Political Hit Job

the buck Sexton Show. This is the bucks Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. No mistake, American, You're a great American. Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. No, I don't know. It depends on the process. I'd like to see a complete process. I'd like everybody to be very happy. Most importantly, I want the American people to be happy because they're getting somebody that is great. I want him to go in

at the absolute highest level. And I think to do that, you have to go through this. If it takes a little delay, it will take a little delay. It shouldn't certainly be very much. But again, this is something that should have been brought up long before this. They had the information in July, as I understand it. That's a long time ago, and nobody mentioned it until the other day. It's very you know, it's very unfortunate that didn't mention it sooner. But with all of that being said, it will,

I'm sure work out very well. You're talking about a an individual who is as high equality individual as you'll ever see. I have not spoken to Judgica. Don't next question. What a ridiculous question. Welcome to the Buck, Sex and Shore. Everybody. You know, they they held it to the eleventh hour. They had a dirty trick up their sleeve, and they've they've deployed it against Kavanaugh. Um. That is yet yet another reminder of what we're dealing with here, folks. The

truth of the matter is as follows. They pretend that they don't like Trump because he breaks norms. They pretend that that Trump is to course, that he's a vulgarian, that he's dishonest, that he lies, and that's why they don't like him, that's why they're so vicious toward him. But the truth is that the Democrats are just as

vicious to anybody who gets in their way. The truth is that the left has a will to power, and if you get in the way of that, you will find yourself the victim of the nastiest smears, character assassination, criminal investigation. Perhaps we've seen the abuse in d J. We've seen the abuse, and FBI we know how they do things, and that is certainly what is going on right now with Kavanaugh. I can tell you that my opinion on this will change if there is new information.

I do not believe his accuser, Professor Ford, I do not believe that she is telling the truth. I'm allowed to not believe that she is not telling the truth. And that despite what everybody says based on all of the factors at hand here, based on everything that you can pull together about this, and just the unbelievable convenience of the whole thing for Democrats, I mean, wow, what a what a surprise. They just so happened to find somebody to try to pull a an Anita Hill against

a Clarence Thomas, so to speak. Here, they just so happened to find somebody with a sexual allegation against somebody who was just about to become a Supreme Court justice. Um, and you know, this is the this is the playbook, this is what they do. This is how they do it. And if Christine Blase for Blaze, Ford's accusation is enough to ruin Cavanaugh, it's enough to ruin anyone. If Kavanaugh could fall victim to this, any of us could fall victim to this. Okay. It means that the new standard,

the new process is. All it takes is an accusation from Democrats of sexual and propriety in your past, and you're done, and you're ruined. And I'm sorry, but it's just not it's just not fair, it's not right, it's not enough, but just and also remember this, this is why I don't want to hear their complaints about Trump anymore. I don't care about Trump's you know, previous dalliances. I don't care that he's a playboy. I don't care that he you know, uses course language, or that he can

be you know, selfish or else. Trump is the political juggernaut that we need right now to crush the leftist machinery that destroys all of the very you know, thoughtful and principled and kind and ethical people that we try to put forward in public service. You know, we we've tried Romney, We've tried Rubio We've tried Bush. They just smash these people. They can't smash Trump. Say what you

will about him, they can't smash him. And as long as he's going to push for policies that I like, and he can withstand this stuff that they try, and they tried everything by it. They've tried to havanall Trump ten times over and then some. But it is in fact his in vulnerability to leftist attack that in many ways, above and beyond anything else, makes Trump so valuable at

this moment in our politics. So if we can take one silver lining from this whole debacle right now with kavanaughts that at least we are reminded that putting forward somebody who's a boy scout to try to fight against the Democrat machine in politics is a fool's errand, and we're not going to play that game anymore. Now. I

also have some breaking news for you. President of the United States has ordered the immediate declassification of a whole bunch of stuff, including portions of Carter pages FISA, all FBI three or twos with Bruce, or all FBI reports of interviews prepared and connection with all Carter page visa applications, and the release of some FBI text, including I believe James Comy's text messages without redaction. Now, I do not yet have the ability. You know, I'm on air with you.

I'm gonna be reading this all tonight, so I can't tell you with the specifics because it just happened while I'm on air here. They just yeah, they released comies too. They just released all of this information. So I'm gonna be combing through this as best I can as we're on air, and as I we'll certainly dive deep into it tomorrow. But this is huge, folks, this is huge. The immediate declassification. Potus did it. He did it. I've been asking to do it for months. You've been waiting

for me to do it for months now. The f behind the d o J got nowhere to hide, folks, nowhere to hide. And you know what, God, this president is amazing. He's he sees, he sees what they do this week, he knows what they've done, what they've done to Kavanaugh, and he says, you know what, if you're gonna if you're gonna show up and you're gonna try to go nuclear, I'm gonna go nuclear too. If you if you think you can be tough, I can be tougher.

You want to play this game, you want to You want to skewer a good man like Cavanaugh, You want to ruin his reputation. Yeah, how are you gonna look mainstream media and Democrat lackeys when all this information about Carter Page, about Combe, about struck about all of them, All this Russia collusion garbage is finally left out in the sun for everyone to see, and left out for everyone to see it rot because it is a mountain of lies and it's all about politics, just like Kavanaugh.

So I'm gonna be diving into this. But Potus has ordered the declassification, folks. That is the breaking news that I've got for you. As we are here on the show. You're no stranger to character assassination tactics and an early hostile political climate and environment. These allegations about Judge Kavanaugh just came out over the weekend. Uh do you find them credible? And do you think this is a political hit. I don't know how to say anything about Brett Kavanaugh

other than I love this person. I've known him since I worked alongside him. This is so wildly out of character, and I loved it that so many young women who had gone to high school with Bratt with Judge Kavanaugh came forward and attested to his character. So I do not I trust Brett Kavanaugh, and he has emphatically denied

the charges. I will say this, the process, I think is very unfortunate for the senator, for Senator Feinstein to sit on these rather old allegations week after week after week, as well as Brett having gone through six full FBI investigations. I think there's a real serious process problem here, Which is a nice way of ken Starr saying he thinks that this is bogus. He thinks this is bogus, and he was a special prosecutor, and of course the left

completely vilified him. Now, anybody who even has a word of criticism for Muller is treated like some kind of of traitor to our institutions. But when it was Clinton being investigated, oh my gosh, ken Starr was was was torqua mata? Ken Starr was? Was Was this evil, puritanical, vile fellow? Right? I canna say, actually, ken Starr was very, very engaging and very interesting fellow. Today when I got

to interview, that was from Rising. We played that clip for you there, But you know that this is where you start to look at the Okay, who do you believe? We're gonna play the who do you believe? Game? You have Kavanaugh who had so many women come to write about his character and his his sterling reputation, how well he treated them, that you had all these media people running around with a false conspiracy that this must have

been planned beforehand. Right there, you had sixty five women all gathered together to say this is not the Cabanaugh that they knew, and that he was so good to them, and so what what was the response? What was the response beyond that they said, Oh, well, clearly this must have been some kind of a plot. You know, it's just not possible that this many women would come together this quickly unless they had planned. Oh nope, it turns

out they just did. They just did. Um. This is a man who is already folks on the DC Court of Appeals, has had six FBI investigations, okay six. None of this has never come up. No problem people talk about is drinking. I mean, I gotta tell you, I really resent this thing about Kavanaugh and his buddy Mark Judge people talking about how they used to drink beer. You know, when I was a teenager, I drank a lot too, Okay, I mean, you know, we all will

go through a little phase. Hey, So I just don't like that that's being used against them, like, well, you know, they drank a lot of beer. Yeah. There' huge difference between drinking a lot of beer and a a premeditated, multiple person attempted sexual assault. Right. I mean a lot of us drink a lot of beer. Not a lot of us are sex predators. But I just don't they're they're trying to link those two things, like, well, he partied a lot, you know, you know, Keg's big Keg

Kavanaugh or whatever. It's dis graceful. But now we look at this this woman, Professor Ford, and what we find is somebody who if we were to try to draw up a caricature of who would be willing to step forward and be this person, be the Anita Hill of this whole proceeding, who tries to take down Kavanaugh, tries to sink his nomination preventive becoming a Supreme Courts I mean to have a a Democrat registered and has donated, you know, not a lot of money, but donated Democrats.

A Democrat professor of psychology and I think sociology or something at a kind of you know, middle of the pack California, you see school. So you've got a California liberal, California professor who is clearly anti Trump. Her online presence shows that she opposes Trump policies. She does not like the president. She's obviously a huge progressive. People are saying

she's also an activist. When you add all that together, you have the person that, if I were to guess, I would say, well, yeah, this is who this is who might be willing to to uh step forward and fabricate something. Because that's what Kavanaugh was saying. Very important.

Kavanaugh is not saying this was a misunderstanding. Kavanaugh statement that came out today, is not claiming that there was some you know, Misshapper mix up and you know, he didn't mean it and maybe he grabbed her but he thought he was He was just drunk and didn't lies what was going on, but he didn't have any ill intent or anything like this. Uh. Capital was saying that she's a fabricator. I mean, she's a liar. She has

making this up. So that's a big charge, right. This is a major, a major departure from a a you know, he said, she said where there could be some you know, mixed signals or there should be could be some misunderstanding or anything. No, no no, no, he's just saying. This is a This is a straight up lie. This is not something that has occurred. And by the way, that does happen, folks. Okay, I would remind you all that the u v A Lacrosse uh case, I'm sorry, the uv A fraternity. I

was thinking of Duke Lacrosse uv A fraternity. Those are both high profile rape cases. Worthy. The victim lied about being raped, lied about everything. In the case of uv A, it was even lied about the whole you know, was it straight up fabrication. In the case of Duke, it was made up things, but there was actual contact between the people at a location. This does happen. We have cases where it has happened. And and if I can just put this and now, look, I can't tell you definitively.

If more information comes out, you know, five more women who have credible stories come forward, or you know, one more woman even comes forward and says, you know, Kavanaugh did something similar to me or there said, that's what we see in these other cases that people say fall into this meat to this meat too rhetoric or this meat too movement. Um, that's you know, I understand that. But we also have to remember, folks, that the stakes here for a lot of liberals are essentially existential for

liberalism in their mind. Not only could they lose their preferred method of winning national policy victories, which is to have the Supreme Court handed to them, they might have to live in a world where a Supreme Court will tell I mean, you know what, this, this policy that you have claimed is a is an inalienable right, this policy of abortion. It is in fact not in the constitution, which of course it is not. It is not a

constitutionally protected right, which of course it is not. And now, state by state, you're gonna have to make the case that you know, murder for convenience is a good thing. Okay, you know, that's a very different world than it's a constitutional right. Yeah, you won't be talking about abortion rights quite the same way when some states say no, actually

there's there's no right to an abortion. And this was complete, This was a talking about a fabrication, but I remember having Bob Bland of the Women's March sit on my show, and some of you who watched that episode a rising remember she said that millions of women's lives are at stake here, millions of women's lives are at stake if Kavanaugh gets and they're gonna They're gonna die if Kavanaugh becomes a Supreme Court justice because of all the women

that are going to die from botched abortions. That that's the storyline to that. I just want to say this, Yes, that's insane, folks, but you have to you have to listen to insane people when they tell you why they do what they do, or people that have a disconnect

from reality, how do they see things? If people in the Women's March, if the Women's movement and all this other stuff around, not just you know, Trump, but the progressive left in general, if they really believe that millions of lives would saying what are they not willing to do? Forget about what they're willing to do? Where do they draw the lines? What would you be willing to do

if you thought you could save millions of lives? Is making an unfounded allegation to ruin a man's career in reputation, is that within the bounds of what you do save millions of lives? If you really thought you're saving millions of lives, what do you think it would be worth consideration? Wouldn't it? It would be dishonorable? Would you just fight

in your own mind? We'll be right back and explained the situation any better than the Senior Center from May and put it yesterday evening when she said, if they believed Judge Kavanaugh has accused her, why didn't they service this information earlier so that he could be questioned about it. And if they didn't believe her and chose to withhold the information, why did they decide at the eleventh hour to release it. It's really not fair to either of them.

The way it was handled. It's not fair. But it's not about fair, is it, folks? It's about politics. They held this because this was all a strategy. This was all planned. I do not believe for one second that, oh, she she didn't want people to know, She didn't want people to find out about this. She called the tipline at the Washington Post she was trying to sink Kavanaugh. I mean, maybe she didn't want her name at hatched

to it originally, but then she changed her mind. How many people do you think how many people would if they really didn't want to come forward, if they really didn't want their name to be attached to something, would take this step of having a polygraph done preemptively just in case, you know, in the future it was decided that maybe they would need to. Yeah, maybe maybe they would need that that back up. I have a polygraph done.

That's that's a big step, right, That's something that you don't just have waiting on the side in case you needed But in this situation. Uh, they did claim that in this situation, we're supposed to believe that, and that the timeline speaks for itself. Folks. The the hearings were all about delay, delay, delay, delay, that's what Democrats are trying to do. The hearings were all about Democrats finding a way to push this beyond the election so that

they'd have a chance of taking the Senate. And then they it stopped this whole thing from happening, and you know, the Trump would have to essentially they would demand Merrick Garland or else there would be no you know, we'd have to wait another two years for another election. I mean, I think that's what the Senate would would probably go for. No, they they believe that this is Merrick Garland seat and

they're gonna they're gonna get him in that seat. But the timeline was is essential and tells you everything you need to know. They wanted delay, and now at the eleventh hour it is not an accident that they have a perfect excuse for delay. And we they really want us to believe that this just happened this way. I mean,

how stupid do they think we are? And you have all these people, these credulous talking heads in the media, and and and of course these very dishonest Democrats in Congress is saying, oh, no, you know, this is just this is just the way that it happened. You know, we had no she didn't even she didn't even want to come forward. Somebody leaked it. Oh somebody leaked it. Huh, just just somebody. I can tell you this. If I told the member of the Senate, hey, I've got a story,

don't tell anybody either. And and and you know, and I wanted to keep that quiet. Whither I leaked it to somebody or the senator leaked to somebody, but regardless, somebody involved the your main a decision, either Feinstein or Ford to spill the beans. Somebody did it, and the motivation was explicitly political. The motivation was to try and delay the hearing and hope that the Senate can actually get through this nominee. And folks, I've I just have

I have no patience with these lies anymore. And I really have no patience with Democrats. I think that they there's zero good faith ever extended from them on any of this stuff. But the timeline speaks for itself. It's all so transparent and so obvious to me that this is what's gone on here. And yet we're gonna have to go through what will be a really, really ugly week. It's gonna be like Bork. It's gonna be like Clarence Clarence Thomas all over again. Actually here we've got a

Clarence Thomas uh clip. This is a circus. It's a national disgrace, and from my standpoint as a black American, as far as I'm concerned, it is a high tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deigned to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that unless you cow town to an old order, this is what will happen to you.

You will be lynched, destroyed caricature by a committee of the U. S. U. S. Senate, rather than hung from a treat Clarence Thomas treated terribly in these But by the way, they should get rid of these show trials. They really should. They should just get rid of it. If you have the votes in the Senate, just do it. No, no more of this grand standing. We don't need this because you know how folks think of it this way.

How many Democrat nominees to the Supreme Court can you think of that were dragged through the mud, that were treated terribly and that had to withdraw because of just the horrific ordeal they were put through. This is what democrats do. This is who they are. This is people who have that mindset, that have a left wing ideology. They think that it's anything goes to get power. The

ends justify the means. Conservative mind is much more. Okay, Well, you know, I guess we gotta live within the system we've got and let's see what we can do here. And you know, they have the votes and this is they're the ones always lecturing us on respect for institutions, and they disrespect institutions at every opportunity, every chance that they get. Um. That's something that I think is is

he gonna get. A defining characteristic of of the left is that they like they like institutions where they control them, and they'll burn them into the ground when they don't. And the Supreme Court and the whole process of getting a nominee through is no different. It really is is no different. Um. And you know then you've of course got the legal analysis industrial complex out there trying to tie all this to Thomas and and Anita Hale and all that play clip twenty. This is CNN's tube in

one of the worst analysts out there. He was the supervisor at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Nita Hill worked for him. Uh. And there was a pattern of harassment that you know, and and um, she was treated miserably by the Senate Judiciary Committee. Um. And you know, in the twenty seven years that have followed, every single piece of evidence that has come forward has suggested that she was telling the truth and he was lying. That's not true.

He's lying. But also she wasn't treated miserably. She was trying to ruin a man's reputation and prevent him from reaching the pinnacle of his career. Uh and doing so for partisan reasons. And oh, by the way, I remember this, folks, she didn't pay some terrible costs. They've made her a hero. She has an HBO movie about her or Carrie Washington plays her, and it couldn't be any more favorable to her. Okay, they made her a hero. Don't believe this false martyr crap.

I believe Professor Ford. I think she's credible, and I think when the investigation is finished and when she testifies and judge kavin who testifies, I think a majority of Senators will find her credible. And I don't think. I didn't never thought kavan Or should get get appointed because he was picked by a president who said I'm only going to pick someone who repeals Roe V. Wade and

vetted by a group whose mission was that. The president said I'm only going to pick someone who repeals health care, and he was vetted by another group, the Heritage Foundation. So I said he shouldn't be on the bench before this, But now we've got to get to the bottom of this. Do you believe her story? Well, I can tell you it really does have a ring of truth to it. The fact that she can refer to therapist notes, so

that she did bring it up before. I am skeptical of polygraphs, but for those who believe them, Uh, she has passed a polygraph test. So I'd say at this point the fact that she would come forward to defend herselves adds credibility to a chart. Schumer, Durbin, these people are all scummy, dishonest, and they're being highly dishonorable in this whole situation with with Kavanaugh. Let me let me just break this down for a moment. That the notion that there's a ring of truth to it, a ring

of truth to this. Uh, well, this woman professor fords allegations. Uh, I would I would beg to differ with that. It is plausible. It is certainly plausible if this happened. I cannot guarantee anybody based on the fact that it did not happen. But to say that it has a ring

of truth leaves out some very important important facts. First of all, that Kavanaugh completely and utterly denies it, not in part, not on the facts, uh, you know, in specifics, not little bits here and there, or this was a misunderstanding capital completely not the denies it, and based on everything else we know about his character and background, I think that that has wait, just like it wouldn't a court of law. Folks, you know, is this person a

credible witness or not? This is absolutely a who do you believe? Situation. There is no way to definitively prove either way what happened, which is why the Democrats have gone with this as a ploy to take down Kavanaugh, because it cannot He cannot be proven innocent. But this notion, there's a ring of truth. And I wrote about this today on the Hill dot com and which I said that the Kavanaugh nomination absolutely must go through. The Republicans

cannot show cowardice or weakness here. It's not just this seat on the Supreme Court that's at stake. It's countless other decent public servants that Democrats don't like, that Democrats feel would thwart their left wing status agenda, and that they would use this same tactic. You know, if it works on cabinet's gonna work on anybody. Remember what they did amid Romney folks. Mitt Romney, they said, was a person who was giving people cancer, who was abusing dogs,

who was a bully in high school. All this just just made They found some little story of some kind that somebody would say, and then they just ran with all the rest of it is made stuff up. And yet and they're doing it now and even worse fashion to cabinet. But for the ring of truth statement the Durban Maid here, why is it that Ford does not remember what day this happened, what month this even happened,

or where it happened. I'm sorry, folks, I have been very, very drunk a number of times in my youth, just saying I've been so drunk that I probably was, you know, putting my imminent or immediate health at risk. But I have been there before. I have never not known at all where I was. And by that, we don't even know if Ford was drunk. I mean, it seems stands likely or reason to believe that perhaps she had a

few drinks. That doesn't matter except insofar as was that what affected her memory, But she claims to not know where it happened. I'm sorry if you had an incident that was so traumatic that you feel they need to speak out about a thirty plus years later, um and and nothing. Remember she she was not she by by her own admission, I mean she she was not physically harmed. She was threatened. She says, she was put in a position where she was very scared. But if you were,

it's scared, you wouldn't remember where that happened. You wouldn't tell your parents about it. Really, you keep this, you would keep this to yourself for that many years? Was there was there supposed to be? What? Because she was ashamed? Nothing? Really? When I say nothing happened to her, I mean there was no actual physical sexual assault that by her own description that that occurred. I mean it wasn't really it was an attempted I guess. She says, well, no, I'm sorry.

She says she was groped. Pardon me, She says she was groped. Okay, she was groped. She wouldn't she wouldn't tell somebody about this. That there wouldn't be I mean, if we're gonna and I would also note groped. This would if this weren't a court at all, this would be adjudicated groped where they grab her arm and I know they said I put her when she grabbed the chest or in her in her in her general area. I mean where where was she grabbed. That makes a

big difference to say she was groped. That's a very specific allegation. To she remembers that, she remembers the boys, she remembers all the things she would need to be able to try and sing Havana, but she doesn't have those details. Those are questions that people should want answers to, and I'm sorry this notion of the ring of truth.

I do not believe that it is likely. I won't say impossible, that is likely that given the situation that she has described, she can't remember where it happened, how many houses did she go party and where this kind of you know, really you don't know where it now. I would say to you, once you put time in location into the situation, then you could in fact disprove

an allegation. Once you have a situation where we know what the date range is or what the date is specifically, now you could have Kavanaugh perhaps being able to show, you know, I was traveling with my family overseas or whatever, or I was in another town. But because There's no date attached to any of this. It's just well, this thing happened at a party, and I remember it was him, and I knew him from our social circle. So you have to believe me because I have a right to

be believed. I I I do not think that has the ring of that this has the ring of truth, but Durbin wants to believe it because the Democrats want to believe it. Because at the end of the day, this is about being able to kill babies at will. That's what this is really about, folks, that's really This is not really about me too. This is not really

about sexual assault. The Democrats had a president who was a rapist for two for for two terms, didn't really bother them at all, still doesn't bother them this day. A rapist, not an attempted rapist, but somebody who actually was credibly accused on the record by a woman of rape and has never really denied it. And other women also claim that he sexually assaulted them. So for them, this is not at its core about any of that.

This is about the possibility of Roe v. Wad getting overturned, and this is about an entire Democrat left apparatus that is devoted to abortion on demand, all nine months of a pregnancy, for any reason or no reason, And what it would mean to the Democrat Party if they no longer had the top cover of the federal government saying yes, that's right, abortion always for any reason and any reason

at any stage of pregnancy is fine. If that went away, there are people who would lose a lot of their power, and there are people who would have a lot of explaining to do about the morality and ethics of their of the positions that they've been advocating for a long time. All these people pushing planned parenthood, all these people running around saying that, you know, it's all about access for for women to have abortions, especially the disproportioned number of

minority females who have abortions. You know, the thinking that they're doing great work, people like Chelsea Clinton saying that it's unchristian to not be able to have abortion, and they have really perverted core parts of our ethical fabric. I mean, these people have embraced evil and they are desperate to avoid that reckoning. And so it's important that you remember that because that is what is at stake, That is what is in the background. That is what

it is pushing all of this right now. It's really not about what Kavanan did or didn't do to some woman thirty years ago. For Democrats, it's about this is a possible reversal of Roe v. Wade in their mind, and they'll do anything, and I mean anything that they can to stop this. I think that's what we've seen. I want to talk to you about the the page struck text exchanged, the most recent one. How they were

constructing a narrative, folks. I mean they they were using the dossier and they were using uh, fragmentary intelligence information to try and convince people and members of the media specifically that there was a they're there with the Russia collusion thing, and there wasn't. We'll get we'll get into

that that's coming up. Background investigation is critical when you're hiring people to join you in your business, whether it's large or small, you want to make sure the people that you're bringing on are who they say they are, have the skills and clean histories in terms of no criminal nonsense, nothing like that going on. That's why you need somebody who is discreet, who is efficient, and who you can call and count on and trust. That's Global

Verification Network. I know the CEO personally, Mark Buckman. He's a great guy and he really cares about this business. He as a former Navy veteran, knows how much your personnel matter to you day in and day out. And he runs a veteran owned and operated business that can handle whether you're a start up all the way up to a fortune one company for all your vetting and background investigation needs. Make sure you go to my GVN dot com again, that's my g VN dot com Global

Verification Network. Leave no stone unturned buck Sextons decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence or make no mistakes American, let me you're a great American again. This is the buck Sexton Show for analysts. No tough day for Mr Manaford for his accepted responsibility and he wanted to make sure that his family was able to remain safe and uh live a good life. He's accepted responsibility and this is for conduct that dates back many years.

And everybody should remember that Maniford pleads guilty in his second trial and America sleeps suddenly as a result. I mean, it's this is the whole thing is such as far as I think that one of the really unfortunate lasting effects of this whole Russia collusion insanity, I really do believe this is going to be that people aren't able to think of the Justice Department, UH and the FBI

the same way. Ever, again, how could they, I mean, how could any of us after what we've seen going on here, after all of the political shenanigans that have clearly been at work. We we look and this is you can separate this out. I'm not saying, oh, you can't trust now now in the FBI arrest somebody for being a murderer or a drug dealer or whatever. All

the most murders are prosecuted not by the FEDS. But you know what I mean, if you know they're there are bad guys out there, and the FBI is dealing with the bad guys. I mean for politically sensitive investigations. I mean in areas where the prosecutor is in fact making decisions that could have consequences all the way up to you know, who is the president United States. That's where there's a lack of trust at the DJ. And

that's because there should be a lack of trust. I encourage you to not trust them, and it's because if you've been following this case, and also if you have an understanding of what the mentality is in these organizations, as I do because I used to work at the CIA, they really do believe that they're kind of a government unto themselves. They view themselves as a separate power within the governing apparatus of this country that needs to continue to function the way that it does in order to

protect all of us. So they do believe at some level there if not above the rules, there's they're definitely playing by a different set of rules. Um. But Manafort, let me just dive into this for a second. Manafort is now cooperating, and everyone's like, oh, Manafort, he's got

stuff in Trump. Man of Ford doesn't have anything on Trump because there's nothing to have, and there's just this desperation the media to have to put it in some context, to have some way of saying, oh, yeah, you know, Manafort is gonna flip any Danel, just like you mean Cohen flipped with all of his incredible information on Trump. There's nothing there unless they think that, you know more gossipy stuff about who Trump may or may not have had an affair with or anything else. Yeah, I'm sure

there's some of that. I mean, I'm sure Manaphort probably has some stories about Trump using salty language and doing things, are acting in a way that you know, the elite media would disapprove of. But you know, I have a biggers here, which is that Manafourt's you know, he had to he had to face two trials. He has spent all this money and all this time in dealt with

all this, and he's been targeted. He has been targeted because he had the temerity to think that he should be allowed to work with the Trump organization and attach himself to the Trump campaign. You know, you look at these different names, you know, and I shouldn't put Manifort in Kavanaugh on the same sentence because I believe Kavana was innocent, and I think that Manaford obviously did break

the law. But you have all these people that are in Trump circle who have either they've either tried to charge with the crime or have charged with the crime. And we know that prosecutorial discretion is a very real thing, and they can always decide not to bring charges or to let somebody off really easy. And I think the message for everyone is abundantly clear here, which is, if you try to get involved with Trump, and if you try to play that game, you are going to suffer

the consequences. Um, you are going to find yourself on the wrong side of an effort. Two. Well, even the score out right. Guy. Remember a lot of the I D. Bology, or a lot of the belief behind why there need to be people punished around Trump is because they're complicit in the theft of the election from Hillary. That's a that's a big part of this, and they really believe it. By the way, Lindsay Graham had some words about the d o J and the FBI plate three. Please what

I wish Jeff would talk about. I wish some of my colleagues would talk more about that's what's going on in the Department of Justice and the FBI. I'm gonna send a letter to Day to Rosenstein. These new text messages from Stroke and Page about leaking information about the FISA warrant process to the media is just one in a series of events that screamed for special counsel. How much more has to be uncovered? At the Department of

Justice regarding a political agenda. The Department of Justice and the FBI were political operatives when it came to Trump. They weren't investigators. And this screams for a special counsel. So I agree with you if you shouldn't beat on Sessions personally. But I don't know why Rosenstein, who's in charge of this process, doesn't see what I see and

out of control Department Justice and FBI. And what's good for the goose is good for the for the gander, Let's have a d J investigated by somebody outside the Department Justice, I mean, investigating the investigators. This is this wouldn't be the first time. And I spoke to Ken Star today, he of the special special prosecutor back in the nineties, and you know, he's all he's all for getting the bottom this thing of the DJ, and he

he believes in it. He believes, by the way, in a special counsel, and generally thinks that someone has to be able to hold the president accountable. So the big thing, though, the big takeaway from Lindsay Graham's uh SoundBite there is that I agree with the senator about these text messages. I mean how much more information can we really have about people acting poorly at the d o J mean,

how much more or sure proof can we have? Then the text messages between Page and Struck, where when you read them you just see, Okay, these are people who

are a little bit drunk with their own power. They realize they are kind of the nexus of this, this moment in American politics and therefore the world where they can put their hands on the they can put their thumb on the scale for either Hillary or for Trump, and they just or they could have done either, which is what they should have done, but they decided to do it for Hillary. And they hate Trump and they're trying to take Trump down, and they're playing very dirty.

I mean, all this leak stuff to the media. I don't want a Department of Justice that is that is selectively telling the media things to damage one person's reputation. I don't want a Department of Justice that that will use its ability. Remember they're the ones that can run even secret warrants on you as an American citizen. They can run a secret warrant on you without any real meaningful do you didial review or do process and then decide what to leak out to the general public. I

think that's a huge issue. And these these text messages between Struck and Page, which you know, my colleague at the Hill, John Solomon, broke this story of the weekend. They also show that they knew that there was nothing when the Special Council was appointed. They were aware, meaning Page Instruck were aware that there really was nothing about Russia collusion. So they had to reach out to the press and get the word out about well, we got this and that and and they were helping to construct

this whole thing. Well, if there was a lot of there there, they wouldn't have had to do any of that. But we know that they were trying to find a way to convince at least a portion of a portion of the public. Guys that I just make a kind of whistling sound. The way that is that what Obama does, John do We know is that it's a little bit of a whistle when he talks. I have a little bit of wistonic common you know, I don't know, it's funny. And I listened to uh a fair amount of people

on TV, and I always find that amazing. Everyone has their ticks, you know, they're their go to words, and I'm aware of what some of mine are, but I won't. I don't want to say them now. All of you are gonna write me now and say, Buck, I know what yours are. Isn't Obama's intellectual stammer that he has wit? Which which one is that? You mean you when he

goes looking up exactly look up? You know, we gotta go. Yeah, you know Obama has that thing, which I guess if you think that he's some kind of super genius, you assume that that's some level of like, oh my gosh, Obama is amazing. But for the rest of us, I think it, Well, we don't need we don't need get

an Obamba. Right now, it's gonna plenty time to talking about Obama because he's gonna the Democrats are gonna figure out really quickly that Hillary is not a a successful surrogate for them, and they're gonna to turn around and say, oh, we're really gonna need Obama out there more. And I don't think he's gonna be as good either, because Obama versus Trump on the public stage doesn't go the way

that Obama thinks it will. I'm not saying that Obama doesn't have areas where he's strong and is a problem for Trump, but he does not. Obama is not used to be made fun of. He does not. No one made no one really got to make fun of him when he was president. That was a no no. And Trump does not care and I don't think Obama can handle it. Honestly, I did also want to have our friend.

What's Devin Newness Devin Nenez Newness said the following about those text messages in FISA plane nineteen, the carter page FISA. It wasn't just that they used the Clinton Dirt two as a basis to go out and get the FISA. They also used planted news stories to corroborate the the dossier in front of the court, they actually matched this dossier, never telling him the court that actually know those were odd of news stories by the Clinton campaign, UH and

the FBI. So these these people are really dirty, really dirty. Devin Newness is right. They they were playing both sides of it right, The FBI, the people involved in this investigation. The FBI were making sure that the public new certain things and they would increase the pressure so they would have a freer hand to push the investigation where they wanted, and then they also were able to operate in in secret and you know, get warrants and do all kinds

of things. You know, Peter Struck's big moment of glory when he was testifying before the Congress, the thing where he was like, oh you know, I've I've got you now, you know? Is all they was that one FBI agent without and by the way, he was the deputy Chief of count of Intelligence. He's a very senior FBI agent, But one guy. I couldn't get through all these different layers of review without other people figuring out what's going on.

That's just not true generally speaking. Whoever is lead or point some of these things would be given a lot of difference by his colleagues. And if it's just a question of you showing some some bad judgment, I don't think people are gonna stand up the deputy Chief Encounter Intel because what what if, by the way, what if he did all this stuff and and Hillary does win?

You know, now he's on the right side of the angel, so to speak, and everyone's gonna say, oh, well, it was a good thing that you were willing to step in and make sure we protected our democracy with Hillary Hello, that we were going to make sure that Hillary has her rightful place. You know, the impulse in this country for dynastic politics, this notion that we should have political families. You know, I don't know why people won't. More people

aren't on my team with this one. We do not need people based on their last name to be in office. We do not need it. We need to stop this from happening. But I suppose that's a conversation weren't for another time that Look, the text messages about Struck and Page tell the tale. They were leaking. They were dirty.

There was nothing, there's no rush a collusion, and the whole point of this investigation was to get at the Trump team and to take people down, and to also justify investigative steps that had already been taken by the anti trumpers. So it's exactly what you and I have been saying along, folks. It's exactly what our discussion, our analysis has been has been saying. I want to talk to you about the Bob woodwork book coming up here in a second. So I've read a whole bunch of

it over the weekend. Let me tell you. Part of it is that it's but there's some stuff in there. We'll get to that. Stay with me. The black rifle coffee revolution is underway, my friends, and it is sweeping away all of that comic coffee that you don't want to drink, that you don't need to drink, and replacing it with a patriotic brew. My friends, that's what you want. I'm telling you right now, I have converted so many people in my office to black rifle. They see the

k cups on my desk. I keep a little stash, and I'm I'm making friends left and right because they are all like, hey, I don't want that crappy car fee that just comes in those corporate boxes. I want black rifle coffee because I love America veterans and delicious, absolutely delicious coffee. Look, it's just a lot better, folks. The quality of black rifle coffee is better than what you're getting in a vast majority of office spaces unless you have some little European guy named Alfonse who is

measuring the foam on your latte. You want black rifle coffee. I'm telling you got a Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck again Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck and you'll get fifteen off your order. Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Did you, Bob Woodward hear anything in your research in your interviews that sounded like espionage or collusion? I did not, And of course I looked for it, looked forward hard, and uh so you know,

there we are. We're gonna see what Mueller has and doubt maybe right, he has something that doubt in the president. Don't know about secret witness or somebody who has changed their testimony, as you know, that often happens, and that can break open or turn a case. But you've seen no collusion, No collusion, says Woodword, just like he's borned from the Trump talking points there, right, no collusion got to be all caps though with an exclamation point or else.

It's not really clear. I mean, what are we really talking about, your folks, We're talking about collusion? No collusion. Uh. The Woodword book, I've been reading it. I'm I'm not quite through it. I got I don't know. I'm probably who cares into it. Um. One thing I'll say is that is that there's a lot in there that's well known and kind of already known by everybody. So I guess wood Word finds Woodword sees part of his role

as as chronicling the administration. You know, he's he's somebody who's telling you, taking you through the whole story and all of it. I would also know that wood Word is not anywhere near as gifted a writer as you'd be led to believe based on all the hype around him. His his his prose a little boring. It's very kind of sterile, and there's there's just not there's no swagger

in it. That's that's the best way I can say it. Uh. And and also think that this I I just read this, and I said, there's no way that anybody can have these these recollections this clearly, I just I don't buy it.

If somebody asked me what was said in my editorial meeting today for let's say, for Rising, you know, if they asked me what was said on that meeting twelve hours later, I mean, if they jog my memory, I might be able to tell them, yeah, we kind of talked about that topic, but chances are I'm not going to remember much of anything. And the recreations he does of these conversations in the book and he does it

all over the place. He just reads a little bit like a Hollywood screenplay, like, oh, and this guy says this, and then that guy said that, and then he's got kind of the timing in there of what the response was. And you know, I think what I think what really

does is that he opens uh. The reason he gets he gets a lot of access because of his name and all that Woodword and Burgenstein, and I understand, but his particular style is all about if you cooperate with him, you get to be one of the creators of this narrative. You don't get to create it entirely, but at least you get to say and you get to maybe get your cool one liner in there. And remember he keeps it all anonymous. So do you want the opportunity to

make yourself sound good? Then you gotta talk to Woodward. Do you want the opportunity to make it sound like you're the smart person in the room. If you don't talk to Woodward, the other people in the room will talk to him. And so you feel like, well, I might as well have some voice in this whole process. But that all men might make for good access and an interesting book. I'm not sure it makes for an

accurate book at all. And I know General Madison, some others have come out and said that they are not accurately quoted, or there are other parts of the bo that are that are problematic, and that does not surprise me in the least. But I can tell you that so far it's really unimpressive. You know, it makes me want to It makes me I just want to shoot that. That doesn't mean anything, do you remember that, Mike, I

want to shoot? Uh No, but it makes me want to read maybe I'm a Rosa's book or finish Fire and Fury, Fire and Fury. I'll say this, it might have been made up, but at least it was really good reading. It was really entertaining. Woodward's books so far is pretty boring. I'm a Ross's book, I'm sure has a lot of fiction in it, but it probably has a little more sass and a little more panash than

than what worldwards God. But yeah, I didn't find any collusion, folks, because there is no collusion, because, as I've said to you from the very beginning of this investigation, it wouldn't even make sense for there to be collusion. It doesn't make sense, there is no reason for Trump to have done to ord to do it, put aside whether he'd

be willing to do it the bad idea. It's a highly ineffective way to try to throw an election, and the risks are enormous, And because there was enormous, he didn't do it, because if he had done an he'd be caught. You know, this is everything else at this point is kind of just nonsense. I want to talk a bit hurricane politics though, Oh yes, that's still happening.

We'll get to that in just a moment. The President continuing to dispute the official death toll of close to three thousand people in Puerto Rico, carelessly spreading conspiracy theories. Donald Trump has become the conspiracy theorist in chief. He's in the most powerful office in the world, and he's

promoting conspiracy theories. The President continues to spread conspiracy theories even about hurricanes, suggesting the death toll in the wake of Hurricane Maria was inflated by Democrats to make him look bad. Death told denialism. There's an interesting new phenomenon. This is hurricane denialism. It's modern day holocaust stile, modern

day holocaust denial. Now, I want you to remember how they fixate on that term denialism here when it comes to Trump and his response to what was what wasn't political, tax folks, it was political. The way that they came at him on on the hurricane in Puerto Rico and the aftermath of it. They have never counted the number before, and they've never counted it that way. And this idea that you're gonna say the three thousand people were killed

by a hurricane. Anytime you say that, people assume that three thousand people died from the actual storm, not three thousand people died on an island in excess an island of millions of people, in excess of what we would expect because of different infrastructure situation and and because of you know, lack of electricity or whatever the case. Maybe, I mean, there was a lot. You know. They keep

saying the official death count is three thousand. They don't know the real number is seven hundred, which I would note over a six month period is is a statistically not a particularly huge variation in a death count. Remember, we're talking about people that are dying from old age. Do people are dying from diseases they had before the hurricane. Now you know the promisee this, I fall into the trap now right, you fall into the trap right away.

But they used they come up with these statistics. And when you say the statistics are are inflated or are are problematic in some way, then you're heartless. So your only response, the only response that for Trump that's really allowed, is to sit there and say, yeah, you're right, I guess I just don't care about Puerto Rico. I guess the the massive federal response that we had was just

in my imagination. And you know, that's your only option because if you challenge them on the numbers, if you challenge them on the reality of what they did or did not do to try to get to this three thousand uh, they just say that you're you're a mean person. They say that you're you're a bad human being. And and this is this is why, you know, Democrats play all these games so dirty. They played this one very dirty.

And I think that the way that they've been able to try to connect Maria, as I've been saying all along to the Bush administration response to Katrina, this is this is it's like they have a playbooks as though they they get Democrats all in the room, they say, how do we really tarnish this president? How do we really hurt him when it comes to the elections. But the denial ism point, just remember this, they say to

denialism is a very loaded word for Democrats. They will say this about climate change, right, your climate change denier, or you're engaging in climate change denialism. And when you try to push back on this, what you realize is that there using that term specifically because it evokes Holocaust

denial in the mind. Right, That's why they're they're calling just like you know, uh, By the way, I don't think a lot of people know this, but the term uh, neo conservative was was coined early on by liberals And it was not that there's any kind not that there's really anything to connect in neo conservative with neo nazi, but they just knew that there was a there was a connectivity in people's minds about it. So that's why

they were like neo conservative. That was what the the the the origins of this, that was what they were going for. So the terminology absolutely matters. And to say it's denialism is and that one guy who I didn't know what that was. That one person on TV said that they're engaging in dialism, denialism, akin of what happened to Holocaust. Um, folks, this is a it was a natural disaster for which the federal government and I'm not guessing. I spoke to the rep in Congress for Puerto Rico.

She said in no uncertain terms that there was a tremendous response. There was a lot of resources. We sent them so much stuff that they couldn't handle all this stuff we sent. You know. Part of this is also that nobody on the island of Puerto Rico, uh or rather nobody in the media talking about the response in Puerto Rico, wants to look at what was the response like on the island itself, What was local government able to do, what was the what was the standing of

the power grid before this hurricane even hit? But you know, this is this is why they set it up the way they do, because even just talking to about this right now, trying to get to a more honest place with regard to the the hurricane situation and and all the all the rest of it. Um, they say you're they say you're mean, and you're you're falling into their trap, which is, oh my gosh, three thousand people died and you don't even care. Oh my gosh, how could you

be so so heartless about all of this? So far, it looks like, um, well, I I guess we're in the we're still in kind of the worst phase of the flooding in in North Carolina. Um. But it's the response so far has been I think what would be expected. I won't say it's good or it's bad, but it's it's what would be expected. The death toll has risen

to twenty people in the Carolinas. I'll be very curious to see, you know, if this uh, you know, afterwards, if they're gonna do the same kind of methodology as they didn't in Maria to see what the long term effects of this are. My guests would be that we'll have a much more accurate account, um, and that will

mean that the number is actually much lower. And then they'll say, we'll see Trump cares more about people in North Carolina, because you know, the Carolina actually vote for the president, and Trump doesn't care about people Puerto Rico. And let's be honest about it too, They say, that Trump doesn't care about Puerto Rico because of racism. I mean,

I think they've been pretty open about that. They they really think that Donald Trump has been uh, has has turned a blind eye, has been disinterested in the fate of Puerto Rico after Maria, because it is full of the island has Puerto Ricans on it, I mean not all Puerto Ricre, but a lot of the people on the islander Puerto rican and and they've been saying this, I mean they've been saying along the Trump is racist.

So in the Carolina is that one apply? We'll see, But you know there are one of our continuing theses here on the show is just that everything is political. But you know, you see that whether absolutely falls into that and into that category now. And i'd also note, folks, um, you know, people died during Hurricane Sandy. I remember it, you know, remember and then remember with Chris Christie and

the hug on the beach with Obama. I mean, York City was in terrible shape, and there were whole parts of New Jersey that were essentially on the Jersey shore that were basically swept away, and there was not this effort to blame Obama because we all realized I didn't look, I didn't blame Obama. I'm like, it was a really bad storm. It's not it's not Obama's fault. Obama couldn't have done anything about it, because this is a normal

rational response to these things. You know, it's terrible, it's a tragedy, but you know, there there is a time when you got to say, yes, stuff happens. And Sandy was a stuff happened situation. And I was there, and I was you know, it affected me, and it was, uh, you know, it was for a lot of people, incredibly painful because they lost their homes and there were people who lost their lives. There are people who got swept

away by the storm surge. So you know, Sandy was was the other version of how the media covers a or or doesn't really cover a media a weather event. They were not tying into Obama at all. It was not something that in any way, shape or form, they put on the Obama administration. And I'm just I'm telling you if they had wanted to, if they had really looked into what they could have told those stories. This

is where we see the bias. This is where you have the uh you know that the recurring bias that that goes on with the mainstreams narrative all the time, and you know that's they're gonna try to find a way to make the Florence you have, you know, a hurricane Florence. You've had all this prep time and the federal government saying you've got to get ready for this, and you've got to be prepared for for everything, and

all the warnings and brock Long out there. If there is anything at all that they can pin on Trump, that they will, And that's why a lot of this just gets drowned out. After a while, you reach this point where you say, you know what, I it's it's always Trump's full. If everything is Trump's fault, that it starts to feel like nothing is Trump's full, if everything is oh my god, Trump is the worst guy ever. Then you get this place you say, well, you know,

are they being objective about anything? There's one more note here. I saw this. I saw the very well known photo. Now these dogs that were in a cage. I read earlier that it turns out that the owner of the dogs hadn't left on The owner was in medical need and and was being rescued at the same time as the dogs are being rescued. So that is, assuming that's true, that's different than what the initial sense of that story was.

I gotta tell you. And I know this is focusing on one little little part of all this, but you know, I know my own family, for example, and I know that if there were if there were a hurricane and a storm surge and for some reason, you know, the family dog couldn't come with us, my mom would be there, you know, up to her waist holding the dog, waiting for waiting for reinforcems, waiting for help to come. I mean, these people who leave their dogs behind, I just I don't.

I can't. I cannot in any way understanding enrages me and I can't in any way understand it. And that that they have to put out all these public service announces and saying don't leave your dog behind. You know, it makes me wish that there was like licensing for dogs. But you know, then again that would be big government, so we don't really want that. Hopefully, these dogs that are being saved, because a lot of them are going

to get adopted quickly. I'm sure that will happen. Um, we have much more coming up, teams, so stay right there. If it isn't Hillary in November, does your act change? Does you'll out my actual change because I'll need to learn to speak Spanish because I will move to Spain win, I'm moving to Africa. I need the coming to your country if you'll let me in our Canada. I'm also reserving my resid my ticket to get out of here. If he wins, maybe it's time for me to move.

I can't afford to go. He can't possibly really be trying to be elected to become president. I get my house in another country just in case, so we'll always be that threatened to leave the country, and I will leave that. I'm pretty sure they haven't. Producer Mike, can we get a fact check on that? That's a fun little montage. Uh, not not much in the way of not much in the way of celebrities leaving the country because of Trump's election. Why do people even think that

that's a threat? You know, what are we supposed to care like? We we can't handle life without a few of these entertainers who are fiercely clinging to whatever privileged perch they they have. That that's usually the case, but we couldn't exist without them staying here. You know that this is because the the era of Trump derangement syndrome and which we find ourselves is one where the the

culture now rewards people for saying insane things about the president. Uh. You see this with what's what's the crazy redhead who did the thing with the beheading with the Trump you know Griffin, Kathy Griffin. She was actually on my show recently, but not this show on on Rising, and I didn't get a chance to interview her. It was one of my colleagues. But she has been elevated because of this. You know, this is there's really a perverse incentive, folks.

I mean when you stand up and say you're gonna leave the country because you don't like who the president is, as long as it's a Republican and especially if it's Trump, there's never this moment for people like that, for these different celebrities and these whiners, when they have to step back and say, hold on a second. You know, maybe I love the country more than I love the president or the presidency. You know, maybe I love America more than I love My ideas being reflected back to me

by whoever's in power all the time. You know, they don't take that approach. They take the the tantrum approach, you know, they take the cry baby, whiney approach to things. And what I think is so interesting about that is that they are rewarded for it. That people think that, oh, man, you know, you you've shown us how much you really. The fact that you even say that you would leave the country, it just shows how much you care. Man, you know, it just shows us how much. And then

you you look at someone like a Kathy Griffin. She is now bigger than ever before. She's traveling all over the world, and she's this martyr for the cause. And that's why I and this ties into the whole cabin all things today to I don't want to hear it anymore, where people do something that is not brave, that is not hard, and that will benefit them personally and professionally, in this case, trashing a Republican or trashing Trump, and then act like there's some kind of martyr. I I

just don't. I can't deal with it anymore. We see this over and over again. You know, whoever it is, whether it's you know, some fired FBI flak who some some flunkey from d O J who all of a sudden has you know, a bank account with half a million dollars in it because hashtags instance. I mean, the left takes care of their people, and if you take

one for the team, they have your back. It's one of the most powerful things about progressivism is that the institutions and the cultural uh, the the cultural capital of the progressive left is used for its fighters all the time. And that's why the celebrity is saying this stuff. It's just so funny to me, and this is a way of advancing, this is a way of going forward with

their careers. But they act like it's gonna be such a big thing, you know, as I've been saying with the Kavanaugh accuser Ford, she will no matter what happens now be considered, she'll get on the lecture circuit. She'll be giving fifty thousand dollars a speech, fifty thousand dollars of speeches, my guess pretty soon, okay, um, And and she's going to be more well known, more famous than she's ever been. She'll if she doesn't have tenure already

in her college, she'll get tenure. All these doors will open to her. But but people are gonna tell us all week, oh my gosh, it's so hard, and she's the thought that she's done this. Yeah, she's gonna get death threats from some Trump supporters, which is terrible and nobody should do that. But I know people in media who get death threats from liberals all the time, and it doesn't make them some kind of national hero. No,

no one's sitting around talking about that. But on the other side of it, they don't get anybody rushing to sign them to a big book deal or to make them make their life easier, make everything so much better for them, right, So you know, that's that's I think in another part of this that that doesn't really get

enough attention. But the it's it's like college kids. You stand up and say, I'm about to speak truth to power in an auditorium surrounded by people who agree with me, and this is gonna be hard to say, but I think Trump is a monster, and ever goes yeah, it's like, yeah, you're so save. No, you're not brave. If you say something that everybody around you will love you for and will benefit you in every possible way, that is not

That is not what brave is. You could say it's strategic, you could say it's smart, you could say it's self serving. It is not brave. The left needs a refresher on what the word brave actually needs. And it's certainly not threatening to leave the country and then not leaving, as all these celebrities we've seen have done. Buck Sextons decoding

the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, you're a great American again, this is the buck Sexton shows no. But this oslot that we're seeing does require require us not only to be vigilant, but be more aggressive and demand more, demand more of our leaders who represent basic American values of respect, decency, equality, giving hate no safe haven. This is deadly earnest. We are in a fight for america soul and we have leaders. We

have leaders. At the time when that occurred, when these guys are accompanied by white supremacists and ku klux Plan and those who objected making a comparison saying they're good people in both groups, what has become of us? Our children are listening and our silence is complicity. So thanks to you, our children, my grandchildren will grow up in the world that's far more just open minded, humane. But our work is not yet done by any stretch of

the imagination. The stakes are much too high. And as I said, we faced with an administration and some of his most ardent right wing supporters from the klu Klux Klan. The head of the ku Klux Klan is endorsed, and they all, right, who are trying to undo all the progress you have made in a little the Barack and I have made with you. Despite losing in the courts and in the court of public opinion, these forces of intolerance remained determined to undermine and roll back the progress

you all have made. This time they not you have an ally in the White House. This time they have an ally. There are small percentage of the American people, Virland people, some of them the dregs of society. And instead of the dregs of society, he says, no, I think we've had enough. I think we've had enough Biden. We've had enough Biden the dregs of society. Now, if we're really going to play this game, I think there

are dregs of society that support both political parties. But this is this is taking the whole notion of a deplorable even further and just going all in with the stuff that we've been told this entire time about Trump, even though Trump is the first president in history, and I mean this is relevant because Biden was speaking at the Human Rights Campaign's National Dinner, which is for lgbt Q rights. Biden was the first. I'm sorry, Trump was

the friend. Biden wasn't the first to do anything. Trump was the first president ever come into office waiving a rainbow k Pride flag on stage, as as he would remember that he did that before he gave one of his town halls. Trump is the first person to ever become president who is completely on board with same set marriage.

So I just think it's interesting that Barack Obama was very much against same sex marriage because politically speaking, he wanted to make sure that he had UH, particularly black churches in the South, on board for his first election and did not want to cause any problems by opposing traditional or seeming like he was not a supporter of traditional marriage. So it was just a political calculation, you see. So, but Barack was allowed to be a political calculator when

it came to UH the gay rights movement. It is not the case that any Republican would get such the benefit of the doubt. But even beyond that that a Republican don't even get any any credit for the stay in this movement. But more to the point here, Biden thinks he's running, folks, Biden really truly believes that he is the answer to what ails the country, that he is the one. Biden is the one that we have

been waiting for or um. I will tell you this is a bit, this is a little bit of a of a jaw dropper, but I do think that he is. If you look at the polling among Democrats, he is certainly one of the most favorable possible candidates for the Democratic Party going going into twenty twenty. And he thinks that he made he made a mistake by not running the last time. Now, I think Trump would have absolutely wife the floor is Biden, just because there's nothing about

Biden that's impressive. I mean, Trump, who is very good at insults, said it quite well. If it wasn't for Obama making Biden a vice president, Biden would kind of be just another senator from a state that not a lot of people pay all that much attention to. No offense Delaware. I love you, Delaware, but people tend not to lead the news cycle with what's going on. Hi, I'm in Delaware. So Biden's out there given this speech. Called then the dregs call some Trump supper. He said some,

he didn't say all. But first, the Trump supporters is the dregs of society. I would just note that there are ah plenty of folks, plenty of folks on all sides of the political spectrum who none of us would want to be associated with or hang out with. But it is only the Democrats who consistently get away with this pretense that you know, we have to have every Republican, every candidate has to be asked, hey, you know, what do you think of David Duke? Which is the ultimate

political version of the when did you stop beating your wife? Question? Hey, what do you think about the neo Nazi? Just being asked about it is a way of tainting anybody who gets gets the question thrown their way, So you know, that's why they're still talking. But by the way, have

you seen David Duke anywhere since the election? No? I I almost think that David Duke is some kind of a Democrat plot where they hold him in some basements somewhere and then they they let him out just when there's a Republican who has a real shot of winning a national election. They're like, oh, it's time to unleash the David Duke and and they let him go. And then he runs around and says, you know, I support

the person on the right. Meanwhile, I mean, you could do the same thing, and you never hear this, but there is an American Communist Party still. Do you know who the American Communist Party support in the last election, Well, actually, I'm not sure if it was. I think it was Hillary, It could have been Bernie Well. In the general they

supported Hillary. So there you go. That's right. Do you ever hear that the American Communist Party supports the Democrat No, of course not, because no one in the media wants to talk about that. And they would say to you, oh, well, that's because the American Communist Party is irrelevant, to which I would say, yes, so is David Duke. Why are

we even talking about this? But Biden is um somebody who has mistaken has this mistaken belief that the rhetorical gifts and and political skills of Barack Obama have somehow translated to him. I can assure you all they have not. I know you already know that although he is not the only Democrat retread that is clearly angling for a come back. It's not just Biden, folks, there's another one. Hello, she's back, She's bad, She's ready for action. Hillary Clinton, folks,

I you know this. I have been saying all along. He's like, bug, tell me it's not true. It is accepting. Go gosh, Mom, I have a cold. I can't really do the Hillary voice right now. Uh. The fact of the matter is that Hillary is still doing stuff that I don't think she'd be doing unless she still wanted to be a player. And Hillary has new interest in being a player for anybody else. Folks. Hillary, it does not have any interest in, uh, just helping the party

for the sake of the party. I don't think he really cares about Democratic Party. Hillary cares about the Clinton Party, and she doesn't want that party to stop in. No party like a Clinton Party, because the Clinton Party involves a lot of corruption. She wrote an editorial in the Atlantic, kind of interesting choice much or why she started to go with the Atlantic? American Democracy is in crisis. Our democratic institutions and traditions are under siege. We need to

do everything we can to fight back. What does this even mean? That our institutions and traditions are under siege? I hear this a lot. This. This is meaningless to me. Under siege? How what institution is under siege? Now? What? Oh? The media, the incredibly hyperpartisan and uh and you know, one sided mainstream media. They're they're getting some pushback. Oh. No, I thought the media was all about the free expression of ideas. I didn't think that the media needed some

kind of socially enforced monopoly. I thought that they would just impress us all with their great work. I didn't think that we had to sit around and worry about and whether the media was feeling like they were getting enough love. Yeah, here we are, um, here we are with Hillary. Oh. The first line in this piece is fantastic. It's been nearly two years since Donald Trump won enough

electoral College votes to become president United States. On the day after, in my concession speech, I said, we owe him an open mind and the chance to lead. I hope that my fears were overblown. They were not. I just love them that she starts with one enough Electoral College votes to become president of the United States. That's another way of saying one the election. Hillary, That's right,

that's how you win the election. This is the among the the stupid talking points and childish tantrums that you see from Democrats. This fixation on the popular vote as though it means something is one of the most is one of the just the most pathetic. Really, Yeah, there's a reason folks that Republicans go go to certain states battleground states because they know they're not gonna win New York.

They know they're not gonna win California. They would spend more resources and more time and messaging on some of the mega blue states if it were a popular vote count because and by the way, people like me who have lived in New York basically their whole adult lives were Republicans would actually, I mean I vote, but other people would go out and vote who wouldn't vote because they realized that it actually doesn't matter. It doesn't just get kind of canceled out because all the electoral votes

go to the Democrats. So anyway, it's a different race. But Hillary wrote this editorial, it's it's the usual stuff. Trump is a liar, Trumps the words Trump is terrible. It's this long editorial and you know where it is, folks. This is Hillary trying to keep her name out there, trying to be a part of the hashtag resistance. Because I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton thinks she's running for president again.

You think I'm crazy, That's fine. She is waiting in the wings for her opportunity, and she thinks she's gonna get it. The FBI says home title theft is one of the fastest growing crimes out there. Brace yourselves, because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for when a thief steals your home's title. Look, folks, it's not hard for the bad guys to do this, and they go after Americans. Remember, the thieves are all over the world. They don't have to be near you.

They just need internet access. They take you, they find your home's title, they replace your name with an alias, and then they borrow to the hilt. They use your equity for the purpose of securing a loan. They take that money, then you get stuck with the loan payments.

Identity theft monitoring does not protect you. But you know what does home title lock for just pennies today at home title Lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home registered now and you can get a free screening, folks. Check it out for yourself, a free analysis. It's a hundred dollar value free when you go to a home title lock dot com. Again, that's home tidle lock dot com to protect your most viable asset, your family's home. Check it out. Why do we have to mix football?

You know, the season just started, it was so much this patriotic bulls, you know, the flyovers and the flag on the field and the singing and the baseball. It has two songs now, like I forgot that they sing the national anthem at the beginning of the seventh inning, like I forgot what country I'm in? And six endingsland. You know, I think it's kind of funny that that you're here and now that was obviously Bill Moore, who

likes to be a little provocative. But you know, if things were going a little differently, meaning that if if the left had one this one over the anthem, uh, then I think they feel very differently about it now. They want to either just forget about it, move on

past it. Because I think that a lot of players realized that as much as the NFL is a major American sports franchise and as much as it's uh generating billions of dollars of revenue, people care more about patriotism and respecting the troops than they do about who's going to win the next NFL game. And that's true of a lot of Americans. Um. And I think that that's another you see, it's one of these moments where the left it's like, Okay, well, what's with all that stuff? Anyway?

Who cares? Let's move on to something else. And it's because if if push came to shove, they weren't really going to to win with this one. This was not good. This was not going to be a winning issue for them. You know. I also saw over the weekend not that not that I'm gonna start talking to you about sports a lot. I know it's not really my area. I don't sound like somebody who because I don't watch much sports,

but I I had two things. One is that I watched a boxing match with Canela and Triple G because my older brother likes boxing, so we had some bro time, actual bro time where we watched a boxing match together and John, do you know that costs eighty dollars to watch that thing on pay per view? Now, I know how these fighters get a hundred million dollar pers or whatever. Uh. And also they call it a purse. I was found

that kind of funny. Um. But you know, I I watched boxing, and the problem of boxing is if you grew up watching the Rocky movies, you're used to people just throwing these giant haymakers and just clocking each other all the time. And then when you watch an actual boxing match, it's so very different. I mean, there's so much more. Um. You know, I don't know science to its sweet, the sweet science of boxing. I watched some boxing over the weekend. That was a reminder of why

I generally don't watch much boxing. But also some some stats came out, some stats came out about the whole Serena Williams phenomenon. I'm gonna keep it short on the sports stuff today, but I did think it was worth noting that there was there was this whole storyline out there that Serena Williams, you will recall through it antrum and she got into trouble, and of course she she said that it was sexist and maybe even racist. That

was implied. No one said that. But usually when Serena Williams gets in trouble, there'll be people who say that that it somehow race plays a factor. And I know that those who believe in intersectionality in American society, the idea that all these different groups are competing and oppressing one another and we have to balance that out. That uh, race is always a factor. That's what we're told. We're

told that race is always a factor. So Sir Serena Williams lost her her lost her cool and engaged in a tantrum of sorts. And you know we we then were told that it was because she was a female. And you know, she she broke a rackete. I mean, she did some bad stuff and she said that a man would have gotten away. This became a line a man would have gotten away with it. Well, Jason Whitlock, who is a sports analyst, that I here's actually pretty thoughtful. Um,

not that I would know. I don't really know much about sports analysts, but he has all the numbers here compiled for all fines from the United States Tennis Association from eighteen. And who wants to guess whether men or women get more fines for unsportsmanlike conduct and bad behavior in the court. Anyone to take a guess. Men get a much higher number of fines for these things. Racket abuse men sixty six women, Audible obscenity men three four

women a hundred forty. Unsportsmanlike conduct men two seven, women sixty seven. Now I bring this up for two reasons. One is that it was it was obvious to many of us right away that this notion that Serena Williams was being penalized for being a woman was preposterous, and it was that a man and would get away with it. Was just a self justifying and uh, you know, essentially get out of jail free card for losing her cool

because she was getting her butt kicked on that tennis court. Look, she's the greatest of all time, but that doesn't mean she's the greatest and when it comes to sportsmanship, and she's quite far from that. And she was getting her clock claimed on that tennis court and she didn't like it.

But but you know, you also then look at this and and notice that disparate impact is when one group claims that they are, even if it's not on a specific basis, Even if it's not something that on on each individual case is true in the aggregate, a group is affected more by something than another, and that there's something unjust about that inherently disparate impact would be for example, more young black drivers are pulled over on a stretch

of highway than anybody than anybody else. Well, you could say, is there any one incident where a black iver was unfairly pulled over? Or is this just the overall number? And the answer is disparate impact theory looks at the overall number and says, well, there must be bias here. Well, if you were to apply that to tennis and to women's well too, professional tennis in general, there's a disparate

impact against men, not against women. But we all know that the reality is men, because of testosterone and society and all the rest of it, are more likely to drop salty language. Not the only ones to do it,

but they're more likely to do it. They're more likely to smash things because men like smash, and so this all makes sense to us, right, But when you look at the numbers that Serena Williams thing was all alive, but now now everyone's kind of moved on from it, they forgot I mean, I obviously haven't, because I found the whole thing very distasteful, and I thought it was really mean that Osaka, who had one our first uh one, her first major tournament, had it really stolen from her

in terms of her moment of glory by Serena Williams tantrum. But social justice and the ideology of the left came into this, and once again, social justice, what's wrong. There's no question that social media can be a pretty gross place. You've seen it, I've seen it, But that doesn't mean that it's always that way. In fact, one of the great things about social media is that I can talk to many of you. I have a much better way to connect with you than I ever would have before.

And occasionally, just occasionally, there is an opportunity for something really fun or coincidental to happen on social media. So I had my older brother down in the swamp with me down in d C this past weekend, and he, among many things, is the co founder of an incredible muffin company you can check out if you want to check them out and just go to Susie's dot com and you'll see they have these gluten free, really good ingredient,

delicious tasting muffins. But we went to this food show where you have all these innovative food brands that show up, and it's mainly for people in the industry, but I got to try all kinds of stuff. Man, there was some amazing Imagine walking around a huge convention center and it's just all of the newest and most delicious granola bars and jerky and different sweet treats and chocolates and all kind I mean, it was just everything was there.

I mean they had so much uh delicious food, I mean really snacks, but delicious food that they were handing out to people. So we're hanging out. My my brother mentioned something to me because he said, I forget even how it came up, but I said something like, you know, James Woods of Twitter accounts really funny. You should follow it.

You know, he's he's really sharp guy. And my brother told me, and I didn't realize this at the time, well, you know, James Woods was friends with grandma, with our grandmother, And I said, what do you what do you mean? James Woods was friends with our grandmother. I didn't. I didn't know that, and it seemed like pretty rare and him thing to find out. And he said, yeah, I know a long time ago when when my grandmother was a uh an actress, not really professionally, but did did

a fair amount of a theater here and there. And I think she did do some paid work. I know she had been a commercial model. But my grandmother was in a play and she was quite a bit older than James Woods. He was just starting out his career and they got along very well, and she thought very highly of him. And you know, they worked together on this play for a whole season or whatever you call it, when the play goes on. So James Woods tweeted something at me last night, and I figured, you know what,

I'm just gonna give this a go. I'm wondering if this family lore is true. So I responded to him as an aside, my mother recently told me that you were acquainted with my dearly departed grandmother Jean, a wonderful and elegant woman. I believe you did a play with her many years ago. I wanted to tell you that Grandma Jean thought of you as brilliant, funny and talented. Well. James Woods soon thereafter responded, I always said Jean was

the best judge of character. Seriously, Jean was a lovely woman. I'm sorry she is no longer with us, Buck, but I guarantee she enriched the lives of all she knew. She made mine better in the early starving actor days for sure. Now, that was a really nice little message from James Woods. I have to say, I've always thought he was a good actor, and I know he's also

obviously a good guy. And it's just so funny. What a small world that my grandmother many many years ago would have been acting in a play with James Woods. And then without either of us ever knowing, we're interacting on Twitter, and turns out that we have this connection and he totally remembers her. So I thought that was kind of fun. You know, occasionally social media is not

the terrible cesspool of the worst of humanity. Occasionally there's something that comes from it that's a kind of fun and nice, other than talking to all of you, which is always fun and nice. That's why always say use the roll call for Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton Grandma Jeans was amazing. Many of you listening to this would have really liked her. She was a devout Catholic, but she was really into the theater. Obviously she did this play with James Woods. She was into ballroom dancing.

She would tell us to listen. She was a big proponent of listening to the music, kind of that music from the you know, the thirties and the forties. Um, so you know, I think you you know Frank Sinatra and all that. She's she was truly one of a kind, an elegant woman, and she's very much missed. She was a throwback to another era and all in all the best ways. And I just thought it was so funny that James Woods and her knew each other. So anyway, it was nice, and I appreciated James being so so

gallant and uh and friendly about the whole thing. We We have roll call, which is going to become up here in just a moment, team, so get ready for that. You know. That's always that's always exciting stuff. And I get to hear from all of you, So that's coming up. Stay with me. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party, Because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Alright,

roll call time. Let's see what we got here. First, up, and if you want to be a part Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton, very easy way to reach out to me and the rest of the team. We have Darby up first, our brother Darby, he writes, and had a feeling I wasn't alone on the whistling. Thank you, Buck, and thank you the rest of the freedom hunt that suffer along with me. By the way, I bought some E O D Fudge today as soon as I heard Aaron and michaela on your show. They're both American heroes,

Shields High Well Derby. I'm sure that fudge is gonna taste extra delicious. So thank you so much for checking it out and always good to hear from you, Ted writes. Buck Kavanaugh's mistake was his unequivocal denial. Heck, I was once stumbling drunk in high school. I can't remember much else. That is what Kavanaugh should have said, because it would have given him a necessary measure of believability. These carte blanche carte blanche denials that suspects issue are too cute

by half. Well, Ted, I gotta say I disagree with you on this one, because if he said that he didn't remember anything, uh, then he would in fact be in in much worse shape. Uh. So that's that's I think what you you need to keep in mind here. I mean, if if he had said I don't know what happened, then whatever the accusers has happened is the only record of what happened. So I don't think that. I don't think on this when your advice would be

a good idea for Kavanaugh. Uh, Paul, Right, Why is no one criticizing Cortes for woman splaining in a three thousand dollar outfit while trying to relate to economically disaffected people, Paul, Some people did criticize her for that, and she this is about Occasio. Alexandra Ocasio Cortes. People did criticize her, and then in response to all of this, she said that she did not get to keep the clothing. It was part of a photo shoot, so she felt that

criticism was unfair. Um. I prefer to focus on her policy instead of her fashion choices, because her policy is uh humorous enough for for for my money without having to get into any discussion of how she chooses to dress herself or what she wears. But I appreciate hearing from you, Paul, Uh, Ralph, right here we go. Uh. This post was removed by Facebook. I am repeating it. Um I am. If it is again removed, I will verify social media political agenda bias f y I, boys

and girls. I am a conservative Republican and support Donald Trump an percent. I vote straight ticket. I'm also an avid hunter and owned many guns. I harvest and eat wild game. I support the n r A. I don't think I am special. I support your right to do legally as you choose. I all support your right to speak freely. However, if you okay, if you choose to express your opinion of my way of being with insults, I support my right to block you. Okay, Ralph, thanks

for the update. Good to talk to you, Carol writes. I'm a fan. You asked well, Carol, I'm a fan. Thank you for writting, and you asked for a series to watch. Try Bosh on Amazon, fauda in Israeli series, and border Town, a finished series on Netflix. Try Deep State and Berlin Station on Epic, and try Borrigan on MHz. Based on listening to you, I think you'd like all of them. Wow, a lot of a lot of foreign stuff. Danish suite, s BR Spigen. I'll have to check out

and the finished series too, that'll be interesting. I tried an episode of Berlin Station and I liked it, so I should go back and give it a second shot. I think I thought it was pretty good. Michael writes, listen to some of Obama speeches. He can't miss it. His lisp especially noticeable when he's lying using some of his strong man arguments, are trying to sound legit. It's clear as a bell um. Alright, Michael, Well, I will go back and listen to some of his I've never

picked that up. I don't know what's wrong with me. I just somehow it just didn't just didn't happen for me. Never heard it, Jim Rights, roll call, Sorry, Jack, Ryan is a waste of time, terrible production from makeup to the acting. Not sure what you saw in it either than a reflection of your awesome life. Maybe we are spoiled with the high quality of Netflix and HBO, etcetera. Amazon. Amazon looks like they got new HD cameras like back

in the early two thousand's. I quit after the first one, but watched two more because you spoke highly of it. From what I saw, they were trending towards sympathizing with Muslim extremists. Shields High. You know, Jim, I think you, buddy, Buddy, I think you bailed a little early on this one.

I can't speak to the production value part of it, although Amazon is one of the wealthiest companies in the world, so I feel like they can probably pay for whatever they want to pay when it comes to their series. But maybe in this one they got a little a

little tight fisted. I don't know. But as for sympathizing with Muslim extremists, look, the show has the bad guys as actual gee hottests and doesn't do the whole Oh they're ge hottest, but they're actually they're actually being run by a Blackwater like organization of Americans, you know, some nonsense like that. So the bad guys are g hottests, and I that doesn't change from what I can gather. So I think it's pretty good, my friend. I don't know.

We're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. Look, there's some stuff that's ridiculous, I've but it's a TV show. I don't want to be that guy who sits around. It's like, well, you know, it's not the most realistic thing I've ever seen. I mean, there's some things here and things here aren't exactly realistic, and I just think, you know, it should be more realistic. That's not fun

for anybody. Sorry, But by guys, by the way, about my voice that I had a cold over the weekend, so I woke up with a cold on Sunday, Allen writes, Buck, totally enjoy your take on current affairs. I wonder if you think that c Ford would have come out with her accusation if the nominee for Supreme Court was a choice of the Democrats instead of Republicans. This is separate from whether the accusation is true or not. Perhaps some bias on her part. Regarding this, Alan, I think it's

a political hit. I've been very clear about that. If there's new evidence, I'll change my mind if I think that that's required. I mean, if I think that that's where the facts lead us. But I think this is a political hit, pure and simple. I do not I do not believe this woman. I do I do not believe her, so that that's not to say that I would never believe her, but based on what I've been told so far, and I would just know, there's no point in telling me old buck if to wait. There's

no process, but I'll hear her testimony. Sure, that's but that's in a sense going with your gut feeling as well, because there's no official process, there's no not gonna be adjudication of what happened there. And I don't believe her. I think that it's a little to the whole thing's a little too convenient. The timing is a little too convenient, the nature the allegation when it was released that she took a polygraph before she didn't want it to come out,

but she had already polygraphed herself. The whole thing feels a little just it's it's too too much of a coincidence, and I'm not I'm not buying it. Also, doesn't remember

the house. I'm sorry. I can't remember any time in my life where something important happened in a in a location and I have no idea what the location was, so I I have a very tough time with that too, because keep in mind, folks, if she if she could tell you what the house was or what time of year was she maybe, you know, if she is a fabricator, what if Kavanaugh was out, you know, at the beach with his family. What if you could prove that he

was away by saying it was at a party. And you know, how is he supposed to be able to fight back against that she can't tell him where it was or when it was. That's quite an allegation. Um, all right, another one here, James retz Buck, I'm shocked that you've never noticed that annoying Obama whistle. I almost feel bad for you, because now that you've been made aware of it, you'll have to suffer with it like

the rest of us. Thank God he's no longer president, so hopefully we won't have to suffer much more of it. Shields high Man, James, I gotta go. You guys are gonna really do this to me. You're really gonna do this to me. You're gonna make me go back and listen to some Obama speeches. That's what has to happen. I mean, team, I'll do it. I'll do it for you, but I'm gonna to go back and listen to a whole bunch of Obama. That's uh, that's that, Jim right.

Daniel Patrick moynihan was a senator from New York, not New Jersey. Shrillery held his former seat. Now it's Jill a brand pretty stinky seat. I have some deep dive info about moynihan if you're interested. Oh, Jim, thanks for the correction, Thanks for the heads up. Good to hear from you. Uh run rights. Hold on a second, where whoa hey buck and joined the new show is always? I had two quick notes like you. I found my public speaking class to be one of my most valuable courses,

but it almost got me arrested. Wow. N seven my senior year in high school. Our assignment was to speak on a controversial topic. I took it a heart and proposed legalizing pot. Never used it, but part of my premise was that it's a gateway. It's gateway properties were at least due in part where he had to buy it um. Before I got to my next class, I was hustled off the school security office. They interpreted my familiarity with the subject matter to mean I was a

user and at worst a dealer. Wow. Second topic the attempt by Kamala Harris to smear Brett Kavanaugh by leaving out the they said part of his story regarding birth control is just like the lie that is still on President Bush regarding yellow cake uranium. And if if if not fake news, then at least fake reporting and part of why the media has deserved the mistrust shields iron. All right, Ron, thanks for writting in my friend. Good to hear from you, Max, Right, is this where listeners

submit roll call messages? Well, Max, your question made it under roll call and I just wrote back to you. Yes, it is where people put roll call messages. Randall writes, Buck, I heard you on radio tonight, dream by commute at home and always it makes my drive more tolerable, tolerable

here in southern California. You asked about Netflix recommended series are several that I like her Altered Carbon Slasher, Mine Hunter, and on Amazon, I like Eureka, Grim, Hannibal, The First American, Lafayette, The Lost Hero, Bosh, John Adams, burn Note is Evil Dead and Army of Darkness, and Ash Versus The Evil Dead series on Showtime Billions is very good and last man Standing. Randall, you are a fault of information when

it comes to series on TV. My friend, thank you for writing in I'm not to take notes on some of this um and uh. Also, former Navy veteran and Black Rifle coffee drinker and Strike Force energy user Randall, you are a superstar Team buck member. Thank you so much. Shields Hie to you as always as well. Team. That's it for today in the hut, I'm gonna try to drink some throat coat tea and get myself back in action for tomorrow. Please do a share word of this podcast,

spread it far and wide. I'm excited to be with you as always, Shields High Snippy dot com folks, if you heard of it yet, you should because if you're tired of all of these left wing moderators and shadow banning and all the stuff that's going on now to suppress conservative thought in social media, and you know what's happening, all right, this is a real thing that's going on

all the time. If you're sick of all that nonsense and you just want to be able to have a place where you can share your thoughts, connect with other conservatives or does anybody for that matter, and talk without fear of political bias or agenda. Snippy dot com is a new, up and coming social media site where you can post, you can follow writers, you can just get

going with the conversation. It's totally free and there's no agenda, no left wing moderators, no conversational health, none of that stuff. Go to snippy dot com. I've got on a out. You should too. Snippy dot com totally free to join, or you can try the snippy dot com app and get the conversation going.