Shifty Schiff's Anti Trump Plot

to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're a great American Again, The buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, Remember, no questen was what did you want President to Lensky to do about President Vice President Biden and his son Hunter? Are you talking to me? Yeah? It was just a follow up of what I just asked you. Sir, listen, are you ready? We have the President to Finland? Ask him a question? I have one

for him. I just wanted to follow up on the one that I asked you, which did you hear me? Did you want? Did you hear me? Ask him a question? I will, but giving you a long answer. Ask this gentleman a question don't be rude. No, sir, I don't want to be rude. I just wanted you to have a chance to answer the question that I asked. You answer everything. It's a whole hoax. And you know who's playing into the hoax. People like you, people like him

playing into the hoax. Welcome to the buck sex and show everybody President Trump and rare for him, yes, slready even for the President deciding that he was going to stand up and not just fight, but relish the fight a little bit, throw punches, go after people, really decide that he's had enough. You could tell that he's frustrated.

You could tell that he no longer wishes to be told that he has to abide by the process as it's been laid out for him, that he has to listen to whatever it is that the mainstream media tells

him he has to do. And it wasn't just the press conference yesterday that was a bit of a change in the narrative right now, as we know, the narrative is that the President of the United States did something bad, very bad on a phone call that a whole lot of people were on, and that one almost certainly rapidly anti Trump partisan thought, gave an opportunity to take yet another another swipe at this president, possibly de rail or even end his presidency. The President's having none of it.

And when you add to it the revelation yesterday about Adam Schiff, who has been quarterbacking this whole phenomenon from the start, I suppose nobody should really be particularly surprised by any of this. I feel like they probably should understand that Adam Schiff is obviously a hyperpartisan and wants to get rid of this president, does not believe that President Trump should be allowed to stay in office, and so he was part of what seems to be a

deep state slash Democrat slash media conspiracy. This isn't surprising. New York Times, though, breaks the story, which is interesting. Schiff got early account of accusations as whistle blower concerns grew. Now this is interesting on a number of levels, but one that I want to start with is that initially shifty Shift, as he is aptly called, we're saying that

this did not happen initially. Adam Schiff was claiming that there was no early tip off that he had not spoken, or he referred to it as we we have not spoken to the whistleblower. Turns out that's not the case. President Trump recognizes this, and I'll get into what his response to Shift isn't just a moment. But now first we have to go to do we have a producer Mark, Do we have the Shift lie here somewhere initially where he says we did not speak. Let's let's grab that

one in. Oh yeah, well, we definitely have Shift getting defended on MSNBC play clip twenty four. Sam, you spoke to Chairman Shift last night. I want to read the quote again. That was September seventeenth quote, we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. How does he explain that when clearly at that point the whistleblower had come to Chairmanshifts committee, so we talked for complements last night. He expressed regret for not having been more clear in his

wording what he said. He said at the time when he was saying that, obviously we now know that they the whistler had approached his staff, but there wasn't one hundred percent certainty that the whistleblower who would approached his staff was the same one who was behind the actual complaint. There's a suspicion it was, but there wasn't one hundred percent certainty. He also was explaining that he was trying to compel the whistleblower to come testify before the committee

when he was saying that. But again, he expressed regret for saying for what he said on the initial interview with Morning Joe and said he should have been much more clear about it. I will say this puts him in some trouble. He clearly wasn't being forthright in that interview with us a couple of weeks ago, and he should have been. It wasn't forthright with us, and he should have been. I like that. Notice how when it's a member of Team Democrat, there's a there's a different

kind of language that's used. You know, they'll scream about how Trump has lied fifteen times, fifty thousand times. We did a fact check, Trump has lied five hundred million times. But then when you have Adam Schiff straight up looking the meeting the eye and the American people in the eye, lying about this, it's oh, he could have been more clear, and he regrets the lack of clarity, and maybe he could have done it another way. No, he lied, and

it's a very significant lie at that. Why would the whistleblower go to Shift before finishing off the process, going through the entire process of the intelligence community, inspector general. You know, the process really does matter here too, because the Democrats tried to make that the initial line of attack. Do we have a lie where Shift is at? Just so you could hear it. I feel like you should

hear Shifty Shift himself. Go for it. The essence of what the president communicates, We've been very good to your country, very good. No other country has done as much as we hadn't restonansity here. Well, this is a lot of that. That's when he made up the I tried my best. Yeah, that's all right. That's when he made up testimony that didn't actually have I'm talking about when he said he had not spoken to the whistleblower. Okay, that's the that's

the base. That's a very straightforward lot, because he had spoken to the whistleblower. So this is a yes or no thing. It turns out that that was a moment of Shift showing us exactly who he is. And it matters because the process was initially part of the assault. They were saying that they tried to stop the whistleblower from getting through that McGuire acting DNI, that he didn't do enough in order to make sure that this was given to Congress fast enough and would delayed it three weeks,

and they're complaining about the process. Meanwhile, on the other side of this, when you look at another component of the process, the whistleblower came forward and said or went to Adam Ship's committee, went to Democrats in Congress and said, hey, just to give you guys a heads up. Now I think he might have done it through an intermediary or but hey, just to give you guys a heads up. I've got some real stuff on the president here, and I'm worried it's not going to get through the Inspector

General inspector general process. Why would the whistle blower be worried? And also, that's not the whistleblower's call. Then there's the whole other issue of the whistleblower doesn't have jurisdiction to blow a whistle over the president of the United States because a phone call between a president and a foreign head of state is not an intelligence activity. So there's a lot of problems here. But the lie about the process, meaning Adam Schiff saying that he did not get a

heads up about this. That was important to the Democrats because what does it look like, Now, let's just strip away all the nonsense for a second. What does it look like happen? Well, somebody from within reportedly the CIA saw something or i'm sorry, heard something from someone who saw something in a transcript and decided that this was

an opportunity to be a hero of the resistance. Is this person an acolyte of John Brennan's as this person someone who has been involved in other deep state actions

against this president, whether it's leaks or who knows. Also, this pretense that the whistleblower's life will be in jeopardy if anyone finds out the whistleblower it's not true, but shifts involvement in this from the very beginning, and the way that he made sure that this would get through just goes to show you that it was two things.

A weak complaint. Remember, the Inspector General had to rule on whether it was an urgent concern without seeing the transcript, so it was really just taking the person's word for the initial complaint. And then there was pressure coming from Democrats like Shift in the House Intelligence Committee saying hey, this better. You know, we better get this information, you better release this information. So they were trying to subvert

in some ways the process. They were trying to escalate the process for obvious political benefit for their own ends. And now they've been caught. So Shift was involved in this. Then this was an effort by Adam Schiff to have a basis for this whole impeachment inquiry. They were looking and looking and looking, and this then became the thing they would latch onto. So there's, as I've been saying, every coup starts with a conspiracy. It looks like we

have seen the conspiracy here. I know it's a soft coup. No one's saying that they're rolling tanks up to the White House. But it's a soft cup. And also this wasn't a strong complaint. If it was, you would think that the person bringing it, instead of trying to make sure that he put his hand on the scale to make sure there would be disclosure, would go through the standard process. Why go to Democrats on the hill and say there that this person's worried. They're saying vein now

because it's not. We don't have to hear a sheet that they are worried that this won't make its way through the inspector general process. Why why that concern? Why that worry? It seems to me very odd. Indeed, seems to me to be very range decision. So that's what we've got from yesterday. Well, actually, I'm sorry. We know why because the person's a part of anyone take it's very obvious. Why I ask you good question rhetorically, because the person wants to harm the President of the United States.

That's that much, is very honest, very obvious. I don't see any issue with what was in that transcript. That's part of my problem, I suppose. I don't see it. As they keep saying digging for dirt on Biden. This is the phrase they use. He didn't ask for dirt, he asked for an investment. I think it's a scandal. But he's allowed to do that. Okay, that's what the word is, and I think it's I give a lot of respect for the New York Times of putting it out.

Just happened. As I'm walking up here. They handed it to me and I said to Mike, I said, whoa that's something. That's big stuff. That's a big story. He knew long before, and he helped write it too. It's a scam. It's a scam. It is a scam. I think that's clear. But the Democrats are all in on it. They're not going to stop just because it has become apparent that this was a partisan maneuver all along. Of

course we knew. Now we just have the facts. It was clear based on what had occurred, but now we can point to specifics and say, oh, okay, this is why. This is the way that they unveiled this latest effort to undo the twenty sixteen election. This is the first time, I think, in a few days that the media has had to just say, well, doesn't matter what we report. I suppose we're just supposed to be anti Trump, So

here we are. New York Times puts out the SHIFT got early warning if they remember when Trump gives the New York Times credit here, they broke the story. But if they didn't, somebody else was going to This was already I think Sean Davis a few days ago had already said that it looked like SHIFT got early warning about this based on the timeline. My friend Fred Flights also got word of this or analyze, I should say that that must have been what happened, that there had

to be a way that Shift had early warning. And so what this did was it allowed Shift to pretend that he just wants the process to play out. He doesn't know what's in the whistleblower complaint. He we just need to find out what's going on here. But he'd already been told. It's like he got the answers to the test beforehand, and then he sat down to do some algebra two and was like, oh, this is I don't know if I'll be able to get through this exam. This is very hard. You know, he's such a scamster,

shifty Shift. It's not a surprise. That's where we are. That's the truth of the matter. Where does it go from here, Well, I think we've already seen that Democrats can't back off now. They can't back down now, and that means that this is just going to turn into a massive fight in the media. President Trump is just going to continue to call it a hope, which is one of his favorite words these days. Let's let's hear from the President. Sixteen producer Mark well I always cooperate.

This is a hoax. This is the greatest hoax. This is just a continuation of what's been playing out for the last since my election. I would say, if you want to probably we'll find out soon, but probably even before my election. This is a fraudulent crime on the American people. But we'll work together with Shifty Shift and Pelosi and all of them. Saying like we'll cooperate because they're going to go through this process one way or the other doesn't mean they're going to do everything the

Democrats want them to. But get ready for it, folks. We are. We are heading into impeachment season. There's no there's no doubt about that. And there's going to be an impeachment vote. And I'll get into why that is in just a little bit. But they're going to impeach this president. I think we all need to be prepared for that. They don't care what the facts are, where the facts may lead, or any of that stuff. They are they're planning to impeach the president of the United States.

There's nothing that can be done at this point, in my opinion, that would change that. In fact, they're looking at polls and viewing this as a political win already. Paul Krugman, who it's amazing to me that he was considered, and I guess still is. He's a New York Times editorial columnist guy, an excellent economist, but he's a terrible political analyst. And he's already crowing about how it looks like the Democrats have picked up a big win here

by going going after Trump on impeachment. I doubt that that will in fact be the case in the end, but we will see how it all plays out. But there are important reasons, and I will get into that in a moment. There's actually a very good piece that I think lays out that impeachment is about more than even just Trump hatred. There's a whole another layer to this that we should explore, and it has to do more with the establishment and the political class, an elite

consensus than most folks would assume. I mean, Trump hatred is the tip of the spear, but behind that there's a whole lot more. I have to wonder at what point more Americans will see this for what it is, which is a backlash about the twenty sixteen election, and really that will never change no matter what evidence they find no matter what Trump says about anything. Oh, we also have some time today to speak about how the Biden phenomenon's not going away. Democrats, you know, they took

this shot. They decided that they were going to use this as the spur to impeachment. They took this shot. And yet huh, now they've got problems because Joe Biden himself has a history here that will be further scrutinized Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, and whether it's illegal or not requires investigation, but whether it is disgraceful or not, as already established, it's gross. And it's not just the Ukraine issue. There's also China that can be

factored into all of this. China is a component of the latest allegations. It looks bad too. And you break down what happened here with Hundre Bidens. We'll talk more about that, and later on in the show, we'll also have some a moment to look at what can happen when someone decides to extend an incredible grace to a person who has done a terrible wrong. That's just a

preview of what we'll be looking at together. But when I come back, I really do want to take a moment to look into the realities of the broad narrative of anti Trumpism from the establishment, not just the Democrats. And if you're hearing some weird siren of the background, apparently we're in the midst of a fire alarm test here, but it's radio, so we're just gonna roll with it and we'll be back in just the moment. So why does the left, the Democrats, the media, why do they

want to impeach Trump so badly? Trump to them is a vile creature. They think that he's uncouth, he's barbarous. Whenever I hear that word, I always think of this is barbarous, and then he goes, oh, this is Sparta. Remember that it's amazing. Three hundreds, a great movie, great movie, I watch it anytime. But they think that Trump is barbarous and that he is not Sparta, and they absolutely hate him for many many reasons that are both substance

and style. Based mostly on style, though, I think, which is to the elites, to the establishment class, that's a sin that is unpardonable, to be as ghaush, as meretricious. It's like we're doing an sat word prep now. As Trump is. That's just unacceptable to them. So then we move on to why what is really going on here?

There is a fantastic piece in the Spectator Spectator USA, which I actually think I just met somebody from a Spectator at an event a week ago, and they asked me if I wanted to write, So maybe I'll have to write for them since I think this piece is so good. Impeachment is regime suicide. The ruling class still believes in a consensus that doesn't exist. Their legitimacy is vanishing.

Now I will walk you through a little bit some of this, not all of it because we don't have the time, but it is an excellent, excellent piece, and in it Daniel McCarthy takes you through the previous, the previous impeachment moments. Now, of course, you've had a number of people already fall into that, fall into that bear trap of or where Nixon was impeached. Nixon wasn't impeached. Everybody Nixon resigned. Nixon knew that he was. He was dunzo, as the kids say, so he resigned. But you have

a lot of people, oh, well, Nixon wasn't impeached. Maybe they can get David Gurgan because he loves you know, hey, David Gergan, what do you think about the economy? Nction resigning. He's the CNN, He's the CNN senior statesman over there for all political analysis, and whether we're talking about the FED rate or counter terrorism, he'll work in some reference to or nriction Ford administration, or remembers real terrifical from

Niction and raygn Ford. So now he at least it is going to be talking about what people are asking about, which is the era of Nixon, and that of course the Clinton impeachment. But back to this Daniel McCarthy piece about impeachment as regime suicide and really a a an effort by the regime to not just undo the twenty sixteen election, but undo the idea behind it that many of the centers of power in this country are not

nearly as legitimate as they like to pretend. That elite media is a fraud, elite university system, as we know in anyways, can be schemed and gamed. It's not this meritocracy that it's just providing us with the best and brightest in the future. That corporate America, there's a lot of buying of political influence, incumbents always squeezing out, crushing

their rivals, using the state to do it. Remember, big business and big government like each other, and the cult of government expertise coming under probably greater pressure and threat than at any point before. So those are all real dynamics that Trump very much played into in the last election that Trump was in many ways a messenger for. And that's why this piece by keep on Us. Yes, McCarthy, I always think of a friend Andy McCarthy, but this

is Daniel McCarthy. But he looks at impeachment in the past and just also moments of real political crisis. And there was something of a national consensus, meaning the consensus after Nixon stepped down was or when Nixon was about to resign and step down, was that that was the

right thing to do. And while Ford lost in the next election, he didn't lose by a lot to Jimmy Carter, and it was not the end of the Republican Party because the feeling at the time was that Nixon was that the correct move was for him to stepped down. And then of course Ford, as vice president, became the president. Then he had to run against Carter. But Clinton in

nineteen ninety eight, the impeachment against him. The nation felt like maybe that wasn't worth it, and that was considered to be a mistake, But that was still a consensus, a consensus in a different direction and involving a different member of a different party. But there was a general national feeling of this is more or less what should happen here. There was not some huge outcry that, oh,

Bill Clinton, he must be moved by the Senate. I mean, people felt that way, but that wasn't as much as you can describe a consensus, which is a feeling about mass opinion. That's what was going on. But then McCarthy goes into how this is not a moment of consensus

at all. This is the elites deciding that they determine national consensus even when it does not exist, and that they are never going to accept Trump, not because of his policies or even his personality, but because he has a challenge to who they are, to their position in society. And I've been saying that to you for a long time.

This is most apparent, perhaps with some of the journalists out there who have completely lost their minds, including Republican or GOP leaning or conservative leaning journalists of the never Trump kind who have just never accepted I mean they say they're never Trump, but really they're just never facing the reality of they're not going to have the access

they thought they were. Their ideas are not going to be herald they're not going to be invited to all the fancy parties, which are real as I keep telling you have the Georgetown cocktail parties. All it's a cliche, yeah, because there's so many of them. I was just down there. The swamp is swampy, trust me. But the regime now is trying to assert itself. That's the elite media. You see this, MSNBC, CNN, New York Times, Washington Posts, all

these different media outlets. They are without question devoted to the destruction of the Trump presidency in a way that exceeds anything that we've seen in the past with Republican administrations. They didn't like Bush and they called him stupid, but they didn't really think that they were going to be

able to get rid of him before the election. But I have brought up with you yesterday that if the elites, if elite consensus has led by Pelosi and Schumer and Anderson, Cooper and Rachel Maddow and the Dean Baquet at the

New York Times and all these other folks. If elite consents opinion was really about respecting our institutions they often talk about protecting our democracy, respecting our institutions, then of course they would just focus on the twenty twenty election, because the only true repudiation of Trump as a politician is going to come through a defeat at the ballot box. But that's not really their purpose. In fact, they don't care much at all about the underlying institutions of this country.

What they care about is that those institutions belong to them, that they are in control of the elite apparatus of power in America, or just the apparatus of power period, you could say, and Trump is a threat to that. Trump's message, as McCarthy rights when he came in, was it was boiled down to quote, they screwed you. They being the Bushes, the Clinton's, the establishment in both parties, the warmongers, the trade deal architects, the communist Chinese free

riding allies, and more. That really readinated with people, because there certainly has been a sense, especially when you look at all those issues that not only have the elites managed to become fabulously wealthy during a period where an nowomenous sound a little Bernie sanders esk for a second here, but where wealth disparity is more apparent than it had been in the past, where the consolidation of wealth for really the point zero one percent is galloping away from

the rest of society. So the free traders and the people that have been pushing along these mantras, both on the business end of things and then using their mouthpieces in the media and paying for the think tanks, and oh just free trade. Free trade was this thing that you could say that would never be challenged. It was just considered a good in and of itself, almost like diversity. Someone just asked to say that they had an interest in diversity, and if you were to question in that,

what's wrong with you? Why don't you like diversity? Well, what does diversity mean and how do we achieve it? And what are the trade offs? And oh no, no, no, you're rather on board for diversity or not. Same with free trade it used to be. And this was among conservatives. This is on the right. You'd just say, well, I'm for free trade. And if you weren't for that, you were a troglodyte. You know, you were stuck in the past.

You were not somebody who understood economics. And oh, but then all of a sudden, Trump comes along says, China's been ripping us off. You start looking at trade deals, including the NAFTA trade deal, including what's going on with China, and we are getting ripped off. That's a fact. There are bad things that are happening in US China trade that no one has done anything about for years and years.

Why does take Trump coming along to tell us that. Well, a lot of people that were making decisions in the upper echelons of power in this country, who while China was getting away with all kinds of theft and exploitation, well that was happening. They were getting very rich. They didn't much care. They liked the status quo. And Trump came in. I mean, he's not he's not some deep political irist. I've never made that claim, and I never would.

But he has a gut understanding, of visceral understanding of just what's really going on here. And McCarthy points that out. But then why this push for impeachment. Well, quote Trump's enemies are not just the left, they are the ancien regime.

Anyone who supports the political and economic dispensation of the post Cold War era is apt to feel threatened by Trump and even more menaced by what stands behind behind him, a growing anti consensus, a force that declares every center of power in this country illegitimate and antithetical to the well being of the people. And yet the ancien regime assumes that deep down, for all that Republicans are racist and deplorable, they still love the regime and they will

support it over Trump. They haven't yet given up on this idea at all. That's why, that's why impeachment is a process that you are seeing underway. Yes, it is harnessing the rage, the animosity of the left, the sense that Hillary should have been coorradated, the sense that she was going to be the next president. There's all of that, there's no question, and they absolutely despised Trump. But there's something broader. Mitt Romney, for example, what is Mitt Romney

doing in all of this? He has to know that he's being helpful to the ideological enemies of all that he says he stood for. At least in the twenty twelve election. Why is he always making trouble for Trump? Does he really think he's going to change his behavior to help out? When you look at the establishment media, this is beyond just they disagree with They are on

a search and destroy mission for this president. Why do you think that is well, because he's the first president has ever come along and said, oh no, guys, I'm not just going to ask you to be fair to me.

I'm going to point out that you are frauds, that you and the journalistic establishment in this country are absolutely partisan's activists, people who are taking a side of this and engaged in an endless stream of propaganda, in part driven by the brainwashing of an audience to the center left that will always think that whatever they see that fits into that mentality is actual news, the real news. Anything that challenges that must be coming from some right

wing blogs somewhere. But then also because those are the proclivities of the journalists, of the people in the newsrooms, the senior editors, editors in chief owners of these publications, the bezos is and I mean just think of all these major media publications, who owns them, who's paying for them?

Incredibly wealthy liberals. They want to see their ideas reflected back to them in this and they don't like someone coming along who has a megaphone that is as big, if not bigger, than theirs and saying these are lies that the establishment of this country is not composed of the best, the smartest, the most hard working, the most amazing. They're not looking out for the little guy. They're not

all about the rule of law. In fact, there's different laws for different people depending on how wealthy and connected you are. That's a reality now in this country. Here, it's impeachment is a regime counterattack against a man elected to bring about change. And while impeachment is certainly constitutional, it is an elite procedure, not a democratic one. The prestige media has passed the first judgment on whether it's

warranted in this case. It is they say, democratic house will investigate and then inevitably that will move forward with the vote. He goes on. The old saying is that if you strike it a king, be sure to kill him. In this case, the regime is striking not at a king, but at the very idea that an elected official can challenge the establishment. This risks revealing just how weak the

country's ruling class really is. If forty percent of the country remains with Trump despite the ordeal of impeachment, that will show that forty percent is anti regime, and revolutions are made with less that forty percent would be a floor, not a ceiling. This is the last gasp of a ruling order, or perhaps the last lashing out of a ruling order, that views Trump as an existential threat to all that they hold dear and important. That is why the evidence does not matter. What Chiff is saying is

all just for show. What the Mola report did or did not say does not really matter. They have to destroy Trump. It's not enough to beat him at the ballot box. They must impeach him. They must asterisk him, they must blackmark him for all of history. As a message to anybody who'd come along down the line, if you cross us, it doesn't matter if you win, you will eventually lose because we will harness all the power that we the establishment have left. We will destroy you.

That's why we're heading toward impeachment. It's driven not by the will of the people, but by the will of the elites who despised Trump and feel that he's a threat to everything they hold. Dear, Okay, I think I've answered most of your questions. What do you think he is the happiest country? Finland is a happy Well, if you got rid of Pelosi and you got Ridish shift, Finland is a happy country. He's a happy leader too.

There was a funny moment yesterday where apparently Trump I saw the video of it, kind of tapped the Finnish president on the knee and everyone said that that seemed a little uh. It seemed like the Finnish president didn't much appreciate that. Uh. Finland does usually get the highest marks. And when they do these studies of happiest countries in

the world, Finland does do does do very well. Um. It was just it was a funny funny day yesterday at the press because Trump was he was in rare form and one second He's saying, all right, give the Finnish president a question. Then he goes, oh, no, I like that question. He was jumping in. He Finish president was kind of like, but that Christian is for me, and uh, Trump was like, yeah, it's for me now. So you know, Trump is he sometimes is the kid

in the sandbox in the playground. Who wants all who wants all the toys? I think that's true. He doesn't always like to share the toys. But it was quite a press conference yesterday and the way that he went after the Bidens. By the way, um, this is going to raise some interesting questions for Democrats. They can talk about how what Trump did on the phone call wasn't illegal, and they keep saying that it's unethical, so he should

be impeached. Okay, what the Bidens have done may not be illegal, though we haven't really had a good investigation of it yet. It definitely is unethical. And are they just going to cover up for this like they did with Hillary? I think the answer as well. We will have to see. But let's dive a little deeper, my friends, into the Biden corruption situation. Ask a question, Thank you sirs, What did you want about Biden? What you want them to look at you on Biden? Look Biden? His son

our stone called crooked, and you know it. His son walks out with millions of dollars. The kid knows nothing, You know it? And so do we go ahead? Ask a quition. I was one of the best moments yesterday at the press conference, and it dealt with the Biden phenomenon, which we are being told by the elite media, by the Democrat media calling him elite. It's a little they really Maybe the smug media would be a better way to refer to them, the self satisfied, dominant liberal left media.

But the point about Biden and corruption is one that sticks. The point about Biden corruption makes sense because guess what, you don't go to Ukraine, and now I'm saying it. I have been saying fifty thousand a month. It went as high. I think it varied month a month is eighty three thousand dollars a month. So Biden's son Hunter Biden's getting a lot of money while his dad is the point man on foreign polo see for a country that desperately needs US aid and the benefit of US assistance.

So I do think that as we look at this now, we have to start asking ourselves when is it a little bit too much? When are they asking us? I think they already have asked us to swallow what we refuse to in terms of this story, it's absurd, and that's why Trump calling out the crookedness here. I think really matters because they're making the phone call, the whistleblower phone call, about what's ethical, about what's right. They're not saying that Trump necessarily broke the law. They tried that

for a couple of days. But the campaign finance thing is that's just a non starter if it's a campaign finance relation. As I was sanked you from the beginning, for the president to ask a foreign counterpart to do something that's within the president's power to do because it will benefit the president as well as be something that he's allowed to ask for. That could be said of any policy decision. Oh, well, they got a trade deal. So when the president asked, hey, I really need a

favor here. We need to get this trade deal signed. That's helping his campaign, it's just idiocy. It doesn't work, it won't hold water. Nope, nobody could really believe this stuff just would not would not stand right. So they had to abandon the criminal component of this, and then

they had to look at the ethical side of it. Now. Democrats, the same Democrats who told us that Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, we raised a lot of money for a lot of people, you know, we did like all the stuff all over the world. Man, it was crazy. We're on private jit and flying around stop and climate

change and empowering women. The Clinton Foundation, we were told was all about charity, and then we found out that it was about charity except until after Hillary wasn't going to be president anymore. And then people were like, I'm not sure I'm gonna give money this, which is so strange because wouldn't Hillary have more time to run that charity. Wouldn't she be able to focus on her charitable endeavors, not be distracted by running for office, use all of

her rolodecks and her connections for good. Yeah, you can hear Hillary cackling. That's because that's what she really wants to do. Hillary really cares about the little guys, really wants to help people. Her whole career has been about just helping people, not advancing herself in maniacal fashion. But then the Biden situation comes up here and they're telling us, oh, well,

there's nothing illegal. There's nothing illegal Biden, and there was an investigation and the investigation didn't bring charges, so we should shut this whole thing down now, or shut the whole discussion down, which I say, Ukraine is one of the more corrupt places in the world. We're really to believe that Ukraine is on the up and up here, that this investigation. You do have choken now the prosecutor that Biden fired and said, I'm going to cut a

billion dollars of aid unless you fire that. So that is a quid pro quo. That is a straight up a quid pro quos are now it is within Biden's realm as foreign as a foreign policy envoy of the Obama administration, to make that kind of quid pro quote. But not if it's for the benefit of his son. Then you do have a straight up corruption case if you can prove that right, if you can prove that it was for the sun, but that's going to be

difficult to prove. You do have a lot of people running around saying that Chokin was a bad guy, everybody who was a bad guy. But we are being led to believe by the Demps here, but the Libs that the investigation of Bisma, the natural gas company that Hunter Biden was on the board of making fifty to eighty some out thousand dollars a month, We're being led to believe that, oh, well, that's that was a very a thorough and most excellent investigation, and there's no need to

look back at it anymore. The same Democrats who had a special counsel for over two years and now are calling witnesses and using subpoenas and dragging people who have already gone through the Special Council process in front of them as if they're going to find out more than Muller and all of his anti Trump, which Hunt experts. Does anyone think that that's fair minded? Of course not.

But this, no, this has never been about fair and people who think it's fair have just been brainwashed and want to believe that, and therefore they allow themselves to suspend all critical faculties and skip beyond the obvious situation here of this is an effort to destroy the president, right,

That's what this is. That everything else has to be fitted into that basic understanding, that basic narrative, and Hunter Biden and Joe Biden have become collateral damage in the whistleblowers attempt to use a conversation about about Hunter Biden

Joe Biden to destroy the president. So they weren't expecting that this would be And keep in mind they also sometimes make strategic errors I think people say, well, the Democrats, they wouldn't do this, they wouldn't be foolish and put the Bidens in the spotlight in a way that could be problematic for the Democratic frontrunner. No, Democrats make all kinds of stupid, buffoonish errors, and I think it's quite

possible that this is one of them. They figure it, well, it'll be more important to get out that there's this whistleblower, and they'll start the impeachment proceeding and they'll just ignore all the counterfactuals. They'll ignore the lack of any integrity about whether what the Bidens did here was acceptable, whether this should be Should this guy be the next president the United States based on what went on with his son?

You should say the answers no pretty clearly. And now China is going to be a part of this discussion as well. It's not just Ukraine. That was part of the part of the shift today in where this fight is going now for those who don't know. As a quick review, Hunter Biden traveled on Air Force two back

during the Obama administration. He traveled on Air Force and introduced Joe Biden, the Vice president at the time, his dad to a bunch of Chinese government officials, and it was the Chinese government that gave him, Hunter Biden over a billion dollars of assets to manage. This was written about by Peter Schweitzer in his book Not Invisible Empires. Is it invisible? There's something like that, But that is

what happened here. There was a pay There was a huge payout for Hunter Biden while traveling to China on dad's jet, which is the taxpayer jet US government jet known as Air Force too for the Vice President, and then all of a sudden, Hunter Biden gets a huge sum of money from the Chinese government. We're supposed to think that there's there's no connection there. Who's given this

guy a billion dollars? My friends, who thinks that, you know, Hunter Biden's really got a lock on the next great investment idea or that someone who very rapidly washed out of being a public affairs officer as a commission naval officer that he only got because of his dad in the first place. For I can't remember it was crack cocaine or cocaine used, but one or the other. Yeah, that that guy's the one you're just going to hand a billion dollars too. Now we could get into this

discussion about whether it should be illegal. That's fine even if it is entirely even if there's nothing you could say that is explicitly illegal about what was going on with the Bidens, And I suppose that there someone will take that position about the Clinton Foundation. It's just filthy dirty.

We know that this is selling access. We know that this is leveraging one's familial position and using the full power and backing of the United States government as a backdrop for private business transactions that would not have happened without this. No, there's no question about that would not have happened unless his dad was the vice president. So now what do the Democrats do. Well, they've got a choice to make, and we got the Democrat debate coming up.

See my favorite Democrat, Tulsi Gabbert is in fact going to be on the stage. So there we go. She's made it. We'll talk more about the Democrats at a few moments. But now that we're looking at what the future is going to be for that primary, Joe Biden can either stay and the Joe Biden mantra or the anti Joe Biden narrative. Is going to be at least in part that Hillary had her emails and Joe has

his son's nepotism and all this other stuff. Right, So there's that, and then on the other side you could have Joe Biden stepped down. But then that's in a sense and admission and admission that there was in fact something going on here, that this was bad, And so that will then leave quite a bad taste in the mouths of voters who have been told by the media all along, Oh, there's nothing to see here, there's no problem, there's nothing, there's no worry. Well, I tend to I

tend to disagree, my friends. I think there's a lot to see here. I think there's a lot for the Democrats to be concerned about. We shall see if they decide that Biden is too much of a liability. So far, the Poles have remained steady. They really believe that he is their best hope, which is why you've had just the stupefying expression on the faces of so many of these Democrats out there in the media in particular, who are saying, oh, fifty eighty thousand a month, one hundred

and nah, no big deal, was it illegal? Do you do anything wrong? Why was there no charges brought? No big deal, Just like the said of a Hillary's emails, no big deal. The same people that tell us that, you know, if Trump says that he's the greatest president ever, he's a liar and basically worse than Hitler, because of course he's not the greatest president ever. Trump's arrangement syndrome

is real. Just a question of how bad the diagnosis is for anyone member of the Democratic Party, anyone news outlet, individual. Trump derangement syndrome unfortunately, has spread far and wide across the land. My friends, we have more to talk about. With Secretary of State Pompeo fighting back against the bullying of his state department. I'm get into that where I think all of this is going with the Democrat impeachment effort. What I see happening there, Democrats want to take your guns.

That's not a surprised. We will have some time for that, and then a towards the end of the show will get into a more inspiring moment. In a very difficult circumstance, someone showed us all that forgiveness and grace can exist even in the most in the most trying of situations. So we have that and we have oh so much more team coming up here on the Buck Sexton Show. I don't care how much money you spend, mister President,

or how dirty do you attacks get. Trump knows there are no truth in the charges again me, none zero. Every independent news organization that has reviewed the charges at length has found it to be a flat out lie his assertions, every single one. On Now, let me make something clear to mister Trump and his hatchetman and the special interest funding his attacks against me. I'm not going anywhere. You are not going to destroy me, and you're not

going to destroy my family. Well, I guess Joe Biden's pretty definitive right now on how he's not going to get out of this thing. He's not going to change his mind and decide that there's another Democrat who should be at the top of the field and Joe Biden can go spend his time on the vineyard and fly fishing and hanging out. He's got other plans, folks. He wants to stick it out. At least that's what he says right now. I am not sure that that is

going to hold. But the discrediting of the investigation is such an interesting thing to see play out because we've

known it would be coming for quite a while. It's been very, very obvious to anyone who's been paying attention that they can't allow the Attorney general, the current Attorney General Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut, to finish their investigation and present findings about Russia collusion origins, fives abuse, and essentially the international dirty tricks scheme that was used to try to destroy the Trump to first stop Trump from winning the election and then destroy the Trump presidency

right after. If we find out what really happened there, that could be devastating to Democrats and their worst fear of Trump getting handily reelected in twenty twenty in part because of the truth of those revelations coming out. That could very well be where this all goes. Yeah, Joe Biden says that he's he's going to stay in it. He says that he is going to fight this thing all the way to the very end. By the way, and we mentioned before how Shift lies. You know who

else is a very dishonest character in all this. Nancy Pelosi. All Right, Nancy Pelosi is someone that she's remarkable in what she's been able to do in politics for someone that you know, you look, you hear, you think, why how has she been really the most powerful Democrat, female Democrat in the Democratic Party in my lifetime. Well, one thing is that she never breaks ranks. There's no stumbling over integrity, there's no issue with well, that's a lie,

and my party's peddling a lie. So I'm gonna go against it. And here's a perfect example that. Here's Pelosi talking about Remember when Shift did the whole Hey, I'm a mafia ball, I'm ordering the assassination of a million people. I'm making stuff up as I'm talking about things, but I'm pretending that this is what Trump said, Right, remember that thing when he just was speaking crazy talk. Pelosi is saying that that was actually what the President was saying.

He played twenty five. I know you support the chairman, Shift, but was it right for him to have that dramatic interpretation of the President's transferred the phone call at the hearing last week. I want the American people to know, but that phone call was about I want them to hear it. So, yeah, it's Sarah, it's sad, but it's using the president's own words. So well, those weren't the president's words. Who's an interpretation of the president's works saying

he made this up? He didn't make it up, Nancy Pelosi. There, folks sitting with George Stephanopolis, who is doing the bare minimum pushback thereof Well, I mean that's not entirely true, because it's not true use the president's own words. No, he didn't. He did not use the press it in own words. That is not what happened there. Okay, So why is Nancy Pelosi then able to get away with saying that it is? Why aren't people running around saying Nancy Pelosi is a liar? See that term to label

somebody in politics a liar, it's very very powerful. It's very effective for one side of the aisle. The other side somehow always doesn't get the same doesn't get the same benefit. Pelosi was lying there, She was clearly lying. And that's because the underlying substance of the charge against

Trump here is weak. The substance is weak. And because they're released the transcript, and because they understood what this effort was all about early on and handled it better than I think the Trump administration would have in the past, the process argument also very quickly fall apart. So now what do you have, Well, just the very straightforward proposition

that the Democrats are going to impeach this president. Because they're going toapeach this president, nothing else really matters, nothing is going to be to get in the way of it. And that is where we are. That is how this is going to shake out. So we shall see. We shall see whether or not that has an enormous backfire, which I really hope that it does. I think it's

quite possible that it will. But I'm not somebody who thinks that this inquiry is, Oh, they're dipping a toe in the pool and they're not sure if they're gonna go,

they're gonna have to go in. Imagine the fury and the just the noise, I mean the literal noise from all the protesters and the loons, and the Capitol hill'll be turned into an insade asylum by all the Democrat donors running around with crazy costumes on some of them profane costumes at that, and saying that Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats have sold out on this, so they're gonna have to impeach the president. They're gonna have to impeach him. This is and this is just

gonna hurt the country. It's gonna divide us even more. It is nothing but spite. Do you understand a motive? I don't, and I'm supposedly going to be interviewed by mister dorm as part of this non investigation. I remember William Barr, you know, when he was testifying in front of Congress, he said he didn't understand the predication of the countertelligence investigation that was launched into Russia's interference in

twenty sixteen election. I don't understand the predication of this worldwide effort to try to uncover dirt, either real or imagined, that would discredit that investigation in twenty sixteen into Russian interference. You know, on one hand, the aboministration is crucified for not doing enough, and now they're looking for what we might have done in order to try to understand better and to prevent the Russian interference. And I do agree.

It's not just that Trump doesn't care about Russian interference. I think he is hoping that he's going to get it because he knows that Russia interfered on his behalf, and I think as he sees his political fortunes dwindling, I think he really is hoping that his pal Vladimir is going to come through once again and help him get elected in twenty twenty if he's going to be

in office. By the former CI director John Brennan as single handedly trash the brand of the organization that I once worked for and actually have very many fond memories of. Brennan is just trashing the CIA. He doesn't view it that way. Of course. He thinks he's being some kind of patriot, including when he runs around and says that Trump is a trader or tantamount to trees in he said some of them more insane things of anyone. I mean, he is a true hashtag resistance Trump hater. The fact

that he was CI director under Obama. Should remember what I was talking about in the beginning of the show with the elites and how they're not as impressive as they want us to think they are, and a lot of them can wield power and have consolidated power under the premise that they know what they're doing and we can trust them. And the more you learn about them,

the more you find out Nope. A lot of them are just playing the game, sucking up to the elite, sucking up the establishment as they need to in order to get into the positions of authority that allow them to wield that power over all the rest of us and enriched themselves in the process. Why is Brennan so concerned though, about the investigation? When did investigating become bad? We've been told for three years now, Oh, why are you trying to stop the truth from getting out about Trump?

He would say, Okay, you're right, fine, When did investigating become a problem? I'm just curious. I would like to know at what point in this process, at what phase in all of this more information, more facts about Russia collusion, Russia interference in twenty sixteen, What happened with the CrowdStrike? Why didn't the FBI do its own investigation of the server that the DNC claimed was hacked and that's where

the emails came from? That showed what we already knew, which is that the DNC was completely in the tank for Hillary at the expense of Bernie Sanders. That's really all it showed us. Why is that such a problem? Wow,

because they want their guy. You see the Democrats they love, They want their person in charge of this and putting someone else in that role that they cannot trust, to approach every aspect of the investigation with an anti Trump lens really more of an anti Trump ferocity, and to make decisions within the discretion of the investigator that will

always favor one side. Is That's part of the problem here, folks, is that we see that discretion from the powerful is abused in ways that always goes one way, and it goes toward the establishment, toward the elites, the Democrat left. It is used against conservatives in the right in ways that you just look at if I'm missing something, show me the conservative who has broken all kinds of laws

and gotten away with it all. Oh, they would say, Donald Trump, really, what is the I sit here and I ask what is the law that he has actually broken? And they'll throw out a bunch of things at me, to which I would say, he has not broken any of those laws. He just has it the emolument's clause. Someone from the Japanese embassy had a cheeseburger a Trump hotel. Oh, no, Trump is selling us out to the Japanese embassy. That man didn't just get a cheeseburger. He got bacon on

a Demit that's three dollars extra. And I used to go to the Trump Hotel a fair amount actually, so I guess I've also bought Trump's foreign policy. You know the best thing there is Producer Mark. It was amazing. They had these bacon strips. Their fame. Everyoneys takes photos of them. It's like a touristy thing to do. You go to the Trump Hotel in DC. They have these bacon strips and then they take a blowtorch out and

they blowtorch the bacon. It's already cooked a bit, but they sear it right in front of you, and it's and it's a maple glaze on it. That sounds delicious. Yeah, I'm telling you, if you go down there, man, it's worth the super thick. Yeah. You could. You could slap somebody and knock them out with those bacons. Yeah, I guess. I guess bacon is plurals. So I didn't mean bacons. Look at me. I got so excited I forgot the English. How many bacons do you want? Hey, how many bacons

do you want? I'm gonna I'm gonna grill it. I'm gonna flame flame thrower it. It looks like a little flamethrower. But I'm sure they've had some interesting accidents in the past there, So yeah, I think that I own Trump's foreign policy though, because I have eaten at the Trump hotel. That's good. That's good to know, a good thing to do. And John Brennan doesn't want us to find out more about what happened in twenty sixteen because here's here's a prediction.

John Brennan's not going to look good in the investigation of Russia collusion origins. He's not going to look good in that. And here's another prediction. The more we find out to bring it to the current, the current moment with a shift and all the rest of it, the more we find out about both the whistleblower and the behind the scenes of getting this complaint through and weaponizing against Trump, it will be so clear that this is

it's the Blasi Ford playbook. Go to partisan democrats and enlist their assistance, enlist their help in finding a way to you know, shut this thing down and or rather attack somebody in an effort to shut down the presidency. And that's it. That's all you really have to do. You have to worry much about the facts or anything else. So Brennan's a guy that should He's got concerns, I can tell you that much, and so does McCabe, who's been referred for a prosecution based on the Inspector General

of the DOJ report. So our side gets to investigate two folks. This is what this is what they've never understood, they will never accept. Our side gets to investigate as well. For example, if it's acceptable to start an investigation based on what George Papadopolis says to a dude at a bar, based on what he heard from another dude somewhere else, and the FBI spins up a full field investigation based

on that. I think Hunter Biden getting fifty to eighty grand a month while his dad's running forign policy in a country for the Obama administration, when Hunter Biden is clearly unqualified for those fauns that has no idee is talking about. I think that this is all, yeah, a conversation that we get to have about the investigation, about how we should go forward and look more into this. Oh wait, I've got a fantastic moment here. By the way,

from the the Trump twitter yesterday. So we can't play it. We can't play the Trump tweet for you because there involves copyrighted music. Wait do we How are you saying we can play it? No? No, we cannot. Yeah we can't. We can play like three seconds. No, No, that's all right, I can just do it. I was gonna say, look at this photograph. Yeah, we're good with that. I gotta scratch your voice. I'm from Canada. I don't think Nickelback would want to claim copyright on Yeah, look at this photograph.

I'm Nickelback, I'm you know, yeah, it's not really I'm not really sounding that much like them, but trying. Look, you know, Nickelback is the poor man's Creed. So I think that that's you know, yeah, I agree. I think that's pretty true. Yeah. So people who say they, hey, Creed are also just lying. They're just lying. Creed the movie is good, by the way, But Creed the band had some great stuff back in the day. They were a nineties, a nineties phenomenon. So, and I think Scott

stapp is a concern. Am I right in thinking that? So he gets extra points? Extra points? I don't know people's political affiliations, but come on, we we've done over this. I did see stay Stacy Dash got arrested earlier this week. That made me sad. I like, she'll always be Dion from Clueless for me. So do you know what I'm talking about? No? Okay, Well here's what happened for those who are curious. Yesterday you had the President of the United States to his sixty five million that's right, sixty

five million Twitter followers. He tweeted out and it was amazing. And if you haven't seen it, I hope that someone's grabbed because now they've pulled on the music. A photo of Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, who they've now had to look back at. The Oh we've never talked about is Hunter Biden and Joe Biden with a Barisma executive playing golf. So that's that seems noteworthy, doesn't it. Oh so you just played golf with the guy. But like you guys, see this focus is where this? Oh where's

the smoking gun? Evans? Oh? Please? They had conversations about this, of course they did, and they were smart enough not to put in an email. Hey give my son a lot of money and I'll help you guys out when you need it at Barismo, Like they're not that stupid.

I mean, even Joe Biden's not that dumb. But this photograph comes out after Joe Biden has said that there's nothing, there's nothing to be concerned about, there's no issue here with corruption whatever, and so Trump shares the photograph and someone, I mean, I don't know who it was created a kind of mashup of the Nickelback song look at this photograph, I grabber. I'm from Canada and singing a song you know what is. I don't know the rest of it.

It's only it's the only thing that made me. I'm sorry, I'll stop. I know you guys people right now are they're deleting the podcast And I could hear the clicks, but it was. It was Nickelback mashed up with a photograph of Hunter Biden, Joe Biden and the and the natural gas executive from Ukraine with the song look at this photograph, and the President of these United States tweeted it out. Pretty pretty amazing, I gotta tell you, pretty amazing. Um,

it was really funny. Now Nickelback decided to put out a copyright infringement claim on this because Nickelback has no sense of humor, and so now the good thing is that the entirety of America can go back to hating Nickelback. This is a unifying moment for US producer Mark. Everyone can be like Nickelback's the worst. Although I'm gonna tell you something right now. You know it's worse than Nickelback. What Matchbox twenty? That's right, I'm gonna say it. Are

you just a little unwell? You like Matchbox twenty? No, that's just the one reference of a Matchbox twenty song I can make. Oh, I didn't even know that was a Matchback twenty song. I didn't that there're one song on Well maybe I don't know. They're a whole bunch of them. I don't know if I've ever been good enough. I'm a little bit rusted, you know whole thing. Yeah, I swear people are I'm you know what's gonna happen. The inbox is gonna be full of people saying buck,

do not don't ever sing on the podcast. I look, guys, I didn't want to. My hand was forced here. I don't think it won. My hand was forced because I wanted to play the Nickelback, but they already pulled the copyright infringement and this little show is not going to be able to handle the Nickelback legal team. They're gonna come to a bunch of mean Canadian lawyers be like, don't play our song a they might sue for you

singing it really yeah, just because it's so terrible. Oh yeah, I was gonna say it's parody, my man, that's protected under parody. That's like, uh, weird al Yankevich level stuff right there. It might be the listeners that sue. We're having to hear it. That's probably true. Hopefully they won't start listening to some other inferior conservative podcast. A parental

advisory for you. In this block, I'm going to be quoting from things that the President of the United States has tweeted, So if you have kids in the room, you might want to mute the television because he used some profanity today. The combative President Trump increasingly combative, lashing out claiming he always cooperates, which is not true, as House Democrats prepared a subpoena the White House for the

Ukraine scandal. The president also attacking the impeachment inquiry as a hoax, a coup, and even saying that Democrats are focusing on quote Jake Tupper, how dare you? Oh no, not Jack Tupper, You're so proper Like I said, ah, if you don't want my hairs, you know, if you have kids in the room, I want to have them leave the room. Because the president and as him, this is the same network I might add that was running

around talking about s space whole country. You gotta say it that way because otherwise it comes across the wrong way on some some other friends of mine of the business have gotten into a little bit of an you with this because you're trying to refer to the you know, we'd say blank hole. How about that that's better because if you say the S and then the other thing, it sounds like you're saying the thing you're not trying to say. See so I'm a savvy cat. So I'm

going to stay away from that. And yeah, that didn't that wasn't supposed to rhyme. The media is all like, oh my gosh, look what Trump has done, Look what he's up to with this, talking about this in a way that normal people talk about things. One of my favorite things about this president, and there are many of them. One of my favorite things in the fact this guy

just talks like a normal human being. I really hope if there are, if there are some things that we can continue post Trump, it would be that politicians and all get to be like, Wow, I just I woke up and I was sleepy. I got a bed of the Constitution, and that I went for a walk thinking about the foul dog Fathers, and that I figured I would stop and read a little Adam Smiths on the wealth of Nations and the way that we could perhaps get free trade going, get a more robust fashion to

elevate me and income. And you know, how about you speak like a normal person. Wouldn't that be better? I like guys that actually tell and gals. I just like people who communicate the way human beings communicate, without all the pretense, without all the nonsense. I certainly try to

do a fair bit of that here. But I just thought it's funny the CNN, which which has had people on its air cursing up a storm, and they love the second, oh man, the second the president does anything that's a little salty, says anything a little salty then, which you hear is one journo after another just ripping into it with you know, ooh the president. So the President said this. So I'm gonna be edgy now and

repeat the curse word that the President said. Oh no, oh no, yeah, it's not really not really that scary. I wish people would just act like they've they've been there before, they've seen this before. Oh, by the way, looks like the effort to change the law in California didn't work out. Oh no, But I thought that they

respected the rule of law so much, these libs. I thought they cared so much about our sacred institutions that Trump is a threat to our democracy, they say, as they try to prevent the democratic process of electing our leader, next leader for this republic. This is what Trump said about that. Gavin Newsom attempts to mess with potus please. Yesterday, as you know, I was sued by the governor, Gavin Newsom, He's another beauty. I was sued by him. He said,

do nothing. Sued by him so that I can't get on the ballot in the state of California. It was a massive story. It was the biggest story, mister President. It was headlines all over the place. Trump gets sued by do nothing governor and California. It was big. Here's

what happened yesterday. I won the case very convincingly. A very tough, smart, highly respected judge, not a Trump person at all, not appointed by Trump, appointed by somebody that you would call the opposition, came out with a scathing and tough opinion. I won the case. I didn't see one story that I won that case, as our California tried to change the law and violate the constitution by saying you can't be on the ballot in California for

president unless you share your tax returns. These people change laws statewide just to try and stick a thumb in Trump's eye. And they're the ones who lecture us about respecting our sacred institutions, the rule of law. They have no shame. But then again, Shifty Shift will go on TV and say that this whole impeachment's nonpartisan, So they are beyond parody and beyond shame at the same time.

It's quite a thing. I did not mean to skip this story from I think it was yesterday, So I'm coming back to it now because it does illustrate something. It does tell us something but not really about the president. I think it tells us more about the media. The story was that the New York Times, which I think has a book coming out on this, well, I mean the anti Trump books in twenty twenty are just it's gonna be, you know, vote against Trump or We're all

gonna die. I mean that's the title of pretty much every book you know, vote against Trump or you like Hitler. I mean, they're just pretty One of the issues you come up against with these resistance folks is that it's

an arms race of crazy. So the more one of them will say Trump is the worst president the history of presidents, and he's horrible and he's terrible, and what are we going to do about it, the more others have to up the annie and say, oh no, I think Trump is Trump has killed more people than Gangha has come, which, for those of you that have ever listened to a hardcore history no or read any books about Mongol history, ganghas kind called a lot of people.

So I think that would be an exaggeration. But liberals don't seem to think it's an exaggeration because they say crazy things all the time. Although they haven't said I'm not trying to pull an Adam shift. They have not said that he has killed Hutland Ganghis Khan, although there are people that what was it? Earlier in the week they said he was complicit? Who wasn't in the Bill mar Show, wasn't it? Someone said that he was an accessory to murder by helping Russia or something. Just crazy talk.

But the crazy talk continued because you have Donald Trump issuing or issuing a denial of this New York Times report. Here's what the report is, my friends, they think they say. They claim that Donald Trump wanted to have a serious discussion about building a moat like the old medieval castle moat, you know, around the around the citadel or the castle

or the whatever. And the moat was to be filled with alligators and snakes, and that there might be spikes put on top of the fence that would impale people. And oh, by the way, maybe Trump also asked could illegal aliens who are crossing the border, could they be shot in the legs non lethally to stop them. I have thoughts on this. Okay, Trump has already come out and he has said fake news, just like the snakes

and gaiters in the moat the media's deranged. They've lost their minds, so he's saying, and that was in specifically to Trump asked about shooting migrants crossing the border in the legs. ABC News, they say here, confirming New York Times reporting. My friends, there are only two possibilities here. Really, there are only two ways that this is even a

story that we should discuss in any context whatsoever. One of them is that this is a rumor that media has seized on because it makes the President seem nuts, and they want to make him seem nuts, and that's the most important thing to them. And even if the sourcing is flimsy and it is not oh there's that word, it's not credible per se, they still want to put it out there because some people will believe it, just like some people still believe the Kavanaugh was guilty, even

though all the evidence is that he's innocent. In that sense, the Libs manage what they wanted there. Kavanaugh comes across as the asterisk Supreme Court justice because liberals made these claims they could not substantiate and they could not make stick to him. But there people still believe it. They still believe this stuff, all right, so that's one part of it. The other possibility here, and I'm not going to say that I think this is I think this is unlikely, but I can see it. So I think

that this is probably just total nonsense. But there's another component of it, maybe, and that is that Trump is a very He's very freewheeling with the way he speaks about things. And he said, I have interviewed the President, I've talked to him on and off the record. You get this president off the record, and he will say things that are edgy, are salty, and he does it in some ways I think just because he likes to let loose, but also because that's just the way that

he communicates. That's the way that he likes to engage with certain people. He likes get a rise out of them. He likes to be ended. Me. He's the most most entertaining governor official I've ever interviewed by far. Is Donald Trump, no question, not even close. I mean, Mike Pence a great guy, but you know, Mike Pence, you're interviewing a vice president that you would think is the vice president in a movie or something. He's just very vice presidential.

Donald Trump, you got a whole other it's a whole other thing when you're interviewed Donald Trump. So is it possible that he made some passing joke to and now I know people say, oh, it's not funny, and he's the commander chief and he shouldn't, But alligators in a moat, I mean maybe I could see And then just the same way we've seen with the whistleblower, through the media apparatus of anti Trump hyperventilation that turned into Trump is going out trying to, you know, eliminate trying to trying

to take out illegal immigrants with snakes and alligators. I mean, no one thinks that snakes and alligators would really be effective, right, that that's a thing that you would want to do. I mean, even if Trump was this horrible person that they clearly must believe he is, that's not even a that's like a cartoon villain, bad idea, and it's just not an idea he was ever serious about. If he said anything about this, it would have been it would

have been in jest. And you can determine for yourself whether you think that the any kind of joke like that's appropriate or not. But there's just no way there's just no way that the President the United States was saying, Yeah, I've got an idea, let's put a Oh my gosh, what Napolitano. Come on, man, I'm just seeing this on my screen. Trump behavior is criminal and impeachable. Oh, this is frustrating. Look, Judge, I don't know the judge very well.

I know him a little bit. I've met him a few times, and he's always and everyone always says this about him. He's always a gentleman to me. So you know, I have nothing personally against Judge of Politano. He's always been a perfect gentleman to me. And that's not true of everybody in the business, including even on the right. And there's some people on the right who are jerks. But man, is he wrong here. He's just wrong. And I think that a lot of this is I do

think a lot of this is personal. And you know, it's so personal for some people who hate the president that they can't even separate themselves from that animosity, and they're not even really able to be aware of what's driving their decision making. You know, what's driving the react ladies of their perception of Trump. I saw, for example, you know, George Conway George Conway, Kelley and Conway's husband.

And I don't like this. I don't like that the media latches onto a really a public dispute between a husband and a wife over the president, and they like this drama. They stoke this trauma, meaning the media. So Conway has written an art I've written an editorial that says Trump is unfit for office. Oh, big surprise. Jake Tapper shared it from his Twitter account because you know, he's an objective journalist, so you can share a lot

of things that say the president is not objective. But that doesn't mean that you think that I'm sorry the president is not fit for office. But that doesn't mean you're not objective. Oh no, of course not, of course not. But the judge for me, judge of politan analysis, he he is personally agitated with Trump and that is driving a lot of his legal analysis. And I just find that really troubling. I really do it. It's i should say disappointing more than troubling. It is not criminal. His

behavior is not criminal. I've not heard a single valid, serious argument about the whistleblower phone call being riding the level of criminal activity. You know, it is criminal. In my mind, seizing people's private property, especially when it's constitutionally protected property like guns. Democrats were threatening to do that the ninety four so weapons Man, it didn't apply to

weapons that were purchased before nineteen ninety four. What would you do about the millions of specifically assault weapons that are already in circulation. What do you do about those? Well, there are approximately five million, two point craig. We have to have a buyback program, and I support a mandatory buyback program. It's got to be smart. We got to

do it the right way. But there are five million, at least some estimate as many as ten million, and we're going to have to have smart public policy that's about taking us off the streets, but doing it in the right way. Mandatory buy back such an Orwellian term. Democrats have all the ones who are trying to get a little bit of an edge on the competition, at

least in the primary. They are they are leveraging the left's animosity towards the Second Amendment as best they can and saying that they're going to have a buyback of ten million guns. It's just it's just insane. The mandatory buyback. What happens when people say, no, are you really going to send law enforcement into people's homes? You're really going to say, hey, we have reason to believe that you bought an A R fifteen, you hand it over. Are

you going to arrest the men? Are they felons? I'm pretty sure in Connecticut they got rid of what they believed to be about one hundred thousand assault rifles that would have been banned under a new state Connecticut law, and they were supposed to turn them into local sheriff or police station, whatever it may be in Connecticut, and very small percentage people to them in What is this mandatory buyback program going to look like? I don't know.

Justin Trudeau may be thinking about it though, up in Canada, because he now wants to ban all assault rifles in He's like, I am very much trying to rebound from my week of everybody thinking that I'm a huge racist, and so I have an idea, let us ban the guns. That is the Trudeau move ban the guns. This was also the Harvey Weinstein maneuver, and now it's the desperate Democrats who are not getting traction in the primary maneuver,

like Kamala Harris, who was a media darling. I mean, they were all in on all things Kamala until they weren't or I still think that she's on the cover of Time magazine. I believe for either this week or month or whenever Time magazine mark you check on that. Am I crazy? Am I seeing things? I'm pretty sure she was. I tend to be. I tend to be right about the things. So I think she's in the

cover Time magazine. The media is trying to prop her up and still have a god because look, if Biden steps steps Yep, I'm right, Time Magazine, boom, the buckster always delivers. If Biden changes his tune and he actually can handle the heat going forward, then who knows where that twenty some odd percent of the Democrat primary vote is going to go. I think that the belief in some quarters in the media is that that translates to Kamala Harris, that if and if Biden steps out, the

next electable person would be Kamala Harris. That's what I think I think will happen. But who knows. The truth is nobody knows right now. Who else, by the way, is making noise about they want to take all the guns. Wasn't somebody Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, mandatory buyback. Corey Booker another guy the media loves, the voters don't. Here's what he says about the mandatory buyback twenty seven. The number one killer for African American children is gun violence. Protect

our families, protect our communities. If I'm president, I will do that mandatory buyback, voluntary buyback. This is another thing that to me is just again absurd. Let's start with what we're talking about here, where we're talking talking about assault rifles. That's what I'm saying, right. I want to be clear exactly what we're talking about. Again, the overwhelming majority of Americans over seventy five does not believe that we should have these weapons of war on our street.

So how do you get them off the streets? So you have a mandatory buyback program? Confiscation? This is said. This is Democrats telling you that they're going to come and take your guns. They're telling you repeatedly. They're not hiding it, they're not they're not shading the truth here. They're not trying to hedge their bats. They're just saying, yeah,

we're coming for your guns. Now to a Corey Booker's point there about violence against I believe he said violence against African American children is the number one gun violence is the number one killer. I would be willing to bet that if you were to crunch the numbers on that ninety nine percent of that violence is from handguns. You're talking about people that are either killed in accidents, children that get you know, that that find a gun

in the home. You know, it's it'd be very difficult, for example, for a small child to operate a large rifle or shotgun, and you know, a handgun, it's not not difficult. And if you're talking about gang violence, gang violence is overwhelmingly committed with handguns. Well, well, let's just break down the numbers. All gun violence of all kinds is almost entirely handguns. It's ninety seven percent of gun

violence comes from handguns. Two to three percent comes from rifles. Now, if you were to break that down even further, so they were talking about gang violence, and you're not discussing, say, some of the mass shootings that have happened in recent months, that's going to be handguns too. So here you have a problem. The Corey Booker sets up, we have gang violence,

killing young kids, which is terrible. But instead of taking a law enforcement approach to deal with the criminals, what he's saying is, let's ban something that has effectively nothing to do with the problem with the violence that I just brought up. Let's get rid of something that is completely extraneous in this discussion because it'll make the left wing base happy and they hate guns and gun owners.

That's it. That's when you when you look at this by the numbers and the reality of what's going on, and just so that he can't get beaten from the left here Joe Biden, who's supposed to be the modern but Joe Biden's the whatever you need him to be candidate if you're a Democrat. That's what everyone who's really watching this understands. Whatever Joe Biden to say, he's gonna say. But Joe Biden's out there saying that he wants also

to take dramatic, draconian anti Second Amendment action. It's talking about a federal gune and magazine registry. No more maxim magazine, no more of that naughty stuff. Just getting bad joke. Different magazine played twenty eight and meantime, go out and eliminate the ability to purchase and or make any more of these assault weapons period. Now there's a third thing

where you do under the Firearms Act. In nineteen thirty four, there's a situation where when they outlawed machine guns, they said, Okay, you can continue to have a machine gun if you own it, but guess what, you gotta let us know you have one. You gotta let us know you have arms. You got it. I want that for all assault weapons. I want that for magazines, because what happens is if we know you have one, the likelihood of that ever being used in commission of a crime after a voluntary

buyback is highly unlikely. Highly unlikely. That's a lie. By the way. First of all, the people that have them wouldn't register them. A lot of people wouldn't. Anybody that had any ill intent would certainly never register one. So what is he even talking about. Well, we he's talking about is establishing the basis for a nationwide assault rifle registry, and then they really would know exactly who has it. And they're gonna say, oh no, we just need to

know you have it. We're not going to do it. Well, you got one politician here saying we just need to know you have it. You got a bunch of other Democrat politicians who are saying, oh, no, we're going to take it from you, which is it. Well, this is why we can't trust them, because they keep moving the target around. We don't know what the well, no, I've scratched that. We do know what they want, which is they want to ban these weapons entirely and get them

out of out of legal, lawful gun owners hands. That's the other part of this. If you look at the numbers with people who own rifles, if ninety seven percent of all gun violence is handgun based, what percentage of individuals in America who own a long gun of any kind use that long gun in any sort of crime. It's going to be a tiny fraction of one percent, a tiny fraction of it. It's not below one percent. I'm saying, it's not even going to be something that

you'd be able to easily plot on a graph. But they still pretend like this is a way to save lives and end gun violence. And unfortunately, there's just no sense of good faith from Democrats on this at all, especially because it's an election year, so we should just not seed ground, not give an inch that should be our approach team. I wanted to take a moment to tell you about a sad story, but one that at least adds at the end a moment of hope. Doesn't

I certainly not call it a happy ending. It's a tragedy. The whole situation across the board as a tragedy, but there's a moment of hope that has offered up at the end. It has to do with a former police officer in Dallas, Amber Geiger. She was just sentenced yesterday to ten years in prison for the killing of an innocent man. Now, she shot him when she entered his apartment, which was the same layout of apartment in terms of words on the floor, but a different floor. She went

into what she thought was her apartment. She's a police officer. She saw a guy sitting on her couch. She thought he was robbing her. This was this was her story for the for the judge and jury. And so she drew her firearm and she killed him, shot him on the couch. And she had inadvertently and it does the story at least seems lausible to me. I don't see why this would not have been I do not believe it.

She decided to just randomly walk into some stranger's apartment and shoot him just because she looked like a terrible error, a terrible mistake that she made and one that she does have to pay a price for. But she went in thinking that it was her apartment, she shot him, and she just got ten years in prison over this. She's eligible for parole in five years, but she's going

to prison in the state of Texas. Now, I will tell you I've actually done the same thing in my obviously not with a firearm, and Norm's hurt, But I mean I've gone to the wrong floor and gone to open a door thinking it was my door. Especially in hotels which you're not used to layout, it can happen. So I've done that before. I've never been carrying a firearm and gone into someone else's apartment and drew down on them. But so that part of the story I

can find credible. Unfortunately, the individual's door was a jar, a little bit unlocked, and so she went in, and that, she said, was part of why she thought there was a burglar in progress. Now, why she when she had a firearm and this guy posed no threat to her, why she felt the need to shoot, especially as a

train Remember she's law enforcement's a cop. To shoot instead of making an arrest strikes me as very very problematic here, which is probably why she went to prison for ten years, or he's going to prison for up to ten years. But there was a moment of incredible mercy and grace in the courtroom yesterday. The brother of the man who was shot decided that Brant Jeane I believe is his name, he took the witness stand in the court. Remember this is he's talking about the woman. Bottom Jean is the

man who was shot. His brother, Brant Jean took the took the stand, and here is what he said in front of the court and now in front of the whole country. And I wasn't gonna ever say this in front of my family or anyone. But I don't even want you to go to jail. I want the best for you because I know that's what that's exactly what both of them would want you to do. And the best would be gave your life to Christ. I'm not

gonna say anything else. I think given your life to Christ would be the best thing that both of them would want you to do. Again, I love you as a person. I don't wish anything bad are you. I don't know if it is possible, but can I give

her a hug? Please? Please? Yes? Wow? This young man lost his brother in what was a terrible accident, but an involuntary manslaughter really, and the woman who killed his brother, he wants to give her the message that she should give her life to Christ, that he loves her as a person, and that he wants to give her a hug before she is taken into custody and certain begins serving a lengthy sentence for homicide. Surprised a lot of

people seeing this happen. We feel these days. I think many of us feel that we live in a society where grace and forgiveness are in short supply, and we often get caught up in political tribalism, religious factions arguing with one another, tearing one another down. I think far too many people root for the failures of their fellow human beings in this country and anywhere else, take too much pleasure and seeing people brought low, and also feel

very comfortable demanding vengeance in place of any kind of forgiveness. Well, the brother of Botham Jean here gave everybody, I think, a lesson in what is possible, and I think that it's something that I hope people remember going forward in their own lives because it was powerful watching this play out. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Buck turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. It is

It is time for roll call. The optimist prime sounding voice there is correct, it is roll call time. If you want to be a part of this part of the show, wasn't the most eloquent way of saying that, You can write to us at Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton or you could also email us at Team Buck at i heeart media dot com. Those are your options, so very exciting stuff. If you would like to get in on the Facebook roll call or email action, just re mark make sure that we mix it up. But

we're gonna a little bit of Facebook right now. How bad do things have to get wade rights? How far along the road of detriment do we travel until the protectors of our life, our way of life, our military can step in to remove these lying, delusional congress people from power. Well, my friend, I think that You're gonna wait in a long time before anything like that happens, because if that does have to happen, it's a very very bad day for this country, and we're not there yet.

I'm here to tell you, Wade, it's gonna be okay. Other shows tell you the country is going to hell. I'm gonna tell you it's gonna be okay. We gotta fight, we gotta keep an eye on things. But I think that part of the American spirit is optimism. Got to be an optimist. Rory Right's buck. It's a wee bit of concern regarding free college for medical students. Does this mean healthcare costs will be lowered? Does that factor in the DEM's grand plan to destabilize the US and have

us on the government shields high or Rory M hell. Yeah, you know, it's interesting. I don't know what the plan is for medical school. I think most people graduate from medical school with debts somewhere in the neighborhood of I think it's close to half a million dollars. I think it's three or four hundred thousand dollars of medical school debts. I think that's that's a real thing. That what does that mean, now would your medical school be paid for?

And if the government, in a Bernie Sanders plan, for example, is going to take over healthcare, does that mean does that mean that doctors won't be able to make as much money? Because it probably does mean that. So who's gonna want to go and take on four hundred thousand dollars of loans in order to make very little money and not be able to pay back those loans? When now you say, buck, oh, we'll make medical school free.

Really so now everyone's graduate degrees are free too. This is going to be even more expensive than anybody could have anticipated, and it's not free. And a lot of you are going to yell at me or semi email saying that's not free the taxpayer, I know, but no cost to the individual, cost to the society. That's the basic promise. That's what they will be With's what they will be saying. Kristen writes, I thought that your Scottish accent was fat bastard. Didn't he sing that song in

the second Austin Powers movie? I know, I've heard it, I've never seen so I married an axe murder A great job though, No, Kristen, so I used to celebrate Mike Mike Myers whole catalog, so I know some of this stuff. He is the dad, the Scottish dad of Mike Myers, and so I burried an axe murderer, but he does the exact same accent in so I married an axe murderer as the Scottish dad, as he then does in a fat suit when he's playing fat bastard. I did think he sang that song though, Oh he

sings that song in Austin Powers. You mean think so he thinks sings something close to it. I mean I can believe that. Yeah, he definitely does this thing at the wedding and so I murdered an axe murderer where there's bagpipes being played, and he's like, hey, we've got a pipe utter down, We've got pipe utter down. You know, I don't know. You haven't seen a producer work. You got homework, man, you gotta go see this movie. Yeah, that's what I need to be doing in my free time. Yeah,

you got a wedding in like a few weeks. You got a lot of other things you gotta do. I can officially say next month, Hey, many many crab cakes you guys gonna do it. Uh, you don't want to know about the wedding of this Uh the the menu of this wedding, why, well, uh, it's a closer dairy kosher non dairy, no kosher dairy. What is kosher dairy? You can't have milk and meat together. Yeah, so we're only doing milk. So that means fish pasta, no meat. Uh,

basically a vegetarian wedding. I am unhappy about it, but I'm not paying for it, so wow. Hey, uh, you know it's a religious thing. I I'm just I just was thinking you're gonna be no brisket. No, oh my god. I'shure. Meat is a lot more expensive than just doing it the other way. We have no cake, Well you gotta have cake exactly. But but I always go to wedding at a candy I'm the loser who can't eat the cake because of celiac disease. It's never fun. Yeah, all right,

let's see we got here next. Jay writes Buck. I really enjoy your show. Um. I have to admit the first time I saw you on Fox News, I thought you were one of President Trump's sons. Please keep up the good work, all right, thank you, appreciate that. I'll take the vote of support. I think the sons are sons, are handsome guys, are strapping young lads. They're the lads. Say they are handing some young lads. Uh so I'll take that. They got good hair. Here we go, brass buck.

Is there any scenario that puts the military stepping in to stop the coup? Well, that's another question about this coup. Guys. There's not going to be a coup. I mean when you say is there any scenario, I mean, yeah, there's always a scenario for everything. But I don't think you need to worry about that. That's not gonna happen. Look, Trump's Trump's gonna win reelection. It's gonna be fine. Like I said, I'm an optimist. Trump's gonna still get fired up. Though.

You gotta get out there and and you've got to do what you can to make sure that the Libs aren't able to just have their way with the narrative. But we'll see. Um, let's see what else we got here next up? Dave, Right, it's so funny. This is gonna be an amazing ear of politics. Oh yeah, Dave sent me the lost photograph. I see I went through it quickly that time because I didn't want you guys to have to listen to me singing again. Every time

I look. It makes me laugh. I see we make see we make fun of Nickelback, but then we take every opportunity to do nickel back here on the show. Well we make fun of nickel Backs, so we can make fun of you. Well that's true too. Yeah. I probably should admit this, but I shared some Spotify playlist with my little sister and I just I just got a text from her. She was just like, work out playlist, Comma T Swift? Really, question mark? Was this your own

personal Spotify play Yeah? Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah. Look I just searched workout on Spotify and it comes up with the good stuff. That's that's probably a better way to do it. No, I have a whole curated workout playlist. But little little little cis little sis picked up on the fact that there was some T Swift on there, in fact that your sister is making funy for that. Oh yeah, I mean, was there was there an area on a Grande song? I can neither confirm

nor deny. It sounds like you have the musical taste of my future wife. Yeah, there we go. I could DJ your wedding perfect. You guys have to bring in special food for me though, what we'll have a gluten free option. Oh, there we go. Okay, coming as long as you got some gluten free um. All right, let's get into this real call Facebook dot Com, slashbox sex and mic rides. The damns are just throwing gas on

the fire their way out of their league. Bar Pompeo and Durham are going to expose them for who they are. It's all coming out. I bet you Comey Brennan and the rest are deep state participants, and the rest of the deep state participants are as nervous as a prostitute in church shields. I oh, Mike. Some of them, I think probably realize that they may have an issue on

their hands here. But I would not overestimate the conscience of these deep state libs and assume that they really are that worried about things, because they look the establishment is still very powerful. It's still very strong. All let's get into the emails now, because I'd like to switch it up. This is from Diane and it comes into Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com hey buck. I heard this morning the House committees that are conducting the appeachment inquiry.

I've declared that the Republican members won't be allowed to attend the hearings, much less ask any questions of the witnesses. I thought they said this was not political. How can they say it is a by part as an inquiry? How can surely the Republicans won't sit still for this. I'm boiling mad. They're trying to railroad our president and they know there are Republicans on the committees who will shoot holes in their flimsy story. They must not get away with this shields. I thank you for being a

one of the voices of reason. Oh, thank you, Diane. Yeah, look, it's all. It's all going to be a big part as in mess. There's not gonna be any effort at bipartisanship here. It's just not going to happen. So we might as well be prepared for that, and yeah, geting ready for it. I don't know else to tell you. The Democrats have no interest, No Republicans are going to go along with them. And this is also just gonna make things more damaged politically, especially if Trump becomes President.

The Democrats keep exacerbating what divides us and then turn around saying why are we so divided? James, hey back, I'm hearing that people getting sick and dying from vaping are doing so after you using black market TC products. I'm a millennial conservative turned libertarian and can't understand why we haven't legalized marijuana federally yet get people out of the shadows and open a pathway for safer products. From

James James, I'm in april of legalizing marijuana. That does not mean I advocate the smoking of marijuana, but I am in favor of legalizing it. That said, at the federal level, I just think there's a there's a big hesitation to do this because we've been fighting the war on drugs for a long time and they don't want to they don't want to change this. I can't really think of people that are going to argue that marijuana is more dangerous or is so dangerous that it has

to be regulated as a Schedule one drug. I just don't see that argument. I don't think that that's I don't think it's true. I don't think it's accurate. When is it going to go nationwide. When is it gonna be legal nation wide? That's a good question I gotta think about. That might not be for a while. We have this state by state process that's playing out right now, so we shall have to see Sherry short and sweet in the subject line love the podcast, well, Sharry, thank

you so much. Please do share the podcast with as many people as you can Itune, Stitcher, what's the other? Spotify, I heeart appay, your company, my company, I heeart app Yes, anywhere. We're fine podcasts or listen to. You can listen to the Bucks Exton Show. I'm hoping you guys all enjoy that. We get the show out earlier now, so we are in your drive time, We are in your feed early on. That means that it's a great way to or it's

a great conversation. Sorry to Hey, you know the Bucks Exton shows early now, Tell somebody get them to listen. It's a show that they will enjoy, as will be tomorrow's show, which you will hopefully enjoy. Until then, She'll tie