Sewer Creatures Rush to Judge

This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. American break, You're a great American Again the buck Sexton Show begins and buck Sexton, No, this woman is to be believed, and you can believe Dr Ford. This was attempted rape. And this is a woman who exhibits Dr Ford courage but the classic signs of post traumatic stress.

I believe her. Listen, First of all, anybody who comes forward at this point um to to to be prepared to testify in the United States Senate against someone who is being nominated to one of the most powerful positions in the United States government. That takes an extraordinary amount of courage. Not only do women like Dr Ford who bravely comes forward need to be heard, but they need to be believed. They need to be believed. Let me just say right at the outset, I believe Dr Ford.

I believe the survivor here. There's every reason to believe her. She has come forward courageously and bravely. Welcome to buck section show, folks. Democrats rushing to judgment in favor of the accuser. Of course, no surprise there. We've expected as much all along. They they have shown themselves to be the the swampy ist of swamp creatures, really really sewer creatures.

The Democrats are have been so low and degrading in this entire confirmation process for Kavanaugh um And And as I've been saying, it's because they have an edifice of evil, the abortion industry in this country, that they will protect

at all costs Politically. For them, this is a an issue that they will not budge from um And that they're willing to do anything and everything they can to make sure that Roe v. Wade, which is the closest thing that the left has to a political sacrament as twisted as it is to think of it in that way. Uh is protected by the way. I'm not the only one who who thinks this. We even usually I would go into an extended mockery of his preposterously bad both

delivery and analysis on TV. But David Gergen has said as much about the Kabina attack Plate three. This vital last step about who's going to investigate is crucial to the outcome. What's most important for the country here, Anderson, is when this is all said and done, if Judge Kavanaugh was going on the Supreme Court and it's going to tip the balance of the court for years to come, UH, it's really essential that he go forward without a big

cloud over him. To have Judge Kavanaugh go up there and join Clarence Thomas, you have two people who've been accused of sexual harassment on the court deciding whether Roe v. Wade should be sustained or not and pressing not to rule. That is not a helpful situation. It's about Roe v. Wade. He's just gonna come out and say it. And notice Clarence Thomas was accused of saying some inappropriate stuff by a woman who was If you go back and look

at the hearing not credible. A Democrat controlled said it voted Clarence Thomas through folks because because he didn't think his life should be ruined because of some allegations of some inappropriate comments. Never touched anybody, never attacked anybody, never did anything like so to even put him in the same discussion, I mean, I think Clarence Thomas was innocent as well, but to put him the same discussion as these Cavita allegations just shows you that they're just sloppy folks.

This is just all smear. It's mud slinging, it's attacks, it's vile, it's transparently self serving. This is what the Democrats do. This is who they are. And they're all saying, oh, she's Dr Ford is so credible, Oh she's so credible. Play too. We have Dr Ford's credible allegation. She has enough to gain here, the receipts were there, the story

is credible. I don't think anyone doesn't believe her. I have every reason to believe that she's gonna show that she's a very credible witness and their story is very credible. I believe Dr Ford as I referred to her, because she makes a very credible case. This is a situation where you have serious and credible allegations of rape. They're not credible allegations of rape. First of all, the woman

was not raped. No one thinks she was raped. They claim that it may have been an attempted rape, but a rape actually involves a physical process here of some kind that we don't need to discuss on air. But no one says that is what happened. She may have been may have been growthed, but there are there are legal definitions for what would actually constitute rape, and that has never been alleged. But you see, who needs the law when they've got they've got a man's life to ruin.

I mean, none of it matters, right, Oh, it's just all it's just all about it and all out to the last man and woman. Defense of Row. For the left, that's what this is. And because that's what this is, they don't care how foolish they look, how dishonest they are, how disgusting they are, and all the things that they have to do to try to take down Kavanaugh in their minds are justified, absolutely justified. To call this allegation credible is an insult to credible allegations of sexual assault

all across the country. She doesn't remember where it happened, She doesn't remember when it happened. She won't now show up and and testify or answer any questions about it. She sent a letter said she didn't want to come forward, but had a polygraph run just in case she ended

up having to come forward. The Democrats think we're so dumb that the only people that supposed they knew about this were Democrat congresswomen in this case fine Stein, and also the one out in California's name, I forget, and and there's someone on their staff just happened to leak it at the most opportune time. If the whole game is delay, that's what they're going for here, folks. If the game wasn't delay, we would have be a slightly

different conversation, right. If they really thought they could get Kavanaugh, that would be something else. They would have been working feverishly for the last six weeks to get the information out right away and to try to hold these huge hearings. No, no, no, they're not. They're they're not gonna get him because he didn't do it. I do not believe that Kavanaugh did this and I do not believe that he's guilty of anything.

And everyone who has come out to speak in his favor is just completely and utterly shocked by this thing. And you got on the other side of the people saying, essentially there's no such thing as due process anymore. If a woman accuses you of something, you're guilty. That's what the Democrats are saying. That's their position on this. A woman should be believed. She what about the Duke Cross case.

Should that woman have been believed she went on to kill somebody, by the way, because they did not press false charge, false allegation charges against her, which they always should bring in rape cases when it's clear somebody has made it up, in lied, which by the way, disproportionately happens in sexual assault cases compared to other violent crimes. Just a fact. The Duke la Cross case completely, I mean sorry, uv, a case completely made up, totally made up.

But that woman had a right to be believed, the one woman who made those allegations against that fraternity. You know how many times do we have to go through Towana Brawley. She have a right to be believed. Now now, now you get in a day oh, buck, what do

you do. You're getting this dangerous territory? Are you saying that you know you are you undermining the real No, of course not every red blooded American male I know right now was listening to this across the country would lay down his life to defend not just the honor of a woman who was being attacked in this way that he knew, but any woman a stranger, all right. That's what real men would do. Real men are horrified

bisexual assault. They're horrified by the notion that any man would force himself upon a woman, would threaten old woman, would do any would lay a hand on a woman, never mind lay a hand on her for this specifically to sexually abuse her, and would take it upon on himself to visit violence upon those who would do such

a thing to a woman. So that's the perspective that I come at this from, and that's the one that I know that the people, the men of of all ages listening to this across the country, that's how they feel about this. And so we feel insulted that we have to always say, oh, but you know what the sexual assault is. We're not saying sexual assault is not bad. We're just saying we don't believe this one. Of course, we think sexual assault is terrible, so it's a heinous crime,

it's a felony. People go to prison for decades, as they should. But what Kavanaugh is alleged you have done here. There's just their facts, aren't there, folks. And that's why you're seeing all these games of the media that the timeline is so clear cut. They want to try to push this until after the midterms and the hope that they'll take the Senate and they'll steal back a Supreme Court seat they thought was stolen from them by McConnell because he would not put Merrick Garland up for a vote.

And you have fake news, false reporting out there about how they you know that they're gonna make her face her accuser in court. That's not true. They've said they they have offered for Professor Ford to have her testify behind closed doors, to have her testify out in the open if she wants to have her uh, just doing a phone interview with members of the Judiciary Committee. Won't do any of it. Won't do any of it until the FBI conducts an investigation, she says via her lawyer.

Oh Okay, So now this accuser who's dredging up this thirty five year old memory, now she comes forward to say, well, the United States Senate has to work on my schedule. I me, the accuser of Kavanaugh, get to tell the Senate how they do their business. This person thinks that she has that she has the right to have a a veto power over the Supreme over the next Supreme Court justice of the United States, Folks, that's what that's what's being given to her by the media, by the

devil her, and she seems to gladly take it. Remember, the entire motivation here for her to come forward was political. She's known about this allegation for entire adult life. She's only coming out now to say it because this guy was going to become a Supreme Court nominee. And she's a progressive and an activist and a Bernie and I'm sure Hillary lover she is a partisan in this process. And that matters because her motivation for coming forward is

in fact partisan. She's not coming forward because oh I just want to I want to raise awareness about sexual assault and I can't I can't stand that this man, you know, had gotten away with it. No, No, she's coming forward because he was going to become a Supreme

Court nominee and she wants to stop him. Now when somebody's approaching it from that perspective, with that thought process, doesn't it seem at least fair to the situation to say, maybe the motivation here is what's really driving the story. Maybe the desire to divert two derail this nomination of Justice Kavanaugh is in fact the entire motivation behind this, and she figured that she was in a position to

tell this story. Maybe she believes that maybe it's so essential, or maybe she thinks that the defense of Roe v. Wade is so critical that her mind has allowed her to think that this really happened. I can't begin to tell you what's going on inside of inside of her mind right now, but I do know that this notion that there's going to be an FBI investigation. Oh, in the media, they're all playing these games to the FBI

investor gids. Every Supreme Court cominity. The FBI does a background check, which is a routine process of gathering information talking to a few people about somebody. The FBI doesn't chase down a random allegation of criminal conduct from thirty years ago as part of the background investigation. And people say they will okay, you know how the FBI would chase that down. They'd say, well, we don't have enough to go on here, so we'll included in the file,

which is what they've already done. The FBI has come out and said, after I was getting all these people last night they were yelling at me on Twitter and all these different libs running around hair on fire about this, the FBI said, this is a political question. The FBI doesn't have jurisdiction to investigate this as a criminal matter, and local law enforcement wouldn't investigate it because it's past

the statute of limitations. And the reason that's there's a statute of limitations is that when you get beyond a certain time period, it's impossible for somebody to fairly defend himself. The reason a statute of limitations for most crimes, not all crimes specifically, exists, folks, is for reasons like this, so that the state or a politically motivated entity can't just come after you with an allegation and ruin your life. You know, Oh, they tell a compelling story, Well, but

this happened twenty years ago. I can't you know, my witnesses have died or you know what, I can't defend myself U against us. Oh well, they told the compelling story. They convince the jury. You're going to prison now, but there's no evidence. Yeah, but people believe that person. That's why we have a statute of limitation. Is actually very important, goes back to English common law. Right, there's a reason why we have this. Uh, I'm just getting started here.

I'm is this who we a little more of this FBI backer Inn investigation thing, and then I'll talk to you about just some more of the politics at play here. But we got to hold the line on this. The GOP must hold the line on Kavanaugh. Meaning shoulders shoulder, shields high. It means they they better be in this fight to win this fight, because this is just a political hit through and through. If I get new information that changes my mind, I'll be the first one to

let you know. But right now, this is dirty, it's underhanded. I do not believe her. We'll be right back, I say, can. It's truly too bad that no one called her or called her lawyer. Of my understanding is she got emails and This is a woman, and I really believe who has been profoundly impacted by this. Now, I can't say everything is truthful. I don't know, but I do know that, um,

you had to contact her lawyers. Well, they've contacted her lawyers, and her lawyers have tried to set all these special terms for whils when she'll show up her house. She'll show up or it's not gonna fly. You don't get a demand and FBI investigation. The FBI has already said there's nothing for us to investigate. So you know this, folks, it's all about delay. It's all about delay. I mean, I was willing to hear this out and I was fine with you know, I agree with what the President

was saying. Okay, she's made this allegation, let's go here and talk. I didn't really believe her then, but I really don't believe her now. I mean, if you will make this allegation and not show up, then there's there's ill intent at work here. I am very very confident of that, and I really do believe that. So you know, keep keep that, my friends, uh in mind here, and just remember something else too, The way that the Democrats are reacting now they act like they've had this Oh

there's this me to record and all this. But rape has always been a terrible crime. It's always been wrong. The Democrats had a credibly accused rapist. You know, they used the term sexual assault very broadly, and they you know, sexual assault can be you know, grabbing a woman's behind for a second, or it could be a terrible you know, first degree felony rape. Right, there's a whole span of crimes one need a broad Rick was on the record

incredibly accused Bill Clinton of rape. Here's what she had to say about how the Democrats reacted to her play fifteen. It makes me go back to nineteen ninety nine when Diane Feinstein, along with every other Democrat refused to read my deposition to the Independent Council. They wouldn't have nothing to do with it. Uh. That just shows you the difference and the double standard that existed back then and still does today. The double standard is the Democrats want

to win. They will do anything to win. They will play as dirty as they have to. And there is no principle here of defending women in general. That's just nonsense. There is nothing that they have, There's nothing that has changed about anything other than right now, they have a Supreme Court seat in the balance that could tip the court away from them getting some of their favorite little policy things through that they can't get through the legislature.

And they are acting like panicked children as a result of it. And for the people that have so little respect for our institutions as we see here to always be lecturing all the rest of us about at our institutions. It's it's it's rather astonishing, isn't it. Now They always say, oh, Donald Trump, look what he's done. He's he's eroding our

institutions of government. Meanwhile, they have turned the Supreme Court nomination process into a complete circus, and they've done it with somebody as qualified and mainstream and worthy as anyone you could ever possibly find. The Democrats have no respect for due process and no respect for government process. They just think that whatever they have to do to staff to stop Kavanaugh is inherently justified. And that's why they're

acting in this way, and they should be ashamed. But I promise you they won't be more on this coming up, and also talking about the declassifications that are on the way. Why should we participate in a victimization of someone who has encouraged to come forward, and she is under absolutely no of like nation to participate in a smearing. Guess who's perpetuating all of these kinds of actions. It's some men in this country. And I just want to say, to the men of this country, just shut up and

step up. So that was a U. S. Senator, folks telling the men of this country to shut up. Is is feminism a form of hysteria on the left? It seems like it is. You know, is is left wing

feminism a form of hysteria? I just want to know, because a lot of people that are that are holding themselves up as prominent voices of a kind of you know, hashtag me too feminism right now are willing to completely dispense with due process, willing to say things that are unjust, willing to destroy a man without giving him any opportunity to not not face his accuser of and just have

somebody test the credibility of the allegations. He is supposed he is supposed to suffer consequences without having any recourse whatsoever. That's what the Democrats want for Kavanaugh. That's what they say is justice. This is why you really don't want these people in charge. By the way, Mazie heron No sen Rono went went further play seven. She has come forward with information that ought to be investigated by the FBI, and when Dr testified, I think she expected a modicum

of a fair kind of a situation. You know, I think he's appalling and I am totally disappointed that all these people who have can come forward to say, oh, we should hear from her, and now that she's expecting a monicum of fairness, so she's not re victimized or now saying wo, if she doesn't want to testify, we should just go ahead. That is additional callousness from my colleagues that I am totally appalled by. I think herono is is she certainly sounds like an idiot. I don't

know if she is an idiot. I don't know enough about her. But everything she just said there was idiocy, very very dumb um and not true. Maybe that's even more important lies where all those fact checkers, where's all the truth facts? First? Not apples but bananas, Not bananas but apples? Over at CNN, where are they right now?

A modicum of fairness? They have offered the Senate Committee Judiciary Committee has offered to have Professor Ford testify in open hearings, in a closed hearing behind closed doors, or even Justice staffers, or just to be on the phone with people on the on the committee to ask her questions about this, and she won't do a no. She she thinks that she gets to dictate the schedule of the Senate and it just so happens. Oh my gosh, it's all a coincidence. How dumb do they think we are?

These people are pathetic. The Democrats right now they are trying to stall this thing, to stop this cabinet nomination, are pathetic. It's so transparent, it's so obvious what they are doing. It's so clear how they're playing this game. It really is. Pardon me, my voice is still a little shot because I've had a cold last few days, but it is so clear to me, it's clear to all of us. And that's why they keep saying things that are so disprovable, so obviously either irrelevant or dumb,

or because they're scrambling, folks, they're scrambling. They talked about this this polygraph notion, like that's supposed to prove something play eight. She has taken a polygraph. She's a credible person. These are serious allegations. I think it's amazing that she passed that polygraph. In fact, I would love it if maybe Judge Kavanaugh wants to get on the We call it being in on the box. We are immediately questioning her credibility despite the fact that she has passed the

polygraph test. We're questioning her credibility because she cannot remember where this assault that is seered into her brain that she says she remembers exactly who did it, how it happened, where his hands went, all of it, but not where it happened, where his hands went, yes, where they were physically located at the time. No, are we allowed to ask were she black out drunk at the time, because that would explain why she wouldn't remember where she was.

But it also means that how would you know who it was? But we we we were not allowed. Chris Lee's over at CNN and really kind of gave away the game here. He said, you know, it's it's dangerous ground. He's some CNN hack. It's dangerous ground to try to ask any questions here. For for Republicans, Okay, So now the truth is the truth is is dangerous ground that that's interesting and by the way, that's what we're that

is how the other side used this polygraph. Polygraph is useless if somebody believes what they're saying is true, that's just a fact. Do I think that Professor Ford maybe really does believe in our heart of hearts that that Judge Kavanaugh did this to her? Sure? Do I think that he did it to or No? I think she believes it. I think she maybe, you know, I have some problems. I think she might have some so mission. But look, we we know that she's had to seek

counseling and therapy, which I do not put down. By the way, anybody needs counsel of therapy should go do it. But she may have some mental health concerns that she has to work through. You know that that we're not We don't know anything about anything because she won't show up and talk about it. And the whole thing is all just so obviously orchestrated, and they're trying so hard to make it sound like it's not. Yeah, I mean, do I think judge Judge Kavanaugh did this? No, I

do not. I do not believe his accuser is correct. Could she be a little either, could she misremember or maybe even be delusional. Yeah, that's possible to I don't know, but I don't believe her. So that's where I stand on this one. Folks. We've got more. I want to play for you a piece of video that we just found. It shows Brett Kavanaugh back in getting back to what Joe Jackson was saying a few moments ago about what happened at Georgetown Prep, what happened during the high school

days of Brett Cavanaugh. And here's Brett Cavanaugh talking about this video that's been unearthed by our team just the last few minutes. Unfortunately, we had it. We had a good saying that we've we've held firm to the to this day, as the Dean was reminding me before before the talk, which is what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep. That's been a good thing for all

of us. I under obviously, susan not a conclusive you know, a piece of video that says you know that he did anything, but it is it does speak to uh this notion that perhaps you know there are there are portions of his childhood that he would rather not come to light. I suppose. So is CNN Jim Acosta a

moron or just humorless or maybe both. That's how desperate they are over at CNN to playcate their audience of brainwashed liberal an income poops, They're gonna play a clip of Kavanaugh giving a speech at a school where he's trying to be funny. It was a joke. He's playing off of the Vegas slogan, what happens in Vegas days in Vegas. But but cav but but there you had Acosta acting like Cavanaugh, uh is repressing memories, you know, maybe the kind of memories of the allegation that just

came out this past week. You know, you get a Costa doing this armchair psychiatrist garbage, and it's just crazy, folks. It is just crazy that that Acosta would do this, and yea, yeah, here we are. By the way, it wasn't even in the full context. So you heard him played out there what happens in Georgetown Preps days at Georgetown prepp Here is what the actual full context of that Kavanaugh speech was playten By coincidence, three classmates of

mine at George Town on Prep. We're graduates of this law school in and are really really good friends of mine. Might been well done or Ago and film Merkel and they were good friends of mine, uh then and are still good friends of mine as we can as recently as this weekend when we're all on email together. But fortunately we had it. We had a good saying that

we've we've held firm to the to this day. As the dean was reminding me before before the talk, which is what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep. That's been a good thing for all of us. I've been so he's talking to Yale Law School. And as you know, whenever you give one of these speeches, and I sometimes have to go to different places in the country and give speeches. But if you're listening this you want send me an email and people are like, wow,

we can really get you. Come out and give a speech. Yeah, sure, we'll talk about it. Send me a message on Facebook. It's that easy. People are like, hey, come speak to my thing. I'm like, well, let's talk. You know, we'll discuss um. But Cabinal was giving a speech at Yale Law School. You like that shameless plug by the way.

I love doing like because then I got to actually meet the team in person, um the capitals giving a speech at Yell Law School and he's trying to be funny and he's talking about old friends and he's making a little joke here, and that then gets aired on CNN like it's almost a confession or something like, Oh my gosh, did you see what Kavanall said. I mean, it certainly opens up the possibility of a depraved mind here. I mean, I think we need to take this very seriously.

And I'm just sitting I'm like, I mean, they're just such CNN, such a bunch of buffoons on this whole issue. But they're not, you know, but foods can be well intentioned. The problem with CNN is there's no good faith over there. They they are the cable news hashtag resistance channel. They're not even really the channel for the Democratic Party and progressive left that's really MSNBC. CNN exists to take down Trump, now,

That's what it exists to do. And because of that, because of that mindset and that reality, they will say things like what a Costa just did there where they look like a bunch of look like idiots. They really do look like they're are incompetent. But it's not incompetence. It's malice. It's worse than incompetence. And that's coming coming out in many ways with the whole Kavanaugh thing. And I got ato debate last night with a friend of mine.

Actually we're talking about whether they whether the Democrats, whether they're uniquely vicious when it comes to Trump or not. And I was saying, well, the viciousness that they've shown towards Kavanaugh, well shows either they'll do anything to destroy anybody that's important in terms of their war on you know, liberal war on you know, individual rights, on the Constitution, everything else. They'll do whatever they have to do. I mean,

they'll play as dirty as they have to play. So it's not that their tactics against Trump or any dirty or just that Trump gets them more aggravated because he gives them more to work with it a lot of ways, but they still can't seem to beat him. So I think Trump elevates their frustration. But the same sinister tactics that they will use against Trump, they'll use against Cavanaugh,

these against other people too. Some really Democrats are if not equal opportunity haters certainly willing to fight as dirty. They're willing to throw low blows against anybody. And that's what Cavanaugh is a reminder of it. That's why you've had I think a lot of conservatives who are never Trumpers finally having a moment here of of comedy and and you know, togetherness on this issue because they realize a whole lot of second, maybe the left really is crazy.

You know, I think they have some of them, some of the never Trumpers have forgotten that maybe the maybe the left really is the primary ideological foe. And we should come together with our Trump supporting colleagues here and and friends and neighbors and stand for a conservative on the Supreme Court like Cavanaugh. Folks, I'm just gonna say this now too. I don't even know how great Cavanaugh is gonna be on the bench. He does line up a lot with John Roberts, who, as you know, great pedigree.

But he's the one who kept Obamacare alive, and basically because he didn't want the Supreme Court to save the American people from their political decisions. That was that was really the reasoning. I mean, they completely contorted logic and language in order to keep Obamacare alives. I don't even think Kavanaugh is gonna be so true liberals all the time. I don't think he's even worth this level of freak out from them, but you know they're freaking out about it.

By the way, a Costa not only does he have no sense of humor um, but he is willing to put the You know, he's a guy who has really made his name by just being so anti Trump, and you know he's he's a pundit without the brains to actually come up with his own material, right, So he just goes out there and he's he's a reporter who's trying to make score points against administration, but he's not willing to really engage an open argument. I mean, the

Costa never goes out to debate anybody. You've noticed that. He just wants to be a reporter who gets to say whatever he wants. He won't actually engage with the other side, but he's in. He went out and interviewed a Ford professor Ford uh friend and order named Samantha Gary, and somehow thought that this was relevant to the discussion

around Capita. Not that Kavanaugh did anything wrong, but that there are other people that maybe acted in a way that was inappropriate towards you know, their female peers played two. It's not the first time I've heard anything like that in terms of the community of women that I know, and not regarding him, but those sorts of things went

a lot. You know. One of the things that's been surprising to me as I've gotten involved in this in the last couple of days is how many women of my class have come forward to me in this the last few days and said I had similar experiences in high school and this hits me very deeply. And but with other boys in our community, and and we all feel that if we were in her shoes, we'd want to be taken seriously as well. She's being taken seriously. She's the one that's un serious in that you won't

show up. Okay, I'm sorry. I will not stand for this. No one is is negating her because she's a woman. This isn't sexism. This is you can't destroy a man with a stealth letter. Basically, not you know, based on something happened thirty years ago. Not show up, not after stand up for what you said, and that that's just

not gonna fly. But notice how what They've really done here is try to stack the deck against Kavanaugh by having somebody who is from his you know, from his area, maybe doing growing up to say effectively, there was like a rape culture going on in you know, in this high school. They said that about campuses too. By the way, it's a lie about contemporary college campus. There's not a rape culture. That is a false. That is a lie.

But okay, we're there, guys. Were there young men, you know, sixteen seventeen eighteen who transgressed against women in this period of time in the in the early eighties, in the d C area, in elite private schools. Yeah, I'm sure that has nothing to do with Brett Kapita. That's like saying, you know, Buck grew up in New York in the nineteen nineties and there was a lot of crime in which there was a lot of crime, a lot of

violent crime in New York. And in fact, a lot of my peers, a lot of people I knew, would carry knives sell drugs. It sounds crazy, I know, but it's true, a lot of selling and drugs. So if somebody ever accused me of selling drugs, would it be relevant that there were other people in New York City that that I knew of who sold drugs. No, it is not relevant because I never sold drugs ever, ever,

ever a day in my life. Right. But if somebody accused me of doing that and said, oh, but but you know you knew of people in New York City that's sold drugs, that is a non sequitur. That doesn't mean anything. And that's what they're doing here. It's just a smear tactic, folks. It's just it's grotesque. But they're desperate and with that desperation comes viciousness and the pathetic, the pathetic chord in an effort to takedown Kavanaugh, I

want to do the switch gears. I know we've talked a lot about Kavanaugh um this week, and certainly, Sarah, I do want to talk to you more about a few things coming up. A project Very Toss has some deep state audio we're gonna play for you. We also have some more specifics on my interview with the president.

Can read you from some of the transcript. We're able to print the transcript today, and I'll give you a little more of insight, a little bit of a behind the scenes into the my forty five minutes with the President United States. Just happened yesterday. We broke huge news with the UH Jeff Sessions. I felt kind of bad for Jeff Sessions, but you know, it's news, and we gotta print the we gotta print the interview. And this

the President saying it, not me um talking about that. Also, some major U s Citi is more than half close to half in a bunch cases, more than half in l A don't speak English at home. What does that mean for our culture? Uh? These are all discussions we've got coming up. The FBI says home title half is one of the fastest growing crimes out there, So brace yourselves because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for if identity thieves managed

to take control of your home's title. Folks, if you haven't heard about home title theft, it is a growing crime. It's a real problem out there, and the downside of this can be huge. Think of all the money, all the time you've spent trying to pay down your mortgage. Right, you've got equity in your home. Well, if the bad guys are able to replace you with an alias online, it's not hard to do. I've seen it done. They can use your home's title to take out loans and

then you get stuck with the payments. They just get the cash from alone. Don't let this happen to you. For just pennies a day, Home title Lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home registered now for a free analysis and it's a hundred dollar value, folks, and see if your home's title is safe. Go to home title lock dot com. Again, that's home title lock dot com. I think the President has probably felt this has gone are enough as far as waiting for the FBI the

Justice Department to release the fiser applications. I've read the applications. I've gone down to the Justice Department, and I think objective people looking at this, whether they support President Trump or not, will see that the fiser warrant defiser application was not an honest one, not anywhere near enough. Was

a closed to the court. The court. Really I was treated badly, But the result of that is the abuse of power by the Justice Department against a presidential campaign, unprecedented in American is welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show, folks. I I do think we are heading for a showdown. Over declassification here, and this this is going to get very interesting. You have people who seem to believe that they are above that they can work for the president

but be above presidential directive. They think that they can work for the President of the United States but not actually have to be subject act two lawful orders that he that he gives within his constitutional authority. And you have you know, the d O j FBI in the Office of Director of National Intelligence O D and I all at least having some murmurs, uh that they're gonna try to just give him documents that are still redacted,

that are still over redacted. And people are saying that this is going to open up some kind of a war between the president and the officials that won't okay this information. We had we the former CIA director on air Brennan saying, I know we talked about this yesterday on the show, but saying that people have a duty to ignore the president's order here. I mean, You've got two big problems that are coming to the forefront as

a result of all this. One is this means that there are people who really do believe that the chain of command does not apply to them. I mean, the hashtag resistance. These people are our saboteurs within the government. They have this notion that just because they've seen enough you know, propaganda online about Russia or or the you know, the or some of them were the ones that made the propaganda about Russia, but they think that the president

doesn't really get to exercise his full authority. This reminds me of when I was interviewing Lissa Milano and she said the president shouldn't be able to appoint a Supreme Court nominee while he's under investigation. And I said, well, other presidents under investigation have done that, and that would be like saying the presidents under investigation. So he's no longer the president. He has this authority in the Constitution,

in our founding document case closed. And he has declassification authority too because he is the chief of the executive branch. How can somebody else within the executive branch chain of command say that, no, no, you can't release this. This I say, this is not classified. That at the end of the day, if the prey and it says this is the information belongs to the executive branch. If a

president says this isn't classified, it's not classified. In fact, friends of mine that have worked in the different public and press, you know, the press shops of the various agencies, will tell you that they have to deal with something called real time declassification, which is a kind of tongue in cheek way of saying, well, the President just talked

about it, so it's not classified anymore. That happens. Now that's not an official process, but it is a recognition of the fact that the presidents at the top of the command chain here, right, So who are these other people who are gonna step up and say, oh, no,

you can't do that. It's just it shows such a a lack of understanding of what the role of the president is and also the people that work within the executive branch, and and it just shows you that they, uh, they come with this notion that they shouldn't be held accountable. They really seem to believe that they are able two just decide they're going to defy a presidential directive. Now,

I don't know, they would have to get fired. You know that that's where this would all head if they refused to do with the president have to start firing people just like Sally Yates. Look it's not unthinkable Sally Yates refused to do her job. She just refused to do it. Okay, So, given that Sally Yates didn't want to do her job, I wouldn't be surprised if there's some folks that FBI d o jare some others who

are also unwilling to do their job. But so that this one problem is just the lack of respect for chain of command for the office of the presidency and these people thinking from what we've seen so far, we don't know where they're gonna go. Um, but these people seem to think that they're deep state. I know the President doesn't like that phrase. We'll talk more about that.

Uh there, bureaucratic supremacy is something that should be celebrated, and that they are you know, they're more they're more fit to determine what gets shared with the public and the presidents. Okay, So that's one big problem. The other problem is what the heck is with these people that don't want us to get this information. There's so much and oh my gosh, in Congress, they're trying so hard. Oh this is so reckless, this is terrible. Why would

the president ever do this? Uh? You know, they're saying that the big story you here now is that they're they're claiming that this means that we will no longer be in a position to get intelligence shared with us from different places, or there'll be people that won't share. Here's what I say to that, folks, there is a presidency at stake over the outcome of all of this,

all right. They don't get to tell us that Russia undermined our institutions, that this is the most important and critical threat to to our democracy, which I always love to say, uh, you know, in the last fifty years or whatever time frame they want to give you. They don't get to hype up this as the most important story in the country really therefore in the world for eighteen months and then and of course Donald Trump impossible collusion,

the Rustan investigation is that's all tied together. They don't get to do that and then turn around and say, well, you know, we don't really we don't really need to know stuff. We don't really need to be um getting the truth on this stuff. We'd rather just have the investigation grind on. You know, there's there there, there's there's a recurring theme here whether it's the Kavanaugh hearings, or the declassification of information relating to Trump in Russia and

how the Russia investigation got started. What we're Page and Struck and others up to at the d o J. And the recurrent theme is that the left Democrats are very good at abusing process for political ends because the leftist mind is comfortable with bureaucracy, because the whole notion

of a bureaucraus. She actually goes back and you can look at the origins of American progressivism and some of the borrowed ideas that American progressivism has from uh Bismarck and some of the that German era state or that that that time period of Germany. Even a Bismarck, we wanted, uh, you know, veterans to have welfare payments and or you know, veterans to have pension payments, I should say, in national healthcare and all this stuff. You know, there there's cross

over these ideas. The left believes in an elevated bureaucracy of people that are highly intelligent, highly adept that will administer the wonderful government. Because I love the government to all the rest of us. This is a very leftist idea very American an American progressivism picked up on this in the early twentieth century and ran with it. As

we know, bureaucracy is really the enemy of freedom. Now, I'm not saying that you can have no bureaucracy just like you can have no you can have no government either. But bureaucrats are a constant concern for those of us who privilege and and uh cherish liberty, and the leftists because their status, always have a greater preference for bureaucracy, but also have a greater comfort with it and are willing to use it to try to achieve political ends. They know that in the big mass and the flabby

folds of bureaucracy, any debate can get lost. You know. They know that they can slow it down, they can change the news cycle by relying on on bureaucratic wrangling. And and that's so that that is absolutely a a concern here, um. And they just don't want us to get to the truth. They're saying that, you know, we we can't release this information because it's going to result

in less information sharing for us. But this is about a presidency, folks, What do we really care more about the possible the the theoretical damage to intelligence sharing, the theoretical damage to uh, you know, our sources and methods, which I believe will even be redacted in this request that Trump has. They just want to keep stuff out of there that they know, uh, if it comes out, it's going to make their whole storyline look really bad.

And that's why you get journalists and democrats, isn't an interesting Journalists and Democrats are the ones who are opposed to the release of this information. You know, I remember that some of the same journalists that were, you know, cheering the wiki leaks releases of stuff from the Iraq war are very opposed to this over, very very opposed to this information getting out there. It's just it's pure politics, folks.

I mean, this is what we have. Ah. The media has become a reflection of the tribalism of American politics, but the media is kind of a hyper concentrated version of it. And what you see is is people doing everything that they can to root for a team, to push for a team, and Team Trump Russia collusion is something that of the media is a part of and they know that if all of a sudden we have to come to a reckoning over uh, the f behind

the d o J working with the media. So you have really the unholy alliance here of the bureaucracy with the uh, you know, the media. Um. I was want to you know, fourth Estate, fifth column. I always want to say the fourth Estate, and it's the fifth column, but the fourth State is a fifth column. But that alliance is what got this whole Russia collusion thing going. And and this was really in a sense there this

was their failsafe. I mean, the progressives failsafe was, well, even if we can't win an election, we can have the media and the permanent bureaucracy work together to undo the results of an election. And I don't believe that any any Republican other than Trump would be able to as much as sometimes he gives them more to work with. You know, the Lester whole interview was a disaster, and there's been things, but I don't think anybody other than Trump will be able to fight through this. I think

that they would just wear them down. Um they you know, anybody from the kind of Bush approach to gop ism would be too concerned with the the loss of of public esteem, would be would be too concerned with how they just you know, are getting hammered in the press all the time. Um. Trump has said that the declassified information that's gonna come out with this Russia probe exposes bad things. It's gonna expose bad things, and there's more

to come beyond that. And and you know, we we've extended this discussion out such a long time, so many months we've been talking about the Russia collusion thing. I think people should just be be forced to, uh, to remember, especially on the other side, that we've gone so far from what they promised we'd find and are actually all the way in the other direction. They said we find that Trump was a trader, and what we found is that Trump is a patriot, and there were traders. They

just all happen to be Democrats. Whether you're a startup company or a huge, fortunate, one hundred massive corporation, you need to make sure that the people that you're hiring are who they say they are, right. The people you're bringing in have no criminal background, no problems there whatsoever. Aren't people that have been involved in lots of nasty lawsuits? Right.

You want vetting and background screening done right, and you want it done by a company you can trust and that you can get in on the phone any time you need to. Okay, that's Global Verification Network. This is a veteran owned and operated company. I know and trust

the CEO. These are people that when you reach out and you've got a question about anything that's coming up in the background check process, they will make sure they walk you through it and they'll also get clear and efficient answers for each in every case, whether you're a huge company or small, you want Global Verification Network for your background investigation needs, go to my g VN dot com and tell them Buck Sex Incent you my GVN

dot com. Some pretty stunning statistics today, folks. This courtesy of the Washington Examiner. Nearly half in the top five U. S. Cities don't speak English at home. Uh Instead they speak their native language. This is according to Census Bureau data that looks at the impact of immigration policy over the last decade. Sixty seven million people in this country do not speak English at home. That is nearly double in twenty seven years as a share of the population twenty

one point eight percent. This according to the Center for Immigration Studies, twenty one point eight percent of US residents speak a foreign language at home, which is about double what it was in America's five largest cities. Forty eight percent of residents now speak a language other than English. New York, It's in Houston, Los Angeles, It's Chicago, it's Phoenix.

It's thirty eight percent. Uh. You know this is the findings come out, as Washingtons Ever says here as more and more reports emerge about people getting in debates over speaking English. Right people want to be able to speak English, or others say that they shouldn't have speaking We should have a national language, folks. And this should not be

a controversial thing to say at all. Those who like to hearken back to, you know, when when they had when they think it's not actually true, but when they think that we had this wide open door immigration policy, uh, should understand that, Yeah, you didn't have to have perfect English when you came here, but there was gonna be no choice. If you were going to be successful, You're going to have to learn English. You're gonna have to speak English. And language is right after rule of law

and and an understanding of the law. Languages is a foundational element of culture. So and language language affects the way we think, it affects the way we act. I mean, language is essential and that we have the cultural connections we do. I mean, why is it that, as an American, if you get on a plane and you go to Australia, it'll feel very, you know, very much like America to you.

But if you get on a plane and you were to go to you know, uh say Honduras, or if you were to go to France, you know, you'd say, okay, well there's some stuff that reminds me of my culture, but it's very different, right. I mean, language is going to be among the very, uh the most noticeable, most important differences between our culture and other cultures. And it's

really what binds us together as a people. Um. And while people will look at this, a lot of liberals and leftists will look at this, these statistics and they'll say, well, it's not bad, and you know, diversity is a mirror go strength, and we're a melting pot and all this stuff. The truth is it's gonna be harder and harder for us to have a shared political culture and a and a shared understanding of what this country is if we

can't even share a language to speak about this country. Now, I understand, speaking it at home doesn't mean that people can't speak the language at all. It doesn't mean that I'm not This is not telling us, uh, that people don't speak English at all. It's it's saying that at home they choose a different language. But that also can have you know that that there's some upside of that. Being bilingual would certainly have its advantages or trilingual or whatever.

Some people speak in eight languages, but you need to have at least complete English proficiency. And if you look at the explosion of e s L English as a second language, training and a lot of schools, uh, the fact that matters that you have people who are not proficient in English and large numbers who are foreign born and in this country, uh, and you have a lot of people who well a lot of native born Americans are gonna need some help with their their language skills

as well. But this, this is not encouraging for the future of our cultural unity. I And it also just shows you what a vast increase in the foreign born population there is, right. And people born in this country of American parents speak English. I mean, if your parents are from here and they're born here, and you're born here, you grow up overwhelmingly speaking English. Not saying everybody, but

overwhelmingly that's going to be the case. So on the there there's the cultural disconnect that this raises, the cultural disconnect that I think is concerning. And then beyond that, you have the issue of what is our immigration policy really looking like? I mean, how many people have we brought into the country from abroad? And this this gives you a sense of it. I mean, when we have basically half of the biggest US cities, more than half in Los Angeles, people not speaking English at home, we

are looking culturally fractured. And we also get a sense of the scale of immigration, including a legal immigration. We're talking about Los Angeles, You've got a lot of illegal immigration. Uh, and it's pretty staggering. The numbers are incredibly high. So you know this, this I think should should get some attention. And you know, the the real long term challenge for the real long term challenges as I see it, for this country. Yeah, eventually China might be a military and

economic threat. Right now it's a challenger, it's not really much of a threat um But the real long term challenges are our debt are the fight against stat ism and socialism and cultural unity, American culture being something that we are able to sustain and replicate because this is you know, not to get too philosophical here, folks, but you know there's a country is an idea, and when it ceases to be a shared idea, bad things happen.

For decades, credit cards have been telling us buy it now and pay for it later with interest, despite your best intentions, that interest can get out of control fast. With lending Club, you can consolidate your debt or payoff credit cards with one fixed monthly payment. Since two thousand and seven, lending Club has helped millions of people regain control of their finances with affordable, fixed rate personal loans. No trips to a bank, no high interest credit cards.

Just go to lending club dot com, tell them about yourself and how much you want to borrow, pick the terms that are right for you, and if you're approved, your loan is automatically deposited into your bank account in as little as a few days. Lending Club is the number one peer to peer lending platform with over thirty five billion loans issued. Go to lending club dot com slash buck check your rate in minutes and borrow up

to forty thou dollars. That's lending club dot com slash buck lending club dot com slash buck all loans made by web bank member f d i C Equal Housing Lender. What I worked everything everything there. You have a State Department employee filmed as part of an undercover investigation by Project Very Toss of the Resistance inside of government, folks. It's it is a very real thing. Um. The State Department is a is a hotbed of this. I've known

this all along. I have friends here in d C that I've spoken to who say that the stories that you've may be read or that you've heard me talk about here on the show, of people in the State Department who cry at their desks because they're so upset that Hillary lost the election, who wait in their cars in fear and won't go into it, won't go into the office because they're so worried about what it means to work in foreign policy in Trump's America. Those people

are real. That is happening. And this is where I think, you know, we've been talking a lot about about d O j FBI, but the problem of anti trumpers who will use their offices in some way or another to try and either blunt or reverse administration policy, and who will work against the president in whatever way they can, whether it's leaking to the press, telling you know, unflattering stories. Uh, that is a federal government wide problem. That's except for

the military. Military loves Trump, no surprise, But the rest of the federal government is Look, it's it's full of of you know, bureaucrats who went to liberal arts colleges and are bitter that they're not making more money and no one listens to them. I mean that that's you get a lot of that really talking about the State Department Calmerce some of these other places. Uh, State de Farmer's bad. But it's not just there. I mean we got also a we got a whole bunch of clips

and this is all from Project Very Toss. You know, James o'keep's outfit. Uh, you've got a a D O J employee played twenty six. So since a lot of your coworkers are like an employers, more leftists, are they trying to do anything? Um? Yeah, I mean I want to describe unless regulars. Yeah, A lot of lawyers which is like what is the most radical Okay, what are they doing anything to like fight against Trump? Um? Yeah, I mean a lot of us talking about it. So

most of them are like vaguely politically involved. They might support candidates into fundraisers and some of the canvas okay um. And then there's a lot of talk at work about how we can resist human side, I wouldst Shaman side. So by the way, that that that is again from resistance from the inside. You heard that right, people are resisting from the inside. And uh they're calling this the

Deep State series project, very tous Deep State series. And you had Democrats that that one guy we started off with at the State Department says he organizes for the Democratic Socialists of America during work. Uh. So that that's an interesting one, isn't it. You know, on on work time he's doing this stuff. But this Deep State series

was was I opening. I think for a lot of folks who believe that there is a that it's exaggerated that there are all these people that hate Trump in the government, that there's got to be something that's more. You know that there's gonna be this this greater nuance or I don't know, they just don't want to believe it. Oh, we got an A J. Jess person too. Let's throw let's throw that that agency in the mix to play. Do you have any friends that are to work there?

Screw him over? They do it kind of like Nixon type of thing, is like is there rest is just your friend or is it like a bunch of people people? And uh are you say they were giving you? They were giving you like they were given you early information to help. So they were leaking information to you to help on be able to help on the outside, to help on the outside, and then you were able to

howard that to lawyers yeah, y or reporters, Yeah. Leaking information trying to get stories out there to to hurt the administration. That that's what they're doing. You know, folks, if somebody really has a problem with a particular administration with the president, I'll tell you this right now. When I was at CIA and what I was going to be doing as a as a CIA analyst was writing

very focused and complicated analytic products for Barack Obama. I did my very best, and I was really working Afghanistan for the time that I was in the agency. When Obama was in office, I did my very best on all the work that I did. It never would have even occurred to me that on an issue as serious as national security, defending the nation and intelligence for the commander in chief, that I would let politics play even

the slightest bit of a role in my thinking. That all set, I did have a level of discomfort with continue to work for administration. That was I thought at odds with American national security interests around the world. And you know what I did. I left. I left. I didn't try to play any games and leak stuff to the press. I didn't, you know, slow roll my day to day. I didn't try to half acid or you know, act like it doesn't really matter anything like that. I decided, Okay,

I've had enough. I'm gonna go do something else now because I don't want the you know, the pinnacle of my time at the agency under the Bush administration was when I actually got in the Oval office and got to talk to the President about some very important, very high level stuff. I mean, when you're an analyst getting into the getting in to see the president and getting

twenty minutes or so with him. Maybe it's more like fifteen felt like a year, but that was you know, you were at the very pinnacle of what what was possible really in the in the analytic side of the profession um. And and I just didn't see myself getting to show up and talk to Obama after he had read whatever he read on his iPad and have him care about what I said. And I just knew that we wouldn't have an aligned vision for U S. National security on some things. On counter terrorism, I gotta say

Obama was, you know, he was very drone happy. I mean, he was running around a lot of drone stuff, and obviously the whole Big Laden raid, which was one of the biggest I think one of the biggest breaks he got in his whole presidency. Uh So, on those things we could agree, but on a lot of other areas you didn't agree. And what I'm just trying to say is I was either going to stay and do the job or go and not do the job. You know, you either stay and man the post or you resign.

You don't get to stay in the post and then

be a subversive. I think that's dishonorable. I think that should be uh, that should face really strident criticism, and it's low and it's nasty, and it goes to show you that there is a lack, a really systemic lack of respect for the office of the presidency from these individuals that are coming out now and or not coming out, that are being outed by Project very toss and and all the things that, um, you know that they've they've been talking about here with resisting from the inside, you know,

the deep states. I would telling you, I gotta say that, you know, the president doesn't like the deep state as a term, alright, that came up in her interview yesterday. Which he's smart, he he is. Even people I know who don't like this president will admit that he is a branding genius. That his ability to market ideas to market people. Um. And look you see this in media too.

All it takes is the president. All it takes is the President to say that somebody is a good guy and doing good work, you know, publicly, and all of a sudden their book is a bestseller. There. You know, he has a huge bully pulpit now, um, but he also knows when he knows how to talk about somebody or how to push somebody's work out there so that

it's going to get a lot of attention. Um, I think that this president understands that saying deep state would be open, It would open him up to a lot of the you know, oh, he's just like Alex Jones or something Baris theorism, and that's so. So I get it. That all said, analytically, I disagree with the president on the notion that there that this doesn't qualify as a or rather shouldn't. I disagree with them. I would go

to a different direction. He's not saying it because of the optics, and I get that, and I respect that. I'm saying it though, because I think it's I think that if you're looking at this on just a factual basis, when you have people that are inside a government that are trying to frustrate core aims and goals of that government, if you don't call it a deep state, I don't. I don't know exactly what you're gonna call it, but you're definitely gonna find yourself very frustrated with what the

outcome is. And the deep state, so far, I think is is unable fortunately to get the kind of traction against the President that they've tried. The closest thing they've gotten is the Russia Inclusion investigation. I think that's all gonna get that's gonna come to an end relatively soon. I mean, I can't say very soon, but you know, they're they're going to run out of team with eventually, they're not going to be able to keep this up and continue. So we'll see, my friends. I mean, I

I gotta give credit. I gotta give credit to O'Keefe for doing this kind of work. It's one thing that I don't know i'd be able to do. I don't think I could do the Hey, I'm just like a guy hanging out talking to you about some things, and like maybe we've got a video camera on me somewhere, but you know, the hidden camera stuff. I'm not. I'm not built for that. And people say, oh, Buck, you

were a spy, Yeah I was. I was really a policy guy, policy guy who got out as closely could to the front lines and tried to help and did some bad guy finding, that's what I'll call it. I was good at that too. I was a good bird dog for the the door kickers, you know, for the actual snake eaters. I was, and I got along very well with all them too. We we always had a good rapport. Something used to call me junior because they assumed that I was a junior. I'm not. My older

brother is a junior. I'm not actually a junior, but they referred to me as junior um also because I was very young. And the more elite guys tend to be, at least in my experience, the more elite units, the tier one units, you know, Delta and Special Forces, uh, you know, you name it, Seal Team six, they they

tended to be in their you know, in their thirties. Uh. In my experience, they tend to be a little a little bit older because they got to spend some time in the units before they can actually get through selection and all the other stuff. So, you know, there's that.

I just I want to keep focusing in when we can on on the deep state and trying to bring this into a place where there's a really high public awareness of just how left wing a lot of the federal bureaucracy has become, and just what a problem this is for the Trump administration and what it means going forward for because there will be another by the way,

there's gonna be another big league, folks. I can assure were you of that there will be a bombshell leak from some federal agency about something at some point to try to take Trump Trump down, probably with regardless of that elections, but it's it's gonna happen. You will see you will see leaking from government employees, mark my words. You'll see leaking going into meant to take down Trump. That will make your head spin. Um. And we have not gotten to the bottom of the leaks that have

already happened, things like the General Flinn phone call. There's been a very I think lackluster effort from the authorities that are in place, and I can't explain why. I mean, it's another thing that probably Trump would would criticize Jeff Sessions for, you know, it's tough to criticize the present for though the economy. Economy is doing very well, as we are well aware. And I had somebody last night

who would know things. Maybe it was a U. S. Senator that I just happened to be having a drink with. Uh tell me that he thinks GDP could be as highs five percent if we didn't have these headwinds from the trade war. But what a bunch of college kids say when you asked about the economy. Might surprise you. We got a little quick trip through that courtesy campus

reform coming up. I'm kind of follows the campus reform. Today, we're at Michigan State University talking to students about President Obama's comments saying that President Trump does not deserve credit for how well the economy is doing. What students had to say, Let's find out. President Obama gave a speech this week in Illinois talking about how it's wrong for Trump to take credit for how well the economy is doing because it's still his economy. What are your thoughts

on that comment. Um, he's been out for long enough now that it's not on him anymore. It's more on Donald Trump. So I guess he's a little bit in the wrong. I would probably, unfortunately side with Trump for this one. Um. I think that he has done like a lot for the economy. Um that Obama didn't do such a well good job on but um, yeah, so I guess I'll sign with Trump on that one. But I feel like once the president's done, they hand it off. I feel like all presidents do this. They'll just sort

of take credit for something that's happening. Down the line, I think the underlying fundamentals are likely still largely Obama. But in terms of confidence and changing people's attitudes, I would say that's mostly Trump. I kind of feel like everything is just like like just not the market. The market is going way up. I mean, I just haven't really kept up with that, so I wouldn't really really know too much because of all the things I have issues with, the economy is not really one of them.

It's more like foreign relations and just like public appeal and things like that. So of all, I don't really think that he's probably one of the things. I think he's doing decently well at. He's a businessman. I think that's his his strong suit with his tweets and stuff I find very offensive because I'm a girl, so in a lot of them Oregon stuff stuff. But economically, like I feel like he's really helping us. Looks like a bunch of random college kids at Michigan State. Hat tip

campus reform for that one. Looks like those college kids understand the economy a lot better than most of the mainstream journalists I see on TV or Obama's economy still nor it's Obama who's in charge of the economy, even though he's not in charge of anything. I guess he's in charge of Netflix now part of Netflix. Uh No, it is not the Obama economy. That is an inaccurate

thing for for them to say. And you know, the quickest way to shut down this argument is to say, if the economy were crappy, does anybody think the Democrats would be saying it's not Trump's fault, it's Obama for all the bad spending policy and think No, they would immediately pile on Trump, say that he's a buffoon, he doesn't know anything and uh and and they would use this as a major way to to go after the

president and say that he's inept. And there's all kinds of reasons why you know, you should vote for Democrats because they're gonna give you free everything, lots and lots of free stuff. Who's gonna pay for the free stuff? Like whatever? Like a Kazio Cortez will tell you that, like like whatever, Like where does the twenty trillion that like I need for the healthcare thing? Like I don't even know? Because social justice and stuff. Ah, this is what this is what the other side. This is what

the other side promises you. But this is this is why I have some some hope for the mid terms, because the economy is so strong and Democrats are in really such a weak position in terms of their criticism of where the economy is right now and all of that that I think that we may have a slightly surprising result ahead. I think that there is a there's at least some shot um. But the issue is going

to be our people complacent, our conservatives. Are Republicans going to be complacent because things are so good that they will be you know, immediately or or they'll fall back on that. Well, you know, I don't have to worry about this. I don't have to worry about this because the president, you know, he's got this. No guys, and

we we really do need to show up. And people need to make sure that they are pushing for their Republican candidates because the agenda comes to a screeching halt otherwise, big our three coming up teams stay with me. We have an attorney general. I'm disappointed in the attorney for many reasons, and you understand, we are looking at lots of different things. I have a great cabinet, we have the greatest economy ever, in the history of our country.

President today answering some questions from folks before he jumped on board his his chopper. Get with the chopper. Uh and he did. He didn't fact get to get to the chopper, but he spoke a little bitout Jeff Sessions there, you know yesterday, as as you all know, I was in the I was in the Oval office for quite a while, about forty five minutes. And now I'm able to tell you because we released the transcript. It's been out all day and we had I think three links

up on the Drudge Report today of that interview. I mean, it's just look, we were able to break a lot of news. It was a very timely interview and covered so much territory. And I think it's because the President understood that I wasn't there to do anything other than here with the President United States thinks and what he's gonna do on a whole host of issues. It wasn't playing any games. I'm open about the fact that I

support his administration. I'm I'm a pundit, also known as an honest journalist as opposed to a just journalist who pretends not to have ideas. Uh. So you know, we

were sitting there and had a really good conversation. One cool little note is that the President had I've never seen this before, I heard this mention before, but he had little forty fives on his embroidered on his cuff links or not his cuff links, on his cuff themselves, which I thought was pretty cool, you know, like a boss, because he is the boss of the free world sort of. But on on Sessions, this has been a tough one for me. You guys all know that Jeff Sessions. I

got a soft spot. He's the only cabinet official who's called into this show three or four times. I mean, you know, Jeff Sessions, for whatever reason, you know, he's been he's been a buddy and uh and I've always appreciated that because you know, he listens to the show a little bit and he appreciates what we do here. So I like the Attorney General and he's a good guy. He's a good man. I think a lot of that's gotten lost because he just didn't realize what he was

in for with this whole Russia collusion thing. I really don't think that he was he was prepared for what he's up against. But when I asked him about this,

and this is this is from the transcript. Now, we tape the Trump interview, but because of some of the we audio taped it, but because of some of the agreements that we had before and and it has to do now with with enhanced UH security in the White House in terms of you know, information security, UH what we we agreed to, we would tape it so we could transcribe it exactly, and so I can tell you some of the more important parts of it. But if you want to read the whole thing, it's up on

the Hill dot com right now. But on the Attorney General, I said, Mr President, why haven't you placier attorney general? Given all the things you've said and everything else that's come out of about his actions or inactions. President Trump, I'm so sad over Jeff Sessions because he came to me. He was the first senator that endorsed me, and he wanted to be Attorney General. And I didn't see it, but he came very strongly. He really wanted to be and I let him be. And then he went through

the nominating process and he did very poorly. I mean, he was mixed up and confused, and people that worked for him, you know, a long time in the Senate were not nice to him. But he was giving very confusing answers, answers that should have been easily answered, and that was a rough time for him. And he won by one vote. I believe, yes, he won by just

one vote. Then President Trump went on um then he gets in and probably because of the experience that he had going through the nominating when he asked in the first question about Hillary Clint or something, he said, I recused myself. I recused myself. And now it turned out he didn't have to recuse himself. Actually, the FBI reported shortly there after any reason for him to recuse himself. And it's very sad what happened. In the meantime. I don't have an attorney general, folks, I don't have an

attorney general. That is what the President told us on the record in the Oval Office yesterday. Jeff Session is a good man, and I know he's an honorable man, but I know he's also got pride. And if the President United States really doesn't feel like you're doing the job, I wouldn't be surprised if Jeff Sessions decided that he had had enough sooner than later, and I mean very soon, by the way. At that point I I interjected, I didn't interrupt it, said, are we gonna get a wall? Mr? President?

He said, Okay, let me finish this. We'll see what happens. A lot of people have asked me to do that, and I guess I study history and I just want to leave things alone. But it was very unfair what he did. And my worrist enemies, I mean, you know, are on the other side of me very disappointed. So we'll see how it goes with Jeff. I'm very disappointed in Jeff. And then he said, so we have started the wall. We got one point six billion dollars, we got another one point six we fixed a lot of

existing We've started an eighty mile stretch. The entire Democrat life is uh to try and make sure we don't have a wall, not because we don't need it, but because we do. So, you know, he went into the wall and and he's telling me that, you know, he needs more votes in the Senate. But I just don't think, you know, guys, I I think that we got to hold the president to account on this one. You know, they're not going to do a shotdown. They've already got

a budget deal. They got a budget deal before. They haven't gone to the mat over the wall. And I just feel like this is not a promise that's being kept. I really gotta be honest with you. Look, he's kept a lot of other promises. And I think the President would if if Congress went along, or if if Republicans had the votes, it's a better way of saying it, he would build the wall. I don't think he's been false in saying that. I just think that he is, uh, his hands are so what tied. But he he also

could have pushed a little bit harder. He could have pushed a little bit harder on all this. Um. Here's here's what he said about it. He said, we started the wall. The entire Democrat life is to try and make sure we don't have a wall, not because we don't need it, but because we do. Um, but because that was a promise that I made and they want to try to make sure I don't deliver on that promise. And we have a majority of one in the Senate

because we have the filibuster, which we shouldn't. You can't get ten votes in other words, Buck, we got a majority of one. We got to get to sixty, so ten Democrats are controlling the Senate. We shouldn't have the filibuster rule. The first thing that Chuck Schumer would do if he ever took control of the Senate is get rid of the filibuster rule. And for whatever reason and nobody can explain it, they just won't do it, which means we need to get nine more Republicans. So it's

a very tough thing even though we need it. Yeah, I mean like he's basically saying, if if you guys don't get me to sixty, there's not gonna be a wall. And I gotta say that that's as far as I'm concerned, pretty close to saying there's not gonna be a wall because we're not gonna get the sixty center votes. In fact, if we hold the Senate, I think we'd be in

pretty in pretty good shape to that end. Sitting there talking to the President and the other guys, the whole thing was really it felt a little surreal, and not just because I was in the Oval office. I've been there before, as you know, I've told you about that, as I've run intelligence briefings, which is very very different. That's you sit down and it's a you know, you you're presenting on a specific issue and the answer and

then you answer questions. I mean, being in the Oval Office in the capacity ivan before, it's almost like the president's interviewing you, or at least the President's the one asking the questions. So now the role was was reversed in that regard. I was the one asking the questions. Uh. And it was just the fact that Donald Trump is sitting there behind the resolute desk in the Oval Office. I you know, you folks, you know it's real. You know it's a thing, but when you are experiencing it,

there is a party that goes, is this real? Is this really happening? The Donald Trump? This guy that I mean, I know, I grew up. I grew up knowing Donald Trump from Trump Tatwell. Actually I knew the family, as I've told you a little bit. Ivanka wasn't around the White House yesterday, so I didn't get a chance to see here. Um, but you know, we knew the Trump family a little bit and the Trump buildings. And he was in home alone too for those of you, because

he owned the Plaza hotel. At one point he was at home alone too in the plaza. You know, he's just like he was a celebrity, he was a playboy, he was a uh you know, uh, construction magnate. All this stuff and and the fact that he's the president United States. Now, if if you had written this in a screenplay twenty years ago, people would have said you were like, it was too silly. There's no way, uh and yet way, uh way, that was what happened yesterday.

I was sitting there and think to myself, Um, this guy he really not And to keep in mind, not only is he the president, but he's a president that I think is doing a great job. Right. It's it's one thing to have the it's one thing to be in the role. It's one thing to have the job in any capacity. I mean that alone is pretty remarkable, but this goes well beyond that. It's not just that he has the job. It's that he is executing at a high level in this job. And you know, it's

pretty pretty incredible. But on the holding holding the House and holding the Senate. We got a question out. My colleague John Solomon asked him the following, do you still feel good. Remember this is back to the exact transcript that we've transcribed from the recording we made of this, but we were not allowed to share the audio recording publicly. Do you still feel good about a red wave? Do you think you could pull that off? President Trump? I

think we probably have the greatest economy and history. So they've tried many narratives with me. You know, I took that test when I got my last physical, and the doctor said, that's one of the highest scores we've ever seen. I did that not because I wanted, but I did it. I was always good at testing. But if there's anything great about me, it's stability. And I'm a good manager. I've always been a good manager. But you know, I

have a vision. And I had just beaten seventeen because actually it was eighteen, including Gilmore Um he was governor of Virginia. And I just beaten seventeen people, including the Bush dynasty. Then I beat Hillary Clinton dynasty. You can give me credit for Bernie Sanders and all because I was part of it. But you know, so I beat the Bush dynasty, the Clinton dynasty, seventeen people, and I never left center stage once. You can check I never

left center stage meeting. I had leading Republican primaries from day one, and I had I went through four, fourteen or twelve debates before Hillary. Um. So, by the way, when you start asking me questions, maybe someday and I say, hm, I don't know those answers, I may say, well it's time to hang it up. Okay. But the opposite, and I will say, the narrative, the different narratives they've tried, all different narratives they tried that, they try that he's dictator,

he's a fascist. One of them did uh, one of them did say he's losing it, and the next they went into he's the most I'm just folks, this is what he said. So I know it sounds like I'm this is what he says. I'm reading the president's exact words. To me, he's the most brilliant mind. He's taking over the country. He's a fascist, he's a dictator, and he's gonna make the eight years into life. Okay, I said, wait a minute. Last week, I was incompetent and now, um,

you know, taking over the world. Okay, it's incredible, it's sick. But the various narratives that they do are just so bad, they're so bad for the country, and there's such opposites in a sense um end quote. So I mean that's all. That's all the president there. And by the way, you know, he mentioned people that are saying that he is going to be a fascist, and I always hear people say, oh, no,

that's not true. He's he's not claiming that if there's anything fascistic about you know, or rather that no one claims that the president is really a fascist. I mean they just say that it's kind of well, that's not exactly accurate. Um, I can I can certainly think of one person who clearly believes that the president is uh is something akin to a fascist. I will tell you who that imbecile that ain't antipatriotic, slovenly disgrace to humanity

is right after the break. You know what I'm gonna do tonight, I'm gonna get the conversation started over at snippy dot com. I'm gonna post something on my interview with the president there. I'll just give you a little bit of a backstory you haven't heard elsewhere. Because I want us to have a place where we can go and talk and chat it's totally free to sign up, and unlike these other social media giants that are out there right, Snippy is just getting going, just getting started.

But they're creating a space for conversation. That's not a safe space. It's a free space, okay. They want you to be able to engage how you want, when you want, and share whatever's on your mind. You can share photos, you can post, you can follow writers there. Snippy dot com ease a social media platform without agenda or bias, No left wing monitors, none of this partisan nonsense, no shadow banning. All this stuff you're seeing from all these

other huge social media companies. Snippy dot com doesn't have any of that. So team go check it out for yourself again. Snippy dot com sign up totally free. Totally free to sign up your account at snippy dot com. Germany in the thirties was one of the most intelligent societies on Earth. They were cultured, they read more books than any other country, they were well educated. Um they

were a liberal democracy. The popular vote in ninety two was won by the liberal left parties Killer One with only of the vote, and then they had a national emergency where their parliament was burned down with it through some sort of act of terrorism, and that was used as an excuse to do X, Y or Z. Less than two weeks ago, this man who sits in the Oval office suggested that the license of this very network that we are sitting here in the studio today should

be we should consider what to do. Should they Should NBC still have a license to broadcast Michael Moore? Everybody is a dishonest propagandist, or maybe you could say he's an honest propagandist, because he at least admits that what he does is is hyperpartisan. So that's why I would I would amend that UM. But I think that his view of the country is UH is borderline deranged. UH. And sure enough he goes immediately to the Trump Hitler comparison.

This is becoming something that only stupid people or people who think their audiences are stupid can continue to say. You know, having spent time in the Oval with the President yesterday, I mean, this man is he's so far and I've known this just from all the things that he's doing and all the people around him that I that I know and talked to a regular basis, He's

so far from a fascist. You know. Trump maybe sometimes likes to go the media a little bit and he talks about their broadcast license, but he hasn't actually taken any action against the media. That's even in the same universe of aggression to what Obama did. I mean, Obama was cracking down on leaks and was willing to throw the press on the funeral pyre of the First Amendment along with it. And there were very few old noticed. There were no hashtag George W. Bush resistance fighters inside

of the federal government when Obama was in office. There was no one at the d o J the FBI leaking very damaging and illegally leaking very damaging information to try to hurt Obama. But to make sure that that wouldn't happen, Obama went on this jihad of sorts against leakers, and that included the most aggressive tactics against the press we've seen in a hundred years, and also the most Espionage Act prosecutions of all time, in fact, more than

every administration before him. Come bind. Okay, So they're talking about Trump as a fascist on this and I just sit sit there and I think, you know what, what idiocy? You know, can we at least have a series. If people want to talk to me about single payer, I'm game. I'll talk single payer all day. Terrible idea, way too expensive, going to ruin the country, but at least it's a real idea, and at least they want to do it because they think that it will mean we all have

better healthcare. They're totally wrong. They'll destroy the country, but they think we'll all have better health care. Saying that Trump is a fascist is just is just stupidity dressed up as analysis. It is not worth discussing. And you know Trump also, I can tell you this from being with him yesterday. Um. You know, he and I tried to give you this sense of it. He really does love this country. He really does think that America is a very very special place, and he wants to everything

he can to help all of his fellow Americans. And I think that that's that that comes across and that there are a lot of people who when they think about what the president, what the President's why he resonates so well with the crowd, It's because he seems like one of us in a way that you can't fake. Um. And he's also, by the way, very concerned with what's going on in North Carolina. I mean he has a he can be very paternal when he wants to be

play you know what. He can show his emotion, he can show his connection and still be the manager in chief and uh be the guy that can get aid where it's need to play a team help from Congress in all fairness, and we're ready and they're ready to do whatever we have to do to make this perfect. And that being unfortunately, the money will be a lot, but it's gonna come as fast as you need. It's

gonna take care of everybody. Hurricane Florence was one of the most power full storms ever to hit the Carolina is one of the most powerful and devastating storms ever to hit our country. To the families who have lost loved ones, America grieves with you, and our hearts break for you. God bless you. We will never forget your lost, We will never leave your side where with you all the way. And to all those impacted by this terrible storm, our entire American family is with you and ready to help,

and you will recover. That's our president. That is President Donald J. Trump. I mean, he he really does understand the role that he's supposed to play it and people would they say when they talk about does he sound presidential? Yeah, it doesn't sound presidential all the time, but he always understands that he is the president, and he always understands what the stakes are and what he's there to do. So it was it was a problement yesterday. You get

to sit down and talk to man. I look forward to getting to know him better with with further interviews. And it also just fires me up to fight against the lies of people like Michael Moore who are trying to tear down this president. But not on my watch, industry, and I agree with you, Whippy has not shied away from those issues. Almost world Um introduced a character that

had two moms and also two dads. They have the autistic UM puppet, they have the HIV positive get So I can see your point and that when they really want to come out and have a gay I think they should at this point because kids, um, they identify their gender identity at least by two, and by four

or five start understanding their sexuality. So maybe that's a place where oh boy, folks, of course, we we have to now have political discussions on television about what we should do with the reality of Ernie and Bert's sexuality or Burt and Ernie. Uh. Sesame Street characters are now part of wokeness. That's right. You can't watch Sesame Street without being told that there has to be a lot of social justice thrown into the mix. Here's what happened

this week. The reason this is being talked about. Sesame Street writer Mark Saltzman UH said that his comments that he wrote Ernie and Burt as a gay couple based on his own same sex relationship were misinterpreted. This according the Post, as a writer, you just bring what you know into your work. Somehow in the uproar that turn into Burden Ernie being gay. There is a difference. There are two guys who love each other, that's who they are, uh,

but they are not necessarily gay. According to this year, um Sesame Workshop released a statement saying that Burden Ernie do not have sexual orientations. Quote as we have alway said, Burton Ernie are best friends. They were created to teach preschoolers that people could be good friends with those who are very different from themselves, even though they are identified as male characters and may possess many human traits as most characters, as most sesame puppets do, they remain puppets

and do not have a sexual orientation. Yeah that's right, folks. Sesame Street needed to remind the woke left that no, no, they're just puppets, folks. They're just puppets. They don't have genitalia, they cannot procreate, they don't have a sexual orientation, and they don't inherently have a backstory about their sexual orientation because their hand puppets. You can't really make fun of the Left, because the Left makes fun of itself so much without trying to. I will say that is it?

Producer Mike burt Is, the one with the unibrow, right, correct, the big uni brown Right? Did you were you a sesame Street guy growing up? I was not? Not really. I wasn't really either, although I did. I did always kind of like the count one Pool, I was kind of you know what I mean that I was that guy and and Oscar the Grouch, but you know he lived in a trash can. That sounds that's kind of rough when you think about it. If I was a Sesame Street guy, I would be a big fan of

the Cookie Monster. Yeah, I mean, look, they're they're pretty timeless characters me think about it. True. Um, but were you more of a Bert or an Ernie guy? Um? I don't know. I really didn't watch. I mean, I can't tell you either way which one what they're all about. Ernie was more silly and was the serious one like the Odd Couple. I'm definitely a Burt guy. Then. I

always like Sam the Eagle a lot too. I'm i'm I will tell you that my when I worked in the governments, my avatar assigned to me unofficially by my colleagues was Sam the Eagle. I like that a lot. Which one was a sports fan and love the Bone and Ribby, that's the one I would like. There we go, well played producer Mike. Yeah know, I I think that you've got your own Sesame Street character there. It's called Mr. I Love America, So you know, it's it's just interestanting.

They also had Thomas the Tank Engine. There was a big kerfuffle over that recently because they want a transgender character on Thomas the Tank Engine. You see this, This is another one now, Thomas the Tank trans If you go, if you go and you check this out, you'll see that they're trying to get Wait, oh no, the u N at one point wanted Thomas the Tank to be gender neutral. This is a British thing, I think, right, Thomas the Tank engine. I don't remember this one. This

is like some communist agit prop. Do you even know what I'm talking about? Thomas the Tank anyone? I know what Thomas the Tank and Percy are for sure, from my from my niece and nephew. Oh you do know the trains? Okay? Yeah, man, I know, thank you, I know it's a rain. What is you know? Do you know what any mean? Be on that how to trans First of all, aren't all I mean, I'm just being seriously for a second, aren't all trains inherently gender neutral?

Because they don't. Again, they don't have genitalia or x Y chromosomes or xx chromosomes. So I feel like they are gender neutral because they're inanimate objects that we put a face on so that they can talk. I'm getting too deep, I understand the rabbit hole going too deep, fair enough? Maybe I need to maybe to tell it that a little bit. But yeah, that's right. The left was upset because they were excited that Ernie and Burder gay, but they're not gay because their puppets. Thank you Sesame

Street for clarifying that. And you know, maybe I'll do some if I had a really good impression of any of the muppets, I'd probably do some of it here on the show. You know, um isn't the Swedish chef themupet blue? Right? Yeah, the Swedish self is um Upet. But that's not Sesame Street. Is that Sesame Street? No? No, it's a m how about that? You need to him? No awful figures? Okay, what's going on? I can do so I can do some of them. I like that.

You're putting me through my paces though. All right, we're gonna close and get to roll call. Stay with me, Team Buck. It's time for roll call. Alright, rod call. You know what that means. All of you get to tell me what time it is, as the kids say, Facebook dot com, slash buck sex and if you want to get into that action. Thank you for all the kind comments from you from y'all. That's right. I went there, y'all on the interview I have with President Trump. Forty

five minutes, good time. It's very much enjoyed it learned a lot. I laughed, I cried. I uh, I didn't actually cry. I did laugh though, but it was really fun. It was really and just illuminating to spend that much time with the President of the United States. So there you have it, Um, let's get to it. Timothy Rites Shields high Buck. This assault on Brett Kavanaugh is a prima fasci case prima facie, and I hear people say that different ways case of why dueling should still be legal.

I believe dueling was is a legitimate means of resolving disputes. It would certainly reduce the number of cowards in our society. Make dueling great again. Timothy Shields hie. Um, Timothy, I don't know how much to add to that one, my friend, other than interesting interesting thought. Alan rides Buck great coup on getting a forty five minute interview with Potus. I wonder if Ford and lawyers are bluffing about FBI investigation, figuring it wouldn't happen. What would happen if podas did

allow the FBI to check on allegations. Do you think Ford would welcome it or find an excuse not to have it. Well, and as I've been saying, Alan, I don't really I don't think it's even possible to investigate this. You know, if somebody shows up, let's say, at a local law enforcement uh, you know, wherever you are across the country, and they tell the cops, hey, somebody, somebody punched me in the face thirty years ago. Let's just take sexual assault out of this for a moment, just

to make it easier to discuss. Somebody punched me in the face thirty years ago, which is assault, which is illegal. But I have no proof and I can't tell you where it happened or when it happened. I mean, the police would would take your statement, but then there would be no further action on it, because what are they supposed to do Unless you can give them more details, they can't actually do anything. And never mind, what is the district attorney going to do with it. I can't

bring charges. So I don't think that she wants an FBI investigation. What she really is hoping for is the fb I to reopen the background You know, there's a criminal investigation there, and there's background investigation and background check, and they want to make this a part of the background check. But there's no reason to make it part of the background check because it wouldn't change the outcome

of it. So it's it's that there's no way you wouldn't get denied a clearance now because of what happened when you were seventeen. And now people say, well, what if you lied about it? Well you could say that about anything. So I mean, there's folks, there's so much desperation, so much desperation out there about trying to stop Kavanaugh from getting into the Supreme Court. That's that's all this really is, as we all know. Kimberly writes, Hey, Buck,

just want to say that woman is a liar. I was grabbed off my front porch back in four long story, but I got away from him. I've never forgotten anything about it. Nothing. If something traumatic like that happens, you don't forget. Well, you know, I can tell you this, Kim, I do not believe, and I know that people. You know, how can you say that? I just don't believe that you would forget the place where it happened. That I

don't believe. Uh, you know, the month maybe getting or the day maybe getting a little hazy, that's one thing, But you don't remember where this happened. I just think that that's not credible. Kathy is up next here. Kathy writes, Hey Buck, I was wondering if the statements by Dr Ford's lawyer that our client and family have received death

threats are valid and if there's any way to verify this. Conservatives, Christians, and constitutionalists usually don't do this outrageous threat making behavior. Usually is the forte of the left shields high Kathy from Ohio. You know, Kathy, the left is crazier than the right, But I have to I have to keep it real. There are certainly people on the right as well, especially when it involves anything that they think touches on

Trump's world, who could get very, very nasty too. So I'm not surprised that there would be threats against her, and I am willing to bet she's not surprised that there are threats against her. Um it would be a lot worse if this were a conservative coming out against a very liberal judge that might tip the court one way or the other. So in general, Cathy, I agree with you in this case, though there are there are

we We've got to always be honest. There are bad people on the right to there are crazies who will threaten people on the right to they're just aren't as many of them. Alice rites, thanks for sharing your experience at the White House today. Because of the way you include your audience I think many of us felt like we went to the Oval office right beside you. I look forward to hearing more about your visit as protocol allows. Also,

on vegan chocolate, it's actually delicious. I'm as far from vegan as as possible to be, but I would served some and thought it was extraordinary. So that's one point for the vegans, just one. But heck, it's chocolate, so it's kind of a big point. Alice, absolutely accurate all the way around here. You know, I, first of all, thank you so much. It's really high praise. That's all.

I praise Nicolas Cage Saturday Night Live. Anybody anybody, Well, it's high praise to say that you felt like I was able to bring you into the old Bow and that was really my intention. And as for vegan chocolate, I will have to take your word for it. I'm excited for when my my brother's muffin company is fully fully national and also it's uh able to I'm able to tell you more about it. It's getting into now.

I think well over a thousand stores. I need to check on the numbers, but it's definitely in hundreds of stores. Because if you like baked good products, his his stuff is the best. I mean the muffins. I have one every single day. I start every day with one of my brother's muffins, Susie's s O. O z Y his muffins, which some of you will have if you have a Wegman's near you or there's some other stores. I know

that they're in Kroger's. I believe they're in now. Um. I started with black Rifle coffee and Susie's muffins every day. That's what I do. Um. And chocolate is amazing. And I have a talk with Stash Alice. It's a true story. I have a stash and Ms Molly makes fun of me because I like to have this little corner of one of the cupboards where I just keep all my different chocolate and I have lots of different kinds of chocolate. It's my weakness. I mean that is, chocolate is my

thing that I allow myself my vice. You know, would I be able to see my abdominal muscles. If I had stopped eating chocolate altogether, probably not, but I'd be closer to it. So there's that. Um let's see. Julie writes, uh, hey, Buck, just want to offer some solidarity in the whole Obama whistling thing. I too had speech issues as a child with R and S. I had to go to speech therapy, and to this day, I'm very sensitive to any lisping or whistling with S. No, I never made it a

habit to listen to Obama. I've never noticed a whistling issue from him. You're not crazy. Have a great night, Julie. Well, thank you, Julie. And you know, see, you understand what it's like to go through speech therapy and have to be in that whole process. It's it's not not an easy thing at all, um, but obviously well well worth it too to overcome that, um, that issue, that hurdle

at a young at a young age. Uh. And as for Obama, you know, guys, I haven't been able to go listen to that clip yet, but let's just assume that I will. Okay, I will, because a lot of you wrote to me and you're like, how could you not, I get it, I get it, you think, Obama whistles Keith Right. Senator fine Stein told their Chinese operative driver about the balls letter huh over some Chai tea while

at Seattle's own Comic Comy coffee shop. The driver then Sentator Hillary's new basement server, wow, Keith, all right man, Thanks Keith. I'm not really sure what you're going for, but I like the enthusiasm. Brittany Rights, Hey, Bucks started watching Jack Ryan. It's great. In the first episode, the main character gets hit in the face and I yelled, Buck no. Uh. My boyfriend looked at me and did a slow headshake. It was hilarious. Thank you for all

you do well, Thank you, Brittany. Yes, I'd like to think there are some similarities between myself and Jack Ryan, played by John Krasinski. Uh. Look, if I could just there'll be a lot more similarities with me and Krasinski. If I could spend about three months not working fourteen hours a day and go to the gym and eat right and grow out of beard, then then you'd be like, yeah, bucking Krasinski. Okay, maybe six months in the gym, but

bucking Krasinski. Very very, very similar characters. Uh. Andrea writes, Hey, I'm a musician and theater director and have lots of experience with theater driven music, So if you need help with your special music for special episodes, I'm here and I'm in the swamp. To Andrew, Why Andrew, thank you so much. That's very kind of you. I am currently talking to some folks about the best ways. I know I keep saying this, but it's true, the best ways

to bring back some of those history shows. Um, and and I'm working on it, and that's the most I can say about that right now. But thank you very much for the for the kind offer. Uh and writes, uh, whole a lot of second. Here we go, Buck, a Charleston, South Carolina listener checking back in, made it through evacuation and returning home just fine. Charleston dodged a bullet, We

had no damage in our area. But those Democrats, man, why is it they accused the president being a dictator and disregarding the constitution, then expecting to solve legislative issues himself. Expect the federal government runover states rights. They are the ones disregarding their constitutional obligations and wanting the president to be a dictator Dude, we're living in the upside down, that's true, and we are kind of living the upside down these days. I can't disagree with you there, um,

but I'm glad you're okay made it back. And Charleston is a city I am really fond of Charleston, Savannah. Um, you know, these are these are great places to visit, some cities that I've really had had good times when I've had the good fortune to be able to go and check them out. That's gonna be a team for today here in the Freedom Hunt. Thank you so much for joining and hanging out. I hope that you will

tell somebody about the show. That is how I end the show every day, because it really does mean a lot to me. Be're like, hey, do you listen to podcasts? If the answers yes, listen to the Buck Sexton Show, go on iTunes, or go on I Heart and listen to the Buck Sexton Show on the I Heart app. Thank you so much. Um. I was gonna tell you that the next next week I'm gonna be out in Vegas, but it's actually the week after that, so that's coming up.

I'll have some cool stories for you. But until tomorrow. My friends, shei'ls high team. How do I start my day every day the right way, the patriotic way, the delicious way. Black Rifle Coffee. Black Rifle Coffee is the best coffee you're gonna get anywhere. And unlike a lot of those comic coffee brands, they're not trying to get everybody to pretend that they all want to get some kind of socialist healthcare system going or any of that other political nonsense. Black Rifle just wants to give you

the best coffee you can get anywhere. Just go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Okay, go on that site. You'll see for yourself. They've got great blends, delicious coffees, and they also will give you fifteen percent off if you go to my sites. You're getting a great deal and you're supporting a veteran owned and patriotic company that honestly, everybody that I have tried in my office at the Hill just wants to drink Black Rifle now,

every single one of them. Go to Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash Buck again, Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck and sign up for the coffee or die Revolution