Politicizing Weather

the election bemoaning the fact that Trump beat Hillary. Does this affect the way the algorithms on Google actually deal with conservative issues? I certainly think so. That plus the latest smear against Judge Kavanaugh courtesy of Senator Feinstein, That and more coming up. This is the bus Sex and Show or the mission or is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence or make no mistake American, You're a great American Again The Buck Sexton Show begins. Set No.

I mean, what we're worried about is the wind and the water. The wind is hurricane force winds very damaging. The water can be deadly. We have the storm surge, as you mentioned, up to thirteen feet in some areas that could come across the land. That you're not going to be able to outrun by the way and is

the number one contributor to fatalities during a hurricane. In addition, we have inland flooding here, which means after the storm passes across the coastline, we're gonna have flooding for miles inland. So if you're in a low lying area, even if you're miles from the coast, get out now. Welcome to Buck Sexton Show, folks. It's it's very important that you you heed the warning there of of that gentleman about

what to do when it comes to avoiding this storm. Okay, it's very important that you do everything in your power to avoid getting caught up in what is going to be a nasty want to. I know that there's some some reporting out there about how it's gonna be not as bad as initially thought, and that you know, there's gonna be some some ability I think for folks to you know, probably come back to their home sooner. But just you've got to just assume the worst for right

now now. And I know there's a lot of a lot of news out there on this and every's focused on it. You know, I'm not a weather man, and I certainly don't play one on radio either. I'm not a guy who's here to tell you about the weather, really, but I am amazed at how political the weather has

become in the last forty eight hours or so. I do find it somewhat astonishing that here we are in a circumstan ants where uh, the Democrats the media are pushing this storyline of no matter what Trump does, and that's what you need to say, no matter what Trump does to help in terms of the federal government response, which is not the only response here, Uh, they will be you know, it'll be a problem. It'll be they didn't do enough. They were you know, it's unacceptable. Trump

doesn't care enough. That's what they're setting up here, before we find out anything about this, before we find out what the full damage is. It is impossible, it is impossible for them to accept that Trump is doing everything possible. And that's why they're going so much into this narrative over Puerto Rico. That's why you're also hearing there's such a focus now in a storm that happened about a year ago. Um, and you know, you have this this

storyline about three thousand people dying for going. You know, look, Puerto Rico, it was a terrible thing what happened with Hurricane Maria, there's no question about it. But it also was a natural disaster. It was not a man made disaster. And there's a lot of really dishonest reporting going on about just what happened and how it happened when it comes to the aftermath of of that whole of that storm system that came through and just ripped up that island.

You know, now, what you're hearing is a steady stream of people like Jeffrey Tuban over at CNN saying stuff like the falling plick clip one. Isn't the story that these people who died apparently thousands of them in Puerto Rico three thousand, as you point out, they're not white people, and they don't count to Donald Trump as much as the deaths of white people. I mean, you hate to say that about someone, but look at his record. Isn't that indicative of who he is and what he stays?

I mean, it's just terrible, folks, The stuff that they're saying. It's it's horrible the the stories that they're pushing here like this where they're saying that it doesn't. It does. He doesn't care about these people in Puerto Rico. No, folks, what they're doing is they're they're changing the numbers. They're changing the way that we calculate these numbers. They're changing the way that that we think of no other And I know you're allowed to say this. Washington Post actually

publish an editorial today. No other natural disaster has had these analyzes of the aftermath and consider them deaths from the disaster in the way that we've seen from what happened in Puerto Rico. Usually a natural disaster, you count who was killed by that weather system, not who died of a bacterial infection three months later that maybe they wouldn't have died from if they had had more immediate access to medical care because of the downed electricity and

the down pounds. But this is what they're doing. This is what they are doing. Uh, They're they're making it sound like Trump is responsible for the deaths of three thousand people. I mean, and they're saying it. They're they're straight up going out there and saying that Donald Trump is complicit in this in some way. They are saying that Donald Trump is the problem here. And it's just crazy what they're doing. It really is. It's just completely unfair.

It's so disingenuous, it's so dishonest. Here here's Luis Gutierrez, for example, slamming the Trump administration on on the preparation for a hurricane that everyone's saying, no, they've prepared for Goodyeris doesn't care. Play five. You want to know what I fear. It's the calamity because of the lack of coordination of the government with the National Guard and with local government. The lack of responsiveness and preparedness of this government.

Because the president he wants to find out who is the one that wrote that abbit p about the chaos in the White House because he wants the Justice Department. He is so consumed by the calamity that exists and the calth that exists. He's not really prepared and focused because he spends every weekend golfing instead of preparing. This is what they're gonna say. No matter what this is going to be the storyline it does. It simply does not matter to them what President Trump does beforehand and

what he does during this storm. Now you can hear from the President on this himself. He's saying, Look, we are all on this, we are focused on this, We're doing everything that we can. Play fift tremendous people working on the hurricane, first responders, law enforcement, and FEMA, and they're already and we're getting tremendous accolades from politicians and the people. We are ready. But this is going to be one of the biggest ones to ever hit our country.

One of the biggest ones to ever hit our country, folks. Uh, that is what the President is saying. And he's he's also making it as clear as he possibly can that he's doing everything in his power to to mitigate the damage from this. But but the Democrats are already running.

I mean, they're politicizing weather now, folks. They politicize storms in a way that is just so dishonest and so unfair to this president, so uh so ridiculous when you actually look at what's what's possible here and what's happening, and and I am, you know, I just find the whole thing to be a complete and utter outrage. I really do you know, we should have a moment here we say, okay, you know what, we're gonna put aside

the the the toxic politics of the moment. We're we're gonna put aside the problems of you know, Russia, collusion, all this other stuff. We need to focus on this hurricane right now. We need to be united as a nation in giving all the support we can to Carolinas. No, no, no, they're already running around trying to score cheap political points

in this. They are already engaged in just this. This complete nonsense, this complete nonsense about how Trump isn't doing enough and he's a racist, he doesn't care about Puerto Rico. You see them, they're mixing it all together. This is what I mean by narrative creation. Right, Trump is responsible for three thousand deaths in Puerto Rico. Trump is a racist. That's why he didn't do more in Puerto Rico. And oh, by the way, he's not doing enough in the Carolinas.

And anyone who dies in the Carolinas or even as a result of that storm, just like in Puerto Rico, it's Trump's fault. And this is because they're connecting it all back. They saw how effective this was with the Bush administration. They saw how how much Miley's they were able to get out of the notion that you know, uh, with the Bush administration getting hammered on Hurricane Katrina, that they think they can do that again with Trump now,

and they just see this as as explicitly political. They see this as an opportunity to do Apo and to hit him. It's disgusting, It's a disgrace. We'll talk more about this, folks, but you know, I also want to want to get into what's going on with Google. I want to get into what the latest is, uh with with um the Kavanaugh hearings. We've got a lot to cover. The Google thing, by the way, is incredible. You're definitely

gonna want to hear that. We have a lot of show for you coming up eight to eight to five, eight four four buck Um. Also make sure if you've got thoughts on any of this, send me your your thoughts at facebook dot com slash buck sex in and maybe we'll even put you in roll call at the

end of the show. Team will be right back. Let me ask you about red Take because after all of this tragedy people in Puerto Rico, and we've now discovered only seventy five as of July three, only many five of twenty three and forty one requests for emergency funeral assistance for Puerto Ricans was approved because of red tape because they needed approvals from the state officials when they for months and months didn't even have electricity or communications.

Is there any way to clear up that kind of red tape? I'm sorry man. You know, when when it came to the amount of food, water, and commodities that we put on the island, we put over too many two billion dollars worth of commodities uh into Puerto Rico. Um. But but here again, UM, when it comes back to who actually runs the food chains, it's the it's the

major grocers, it's there's all kinds of things. And what we need to do is make sure, like what we did with Hurricane Lane in Hawaii, we're reaching out to grocery stores, were reaching out to the major retail providers to understand what they have on island versus what we need to backfill, because again, this is a partnership. If anybody is depending on FEMA to be the sole responder and the owner re responder, UH, that's not right and

that's what we're trying to correct. Uh. And and with for Rico, you know, uh, the amount of money and the effort that's being put into Puerto Rico, it's gonna be a wonderful place. And that's you know, and um, we're we're absolutely working every day to make Puerto Rico resilient and economically viable. You see, it's more complicated, folks then just oh, you know, Trump lied, babies died, or

Trump is hitler or any of that stuff. Disaster relief involves a multi multi agency, coordinated effort try and help people in incredibly difficult circumstances. And instead of just uh, you know, hyper politicizing everything, it would be useful of maybe Democrats were using the megaphones they have in the media to try to make sure that the word gets around about you know, well what can you do? What

should you do? And you know, if they had any solutions, um, then they then I would be willing to hear them out. But what they really just have our exaggerated complaints that are always about how Trump has somehow failed. It's always Trump's fault. He's the bad guy. Um, you know, like like there was no bad weather, no nothing, no major hurricanes happened in the eight years of Obama's presidency. Now

nothing bad ever happened that was a natural disaster. You know, if there's forest fires in Cali, wildfires in California, it's Trump's fault. Right, If if there's a hurricane that hits the US, It's Trump's fault. This is stuff that only people with a uh, you know, a crazy religious belief in place of actual politics and policy when it comes to hurricanes and disaster management, only they could think this way. Uh.

And I'm telling you right now there are probably already editorials. Um, there are probably editorials out there that have been written in advance about how terror now it's gonna We'll see if the storm isn't as bad as anticipated, if there are some aspects of it that aren't absolutely terrible or the way that we think they may be, you know, then then there might be a bit of a hold on this from the media. But they are ready to go all in with with blaming the presidents of the

United States on this. And you know, I mean Andrea Mitchell in that exchange there with brock Long. I don't have this part of the clip, but she went on to say, you know, well, look at what happened in Katrina, and and look at what happened in Puerto Rico with Maria. You know, at the federal government's responsibility to have the infrastructure up to date so we can and brock Long's like, no, it's not, or at least it's it's certainly not FEMA's responsibility,

and it's not the federal government's responsibility. A lot of what you're talking about with power and in utilities is privately owned stuff. So you know that to to turn around and act like the federal government can save people from all this. But you know, this also plays into

a liberal mindset in some ways. And the liberal mindset is as follows the government, if only it was in the hands of democrats who really care about people, If only the government was run by the left, who are the people that really care, then and only then would you be protected from all these bad things. You know, then you'd be protected from uh, from storms, from hurricanes, from climate change, from big bad, mean capitalists, and and

from white privilege and all this other stuff. It's dishonest. It's dishonorable, a word that we will return to you later on in the show. We're gonna talk about honor a bit today on the show, um and as well as melting snowflakes at Google. That's coming up later too. But it has been astonishing to see how much of the coverage of this storm is somehow tied to Trump. And you know, look Trump, Trump went on on a bit of a of a tirade today. I'm not gonna

say he didn't. You know, the President of the United States is not happy with being blamed for the the three thousand deaths. I mean, if you missed it on Twitter or he said the following, three thousand people did not die in the two hurricanes that hit Puerto Rico. When I left the island after the storm at a hit, they had anywhere from six to eighteen deaths. As time went by, it did not go up by much. Then a long time later they started to report really large

numbers like three thousand. This was done by the Democrats in order to make me look as bad as possible when I was successfully raising billions of dollars to help rebuild Puerto Rico. If a person died for any reason like old age, just add them to the list bad politics. I love Puerto Rico. There there's some truth to what

Trump is saying here, folks. And look he's saying it in a way that only Trump Kennon would But they are, they're they're creating this new narrative of well, if you die of you know, if you if you die of any preventable disease that we assess maybe could have been better treated had you had more immediate access to you know, hospital facilities. That's now a death attributed to this storm, and therefore a death attributed to Trump. What a leap, right,

But this is why we don't trust the media. This is why there's so much dishonesty in this. Uh you know, I've these g W reachs researchers used a computer model to come up with this. You know what the range was. By the way, I ever keeps saying three thousand, you know what that is. That's the middle of the range. The real range is something like seven hundred people two three thousand people, I'm sorry, or seven thousand people. So they went with the thirties undred number and they're saying

three thousand, but it's just a guess. They don't really know, they don't really have the full numbers. And keep in mind you're talking about it and I with a few million people on it, you know, seven hundred more people dying than expected in the same period last year. I mean, how statistically significant really is that? Now, look, I'm not mitigating in any way the the the reality of the devastation the island and the blackouts and the suffering, and

there was a tremendous amount of misery and suffering. But the storyline that Trump, uh, the storyline that Trump is the reason three thousand people died is just a smear. It's a lie. And that is the story as we get ready to see what happens with this hurricane and and the Carolinas and and and elsewhere, and look at what the after effects of it are. Man, it's the the dishonesty from this media. It's hard to overstate, folks,

really is. While President Trump has been talking up our preparedness, his policies have been tearing down our defenses to climate change, which is often blamed for extreme weather. In fact, on the very same day Trump was discussing Florence from the Oval Office, his ep A proposed rolling back restrictions on emissions of methane, which is twenty five times worse than carbon dioxide when it comes to climate change. And that's just to the latest environmental party policy targeted by the

Trump administration. According to July study from the New York Times, nearly eighty regulations could be on their way out. It's so bad that, according to to Harvard scientists, Trump's environmental policies could lead to an inditial eighty thousand unnecessary deaths every decade. This is the climate change hysteria. That's uh. John Avalon over at CNN, By the way, what does he know about science? The answer is nothing. But they

only do that to conservatives. You see, if you're on the left, you can pose as somebody that's knowledgeable about climate change or as long as you take the proper view. If you're on the right, people say, where's your where's your PhD? You know, where do you know about climatology? And you know, well, I just some somebody who reads and knows that you guys are wrong all the time. But apparently that's not enough to have an opinion on it.

I guess, um, But this is this is just more of the same, folks, more of the same on finding ways to blame Trump and finding ways to say that. You know, I keep saying this and what does that even mean? But I really I really mean that whenever I say it our defenses against climate we don't have defenses against climate change. The things that he's talking about are are infinitesimal in terms of changes in the global emissions.

If it really is a global issue. China is not changing anything, India is not changing, and I think all the other countries of the world aren't making these changes. So what the heck is he talking about our defenses against climate change? More extreme weather? That's not even true. We don't have more extreme weather than we've ever had. Folks, This planets going through ice ages, This planet had the extinction of the dinosaurs, and we got hit by a

you know, a meteor and all this other stuff. I mean, come on, at what point do we get sick of being force fed this line of crap from people who don't know anything about science or climate change. They just are obsessed with the the cultural trappings of being somebody

who's worried about climate change. That's what the smart people do, right man, tearing down defenses to climate change, which is often to blame for extreme weather, that is an idiotic statement that is not true, is just not true, and then saying that Trump is his policies will lead to eighty thousand deaths. This is another lot of very dangerous stuff. And you see this in the left. You don't see it on the right, which is they they extrapolate out.

Let's say, let's say that you know you you have a policy of um, you know you have a policy about workplace safety. And you say, you know what, We're not gonna mandate this because we're only about a person a year dies from this workplace safety issue that the left is so concerned with. Well, they'll say, well, over the next thousand years, that means a thousand people will die,

So you are guilty of killing a thousand people. This is the way that they think they do hashtag math and uh, you know, here's the UN Climate Change Chief. I mean, it's not just here in American play thirteen change. We're more than just were the future. Now. I know it was a little tough to hear that there, and we had a problem with the audio for a second. But by raising this is the UN Climate Chief saying, by raising our ambitions for climate change, they're doing more

than changing the weather. Folks. They cannot change the weather. That is a lie. Do do we care about truth? I mean, I'm always hearing from the left. They're all about hashtag truth. Right, Do they care about truth or not? Is this something that matters to them or not? Because that's a statement, that's that is indefensible from the perspective of what is reality and the world we live in. It is simply indefensible. And yet, and yet here we are,

right here, we are having this discussion. Here, we are looking at this issue and being told essentially that they can say whatever they want, however they want. But if you don't say climate change is real, they're gonna yell at you and tell you you're an idiot, you don't know anything. And oh, by the way, it's Trump's fault. This is how crazy the lips are. They are blaming the president for bad weather. You can't make it up, folks.

But let's talk about Google coming up here in a second, and how they are a hotbed of leftist lunacy too. You know, let's face that most people here are pretty upset and pretty sad for uh because of the election. Ah, that was the first moment I really felt like we were gonna lose. And it was this massive like kick in the gut that we were going to lose and it was really painful. It will be very strong and local and uh, you know, not just in a a

press standpoint or a pr stand point. We're actually working hard behind the scenes to stand up for what's right. I think it's it's worth being very vigilant and thinking about all these issues. What can we do to lead to maybe a better quality of governance, decision making and so forth. Is there anything positive you see from this election result? Uh? Boy, that's that's a really tough one. Right now. You may be thinking, Buck, what was all that?

Who are all those people who are like a news like so upset because like what am I gonna do? Like of the election? And you may be thinking, Buck, did you did you sneak a camera into the the faculty lounge at at Oberlin College? Is that? Did you gather together some audio of the Women's and Gender's Study department, the sociology department, the uh philosophy department, probably to any of the above at Brown University and want to get

a sense of what they thought about Trump's election. No, my friends, that was a twenty sixteen right after the election, all hands meeting at Google. That's right, one of the most valuable and most powerful companies on planet Earth. And that wasn't just some random Some of those voices were very senior people there, including the CEO and co founder.

They're all gathering together to have a giant company wide pity party where they're saying things like they're scared and it was a kick in the gut because Trump won the election. And it gets even more interesting from the perspective of are these companies far left social justice obsessed entities? Yes, they are, as I've been telling you. Here's a Google executive, uh, responding to an employee talking about, Oh that's right, white

privileged play ten uh speaking to white men. There's an opportunity for you right now to understand your privilege in the society. Take the opportunity to go through the bias busting training, read about privilege, Read about the real history of oppression in our country. And tomorrow night watch Thirteenth the movie that is here. If you can't watch it here,

watch it on Netflix. Discuss the issues you're passionate about during Thanksgiving dinner, and don't back down and laugh it off when you hear the voice of oppression speak through metaphors, and I promised to do this. You need to like check your privilege on speak through through bias busting and look at privilege and a history of oppression. And when you hear the voice of oppression a dinner, good God. This is the stuff that passes for wisdom among the

social justice left. At a company that is full by the way of multi multimillionaires, billionaires at the very top, we're just here to talk about oppression and like, we're so about oppression. Whoa Google co founder Sergei bridd Here's what he had to say about By the way, this was all courtesy and hat tipped to uh courtesy, I've hat tipped to bright bart dot com. They're the ones that got this audio from right after Trump's election play clip a letton. I know this is probably not the

most joyous t JF we have had. Um and Uh. You know, let's face that most people here are pretty upset and pretty sad for uh because of the election. As an immigrant and a refugee, UM, I certainly find the selection deeply offensive, and I know many of you do too, um And and I think that's a very stressful time, uh, and it to conflicts with many of our values as right, folks, it's it's a deeply stressful time. It's offensive. Now you may be saying, Buck, why why

do we care? Why should we care about what they're saying at some internal meeting, Like oh my gosh, like when someone just give me a hug because like I was drinking my machat and I'm like so upset about Trump's like like victory, and I just I want to go to one of our nap rooms because we're Google. Uh, you know you can. We can sit here and talk about the snow flakes and the libs and their preest driving ways and I I and I do that because

it's fun. But there's a much bigger issue here. And it goes to one of one of the recurring themes that I've brought up to you so many times on the show, and those you've been listening to me for over year now. I've been saying this all along. I've been I've known this because I know people who work at these companies. I have some very dear friends actually who work in pretty scene not CEO level, but pretty senior roles at some internet companies. You'd be like, wow,

that's one of the that's that's a really big internet company. Yep. And some of them are stealth conservatives or at least centrist, normal people who don't think that they need to go to bias busting seminars about white privilege. And they've been telling me all along, and I've been talking about this now for for going on a decade, that the Silicon Valley is is a it's not just a hot that of progressivism. It's progressivism with an even evangelist streak. Right.

They want to spread their worldview across the country and across the world. I mean, they're you know, they're gonna probably play ball with China, and when it comes to you know, not they don't want to step on China's toes because you know, they want to make money too, right. So so they're this very interesting hybrid of socially incredibly left wing right on social policy, all these come and these are all about the thirty seven genders and everything else.

They're they're absolutely hard left on those issues. When it comes to capitalism, though, you know, they like their money. They want to have a lot of money. They'll advocate for higher taxes for you, but they want to find ways to offshore as much as possible to engage in as much uh you know, favorable tax treatment as they

can get in as many ways as they can. You know, they're not looking to pay more of their fair share, but they're gonna send a lot of donations to folks in the political world who are always gonna talk about you paying your fair share. I mean, I mean, if I you know one thing that really I'll get into a tax ran another time, it just gets me so angry.

It gets me so angry as somebody who has had you know, some years where I make you know, more money, is this is very uneven business and media and other years or make a lot less? Why am I paying? You know? The whole that the whole notion of a progressive tax code seems to me to be, Well, if you're making X amount of dollars, that's what you make. Well, what if you make that one year and then the next year you're you're down you know, half of that? Do they do they give you back the money? At No?

I mean they really don't. I mean, I know there's some balancing out you can do, But anyway, Google is a problem for all of us folks, because Google is a place that has so much sway over the public conversation, and they're not honest about it. You want to talk about bias busting, Google needs to do bias busting on itself when it comes to how it views uh Conservatism, when it comes to how it views traditional Christians, when it comes to how it views I guess, white males.

You know, it's such a lazy the intellectual laziness that goes into hating white males by the progressive left, including white males on the progressive left of course, right if they engage in this too. It's just so stupid. And people do this all the time. They're all, there's all this, What does it even mean? What does white privilege even mean? How can we confront this? How can we handle this issue? How do is it something that has to be monetarily

balanced in some way? Should we have quotas at different companies? Do we have to have reparations? What? What does it mean to confront white privilege and white male toxic masculinity? What does that even mean? How do we do that other than talking about it a lot? And at what point do people that haven't done anything wrong but just exist and we're born a certain way I e. White males like me get to say I'm kind of sick of all the lectures because I think I'm already there.

I think I'm sick of the lectures. I think I'm sick of sitting around and seeing people who are not white males in many cases get elevated professionally because of quote diversity, and I sit there and say, yeay, this is great. And then, by the way, some of those same people turn around and say, you know, white males need to do more to check their privilege. Okay, that that seems like completely unbreasonable to me. In fact, Google's

politics are hard left. The people that run that place are effectively for open borders when it comes to immigration. They have embraced all of this social justice rhetoric. They embrace intersectionality, whether they call it that or not, which views our society as just a series of interlocking groups with varying degrees of oppression by one against another. And they hate Trump. They they acted like Trump's election was

the destruction of America as we know it. And now we're told we're told, oh, they're not biased against conservatives, though they're not changing the algorithms, they're not doing anything. It's folks, Come on. One, we have no transparency, no visibility whatsoever into what they're doing and not doing too. I don't even think they know how biased they are, so there's might be a there might be degree of

subconscious bias in their anti conservative maneuvering. And three, I mean, how stupid do they think we are that they're not They have all this power, all this influence. They're not gonna use it uh to help them push these ideas. They're not going to use this too, you know, help them win on the battlefield of ideas. It's it's just unrealistic. It just is. The social media giants are engaged in a massive weighing, you know, putting their thumb on the

scale for the left. They're doing it every day. They're doing it with our social media platforms. They are uh doing it in in ways that are overt and covert, and we need to address this. Uh, go to snippy dot com, set up an account, you know, go to places where they don't uh, they don't play these games. Because this isn't gonna stop anytime soon. And this is a big ideological debate that we're going to continue to have to

have here. But Yeah, Google has been exposed for what it is, for what I've known it is all along, and you know, I think this is gonna start to affect the really affect the long term viability of some of these companies as the hedge them on, Because if half the country can't trust you, half the country does have the wherewithal and the resources to, you know, find an alternative. You know, what is the fox News of search engine is going to be? What is the talk

radio of social media platforms going to be? I think we're gonna find out sooner then later. Do you have opinions that you feel like you can express? I think we all do. Are you looking for a place to stir up some conversations, let your thoughts and your opinions be heard. I want to introduce you to an alternative social media site, snippy dot com. Snippy is an unbiased

social media platform. It's all about conversation and community. Snippy not only encourages freedom of expression, but guarantees its users the ability to discuss topics freely without any suppression from administrators. Check in for a quick update about current events, or spend hours scrolling through users posts. Write your thoughts and strike up conversation. Snippy's founders have intentionally created a forum

where anyone can feel free to express their thoughts, frustrations, ideas, anything. Really, it's a place where discussion is valued, a place where your opinion matters, and it's totally free. Go to snippy dot com now to express yourself. No shadow banning, no character limit, no suppression of conservative thought ever. Check out the website at snippy dot com or download the app.

No censorship, no agenda. Joined snippy dot com. Do you get the discussion rolling buck Sexton mission, decoding the news and disseminating information, who have actionable intelligence, make no mistakes a great American again, this is the buck Sexton Show, analysts, No detention of migrant children has I rocketed the highest levels ever? That that's the big blaring headline from the

New York Times today. They want to return to this story that they thought it was a very I thought it was a political winner for them to talk about how heartless Republicans are setting up concentration camps for kids. They don't they don't use that term, but a lot of people did at the time. If they don't use this term now in this piece a concentration cancer kids

at the border. My former boss, Mike Hayden, my boss at the CIA, tweeted out a photo of a concert of a Nazi concentration camp and compared that to what the UH immigrant children at the border were being subjected to, which is just a horrifically irresponsible and stupid thing to do.

But Mike did it. I still don't know why. But even though you had hundreds of children who were separated UM from their families, and many of them have been reunited under court order, there's a lot more detained immigrants children and it's the highest number ever recorded. Now how this is being shown as as a crisis, that's they're gonna put it at the Trump administration's feet. This is Trump's fault somehow. You have hundred children in custody in

May of twenty seventeen. This month, you have twelve thousand, eight hundred children, and they are all these concerns now about the federal shelter system. It's near capacity UM and they're saying it's because of children not being released to live with their family with with with with sponsors, by the way, which is not necessarily family. Because of HHS

and they're blaming all of this on Trump. They're saying there's a slowdown, there's essentially a bottleneck now of detained children at the border because of the Trump administration and because people are scared two illegals, what they're saying, are scared to be in contact with federal authorities to pick up the children who are at the border. Now, first off, folks, this number of children. You have thousands, thousands of children.

These are unaccompanied miners, which is another way of saying that people are sending their kids, like twelve year old kids in many cases alone, across what is one of the most uh lawless and you know, crime riddled parts of the Western hemisphere, which is our southern border. Now, I know, people say, oh, buck, there are towns you know, on the American side of the border that are safe as any of the country you know, I know, But

we're they're coming through Mexico. They are going through cartel controlled territory, lawless parts of the Mexico side of the US Mexico border. They're being subjected to sexual assault, they're being traffic, they're being used to bring drugs into the country. They are enriching the coyotes assuming their families have paid the counties to bring them across, which you've got to think that's that that's going on in a lot of

these cases. They're enriching the cartels through human smuggling the tune of hundreds hundreds of million of dollars. And Trump is the problem. They said, Well, let me just step back, step back for a minute on these books, because this is what this is what the mainstream media is not going to tell you, and and that's why I'm here to actually do the research. Folks. There's been a huge surge again at the border. Why why are there more

this month than than months ago? Why is there a spike of over a percent now showing up at the border unaccompanied miners, parents with miners, Because that's right. They've heard that, Hey, the Trump administration had to blink on that whole policy of detaining everybody, so now it's probably a good time to try to get across the border again. They've also heard from those who have crossed in recent years the same way, bringing children, using children as essentially

a tool to wedge themselves into the United States. These adults, they've also been told that you get to stay that over of the people that have come into the country and claimed asylum, in many cases defensive asylum, which means that they tried to cross or they crossed into the country illegally, and then when they got caught, they said, oh, now I want to claim asylum, which is not how it's supposed to work. But they know that over nine

of them don't get sent home. They don't uh, they don't get forced to leave the country, no matter how they came here, no matter what the merits are of their claimed And oh, by the way, now there's a big surge again at the border. And you had in the first eleven months of the fiscal year eighteen hat tip Daniel Horowitz at a Conservative review for this seventy seven thousand pounds of drugs. Seventy seven thousand pounds folks were seized at the border. In The number seas in

that same period was eighteen thousand pounds. So here's what I want to tell you. If Democrats want to play this game of if you don't allow children to endlessly stream into this country from from Mexico, from Central America, from whatever foreign country they come from before they get south of our border, your mean you're heartless, you're separating families. If they want to have that discussion, I'm also going to insist that we have discussion about how the cartels

are more powerful than ever. They're richer than ever. Human smuggling networks are a huge part of their recent surgeon profits. They're also bringing more drugs in the country than ever before, and those drugs are killing seventy thousand plus Americans a year. Because people keep talking about, yes, originally there was a lot of prescription drugs in the streets, and that was that was the problem with the opioid epidemic. That's what

God had started, folks. Now it is illegal fentanel. Now it's illegal chemical compounds that are essentially the same as are similar to those prescription drugs, but they're being brought in by the cartels. They're being brought in after being manufactured in vast quantities in Mexico or even in China, and then brought to Mexico, then brought in to the United States. This is a national security problem. We are losing thousands and thousands of people because of our poorest

border and the surge in migrant children. The border, by the way, it takes away from law enforcement's ability to focus on stopping those cartels from bringing this poison into the country. Our border is a mess, and it's a mess because Democrats are utterly feckless when it comes to

our sovereignty. They don't care about it whatsoever. They just want to tell sob stories about how Republicans are mean racists who don't want to talk about the kids from south the border who all come here and they're all valedictorians. Well what about m S thirteen? Oh, how dare you? That's not representative? Well they're not all valedictorians either, And

that's beside the point. Our border is our biggest health, public safety, and national security challenge in the country, and the fact that unaccompanied children are showing up there in greater numbers than they have in months is a very bad sign about where this is trending, which is what Trump needs to take action. We'll talk more about this in a moment, but time for a wall. The wall needs to happen now, not in not in two years, not in ten years. The wall needs to happen now.

We'll get into this moor run after the break. Stay with me. A brand new poll out today as we approach fifty days to the midterm elections to show it is now increasingly likely the Democrats will take control of the House. Whate are the numbers to back that up? This the first time we're using likely voters in our CNN polling, A ten point advantage for the Democrats when voters are asked which party do you want to run

the Congress? Which party will you vote for come November fifty two to forty two the Democrats with a ten point edge among likely voters. Likely voters tend to move Republicans way not in this poll, a ten point edge for the Democrats. Here. If this is the case on election day, the math tells you democrat as will take back the House. I know that's what everybody's saying, folks, But you know, there are some things that Trump could do that would throw quite a wrench into the gears

of this preemptive Democrat victory party. And I think the best one would be shut down the government build that wall. I mean, let's let's go to the math, folks. If not now, when if it doesn't happen now, it's never happening, all right? Where we are at that point where if we do not see a willingness to go all in on the issue, really the signature issue that made President Trump the president of the United States. Then I think

there's you know, what are we doing? What? What are we wasting our time even thinking that we can change these issues? Right? The time is now. I know Republicans lack courage on this. I know Republicans in the Congress want to find somebody else to show the backbone that they themselves are lacking. There's there's definitely a a jellyfish like consistency to the spinal columns of many, many, many members of Congress, including Republicans. But it's got to be now,

and to think about what that would do. I mean, I want to see the Democrats out there trying to justify effectively being the open borders party. I want Democrats out there saying that they care so much about stopping a wall that they will shut down the government. Remember Trump was elected elect Elections have consequences, and on this issue, and by the way, they can do in such a way that hey, you know, okay, well you know you are an extension of your doctor protections, or you want

you know what, We'll give something. But they know the wall is permanent, and if the wall starts going up and people see what the changes are at the border, then we will be in an entirely different world in terms of the conversation over immigration. If the wall starts to work, then they can't say, oh, well don't work. Well, you're idiotic. Come not paying for that stupid wall. But

all that stuff that all goes away. So they have to stop the wall from beginning because the early success will lead to the full out, full on construction of the wall, and then they won't ever be able to get rid of it because people say, why you want to get rid of the wall? It makes our border

more secure. And then the Democrats have to find a way to actually convince more Americans to vote for them instead of importing people from the developing world, the third world to vote for them, which is what's going on. And you say, oh, buck, that's not true. Illegals can't vote, Well guess what. Illegals tend to come to the country with certain cultural expectation, certain cultural approaches, and their children are led to believe that the Republicans are the mean,

nasty party. The children who are born here, so when they're able to vote They've had parents their whole lives who were saying Republicans are the bad guys because they opposed illegals, because they themselves were illegal. And you know, it's not hard to figure out how you get to the voting patterns that you currently see with illegal immigrant tied populations. Right, It's not not hard to figure this out.

Democrats know this, by the way, if if illegal voted Republican, they would have made the wall a hundred feet tall, and they would have built it twenty years ago. The Democrats would have and oh my gosh, we did a wall right away. You know, if we were taking a lot of people who were saying, hey, no government assistance, no, no socialism for me. I I just want to make it on my own. And I believe in limited government

and constitutionalism. Uh. And I don't think that America owes me something because of a history of colonialism or a history of uh you know, global white privilege or whatever it is. The Democrats would be opposed to this thing entirely. So you know, I know the Democrats are already they're they're getting a little bit ahead of themselves here. You know, they feel like they were denied their great celebration when Hillary was supposed to win, and they really want to

they really want to make it happened this time. I just have to say that we have it is still possible for Trump to flip the script, and I think he should do it because right now, even with even with the economy as good, good as it is, folks, I think if we go into this midterm kind of

all right, let's see what happens. Yeah, I think Democrats probably do take the House, and that means that the Trump agenda is dead in the water until twenty That's what happens the ad ject Now, the tweets will still be there, There's still be a lot of stuff, but the Trump agenda will be on hold. And man, that

election is going to be bonkers. I want to switch gears for just one second here, because we're gonna talk about the opposition to Kavanaugh in a minute, and how insane people are in terms of the ways that they're the way that they are opposing Kavanaugh, the way that they are trying to stop him. And you know, we've got a really dirty trick that just came out today, which we'll get to. The Democrats, though in their dealings,

are dishonorable. The Democrat Party has embraced dishonor, and certainly the Democrat aligned media, which is the mainstream media. Majority of the media has very little honor as a general rule. Clarence Thomas, who went through all kinds of nastiness as you know in his confirmation here. I mean, they made some garbage HBO movie about how Anita Hill was really you know, like a women's rights champion or something. It's just all the rewriting history that goes on is madness.

But Clarence Thomas recently spoke about the issue of honor placlibate. If we could use the word honorable more often, think about the difference it will make, then you'll have a legacy. We will have left the country in better shape morally,

uh structurally than we found. But as long as we're looking at our interests or scoring points or looking cute or being on TV or the green out of fact or what editorials we're getting, especially the legal system, how do we mainteen If you can't debate hard issues honestly with honor, with integrity, how do we keep a civil society. It's such an important point, and the lack of honor in our public discourse, it looks Trump Trump is a

street brawler, folks. But we needed to bring in a street a street brawler because really Conservatives and the Republicans, at least on the national stage and in terms of media coverage, we were like the terrified town with you know, cowboys running around stealing all of our staff and you know, kidnapping our women and everything else. And you know, Trump is like the Trump is the is the gun slinger so to speak, that we hired to come in and

clean up the town. We need honor, though in our society, we really do, I mean and and I think the first part of it is to call out the dishonorable. Call out places like CNN that are are engaged in a mass and sustained dishonesty on a daily basis. Call out the way Democrats, I mean, the way that they've acted on this kabinet hearing. We're gonna get to the really the height of their dishonor in just a moment. The way they've acted in this kabinet here, though, is

an utter disgrace. Uh. They should be ashamed. I know they're not, because the Democrats are really incapable of shame. It's just about power, it's just about achieving power. But they should be ashamed of themselves. By the way, Clarence Thomas uh even at a little moment where he decided to talk about our modern spartacus clip seven, Please, how many people can you use in leadership positions today? The word that I used about red honorable honorable, not the

honorable honorable. If we could use that word about more people who are in public light, people who actually asked the questions at confirmation hearings instead of spartacus, we use honorable. You know, it's a term that all of us should should strive for others to think of when they think

of us. If there's if there is a a principle that I woul always like to be at the center of this show and of of my interactions with you and all of our all the work, all the thought that we put into this this community of people across the country. There are hundreds of thousands of you. Um, I would like honor to be at the very center of it, and I think that it should be the

center of American public life. Again, we're in a battle right now, and you can be honorable in battle, but it's it's certainly more challenging, but honor should be at the center of our public life, and honor should be the center more importantly of what you and I are doing every day. And this is a concept that we

should spend a lot more time. Not we although I guess that too, but just as as a society, we should return to this and not just be so focused on the immediate, on self gratification, on the winning in the moment, on owning quote the other side, it will be much better to to finish each day with were we honorable today and know that that's the single most important thing. The Democrats are not, so we will address

that in just a moment. The most disgusting thing I have and there's been a lot of stuff, folks, and I had to interview the head of the Women's March and she was alone, I mean, but the most disgusting thing yet in some ways, is what's happened today, and it involves a highly respected senator who is just trying to destroy Judge Kavanaugh's reputation. That's coming ups can help

the day. Don't be them. If you vote for him, you are standing that secless, sackless circless woman standing that Letting Letting Trump and his appointees steal I'll get from millions of Americans, steal the right to choose what women do with that body. And you stood by that. Oh I didn't know. I'm so not you. Oh there's more, folks,

but we'll stop there. Those were some of the released recorded phone calls that were left for Senator Susan Collins of Maine over the Brett Kavanaugh, the looming Brett Kavanaugh UH nomination. And you know, the left, they are unable to mount a serious, honest opposition to Cavanaugh. But they are so frenzied and so desperate in their antique, having all hatred, that they're trying everything and anything. I mentioned

you yesterday. This crowdfunding campaign to raise a million dollars and it will go to Susan Collins's opponent, whoever that may be in the Senate race in Maine. And Collins isn't up right now, but she'll be up in UH. That which that's that. That's fine. I mean, if people want to throw their money away into that, that's fine. As I've said, they can talk to Jeff Bush about how money does are just not buy you political victory, but they are. They're in this frenzy over the issue.

And that's how you've also had so much lying, most notally from Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton about what Kavanaugh said. And that was it was really intentional, folks. I mean, the the lies were intentional about about Kavanaugh, the lies that they were telling about his uh saying that birth

control and abortion are are essentially the same. They knew they're lying, and it didn't matter them because it was they thought damaging to Kavanaugh, and it actually would be damaging if it were true, because a majority of Americans do not think that contraception as a general issue is abortion right. That's that is not actually something that conservatives belief.

But here we are with abusive phone calls, all these threats, and then in a kind of eleventh hour maneuver to show us just how desperate all this stuff really is. Fine Stein, Senator fine Stein, who when she's not you know, rolling around with a Chinese spy in her car for twenty years, is a lefty progressive who wants to stay in good stead with the Democrat Party and all of its progressive foundational important base entities number one of which

is planned. Planned Paranoid is basically the v all only constituency in the Democratic Party that you are never allowed to cross. You are never allowed to deviate. You cannot be a Democrat and be pro life anymore. Isn't that interesting? You cannot be People say, oh, to a book, there's some pro life Democrats. False. There are Democrats who say they are pro life and then they vote and in all of their public and political activities, vote with the

abortion extremists of the modern Democratic Party. The extremists on the issue of abortion. They are not moderates, They're not reasonable, they are insane, and they're that what they what they're willing to defend is straight up barbarism, alright, third term abortion. Never mind that abortion is all the taking of life and therefore it is killing it as murder. But the third term abortion is is absolutely barbarous and is a blight on our civilization that this is going on right now.

And the Democrats they they will defend it. I mean, if you're going to take the Ney role, a pro choice America view, you have to defend that. You know, abortion at eight months, no problem, that's what they say. But fine, Steint because you remember this, that's what's really at stake here, folks. Abortion is really what they're focused on. Yeah, they talked about the affordable health care and everything else, but the one that has them acting like a bunch

of crazy people is Brover swayed an abortion. And fine Stein just today release this statement saying, quote, I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision. I have, however, referred the

matter to federal investigative authorities. Now let me just say this, if if in fact, and I would, I would bet a large amount of my very me savings on this. But if in fact that there there is nothing to this, what fine Stein has done here is one of the most unethical, disgusting, disgraceful character assassination maneuvers I've ever seen, involving a major political figure and a national level issue.

This is worse. This is worse then when Harry Reid on the floor of the Senate, where he couldn't be challenged or sued for what he says. Uh said that Mitt Romney hasn't paid his taxes in ten years, just which was an out and out lie, an out and outlie. Um, but and which Harry read a minute later was a lie and said, yeah, but did he win? It was? It was worth it. Democrats lie big and recklessly and destructively. Okay, Trump, Yeah, sometimes he lies about his golf game. We don't care.

Feinstein here has done worse than what Harry Reid did, though, because what she has done allows people to just allows their imaginations to run wild. Oh, is this some kind of terrible sexual misconduct. That's the first thing I think that comes to mind. Um, this I'm seeing already speculation that it has to do with some kind of something that happened in the eighties. Uh. And I mean unless Kavanaugh murdered somebody, which I don't think anybody thinks that

he did. I can't think of something realistically that would involve kavanall in the eighties that you know, I mean, is the Statute of Limitations something that you know? I mean, no, and that, by the way, it's not. I don't even think it's criminal. I think it's just some kind of an allegation. I just think that they're just and this is what they do. They hide like little cowards. Oh, Mike says Mike something. Yeah, it's when he was in

high school. Folks. Okay, what could he have done in high school that somebody would have knowledge of that would be so bad that Senator Feinstein has to bring it up. I'm not saying it's impossible, but and you know, then, now you get into this, let's say it is an allegation of some kind of of some kind of sexual impropriety. How is he supposed to defend himself. How is he supposed to come forward and say, maybe it's not that I don't know, you know, maybe it's that he cheated

on his biology exam. I have no idea, but that's the point. They make it seem so nefarious, and they allow all of the what what What fine Stein is doing here is throwing a big bucket of gasoline on the raging fire of the lunacy of the left when it comes to capital and she knows it, folks, and she does not care. Here the letter quote took a circus us, a circuitus route to find Stein, the top

ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. In reportably, were portably describes an incident that was related to someone affiliated with Stanford University who authored the letter and sent it to a Democrat who represents the area. Different sources provide different accounts of the contents of the letter, but the one consistent theme was that it involves an incident with Kavanaugh when he was in high school. I mean, what the heck is this, folks, So, I mean, that's it is.

They're they're alleging some kind of deeply nefarious sexual impropriety without actually alleging it. If they can do this to Kavanaugh, they can do this to anybody. This is why, folks, I don't really care what Trump tweets, what Trump says. The Democrats are soulless and evil when it suits them. They do not care who they destroy. They do not care what happens to a good man like Kavanaugh. This is and this is the elites. This is fine Stein. This is somebody who's supposed to be, you know, an

adult in the room and supposed to know better. Yeah, producer Mike is telling me, this is just like it's like Clarence Thomas, Clarence Thomas Redux, you know this is, but it is it is how they It is how they play the game, it's how they do things, and we we should not stand for it. We absolutely should not allow this to go without, you know, a thorough repudiation.

It really makes me angry because, you know, fine Stein, these people, they they're so smug and they're so condescending toward Trump and all of his supporters like you and me, and then they do crap like this. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night if I did this to somebody with fine Stein and all these people in the media running the story have done. You know, if it turns out that this is some bomb show, well yeah, well then I was wrong and I were tracting. Who

wants to bet that it's not? Then I hit their oil, We're gonna hit their for banks, and so they're really going to start to feel it. Their economy is spiraling out of control. The Europeans are trying to salvage what they can. Nothing is going to fix Iran until Iran fixes itself. Every Secretary of state, former secretary of state continues to meet with foreign leaders, goes security security conferences,

goes around the world. We all do that, and we have conversations with people about the state of affairs in the world in order to understand them. I think everybody in the world is sitting around talking about waiting out the President Trump. So there he had two different heavy hitters and their respective administrations on the issue of Irani Nicki Haley, US and bassing that the Nations and former Secretary of State and overall blowhard John Kerry. And you know,

let's start with the Nicki Haley component. That's what's going on right now. Nicki Haley is saying, look, we're we're punishing the Iranians. The Iranians can make this stop whenever

they want by stopping the nonsense. The moment that the Iranians are all of us, the moment that they're willing to stop being such bad actors in the world stage, and that they're willing to to play ball and stop supporting all these terrorist regimes throughout the Middle East, uh, creating instability and countries where we have strategic interests, where we have allies threatening to destroy Israel, threatening to you know, kick the Israelis into the sea, and and uh, you know,

turn America into a sea of fire and all this other crazy crap. Then we have something to discuss, but we're not just going to allow all that to continue on and give them access to the international economy, international banking just because we're desperate for some kind of foreign policy legacy item A k A. What the Obama administration did. Right. So, so you're hearing that Nikki Haley, She's like, we are turning up the heat on Iran and it's not gonna stop,

and we have the stronger hand here. Then you hear from John Kerry, the former Secretary of State. Now he got himself into some trouble because he in classic arrogant, self important John Kerry mode, thought that he should go and start meeting with not just Iranian's folks. Okay, and now he's not shown up at conferences and just giving his thoughts on things. Everybody has First Amendment rights. Former government officials have just the same First Amendment rights as

everyone else. But he sits down with the Iranian foreign minister, somebody that he was negotiating against, whether he realizes that or not, and I don't think he does. I think he was negotiating with as in he thought that there

was you can maybe call it even collusion. He thought that the process of trying to get the Iranians to come to the table on a deal was working for the same general purpose, the same side the Trump administration and Nicki Harley and others think that the process of bringing her onto the negotiating table is bend them to our will because they are out of line. It's a

very different approach. But John Kerry has been holding these meetings with foreign leaders, and when people look at this, they they very understandably become quite uncomfortable because John Kerry knows a whole lot more than your you know, average folks do about this nuclear negotiation process, including the weak points from either you know, the perspective of the deal or or you know American American political weak points on this or where he and what you have is something

that sounds very close, in my mind, very close to a situation where you have the former Secretary of State John carry under the Obama administration who sounds like he is advising a not just a foreign secretary of state, but really a foreign government in how to defeat in negotiations the current administration. That's a big problem, folks. I mean, this is now I know he would he of course, John Kerry would, he would say that's not true in

no way. But just for one, the Secretary of State, John Kerry, a former Secretary State, of course, pardon me, sitting down to say, Hey, all you have to do is wait out with the rest of the world, wait out the Trump administration, and then you'll get what you want. This starts to feel pretty close to giving aid and comfort to the enemy. My friends. I mean, it's like I'm not in the room and I'm I'm trying to analyze based on what he's admitted he as talky Ronnie

and Foreign Minister. He's admitted that he talks to them about the nuclear the nuclear deal. And there's just no way that a normal person doesn't see that as undermining the Trump White House. There's no way that a normal person sees this and doesn't think to himself, for hers off, Oh my gosh, John Kerry, he's running a kind of rogue diplomacy where he is really taking the side of at least in this dispute. He's taking the side of

the Iranians over the Trump administration. Now here's the here's the way you could really get to the heart of this is John Kerry more favorably disposed towards javad zare the Iranian for minister or Donald Trump himself. If he were to say, you know, if if you were to ask John Kerry, who do you think is more trustworthy a negotiating partner, the Iranian for Minister or Donald Trump, I would be very curious to hear what his answer

would be. I would be very curious to know how John Kerry, uh weighs the quote threat of Trump versus the threat of a nuclear Iran. You know that that mentality that was expressed by the imbecilic Joe Scarborough article earlier in the week in the Washington Post where he said that Trump is essentially Trump getting elected is like is worse than nine eleven for America. Uh. That sentiment is widespread among the elites. And John Kerry is as elite as it gets. I mean, he's a guy who

he married a very wealthy woman. I think he very two very wealthy women in a row, but married a very wealthy woman. He is quite elite. He is Mr Martha's vineyard, Mr. You know, ten million dollar townhouse in Boston on Beacon Hill. And I'm telling you that he has absolutely internalized a lot of the most hysterical anti

Trump sentiment. And when that kind of a guy sits down across from Iran, which is an enemy state in enemy regime, I can't trust that he would not feel the need to try to help the Iranians a little bit to balance out what he views as a threat of the Trump administration. And that's crazy, it's subversive, and it's wildly irresponsible. You know, we just had this news about Google and how they feel about people who vote for Trump, how they feel about Trump himself. He's a disaster,

he's terrible. They hate him. Do you think that when people run a company and they almost uniformly have that kind of political bias toward the left doesn't affect the actual workings of the company, especially a social media platform where you just assume that they don't really care and they're just gonna do right by you. But guess what what if they're biased against conservatives, folks, snippy dot com

is the place you should go. Snippy dot com is a new social media site where there is no agenda, no bias, no conversational health nonsense. It's a place where you can share your thoughts and ideas, and where conservatism will never be suppressed. I've got a snippy dot com account. I'm already active there. Go check it out for yourself. Snippy dot com totally free to join. You can post your thoughts, post video, post photos again snippy dot com, or you can download the snippy dot Com app and

start the conversation. Buck Sextons decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Stake American, You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Analysts No, well, Obviously, today's new text messages would suggest that the media leak strategy was exactly what we surmised in the letter that we sent to Rod Rosenstein just a couple of days ago, I think. But the bigger context of this is that

this is not the end of it. I can say the Department of Justice has been working with Jim and I to get us additional documents, and I can tell you there are dozens of other documents that would support the fact that Peter Struck and Lisa Page had ongoing relationships with multiple reporters and that they were feeding them information. Uh to spind the narrative sinds this President. No, it's it's not even it's not legal, it's against protocol. But the other thing is is they are denying it and

we have the proof that would suggest otherwise. Here's what's so frustrating about. The dossier was a big lie. So what they did is they said, this is a big lie. The more people we can get talking about the dossier, the more likely it is they'll believe the lie. So that's why they had this leak strategy to support a document that was the basis for everything. That's the big problem here. They took that document, the dossier, untrue document, they took it to the Secret Court and didn't tell

the court important facts to get a warrant. Didn't tell him who paid for it, didn't tell him the guy who wrote a Christopher Steele, had a extreme bias against the president, said he was desperate to stop Trump, and didn't tell the court about Oars involvement, both Bruce and Nelly Oars involvement in production of the document. This whole

thing stinks, folks, It just stinks. Okay, we we are way past the point of giving any benefit of the doubt to the d o J and the FBI when it comes to anything related to Trump and Russia and collusion, all this other stuff. This is just out of control. You have new text messages that have been released this thanks to Mark Meadows over on the House, But this tech tech messages say that people were leaking like mad

in the lead up to the Trump Russia probe. Before I get into the details here, let me give you the the overview of what we all know is going on here. They were trying to shape the the narrative in the media to justify what they had done after

the fact. I think that's very obvious, Okay. They were trying to create the perception the general public that there was a need to do this stuff because they knew that if and when the truth of the investigation, including the Fiser requests against Carter Page and and all the other aspects of the Russia collusion hoax, and it is a hoax, if that ever came to light, it would

look terrible. It would be so obviously and blatantly and hopelessly politicized that there would be frankly, uh no conceivable way for them to defend this in the court of

public opinion. So they had to both tell stories in the press about this to create, if not an alibi at least a defense for themselves and to really make it clear to the Democrats in Congress and in the media, Hey, you know you better, you better join with us here on this anti Trump stuff, or else we're all gonna be a whole lot of trouble because we were trying to help Hillary. You know, take take our side here, you know, help out the rest of the of Team Hillary.

And that's I don't see how you can come away with a different conclusion than that. I mean, here's what the the the text message it change on December six says all right. Quote, oh, this is from page Lisa Page, not Carter page Lisa Page to Peter Struck. Oh, remind me to tell you tomorrow about the Times doing a story about the RNC hacks, she texted Struck. Struck replied, and more than they already did. I told you, Quinn told me they pulling out all the stops on some story.

A source told Fox News Quinn could be referring to Richard Quinn, who served as the chief of the Media Investigative Publicity Section in the Office of Public Affairs. Quinn could not be reached for comment. Struck again replied, I think our sisters have begun leaking like mad, scorned and worried and political, they're kicking into overdrive. In one passage, Struck apparently misreads a reference to RNC and then blames his old man eyes. And it's unclear whom Struck was

referring to when he uses the term sisters. Okay, folks, let's let's break this down. Sisters is most likely a reference to the Intel agencies, which I'm sure they would not like to be thought of as the sisters of the FBI. But that's a whole other conversation. But probably the the Intel agencies and and most more specifically, the CIA would be my guests. But I don't know. I'm not Peter Struck. I've I've never heard let me tell

you this much, nobody the FBI. Yeah, that's right, Nobody the FBI is going to refer to the CIA as as it's it's sister agency to anybody who works at the CIA. That much, I can tell you. But maybe the FBI, that's how they do it. I don't know. Maybe that's that's clear to them, that that's the most likely. And and that appears in an analysis here on this Fox News piece online, and I think that's the most

likely scenario. But what this makes absolutely clear is that the FBI folks involved here were very aware that there was a public relations component. He and I would even argue to you it starts to get very close to

being propaganda folks, right. This is the government trying to justify the government's actions through confidential stories or rather giving you know, sourcing to the media through confidential sources, in order to propagate a certain version of events so that the public thinks something that the government wants them to think. They're really not supposed to do that. That's that's not

how this is supposed to work. And I think there you so you have that component of it, and then just that there's so many people who are leaking, who are leaking you have really a dual track here. You have rogue actors in the FBI and d o J who were leaking classified things like the Flynn phone call

to Ambassador Kisliak. So that's one part of this, and then you also have the official I mean it's not really a leak, but the the official propaganda strategy you could say, from the Office of Public Affairs of the Department of Justice that is going to Remember this, folks,

it's not always about politics. Sometimes it's about bureaucrats. And you have people who aren't necessarily all that pro Hillary or aren't even that anti Trump, but who work at a place like the Department of Justice, and when they think that the public might turn on their organization, they have absolutely no problem. I can assure you of this. They have no problem doing what needs to be done

to protect their agency. And I think that's probably what you saw here, meaning the Office of Public Affairs at uh the Department of Justice, or rather in the in the FBI. I mean, they probably have, but they there's I'm sure there's an O p A in both was telling the press certain things to massage the story about this Russia collusion madness. And then you also had people that we're passing classified information to the media for really

specific hits, like going after General Flynn. Uh So, But what you see is, I mean, this is the weaponization of government in a in a political dispute. That's what's happening. I mean that is now on the record, clear as day. No serious person is going to be able to convince me that that's not true, because it is true. I want to know when we're gonna find out who was doing a lot of that rogue actor classified leaking. I would note keep in mind, folks, do you know who

does the investigating of that? Do you know who is charged with finding out who would have leaked classified to hurt Trump? That's right, the Department of Justice and the FBI.

So if in fact, what we're dealing with here, and it seems abundantly clear we are is a cabal at FBI and d o J at the top level, mind you, including people who have been fired like Struck, people who have been fired like McKay McCay who's facing criminal charges, if they were the ones and some of their close colleagues who have stayed behind in those agencies, are the ones that are that are tasked with ferreting out leakers

of classified information. I have a feeling we're not going to find too many folks who were doing the anti Trump hashtag resistance classified leaks. Who will watch the watchers?

It's a recurrent question whenever we talk about government, especially federal law enforcement, and any time that there's the possibility of the surveillance apparatus of the intelligence community being used for political purposes, that's what happened here, And I just I just have to note that you know, they were very good at tracking down leaguers during the Obama years, and there were no damaging leaks from inside the Armnament

about anything Obama did. A lot of people were all, notice, you know, you say anything, we're gonna throw you in prison, ruin your life. But when it comes to Trump, a lot of damaging classified leaks in the press and people aren't being No one's been prosecuted for not a single person. Well maybe it's because the leakers are the ones doing the investigation. How about that? People? We jump very quickly today,

But I do think that we like to forgive. You went on the Howard Stern Show yesterday to apologize and you end up making it worse because you said you'd have to have down syndrome not to feel sorry for the victims. Do you regret this by getting into trouble, Norman Dumba, it's always bad when you have to apology for apology apology? Do you lose it when you're on Howard?

Is that what happens to Well, there is a thing on on Howard where there's a recklessness in the studio and you know there are you used to be a word we would all say uh to mean stupid that we don't say anymorrow, Right, you know what I'm talking about, Yes, and stupidly I was about to say that word, and I stopped and said what's the right word to say? And then I said, um, I said a different word. Did you realize that? Probably realized at that moment that

I done something unforgivable. Yeah, this is kind of a follow up team to yesterday when I talked to you about Norm MacDonald, comedian just got a show on Netflix. This guy can't get out of his own way. You know, I'm obviously somebody who's going to give more than the just the benefit of the doubt on you know, saying something that the left jumps on, takes out of context and all that stuff. Right, I'm the first one to say that comedians should be given some latitude to make

jokes and be funny. But he talked about Roseanne and Louis c k and he got in trouble and then he was trying ring to apologize for it. And I went on the Howard Stern Show, which I would just notice probably not the best venue for an apology. On this stuff, and then he went on to say you'd have to have down syndrome to not understand what he was saying. And I didn't know that part of it. When I went on the area yesterday talked to you about this, I saw that. Afterwards, I just thought to myself,

what is wrong with Norm McDonald? Now he he obviously is not defending that, and he didn't he explained to you what what his thought process was. He was going to use the R word, which you know I would. I would note I try to be fair minded folks about all the things that I that I discussed here on the show, and I know that for a lot of people there's kind of just a constant own the Libs always own the Libs fight fight, fight mentality. I

try to bring some nuance to this too. So while I'll tell you that the war on words that the left is is waging all the time is very important, and that they played dirty, and that they cheat, and there's all kinds of stuff we should be aware of their, I will say that when I was growing up, I remember that people would say I would say the word uh retard as though it was completely normal and fine to say about anybody that they thought was acting in

a way that was stupid or anything else. And anyone who spent any time around somebody with Down syndrome or somebody with learning disabilities understandably just gets very uh angry about that. And and and it is wrong and it's not something that it's not something that people should say and we have but see there's a reason for why we shouldn't say it, right, and it's understandable. It's you should not use that term for somebody as a term of of any kind of disparagement, and shouldn't use that

term now in general. Uh that all said, I don't know how Norm McDonald goes from about to say that too, and why not just say jackass? What why I go from the R word to saying down syndrome, which is even more specific to people with a condition, who are you know, are there loved ones, they're family members there who have had to you know, overcome uh quite a

difficult burden. I mean, having Down syndrome obviously makes life in many ways more challenging, although people also point out that people with Down syndrome generally are very happy and very loving and but you know, Norm McDonald man well, what is he doing. I mean, he's been in the game a long time. He should know better than this. I'm not here to sort of do the pylon. You could tell he's sit in that view interview. He's not smiling,

he's not laughing. He he knows that it's kind of a a second strike here, and and I guess he'll he'll get he'll get a third one on this. And he's because the first look, I was defending what he's not defending what he said, but defending his right to say the original stuff about how look, the me too movement, you know, shouldn't get shouldn't become essentially a career death sentence for everybody. That's what he was trying to say,

or trying to get at. I think, um, but you know, man, I just felt that I had to follow up after yesterday talking about Norm McDonald. And I do find it really troubling that comedy is is just under constant assault in this country. I mean, I do find it troubling that we can't allow comedians the the latitude that I really think they should have to do the you know, they pushing of boundaries that we would expect from the pushing of boundaries that's really necessary for them to be

effective in what they do. I mean, a comedian that's trying to be safe, it's general. Will you have a lot of that these days, folks. You know comedian is trying to be safe is somebody like Kathy Griffin who really now only makes fun of Trump and Republicans and you know, people who live in rural America and Christians. You know that that those that's what you get with comedians who are trying to be safe. They attack the

targets that politically political political correctness say they can. And I just find I find the whole thing very dispiriting because I wish we could have comedy back anyway. I just had to follow up with the Norm McDonald thing. I was really surprised at his ineptitude in handling us and dealing with it, and then to to go on on the View to discuss it. At least the ladies of the View were willing to hear him out. I was. I was surprised at that too. They were. They seemed

willing to to engage him on this stuff. But and h man, there are limits, folks to what we can say. Okay, well, anybody could have said that, or you know, that's a mistake that any of us might have made under the circumstances. I don't think if I'm trying to backpedal a little bit from a discussion, trying to have a nuanced discussion about me too. I don't think all of a sudden I make a disparaging remark about people with Down syndrome, that that is not something that I could see happening

to just anybody. So I look, Norm McDonald, maybe he's just learned his lesson. I wonder if his show is going to be any fun uh funny at all. As I've told you, I'm not a Norm McDonald person. I've never thought he was funny. I've always thought it was very he was trying very hard to be funny. But other people I know are devotees of his comedic style. And if you ask me these days, you know, buck, who do you think is a really funny comedian? There

are some funny shows out there. I mean, I think Silicon Valley on HBO is actually it's a Mike Judge show. Who's the Office Space creator. He created the movie Office Space. I think Silicon Valley would be very high on my list, but I I can't tell you right now who I can think of that does stand up comedy that is truly great. And I think it's because the boundaries for stand up comedians have been so set by a politically correct agenda that there's really not the room for the

kind of brilliance that we've seen with other communities. I mean, you could never have the and they'll never be in a clipment any but you could never have an Eddie Murphy in his prime doing what he used to do today and saying the kind of things you could even have Robin Williams. I've said this to people, you go back and look at some of the retrospectives that we're done in Robin Williams life after he tragically took his own life. People were saying that Robin Williams comedy was

too offensive. This is just a few years ago, anyway, But do watch A Silicon Valley. I think it's very good. It's obviously a little irreverent and there's a you know, a fair amount of cursing and stuff like that, but it's it's a it's a good show, folks. I would recommend that one to you if you're looking for one get silicon value on HBO. We'll be back in just

a moment. Should schools force kids to face their fears? Well, if they have an irrational fear of say, spiders, if they're arachnophobes, or if they have a fear of going outside agoraphobia, there are some clinical fears that maybe are a little too much. I don't think we should take somebody who's terrified of snakes and necessarily put them through immersion therapy and cover them with snakes, right that that would be cruel. But should we make some exceptions for

people who are afraid of public speaking? This issues actually getting a lot of attention right now because of a a tweet when viral from a fifteen year old high school student who declared, quote, stop forcing students to present in front of the class and give them a choice not to. This got a hundred and thirty thousand retweets and nearly a half a million likes. And this is following a similar sentiment in January that also got a

lot of attention on Twitter. Uh. And then you have these this is from the Atlantic, by the way, This that that that's who's covering this that teens are protesting in class presentations, and you have some teenagers quoted in this again. Now we're being told these days that teenagers

have a lot of wisdom. Quote. Nobody should be forced to do something that makes them uncomfortable, says Ula, a fourteen year old in eighth grade, who, like all students quoted, has to be referred to only by her first name. Even though speaking in front of the class is supposed to build your confidence and it's part of your school work. I think if a student is really unsettled and anxious because of it, you should probably make it something less stressful.

School isn't something a student should fear. Well, they really have this backwards. Students shouldn't fear speaking in school. It's not that school. That's something that you should not fear. Uh. This is not a a sufficient approach to it. It's not enough to say, well, I don't like it and I'm scared. You shouldn't go through life terrified of speaking

in front of people. And in fact, the data shows that one of the most sought after skills by employers is the ability to communicate two people effectively and also to communicate to the public effectively. You know, of all the classes that I took in high school, I've got to tell you one of the best ones. And this may be obvious because I now make my living as a radio host, but I took a speech class my

freshman year of high school. And it was something that at a lot of people complained about at the time. They said, oh, you know, what a waste, and because all it was was you had to get up and you had to write a speech or you could give

it extemporaneously. It was usually a set time. It was, you know, three minutes or five minutes or whatever it was, and you would get up and give a speech in front of all of your classmates, and then we would talk about effective speaking, uh, you know, effective speaking styles and traits and things that you could do up there, and you know, what to do with your hands. And this was not a waste at all. I think every school should absolutely have this as part of the curriculum.

I think that getting up and speaking is something that people should in fact be forced to do, because it is not healthy to go through life afraid of communicating. I'm not saying if you get up there and give a speech on subject matter you don't know anything about and you know, obviously there are some limitations on this, but in general, we should not be catering to the

fear of public speaking as well. We shouldn't be catering to those who have have a fear of public speaking and think that they can get around this problem by avoiding the problem. That's not sufficient. And I think that everybody should get used to the idea that they're going to have to communicate publicly. Now because of social media, everyone's communicating with the world all the time. But being able to speak effectively is an asset that we should

be training as many people as possible to have. It's so worthwhile. I mean, I've been in so many different office environments already in my life, and oftentimes what you find about the people that are running things and the people that are the most highly regarded is they're not necessarily the best decision makers, they don't necessarily have the best leadership style. They're the people that communicate most effectively with their peers and with those around them. So I

think it's absolutely essential. I don't like this at all, And and this just goes into this pile of oh, we need to give kids what they want kids, no better, no and a lot of this stuff. They don't. They should get up and speak. There should be more of us. I should have had much more speech training in college in high school than I did. It should have gone into college as well. Although I was part of the debate team, so I was really a speech super nerd.

But there you have it. That's my feeling on that. To tell all these high school kids are grammar school kids who are scared to speak publicly. To get off my lawn and start giving a speech team bucket, it's time for roll call. All right, my friends, let's get to it. Philip writes that Darby was dead on Obama definitely whistles his s is. It drives me crazy too, She drives me crazy. It's a great song. It's a Mike John don't give it's a great song. You guys

know you love that song like no one is. Yeah, that's right, that's a great The eighties had some great tunes that we don't really ever hear anymore. You know that song and the King of Wishful Thinking, and there's all kinds of stuff that you heard in the background on movie soundtracks that. Yeah, you're making fun of your team, you're making fun of me right now, just like Mike and John are making fun of me. But you know what party? He was like, Yeah, that sounds pretty good,

that sounds pretty pretty catchy. Um, Michael Rights, Hey, I remember I just told you to have Bustardi on during Harvey last year. I memories not so great anymore, but once in a while, something bubbles up from that primordial swamp. Well, Michael, as I said, my friend, it's like you read my mind. We had but starting on yesterday, I hope you enjoyed hearing from him. Really nice guy too. I like Mr Bustardi and he always has interesting things to say about climate,

about storms, about all that stuff. Our brother Darby Rights, Hey, brother, I wanted to drop a note about hurricanes and climate change. When I was stationed in Charleston. We had to get underway for Andrew. The fifty ft waves we face on a Knox Class frigate. We're daunting, to say the least. I also wanted to mention the most unbelievable self importance on the on the left on climate change is breathtaking. As I'm sure you know, the planet could shake humanity

off like a speck of dust. It will be here long after we are gone, just as it was here long before we arrived. Darby. Absolutely true and as always, my brother, good to hear from you. Thank you for writing in Shields High, Rob. Right, Norm McDonald does voice over for cartoons? Does he lose his job? You know, Rob,

I don't know what cartoons. I think the answer to your question is it depends on who's making the who's making the decisions wherever, you know, for the for those cartoons and the people in charge at that network, whatever it might be. So yeah, there you go. I don't know. I'm not up on on the latest Norm McDonald projects. Paul writes the following, um, whoa hold on? Buck? Great job highlighting the m s MS bias in blaming the

president for everything. Perhaps it warrants a new audience participation segment on your show, mocking the MSM. It could be entitled today President Trump is to blame for examples, Today President Trump is to blame for a three horned cow being born in Brazil, etcetera, etcetera. Ps. You could even do two versions of it on Rising. Hey, Crystal, did you hear about that three horned cow being born in Brazil? Crystal? What? No? Buck? Yeah, they say it's Trump's fault. Crystal. Okay, I don't like

Trump Buck exactly, Crystal. I feel Trump's policies on the environment making responsible for Florence Buck. That's not serious, Crystal, No, I am serious. But okay, I think we get the idea. Paul shield Side, thank you for writing in on this one, my friend. Good to hear from you. Um Mike writes, I think you're right about Jack Ryan's girlfriend being European something. In episode five, Jack and his girl having dinner out.

I heard a slight accent in her speech. Uh you know, I heard it too, and I gotta tell you, I don't know what it is with we can't get more American actors playing Americans, but I find the whole thing kind of annoying, to be honest with you. Her name is Abby Cornish, which certainly doesn't sound uh particularly um oh, yeah, she's Australian. Told you, I know it. I knew it. We'll do it live. I knew it. Yeah, that's right, she's an Aussie. I can tell folks. They think they're like, yeah,

I can do an American accent. This is how Americans talk. No, it's not. That's how somebody's used to have it in really well open mouth. That's how they That's how they think Americans talk. I can do in American accent. Here we go. The name is bad. I'm a fam Minnesota. That's what they have a lot of English friends, true, and that's always there their version of the American accent.

And as we all know, a British accent. One day we will all agree, America, we will all agree to stop, whether subconsciously or not, thinking that a British accent makes somebody smarter. We we should come together on this one, just like we should. We should make it illegal for there to be uh car alarms. We should decide that there should be no more extra points added to somebody's i Q, theoretically at least because of their British accent.

It's just crazy. By the way, some of you pointed out yesterday that I think I'm mixed up and as I was speaking in my head two books that I both, both of which I really recommend, both fiction books, Michael Crichton's State of Fear and Tom clancy Debt of Honor. I think I've either mixed up the books or the authors. When I was talking about flying Ant seven into the White House. That's that's the end of debt of honor. I think I said, state of fear, state of fears

about climate change. Michael Frighten, who said that in his career he wrote about abortion, he wrote about genetic engineering and cloning, and I mean some some very hot button topic stuff, said that the both the hatred and venom that he got from strangers and and the death threats for writing about climate change, and the the sort of shunning from the elites that he got for writing about climate change in a way that it exposed the hysteria about it. Uh, it was crazier than anything else he

ever dealt with in his career. As you can tell, I've watched a lot of not only I read almost all of Creighton's books, but I've also read a lot of his and watched a lot of his speeches. I thought he was a very interesting guy. You know. At one point he had the number one movie in the country, the number one TV show in the country, and the number one book in the country. It was Jurassic Park, the movie, Jurassic Park the book, and e Er the TV show. So the guy's got skills. It's kind of

an egot before there was an egot. Uh, and well it's a simultaneous he got really Oh, if you don't know what that is, don't worry about it. Can google it. Mike writes, I think you're right about Jack. Oh, yes, sorry, I already said that one. Peter writes up State of Fear is a great book. It exposes the delusions of global warming and climate change, absolutely, Peter. It's It's also just a really good read. Uh. Crichton was a master of his craft, and I think people should go back

and check out his book. Uh. Matthew writes, Hi, bak love the show Shields High. I have a solution for by the way, just as an aside, I love when people right me they're like, what is this? She's high that everyone yells and they're like new people come into the Freedom on They're like, what is this? She's I

what is that? I'm always I send out usually a little note to those folks who explain to the origins of this, which it's just just takes us back to the earliest days, those special Saturday shows when I was beginning all this madness. Anyway at Shields High, as you all know, Um, Matthew, rights have a solution for the social media bias problem. We know government regulations will never work, as the right is never as good at that game,

but we can bring them down on campaign finance. The subversive material support Google, Facebook, and Twitter gave Hillary was worth millions of dollars. Was any of that direct campaign aid reported as in kind donations? Prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. If they want to be an arm of the d n C, then fine, but they need to report it and limit it to the existing amounts per the law. Don't let them get away

with this double standard anymore. Thanks Matt in Wisconsin. Matt, I don't know if that is gonna work legally speaking, but I like, I like where your heads at on that one. Uh. At least it's fun to try to own the lips with the law when you can. I don't know enough about campaign law whether that would be I think we have to look at the specifics. Are they really making a contribution of some kind. There's obviously

gonna be a free speech challenged to that. I don't know, my friend, but you're thinking outside the box and you're obviously a smart guy. So thank you for writing that in uh, Mimi writes buck, I live in Castro Valley and I know Rudy Peters, the politician who was attacked. A couple of important things. First, Peters is running against Eric Swalwell. Eric is a Pelosi protege. He is frequently on TV saying mostly stupid liberal talking points. You have

pointed out that the guy is an idiot. He needs to be defeated. The second point is that Rudy is a veteran. He is truly conservative, not a rhino, and he won in an open primary. It's very unusual for Republican to make it to the runoffs. It's usually two Democrats to choose from. Finally, he deserves our support. It would be great if you could interview him. Thanks for your great shows. You're getting so popular. I can't get through on the phone anymore, but that's a good thing.

Keep up the great work. Mimi from California. MEMI, I know we we uh, we focus so much on the show. Sometimes we're not taking as many calls these days, but that's why roll calls so important, and so please do continue to send me your messages here on Facebook. UM, and thank you for that meet me. Always good to to hear from you, Dan, right, Buck, I think it was Tom Clancy's book Debt of Honor, where the Japanese radical crashed into the Capitol during a joint session of Congress.

Did Crichton write something similar as well? I'm a podcast listener at any rate shields high now, Daniel, I just corrected myself. I think I just I jumbled it up when I was talking about on the radio. Sometimes that's gonna, that's gonna happen. Aries Aries always has strong opinions that much. I know. Come on, Cabin Boy and Joe Virs the Volcano aren't even memorable. And how's that TV series Battlestar Galactica working out for you? It's not bad and sometimes good.

But whoever told you it was the greatest TV show of all time needs to watch more TV arias I I haven't really gotten into it yet, so I need to. I need to check it out. And uh, I will take your advice on Cabin Boy and Jovis the Volcano. I don't those have never crossed my radar. It's not a good thing. Aaron writes, dear Buck, I just started watching Jack Ryan. I decided I'm going to imagine this as your backstory and that they cast Krasinski to play

the younger you. His hair doesn't do yours justice, though, Shields High. Let me say Aaron that there are some interesting There are some interesting parallels between Buck Sexton and Jack Ryan in the Amazon Prime series of Jack Ryan and his time at the CIA. Bucks Extent and Jack Ryan both lived in Georgetown while they were CIA analysts. Bucks Excent and Jack Ryan both rode crew in college, and Bucks Excent and Jack Ryan both have quite a swoop of hair. Beyond that, I'm not sure there's that.

There's a lot of a lot of similarities, um, but there's some. There's some, there's some crossover. I like where your heads at. That's gonna be get today, folks excited to be with you tomorrow. Please tell people about the show. Tell them they can listen to the podcast. They don't have to be able to listen on radio. They can listen to the podcast any time. And we're getting that podcast out hours earlier now than we were before. So do check it out. iTunes the best place for it.

The Buck Sexton Show on iTunes. See you Tomorrow, Shields High. The FBI calls home title theft one of the fastest growing crimes. Brace yourselves because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for once an identity thief takes control of your home's title. Folks, you know the toughest store online these days, including your homes title and domestic and international cyber thieves are hunting American homeowners because they've got a lot of equity in

their homes and they like to borrow your money using that. Okay, it's not a hard process. I've seen how home title lock walks through. How the bad guys do this. They take you off your home's title, replace you with an alias, then borrow every penny against your home's equity. This is a nightmare. I mean, imagine getting these bills in the mail and that's the first time you're gonna even find

out this has happened. Identity theft programs do not protect you for just pennies a day, though, home title lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home. Reddister now for a free analysis and discover if you're a home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value. Free visit Home Title lock dot com. That's home title, lock dot com