Pence Schools Kamala

you're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts. I can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No welcome friends, Great to have you with me here on the Buck Sexton Show. And looks, let's all just take a little victory lap. Let's all just let it, let it sink in for a moment. Mike Pence gets an a great job, great job in the debate last night. Honestly, I thought substantially more effective than it even I had anticipated. And

I thought he was going to be pretty good. But this was a reminder that Pence is an undervalued asset of the Trump administration, at least in many people's eyes. This guy has been a steady hand, competent, solid, but also gentlemanly, respectful. He's a great, a great yin Yang, a great contrast, you know, counterpart to Trump. Because of all this, and Kamala was, how do we put this gently a disaster a disaster. But that shouldn't surprise anyone.

As I've been saying to you, she wasn't strong even in the Democrat primary at all. Nobody thought that she was doing a good job then. But so, how do you know that the Democrats are particularly worried about all us? How do you know that the Democrat Party doesn't feel like things went their way last night? Just by all the whining today, all the nonsense of the misdirection he was man explaining. They're saying that a lot vice presidential

debates don't matter. Let's remember they're sexism in our politics. Voters aren't ready for an assertive woman, and time to change the debate format. These are talking points coming from Democrats in the media that roughly translate to our side got crushed last night. Let's just pretend that never happened. Now. Look, the polls are all still showing Biden ahead in a lot of swing states, and you know, the election were held today, the posters would have you believe it's likely

Biden would win. I don't believe that personally. I think that they'll be wrong again, or they'll they'll all magically be within the margin of error, but always in the margin of error favoring Biden. That's what they like to do. Well, it's a you know, it's a it's a two point race, but everyone thinks Biden's up two points, and it's a two to three point margin of error. No, I don't see that the the vice presidential debate, as bad as it was for the Democrats, is not going to change

the course of this election most likely. But this is that the on the other hand, also all about just those those small slices of the of the electorate, right, the voters out there who are thinking, Look, I just want and I don't say this with any with any disrespect or any judgment. I understand there are going to be people out there who are who are good folks, who are responsible and you know, worthwhile productive members of

their community. Wherever we're talking about in Florida and Ohio and Michigan and New Hampshire and so on and so forth uh, and they're just saying, look, whoever's gonna bring back the economy the best. That's who I'm voting for.

I don't care about anything else. I understand that I don't creating necessarily that's the way people should view politics, But I can understand how people would feel that way, and for that group, for those that are going into this looking for who would do a better job on issues of actual management of the United States government in the economy. I don't think you could have watched last night's debate and come away thinking anything other than so

the Democrats are evasive, dishonest, and incompetent. That's really what you're getting. And there's been so much effort from the Democrat aligned media to try to convince people that that's not true, but you could see it last night. No, in fact, they want you to believe that Donald Trump is terrible. He's basically hitler as vice president, is a stooge, and has no thoughts of his own, doesn't do any They say all these horrible things about him all the time.

But when they can't be the ones who are just writing the narrative, when they can't be staring into the prompters on CNN and MSNBC doing the work of the DNC while pretending to be journalists. All the rest of us sit around and see what's really happening and realize that this is a weak Democrat ticket. Folks. It's weak, it is, and that has not always been the case. And I'm not judging that from what I think or like. It's what the American people want from an administration. These

Democrats are not going to provide that. So they're trying to convince people there's something other than what they actually are. The biggest wins and we'll go through some of the specifics on the policies and the exchanges, and there were a lot of them, and they were worthwhile in this debate because there were fewer interruptions and the moderator wasn't trying to do an audition for NBC News because she was already at c SPAN. So what difference does it make.

There were some good moments, but the best single thing, I mean, the one issue where you knew that they had to push and it didn't come from the moderator. It should be noted it came from Pence. He tied this up. He followed up. He made it very clear they will simply not tell you, Kamala Harris and Joe Biden and the DNC will not allow you to know, will not make a claim on either side of whether they will pack the Supreme Court. And that's just really

all you have to know. Here's Kamala trying to dance around it, trying to avoid addressing the issue. Play clip nine. Yeah, let's talk about packing the court. Then let's talk about

the pack. Yeah, I'm about to So the Trump Pence administration has been because I sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sessan as you mentioned, and I've witnessed the appointments for lifetime appointments to the federal courts, district courts, Courts of Appeal, people who are surely ideological, people who have been reviewed by legal professional organizations and found who have been did

not competent, are substandard. And do you know that if the fifty people who President Trump appointed to the Court of Appeals for lifetime appointments not one as black, this is what they've been doing. You want to talk about packing a court, Let's have that discussion. That's amazing. People should listen to that answer. On a vice presidential debate stage for years to come about what you don't want

to do as a politician. Pretend that you're being earnest, pretend that you're being forthcoming, and then for everyone to see, show them that you're actually just completely full of it. Let's let's have that conversation. You were asked a question. You're not asked a question as to whether you would like to have the conversation. You were asked yes or no. Would your administration or the administration you'd be a part of as the vice president although really should probably be

the guy I mean, sorry, the gal running things? What do you think would you do? This? Wouldn't give an answer, They will not answer. How can you trust a presidential ticket that are an issue as massive as packing the Supreme Court, which people brought up until now, even on the left, as you know, FDR was pregating to do this, and that would have been really norm busting and tyrannical and undoing our system and changing the balance of powers and everything else. How can you get away with not

answering that question. There's there's no reason other than they don't want to tell their base they won't up end this system and remake it in the image of the radical left, and they definitely don't want to tell independent swing state voters, yeah, we're full of it. We actually will do whatever we have to do in the pursuit of power, or whatever we have to do, we will do.

And that doesn't sit well with folks, especially when you've had years now of Democrats saying that Trump is undermining or sacred institutions they are trying to remake, to destroy and then remake our sacred institutions, by the way, not that they're really sacred either. I don't even like that term. But there was that evasion, and then there were other things,

the lies that came out. Pence squarely for anyone who is not utterly delusional, last night, Vice President Pence destroyed the lie that Donald Trump said that there were good people on both sides and also pointed out that this is a man who who has Jewish grandchildren, but the left keeps calling him a neo Nazi. They think that that's in any way fair or sensible or are acceptable, and it's not. I mean, they're disgusting, they are disgusting,

but that's what they're doing. And I thought Pence was excellent on that issue. I mean, he crushed the vile lie about Trump Charlottesville comment once and for all for anyone who's not suffering from stage five Trump derangement syndrome. And I wish the President had been able to lay into it when he was going up against Biden the last time around. But at least Pence got to it last night. We also saw what I've been saying all along, and it's just objective. It's just obvious at this point.

It's something that you would pick up on very quickly. Commers is just not very likable. She is a product of California machine politics. She's never had to appeal to people who aren't solid left wing Democrats. She's never had to appeal to moderates or swing voters. She just figured out who the power players were in some ways that were also unethical that no one even brings up anymore.

But she figures out who the power players were and ensconced herself in the Democrat apparatus of California and just sort of worked her worked her way up by befriending the right people, making the right allies, and running in the safest of safe places to be a left wing Democrat, particularly one who's a minority female. Because as we know diversity, they don't just say it's a strength on the left anymore.

Diversity is a requirement for many things. California just made diversity meaning racial and ethnic diversity, a requirement for company boards that are set up in California. You have to have at least one minority board member in California. Now, so Kamala comes from that left wing machinery of the Democrat Party. She's never had to be in a really tough race. She's never had to convince people that don't agree with every poll tested political consultant created phrase that

comes out of her mouth. And it was there for all to see last night, and no one could cover for her. There was no one to bail her out. And she wasn't very nice either. She's just not that likable. Now. Maybe as a person one on one, I mean, I don't know. I've never met the lady. Maybe she's fine. I have no idea. But we're talking about her political persona.

We're talking about the way that she is perceived by those who were supposed to vote for her to put her in a position of power and leadership and truth is she kind of makes Hillary look likable hollow. It really thinks that people thought that Hillary was about as untakable unlikable as one could be. But no, I think Kamala actually was in some ways even more so, just because she hasn't even had to be through the battles, She hasn't even really had to be through the political fights.

Feels like it was all kind of handed to this person. And now she's just been handed the vice presidency, so she could be handed the presidency. You're like, what what if she done to learn any of this? Why? It was a very kind of interchangeable prosecutor and then made the right friends and the Democrat power circles and became a state attorney general and ran for Senate and now she can be vice president based on what what's her

big policy is? Now? Perhaps we're digging in too much on the holes in Kamala's record or just the lack of an impressive record, but also, she was a representative of the Biden ticket last night. And when you allow somebody to represent Joe Biden's political campaign and you actually forced them to answer some questions or at least pose real questions to them, it's all very flimsy. It all falls apart very rapidly, and that's what you saw on

that stage. One of my favorites is the issue of fracking, because you know, we're fracking. Really, you don't want to talk about banning fracking in places like Pennsylvania. Not good, not a good, not a good move. So what do the Democrats do when they come up against a difficult position that they've taken in the past, now when they can present it to the full view of the American people. Oh, we'll get into that. You're in the Freedom Heart. This

is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Joe Biden will not raise taxes on anyone who makes less than four hundred thousand dollars a year. He has been very clear about that. Joe Biden will not end fracking. He has been very clear about that. Joe Biden is the one who, during the Great Recession, was responsible for the Recovery Act. Okay, Joe Biden will not band fracking. And she was very upset with the even the suggestion that that was not the case, that the Harris Biden team would ever even

even consider such a thing. Isn't that so interesting because here's m Kamala was saying during her run, which did not go very well for the Democrat nomination Play twelve practice, there's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking. So yeah, starting there's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking.

So now I understand this is where people would jump in, who are the little the Kamala handlers and you know, spin room people and everything else, say well, she's now a part of a different ticket, but there's an even bigger problem, right, So she clearly when it was the Democrat primary, was gonna bean fracking. And for those that are who don't know this, I think it's worth everyone understanding that fracking is a huge, a huge component now

of our energy situation. That fracking is something that's done routinely so that people have access, so that the companies that are taking the stuff up out of the ground are able to create this unbelievable American energy superpower that we've become in the last ten or fifteen years. So anyone who's saying band fracking after stand this is big.

Hydraulic fracking is used. It's where you take a process of injecting liquid water and sand, tiny amount of lubricants into shale formations that creates small fractures allowing the extraction of oil and natural gas from sites where the oil derec and the well have been removed. More than ninety percent of American oil and gas wells are currently hydraulically fractured. Of oil and natural gas is involved fracking. You're gonna ban fracking. This is what it's It's actually a really

big deal. You're gonna ban fracking. You're telling people to do this. Oh okay. Kamala Harris says, I wouldn't do that, and now she's on Biden's tickets, so maybe she What was Biden saying about this before? Too? Play one, No more, no new fracking. We are we argue to get rid of fossil fuels. What would there be any place for fossil fuels, including coal and tracking in a Biden administration. No, we would, we would work it out. We would make

sure it's eliminated. I guarantee, I guarantee We're gonna fossil fuel and no ability for the oil industry to continue to drill period ends Number one. Three consecutive American presidents have enjoyed stints of explosive economic growth due to a boom in oil and natural gas production. As president, would you be willing to sacrifice some of that growth, even knowing potentially that it could displace thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of blue collar workers, in the interest of transitioning

to that greener economy. Answers Yes, Oh, but he wouldn't ban fracking. Kamala says, these people are lying to you, my friends, and you know it, and I hope all the American people know it. Thanks for listening to The Busson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the

iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. There's certainly more policy to discuss, and I want to do that with you today from the takeaways from this debate, But first, can we just have some fun with the O. Kamala is wonderful media, She's really Her core constituency is the editorial page of the New York Times. And if you're wondering who are the biggest all the supporters, it's people who work for establishment media, people who are big producers

in Hollywood, left wing hedge fund managers. They love Kamala. She's great. She's great, but just normal Americans, and I'm talking about Democrats now they're like, nah, not so much, sorry, not into it. And the media now has to do this whole act where they come up with explanations for why it was such a tremendously lackluster performance last night.

Here is fake Tapper explaining, you know, try try to come up with a ration now for why Kamala got crushed, I mean straight up trounced in that debate play too. I wonder if a woman candidate feels like she can't push as much or steamroll as much as say Mike Pence can, for fear of seeming and offending some segment of the electorate. I'm not saying that it should be that way, but I'm wondering if it is that way. Yeah,

I'm just asking questions, like maybe it's sexism. I'm just asking questions though, you know, just just asking questions, just just floating an idea, just putting out some analysis. I'm a straight reporter, man, I'm I don't do opinion. You don't do clean up on Aisle seven for colmless disastrous performance, because that's what that sounds like. Oh, she can't be

assortive enough. She was nasty to him to Pence at different parts during the debate, and I think she thought, because of what we had seen with President Trump, that maybe she'd be able to goad Pence into the same kind of look. I thought Trump was a little too aggressive in some parts of last debate. You know that I've said that where it was just counterproductive for him,

and that's what I'm really focused on. But now you look at the way that the media is trying to convince people that there was sexism involved here or something like that. It's just it's completely The problem is when Kamala Harris is asked, are you're gonna ban fracking? She says absolutely not, when both her and Joe Biden been like, yeah, fracking is evil, get rid of it on the campaign

trail in this election. That's the problem. The problem is she repeats the Charlottesville lie and is so sanctimonious and smug while she does it, and you look at her, you go, what is this. We all have access to the transcript, it's online, you can watch the video of that press conference, and you can also just think through because they didn't really believe the president of the United States, who wants to stay president get reelected as president, that

he's gonna openly praise neo Nazi. Of course not. They don't really think he did that. They just think they can get away with saying he did that, which has been the game, the game all along. Here, MSNBC had a comment you know, there's more of this, of the sexism thing. MSNBC had a commentator who there's so many of them, but he's got to hear some of It's

kind of fun to hear that. Just I don't know what to do because no, no serious person could watch that debate and they get any other than well, Kamala was outclassed on presentation and on policy. That's it. Everything else is kind of a waste. Everything else is make believe time. So let's get into some of that make believe time. Here's someone on MSNBC. You never heard of

this person before played twenty nine. The things had jumped out for me were the way that he seemed extremely misogynistically dismissive of the other two women who were there in conversation with him. He talked all over the moderator like she didn't even matter, and then certainly had you know, a bit of disregard for Kamala Harris and just kept on going, even with a calm tone. And I think that, you know, he showed himself out to be in a

very evangelical way. I'd say, someone who is dismissive in disregards women. I didn't like that tone and tenor. I also didn't like the fact that he just lies through his teeth. And the guy is responsible for two hundred and eleven thousand I think deaths due to COVID. He's in charge of the committee, he's responsible for. I mean, how much stupid can you fit into one SoundBite is a fair question you could ask me right now. First

of all, the misogy that she claims was there. Vice President Pennce I thought was very gracious and quite respectful of Kamalaris. He started out the debate by saying, honored to be here on the stage with you. He very clearly established a level of respect that I don't think was always reciprocated from Kamala with all the faces and the you know, the person of the lips and the rolling of the eyes and all the things that she was doing when he's talking. I mean that may play

well with the MSNBC audience. But for people who really want to know what these individuals who are who are vying for a very consequential role, very consequential job, they don't like those kinds of little games. And but then of course this commentator at the end says that he's responsible for two hundred thousand deaths. Does anyone think does anyone think that with a Bye administration? I just want to how many deaths would we have with a Biden administration?

I would like to I'd like to know what the Biden supporters think. Ten thousand, twenty thousand, is that really what they're going to claim we're gonna have. If that were true, we would have by far, we'd have a lower death we'd have a lower death rate per capita population than than any any country in the world that has actually been hit by this thing that's over. You know, ten million people. We got three hundred and fifty million

people in this country. They have twenty thousand dead in Argentina. So or three on thirty million people in this country, I should say, although how many legals there are is still an open question. Uh, they're they're living in a fantasyland.

That's not surprising. I suppose Oh, speaking of fantasyland, that's a perfect that's a perfect transition point here to Meeka, who just hates our president, just hates them, who turns on the TV in the morning, goes you know, I really need to know what Mika Brzinsky thinks of something. From her deep expertise of having her hair and makeup done and reading off a prompter for many years, I really need to hear what she thinks. I just wonder about that same thing with Joe Scarborough, by the way,

But I'm curious. I kind of want to meet the person who finds Mika insightful or Joe for that matter. But here she is living in a truly alternative universe. But what else you gonna do. You're a flack, You're a hack. You're there to do a job, which is to promote the Democrat candidate. Here is Mika. Oh. I thought Kamala Harris was fabulous, and she was disciplined, She

was strong. She kept a fine balance in terms of tone, which you know, would be a challenge for any woman debuting on the national stage like that as a vice presidential candidate. She was reality versus of whatever was happening on the other side of the stage, and she really used every every skill in her toolbox to deliver a clear, almost you know, near perfect performance. She was right on spot on a near perfect performance. This is awesome. You

know why I made you listen to this. I mean there's a reason for it, not not just because I find it amusing, although that's a big, a big part of it. That what she just gave you is what the lib hack media. That that's a perfect You could use that as an exemplar. That would be the the boiler plate, the template of what you say after debate with a Democrat involved, where you're just going to say the same thing about them no matter what, because you

don't care, because you are a cheerleader for them. You are a booster. You are rooting for and actively trying to help them win. This is this is what you would have. This is what you would say if you had seen the debate and you walked on set in the morning. You didn't even watched a minute of it, but you know you're a Democrat, you know you're a phony in a fraud, and you got to support the democrat cannedy no matter what. So that's it. Oh, she

was fabulous discipline, strong says. He says, there's not anybody in the day what about her not answering critical questions and really not answering them. I mean it was clear that she was like, nah, I'm just not going to answer. Sorry, oh okay. There was there was nothing about her performance that was fabulous, and there was certainly no reasonable human being, whoever reasonable is the caveat There no reasonable human being who saw that and thought, you know what, Kamala was perfect.

Kamala is perfect. Yeah, so perfect that Democrat voters in the primary were like, we have no interest in this person whatsoever, but we appreciate that the New York Times, the Washington Post have tried to voice her upon us. Look, I do believe that for a out of the journos, they have a nostalgia, they have a PTSD from Trump. They have post traumatic actually it should be p tt D post traumatic Trump syndrome or disordered post traumatic Trump disorder.

That's what they've got. They can't adjust to this new world, they can't deal with this new world. And they also have this crippling nostalgia for Obama. And I think our media, which is diversely obsessed and deeply superficial. I mean, our national news media is full of vein, really a bunch of vein self loving but secretly self loathing idiots. I think that they see some similarities in background, in presentation, in storyline between Obama and Kamala, and that for them

is enough. That for them is all that is necessary. Right. They think that they can maybe get back to the great old days, the eight years of the Obama administration, and so they add her to Biden and what do you have? Obama two point zero, a third term of the glorious Obama administration. That's to me how we got to this point because on skill, on the electoral map, on any of these other political considerations, you can't look at Kamala and think that this is really the best

they could come up with. Doesn't make any sense. You know, if she were from Ohio, if she were the senator from Michigan, you know, I would think that there's a distinct possibility. But nope, it's because they want Obama term two. That's what they're going for. You're in the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I thought that wasn't even a contest. Last night, she was terrible she was I don't think you could get worse and

totally unlikable, and she is. She's a communist. She's left to Bernie. She's rated left to Bernie by everybody. She's a communist. We're gonna have a communist and she's going to be, in my opinion, within a month. Look, I stood next to Joe and I looked at Joe, and Joe's not lasting two months as president. Okay, that's my opinion. The president. Oh man, he's calling her a communist. He's like, Joe's not gonna last two months. This is what I

love this guy. This is this is when he's really it's most entertaining when he just decided to let it rip. But understand who he's fighting against. Understand that the other side doesn't even do this stuff. In Jess. I mean, they'll say the most crazy, untrue, absurd stuff imaginable, and if it works, it works. They don't care at all.

Here's Steve Schmidt, the dumbest political analyst on TV. Not surprising guy ran John McCain's campaign into the ground so that John McCain could get absolutely crushed crushed by Barack Obama, not even close. And it was part of the picking Sarah Palin genius decision. So here's Steve Schmidt. He's not trying to be funny, he's just crazy. The thing is, sometimes these lib commentators will say something that you go, well, I mean, maybe they're trying to get a rise out

of us, or they're being hyperbolic on purpose. No, they're actually just nuts. They're they're not normal. There's something something deeply wrong with them. And here is a Threeve Schmidt played twenty eight and not for nothing. I mean, I don't think it's ever a good sign when a fly plans on your head for two minutes. You know, that's a that's a sign all through history of sin and

historically biblically. Maybe you wouldn't normally say this after you wouldn't it's only safe to say this, sorry after midnight. But you know, a fly, he who commands the fly has always been seen historically the mark of the devil. Hugh commands a fly, mark of the devil. I mean, yeah,

I will, Okay, what's here talking about. If you didn't see the debate, there was about a ninety second or so period where a common house fly, I guess you'd say I think that's what it was landed and Vice President Pence's hair, and because his hair is silver, it was noticeable, but it flew away. It wasn't a big deal. It was a little distracting for a second. You got one of the chances of this. I was just glad that it didn't stay there the whole time. But you know,

Steve Schmidt, I mean, this is what people. They're grasping, folks, and they're grasping at straws. They got nothing. There was nothing to take from last night's debate that was good for the Democrats. And as we're in the final few weeks here before well, I know, Americans are already voting in some places, but before all of us have to cast our votes, except for the Democrat election fraudsters who are gonna send in ballots late or figure out where

they need a little more help. And all of a sudden, some of those you know, oh, because that would never happen. Sure, yeah, anyone, anyone really believe that. But they're they're only able to win by lying about what they want to do. You know, Democrats have really abused the word lie a lot. They'll say that Trump lies when he says that you know, he's the best president ever. That's not a lie. I mean, you might think that's not a true thing to say, but it's not a lie, or it's not an accurate

thing to say. But they abuse words, and lying is one of them. They can't be honest with the American people about what they want to do. Right if Trump says that he's going to build a wall, and he comes into office as he has and it's trying to build a wall and keeps getting stopped and stopped, it wasn't a lie what he said, I'm going to build a wall. That was his plan. They just got in the way of the plan, but he did try to

execute on it. Democrats are lying to you. They're lying to the American people because they don't even want to do the things that they say they want to and they won't do things that they say they will. So that's a pretty big difference. And the President points that out call play twenty three. He gets up and he says, we're not fraking, we're not fracking. He was fraking for six months. He was fraking. He was raising his very thin hand and he was fracking. And now all of

a sudden he's not tracking. We'll tell the Pennsylvania people that you're going it's ridiculous. He said, he's not frakking, That's all he said. And then all of a sudden he goes to a franking motor. How about her? She committed her life to it, and all of a sudden, she's a fracker. She's a big fracker. They're going to stop fraking the minute they get into office. They're lying to everybody. They're lying about so many different things. It's true,

but they can't win unless they lie. Trump I'm not talking about his record. When Trump says what he stands for, what he wants to do, we've seen for four years he does stand for those things, and does try to accomplish those things, and in some cases has delivered on some major areas. He also does not get enough credit for not getting us involved in a pointless war, because you know, for my young adult life, for my twenties and into my thirties, we just we couldn't stop getting

drawn deeper into one war or into another war. So we're talking about foreign policy more in the next hour. But the president deserves a lot of credit for that. Doesn't get any of it from the media at all, Kamalin Biden, meanwhile, get away with lying constantly. Thanks for listening to the Bust and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you

get your podcasts. What about the Green New Deal, folks, I don't have the big idea that the Democrats rolled out before COVID that we spend all this time talking about it and it became something that you could expect to be asked whether whether climate change was an existential threat. That's a fancy sounding way. I mean, that's a pseudoscientific way of asking if you don't do what we want

you to do on climate change. You understand that everyone's gonna die, right, You understand we're all gonna die from climate change. We are all gonna die, as I like to remind everybody, it's important to know that. But we're all gonna die from climate change. This is insane. This is a belief for crazy people. But they really think it.

They really think that unless you know, California reduces its carbon emissions by I don't know, twenty percent or something, or they change it all, it doesn't matter unless California and start living greener lives, and we give the federal government more control over industry. We're all gonna die from climate change. So I think it's it's important for us to understand just how they frame the issue normally, Like what they say when they talk about climate change, what

are they claiming the downside is? And then beyond that, why would they walk away from it now? I mean, if they've established that it's an existential threat, if I told you that, I thought there was something that was truly capable of wiping out the human race, And I really believe that anytime that issue came up, I would say, whatever we have to do to address this, we have to do it without fail. Because what could be more

important than the continuation of our species? I think it's very hard to find, right, So they they take it to that level with the rhetoric, they say it's an And they even asked Mike penns this last night the Journal or whatever name was, and I don't remember who cares, totally replaceable with a thousand other kind of boring journals, but they ask, as climate change an existential threat? And sure enough, Mike Pats just kind of said, look, you know,

there's some things we need to do. The climate's always changing. I like that by all you have to do. This is the response when someone says, do you believe in climate change? You just found climate's always changing. It took us a while to get to something, but it's true. It does not concede what they're looking for you to really concede, which is you're going to do what we

say about the climate right. No, just like, yeah, the climate change is sure, it does and it drives libs nuts, which is the best part, which is really one of the biggest reasons that I think it's so clear that everybody should support Donald Trump if nothing else, and there's a lot of other stuff, but just for the way that it would trigger libs alone, getting Donald Trump four more years, to me, feels like a great idea, just for the way that it would make them completely lose

their minds, their heads would explode. It's worth it. It's worth it. So then there's all these other issues. But on the Green New Deal, Mike Pray Mike Pence pointed this out, they're playing another game here where they're saying that Biden's plan is not the Green New Deal. But he also said that it's greatly influenced by the Green New Deal. Well why not just have it be the

Green New Deal talking about an existential threat? Right? The Journal last night even asked about the existential nature of climate change. Pence pointed this one out, and I have to say he was quite right in doing so. Play eight. And with regard to banning Franking, I just recommend that people look at the record. You yourself said repeatedly that you would bann franking. You were the first Senate co

sponsor of the Green New Deal. And while Joe Biden denied the Green New Deal, Susan, thank you for pointing out the Green New Deal is on their campaign website. And as USA Today said, it's essentially the same plan as you co sponsored with AOC when she submitted it in the Senate. And you just heard the senators say

that she's going to resubmit America to the Paris Climate Accord. Look, the American people have always cherished our environment, will continue to cherish, and we've made great progress reducing CO two emissions through American innovation and the development of natural guests through fracking. We don't need a massive two trillion dollar Green New Deal. That would impose all new mandates on American businesses and American families. Of course we don't need that.

But the Democrat left is psychotic about climate change. It's their religion replacement. It's the religion for people who think they're too smart for religion. That's what climate change is. It's a it's a belief about existential nature, right, it's it's a belief about why we're here and the end of days, and it has and then you get more into it, you know, paying for indulgences with the carbon offsets.

And it is completely set up in a way that it's an analog of actual belief in a creator and god of a religious belief, except the god is Earth right the planet. It's like as so in that sense, it's a more early stage or primitive religion where it's Earth worship. That's what you actually have with the climate change believe But they think it's all science. Isn't that fascinating? They believe it's a deeply a deeply scientific and sophisticated belief system. But really at the end of the day,

it's because why are we all here? Oh? Oh, we exist to save the planet. And the way we're going to save the planet is by making sure that you can't have a plastic grocery bag. No, you have to have one of those dumbass paper bags that will have a hole in it when you're trying to actually carry some milk and eggs back to your home. That's how we're going to save the planet. These petty idiots think

that that's really true. They think that, oh, you know, it's it was the landfills are filling up too fast, and it's we're choking all the sea life, and the CO two is all over all over the air. CO two is less than one percent of the atmosphere, and yet they believe that it's going to warm up the whole planet. They can't tell you what the warming will actually be, and they can't even measure it accurately ten

years from now. But we're supposed to all change our lives because of what's going to happen on a hundred years round. I know, I don't want to get too deep into the how climate change is insane, but the more obvious thing, and I mean climate change catastrophist, this notion that if we don't do everything the left wants us to do, we're all going to die. And that's really it. We're all gonna die. I'm not I'm not trying to be funny. Well it is kind of funny,

but I'm not exaggerating. That's what they say. Unless people believe in the scientific wisdom of AOC. I mean, I remember in college. I mean there were people I knew, guys and girls who were like AOC and that they were the dumb kid in the class who still a lot and thought everyone should listen to them. I've been around people like that who have a tremendous and unearned confidence in their intellectual abilities and have no self awareness

that their way beyond their knowledge and their understanding. And that's what AOC is on climate That's why she had the staffers right. And this is where we got cow farts. Remember that we got to stop the cow farts? And oh no, that was a working paper that wasn't supposed to be released. Sure, sure it was. No. The truth is, if you believe in climate change catastrophe, then you have to also understand that you have to get rid of meat. And there have been Democrats who even say this, I believe.

Was that one of the town halls, which were just kind of in kind donations to Democrats that CNN and these other channels do where I think I think it was Kamala Harris who's asked about whether we should consider banning meat because of the climate change, and she was like, yeah, yeah, that's a really really interesting which again is what this is what a professor does when you're saying something that's dumb, but the pressor is not trying to be mean, so

that's a really interesting perspective. They'll say, right, which is a kind way of saying, what kind of garbage are you saying? But I don't know, maybe Kamlo would want to ban meet if that would get her enough votes and enough donations because methane from cows. Look, I know it's so dumb that it's hard to even talk about

this out loud, but it's true. Methane from cows creates much greater damage to the atmosphere in the environment and causes much more warming than what you get from a whole lot of other areas where they're focusing in on CEO two. So they've been wrong with this. They're gonna be talking about this for another fifty years. I mean, this is not going away, and in fifty years they're

gonna keep saying. Every ten years will be told we have ten years before it's too late to fix this, and then in ten years they'll just you know, enough time will have elapse that people will forget that ten years ago they were saying, Look, it's this is maybe just the circuitry or the wiring of certain human brains, but this is the way it's going to be, this is how it will play out. Oh and another area where we were treated to a Democrat fantasyland version of

what's really going on on what will happen? This was a question in the debate. Now we were so we were so burned. I know many of us were expecting it, but we were so burned by Chris Wallace being so far in the tank for Joe Biden that I think this debate moderator and Jesse Kelly and I talked about this last night on the first that this debate moderator was just not as horrible. So you want to think, Okay,

I guess she's all right. But one of the questions that they asked was what do you do if Donald Trump doesn't accept the results of the election, What do you do if Donald Trump doesn't accept the results. Who thinks that's going to happen? Evidence is there for that actually being a serious concern? And Vice President Pants did a very good job dealing with this issue play eleven.

When you talk about accepting the outcome of the election, I must tell you, the Senator, your party has spent the last three and a half years trying to overturn the results of the last election. It's amazing. When Joe Biden was Vice President of the United States, the FBI actually spied on President Trump in my campaign. I mean, there were documents released this week that the CIA actually made a referral to the FBI documenting that those allegations

were coming from the Hillary Clinton campaign. And of course we've all seen the avalanche, what you put the country through for the better part of three years until it was found that there was no obstruction, no collusion case close. And then Senator Harris, you and your colleagues in the Congress trying to impeach the President of the United States over a phone call. And now Hillary Clinton has actually said to Joe Biden that under and her words, under

no circumstances should he conceive the election. So So who are really worried about refusing election results? Who is really of concern here for rejecting the expressed will of the American people through a free and fair election as Democrats friends, there was no Republican movement in twenty twelve to pretend Obama didn't really win, or to unseat him or impeach him, or have a special counsel against him. Look at the

record with Democrats. You have an impeachment against Donald Trump over the Ukraine phone call, which was just crazy town. The whole thing was crazy town, and we know it didn't go anywhere, was never going anywhere. But Nancy Pelosi's nuts. She's a rich, you know, nutty old lady. And you had the three year long special Counsel investigation based on Hillary Clinton campaign dirt dossier, totally false, but that led

to a special counsel and all the other stuff. And the whole point of a special council was to create the grounds for removing Trump from office through impeachment and removal in the Senate. So that was the point of it. So it's not like it didn't at least give them something, but it didn't give them enough. There were the marches of people saying not my president. After Trump won. I remember that that was happening here in New York and

other places. So they just immediately rejected it. There was the Special Counsel during the Bush administration of Scooter Libby, so this is their favorite tactic. They get a special counsel to go after the top people in the administration as a weapon over the completely farcicle Oh Bellary play, she's in so much. It's crap. I was in the CIA.

It's crap. The whole thing was nonsense. But you know, they were going after Bush people, and Bush got very unpopular at that point because of the Iraq warm was going on Afghanistan and the war on Terror, and nobody was willing to step up and say this is not meant for this, this is this is really unconstitutional actually to create this body of investigative partisan hacks who aren't really count anyway. And then you have the two thousand election who didn't accept the results, al Gore, who kept

taking it to court al Gore. So you have this long line of actions taken by Democrats meant to ignore election results. But last night we're at Donald Trump, or rather Mike Pence has asked, what if Donald Trump doesn't accept the results of the election, where is there any evidence for that? Hillary Clinton has said Democrats shouldn't accept

the results of the election. Democrats have been setting up mail in balloting intended, in my mind, not only to try to help them win through possibly fraudulent means, but also to create the grounds for rejecting the election results based upon you know, I've been predicting this too, that they would reject the ground ounce for the election results based upon the very changes to the election process that they insisted on. Oh okay, that's where we are, that's

where we're heading. And yet Mike Pence had to feel that question last night. Isn't it so interesting? Friends, the way the journos play the game. You're in the freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Oh, let's not forget about Kamala's record. I'm sorry, es get past this one. Vice President penns dismantled her record last night.

He wasn't only a very effective defender of the Trump administration record and really just a promoter of what has gone on here, someone who will smash the lunacy of the left, acting like Donald Trump has been some catastrophic failure. Who's killed two hundred thousand people as if he was going around, you know, smothering them all with a hello himself. These people are nuts, crazy, totally outrageous stuff that they say. But Pennce went after Kamala's record. Here's what he said,

played ten. Did you talk about having personally prosecuted. I'm glad you brought up your record CENTA, thank you. I really need to make this point. When you were when you were DA in San Francisco, when you left office, African Americans were nineteen times more likely to be prosecuted for minor drug offenses than whites and Hispanics. When you were Attorney General of California, you increased the purport the disproportionate incarceration of banks in California. You did nothing on

criminal justice reform in California. You didn't lift a finger to pass the first step back on Capitol Hill. I mean, the reality is your record speaks for itself. President Trump and I have fought for criminal justice, fought for educational choice and opportunities for African Americans all of our thank you, sir, and we'll do it for form. Thank you. So the moderator here. You'll notice is, you know, every like four seconds, thank you, thank you know, trying to talk over and

we get him to stop. I just want you to note that there was a lot of complaining initially about how Penn's steamrolled Kamala and all this stuff. She spoke more than he did, Okay, she got more airtime. The good news about these things is that we actually can measure it, and it's there, and there's a record. I think she spoke for two or three minutes more in total than the vice president did, so it's almost exactly

equal time. So I'll say that's pretty good. But if we're really going to talk about this, there's no steamrolling. She spoke more than he did. You can't say your steamroll when you get to talk more than someone else. Now,

on the issue of Kamala's record, he got it. Something that's very important here, something that doesn't get nearly enough attention, and that is Democrats often talk about desparate impact in the criminal justice system, which is just a way of talking about how you in many jurisdictions, in many places have a larger number of certain groups incarcerated than they

represent of the general population. New York City is a good example of this, where you have ninety percent of Rikers Island is either Black or Hispanic, Rikers Island being the main prison here. Well, we're told that that's all about systemic racism, and Pence is pointing out that you actually meeting Kamala Harris when she was the state Attorney general, that incarceration of African Americans went up substantially compared to her predecessor. So why is that was she a part

of systemic racism? It's a brilliant point that I think should get more attention from the Vice President. Thanks for listening to the show. Podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's talk more about the difference between the Democrats and Republicans on feminal justice for a minute. Showay, this came up in the debate. It comes up all the time because of the BLM protest. There's another one that happened.

It's not getting much attention right now, but there's another setup protests, riots going on, I believe where someone was shooting at cops. It's it's honestly tough to keep it all straight and keep up with this. And Kamala did the usual last night where she was saying justice wasn't done in the Brianna Taylor case. That's a very you

know that, that's a very kind of wishy washy. She don't really take a position because, as she's saying, the justice system did not do the law there, the justice system did not actually function it's supposed to, or just there's no such thing as justice for a woman who's killed accidentally by the cops, because obviously the latter is true,

you're never going to achieve justice. But you could argue then that our entire justice system is misnamed because anybody who's a victim of a crime, sending away the person that did it too doesn't make it, doesn't really make it better. Maybe it protects the rest of society and we need to punish the guilty. And I understand that there are reasons for this, but I'm just saying, you

never really get justice. Right if some guy robs your home, steals all your stuff, and an attacks you in the middle of the night, and then they catch him six months later and he goes to prison for ten years, Okay, that's the justice system working. It's not really justice for you. You just wish that thing had never happened. So I just I note that what she says, your justice wasn't done. I think that's a very interesting way to put it. She was clear and that she has to take the

side of BLM, and that's that's not a surprise. She very clearly is a big BLM supporter and has been on the record saying all kinds of things about how it's a great movement for change and it's really in line with the civil rights heroes of the past that BLM is doing all this great stuff. I mean, I think she's completely insane for saying this stuff, but she

believes it. She believes it. And Penn's pointed out that, you know, you really like to offer somebody who was a part of a justice system that sent a lot of people to prison, meaning Kamala Harris when she was stated turning general when she was a prosecutor before that really doesn't have much faith in the system at all

when it suits her politically. Play thirteen, Well, our heart breaks the loss of innocent, any innocent American life, and the family of Brianna Taylor has our sympathies but I trust our justice system of grand jury that refuses the evidence. And it really is remarkable that as a former prosecutor, you would assume that anpaneled grand jury looking at all the evidence, got it wrong. But you're entitled to your

opinion center, So yeah, they got it wrong. What I would have said, I'm just gonna point this one out. Someone should ask Kamala Harris, are the cops murderers? Your prosecutor? You know the law? Would you charge one of those officers with murder? Really that she should be pressed on that one. Let's hear it, because she could not say no and stay in the good graces of the Democrat left and the BLM rioters and all the rest of it.

Couldn't couldn't do it. They want to hear that, yes, those cops are murderers, even though that would mean that we're creating a new standard for murder by which when you try to defend yourself you could be considered a murderer, even if your actions are entirely justifiable. But if something bad happens while you're defending yourself, that is an accident, which is what happened to those cops. One cop was hit in the femoral artery and could have bled out

and died right there. It was. It was a near fatal, a near fatal shooting of that officer. He's not supposed to shoot back. Now you're gonna start firing a cops. The cops are gonna fire back. I don't know how anyone can expect anything else, but that is surely one of the areas of demagoguery where the Democrats can't give up any ground. They can't do it none Whatso there's no way they would get away with that for their base. And then you look at the other area where I

think Pence could have hammered it home a little bit more. Look, he did a very good job and so now I look, I'm doing a little bit of Thursday morning quarterbacking here after the Wednesday night debate. But I wish he had gone after a little bit more on the rioting and BLM and all of this, all of this insanity. I mean, he made this clear. Here's what he said, play six. And with regard to George Floyd, there's no excuse for what happened to George Floyd, and justice will be served.

But there's also no excuse for the rioting and looting that followed. I mean, it really is astonishing. Flora whist Brooke is with us here to nine a Lake City. This few weeks ago, I stood at what used to be her salon was burned to the ground by rioters and looters, and Flora is still trying to put her life back together. Yeah, how could anyone justify that? Oh?

But BLM is really angry, So that's no. No, This is no different than if somebody doesn't like a jury verdict and goes out and just hit some random person on the street in the head with a brick because they're angry. If you can justify that, then you've destroyed You've destroyed our entire system of laws where you have individual culpability and responsibility and the right for people to

be protected, and it's all gone. But it does seem that they're willing to at least kick at the load bearing walls of our justice system because it plaguecates this mentality, this anger that exists on the left toward this system, toward the cops. And these are Democrat base voters. These are people that are very very much, you know, in favor not only of the Biden Harris ticket. But these are the activists. These are the people that get the other voters out, you know, these the people that get

the other voters going. So they're not going to speak the truth about it, which is that the cops are overwhelmingly doing the right thing. You know, here's here's a perfect way to encapsulate this whole BLM debate and the thing we've been talking about for months now. They will excuse the rioting and the looting. Michelle Obama did this herself in that video early. They'll excuse that by saying, well,

it was ninety percent peaceful. But they will condemn law enforcement, our justice system, and our brave men and women who wear the uniform of the police on the streets of American cities, and our state troopers and highway patrol. They'll they'll they'll defame them by referring to our systemically racist law enforcement system based upon the shooting of unarmed black men.

That is one. I mean, I can't even do the math off the top of my head, but it's a tiny, tiny fraction that is less than one percent of all police encounters using force of any kind. And it's something that in a country of three hundred and thirty million people. Happens less than fifty times a year, probably more like fifteen to twenty times a year, where someone who is unarmed and black is shot and killed by cops. And sometimes it's entirely justified, moral and legitimate. When that happens,

that we need to say that that is true. Sometimes it is, sometimes it's not. When it's not, the law should be and I think generally is applied with its full force against that law enforcement officer who has transgressed, who has broken his or her oath, and who needs to be brought to justice, needs to be punished. So that's that's my view of where I think they need

to go on that one. I wish I wish we could see a little bit more I don't a little bit more fire fire and Furia like that book, a little bit more fire in the belly on this issue of the rioting coming from the left and what's going on there. That's what I would like to see, because people really need to know exactly what has gone on here and who's responsible for it. You know, I almost forgot the I want to just throw this in there too. One of the best lines of the night that Pence

had had to do with China. China and the trade war because Kamala Harris was claiming that Joe Biden that Donald Trump lost the trade war with China, which I don't, I mean, look to say that she's wrong and making stuff up. He's obviously nothing new on this show. But here's what Penn said about about Biden and his record in China. Effectively, Pennce dunked so hard on Biden in China that he shattered the backboard and then Kamala had to clean up the broken glass below it afterwards. I mean,

this was a really good moment for him. Play three lost the trade war with China, Joe Biden never fought it. Joe Biden has been a cheerleader for communist China through over the last several decades. And again, the Senator, you're entitled to your opinion, you're not entitled to your own facts. When Joe Biden was Vice president, we lost two hundred thousand manufacturing jobs and President Obama said they were never coming back. He said we needed a magic wand to

bring him back. In our first three years, after we cut Texan fullback regulation, unleashed American energy. This administration saw five hundred thousand jobs created, and that's exactly the kind of growth we're going to continue to see as we bring our nation through this pandemic. Good stuff from the Vice President. You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right, team, very fortunate here to be joined by Mercedes Slap. She's a senior

advisor Trump campaign. You see her on Fox and across all media outlets all the time. Mercedes, thanks for making the time. Well, thank you for having me. I'm actually live from the Women for Trump bus. It's a big pink bus going through Pennsylvania. We've had several stops here in h near Pittsburgh, and it's been a very enthusiastic crowd, ready to win and come November. Tell us about this this uh ready for women for Trump rather this this whole campaign. Who's a part of it, what's the what's

the next itinerary? And what are you telling the ladies out there? Because we all know that particularly suburban women voters are a very coveted demographic in this upcoming battle. Well, I think one of the phenomenons that we have found when we've been on the road for so much and we've been on this bush, it's been going for over

one hundred days. Has been the incredible response at phone women, women who are leading many of these field offices, women who are making phone calls, knocking outdoors, you know, basically saying we have to get President Trump reelected. Very concerned about the direction that the Democrats have taken, where they really have abandoned any sort of moderate policies, moved to

the far left on so many of the issues. And uh and you know, we really spend a lot of time talking to these women and get out the vote effort. So today on the bus to Tuna person, another senior advisor in the campaign, one of the originals for twenty sixteen, Laura Trump, is joining us as well. And you know, I just got to tell you we feel very strongly that it's important to be in contact with these voters, let them know that the President is incredibly grateful for

the work that they're doing. And obviously during this time that we know that the President has been fighting for us, fighting for America, and it's our turn to fight for him, get him to the finish line, and continue to really expose the far left. Adjudda of Kamala and Joe Biden, which we know even yesterday and in the vice presidential camp debate, Kamala couldn't even answer basic questions like will

they pack the court? You can see a little bubble over her head saying, well, of course we're going to pack the court, but they're not willing to be transparent and honest with the American people. Speaking to Mercedes Schlapp, senior advisor for the Trump campaign, he's out on the road trying to make things happen so that Trump gets

four more years. Mercedes, specifically from the women voters that you're talking to out there and especially in these swing states Whereveren's gonna have such a focus for the next few weeks. Here as we get into the final stretch, what are the biggest things that they're wanting to ask about and what are there what are what's the top of their list of concerns right now? I mean, I know it's going to be one of the things we but I want to know from from what you're hearing,

what are they putting at number one? Number two? I would say number one and number two are clearly the economy and ensuring that we're able to build a strong economy or robust economy, and they've seemed President Trump to do it once and they know he's going to do it again. And we've seen obviously a lot of concerts in that area. Uh, you know, in the recent jobs numbers where we've created over eleven million jobs in the last four months. And so the other piece of this,

I would say is safe communities. It's this idea that we've seen a lot of chaos on the streets and the fact that he the President, has made it very clear that law and order is a priority, and that that we're that we don't report on defunding the police, that we hone in on community safe, community policing, community safe safe, and that's also another priority. And of course, you know, COVID is on the minds of so many

of these women voters. You know, it has been exhausting to raise children during this time, to make ends met, during this time of dealing with the global pandemic. And this idea that Joe Biden really has no plan, as Vice President Mike Kent said yesterday. Yesterday, they're literally plagiarizing what President Trump and the Vice president have already offered and what the plans that we have put in place.

And what's so shocking to me is the fact that you know, I know, the Democrats want to use coronavirus. As you know, Jane Fonda said that this is God's gift to the Democrats and politicize the sellers. Sue, that's disgraceful. We're in a global pandemic. The President is fighting her to make sure that we're able to develop the vaccines, to get the therapeutics to market so that the American people who are inflicted with coronavirus can get better and

get healthy. And the other piece of this is that we can't be in lockdown indefinitely. It is really causing a lot of stress, a lot of anxiety for our youth, for our families. We need to be able to reopen our economies in our schools safely and responsibly. And that's what the President is focused on to ensuring that we can move in that direction, as opposed to Joe Biden, which wants to end some of the media that want

to make sure that we all live in fear. Mercedes, what are we expecting now for the next presidential debate? As of today, we've heard the Biden campaign wanted to be a virtual debate, and the Trump campaign, as of the latest reporting i've seen, says, well, there's not going to be a virtual debate. What can you tell us? Well, what was shocking was that I call them the communist Commission of Presidential Debates. I mean, they've got like never

Trumps on there. And one of the things that what I'm finding with them is that they literally made this unilateral decision on moving forward the virtual debate without even talking to the campaigns about it. Just think about that, and that's what's so disturbing is the fact that they're

looking to protect Joe Biden. They know that the president had a very strong night, they know that My Pence won the debate yesterday, and so at this point, it just seems that they have no interests in ensuring that this conversation, and this important conversation happens between the two presidents, between the two candidates, I should say. And so I think it's important to really understand that this was a unilateral decision made by the Commission. They did not discuss

it with the campaigns, and that is incredibly problematic. So we're hoping and what we're looking to do is to move the debate a week later, had the two debates October twenty second, the next October twenty nine, and let's have that discussion where the American people could see these two men in person being able to, you know, to subscribe what their visions are for America. And that is I think we're what the goal is at this time. Mercedes Schlap, senior advisor for the Trump campaign out there

on the trail on the bus doing the work. Mercedes, Thanks so much for joining us. Good luck to you. Thank you so much. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts Our buddy David Harsani of National Review back in the mix here to tell us what he's seeing in the realm of politics, culture, America. All that good stuff, David. Great to have you back.

Always a pleasure. Thank you. So what do you think about last night? Man? I mean, I thought I thought penns one convincingly and almost every area you can win in debate. I mean I didn't think Trump had won, though I didn't think it was as bad a performance as many did. But I think that clearly Pence was the winner here on both specifics of policy and vote in general. Pushing back as someone online I so said that Pence is kind is better at defending Trump's record

than Trump is. I think that that's a pretty fair assessment. Sometimes the way he kept as cool, and I think part of that also has to do with Kamala Harris not being perhaps as likable as perhaps some other candidates. Yeah, well that's not surprising to anybody. I mean, this was we ran this experiment already of do do even Democrats really like Kamala Harris? The answers no. I want to pose this question you because people have been asking me this and I gave my assessment at the beginning of

the show. But I want to know what you think here. Why did they pick Kamala Harris? Like, what was the thinking behind this? It feels in retrospect now, especially after

last night, like that wasn't a very strong move. I mean, I think obviously part of it is that, you know, it has lots to do with identity politics, and I think that not to say that there aren't good black women candidates out there, but to just say that a few months before you're making this decision without seeing who you mesh with best or how candidates are going to perform, is put you in a pretty tight spot. So obviously, like you mentioned or alluded to, she was not popular

with Democrats, so she had a horrible primary. So I don't know why he picked her. I think it hasn't worked out. We don't see much of her. I kind of forgot she was even running until yesterday. Frankly, for weeks. Her positions are are at of sync with the sort of predict what way he's trying to project this idea that they're moderates. I mean, she's taken left wind positions on the environment, on guns, on a ton of other things that simply are I think, out of sink with

most Americans. So I don't know, is that's a long answer, I don't know, or I don't know. It just feels like the to me, I mean, except for the identity politics piece. And I know when we talk about with Warren identity politics, you and I the jokes start writing themselves, right. But if you wanted a female vice president who was actually popular with Democrat voters, who did have substantial support, Kamala was never popular with the Democrats and the idea

that she would now be useful. But no, I think we also need to remember that, I mean she's the governor of California. I mean she's a Senator of California. So it's not like she has no support. No know that Elizabeth Warren. Maybe Warren would maybe war would have been a bad pick, but I just mean the Democrat primary there was, I mean Warren was number three at you know, behind Bernie and Biden, but especially toward the end,

and Comlin ever got that much help. And your point about California, I think it's interesting because yes, she can appeal to people in California. I think the same way that Joe. I think that everyone needs to remember there are some states where you have to appeal to beyond just your own party. California is obviously not one of them. But it's also going to be a more are left electorate than you'd see even in some of the other states that are at least closer to being purple. But

that's a fair point. Kamala won the who do we even remember who she run against? You don't, right, right, Well, obviously I think she's probably a primary candidates they don't remember that's what I mean. Yeah, yeah, they don't run against a Republican, which is why these these people who are always talking about all the Democratic voters who come out, Yeah who can there have no reason to come out in California for statewide elections because there's no one to

vote for. So, you know, it's a little different. But you make a good point and that you don't really need Harris because California is going to be yours anyway, So why not pick someone perhaps whole appeals to you know, Middle America or the South or something like that, trying to pick up state here or there with a candidate. But that hasn't really worked very well since you know, Gore lost Tennessee. Right, I don't know how much that

actually matters. Yeah, well that's that's the other question, other than the fact that there's I think a realistic, a realistic thought that Kamala Harris might actually have to take over the presidency if Biden wins this election, and not that far off I think that that is. Look, the

guy's gonna be almost eighty likes president United States. This is real, right, I Mean, when you get to this age and Democrats have kind of learned recently that you can't just keep wishing people to be in you know, infinite good health for as long as you want them to be for political reasons. The you know, never mind what's happened here with Trump. But they it seems to me maybe the Democrat it doesn't really I mean, the

vice president. Maybe it doesn't really matter that much usually, And I don't think the debate will matter that much either, And now that I've spent a lot of time analyzing and pulling apart in terms of who people vote for. But do you think it does? I don't think it matters a ton. It might matter more because of what

you just pointed out. You have two older people as president, and not just old, you know, very you know, considerably older people than you usually have running, you know, either running for president or even in the presidency, So it might matter to some extent. I think it's more like this. If you just perform admirably or don't embarrass herself, nothing happens. But you can hurt yourself by having a really bad performance.

So I'm not sure that Harris had that terrible of a performance enough to change any of the dynamics, but it certainly seems to me like she's not going to ever win a presidential election. I mean, she might have become president one day, but I just I don't think she's ever gonna win with She's just not that good at debate or I noticed that, um, you know, doing the primaries as well. She's just not that good. Her can lines come off canned, and and and her her

sort of like fake uh indignation and stuff. It's just it's just really obvious, at least to me. Look, it felt very staged. It felt very staged to me, and I mean I was willing to admit it. I mean Obama when he was in his zone, you know, when he was doing his thing. There are a lot, it feels a lot of Democrats, and there are a lot of other folks who they like the the Obama way of being on stage and the speeches and everything else.

And even Joe Biden gets away. I think now that he's kind of older and a little more tired, it seems a bit more forced. But his whole rolled up sleeves Joe from Amtrack, I mean you I appreciate that you've put it up. The sela is like very you know, a very high end train, very high end trained life. This is not like the way Joe Biden, you know, makes it sound. It's like he's wearing overalls that he's there shoveling coal with the engineers or something that's not

That's not Joe Biden, good old amtrack Joe. But you with with with Kamala, there was no go ahead. I just gonna say he pays twenty thousand. He pays twenty thousand a month for his mansion here in McClain or wherever in Virginia. But I just want to quickly say the difference between those two is this. It's the Castanza thing. If you don't if you believe your lie is true, it becomes true. And that's what I think Biden is.

I think he believes the stories he tells. I think he believes that he's sort of working class Joe, so it always comes off as more authentic than Harris, who I don't think believes anything she's saying, right, I think that's an authenticity to Biden because he actually believes the fairy tale he has built around about himself, which has gone on now for thirty years. It's like the incredible notion that Harris repeated yesterday that Biden is running because

of Charte what happened in Charlottesville. It's been running for president since nineteen eighty seven, he's probably even before that. It is it is just a lie, and everyone knows it, and she knows it what she says it well. I also think the whole Charlottesville thing is a lie, and Pence did a good job of finally really addressing it and saying the president has Jewish grandchildren, so calling him

a neo Nazi is pretty gross. And beyond or the saying that he has sympathy for neo Nazi is pretty disgusting, and they also leave I mean, his daughter, one of his daughters is a convert to Judaism as well. But beyond that, he said in the speech, I totally condemned neo Nazis and the bad people. But I'm talking about the statue debate. He clarified in the statement. They always

cite exactly what he was saying. It wasn't a later clarification, it was, as you know, the equivalent of a paragraph down to the transcript, just so everyone's very clear on what he's saying. And he's Trump, so he's imprecise with his words, and they've just I feel like that's been one of the fundamental dishonesties that the media and the Democrats have run with this whole time, and it's really

a foundational lie of the resistance, you know. It's that and Russia collusion are the two things they dug in on, and they're both complete fabrications, and yet we're supposed to take them seriously when they, even at this stage, continue to cite Russian interference in the election and Trump's Charlottesville comments.

It's even worse than that in a way, because she aframed the Charlottesville comment as if Trump said it while the neo Nazis were marching about them specifically, and then she tied it into this larger story of him saying things about soldiers and so on. But the way she framed it was even worse than the lie itself is usually told. And it is a lie. And you're right, though, I mean, it should have been a slam dunk for Trump at the time to be more clear and precise

about what he meant. But still he didn't say what they claim he says, which has becomes so prevalent that it's everywhere all the time, and no one will fact check it, really, I mean on the you know, in the media, they'll just repeat it. And now she gets to say things like Trump walked up to you the graves of soldiers and spit on them, which is also probably not true either. We have no real corroboration of

that story, but yet they can just say it. They work in sync with the Atlantic magazine whoever reported that, and they do this constantly, and it's very hard to fight back against. And I think you're right. Pence did a good job of pointing those things out as the debate went along, and he also did a good job of posing questions that Susan Page, who everyone says or most people say, did a good job. I don't think that that's true. Wouldn't ask, you know, yeah, well, she

didn't ask about the Supreme Court, which was stunning. She didn't ask yeah, right, the court packing question was very a very good moment for pets where she wouldn't answer, and then she went off on some ridiculous you know, university rant, you know, yeah, diversity rant. It you should have done more of that. That I think is what Republicans shouldn't be doing. So like when they asked you would you would you ban vice president of pets? Would

you ban abortion in Indiana? You should turn to Kamala Harris and say, give me the single restriction on abortion you support. Do you support states funded abortions until the ninth month? Because they're never going to ask that question of the other candidate never. Yeah, you're right, you know, and I think that's important. And I spoke with the Jesse Kelly about this last night right afterwards, and you know, because he said she was horrible, and I said, well,

the moderator was horrible. But it felt like in comparison to the I mean Chris Wallace white supremacist question, I mean that for me is just that's like, you know, hit hit the button, nuke at all. I can't handle this anymore. I mean, for me, that was a total total debacle. But you're right, I mean the MOTOO. We are so used to the bias and so used to the journos doing what they do that we don't even really ever step back and say, hold on a second,

why can't they ask a question like that? They'd ask questions like that of Republicans. No, we have we have become so used to allowing them to frame the issues, talk about the issues that they find important, that we don't talk about the issues that we do. Now the whether whether he wants to ban abortion or not. Returning Row would only bring it back to the States. Now, let's have an argument about abortion. But when you really

they always point out that Rows overturning it is so unpopular. Well, let's see how what polls say about people who want state funded abortions in the ninth month. You know, I assure you that that's going to be unpopular as well, But they never bring it up. And even though sort of words they use, like you know, pro choice or whatever it is, it's always skewing in one direction. I'm

not sure how to fix that. I don't know what to do other than taking over a debate and asking your own questions, which is why I think these debates are ridiculous. Anyway, let them fight. It is ridiculous to have all these rules, like they're in the middle of a good conversation and somebody has to butt in and say, oh, it's the two minute deadline on this question, so we can talk about global warming or whatever. I mean. It's

just insane. Yeah, they really should just have people. They should just have somebody who's sitting there to you know, I guess, try to keep some degree of equal time and let let them have at it. Because my least, for everything the debate was every time it felt like it was getting good, there was, but we got to get to this other thing. Why I don't give a crap about global warming. I want to hear about this nonsense.

Let them actually have the debate they're having, or have a number of debates and have them talk about different issues per debate. You should like, for instance, why are you asking different questions? Both candidates throw up an issue and let's see what they have to say about it. I just don't understand why you have to lead the conversation in that way. You know has had better questions

than the moderator. Yeah, from the Republican point of view, but still let let Kamala Harris ask her own questions if she wants. Maybe that's the best way to do it. Yeah, I like it. David Arsan everybody national review dot com for his latest check out his very clear thinking and clear writing at National Review dot com. David, thanks so much for joining. Thank you, sir, you're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Got to throw a discussion at COVID into the mix here before

we get to roll call. Kamala went after the administration and this is their single biggest area of attack, and it's really all about con COVID. It's terrible. We know that it's hurt the American people very badly. Two hundred thousand plus people have died. How many of them died from COVID directly versus with COVID. That's a discussion will continue to have going forward. But it's clearly a lot of people that have died from COVID nineteen and it's

done terrible things to our economy. It's true a lot of countries around the world, but they want to blame Trump for all of it, and Kamala Harris is certainly part of that effort. Play sixteen. Trump administration's perspective and approach to China has resulted in the loss of American lives, American jobs, and America's standing. There is a weird obsession that President Trump has had with getting rid of whatever accomplishment was achieved by President Obama and Vice President Biden.

For example, they created within the White House an office that basically was responsible for monitoring pandemics. They got away, they got rid of it. Not true. There was a team of disease experts that President Obama and Vice President Biden dispatched to China to monitor what is now predictable and what might happen. They pulled them out. We now are looking at two hundred and ten thousand Americans who have lost their lives all because of Trump. Is what

you're supposed to take from this. That's insane. But they believe it, or at least they want enough people to believe it so that they can become the regime in charge here. First of all, what she's saying is not true. But as Vice President Pen's pointed out, they did not scrap all these disease experts. We have a CDC, we have an NIH, we have an intelligence community with you know, hundreds of thousands of people running around in it. Okay, what exactly, what exactly are we supposed to think was

going to happen here? Oh, if only we had had a handful of people in the NSC who specialized in pandemic what they would have known more than Fauci. They would have known more than the other experts. I mean, you got experts all over the place, and honestly, most of them were kind of worthless. What have they been

ambled to tell us? People forget that we didn't know how this was going to affect, particular the elderly and the more vulnerable until it really hit Italy very badly, and at that point it had already spread to American shores, and was anyway just lying about it. You know, it is to blame for it, though Pence is right about this China play eighteen. China is to blame for the coronavirus, and President Trump is not happy about him. He's made

that very clear and made it clear again today. China and the World Health Organization did not play straight with the American people. They did not let our personnel into China to get information on the coronavirus until the middle of February. Finally, some honesty. I mean, the Vice President did a phenomenal job. I know we spent a lot of time talking about it today, but the guy deserves a big high five, and he really showed what the other the other side of this debate's all about, which

is misdirection. Lies, obfuscating, stonewalling, and doesn't really have very much to offer the American people. The Trump record is something that they can be proud of. The Biden Harris record is well individually, and then what they would do going forward is something that they just can't be honest with the American people about. That's the biggest single takeaway from all of this. Thanks for listening to the past.

Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the iHeartRadio app for wherever you get your podcasts, like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time for Roll Call, Role Call everybody. I'm so glad we have roll Call so I can hear from all of you across the country about what you think about the show and just what's going on in your lives. But also, you know, it's nice to hear stories about what's going on in other places because we have so

much less contact with each other. I go, I do so much less traveling now and don't get to get around and it's a shame. I like being able to bring you some stories and tell you about things. But we're all everyone's in kind of work from home lockdown, mode here in New York, New Jersey. I don't know what it's like in other places, so I'm glad to hear from all of you. I think it's a little

bit better. But it looks like my brothers gonna be moving down to Texas the next couple of weeks, so I'm gonna have a There's gonna be a Sexton in Texas a couple of weeks from now, so I'll be visiting him. He's gonna be in Austin, So it's a KLBJ. I know I've been promising you folks for a long time, but I will be telling you at some point. I'm down for the weekend and I'm gonna be, you know,

eating some barbecue and hanging out downtown. You can all come, and I'd say first rounds on me, but there could be a lot of them and that might get very expensive, and you know, gotta watch the expenses during the pandemic. But you know, we'll see, we'll make it happen. Facebook dot Com, slash Buck Sexton on the Facebook, Instagram Bucks Exton. Please send us your your messages there and let's get to it. Andrew right Hey, Buck Marine Corps lawyer here.

I wonder if Republicans in Congress could propose a constitutional amendment to establish nine Supreme Court justices. I think it would have wide public support, and then maybe Joe Biden will answer whether he supports it. Love the show, keep up the good work, brother, Well Andrew, thank you so

much for writing again. Thank you for your service. Sir. Yeah, I think that you know, it's a good idea what you raise, But I just know how the Democrats would probably dodge it very very early on, very very quickly. And that's just to say, well, of course it'll be not we don't even need we don't need it, Andrew. That's what they would say, we don't need it. We're nine, it's gonna be nine. Sure, sure, I need to say, well, buck,

but they've said that maybe they packed the court. Yeah, but that's just that's just what they're saying to try to get their base happy. Right now. They can't tell people what they would really do right now, so I think they would they would avoid it, just like look what Kamala is doing. She is straight up saying no, not gonna answer. No, I'm not gonna give you an answer. Ah, how does that work? Well, that's where we are. But yeah, man, good thought, Andrew, thank you so much for listening to

the show. Kevin Buck, I run off the road and die because my fogged up glasses when I exhaled while wearing my required mask while driving for Uber? Is that a COVID related death? Kevin? First of all, please safety first, Kevin, take care of yourself. We need everyone, We need every everyone on the team first and foremost to take good care of themselves and make sure they're healthy and safe.

And as for yeah, COVID related debts there the media has no interest in finding out whether this is sure or not that the media has no interest in finding out whether there is in fact an inflated number of COVID debts because of the way that they're categorizing them. There have been doctors who have come forward and said, yes, sure enough, it is the case that we are counting things as COVID related debts that are not COVID related deaths. But I don't care a right the media doesn't. It

doesn't matter. They're just going to keep pretending that this is not an issue because for right now, and this will switch so there'll be far fewer deaths attributable to a bid deministration under change rules of COVID, not actually any response because of the way they tabulate the numbers. The fix is in, folks, the fix is in. We all know it. Chris. How do you, mister sex and love the show? Anyway you can post your bit on

Obama reading off the teleprompter? That is, no doubt in the top five funniest things I've heard in my life. Your discussion on that was awesome. It'll serve as a great pick me up with Nita. Keep doing what you're doing it. Thank you for it. Well, thank you so much, Chris. I'm really really pleased that that was so amusing. Mark. Which one did I do? What was that? What did

I do? Mark? Has to remind me of what I say on the show the day of as soon as I'm done, I'm like Will Farrell and old School, where it's like he prepares for the debate gens at all in his head, and then afterwards she's like he doesn't remember anything. Um, I have a feeling this was before my time and this wasn't the end about Obama administration. Probably an OSS member here, Uh so it wasn't recent then, Yeah, because I don't I don't know. I don't know when

I did this. I mean, I don't know done a lot of funny things, folks. I don't want to tell you. You You know, it's hard to keep up. What can I say? Sorry, um, yeah, I don't Well, Chris, We'll try to find out what this was what I did. And I'm okay, Tim, I'm gonna tell you this too, and Mark is gonna groan, but I I give you my word. We are days away from the next shield Tie podcast. Days away, not weeks. Days from a shield

Tie podcast right at the height of the election. I know, but I feel like we could all use something that's not election related to listen to. It's already the first episode. The first new episode is seventy five percent recorded. So I'm not I'm not Mark. Mark don't. We don't want to hear it from Mark about how I've been promising for months of months. I'm just telling you, folks, right now it is recorded and it will be out relatively.

See now that you've said it, you're gonna procrastinate even more. Let's hope now. I would have preferred you just didn't say anything, and I should have just told me when I was done. I should have just surprised everybody with it. But now now this is like I've I've made a deadline for myself that there's even I can't escape this. I mean, you made a deadline six months ago, just for the record. No, but this is like a real deadline. Oh, this is this is a deadline that you know. It's

like it's a deadline, not a you know. Come on. Maybe I'm just saying we're gonna get it done and people can listen to the history, and I think they'll like it. And I've got a whole bunch of others in my mind, and once I get moving with it, then I think it'll Once you get those juices flowing, then it's easy to keep keep the history train rolling. Dan, here we go, Buck. I'm a professional software engineer with

my own business. I manage enterprise scale clients, including a very well known media company, a distinguished university, and a handful of Silicon Valley startups. If I was as wrong as Anthony Fauci any point with my clients, I would be laughed out of the industry. We are led by, as you would say, unimpressive people. I have never heard of doctor Fauci before COVID, and the doctors I am familiar with, such as doctor Salk, Pasteur, and Freud, all

have considerable accomplishments in their field. Even doctor Drew or ken Jong are more reputable at this point. And most importantly, please ask producer Mark about doctor Fauchi's not calling him doctor anymore? Throwing motion. How can we entrust the safety of our nation to a man who throws like that, Producer Mark, We defer to your expertise. Does a man throw in a way that is not to be trusted? Well? Yeah, I mean you remember the opening day first pitch for

the Nationals. He threw it to first base when he's trying to throw it a home plate. Basically, it's terrible, isn't he Like it is mid late seventies though. Yeah, but you, I mean, if you're in somewhat good health, you should be able to throw a ball straight. I think that's fair. He also was the captain of High High school's basketball team in different times. Maybe you give

him a basketball instead of a baseball next time. He was the captain of the High of the of the basketball team, he was five to seven um, which is which is now? I think I think he played center as well, which was interesting. He's the center, he's captain. He's five seven, so huh, I don't know. Yeah, kissing that league, they don't grow him tall. Yeah, yeah, because five to seven for a basketball center is not not

particularly large, Deborah. Since all the Democrats are so worried about having a hearing for Judge Barrett, is there some reason why they can't just take a vote if Mitch McConnell has the votes. Thank you, um, Deborah, I've been saying all along. I think that's what they should do. The hearing is coming up on Monday, so there certainly will be some fireworks there. The hearing is coming up, and yeah, we'll have to see, we'll have to see. I don't know. Um, that's where we're Bob. I look

back to your your thing, Deborah. I want to believe that. I think I just kind of did a kamala too there. I was like, you know, they hearing, it's coming up. I mean, look, it's been a long show. What could I tell you? The hearing coming up, and it's gonna be a hearing and we're gonna hear things at it. Sort of like I was comma on the debate stage, just spewing nonsense. I think they should go right to a vote. I don't I wish that they weren't going

to open the door for the assaults on ACB. I just I don't see how they're gonna be able to stop ACB even even with what they're gonna try to do. It just won't work, even with a Democrat, a Democrat opposition that would break any rule of decorum, decency, morality, or ethics to stop her. I don't see the pathway one. I gotta say that she was a high school rapist too. I mean, they could try. I don't think that will work. So what are they gonna go with. They gonna call

her a racist? Yes, the woman who adopted two children from Haiti and loved them as her own and raised them, you know, within her own family is a racist. Sure that's going to work really well, you know it? So they those are the usual. And look, Kamala last night, I will say this didn't really get to play much of either the racist card against Pence or the and she the sexist card the media tried to play for her. But and she was being a little bit a little

bit snippy with Pence. But it was not it wasn't It wasn't that much of it. So maybe ACB just gets through. But I'll just tell you this right now, and I will not forget it. Kavanaugh was just sailing through. Kavanaugh was totally qualified. Sterling resume. Everything about this guy should have been just easy as easy can be to

get him through. And then the coordinated assault with the three fake accusers of cavanall all coming forward to lie about him and call him a rapist and try to ruin his reputation, and you know, think about what they were really doing. They wanted that man's They wanted Brett Kavanaugh's wife to think differently about him. You know, every night when they would go to sleep, they will want Kavanaugh's wife to think that she had married a rapist.

I mean, this is the most disgusting. Look the Kavanaugh hearings they create, They created so many wartime conservatives and change the perspective that many of us have about the other side, where we just realize they're they're totally ruthless. They'll do whatever, they don't care, and you can either fight back or just let them have their way. Those are your options. The third option about triangulation or conciliation. You know, the the Mit Romney, John McCain, and yes,

even George W. Bush approach at some level. Not good, not good. You're in the freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right, more roll call? We got bomb up here, Hey, bucking Mark. I think Trump's message after leaving Walter read yesterday that we should not allow fear of COVID, we should not let fear of COVID control US is very powerful and will resonate

with a huge number of Americans. I think the Democrats also realize that, and I believe the media will freak out about it as an attempt to make the statement radioactive, to try to scare Trump into toning down or abandoning the message. I am concerned they might succeed. I believe it is a winning message and he needs to keep it front and center. It speaks to the American spirit and American history. Who are we to borrow the DEM's

favorite phrase? And I think it ties directly with economic recovery. Knowing Trump as you do, do you think he and his team will resist the message and keep pounding. I'm sorry, resist the pressure and keep pounding this message home. Yes, I think Trump will keep hammering this message, Bob. I'm very confident of that, and I've spoken to some of his top people and they're also very confident about that.

So yeah, I would say the answers. Yes, I would say it's very likely that the president will stay right where he needs to be with this Kevin Buck, when I run off the road and die because my glasses, Oh I'm sorry, we already did that one. Where we go here, Kyle Buck. On Tuesday's show, you talked about the anti cop hate movement in the Democrat Party while politicians talk out of both sides of the mouths, like Biden, of their mass mouths in order to not totally seem

insane and moderate voters. It reminds me of the anti military protest during the Iraq War. I remember being subject to some very nasty comments and gestures when in uniform from what we're obvious lives. While Democrat politicians back then we're doing the same rhetorical two step you see now about supporting the troops while opposing the war. It was bull like more recent or like resent the war fighter because the war is a useful political cudgel against Republicans.

Our unit was a was near a college campus and one night at brick was thrown through a large window with the words don't forget, will always hate you spray painted on the remaining window. I haven't forgotten. These are the types of people who protest cops. Now. It's disgusting. Kyle. Thank you for your service. And I think you're I think you're correct. I think that a lot of Democrat oh, we support the troops but hate the war. No, a lot of them actually hate. There are a lot of them. Actually,

I disdained for the troops too. If you look in this country, and this is why their attacks on Trump and saying that he doesn't like the military, it's just so obvious and so fake. In this country, if you don't respect the military, there's about a ninety nine percent chance that you are a Democrat, a leftist maybe ninety nine point nine. That's where that's where cop hatred lives, and that's where military hatred lives on the left of our political spectrum. It's just the truth, just the way

that it is. So I think you see that, Kyle. I'm sorry that some people show disrespect to you, but the decent patriotic Americans who listen to the show cannot thank you enough for doing what you did, serving in uniform and being the best of the American family. We appreciate it. Matt. I don't hear much about taking back the House this election. Is this a foregone conclusion that

Republicans won't take control? Matt. I've heard about it, but you're right, it hasn't gotten a lot of attention, and I think it's because they don't want to raise expectations of it, maybe a unified Republican government and then have to obviously scale that back a whole lot if it doesn't end up coming to fruition. So I don't know. I don't know if it's really looking that good for us right now. I haven't seen the polls recently, and

I haven't seen a macro analysis of the House. My understanding is that it's probably going to be a tough one for us to take back the House. That's where that's what i've as I understand it's probably gonna be tough for that to happen. So we shall see. But I will look more into that one, Matt, because you're right, that's not really a lot of focus on obviously the presidential race, and on the Senate a bit too, not so much on the House race, and that's going to

be up for grabs as well. John Buck, First off, Pens killed it in the debate. Second, I used to subscribe to the prediction that the election will be closed. But recently, after seeing a group of these Trump parades, yard signs, record new gun owners, record new black gun owners, and like in twenty sixteen, the Trump crowd versus the opposition crowd, I believe Trump will sweep on election day as long as he stays strong. All of these new gun owners are taking their safety into their own hands.

They're not going to vote for the party that wants to ban them. Let's see, John, I'd like to think that, you know your observations here will turn into a huge ump wave. Let's just say that. I like where your heads at. But I think it's going to be a very tight election. But I hope you're right and I'm wrong. I hope you're right and I'm wrong. Remember how I told you there probably wasn't going to be a second debates Looking like that might be the case, though, So

I do tend to get this stuff right. Just gonna say that. Remember people ask me back in August, I said there'll be one, So that may be it, and that may be it. We'll see all right, team, Thanks so much, Please pass the buck. Tell someone this week to download The Buck Sexton Show wherever they listen to podcasts. Until next time, Shield Tie