're hearing about the only part of the story that we're allowed to talk about is teary eyed children being separated from their parents. Were not allowed to

look at the other issues here. Now, look, I'm I think you know, yeah, to detain the family detained process and send them back right away, keep them together, make sure that they're actually a family first, but keeping together, bind ways to do this. You know, eighty five percent plus the American people are in favor of that. Okay, Um, you know that the system, the system was being exploited

by illegals. The illegals essentially broke the system. They overran our border fortifications, so to speak, and now we're fixing it. They chose to overrun with those So this whole thing of oh, we're so evil and we're the Nazis, it's garbage. That's that's unfair, it's not true. And now we're gonna be detaining families. But we have this other component of this that needs to get much more of our focus. And look, Jeff Sessions is really good on these immigration issues.

He does not waiver He does not back down. He

understands the issues backwards and forwards. I think it's why he's still in this role, by the way, because as much as Trump may be frustrated over the Russia collusion probe and how Sessions recused himself from it, as much as he may feel that frustration, the fact of the matter is that Sessions on policy maybe Trump's most important single player after Mattis at Defense, who has been relatively quiet recently we have been hearing all that much about.

But Sessions is on the front line here of the immigration issue, and I think is doing a very very good job. By the way, the the compromised bill today in the Commerce just fell flat in its face. And the compromised bill was like the pudgy kid who's got the T shirt sunburn, who does a belly flop into the shallow end of the swimming pool. You know, it just was a mess, and we knew that was gonna happen,

So that didn't go anywhere. The fact is that within the Republican Party there's still a real split over what our immigration priority should be. What the most important thing is that can be accomplished, uh through before immigration, through immigration so you know, we we need to have a continued focus on this and and I think that you know, the good news is that we don't. While we don't have a wall, we've got a Supreme Court nomination that's

hanging in the balance. So that's gonna get turned out. That's gonna consolidate the GLP, that's gonna consolidate Conservatives and Republicans going to these mid terms. But man, for Trump's reelection, I'm just looking kind of far out of things. But for Trump's reelection, we need that wall, need to get that wall up, and that has to happen. So I think that's very very important for us to keep an eye. But this this cartel issue, I'm telling you, this is

a this is a major national news story. The cartels are flushed with ash, not just from drugs but also from human smuggling. Remember six or seven thousand dollars of person. How many thousands of people need to give you six or seven grand before you've made a lot of money. Not very many, And it's probably tens of thousands, might be over a hundred thousand people that are paying, and some of them pay more, probably have to pay per

head for their whole family. So because we don't have a secure border, because we don't have a wall, the drug cartels that are sawing people's heads off, like Al Qaeda back in the day, are rich beyond people's wildest imaginations and are a real threat to Mexico's national security and even the national elections which are set for July first, folks, exuding a lot of pressure there, so keep an eye

on the cartels and the human smuggling networks. Don't let the media just tell you about all the valedictorian docca, Folks, I've got a lot more comments. Stay with me. Nine Line Apparel is more than a gear and apparel company. Nine Line is about all of the issues that matter to you. Yes, they have cool looking designs and they have top quality fabrics so you're comfortable and looking good

all the time. But also when you see what they stand for, you'll know that this is what you stand for to They're all about first responders, military law enforcement, and encouraging a conversation between those who serve and those who support them. I'm sitting here right now in a T shirt designed by nine Line Apparel. Twenty two veterans a day. Veteran lives matter, so it's a cause as well as gear my friends. Check it out for yourself. They have so many different designs and they support so

many worthy causes. Go to nine line apparel dot com use the coupon code buck twenty to save off your next order. That's nine Line Apparel coupon code buck twenty. That's a great deal twenty percent off the full price of your next order at nine line apparel dot com. Today was a fantastic fulfillment of Osama bin Laden's vision by Donald J. Trump. What Osama bin Laden was a war of civilization, a war between the West and one

billion Muslims. And so what Donald Trump in this Muslim band signal to the world is that Muslims are not welcome here. Oh my gosh. Steve Schmidt is like on a he's on a on a terror this week. He is you know them, you know, remember the old Doseki's guy stay thirsty, my friend, the good one, not the one they replaced him with who was terrible, right, I mean the original one, right, that Doseki's guy. Uh, And

he was the most interesting man in the world. Steve Schmidt seems to be trying to be the most the most idiotic pundit in the world this week. And you know, I've heard people say it's this is not personal. I've heard people say he's actually a nice guy. I don't know him, so this isn't this is not I'll always tell you when I don't like somebody. By the way, it's not that I don't like Steve Schmand. I don't

know him. But what he says hang on air is terrible. Uh. It's terrible in a good way because it's fun to come in here and make fun of. But this is the guy who yesterday we had him on air talking about how you know North Korea in Venezuela, in Cuba, you know, they don't have they don't have concentration cares for little kids at the border. Like reader, You're like, dude, come or it wasn't what he said Venezuela and Cuban on North Korea. But it's just crazy stuff. Now he's

talking about Donald Trump implementing Bin Laden's vision. Folks, I can assure you, okay, I can assure you that ge hottests, when they have their pick, would rather have a far left progressive democrat to deal with or just a Democrat period. Than anyone are you on the right because on the far left, on the Democrat side of the aisle, what you have when it comes to Gee hot is Um, which is a subject that I will be returning to here on the show when it's more in the news cycle.

And notice has kind of dropped it would dropped down right, not not really get much attention these days, but the left makes all kinds of contorted and convoluted uh explanations for jeehot is Um. The left is constantly finding ways to blame America for the rise of jeehot is Um. Although you did have Ben Rhodes and you know, with just the crazy news cycle this week, I didn't get a chance to address it. Rhoades said something along the lines of, well, to be fair, I just saw the headlines.

I didn't even get to dig into it. But talking about the obamaministration policy in Syria and whether they realized it or not, there was a an arming of bad guys that went on, you know, of ge hottest because by trying to arm people. Initially there was that Pentagon program and you know they're trying to build a Syrian a Syrian anti assad force that I mean, they spent five million dollars I think, and they trained five guys and the weapons all disappeared, and that went to get

a lot of that ended up in Gehodes Tans. But the the Obama administration is a perfect example of trying to play Kate implacable enemies, and it's a terrible idea. It never works. But for somebody to go on MSNBC and say that Trump is implementing bi Lan's vision, this is just another version of the stupid talking point you here. And it's in fact one of the root fallacies of our fights against Islamic extremism around the world. And the root fallacy is the cause of jihoti is um is

the fighting against it. You see, I can play this game. In fact, I had to take the opposite end of this argument because it's the right one. At CNN when there was always some of you. I wish we even had the clip right now after the nice massacre at CNN when some lunatic Islamic g hottest. Uh that's repetitive, I know, but some Islamic extremists ran over almost eight people. If I recalled just murdering mass murder of people with a truck on Bastie Day, which is there great day

of national celebration. And I went on CNN and one I was the fourth person in the panel, and one for another, each one of them, each one of them said, well, you know the problem. I mean, the bodies were still on the ground, folks, okay, And each one of them was saying and it was a former you know, a former c I a guy like me, uh although former CIA from like twenty some odd years ago, I think, a couple of generals, and and then an academic who that you know where that's gonna go a quote academic

on radical Islam. Academics and radical Islam tend to write papers about how like, I mean, are they really that radical? But but their whole line on what was going on in Nice was that this was the result of Europe's poor ability to integrate Muslims into its society. I mean, mass murder of almost entirely you know, French, Christian or secular Europeans. And the response is, well, they don't do a good enough job. This is what you're seeing on

TV on a major from network. And this is part of why I just I just couldn't do it anymore. I think I've told you before, and there's a there's This is also why you may occasionally see out there some hostility directed very much at me from people at CNN because I left, And that's not supposed to happen. Right when you're brought in there and they want to keep you around, you are supposed to be grateful because it's who it's CNN, right. I left because I thought

it was gross. I just didn't like I didn't like what was going on over there. I didn't think it was honest. I didn't think I didn't think there was any integrity in it. And so that makes me a marked man over there now, which is fine, whatever, bring it a bunch of whims. But with this is a perfect example. On TV, they have all these different people. They're taking this position during after a mass casualty terrorist attack,

that we are the cause of it. That's a Democrat thinking, that's left wing thinking, and and you see it with with attack after attack, and it's always either our fault or well, it's our fault. And and one of the primary reasons that's our fault is that we tried to do something to stop it. That wasn't so much the case and the nice attack, but it's been the case in countless other left wing variations on the oh terrorism

is is our fault theme. In fact, on nine eleven, I remember hearing professors when I was in college, and I mean on nine eleven on the day, get up in front of the whole school and say, this is what happens when you make people angry. Oh, people have moments in their lives when they realize what they believe

in who they are. And I was like, okay, so I'm a patriot and a conservative and these people in this room, I don't know what they're I don't know what they are, but we're not on the same team, folks. It's also when I started to think maybe I'm gonna go join the c I am in retrospect, I wish I joined the military, but see I was a good second choice, good good second best. Uh. But anyway, So, so for Schmidt to say that Trump is implementing bin

Laden's vision, this is just crazy. First of all, it doesn't even deal with the fact that North Korea is on this list. Venezuela is on this list. And you know what, you know what the real the real truth, this is the world doesn't really care. They've got other things to think about. What we're so worried about not getting enough not not getting enough foot traffic from you know, Yemen and Sudan. There are a case by case waivers, uh,

the whole policies under review. Those countries can make all this go away if they just get better vetting procedures, as some countries already have. Anyone who wants to look at this, it's actually entirely reasonable. They're countries that were picked out by the Obama administration as security threats. So I don't know, did did Trump have a time machine go back in time and make Obama's people pick out

these countries as security threats? Yeah? I just I understand the need that people look at people got put food on the table. You know you're gonna go on MSNBC. You're gonna say some crazy left wing stuff. I get it, right, I understand that's what you're or or you're gonna be a quote conservative who's like Donald Trump is hitler. I'm

the real conservative. Yeah. I don't know about that. I don't know about any as I've said to you, anyone who claims to be a conservative who is out there and now saying that they will vote for the Party of abortion, the party of of of death in so many ways. Uh, it's it's just it's a disgrace, it really is. But Schmidt, I don't know. I'm sorry. At some point, I'm sure we're gonna get to meet each other. And maybe he's a nice guy, but dumbest, dumbest stuff

I've heard on TV all week, maybe all month. And he's really in a class by himself on this one. Uh and and does not know what the heck he's talking about. With Bin Laden's vision should should stick to, you know, running and picking political candidates like Sarah palin As VP, because that was a great idea. Uh yeah. So, by the way, we're gonna have a buddy of mine. Well I don't know him, but we're gonna be buddies

because he's gonna call in. It's not really a buddy man, because I don't know him and I've never even met him. But Andy Sullivan will be joining. He's a union member. I just wanted a union guy to fall and tell me what he thinks about the Spreme Court decision. I want a union pursue a union perspective. One day so we're gonna get a union perspective in just a few minutes. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton his back.

All right. So we've talked about this huge decision today from the Supreme Court at the progressive left is saying, oh no, it's going to gut public sector unions. What will we ever do? Well? What is the truth of public sector unions and union life in general in this country these days? We've got somebody who can give you an insider perspective. Andy Sullivan is with us now. He is a twenty year union member and former leader of nine eleven Hard Hats, and he thanks for joining us. Thanks,

I appreciate you having me. Just give me your your your quick reaction, uh to tonight's or today's Supreme Court justice decision? What do you think about the public sector unions no longer being able to force people to pay dues whether they want to or not. You know what, I'm actually not against it, and I'm going to tell you why when you're talking about public sector unions. To me,

I think is is really not legitimate. I've been a private union member for the better part of almost three decades, and there is a huge difference and level of performance that you need to adhere to when you compare the two industries. I mean, in the public sector union you really, I mean you really got to screw up to get laid off or get fired. And meanwhile, in private sector union world, if you're not pulling your weight every single hour of every single day, you are eliminated immediately. We

have people walking around with checks in their pocket. It's just ready to write you a check if you can't carry your own weight. So there's a bit of animosity between the private union sector industr Tree and the public union sect the industry. I think it was even FDR who said he thought it would be a terrible idea to unionize the public sector. And you know what, we are a few things I agree with FDR. So so you think this is the right the right call, the

right decision. Do you think this is going to have an impact on private sector unions now, now that this has been seen by the court as an issue of free speech, do you see any trickle down? Do you see any crossover? Yeah? I do, But you know what, bucket, this has been uh an ongoing thing ever since Reagan back in the eighties, with the Patco uh air traffic

control of strike. As soon as private unions became this single party entity and basically a political arm of the left union ship and its territory has dwindled year after year. I mean, here in New York City, where I'm from, the territory used to be about thirty seven per cent of all construction that was taking place in New York City was a union stronghold. Now if you look at

it today, we're into single single digits, you know. And I attribute that whole entire decline and the fact that we've become so politically politicized, which was wrong because you talked to most union guys, well over fifty of union workers hold conservative beliefs. But here they are, we're we're kind of painted into a corner and we're told we have to vote for the d n C candidate because he's the guy who's looking out for the unions. And

I said to myself, really is that the case? Because here in New York the proof is definitely not in the pudding, because we're losing territory every single day and we're totally dominant, dominated by the Democratic Party. Yeah, why is that? I mean, let me you know what, what is there's a historical affinity between the left and organized labor in this country, but up to up to the current day, what do you attribute the dominance? I mean, this is why the Democrats are so upset about this.

They view unions as a Democrat constituency. But given what you're telling me, you know, yeah, I've I've met steel workers, you know, who are culturally conservative guys. You know, I've I've met people that are working construction crews and people that are doing things that are cover under unions and and they're not you know, progressive Silicon Valley style Democrats to say the least. But they have to vote Democrat.

What's going on? Yeah, absolutely correct. And even in some of these unions, they actually take the money out of your paycheck. They call it dues or sees, and they will take money you've worked for and they will just forward it right to whatever the latest Democratic uh political election is coming up. So in many cases, a lot of the union guys don't even have say in where their funds are going politically, and that's a problem. Now,

what's what's begin to happen. It's it's basically like death by a thousand cuts, you know, with the project labor agreements and with the declining agreements where they do instead of a hundred percent of your mechanics pay, they're doing of your mechanics pay. Now, all of a sudden, we have an A rate and a B rate. Also, you want to keep working, you gotta work for the B rate. I mean, this is amazing. Everything is going forward except

the union's wages. We've got tradesmen out there that's been doing this that their professional trades for less twenty five years, all of a sudden are getting paid like a third year apprentice. You know, it's grateful. Now, what do you what do you when people say, you know, maybe unions no longer have a place in a in a globalized economy, unions are are destructive too many industries they're in. What's

your response to that sentiment? You know, buck Very, you know I've spoken on this subject a lot, and this is my biggest thing. If we could just get the GOP to realize that they have a treasure trove of conservatives that are union workers that would vote for the

Republican candidate. But you can't come out against the unions, you know, with with UH with all of this energy and momentum, we would be welcoming to have the GOP come back into the folks to deep politicize the whole union infrastructure because right now, but it's being run like a soft dictatorship. If you agree with whatever the union leadership says, you know what happens to you, you don't do all the time. Maybe you'll go to the next job I can, and then you have nowhere to appeal.

There's not an opposing party that you could go to and plead your taste too. I hear you, man, Well, look and we really appreciate getting perspective for someone who's actually in a union. Thank you so much, sir, appreciate your time any time, Buck, good luck, Andy Sullivan, everybody, former eleven nine uh, former leader of not eleven Hard Hats and a twenty year union member. We are going to come back into Roll Call here in just a moment. I'd like I'd like to bring on diverse voices from

various perspectives on this show. And uh, there you have it. And we talked about unions. I feel like we should get guy whos actually in a union and join. Although I know a lot of you listener, probably in unions, and you can light it up on roll call, not for this addition, but for tomorrow's if you want let me know what you think about all this, Let me know what you think about unions in general. I want to know team and uh, we'll be right back. Hey,

Team Buck, it's time for roll call. Oh yeah, roll call Tom Falling a roll call. That's what I'm talking about. Loving the role. Okay, I'm sorry the dubstep gets me fired up. Yes it does does. Indeed, one day I'll be comfortable saying y'all. I know some of you have given me a y'all pass. Wow, I just made that up and that's amazing, and I would like to use

my y'all pass. But as a as a just I'm about as Yankee as Yankee gets, even though I hold politics much more similar to many of my Southern brothers and sisters. Uh. And you know I have family in in the South. In fact, I've got I've got family right now in Charlottesville, Virginia. So you know there's there's some there's some Southern ties to the Buck. All right, enough of me, let's get into you roll call Facebook

dot com, slash Buck section. Oh, the Freedom Hut podcast, guys, Just so you know, it's gonna be tomorrow, and I think we're gonna make it a Thursday. It is gonna be weekly, come hell or high water, but I think we're gonna have it be a Thursday release just because of life and things and all the work. But I've got some really cool ideas for that that are going into it already, and the best martial arts movies for example.

You're gonna enjoy it. You have not already, Please do go subscribe on Apple podcast just typing freedom Hunt going to Apple, going to podcast, or just typing in the search bar freedom Hut, and you'll see it'll pop up and it'll look like a little freedom Hunt icon. That's the Freedom Hunt podcast. And please please spread the word and check it out. It's our time to just hang out.

It's not Remember, it's not gonna be news based. It's just gonna be It's kind of like Deep Thoughts with Jack Handy, except not that good job Buck, good good description. Okay uh. In the roll call, you remember Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. Whoops, hold on a second, I just made them all disappear right on time. There Michael sends me, Bob, you might have to to rethink you're a statement that fly kicks are useless, and he sent me a video of a guy taking out a violent

homeless man with an impressive flying kick. Michael, I'm not saying it never works. I'm just saying it's low probability. You know, the fly kick is kind of like the three pointer from five ft beyond the arc. You can hit it, and if you do, it's amazing. But I wouldn't exactly base your game around that one, you know what I'm saying. That's that's what how I view fly kicks. Also, I'm at the age where the notion of a fly kick to the head just makes me think, Hammi poll,

like my hamstring is gonna get ripped in half. So there's that. Brian. Next up here, Brian writes, I do not turn to MSNBC for my theology. Belief that Christ is the Son of God is all it takes. The thief on the cross did nothing but believe, and he

joined Christ in heaven. Brian, A very good reminder, A good reminder after all the things that were going on in this country, around the world, of of what's really in Bordan, So thank you, sir, t J. Next up your buck, What do you think can we should we turn the Supreme Court vacancy into a voting issue for November. I know we don't need any elections to get a justice through, but perhaps there's some sort of angle we

can take to bolster turnout in November. Thoughts Well, t J, I think you are correct as uh, this is a strategy that will help, but turn out, I do not believe given that the Supreme Court vacancy is now going to be this is going to be the most epic political fight since well Trump v. Hillary certainly, but in some ways it'll be even more because they thought they had that one. You know, you have to remember that

there there wasn't a desperation on the left. There was an arrogance on the left when it came to Hillary versus Trump. And now not only is Trump having a an incredibly successful presidency, which I am here I Trump, I can't The guy is amazing. He's amazing. I don't know what else to say. And I was not a an original true believer, and you know, I'm sure they're gonna be things where he disappoints me. He's human. He's

in peror. I get all that right. There's some stuff that I wish you'd do a little differently, but overall, he's amazing. I know what else to say? What he's doing for the country. You know what he's doing for you. Tell me what industry you're in, and I can point to it and say, most likely unless you're in like the you know, biofuels, or unless you're you know, relying on massive government subsidies for your crappy solar panel company,

and you're probably doing better. And it's because of what this president has been pushing, because the tone that he has set, and t J I always loving you send a message because you've got an old school Shields high T shirt. So there you go. Alan, Next up here, you right when you were talking about being a ventriloquous act with Hillary Clinton. I almost got sick think of out where your hand would have to go. Yuck, Allan, get your get your head out of the gutter, sir,

good gosh, Alan, your gross? Why are you so naughty? Alan shouldn't be thinking about where he's putting the hand on the Hillary doll. That's right, Alan should not be thinking about that. Next up here, Brandon Buck love your shows, Brandon loves your taste in shows. What are your thoughts on the Supreme Court decision on Janice v ass Me. Well, as you know, Brendon, I've been talking about it on the show today, so we've we've dealt with that one. I'm excited to leave the union and not pay union

dudes for a liberal union that I disagree with. Shields Hie, there we go some union representation on the show. Indeed, indeed, sir um, thanks for writing in. Daniel Buck, listen to your podcast commentary on the civility of the anti war movement. In my time in uniform, I've been spit at, had swastika's drawn in dust on my car, called a baby killer, a d bag warmonger, war criminal. I have seen bricks through windows of recruiting stations and seeing hateful epithets spray

painted on windows. Just remember We'll always hate you nineteen sixty nine, No try circle two thousand and five and two thousand and seven during the surge civility. Indeed, well, Daniel, first of all, thank you for serving our country. And second of all, I'm just you know, there's some things that happen and as an American, you just you, even if you have nothing to do with it, you oppose it with every five of you being You're just embarrassed

that another so called American would do it. And anyone who shows disrespect to our troops, that's day they fall into that category. They I'm embarrassed as an American that an American would ever do that. Uh. And we know that anti troops sentiment is overwhelmingly from the left. It's not an act there. And folks, maybe it's a conversation. We'll have more another time. George. Hey, George, I think you're a first time you're here in the roll call.

Hey Buck, glad you're one of the new generation of conservatives. Please check out Charlie Reese columns. He brought me into the into uh the conservative movement. He has gone now, but please read a few of his columns. George, I have never heard of Charlie Reese. So on your say, so, I will check it out. Um, so here we go. Oh, by the way, for sometimes people write to me and they and then they write again and they think that

I'm not reading. I read everything in the EMOX. I can't always respond to everything in the emox though, because we get hundreds and hundreds now thousands and thousands of messages. So I'm reading it all, um, I'm reading it all, and I'm you know, making sure that I get back to it as quickly as I can, as often as I can. Um, So just remember that, everyone, all right. Uh, Next up here is Melissa Melissa Rights Love the podcast

Being Behind. I just heard the discussion on martial arts. Uh, you might want to look into Shaolin Kempo Karate, which incorporates three advanced martial arts styles, karate, kung fu, and jiu jitsu. It provides a very good set of real life situational skills. Have seen lots of good for Kraftmaga to e Er. A nurse friend has had to use it to defend against violent drug addicted patients brought in for treatment. Hey, guys, I wasn't hating on all martial arts.

I was just comparing. First of all, I don't know, you know, I'm a I'm not even a dilettante. I'm like, you know, an observer from afar in the martial arts world. I'm the equivalent of the guy who's way up in the football stands, like way way up, who's scarfing a bunch of you know, pretzels covered in mustard. Was like, gah, touchdown in the end zone. You stink, Manning, you stink. It's like, you know, no, he doesn't stinking, And I

definitely couldn't have thrown that touchdown. So I'm that guy in martial arts, like, I'm the guy that has no basis saying anything really except I read a lot um. But yeah, it's absolutely true that some martial arts are very exactly perfect. Uh, team, make sure you subscribe. The Freedom Hunt podcast go on iTunes, is also on Stitcher. It'll be out tomorrow and uh without my friends. As always, I will say it to you because we must keep our shields high. Dogs are the greatest. We all know that.

But when you're out and your dog is cooped up inside, what's the first thing your dog does when you let hammer her out of the yard? Might be digging. Now, digging can be kind of funny and cute for a moment until you realize, one they're putting a hole in your yard and two they can get under your fence.

How do you stop them from doing that? Because if they get under the fence and outside, guess what that poses a risk to the dog and oh, by the way, predators like foxes and raccoons they can also get under your fence. Dig Defense solves this problem. Dig Defense keep your furry kids safe. It's easy to install with a hammer and a pair of gloves, and all it does is extend the protection of your fence underground. It's available online at lows Menards, Wayfair and Stop the dig dot Com.

Dig Defense the solution to pets digging under the fence and getting out or letting predators in. Go to stop the dig dot com again. Dig Defense at stop the dig dot Com now