Supreme Freak Out

breastfeeding now political because of the era of Trump. That and so much more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American Great, You're a great American Again The Buck Sexton Show begins. Sexton Sexton, No, I am officially running for President of the United States. Could he actually win? No freaking Republican candidate has the best chance

of winning the general election? Donald Trump. There's not going to be a president. Donald Trump. Trump will not be Trump will never be elected president United States's not going to be president? Then? Who will never be President of the United States? Donald Trump is not going to be President of the United States. Take it to then she will never be president. Ul Trump is not going to become president of the United States. She's a plus nineteen.

Do you think it takes me in a difference? Of course, they made all the difference. This race is over. Hillary Clinton has raised more than double Donald Trump, vastly outspending him. The presidency at about eight nine for Hillary Clinton. Your analytical model has never been wrong for ject's Hillary Clinton to win presidential election percent chance? Do you still think she has a hundred percent chance to winning the election? I do? And what would Donald Trump have to do

to turn things around? Prayer and hope for a Festivus miracle. This is CNN's coverage of election Night in America, the fight for the presidency. Because we don't care? Okay, have Kentucky, Kentucky and Indiana don't care? Indiana with it's West, Virginia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, Kansas, Nebraska's and why y'all being with its vote in North Dakota and South Dakota, Texas, up and down the middle of the country already, Arkansas, Louisiana,

the state of Montana, Missouri. It was an hour ago for Clinton. What is it? Okay? Goddamn it. I'm nervous. Hold Ohio. God, yeah, I don't see a lancelight, dude, I don't see it at all. North Carolina, God damn it. If we need Florida, are you Florida? Georgia now the favorite to win The President's New York Times Now has it at nine percent. Champion you talk and still win, But in order to do so, she has to win Wisconsin, Wisconsin, goddamn, Arizona, Alaska, Pennsylvania.

What a night? How did this happen? Welcome to the buck sex and show everybody. The President tweeted that one out over the weekend. I just wanted to start it. Wasn't that just wasn't that incredible? A little trip down

memory lane for all of us. I felt like it was a fitting way for us to get started tonight, given that tonight's the night when we find out who the Supreme Court nominee is that President Trump is going to be offering up uh And it's just a reminder of what we were facing in the past, was going on before. Right. Trump's never gonna win. He can't win. I'm a honey percent sure Trump can't win anything. That

election night, I woke up the next day. I've told people this before, and I know, look, it's not like Trump has one re election again, and there's they're gonna be other times to celebrate. But the night before this Supreme Court nominee gets or the day rather the night of the Supreme Court nominee gets named, it's worth just taking that moment to bask in this, to take it all in. And just remember how they said we'd never be here. They said this would never happen. They promised

their constituencies that just wasn't gonna happen. There was no chance. And here we are. Not only has it happened, but Trump's actually doing really well. He's about to put a second true conservative constitutionalist on the Supreme Court, one who will be there for decades, God willie uh, and that will have such a long and lasting legacy. And if nothing else, it's not what happened Hillary Clinton. So there's so much to be pleased about here. There is so much for us to uh to be thankful for in

this regard. And look, I'm gonna right now. It was one of these days where the news cycle is completely caught up in you know, the big announcement, the big announcement. This is turned into the last episode of Survivor or The Bachelor, where it's like who's gonna get the final rows or who's going to get the mike? What do they give the person who wins? You know that, don't you get like an emulator or something if you win on Survivor? Isn't there something that they hand you? You

know what? I mean? What is it? I always thought it was money? No, No, I know you thanks Mike, I know you win money. I mean, isn't there like a tangible thing that they hand you, you know, one of those things? Yeah? I don't know. I mean, man, I don't know either. I don't watch I don't watch much TV. So you know that we've got the Supreme Court nomination and people are freaking out about it, which

you know is going to be the case. Uh, You've got uh Dick Durbin out there saying that this is a really but you know, you gotta everyone's gonna get on them. Well, we'll hear from some of them here. Let's hear from sevent team. Mr Dick durban himself. Staying united to stop the Supreme Court pick could cost you Red state senators not fighting it as hard might allow the red state senators to get reelected and get Democrats

in control the Senate. That's your dilemma. I will tell you the men and women that I work with on the Democratic side really take this seriously. They understand it's an historic decision. It's about more than the next election. It's about what in country, the United States of America is going to chart as its course in the future. And this Supreme Court. I think each and every one of them take that seriously. That personally it goes beyond the next election. It takes that he's saying, They all

take its terously right. So Democrats in red or red ish states, they're gonna fight over this issue, but they understand the implications here. They understand what it will mean. If they don't fight, then they could be seen as weak by their inside. If they do fight, they could lose Senate seats. So it's gonna be Uh, it's gonna be a tough one for some of the Democrats on the Court and not the Court, pardon me, Democrats in the Senate. Uh. And there is that possibility where you

get it's gonna be a very thin margin. I think you're looking at fifty votes might even be a fifty fifty with Pence wouldn't be awesome. Pence got to walk in there, just sort of stroll and be like boom, scoat is done. But it's gonna be something like that. If you do have that, you also may have Democrats

along the way who have damaged themselves. So you could have a conservative constitutionalist on the court and Democrats scoring an own goal where they may lose control of the Senate because of the actions they took to unsuccessfully block the nominated Supreme Court. What a time to be a lot What a time to be an American. It's good, it's good things all around. Um, there's a lot of effort to scare us all about this, like, oh my gosh, what's going to happen? Play clip too, what's the look like?

The next thirty we're looking at a destruction of the constant City, United States. This nomination to move the chord in a really dangerous struction. Clean air and water that you use and breathe is at stake. In essence, we go to fifty civil wars in each of the states plus the District of Columbia. As the end of the world as we know it. They also want to criminalize abortion in this country. They're literally trying to punish women. We are in an unparalleled moment of assault on the

rule of law, of rights, equal freedoms, equal liberty. Uh, it's it's an issue of life and death for a lot of women. I mean, we might lose some of the most precious ideals of our country. Women. So basically, if you are not a straight white male in America right now, you're probably freaking out. This is not a fire drill. This maybe the pull the viral alarm moment that you have been expecting. This is definitely break the

glass moment. Yes, what it means as a woman of color to be denied equity and justice in the system of justice in the United States. Everything is at stake. When you're looking at this God to spake, abortion, workers rights, everything, same sex marriage, l g p t Q riots, We're actually screwed for generations. You know what's amazing how clear it becomes that deliberal left relies so much on the Supreme Court. You look at some of the most important I mean, this is why there's such a freak out.

You look at some of the biggest quote unquote wins right. Some of the biggest issues that went for the progressive side in this country in recent decades, and they are things that were handed to the left by the Supreme Court, issues that would have been better decided and should have been decided at the state level. We're not, uh abortion top of that list. You also had same sex marriage, I mean some of the very big and then there's all these other cases that people don't even really think

about all that much. I would also note that there's such a a focus on Row and Roe v. Wade that case, but also Casey v. Planned Parenthood is really and had to have to Andy McCarthy for actually writing on that over the course of the weekend. Casey is much more likely to be at issue than Row, but Casey is lesser known as a case. So the left has relied on the Supreme Court as their super legislature

for a long time. And the left has also been able to get bailed out by the Supreme Court in recent years because remember, folks, you know they said, oh, Roberts is so conservative. Roberts saved Obamacare by changing the plain text of legal language to mean something other than what it says. That is what happened it cannot be a penalty one day and attacks the next day and a penalty the day after that. That was what he

did to say Obamacare. Without that, we would not have this healthcare monstrosity that now this point people can think about. I've met people who have Obamacare and overwhelming I know there's some people that say, oh, well, I couldn't get insured before and everything else, but I may people have had to go through Obamacare exchanges and they're like, this is terrible. I'm paying all especially if you're young and healthy,

it is a terrible deal for you. That's why seeing all these millennials running around, you know, don't touch our Obamacare, it's terrible for them. They're getting a really bad deal. But the court has given the left some of its most important victories. Which is so interesting, isn't the Democratic Party is really the top down elitist party. They would rather have five judges tell all of America how to live, what they can do, what their rights are, what sacred,

who's protected. Then let the American people decide, then let our legislature decide. They're fine as long as it goes their way. I mean, this the most dishonest argument you will see is this whole Ah, well, it's it's decided. It's decided. Really, we're gonna play that game now. It's decided until it's not. I mean, I can't take people seriously with this. Yes, there's a the deference to precedent.

Star A decisives if you want to sound cool and legal. Uh, star decises it exists, meaning that yeah, you shouldn't have a court come in and flip what was done last year and then flip after that. And but if something was wrong, they decided it's wrong. They decided that the point of the justice system and and the court system is justice. It's not process. It's not well this was done then, So that's all that it's going to be. So we we will see. We will see what ends

up happening here. Um, and uh, there's no shortage of panic on the left also because of a particular conspiracy theory that I want to tell you about that shows you so much of what liberal Democrats really believe. Somehow, the Supreme Court pick it's not bad. It's not just bad because it's a conservative constitutionalist based on the list that we've seen, and I know tonight will the named person I'm guessing by the time some of you here this,

it will already have been named. But I'm guessing Barrett, even though I know people's in Kalvanaugh was in a black suv and broad broad Barrett. I'm saying Barrett, it should be Barrett. I'm hoping it's Barrett. We'll see um. But there's a conspiracy theory out there right now that's just so crazy and it's being fluttered around by media folks.

Do that goes right to the heart of how even in this instance, in this case, it's not just about out the pit to the court, it's also somehow about Trump specifically, because the Trump arrangement syndrome is such that all issues inherently go back to being about Trump because people are crazy on the left. Eight four four eight to five eight four, Buck, I have so much more for your teams. You want to call in, please do.

We'll talk more about this, and then I've got more, uh politically motivated stalking by leftists to talk about with you, socialism. Maybe I'll tell you about what's going on in Nicaragua. This is the coolest show on radio, So that's how we're gonna roll. When we come back. I really don't think they can afford to filibuster Supreme Court nominee. It would be the first filibuster in history. But I wouldn't put anything past them because they they just hate the

Donald Trump has stay right to a point. Uh this next, sir, friend Court nomination of the nominee, and it's really hard for them to swallow. But you know, Uh, these people are all really outstanding people. And you never know how a person's going to room when they get on the court. And we've we've been both placed from this place some of them. Yeah, these are great nominees, folks. I'm not looking for conservatives to be on the court who just

give me what I politically want. I'm just looking for people to be on the court who like, this is the law, let's supply the law. That that is a revolutionary concept right now, and that it upsets liberals so much tells you a great deal about what's really going

on here. But then there's this other issue. You know, you've got bloom what is this a Bloomenthal over in Congress talking about how there's a sweet this is a theory for You're gonna see more and more this there's a theory out there that the real reason Trump is making this pick has to do with keeping Trump himself. I can't make this stuff up out of liberal out of legal jeopardy or liberal jeopardy because liberals abused the legal system. Here is what Blumenthal had to say, play

clip seven. This next nominee will be the swing vote to overturn Roe v. Wait. The next justice appointed by this president ought to recuse her or himself Rudy Giuliani, raising the possibility of a pardon. This next justice will sit on the issue of whether or not the president can pardon himself, probably a swing vote in deciding whether he has to comply with this again, along with whether or not he has to stop define the chief and

coruption provisions of constitution that forbids him from taking payments. Mhm, that's right, folks. It's about trying to Trump's main main position here, as the left is saying it is he needs to pick a Supreme Court justice that will keep him out of prison and that will not make him comply with the emoluments clause because you're not allowed to

own hotels where foreigners stay and run for president. Right, This is what it's so pathetic I mean this is these are not And recently I've been talking to some friends of mine who are here on the some Hill staffers and people I work with and are not work

with the people that I know. I work at the Hill, but I speak to people from the Hill, which is a place is supposed to the Hill where I work in media, and the only way that we among ourselves can describe a lot of this stuff, whether it's the screeching and the freaking out about the Supreme Court and everything goes, these are unserious people making unserious arguments that we have to take seriously because they're damaging and they

can be dangerous. That's what's really happening here. These are not serious arguments. These are not serious people. This notion that the president's first first priority here is to pick a Supreme Court justice that's basically gonna like save his bacon if he gets in a position of of criminal legal jeopardy. It's like, this just isn't gonna happen. This is some left wing liberal fantasy, and they need to stop.

But they can't stop because they've dug themselves so deep into this hole that to be normal now would just blow their minds. Oh, CNN Zone, Jim Acosta, it's Trump. Scotis team has looked at Kavanaugh's past comments on indicting a sitting president. See that they're spreading this all over the place, folks. The Freedom Hunt powered by Liberal Tears, Liberty, Truth, and great Hair. The Sexton Show is back. I'm kind

of pills the Campus Reform say. We're in New York City talking to students to about President Trump's Supreme Court pick. The only thing is he hasn't made that pick yet. Well, people still have opinions on who it was, though, let's find out. I think the big thing that's been in the news today spring Court Justice Kennedy stepping down. So there's a vacancy. All week people were worried about who was going to be this week he made his announcement.

What's your reaction to the justice that he nominated today. I'm honestly not surprised by his choice, but that's just worse for us. I'm like, I just saw a pick and I was like, like, it's almost at a point where you kind of expect that's something. It's not going to be what you want. He's quite you know, extreme

in his views. Yeah, I don't know who. I don't know if it would make the spring Court very even see it all over the news that like he's He's like this newcom is very very away, something something very negative, and I'm really scared about what happened in the future and what choices he will make. So what reaction have you seen on social media today after the news? Outrage as it should be if this is a surree current thing. He keeps doing this with different positions and just doing

whatever he wants of using his power. Do you feel like his pick is an abusive power? Basically, his entire cabinet and everyone he's chosen has been the white supremacist legion the doune, and it's dangerous to everyone who looks like me. Do you feel like the spring Court nominee today kind of falls in that same line. They should all wear white hoods and burn acrosses at the Capitol because that's exactly that's exactly the move, that's what they're

going for. Yeah, that's right. They think the Supreme Court pick that hasn't happened yet is a terrible pick. They think it's it's the worst pick of all picks, even though there is no pick. That was an n y U. By the way, that was an n y U. And uh, sure enough, um, sure enough. We have all these college kids who are paying I think n YU costs sixty thousands a year now, and they don't spend a lot of time actually reading the newspaper there, that's for sure.

You get all these colleges like it's just the worst. He's just like the worst pick I've ever all the picks out there, this is the worst one. Well, it hasn't happened yet, folks. I know they're only college kids, But isn't it fascinating that this is really a view into how effective the propaganda is because they're saying exactly what they are supposed to say, and in fact, in a matter of hours or depending when you listen to this, it will have just occurred. Everything that they've said will

be considered correct by their peers. But this is a window into how the propaganda works because they know what they are supposed to say, regardless of who the pick actually is. Now, I know it's unlikely that all of a sudden Trump will be like, you know, and here he is Merrick Garland, right, I mean that would that would be crazy but it's theoretically possible, but you would think that they should at least hold off. Is anyone that Trump is, anyone on Trump's list inherently a racist?

Is anyone that Trump is going to pick inherently a man splain? Or even if it's a woman, what if it's Barrett, Well, she's just like man splaining because like she's taking like the man's splainer view on things, and like she's part of the patriarchy, even though she's a woman, because like the patriarchy has women who fell out. Uh, it doesn't matter that it hasn't happened. They already know

what they're going to say about it. They already know what they're supposed to think about it, because they are automatons. They've been programmed. And that's why, as much as part of it is just it's fun to hear people describe an event that hasn't happened as though they know about the event it is. It isn't entertaining. And look, they do this on some of the late night comedy shows too, write but in this case, you're on a college campus.

The political tensions around this issue could not be any higher. I am certain that every single key there has been told, Oh my gosh, the country's at stake, you know. There if they are taking a class that is not a pure math or pure science class and an undergraduate campus right now, they have probably uh, they have probably been in a situation where, uh, they've probably been a situation where they've been told that they need to be deathly

opposed to what's going on right now. Right Everything that's happening right now is terrible. Everything that's happening right now is the worst thing that's ever going to happen to them with the Supreme Court right, Oh my gosh, it's terrible. So I don't really blame these kids. They are reflecting back to us what is being put out there, but it is. It is pretty amusing. Are we got lines late?

Let's get to some of that. Lonnie in West Virginia? Hey, Lonnie, Hey Buck, how you doing, Budy, I'm good, my friend. Thank you for your call. Hey, So imagine this and know you already have because I told your strainer you're a genius. Um. Trump's gonna wear him out and the old lady, so he's gonna get to pick again, and it could be what do you think about that. I think it's possible. I mean, RBG probably there was some I don't know how this happened, but some news reporter

did rbgs apparent workout today and he's like, I'm exhausted. Uh, And I'm like, you're exhausted by the seven year old woman's workout. But anyway, Uh, you know Ruth Bader Ginsberg, you know, she's she's they're they're trying to tell her to hold that Trump's gonna be president for six more years. Folks.

So your question, Lonnie is a very astute one. I think it's very possible that you have a another Supreme Court pick after this for Trump and then of another conservative constitutions, which remember, it's not gonna be radical change across America. It's going to stop more radical change across America via the Supreme Court. That's the big difference here. Okay, yeah, right, yeah, yep,

that's right lyon in West Virginia. You sound like a great American surch Shieldside, and thank you for calling in. I appreciate it. Wade in Mississippi, Brandon, to be specific, good to have you, Wade Shields Hi brother, shield Side brother, what's up? Man? I just I've been investigating the pics here for a few days, and Uh, Kavanaugh is the only one that scares me. Everybody else is good. Um He's a He's a bush, Kavanaughs a bush. Uh New World Order guys, He's just a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The rest of them, I'm good on UM. I wanted to ask you about Manafort and this twenty his twenty three hour uh solitary confinement and Harvey Weinstein getting to walk around and go home. What do you think about that? I think, I think what's happening with I think what's happening with Manaford is it is an utter and complete disgrace. I think that. I'm I'm note there's a difference between

ad SAG or administrative segregation and solitary. Anybody who's working law enforcement knows, for example, that in many facilities, when cops go in, if a copy you don't want to put a cop in general population, that doesn't mean that the cop is held in solitary. So you know what, Wade, it's a very excellent question. I want to come back on the other side of this break and address it. Okay, So thank you for the call. Think it's it's very important.

I want to lay into this little more because there's a few other things that have gone on to shield high Wade. When we come back, why is Manafort sitting in solitary and what is this telling us about the Justice Department and what's really going on right now? The d o J, all of that is coming up. The reality is that there are biases that have to be

explored surrounding Molark. How how you could end up hiring a group of people that are as prejudiced and biased as this group in the record at least is extraordinary. And then how you can expect us to just walk up our client is like a lamb going to the squatter. What is it going to take after a year and a half for the special prosecutor for for Bob Mueller to prove that there was a crime uh directly related to or by the President. He hasn't. He hasn't come

close to it. Remember that there is a really high chance that Peter and his cohorts, again and again and again we see they're creating the appearance of wrongdoing in order to to do this spying and in order to do this investigation. This is just a continuation of it unless Mueller comes up with some actual fact, and he

hasn't been able to do it. He you know, he's been indicting people for things fifteen years old, rather than finding any crime that occurred during the the election other than Hillary Clinton's people clearly uh distorting the facts, with people like Peter Struck being enablers. I'm really starting to worry about the long term perception the American people have when it comes to the Justice Department. I'm starting to worry that we we will never really be able to

recover from what we are seeing happening here. And I mean that I'm I'm not trying to be provocative. I'm not trying to just you know, get everyone all, oh, you know, inflamed over this issue. I really say that at this point, it seems like the Department of Justice is almost a government unto itself on political issues, on politically sensitive stuff. I'm not talking about you to forget

about the run of the milk crime stuff. By the way, the federal government involves itself in a lot of criminal activity that state officials and state law law enforce and could deal with it, but doesn't deal with right, So there's that a lot and this is a diversion, but a digression, just so you know, a lot of federal

prosecutor's time is taken up on gun charges. Not something that gets talked about all that much, but depending on what part of the country ran a lot of you know, felon in possession of a firearm, somebody with drugs and also a firearm, a lot of you know, domestic abuser in possession of a firearm, things that local law enforcement

really could handle, but the federal government likes. And there's a a t F and there's you know, a lot of federal stuff going on anyway, But we're seeing this police state activity that's been going on here trying to stop Trump from being president. Obvious at this point that there was collusion between the Hillary campaign and law enforcement and the media to try and stop Trump. I mean, this is just what we see. This is just the reality.

Then you add into it this uh Manafort situation. Now, Paul Manafort, I I understand he seems like a shady guide to a lot of folks. And did he pay all of the taxes he was supposed to pay it? I don't know. Does he strike me as any more unethical. Then a lot of people that are currently operating in d C, as you know, lobbyists registered and unregistered. Did are there a lot of people that should be under

pharaoh the Foreign Agent Registration Act? Who aren't? I mean, you started to look at this and he's a guy that I think they're gonna get on tax from. They're gonna say, why are fraud and all this other stuff. But you know he's trying to hide money and not pay taxes on it. That's what I think they're gonna get him on. The fairer thing. Foreign Agent registration is just a joke. I mean, that's the That's the DC equivalent of a speeding ticket. No one usually goes to

prison for that because it's a judgment call. It's not mallem in say, meaning something that's obviously bad. It's mallem prohibitum, meaning something that the government says is bad. But you're like, is it really bad? I mean, I guess so because the government says so. But Manaford is currently in solitary confinement. Folks, Okay, paum and a fort is sitting in solitary confinement for

twenty three hours a day. He's being held at a facility two hours away from his legal team, and the only people that really get to see him are his legal team, and they're saying that he's being held there for his own safety. Now, a few things on this one. I know he's been denied bail because he they say he engaged in witness tampering. All right, fine, you can't do that. You can't violate the cognicitions of your bail. So I understand that he's being held, but twenty three

hours a day in solitary. Some of you listening maybe have more experience. Some of you listening may in fact be uh people who work for Bureau of Prisons, or you may know more of the specifics of this than I do. But I do know that from the law enforcement side, you will be kept in administrative segregation, which is different. You have different privileges and different access, and you're treated differently than if you are in solitary for

bad behavior. I I can't seem to see how Manifold is not being held in solitary in the most punitive fashion, as though mana for it is some kind of you know, mass murderer. And I can't help but think that DJ is trying to make an example of this guy. There are a lot of people, a lot of careers, are riding on complete destruction of Paul Manafort. Get him on this the count of countless counts, you know, get him on as many different charges as possible, because you know

what's gonna happen. The imbeciles over at the CNN news desk and the the anchors over there, look at me. I'm an honest news anchor. They're gonna say thirty criminal charges. Play pleaded guilty to thirty criminal charges. Yeah, it's gonna be you know, tax fraud, wall on tax fraud, to lying on a form, lying on a form, wire fraud, you know, and eventually he's gonna have to plead to

this stuff. I think maybe they won't even let him though, they may say a please off the table, just so they can get him on as many things as possible. But you know, I'm looking at this maniform situation and I can't help but feel like, here's a guy who they are throwing the book at. They're nailing on everything they can because he's tied to Trump, and it just reminds me of the Scooter Libby thing. It really does.

Now I don't think Libby did anything wrong, but Libby became the scapegoat for all of the anti Bush you know, Iraq war, rage of the left, and I Maniforts a shady guy, but he's becoming the scapegoat for the anti Trump insanity and hatred and rage of the left. Your children are not going to sleep more soundly at night. You are not safer in your home because Paul Manaford is sitting in a cell for twenty three hours a day, folks, solitary confinement. This guy is charged with like not paying

enough taxes. Basically, that's it. Nothing else, No collusion, no spying, no espionage, nothing taxes. You want to talk about a crime where it's difficult to prove damages, let me tell you something here. You know people always said with Hillary Clinton, oh, the classified information thing, it didn't really matter. Uh, national security being national security secrets being exposed in that way is a way bigger deal to you and me than

whether somebody doesn't pay enough other taxes. And keep in mind, okay, you didn't pay his taxes in a lot of countries, civilized places, I would note, first world countries. Do you know what happens when you don't pay enough of your taxes. They come after you and they say, excuse me, sir, you are tax money and you're paying penalties. And maybe they'll like garnish your wages, maybe they'll seize your house

if they're gonna get really aggressive. They don't lock you up in a hole somewhere, which is what they are doing to Paul Manafort. I'm sorry, but this is not justice. And I'm not some metaphord fan. I know he's shady. I'm sure he's broken laws, and I'm sure he's done sketchy stuff, but come on, we've seen so much of this.

Look at the evidence. They they he was complying or his legal team was complying with the request from the Muller team, and they did a no knock right on his house at like four o'clock in the morning, you know, basically kicking in the doors, guns drawn because of Manafort. What they think he was gonna do, like throw his Gucci slipper at them or something. This is preposterous. This is an embarrassment. And they'll tell you that this is a real window into the mindset of the left, and

it it's chilling for you and for me. Because I am seeing people cheer the annihilation of this guy Manafort, just because he's tied to Trump and just because they want someone to suffer for trumps sins. If they can't get Trump, they'll get someone else. Folks that the parallels to the Scooter Libby situation with Bush are so clear, you know, and Libby didn't do anything wrong. I mean Libby,

they just fabricated nonsense to get him with. With Maniford, you know, they're taking some things and they're just you know, they're taking a guy who's done the equivalent of, you know, a speeding ticket, and they're making it sound like he was trying to you know, more people down or something. I mean, it is just nuts what's going on to them.

And we need to pay close attention to this because the deep state really is the upper echelon of the federal judiciary and law enforcement bureaucracy that has been weaponized only against one side and has been weaponized against conservatives.

In the age of the Internet. You need to make sure that you have the best information possible at your hands, because you know, the guy at the other side of the negotiating table, the person who's on the other side of that lease, of that property, of whatever it is that you need to do for your business. They're leveraging all the information then they can. That's why you need

Global Verification Network on your side. They are the only dual certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company and they take each case in a very individual, very tailored basis. You check them out for yourself and see they work with startups all the way up to Fortune one companies. Unlike a lot of the other guys, they don't offshore your data. They don't send your client stuff to someone

else and pretend they did it themselves. You call Global Verification Network, you're speaking to a g v N employee, and you know who's working on your case. Go to my GVN dot com. That's my GVN dot com or call eight seven seven, six nine, five eleven seventy nine for all your background investigation and vetting company needs Global Verification Network. Buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence? Make no mistakes, American, You're a

great American Again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Analysts, No, welcome back to the buck Sexton Show. Oh my We've got things to discuss this now. I know. I know that. You know I'm trying not to play the like, Hey, you know, I'm I'm hearing I'm hearing things. I'm hearing things about the Supreme Court nominee. But this is pretty legit. It's from Wall Street Journal reporter. Word is this makes me sad. No tears producer Mike no tears. Amy Coney

Barrett is out corners Wall Street Journal reporter. Which makes me super super sad. What are you are you in? What's going on? You're not in favor of this? You know she was the best, she was gonna be great. You know who would be an amazing pick for the Supreme Court, just to really just to really own the libs, Hope Hicks, bring her out of retirement. Just make a Hope Hicks as Scotus. It would be amazing. Dude. Think about it for a second. Think about how fashionable the

Supreme Court would be with Justice Hicks. I think it could be. I think I could be onto something here. She'd be very fair, she'd be very fair minded in the law. She's got a lot of clerks and stuff. Don't worry about it, Okay, crazy idea, yes, but a fun idea for sure. So Comey Cony Barrett is out um according to Senator or in Hatch. But the upside we're being told here again this from Walshing turn report could be totally wrong. I'm still holding out hope that

it's gonna be buried. Upside is that she may be the justice picked the next time because Trump's gonna get three ladies and gentlemen. Boo. Yeah, that's what I think is gonna happen. That's what I believe will happen. So it might not be here this time. They give her a little more time on the six or seventh circuit. I forget what circuit she's on. She's uh gosh, I think it's the seventh circuit. Thank you, thank you, Proucer, John um So, I think it's seventh circuit. Anyway, that's

where that is, Folks. If I get any well, I know, I don't get to make another another conservative puned it with very good hair and overall and overall sartorial style. He'll be the one making the where the announcement is made tonight, I don't get to make the announcement. It makes me sad. But at least it's going to a conservative who loves a mirror gun has a pretty good swoop of his own. He'll be making right. Isn't Tucker making the announcement of his show? Am I crazy? Oh? No,

I don't know. I thought it was being announced on Tucker Show. Is it being Oh it's being Ance at nine. No, that's not Tucker Show. All right, forget that, folks. I'm I'm getting I'm getting off the rails. I'm forgetting what's going on here? So important stuff happened over the weekend. Civility, in civility, all things that we discussed here going on. You know, you would think that the left would have figured out at this point, don't mess with with Mitch.

Mitch McConnell, aren't are no? Is not order dractly imposing figure himself? I don't know. You look at him, you think maybe he'd beat you in a staring contest, but not not a whole lot of other things. But Elaine shout, she was she wants a piece. You don't mess with Elane. You don't get up in Mitch's grill because the lane will come at you. As you know, we saw that video last week. But in Louisville, which is one of those places that I know people make a lot of

determinations about you based on how you say it. I know, as long as I don't say Louisville, I'm told I'm okay. You can say Louisville if you're from the East coast Louisville, or you can say, uh, Louisville, or if you're really from there, I think it's Louisville. It's kind of all like goes together. I don't know, I don't know. I'm just I know there's a lot of different ways to

say it. But he was there. And my understanding of Louisville is that the rest of the state pretty much loves America, but in in Louisville, you basically got a fair see now, my now, my New Yorkers coming out in Louisville, you've got a fair amount of like Antifa, left wing crazies. Why do they get to own all the city's folks. Can we do some kind of you know project here, Yes, there's some great ideas out there.

How about we take a major federal department and move it somewhere out of d C. Right, you get like agriculture department, goes to Iowa. Uh, you know, education apart meant Antarctica. I mean, you know, like we moved departments, as in it doesn't exist anymore, but we moved departments to the other parts of the country. I think that's a good idea. Uh. I had another one that I was gonna say in just a moment, and I just completely what was I talking about? I just lost Antifa.

That's right at Louisville. Thank you. Um so I got all these different ideas there, but you know, Louisville, oh oh hey, thank you, thank you Antifa. That just jogged my memory. Can we conservative? Can we just take over one city, folks? Can we just have one city where, you know, we we don't have to like feel under siege as conservatives, you know, Can we just have one place?

Run down a list of the of the fifty largest cities in the country, and I'll be like, liberal liberal, liberal, liberal, crazy, crazy, commy commy liberal, liberal, all of it. You know, they might as well have Antifa as the main political party. That might as well have an Antifa guy as the mayor some of them basically do. And Louisville another one. I'm like, come on, we can't even have a conservative city in Kentucky, in Kentucky, but no, sure enough, we don't.

Mitch McConnell's walking around there and and he's I forgetting what he was doing there. And he got he got threatened and followed. This is more of the politically motivated stalking that I've been talking about, right, he got threatened, he got followed around the place, you know, and it's just like, when does this stuff stop. We've got some audio of it. Play the clip. Please sell you out, the baby you out. Yeah, we know where you live. You know where you live. Yeah, we know where you live.

With no comfort for fascists, no comfort, no just no peek, no just no peace, no comfort for fascists. Now there are things you could say about Mitch McConnell. The guy is not a fascist, you know, Like this is just at some point, it's like people yelling at me saying that, you know, Buck is a professional bullfighter, Like it's just nonsense. That's not a true thing. So why are you saying it. Calling Mitch McConnell a fascist isn't even a good insult. It's really an i Q test, and it's one that

the person yelling is failing. They're failing this, I Q test he is not a fascist. A very stupid thing to say. But I would note that they took it even further here. They took it even further when they said, does anyone really care about the difference in further and further anymore further relates to distance right far? I forget what it is. It's in that movie with Sean Connery and uh Rob Brown. By the way, Rob Brown went

to my college. We actually were pretty friendly. Uh he he lived on my girlfriend's floor, so you know, I knew some celebrities. No, no big, no big thing. And his that movie Finding Forrester was filmed in part in my high school. Fun side note for all of you that you don't care about. All right, let's get back

to this. Uh, they're yelling, we know where you live. Now, I will just tell you if a couple of guys just just just so why I can give you how I'm approaching this the context that I see for this. A couple of guys walked up to your your business. Then they said, uh, I see you haven't been up to date on your payments for the you know, local security organization here. You know you're a little behind on your payments. You gotta tell you, you you know, we know

where you live. You wouldn't feel good about that, right if some guy named Tony and some guy named Rocco showed up at your place of business and one had a bat and the other had brass knuckles. Something particularly intimidating about brass knuckles. You know, it's like, really you're gonna use those? I don't know, it's just scares me, like a guy walking around who's like carrying a headsman's axe or something like whoa. I mean, a gun is one thing, but like, we don't need to, you know,

we need to get crazy. Heren't get medieval on each other. Rass knuckles. It looks like it would hurt. Uh. But if a guy was doing that and he said, you know what, you don know where you live, you would understand that as an implied threat, right. I think that is quite clear. It is an implied threat to be like, we know where you live, to a public figure and

that this is now where we are. That people who are I'm sure all those people that are running saying you know, no, no, Josh, that's for fascist abolished ice abolished by the way I want them. I want to abolish ice rallies all across the country because these idiots are a reminder, folks, we cannot the other side is un serious. We cannot allow them to be in power. They are they are foolish, they are children. In fact,

they want children to be in power. Literally, they think that we should be listening to children about national level policy. I was a very precocious twelve year old. Let me tell you did not want me determining what was i'd be like. This country shall be renamed buck Topia, and all of my subjects shall bring me ample amounts of chocolate and French fries. Herewith it shall be written and done. You would not want twelve year old Buck running the country, just as I do not want any other kids to

be in charge of running the country. But the the childish mentality is very widespread among progressives, this notion that if they're angry enough about something, if they wind enough that they yell enough, they should get their way. And when you have this, I mean, this is the folkes, this is the majority leader in the United States Senate can't go out in public now without a bunch of idiots basically threatening him and calling him a fascist based

on what Mitch McConnell does not determined border policy. Mitch mcca donald is not the guy behind you know what. You know what another name for zero tolerances at the border and forcing the law. All zero tolerance just means is we're not gonna stop enforcing. This is again the left one, this verbal fight being the fight over words. They won the fight over verbiage, and we let them get away with this time and timing. That's why I will not let them get away of this undocumented immigrant crap.

It is crap, but we let You'll notice that when the fact they're calling it, I mean, it was a mistake even for um, who's my favorite guy again Jeff said, just because he calls and he's my buddy, Jeff Sessions. But lel enfolded the boat. You know now he he called a zero tolerance and I'm like, Jeff, buddy, Uh, you guys shouldn't be calling it zero tang You should just be like, we enforced the law. We have this radical idea and the Trump administration of the law should

be enforced. You guys, the Democrats can be the law doesn't count people, but we're gonna be the law should be enforced people, how about that? And you know that's why. But the moment you call it zero tolerance, it sounds oh, no, no tolerance. Who notice who wants to be for zero tolerance? Oh that sounds bad. But Mitch McConnell is not responsible for it. So they're saying, where are the babies, Mitch, where are the babies? It's not Mitch's problem, it's not

Mitch's fault, but they don't care. It's all about just anybody who's a Republican right now becomes a figure of raye. You know, a person on whom rage can be taken out right becomes a pinata for anti Trump hatred. And I guess saying piniata is some kind of cultural appropriation by me, but you know, it's the best thing I

could think of on the spot. That's what's happening. And and I find it really worrisome, you know, and none they're starting to write articles now about how Steve, uh, Steve miller Um and and that's the guy's name, right, I forget that, the the guy with the with the stair, Yeah, yes, Steve miller Um. You know that they can't walk around d C without being harassed. I'm like, what is this.

You can't be a senior administration figure in the unit figure in the United States government and walk around our nation's capital without people harassing you. This isn't folks, this is new. This is a now thing. This was not the case before, and we should make Democrats own it because what they've done is terrible, and what the media has done is terrible, and CNN is a disgrace, an

out and out disgrace. They have fanned the flames of this animosity that hatred the goal we're just fact checking Trump. There are a bunch of clowns and liars. It's completely unacceptable. I actually hope, I hope for a better CNN in the future. I hope the CNN will return to just trying to present as neutral and factual a storyline as it can about what's happening day to day. I think it can happen. I think it might happen. I don't think it'll ever be impartial, but I think at least

it can be not hashtag resistance central. But they have had a hand in this and and going after Mitch McConnell and all the stuff that's been going on here. I'm telling you this right now, and you know we should mark this down. This politically motivated stalking that the media has basically encouraged and that they now cover for,

meaning make it seem like it's not that bad. This politically motivated stalking is going to lead to tragedy, and then the left and CNN and all the others will just be they will be gas sliding the crap out of the rest of us, being like, we didn't you know, this wasn't we never saw this coming. We have no idea this whatever happened, I'm telling you, that's what we're

heading for. Unless there is real social, societal, and uniform pressure against this kind of idiocy, we actually have a happier ending one coming up here in a second, then, of all of Steve Bannon, Well, I gotta go, I gotta go chat. You know, I've I've actually never met Bannon. I think I just need to. I need to put out the buck signal here. I'd be like, Bannon, we gotta talk. I gotta see what that guy's got planned.

We never crossed, you know, because when I was at the Blaze, the Brighte Bar Blaze, relationship was not amazing, so I never I never got to meet bandits maybe one point. But we got a Bannon story coming up, and then I've got a North Korea update for you, and then I've got the battle over breast milk. It was intense. It was It involved boobs in public and policy at the national international level. The bo the breast milk battle, I don't know, I gotta think of another

name for it. We got that and more. Stay with me. Strike Force Energy veteran owned, American made, and one of the hottest new energy products on the market. Strike Force was developed by veterans for one simple reason. Fight will always follow you, and it waits for no one. This is buck sex in here and I love strike Force. I use it to fuel my day and get me through the fight. And over the last three years, by the way, Strikeforce has been giving back to America's troops

as well. Strike Force Energy has shipped millions of packets to our troops both at home and abroad. And now we're bringing this battlefield proven liquid directly to your door. Strike Force Energy is available in four flavors, zero sugar, zero calories, made with only the finest ingredients, all you have to do is add strike Force to sixteen to twenty ounces of water, tea, lemonade, yogurt, even an ice

cold beer. Go to strike Force Energy dot com and our discount code buck at checkout, and for every packet you buy, we will donate a packet to military members around the globe. Again, strike Force Energy dot com discount code buck fuel for the fight strike Force m So it's not just active members of the Trump administration who get heckled. It's a former one sto apparently, so Steve

Bannon dressed in his uh classic hobo chic attire. I'm sure five or six shirts piled on top of each other, hair pulled back and and askew and ruffled all at the same time. But he's got a silvermin you know, he's got his own swoop. I gotta give him credit. He is. He was at a at a bookstore, Black Swan Books, over the weekend and a woman began verbally accosting him and called him a quote piece of trash. Now you might say, oh, Bannon had stumbled into a

den of the hasht resistance. Ah, But oh, contrail monsieur, that is not what happened. It turns out that Nick Cook, the owner of Black Swan Books, feels that a bookstore should be quote all about ideas on tolerating different opinions, and not about verbally assaulting somebody, which is what was happening. So Mr Cook asked crazy lady who was assaulting Bannon verbally a costing Bannon, not assaulting, but verbally accosting Bannon,

be rating Bannon. Mr Cook said, hey, crazy lady, I would like you to leave my establishment because this is a private establishment, is private property, and I do not want you here anymore. And she refused, at which point he said, all right, well then I will call the police because this is private property, it is my establishment, and you were no longer welcome here. And it was amazing to see all the libs over the weekend. Oh my god, you're such an overreaction calling the proof. You'll notice,

I want to concern over it. It It is asked to leave an establishment, they do so they can be unhappy about it. They can exchange words in the way out, but they don't stand in pout. But the liberal here, no surprise, decided that she was going to make a left wing stand after being just so rude, I mean, what what person is rude to a complete stranger that she knows nothing about? Really and does she really? What is this supposed to accomplish? What does this idiocy do

for these people? But I'm just telling you it is. This is a mass hysteria. This is a widespread psychological issue that the Democrat Party has now and the media has created. They have created a hysteria. You know this, you know in in in you know the medieval times, they started burning witches, right and this actually happened very large numbers in some parts of Europe. You know, oh gosh, black magic burning witches. They have created an antique Trump hysteria.

And that's why you get people that are maybe otherwise normal going up to bannon enacting like total idiots. Recently, I've been receiving all my style tips from the clothing experts at Peter Millar. Look, if you're a golfer like me, you know the name. If you don't, you should, because Peter Millar is all about quality, value and style. It's the most comfortable clothing I've ever worn. Right now, I'm wearing their five pocket pants. I tell you they have

perfect stretching them. The fit couldn't be any better. They look stylish. You can wear them around the office, you can wear them out on the town, and the whole time you're just like, Wow, you might as well be wearing sweatpants in terms of the field, but the look is all style. You're gonna love them. Check it out for yourself. The five pocket pants I'm wearing are the most comfortable pair of pants I've ever worn. And I can say that about everything I've got from Peter Millar.

And right now you can head over Peter Millar dot com, slash Buck, Peter m I L l a r dot com, slash Book check out some of my Peter Millar favorites. Be sure to use my link and you'll receive some complementary shipping and a free hat. That's Peter Millar dot com, slash Buck, Peter Millar dot com, slash Buck, Liberty, Truth and great Hair. The Buck Sexton Show is back well. I think a lot of what we need to talk

about is what values are. Immigration system has been legislated on the original roots of the U S immigration system. The first immigration law is a Chinese Exclusion Act, and our immigration system is built on a premise of exclusion. It's built on a premise of choosing who we want out instead of who we want in. And I think that really we need to re examine the values on which and values of inclusion and values of what this country is about when we talk about immigration pobms. Yeah, no, no, no,

that's that's not what we should do. That's ah and how Undrakasio Cortes, can we just do we? Can we agree that hyphenated names, it's just asking a lot Can we just pick a last name, folks, I know something like bunk I have a hyphenated name and your name isn't even pocket streams. Yeah, fair point, but hyphenated names are long. But here she is saying talking about immigration

and saying that it should be more about inclusion. Which is really saying is that immigration policy should be guided by the left wing, dictated and very malleable, very you know that they change it as they see fit. Conception of diversity alright, we forget about the diversity lottery. The diversity, if the left has its way, is going to be a primary a primary goal of all immigration. And by diversity they mean non white. That is what the left

means by diversity in the context of immigration. They're very open about this on MSNBC. They're very open about this in many different networks. In fact, you'll notice that whatever we talk about English being the primary language of America, though, oh, you're just you're just saying that because it's all white people, it's no. I think, go to Nigeria, which I think is a hundred and eighty million people and the national language is English. You know, it's actually not about skin color.

It's just about trying to have a cohesive culture and linguistic foundation for a society. But they they very much see this in racial and ethnic The left seasist in racial and ethnic terms, and they want to counteract what they view as predominantly European immigration for a long time in this country, with also the uh importation of enslaved Africans, which why African Americans have been a part of you know, they've been a part of our history for as long

as there's been in America. But the on on the immigration front, it's been very different in the twentieth century than it was in any century, and really the mid delay twentieth century it was any time before we've had a massive influx of Latin American immigrants in this country unlike anything else we've ever seen in our history. And keep in mind that we also have contiguous territory with the Latin American country, and so that changes things. That's different.

You know, when somebody is from India, they come to America there, you know, they got to embrace what's going on here that they can't just you know, take a quick drive back to Indian any point time, right, So that that matters for the purposes of assimilation, it matters for immigration policy discussion. But you know, Occasio Cortez Is is a radical who was being embraced by the fashionable left right now and certainly by the media. And I'm

just wondering when we get to revisit. Remember, we used to talk about how Obama had socialist tendencies and people would people would say that was racist. You're just trying to other rise him. You're trying to say he's a socialist. Now I'm just saying he's got some socialist tendencies and this oh that you can't say that's terrible. Now it's just true. And now we're seeing that the mask has dropped with Democrats and we're seeing that they are more

open about socialism the ever before. In fact, professor at I Think at Princeton right Cornell West has said this about part of the problem is the brother that any time there's been attempts of ordinary people to engage in self determination, they can get crushed by external nation. Look at US policies towards Venezuela has been very very ugly

Nicaragua in the same way. We saw that in so many other instances where countries try to engage in self determination and they either get crushed, they either get coerced, and they end up oftentimes responding to that kind of authoritarian treatment. So we've never had a chance to really pull it off. So it's only been a movement so far. It's an attempt to resist the greed at the top, the racism, the sexism, the homophobia, the various ways in

which human manity is violated, rather than affirmed. He's oppressor, Harvard. By the way, it's hard for so much wrong to be in one sound bite. Notice how socialism in the context that he uses. Now, socialism is something the left. It is a an economic philosophy that the left then uses to justify any political goal that it wants intersectionality, you know, gender identity, fight, whatever it is. Socialism becomes the vessel for all of this. When socialism is really

about class struggle and economics. Uh, they've they've layered on all of this other additional ideology because they're looking just for a a counter paradigm to liberal capitalism, which is what we have as long as we can keep it, if we you know, keep fighting for it. But he says all these things about how oh, that's it's just a struggle for justice for the oppressed. That's what socialism really is. That's not socialism is government control of the

means of production and the distribution of good sir versist wealth. Right. You you can actually look when you look at a definition of socialism, it is not what the left refers to these days. Here it is here, here's the first thing. Comes a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community. It's not even a great definition of it, but that that's what it is.

It's about the means of production and the distribution of goods and wealth. It is not thirty seven genders on your college application. But somehow that gets folded into this right, somehow that becomes a part of the discussion. And then just to hear he's a Harvard professor, by the way, not Princeton. Uh, to hear a person like corner West of his stature with his following to say that the promise socialisms is that it hasn't been implemented. I don't

know how to put this. How many societies, how many countries have to be destroyed before we all accept the problem with socialism is that it ignores and tries to override basic truths about humanity and liberty. Socialism is failed, not in practice, but from the root to stem. Socialism, top to bottom, bottom to top, is wrong. It is bad. It is a failed ideology and will always be a failed ideology because the failure is in the thoughts itself.

It's not the implementation of it. Let's talk about the breast milk war. It's a thing. It's coming up, Team Buck. Is there any issue that goes outside the bounds of Trump derangement syndrome? You know, Is there's something where I can point to the issue and say, you know what, at least we can all agree that this is just something that isn't being politicized by for or about Trump. Right, Isn't it possible? Isn't theoretically possible that there's that area?

And I was thinking today, I was doing my my deep dive last night into, you know, research on what's going on in in the world, so I can do a good show here on radio and also on my morning TV show, Hill dot TV slash Rising BYO. We had a fun show today. We had Breet Peyton from The Federalist on You guys should really check it out. I'm telling you, I'm hoping the team Buck starts being regular

morning watchers. Don't watch Morning, don't watch that Morning Joe stuff. Alright, watch Morning Buck also known as Hill dot TV slash Rising. I know there's some progressive stuff on there too, but I do a good job of keeping it, keeping it real and keeping it light and making sure the conservative case is heard, but in a way that you can handle in the morning, right, in a way you can handle the morning. But but I was doing this research and I thought to myself, is this can't be real.

You know, this is one of these stories where come on, really, I started to see the headlines, A started to see what people were talking about. And and sure enough, breast milk and breastfeeding has become a contentious political issue. Now you may think, well, Buck, is this about whether or not women should show their boobies in public? And I would say no. And in fact, that's an entirely separate discussion what I'm happy to engage in another time. Where

does Buck stand on boobies in public? Well, you'll have to wait on that one. But or what's the prop breasts? Sorry, you should not call them boobies. This is a we'll be there having a serious discussion here. This is we're talking about. We're not talking about them in the case of a ghoul. Look at the boobs. But like memory glands for the raising of children, darn it, or the nourishment of children, I guess the memory gland itself can't raise the kids. You know what I mean? You know

what I mean? The World Health Assembly, Okay, this is a This is one of these bodies that comes to gather and tries to convince people like, hey, you know that you know, make sure that you boil water if you're in certain areas, and you know, really it does important stuff. I tries to pass wisdom around and do some health stuff and making the world healthy, which is

a good thing. But the story, and this is reported by the Associated Press and all these other places, was that the the World Health Organization was trying to get out there a a resolution to encourage um to encourage the usage of breast or the the practice of breast feeding over formula. Now this gets into by the way, I know, with this audience, whatever I get into health. And because you guys all do your own research and

your own thinking on this, as you should. By the way, I've learned so much more from learning than I have from asking doctor's questions. M d s get picked off

at me sometimes with my own stuff. I don't go on air and try to pretend I'm an m D. But I mean when I've asked them questions because I do my research and I don't like nonsense questions, I can also sit here and tell you, by the way, one of the more important things you may even hear on tonight's show is that they've done studies that show that when you have to go to see a specialist, the number of times you will get a different diagnosis

or a you know, a different recommendation for treatment when you see a specialist is very when you see a second specialist is very high. So just remember that the next time you go to a specialist and you're like, maybe I'm gonna go get a second opinion if you're not completely satisfied. Always always get a second opinion, and don't tell your current doctor. They don't have to know.

You're allowed to get a second opinion without telling anybody about it other than your you know, your HMO or you're insurer, right, But you don't have to because because doctors, like everybody else. You know, I love, I love my m d s out there right, high five all you guys. But doctors have egos to They don't like to be told that maybe they don't know something, they're wrong anyway. You just like to pass along a little bit of wisdom that I've that I've learned the hard way. Um.

I remember being once. I was like, wouldn't wouldn't taking antibiotics in this case? Doctor actually make make it worse. She's like, I'm sorry, do people tell you how to do your job that they know nothing about? Turned out a week later I had to call that doctor. But like, so I was right, and you were wrong and maybe you shouldn't have spoken me that way. Story for another time. So where are we? Oh? Yes, uh, the World Health Assembly.

So they wanted this thing on breastfeeding. And the idea here is that breastfeeding is you know, better for the baby, more nutritious, and and just the main thing is that there's a passage of antibodies in the mother's milk to the baby that makes for a better immune system and a happier, healthy, healthier baby. Right, And then there's also people who just say that even being against the mother's breast is you know, is the better and more comfortable. I I look, I am I can tell you this.

You can you can you know you can call me controversial, folks. I am not a breastfeeding expert. Okay, I have no experience in this realm, don't know anything about this and never will. So despite the fact that the left things there are thirty seven genders, I'm very confident I will never actually personally experience, uh, breastfeeding. And but but it is thought, it is believed that breastfeeding is a a

more healthy approach than two give formula. And so the big story that you're like Buck why are we talking to The big story is people said that Trump and big formula, right, you heard of big Pharma. Big Formula was out there Kai bosh ing, you know, slapping down this resolution to encourage breastfeeding because of all the money that goes into baby food and baby formula. Right, it's essentially in the US is a major producer of these things.

And so the idea here was that, you know, the swamp, the tentacles of the SUA extends so far there even involves what you're putting in your baby's mouth, right that the UH and and the Trump administration is just in the pocket of of industry so much that they're willing to, you know, stop women from doing what's best for their babies. And people really ran with this. I'll tell you on

I didn't really know much about this story. So this morning when when Crystal brought it up on on Hill Dot TV, I was like, really, that doesn't seem that seems kind of weird. I mean, I read the initial news report, but as I said, there's some things folks I could just you know, if you want help on your trigonometry homework, don't ask me. And if you want to know the ins and outs of breastfeeding and how to raise babies. I am I'm pretty much a zero, you know, I know, like cradle the head and make

sure the baby is like safe. That's beyond that. I don't know really anything about babies. And but those the whole story was that this is Trump's fault though, right,

That's why this is so fascinating. The World Health Assembly is getting together to talk about breastfeeding versus formula, and there's all these different countries sending representation san there, and you know it, it turns out that's uh, that's not really you know, they're saying that you know, Trump was, um, you know, Trump's people that well, basically the US was not playing ball here. And and Trump says, this is just a lie, that we weren't trying, that the US

wasn't trying to slap down this notion. Here's what he tweeted out, quote the failing Remember this, this made its way all the way up to the presidential Twitter account. Friends, So it's clearly an issue, right, the failing New York Times fake news story today about breastfeeding must be called out. The US strongly supports breastfeeding, but we don't believe women should be denied access to formula. Many women need this

option because of malnutrition and poverty. See this is you know, this is what this is what the the additional layer is here. This is when you see that the media they jumped on this story and and didn't give it the full context. Because whenever there's an opportunity to hit Trump, even if you're just hitting Trump over breastfeeding resolutions and some health organization that most people have never heard of. Uh, if it's an option to hit Trump, you run with

that story. I will also tell you that I did little research into this today, and it turns out that most of from what I read again not not an m D, not not playing at m D on radio. From what I read, most of the antibodies that babies have actually come to them in the uh, in the womb via the mother. And you know, you had your born, you have an immuneism that has to grow and mean, but you already have a lot of antibodies there, and there's not that much that comes via milk, according to

some according to some studies, according to some study. I know what scientific studies, you can always, you know, find one that contradicts another one and now we get into a whole other realm of you know, who's telling the truth and who's not and all that stuff, so or who's right and who's wrong. But but this is just in the era of Trump. Even breastfeeding is very political. And it just goes to show, you know, when we say that nothing can be outside the realm of Trump

arrangement syndrome. At this point, I really feel like it's nothing. You know, now baby food is part of hashtag resistance. It's crazy. All right. We've got a big Hour three coming up, including Oh, you're gonna you're gonna want to get ready for this one. Is it really possible that Hillary Clinton may run for a third time? Folks, I told you a while ago. We'll even play the audio for you now. Others are jumping on the Buck train here saying that Mada, I'm secretary, might want to run,

might want to do it, but we will see. Stay around for that. I'll tell you what's happening and what the evidence is in just a moment. Buck Sexton decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American, You're a great American. Again, This is the Buck Sexton show, no being welcome to our three here. And I don't know. I like to sometimes just come right out and say it.

I saw it coming, all right. I I'm not gonna say I'm a visionary, but I'm not going to say I'm not a visionary. You see, I've had this premonition. I've got a superstition. Black cats and voodoo dolls. You guys, remember that. Everybody sits around acting like they hated that song, but everybody knows the words to that song. It's it's a terrible song that's incredibly catchy. It burrows itself living Levita Loca, burrows itself into your brain like some kind

of parasite you can't get rid of anyway. But I had a premonition. I had a prediction a while back. In fact, we have it here for you. This is what I said. Uh it is now July nine, this is what I said just back on June. Play clip one please. And this is a little crazy. I know. I think somewhere in her mind she has the belief that she's still going she's still going to be president.

I think she still thinks that. And I also think that if right now, you're like but come on, come on, I think if you opened, if there was a pathway open for her to try and run a third time for the presidency, she would do it in a heartbeat. This is who she is. Oh my gosh, it's that he reads my thoughts. Turns out that I'm not the

only one who thinks this is possible. In fact, if you happen to flip open your computer over the weekend, you may have seen that the uh the main headline on the Drudge Report was about Hillary Clinton possibly running in tw oh Here we go, folks, here we go, third times a charm? Is Hillary Clinton's secretly plenty to run in twenty That's the column by our friend Michael Goodwin.

In fact, you know what, note to self, guys, let's get Michael on this week to talk about this because I am as you know, I said it before, right, I said it. What a lit over week you go, I said, guys, I think this is And now here we got Michael. Michael has been a political observer, analyst, commentator for UH for for decades and here's what he writes. Quote. The messages convey a sense of urgency and are coming with increasing frequency. They are short, focus reactions to the

latest outrage committed by President Trump. Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance. Hillary Clinton is up to something. Five times in the last month alone, she sent emails touting her super PACs role incombating President Trump, most seized on headline events such as etcetera. Okay, there you have it. Anyway, that's Michael's

column up in the New York Post. Guys, you cannot put the perfidious nous, the deceitfulness, the odiousness of the Clintons out of your minds now, because you gotta think of it this way. I know what people would say to me, right, They would say, Bob, come on, Hillary, Uh, Hillary. You know she didn't win the first time, she lost her brock, he cheated. She didn't win. The second time hes she lost it, she lost the Trump Russia. And now you know the third time she's gonna run. It's

just crazy. Are times a charm? So I I sit here and I think to myself, there's no way except for the fact that this is who Hillary Clinton is, you might say that she's gonna try to play the role of kingmaker here, right. I think that's what most people. That's the conclusion a lot of people would jump to, and they would say, okay, Buck, it's not about It's not that she's uh going two run. She wants to be the person who kind of holds power in the hed and see what the problem is all Barack Obama

has to do. It's kind of like, you know, lift his hand up in the air and say, actually, I'm gonna play kingmaker and everyone, everyone, media and everyone be like, yep, it's Barack. Right. The media's love affair with Hillary in this last election was only because Barack couldn't run for you know, the mainstream media, the Democrat media, because Barack Obama couldn't run for a third term. They they prefer Barack, no question about it. So she can't really be a

kingmaker because that role isn't really open to her. In fact, I think a lot of people in the Democratic Party, the Democrat Party, and it annoys them so much when you say Democrat don't know why it's shorthand why can't they call us the GOP? And that's all fine, grand old party, right, But why is the goop five. But Democrat isn't fine Democratic. You know, if they wanted to call us the republic Party, I'd be like, it sounds

like a fun island somewhere. Hey, you going to the republic Party and a republic Um, which I know was a place before, well it was a line in a book before it was actually a store, a store that I've never been able to understand how it was different from the Gap or any of the other stores that were very similar to it. But I digress, all right. So, so you might say, Hillary Kingmaker, I don't think so.

She also really does believe. I think I think she believes that she was that this was stolen from her, that she was the rightful heir to the throne, so to speak, and that usurper in this case, that Donald took it from her. And in her mind and maybe even in the minds of some of her most ardent and connected Hillary supporters, the only way to make this

right would be to make her president right. That's the only if you're a true believer in the progressive left, in the American Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton, you know, of all theo if you checked all those boxes, the only way for you to restore justice in your mind, is if you have Hillary become president because they think

it was stolen from her. Notice how in my lifetime I keep any pointing this out, not once, but twice, we've had major national narratives created, constructed by the media that a Democrat had the election stolen from him or her right before it was Al Gore, Now it's Hillary. What's more likely that Republicans are that machiavellian and brilliant or that Democrats just lost elections and are huge babies. I think we know the answer. But here's the other part of this. I want now, is he really gonna

run around? I'm not saying she's announced or something, right, I'm just saying that I was early on here noticing a fact pattern that others are noticing too, and paying

attention to this. And when you start to add it up, you know, and you say, especially guys, especially if you see some stuff at the end of the Mueller probe about you know, there wasn't criminal obstruction, but there was a will to obstruct or you know, if the Muller probe is essentially a political hit job on the Trump administration, which I think it will be, no one's gonna go to prison. There's gonna be charges. I mean, people go to prison for a little Mickey mouse stuff, which is

what's happening now. Uh. But you know, no one is going No one in the Trump administration is going to prison for collusion. But there's gonna be some stuff in there just to just because, just out of bitterness, that'll be asked you about Trump, and then you get the whole Oh. Hillary comes and she's the only one who can set it right. Equilibrium, that's what she'll want to re establish, she will say. Uh. But here's my other

thought for this, something that I think very very important. Um, I want Hillary out there as much as possible, reminding Republicans of what Donald Trump saved us from. Hillary is great for us because she helps base turnout on the right and she suppresses based turnout on the left. In my opinion, I know she gets people fired up on the right. I mean the fact that as Secretary of State she presided over the fatal debacle of Benghazi and

suffered no political consequences for that whatsoever. None. At this point, what difference does it make, right none that she would use being Secretary of State as a resume bullet. She just used the State Department as a personal travel service and essentially the character to to cover her bills while she was out there pitching the Clinton Foundation. That's what was really going on. But she harnessed the the State Department for private gain in a way that's jaw dropping

to this day. And and she paid no real price for this whatsoever. In fact, she became fabulously wealthy without building a company, without creating a product, just by being Hillary. I'm invaluable. So I do hope she runs because I think it would be it would be good for the GOP. I think it would help us in the mid terms. And and even if she doesn't run, and now obviously that's so it's not so much a midterms issue, but

I just want her out there. I just want her to be for sheer reasons of ego, presenting herself as a prominent player, as a power broker in the Democratic Party. So you have to say Democratic now, because I do a show with the Progressive every morning and they get mad at me when I say Democrats. So I'm switching back and forth, like there's a little bit of a split personality thing with with me. Now I'm just like, Uh, I just want to say what I want to say,

but on TV have to be polite. All right, quick break team, We'll be right back. You're probably sick and tired of having to worry about this problem, so I'm gonna help you forget about dealing with it forever. Okay, I got a solution for you. When pets are digging under your fence, don't waste your time trying to get bricks and wood and concrete and other stuff underneath. There go with dig Defense. Dig Defense extends the protection of

your fence underground. You see. You install it at the base of any fence and will protect your pet and your property. It's so easy to install. All he needs a hammer and gloves. You don't have to chase around fight Oh or Maximilian anymore. As he runs around the yard, you can stop him. Now with dig Defense stop all

the digg and it's available online. It lows tractor supply Menard's Wayfair and stop the dig dot com and now for the month of July as it stopped the dig dot com and use promo code buck for ten percent off that stopped the dig dot com. Use promo code buck b u c K for ten percent off your entire order stop the dig dot com promo code buck. So we got this huge announcement tonight amount President Trump's

nominee for the highest court in the land. Just so we're all clear, what are some of the differences between some of those candidates who were close. Remember, even just because one is gonna get named doesn't mean that another one won't get named later on. You could have another opening in this presidency. So I wanted to talk to you a bit about some of the the differences in the top three, such as they are, and then also what we can expect once we get another conservative seated

on the High Court. To help us through that, we have Adam White with us. He is Hoover Fellow and Director of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia School of Law. Adam, great to have you. It's great to be here. So, uh, first, just you've got these picks Catholedge, uh, Kavanaugh and Raymond. What do you think? I mean, you know, of the top choices right now, and I'm actually not even sure that those are necessarily the big three, but of the

big three. What are the differences that we can see? Well, let me cheat and talk about four. Um Kavanaugh Judge, Jamie Coney Barrett of Notre Dame, Raymond Catholedge of from Michigan and the on the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and Thomas Hardeman UH, federal judge from US cordrom Fields with the Third Circuit. I mean, the list have been sort of fluid, but all four of those names have been bounded about. Now. These judges have

a lot in common, right. They are all basically UH variations on on conservative judges and conservative jurisprudence, and their records are colored in some ways by their experiences so far right. We don't know necessarily that they agree or disagree so much as we know that some some of them have had, you know, specific areas of focus where others haven't. Let's start with some of Brett Kavanaugh the

d C Circuit. He's the one with the longest record. UM. He's been on the U S Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit since President George W. Bush put him there. Before that, he worked in the Bush White House, and before that he was on Ken Stars UH Investigation of the Whitewater crimes during the Clinton ears, and so Kavanaugh, since he serves on the DC Circuit, has had a

very regulation heavy docket. The DC Circuit gets a lot of regulatory and constitutional cases, and Kavanaugh has shown a lot of respect for the constitutions, separation of powers, the importance of constitutional structure right, and the importance of not delicate of Congress not delegating overbroad powers to agencies, or at least the Court's not deferring to the agencies too much. So that's that's an area of Kavanaughs emphasis. And in terms of Barrett, by the way, my my favorite choice,

what can you tell us about her jurisprudence? Well, Barrett doesn't have much jurisprudence, so to speak, because she's only been on the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuits since November she was appointed by Trump. But she does have nearly two decades of really serious scholarship as a law professor at Notre Dame. She's written widely on really fundamental questions of the respective roles of the court

in Congress and so on. She's written papers about what we lawyers call starry decisives, which is another way of saying the weight of precedent. She's written about notions of du pros sess. She's also written sort of famously, or to the eyes of Democrats, infamously on the obligations or

or challenges for a Catholic judge. And so she's written, you know, fewer judicial opinions, but she's written very broadly and very deeply on these these fundamental questions of what it means to be a judge, of what it means to have a constitution that will last to uh. Keitholedge and Hardeman they have a little more in common with one another. They both have been on the US Court of Appeals again, Keitholedge on the sixth Circuit from Michigan,

Hardeman from the Third Circuit from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. They have had more traditional legal careers. They've been practicing lawyers. They don't come from elite legal background, so to speak. Harder Than went to Georgetown. Keith Ledge went to Michigan, which some have seen as as being very appealing to President Trump given his his popularity and the in rust belt and in the West. And they've had traditional legal careers that they've touched on a variety of issues, not really

emphasizing on one specific subject. The way that Kavanaugh's DC Circuit docket sets up, They've had a lot of cases touching on religious liberty, a little bit of a Second Amendment, and so on, and they've shown by and large, conservative instincts and a conservative approach that takes constitutional texts seriously and also takes precedent seriously. What of the conspiracy theories

that I'm seeing out there? A lot are people are saying, well, who, and I'm I mean folks in the media with some large platforms who were supposed to be responsible about this kind of thing. They're they're reporting on how the president is very concerned at him with whether or not the particular judge that he would appoint would allow a sitting president to be indicted, putting aside whether any of the judges, whether any of the judges actually have opinions on that

yet or not. What's your take on that, can a sitting president be indicted? What's funny I'm writing about that right now for the Weekly Standard A little bit um.

That's a profoundly challenging question. I tend to be persuaded by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel's memo from the Clinton years saying that a sitting president cannot be indicted because the president himself is ultimately in charge of the of the the federal system for prosecutions, and so a president can only be indicted by lead of the president, which which won't happen. But I think this is raising this issue is important in this context because it reminds

us of something important about confirmation hearings. All modern Supreme Court confirmation hearings, they end up touching on the familiar hot button issues, most famously abortion, Roe v. Wade, and so on, But each confirmation hearing becomes itself a bit of a time piece from the moment in which it arrives. So the the Roberts and Alito hearings they focused, especially, you know, um on presidential power. This happened in the aftermath of the attacks of Not eleven and in the

middle of the global War on terrorism. A few years later with Kagan and so do Mayor you had more focus on campaign financial on issues like that. Again, not exclusively even predominantly on those issues, but those issues arose

because they were in the political atmosphere. And then more recently, you've had Justice Score as such, who has asked questions about about campaign finance regulation, He's asked questions about President Trump, and so with who whoever is nominated right now, and whoever it gets the next nomination, if there is another nomination in the years to come, they will be asked questions about the most salient political and constitutional issues of

our time, which include presidential power. Um, probably not impeachment, but those issues surrounding the exercise of presidential power, maybe the president pardoning himself and so on. All right, Adam White, everybody of the antonin Scalias School of Law at George Mason University, Adam fun fact, George Mason is a direct relative of mine, or I'm a direct relative of his side note. I thought i'd just throw that in there. Yeah,

I got that going for me, which is nice. Adam, Thank you so much for joining us, and we'll have you back. We get the first big court and a big, big case in front of the new court. Looking forward to it. Thanks so much. Team. We have a whole bunch more show coming, including your favorite, my favorite laurole call coming up, Liberty, Truth, and Great Hair. The Buck Sexton Show is back. So Jeam, I was. I was in uh, you know, I was down in DC over

the weekend and I found uh. I was trying to find a quiet place to do some reading because I'm a really exciting guy who does really exciting things. Uh. And I I found this this area near my well, it's it's kind of a secluded area of the building. I live in this apartment complex and there's a secluded area and and they have this little grassy knoll and I'm like, well, this is perfect. You know, I just can lie in the grass, read my book, get some raise.

And sure enough I get closer to go. Wait a second, it looks like there's a bunch of dog poop on this grassy knoll area. And uh. And then I realized, oh, this is a dog run. Now you have buildings, and I've seen this in other places. This is big in d C. I've never seen this before. In New York. I'll be honest with you, I've never seen it before because I think real estate is probably too expensive. But

now you've got amenities for pets in buildings. You know it used to be they have amen and easily those of you who live in apartment homes that I'm talk talking about, Oh, you know, you've got a gym. Usually the gym is like two ancient Nautilus machines from the eighties and like a rack of you know, rusty freeweights that only go up to fifteen pounds, and they're like, look at our amazing fitness center. But you know, some

some buildings are super fancy. They got like swimming pools and roof deck patio stuff with you know, barbecues and all this. But I was just looking around for a little grassy area or just an area to read my book quietly, you know, outside, get some sun turned my pasty irish skin a nice shade of red. And I find this dog run and it's kind of like this hidden away part. It's up on the rooftop near some

elevator machineries. I'm like, we're building little special areas for the doggies now, and of course the dogs are up there going we wei and poopa all the time, and you know, I'm just thinking this is crazy. But then I saw today. I't even know how this cross my radar. We talked, well, we talked about it on on Rising Hill dot tv slash Rising those of you who want to see it or haven't seen it yet, that Americans are spending about out seventy billion dollars a year on pets,

seventy billions. You know, I really want a dog. I've talked about it here before on the show. But I've known that my career is crazy and I gotta move around a lot, and I got a lot of things going on. But seven zero billion seems like a ton of money. And then when you dig into it a little bit, they're not just spending money on the usual

dog stuff. I mean people are spending money on and like doggie daycare, and then there's doggy day cares now where they have like doggie yoga and they do like doggy stretching classes, and you know, dogs are like basically being taught how to you know, do tai chi now.

I mean, they got all this stuff going on. But there's also some industries that have popped up, like people get plastic surgery for their dogs, which I had never that to me, I've just never even you know, there's some dogs that have the squiggly tail, for example, and you've got to snip the tail or else it gets in the way of natural processes. I'm just saying there's even something out there now, folks, I bring you the

truth and only the truth. There's something called nuticals and these are trying to think of how to describe this on radio. These are for dogs when you have your dog, you know fixed, which is a very polite way of saying what's actually going on here? Uh? Notice with we say fixed for dogs. With farm animals, we have a different word for it that starts with the sea. That's much more whoa, but with dogs. But neuticles are and they're selling these. This is a product, you see, This

is I did. I did this whole deep dive into how expensive for dogs basically because I'm like, can I even afford a dog? I don't know. You know that the Freedom Hunt I need you guys to to buy more gear the Freedom The Freedom Hunt can't afford a dog, although we do have cash as our unofficial official mascot. So that's a producer Mike can afford a dog. So

that's I must be must be nice producer Mike. Um. But but they had this thing called neuticles and they're fake dog testies that people give their dog to make the dog feel better. And I don't. I'm actually I can't. I won't even google this because I'm just like, whoa, that's too weird. But that's the thing that people sell now, and I see here, I'm like, what is this country coming to? You know, I'm reading a lot on on some of the conquistadors right now. I want to do

some history deep dives on that. Yeah, that's right, folks, haven't forgotten about my history stuff with all of you, and you know, you go back, you read about the Aztecs and some of the stuff that they were doing, which was just horrific. Um. I wonder future generations are gonna look back at us and be like, yeah, they were selling fake dog test ese to help the dog's esteem after they've snipped the dog. Pretty weird, right, That's

how we get to seventy billion a year, folks. Roll call coming up, Team Buck, It's time for roll call. All right, let's get into it. Time for some of the role call you and I love oh so much, my friends. What a day, Quite a day, Supreme Court pick all kinds of interesting stuff happening in the world. I want to hear what you have to say. By the way, the freedom hum with Buck section will be out this week. I'm so sorry for the delay, but stand by and stand ready for that one. It will

be really good. Decided that I'm gonna make sure it's good and then we will release it. So you you guys know, it's busy times down here in the swamp, all right. First up, we have Erica, who writes I have to agree with you on concerts, I just don't get it. For the cost of just one concert ticket, you could buy every single release of an artist or band and this sound level. The last concert I attended

was Peter Gabriel Chicago suburb. I lucked out and found shooting ear plugs in my purse, but I still spent most of the night in the hallways to get away from the deafening music. Erica, you and I are very sympathical on this one. I've actually been that nerd who goes to concerts and brings ear plugs, which I know sounds so counterintuitive, but it's always so loud, and folks, I can tell you this, it damages you're hearing. It

really does. It's not a good thing if you have ringing in your ears, and you know, temporary deafness from music you've been listening to that's really bad. That's something that if you do it enough times, you will be in a situation where you can't here as well. So I'm all about protecting my ears. It's one of the reasons why even in this business, I only put an earpiece because you know, with TV and rad in one ear,

because I'm protecting one of my ears. You know, at least I figure if the constant noise being close to my ear, if it hurts one ear drama, at least the other one will be fine. And so I'll be Mr Magoose style on one side, but the other one I'll be able to hear uh ed and Rachel right Buck Rising is slamming all caps must watch Appointment TV that I haven't had four years. One thing, please use your questions to include true information that is not commonly

known by people like Crystal. She uses her talking time to get in the insane progressive perspective and assumption of false information. Please use your talking time, even your question of guests, to include the truth as a given as an assumption, so that she has to let it stand or question and get further schooled along with any other progressives or never trumpers who might be watching. Hopefully there are some and the Rise is not just preaching to

the choir. Well Edin, Rachel, thank you first of all. I'm glad you're enjoying the show. I think we're getting stronger each week. I think we're getting into a good groove with it, So thank you for watching it. Those of you who haven't seen it yet, hill dot tv slash Risings where you can watch it. Here we go. We got Carrie lean rights. Are you paying attention to the walk away movement? It is absolutely amazing. I'm just looking at the hashtag on Facebook. Wow. Uh well, Carrie,

I have paid attention to it a little bit. I've talked about it here on the show. Um, I don't know if there've been any I guess what you'd call high level defections. I'm not sure we've had anybody who has been part of the Walkaway movement who has gotten a lot of headlines. But I do know it's a It's a thing on social medium. People are talking about it, so I'll I'll keep an eye on it and thank you for raising it to my attend. Shin Kyle Buck, I was listening to your show from the five of July.

Amen on your bid about parades and fireworks. I had the same conversation a day or two ago with my wife. I love your show, but with you from near the beginning, I feel like we could be friends. Shields High, Kyle, what Kyle? We are friends? Thank you for being a part of oss original Saturday Squad when I started my radio career. Now feels like many eons ago. But yeah, look, parades, anything can be pretty much fun if you're in the right mood and it's the right circumstance, you know what

I'm saying. But with parades, I just find that we're all led to believe that they're so great, and they are just not really that great. They are not as awesome as people want to say they are. That's that's my interpretation of it. At least you know, we're we're all we're socially pressure into liking parades, and we shouldn't. We shouldn't feel socially pressured into such a thing. Uh, Lenny Rights, you talked about working long hours. I'm working forty twelve hour nights in a row, and we will

do it again three weeks later. I love the show. Well, Lenny, you got me beat there. My friend, congrats on getting it done, commerce, baby, I love it. But you know, make sure you get some rest to my friend, alright, make sure you take care of yourself. It's very important, you know, the same way that if you're gonna be a you know, if you're gonna be an athlete, it's not just about the performance on the field. That's also about, you know, stretching and taking care of yourself off the field,

and getting enough rest and getting enough water. You know, with any job you need, I don't care what your job is. I don't care if you know you're stay at home parents, stay at home mom or dad, or if you're out there, you know, chopping down huge trees for a living. You've got to be I made it sound like people are doing that with like an ax, but you know, I guess you use a chainsaw. Uh. You've got to be able to rest and recuperate. You've

got to give yourself. You gotta give yourself that space because you're no good to anyone else if you get broken down. So whatever it is you do me time is not a selfish thing. Look when I was when I was spending time with the military, overseas. You know they had the n w R right mental Wealth and Recreation Room. I hope I'm getting that acronym right. But you know, the m w R was a place where you know, you you needed to be able to, you know, email the family, give a call to your give a

call to your wife, you know, see your kids on skype. Uh. You know, play Halo. A lot of Halo overseas and a lot of guitar hero in the m w R. Do you remember that? Um? I remember I used to play Down from the Mountain, I think a lot, which was a gosh, who is it Alice in Chains? I think? Anyway, So yeah, there you have it, but you gotta take care of yourself. Next up, we have so much in the roll Call here, Gail right love the podcast listening to the fifth of July podcast. The duke reference is

from The Shootiest. I think it's the best movie by the Duke, although it was his last. The quote is from his conversation with his landlady Lauren Bacall Gail in Boston's Metro area. Well, Gail, you you get the movie quote Award for today. I did not know that and you did, so thank you for bringing that knowledge. Brittany writes, Buck, you are seriously amazing. Thank you for everything you do. Well, Brittany, you are very kind and you have brightened up my

day a little bit. Question. Is the president required to release tax returns? If so, why hasn't Trump done that? And is that a problem? I love, love, love you well, Brittany, love you too, Thank you so much for writing in. And the president is not required. It is a tradition that the president releases his tax returns. It is not a law. There's no legal mandate, there's no process to

force him to do so. And you know, I think that in part the reason Trump hasn't released his tax returns is because it upsets the other side so much. I know that may sound a little simplistic, but I think that Trump the more you tell him he has to do something, the less likely he is to do it. At least that's my sense. Dawn writes, Wow, Uh, first time I ever made the radio and I'm impressed you got my name correct. Uh most people don't, Well, Dawn, I did so yeah for me and thank you for

writing it. Writing in again. Um, Bob right, it's on. Disagree with you Mountain Dew is awesome. Shields High, Bob, you are entitled to your wrong opinion on this one. You know you are entitled to think that Mountain Dew, which has a flavor that is indescribable and which is actively rotting your teeth every second you spend drinking it, is, is good for you. Now, if Mountain Dew or to sponsor this radio show, would I be willing to try it once again and give it a fair hearing. Sure,

Mountain Dew. Sure, I will not bow to any sponsor. But I will give a sponsor like Mountain Dew a fair hearing, and maybe I will decide that I love it. Uh. Next up here is Jeremy, who writes the basic what a burger is a very simple burger, But add green chili, cheese and bacon and you've got a great burger. Also, there shakes and malts are good. Shields High, Jeremy, Jeremy, I I had a water burger down in Dallas. I gotta tell you I was really unoppressed with it. Man.

And I'm a I'm a burger aficionado. I think the burger is always a good idea. I love hamburgers. I eat a lot of burgers without buns, obviously, because I cannot eat the gluten shakes and malts. I will tell you I pretty much don't drink milkshakes because I love them so much that I feel like if I start having milk shakes, I'm just gonna start having them a lot.

You know. Remember the thing with what is it the Derrito's once you pop you can't stop with me, it's once I take a milkshake and like a snake eating a you know, a large peccary or something, I unhinge my jaw. I do that with with milkshakes, and all of a sudden, I'm just seven hundred calories goes down so fast, you know, probably not not good for me to be doing that. Uh, Ruban, rights, I see your

very busy person I have seen in your profile. Could you please help me to contact Oprah, Sir, please reply, this is not a fraud message. I am not a fraud person, um Ruban. I don't know Oprah, but I will pass this on to producer Mike and maybe we can help out somehow. I don't know what else to say about that other than that's what we'll do, and I wish you all the best. Al writes him and

Z versus teen story. So his new standard in lawful behavior if someone says something offensive or hateful, you can steal their property and assault them. Probably pronounced him and Z, not Jim and Z. Yeah, I know, I know, uh Al. I don't think that's the new standard, as I think I was quite clear during the during the course of what I said about that issue. I'm just that that, you know, you can't assaw people who can't steal their stuff.

But it does change the public perception if there's any racial angle that has thrown into any racial incitement that's thrown into it. But you'll notice I haven't heard anything else about that. I remember my my analysis of that I think was pretty spot on. Meaning if the person that did the assaulting is not claiming a justification based on a response to racism, uh, then I think it's pretty clear that's not what happened. But we'll see. I'll continue to follow that. That's gonna be it for today

in the Hut team. Thank you so much for hanging out with me. Be sure to subscribe to The Buck Sexton Show on Apple Podcasts. Let's see those numbers go up this month, folks, tell a friend about it until next time hill's high.