Rat Cohen Circus Hits Capitol Hill

This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, America, You're a great American. Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. Remember you guys are down, and it makes sense that most of them, all of them, says Poles. I just told you I answered your question. Okay, which Poles? I want to apologize to each member to use Congress as a whole. The last time I appeared

before Congress, I came to protect mister Trump. Today I am here to tell the truth about mister Trump. I lied to Congress when mister Trump stopped negotiating the Moscow Tower project in Russia. I stated that we stopped negotiating in January of twenty sixteen. That was false. Our negotiations continued for months later during the campaign. Mister Trump did not directly tell me to lie to Congress. That's not

how he operates. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Uh. You know, this is one of these days where the whole news media, the whole journalism apparatus in this country is fixated, fixated on this Cohen testimony on Capitol Hill. I think a lot of Americans don't pay attention to this, and rightfully so because really, ultimately it's just such a circus, so much in one place that is despicable and disgraceful,

so many lies here. Yeah, i'man Cohen's a liar. Cohen is being forced to engage in a kind of self flagellation, kind of ritualized humiliation on TV for the amusement of the trump'ter arrangement syndrome. Mob Democrats get to grand stand and give these little short speeches about how this and that and democracy. And it was one of these days where you also are reminded that a lot of people

who are in Congress just aren't very smart. They're just not you know, they just really wanted the job and willing to say whatever they had to say to get the job. But a lot of members of Congress are deeply unimpressive. But Michael Cohen, they set him up to do this, the Democrats asked him to do this. He's got Lannie Davis close confidante consoliary to the Clintons, Lannie Davis there with him, and they're going with this whole Oh,

it's a redemption story. Oh that's right. Cohen just want he just wants to be a better man now he's learned his lesson. Whatever they have to say, They are going to say here, you know, whatever they have to do to try to make this stick. And the whole thing's a disgrace. The whole thing is a disgrace. You first of all, have a guy who is the personal lawyer to the president and he is violating attorney client privilege just because there's no proof of any criminal activity

between Trump and Cohen. And if they can't get him, I mean, I have obviously a completely different take on this. And you're gonna get from the mainstream media if you can't get the President of the United States on something when you have his attorney for over a decade just doing everything that he can to throw his former client into the bus. I mean all ethics, by the way, all sense of decency and propriety for a lawyer all gone here. But they still can't nail Trump with anything.

There's still nothing there, and they don't have anything on collusion. They don't have anything to prove the Russia hoax was real that the Trump administration. Could you imagine if we if we had had one lawyer close to Hillary and Bill Clinton for the last ten years who decided to just straight up flip on them. I mean, give all the goods, you know, Hillary and Billy, they'd be going

away for a long time. And even though the prosecutors the Democratic establishment wouldn't want anyone to bring charges against them, it would be too obvious. They'd be too much there. So if someone with access to what was really happening with Hillary and the Clinton Foundation and Bill and I was just worth eight hundred thousand for that speech in Russia or five hundred thousand or whatever was somebody came forward, the Clintons would be would be over and done with

and sent to prison very very expeditiously. But they've got the president's personal attorney coming forward saying everything he can to try and destroy this president, and they're not going to have any charges. I mean, Cohen said, I'm a Shane because I know what Trump is. He is a racist, he is a conman, he is a cheat, and yet he's a better president than Barack Obama was, or George Bush was, or just go down the list. The country

is doing well. I spoke this week even to some friends of mine who are pretty agnostic about politics but very very knowledgeable about economics and finance because they work in those areas in ways where you have to be good at your job. I'm not talking about professors, I'm talking about practitioners, and they say, look, I don't agree with the president's tone of it, but in terms of what he's doing, in terms of the way he's approaching

capitalism and the economy, it's great. It's really really positive for the country. So you know that they can tell us as much as they want the Trump is a racist, a comment, a cheat, But at the end of the day, this is coming from a guy who is a known liar. But even more importantly than the fact that that Cohen is a known liar, a lot of what the testimony did today was shoot down some of the craziest conspiracy

theories out there about Trump. We did get Cohen on the record in front of Congress saying he's never been in Prague. So a very clearly verifiable part of the dossier that was used to get this whole Russia collusion farcet going was wrong. And unless you think that Cohen's just subjecting himself to additional possible federal criminal charges just

for giggles at this point. But everything that happened today with this, all of the different you know, congressional questioners and and everybody who was coming after, they're all part of this circus effort to try and create a basis for we all know this is going to turn into, which is impeachment. They want to impeach this president. That's

what they want to do. They want to impeach him, even if they realize and I think the Democrats know this somewhere and their Democrat minds, they know that impeaching the president may help him stay in office, impeaching the president may be a bad political move. I don't think that Democrats can help themselves. I think that they're at a point where they just feel like they absolutely. Their base demands it. Their base demands that the President United

States gets impeached. This is now, that this is, These are the wages of Trump's arrangement syndrome that we are seeing happening right now. Representative Green from Oh wow, I talked to him this morning. That's interesting, and then he's on the on Capitol Hill answer. But I think it's

still going on now. I mean the whole thing. I'll get into my broad stroke assessment of it in a second, but whole thing's kind of a waste of time, honestly, because even if they didn't do this, Democrats are going to impeach Trump. There's really no new information. There's nothing new to work with here. In fact, if anything, it just shows that there's if Michael Cohen didn't know about collusion, are we really gonna think that there was collusion? Who

did know? Donald Trump just did this whole thing with Russia on his own, didn't didn't talk to anybody, didn't What a joke? Any Representative Green is saying though Cohen's a liar, which we all know. Play nine. The Democrats have vastly limited the scope of this hearing. They've issued a gag order to try to tell members of this committee what we can and cannot talk about. My colleagues on the other side of the aisle claim that they want the truth, that they want transparency and fair oversight.

Yet the Democrats witness to testify before Congress today is none other than a scorned man who's going to prison for lying to Congress. Let that sink in. He's going to prison for lying to Congress, and he's the star witness to Congress. If you read the sentencing report on mister Cohen, words like deceptive and greedy are scattered throughout that report. It paints a picture of a narcissist, a bully who cannot tell the truth, whether it's about the

president or about his own personal life. But today he's the majority party's star witness. If the Democrats were after the truth, they'd have an honest person here testifying. Now. I think most of what Congress and Green there said is true, except I would add this. I think Republicans, a lot of them that they didn't really do as

good a job as I would have liked. I think a lot of Republicans were were weak in their questioning here because they should have seen Cohen as an opportunity to knock down some of the crazier things that Democrats still cling to about Russia collusion, right. I mean the fact that it took them as long as it did to ask a question about have you ever been to Prague? For example? I mean, this should have been asked a

lot sooner. This should have been known a lot sooner on the record, this idea that he was scorned though, and this came up quite a bit. It were saying that the issue here was that Cohen didn't get the White House job that he wanted. I would say even CNN and some of the Democrats were like, well, look, we all know Cohen wanted a White House job that was well known, but that he would be doing all this because he didn't get that job. And some Republicans

seem to take that approach that that's just silly. He's doing what he Cohen is trying to trash the president's today because he's going to federal prison. He wants some sense that the establishment will make room for him when he gets out, that he will have made amends in the eyes of the very powerful Democrat machine in this country.

And you know, he's trying to take some of the heat off himself as he goes as he goes away, I mean, this was his throwing himself on the mercy of the left wing machine today, and the left wing machine has no mercy. So it's a very bad idea. Now, that's what this was. He's nailed on numerous federal charges, he's facing years and years in prison. They could have gotten him to say whatever they wanted him to say today, and that's pretty much what they did. This was a setup,

as we know. This was the Democrats engaging in politics under the guise of oversight. There's no oversight here. They were asking him all kinds of stuff about Trump and his finances and his taxes, and this was just they turned Congress today into one big opo session. It's like they made Congress one of those mega panels of imbeciles over at c Then you just get to hear all

this different bashing of Trump. And yes, there were some Republicans there that were trying to get better answers, trying to push back on this, but by and large, because Michael Cohen is the witness, you're gonna get anti Trump lunacy, and that was what you got. Not all of It went well for Cohen, though for sure Mark Meadows asked him about what he was doing with his foreign entities.

And this is tough, right because we've got how many hours of hours and hours and hours of testimony to day, But we're gonna spend We're only talking about this a little bit the first hour of the show. That's it. We're gonna move on to other things. This is not that important. I watched it today so that you don't have to, and and it already and no one's even gonna remember this in a week. The Democrats will just

refer to Michael Cohen's damaging testimony. Cohen could have showed up in like I Hate Trump, and all we'd hear for weeks ahead was Democrats saying Michael Cohen's damn damning testimony of Donald Trump means that we must, we have no choice but to impeach. That's where all this is going.

It was just mostly blather today. I mean, Debbie Wasserman Schultz at one point was asking, well, you can't prove collusion, don't have any proof, but do you think it's like possible maybe that he colluded with the Russians based on you knowing him. That's asking a witness to just wildly speculate. Yeah, do you think it's possible you can't prove it? Do you think that this person is actually an axe murderer? I mean, there's no proof of this, But do you think,

I mean, maybe can you prove he's not an axe murderer? Well, I suppose that's one way to go here. There were some takeaways from this that I think we'll come up again, and that will be helpful for us to dig into a bit. We will certainly do that. We'll also talk about the fact that the president's trying to negotiate a deal that would help avert a major war on the Korean peninsula that could have come as soon as who knows, a matter of a few years based on what we've

been seeing. There also Trump's efforts with China. How important those are right now? I mean, there's a lot of stuff that's happening that really does matter. Michael Cohen talking about a payoff of a porn star is not one of them. But here we are. The country has been so at least the people that believe the Democrats have their minds have been so poisoned against this president that they can't help, but latch onto every fanatical bit of

Trump hatred that they can. We've got much more common team, Stay with me. I'm concerned about your lives today. Under your testimony just a few minutes ago to me, you indicated that you had contracts with foreign entities, and yet we have a truth and Testimony disclosure film which requires you to list those foreign contracts for the last two years, and you put na on there. And it's a criminal

offense to not have that accurately. So when were you lying they're in the testimony to me earlier today or when you filled out the form. Jemma's time has expired. As to coin, you may answer his question and then whatever you wanted to say on it is his questions. Unfortunately I don't have an answer for his question. Well, Mark Meadows is saying that there could be even further legal jeopardy at this point for Colin, although I doubt

anyone's good. I think he referred him to the DOJ for failing to fill out that thing about the foreign influences correctly. But you know, Cohen's already go into prison, so he has nothing to lose here except well, maybe shave some time off of his sentence. That's always possible. Although in a federal situation you actually can't get parole,

so the charges are all federal. That wouldn't work. Cohen is not a particularly good lawyer, and this is I cannot skip over this entirely particularly good lawyer he may be. I don't know if it's Code or Alvanati, who is the worst lawyer twenty eighteen. It's a I tell call. I think either one of them you can make the case.

But Cohen was asked or he asked a very straightforward question because remember he taped Trump, which is a strange thing to do as well, because he taped him before it seems that he had this whole change of heart thing, right, I mean, you got Carolyn Maloney is saying, for example, that this is a story of redemption. The congresswoman Maloney played fourteen. Michael, can you suggest who else this committee

should talk to for additional information on this or anything else? Yes, I believe David Becker, Dylan Howard, Barry Levine of AMI as well, Alan Weisselberg, Alan Garden, Trump Organization as well. Well. Thank you very much for your testimony, and mister Chairman, this is a story of redemption, Thank you man. Meanwhile, a story of redemption. Yeah right. Cohen doesn't know if recording clients is ethical play fifteen New York's a one party can sensate, one person can record the other one

without it being illegal. Correct, But you also are a member of the New York Bar. I was, yes, how would you rate recording clients in the ethical realm of being a lawyer? And it's not illegal? And I'm not asking if it's illegal, I'm asking if it's I don't I don't know that we'd have to leave and judgment of the bars socially so. But I think every other lawyer in here knows exactly where it is in the

ethical standard. Highly highly highly unethical. I'm not a lawyer, and I don't play well on radio, but I can tell you guess what lawyers recording their clients as leverage against them. It's a big problem. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton his back. Once I get eight seconds. I got eight seconds. What did you talk to mister Schiff about. I spoke to mister Schiff about topics that we're going to be raised at the upcoming hearing. Whoa

not just what time to show up? Actually what you're going to talk about the gentlemen? Time to expired? Wow, mister starbing H. It's almost like this is all a Democrat opo exhibition in the first place, isn't it. I want to bring in somebody who can speak to the politics and also speak to what's going on in Vietnam, which is much more consequential than anything happening on Capitol Hill. Today. We're joined by our friend Tony Schaeffer, Lieutenant colonel. He

has of course retired. He's Vice president for Strategic Initiatives and Operations at the London Center for Policy Research. Tony, great to have you all, my friend, Hey Buck, thanks for having me. Great to be back on and talking to you again. So tell a bit about just, you know, your takeaways today. What mattered from what was a pretty endless, repetitive and overall boring hearing, but from what you could see and from you know, what should we care about?

From as if anything, well, I think the one thing that kicked this all off theoretically, you know, theoretically being the operative word, is the Russian collusion issue. And I heard nothing that relates directly to anything Russia other than an opinion that you know, Cohen had not. Remember, this guy's a lawyer, so he's supposed to understand the basic tenants of the law. He had a feeling that something was going on, and you know, you and I and

stuff we've been over the years. That won't even make for a good field report, let alone, uh, you know, a sworn bit of testimony. And secondly, you know Jim Jordan and I love Jimmy, you know, confirm a friend, was I think doing the right thing going through and trying to tear down the narrative by the fact that Cohen lied, He got caught lying. He's been convicted. Pretty much everything he's been convicted of relates to his own

personal deceptive practices. And that's the other thing that Jim Jordan I think did a great job, and other members of the Republican side did. They kind of showed this guy to be a complete fraud and those those things, you know, that's the fact. And you've got people like Shift Representative Shift, whose primary objective in life has not

been accountability or oversight. It's been trying to find something to disrupt the president and what he's doing, and to me today was a complete and utter play, if you will, good guys, bad guys, all about the politics, But wasn't one point I found from anything I've heard, that resulted in any legal issue. The president should be worried about it.

I think it was just a political theater. And in terms of impeachment, are we heading there regardless of whatever the analysis is from the left of today's events, And I've always felt like they're willing to go there, even

if wisdom would tell them not to. Unfortunately, I think that if people were actually looking at the facts and again following the law, looking at what is legal and not, the issues which were brought up today by Cohen are inconvenient and it's it's the old adage of making sausage, you know, the sausage making process is very nasty. Politics are very nasty, nasty game, and everything I heard that they had to do with the way the political game is played, no matter what side you're on, but not

a thing rises to the level remotely of impeachment. With that said, I think that the Democrat Party are completely committed to that being a course of action, and I don't think there's going to be any common sense or any facts which slowed them down from pushing towards something in the way of some appeachable offense, even if they have to make one out, make one up out a whole cloth. We're speaking to a Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaeffer

of a London Center for a Policy research. All right, let's get to Let's get to something that actually matters to all of us, or should matter to all of us, which is the prospect for a breakthrough with North Korea President Trump's in Vietnam. Look, Tony, you and I both know that this is not just high stakes. It is a difficult a difficult ask. It's a difficult thing to

pull off here, no question about it. But you know, how do you view where the president is on this so far, and what are your expectations for what he realistically but successfully could get out of this. Yeah. I've worked this issue since the nineteen ninety two one, back when Jim Wolsey became director of CIA, and Jim and I are still friends and we talk about this fairly often. Even then in the nineties, when we knew that we had intered into agreement that they would uncularize, they didn't

do it. We gave the stuff anyway. That was repeated under President Bush and again repeated under Barack Obama. Every time we've sought an agreement and given them stuff, they were neigued. President got to stop that. He's actually taking the approach of let's talk to them and maintain really hard sanctions, but give them an option other than simply

trying to contain them. And the option here, I think is a valid one is the idea of creating an economic circumstance, an enticement, if you will, for the entire country to kind of walk itself off the ledge. And I think the strategy of doing this in Vietnam, which was a former enemy now turned an economic partner, was a brilliant move. It's kind of like the proofs in the pudding, walk away from the Dula coast language and behavior,

and hey, you may join the twenty first century. So I think that's the thing to take away from here. And do I believe there'll be a huge breakout or a huge event at this I'm hoping, I am sincerely hoping that we'll get some indication that we're going to end the Korean War war that's been essentially ongoing. But on pause since nineteen nineteen fifty one. We entered in

the arm assists in fifty three. So I do believe the president's doing a good job of really pushing him to understand that we will continue to use military force if necessary, because maintain sanctions as we are until there's some indication that he's sincere and doing the things complying with these things we're asking to do, primarily the nicular weaponsition taking Let's take the Trump approach off the table for a moment, based on the glide path that we

were on from the Obama administration beforehand. If status quo had continued with North Korea. With the approach North Korea, what did you see happening in the next five years? Well, I would have send two years buck. Look, they were building an effective range of ballistic missiles, very long range that could reach her. Why I look out met with Coulsy Gabbett on this while the Democrat Party's anti ballistic

missile protection. She was calling for Hawaii to be essentially armed because there was a realistic a threat against the state of the Hawaii. The other thing that I was concerned about is that they may do some provocative actions such as a firing off a high altitude nucular blast and creating an MP electromegatic pulse and saying, oh, we

had no idea that was going to cause damage. And under a Barack Obama, based on his other lack of following through on threats such as Syria, I think would have had the impression he could get away with that,

and he would have continued to push. So this is the critical departure from the Obama administration is that the President Trump as has made it very clear, and I do believe General Joseph Done for the Chairman to Joint Chiefs, has made this very clear in the language they've been using that there would be huge consequences for any continued provocation. And then the engagement that President Trump entered into I think has been another thing which has prevented them from

firing new ballistic missiles. And I'm sorry, I'm one of those who I do believe that they've got re entry technology for nucular weapons and buck I mean of the I don't know what the intelligencemmunity is thinking, but it's not that difficult. It's all about ceramics. You can if you can deal with high temperature surroundings, you can create every entry vehicle. So I do believe that that direction

would have been sustained by the North Koreans. They would have continued to develop weapons, and I think they would have had an eye on us some provocative fashion to see how far they could get away with something. You think we might have ended up having to take a strike against them before that, Yeah, no doubt. For a fact. We've planned these things since the nineties, but we've never fallen through. But I do believe that he was. He was inching his way forward, but just seeing how far

he could get. And remember, there was no consequences to the bad behavior. It's been made very clear that there will be consequences, and there's no doubt that President Trump would have fall us through with consequences that behavior continues. So again it's night and day between what Barack Obama I think and at frankly a Hillary Clinton presidency would have resulted in. I think we would have seen some level of nikular use the North Koreans, so they thought

they could get away with it. Speaking to Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schaefer here before we let you go, Uh, Tony, I want to ask you about Syria. Something yeah, near and dear to my heart as a topic, but also as as something that I'm gonna be talking about at seapack later on in the week. Where are you what's your your sense of the decision to lead behind? I think it's four hundred. I've seen three hundred, four hundreds something like that in Syria. What is the proper mission

set for the United States inside Syria? The primary missions at this point in special operations and closer support to our allies occurreds in the Syrian Free Forces are working with. That's it. It's not our job to rebuild Syria. I think the primary mission there should go to the regional allies and friends. We've been working on something since before the administration came in called the Arab NATO. It's now

called the Middle East Strategic Alliance. The idea should be bucked that, you know, people other than us goes in to do the peacekeeping in the stability GOMP. The other thing is, you know, when the audience, I don't think it is gonna be prize. We had put indo Syria as part of our going after isis a perhaps depending on who you talk to, between six to eight thousand American forces that includes contractors and military forces, and simply put,

they were becoming essentially a mission creep. We were doing more than our original mission of defeating ISIS, and that's dangerous. We've seen that happen before in other nations. And I'm one of those who I'm a Reagan Conservative, I'm not an eacon. I don't believe it's our job to go solve every single world conflict. It's our job to defeat terrorist organizations which lead which are clear in present danger to our interests, our homeland, and our allies. And I

think that's been pretty much done regarding ISIS. The other things should be done to resolve the issue in Syria, but I don't believe for a minute that are putting in a large ground force, which hr McMaster was proposing and others have tried to push for, would be anything more than folly, as we've seen in other nations where we've we've done that sort of thing. Jennet, Colonel Tony Shaffer every Buddy London's for Policy Research to see what he's up to, and also on Twitter, T s pooky

or T spooky depending on T spooky. Okay, Tony thanks so much for making the time. Man appreciate it. Hey, thanks luck team, We'll be right back. Here's what the US attorney said about mister Cohen. While mister Cohen enjoyed a privileged life, his desire for ever greater wealth and influence precipitated an extensive course of criminal conduct. Mister Cohen committed four four distinct federal crimes over a period of

several years. He was motivated to do so by personal greed, and repeatedly, repeatedly used his power and influence for deceptive ends. But the Democrats don't care. They don't care. They just want to use you. Mister Cohen, you're there, Patsy. Today they got to find somebody somewhere to say something so they can try to remove the president from office. That is correct. This was all a set up today, all an effort to just let the left air out all

of its rage against this president. Oh, talking about his tax returns, his golf courses, all this stuff. What a giant waste of everybody's time. But if you're consumed with anger at this president for taking away what the left believed was rightfully Hilary's the power of the presidency, itself. I guess any opportunity to vent that fury is something

that you jump at. And so here we are keep in mind that it is still believed that next week now, once the president's back from Vietnam, next week, there will be all the Mullar probe will essentially end. There will be a report that we may or may not get to see some parts of all of I don't know, but you could tell that there's already a bit of a preview of how the left is going to treat

that report, because today people were saying things. I was looking at the analysis from the Blue Check journo types, oh Trump Trump had advanced word of wiki leaks. Advanced word of wiki leaks. No, that's not true. It's not true. If you look WikiLeaks was before the Trump Roger Stone conversation supposedly happened about contacting WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks that had already tweeted out from its official account that they were going to drop emails about Hillary and Burnie and on all

of that. So that was already out there. These were rumors that people were hearing for quite a while during that period of time, and it was widely known that the WikiLeaks was going to drop something, and people had a pretty good idea of what that was. But the misreporting from journalists is not something that they ever think they're going to be held to account for. They're not going to be punished as long as it hurts Trump or this is all a hurt Trump operation. That is

what they were trying to do today. That was the whole purpose of this. And that's also why you can tell, based on the Democrats who were involved, that this really is a Clinton This is Hilary's revenge in a sense. Jim Jordan actually spoke to this when he went after Elijah Cummings a little bit in the hearing. Clicklip five. Mister chairman, your chairmanship will always be identified with this hearing, and we all need to understand what this is. This

is the Michael Cohen hearing presented by Lanny Davis. That's right, Lanny Davis choreographed the whole darned thing. The Clinton's best friend, loyalists operative. Lannye Davis put this all together. You know how we know? He told our staff, He told the committee staff, he said the hearing was his idea. He selected this committee. He had to talk Michael Cohen into coming, and most importantly, he had to persuade the chairman to

actually have it. This might be the first time someone convicted of lying to Congress has appeared again so quickly in front of Congress. Certainly it's the first time a convicted perjurer has been brought back to be a star witness in a hearing. Jim Jordan going for it today. You know, obviously he didn't have a blazer on because

he's Jim Jordan, so no suit jacket for Jim. But he's making some very important points here, which is that this was all just about politics today, and it tells you a lot about the new Democrat majority that this is the hearing that they want to have. You know, one thing was surprising. Occasio Cortez got her shot to ask Cohen questions. It was she didn't ask him anything. Really, it was a very maybe she just realized better not to give the right a viral meme of her stupidity

for the week. I think that may have been a part of it, because there was nothing memorable about her questioning. But really today's hearing there was very little those memorable period. We're gonna switch topics for the rest of the show, folks, I'm not going to sit here and keep going. Oh and then an hour three and then an hour five. And you know, Cohen's a liar. He hates Trump. He's saying bad stuff about Trump. No one thinks that Trump is perfect for Trump did not clue with Russia. Trump

is not a Russian stude. He's not some arch criminal. This is all bullcrap. We all know it. And you know, Democrats maybe should focus on making a real argument instead of trying to rely on the exploitation of the law and the abusing of prosecutorial powers and investigative authority to do what they can't accomplish despite the vast propaganda networks that are at their disposal. Right so, I wish that they would just back off the lawfare a little bit.

But that's going to continue on with this president, There's no question about it. We're gonna talk a little bit more about the North Korea situation, and then I've got remember when the ten year olds were lecturing Diane fine Stein. I spoke to the founder of that movement today and I asked or some questions that you're gonna want to hear the answers to, Like, hey, person, that now runs a national movement mobilizing for climate change action. Do you

really think that ten year olds understand this stuff? Do you think that ten year old should be able to vote in elections? My friends, you will want to hear that exchange. It is coming up some folks. I think its senior organizations. AARP comes to mind right away, but you know it doesn't always come to mind for even those folks that aarps pretty left wing. It is all about progressive causes and fought tooth and nail for Obamacare and does not believe in securing our southern border. That's

why for seniors, I recommend AMAC. AMAC was founded by an Air Force vet, and it's an organization that shares your values. AMAC also gets you great discounts on car insurance, hotels, roadside assistance, and much more. But if you want the conservative alternative to AARP, AMAC is your answer. Join the over one point five million patriotic America who are already part of AMAC, stand with AMACK as they fight the good fight by becoming a member today. Join right now

at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's AMAC dot us slash buck. AMACK is better, better for you, better for America. You are now entering the Freedom Hotti Elaboration Center. All programs Muskie camps strictly need to know Team Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck brief. The fear is that he gets into a bad agreement to make big news and hopefully, in his mind, distract the public from

what Michael Cohen is saying. Michael Cohen is on Capitol Hilliot, how could that impact the negotiations we see in North Korea? What could we see the president giveaway? There is a great weariness that this president would give away the store. The President's just looking for good press and he figures

another photo op might do that. And the president's lack of seriousness, lack of preparation, and lack of groundwork when he goes into these summits, the President can't be too naive or too eager to reach a deal that gives him that photo up. The President could make an impulsive comment that would give away more than his team is planning. The President always gets left naked of poker table because

he doesn't negotiate to save his life. The President declaring his love affair essentially with Kim Jonglen, how does that lay the groundwork for negotiations. Yeah, they're really rooting for President Trump to avert a possible nuclear exchange, aren't they. Nuclear war folks, That's what it would be if North Korea fired off a nuke, could somebody us or one of our allies. Retaliation would be nuclear and would eliminate

North Korea. Millions and millions of people be dead. If there's one area where you would think, perhaps, just perhaps there would there would be a chance for people putting aside partisan affiliation and just hope for the absolute best. It would be on averting a nuclear war. But Libs

won't do it. Libs won't do it, in fact that they would much rather have us talk about hush hush money payments to porn stars and bizarre conspiracy theories that Democrats trotted out into all this and they or rather you know, about Trump that they trotted out into all this.

And it's just so indicative of the degree of trumped arrangement syndrome that they're willing to ignore or downplay the news out of Vietnam right now, where you have a president who's trying to negotiate an end to a war that's been going on since nineteen fifty three, a nuclear threat that's only increasing with time. I mean, here's the truth of the situation on the Korean peninsula. Mean, it's bad and it's going to get worse. Trump is trying

to stop that from happening. But that was the trajectory. You know, there are nine nuclear states in the world. North Korea is by far the most aggressive, the most psychotic, the most troublesome, and nukes represent the absolute pinnacle of military force. So you look at Kim Jong owned and understand that his entire regime is force. So getting him to give away his Trump card pardon the pun is going to require something near a miracle. But it's a

miracle that everybody should want. Everybody should want it. Kim Jong oonne is seeing what happens to countries that don't have nukes. Saw what happened Asadam, saw what happened to Kadafi and Libya. You think that that doesn't factor into his calculation. Sure, I see he sees what happens. Probably

if he based cloths enough attention in Ukraine. Ukraine after these Soviet Union dissolve had a lot of nukes because the Brits and the Americans and yes, the Russians promised to defend their territorial integrity, and the Russians obviously lied

that we won't do anything really about it. But North Korea is currently an existential threat to South Korea, and it's just a matter of time if we're not there already depends on whether they could hit Hawaii or Guam or you know, how far their nuclear missiles would really be able to go. Just a matter of time though, before they are a threat to the US homeland. And the more you also understand about this regime, the more you realize that it's going to take time to de escalate.

It's not just like you sign a piece of paper. You know, Trump is going to get an agreement. Hopefully we'll find out tomorrow the agreement will lay out some steps. If it has verification procedures in there, that would be you know, really positive and certainly move in the right direction. But the entire ideology of the North Korean state has been about preparation for a war with US. That's what they get up every day, and the leadership this is

what they're thinking about. This is what their whole regime is geared toward. So when you understand that much, and you look at what they've been willing to do in order to get to their nuclear status. You know, keep in mind, yeah, North Korea is one of the poorest countries in the world. They're over two hundred countries. Nord Koree is one of the poorest countries of the world, but it's one of nine that has nukes that we

know of. So when that country says that they are in the final stage of preparations for an intercontinental ballistic missile and is trying to build the capability for a preemptive strike, which is what Kim Jong un has said, you need to pay attention to that because they've sacrificed a lot. Their people have literally stalled so that they could build these nukes and this enormous military and this concentration of force in the hands of the state. And yes,

the administration has put smart sanctions into place. China has taken a stronger approach to North Korea then on at any time, and certainly the recent past, perhaps and any time ever. They've banned call imports from North Korea, for

they did that in twenty seventeen. But when you look at what North Korea has done, I mean, they at least eight times in the past they either said they would not pursue or then abandoned, or essentially they lied about their nukes, their nuclear program, and we've seen them to be the dissemblers on the world stage that they are also And here's another problem. This is why the Obama approach, whether it's Iran and Earth Koreer anywhere, isn't

going to get it done. Concessions with North Korea don't work. Concessions don't work, So what do you do. You have to have the credible threat of force, which Trump has, and then away forward that benefits the North Korean state and people. That's why Trump's talking about a better economy. That's why he's saying that they have tremendous upside here

if only they could change some things around. It's not because he's some guy who's in the pocket of the North Korean state or you know, he loves Kim Jong and people make fun the way the president talks. Where did Obama get with North Korea? Where did all of you, all of the luminaries of the foreign policy elite, whe where did they get North Korean? Answer is nowhere. The answer is nowhere. I mean, the demands that the North Koreans have made in the past have been absolutely ludicrous.

That's because they figured that they could get away, because in many cases they did. You know what the Obama administration's approach North Korea was. Just just to remind you all, remember in Libya, the Obama administration said that they were going to lead from behind, and that was among the greatest Obama isms of all time. We all knew, we

all knew what that meant, leading from behind. But the Obama aministration had an equally insightful and laughable slogan for what they were trying to do with North Korea, which is quote, strategic patience. You know, if they're this is like advancing in reverse. I mean, this is almost an oxymoron. Strategic patience you mean not doing anything, you mean, not taking any particular action. Also, the negotiation with China, let's

understand that factors into all this too. You have to think the same way that anyone who understands Afghanistan knows that it's what they started to call a pack, that's what the cool kids call it, Afghanistan Pakistan. The same way that if you want to deal with Afghanistan, effectively, you have to know that you're always dealing with Pakistan and also Iran and Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan countries to the north of Afghanistan, but particularly Pakistan. You have to understand

these are a related problem set. Well. North Korean China are related problem set. China provides ninety percent of the economic activity of North Korea, all right, so when China decides to crack down on North Korea, that really matters. And by being willing to have economic sanctions against or take economic actions against China in order to get them to deal more fairly with us, there's also of course the opening in these negotiations to get them to take

more action on North Korea. So you know, the people that are laughing at Tromp and mocking him on this, he's got his handsful, there's no question about it. But he's also tackling a problem that didn't just be devil bested previous administrations full of people that were supposed to be brilliant geostrategists, the best of the best, and it did this now for the Clinton administration North Korea School, the Clinton administration, the Bush administration, the Obama administration. Trump

is taking a different approach. I just wish that we could get the country on the same page here, you know, Democrats instead of just being so obsessed with the latest from Michael Cohen. Oh, what does Cohen have to say about this? You know, how how is Cohen going to be useful for our efforts to try and tear down

this president? Maybe they should focus in on how could we maybe give helpful advice to the president to get some kind of a deal here, and a deal that would also be helpful for other negotiations that are underway or and also will be underway in Asia and the future. Remember the obaministration said they were going to pivot to Asia. That pivot never really happened. Trump is pivoting to Asia.

He is looking at what's happening in that part of the world, which is where you have the greatest explosion of population and wealth and a technological dynamism, and he's taking this on. So I'm not saying it's perfect. I don't know if this agreement he's going to get, assuming he even gets an agreement, is going to be as wonderful as I'm sure the White House is going to say it is. But it's something and it's serious and

direct talks. Now that you look back at this, the previous conventional wisdom here was that sitting down with Kim Jong un was a terrible idea with legitimizer. How are we, ever, how are we ever going to break the stalemate without having somebody at the president you know, the president. I was at somebody at the presidential level, having the president talked to the leader of this country that has been such a problem with the international community for decades. You know,

how are we ever gonna get there? We're gonna back We think we're gonna have a back channel discussion North Creer to get them to give up their nukes. Given the nature of this regime, I just think that was never going to happen. I was never going to happen. This is the hardest diplomatic challenge that Trump could have, or anyone could have coming into office right now. And I think the President deserves our best wishes and honestly,

our prayers on this one morning. Coffee is an American institution. That's why I kick off every day the same way with a delicious cup of black rifle coffee. I put those k cup rounds right in my machine, bam, and I make it happen because Black Rifle helps me get it done. You know, Black Rifle is also a fantastic company founded by special Operations vets. They give a portion of their sales to first responder and veteran causes. Oh, plus, the coffee is delicious, and I'm somebody that gets really

into their coffee. Black Rifle coffee is roast to order, guaranteed fresh when delivered to your door. And oh that's right. It's also super convenient. They will send it right to you. Don't have to worry anymore about when or where you're gonna get your coffee. All right. While liberals threatened to further tax your hard earned money with their socialism, Black Rifle is fueling the fight for freedom by upping their

offer to twenty percent off. Take advantage by visiting Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck get twenty percent off your entire order. Again, that's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck for twenty percent off. The Democratic Party has lost any sense of patriotism, any sense of balance, any sense of propriety. And you would think when you deal with something like the Korean War, the nuclear weapons in North Korea, the

potential to make you get a breakthrough. It might work, it may not work, but boy, it's sure a courageous step. The bitterness, the hatred, frankly, is so deep that they can't see beyond their own fractricidal warfare. Very dangerous for the country. I think I didn't even know new Degree with maybe a new degrees with me. So there's that mister Gingrich himself a speaker. I know. I'm not somebody

that likes the whole. Oh, we're going to keep people's titles going forward, even when they don't have that title anymore. It's not a new it's not a new criticism. It's just like people with oh, speaker, speaker Gingrich. No, No, he's now, he's now just Newt, new to loot, what's up, Newt. I do not think we should call people speaker or leader or any of these things when they do not have that title. I don't think these titles should be kept in perpetuity. I don't think they should be inherited.

I'm I'm not in favor of any anyway on the Democratic Party. Yeah, this is this is what you see happening. There's an obvious an obvious rooting for failure in North Korea, because imagine how lib heads would explode, explode if Trump the hush money to porn star paying vulgarian who doesn't you know, doesn't like fine cuisine and orders his stakes well done with ketchup on them, and all these things, and who likes fast food, hamburgers, all this stuff that

the media just despises about him. If that guy, if the brash builder billionaire abuse that alliteration buck from Queens was able to get an agreement that would be the single most momentous diplomatic national security accord in the post post Cold War era since the Berlin Wall came down. What would they say then, because you know what would also happen, and this, this lingers in the minds of

a lot of people. They would look bad. The Obama team that still thinks that they're good at foreign policy, even though Obama's foreign policy was just all wrong. It's basically all wrong, just one one stupid decision after another, one failure after another. Every place that was a challenge was made worse under Obama's time in office. Every issue Obama faced he handled poorly on the global stage. As much as everyone likes to say, Oh Obama sounded so presidential. Yeah,

he gave a lot of speeches that nobody remembers. Now, where the whole point was just listen to how eloquent Obama is and not are we going to change anything. Trump came in to change things. Trump came on the world stage. Trump came in with a different philosophy about how America should see itself and how America should interact with other countries in the world stage. There's going to be a level of disruption there. There's going to be

a level of discomfort. What I think keeps a lot of the DC where I'm broadcasting to you from here in the swamp. What I think keeps a lot of the DC intelligentsia on edge is the possibility that Trump may get all this right, that Trump may in fact manage to do what neither Obama, nor Bush nor Clinton was able to do. And then what are they going to say, How are they going to explain that to themselves? What will what will be the line of attack be?

If in fact, there are verifiable inspections of nuclear facilities in North Korea and that we are moving toward a true and lasting peace all the Korean peninsula. I'm not saying it is likely. I am saying that would be amazing and it's worth trying. And those who are compared to what happened with Obama in Iran, I would just say, we are not, we are not. We are not give Kim Jong un anything. We're giving him the opportunity to

come clean with Iran. We said, oh, here's a whole lot of money, and here's a guarantee we won't strike your facilities, and you can keep all the know how and all the stuff you want. We saw Israel's presentation about all the Iranian nuclear program information they had, and that those libraries full of information they've kept. Obama was essentially, how do we bribe the Iranians so that we don't

have to do anything about their nuclear program? Right now, Trump is just saying that Kim Jong un, all the sanctions are in place. You can either join the Community of Nations slowly but surely, or you can roll the dice and see what we decide to do if you keep testing your missiles and being a threat of the region. So we will see how this shakes out. I think tomorrow we're supposed to get word from Trump himself. Trump is going to be at Sea Pack, I think on Friday,

so I might see the Trumpster. Maybe I can get a few minutes to talk to mister Trump himself about this. We'll see. Obviously, security's gonna be a little type backstage. Those are going to be in the DC area, especially if you our team buck campus, you're gonna be at Sea Pack. Definitely come find me. I'll be there tomorrow, Thursday, and Friday, so I'll be wandering around. Come say hi. We'll be right back. I've been struck a couple times by the denial of humanity of many of these families

and children. When the issue is framed as an invasion by aliens, and when we refer to children as UACs, it's easier to pretend they're not human or worthy of compassion. This hearing is a recognition and an insistence that on that humanity, a recognition that the Flora's decision also addressed, and a recognition that just following orders is no more an excuse today than it was back in Germany. Wow, look at that that was the Democrats. You just the

stuff is amazing. Mary Scanlon there, Democrat of course, right making a pretty clear comparison to immigrations and customs enforcement enforcing, which is in the name of the organization enforcing the law on immigration, saying that that is similar to what

the Nazis. Did you know that the Nazi and this is really a reference, and I doubt Representative Scanlon even knows his history, but the Nazis who were tried at Nuremberg and and just in general, this was the defense you'd here, was that they were just following orders, right, and this this echoed throughout history. Well, if you're doing evil and just following orders, you're still doing evil. But this tells you what the Democrats really think of law

enforcement agencies. One of the more remarkable turns that we've seen is that the same left wing progressives who spent years years under the Obamba administration just tearing down law enforcement and tearing down the law enforcement that most Americans know is the most necessary to their day to day lives and does the most good for their community, which

is local law enforcement, cops, police officers. The Democrats were slandering police officers, slandering local sheriff's offices and local police, state police because it suited a narrative a narrative of the movement Black Lives Matter, that there were young African American men who are being murdered for reasons of of racism by police departments across the country, and when you would look at the numbers, you'd see this is actually a very very rare occurrence, not saying it does not happen,

but it is a rare occurrence. And yet it became a central, a central theme of part of the Obama second term. Black Lives Matter was probably the best known political movement of Obama's second term. Yeah, this also as an asside, I spoke to a a long time local reporter in Chicago. I can't remember her name on top of my habit. She came on Rising later this week, and I sometimes we have segments where we just have to cover the news, and you know, I've talked to

a lot of libs and whatever. But she she was there to tell us about the mayoral race where I believe now two female African American candidates are in a runoff was the end result. But the you know what, I should actually probably tell you the names before I go much further here, but I asked her, you know, people know that Chicago has quite a problem with violence, and the problem with violence is mostly on the south

and west sides of the city. Former federal Prosecutor Lorry Lightfoot and Cook County Board President Tony Preckwinkle they are going to be in an April second runoff in Chicago, So there you go. But I asked this long time Chicago local news reporter, I said, what are the mayoral candidates offering about how to deal with the Chicago homicide rate? What are they saying about how they're going to tackle that?

And it was amazing. Six hundred, wow, six hundred and fifty people were killed in Chicago and twenty seventeen, that is that is astonishing, was at seven I'm sorry, seven hundred and sixty two murders in twenty sixteen. By way of comparison, New York City, I think here I'll find out New York New York homicide rate in twenty seventeen. New York, which is four times the size of San Francisco, I mean, of a Chicago had what's the total number

here a homicides? It's a couple of hundred. I can't find the exact number right now, but fewer than three hundred homicides. So Chicago is a fourth the size of New York City by population. New York is eight million, Chicago is a boy two million. And Chicago had more than double the murder rate in twenty seventeen. Okay, so

they got a big problem with murder there. I ask I ask this reporter about it, though, and she immediately because she knows that, you know, this is not if you're at you don't want to talk about the crime in Chicago, which is predominantly gang related and black on black violence in the city of Chicago. That's what statistically that it is, what it predominantly is comprised of. What

you want to talk about is police violence. So she launches into this whole thing about police violence and Lakwan McDonald and the shooting, and you know how there needs to be more review of police tactics. I'm saying, more review of police tactics. I asked you about how to stop street violence. I didn't ask you about police brutality. But it just goes to show that that the liberal mentality is always talk about how the cops are the ones who are messing up, how the cops are making mistakes.

Don't discuss high crime minority communities what could be done to help them to fix them, because that's sensitive, you see, that's sensitive. You don't want to go there. But the liberal mentality is that law enforcement is generally a problem, that law enforcement in this country is soaked with racism and all kinds of unconscious bias. Accept the FBI. Accept the FBI, which we've been told is an organization of only the most upstanding and wonderful individuals you could ever

find at the very top ranks. McCabe and Comi and all the rest of them are just first rate. And anyone who criticizes them as undermining our institutions, they feel that way right now about the FBI. Meanwhile, immigrations and

customs enforcement they will compare to the Nazis. I've even seen some very senior former Democrat national security figures who have come out and made similar comparisons about our southern border and the law enforcement agencies that are tasked with securing it with being Nazis, which is just unbelievably irresponsible, terrible stuff for them to say. But this is how they appeal to their base. They understand it. This is how they try to get people fired up about a

more socially just future. You know, the plan is that essentially they will tear down law enforcement right now that is essential to Trump's plans of securing the border. And in that whole process they'll make it harder for the President to achieve his goals. And maybe later on, later on, they'll find some means of allowing these agencies, these organizations

to regroup. I mean, I can tell you when I talk to border patrol, they know that the Democrats, and even Democrats who are in the border patrol know that their parties betrayed them. They know it. People to work for immigrations and customs enforcement do not trust left wing Democrats when it comes to how to do border enforcement, how to deal with immigration laws, because they know it's

become so incredibly politicized. But to start to bring in analogies comparisons of immigrations and customers enforcement to Nazis, you start to wonder what is too far for these Democrats? You know, what is the length to which they will not go in order to make some kind of a political point. They have been willing to do so much to lie about the border, so much, to say it's not a crisis. He had this ridiculous vote that the President may end up vetoing because there's a lot of

Republicans who really specialize in cowardice and surrender. Unfortunately, a lot of Republicans out there don't want to have to take a tough vote on this. I really wish the media would stop saying, well, politicians along the border og Maybe the illegal immigration from Mexico and Central America that has completely changed the demographics along many of these border districts. Maybe that is something to do with why one you've got a lot of Democrats now along the border, and

two they are very opposed to the wall. They're very opposed to the wall because the identity politics to break down in this country as such that even if you are, you know, in the Latino community, they're constantly told that support for the wall is anti Latino. Meanwhile, if you spend any time at the border, you find out there are Bangladeshi's who are coming to the wall. Now, Chinese are coming up with people from all of the world

are showing up the wall. But the Democrats have been shut to may have been shut to spread the messaging that Trump wants to build a wall. Merely to stop people from Latin America from coming into the country. So they haven't an animus toward the wall that is just

comes from that. But calling immigrations and cuffs enforcement or even even speaking about them as though they deserve to be talked about the way that the Nazis justified their own atrocities, and to say that there's such a dehumanizing effect, I mean that woman. Also to call them aliens' that is the term in law. No one is saying that they're aliens like e t phone home, and they're not actually human beings. Alien is a legal term for somebody

who is not a US citizen who is in the country. Okay, if you are a you can be a resident eliot, you can be an illegal alien, illegal aliens, people who are not supposed to be here. I just think that we haven't really figured out the Trump administration hasn't figured out how they're going to follow through on the promise and immigration yet. I've got to tell you it's a it's a disappointment from me up to this point. I wish that Trump had gotten on this earlier, and also

that he had better partners with the Republicans. But you know Paul Ryan is a is almost an open borders guy. I mean, he's whoever wants to come here and work should be able to work. Whoever wants to do it, they should just they should have that totally open to them. And there's no cultural I used to pay in this country.

Assimilation doesn't matter, Political cohesion doesn't matter. It's all just about making the donor class happy and making the virtue signalers happy by letting anybody who wants to come here come here. So Trump hasn't had good partners on this one, but we got a lot of work you do still in the immigration fight. I think it's going to factor into twenty twenty. But if we don't win twenty twenty, folks,

guess what's gonna happen Amnesty. That said, it appears today's hearing topic as well, outside our jurisdiction and power house rule ten and the reasons I've stated, how we move that we adjourn all those in fairy CEI. Although both say no, no, the clerk will call the role mister Sharman, and the motion the eyes are four and the knees are two. Thank you. The motion passes. The hearing is adjourned. All right, So that's not an exciting sound bite until you know what it's about and any and then it

needs a little contact. But there was a House Natural Resources Committee subpanel that just yesterday had a was able to get together a motion to adjourd at the very beginning of a hearing on climate change. Now you might say, buck,

hold on, hold on a second, buck. Democrats have been telling us now for weeks that climate change is an existential threat and if we don't do something about climate if we don't do something about climate change, I mean, the world is just gonna like cease to be the world. And like that's why you just have to stop all the cow farts and like drive a bicycle or maybe

even a tricycle to work and not a car. People have convinced themselves of this, or at least there's a a contingent of the left that believes all this stuff. And the way that I just I just gotta say this the way that they will assert because I'm with the scientists. I'm like, I'm sorry, aren't you the you know, men can beat you know, men and men and women should be able to should compete in the same athletic events as long as the man says he's a woman, aren't.

Oh but you're the science people, I see. Okay, all right, that's that's a good one to know that there was all the scientists agree with me. Who are these scientists? I'd like these scientists who really sit down. Now, you know, you can't even find anywhere a real piece by piece assessment not of what they think is going to happen, but what their predictions have said for the last twenty or thirty years. Because they've been wrong every time, they're

wrong over and over again. They don't know, but people could. Oh, I'm I'm one of the smart people. I believe that climate change is going to I've met Look, I sat down with Crystal yesterday. I didn't get to interview him, but you know, Tom Stier came in. It was a billionaire as a hedge fund guy who's made billions of dollars, so he's obviously not stupid. He believes in this climate catastrophe stuff to the you know, to the nth degree.

I mean, he is all about it. Really thinks that the world is in crisis and America has to lead and this climate stuff, I mean, this is this is a crazy cult. It is this is a some kind of you know, fringe religious belief that all of a sudden has gone mainstream. This is not reasonable stuff to think. No, no one really believes the world's gonna end in twelve years, right their Their financial planning would dramatically change there there. You know, what would you I mean, think of how

many people would quit their jobs. Heck, I think, well, I'd keep doing radio because I love the show. But you know a lot of things I wouldn't do anymore if I was only the last twelve No one believes this. No one are banks changing their lending standards because they're not gonna you know, the thirty year mortgage isn't worth very much if the world's gonna be underwater in ten I mean, this is just so stupid, but it makes more sense when you see the actions the left takes.

And that brings me back to this house. Natural Resources is subpanel which was adjourned because Democrats weren't even there. Democrats didn't even show up. This is quote the seventh oversight hearing related to climate change the majority is holding this month. It's been a bit concerning how this all

fits within the committee's jurisdiction, gomer It says. Louie Gomert says, when it comes to matters of climate change, the House Rules explicitly references several topics, topics such as conservation of energy resources, almost anything that has to do with renewable energy. None of these areas follow within the jurisdiction of this committee. So you know, they're holding emergency meetings just to hold

emergency meetings, and then they don't even show up. And that's really where the Democrats, that's where the left is on this climate change issue. It's it's an emergency in theory, it's an emergency rhetorically speaking. Does anyone really feel like it's an imminent threat to them? No, of course not, Oh, of course not. It's completely absurd. I feel badly for anyone who does believe that, because they must live a very, very fearful and anxiety filled existence. But Democrats are telling

you existential crisis, existential threat. But when the House Committee on Resources has a meeting about climate change, they can't even show up. The Republicans shut it down. Tells you a lot, folks, usually in a political debate, I can at least understand what the other side is trying to accomplish, and I can see my way to understanding at some level how it is that even if they're wrong on this issue, they could get to that place of wrongness.

So I can understand the basic fallacies that have brought them to this place. And it does not leave me flabbergas it doesn't leave me dumbfounded. I can think, Okay, I understand why they think this. They're wrong, but I know why they think this, you know, I understand the basics of it. Today on my show or Rising at the Hill, where I have to engage with a very very very nice, but very liberal co host. She's very

very a dear friend, but obviously very very progressive. But some of the guests that come in are incredibly left wing, and I have to deal with them too and try to be respectful and deal with them as I would want to be treated as a guest on a show. But you will recall the kids that went up to Diane fine Stein and told her about what should be done on climate change. We are trying to ask you to vote yes on the Green New Days. Okay, I'll tell you what. We have our own Green New Deal scientists,

We have twelve years to turn this around. Well, it's not going to get turned around in ten years. The government to be floy the people and by the people. And you'll know what's interesting about this group, it's I've been doing this for thirty years. I know what I'm doing. You come in here and you say it has to be my way or the highway. I don't respond to that. I know what I'm doing. So you know, maybe people

should listen a little bit. I hear what you're saying, But where the people who voted you, you're supposed to listen to us. That's here, I'm sixteen resolution. Any plan that doesn't take full transformentive action is not going to be what we need. Well, you know better than I do, so I think one day you should run for the Senate. I let you do it. I wanted to play it for you. You can hear me. He's a little kid. You will terrified about your world ending in twelve years.

And you know they're putting themselves in a in a position. Now we're supposed to if we have to listen to them, they were allowed to criticize them. I'm sorry, it's kind of funny. It's like quote the shy and teach of the government Shay. I mean, look, they're little kids, They're little kids. What are they doing. They should be thinking about recess and chocolate chip cookies and you know, making friends with new people and stuff. Shouldn't be sitting around

worrying about the world ending in ten years. This is nuts. This is absolutely nuts. And that that group that brought them there is called the Sunrise Movement. It is quote a movement of young people uniting to stop the climate crisis. This dark hour in America cannot last. Welcome to Sunrise and that's from their website. Well today we had the founder of the Sunrise Movement come on Hill TV. So the person who came up with this idea to deploy

kids for political purposes. And I don't mean kids as in like oh those you know young uns in their early twenties. No, no, no, no no, I mean eight year olds, ten year olds, little kids, children, terrify them with stories of how the world's going to end, and then send them out to try to guilt adults into taking positions on incredibly complicated and important national political matters. This is crazy. This, I mean, I know you say,

or rather you say probably. I definitely say that the looney left has really gone to new levels recently, but I had to think that this was maybe an anomaly that mostly the Sunrise movement, this left wing activist group, you know, you know who knows. I got to find out he's funding this thing. But you know, they just got a whole bunch of people arrested. They're bothering Mitch McConnell.

I figured this has got to be for young people, but not explicitly going after the politicization of little kids, right, that's just too weird, that's crazy. Nobody would do that because it's not fair. It's not right to fill little kids heads with this kind of propaganda. It's child abuse to tell kids that the world's going to end in ten years. I mean, if they really believe that, then

they would change the whole trajectory of their lives. And only morons believe this, all right, don't be bullied into this. The world is not going to end in ten or twelve years. Only idiots believe this. Only people of very weak minds with very poor intellectual capacity believe this. A lot of people who are otherwise very smart and crafty will say it they'll say it because it's a way of manipulating the stupid. But nobody who knows anything believes

that that is the case. But of course, when you're talking about eight year olds, they're going to believe what the adults tell them, right. So could this movement really be about mobilizing little kids in order to try and guilt or bully adults into crazy and completely unrealistic political action on climate change. The answer is yes. I asked the Sunrise Movement co founder today, Varshini Prakash, what do you think about this? And I just want to play

for you this was just from this morning sixteen. Do you think that's responsible for little kids to really think that the world is going to end in ten years? Well, what I would say is that I think people are recognizing and are like viscerally responding to the fact that young people might be sentient, intelligent beings who actually understand. You think ten year olds understand politics. I think ten year olds understand that climate change is. You think they

understand the science beyond climate change? I think that they actually Do you think that people should pay attention to the politics of kids that don't actually know how to In many cases read books about a fourth grade level. I honestly think that young people today are extremely intelligent and understand intuitively that the climate crisis is a serious threat. Or ten year old to be able to vote, I mean, it seems like those are pretty intelligent beings. I don't

know the answer to that question. I asked the founder of a left wing movement with you know, chapters all across the country. Now they're storming congressional officers, making all this noise, and they're they're they're trying to get your kids, folks. They're trying to brainwash your children. That is what they want to do. They want to use the schools to do it. They want to use the media to do it. They want to convince little kid the world's gonna end

in ten years. I asked the founder of the movement, you heard it. Do you think that little kids eight, nine, ten years old understand the science behind climate change hysteria? And she says, yes, they're smart. I asked the founder of this movement, should ten year olds, do you remember what you were like when you were ten? I remember just trying to, you know, sneak my hand in the cookie jar when mom wasn't looking and running around in like onesie pajamas with Star Wars on them and trying

to watch movies. I mean, she thinks that, or at least she wouldn't say that ten year olds shouldn't be able to vote. She thinks the ten year olds are really smart. And I mean, it's so so stupid, But this is the this is the problem these people, And this was you know, I reached out to producer Mike right off his interview because I knew he'd appreciate this. It's like I was talking to somebody who is in Hamas.

It's like I was talking to somebody who was, you know, a Bolshevik at the early stages of the twentieth said, I mean a radical. Put your politics aside for a second. You think the ten year olds have political wisdom? Do you think that we should listen to? Well, where else should we listen to ten year olds? Well, you know what what should what should the top marginal tax rate? But should we go to war? Let's ask some ten year olds. I mean, the Green New Deal would affect

trillions of dollars, trillions of dollars of economic output. It would essentially evaporated, it would take it away. It would be immensely wasteful, slow down productivity, hurt our quality of life, and it wouldn't even do anything. It's really just about a status takeover of the entirety of the American economy. But I put all that aside for a second. How do you have a conversation with somebody, How do you have a conversation with someone who thinks that ten year

olds are wise when it comes to politics. You know, I was a precocious ten year old. I had a pretty big vocabulary. I thought I was I was pretty smart for ten year old. I mean I was a little you know, a little booger eating nerd at at ten years old. I mean, this is just insane, absolutely insane. But this is a movement. It's not just one person. They're building this movement. They're getting national media coverage. They're sending all practically toddlers to go say, I'm scared of

dequiment changing in twelve years. You weren't gonna And they think that I'm supposed to listen to these people. Look, here's the problem. They got away with this crap with the Stoneman Douglas kids. Oh they're victims, and you know they listen. Okay, Well, they're kids. They don't they don't really know anything. They can't vote, I mean some of them can't. Some of them can't. But they don't have any wisdom, they don't have any policy knowledge. I don't

care what they think. Oh dare you. They're victims. And this is the youth, this is the future. But the left loves and this stretches. This is why there this is their approach in public schools. By the way, this is also why they want universal pre K childcare, so that they can get the state apparatus at your kids as soon as possible. The brainwash them with all this

nonsense as soon as possible. But the Left likes to mobilize the youth because the youth are full of emotion and the sense of their own importance and promise and do not have wisdom or experience to draw upon. Wisdom and experience are important things when you're thinking about governance, when you're dealing with the complex political systems of a country of three hundred and twenty million people with the largest and most powerful military in the history of the universe.

I think wisdom and experience these are matters that these are issues that should come to the forefront and not just this is our future. But it was like speaking to a radical today. Notice how she wasn't even shy about it. She didn't even step back from questions like should ten year olds be able to vote? If a ten year old should be able to vote? I would just want to know, should a five year old be

able to vote? Would the Left be comfortable indoctrinating three year olds into just walking into a voting booth and taking their little stubby finger and pushing it up, pushing it against the screen to press D for democrat. I think we all know the answers. Yes. They simply don't care. There's no principle at work for them here, the notion of being a citizen who has enough life experience and the knowledge that comes with it to at least have fully formed judgments. I mean, your brain is not even

fully formed until adulthood. They've done all kinds of studies on this. Teenagers are unable to see and unable to assess the long term consequences of their actions the same way that adults can. This is why impulsive teen behavior something that parents have to reign in. It's also why parenting is so important and why The one thing that no one seems to want to talk about in this country is that a lot of the problems we have stem from a lack of parents and bad parenting. But instead,

here we have let's propagandize, let's politicize little kids. There are some places where I just I cannot see, I cannot see common ground with the other side. I do not think that they have an argument. I do not think that they have a point of view that is worthy of respect. The notion that ten year old kids should be lecturing adults on climate change because they've been terrified, because they must believe. Why wouldn't they the adults who are telling them yet the world is going to end

in ten years. Anyone who believes that I do not respect on this issue, they are wrong. They're wrong. This is nuts. Organizing kids in this way for this purpose is exploitation, full stop. You know, if parents want to teach their kids about politics, that's fine. You want to come together with some nationwide activist group that's going to frighten little children and then mobilize them and use them in youth marches. This is an embarrassment. And if the

Left had any shame they would recognize that. So when we stood up Hill TV, we need to get the best people fast and it's not an easy process, right. You need to get very specific qualified candidates in and time is money, right, So you want to do this as quickly as you can, as efficiently as you can. And that's why I went with the best possible option here,

zip recruiter dot com slash buck. Right. Zip recruiter dot com slash buck lets you hire the best people because zip recruiter sends your job to over a hundred of the web's leading job boards and they don't stop there. They've got incredible power, full matching technology that scans thousands of resumes to find people at the right experience and invites them to apply to your job. As applications come in,

zip recruiter analyzes each one and spotlights top candidates. You're never going to miss a great match, all right right now, my listeners can try zip recruiter for free at this exclusive web address zipp recruiter dot com slash buck. That's zip recruiter dot com slash buck. Zip recruiter is the smartest way to hire. So a little hard to understand what's happened psychologically to the Democratic Party that you could

have such a lockstep group of people. I think all but three of the Democratic senators voted in effect to allow the killing of babies who are already born. I mean, this is just pure infanticide in a way which is unthinkable in most of the world. On almost every front. They now feel compelled to rush to the most extreme positions, even if they're crazy. As somebody said the other day, that they've now become literally the party of death and taxes.

To have every Democratic presidential candidate vote that it's okay to kill babies after they're born puts them in such a small minority. I don't quite see how they think they're going to create a winning campaign. This issue is not going away anytime soon, and it shouldn't go anytime soon. Even though the Democrats, including the Democrat presidential candidates thus far, who are in favor of a legal opening for infanticide, that is what they That is what they have cast

their vote in favor of this week. No matter what they tell you, that is what they have done. But the Democrat media, which is unfortunately a vast majority of the media, is going to run cover for them. Interesting that my friend Ben Dominic over at the Federalist did some searches, and as of as of today in the afternoon, I haven't been able to check since I went on air,

but just the fact that this was true. As of one o'clock Eastern time today, neither CNN, MSNBC, or NBC News had run a single story about how Democrats blocked a Republican effort in the Senate to pass a bill that would criminalize, for doctors, not for mothers, the practice of infanticide, you know, the killing of a baby outside the womb. None of them found that to be a story worth reporting on. None of them thought that this

was something that maybe deserved any attention. We are going to continue to follow this story here because this is not aberrant. This is not something that just happened out of nowhere. The truth is that the Democrats have embraced abortion extremism in a way that I think even many on the left would have found absolutely appalling five or ten years ago. Not everyone, I mean a lot of Democrats have known that this was really their position, they

just wouldn't say it. But I think some Democrats now have an unease I can't tell you what number, what percentage. But I've been speaking to some Democrats that I know, and they understand that if the American people really figure out just how extreme the left is on the issue of abortion, that there will be a reckoning. In fact, there's some polling data from the last few months to show that the trend is toward pro life, strongly toward pro life, and a vast majority of the American people

opposes third trimester abortion period. Opposes it period, you know, the only time that you And then they say, well, what about the life of the mother exception? Well, yeah, the same polling shows that, you know, they are open to the exception of life of the mother, but any other reason no, And that's a strong majority of the American people. But you won't get that from the media.

They don't want you to know this because look, the mainstream media has been complicit in supporting and taking money from Planned Parenthood and its donors and all the rest of it for decades. They have blood on their hands here, folks. I want to tell you a quick story about a professor at Harvard Law School, Ronald S. Sullivan, Junior. He is a faculty dean of Winthrop House. He is the first black man to serve in such a position at Harvard.

He also directs Harvard's Criminal Justice Institute and Trial Advocacy Workshop. He in two thousand and eight advised he Senate campaign of Barack Obama on criminal justice, and he represented Mike Brown in the Mike Brown City of ferguson matter and

has done a lot of work on criminal justice more broadly. So, you know, it is a fair a fair thing to guess that Ronald Sullivan, tenured professor at Harvard Law School, African American and social justice and just general justice reform advocate, would be somebody who you would think that Democrats would not just be okay with, but would celebrate. Right, it

seems you read his bio. I see this piece here Onreason dot Com by Robbie Suave works right through his backstory, but it turns out that the professor is in a tough spot right now. In fact, many black students at Harvard are organizing to demand that he be fired. Why, you might ask, would a tenured and esteemed African American professor of law at Harvard Universe City the number one or number two, depending on who you ask, Law school in terms of admissions difficulty in the United States. Why

would African American students want him to be gone? What terrible misdeed would he be guilty of? Is it a me too violation of some kind? Is there any kind of sexual misconducted issue on his part? No? Did he say something horrifyingly unpc. No. What you find out when you read this article, and this has started to get some traction in the news, and this is astonishing stuff, is that there are students at Harvard Law School who want a professor to be fired from his job because

Professor Sullivan is representing Harvey Weinstein as his attorney. Oh okay, so you mean that now the social justice left has gone so far as to undermine our system of legal representation, so that if you represent somebody as their defense attorney, you are now essentially tainted by that person. Since so if you fall to the wrong side of the social justice left, and look, Harvey Weinstein's a total dirt bag

and he deserves whatever he gets. But defense attorneys exist for a reason, right, We are supposed to have a justice system that has oppositional forces at work to bring out the best and most just outcome. Right, there's a reason that it exists in this way, and for law students at Harvard Law School not to understand this, in fact, to go so far against this that they want him to be fired. And you even have the Association of Black Harvard Women saying that he must go because this

is trauma inducing. They say, not only are these students a bunch of babies, but you also notice how utterly totalitarian they are in their instinct here, which is to get rid of somebody that they don't that they disagree with. Fire him. He should be fired. There is a completely legitimate, I would even argue compelling reason within our system for there to be legal representation, robust legal representation for the accused. People in law school who are concerned with justice matters

in general should know this. But at Harvard it's more important to virtue signal. And this is what I've been saying for a long time. Not only have these schools been infiltrated by this leftist and statist group think, but they're becoming increasingly less impressive places because their primary reason for existing is the properation of the mythology around diversity.

As the ultimate strength of all these institutions, and the pretense that these elite academies places like Harvard are just supposed to be creating the social justice leadership up tomorrow. I thought they were supposed to educate the smartest people in the country. They don't do that anymore at a lot of these places, at least only some of the people they educated really smart. A lot of them are not very impressive, including a bunch of law students at

Harvard apparently bucking. It's time for roll call bad one. That one's got a little kick to it. I like that one, uh, Tino. We're gonna get right into roll call today. Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton, do not forget see pack. I'll be there tomorrow Thursday, and I'll be there on Friday, so I'll be speaking Friday morning

and moderating a panel Friday evening. But just if you wander the ground at Seepack, look out for the swoop at the Gaylord National Convention Center in Maryland, just outside of DC at the Conservative Political Action Conference, I will be there all right, Tino writes on Facebook dot com

slash buck Sexton. Hey Buck, I spoke with Mark Levin yesterday and wrote up for him a short list of points and issues as they relate to Denmark and the Democrats posturing in regard to free healthcare, etc. I was born there and left my business there for a reason. Maybe shoot me an email. I will send it to you as you may find some of the facts and talking points useful in the coming debates. Tino, I will

send you an email right now. Actually, I can just tell you official Team Buck at gmail dot com Brandon in Hey Buck great show on Venezuela. Yesterday. I've been helping out a friend of a friend in Venezuela, a

single mom of two girls, for the past year. Yesterday we sent over the counter medicine, common over the counter medicines and toothcare items that are impossible to obtain in Venezuela, along with the antibiotics to kill the parasites that she and her two children have due to the bad water. My friend's brother owns a shipping company based out of Miami and is able to personally deliver the items to this single mom. My friends tells me, tell me that

my wife. My friend tells sorry. My friend tells my wife that for dinner, the girls are getting sugar water. They're desperate. My friend is a legal immigrant from Venezuela and a strong, strong Trump supporter. Please everyone keep these people in your prayers. Take care, Brother Airborne all the way. Well, Brandon, it's a very kind and very Christian thing you're doing

to help out this woman in need. It certainly illustrates the degree of economic desperation and the amount of despair that is spreading across and has been for a long time across Venezuela in a world where there could be so much abundance, and in the case of Venezuela, given its oil reserves, there should be. There should be so much abundance. I just think it's important for us to keep in mind that this is the result of bad decision making by people in power, and decision making by

people in power for sure, David Rights take the pain platoon. Indeed, David, I'm assuming you listened on Podcast Delayed, because otherwise, if you listen to the show yesterday, you would know the answer. And it's not fun to say the answer if you know it. No, No, not fun. It's like I remember, I used to do this in the earliest days of my media career. We would do this website Trivia Night

at a couple of local bars in New York. And if I remember, I think BuzzFeed was there and Gawker was there and some of these real left wing sites. But I got invited, and I was young, and I was young and naive, and I would go. And I wish that was amazing that some people would really actively try to listen in to what the other teams were saying on Trivia Night to cheat. Who cheats on Trivia Night? I mean, the prize was like another round of beers.

You know, I just don't understand some people. Doesn't make any sense to me. John writes, as a fan of all your accents, I gotta say your Trey Gaudy sounds more like Bill Cosby than anything world. John after said, disagree. I think m Trey Garty sounds a lot more luck Tray Garretty. But I'm gonna have to stop because some of you really don't like the Trey Gaudy. And I look, I don't like strawberry ice cream. I don't. I don't mean I don't like it compared to other ice creams.

I mean, if I'm really in the mood for ice cream, and all there is is strawberry. I'm gonna I'm not gonna touch it. I don't want any of that stuff. You know, I'm a chocolate guy. Number one, vanilla, number two, strawberries. Not even listen, Brandon, important question? What is the best flavor of ice cream? Go vanilla? But are you see dude?

Really you're gonna You're gonna come with vanilla. A guy who has a podcast about guns and roses is gonna tell me his favorite ice cream is vanilla with sprinkles. I do? I mean, I have the palette of a ten year old unless those sprinkles are like laced with LSD. Man. A lot of people right now are like, what is going on? I would have thought you'd be like a Ben and Jerry's, you know, Chunky Monkey, Rocky Road, one of those I don't get to say here, what's up?

I didn't even do to Usually you're talking to the ladies across the hall. I don't know. Are you even there right now? Yeah? We were talking about ice cream. That's what we were talking about. Oh, produce, Oh, producer, Mike. He came to play at producer, Mike, what is the best ice cream flavor? Oh? Man, it's a three way tie for me. Well, technically it will be a five way tie because it's uh men chocolate chip hagendaes uhdultad h Hagendas. And then I love the what's the name

of the Vodella tucket strawberry altogether? I don't know what that is. It's the um sounds good, ye smorgers board. I don't know. Yeah, there's a name for it. It's the I will tell your Dulce dela call on Haggendas. Yeah, is a good one, Yeah it is. That is a stand out flavor in the Hogendas. And I'm also a mint chocolate chip fan always and at all times. But I if I could only have one ice cream the

rest of my life, the correct answer is pistachio. I love pistachio, which is a bit what producer, Mike, get your get your bougie ice cream nous on and go get yourself some like Brooklyn Hipster pistachio small batch ice cream. You'll be all about it. This reminds me we should get an ice cream sponsor on the show. I'm all about it. Yeah, all right, So, but you had some good ones there, Brandon. At least you threw the sprinkles in. I appreciate it. Oh it's uh na pole the Poulton,

Napoleton Neapolitanapolitan? Is that it? I don't know. You tell me. I've never been trying to look at that real quick, and I was fumbling there, but I couldn't that that. Here's what I do with the Niopoltan. This is this is what I call the fat Boy Special. I get the niopolten ice cream. I get a couple of waffles, and I heat up the waffles and I make a ice cream sandwich on waffles. Try it. It's delicious. I mean that does I will say that does sound good.

It sounds a little bit like becoming, you know, pre diabetic overnight, but it is. It does sound good. Yeah, Neapolitan ice cream. I have never even heard of this. It is separate blocks of vanilla, chocolate and strawberry together. Look at you, dude, You're you're teaching me things about ice cream. Yeah, I've had that since I was like it. Also teach you how to put it on ten pounds real quick if you want. Oh my god, Well, unfortunately I don't need any help with that. But conversation for

another time. Back into the roll call here for a moment, folks, Richard writes, we need to break the engine of the world. Buck every day. The stuff I see and here keeps taking me back to a movie series I saw a while back. Atlas Shrugged is the name. If you haven't seen it, i'd suggest you do, Richard. I have not seen the movie. I'm certainly familiar with Iron Rand's books, and I heard the Atlas Shrugged movie was kind of me. But I'm willing to I'm willing to give it a

shot if you tell me it's good. Sean. Right, Oh, I knew this was coming. I love you like a brother, but you're game. But you'r gaudy. Impression sounds like a Frank Caliendo impression of John Madden doing an impression of the Swedish chef. So you're gonna get in a shotgun information you get through a long bomb in the enser. It kind of kind of works. Actually look at that, all right? All right, Sean, I know I I gotta

put the tray the trade gaudy away. People are not as I mean, my Bernie is amazing because I'm from New York City, so we all understand it. Like I got the burn, I feel the Burn twenty four to seven. That didn't that didn't sound right. That's not that's not the image that we wanted to come up with. Um. But I do have a good Bernie Sanders impression, which is important. I think it's important. James rights the movie quote. You didn't know. I should have been more clear. Now

you know what I do for a living. You should have waited I was worth It is from The Expendables. This was a quote someone else mentioned, not the Platoon quote. I knew that one to great show regardless. James, well, James, you are the quote expert extradina there. I have never seen The Expendables, so I can't speak to it. A movie that is a send up of all action movies. I don't know. It seemed a little too contrived for me, but I know they made a second one, so it

must have made money. David hey Buck, I was flipping through the FiOS menu tonight and saw the Trump Dynasty listed on A and E pretty much all night. I don't remember them seeing them run a Clinton or Bush dynasty back in the day. They come at this guy at every angle. They're definitely failing. Living in VA, Virginia, Northam fair Fan and Herring are helping the conservative cause. The further they dig in, the more we benefit. Take care of Dave, you know, Dave. None of those three Democrats,

none of those three Democrats are going to resign. And I've thought that for a while, but it is. It's pretty remarkable when you get down to it, that not one of them is going to have to step down. When you when you see how democrats deal with the opposition, how Democrats treat Republicans that are enmeshed in a scandal, whether there's any merit to it or not. Obviously there's a different standard at work here. I don't know if

it'll really help at the national level. I mean, people people don't spend as much time thinking about how evil many Democrats are as I'd like. But there you have it, Danessa Rights, Hey Buck, I'm new to the team, but I found myself looking forward to listening to your show every night. I was wondering if you could give a shout out to my brother Dakota. He is up and coming as a singer songwriter and you can find him on Instagram and Facebook under Dakota Sailor say l O

R Music. Shield's High Keep up the good work well, Danessa, asking ye shall receive. First of all, welcome to the team. Great to have you listening. Thank you so much for joining Team Buck honor and a privilege joining your fellow patriots across the country. And as for Dakota, that's great. We wish him all the best of luck Instagram and Facebook Dakota Sailor, guys, you can go check him out. I'll check him out. We'll see if he's good. If he's really good, maybe we could have him do some

you know, intro music for the show. That'd be kind of fun. It'd be fun to get that going. I want to check it out here. My college roommates were in a band that was interesting. Stories for another time. John right shields high Buck. To be honest, you're Bill Cowsby sounds a lot more like Bill. You're sorry, You're Trey Goudy sounds a lot more like Bill Cosby. Darn it, Now that a couple of you have independently said this, it makes me think that maybe my trade Goudi does

sound more like Bill Cosby. You're general putting pups. I've never thought that I really had a Cosby, And you know, I never really watched The Cosby Show either, can't can't say that I was a watcher of the Cosby Show of all the I spend too much time in my youth, probably watching TV, which maybe comes across during the show. I read a lot of books too, though. All right, gonna close up shop tonight. To be sure to come find me at Seepack Thursday and Friday. I'll be wandering around.

I'll be the guy with a swoop. You know what that means. Talk to you tomorrow, Team Shields High. If you need background checks done for your business, you need to make sure you check out my friends Global Verification Network. The CEO, Mark Buckman is a buddy of mine, and this guy is a veteran, a patriot, and somebody that you can trust. And background checks are essential to making sure that you bring in people that you can trust

to work for you. A lot of the other background check organizations out there, a lot of people to do background investigations in vetting. They'll send it over se they'll outsource it. They'll even park this sensitive data that you give them on servers that aren't even on us soil.

Don't go with any of that stuff. Call my friends at Global Verification Network eight seven seven six nine, five one one seven nine is a number again Global Verification Network eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Or go to MYGVN dot com again. That's my GVN dot com. Global Verification Network. Leave no stone unturned