Portland Rioters Rage On

doing that sometimes. No, welcome everybody to the Buck Sexton Show as always an honor, thank you for being here. I just want to jump right into it. You know, we were told in the last few weeks, I feel like I should just start doing a segment. We were told lies by libs dot dot dot. But this is

another good example of it. We were told by people like Nancy Pelosi, who was out there saying this time tupas the federal government agents law enforcement officers who were trying to assist in the protection of a federal courthouse in Poland, that they're bad people doing bad things. They are the reason for the riots. That was the part

of this that you really have to remember. They were the cause of the rioting and there was this effort also to pretend there weren't riots, and then that failed because of some intrepid actual journalists and people who show footage. Now not the mainstream journals. Really it was other citizen journalists, people like our friend Andy no who just show what

really happens here. And then it's really difficult to make the case that these are mostly peaceful protests when everybody sees that they're throwing rocks and using weapons against federal law enforcement. They're dressed up for battle. They're not dressed up for a peaceful protest. We've seen all that. But remember that the Democrat position on all of this was that it was the presence of the federal law enforcement

officers that was causing the problem. It was their deployment that was the reason for all the bad stuff that we then had to at least we had to at least all agree was happening because there was so much video of it. Well, you've got two nights now in a row where the police department in Portland, remember that it was handed over to them, and the mayor of poor Land, Ted Wheeler, antifozz Aran Boy and the governor

in Oregon. I mean these leaders were saying the problem was the federal law enforcement officers just get to them and the rioting stops. They're the red. Now, no one really believed this, but it just shows you how dishonest the Libs are about all this stuff. We were quite aware that it was going to I'm pretty sure I actually said here on the show, Hey, they're going to be more riots. This is not going to stop. And now we can all look back to a Nancy Pelosi

and the Democrats. We're making that absurd claim about federal law enforcement, and now we see with our own eyes exactly what is going on here. Continued riots, more nonsense, more madness, and the police chief in Portland is now saying that the cause of the cause of racial justice is not being helped by these rights. Remember that these ANTIFA members, they're they're really using Antifa tactics, but they

think they're part of Black Lives Matter. And this anti cop sentiment that Democrats embrace because they need to for their political party, they need to for their aspirations for power, that has had an effect on cities all across the country. This has made urban areas worse, and Democrats own that that's on them. They're going to try to avoid it as much as possible, but they have been reckless and we are now suffering the consequences of this as a country.

What's going on in Portland is a continued disgrace. These Antifa lunatic should be locked up. They should spend some serious time in prison. Rioting is a crime, destruction of property as a crime, and the laws either count or they don't. They don't get to have it both ways. I know the Libs love to pretend that they can have it both ways, or they try to have it both ways, but they are unable to as long as we are in a position to hold them to account

on this. And that's why I keep saying, you want accountability, you want justice, you gotta win. That's what it really means now politics, That's the truth. You want accountability, You've got to have people who are not completely insane in power. That's where we are. So we also, while I'm talking about safety in cities, on the one hand, you have

riots in Portland. They can't get that under control. On the other hand, you have Los Angeles, Chicago, New York that are going into what I've been saying all along. They would which is the lockdown two point zero phase, just in time for the election, just in time to make sure the economy remains suppressed, and to create a widespread perception of an America that is failing, that's going in the wrong direction, that is needs change, that needs

to be in different hands. When it comes to leadership, Los Angeles and New York are almost at a competition right now for who can engage in the most breath to making government overreach. You see the problem, my friends, and this is true across most of America, is that we've let politicians seize unthinkably broad powers of unbounded duration and are going to continue suffering the consequences until we decide our rights outweigh their mandates. It's not going to stop.

They love this power, they take to this, They have no problem with this. In fact, they want more of it. They want more of it if you allow Democrat leftists, they will dictate every aspect of your life, no matter how counterproductive, painful, absurd, and they think that that's their role. They have no problem with it. They'll continue to do this. Now we have Los Angeles, we have Los Angeles Mayor Garcetti telling everybody that they're willing, well, I'll let him

say it. Play clip four. While we have already closed all nightclubs and bars, these large house parties have essentially become nightclubs in the hills. Many times the homes are vacant or used for short term rentals. And beyond the noise, the traffic and nuisance, these large parties are unsafe and

can cost Angelino's their lives. That is why tonight I am authorizing the city to shut off Los Angeles Department of Water and Power service in the egregious cases in which houses, businesses, and other venues are hosting unpermitted large

gatherings starting on Friday night. If the LAPD responds and verifies that a large gathering is occurring at a property, and we see these properties reoffending time and time again, they will provide notice and initiate the process to request that DWP shut off service within the next forty eight hours, weaponizing city services and regulations for what they say is as public health. But let's remember they could have prevented mass gatherings in the streets with the LAPD. Oh, but

that was about BLM. That was too important, you see. But now people want to throw house parties. Look, I don't think it's a good idea to throw a house party right now if the numbers are pretty high in your community. I'm not saying that. But I also don't think the government has the authority to just tell you you can't see your fellow human beings. The government is telling people who are overwhelmingly healthy and don't have any

disease whatsoever. By the numbers, ninety nine out of one hundred people that are at this party probably don't have any COVID, and maybe one hundred out of one hundred you don't know. The government is saying you're not allowed to do that. You're not allowed to gather together. Freedom of assembly, My friends, we have rights. We actually have things that are ours that the government is by charter, by constitution, by contract, not supposed to be able to

just take away. And what do we see in particularly these democrat controlled major cities. They take it away on a whim, They take it away and there's not even a complaint from most of the population. How far are we from some of these other countries, never mind just democratic socialism in Europe? How far are we for what they're doing in China? These days. We have control over what we can say on the internet from the monopolistic

major tech companies. We're not allowed to gather. We have to wear a face diaper all the time because that's going to save us all. We got all these rules and regulations. There's no there's no laws that are being passed for any of this. People in power who have police authority instead of just enforcing the laws as they are making up laws as they go along. That's what these governors are doing. They're expanding quarantine powers to the

breaking point. They've been catastrophically ineffective. You know. On the one hand, you'll notice there's this this call for oh COVID. Our response has been so terrible in America. It's it's on all of us to listen to these governors. And they never stop and think, Hold on a second. These governors have been in charge all along. They're morons. We had this terrible response. They've had a terrible response. Why

aren't they accountable? No, But the Democrat narrative, because Trump is the president, and because they're all so delusional with their anti trumpism, is that things are terrible in this country because Republicans haven't worn enough masks. That's that's what they tell themselves. If only that were different, then we would all be fine. We wouldn't be going through this. You know, there are surges in different countries right now too. You don't hear much about that. Our media just wants

to focus on panic. Panic here in America. Panic. You got a surge going on in Germany, even a surgeon in Australia. I mean this, this virus is everywhere. It's everywhere. And what governors and mayors have shown is they can't protect us. They can't protect us. But what do they do.

They keep doubling down. They decide that now that we live through this nightmare to this point and have seen more of the numbers and have a better sense of who's at risk and what's going on, they are taking the anti science position that the risk is too high for kids to be in school this fall. We all know that's crap. And they're also getting even more strict and severe with the lockdowns. In New York. We have quarantine checkpoints that are set up now. They're threatening to

find people ten thousand dollars. Here's the mayor, the worst mayor in the country, even worse than Garcetti. Believe it or not, they are build the Blasio. Here he is explaining that he has special powers, and no one even knew about play clip fourteen. So starting today, we're going to do something new in New York City. We will

have checkpoints at key entry points to the city. Travelers coming in from those states will be given information about the quarantine that will be reminded that it is required, not optional. They'll be reminded that failure to quarantine is a violation of state law and it comes with serious penalties. In fact, under certain circumstances, of fines can be at as highest ten thousand dollars. Where is the federal government? This is interfering in interstate commerce. Okay, enough is enough.

This is insane. They can't enforce this quarantine. This quarantine is not based in any data. It's just, oh my gosh, we're terrified. Everybody has to lock themselves in their homes for two weeks. From the very beginning of this fight against COVID nineteen, lockdown was supposed to be the last ditch when you have nothing else you can do, you don't know what you're facing, you don't think you have enough.

Hospital beds in Ppe. It was a last resort, the last resort in the fight against this has over time become the first resort, the first option that's being deployed. Oh there's a surgeon, numbers locked down, everybody. What benefit have we seen from this? Where has this worked in America?

I'll sit here and wait. Anyone who says New York and New Jersey is a moron, because New York and New Jersey have gotten a hate by this worse, more dead people, more misery and sadness as a result of this virus than anywhere else in the world per capita. But the narrative is too important for the libs. They want to pretend, Oh no, we figured it out. Now just do what we're telling you to do this time around, because look at what a good job Cuomo has done.

Look at how well Newsom has handled this. You look at these different states. You say it's done a horrible job, and now they're using that as justification to do the same thing over again. Cuomo is like a kid who shows up who got an F on the exam and then wants to stand up and lecture the rest of the class about the subject matter. The worst grade the worst results of anybody. And he's talking about this like he knows what the heck he's talking about quarantine checkpoints. Folks, know,

where are the protests about that? We have massive protests across the country over one individual being killed by a cop and what certainly still seems to be excessive force, But there was a lead up to it. There was an individual who was noncompliant and who was high and who died of a heart attack, not asphyxiation. So that leads to nationwide protests. But we have cities telling us they're going to shut off power and water to a house if too many people gather there under what authorities.

As the authority just we're scared, and we watch a lot of CNN, and we're the governor, so we're going to tell you that this is what you have to do. And I'm gonna keep saying it. Where is the federal government on this? Where is the DOJ? Why aren't they stepping in? This needs to stop. They're interfering in the interstate commerce. They're stopping cars and saying that we're going to find you unless you lock yourself in a room for two weeks. That's insane. They can't think this through,

my friends, how are they going to enforce this? Now? They're going to tell you in Dublasi already has Oh well, we're really just trying to make a point. That's what they said about masking originally. Right now, there are mandates now they find people. Now they lock you up if you open your business after a couple of warnings. Now they'll actually arrest you. What is suggested becomes mandatory. What becomes mandatory is punishable with fines and arrest. We have

seen this progression keep happening. They don't have an answer about how to contain this thing. They don't unless you really want to lock down forever, where we keep coming back to the same discod just keep locking it down, Lock it down, hope a vaccine comes, and hope that vaccine is distributed quickly enough and is effective enough that it eradicates this disease, which I don't think anybody really

believes that's going to happen. Lockdown, or else we'll shut off power, will shut off water, We'll find you ten thousand dollars. And they're doing this to people who are almost all zero risk to anyone. They may have antibodies they may have t cell immunity, they might just not be sick at all. I mean, they have no idea. This is the biggest power grab I have seen in my adult life, and everyone's just going along hoping that

it'll go away. It's not going to go away. We confront this, we confront our lockdown overlords, or else it's just going to get worse. You're in the Freedom This is the Sex and Show podcast. There is a degree of anti science feeling in this country, and I think

it is not just related to science. It's almost related to authority and a mistrust in authority that spills over because in some respects scientists, because they're trying to present data, may be looked at looked upon as being authoritative figure. And the pushing back on authority is pushing back on government is the same as pushing back on science. Unfortunately,

that's not what scientists are. And I think we need to be more transparent and reaching out to people and engaging society and understanding why science and evidence based policy is so important. It's that last point that you really got to focus in on evidence based policy. Where's the evidence that any of the most draconian policies in this country that different states have have an act, where's the evidence that it works? Fauci has said things like New

York has really shown you how to get it done. Yeah, in New York, if you're willing to have you know, close to thirty thousand people die from this virus in one city, then sure, sure, that's a way to go. And there's a lot of people that were hospitalized and are very close to death in New York who just barely made it out of the hospital and are okay now. But evidence based policy, where where is the evidence for these policies? What he doesn't understand? I mean, there's an

arrogance here that we have to unpack. We have to deal with what they're saying that is clearly untrue. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Anti science feeling, that's what doctor Fauci calls it. You know, it's an ant there's a feeling of a mistrust of authority and the mistrust of the

authority lead. Yes, that's right. Anybody with even a passing knowledge of US history understands that we have a whole heck of a lot of mistrust of authority, and with good reason. Our country. The limitations on government enshrined to the Constitution. The reason we have a Bill of rights, the reason we have delineated powers, is because we do not want authority to be concentrated. We want a separation

of powers, we want checks and balances. There are reasons for that rooted deeply in our experience, not just as Americans, but as human beings. And we're seeing a forgetting of that right now. Oh yeah, let's just let these people make all these decisions. Let's let's leave them to be in charge of this. Fauci talks about science and data

driven policy. See what is the data driven policy? There are plenty of research, of published, pure viewed research papers from epidemiologists that in the past looked at lockdowns as a way to deal with a pandemic, and they really all came to the same conclusion. It's disastrously costly in every sense, economically, in human toll, and it's not even that clear how well it would work. There are other countries that have never locked down. There are countries that

have that had terrible results. I mean, where's the data being all the only data that we know? But there there's a lot. This disease spreads very quickly and is very lethal to older people with certain comorbid conditions. That data is all true, that's there. What's the other data we're using to determine this? Where was all this data driven policy? When you add hundreds of thousands of people marching together in the streets, screaming, shouting and close quarters.

Oh and a lot of young people got this disease. We're told it was just the bars. You see, it was just the bars. Okay, that's very convenient, isn't it. You got de Blasio setting up checkpoints in New York City for out of state drivers. I don't even I don't even really understand how they think this is supposed to work. Oh, you better quarantine for two weeks. What does that mean? You're gonna stay in your hotel room or stay if you're with you in a private home.

You're not gonna go outside for two weeks. No one's gonna do that, de Blasio unless they have symptoms, maybe unless they actually get sick. But they're telling healthy people stay for two weeks. That's a long time, two weeks on your own. It's just crazy folks. And what do they say about the John Lewis funeral attendees? What do they say, Oh, well that was really important, so you don't have to quarantine. Oh okay, So if you're at the John Lewis funeral in Georgia, apparently the virus doesn't

come after the same way. Wokeness is its own vaccine against the virus. Right. Sure, you've noticed in a Fauci he lost so much credibility for whatever credibility he had with so many people. When he was asked specifically in testimony recently about the crowds, he said, mask, you know, gatherings could spread the virus. Okay, So that means the protest could spread the virus, right, gatherings of all kinds.

You know. This is like will you condemn Antifa? When you ask Democrat this, Well, we'll condemn all political violence, okay, but will you condemn Antifa? We condemn all political violence. And if this happens with Black lives matter and all lives matter, they completely accept, They completely reject that. They think that's a horrible thing to say, But they do this game all the time. This is how they This is how they operate. I'm wondering what it's going to take,

my friends. They're doing everything they can to just steal this election, seize power from Trump, and run this country into the ground. And you know what's going to happen. It'll be just like when Obama took over after the Great Recession, and everyone's acting like Obama saved. Obama's economic policies were horrible, disastrous, just hurt productivity. Every decision that was pushed by him, by his administration was bad for the economy, was bad for wealth for all people, bad

for wages, the things that he was really behind. But all they had to say was, well, look what happened when we took over. Look at how bad things were. They kept pointing to the worst month of a cyclical recession and saying, look at how much better we are than that. See, even though it was the slowest recovery out of a recession since World War Two, but that was all they needed. Just compare it to the worst

at the very beginning, and they'll say it's better. They'll do the same thing with Biden for the first two years, when when we're grinding through and all this economic fallout and all the stupidity and the Green New Deal and all the things that they'll do that make the country poorer, less free, and more miserable. And then they'll turn us against each other and more of this wokeness and this rhetoric about race that's just really all virtue signaling for

white libs these days. That's what's going on here. White liberals love to just preen about this BLM stuff. They're pathetic, they're cowardly. It's so easy. Oh, I care so much, you know BLM. They're marching through the streets and they've got like a T shirt with BLM and yeah, and celebrities like this. How many of them volunteer and minority communities to do after school, after school tutoring for underprivileged kids? How many of them have even I don't I really

want to know this. I'd be so fastened to see people at the protests. When was the last time they actually had a person from a community of color over to their house for dinner. I'm telling you this right now, And I think you all know a lot of these white libs who are out there screaming about Black Lives Matter, and they it's about them. They don't care about the minority community at all. They don't spend time in the minority community. They don't socialize with a lot of minorities,

if any. But oh, they're having this opportunity. Oh it's so so important. It makes me feel so good. And I'm, you know, all of a sudden, I'm part of a movement frauds, frauds, immature, cowardly frauds. And unfortunately they're they're the the the middle tier now and the you know, the the new hires at all the major media companies across the country, you know, the the assistant and associate producers.

And if you look in the newsrooms, twenty five year olds right now are are terrifying the fifty five year olds that are in the c suite because the twenty five year olds are woke robots. They don't they don't look at reason, they don't look at new data. That they are like terminators for social justice. They are on a mission. Nothing else is acceptable, and they will even destroy their own that's one of the new that's one of the new layers to all this. They're willing to

sacrifice their own people. It's like Longshanks in Braveheart when he starts firing off arrows while his own soldiers are in the melee in the middle of the field, He's like, whatever, we got more soldiers, just kill kill all of them, right, that's the attitude of the woke left. Now, Yeah, we have reserves. The dead costs nothing. That's their attitude. You know, there's plenty more lives out there. If we got to

sacrifice some, we're willing to do it. Bring me back to Fauci for a moment here and the anti anti science feeling in this country. Fauci's policy have been a disaster. It has not. We are not better off because of this, all right there, You cannot show me one place where you know we listened that. They're all pretending now all the reopening happened too fast. Oh there was too fast

of a reopening. Okay, what was the alternative? Lockdown? Straight up, no business is open nothing, only grocery stores, drug stores, and you know, hospitals. Unable to see anybody. We're going to keep doing that from March. Everyone just being being a total phony about this. What was the alternative? We opened up in May? We had been on lockdown for months. They said fifteen days to slow the spread. We basically waited ninety and then they say it was too soon.

And now they're saying, well, maybe we got to do that again. This is the best they've got. The answer is they don't have answers. The answer is that the policy science nexus has been disastrous. Oh if we had only wore masks, right, you mean, like what they told us not to do for the first sixty days of the pandemic, make sure it spread all over the country, and then be like, oh, we're masks, guys, that'll stop this thing cold in its tracks. Does anyone really believe that?

I mean, maybe it would be true if you wore a mask all the time and it was air tied and it was fitted, and you know, I mean, then here we are, here, we are it's our fault. You see. What else are they going to say? What else? What's the admission going to be from the people that have created so much misery? What I'm telling you this? You know, there's some things I predicted. I say, I think, but

I don't know. I have a very high confidence. I would almost say I am not uncertain that when they were able to look back at the additional mortality this year for what would be expected in the US population. You've heard of last year, and they see the number of drug overdoses, suicides, and also the late stage cancer spurt or you're gonna see so much more late stage cancer. And that's just the one that everyone can think of. There's a lot of other diseases and a lot of

other medical conditions. You know, they've made a lot of America a lot slower, fatter, and less healthy. Let's just be honest, and a massive scale. I know some of you have your solo flex, your bow flex, you're you know, whatever it is, your ab roller in the closet or maybe you've been able to keep up that. But for a lot of the rest of us, we're just not able. And plus there's all just the stress and your body's quarterisol levels, all these things. There are enormous costs that

have been imposed on all of us. Do you think that people are ever going to listen to public health experts again if we really are able to look at the data and find out that these costs really didn't do anything for us, that this was an elephant with a mouse annoying it to get away from it falls off a cliff. Do you think they're ever gone. Do you think they'll ever admit that no matter what the

data says, Oh, of course not. They'll fight this one till the very end, never going to relent on this, going to pretend that they had the answers all along and hope that people just go along. And you know, I guess also, I just have a different view of this. I've had some I've had so many different times where I've asked a doctor or no of a condition and I've asked the doctor, you know, how do we make this better? Or you know, I'm in pain or I've got this or that or whatever it may be. And

do they try? And most doctors are really good people, and they're very very educated, but they don't have I know, they don't have all the answers. And I wish there was a little bit of a greater humility from the health policy community, right the lab coat wearing dictators that are out there right now, a little more humility that they have been wrong. They should square up with the American people. They should say, yeah, we were wrong on some stuff, no question about it. We didn't see how

bad this was going to be. We thought our containment measures would work better. We didn't understand the real implications of masking or not masking. We thought handwashing would be much more effective than it was. But this is what we got, folks, this is the best we've gotten. Now, here's what we can tell you about where we are now that would go a long way. No, instead, what they do they have found here's a degree of anti science feeling. You know, they don't listen to don't do

everything I tell them to do. And yeah, because you've been wrong, dude a lot, and people have suffered because of it. Can't even come in and out of major cities now without going through checkpoints on the orders of the most moronic mayor in the United States because he thinks he's backed up by the health policy community. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh. I think that we're all learning this at the same time now that he won't be there.

But I think it's an indication of the serious and split that she judges that the situation this the pandemic is dangerous and the increase in numbers just demands that we keep our distances. Commend him for doing that. It's going to be a great convention. People will see it virtually,

and we're very proud of him. I think it's it's a great thing that he's doing this early enough, so the rest of us now we're told that we're not coming either, I guess, and we can all make our plans from around the country for a great American victory for Joe Biden as he is nominated for president. Well, at least that was coherent chardonay socialist Nancy, and you know, she sounds like she, you know, got her ten hours of sleep last night. Biden's not going to Milwaukee because

things are so serious. They act like we didn't see all the Democrat luminaries in Atlanta last week, right in Georgia or in Georgia last week. I think it was in Atlanta in Georgia last week for the John Lewis funeral, so that they'll go to But Biden, it's too serious. Oh, it's too serious for him to go to Milwaukee right now. Can't do it, can't do it now. There's a reason for all this. Biden is just trying to ride this whole situation out. I do think that he's going to

show up for one debate and one debate only. But that's only because they're gonna try to get him out of it and it's gonna look too bad, and it'll be close enough in the polls. The Democrats realize he's got to just he's got to muddle through. He's got to just find a way to pretend like he knows what time of day it is and what year it is and all the rest of it. And if he can do that, they think that he'll win. But we're going in it. We're in a political season, deep into

it right now. I mean, it's going to be September in the blink of an eye here, and you know, once you hit that, it's just for those of us who are in the political commentary media world, it is a flash and then it's election to I mean, it just moves very quickly. And there's been really no campaign. There's been very little. So I think it's important that we at least here, you know, what is President Trump a Biden is offering, not Trump hiding an abasement and

America being terrified? What does Trump offer in a second term? Play fifteen A few of the things, just an ending. We will at least the full power of the American economy. We created an unprecedented economic miracle once and now we're doing it again, and already you see the numbers coming back very quickly. We'll shut down a legal immigration and we'll finish the wall. But if you're a farmer, you'll be able to get the same people that you've had

for many years. Were shut it down, But the farmers will be allowed to have those same people come in. We're not going to make otherwise, you'd make it very tough in the farmers that we've made it very easy on. The farmers will be tough on China, demanding accountability and fair trade. We'll bring medical manufacturing and critical supply chains back to America, which I've been fighting for and succeeding in. But we've never ever done the things that I'm done.

We're going to bring them back to our country. We'll root out anti American bias in our public schools and colleges. That's just a start. I like these things that President Trump. I think they're good for the country that thinks the President Trump is offering up What from what we know, does Joe Biden offer the country other than the hilariousness

of yet more absurd incoherent statements. Well, I think we should also look at that, because this is in the background of all the debates right now about COVID and everything else. Who should lead the country. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

What does Biden stand for? Everybody? Well, we all know that he stands for whatever the Democrat establishment, the coalition of activist groups, the media, Hollywood, academia, journals, whatever they tell him to stand for. That's effectively what he'll be all about. We know that. And we also know that he says incredibly dumb things and we're supposed to pretend that we don't notice for whatever reason. We know the reason. Here is Joe Biden speaking about Remember, he did very well.

It was really the difference maker for him in the primary. He did very well with the African American community in the primary. And here's what he said today. We'll just let him say it himself. When he's talking about the African American community play twelve. Yes, by the way, what you all know but most people don't know unlike the African American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is

an incredibly diverse community with incredibly different attitudes about different things. Okay, let's let's unpack this because you heard what you heard, and I know the media's get on. Unlike the African American community, Biden says the note with notable exceptions, the Latino community is incredibly diverse with different opinions. Now he's straight up telling you. Biden is saying that he views the black community as a as a monoliths, as all

similar and all having similar ideas. You know, you would think this is kind of racist, right, but no, no, it's okay because you know he's Biden, and he's the guy the Democrats will prop up no matter what he says. I mean, they've made their bed, they're going to sleep

in it. There is no all this stuff about they're gonna they're not gonna bail on Biden because even if they put a VP in place, and I think it's gonna be Kamala, which again, when we turn back, if they don't end up winning this election, to say that was the Biden and Kamala Harris were the best the Democrats would do. We got a country at three hundred and thirty million people, and those are the two best people they could they could pull together on a ticket.

Not Democrats don't really like either one of them. That's what's so fascinating. Biden is just the default candidate. He's the I guess we don't have We don't have an Obama this time around, so we gotta go with somebody that our base isn't excited about. But at least we all know his name, Joe Biden. That's it. And Kamala

Harris ran for president and never did very well. And then most of the polls you would see she was not even really in the top and top five I think, I mean, she was a distant finisher in the Democrat primary. But Biden will get away with this, right. He'll say things like that. He said something there that wasn't his usual maham, we gonna be real loud. I don't really know what's going on. I'm getting kind of dizzy from all the talk. You know, he doesn't just say things

like that. I think here that's he views the black community as as one, as having one political identity, as having you know, he said as not being diverse. You know, they're they're they're black is what Biden thinks. That's what he's saying. And so black people have certain attitudes and certain Can you imagine if a republic had said this? Can you imagine the I mean, it's but you know, I, I know, the double standards that we see all the time are just there. It's on. I run out of

superlatives here. It isn't unfathomable because we fathom at constantly we have to deal with this. What else does Biden stand for? As we're getting closer into this And this is important too, because it can get easy to fall into this feeling of relative despair, like I just want it to end. I just want the craziness in this country to stop. How do we get it to stop? That's a feeling that I believe the Democrats are hoping to capitalize on when it comes to swing voters in independence,

people who are going to be the difference maker. You know, unfortunately you and I most likely. Oh though, you gotta show up and vote, folks. I'm gonna do it here in New York even though my vote is meaningless. I gotta move. Producer Mark is looking at me. Right now without being able to see me. I know he's like, yeah, buddy, Florida, Florida. And he's right because at least there the vote would feel like it has some meaning because I think a

New York you're outvoted in the presidential election. I think it's usually it's definitely two to one. I think it's closer to three to one in New York So in New York State, so we're definitely, Man, it's all because of New York City's eight to one Democrat to Republican. But we've got to make sure that we don't allow the rest of the country to feel like anything is better than what we have, because that's really the pitch, the elevator pitch of the Biden campaign is look at

how and they're making you more miserable? Right, They want you to be more miserable than they're saying, Look at all miserable you are. Don't you want something else? This misery could all stop, you know, this misery could all stop. They're really holding the psychology of the American people hostage in all of this. That's the plan, that's the way that they're preparing this. And Biden does have policies though that he's speaking about that, I think you should hear

about now. I mean, here's one because the Democrat Party is now there's no leeway on certain issues, right, There's no leeway on being pro abortion, there's no leeway on being in favor of amnesty. There's nothing else all right, And here he is on the issue of immigration, specifically talking about what what illegal aliens should get in this country play thirteen. Should undocumented immigrants also be able to

get subsidized healthcare? If they are working in the United States America and they are paying taxes, they should have access to healthcare. They should have access to what everybody else's has access to. The most important document. No, it depends. Not all undocumented workers are working. You say, you're saying on every undocumented worker here, you share your share undocumenter. Yeah right, I'm really deep on the polish here, Sure he is. Let's um, let's take a step back for

a second, shall we. Why is there the distinction in Biden's formulation here between undocument always used the term undocumented illegal aliens who are working in this country illegal aliens who are not, because the argument for illegal aliens who work to get healthcare is a humanitarian one, right, it's not.

It's not an economic one. Not really. Oh I'm sorry, well, people who this is also like when we talk about paying taxes, if they're actually the first of all, about half of illegal aliens and this is where you gotta get about half illegal aliens don't they're paid in cash, they don't have they don't have pay income taxes. That's not true. And if they were to pay income taxes, a lot of them get a refund from the federal governments. They don't make enough money to actually pay into the

federal system. But beyond that, yeah, they pay sales tax. I mean everyone who's here is paying. When I go to Europe on vacation, which I haven't done in a very long time, you know, you're paying their vat taxes.

You're whenever you buy or pay for something. So does that mean that wherever, any whenever anyone shows up because they've paid taxes, they're supposed to be able to access the same benefits as people who are here legally and who are paying all kinds of taxes and who are under an obligation into that state that others are not, and the state is under an obligation to them as well. No,

Biden wants subsidized healthcare. He wants the government to be paying a portion of the premiums of illegal aliens under the Obamacare plan, which the Democrats under the Obama administration, which Biden was a part of, were just ferociously shouting down as a lie, constantly claiming that that's a lie. Illegal aliens would not get this that. No, they just were just gonna once they slide it through once the plan is enacted. Too late. Now they've got the power

too late. Now the laws already moved on this one. Sorry, Yeah, we lied. What are you going to do about it? That is the Democrat attitude with policies like this all the time. Yeah, sure, we lied to you. What are you going to do about it? The answer, of course, is I don't know. Send some money to a think tank in DC and Republicans, I'm telling you, we are We do not have the platforms, We do not have the institutions that we need in this in this fight

and fight for the future of the country. All we have are the American people, that's it. We do not we do not have these extra layers, these these auxiliaries of a conservative point of view that democrats can call upon. We just don't have it. Okay, So he wants illegal aliens to be able to access subsidized healthcare. What else? What else is Biden uh particularly excited about? Playlip play

clip nine here. The way Trump, the way China will respond is when we gather the rest of the world that in fact invasion and in open trade and making sure that we're in a position that the world that we deal with who the right way. That that, in fact, that's when things began to change. That's when China, That's when Chinese behavior is going to change. Joe Biden has been a failure on China for as long as he's been in public office. This guy has no idea what

he's talking about. I mean, really, his understanding of the private sector is giving speeches as a former vice president and helping his son get on the boards of foreign countries and hope that he doesn't blow it too soon with drugs and strippers, you know what I mean. That's that's Biden's understanding of economics, really, and yet he thinks he's going to be an architect of policy with China. It's going to make things better I don't think anybody

who knows anything really believes any of this. But and Trump has been right on China. He doesn't get nearly enough credit for it. Trump has been right on China. But as with so many other things, now we pretend that all the initial all the initial outcries about how awful he was, it's it's just absurd. It's absurd. It's it's the constant, the constant drumbeat of lies and propaganda. You're almost overwhelmed by it. There's almost too much of it.

You're just trying to you know, a lot of people want to go on their day, like I've had enough fun. I don't want to do this anymore. And then just one more thing on the point about the filibuster, which has come up in news stories recently. Democrats, remember what I told you about how they'll say we won't do that, and then when they're in position to do it, and they do it, they'll say, yeah, we lie to you, So what what are you going to do about it? Now?

That's exactly their mentality with the filibuster, because Biden will tell the base, yes, we'll get rid of it, but then the national media will gaslight and say no, no, I mean they're not really gonna get rid of it. The base will no, no, no, Biden, Democrats, no, Biden's telling us it's gonna happen. Then the national media will tell the swing voters, and we'll tell the independence No. No, he's not really going to do that. Here's what he says,

play clip eight. You do not agree with President Obama that getting rid of the filibuster is necessary, He just as a relic of Jim Crow. What I said was that if in fact they are as obstreperous as is expected, we'd have to get rid of the filibuster. But the filibuster has also saved a lot of bad things from happening too, So you'll oh, yeah, no, no, I'm sorry. I thought. I'm on record as saying that if the Republicans, if there's no way to move other than getting rid

of the filibuster, that's what we'll do. This is the same as saying Republicans will do what we want, or we'll get rid of the filibuster. That's their version of if they're not willing to move, do what we say, or you're being unreasonable, we'll get rid of the filibuster. This is what I mean by they have no principles. There's no common ground, there's no sense of fair play.

They'll always just change, They'll always just change the context to suit their needs in the moment and not allow any actual rule, regulation, policy principle to get in the way. That's certainly going to be the case with Joe Biden, the trojan horse for the far left to get into power once again. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is

the Buck Sex and Show podcast. You know, we need some political analysis from because it's been a while, but we need to hear from from Lebron James, almost a billionaire, one of the most famous, wealthy, celebrated human beings on planet Earth. We need to hear from him. You know, he talks about the oppression, and he's very favorable to the Black Lives Matter movement and says that young black

men are hunted every time they leave their homes. You know, Lebron James said some pretty reckless stuff, but and doesn't seem to have any gratitude for the country that's elevated him to superstardom status. You know, it really likes to tear the country down and take this attitude that it's all been so hard. This is a guy who I think was on the cover of Sports Illustrated when he was in in high school given like fifteen or sixteen.

So yeah, I mean it's it's just been uh, I don't know, and we're supposed to believe it's been some impossible struggle. Okay, fine, right, but here's lebron on on Trump saying that he's not you know, he's not happy

with all the kneeling going on. Play seven. Our game is in a beautiful position, and we have fans all over the world, and our fans not only love the way we play the game, we try to give it back to them with our commitment to the game, but also respect, you know what else we try to bring to the game and acknowledge and you know what's right

and what's wrong. And I hope everyone UM, you know, no matter the race, no matter the color, no matter of the size, and see what what what leadership that we have in our at the top of our country and understand that in November, UM is right around the corner and it's and it's a big moment for us as Americans. UM. If we continue to talk about we want, you know, better. Won't change. We have an opportunity to do. But the game is the game. Will We'll go on

without without his eyes on him. I can sit here and speak for all of us that love the Yama basketball. We can care less. Well, the ratings are way down, and I think the ratings are going to continue to go down. But here's one here's one dynamic that I see playing out reminds me a bit of of when um and I'm not even I could get into really Lebron about leadership and about changings. What do you think

about China these days? We want to talk about that. Yeah, you're a huge He's a huge celebrity in China, Lebron James. NBA stars huge celebrities in China. He points out, there's a global dynamic now with the NBA that did not exist, certainly, you know, twenty or thirty years ago, anywhere near what it does right now. I mean, the NBA is now. And this is why I think there is a bit of arrogance from these leagues where they can, they think they can, they think they can, you know, upset a

lot of Americans. It doesn't really matter all that much to the bottom line or at least they'll be able to continue on making a lot of money because they'll watch them in We'll watch these games in China, in Europe and South America and so on and so forth. Right, But I see a dynamic playing out here where where the lack of patriotism and professional sports. It reminds me a bit. And it's not across the board. I know they're athletes who have stood. I know there are a

lot of great patriots who play in professional leagues. And you know, we're speaking obviously about those who think they're making some profound point by being disrespectful during the anthem. That's all it is, right by by calling attention to themselves during the national anthem, which is supposed to be a moment of unity, brings us together before sporting event. I honestly think that we should just probably I think we should probably just get rid of the anthem before

these games. I think that it's we are selling the anthem by tying it to these some of these sporting events. I know we've you know, there's been this huge campaign. The NFL has been a really big part of it with you know, the military and the flag and this this sports game Okay, when they're being respectful about those things, fine, but they're going to be disrespectful. There's really no particular

connection between these things. I'm getting to the point where I just think that this is a fight that we don't need to continue to have. But you know, other people would say, don't concede this ground. But as long as you're doing these anthems, any player who wants to draw attention to himself will just do this, and the woke side of things will come to his defense and

they'll they'll make the whole Colin Kaepernick case. But I think you have the the international the internationalization of professional sports in the US, the same way you've had that with the media. It reminds me when I was in China watching CNN International because it was the only thing I could watch in English in my hotel room. And I mean, c AN International is taking a very anti American point of view, but that appeals to the rest

of the world. Right, you can now have sports teams and sports leagues that lose a portion of American audience but gain you know, among the more woke, you know, youthful, lunatic lib side of things, but also know they can make it up within a global TV revenue. So it feels to me like some of these sports leagues are just becoming less patriotic. That's happening. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,

the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Sally Yates, Oh, Sally Yates, You miserable deep state democrat fraud you testify

yesterday Lindsey Graham way too deferential to her. You notice how Democrats do this versus Republicans, or Republicans still think that they get points for being good little boys who will be respectful of our government servants, even when they've been part of an effort to ruin the ruin the life and career of decorated thirty year military veteran like General Flynn, to bring about a soft coup against the

president of the United States. You know, now we've you see with time what ends up happening, what the new perception becomes. We went from a media apparatus that was in love with James Comey to now everyone's like, oh yeah, Comy, No, I mean every I mean everybody knows Comy's kind of a jerk, right. I mean, you know, Comy is not somebody you can't trust James Comy. Come on, No, I remember when they were telling us that James Comey was the greatest public servant in the history of the country.

I remember when James Coomy was being hailed as like the greatest law enforcement guy since Elliott Ness or I don't know, pick somebody. And now they're all like, oh, no, he was a weirdo and what he was doing was wrong, and it was clearly a personal vendetta. And so but there's no h there's no accounting of this. There's no accountability for who was right and who was wrong? Right, what I've been telling you about James Comey now for

four years? Correct, He's an untrustworthy, self absorbed, narcissistic, dishonest, lunatic. Okay, true, But you remember, for about two two and a half years, media was, oh, James Comy is a great How dare Trump? The FBI? Everyone's crying in the whole because Director comyus gone. They're all these little comius that were hired over at CNN, you know, Pajama Boy and a bunch of others that had worked with Comy at the FBI. Oh, Comey was

the greatest. Comy's horrible, absolutely horrible, and even Sally Yates willing to throw him under the bus. Here's what she said, play clip five. Here's what I want to understand. It is a counterintelligence of vege that led to the interview. You didn't authorize the interview. As a matter of fact, you wanted to go to the White House and tell them about the problem, didn't you. That's right. I didn't

thought that that was the more immediate issue. And when you hear when you heard about the interview, you got upset, didn't you. I was upset that director Comy didn't coordinate that with usn't acted unil like. Yes, I was, okay, did Comey go rogue? And you could chuse that term? Is finally, did Comey go rogue? You could use that term? Yes? Oh, Now, after what four years of when you Comey got fired and all this other stuff, now they'll actually just say, oh, no,

I mean Comey was a jerk. Four years of just whining and all this stuff about how James Comy was this great public servant and how could Trump be so awful to them and all this other It's just garbage folks. They're lying to you, CNN. I mean, you go, you can go back and look at what people CNN's particularly agreedious in this regre. I mean they've lost their minds. I know people over at CNN, I can tell you, you know, they'll they'll behind closed doors, they'll be like,

I mean, CNN has lost its mind. It's very pert That Zucker Trump thing is real. It's very personal and and that and he controls that organization with an iron fist, and it's it is an anti Trump pack. It's not a news organization anymore. It might as well CNN is the Lincoln Project with you know, more hairspray. That's what it is. And and obviously there there libs openly and

like the Lincoln Project where they're just secret libs. But you watch the way that Yates is talking about all this stuff, and I can't help but say that I saw all this coming, that they just needed to use. That it was used the narrative as long as it's effective and by the time everyone finds out because the information will come forward despite all their efforts to suppress it. That the dossier was a joke, that Carter Page never should have been surveiled that all this stuff that was

done by the FBI was done in bad faith. They were they're just claiming now that they were too stupid to see all the giant holes in their theories. That this guy Christopher Steele, who's not the second coming of James Bond, like we were led to believe, this guy's a fraud, a clown, a public drunk. All of that we find out and they're like, well, you know, but it was useful. While it was useful, and it's too late. Now, what are you gonna do about it? That's really you

see it again, that's what the Democrats do. Okay, so we lied, we were wrong. Look at this, Look at what happened. That's why that that moment you will remember years ago and Mitt Romney ran against Barack Obama and a Mitt Romney don't even get me started. Don't even get me started. Folks be here all day. Mit you quit, you quit being a Republican. It's a very very sad thing, if you ever really were one, very sad thing to watch. It's all personal for these guys. These guys are all

ego maniacs. They'll abandon their principles and their politics on personal on personal whim. That's what you've seen clearly with Romney among many many others. But you remember when Harry Reid said that Romney hadn't paid taxes in ten years, and he said, on the floor of the sentence, you can say anything there and you can't be sued. And it was a lie. And when someone pointed that out that it was just a lie what Harry said, He's like, yeah, did he win? That is the Democrat mentality on all

of this stuff. That has been the mentality on Russia collusion all along. Okay, yeah, we lied, but didn't you have to have Trump on defense off balance? I mean, Trump presider over three of the best years in America in my lifetime. The first three years the Trump presidency were three of the best years in this country as long as I've been alive. No major wars, no major

terrorist attacks, booming economy. I mean, the media finally getting when it deserves with a president who's telling them to just you know, stop being a bunch of jerks and shut up. But they were able to use this Russia collusion nonsense as a weapon against the president, and they were able to do it for a long time, and that's what mattered to them, that that was the whole point of it, to get away with the end. They did get away. There's not This is why I've said it.

I talked to my friend doctor A Sebastian gork on his show yesterday. I said that if I'm by Jesse Kelly still owes me a steak, I'm coming to collect Jesse Kelly. We had a bet over Nancy Pelosi. You guys, remember that was earlier this year. Jesse Kelly is a great man, but he owes me a steak. Damn it when the quarantine's over. But I bet Gorka a steak.

And it was what I've already said to you. There's not gonna be any major major prosecution, major arrests um made, you know, and any major indictment brought based on what has gone on here, based on the Durham probe. I

just don't see it. If I'm wrong, you know, all coming to say, guys, I was wrong, I'm sorry, but there's not going to be in my opinion, of major indictment because we just have all we've all gotten so used to the Democrat abuse that we're we're unwilling to use the same sort of winning at all costs mentality and even enforcing the law at at at it at its actual written level, right the way that it's supposed to be enforced. We won't do it. You're in the

freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and podcast. I relied upon the FBI as the fact finders here and the lawyers in the National Security Division to vet the accuracy of the application. Trump right, No, Senator, they did not hate well if I mean, we have to say, I have to speak up here for the career men and women of the Department of Justice. You know, do w oh, I'm not talking about all the career men and women. I think you and your collegue should have

had tarnished the reputation of the FBI. She relied on the FBI, and see everybody was lying up, relying on somebody else to do the fact checking through the real investigation to the But they were happy to run fi's a warrants on people and play all of these games. It is the most appalling political scandal of my lifetime, right, and there is unlikely to be any real accountability for it, as I've told you, because they'll just say, oh, no,

we were that was somebody else's job. This is the problem. Whenever you're dealing with a bureaucracy, it's always someone else's job. Someone else was always responsible. No one's really in the chain of command in a way where they're going to have to fall on their swords, so to speak. It's just not going to happen. And that's what I think you're going to see here. We'll find out that there were all of these very convenient It's the same way that libs can think that journalism is not just an

enclave of Democrat activism. We can say to them, hold on a second, you've got a hundred stories, and ninety nine of the hundred stories for your news organization, or one hundred of one hundred news stories for your new quote news organization are anti Trump, and you're gonna tell us you're not biased, And it's a yeah, that's just how it went. No bias there. You know, I know it's only negative stories about Trump from our news organization. But you know that those that's what the facts, that's

what the facts led us to. All the only negative stories, no good stories. And they'll say that to you. We'll say, how do I, how do I have an exchange of ideas with a person who is this incapable of dealing with things in a rational, factual way, Like, it's not possible, as a matter of probability, that you're only writing negative stories about Trump, because those are just the only stories that your news organization, a news organization, could come up with.

It's certainly possible if the purpose of your news organization is to trash Trump and tear him down, Yeah, then it's going to be you know, one hundred out of a hundred. And you have the same thing here with

the FBI. It's not possible that at all of these different stages, whether we're talking about Papadopoulos or Carter Page and the fires are worn and crossfire hurricane and sending somebody after National Security Advisor Flynn and Comy going rogue and Comy leaking documents to try to get even with

Trump and get a special counsel started. It's not possible that all of these things are happening in the bureaucracy of the FBI and the DOJ that are all negative for Trump, and there wasn't actually a mentality and ideology

of anti Trump bias pushing this. It's not possible. No, no one ever stopped or think you're talking about the most This isn't just some FBI investigation, right, This isn't a couple of guys you know named Tony and Billy running numbers in the back room of a grocery store somewhere and the FBI is looking at them for a RICO case. Like this is the biggest, most important, politically sensitive investigation in decades. And it's just a comedy of errors.

Not funny comedy, but it's just endless clownishness. A dossier that was paid for by the DNC that they didn't tell the court, was paid for by the DNC, that was full of lies, faking information about carter Page, saying that he was working against the US government when he was working for the US government, pretending that he could be some kind of a Russian go between spy, that

he was a trader. They pretended carter Page FBI agents pretended, knowing that it wasn't true that carter Page was a trader. They act like Papadopoulos was some bad Papadopolus didn't do anything wrong, nothing, he did nothing wrong. He got scared when he was having the Muller team trying to ruin his life, and he lied about an email that didn't make any difference, so they sent him a prison for fourteen days or whatever, ten days. But in terms of

Russia collusia, he didn't do anything wrong. Nothing. Yeah, I heard a rumor. A lot of people were hearing rumors,

but a lot of things. That's it. And yet they want you did the Sally ates is of the world want you to believe that all the unmasking, all the balloon that the dossier was real, the laundering the dossier through the intelligence community, and with the with the compliant media, and the back and forth between the two and Bruce Orr and Nelly or working you know, she's working for Fusion on behalf of the DNC, Bruce or Is at

DJ all these things. We're to believe that it was just coincidence that these things all lined up, I'm to orchestrated in such a way that it was damaging for Donald Trump, trying to ruin him and people around him. You're supposed to believe that as if we are all that blanking stupid, right, But that's that is the Sally Yate's argument. Oh, it was gonna we did this everything we had to do, and I just you know, I believe the FBI was gonna do no. No, that is unacceptable.

That is completely and utterly breath of believability. Sally. It's a Democrat partisan. We all know this. She at her whole Oh, I'm gonna stand up and I'm not gonna do my job. I'm not gonna listen to Trump. I'm gonna Oh, I'm gonna show him, Okay, and she got that. What was it the letter from Weissman. I'm so proud of you, Weisman, Muller, Yates, you know they're Oh, there's so much co mingling of the deep state here, There's so much collusion behind the scenes with all of them.

Weisman is head headlining or was going to do They realize how bad the optics were. The guy running the totally neutral, unbiased probe wasn't Mueller. We all know that Mueller was like Biden Murma doing and bring me a shippy cup. Weissman is a clear Democrat partisan, a vicious Democrat partisan who is thinking about how he's gonna raise money for Biden. He was the unbiased do J A veteran that was going to come in here and get

us to the truth. Set out ten possible counts of wouldn't call it act, wouldn't say which one was actually criminal, but set out ten possible counts of criminality as a smear, a smear from the Mala report. It's just all politics, folks, It's all what we've seen it now. And this is my problem, this is my problem. I think that we already know what happened. Let's not let them gaslight us. You know, I understand that Durham is getting too more factions and maybe, and God willing, will find this out.

Durham's got him. Maybe he's really got them on something. Maybe he finds that smoking gun, email or text or whatever where they can't even hide anymore. I certainly hope that's the case. But if I'm a betting man, and I've already told you, I owe doctor g Is stake if I'm wrong on this one, I think that we're going to find that everything that I have been telling you for four years, everything that the people defending Trump against this Russia collusion insanity for four years have said,

was true and correct, and his opponents. Trump's opponents were lying about all of this and whether it was Adam's Schiff or Swalwell or Pelosi or Schumer or all these pundits at the different lib anti Trump networks, they just lied their faces off. And you know what's really frustrating. Once all the truth comes out, you know earth they're going to say, Yeah, but did he win this November? That's the only question that really matters, folks. Thanks for

listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. White people, there are white people who are not as powerful as the system of white people, the cast system that's been put in place, but they still no matter where they are on the or the ladder of success, they still have their whiteness. Oh, they still

have their whiteness. That's billionaire black celebrity Oprah letting people know in eastern Kentucky, the poorest per capita county counties in the United States. Letting people know who are living in a impoverished trailer park somewhere without a mom or without a dad and just trying to get by. At least they've got their whiteness. Yeah, that's right. Deal with it. Wow, this is pervasive. Though. Now let's let's talk about this,

shall we. Let let's have a discussion about what this really does, this this mentality, what it does to our society. First of all, if we have she called it a cast system, if we have a racial cast system in this country, I'm going to need to know why is it that that cast system has also elevated? The system must have done it right, because it's the system. It's not individual decisions played out collectively among millions and millions

of people. It's the system. Why has the system of white privilege elevated Asian Americans who have a higher per capita income than white Americans do? Why is it the Asian community? Why is it? In fact, numerous non white immigrant communities have more substantial wealth, higher levels of education achievement, and higher quality of life than white people in this country. I just I would like the Libs to try and answer this for me. I would I would like them

to explain this. I would also like to know where is where is the overt discrimination in the law against say that the Latino community, where they're always they will often talk of the black and brown community. This is in liberal parlance, and they act like somebody who is from let's say, rural Honduras is in a very similar situation to say somebody who comes from, Oh, I don't know, Puerto Rico or Brazil, and I'd say, um, these are

people with very different cultural and economic backgrounds. You know, Puerto Ricans are Americans, their US passport holders, but somehow they're grouped together with impoverished Hondurans and the liberal conception their categorizations are wrong and sloppy. Whiteness, for example, Okay, let's talk about this concept of whiteness for a minute.

Someone who is let's say, you know, sixth generation American board here who is white, it has the same has the same set up in the same Situation's the same privilege. You can call it as an a recent Albanian immigrant who came here not speaking any English, without a penny in his pocket, from a very different culture. White Albanians are white same? Is that the same? I just want to since we're talking about that that's the same, what exactly are the outer limits of white privilege or where

does it and what does white privilege get you? I think a lot of people sit around in the country right now and say, what is my white privilege got me? Am I gonna I'm gonna hear more stories about how some people are anecdotal stories about some people feel like they're followed when they're in a store. I've been followed when I'm in a store. I was told very rudely once to pump somebody's gas because I had a hat pulled down over my head and he assumed that I

was an employee. I guess I could have gone on for months and months afterwards, upset. Why would somebody think that I was an employee there? But stuff like that just sort of happens. But people can either hold onto it or they can say that stuff happens. Human beings are imperfect and there's not some system that is out to get me. In fact, we have a system that makes distinctions by race in favor of black, Latino and Native American people in America. That is a fact. That

is legal reality. It's true in affirmative affirmative action, it's true in hiring, it's true in corporate America. And yet we're still always told that the system holds people down. We will have Lebron James, will have Oprah Winfrey will have people who are fabulously wealthy, influential, leading lives that ninety nine nine percent of people could never even dream of, and there will be complaints about how hard the system is. Wow, okay,

my friends, this is very divisive. It's very destructive. The sloppy categorizations, the claims that are made that some people just some people have it easy. I mean, what is that supposed to say? What does white privilege mean that a white person is not really capable of earning what he or she has, that it has been given to him. There are more poor white people in America than there are anybody else, So what did their white privilege get them? And I know this is where they would say, oh,

it's white fragility. See you're you're rejecting this concept. Nope. Judging people by skin color, treating them differently, thinking that they are different because of skin color, is racist. It is immoral. It is wrong. That is true, irrespective of whether the distinction is supposed to help some that you think are historically oppressed and hurt others that you think are historically advantage. It's wrong, it's immoral. It rests on moral fallacies and a lack of a real willingness to

have a conversation about what's true and what's not. In America today, we have a system that we're told that elevates elevates white people, and yet we ask in what way are white people elevated through the system? And you get a lot of talk about statistics and everything else. Well, I can tell you this looking at numbers in the aggregate and making determinations that there is a system that created that is not what we do with a lot

of other things. Murder is overwhelmingly a male institution. Guys kill people, women very very rarely. You look at violent crime, women very very rarely kill people. Do we have a system that unfairly targets men? Do we have a I always forget that when the misogyny is hatred of women, miss Andre right, miss Andre, hatred of men? Do we have a I don't even know how you say this, a missendryotic system or something. Do we have a system that hates men that's unfairly targeting men for the violent

crimes they commit? Or do we have men who just commit more violent crimes women do? And maybe there's a lot of complicated sociological and you know, historical reasons. You could talk about this, but is it the system? Are we manufacturing that men create, that men cause more violent crime than women do. I don't think. I don't think anybody yet makes that argument. Although I don't know, give

it time, Give it time. There has been a transition, friends, And there is a fascinating piece by Zach Goldberg in Tablet Magazine how the media led the Great racial Awakening. And what he does is he just goes and looks at the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, and then the Wall Street Journal, almost as a control group in all of this. To see that starting right around right around twenty eleven, right around the second Obama term, you had a an enormous surge in

the usage of terms like racism in the media. All of a sudden, you're hearing a lot more about it, and it's clear you go from you go for him, an increase of seven hundred percent, so seven times as often in the media. The New York Times, the Washington Post used the words racism a thousand percent more in some cases, depending on the terms you're looking at, I mean, you're looking at seven to ten x increase in the

usage of terms meant to describe racism in America. And then you start seeing and I've talked to you about this before this article came out, and a huge spike in usage of the term white supremacy. White supremacy was known in America until ten years ago. And that's about how long it takes for the for the wokeness, for the left to manufacture and spread a narrative that really

seeps into the consciousness and becomes powerful. White supremacy was known ten years ago as something that would be, you know, a person with Nazi you know, a swastika tattoo on their forehead and says that white people are better than other people and and horrible racist garbage. That was what white supremacy was. You know, they wore boots and shaved heads, and they would march sometimes with Nazi swastika stuff and I mean Nazi flags, swastikas, all the rest. That's what

white supremacy was. We all knew that there was that movie American History X about white supremacists that we'd see them. Now, white supremacy is not enough diversity on a corporate board that's considered that is used they used the term white supremacy for that, so they've expanded, and that's intentional. You see an enormous spike starting ten years ago immedia usage of the term white supremacy, and big surprise, folks, guess what.

Around the same time, you start to have a large increase among white liberals, particularly in their perception of how racist America is. The journals of you know, the biggest opinion makers in liberal media convinced, and there was a clear campaign to do it. That the data speaks for itself. All of a sudden, you're seeing all these terms appear that hadn't appeared before, came from it, came from academia,

came from the college campuses, and had started there. It's really a reboot of critical race theory, which has been around since the sixties seventies. Herbert Marcus, some say, the father of critical race theory. And this happened, and you can see the perception, the trend changing as a result of it, and the way that the media covers race and racial issues all of a sudden shifts dramatically. This

was intentional. This was intentional, and I really recommend this piece about the Great Racial Awakening because you see that this was manufactured and it was based on nothing other than the propagandistic desire of the media. They wanted to convince people that there was more racism, so that's what they did, because racism gets clicks, and racism is a narrative that makes the white liberals who are pushing it

constantly feel better about themselves. And anybody who sees what's really going on in these protests across the country understands that you have crazy white liberals who are they're the dominant force in the protests and the BLM protests. It's crazy white liberals. They're the ones who are is claiming and cops. This piece also has New York Times latent association between race and white just takes off like a rocket ship in twenty eleven. It all started right around

twenty eleven twenty twelve Obama's second term. You have an enormous increase in uses of terms like racial hierarchy, white privilege, whiteness, white supremacy. In it all just it couldn't be any more clear when you plot it and look at it on a graph. This was intentional. The country didn't change all of a sudden, didn't get much more racist, if anything, while we had our first black president who was universally

celebrated in the media pretty much. I mean, there are a few people who were critics in the right, but I mean in a ninety five percent of journal its loved Obama. And he's ultra influential, wealthy guy, the most powerful political brand in the Democrat Party to this day. And yet there was supposed to be some huge surge of racism in his second term that the media is reflecting.

I you know, you look for what was the what was the trigger, what was the incident that led to this, And yeah, all of a sudden, you're hearing a lot about white supremacy. You're hearing a lot about these things, reading a lot about these things in the media, and there's just there's a direct correlation between the perception and

the usage of these terms. Also another interesting note that I think should get a lot more attention, and it's that then when they look into the data this is on the Conversation dot com, when they look into the data on diverse with diversity training, Diversity training often backfires and it is worse to have diversity training in terms if you really believe in diversity then to have no diversity training at all, because some people just rejected entirely

and become even more annoyed by this. They reject these theories of white fragility and all the rest of it. But even people who don't reject it, here here's what it's as disappointing results in unintended consequences is from the conversation dot com, and this is about diversity training. In terms of reducing bias and promoting equal opportunity. Diversity training has failed spectacularly, according to the expert assessment of sociologist

Frank Dobbin and Alexandra Calev. When Dobbin and Caleb evaluated the impact of diversity training at more than eight hundred companies over three decades, they found that the positive effects are short lived, and that compulsory training generates resistance and resentment. A company is better off doing nothing than mandatory diversity training. Caleb said. Some of the most popular training approaches are

of dubious value. There is evidence, for example, that introducing people to the most commonly used readings about white privilege can reduce sympathy for poor whites. Oh you mean like Oprah saying even poor white people have their white privilege, especially among social liberals. Piece goes on, there's also evidence that emphasizing cultural differences across racial groups can lead to

an increased belief in fundamental biological differences among races. This means that well intentioned efforts to celebrate diversity may in fact reinforce racial stereotyping. End quote. Ah, so you see this is where even the well intentioned libs with all the diversity training, are like, Oh, this group of people, we're gonna be We're gonna be so good. We're gonna give them more, we're gonna expect less from them, and

we're gonna hire them. We're gonna bring them in because the Libs think this is what the sociological research shows they need the help. Without it, they couldn't get the job. That sounds pretty racist to me. Folks, you're enough. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. And since we're talking about attitudes and race and there's such a conversation going on right now about about policing in this country, I thought it would be worth you hearing this because

you won't see it in the mainstream media. According Gallup Polling, the narrative you here in the mainstream media is that defund cops is what the black community wants, meaning the average Black American is on board with this. That's what you get from the frauds at CNN, the lunatics on the left wing, the left wing media, but most Black Americans, according to Gallup, probably the most respected polling agency that

there is sixty one percent. Sixty one percent of Black Americans want the police presence in America to remain this same sixty seven percent of all US adults want the police presence to remain the same, means not defund cops. Seventy one percent of white Americans want the police presence to remain the same Black Americans. Twenty percent of Black Americans would would like the police to spend more time in their area, nineteen percent would like them to spend

less time in their area. So one in five Black Americans want less police presence, eighty percent want either more or the same. Do you ever get that sense from the media, No, because they're really still overwhelmingly controlled by and comprised of white lives who don't care about the Black community. They care about feeling like they care about the black community. Thanks for listening to the bus sess

in Showbot. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to spread some freedom, coast to coast. It's time for roll call, Roll call time, everybody you know? Pretty s mark. I started watching this new Netflix like Mafia New York versus The Mafia Show. Have you seen it yet? I have none? That sounds

interesting though? Pretty good? Pretty good. Actually, I kind of turned it on as a you know when you throw something on and you're cleaning up, and you're like, I don't really want to watch this, but I want to kind of half watch it. I was a half watcher, and then I was like, well, this is actually pretty interesting, is it? Or is it like a documentary? No, it's like a it's like a documentary of this early eighties New York bringing down the mob. Giuliani makes appearances in it.

That's really how he built his career. Giuliani was known as the US attorney who destroyed the Mob. Yeah, he cleaned up New York City as the merit if one knows that well, of course. But I'm saying, but to become the mayor first as US Attorney. He took it, he took down the Mob, and Nan he became you know, then he became the mayor of New York. But it's it's incredible. The Mob had so much influence and power, the control of the ports, control of meat packing, control

of the fish market. I mean, it's and they could threaten these businesses to give them the payoffs. They would shut the whole thing down. All the workers wouldn't show up. You think they still don't in some businesses. I think there's still some control. I gotta say, I don't really know what the status of the mob is right now. I know more about some of the Russian Mob stuff because I worked with some anti Russian Mob NYPD guys, and they say the Russian Mob is ruthless in Russia.

In the US, they say it's more they're just they're they're just whatever they can do to make money. If they can do, uh, like medicare fraud, they love that. Like if they can just steal from the government, that's their favorite thing to do. But they're also willing to just engage in shocking violence, particularly in the home country, which and the Russian Mob also involves all the former stand countries. So you know, there are Russian mobsters and

who's Beckett. We'll call them Russian mafia, even though they're not Russian. In Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Armenia, the Armenians will often get grouped in as being Russian mob So, yeah, interesting stuff. And I think they call it the Brotherhood and they have all these like different names for this stuff. But Bruce Mark, I think you would like this Netflix show. I'm just telling you, yeah if when I watch it. Yeah, they go into the Banano crime family, the Gambino Genovese um,

you know, a bunch of bunch of other ones. So I'm trying to think like a name Banano, Genovese, Gambino, Colombo. Did I get to five? Trying to see if I could do all five? On top of my head, I'm missing one, I think, yeah, you are. I can't even think of it. I know, I feel like Gambino became the most famous because of John Gotti. So anyway, oh, producer Nick's winging Luke CAZy, Luke CAZy, Yes, yes, yes,

that that's the one. I feel like they didn't have the best pr I feel like of the crime families, they're the least known. You know somehow, I don't families people, what's up? I don't think crime families have pr people. Yeah, but you know what I mean, like they had the like they're the least there's the least lore about the Luke Casey out there. You get obviously Gambino, super big, Bonanos, super well known, General Vies. I know stuff about that

about some of their captains. Um anyway, the mobs and there's a good mob show. I'm just telling I'm looking for good shows these days because you know, New York is still frozen in place. You can't really do anything here. So I reckon a Bosch and this Netflix show are my late night They're my late night joy. I'm all into Big Brothers back. I don't know. Have you ever watched Big brother Now? What's that? It's the show on CBS. It's been around for twenty years now, with a luck

fifteen people into a house for three months. I can tell you A long time ago, I went on a date with a woman who I think won one of the Big Brothers. Really. Yes, Oh, I'm a fanboy of that. True. I gotta talk. I watched every season and I can't even remember her name, but I do remember it came up on a date and I was like, what is this show? And she explained to me and I was like, that sounds crazy. How have you never heard of it? Port It's like the biggest reality show almost ever. I've

heard of it. I've never watched. Okay, I very idea what it's mindless and interesting? Yeah, speaking of much, I gotta get. I gotta get the PS four going a lot. Can you play Fortnite on a computer or only on PlayStation? You can play on a computer, I would say probably with the regular laptop, it's not going to be as good. Like there are people who have like serious gaming laptops,

and it would probably be much better on the console. Yeah, I've you know, I don't have a desktop computer anymore, having it a long time, but maybe it's time to get one. All right, let's get to some roll call here, John, Hey Buck? What do we get to? Wait? Hey Buck? On mail in ballots, there's a saying when a person doesn't give their best, they mailed it in. Well it came from somewhere right in person is the only way

to keep it fair. Less technology is better and harder to cheat, John, I think you're right, and I think that the people that are pushing for this on the left don't care that you're right because they view this as a way to get their way. So that's what I see happening here. That's that's my belief. Alrighty, there's gonna be mail in balloting for a bunch of states. I don't think it's it's not gonna be universal, but there will be some of it. Sarah hey Buck readings

from the Socialist State of Washington. You ever watched The American President with Michael Douglas and Michael J. Fox. One of my favorite lines seems eerily fitting for today. Michael J. Fox says, people want leadership, mister President, and in the absence of genuine leadership, to listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone, they want leadership. They're so thirsty for it. They'll crawl through the desert toward Mirage. When they discover there's no water, they'll drink the sand and

the president. Michael Douglas responds Lewis, We've had presidents who are beloved who couldn't find a coherent sentence with two hands in a flashlight. People don't drink the sand because they're thirsty. They drink the sand because they don't know the difference. Wow, are we there today? Or what? Keep up the good work? YouTube shields High. It's a kind of a somewhat cynical view of politics. But yeah, I

remember the American President. I think that's the one with Anette Benning, where like the big line it's like, you've lost more than my respect, mister president, you've lost my vote. You know. She's like an environmentalist activist. I will tell you this. I have gone back and watched some of the West Wing, a show i'd never really I've maybe had seen two episodes of it in total before, and I was kind of curious. It's a fascinating time warp into the mentality of nineties libs. You go back and

you watch it. It's all about like gun control and hate crime legislation and you know, a woman's right to choose, and it's all these really oh my gosh, all this sort of sanctimonious crapper on that, But so much of it is if we can just get gun control, we'll save so many lives. You're like, what doesn't work? Never has work? Didn't work then doesn't work now but oh, that's that. There's so much smug liberalism in it. But it's a little bit more. It's it's less insane than

it is now. I will say that because it was it was so transparently about feel goodism, and now the Libs are less obsessed with their own feel goodism as they are the feelgodism of destroying you. So it's changed a little bit. There's also a pre nine eleven, so the world completely changed when we love to talk about that stuff again. Oh yeah, yeah, that's true too, it is it was wait was it pre nine eleven? The West Wing? Yeah, it wasn't it in the nineties. I

think you're right. I think it was Clinton administration. When did the west Wings start? Do a quick google on that while I'm going through this. Bruce and Nicks. The west Wick is cheezy nineties Democrat fan fiction. It's absolutely true. It started pre nine eleven. So it started in ninety

nine and it ended six that's right. That's right, So it started pre nine eleven, but it definitely continued inc because it was really the alternative to the Bush presidency for a lot of people for a number of years. But it is so corny and Aaron Sorkin is just it's just so transparent that they're creating this world where like the liberal ideas always win. M what a shock.

Oh gosh, not all the good people are the liberal and the liberals are all like Econ Nobel Prize winners who also know how to throw a baseball and just want to make some delicious chili, you know. Oh god, it's fun to go back and watch it. She's like, is this how lives really see themselves or a bunch of a bunch of lunatics? Anyway, what was I saying? Oh? Yeah,

but the American President. I also remember that one because that was where they had the whole Bill Clinton like thing about how Michael Douglas has to call for an airstrike and he's like practically crying when he's thinking about how there's going to be some guy who works as a night janitor is going to get blown up in the night strike or something, and it's all all Clinton

Clinton esque clean up stuff. Kyle Bluck when I was listening to Biden Harangue, that interviewer talking about taking Oh sorry, I gotta restart this one. When I was listening to Biden Harangue, that interviewer about taking a test beforehand to see if they were junkie on coke. I couldn't help but appreciate the irony of his own son being kicked out of the Navy for failing a drug test for cocaine, the same son who made money off his dad's name in Ukraine, in China. Good lord, I really hope Trump

is able to capitalize on this in the debates. Kyle, you know Where's hunter sometimes trends on Twitter? But they're not going to care about that. You know you're seeing also, and I'll talk more about this tomorrow. The weaponization of prosecutor's offices once again against Trump. As I told you this, I did you know? I've been telling this what happened.

You've got the Cyrus Vans, the District attorney from New York, bringing an investigation against the Trump organization, criminal investigation for fraud. You've got the New York State Attorney General calling for the disbanding of the NRA because of mismanagement of funds. Oh yeah, that's not politically convenient timing, right, Sure, Sure, lives are ruthless, friends, Just accept it. Now, know that

this is what you're up against. Michael right, shield's eye. Yeah, watching that wedding in Beirut, the wedding photos is a hard stopper. And judging from what I saw, they didn't get that there has mats right, and I can imagine it now put that dangerous stuff with the other dangerous stuff, not realize the properties of either. It sure shows very

well just how fast one's life can change. Yeah, how fast one can lose one's life, Michael, biggest craziest explosion I've ever seen on video that wasn't nuclear, you know, historical footage, but I've never seen anything like that before. Almost three almost three thousand tons, not pounds, three thousand tons. It would be like loading up three thousand cars with

ammonium nitrate and blowing them all at the same time. Right, you fill three three cars up with their you know, their own weight in ammonium nitrate, but that uh, you know that that amount of money in my trate and blowing it all at once. Unbelievable, unbelievable, horrible for the people a bear Root. Hopefully they'll be able to get them the aid and assistance that's needed to prevent this from becoming more of a full on humanitarian catastrophe than

it already is. All right, next up here, Jay, Hey, producer, Mark, Oh look at this, Jay's just writing a producer, Mark. Now, I first found the show on eleven hundred kN ZZ in Grand Junction, Colorado, when your show replaced Michael Savage. Well that's nice. Now I listen to the podcast, love the show. I think you're just the best. And that assistant of yours, buck Is, is pretty entertaining too. Just kidding, Buck, you're the best. I heard you start talking about Kindergarten

Cop and how it got canceled. I was expecting the reason to be because the scene when the little boy says boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. I thought that would have triggered the libs long ago. Keep it up, shields high. Well, that is very very gender are a gender gender normative, I guess you'd say, And that's that's erasing translives when that little kid says that in the movie. Right, So there's a lot of reason for people to criticize this. I'm sure now that you

bring it up, probably will get canceled. Probably will get canceled for that too. Whatever you think is the too extreme for the libs, to take a position. Now, give it time, they'll take it right. Whatever the slippery slope shows either going toward, we're going there. You gotta know that about the Libs, Robert hey Buck, Portland not only has lost control, they've lost their constituents confidence to lead. Portland and Seattle are losing billions of dollars as the

lawlessness continues. Defunding the police will only further the decline as businesses and residents leave for a safer state. Insurance companies will be forced to decline the writing of policies of residential homes and businesses due to lack of security in the area. A total economic collapse will be imminent if this madness continues. That being said, people vote with their common sense as well as their wallets, So voting Democrat is a recipe for bankruptcy for most Americans. Yeah,

that's right. There's a spiral, a downward spiral that Democrats put us all on when they do things like defunct cops or just even make cops the bad guys. What then happens is we turn around and we see the businesses leaving a community because they don't want to get robbed or ransacked by by looters, and businesses don't want to go in people residences also people residential real estate changes.

People don't want to live in high crime areas. And so what you have are the people with capital and jobs leave and who's left behind, People who are more dependent on the state, people who have less capital, people who are more likely to be stuck. And that's what ends up happening, and it's terrible for everybody, and it's how cities die. And Democrats are now flirting with policies that can actually destroy cities. You're in the freedom Hunt.

This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, I'll remember you can send me messages for roll call at Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton or Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com for the email. Bucksexon dot com is getting a facelift as well. We're doing more and more stuff on the site, so please check in there and proc your mark. You got to check some voicemails out for tomorrow eight four four nine hundred two eight two five eight four four nine hundred Buck, Are you excited?

Is this? What do you and missus Mark sit and you know, have a have a burrito or something and listen to the voicemails. Oh yes, of course, it's the highlight of the mid day. I actually forgot it was Thursday, So thank you for ruining my day. Appreciate Yep, yep, yep, yep. There you go, buddy, he loves it. Folks, don't listen to him. He loves it. He's it's his favorite part of the whole week is when he sits and listens to one hundred voicemails. All all right. Next up here,

we'll go to that Instagram. You can also send me messages there. Next up we have Teal who writes great segment on Tucker Carlson last night till Thank you so much. Appreciate that. Jeff writes in I've got a new book. Oh Jeff, I gotta check that one out offline and see what we're talking about here. Let's see. Next up, oh, Ivan writes in, there's a point where it stops being

on them and it's on us. We are accepting the lawlessness, the lockdowns, the bankruptcies, the school closings, and the double standards, even when we know what these lunatic progressives are doing is insane. They are using whatever power they have. We are just unhappier by the day, miserable and complaining. Ivan, I'm with you, man. You know when are we gonna fight back? When are we gonna say enough is enough and we gotta win? You want justice win. That's the

truth of American politics right now. If you were on the system and the good faith on the other side, get ready to eat a lot of stuff you don't want to eat, so to speak. After show for today, team back tomorrow for a freestyle Friday. She'll tie