Stand Up For What You Believe

Buck Sexton. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, coming to you live from the great state of Indiana, visiting one of our affiliates out here, getting to know the country, getting to the folks a little bit better. Buck takes America, you know, just bouncing around as I can. I was in Georgia, but a few weeks ago, I'm in Indiana. Now I'll be in California in a couple of weeks. Like to make my way down to Austin, Texas a few weeks after that. Oh, I've got a busy schedule.

We've got a lot to talk about today. Thank you very much for joining, Thank you for being here. Later, on in the show, I will discuss with you a slander about my favorite beverage, coffee, well, coffee and tequila. I'm not sure which one is number one, but probably coffee because I drink it a lot more. A slander that is making its way around the assigned or so called scientific community. Will also discuss uh some of the latest gun control measures. FBI former, i should say FBI

official McCabe is in the headlines. Once again. I will note that everything that I've told you would happen with McCabe is happening with McCabe. He's so it's just so aggrieved. But he's also somehow managing to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars with his go fund me account for his legal defense. We will discuss that, to be sure. Also, a standoff on the Israel Gaza border right now, it's already resulted and about a dozen people killed, hundreds injured.

A mass protest movement that is trying to just effectively walk across the security fence the border in Israel. Perhaps the time to note that fences, walls, they do work. Otherwise this protest movement of thousands of people would just walk into Israel so we will get into that as well in just a few minutes. But first I I want to spend some time with you today talking about an issue that that is particularly troubling to me because I'm I make a living sharing my thought with you.

I write, I do TV. But my my first love in this business, as you all know who have been with me for a while, is radio. I love radio, and in radio in particular because you're going extemporaneously. I've always I always think it's so sweet when people say, you know where who writes all your notes or where do you get all this? Like, well, it just kind of happens. There's no there's not really notes, and certainly no one's scripting anything out. But that means that I'm

going to occasionally stumble on words. I might say something that isn't really exactly what I was trying to say, But that's part of the of the beauty and the excitement of live radio. But I would always like to think, and this isn't just about me and this show, but on any show that people that are discussing ideas and that are operating from a place of trying to tackle what matters should get some leeway in what they are able to say without fear of reprisal, without fear of

perhaps even losing their job. And this is now an issue that we can't ignore because the boycott machinery is once again in full swing. Laura ingram Over at Fox News is a is a big news story right now, not for having the I think the fourth highest rated show on cable news or maybe on cable actually pardon me, but because sponsors are pulling out from her show, not all of them, but about a dozen at last count. Why you might ask, well, this is something that I

mentioned to you, I think on yesterday's show. David Hogg, who is an absolutely a public figure at this point, is making political pronouncements as if from on high, as if from a place of great knowledge and wisdom, and is being celebrated by the media in a way that should be embarrassing for those who call themselves journalists. It's one thing to show respect to somebody on your show. It's another thing, too, fanboy or fan girl, when you have a guest on your show. And oh, you want

to kind of know what I'm talking about here. This is Alison Camarada over at CNN, when she has David Hogg on her show, This is the kind of stuff, She says, play I am stunned that four colleges rejected you. What kind of dumbass colleges don't want you? I mean, you've taken the country by storm. How do you explain this? Did they reject you before the Parkland massacre or or how do you explain this? They rejected me about lenything about two weeks ago. Most of them it was U, C,

l A, and UCSD. I The way I explain it is we have a heavily impacted university system in America, and I think there's a lot of really candidates that don't get into college. And I think it goes to show that regardless of whether or not you get into college, you can still change the world. The hardest part is just believing that you can and continuing that effort to

change the world because you eventually will. So, before I get back into the discussion about Boycott's here, which are corrosive and destructive and should should really only be used as a last resort, Before I get to that, how is it that this young man's college acceptances or in this case, UH rejections is a national news story. Oh that's right, because he went on an interview I forget where with whom and was bemoaning that he had not

gotten into these schools. And and the implication is that because he was rejected after he became a national figure, which he is right now, right, the guy's got hundreds of thousands and Twitter followers. He's calling people blood soaked murderers and child murderers on a regular basis, not in any way challenged by many of the media outlets that put them on TV. And now you see what they're what they're really hoping for is that he becomes essentially

radioactive for anyone to try and tangle with. If you say anything to him that is uh, that is overly critical, or if you, in the judgment of the left and the Democrat media that has created this situation, if you go a little too far, you might have all your sponsors flee. You might be in a situation where there's a form of economic economic warfare if you are being waged against you as as an individual. Alison Cameron, what kind of what kind of Dumas college? What kind of

Dumas college? Would not say you? She doesn't mean, you know, do we really have to go there. I have friends who worked in A couple of close friends of mine worked at admissions committees of elite colleges for a number of years. Is she gonna ask him what is what his SAT scores are? Oh? The college is supposed to care that the media has elevated him into being a figure for their own purposes in the national discussion about gun control. She has no idea what this guy's record.

But yet again here we are. I'm talking about it. Why am I talking about CNN is talking about it? Why I see ann talking about it? Because this is a tactic, This is a tool. This has been the plan all along. They don't discuss gun control and good faith. They're not talking about this because they think it's going to save lives. This is just political warfare through culture warfare, through the lens of kids. That's it. It's not going

to be sweeping policy changes. Is changes that resolve from this. This is not going to uh shed new light on the gun control discussion. And I would note, and it's very important, I don't want you to forget about this, that in the aftermath of the park Land shooting, there were a lot of Republicans who are saying, you know what, we actually should we should do something here, we should take some kind of an action. And now you've got the people banning bump stocks. But there was a willingness

to approach this issue from good faith. Have the people at the forefront of that effort to have a good faith discussion with the uh, you know what, never Again or March for Our Lives movement, whatever they're going to call themselves. Have they been rewarded for that. No, they've actually been shunned and attacked and denigrated very publicly. What was Marco Rubio treated with more respect or less for showing up at that town hall, that sham that televised

show trial put on by CNN. Oh, that's right, we all know. But this is a particularly outrageous situation. You have the national media being wildly hypocritical about David Hogg and some of the other survivors, Gonzalez and those the only ones whose names that I know off the top of my head, Emma Gonzalez. They call for a complete

blackout of any criticism of them. If you criticize these people who are are trying to push a national policy discussion, you could lose your sponsor, You could lose your liveloy lose your job, lose your reputation. Kyle Cash of though, on the other side, because he is just pushing what he believes to be sensible responses to what happened in Parkland, he get he can get trashed by journalist. There's no consequences. What is the Kurt iken Wald from Vanity Fair. You

can go check this out if you want. Is one of the reasons why I would like a lot of you start getting on Twitter, because you'll see this is Twitter is now how journalists yelled at each other, which can sometimes be actually quite amusing, but it is also illuminating for what's really going on in the media discussion.

Do you think that there's any consequences for people who are public figures with large platforms who say nasty things too, and I mean actually nasty things, not someone quote whining about their college rejections, which but that is all that Laura Ingram got in trouble for, and she apologized very very graciously. It was a very gracious apology. I read at you on air. And she has sponsors including Office Depot, Jenny Craig, Hulu, Nutrition Trip, advisor, Expedia, Wayfair, Nestley and Johnson,

and Johnson pulling ads from the show. If that's transgressing beyond, and by the way, beyond the realm of what an apology can make up for, any one of us could be gone at any point in time. And don't think this doesn't affect you. If this is now the new standard for conduct for media figures, it's just a matter of time. He fort filters down to your standard office workplace. It's just a matter of time before all of a sudden, anyone who said something that falls a foul of this

political correct and politically correct dogma could be fired. Oh you've been We don't want anyone here who's insensitive to the survivors of the Parkland massacre. First of all, this is one person who has been very not just public about this, and I've said it here on the show, and I back up what I've said about this. What he's saying is is nasty and destructive and wrong, and that the media gives him a pass is just yet another data point for why we can't trust them, why

they're dishonest, why they're not journalists. I mean, CNN is an embarrassment on this issue an embarrassment. You'll notice that they don't put any of their anchors or their pundits one on one against any of our best on this issue. They won't do it because they will get rhetorically speaking, sliced and diced. And they know it, so they hide or they hide behind victims, which is now the preferred strategy. The left weaponizes boycotts so much more frequently than you

will ever see on the right. The left boycotts. It's just and then I know this from talking to people who are just dealing with it on the on the corporate side, on the sponsor side, you know, if you upset the left, you could lose your sponsors. You could be they call it deep platforming. Now you can say anything you want about the right, though this is still where the media has unfortunately too much power. This is

where we have to break this down. And this is also you gotta show where you gotta show where your heart is and what counts for you. You pay attention to who these sponsors are. Speak up. Don't think for a second that you know your emails, your Facebook messages, your support of people that are telling the truth of shows that are doing the right thing. Don't think that

it doesn't matter. It's all that matters in this environment, because if you don't stand up for the shows that you believe in the people that are telling the truth and it is right in public discourse, it's just gonna become dominated by the very progressives who are doing exactly what we see happening here. To Laura Ingram, you know that this is we we go through this time and again, and you know eventually it passes. But it's also I don't think it's just companies that are cowardly. I don't

think it's just companies that are scared. I think that there's a lot of ideological sympathy from some of the corporations that decide they're going to go along with this, that they don't want to stand for free speech, they don't want to stand for open discourse. They want to punish wrong think in a very orwelly in sense. And this I will know it has been the plan all along with using victims of Parkland to be the spokespersons for an anti gun movement. They were just waiting for

a prominent enough person. Laura Ingram fits the bill, a prominent enough figure. You're on the right to come along and then but like I say, it's all about mobilizing. They're mobilized, and now they're weaponized, and now they're tearing down someone and trying to put a real dent in

her career. I mean, Laura's gonna be fine, I'm sure, but it's distressing to see this and that people who make a living in the media don't understand what's going on here or too much, too much a bunch of whimps to speak out is just utterly disgraceful, all right. Eight four four nine to five. John hit me with some action movie quote movie. People keep asking it back, and I haven't really had an answer, but now yeah, I'm thinking not back. Quote you ever? Right to be dead?

Fight eight four four to five. Buck, we talked about whatever you want, Live from Indiana. The Buck's Actions show can continues right after the break. The Black Live Matter movement has been addressing this topic since the murder of Trayvon Martin in two thousand twelve. Yet we have never seen this kind of support for our cause, and we surely do not feel that the lives or voices of minorities are valued as much as those of our white counterparts.

I am here today with my classmates because we have been sorely underrepresented and in some cases misrepresented. We are proud to say that we're from Douglas. We are proud to say that those who are in the front are doing a great job. But we also, as you can see, have so much to say the racial component of there. So that was more of the students who are are

constantly on TV. Now this is the political movement and the left loves it because if you criticize them, you know, maybe maybe you get fired, maybe you lose your sponsors, maybe they shut down. Let me also say the thing about boycott's is that companies that do it, they're usually just being reactionary. Doesn't last, you know, nobody nobody cares what so and so said in a vast majority of cases one time, if they like the product, it doesn't

really matter. Right, It's just a pressure tactic that works if you can get people to panic, and that's where the media comes in. They create the echo chamber effect. Oh my gosh, people, the whole country has turned. No, the whole country has not turned on anybody because of anything that has happened last week or two. Right, the country is very politically polarized. The most obvious statement on the planet. But you'll notice that all these other progressive

issues get folded into the discussion too. They were just talking about uh, racial in inequities when talking about violence, And I'm like, well, school shootings are not about racial equity. School shootings just about protecting kids who are in school, meaning that if you're in the school, my understanding is in this case, for example, in Parkland, the shooter here was just trying to kill as many innocent people as possible.

So that to to bring a racial angle into it is to just use the platform that these kids have now to talk about other issues that affect progresses. Because what I'm trying to say is just give it time, and you're going to hear some of the Parkland students, uh pushing for name a social justice issue. Yeah, we're gonna have the Parkland students by the time the midterms come around on TV talking to us about the need

for amnesty for legal immigrants. And if you criticize them for not knowing what they're talking about, you're such a monster. They're just children. That's the game of Left's gonna play. He's holding the line for a men Buck Sexton, his back favor chef in the second well, he's saying repeal. Is that repealing? Right? And do you think something? It's poorly can't we just so you'd like to just run right by a militia? Right? You don't saw the sering

number the Southern senators so they could walk off slaves? Really? Is that true history? I don't have time right now. Can you just give me a brief back? Was started? Eventually they want in other areas, but Southern senators started so they could repel slave uprises. Okay, So Larry King there with complete historical fallacy. Uh, ignorant of the history of the facts, and uh, call on your next your next dot please. Unbelievable. Oh it's it's some of the

people of media. I gotta say. I'm I'm astonished they had the careers that they did that they have no idea how lucky they are. Uh, And I got it, Larry Kick of that category poorly, poorly written, the second amendments poorly written. What what do you mean? What do you mean by militia? I think the framers, Larry, I think the framers probably had a better sense what they're trying to say than than you do. I'm just just put that bring me back kick that on the guy

off CNN. They can't do it without me. Oh boy, oh no, this this makes this is a bummer. Alright, alright, alright, this is a bummer. Matthew McConaughey was out in Austin the Austin March for Our Lives supporting gun control. You know, I don't know the guy. I heard. He's nice actually from like fifth hand, you know, six six degrees of buck sex whatever instead of sixt re gews that Kevin Bacon, like I know somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody

who knows him. It's supposed to be nice, dude, gun control in Austin. You know, he's a good actor. It's a shame. The first season of True Detective is is incredible. I think, I really the second season was pure trash and he wasn't in it, so who cares um? But the first season was really really good. But man, Matthew mcconiughey and Austin for gun control. Uh, Austin, I'm kind don't worry, Austin. I'll be on the way down there soon. I'm gonna come. I'm gonna come help out, come, save

save the day. We got a lot of calls up because it's Friday, so let's get into it. Dean in Boston, what's up, Dean, brother Buck, how you doing today? I'm all right, Mann, thank you for your call. So let's just go down this little rabbit hole. Where are these kids that are being led by the progressives? And let's just take all the gun, every gun, every gun in the country. So we've solved that problem that they can

so easily grasp the concept of. And so to protect ourselves because we haven't dealt with the underlying issue of mental health or anybody who's a criminal element who will get a gun illegally. So let's add more police. You can't do that because the police are bad. The police of brutal and they go against civil rights and they

target minorities. So where we go from there? And then we've got to get rid of the NRA because the n r A. Oh wait a minute, the n r A is all single members of society that pay to be members, whether you own a gun or not. They just believe in protecting our rights. I guarantee these kids not one of them understand the complexity of this whole issue. It's just guns bad n a bad guns. Is that in my saying that, right, guns bad, nira bad. Yeah, that's right. Yeah, I think I think you're actually that

that's a perfect sign. That's a perfect sign for the March for Our Lives. I saw signs very similar to that when I went and saw them. I saw what they were writing. They don't have the capacity to understand that it's a right, a god given right to protect yourself, and so they just look at it as it's the gun. The gun has to be the issue. Well, nothing they've talked about has ever dealt with. Is there a mental health issue? A guy goes out and he stabs people,

he drives down a sidewalk with his car. Still the same issue, mental health issue, But they didn't use a gun. Should we ban automobiles, Let's get rid of all the sidewalks. Yeah, the policy prescriptions that aren't really the point. That's what I keep trying to come back to and make sure everyone's everyone's seeing why why I view it that way. This is just about the culture war and about political power. It's really not about guns. Are just the prison through

which this fight is had. Uh, I mean I mean gun control. I mean is the is the prison through which this fight happens. But it's it's not about actually changing gun control as a prime That's not the primary motivation behind this. It's mobilization, it's getting the left together, it's it's donations, it's media coverage, it's the narrative. Let

me look it up. What I'm important, narrative on Russia has been to the media for last year about Trump despite all of the evidence that they've been running around just talking crazy talk on it, right, that they're on a mission. Uh, and they're not gonna find out anything about Russia in the end. Right, So it's really not about Russia. It's about bringing Trump down. This is also part of the anti Trump resistance, this movement of of

gun control. Thanks for calling in, Dean from Boston, my friend. Always good to have you on the show. Um. Yeah, it's by the way, I just want to put this out there as a thought experiment. So, the Parkland Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School has obviously at least four I don't know if it had a primary schools well, at least four different grade levels in it, you know, nine through twelfth grade standard US high school. So some of the people that are on TV are seniors who are

seventeen or eighteen, and so at eighteen they're adults. I think Hogg is seventeen, but I don't really know. At some point is is the person? Are you able to discount their opinion because they're actually too young? I mean, I really want to know. I want to know if if they had a what are you if you're a freshman in high school, you're fifteen. If there's a fifteen year old who has really strong opinions on gun control, is CNN going to give that fifth? And was a

student at the school? Maybe? Wasn't you know nearby? When this The school is very large, a few thousand students, But do we have to listen to fifteen year old talk about it too? And I really mean, I just want to know where the line is because there's there are shootings that happen at schools where there are there are primary schools, So we'll see an end put thirteen year olds on TV to tell us about the Second

Amendment and the Constitution and constitutional rights. You see it, there is a point at which we can I think all agree it's irresponsible and exploitative. So now it's just

a question of figuring out where is that line. And I think anybody with any sense and any any basic decency understands at CNN and MSNBC and the rest crossed it a long time ago by not just giving these kids a platform, but giving them a platform specifically to attack the political enemies of those networks, to attack the political opposition, and to do so for because of the perceived in vulnerability of those students on the public stage, because of exactly what's going on with what you can

call the Ingram effect right now, right there, they're gonna go after people. Um so this look, this is not going away anytime soon. All Right, we got more calls coming to Casey in North Carolina. Hate Casey. How are you? I'm good, sir, Thank you for your call. I'm I remember this department, Casey, Casey. We're gonna have to we'll have to get you back, my friend. It sounds like you're doing a lunar landing right now and I can't

really hear you, and certainly nobody else will be able to. So, guys, we've got a better connection with Casey, let's bring him back. But one small step for Aaron. It's a little bit like that, except that was way too clear. You know what I'm saying? Uh, Justin in Iowa. I'm in Indiana. That's not far away. What's up Justin? Hey Buck? I love your show. I'm an avid podcast listener and I finally had the chance to get to call you. Thank you talking to I have an action movie quote for

it for you. It is a HBO television movie and it's set in World War two. Well, hold hold on, hold on. I want to say, do you really think I need hints? My friend? Do you walk into the master's do jo and say that you're going to give him the week wooden board to smash? No? But go ahead, go ahead? Man. I wish I brought my water colors. Man, I wish I brought my water What my watercolors? Is an action This is an action movie. Quote sounds like a Bob Ross episode. It's it's an action movie. Alright,

hit the buzzer. He's got me. Apparently, apparently we'll see I might throw a flag on this. What do you got the Tuskegee airmen? Oh? I have not seen it and it was. I've heard of it. Yeah, it's based on a true story. Yeah, it's based on a true story. I know. Is it good? Should I see it? I thought it was good. I watched it when I was younger with my grandfather back in the nineties, so I mean it's it's an older movie. Thank you version of it for red called Red Tails, right, I saw that

one too. Yeah, alright, well, justin thank you for the movie. Quote my friend. Great to talk to you. And how far away are you from Indiana? Uh, it's it's about four hours for me. I want to say, on a good day and if i'm but unfortunately I gotta work tomorrow, so I wouldn't be able to come out to in the NNC sadly all right, but no, I know, but I'm just I'm just wondering. I'm trying to get a sense of my distances here. I'm in the heartland. It's fun.

Thanks for calling in justin appreciate it. Uh. You know, it's a great World War two movie that's kind of falling, falling down the memory hole a little bit, I think for people. I always thought Memphis Bell was a really good movie for what it was. That's about gosh, I musta be two bombers wrong plane? Um right, oh gosh, no, I might even getting that one wrong. I'm not sure. I'm not sure what the plan was. It's a big bomber though, all right, it's about a big bomber. It's

a good movie though it was well. I thought it was well done. Um and I feel like it doesn't really get much in the much of the replay stuff going on. So there's that. Who else do we have here? We've got um John? Who else is on the lines? I can't see here on my screen. I'm Doug in North Carolina. Hey, what's going on? Doug? Ug? Are you there? Going once? It's not fun when it sounds like I'm talking to myself. Doug, are you getting Doug? Or it sounds like you got you got a little shy, Doug.

Doug disappeared, Doug had to take up. I'm hi, there is hello. Yeah, we're here. Men. We could hear you. No, I'm Bobby. I'm not Doug. But that's what's throwing me. Oh Bobby, Yeah, okay, well your Bobby? Then what you call? I'll call you whatever you want. I'm glad to get through because I was about to give up, but it's it's all good. I love you, but a fairly recent listener, but I love it. Um, thank you, sir. You know you're welcome. I've got a quit oh in that dusky gee.

I mean that's okay. I don't want to putty might now, but I want that. That's an action movie, but whatever, But I've got one for you. I think it's easy for you. I won't even have to give you a clue. It's brief and quick and it is you bet your ass. I wish to proceed, yeah, uh now when I tell you, oh man, okay, No, I don't have to repeat it. You got you got? Yeah, No, we all heard it. I hit the buzzer. What is that? Who are the first one? That's the black guy? You bet your ask

I wish to proceed. Uh oh yeah, okay, the the the the the computer guy, the computer tech guy. I don't remember. Man got okay. Well, look, I appreciate you calling in, but we're we're getting a little I need to re establish some of the thank you my friend, shield Tide. You need to re establish some of the rules for actual quote Friday. It has to be kind of a quote that you know, has a resident like residence like a one liner. Folks. It can't be like

would you like wine with dinner? Like, No, it has to be you know, I'll be back like, it has to be something like that. Uh. And I kind of think there's also if we're gonna really this is not non there are rules. So I think I gotta throw a flag when someone says that Tusky Yearman's an action movie. It's a war movie for sure, action movie. It's it's close, close call. I'll give it a close call. We'll see.

I'll hit the replay on that. We got a lot more coming up, including an update on McCabe and why he was fired from the FBI and where all that is going. And also, you know, we should see if Comy will come on the radio show talk about his book, because Comy is the last honest man in America. We should see if he'll come on. If you can take the heat and the freedom hunt, all right, we'll be right back. I didn't plan this. I just want to

be very clear about that. I I wasn't asking a rhetorical question and then setting up the next segment when I was musing aloud about what's too young for us to get a national lecture about gun control in terms of the age of the of the lecturer. At what point can we discount someone's opinion from serious political discussion

based on age fourteen. I didn't even know about this and it just got sent to me in the break, CNN No Surprise has a piece up about somebody who wants to run for governor of Vermont to state we're gonna talk about later in the show in the context of gun control legislation. Who wants to guess how old this would be governor of Vermont? Is that that CNN Politics has written a piece on today profiling him thirteen thirteen years old. Now this isn't CNN writing about this

in a humorous way. They're not saying always in't this cute? Pinch his cheeks? He's such an eas any precious. No, they're they're they're writing about this like it's a real thing. Ethan son of Born is an eighth grader who loves basketball, fishing, and writing. He also wants to be governor of Vermont, not when he grows up, but now. And thanks to the fact that there are no state laws that require

gubernatorial candidates to be a certain age. Ethan is officially the youngest candidate to run for that office in Vermont history. Based on the way they act around the Parkland kids, Uh, seems to me like they're saying, yeah, maybe maybe he's got a shot. Oh, by the way, any of you listen, do you want to take a guess what the centerpiece of young Ethan's platform is? And he, by the way, he might be a fantastic young man, and I you know it is it's pretty amazing that he thinks he

should be governing at thirteen. I'll say that. So I'm not criticizing the kid. He is a kid. He's not a young adult. He's a kid. I'm not criticizing the kid. I'm criticizing CNN for covering him. But thirteen is a kid, right, it's a young young guy. What do you think the centerpiece of his entire effort? Oh, that's right, gun control? Now. Can I just can I just out of hand discount

seeing and writing about this as some kind of a curiosity. No, do I think that there's a pretty decent chance that they will put a thirteen year old on TV to talk about the Second Amendment and gun control. Who's who?

Happens to be running for the governor of Vermont. Yes, I do, which now means that I have an answer to my question before, which is does CNN have any age standards whatsoever for who they'll put on TV for the purposes of discussing politics and also attacking their political enemies.

I think the answers no. I think if the if the circumstances are advantageous for the left and for CNN for others, you know that they'll put a ten year old on TV to tell us about how if you don't agree with Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer on guns, you don't care about dead kids, and what are you gonna do? You're going to criticize a ten year old? You monster. This is why these people have no ethics, no integrity. The media, the journalists that are putting this

out there, they have no shame. And that's why from the beginning I was saying, don't think that your good faith in this discussion will ever be rewarded. It will be used against you. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the buck never stops. Welcome buck, welcome, excuse me, welcome back, Welcome, Buck to the Buck Sexton Show. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. Us great to have you with me.

I know we're heading into a holiday weekend, so I'm looking forward to spending some time with family, at least on on Sunday. Currently I'm in Indiana, but I'll be back Sunday for Easter with family, and I'm hoping you all have a very good holiday weekend as well. I know it's pass over, it's good Friday. We've got Easter coming up. We also have a bunch of news to get through today though, so you know, I was thinking in the last hour about my theory is on gun

control and how it's mostly about the political fight. It's really gun control is the vessel, but it's not the it's not really the ultimate end purpose of a lot of the stuff that you see happening in the streets. And the reason that CNN and others cover this so much is because it is part of a broader narrative and it's about political mobilization. And it goes back to

a lynskey. You know, once you get people mobilized for one issue, you once you get the mobilized for for pollution, you can get the mobilized for corruption once they're for corruption, for inequality, for inequality for you know, and so on and so forth. You just gotta get people energized and activated. That's what activists do. And left is very fond of

activists and and community organizers, even UM. And I've been thinking for a while that there's probably going to be a convergence of some of the different leftist activist groups out there in preparation for a uh, a large scale media assisted, social media enabled leftist progressive political movement to

help with the midterm elections. And when you go back and you look at how these protests tend to be, whether it's Occupy Wall Street, black Lives Matter, you know, not my president with Trump, UM, and now oh the Women's March of course, and now the March for Our Lives, these other protest movements will also be there. These other groups, these other agendas come into play. And one that I have had, I've been wondering when are we going to

see the return of the movement. And it's interesting case we just I've had some sound bites here on the show of Parkland students saying, you know that there's a racial inequality in school violence and another camera the clip was earlier in the week, we played someone saying that if you arm teachers because of institutional racism, we'll be putting black students at greater risk. And oh and the school to prison pipeline. Remember seeing that had that panel

of students talking with the school the prison pipeline. And so I'm starting to see some of the the racial protest movement agenda infused into this anti gun or this gun control movement. And I think now we we have the case that will most likely lead to a return of the Black Lives Matter movement, which you remember was against police, not really not against the administration. It wasn't used against the administration because Barack Obama was president at

the time. It was not politically about going after the White House. But it was a means of getting the left organized, mobilized, and enthusiastic about its political activity. And the media love, I mean the media loved covering all the marches and remember the burning, the burning of parts of St. Louis and then Baltimore and and all of it. Right, this was a uh, will you go back and think

about it? Is it wasn't an amazing when you when you think back to when the riots were happening in Ferguson and in Baltimore, how it was covered as though this was normal political activity. From from the perspective of the media, They're like, yeah, you know, Aimes, you gotta burned down a few buildings and some times you gotta load a lot of CBS. Is I mean just gonna happen? Look at look at the footage we have here. Oh, look at the police with their tear gas. The police

are so mean, They're so bad. It was really an anti police movement in many ways. It was about anger against the cops. I also always thought that the Black Lives Matter movement during the obaministration was a way for the Democrats to a defray or to deflect responsibility for not particularly improving the economic situation of disadvantaged minorities in

the country, particularly African Americans, as promised under the administration. Right, so, hey, sorry, we're not you know, sorry, we're not making the unemployment numbers get much better in the in in black community. Sorry, we're not doing enough to bring down crime in neighborhoods like Chicago. But hey, let's all get really angry at the at the cops and institutional racism. I think there were. I think that was part of it, that was part of why you saw that happening, and they they seized

on these specific cases. I think we have perhaps and we'll see over the course of this weekend, but we may have the case that will spark the return of the Black Lives Matter movement, and it has to do with uh Stefan Clark. Stefan Clark was an unarmed twenty two year old who was shot in Sacramento earlier this month. He was shot eight times and now the autopsy report has come out saying that most of the bullets hit

him in the back. And this was an autopsy requested by the Clark family's attorneys, and he only had an iPhone on him at the time, and there's footage of this. There is footage of this, and they're saying that he was not facing the officers when he was killed, and that the autopsy contradicts the police narrative of of of Clark's death, and Sacramento has the sacrament Police Department has a has an issue on its hands right now, a big one um this. I want to dig a little

more into the specifics of the event. I really was just seeing this today before I came on, because that's critical, that's everything. I am very uh favorable towards law enforcement, as you know, I have law enforcement in my family and I have worked with law enforcement in the past. That doesn't mean that every time there's a police involved shooting,

I'll go, yeah, you know, stuff happens. No, those who are entrusted with public safety have a particular responsibility to uphold certain standards of conduct and behavior, and if they failed to meet those, they have to be held responsible like any other citizen would, like any other person would. That said, the media, as you know, loves to misrepresent. The most glaring example that comes to mind is the whole Mike Brown gentle giant situation. Right, he was the

gentle giant, um. But they do this in other in other instances. To The Washington Post tried this, I want to say, six maybe nine months ago, when there was a case it was just outside of Washington, d C. Of somebody who was in a car and the police. I remember watching the video of it and the way that the Post was describing it. It was an unarmed men shot to death in his car by police for no good reason. And when I watched the video which you had, was a guy who was pulled over and

when law enforcement got out of their cars. You've seen this before, right, It's on a lot of those like hey like crazy chase videos. Uh. But law enforcement gets out of the car to just do a routine traffic stop, I think, and the guy takes off and then they chase him, and then he keeps he keeps trying to evade them, and then you and then you have the cops are able to get him off the road and the car gets kind of thrown into it in akment.

But when the cops then stand in front of the vehicle and yelling to get out, he tries to hit the accelerator and run them, you know, and tries to bump them with his car. You know, if if you've got if you got your foot on the accelerator and I'm standing in front of your vehicle and I'm law enforcement. I've told you to, you know, to get out of the car and put your hands up, and you think

you're gonna run me down, I'm gonna shoot. Right. So there were no charges brought ugainst the officers there because they didn't anything wrong. But I could tell the way that Washington Post was writing about it. They were trying to position it like, Oh, unarmed man shot in vehicle for no reason, well other than trying to run the cops down with this car. Yeah, there was no reason,

no reason at all. Uh. In this case, I have to dig because when you when you read the initial news articles there, there will be a lot of focus on unarmed, unarmed, unarmed, And as anyone in law enforcement knows listening to this, well, there's unarmed and there's not a threat. And that's not the same thing in this case. Based on what I've read so far, it sounds like they uh, sounds like it was a case where officers overreacted.

But I don't know. I'm gonna dig in. It's a dig into it some more because I wanna really take a look and see if there's a possibility here of officers said, you know, stop and he has an iPhone in his hand and it's dark and he turns and they shoot him. Now, that could be a terrible accident. That's a terrible accident. But that's not manslaughter, right, that's

not officer misconduct. But I'm seeing it right now based on some of the social media chatter and some of the other Yeah, some of the news outlets that I know are preparing for pro major protest this weekend. And wouldn't that all fit within the narrative. You'll have the March for Our Lives, you know, the anti gun movement out there with these students. You will have the return of Black Lives Matter. You will have the continued mobilization of the Women in His March, which is largely an

anti Trump slash pro abortion march. But you'll have to continued, you know, the Women's March. I think the Climate Change March kind of fizzled out. No one took that all that here, but maybe that will come back. But you see that they're they're bringing all these movements together, and

it is political. It's an effort to construct media narratives that will push turn out in the mid terms, that will force the Republicans or push the Democrats, I should say, to to win the House back and start the impeachment proceedings against Trump. That we all know. The moment you have a Democrat majority in the House, it's going to start.

So I think you may see this here. I think Stefan Clark's this incident, and like I said, I'm withholding judgment on this, not because I'm unwilling to come to a judgment whether I think it was a good shoot or not. I just need to dig into the details, and I want to read the police report. I want to read as much as we can of the autopsy report, because the way media reports on these things and the way it actually ends up happening is very disparate, and you have to go to the as much as you

can the original source material. If there's video, that's obviously quite helpful, but even just the specific written descriptions of the event, regardless of whether it's a good shoot or not. This may be the resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement, which as you know, is very much supported by the mainstream media, and would breed some renewed life into the Democrat Party right now, which is flailing for a reason to exist other than hatred of Trump, abortion and illegal immigration,

other and Russia and Russia fearmongering. Beyond that, it's not really clear what the Democrats stand for at this point. So that's where I think this is. I think this is all heading there. We'll see if I'm right eight four four Night two five. You want to chat this hour eight four four nine Buck coming up. We we're gonna talk about the standoff at the Israel Gaza border. You've got twelve people killed their big, massive, multi thousand person protest and it's really more of an occupation even

than a protest. We'll discuss that. Also, Hillary, Hello, she's back in the news. We'll talk about her because as long as she's gonna make herself a news store, we're gonna talk about Alright. I'm not trying to be mean if she if she wants to, you know, just wander off, hang out, do some finger painting and drink a lot of chardonnay like that's cool. I won't talk about her on the show. But if she's gonna make herself a news story, I don't have to talk about Hillary. So

here we are. Um. You know, she could be doing yoga instead. She wants to remember yoga schedules and uh, wedding plans. That was all that was all that was in her emails. Remember that those are good times. Those are good times. Um. And then some some kind of grab bag fun stuff. In the third hour, people people are talking smack about coffee. You know, we can't allow that. Here, we can allow that. And I've got some other stuff planned for you eight four to five. We will be

right back. I want to circle back for a second because I've been talking to you about the the Parkland political activists and the backlash against Laura Ingram, specifically from advertisers because of what was really a a minor comment. And I didn't even I should have seen the refusal to accept the apology from Ingram, and I knew that

that hog David Hogg had refused to accept the apology. Um, but I should have known better than to just think that it was not not important to see what was written. Here's what he wrote. So Laura Ingram writes that very nice apology David Hogg, which I read you on here yesterday. Here's what he writes in response. I agree, and apology in an effort just to save your advertisers is not enough. I will only accept your apology only if you denounce the way your network has treated my friends and I

in this fight. It's time to love thy neighbor, not mud sling at children. By the way, my friends and me anyway, Uh not mud sling at children? Are they Are they children or they wise political activists who are going to shake up the nation and change the world. I just woult I want to know which one is it,

because he's he's referring to children here. So if his friends who were speaking out are children, then are we elevating children into a national political discussion that they have no business dictating without at least the right of response from the rest of the country, Or no, we're are we on this? Media loves this game. They love to play dirty. You'll notice that they won't invite any they want to have any conservatives on these networks that are

having these interviews with these these children. As he says all the time, two to just ask some of these so called journalists what they think they're doing here, and what what ethics they think they're supporting, and what this is really all about. They won't because they are well the journalists involver cowards. And that's nothing new, but it's always annoying. Do we still have Kenny and Boston on the line. I'm in I'm in Indiana now, folks, So

I can't I can't say is that Kenny in Boston? Yes, it is good evening. Hey, how are you doing? Hi? How are you doing. I'd like to let all this talk of the Salolinsky style methodology of crowd motivation and activism. I want to know your humble opinion. Where do you think Antifa Antifa has been. I haven't seen them lately. They've been like in high they're gonna come out now because of the gun stuff, you know there, they've been a little more low profile. I agree. I've been kind

of wondering that too. Antifa, there we go. Uh, you know, I've been wondering where they are. I think that they got they they were creating more heat for the left, and they were worth for a while. So I kind of think they wore out there welcome for a little bit. They'll be back, I mean to be sure. Remember they think of themselves as the shock troops of progressive protest

movements really, so they're not a completely separate movement. And the black Block, which is what Antifa does, the black block will be around in some of these other if you get Black Lives Matter going again, black block, which is just a reference to the clothing of the tactics used, will be back as part of the Black Lives matter movement protests, you know what I'm saying. So I think

that they'll be around. But yeah, there was a there was a time when they were trying to shut down all these college campus speeches, and I think the press was having a tough time offending them, because when you're when you're being thugs who beat up like Charles Murray at Middlebury or uh, you know, attack a female professor at Middlebury for a speech, you know, when you're acting

like that. And that wasn't even Antifa, that was just Middlebury students, um, but the whole campus free speech fight. Antifa was a liability in that. So I think they've they've mellowed out. And I shouldn't say they haven't mellowed out. They've gone to ground for now. But you know, I'm always keep my as for them. I follow some of the Twitter accounts of things. I'm looking to see where they are fair enough. I mean, yeah, my friend, yeah,

I have to wonder more thing. Do you think that Jeff Sessions has been effectively put into a box or do you think he's lying in the weeds and maneuvering behind the scenes. Well I'm biased here because Jeff's obviously my buddy. But uh, you know, we'll see. I can't. I'm not refusing to answer. I don't have a good answer. I think that. Uh, let me think about that one a little bit. How about that we gotta roll into a break here. That was such a buck you just

whipped out. No, no, I'll address that. I just need to think about it. Um, maybe we'll talking about macab for a second, and then Israel he's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton his back. There's some relatively new breaking news for you. Um Nor Salmon, the wife of the Pulse nightclub shooter Omar Matteen, has been acquitted. Ah, It's been acquitted by a federal jury. She was charged with the material support to a terrorist organization and obstruction.

She faced life in prison if I found guilty. Um, and the prosecutors were saying that she had a role in her husband's murder spirit at the Pulse nightclub that killed forty nine people wounded fifty three others. But um, yeah, wow, hold on a second, this is interesting. Late Friday, the jury foreman sentat a statement to the Orlando Sentinel that the verdict did not mean jurors thought miss Salomon was

unaware of Mr Mateen's plans. Quote on the contrary, we were convinced she did know, the foreman told the Sentinel. She may not have known what day or what location, but she knew. However, we were not decide, We were not tasked with deciding if she was aware of a potential attack. The charges were aiding and embetting and obstruction of justice, and on those charges, he said, the jury was presented with no option but to acquit. Wow. So she knew, according to this juror, that her husband was

planning a matter murder spree did nothing about it. But knowing and doing nothing in this context, they're saying is not a crime. Unbelievably heinous and immoral, but somehow not a crime. What a What a kick in the face that is. Alright, let's let's get into more calls here because it's a Friday, and I love hearing from all of you. Janis in Boston, Hey Jannis, but um, I just wanted to tell you Anti file wasn't Boston last weekend at the rally? Oh first? So wait, so they

were there for the March for Our Lives. Well, someone called it to get out of the boat rally but they so my theory about how they're present at these rallies is of course correct once again, but go ahead. They there was a radio personality who was there interviewing people, and there was a small counter protest and they showed up and they were throwing dirty feminine products at the protesters and the police. They showed up. The police said this, this woman told her it wasn't safe and that she

should leave, so she did. But I don't think the the news people want to cover them for some reason. They just Yeah, I don't think. I don't think they do either. Yeah, this is like whenever there's a violent protest, Janie.

You know, we hear about the mostly peaceful protesters and we tend not We only see the things get crazy violent when police start having to use tear gas and pepper spray and stuff, and then all of a sudden, it's like, oh my gosh, it was a mostly peaceful protest, but we all know they're stacking the deck, and the stacking the deck against the cops. That's interesting about Boston. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. If you see anything like that, you know, take photos, putut on

social media. So folks like me, you know what's going on? Okay, all right, thanks, thank you so much, Jennis, have a great weekend, have a happy Easter. Uh Casey in North Carolina. Hey, case Casey's back. He's not calling from twenty thousand leagues under the sea this time. How are you, sir? Great? How are you? I'm good? Yeah, I've just had one question. Uh these uh, these tops that CNN and uh Time

magazine is using for the Park One school shooting. They want to talk about how it's uh they want to blame the n R A S n R A S fault. It's a conservative fault. Why don't they mention the fact that these students that they're propping up admitted to being some of the people that was bullying the shooter. I didn't. I actually never saw that. Was that reported in Where is that reported by the what's the main the Miami Herald or who reported on that? I can't remember. I've

seen a story online. Um, I don't remember seeing that story, so and that that would strike me as something that I would recall. But let me just let me dig into that some more. That that may have been There was a lot of of rumor and stuff being printed about the shooting in the aftermath that turned out in to be true. So let me let me try to track down. My sense is that that wasn't what happened, or that that that wasn't really the way that it was recorded. But let me let me take a look

at it. I look, I don't remember everything, so um, I'll check it out. Casey, anything else in your mind? Yeah, well, I mean judgment by the way he's acting now, I mean it seems kind of believable to me. M hmm. Well I don't I didn't see that reported anywhere, but I will definitely check it out. And I appreciate you calling in Eric in West Virginia. You're up next to my friend. What's up in Bark? Happy Easter, Hey, Happy

Easter to you. I just want to be in high school to be able to debate this David home kid. I know ten times more about economics and logic than this could even dream of. Well, you know that the Kyle Kasha of who is and also a Parkland student, has been I think I even retweet retweeted it from my account. He's been saying for days now, you know, I I really would like to have an open debate with David Hogg on this issue, and the media is

ducking it. And you know, if this were about never mind getting to the truth, if it were just about ratings, don't you think that they would want to put the most prominent uh anti gun Parkland spokesperson up against the not as prominent because the media doesn't put them on TV a hundred times a day pro Second Amendment Parkland uh survivor Right. I mean, wouldn't you think that's a natural for any TV station or producer. But you know, there it's it's somehow not cash is put the invitation

out there. It's been very public and no taker, no takers in the media, no taker from David Hogg. From what I understand quite yet this is about But I do have the music quote for you. Oh we got time for that? Go ahead? How's this worry? Like you have to guess that? Does that? How it works? Yeah? Like you tell me, you'd say what the quote is to try to guess the movie. It's a game that I played with my brothers growing up, my whole life, so now we do it with all of you. Oh

my god. The quarterback is toast. Oh dude, that's from die hard when they shoot the armored vehicle as it tries to enter the building in what is one of the most ill fated swat missions in all of TV and movie history. Thank you very much, my friend for calling in. It's great to talk to you, and I appreciate it. Shields high and have a eric, have a very good, very good Easter. I didn't say Thanksgiving a second?

Or did I? Did I say Thanksgiving? John? Okay? For second, I almost thought I said have I thought I said a happy Thanksgiving. I'm like buck you needed taking nap um, all right? Team UH Live from Indiana. Bucks Section show continues in just a couple of minutes. Here we are gonna be joined by our friend David if Fun. Why is there violence on the border with Israel and Gaza right now? What is going on? Thousands of people gathering there over twelve twelve killed and hundreds wounded so far.

What's happening? I'll tell you right after the break. You are now entering the Freedom Tachnical Operations Center. All sitive programs must be kept strictly. Need to know. Team Bucket is cleared and ready for the buck brief. Twelve killed and three seventy injured. That's the headline about the protests going on in Gaza right now at the border of

Gaza and Israel. What is happening here? Why are Palestinians swarming the border area burning photos of Trump and in the midst of what could be a protest that carries on four weeks. We have Dovid I fun with us now. He is the editor chief of the album Miner Dvin. Great to have you back. Always a pleasure, buck, Dovin. What's happening here? Well, I think we can see what's

what's actually happening is all over the headlines. You have thousands of towns I think it was survey thousand according to the the I d S count of Palestinians from the Garden Strip trying to rush the Israeli border. Of course, this is not a situation that would be tolerated by

any sovereign government. So Israel, seeing the preparations that were in place in the lead up to this march as as it's being called, has set up security services and snipers across the border and are using riot, dispressal and other methods in order to keep these rioters from crossing into the state of Israel. The question I think that's very interesting is what's behind it? Why? Now? Uh? It is these protests always tend to appear spontaneous, but they

never are. They're orchestrat that, they're prepared, they have an attention, they have a purpose, and that's what we're seeing unfold right now, David. The timing of it though, it's it's because it's pass over, it's because the Palestinians are also saying that this is a right of return protesting. This is just for maximum media exposure. Right. Look, the media exposure is a big part of it, but we're also seeing but it's also a distraction from the real question

over here. And and we've seen this as a cycle by the way, in the in the history of the way that Palestinians have approached their relationship with Israel, Right we sure this with yes A. Basically, whenever they don't want to come to the table and talk with the other side so they meet that there's an immediate turns

to violence. And this achieves a couple of things. First of all, it increases international attention on the issue, so there's a lot more pressure on Israelius to make further concessions, etcetera. And also distracts from the real question, which is why are the peace talks not happen? If why why is it getting to this? So, you know, we saw this, for example with yasa Arafat in the nineties when the

first inter father broke out. That was immediately following the breakdown and peace talks, when when ya Araba famously turned down the offer of a Palestinian state, and then within weeks we were seeing bombings and buses in Jerusalem and the carnage that came with that. So now we're facing a very very similar situation. Here. You have an administration that is more even handed and certainly sees the as

ready perspective than the previous administration. They're not forcing Israel to make concrete professions in exchange for the promise of peace, and the Palestinians have climbed all the way back up the tree. Uh. Now the Trump administration and the Israelis are saying, listen, we want to sit down and talk. You've got a peace plan, etcetera. And the Palestinian responses

violence is the peace process. You think under the Trump administration making more headway at this point than in a comparable period under the Obama's I know it's very early, Dovid, but are we are we seeing uh, the the beginnings, the the early signs of what could lead to some kind of a discussion. Where are we in all that? Look, the truth is the peace process that has been called has never made any headway, not under Trump and not

under Obama. And there's there's a simple, straightforward reason for that. And this has been the fear and the concern that Israels have had for so long, and that is that there is no Palestinian intention to reach any sort of peace agreement, and that peace and the peace process is just used as as a as a as a tool, as a as a faith what what became known as the Phase plan in the seventies. This was very publicly orchestrated the Arab lead where they say, look out goal

is to take the entire Israel. We don't believe that the Jews have any right to self determination in this land, the town land, Darab land, etcetera. Um and the idea is basically to use the peace mechanism in order to gain as much territory as possible and then launch further

attacks from the expanded territory. That's been the fear of Israelis all along, and Israel in in you know, has tried through the Oslo Accords, through two thousand and five disengagement from Gaza to give to this approach, giving a little bit of land and seeing what the result is. And in every single territory that Israel has was drawn from, there has been a terror state established, and god knows

what what amount of bloodshed that we've seen follows. So really what we're seeing here is that the worst fears of the Israelis are actually being proven correct. And this approach whereby if we can't have it all, will have nothing, which is basically the approach that the bus is taking. If you're not going to commit to doing X, Y and Z, then I'm not even going to come to the table. That confirms the worst fears of the Israelis that there isn't a real intention for peace to peace

talks are a tactic. Uh, they're not. They're not a gold in and of themselves. We're speaking of David A. Foon, who's the editor in chief of the Alga Minor. Uh, David, they're the plans, as I've read about today are for these protesters to set up camps, set up tents and stay four weeks. Is this kind of turning into a you know, occupy the border? Is that? Is that the idea kind of like the Occupy Wall Street movement here

in America? And what is this all about? Yes, I mean, look, the longer this goes on and and and the more headlines that this tracks, the more is gained from the Palestinian side. So they're going to do everything that they can to not just elongated, but to inflict the maximum amount of damage on their own citizens. Because the pr win from them is when, as supposed to, the innocent uh Palestinian is killed by an Israeli that that's the goal,

that's the victory. And we've seen reports, we've seen this from the Israelis, the i d F pointing out how they're sending children to the borders and they're taking on belligerent actions. I mean there's there there are attempts at at harming soldiers and and at targeting civilians in that vitility from the Palestinian side, right, So they're looking to to to entice the inflection of damage. They're using the

civilians human shield. The more death, the better for the Palestinian cause that's how they're framing it, and that's how that's what they're looking to achieve their dava. Just any any predictions or anything you want to let us know about what to expect going forward with this, Well that that's a very good question. I think it will depend a lot on the Israeli security forces. So so there's

got to be the shimbat. Who are the key players over here, that Israel's version of the FBI, the the the or the m I five, the the internal security services who have sources and have assets, uh, you know, all across the understanding communities. How are they going to be able to clamp down on the orchestrators of this and to take out from the equation some of the more aggressive elements in this campaign. The other thing that's going to be important is what the price is going

to be for Hamas. We've seen already that Israel has started going after targets in Hamas, targets in the Gaza strip and there's a reason for that. You know, this territory is completely controlled by Hamas, which is of course internationally recognized as a terrorist organization, and nothing happens there without not only Hamasa's blessing, but Hamas's orchestration. So Hamas is behind this, this, this whole event. So the question

is what's the cost going to be to Hamas. So we started to the israel now specifically targeting Hamas's weapons deeper and and and uh and hotspots in the Gaza strip. And if I must feels that that there's a risk that there's a lot to lose, and the Israelis will keep going after how much's interest in the strip, they might decide, well, this isn't really worth the cost of this stage. David if fun is the editor in chief

of the Alga Minor. Go to the Alga Minor uh dot com to check out all of the latest they're doing over there. Dovid, thank you so much for joining us. Men. Always appreciate it. Always it pleasure. But all right, team, we'll be back with our three coming up here in just a few We're gonna talk about Hillary and coffee and Vermont. Oh my, stay with me. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton his back and right now people saying, um, get off the public stage and shut up,

which is something we're hearing all the time. How do you well, you know, um that that began to happen after the election, and you know, the election was pretty traumatic. I was really struck by, um, how people said that to me, you know, mostly people in the press, um for whatever reason, like oh, you know, go away, go away. And I had a one of the young people works for me, go back and do a bit of research. They never said that to any man who was not elected.

Oh Hillary, do not shut up, welcome back to the buck sex and show everyone. But that's Hillary. I actually thought it was Hillary at first, but it was her interviewer. I couldn't really tell the difference. It was like, Hillary, what do you think? Wow, I'm Hillary And I don't know, but I've noticed that there's there's a bitterness, a bitterness that creeps into her voice there along with the dulcet

and just soothing tones. I'm the best. Hillary doesn't want to go away because, as I have said to those of you who have been listening to me for a while, many times, there's a hole in her soul. Think about what this woman was willing to do to get where she is. Think about all of her complicity with Bill Clinton's just serial grotesque behavior of all kinds. Think about the depths of the corruption, and just the willingness to sell one's beliefs to the and and beliefs and actions

to the highest bidder all the time. It must be somewhat exhausting. And I think it's also soul crushing. And Hillary has allowed her soul to be crushed for so long that I feel like she doesn't even remember what it's like to have problems with corruption, narrated, to have

scruples that you don't want to violate. But just more to the point about her not going away, it's a great reminder for all of us there who sometimes and I put I put myself in this category in last week or two, who are like, come on, Trump, you set a wall, Come on, you know it's he still could do it. I'm not saying it's not happening, but it put myself in this category of you know, I I have high standard start it, and I want the president to follow through on the promises that he made.

It is important for me to sometimes be reminded, though, that it could have been a Hillary. Hello, what happened? It could have been her? In fact, it was not just likely, it was almost definitively said it would be her, and we avoided that somehow we avoided because of of Trump. I mean, you know we can we That doesn't mean we can't criticize what's going on right now, but we very much could have had Hillary. But she still can't

help but play the aggrieved victim. Here. Um that it's about how a man who lost an election was never told to shut up. That's just nonsense, right. I can't say enough times we don't need to hear from John Carry ever again about anything. I can say this with all in all truth, I have never heard John Carry say a single thing that I thought was insightful or profound. And I've been forced to because I pay attention and cover politics. Here a lot of John Carry Um. Yes,

oh this is um the way too. He always kind of reminded me of the the Trees from the Lord of the Rings trilogy. They move very very slowly, and Carry even kind of visually reminds me of the Nts the Trees from Lord of the Rings. But he's just not an interesting or insightful guy. Nonetheless, whenever he pops up again, he's like I'm doing a fundraiser. I'm like, no, we don't need to hear from John Carey. We've had enough. But with Hillary, I kind of want to hear more

from her. I think a lot of Republics feel the same way, because she is a reminder of what the other side not just offered up, but was willing to debase themselves to support. You know, if you're looking to just kind of have a little bit of a reassurance going to this weekend, We've got some some tough political headwinds right now, got something that the midterms is gonna get real nasty, real fast. Just remember that it could very well have been Hillary and the left, the Democrats,

the media. There there was nothing that they were unwilling to do, the government itself, the deep state, the swamp, the swamp dwellers right, all covered in vines and Spanish mass or whatever. Right, I'm trying to think of, what was the thank you John swamp thing? That's what I was trying to think of. I feel like I watched a swamp things show on USA when I was a kid for a while. Does that sound right? I can barely remember it, but there was a guy and it yeah, yeah,

it was on Usa. I remember swamp thing. Uh. I also remember a long time ago watching a like a Beauty and the Beast version on TV that the beast was like running around in the sewers and he was real scary looking. You know, I did not he was not like it didn't look like a cuddly a cuddly bear that happened to be a human being. He actually

looked pretty scary anyway. So back to Hillary, she says lots of things, including this black clip ted, but I do worry that what's happened to the Republican Party is that it's being held captive by a very small group of powerful forces. We have seen the power of the n r A, for example. Some of the very wealthy uh patrons of the Republican Party are so demanding if you if you deviate from their stated requests, they will fund somebody to run against you in a Republican primary.

They will dry up your money, They will make it really difficult. So she said that it's held captive, held captive by a small group of powerful forces. What does she think the Democrat Party is really all about? What are we to make of of the Democrat Party? They're not held captive. I mean, the Democrats have two agenda items that are absolute that you cannot waiver from them. You cannot. One is abortion, so planned parenthood. Another is

illegal immigration. But when you look at their the people that are calling the shots, very large donors who in some cases are environmentalist wackos, make all kinds of decisions for the rest of the Democrat Party. I mean, we it's so funny. I mean, how much more we hear about, for example, of funders on the right, and you'll ever hear about Sauros SoRs. He wants to spread out of it, so he right checks, he finds these things. People don't really like my sorrows as much as I feel like

they should. That sounds a lot like sorrows. Everybody, all right, do it audio check you'll see what I mean. Why does this puffy haired kid think that he could make fun of me? I'm worth billions? What is he worth? Like three hundred dollars maybe four hundred. Maybe Soros is right about that. I just had to pay my pay my tax bill. It's not it's not a lot left, not a lot left in the tank. At this point, he is poor, but he is rich in hair that is true. I've got a lot of a lot of

hair up top still, so that's good news. Alright. So Hillary, she's the worst, could have been a lot worse than anything we're seeing right now. And I want her to keep talking. I want her to keep talking. Oh wait, by the way, Kelly and Conway, I want to point this out. She got in on the Hillary speech bashing play clip to please its publicly imported. She got about twenty five dollars for that speech. She used to get ten times at folks, ten times that she was giving

speeches before she lost her second presidential election. There five thousand people, that's about five dollars a person. And so I think if she wants to be part of the national conversation, she should call us about infrastructure, opioids, healthcare, at taxes. There are many conversations to be had. I don't see her out there doing talking much about anything beyond herself. I by the way, I don't put her down for I would love to if anyone wants to

pay me twenty five grade for a speech. I mean, if anyone just wants to take me out for like a really good steak. It doesn't even have to be rib I will will speak for flat iron, right, will speak for butcher cut steak, you name it. There's any number that I'm willing to speak for. Um but grand. It's not that it's not a lot of money, because it is. It's that what it says is that she was selling influence before and now she's not. Vermont change his gun laws, and coffee is now being called the

car car Sinogen. I'm gonna tackle this stuff right after the break. Vermont is a funky place, my friends. I have no idea how many of our our wonderful listeners who live in the great state of Vermont. I know we've got some podcast listeners in Vermont, but it's it's funky. You think of it as the home of Ben and Jerry's great skiing. I used to go to camp. I used to go to summer camp in Vermont. Actually very

fond memories of being in Vermont. Vermont and July is wonderful, right, It's a great place up in the hills there, and uh really really enjoyed it. But it's incredibly liberal. Yeah, I mean it's there's I think Fish the the band with all the tyed ee and weed smoking, and also Ben and Jerry's ice cream again, tied eye and weed smoking. He see ice cream and this need to seem live music. They sound the same in California and Vermont, apparently according to me. But Vermont is a state that has the

lowest per capita violent crime rate in the country. So you gotta tip your hat to it there, right, Vermont is very, very safe. But and this is if you can go back in the archives, Professor Dershowitz and Young Buck here had this debate on CNN about gun control years ago. This was after Newtown, and Professor dersh Witz said states with stricter gun laws have less violent crime and states with more lax gun laws have more violent crime.

And I said, well, Professor Dershuitz, that's a tough one, because Vermont has the lowest violent crime rate in the country, and who wants to guess very lacks gun laws relatively speaking, you can go in and buy buy stuff. I think it's also no permitting necessary. I'd have to check. Every state's laws are different, so don't don't take my word

for it. Okay, you gotta check on this, But I think the lawn Vermont is that you could open carry without a either open or concealed if I don't remember, but without a permit, as long as you're lawfully allowed to have a gun, you can open carry it or concealed carry. I'm not sure which one it is without a permit anyway, So it's very loose gun laws. You know how many murders there were in Vermont? I think it was last year ten in the state. There were

ten murders. There are ten murders in a bad three hour stretch of a weekend in Chicago sometimes, and nobody even notices the entire state of vermonts and murders. This is important because of what it says about gun policy across the country. That the position that Dershwitz took on air against me and CNN years ago. I don't know. Dershwitz has been good on some stuff. He's got on a lot of stuff, but he's bad on guns. Uh. And I won that debate, by the way, I'm just saying,

buck brush your shoulder off. Oh that's right. He's a he's a world famous law professor at Harvard. Well, I'm a poofy haired, preppy former CIA ninja. So I won that debate anyway, I'm gonna stop saying that, and that's like a kid, I win. Uh. But Vermont is a place that is very different than what you would expect based on the gun laws. If you believe that gun laws correlate with either higher or lower crime, as I mean,

it's not the case. And Vermont, despite all of this, and this is why I'm thinking about this right now, the Vermont legislature has just passed a gun control bill. This is in the aftermath of what happened in Parkland, so online it's fascinating. You had a a Democrat in office during Newtown, Barack Obama, and there was very little, if any change in legislation anywhere in the country. Very little. I think New York changed some stuff, Connecticut with US

all rifles, but very minimal. And post Parkland, with a Republican administration, you have had much more widespread, real legislative efforts and some legislation has passed limiting guns. So I can get into why that is, I think in just a second. But the Vermont legislature is raising the buying age and limiting high capacity magazines. Um, this is unlikely to stop anything, and it certainly is coming in a place where there are there are very few murders, very

few homicides to worry about to begin with. Now, I know people will say, well, what about people who buy guns in Vermont and go across state lines with them? And my answer to that is always, well, now we're just saying that state gun laws don't really matter. Right. If you can see that, then you're also then why even change these laws of the state. You should only be worried about it at the federal level because it's

obviously a failed a failed approach. If you think that you're just gonna have illegal guns from Pennsylvania flooding in the streets of New York work, why change the gun laws in New York and make them so draconian. And I'll say, oh, well, it's better than doing nothing. But to that, I say, you're there, there's a concession. They're they're conceding in this whole process that it's completely insufficient and unlikely to stop anything. But it's about taking action.

It's just about doing something. That's what the politics dictate right now. That's why Vermont is passing a gun control bill. Doesn't have any violence, really, ten murders folks in the whole state. Okay, that's and and I know those murders, how many of them were domestic disputes, are involved drug dealing, I would guess all of them. So it's not something

that is a is a big public safety risk. Um. But the reason that different states across the country, and you know, Florida is obviously the epicenter of all this. But the people point out to me because you guys are all you guys are very strict on the words. I want to misuse any words. Ep center technically means to be above the center of something. Yeah, I know people use it as just the center of something, and

I think through common usage that's now accepted. But the more correct definition of epicenters in fact, to be above the center of something. Right, So if you were like hovering, uh, if you are hovering above an explosion, let's say, in a helicopter and looking at the aftermath, you'd be at the epicenter of the explosion. See what I'm saying, Um,

I definitely digress there. They're doing this though, with these different states, with political taking these political actions, because in part you have a republican administration and this is just about mobilization. I might have to do a little more o Lynsky, a little more Olynsky on this show, just to revive that. You see all this all this organizing, you see this March for Our Lives. They've they've really been branding these different political movements from the left for

a while. But the tactics and they have different names, but the tactics are all straight out of a Lensky and the tactics are first and foremost concerned with the mobilization of the opposition, in this case the left, the

anti Trump forces of this country. Just get them moving, get them organized, get them together, get them out there, get them loud, and then as it gets closer to the mid terms, refine the message live or you have to to pick up democrats seats, you know, double down on crazy progressive ism where it will get based turnout going for you. And that's the plan. So we're seeing the playbook here, but it just kind of h it

shouldn't even say frustrating. And Vermont can do whatever it wants, but it's such a waste um and it's in response to political pressure, not in response to stopping violence. That they're raising the the age limit and limiting High Pascity Magazine By the way, I make you this prediction right now, it's just a matter of time before they try to raise the age limit even more. They'll say that you

should be twenty five. Some state will come up with that, and then what you realize is that this is just slow motion, a slow motion ban. This is incremental incremental um seizure of weapons and banning of the buying of new weapons. That's all it is. That's that's what it will become in some states. In other states like those are listening in Texas, are like book. I'm not worried

about it, and I know very different in Texas. But in places like Vermont, you're going to see more and more of us UM and we don't have to see if maybe the Republican Congress can get its act together and pass National Concealed Care reciprocity, they can do it. You know, maybe we should start to abuse the Interstate Commerce Clause a little bit to defend some constitutional rights. How about that. The Left abuses the interstate Commerce Clause

for everything it wants all the time. You know, you can't prohibit the transfer of of or you can't about the transportation of concealed firearms across state lines because it interferes with the market in firearms in certain states. I don't know. Come up with whatever you want. People that the left justifications to abuse interstate commerce are endless. So maybe some Republicans actually passed something here. How about that?

Wouldn't that be a great idea? Is coffee dangerous? I'm dangerous when I haven't had any coffee, But is coffee dangerous? I will answer that question. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. So there are some things that we can all agree to disagree on. This is not one of them. There's some areas of life where I can I can brook some aggression. This is not one of them. There are some things that are sacred, my friends, when

it comes to your daily routine. Coffee is one of them. I am a big time coffee drinker. I love coffee. I don't know how it functioned without it. Maybe you could tell me that I have a caffeine addiction. I don't even care. I love coffee. California has decided to try and mess with our heads, or at least a judge in California who has ruled that Starbucks and other coffee companies have to post warnings that coffee may cause cancer.

Now there's a lot going on here. Okay, First of all, if you look back at media warnings about about cancer, everything causes cancer and but and they particularly like to make it things that you and I like. Right, if somebody sat there and they're like, oh, buck, sweetbreads causes cancer, you'd be like, who eats sweetbreads? Right? But if some but he tells you that bacon, for example, is a carcinogen, and people have said that, by the way, you'd be like,

why do you have to be such a hater? What? What's what is it about life that you are are so angry about that you want to tell me that bacon causes cancer when we all know that bacon is amazing and if there is such a thing as a super food, bacon is in fact a super food. But you go back and look at a history of foods and just things in the environment that they say cause cancer, and they can't ever really tell, you know, they kind of think so they don't really know. You know, do

I think that's smoking dramatically raises cancer rate risks? Yes, it does, But no one disputes that with different kinds of food, it's always some tangential. You know, maybe we looked at a study, but I mean, come on, coffee. If coffee calls cancer, all of us would be counting our days at this point before we had some terrible die ignosis. And this goes to show you where where the nanny state inevitably heads. It did it in New York City where they were trying to ban sugary drinks.

It's the same mentality. You see this propping up time and again. The same people who want to ban sugary drinks tend to be the same people who want to ban high capacity magazines, who are the same people who won't let you use plastic bags in California or some other states now, even though paper bags are probably worse for the environment. Who are now the same people who tell you that coffee causes cancer, which I'm just telling you right now. I'm not a scientist, nor do I

play on our radio COVI. It doesn't cause cancer. That's a lie or it's a falsehood. It's wildly exaggerated. But the nanny state mentality is pervasive. It's not because it is a mindset. It's really a philosophy of everyday life, and you can make up I think I do make a clear case on a daily basis, really on this show that what is central to the Democrat philosophy of government is that the government is there to fix all things. And if the government can fix all things, then there's

nothing that is outside the reach of the government. And once you concede that, then what you eat, whether you're recycling, and you guys know how much I hate recycling. I hate recycling, but it's all coming from the same mentality, same thing. And now people are gonna push back on this. You've had experts coming out to say that no, no, no, it's it's too much to claim that coffee causes cancer.

But this is just a long line of scare tactics you see in an effort to you know, one, increase the government's power to regulate and tell us what to do. And two it just goes to show you that in a very liberal place where there's the the elevation really a deification of science, deification of science that goes on right, science can get this, which also then ties into the whole Stephen Hawking thing and why is he the greatest scientists of all time. Oh, because he gives us an

explanation for life that does not involve God. That's the short version. Meanwhile, the scientists at the center of the human genome project is a devout Christian. The whole conversation for another time. Uh. But that's why when you look at this, you see once again that science is something that the left adopts as a posture, but they abuse it for political reasons all the time, and they take positions that are just not even common sense. I mean,

coffee causes cancer. What are they gonna sit next? Chocolate causes I'm sure that actually there are studies if I you know what, I just just for giggles right now, chocolate causes cancer. Let's see, let's see what happens. I'm I'm actually good. Um let me see no, okay, yep, sorry, there's there's the articles pop up. Yep, lots of stuff. Chocolate cause good. So there you go. People, right, people have said that to studies have said that to also

a lie. What's next, freedom causes cancer? I mean, really, this is getting completely They did say that French fries at one point from the oil in them and the process. I mean this is why when people say, why don't we just have experts and scientists to sawing everything for us? No, why don't we have the free exchange of ideas and let the market decide everything that is not explicitly laid out for the government to do in the constitution. How

about that? That's a much a much better way to go, I would think, man, But there's nothing that you By the way, coffee also is it has antioxidant properties. It's not just because it gives me a boost of energy makes me a little chattier. It's obviously good for radios. Man. I used to iron right. Actually, uh, one time before I filled in for Glenn beck Um, I was sitting at his Glenn had a gorgeous radio studio New York.

I mean it was really it was incredible. And it was like getting to ride in like your dad's Mercedes or something, you know, I was getting, or your rich uncle's Maserati. And and I sat down and I had a venty Starbucks coffee there. And this is before I knew about black rifle, obviously, and I knocked that thing all over, and I remember engineers swooping in the because it was just the huge thing of coffee. If I got on the equipment, it might have shorted it out.

It could have cost thousands of dollars of damages. But you know what didn't stop me from bringing coffee into the radio studio because I needed because it's delicious and it's amazing. So don't listen to the liars out there, folks. Coffee is good for you. We'll be back with the roll call in just a minute. Stay with me. Well, I'm coming to you all from Indiana, my friends. I'm actually visiting our affiliate out here, w O w O

also known as Whoa Whoa. So I am in the great state of Indiana, and I am hanging out in the wonderful city of Fort Wayne, which I must say, for a city of this size, has better than anticipated food options. They're they're they've got some foodies out here in Fort Wayne. I'm kind of excited about it. All kinds of uh excellent restaurants that I plan on storming downtown Fort Wayne to check out later on tonight. So that'll be a lot of fun. But yeah, first first

time in Indiana, very exciting stuff. And I'll be at talk Tank for those of you who are in the Fort Wayne area tomorrow, so I think, I mean, it might be sold out, but you know, just show up at the door and we'll figure something out, you know what I mean. So don't worry about it. Even if it's hold out, just show up and say. You know me, Gosh, I'm gonna be causing problems now, I know book, well you do. If you listen to the show, you do know me, darn it, and you know the secret password.

You know. It's it's like knowing the guy at the door of the nightclub. Be like I listened to Buck on radio. I want to hang out at Talk Tank tomorrow and Fort Wayne, so do come by and check it out. Now. With that, uh, it is time for guys. Is the last time we're gonna hang out for a couple of days because we're about to go into the weekend. Well, it's time for us to get into some roll call though,

Team Buck. It's time for roll call al right. First up here we have Brian who writes for our role call and by the way, if you want to be a part of roll call Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton and also official Team Buck at gmail dot com. That reminds me. Producer Mike make sure we we bring the emails, and Facebook is so easy, so I tend to go with more of those, but I want to make sure we get to all of the emails that

are piling up in the box too. But it's Facebook dot com, slash buck sex if you want to send me thoughts. I read everything that goes into that box, even the mean stuff. Why are people means? Sometimes? The good news is that of the folks who listened to the show, of those fellow patriots that I affectionately referred to as Team Buck are highly intelligent, principled, ethical, wonderful people.

But there's like point one percent of angry lib that listens to the show, and occasionally they send me me and emails, which I'm okay with them when they're a little bit funny. When they're just mean and lots of capitalized curses, that's not cool. But when they're actually saying something like I will never forget I will never forget some of the of the meaner emails that I've gotten that we're entertaining anyway, But I don't want those. I

want nice emails, alright, So don't now. People who are actually my friends within Teambok are gonna start being like, well, since you wanted no, no, no, only nice emails please or constructive criticism also welcomed. We have Brian first up here Buck Greetings from fly Over Country, Oklahoma. Well, Brian, I'm in Indiana, so I don't know which one is You know which one wins the Flyover battle, But I'm just saying thanks for all that you do. I love

your show and don't miss a broadcast. Your sense of humor, pop culture references knowledge and disdain for everything Green Day slays me. You recently criticize yourself by saying that I didn't read the fine print or any print for that matter, and I could totally relate. Keep up the good fight and know there are others out there who are thankful for your voice in the world. Original Saturday Squad oss

and Shields high from Brian in Oklahoma. Thank you so much, Brian, A great note and a great way to start off our Friday roll call session here um. Next up, Daniel, who rights Buck gaslighting. Thank you for putting a word to something I've been experiencing. I've had arguments with people who openly say they want an assault weapon ban. Would also like to ban semi auto handguns and support repealing

the Second Amendment. But when I try to engage them in debate, the response I've gotten is literally, no one is coming for your guns. You're just being paranoid. Go hug your guns, you crazy gun nut. Super annoying, the last refuge of someone who can't make an intellectual counter argument from Daniel O S S. Yeah, Daniel, if you let people get away with it, they'll keep moving the goal posts on the issue of gun control. So you've just got to pin them down if you want to

even have the discussion. There's nothing wrong with saying, you know what, this is not going to be productive because what I'm telling you about the gun control debate is central. It is true that gun control is actually just a

proxy battleground for the culture war. The gun control argument has very little to do with violence in terms of why people are uh mobilized and why they hold the opinions that they do, which is why when you present them with facts that shoot down pardon the phrase, uh, the opinions that they come up with, they become angry because they don't see it as oh, you're disproving my gun control theory. Maybe we can come up with something else that would save lives. They see it as well.

I thought that by holding this position, I was one of the good people, and now you're telling me that that's not true. I was one of the smart people, and you're telling me that that's not true. That is why Aries writes that Laura Ingram pronounces her name Ingram. I know I will never get it wrong again. I got lit up by lots of messages for that one last last night. Uh. And there's that um Patrick, right buck. I love that your show are placed the previous host

on my local radio. I've been a loyal listener since then. But there is one chink in your armor. We are approximately the same age. You've got a year on me, but you're you're just staying for Springsteen. It's bothersome. Try listening to the album Nebraska start to finish. I think you would have a change of heart. If a song is good enough for cash to cover, it's worth to listen. Patrick. I really support I really appreciate your support of the show,

and support your support of the show. That's what I was about to say, so I figured why not just lean into it and say it. Uh. I will never budge on Springsteen, my friend. I hope we can get past this. I hope we can still be friends. I will never budge on Springsteen. You know, the First of all, the guy basically wears a costume all the time. No, no one wears a leather vest over a chambre shirt or whatever it is all the time. It's just ridiculous.

But I don't even care about the costume the music, see Brian, And I mean, I'm sorry that was previously Patrick. We're still gonna be friends, though. I will for you, Patrick, for you because you wrote me a nice note. I will listen to the album Nebraska if it is on Spotify, which is how the cool kids listen to music now, So I'll make that concession. But I think we're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. But shields high and thank you for your note. Next up, we

got another Brian love your show. I've been listening for about a year. I listened to it on the I Heart radio app. We have a suggestion, since we do not have to listen to commercials on the app, could you list the sponsors that help support your radio show on your website? UH for that? That way, we can help out your radio show. Well, thank you very much, Brian. I really do appreciate that. And that's a good idea. Uh, that is a good idea. I think that we should

we should do that. So I will talk to folks here about it. Um and there you go, and hopefully we can get that going again. Uh. Now I'm just rambling, which is I got? I don't have enough time for the it's already have here, but we have another, Brian. I swear I'm not just picking out guy's name. Brian. It did seem for a little while like I would only date girls name Katherine. But that's a whole other story. I went through a series of Katherine's in my life.

I don't know, I don't know what happened, but sometimes it just lines up that way. Brian writes book great show is always I haven't seen any Roseanne episode ever, and I'm not sure I'm going to because her laugh makes me want to claw my face off. But you should give Last Man Standing a shot. It's a feel good sitcom starring Tim Allen as an old fashioned, hard working hunting father raising three daughters in today's progressive world. It's great because he rolls with everything and he never

gives up his beliefs. It's a resurrection of the classic sitcoms where the star can also be a role model. I think you'd like it, well, Brian, I gotta tell you that sounds awesome, and I think I would like it, so I will check it out, and I absolutely is. I'm hoping it's on Netflix or Hulu or something, and that would make it easy for me to give it a shot. Marcella. Next up, I completely agree with you

regarding the new Roseanne Show. I was actually a regular viewer of the original Roseanne Show, and I enjoyed it quite a bit. Roseanne was sharp, snarky, and anything but politically correct. There was no political agenda. The reboot is boring, not funny, and the actors, including Roseanne bar are being used as mere prompts to introduce social engineering into a

show or that was previously never a part. Well, Marcella, I can't speak to the old show, but I'm glad you agree with me on the new show because that means we're both right, So high five for us. It's just not as good as it should be. I am disappointed, disappointed with the way the new show has laid laid itself out. It's not been good. All right, my friends, That's gonna be it for this episode of The Bucks Exton Show. Please do subscribe to the podcast on iTunes,

The Bucks Exton Show You Know what it is. Also want to say to all of yous won't get a chance before Monday, have a happy Easter. And of course Shields High