Revolutionizing Politics

threat from China is escalating. DAT and more coming up on the buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American. Again the buck Sexton Show begins. Former CIA analysts Remember the MD when they said, sir, we're better off if we wait till last, and I say it's better before. Let's do it before, sir, we're better off.

You know who thinks that should before. Rush Limbaugh thinks it should be before before the election. You know who else? Sean Hannity, a lot of them. They said, look, we have the best economy ever we're doing great. Maybe we don't want to complicate it, and I understand it. You know, I'm a little torn myself. I would personally prefer before. But whether it's before or after, we're either getting it or with closing down government. We need to order security.

We need order security. I think the President was gonna throw my name in there right after Russian Sean, but you know he's got a country to run and the country to save. Welcome the Bucks Section Show, everybody. Great to have you here with me on a Friday. Appreciate the chance to address you live from the swamp. I am your humble host from the the filthiest, stinkiest swamp there is, Washington, d C. And I do have some some breaking news for you to share on the show,

which is always fun for a Friday. Usually you get the the document dump on a Friday, especially if it's something the government doesn't want people to spend much time thinking about. Are talking about this one though, is a federal judge who has weighed in on DOCTA and the Deferred Action for Childhood Rivals program. Right this is the Dreamer's program where you get, you get to stay, you are free from deportation, and you also can get a

work permit. Ah. This is yeah, renewable grants of deferred action to non citizen parents. Oh sir, now that's stop. I'll get to that in a moment. So this is how we got to this point, because we need a little bit of backstory before we get to where we are now. President of Obama was in the eight years of his presidency, including two years where he had both the House and the Senate and where they rammed through a massive entitle and programing his Obamacare without a single

Republican vote. So we know they were willing to play hardball on stuff. Not a not an ounce of bipartisan effort, not an ounce of reaching across the aisle. But Obama did nothing on the issue of immigration, nothing, no legislation whatsoever. It's only executive orders that Obama took any action on immigration. And you know you'd say, oh, back, well, the Congress, they would work with them. Or he was president for eight years, his party was in power, uh and majority

both the House and the Senate. The first two of those eight years did not lead the Democrats to reform immigration or do anything substantive on that issue. Even he only waited until his second term to start just with these proclamations, these pen and phone proclamations and saying things like I'm just gonna go around Congress if Congress won't act.

They won't say that that was tyrannical. They won't say now you know that, the media won't say, oh, that's that's undermining our norms of democracy, that is undermining our institutions. What Obama did was in fact dangerous to separation of powers. Trump has done nothing like that. Trump has respected the process at every step of the way. Every you know, random flimsy federal judge who decides to engage in a little hashtag resistance Trumps and Trump at administration go all right, well,

you know, we'll take this to court. It doesn't just come up with another executive order to go around them or tell them just to go forward to remember this, a federal judge actually under Obama had to stop the Department of Homeland Security under j. Johnson from giving I D S and work permits to a lot of people covered under DAPPA, the Deferred Action for the parents of arrival.

So not just dreamers now, it's dreamers parents. Now it's gonna be dreamers, uncles, that it's gonna be dreamers friends, then it's gonna be people that saw dreamers that live in their neighborhood that also want to be dreamers. That's the way the Democrats play the game. We know this,

We've seen it in the past, no surprises. But a federal judge in Texas had to step in and stop the Obama administration from giving ideas to DAPPA recipients because they knew that once they had done that, if they were able to just print and they were gonna go forward it right, it was supposed to be decided by a court that is no, no, we're just gonna go with this anyway that they would make it a fatal complee. Once it's finished, there's no way of turning it back.

So that was what Obama was doing. He was you weren't talking about running through democratic norms and and undermining our system of government by refusing to accept the fact that the legis slaterre can act or not act, and that's just the way it is. Obama put us in this position where by presidential proclamation, almost like you're in

a monarchy or something. By presidential proclamation, it was decided that the law which says you cannot be in this country illegally and if you are, you are subject to deportation. That is the law. No one denies that that as the law. But the law didn't count anymore because Obama said so. The law didn't matter because it was inconvenient for the Democrats and because President Obama wanted to burnish his legacy of being favorable towards illegal aliens, people that

have broken the law in this country. And that was a decision that that president made. Now we have a new president and this is you know, we can get into all the legal complexities of this, and I won't. You know, it's Friday. We got a lot of talk about I got Chinese espionage case. To bring your attention. There's some really interest stuff going on. We'll also take the the liars in the quote neutral media to task. We're not a busy show. But here's the very basic

way we can all understand and approach this issue. Because this DOCCA DOCCA is very important. It's very important that we don't cave on this. You are Trump saying we gotta build a wall. This was a This was all central to the promise of Trump is um, no amnesty, A wall will be built, there will be a secure border. We will not have millions and millions of people in the next ten or twenty years coming to the country

illegally overstaying their visas. All these different games that are played, and that was what President Trump promised, and we are going to hold them to that with DOCCA. Though it's very clear that the Obama administration decided to do this for political reasons, but it was a president it was a presidential decision. Obama said, it's within my discretion, essentially

abusing prosecutorial discretion. Because Obama, the president, is the top of the executive branch, so he's also the highest law enforcement officer in the country. It's also why he can pardon people, right, So Obama abused that authority under under the notion of discretion, and who do you prosecute? Who do you not prosecute? You said, well, we're not gonna prosecute any of these people, and we're gonna confer a

special status to them by executive decree. Trump has come along and decided, you know what, I don't agree with that, and now I'm the president and I'm going to stop that. Program, and you've got federal judges who are saying, no, sorry, it doesn't matter that you're the president. You don't get to stop this program. Oh I'm sorry, how is that supposed to work? And I'm looking at the at the judgment right here, or at the the opinion rather right here,

and when you read into it it's quite clear. I mean they say that quote for the reasons explained the government, that motion will be denied. Although the Nielsen memo members she's running DHS purports to offer further explanation of DHS decision to ver sind Dhaka, it fails to meaningfully elaborate on the agency's primary rationale for its decision, the judgment

that the policy was unlawful and unconstitutional. And while the memo offers several additional policy grounds for docca's decision, most of these simply repackaged legal arguments previously made and hence are insufficiently independent from the evaluation of docca's legality to preclude judicial review or to support the agency's decision. That's a lot of fancy legalis for them saying yeah, we don't think, we don't we don't think that you get to make this call. We're not persuaded, but it's not

your call. This is in the world of presidential power. Let's let's really boil this down to its its essence. This would be like if if you many many of you listening, because you know you've chosen to live in places where you can do this, unlike me, who will probably never own property in this whole life, but many of you live in places where you know you you own a house. You're the owner of the house. You can paint that house whatever color you want, right, you can.

You can paint that house blue, let's say. And then I know some of you, like Buck, who paints the house blue. Just stay with me on this, all right, It doesn't matter, all right, that's that's your right. Yeah, And and let's put aside whether or not that's a

good idea. But you can paint your house blue. The next owner comes along, they buy that house, you think that they have the right to paint it whatever they want, right, But if they went to paint it, uh green, it wouldn't be right for you to say you're not allowed to do that. That's pretty much what's going on here now, except it's with the presidency and amnesty for millions of people. That's at stake if it was, if it was a

presidential decision, a presidential prerogative to extend DOCCA. There is no reasonable explanation how it cannot be a presidential decision to rescind DOCCA. Remember, the president cannot confer citizenship. So this is not like, oh, well that you can't pull away citizenship once it's been granted or something, which is also not entirely true. But this is just the president was saying, uh, here's here's a better version of this.

Forget about the painted houses things somebody like. But come on, it's Friday. I know. I'm trying to make it very basic. Though this would also be like saying, James Comey, that partisan hack helped push the decision with Loretta Lynch also obviously very partisan pro Obama not to prosecute Hillary for her clear violations of the Espionage Act. It is not

up to a judge in the era of Trump. If, in fact of Jeff Sessions and Christopher Ray, the FBI director, decided, you know what, actually we we we do think that she needs to executed for that. That is their call. There's no there a judge has no role in this, you see, And a judge has no role in overruling an issue of presidential discretion. This would be like a federal judge saying, what's going on here with Dhaka. It would be like a federal judge coming out and saying, no, no, no,

the president, I'm gonna put it in junction. The president can't pardon that person, you'd say to yourself. But wait, presidential pardon is a their enumeratd power. I mean, this is the president can do this and it's the president's choice. Oh no, some federal judge says, no, no, I'm not convinced that the president has the power to do it this time. So now this is how you create a

real constitutional crisis, folks. And this you want to talk about undermining institutions and Americans faith in the governing apparatus around them. What is this all about. This is just

hashtag resistant judiciary at work. This is left wing judges on the federal bench who think that it is their moral obligation, even when they know they are doing violence to the law and the process, they think it's their moral obligation to do everything they can to block the president's agenda to stop the president from exercising his constitutional authority granted him by the people of this country. And

they don't care that they will be overturned eventually. They don't care that there's no way the Supreme Court could look at this and not come away it will be five four because there's a bunch of hashtag resistance judges on the Supreme Court to unfortunately, but there's not five of them. Well, I hope we'll see what ends up happening here with Kavanah'm assuming that will all be fun. But this, this is what we're up against. The federal bench stacked with Obama appointees. By the way of the

federal bench right now, people Obama put in place. Now Trump is changing that. Trump's put a lot of judges in place too. But they have been a primary, a a frontline offensive against President Trump's agenda. And they don't care that their reasoning is complete and utter garbage. They don't care that they're going to be overturned as it makes its way up to the either Appeals Court or the Supreme Court. They just want people to think that they're part of the resistance. And this under if you

want to dalk about undermining the rule of law. This undermines the rule of law. This is a garbage decision. It is full of crap, lousy reasoning and rationale. And the the judge here, uh, where is this judge's name? Oh well, whatever, the judge wrote it, and we'll find it at the bottom in a second. Should be a shame, but I'm sure it's not, which is not surprising. Yeah, John Bates, United States District Judge, John Bates, Big surprise there, eight four four to eight to five four four, Buck

will be right back. You know, they keep they keep getting mad. Whatever Trump talks about Russia as a hoax, What is he supposed to say about the Russian nonsense? At this point? Play cliff five please, Now we're being hindered by the Russian hopes just a hoax. Okay, I'll tell you what. Russia is very unhappy that Trump won. That I consent, But I got along great with Tom. I used to study not too much diplomacy. I said,

whatever happened to getting everything you want? Now? Something you have to be rough, some you have to be nice. But whatever happened, And let me tell you, if I did go up and start screaming, they would have said he was terrible. He was so rude, it was horrible. His performance was horrible. Whatever happened to fair press, whatever

happened to honest reported. It's a good question. And by the way, his his point there, and we'll return to this later on about the National Security meeting that was held yesterday at the at the in the White House press conference and here from a CNN analyst version what's going on, which will really which I think, really show you exactly what I'm talking about. But they don't offer criticism of the president as guidance. They just offer criticism as uh, this is an itch that they must scratch.

This makes them feel better because they hate Trump so much. So it's not that they get angry a Trump because they want him to do things differently. They have to pretend that that's how they feel, because otherwise it's just verbalizing their Trump's arrangement, right. But they they absolutely do, and I really believe it's They absolutely will change their position on whatever the issue is based on whatever Trump is for or against. If he's for it, there against it,

he's against it there for, they'll move on anything. If he's tough with Russia, he's pushing US toward war. If he's nice to Russia, he's a stooge in the Kremlin's pocket. We just keep saying this play out all the time. I do hope that the Republicans understand that immigration is a winning issue for them. Returning to that for a moment here, and this this whole breaking news about DACA. Remember now they're saying that the president has to that we have to re implement DACA. So I guess we're

DACA is now a law. You see, it was never passed as a law, but it was an Obama pronouncement. It's important to Democrats, So now it's a law. That's pretty scary. That's not the way this is supposed to work. That's not how any of this is supposed to work.

That's not the system that we have. But the same liberals who are going to tell you, the same media that's neutral, yeah right, the same neutral media that's going to say to you that they just want the president to restore presidential norms, right to just acted with it. They'll also look at this and say, well, yeah, this is the president's decision to make, but we don't think you should make it because we don't like it. I

want to talking about espionage. That's a couple of big cases, not involving Russia, not involving Russian collusion or interferencing election, involving China and what they're doing. We've got that a more coming up. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. So the media, because of Hillary's loss in ten and their need for some kind of an excuse and escapegoat, They've got everybody all all freaked out

about Russia. Got this huge problem of Russia. And if you're in our elections and Russia collusion allegations, all all this stuff that you hear, all this that's going on. And meanwhile some of us are saying, well, if we're really going to take the notion of cyber theft and espionage and trade secrets being stolen, all that stuff, if we're really going to focus in on this as a country,

the bigger concern is China. The bigger concern is what's going on with a massive kind of hybrid communist country that has over a billion people, And uh we we I have you know, this is something that we really need to spend more time on in general in the media. I think you know. Never mind the fact that, as

I pointed out, well everyone's talking about Acosta's whining. You've got Yemen, which is host to the most active Al Qaeda franchise in the world, still one that's you know, that consistently is in the is in the top of the threat matrix of the counter terrorism agencies, and it's trying to blow up planes and do all the terrible terrors stuff that You'll notice this lesson dramatically in the last eighteen months, hasn't it. You don't hear much about

isis anymore? Do you seems curious, isn't it. It's almost like somebody came in and has a different approach to these things, somebody who can make a difference on those matters. But we don't hear much about the millions of people who may be starving to death in Yemen unless some dramatic action is taken on their behalf soon. We hear a lot about Jim Acosta whining, and we don't hear all that much about the following two stories, both involving

Chinese espionage efforts. In one case is alleged in another I think I believed to have already been proven, so I'll start with the one that you're I'll start with the one they're gonna make go away even more quickly. How many of you knew that Senator Diane fin Stein, who was the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, so has oversight, has an oversight roll over what the intelligence community,

intelligence community is doing. Therefore, can see whatever she wants to see, access to whatever government programs that she wants. There's nothing that is too sensitive for the chairwoman of the Senate Finance I'm sorry, Senate Intelligence Committee, Finance Committee,

show me those spreadsheets. How is the economy doing? Um? So, it is known that five years ago the story first broke where where fine Stein had a driver four years twenty years in fact, who was with Senator fine Stein traveling around with her all the time and was a mole for the Chinese government. Oh yeah, that's right, a Chinese spy in San Francisco was driving, uh, Senator fine

stunt around. Now. You know San Francisco, by the way, does have a fair amount of espionage stuff going on that you had the Russian consul there shutdown, you guys, remember that, and there was the the burning of documents

going on. People could see it from the facility, uh, you know, fine Stein's office of course not commenting on this, but you would think that given how much focus there's been on the possibility of anyone in Trump's orbit talking to a Russian ordering a white Russian, you know, doing any of these things, that a senior intelligence uh or sorry, a c A senior senator, UM, a senior senator here

on the Intelligence committee. UH had a spy next door for a long time and apparently never never thought that this was a bad idea. I never thought that they should have this person more thoroughly vetted that to me, she there's a double standard at work here. I think

we can all agree with that. This would be if this were not fine Stein, if this person were a Russian and this person were you know, imagine the storyline right now if instead of it being a Chinese spy who was very close to fine Stein during a lot of conversations, sure she was on her cellphone lot in that car, or the very valuable information was being exchanged in a regular basis. You know, you're driver or somebody who It's kind of like the media business, the hair

and makeup folks here and know everything. You always gotta be aware of that. I know that sounds trite. It's really true though, because people just talk in front of them like they're not there, and so they'll hear everything. People have negotiated their divorces in front of hair and

makeup and think that they can't hear anything. Uh. The imagine the storyline if instead of it, uh, instead of the situation we talked about right here, you had a Russian driver who was Mitch McConnell's driver for the last you know, for for twenty years, folks, who was a spy for the Kremlin. Do you think that that would be a bigger story? Do you think that you'd be here in this one and you know ABC News tonight in all these places. Oh, you know, the Russian espionage

efforts at the heart of the Republican Party. That's the storyline. I mean, they're they're going crazy over Maria Boutina, who was walking around like I'm Russian and would like to be friends with powerful people to know the direction of American politics, and maybe even did some shadier stuff, uh than that from what we're told, And that's a huge deal.

You know. They act like she perhaps was practically running the n r A. I mean, she had some meetings in some places, and they're getting her on a far registration crime essentially or being an unregistered foreign agent in this country. Feinstein's driver for twenty years was a Chinese spy and no one is really saying boo about it. Not not not a whole lot, so, you know, and then just I'm just putting this out there. This is supposition.

I can't prove this, but the reality of operational and information security really, as we've seen with Hillary Clinton, was that she was reckless, didn't care, and thought she was above the rules for classified that applied to the little people. People like me. When I was in the community, was lived in constant terror of saying one wrong thing or

doing one wrong thing. Hillary Clinton thought she was above that and don't Fortunately, when she thought she was above the law, she was correct because she was so important to the Democrat Party and the deep state bailed her out. So we know that that's what happened. I'm really not I'm really not up for debating that proposition with anymore because that is what happened. But when you look at this situation now with fine Stein and a Chinese spy

driving around everywhere. Do we think that fin Stein was like, oh well, I just you know, did do you do you think that she had some pretty loose lips about some stuff in that car, thinking, you know, who cares? Who knows? I can't prove it, but I'm just telling you that's where my mind goes, massive, massive counterintelligence nightmare in my mind. Who knows what was said by fine Stein in that car? He said, oh, buck, she's I'm

sure she was really careful. Really, do you think fine Stein is so much more trustworthy than Hillary Clinton, so much more responsible and ethical than Hillary Clinton. I mean, I'm sure she's a little bit more ethical, but that's not saying much. There's another Chinese espionage story here, And who's been telling you folks that this is this is where, this is where it's all going. Because now people are saying, oh wait a second, cyber and spycraft and intellectual espionage

and all this stuff, intellectual property theft. They they've raised our awareness about this on the Russia front, but China is where the real action is. Ge engineer linked to China stole power plant technology. According to the FBI, this just broke. This is the story from last twenty four hours. Um, here's what it says. A General Electric Company engineer with ties to Chinese companies was arrested and accused of stealing files related to proprietary power turbine technology, which the FBI

says he elaborately concealed to avoid detection. Uh Shao Jing Zengg, a u S citizen, was hired by g E in two thousand and eight to work and its power division and schennected in New York. According to an affidavit by an FBI agent filed Wednesday in federal court, the FBI is conducting a wider inquiry into the suspected theft and

use of g S trade secrets. Agent search Mr Zenk's house Wednesday and sees his passport, electronic devices, and a handbook that explains the type of resources the government of China will give to individuals or entities who can provide certain technologies. Mm hmm, like a bounty list. Get us this, We'll give you that. Very interesting. Also, to conceal the documents, mr Zang embedded encrypted file encrypted files into the code of a seemingly innocuous image of a sunset to send

them to a personal email address. The FBI alleged he told FBI agents that use similar techniques to take GE materials on five to ten previous occasions. Uh. Mr Zank's attorney says he disputes the allegations. Blah blah, okay, all that stuff, so, you know, innocent until proven guilty. We'll see what happens here. But it doesn't look good, right, doesn't look good renaming files, encrypting them. Uh you know that that seems like that's like using bleach bit and

hammers to destroy hard drives. Right, that's not normal stuff. I'm gonna hide data in an image that looks innocuous and send it to a private email address. Why would you do that? I can't think of a a normal reason unless you're trying to hide sort of the old school micro film, Right, unless you're trying to be the guy that is stealing information for the Chinese government, Right,

that that would make some sense. GE. These private companies, these massive private corporations, are huge sieves of information, and they don't even know the full extent of how much is being stolen from them, how sensitive the information that's

getting out there really is. And why do we think that we're gonna have you know, right now, I think the assumption that every American goes to bed with every night is we have better, better computers, faster, faster planes, more powerful missiles, and and just we're we're just if we have to, we could kick China's but because we've got better stuff. And yeah, we've got a better military. But on the stuff front, I'm having better stuff front. That's just technology, folks. They can create a lot of

industrial output to they they're there, we're not. Our advantage is in the realm of information and technology, and if they can steal enough of that, our advantage goes away. And the world when we can't really tell ourselves credibly well, we've got to. You know, our our navy is orders of magnitude better than their's are. You know, fifth generation fighters are way better than there's. That then changes the geopolitical calculation in massive ways. And that's what we're heading towards.

I've been telling you that there is a there is a civilization changing theft of intellectual intellectual property, technology and information from the United States to China. That has been going on for decades and we you know, yeah, we've got the FBI on this. How effective do you think, and not to like start trashing the FBI, given what we've seen with the FBI and their focus on Struck and Page and Carter and all this other stuff, or Struck with one of them. But you know what I'm

talking about. You think that they you think that they're outsmarting highly trained Chinese espionage Asians on a regular basis for everyone they catch. I'd be willing to bet there a whole bunch that they don't. And once you add into this the ability to you know, whole third party meetings overseas, and once you start adding some real tradecraft into the equation, we got we got no idea what's

really going on here? No idea. And if you go back and look at the the KGB archives I've been mentioning, do you'll see that the KGB was stealing us, stealing from us in ways that we've still not really come to grips with. And anyway, So I just think this is it's a it's a big story. There should be more focused on this. And you've been hearing about this here, folks. Uh first, folks, so that's important too. We're gonna we're all into a whole bunch of say, oh, we got

Denisse the SUSA joining. By the way, I have a nice, nice chat with Denish about his new movie, Death of a Nation's a title to grab your attention. We'll talk to Danish for for quite a bit about that. That's coming up in just a few moments, So stay there. I was about fifteen minutes early, and I'm waiting with my wife and that's fine. Hey, it's the queen, right, we can win. But I'm a little early. So I then go up and meet the queen and she is fantastic.

That lasted for like an hour because we got along. So here was the story by the fake news, the President was fifteen minutes late for the queen. Wrong. And then here's the rest of the story. Now here's the rust. Here's the rest of the story. So they said I was late when I was actually early. Number one, number two, I guess the meeting was scheduled for fifteen minutes and it lasted for almost an hour. The president overstate, so I was late, And I always say, and honestly, folks,

it was such a beautiful, beautiful visit in afternoon. But they can make anything bad because they are the fake, fake, disgusting news. I mean the presidents amazing folks, you know there, Why does the president? Why should previous It's always Republicans that have to deal with this. Why should Republican presidents sit there and just get abused by the press corps all the time? Bush did that? He just got abused. Bush got abused by the press. He's a war criminal.

It's all about patting his friends pockets and Haliburton. No, I mean, he just got Fahrenheit nine eleven. That Michael Moore trash heap. Also the movie was bad. Um. You know you you look at this stuff and what purpose does it serve to sit there and just allow yourself to get punched in the face by the left and do nothing about it. Trump has revolutionized politics because of this on the right. He has changed the way that we view everything about the discourse, and I think a

very good way. You and I know, sitting around and just having to take it because we take the hy road, because we're the principal ones, because we're you know, where does that get you? Talking about words? Here? A lot of fight back with words. I'm not talking about violence, We're not talking about or hurting anybody. We're talking about pushing back verbally. That's what Trump does. They're the ones

that want to be violent. They want us to do to be verbally abused and suffer violence in silence, not on Trump's watch. It's a great thing. It really is. Like I said, we've got to Nish coming up here in a few minutes. We'll talk to him about his movie where he's saying that Trump might be saving America. I mean, he's really he's going all in on it. So I'm looking forward to talking to Nish about that,

um and I'm also hoping that you will. I've getten a lot of really positive feedback both about the Sean Parnell Jesse Kelly interview from last week on the Freedom Hunt podcast and this week with Raheem Kassam. Raheim and I had a great chat. The podcast just went up last night. If you're looking for something to listen to this weekend, it's a little over thirty five minutes. I

think we're looking at someone. Just listen. There's no commercials, no nothing, okay, just just having a chat with Rahim about all the things Fortnite, a Costa, A, Lynsky, all this different stuff. I think you'll really, really appreciate it. It's on iTunes. Just type in it's in the Buck Sexton show feed, but you can also type in the Freedom Hunt and it will pop up. You can just click and listen, and soon enough we'll have the Buck

sex and dot com up. You'll just be able to listen to this there too, and uh, we'll get gone with it. Jnistasus are coming up momentarily, uh, and a whole lot of other stuff, So please do stay with me, team, And the third hour is also gonna be fantastic as it always is. You're putting in long days at the office or at home, if you wanted to get a little bit of a of a boost, get even more fired up at the gym, or you just need something to help you push through and be as productive as

possible and get it done. Strike Force Energy is there for you. Strikeforce is fuel for the fight, my friends. It's a veteran owned, American made energy product, and it's this liquid that you can put in anything you want, water, tea, lemonade, yogurt, you can even put it in a nice cold beer. And it comes in four different flavors, zero sugar, zero calories. It is delicious, just pour some strike Force Energy liquid into whatever you want and you will get fired up

and fueled up. And by the way, when you go to strike Force Energy dot com and energiscount code buck at checkout. For every packet you buy, Strikeforce will donate a packet to military members around the globe. Strikeforce Energy dot Com discount code b U c K because strike Force Energy is fuel for the fun buck Sexton mission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American rank You're a great American again. This

is the buck Sexton Show at former CIA analysts. No, Republicans just passed the biggest tax cuts in the history of our country, and the Democrats want to lift them way up. Remember that when you go to vote, they want to end your tax cuts and they want to lift it up so they can waste your money on a lot of nonsense. We really at a high plateau. Uh. The day to day manufacturing was strong, professional services unemployment went down and it's very nice report Atlanta fed GDP

now model preliminary is predicting five for Q three. I mean, I would be happy with three, but they're predicting five. So We're off to a good start. The Chinese had better not underestimate the determination of President Trump to follow through and seek zero tariffs and non tariff barriers and subsidies, and a level playing field and major reforms in i

P theft and force transfer of technologies. You know, the the economy is doing so well, folks, and I just I like to take some time, especially on Friday's when we when we have the numbers in, because that's when that's when you get these things like the unemployment numbers and the jobs reports and all this stuff. And the economy is doing really well. And I know that that's not a segment that's gonna get people, you know, jumping out of their seats and cheered. Right It's we're not

we're not owning the Libs right now. We're not taking it to them. But I feel a need to bring it up because I just think I have to do my part to make sure that you're all hearing this because you may not be hearing it elsewhere, no matter how how much you're reading and seeing and watching. There's so little focus on what really does matter with this president.

There's such a an unwillingness to look at the things that the president is doing that are having a positive impact on the economy, and and to just you just tell us what the numbers are, right, let's judge this president by his results. I will say early on, that was what I told myself. I said that, Okay, I'm you know Trump personally, I don't know how this is gonna work out with him, and but you know, he he beat Hillary, and like, I'm with him. Let's let's

give this a shot. Let's see if Trump can get it done. That was that was eighteen months ago. Now I'm yeah, about to get Maga tattooed on my back anyway. The economic numbers, though, are so strong that Democrats can't even come up with a coherent narrative about why they're not good. Can't even tell us why we shouldn't feel like. Trump is doing a very very good job with this. And He's also got other plans. I mean, you know, are you are you hearing about the workforce training initiative

that he's put out there? Play clips six poor than four million Americans are going to receive job training under our new workforce initiative. Manufacturing, consumer and business confidence has reached the highest level in the history of our country. I'd say that's pretty good. You know, a lot of the numbers he's talking about, he said, consumer confidence, manufacturing, UH, unemployment, Hispanic unemployment, lack unemployment. He's not just talking about the

low in a while. We're not just talking about strong numbers on the economy in a relative sense or in a near historical sense, near term historical sense. We're talking about ever, So, how can that be explained? Oh, it's just I've actually heard some people say recently, well, it's just the continuation of the Obama economy. Yeah. Right, we

saw the Obama economy for eight years. Remember what the first Remember the first couple of years were like after we're being told, yeah, you know, the country is never really gonna have strong GDP growth again, it's gonna be

kind of just limping along. And they were downgrading our expectations for our future as a means of explaining away Obama's failures to be failures on the economy, and those failures just come from a philosophy that is hostile to business, hostile to individual achievement, hostile to people being able to pursue their dreams through their own means. In the in the market. Yeah's individual initiative and keeping the fruit of

your labor without the government. I believe in the declaration independence is therefore just you know, eating out our substance. That was what the Brits were doing to the colonies. And you know we don't want that now either, We really don't. You know, Trump has got workforce training. By the way, You've got a hundred and fifty five million people employed in the country right now, which is a record. Um, You've got a hundred and fifty seven thousand jobs in July,

thirty seven thousand manufacturing jobs. The U six unemployment rate is the lowest it's been since two thousand and one. I could go on and on and on. Wages have started to rise, very tougher, wages to rise, and it has to do with outsourcing and globalism and productivity and a globalization rather but no globalization. And there's a lot of factors in play. But I I'm looking at these numbers, I'm looking at what's going on, and you know, you

can try to argue that, but you'll lose. You know, you can try to say that something that this has nothing to do with Trump. I mean, that's that's where we are now, folks, only with this president. Do you hear the following, Oh, well, his Russia policies are actually very firm and and taking Russia to task and holding them to account. But he's not responsible for that. It's

happening in spite of him. Oh, the economy is booming and unemployment is super low, and it looks like we're heading into new a new era of incredible prosperity right now. But it has nothing to do with Trump. That's happening in spite of him. They say, it's just pathetic. Right, in what other circumstance do you have people saying that a president should not be judged by what is happening in the country during his administration. And I will keep

returning to they've they've got They've just got nothing. They've got nothing, And one of the reasons that they've got nothing is because Trump's got their number. I really liked this line. By the way, this was gonna use in Pennsylvania that rally play for for generations. Pennsylvania Steel and Pennsylvania coll made this state the center of the industrial world. The workers of Scranton and beth Land and Allantown and Wiks Far where the backbone of American might, but the

loyalty of our workers was repaid with betrayal. You would be traded by our politicians. You will be traded by the people that ran our country. But do not be traded anymore. Yeah, the people at the top weren't concerned about American workers, and Trump saw that, and that's why he's president. Folks. That and and the border workers and immigration. That isn't all about everybody but Americans. That's that's how

Trump became president. So we we have a lot more to discuss here, but if you want a chat eight four four nine to eight to five eight four four nine buck, I will return with some additional thoughts, not right away, but some additional thoughts on that New York Times writer. The more bad tweets. Oh, she hates cops too, What a shock. They're not gonna fire her because she's a liberal and she's a female and she's a minority. And then also Jannis to Susa, we'll be joining talking

about his movie. Will have a great chat that will be coming up in just a bit. I love the taste of black rifle coffee, my friends, taste like freedom. Literally, this is the coffee I drink every day, and I'm making converts here in the offense. They thought, oh, I had to get my coffee from a bunch of commie lefties. Right, the people that are all about Latte's and voting for Bernie Sanders must know more about the best roast false.

Black Rifle Coffee is delicious, and it's a company run by veterans who love this country and are building a great American brand. I get Black Rifle delivered to my front door, couldn't be any easier. I get my cake cups sent to me. And I'm also about to get the delivery of Whole Beam coffee too, because I want to start making some French press stuff at home on my own. You can do all of these things. When you get a Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck,

you receive fifteen percent off your order. And that's Black Rifle Coffee dot Com slash buck fifteen percent off. Folks. Check it out this weekend. Go do it. Trust me, you'll love this site. You'll love this company and this coffee. Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Trump wins the presidency, so help me god. They say he's killing America. There will be a vote impeach. They say he's a racist, This is a white lash and a fascist. Who are the real racists? Who are the real fascists? A nation

dies when it's people are not free. That is from the trailer of a new Death of a Nation? Can we save America a second time? We have the filmmaker Mr janesse to Suza with us now. He is, of course the best selling author, columnist, uh, filmmaker, all of the above Danish. Thanks for making some time for us, and there you've got a lot going on. Hey, it's great to be on the show. Very excited about the new movie and of course as a book of the same title also detamination out in stores. So tell me

tell me about that. Let let's start with the basic premise. Then we can drill into some of the details and also some of the pushback some of the media reviews, which I'm sure are not surprising to you at all, donation. But let's just start with the overall premise of this movie so folks can know what they're getting into when they go see it. Well, the you know, the movie poster basically morphs the head of Abraham Lincoln and Trump. But I think many people are surprised, but even some

Republicans do a double take on that. How can you compare Trump to Lincoln? Now, you know, I'm not saying that the same type of guy, and then Lincoln was of course brooding and philosophical, melancholy. Trump is none of that. But there's situations have a kind of eerie similarity. I mean, Lincoln was an outsider. He was elected in eighteen sixteen, a three man race that he won very narrowly, and the moment that he was elected, even before he assumed

the presidency, you may say all hell broke loose. I mean, in the North, Democrats were calling for him to be stabbed and for his assassination, which actually happened later. In the South, they were willing to break up the country rather than endure his election. So I don't think, I mean, we are facing some of that same craziness now. And by the way, it's the same party, the Democratic Party, that this time to not abide the election of Trump, looking for any device, as they put it, by any

means necessary to get rid of them. So this is the backdrop against which I made this movie, and I focused in the film on two things, racism and fascism, which are the two incendiary bombs that are dropped on Trump to try to prove that he's somehow, regardless of whether the American people support him, ineligible to be president. Now, how does that Let's let's start with racism. How do you you tackle that in the movie UM and and draw either parallels or just conclusions from from history that

affect the way that Trump. What happened with Lincoln then now affects Trump today? And what is the connective tissue there? Well, the connected tissue is this the Democratic Party, UM is the party of bigotry. This seems like a shocking to say, because of course Democrats present themselves as the opposite. They're the party of civil rights. We'll wait a minute. The Democratic Party is the party of the old slave plantation. I mean, Lincoln recognized that after slavery, the Democrats became

the party of segregation. Every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature signed by a Democratic governor. UM. The Democrats also started the Ku Klux Plan. The Republicans shut it down the first time, and then a progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, showed a racist movie in the White House called Birth of a Nation, and that led to a national Klan revival to the sort of second flu Klux Plan was, according to progressive historian Eric Fowner quote, the

domestic terrorist arm of the Democratic Party end quote. So this is our actual history. Even when you come to the civil rights movement of the nineteen sixties, it was Republicans who got those laws passed. More Republicans proportionally voted for those laws. If the Congress had been made up solely Democrats, neither the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four nor the Voting Rights Act of nineteen sixty five would have gotten through. So this is the actual history.

It's not taught that way because a lot of the narrative is spun by progressives who are eager to minimize the culpability of the Democratic Party. But that's history the way it is, and that's the history I tell, both in the book and the movie. Yeah, and then to this this point about the history I people don't seem I see the challenges against you. I've seen some of them up close and personal recently, but but people don't tend to say that what you're the history, you're presenting

in this project or in others is factually inaccurate. But they go into a fit of rage, saying that it's unfair. It's unfair that you're telling these facts what I think that's right. The only way that people are attacking me is by misdscribing what I'm actually saying. And so, for example, it's now commonly set out there as the Washing Post article about this basically saying the nest claims in his movie that Hitler was a liberal Democrat. Now that's nonsense.

I never say that. I don't even get close to saying that. What I do say, and this is actually the chilling historical truth, is that the Nazis and Hitler did get some of their disturbingly bigoted and even murderous schemes from American progressive and from the Democratic Party. This is dramatized in my movie. You see a group of senior Nazis sitting around the table. They have in their hands the democratic laws of the Jim Crow South. They're using those laws as a model for their own Nuham

birth laws, which made Jews into second class citizens. So, but this is actually right from the transcripts of the historical record and relying on the work of an eminent Yale legal scholar, James Whitman and his book Hitler Is American Model, where he describes all of this and kind of lurid and excruciating details. So again, no one questions my sources. They can't, so instead of attacking what I actually say, they go, oh geez, then't just thing that

Hitler was a liberal? That's prime a facis. This is the way the left is finding discouraged people from actually reading my book, actually seeing my movie and then thinking about it. I don't know if you've ever if you've seen the interview with Professor Jordan Peterson and the BBC interviewer where she just dozens of times comes back to you, well, what you're really saying is and he used to say, no, that's not what I'm really saying. It seems like that's

what ends up happening to you. Wait, Denis, I don't mean to cut you off, but we're having a little trouble hearing you. Can you get a little closer to your phone there, everyone's gonna want to hear what you're saying. Yeah, I'm sorry. Is that better? Yes? Yeah, much better? Dereka, So are you're saying to Chlottesville near and this is big. People want to hear what you're saying. You're go ahead. Yeah. What I was saying is that the Charlottesville narrative. I mean,

the Charlottesville tragedy was a tragedy. Obviously a person got killed and run over. I don't dispute the tragedy in the slightest. What I'm disputing is the ideological meaning of Charlotte's Ville. And what the left basically says is, look all those guys, those white nationalists, they're right wingers and they're or bigot treat today is on the right. And

what I do is I dispute this. I showed that Jason Kessler, the organizer of the Charlottesville white supremacist rally, is a an Obama activist and an Occupy Wall Street activist, a left winger. So you then may ask, wow, you know, how does an Obama vote or an Obama activists become a white supremacist. Something seems really fishy. Um. And the

media knew about this at the time. I mean, it was reported on the Southern Property Law Center website, but they suppressed it because it was inconvenient to their Charlottesville narrative And in the movie Buck, I interview Richard Spencer, the poster boy of white supremacy, and I we just get into his politics in some detail, and it becomes sort of dismainly obvious as you listen to him that this guy is not only on the left, he's on

the far left. I asked him simple things like do you mean do you do you believe all them in a created equal No? Do you believe our rights come from God? No? Well who do our rights come from? Where where do we get them? Well, our rights come from the state. Where else can we get them? The state is the source of all rights. It becomes clear this guy's a collectivist. He believes in the all powerful state. Ask him, what do you think the Reagan terrible president?

Who are your favorite presidents? And he names a bunch of Democrats, starting with Andrew Jackson, And then I said, well these are Democrats and he goes, well a party. Who cares about party? And I go, well, Jackson is the founder of the Democratic Party. So what really Again? For the audience, it's eye opening because you suddenly realize that this guy, who is routinely described as a right Winger is not a right winger at all. He's no conservative. He's you know, he's in a sense, a pawn of

the big lie. And so I think what I'm trying to do in the movie is is not just through arguments, but through investigative reporting, through the horse's mouth, enable people to see the way in which not only bad things have been done by the Democrats, but then progressive scholars and historians have covered this stuff up, and we have to we have to confront the reality of America today. We're dealing not just with fake news, but fake scholarship

and fake history. Death of a Nation is the film, everybody. It's in a thousand theaters across the country. Uh janesh. Will there be a plan for a further rollout? People will eventually be able to download this Where should people go also to find out more information? Yes, so obviously eventually it'll it will come out in home box office and so on. But don't wait for that. I would urge people to go see it soon. Go see it this weekend. Really, the fate of a movie depends on

the opening weekend. In the opening week because of our movie as well, it explodes to more theaters. It spreads out to more people. So take your family and friends and go see it. And this is how you see it. Go to tickets dot Death of a Nation movie dot com. So tickets dot Death of a Nation movie dot com. And if you enjoy the movie, there's a book of the same title out in the bookstores. All right, everybody

go check it out for yourselves. Jennessia Susa, thanks so much for making the time so good to talk to you, and we'll talk soon. My pleasure. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. That was not a security meeting yesterday. Let me throw a penalty flag here, and that was not a red light. That was the White House using

a bunch of people. So for the next two months they can use a talking point that said, hey, every time somebody raises Russia at Sarah Sanders, she's gonna say, look, the President directed those guys you saw and and also those women you saw on the podium to go do something. That was just the PR stunt. That the PR stunt, can you break? Yes, they got used. That's the dumbest thing I've heard on on TV and in at least

a couple of days, which is saying a lot. That's one of the favorite national security ellis over at CNN, by the way, when he used to go on that's Phil Mud. I know Phil a little bit. I've worked with him over there once or once or twice. Very periphectly. I mean, I've spoken the guy, you know, maybe two times in my life. But initially he was like the way they brought me in, which was national security, this

is counters investigations. But he realized if you want Zucker and the rest of the the higher up that's like you, you have to be hashtag resistance, you have to be anti Trump. And so he's now be he's the guy who was yelling about the s whole countries and you know, he's gone completely full on polemicis pundit, you know, the whole thing and the analysis there is just tainted by it because it's a moronic thing to say. It was

a stupid thing to say. It's the White House, White House Press conference with the heads of the most important intelligence agencies in the country going into some detail about the reality of the threat from Russia as well as other countries, by the way, and all the things that are going on right now and what you know what they're trying to do to thwart it? And are so are they all traders? Mr Mudd? Are are they all in Trump's pocket? To the Russians have something on all

of them? I said last night on Shannon brim since Shannon brim Show that with Trump and Russia, he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. And I said that last night, And here we have somebody who's actually coming out saying, oh, yeah, it was it was a PR stunt. Does anyone think for a moment that if Trump did not have the premier national security figures of his administration out there talking about this? They say, why doesn't he talk more about it? Why don't talking more

about Russia? Why don't he talking about the threat to our democracy? These people are hacks. They can't approach this issue with with any honesty. They are hacks. Just so frustrating me. This is supposed to be an area where we all come together and we're on the same team and we're trying to stop Russia. And like I'm the one who's been telling you and you're seeing more stories rolling out now, China is the real concerned, folks. Anyone you here's like, oh, Russia is all focused on Russia.

That's just political hackery. If you should if I'm gonna tell you things, or if we're gonna talk about things that should keep us worried from the PROSPECTI give of what country is gonna overtake us economically, have a much bigger population and a male skewed population, young males without enough females because of the one child policy in China. Folks. People don't often talk about this or think about this.

That demographic reality alone is reason for serious concern when it comes to major Well, and then there's Trump yelling China, but no, I'm being I'm being serious with you, folks, though, And there's the Chinese. The threat to our national security from China is a much more substantial one than what we have from Russia. But you know, then you get the CNN analysts just saying it's it's a photo op.

They're giving information to the public and it was good information, and they say they're taking the steps that the Democrats pretend they want them. So now when they now when they're saying what they're supposed to say, according to Democrats, Russia is still interfering. Russia is still a threat. They're saying what they're supposed to say. They're telling the American people what the Democrats want them to be doing, which is all we're you know, working with state and local

partnerships and all this other stuff. And it's still it's a photo op. It's it's a scam. Everything Trump does is a scam. The unemployment numbers, which are incredibly low, scam, the GDP numbers which are incredibly high, scam, the fact that commerce and industry and capitalism are thriving and people are getting wealthier and doing better, and scam. It's all

a scam, folks. This is Trump derangement syndrome exemplified. I can't even have a press conference addressing in a very professional way with people who are career intelligence professionals what's been going on here with Russia and what they're doing to stop Russia into it too calm the American people's concerns,

which have been wildly exaggerated in the media. Um and and as you know, the media exaggerates both how concerned that the American people are and tried to create exaggerated concern in the American people over the Russia election middlength threat. But even when even when they hold the press conference like this, it's not good enough. It's a scam, it's a photo op. It's these people cannot get Bill mud on this issue just now, un serious, do not take

him seriously and this kind of unfocused, visceral anger. At the other side, are really neutral people like folks on the press corps, it can lead to this, They're not neutral. Look. According today is Washington Post, President Trump has made four thousand twitter and twenty nine false from misleading claims in five days in office. There's an average of seven point six a day. This is not a normal We shouldn't be in the business of just shrugging our shoulders and

normalizing it, normalizing nice progressive term there. You know, don't normalize Trump. He's the president. But this is not This is not normal. You know what also is not normal. See if they're gonna play the whole oh, we're we're the we're the guardians of truth and they're actually the enemy of truth, then I like to point out things like the following uh The Washington Post fact checker claimed that when someone said that they wanted to squeeze Sarah

Sanders neck or to start to ring her neck. That is this is a fact check. The Washington Post fact checker ran, Okay, someone said that she wanted to ring Sarah sanders neck, and the and when then when Sarah Sanders said somebody threatened to choke me or said they wanted to choke me, the fact checker said that Sarah Sanders was wrong. You see, because because ringing somebody's neck

and choking them are not the same thing. According to the Washington Post, Folks, this is what we're talking about. This is where you get these smug, snide punks, these jackasses just down the street from me at plays like the Washington Post, who are all, Oh, were about truth and we're just being fair and neutral press corps. How do people even say this garbage a neutral press corps?

Does anyone think that a single person at ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC that has their own show voted for Trump and his pro Trump Someone's gonna be about there's nobody who's out at eight a month Sundays once a month when there's like not a baseball game. I mean no, I mean that you can actually think of off the top

of your head. I mean someone that we would know, we would know who it is, Mike, let me know if we we got Anna Navarro I think is the worst politic all anialist on TV, which is saying something the least informative, the least insightful. Uh. And also as as just as a person very rude and and not not not pleasant to work with or be around. Uh. Do we have the clip of uh, well, well, well we'll get there. I'll come back into that one I can. But this notion of the neutral press corps and this

is what got me so so riled up yesterday. And I really haven't I haven't shaken it off. I'm still sitting here and thinking to myself, this is just they're just they're just lying to you. They're lying to me, they're lying to you, and they're not backing off any of this. They're not backing off. Okay, here here we go, like here's another. So so they notice that they call out Trump for lying, but that's what they say, Oh,

he lies seven times a day. But then when you see what the Washington Washington Post considers a lie, they're lying about lies. You know, they like to do this this is a new game with journalists because there's still much about fact, there's still much about truth, where they

they become obtuse hyper literalists. Yeah, I mean I remember I actually had an exchange the Washington Post journalist and he was like, well, you you know, what you should is not specifically true, and I responded, or you know, he said, there's been literally endless coverage of something. What you said is not true, and I responded, well, it's not literally endless, jackass, So what you said is not true.

I can do that. I can play this game too, if we if we want to forget how speak people actually speak and what what the message of what they're conveying is and pretend that we're going to take everything absolutely literally word for word, then we're gonna have to change our our way of communicating. Right. You know, if I say, oh, man, you know, I don't know. I'm I'm so I'm so tired, I don't think I can

get up out of bed tomorrow. And it's I'm not I'm not threatening suicide, right, I'm just saying I'm really tired. I mean, it's just people are idiots. They're so and they like to play this game. They think because they can't, they can and attack Trump on his accomplishments as president. They can attack Trump in an open debate on these issues and not have him spank them like a bunch of little children. So what they do is say, well, he's just not he's not factual, he's not factual. It's

not true. It's not true. It's not factual. Well, what's he's saying. That's not factual, that's not true. They think that an opinion that they disagree with is a lie, and there are others. This is a common thing CNN,

Washington Post. They think that someone saying, you know, I don't believe North Korea is a threat anymore, or North Korea is not a threat anymore, Okay, you can say that that's not true, but that's a statement of opinion because there's no actual factual basis for whether North Korea could not be a threat today and tomorrow we could be in the midst of a nuclear war. You know, these are these are opinions that that people are giving,

that they're saying are factually incorrect. Here's another, but here's a fun opinion. If we're gonna talk about things that aren't true, and are accurate. This is on the View, Anna Navarrow, I think is apparently is she now on the View permanently? I mean not that I watched the View, but gosh, h Megan, if you're listening, we gotta We're gonna have to have to get you some some time to do some yoga or some relaxation techniques. I don't know how you can put up with Anna Varro every day.

That's just but we'll see. Um. Here here's Anna Navarrow and Megan going back and forth on the View on this notion of oh yeah, CNN, that's right. A lot of really respected Trump people over there who are treated with respect play it tries to be very balancede and then has commentators on like me and every time my mom and my somebody that is defending Trump, CNN tries to be very balanced. I mean, is she delusional? I know they're writing, I know the writing paychecks for her,

and I generally think that, you know, it's unfair. And this is only by the way people do this to me. Sometimes when they disagree with me, they say, oh, well, you know, why won't you why don't you criticize Fox News? I'm like, well, one I've never been paid a dollar by Fox News, but too, I like Fox News and respect it, and I agree with I agree with what they're doing. I agree with their approach to the news. That's why I don't. I don't agree to and I'm

honest about that. I don't pretend to be like, well, I'm wake up every day, I read CNN, I read Fox, and I make a judgment call about who I think has done a better job with the news that day. I mean, you know, I'm I already know what CNN is doing, but there's notion that CNN tries to be balanced. I mean Navarro, Oh boy, that's a funny one. Yeah, who are who are the the Trump defenders that are

on air? You'll notice nobody When was the last time that they put oh, let's just run through some people here, that would be what was the lost time they put Ben Shapiro on air or Dan Bongino on air, or um Ben dominanch over at the Federalist or Seawan Davis at the Federalist or you know, Vince Colonies from the Daily Caller or I mean, I'm I'm just running off top of my head here, but I mean, all the any of those folks on in a debate segments at CNN.

When was the last time you saw that? Oh that's right, that doesn't happen. Why is that now? You can say, buck? Maybe maybe they won't take it. Um. I'd be willing to bet right now, and I could probably I could not just tweet him, I could text Dan. I bet if they offered to have a debate between Dan Bongino and any uh and any anchor at CNN, he'd take it up in a heartbeat. They won't do it because

they're scared. They won't do it with me anymore. They went from you know, oh, you know, we'll put you on like a third year show sometimes and you can talk national security and you know, we'll pay you a pittance to do it to uh Now they realize, uh no, if if I'm not if I'm not professionally attached to the organization, I will verbally skewer people over there. And they know that. So I don't even didn't even bother anymore.

They used to bother about last CNN invite I got was um, But remember they're invites, and their invites I never get asked to come on. I would never get asked to come on one on one with any of these anchors. Ever, that's too dangerous from they know that.

What they'll do is they'll put you on a panel with two or three other people and then you just don't get much time to talk, get shouted down, and the whole thing is essentially an ambush, and you'll get talked over and the ankle will disagree with you, and the'll misconstrue what you say, and you know that that's what. Yeah, maybe they'll let me do that, but you know, me versus Tapper, me versus Cooper, me versus Lemon. Never, never, on any of these issues, they would get smoked. They

would get schooled. They know that, right. They know that there's no future for them in having to actually defend the ideas that they propagate through this pretense of neutral or objective news. And they're losing ground here. This is different. There is a sea change that's in effect right now that I hope continues on. We're not there yet, but uh, CNN and some of these other places are are are really no longer able to continue with this facade of oh,

we're just we're just like journalists man. People. People are really catching on in a way that I hope they will never forget. And I hope this is the beginning of the end for all these uh so called journalistic outfits that hide behind this uh, this lie of objectivity when they are partisan, they're actually they're not just partisan, their activists. I mean the New York Times has even published, Hey, you know, Obamacare might get repealed. I think it was Obamacare.

Here are the numbers of people you should call, huh like members of Congress. I mean that's activism. I mean the New York Times is engaged in falling activism sometimes and I just I'm not having it, folks, not having anymore, not not playing the game. UM. I Am through playing the game their way at least. And we'll see um.

And that. The good news is that I think in this digital era we are in, um, in this era of digital uh mass communication, the people are key and the democratization of media platforms that is occurring right now will be a very good It will be a very good thing for me, very good thing for people who do their own work, do their own research brings something substantive to the table. And for the overly tanned, overly hair sprayed Alpha News anchors like, what's that guy's name,

Brian Williams. I was gonna say Brian Jennings. Different guy, Uh, Brian Williams. Um not going to be the future? Is is? I think pretty bleak? Actually? Is that that whole that whole sketch, sketch, that whole skit, that premise of the objective news man. I think it's gone away. I hope that it does. Our third and I want to talk to you about how Trump is doing with the African American community. Will also talk about about racism and whether

racism can be anti white. Uh here's a oh. I mentioned the Washington Post before, By the way, here's how because they're so objective. Remember what I told you yesterday about that woman at the New York Times who set all the terrible anti white stuff. Their piece today says this an Asian American woman. This is the Washington Post, an Asian American Woman's tweets ignited debate. Is it okay to make fun of white people online? Yeah, that's what

she was doing, just making fun of white people. Ha ha. It was all such a joke, right, No, the joke is the Washington Post. But we will get into all this and much more, and of course some roll calls,

So stay right there. To all the business owners out there and people who work in HR folks, I just want to say that if you are looking for somebody for your business, I don't care what business it is, large or small, you need to make sure that the person you're bringing into your company that's gonna be in your workplace is uh squared up with the law, is who they say they are, has no problems, has no

red flags in their background. Global verifica network is the only help you need to answer all of those questions. Global Verification is the only dual certified and veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. Look. I know Mark Buckman, the CEO personally. This is the guy that I call up sometimes when I've got a question about cybersecurity, when I wanna just run something by him as a sanity check. He is an expert and his risk mitigation folks are

the best you can find. Trust me. If you have any neative background investigations or vetting, go to my g VN dot com. That's my g VN dot com or call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine buck Sexton Mission decoding the news and disseminating information. Who is actionable intelligence bank magnor mistake American? You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show, analysts. No man attacked on bus for being white. That's the

headline here, folks from Fox five New York. In my hometown, New York City, cops are looking for a guy who attacked a stranger for being white. This is according to the police. Uh, this guy walked up to someone punched him in the face, making an anti white comment. Uh. And the attacker then got off the bus. They don't know anything about it yet. Um. I think what's fascinating about this is that they don't call this racist. Is

not amazing, folks. Isn't that astonishing? So you can be assaulted in this country now because someone does not like the color of your skin as long as it is white. They will not call that racist. They will just call it anti white or attacked or being white. And this is a reflection. And you can say, Buck, why are you talking about this, this local crime story? You know this, What does this have to do with any No? No, no, no no. This is in fact a reflection of exactly

what I've been talking to you about here. This is a reflection of this idea that is very common among progressives, that is very widespread on the left, that you should that that there's no such thing as anti white racism. This is now become something that you see in the culture in coming out in many different ways. This is not something that's just a progressive pundits or others say, this is the This is the reality of how newspapers are poor on this, and sometimes even how the law

treats these things. You know, sometimes it's even a function of when you look deeper into this, you find out that they won't even press hate crime charges against somebody for an anti white attack. And I feel like, given given what's going on with the New York Times in the last twenty four hours, it's it's worth taking a look at at some of this. It's it's worth uh looking a little deeper and see how we could be

in this place. By the way, in case you were wondering, Joan, who is this woman who just got hired by the New York Times, and that they they stayed, they stayed with her right there, not firing her. It's not just the anti white comments. For you know here and there that got her in trouble. You have her saying things like that this has come out today. F the police, cops are a holes, all kinds of antique cop profanity. Uh. She she refers to as I said, blank the police,

and then um oh. Also she wrote kill more men. Uh in response to somebody, I mean this woman is is her Twitter account. It's not that she's woke, it's not that she made a mistake. It seems like she's deranged. It's now a New York Times editorial member, the most prestigious in its own mind at least newspaper in the country, has higher this person and kept her on board. And I think that we are allowed to ask the question, if you know, break this down into layers, you know,

let let's do some real analysis of the concept here. Yeah. I reject the notion there's anti there's no such thing as anti white racism as we see as it's reported. You know, well, you can be attacked for you know, it's anti whiteness, but it's not racism. Let's let's unpack why they think this is the case. Um. And I would also note that one thing that you don't you don't ever hear the meeting talking about this. There were

race riots under Obama. Now I know it's early the Trump administration, but there haven't been any race riots under Trump. And to be told constantly that the uh that that race relations in the country right now are so much worse because of Trump and they've previously been. I sit here and I think to myself, well, I don't really see the Black Lives Matter movement is not out in the streets largely agitating. It was largely agitation that was

going on. And I'll debate that premise with anyone because I saw the rallies myself. I was there, What do we want dead cops when we want them now? Things like that were said, cops are racist murderers. It was not we just want police reform. That's not what the movement was. It wasn't what it was telling people. And maybe that's what they were hoping for, but that wasn't what they were saying. You know, we're do words have meaning or not? But let's let's step back and look

at this premise. There's no such thing is anti white racism. New York Times has made that abundantly clear. They do not believe that's a thing. As I told you yesterday. This is because the left views all race relations as existing within a a hierarchy. And this is true of

also just different groups of people in general. But everything is about intersectionality and where you fall on this scale, and it's about degrees of oppression, and if you are at the very top of the oppression pyramid, as they say white males are in our society, it is impossible for someone to engage in racism against you. They have they have actually redefined the term racism. Racism no longer means, you know, negative judgments or treatment on the basis of

skin color or race. Racism is now some progressive well it has to do with hierarchies of power and thinks. Okay, fine, I want to know what we should teach kids about race and racism now when it comes to white people. I mean, I want to know how far they really take this. I want to know what the limits are, because if white privilege results in constant oppression, are we

supposed to then be pleased? In fact, is it just to be unjust to white people in American society because of all of the injustice that whiteness perpetrates, all the time. I think there are a lot of progressives who wouldn't want to answer that question the affirmative publicly, but absolutely

believe it. They absolutely believe it. And I remember, and I some of you may even know where I'm going with this one, but I remember hearing from friends of mine, uh, and hearing from people that I knew well, including some friends of mine who were black at at the time and then years after as well, that the whole notion of of the o J trial, for example, UH was was it was not just the idea of racism American deciety that o J couldn't get a fair trial even

though he was the guiltiest human being anybody could have ever conjured up right, but that it was payback, that there was some justification for him uh slaughtering the mother of his own children with a with a knife and and brutally murdering her and also a random stranger by the way, but they were both white, and there was

this notion that, uh, this was payback. I was told this by people will if it's it's payback for racism, And I think you can all see how that goes down a very dangerous and destructive path, very quickly, and I look at where what the state of race relations are right now in this country as put forward by progressives, as put forward by the left, and I think to myself, they're now openly saying that whiteness is almost an affliction, that whiteness is something for which you must be sorry

and and you have to uh be pen for your whiteness. And if that's the case, also wonner, well then should we also suffer? Is suffering just for being white now an acceptable situation? And a lot of people on the left are saying that it is a lot of people are are are making claims that could only lead you

to believe it that is what they think. Uh And and the closest you I mean here, here's here's for example, Um what a woman who is a New Yorker writer, another very prestigious publication wrote today on Twitter, Sarah Jong will outright outthink and outlast all you m effers. But good luck being fragile racist misogynists. When they refer to fragility, by the way, this is another term. This is another buzzword on the left. It's white fragility. That white people

are fragile. This is a term if you're not yet acquainted with it. That's I'm glad to bring you into the the bowels of the progre restive status left. They'll refer to white fragility as a means of saying, oh, it's it's essentially them calling white people snowflakes, right, which also I would note, is a racist term that used to be used on a pretty read a regular basis. People white people were referred to snowflakes. That's been lost

now snowflake. I understand, the definition or the the terminology has changed, and now we use snowflake to be somebody that's easily offended in general. But snowflake and other words

certainly evolved with usage. But this notion of white fragility is just that white people, when they object to things like white privilege, or when they object to affirmative action, when they object to negative treatment on account of their skin color, that's not evidence of them just being normal and not thinking that's fair and understanding that's immoral and that that's not that's not justifiable. Uh, that's evidence of

their fragility. Why fragility. I mean, if you go and you do a you do a quick Google search, you will see this term popping up, and you'll see how it is. In fact, there's a white fragility wicki uh. The New Yorker on July, a sociologist examines white fragility. This is I'm telling you, folks, this is the new term white fragility. Why it's so hard for people to

talk about racism, It just goes down to down essentially. Now, if you don't agree with the lefts completely uh, irrational, unreasonable, self refuting conceptions of race and race relations in this country, things like, well, it's okay to discriminate it against Asian people in college emissions. Why, Well, we haven't really out the why, but we know it's okay because we say so. All right, it's okay to be nasty to white people,

to assault them, to hurt them because they're white. Well it's not that, it's okay, but it's not that bad and it's not racism because you know, white people are in this higher they've constructed I mean, they this stuff, this stuff is is garbage thinking, but they are coming up the sugar coated language of white fragility. The Huffington Post a cure for white fragility, The Pacific Standard White fragility on the rules of engagement. And just you do

you do a search, you'll see this term ali. This is this is a new thing, folks. It was white privilege, and now that people are pushing back on white privilege, it's white fragility. Uh. And and and then they tell us, well,

let's just have a constructive conversation on race. The fact that matters that the the Left, because it has no moral philosophical underpinnings, because it really just seeks self righteousness and self actualization through power, can just can change its beliefs on a dime, can can be in a constant

state of both hypocrisy. As I always tell you, hypocrisy is a defining characteristic characteristic of the left and also self refuge uting ideology, meaning that they believe one thing here, which means they can't believe it there, but they'll believe it there anyway because they don't care because it were it works that day and that at that point in time. Contradictory beliefs, hypocritical beliefs and contradictory beliefs. That's what you have with the Left, and particularly the issue of race

and racism. Uh. The the speed with which they have acted like this writer Jong is somehow covered by the discrimination and the the historical experience of African Americans. They just acted well, you know, it's it's all a person of color. So so she's allowed to do this because she's Asian. Now that's she's allowed to act in this way and be a maniac on Twitter without consequence. I'm telling you this is it's gonna get worse and you're

gonna see this term white fragility more. And it's something that we need to stamp out. It's it's a term a conjured up by cowards and idiots in order to silence people that are better than themselves. And we can't let this become a part of discourse that is unchallenged. All Right, I'll be right back. African Americans, so many others, I said, what do you have to lose? You have high crime rates, you have horrible education, you have this. I went through a list of ten that's what happened,

African American, Hispanic Asian. You have the lowest level of unemployment in the history of our country. What how does somebody fight that? Right? How does somebody find it? To be honest? This is probably going to be them. And I'm gonna saying this at this table, the most pro black president that we've had in our lifetime because and I try to you know, adn't the people that I encowner. This president actually wants to prove something to our community,

our faith based community, and our ethnic community. The last president didn't feel like he had He felt like even he got a past. This president is, this administration is probably going to be more proactive. We got in revitalization and prison we formed than any president in your lifetime. President Trump has been making overtures from the very beginning to the black community and and I really do believe that he is hoping to prove prove his good faith

to the black communitiest country through results. And I there there's some reason to believe there's some evidence to show that this is starting, this message is starting to get through. Uh. For example, I believe that his according to the latest Rasmus and Pull on this look, it's his support among

African Americans is tiny. Al Right, It's it's small or relatively speaking to well, I mean, it's basically a lot of Republicans have But I'm saying it's it's a it's a fraction of of overall African Americans in the country. It's something on the on the order of uh ten or twelve percent, I think, and I and according to the most recent Rasmus and poll, which I'm trying to find right now is I'm on air, but I'm pretty sure I read it earlier today. I had to read

a lot of stuff. Uh, it's basically doubled. You know, it's now somewhere in the in the low twenties um, which is substantial. And Republicans have always have had a hard time, They've had a hard time bringing the black community onto their side of the of the aisle. And I just think that the numbers right now don't lie. I mean, Hispanic unemployment is that a record low? Black unemployment?

Is that a record low? And when you when you listen to all the all the people talking about how Trump is he's so racist, he's so racist, I just think to myself, why why did they come up with this narrative and never give me any of the details of what he has done? One that makes him a rate By the way, that's a terrible charge, isn't it. This is thrown around by the media. I mean, people will go on CNN and freely say that the president

is a racist, he's a massogist. They'll say these things, denigrating the current commander chief, denigrating the President of the United States, and they don't feel the least bit strange about it. By the way, there's one more thing here. I this. This is a black veteran who I wish this would this would go viral. This black veteran slamming Democratic Councilwoman Melissa Slag because she was kneeling during the national anthem. Here's what this black veteran had to say.

Playclip one. You're right to protest, to take any the layout black, to do whatever it is that you should please. Okay, but if that's what you would like to do, do that on your own time. Kneel at your sun or daughter's little league game. When you become a selected, an elected official, you become a representative of all of Adam and all the constituencies. There's the reasons why the lady that represent justice has scaled in one hand and thought

of the other in a blind vote. She does not look to see who she's gonna stand just for and who not. But unfortunately one of us that person decided to pull down the flint bote and start peaking. Okay, that's that you ran at a Democrat, But once you became elected, unfortunately, you have to represent all of their constituencies.

Last week, in this week, you've told at least after town, I don't care whether all Yeah, I'm mo powerful stuff there from a veteran an American remember the black community. I thought that was something worth hearing. Before we get closer to our weekend, folks, we will be back in just a moment. He's holding the line for America. Buck sex in his back there? How could be standards? Was asked about this in today's briefing. Her first answer was

a recounting of the responsibilities of the press. So they tried again, we support that or not. While we certainly support freedom of the press, we also support freedom of speech. Uh, and we think that those things go hand in hand. Now New York Times chief point, you know we're not gonna air that anymore. Let's snake that the last there, how could be Sanders clip everywhere at four o'clock. That's it.

You know what makes me sweat? That is vilent I. You know previously the previous answer, who complains about a restaurant that exercises their first member to kick out someone that they think is obliterating democratic norms s. What the what the heck is this obliterating democratic norms talking point? Did you keep hearing from imbeciles like Nicole Wallace? What does that even mean? Democratic norms that the president has to agree with you? Civility has been a one way

street with Democrats for decades. Now, Finally we have a president who's like, you know what, not playing that game anymore. You slap at me, I'm gonna slap back, no more turning the other cheek for the commander in chief. And then they talk about They talk about things like, oh, there's undermining our democratic norms, undermining our institutions, putting our democracy at risk. How how you know what of cowards

at the enemy of the truth media. Also the CNN won't tell you or don't want to talk about, is that Obama use the Justice Department two to make sure that there were no leaks about how craptacular his national

security policy was. That's why they went on into all the different agencies, more prosecutions under the Espionage Act, and every other president before Obama combined and included in at least one indictment a a Fox News reporter as a co conspirator, and also pulled pulled phone records of reporters. I mean, just did things that were beyond the pale of what we expect for. You know, if you want to talk about a free press, that's threatening a free press,

Calling Jim Acosta a clown is not threatening anything. Jim Acosta is a clown. Why is this so hard for these morons to figure out? He is not somebody that we all have to sit around and clap for because he's doing such a hard job. These are not are jobs, folks. I've been deployed to two war zones with members of the United States military. I was assisting them as a civilian. I saw what they were doing. That's a hard job. I worked in the NYPD. I saw what those guys

were and gals were doing day in and daut. That's a hard job. Wearing a suit and sitting in the White House and getting to ask questions and be on TV is a privilege. And any one of those people and this is what they're They're this noxious combination in the elite echelons of media of tremendous arrogance and tremendous insecurity.

So you never really know what you're dealing with, right They they think they're amazing, but deep down and they want ever to treat them like that, But deep down they know that they're completely replaceable and not a person of much substance at all. And Nicole Walls and the fact that she was formally uh a Republican obviously still considers herself for a Republican. But she just goes on MSNBC and does the liberals bidding for them. I mean,

how does she feel about that? She really feels good, you know, she she she was such a conservative or she believes so much then GP that now she's willing to go to the other side and cheer for the other team. Folks, this stuff, this cannot be allowed to continue on like this. We we we need to fight, we need to fight back. You know, I'm saying that she's gonna ban the White House Press Secretary from being on her show. First of all, it's a it's a

completely idle threat. I mean, it's totally but you know, to say that it was vile and to pile on with Sarah Sanders, what was Sarah Sanders really gonna do in that press commerce with Acosta? I mean, this is, by the way, can I get a buck slap John for Nicole Wallace here? I need some kind of a for her comments exactly. Um, I I gotta say, you know, what was? What was Sarah Sander's gonna say. I'm gonna undermine the President. I'm gonna say what he said was wrong.

She's his spokesperson. The President speaks for himself. She speaks for the White House on matters of policy. This isn't supposed to be a gotcha game. She goes out there and reporters are playing gotcha all day. They think that's speaking truth to power. They're not asking important questions about policy. In many cases, sometimes they are. I'm not gonna look, you know, I'm focusing on the bad behavior because the bad behavior is what overwhelms everything else. Yeah, they're journalist

who do good stuff. I saw my buddy Sager from The Daily Caller over at Fox last night. We're on the Shannon Bream Show together or right one after the other, not together, but we're at the same show. And you know, he asked a very good question in the White House Press briefing, and then I'm seeing all these people that will just they'll just pile on and say the Daily Caller is not real journalist. I'm like, the Daily Caller

has got a lot of really smart, hard working, talented people. Um. Oh, producer might just told me that Wallace calls herself a nonpracticing Republican. Yeah, no, crap, you're a nonpracticing Republican. You're a you're a turn coat. Actually, people are turn coats for paychecks, folks, lots of them over at MSNBC. Turncoats on the GOP, turncoats on conservatism. They should they should not be welcomed back into the echelons of power of the party. Ever. Ever, we should remember this moment. We

got a roll call coming up. We'll have some fun. You know. We did a story today on my TV show about dogs that are a little pudgy, and pudgy dogs are cute, but it's bad for them, it's unhealthy. But just because dogs puggy doesn't be the kid dig you know, it might just make the whole a little bigger. And if you've got a yard and you've got a fence, I don't care if Fido's put on some extra l B s. If he wants to, he'll start digging and he'll make the hole so that he can get out.

And now you've got a problem on your hands. All right, don't let your pet, skinny or fat, slip through the fence. Okay. Dig Defense is what you need. It is genius. It extends the protection of your fence underground. You installed at the base of any fence, and it will protect both your pet and your property. No more chasing Fido as he runs around once he gets outside the fence like he's on some kind of jail break show. None of that.

All right, stop the dig now with dig Defense. It's available online at Lows Tractor Supply Menhard's wayfair and stop the dig dot com for the month of Argust. Use promo code buck for ten percent off. That's right, Go to stop the dig dot com promo code buck for ten percent off. Ain't no party, look a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party. Don't stop. Yeah, we got bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. I'm excited for roll call, excited for the weekend to come,

my friends. Let me just note that the Raheem Kassam guest appearance in the podcast this week I think has gotten a lot of folks excited about The Freedom Hunt. If you are not a podcast listener, I think this is a good one for you to try. Try your first shot on this one. Try it and see what you think. It's so easy. You just go to stitcher dot com and it's free. Type in Freedom Hunt or The Buck Sexton Show and you'll see it'll pop up

there or on iTunes. You can listen that way. Raheem and I had a lot of fun talking about things. Jesse Kelly and Sean Parnell will be back later this month on The Freedom Hunt. I'm taking suggestions for guests next week. Send me your thoughts on Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton. Okay, we have first up here Stacy, who writes Buck, I haven't heard you this fired up, but I can't agree with you more about the press, they are a little cry babies. You're my hero for

speaking speaking out about the things you do Shields High. Well, thank you, Stacy. I do feel passionately about this subject. I think that a lot of people in the press are um. I don't know that there's lacking in courage, decency and virtue and and they need to be called out for it. I think there's a lot of punks in the media, I really do. They're not good for and I know them, I know who they are, So it gets me particularly aggravated when I see them engaging

in just a lot of public dishonesty. That's that's just meant to advance their advanced themselves in their own careers. Pablo, next up here, whoa, here we go, Pablo. Seven chipmunks turning on a branch eating a lot of sunflowers all my uncle's ranch. You know that old children's tail from the sea. It's like dreaming about Gorgonzola cheese when it's clearly breed. Time baby stepping into my office. There's something about Mary. Pablo, you are right. I will see your

quote and raise you. One that came to mind as people in the gym, we're looking at me for laughing out loud as you busted out the above yesterday. You're making me look stupid, you panded jerk, thanks to laugh this morning. Shields high brother o Paplo. I'm glad you gotta laugh out of that one. And uh, I don't know what you're making me look like you're making me look stupid. You panted jerk. I don't know what that's from, so I'm gonna have to uh, I'm gonna have to

hit the map, hit the buzzer on that one. But thank you for writing anybody. Always good to hear from you. My brother Darby from Texas. The next step here something about Mary. Yep, he got it right. Step in my office. You're fired. Ha well played, Buck Well, thank you, thank you, sir, well played for you two for getting it right. Next we have Lanny Lanny Rides greetings from Arizona, Buck, first time I ever watching your TV show today. I watched

the interview you did with the Nisha Susia. Wish you spoke up more than your co host did. The interview hasn't even started, and that smug look she had was truly annoying and obnoxious. I give credit to to Nish for keeping it will and collected the whole time. Enjoy your weekend and shields high uh from Lanny. Lenny. You

know I didn't. I didn't really know that there was going to be quite the amount of tension in that interview that there was with Denish and Crystal and I can tell you that when you're in a co host position with somebody and you're not on the same team ideologically, it can be a very delicate thing because if if she feels like I'm jumping in to take Denish's side, that could make the situation more tense, and then all

of a sudden, you got TV that's going off the rails. Uh. And also I would say that Denish needs no one's help and and didn't need my help clearly, So it wasn't a uh, it was not the the The interview did not go as planned in that sense, and I am I'm glad that we've uh got a chance to talk about a little bit here. I don't really This is the tough part of doing a left right show is when one person is particularly um ideologically opposed to

a certain guest, how do you handle that? Because if it turns into a two on one, that breaks down the whole dynamic of the show, which is that we're gonna talk about it from both sides. But I did not get a chance to talk to Denise enough in the TV interview, which is why we've invited which is why we invited him on radio. Also just because I

wanted to talk to him on radio and general. Glenn writes, Uh, Buck, I love hearing what you have to say on all the news happening every day, as well as your thoughts on the swamp and the swamp monsters. Even though I listen to the podcast, so I'm a day behind. Since you love movie quotes so much, I have three quotes for you to guess. They all come from action movies. He's good with cooking knives. Well, that's from Under Siege obviously.

Next one here is Ranger. Uh, Colonel, it's the major. Thanks. I don't know any of those, man, you got me on those quotes. You guys are writing in. Really really Ranger, that's one. That's that's a quote. I mean, that's that's a word. I don't know if that's a quote. Thank you for all you do, Black. I look forward to more Shields High and more of what you have to say. Glenn from North Carolina. Well, Glenn, thank you so much

for writing in. And yeah, I'm actually even though it's a lot of work, I'm looking forward to getting the Shields Hie up and running again. It's just something I do for this audience. Like I said, I don't do enough of them that we can schedule, at least not yet we can schedule advertising on it. So it's it's just a It really is a labor of love. There is not there's no capitalist impulse yet behind doing Shields High. Hopefully one day that will change, but we will see.

Jason writes, uh, gotta be something about Nary as, something about Mary with the serial killer. My movie quote for you, how dare you sir? Man? Guys, you're you're crushing me with these like very vague short movie quotes today. I don't know, I don't know. How dare you? Sir? Oh? You know what? Actually, I think I've got that one. And then does Harrison Ford returned with how dare you? Sir?

And and it's it's right, I got this one. It's uh, Clear and Present Danger, Harrison Phone, Harrison Ford, the old Potomac two step Jack. You're going to put this one away, keep this card for later. It's uh, it's a great that's actually like a pretty memorable scene in that movie. I think that movie is good. The only part of Clear and Present Danger that I really have a tough time with is when the deputy director of the c I a goes operational and is carrying, you know, carrying

a weapon, and that doesn't happen. Guys, I can tell you this right now that you know that the CIA director, whoever that person may be at any point in time, is not somebody that you want to have next to you in a in a gunfight or a bar fight. Okay, CI director is basically a super nerd Uh, Travis writes original squad here heard you first on Rush. I will buy a CNN sucks t shirt or two. Love the show,

keep it up, Travis, Well, thank you, Travis. Um I I think that those shirts would sell out rather quickly. In fact, we should get some of those shirts going. I think that would be fun. Uh. Next here, Jeremy um Buck really enjoying the freedom on interviews you've had last few episodes. I'm getting a little worried about our friend Comy Bear. We haven't heard from him in sometime. We all know those winners in fladi Astak can be brutal. Can we get a brief update from him in the

next Freedom Hut podcast. If we need a crowdfunding a care package abortion vodka, let him Let Team Buck know from Jeremy. Jeremy man, you are you're keeping You're keeping us honest here. You are correct, Uh that we have not had some comy bear in awhile the bear will be back. Man. God Uh, I got so many projects, so many things I'm trying to stay up on, and that's one of the comy bear is very important. We will get back to it. Uh, Willie rants Hey, Buck

Costa seems to have had a bad memory. Not long ago Republican was badly wounded and the media went too far a long time ago. Look, I agree, Willie. That's why I said that on the show. It's Republicans that have to fear for their safety in general in this country. It's it's Trump supporters who have to be concerned about being assaulted or denigrated or uh just in general attacked in public for supporting the the the sitting president the

United States. Folks. Uh, this is a this is a big problem in this country when when the culture is so divided that there seems to be this acceptance of of pretending. I mean that's what really what liberals do.

Liberals pretend that supporting Trump is is something akin to supporting the KKK, or supporting Nazism, or supporting some horrific violence and evil ideology, and he's the president United States, and he's doing a great job, and the country is in really good shape, and they just don't they pretend not to care about any of that. It's it's really bizarre. I'll be honest with you, uh Sterling. Next up here, Hey, Buck, I have a friend from Austria, and back in the

nineties we talked about his education. He told me that by the age of fourteen he had to choose a career path and the rest of his education is geared in that direction. I imagine it's the only affordable way to make education available for the whole population. Do you know of any studies or information about countries with public higher learning that described this type of plan. I bet liberal arts isn't on the list of available degrees, Sterling, Sterling.

It's a great question, and I can't say that I have much background in how other countries do their their schooling in terms of how are you picked. I know that in uh in France, for example, you take tests, and not everybody you I know there are countries. Let me just put it this way, where you have to essentially take a standardized test for college level stuff, and people get tracked toward more trade school, and some people get tracked toward a specific area of study in the

sciences or in the humanities. But yeah, um, that's a very good question. It's something that I will look into. Next up here we get aries. Who writes l O l you've got CNN on. I hear a baby crying in the background. Uh CNN. CNN got called out this week. Thank heavens for that. Uh. Larry writes Buck your show is awesome. I listened to you in Boston. Keep up the good work, Larry. Hey, Larry, you're awesome. Thanks for listening to my brother up in Boston. I appreciate it.

That's gonna be it from the Hut for this week, folks, another one live from the Swamp in the books. Please do check out their Freedom Hut podcast. I'm telling you it's a great listen. You'll enjoy it this weekend on iTunes or Stitcher. I'll see you next week. Every day, She'll ti