Normalizing Socialism

leading job boards. They have a powerful matching technology that will make sure that the thousands of resumes that you get access to will be scanned through so you'll get exactly the right people with the right experience for your job search. Folks, we used zip recruiter here to hire people for The Hill dot com and we've gotten great hires. These are now my colleagues and friends, and they came courtesy of zip Recruiter. It's no wonder that zip recruiter

is the highest rated hiring site in America. Try for yourself. My listeners can try zip recruiter for free. That's right, totally free. Go to zip recruiter dot com, slash sexton. That's zip recruiter dot com. Slash Sexton for this exclusive offer zip recruiter dot com slash Sexton the Smartest way to hire You are entering the freedom hunt. The left is doubling down on false accusations of racism because these smear tactics are the only way they think they can

beat strong conservatives going into the mid terms. We'll talk about that and also the normalization effect of the media on socialism and how this plays into a grand plan to exploit the next major crisis in this country to push us deeper and deeper into the left wing abyss. We'll talk about that and much more coming up today on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what

really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American, You're a great American. Again The Buck Sexton Show begins if you do it in constant dollars, So there's no monkeying around with numbers here. Nobody here of any party has until two thousand eleven monkeyed around with that proposition at risk associated with monkeying around with the dead limit, this formula.

You know, we've monkeyed around with us for so long, all along the health and Human Services Department has been monkeying around with the website that they would draw the line in Kosovo before he left and told Mr velascovit to no uncertain terms, don't monkey around with this one. And our Republican colleagues, even in their tax bill, cause premiums to go up by monkeying around with healthcare. Welcome to the bucks, exetit show everybody. I am sorry too

to have to play that audio for you. Where where? Clearly you have so many Democrats who, based on our new rules as of yesterday, are engaging in such foul speech. I mean, the racism is overwhelming from Oh wait, you mean they were just using a phrase in common usage. Oh, they've all said monkey around because of the phrase in common usage has nothing to do with with racism. So what is the problem with somebody else using that phrase?

Are we really going to pretend now that it's not a phrase in common usage just so we can slam a Republican? Oh the answers, Yes, what a shock for nobody. Uh, that is what they are doing. Plenty of people say this, it is a phrase, It was in no way intended to be any kind of a racial slide or even insinuation of one. And yet the media is running with this and and actually, to santiss opponent, UH is capitalizing

on this. I saw a poll that I saying he's I had five points, and they're trying to create distance between these two gubernatorial candidates for Florida as quickly as they can and trying to capitalize. Like I said, Oh, by the way, well even President Obama used the term UH play play fourteen. Well I'll tell you what it helps in Ohio that we got Democrats in charge of the machines. UM. But but look, I come from Chicago,

so so I want to be honest. It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeyed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have to phrase in common usage like limo a phrase in common usage. We'll see who catches that quote. But you know, this is uh. This is one of these times when you just see that the fake news in action. Any honest journey List should have said, all right, everyone, hold on a second.

We heard what the Santists said. We we see in the context he was just using a phrase other people just like what I said yesterday and now today, you know, after they've trashed as Santists as much as possible. It's coming out that you've got lots of Democrats that say this all the time, and they're the ones who are creating this narrative that the Santists was actually trying to a dog whistle by using this phrase. It's just it's

just wrong, man. I mean, there are a few things that that are as underhanded in politics as pretending that there is racism where there is none. It's so damaging to somebody's character. It's it's deeply wrong. As I've said to you before on this show, I mean, to be really a racist in our society is to be put on roughly the same well maybe a moral plane or two below the hatred, uh, that is that is reserved for people that hurt children. And but I mean, you're right,

you're right up there. You know, probably somebody that that assaults children is the worst of the worst. And then right below that you got racist. I mean, you know, people despise real racists as they should. We also despise anti Semites. We despise other people for hate, for hateful beliefs,

or rather we despise the hateful beliefs. Uh. And you know, but then people point out, why is like Louis Farricond, for example, able to say the things that he said and not be chased in the public square by the media. That's a maybe a conversation for another time, but but monkey around. I I had to deal with this today. Even on my show on Rising, I had people coming. I had a conservative who came on, a nice guy with a conservative daily caller who's like, I cannot defend

these comments. What do you mean you can't defend these comments. There's nothing to defend. It's fine. He didn't say anything. He didn't mean to say anything bad. He didn't do anything bad. Folks. This is why you are my sanity. This show my ability to come here and talk to all of you every day. I couldn't live in d C without you, guys. I really mean this. I couldn't do what I'm doing and engage progressives. I sat down,

we played the interview day with Elissa Lissa Milano. I was so gentlemanly in this interview, and some of you, when you see it, you're gonna be mad at me because you're like Buck, you should have just, you know, torn her ignorance on guns to shreds. And but you know, I asked, I let her, I let her speak for herself. I asked her the questions, and you got to hear from her. You know, yeah, I just like live in California. Like the main reason is because we have such strict

gun control laws. But but you you say you own guns in your home. Why do you hate someone like it's just but yeah, that's why she lives in a mansion in a canyon right outside of l A because of the strict gun control laws. Sure, good talk, oh man, But you guys are my sanity, You really are. You're the thing that that allows me to feel like I'm not alone in this crazy bizarro political kaleidoscope that is Washington,

d C. And the swamp. And it's on days like today when even some conservatives are running for cover on this one's like, no, this is what has changed, folks, this is what's different now about the Trump era. We don't all have to run for cover. We finally have somebody who's got our back. You know. It's it's like we're we're in a political street fight, and Trump is the six ft a pounds all muscle guy walking around

with a two buy four, who's like, who wants a piece? Like, we've got somebody on our side who can fight the fight for us. You know, we have somebody who's taken it to the media. I mean he was drop kicking. I mean old school like Randy Savage, super fly Jimmy snooka flying off the buckle drop kick against the media today. I mean just taking him to ask and he should because they have no shame. They should be embarrassed. CNN won't walk back this ridiculous story they have about Colin

Lanny Davis. Cohen is clearly uh not gonna say what they said. He said that Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting in advance, Lanny Davis was their source. CNN lied about Lanny Davis not being the source. They won't back down now because they know they've gotten too many black eyes already on anti Trump reporting. They've had to fire people already for anti Trump reporting. This is this is what's happening, folks. This we we see it all

around us right now. And you know, I just get I get so frustrated when I have conservatives they're saying, oh, well, you know it was okay, yeah, should he have been should just Santas have been a little bit more careful. Yeah, of course, I mean, you know, he shouldn't have put himself in a position. He should know better, in a sense than to allow the than to say anything that the left can even miss counts true as racist, right, that that they can even you know, give them anything

to work with on this. He's got to be more disciplined than that. And when he said but he didn't say anything wrong. It wasn't actually offensive or racist or anything else. And I'm just not gonna budge on this. I'm not gonna budge on it. I know you're not either. That's some conservatives to him, Man, it was, you know, And then what ends up happening is they do this whole thing about well, I mean, maybe it's not racist, but in the era of Trump, there's so much racism

that what's not racist becomes racist. No, that's not that's not that's not how words work, that's not how this happens. Andrew Guillim, the very progressive governor, I'm sorry, mayor, not governor whoa bucks settled down mayor of Tallahassee, Florida. He spoke on this issue today. And you know this is this is classic politicians stuff where he's gonna say uh that you know he doesn't really want to say that. Well, I'll let him, I'll let I'll let Mr Gillim speak

for himself play seventeen. I I don't want to jump to name calling at this stage of the race, and I'm hoping that they will try to avoid it as well. UM. I don't, however, believe um that the congressman uh was in any way uh frankly trying to to to back away from what he was suggesting that he was doing, which was, in my opinion, UM, playing a little bit of of of a race card there. I wish you wouldn't, however,

because I think he can be better than that. I think the President has been a horrible example when it comes to these kinds of issues. That is a lie, that is a low blow. It is completely ungallant, ungentlemanly and and dishonorable for Gillum. But he's a progressive, so you know that they don't are things like honor to progressive is that that's a that's a part of the patriarchy or whatever that they don't they don't believe in

that stuff. They believe in power and victory and the power of the state which they must harness, they must have in order to make a a utopian society. I mean,

that's so, that's what they think the stakes are. They think the stakes are either we're all gonna die because of Trump and Nazism and climate change, and also, oh, by the way, if they're in charge, we're gonna all be living in some amazing combination of Williamsburg, Brooklyn and Stockholm, Sweden, and everything is gonna be just just fine and dandy. Do we have a what do we have another Gillham clip? Don't we? John? What was the other thing that he said?

Whatever was? Can we play it? Do we have it? Hand? Yeah, we have it. We have a It's clip number one. It's kill him speaking in his own words, what he really believes in. Oh, yes, this is what I wanted to get to forget. If we want to replace there you go. You know, I'll go ahead and play it. We want to replace ICE with the Department of Justice, the entity that has not been tarnished in the same way as as ICE has. So so again he said, that's he says, you want to abolish Ice. Pause that John,

that is delusional. The the Department of Justice hasn't been tarnished the way that ICE has. The Department of Justice is having a fire people for being zealots who tried to throw a presidential election. Hasn't been tarnished. Where do they find this? I mean, this is abolish ice. ICE is about about I believe thirty of Immigrations and Customs enforcement. That number maybe a little high, so we should check out.

I think it's about thirty or former veterans. So you have an agent, a federal law enforcement agency full of military veterans that the Democrats are just spitting on left and right in favor of the legal aliens. Folks. That's really what this all comes down to. Look at what they're real priorities are. Look at what gets democrats energized and excited. It's not a great economy. It's not you know, the American worker feeling like he's got a shot or

she's got a shot. It's legal aliens a k A. To the left, undocumented, which no, no, no, not playing that game. Illegal aliens until it has changed in federal law. It is a legal alien, that is it. But you know he's saying there, he puts I'm sorry, continue because there's there's more after ice go ahead data FORIDA also believe in. Do you think the president should be impeached?

I absolutely do. I think he's he's already incriminated himself by interfering with the Department of Justice, firing Jim call Me of whom I'm no fan of, but basically obstructing justice. Two very interesting things said there. Let's start with the second one. First, of course, he's gonna say he wants impeachment. That's this is an impeachment election. That's what's on the ballot. I mean, yeah, people are gonna vote for their representative

or you know that. There's the local and state issues matter, But at a national level, the conversation is really going to hinge around, uh, the president and possible prosecution of the president. I should say, possible impeachment of the president. Pardon me, um. That's what this is all about. And it's funny that Democrats have to play. They want to tell their base that, but they don't want to tell moderates.

They don't want to tell centrists. Uh. They don't want to be too honest about their real intentions, which is true about Democrats all the time for Democrats to win, they have to hide who they are, who they really are at their core. This is a this is a constant theme with the left. So I'm not surprised that it will play out here with the whole impeachment looming impeachment fiasco, because that's gonna there's gonna be a lot of national healing then, folks, Yeah, that's gonna be great.

All these people that are lecture goes about discourse, and and political discourse is being coursened. And what about our institutions of government. Let's see how all that's going. When you have the entire media and the House of Representatives, the majority Democrats, trying to take down this president and essentially nullify the election of let let's see how healed we are as a nation. Then that will be interesting. Eight four four two five eight four Buck. We have

oh so much more to discuss. I want to follow up on the Bruce or situation, what's going on the d O J. I haven't spent much time on that. And then also the possibility of Hillary's emails being hacked and sent in real time to China. I mean, this is from the Daily Caller News Foundation. If this is true. I mean, what kind of world are we living in? How could the media not have figured this out before? Anyway, my my conservative brothers and sisters, the Daily Color, Daily

Color are on it. So we'll get into that in war. Stay with me. It has zero to do with ray Sean. Has everything to do with whether we want Florida to continue to go in a good direction building off the success or do we want to turn to left wing socialist policies which will absolutely devastate our state. And here's the thing. I believe people should be judged based on their ability and character, regardless of race. But it's because of that that I know that socialism won't work in Florida.

It's not good for any race, color, or creed. So this is not about race. This is about ideas and principles. And I'm not gonna let the Democrats and Andrew Gillham try to obscure a debate about whether his tax increases, his single payer health care plan, his desire to abolish ice, whether that is something that's acceptable for Florida. I don't think it is. But I don't care what color you are. I'm glad de Santis is is you know standing up

for himself, standing his ground on this issue. Um and and you know, it's good that people are out there fighting, you know, speaking of fighting. Trump on Twitter today was just on fire. It is amazing with this president is able to do with his Twitter account. And let me just give you some of the best while they're all trying to run around with these stories of oh, it's trying. You always just santas a racist. Well that's that's not true, and we all we've talked about that. But then you've

got this. Trump tweeted out today that the hatred and extreme bias of me by CNN has clouded their thinking and made them unable to function. But actually, as I have always said, this has been going on for a long time. Little Jeff Z has done a terrible job. His ratings suck and a T and T should fire him to save credibility. Then he has another tweet. What's going on at CNN is happening to different degrees at

other networks, with NBC News being the worst. The good news is that Andy lack E is about to be fired question Mark for incompetence and much more. When Lesser Holt got caught fudging my tape on Russia. They were hurt badly. Then finally, I just cannot state strongly enough how totally dishonest much of the media is. Truth doesn't matter to them. They only have their hatred and agenda. This includes fake books which come out about me all the time. Add that to fake news folks always anonymous

sources and are pure fiction. Enemy of the people. Trump is amazing. Oh he's amazing, is guy. Ah, it's just after after eight years of you know, hard left Obama is m and all the lectures from Obama constantly, and everyone's like, oh, he's so amazing. I just have Trump call out the media like this, I swear you know Trump's Twitter account. Man, it's like slipping into a warm bath. At the end of the day. It's just still relaxing

and great, he's back with you now. Because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fund never stops. Everybody's checking everybody else under the kind of Madisonian system of checks and balances that have served us so well. The courts is striking down executive orders, sometimes upholding them. The president's checking Congress. Congress, particularly if the Democrats get control,

will check the presidency. But who's guarding the guardians who is overseeing the Special Counsel or other over zealous prosecutors. The courts aren't doing it. Um the there's no there's no process that today exists. And I suggested the appointment of a permanent group to oversee prosecutorial overreaching and they would have the opportunity to at least final reports about

prosecutorial overreach. Because today the Special Counsel is the only institution of government outside of our system of checks and balances.

Why did Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele before we before we get to I know, we had another different plan there, but this, this is just too important that the dirsh is hitting on something very central here, folks, something that you should have in your in your mental arsenal whenever you come up against somebody who's saying things like Trump is destroying our norms of government, He's destroying our institutions, all that stuff that you hear. How he's such a

you know, yes, he's norm busting in many ways. That's good disruptive, right, Disruption in the private sector is a good thing. Why isn't disruption when it comes to a government's sclerotic way of doing business? Why isn't that also a good thing? Okay, So, um, what you need to remember, and I say it to you also as a reminder to myself, is that the system is in fact working

as designed. The system worked in that Trump was able to despite all the media machinations against him and all of the hurdles that were in his way from the establishment, Trump was able to break through. So we can still have real Uh, you know, political political change can occur in this country. We can be surprised. It doesn't have

to be the way it's always been. But then more so, when he's been in office, there have been lots of ways in which different agenda items and and different points of policy have either balanced out or stayed stayed in a kind of neutral space because of checks and balances. You have the Trump administry. They talk about Trump as though he's some kind of an autocrat or a fascist, a Mussolini like figure, or maybe Hitler, depends on how

angry they are that day. I'm pretty sure Mussolini wouldn't have been like, Okay, well, there are hundreds of federal judges, but one of them doesn't like me, So I'm just gonna not do the thing that I've said I'm going to do as the head of this government because of that one judge. That's now, that's not how Trump has done it. He said, Okay, you know, we'll take this

to court. We'll go to court over this issue. In fact, many of Trump's critics are willing to throw out what our constitutional norms, are willing to abandon the system of government that they pretend to like whenever it comes to an area that Trump is acting within those boundaries, and they just don't like the decisions that he makes. This brings me back to my mind. We should have actually put some audio, Mike from the list of Milano interview.

I didn't think about that till now. But it's pretty funny. You know, she liked this. She liked the swoop until things got a little you know, things got a little spicy with the political discussion, and then she had to uh, she got a little sassy with me. But I think overall she liked the swoop and we we had a nice scot a nice conversation. I'll tell you the true story. Actually, Mike, you ready for this. So we're about to start the interview, and we were all set up in in her home

in uh, you know her lab. I mean it's a mansion. It's a straight up mansion. And you know California outside of l A And and there's all these other mansions. When you're driving to the mansion, I'm like, this more to be nice. It's just like mentioned Ville. And I don't mean Mick mansion's. I mean like Jeeves the butler is waiting for you with the door kind of mansion. Uh. And and this this, it was pretty cute. I will admit.

This chihuahua, she told me. I think he was sixteen years old, which I didn't even know chihuahuas could get that old. This little ancient chihuahua walks over kind of like the docks, and that was dragging. It's it's you know, it's fifth leg. When I when I tried to pick him up, and then he tried to bite my face off.

But her little ancient chihuahua came over and like walked over and I was gonna reach down and try to pet him, and he just like whizzed on the rug right next to me, and you know what, like and we had cameras the whole day. I'm like, you know, this is a sign I think this interview is gonna go off the rails. When the chihuahua basically peas on your foot before the interview, things are gonna go south on you. Things are gonna go So I got a little ching there. But anyway, so by back to the

policy part of this discussion. Forget about ancient chihuahua. Is we weing? Uh? The the Supreme Court situation with Kavanaugh. She said at one point she goes, he should Trump shouldn't be able to appoint Supreme Court justice And I said, I said, well, what what do you mean he shouldn't be able to? He's the president. The president has the right to appoint. I mean, these are this is a constitutionally granted power. When you say he shouldn't be able to,

what does that mean? And what it really comes back to is they don't they don't accept that he's the president. They're in this weird state of denial. But who's really doing the undermining of government? Then, when you're the one saying the president is not the president, who's the one that's undermining institutions? When you're the one that's saying, as a leftist that when the president exercises his authority to either appointed Supreme Court justice or fire James Kobe as

the FBI director, for example. Who's undermining on norms of government?

You know, Dersha, it's his point. And this is I think really profound, is that Trump has stayed well within the bounds of government, that our government is functioning just five and actually, and the only part of our government that is a rogue elephant that's out of control, that is unaccountable, is, in fact, the Special Counsel that the leftists are cheering on against the president, that the deep state mob is crying out, uh two, you know, give

them their dream, which is that Trump will no longer be the president. So that's why I think the calls for some review of prosty. There really is no mechanism in place to deal with the Special Counsel, because, of course, if they if they shut it down, oh my gosh, you know, that's terrible, it's an impeachable offense. So who is the Special Council accountable to if he can't be fired because they've already decided it's political to fire him

under any circumstance. There's no circumstance under which they would agree he should be fired. Is there any accountability for Muller? No, now there is not. So who's really running a rogue operation that is outside the structure of government that we're supposed to have. Oh, that's right, it's the anti Trump Democrats. What a surprise, um, And you know the there was a we don't have the audio. I know, Mike, but

I saw this is one of these panelists. Tapper puts him on his very serious news show a lot because some of the dumbest panelists on television going on Tapper Show in a regular basis. But anyway, Uh, A woman went on I forget her name to say that it's a hostile takeover of the judiciary that Trump has engaged in. No, he's just the president and he's appointing federal judges and McGann, who everyone I know is all in some panic about. Oh m again, he spoke to special counsel for thirty hours.

He's leaving. Yeah, folks, he spoke the special counsel for thirty hours and they still got nothing. What does that tell you? Uh? You know what, what's the real takeaway there? So? I think that's I think that's very important to keep

in mind. And now I want to because so that's the the notion of federal prosecutors running them off doing whatever they want, in this case, with the Special Counsel, the effectively the unlimited resources of the federal government at their disposal and a mandate to take down Trump, which is what this is. It's all it's a myth that this is about Russian interference. We already know about the Russian interference. And guess what, there'll be no consequences really

to Russia. I know we're gonna sanction some people over the place. Let me no real consequences of Russia. And we couldn't even stop this again if we wanted to, we might be a little more on guard against it. But it was nothing. It was a nothing burger that they made into a something burger. Um. So that that's let's just put that. Put that now in the on the list of things we needna keep in mind that the the undermining of our government is actually coming from

the left. Trump has stayed well within the bounds set by the founders, and in fact it is the Democrats who are suggesting that Obama's decision making cannot be undone by Trump when it comes to say DOCCA, when it comes to different issues of executive discretion. All right, now, John, please do play a man Jim Jordan's shirtless or rather blaze a less not not shirtless Jim, God, that's a that's a different show. Jacketless Jim. There we go, jacketless

Jim Jordan's Uh. He had this to say about Bruce Or play. Why did Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele picked Bruce Or in the first place? Why they select his wife to come work refusion? They had a direct access Chris Steele had direct access to the FBI. He was handing them parts of the dossier. Why did they also want to run it through Bruce Or at the Justice Department and to me to create weight incredibility behind the

document that was completely false. If you can now go tell the press and tell other people, Oh, a senior Department of Justice official is also talking about the dossier and also passing it onto the FBI. It gives it weight when in fact it was completely an incredible, unverified document and a bunch of garbage. Jim Jordan's totally right, folks. What the heck was Bruce Or thinking in this whole process? And why would a why would someone at his level

be so involved in this. I've told you this all along, and I don't like to bring people, you know, family into things and let but his wife is directly involved. She's directly implicated here. Nellie Or worked at Fusion GPS. She saw it, was all all involved in this dossier. She's also I believe a Russian linguist and a russianist or a Sovietologist herself. But you know, Nellie Or was

was working on this project for Fusion GPS. Christopher Steele brings back the information and her husband is the guy running around like uh javert looking for Valjean that just got very French, like a lame is reference out of nowhere, but but just completely set on this notion of the dossier as credible and as a necessary thing to be investigated and even to get you know, is a warrant based off of it. I'll tell you this if I get the opportunity, and maybe I will at some point soon.

I'm not saying I will, but maybe I will if I get the opportunity to speak to the president about this. The one question I've got to put to him, I think he'll just say that they would claim he's interfering with the investigation. And even if it did prove that the dossier was the primary basis for the investigation. The one thing that I would want to ask the President right off the battist, why not just declassify it? Man,

Just do it, Just do it. Let's see what was in that PIES application, because I think that would make for any reasonable person, it would make the whole thing crumble. But I think Trump's point would say, he'd say, look, we already know that it's the dossier, and if I declassify the rest of it, the national security deep state apparatus is going to completely freak out at me. And and the Democrats are still gonna say I should be impeached. Are still gonna say, you know, you can't undo the

brainwashing that the Democrats have engaged in against Trump. You can't undo it. So even presenting them with irrefutable its feels like a fool's Errand I think that's what Trump would probably say, in a much trumpier way than that, But that's that would be his his approach, because I I just I want this whole thing to stop. We have more important issues to focus on than this fantasy of Russia. Collusion with Trump, and and I would like to also see some accountability. I know Trump has called

for Bruce Or to be fired. We'll see. I have a suspicion that Or was more careful, more cautious than some of the others involved in this, and that his bad behavior, while politicized, wouldn't necessarily cross the red lines into anything that would be criminal. So I don't think that you can. That's just my guess, you know. I know it probably is. It would sound more interesting on radio and it's like Bruce Or is going to prison,

but I don't think that's the case. There's also this issue of Hillary's the possible hack of Hillary server with real time well that the China Chinese Link company did this, and we're just finding out about this now. If this is true, and I'm not yet confident that it is, although there is there is reporting on it and they're standing behind the Daily car. If this is true, uh, we are at we are at def Con one in terms of politicization for the Department of Justice and the FBI.

I mean that then then it's not just we need to get rid of the bad apples. We need like a full scale house cleaning and maybe we maybe that's where it needs to go, folks, maybe it does. Eight four to five, we got much more. Stay with me, YEA got some lines. Let let's talk to our buddy Brian from up in Massachusetts, the state I remember finally

from my college years. Hey Brian, Hey Buck, you know, I think the main reason Trump doesn't be classified toppy the document is because of set a precedent and the left would be able to use any kind of reculation against Trump, uh that that involves a classified document, saying, look, if he's innocent, why doesn't he just declassic document like he did with a visa and they would just use the game suspicion against him, you know, and they use

it against him in the future. So when I'm a little confused, you're saying, why shouldn't he declassify it if he were to be classified document, if there were if there were any kind of speculation on a different issue that involved a classified document in the future, all the news organizations left when media would say, well, if he was innocent, he would declassify the document. Ah, you're saying,

I see, I see. You're saying it sets a precedent so that you know, if he declassifies that, they could say, well, why won't he de classify this other thing? He must be hiding that, right, So anything in the Mueller probe then becomes an issue that they could use as essentially use use against the president and suggest that he should

declassify anything that they tell him to. Is that Is that a fair read back of what you're saying, not just the Mueller investigation, but any any kind of speculation in the future, anything that comes up in the future. If he doesn't be classified, eventually there will be something that involves Dorces methods that he can't be classify, and they're going to use that to his disadvantage. I think that's true. Look, I think that's a complete mab ran.

I think it's a completely valid point um. And and maybe that would also be what the president's response would because he I think he said before that you know he's thinking about it. What the president says that a lot of things, So I don't I don't know if that means that he's really seriously considering it, but it is a it's a it's the nuclear option. There's no question to to declassify the entirety of a FIES application.

Would and now when I see the entirety, maybe they could black out and you know, some names that but but you know, once you get into that process, now it's like, well, who's gonna be doing the blacking out of names? And all of a sudden you're where we are right now, right, So it's either it might have to be uh, you know, the whole thing, you know, a whole hog or nothing. Um, but I think you

raised a very good point. Anything else you got on your mind, Brian, that's all all right, man, Thank you, excellent, excellent call. Appreciate you give me a ring shield ti Um, Mike, do we have that sort of cryptic prediction from uh oh we were about to interesting Chuck Todd. Well, you know, there's a part of me that looks at somebody like Chuck Todd and thinks, you know, I I respect you, got it. I respect that he's gotten Oh oh, sorry,

that was John telling me something else. I respect that Chuck Todd, who's to meet the press host, has gotten very far on what I can what I would consider to be not so much. So there's a part of me that looks at Chuck Todd the way that when you see a guy walking down the street. Who, um, let's just say, is not exactly an Adonis and he's walking with a beautiful woman. You could think to yourself, you know, that's so unfair, or you can think, ah,

there's hope for me too. Uh. And with Chuck Todd with his media career, that's kind of how I think of him. I'm like, I guess there's hope for all of us if Chuck Todd give me the host to meet the press. So let's let's we'll come back to that. My god, we got that, we got a cryptic prediction about a possible Mueller bombshell going into the well going to the liber Day weekend. But we will get into

that and much more in the second hour. Quomo throwing down with Cynthia Nixon we'll discuss and Broke Cuomo makes an appearance later in the show too. Every higher that you make is precious, right, it's somebody that's going to be contributing to your business, you hope day one, and especially if you're a small business owner, you know that

the people you have around you are everything right. If you're a huge company, you know that you need to make sure you process the best people possible as quickly as possible when you bring them in. That's why, whether you're big or small as a business, you need Global Verification Network. Global Verification is the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. They're headquartered in Chicago.

I know the CEO personally. He really cares about what he does and make sure that his people, his investigators, his vetting folks, are the best in the business. They're incredibly discreet, they are trustworthy, and they are a veteran owned and operated company. Call to check them out. Eight seven seven six nine five nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five nine. Are going to my g d

N dot com. That's my g VN dot com. Buck Sexton mission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Mag Noor mistake American. Ready, you're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Tum C I a analysts Sexton. No, that's trap Juliani is trying to set. I think pr wise, which is you're taking forever. Wait,

why are you taking during the election? Think exactly. That's why I feel like maybe in January is going to be the time when Mueller an announ started thing because you enough time before election, but you wait until after this election saying I'll be out here. I'm not missing work tomorrow. I would miss work. Tomorrow's a day of the pre labor day to election day window sale. Is Chucky Todd correct there is? Is there going to be some kind of a bombshell tomorrow from the Mueller probe?

I tend to think not, you know what, what Mueller has done in the past, what the deep staters have gone with as their strategy leading up to this point has always been much more dumping news that is unfavorable to them late late in a on a Friday or even over a weekend, and timing other things for for

maximum impact against the administration. I think if you were to look at a timeline of some of the biggest announcements so far in this whole probe, you would sure enough find that you'd have to believe in some pretty big coincidences for this too, you know, not be in any way politicized in terms of the announcements and when they've when they've come out, when they're going together. So we'll see if if Chuck Todd is correct, but they're

clearly hoping. I think that there will be something that will get the resistance even more fired up going into the mid terms. There is always the possibility of backlash. There is that chance out there that by pushing so hard for impeachment and by making the mid term elections about removing this president from power in some I mean, they're never really going to get them in the Senate. I think that's that's I do believe that's a straight up fantasy for the last there's no way that there.

But I think they believe that they can effectively hobble this president's agenda um by making sure that we just spend the next two years talking about impeachment and then they'll have somebody else who will be running against an impeached president for for his reelection. So that that's their game plan. I think that much is is pretty clear. And another part of it is the the lawfare that

you can expect they will wage against Trump. I mean they will, and I have to agree with some of the Washington Post reporting on this, they will just find so many ways to come after this administration abusing, abusing, uh the law that it'll it'll make our head spin if they if they take the House. I mean, this is from the Washington Post today. Winter is coming, alliesphere.

Trump isn't prepared for the gathering legal storm. And this is advisors worry that President Trump has neither the staff nor the strategy to protect himself if Democrats take over the House, which would empower them to shower the administration with subpoenas or even pursue impeachment charges. I think they will pursue impeachment charges. But just remember, folks, and and

do all those subpoenas. But remember, you know, with all the stuff that happened in the Obama administration, there were lots of hearings, lots of stuff that went on, and there was no accountability for them. It's really gonna come down to just Trump's base stand behind him. These are political questions the Democrats are trying to settle through the weaponization of the law for political purposes. But these are political questions that and these are political issues that have

them that have the left so upset. They're pretending that it's all about the rule of law and Trump is is destroying all these norms and is broken I mean, they think he's broken so many laws. I mean At this point, you gotta think, well, either Trump is a is a is a genius evading the accountability, the legal accountability that should come along with all these violations, or they're just throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks.

They're just trying to find whatever means, whatever mechanism they can to create a narrative of of Trump doing illegal stuff. Um. And and speaking of accountability and the lack thereof, you had the the FBI today responding to President Trump's tweet. Now here here's the backstory. Okay, so the Daily Caller News Foundation has this story that a Chinese company was getting real time updates about Hillary Clinton's emails. Uh, and

that it looked That's the Daily Caller story. As far as I understand, they have not backed down off of They have not backed down from it at all. Um. I don't believe that they have had any amendments or anything else to the story. And so they're saying, look that Hillary wasn't just it wasn't just that there was a hack, It was that the Chinese government may have

had access to her emails. Including that would mean, because of Hillary's reckless email practices, classified information that was transmitting her server. And always remember this, folks, because they tried leave this out. The only reason she had a private server for this business was to evade fo your requests. The only reason she did this was because she wanted control over her record of emails so that they couldn't

nail her. I'm sure for Clinton Foundation malfeasance, she was still involved with the Clinton Foundation when when she was Secretary of State. I mean it was a massive slush fund, a global slush fund. Billions of dollars gone to the Clinton Foundation, and she was still involved while she was the head of US foreign policy. I mean, it's just insane what she was able to get away with. It really is. But the FBI has responded to this Daily Caller report saying that they have not found quote any

evidence that the Clinton servers were were compromised. I have a few thoughts on this. First of all, I'm not entirely confident, and I don't know. I'm not I'm not trying to suggest that I'm saying not confident when I mean I know one way or the other. But I I couldn't tell you definitively if the FBI would even be able to tell if there was an intrusion. I mean, especially if the Chinese government was involved. The Chinese were

very sophisticated cyber actors, folks. You know, look at the level of sophistication that we have seen on display from our do o J and our FBI. They're basically like, this guy did a report from some Russian sources. You's got a Dacier and Dacier. You know, it's like scary, and you know this guy Trump is bad because of

the Dacier. That's not encouraging when you think about some of the some of the enemies that they're up against, and especially when you're talking about a sophisticated state actor like the Chinese government. I don't know how how well are you know, FBI digital forensics measure up against the Chinese government's ability to get in and out of that server without And I really don't know, but I would say that it's at least worth thinking about. Is at

least we're thinking about. But then you also have the other layer here, which is, well, how much do we even trust that the FBI really gave its all to this effort. You know, there's another report out an investigation I think it was published in real clear investigations that was saying that they didn't, that there's no way that they went through all the emails on Wiener's laptop in advance of the election, That there's just no way they

could have done that in time. I also think that based on everything we've seen from the Hillary investigation and the clear lack of desire for any kind of a conviction of Hillary or any of the people around her, they really weren't trying to get a conviction. They're really trying to make the whole thing go away. It's hard to look at any of the other aspects of the investigation to Hillary's email server and not feel like, well, the fix was always in, So why should we believe

them on this issue? You want to talk about undermining institutions, and this is, I know, to recurring theme I'm hitting a lot today on the show, but this is one of the primary criticism year from the left about Trump. Look At how much the dj is undermined itself. Look at our completely rational skepticism that we must apply to any pronouncement from the FBI right now involving these matters,

not involving like random drug dealers and everything else. But uh, you can't help but feel like you've got a greater degree of skepticism now than before, and you should have a greater degree of skepticism than you did before. So did the did the Chinese hack Hillary's emails and get into them and see classified stuff because of Hillary's recklessness?

We don't know, but I'm not sure we're ever going to be able to know because there are too many interested parties who I think we're willing to lie about it. I gotta I gotta tell you guys something funny today. You know, I've got this this crew I work with on the hill, and these guys who run the studio and the cameras, and they're awesome, right and and they're so funny because they, like me, are up very early

in the morning. They love coffee. But you know what the only coffee is they want to drink now, Black rifle coffee. I've got my black rifle cake cups on my desk at the office because first thing I do every every single day as I go into the office and I throw a black rifle cake up into our machine. I'm making myself a delicious hot cup of freedom. And I'm telling you everybody in my office now is trying

to sneak my Black Rifles when I'm not looking. I've told them, go ahead, guys, get it for yourself, take whatever you can. But also, why don't you subscribe like I do? And now I'm getting lots of converts to Black Rifle because they don't want to drink that commie swill. They want the good stuff. Go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck use the coupon code buck fifteen that I'll get you fifteen percent off. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash Buck coupon code buck fifteen for

fifteen percent off your whole order. Jeff is in Evansville, ahead of the big of that Jo Sandra, I'll tell you the President. You know, you may argue with some of his tweets, but he's right about this. Like a look at the crowd already gathering outside the Ford Center here in Evansville. At of my enthusiasm for the president, I agree with a lot that he is doing, even though some of his methods may not be as traditional. And he's the first president we've had lately. It isn't

kissing everybody's round. If it's a choice between lacking him on his comments and his his demeanor or his policies. I like the policy, so I can live with the demeanor. But these folks say to a person that actually things are much better for them. So do you think it'll be a big enthusiastic crowd here? You know, that was a bunch of folks and uh, that was Curtis. That was from Fox News. But they're out in Evansville, Indiana,

where is doing his rally tonight. And and you know this, this is one of these areas that the mainstream media still refuses to understand. I think it's not that they aren't capable of understanding, they just choose not to understand. And you know this is this is where you start to look at um how it's It's always framed as though Trump voters are they're making excuses for how he acts as a person. You know, Trump voters are are

ignorant of the Stormy Daniels thing or something. They say all this stuff, But no, that's not what's going on. We just refuse to allow the media to make us care and to make us wallow in whatever Trump's personal idiosyncrasies. Maybe because he is getting done as the commander in chief. He's doing a good job as president. I do not care. I do not need a moral example from the president. Quite honestly, I don't think we've had a moral example in the oval office in a long time. It certainly

wasn't Clinton. I think George Bush was a good man. I think that he made some terrible mistakes as president. Uh and and a lot of people paid with their lives. Okay, So I think George Bush had some big mistakes. And you know, Obama he wasn't. Uh. He didn't have personal scandals, but certainly at a policy level, and some of the things that he pushed, and I think some of his I think some of his ideology is really dangerous to the country. But I guess for some people, you know,

he had a nice family life and everything else. So I give credit where it's due, But I don't need a moral, a moratal exemplar in office. I need somebody who, yes, obeys the laws. But Trump he is obeying the laws. All this stuff about how he's he should be impeached because he did this or that, it's just all noise. They they really think that they're they're gonna they're gonna bring him down by citing some some pretty vague interpretation

of statute when it comes to campaign finance law. I mean, this is the this is the political equivalent of a speeding ticket, and they want the presidency to end because of it. It's just nuts. And I'm just so happy that, you know, I'm so happy that people who supported Trump are are still willing to look at this despite all that, because there's so much pressure from the culture broadly speaking to to just say, you know what, yeah, I can't

support Trump anymore. He wasn't nice enough about John McCain towards the end, or or he wasn't you know, he was mean to a gold Star family, or you know, there's all these so much pressure, and we look at this and say, you know what, I want a president who's doing things that make the lot, that make my life easier and better, and that is doing that for

the American people overall. Notice how I won't use the term written large, the very d C thing I'm always says written large around here, But you know Trump, all Trump and and his voters, there's this connection the reason that his his numbers don't go down, which freaks out. I mean, it actually freaks out some of the left on TV, and it's because we understand why we're supporting

him and what we want from him. And you know, here here you at MSNBC, you have Ali Velshi and Stephanie Ruela who are trying to make heads or tails this whole thing. Here's what they say, Place sixteen, so well we could find or do find the president's constant lying or lawlessness or reprehensible behavior morally unacceptable. A lot of people vote pretty selfishly, and they say, what's going to give me more money in my post, or what's

gonna keep what's gonna make abortion illegal? Or what's gonna make sure that my Second Amendment rights stay the same. And clearly that adds up to enough people that the president still has something akin tot of the electorate in polls. It's kind of fascinating to us, as I'm sure it is to you. But how do we talk about that? How how about not calling it selfish? How about calling it voting based on the policies that they want their

elected representatives to pursue an office selfish? Why is that, of course making abortion illegal? That's not selfish. That's the most selfless thing that any any administration or president could ever do. Uh. And it's something that I really do hope that Trump, who has been good on the on on pro life issues thus far, and the the remaking of the judiciary that has occurred under this president. Uh,

you know, and especially after Kavanaugh gets through folks. Yeah, there's an argument made that Trump's the most pro life president, will have been the most pro life president in his actions. I know, something to say, oh, Poky slept with a porn star in his actions that affect the entire nation of million people a little bit, the most pro life president in my lifetime, or maybe well I don't really remember Reagan, but he even mind Reagan did. People are

gonna yell me for saying this. Reagan did actually sign a law, sign an abortion law when he was governor California, which he repudiated later. But you know, that is a that is a fact. Um. You know. I think it's interesting though that it's to see these people that in the media taking this position of wait, what what do you mean hold on a secure that that they like that the president is doing what he said he would do, which is good for them. And so even though we

say that he's basically Hitler. They still support him. This just doesn't make any sense. I mean, they seem to have a real, a real hard time computing this. But it should not be, in fact, that complicated for them. It should not be something that brings uh so much consternation to the forefront, because, you know what, what could be more straight forward than a president doing what he says he's gonna do and people voting for him because of that. You know what could be more straightforward than

the country is doing well. I remember I, you know, I was out there trying to make a career switch. That's right. I was looking to make a career switch when we are still dealing with, you know, the financial crisis, and you know, I was thinking of going to grad school and I didn't go. Why didn't I go to grad school? Because I don't want to take out the debt because I don't know if I'd be able to

pay it off. And I wasn't gonna sign anything that I wasn't darn sure i'd be able to pay back, right, I mean, that's but but I remember it was, oh, you know, the economy, it may never really rebound, it may never really come back. And now everyone's like the stock markets at all time high's. People think it's going higher. And people that I know who were really smart on the issue and there, and they don't even like Trump necessarily and they're saying, oh, no, Trump has really has

really done some great things here. So you know, this is just it's such a divide right now, folks. The media is but we said he was hitler and he's terrible and he's a fascist, and um, norm all Americans who have not had their brains polluted or who have not been brainwashed by the meeting to thinking that Trump is is some kind of a crypto neo Nazi what whatever, you know, Russian agent are looking at things and saying, now,

this is good. We're gonna stay with this. This is better than what we had with Obama on the things that matter. Why wouldn't you support that? That's the question I have. And that's a question that I have for some of my my colleagues and the concern and conservative media they still call themselves conservatives, who are even going so far as to say they want to vote for Democrats in this mid term. I you know it, it bums me out. I can't say that I can't say

I'm okay with it. It's not my call. Obviously, people can do whatever they want, vote for whoever they want. But it bumps me out to see some some some very smart conservatives actually, just who are so never Trump that they think that helping the other team, that fighting for the other side of the battlefield is the way to go. That makes no to me. But that rallied on Indiana. It's going to be it's going to be lit. Trump is gonna be in fuego and we'll be right back.

He's holding the line for America, Buck Sexton his back. The Democratic Party of Humphrey or Jfkre even Bill Clinton, no longer exists. It's a pyramid with a few grandees on top that have enough money that they can be immune from the consequences of their own ideology, and then a group on the bottom who depend on subsidies and they've alienated the middle class. A lot of this passion

comes from misreading the two elections of Barack Obama. They felt that that was a trajectory that was going to be permanent and create a progressive future, and really it was unique to Obama and Hill. Clinton inherited all the downsides of losing the middle class under Obama, who after all, lost the House and the Senate in a thousand local races, but she got none of the upsides, that is record minority turnout and block voting. I think it's very astute

from Victor Davis Hansen. And you all know I'm I'm a in general an admirer of v. D h is work, But his point about the Democratic Party, I think we're just seeing this play out in real time. I mean, the Dems are are a party that it's it's so hard to really gauge where they think the outer limits of their leftism lies. At this point, they've got candidates

out there on the national stage. Now they're not running in you know, national elections, not running for president because we don't have one of those going on just yet, but who are pushing some really out their ideas. And they wonder why when people ask about this, and and you know, they run the polls, you know Democrats can't make a dent in Trump's support. Well, it's because look

at what they're offering. You know, if somebody wasn't enamored with Trump's rhetoric, if somebody feels like you know what, Trump takes it too far sometimes I don't like his approach.

I disagree with this or that. If that was in fact their feeling and the Democrats were a party that was all about greater efficiency with the healthcare uh that we have right now, and and you know, trying to do more to promote jobs for the working class and do more to you know, the blue collar, the blue collar predominantly white voters that Trump won, many of whom voted for Obama. If Democrats actually pitched to that group, uh.

And by the way, I believe that a lot of that pitch would resonate with non white voters as well. Who are people trying to work and get ahead in life, then they'd be a really they'd be so much more serious as opposition and as contenders. But in head, they just had this wild eyed anti Trump fury that they offer up and it just does not make any sense. I mean, you know, he Vitor Davis Hansen mentioned, uh, the grandees as he called it, you know, and that's

so true. You know, Democrats are always posing is so concerned about the poor and minorities and lgbt Q. You know, the Democrats poses as that as the defenders of the downtrodden. That's one of their favorite moral positions or positioning of themselves in moral terms. But when you when you look at some of the people that are the ones pushing that narrative, these are people that have no idea what

it's like to be poor in America. These are people who don't live in predominantly immigrant uh and illegal immigrant neighborhoods, who don't interact with illegals, who don't have to worry about their kids in public school, who, as he said at are are immune from the silliness of their policy positions. But they've achieved through the very capital assistant that they scorn so much wealth that they're able to infect the

rest of society to some degree with their bad ideas. Uh. He spoke about styre and sorrows, for example, and how there's this push now for pretty much open And if you don't know stire is Tom Styer. He's environmentalist. We'll get to him in a second. He's out there. And then there sus whose nms like this. If you think I am making it up, listen to a saus into a view and he sees how he talks about international

financing Anyway, here's the dah said about that play a levet. Yeah, I mean Styre got his wealth in part through investing in coal plants abroad. And George Sorols was indicted and convicted in France and he was responsible for a crisis in the Bank of England. So they don't have sterling ethnical records. They've so de legitimized Trump, or at least attempted to and demonized him. That socialism is sort of is portrayed as a legitimate opposition to an abnormal situation.

So we usually in America don't like socialists, but if we create enough chaos analogies to the two thousand and eight election or the Watergate, then socialism looks sober in judicious as a foiler. This is so important because historically Victor Davis Hansen is right on the money. The reality of socialism in America is actually much more complicated, and the Communist Party USA was much more prominent than a

lot of people realize. And the reason for that was that after the First World War and the Great Depression, there was a widespread sense among the intellectual class in this country as well as in Europe, that capitalism had failed and that capitalism was in fact a a a system that would always result in collapse and misery. And so there was this push because of the Great Depression, there was this uh, the the intellectuals were able to get much more traction and I'm talking about in America,

in England, certainly in France and obviously Germany. Uh, much more traction for these these Marxist notions of class struggle and class warfare than they would have in good times.

And that's why, you know, the Democrats really did overestimate the the left word trajectory of America because their assumption was that the political reality they were dealing with with a particularly charismatic candidate in Barack Obama and a crisis, which is what the two thousand and eight financial meltdown was a crisis um that they could then use and Rob Emanuel said, is they could then use to push policies they never would have been able to get otherwise.

You know, it is not an accident, folks, that we had a financial we had a financial crisis. And what do they do? They went for healthcare? Why would they do it? Then? The hundred year dream of the Democrats? Why then? Oh, because there was an opening because people were scared, and the Democrats were able to steamroll the opposition and and the pendulum swung so far toward the left that they were able to do this and put

through this terrible, this terrible bill. So you know, that's I think an important part of this, of this whole discussion, or the terrible law by the way it was signed into law. But the Democrats are struggling right now to find a national message that's not essentially yeah, we should

go for democratic socialism. And you know, I have this thought, maybe we don't let them get away with calling it democratic socialism, because I think they should just have to own it, right if they want socialism in America, that they can't tell me that Sweden is socialist and then tell me that they don't want Swedish policies, or rather they don't want socialism in America, because they do. They point to Sweden, they say socialism is not bad. Look

at Sweden. And then I will say to them, Okay, so you want everyone to pay about six of their income in federal taxes. Everybody you make thirty thousand dollars a year, you pay six you make you know, two hundred thousand dollars a year, you pay sixty percent all the way up to probably eighty or nine. Right, but whatever it is, you're gonna be paying incredibly high taxes and have a massive government apparatus to administer this superstate

that that they want. You know that this is what this is what they are pushing for the Democratic Party. They talk about how Trump has been normalized. They like

this word normalized. What I think is so interesting is that in their hatred of Trump, they have moved to normal using socialism in a way that you know, it's if you don't look at it over the whole span of of the conversation as it's evolved, let's say, over the last really the last ten years, but particularly last two or three years in the era of Bernie Sanders and his rise. The normalizing of socialism is very real

in American political discourse right now. And you have lefties were running around, We're basically like, yeah, single payer, that's

now because a single payer, free college, folks. You know, if they get single payer, if they get free college, if they get really high corporate and individual income tax to pay for some of these things, you know, you start looking at well, what's left, and then it would just be government regulation of private industry, so government regulation the means of production, and then you're pretty close to a full on, you know, full on socialism. You know,

a single payer is a huge step towards socialism. If you then have free school and single payer um and then on top of that you have a federal bureaucracy that just grows and grows and grows all the time. You know, you start looking down the looking down the road, and you realize that it's not that far off. We

are one bad financial downturn in the Trump era. And I hate to say this away from the Democrats fooling just enough Americans into thinking socialism is a good idea that they might be able to get through some very big uh moves in that direction, moves towards socialism. And they know it. And that's why, you know, when you get Tom Steyer and these others out there. Oh Styre, by the way, of course, he wants to impeach Trump. He was one of the ones that Victor Davis Hansen

mentioned play clip ten. How much more does Congress need to see? Donald Trump has now been implicated in two felony crimes, and he's all but confessed to them on Fox News. No one is above the law, so we have to make sure this president doesn't use pardon to cover up crimes. If you agree that the president should not be allowed to pardoner himself or his associates, join us at need to impeach dot Com. But the Washington establishment doesn't have the courage to act, but the American

people can. This guy is a loon. I mean, the fact that he's a billionaire does actually give me some encouragement because I think, well, if this guy could become a billionaire, I guess anybody can. But it's a constitutional power to be able to pardon whoever the president wants when it comes to federal law. So this notion of you, you don't think the president should be able to do that, No,

he can. He's allowed to do that. And yes, Styre can say that he wants the president to be impeached, but keep in mind that this is not a sty or somebody who is going to be living in the castle on the mountaintop while all the plebs, that's you and me, deal with the terrible economic outcomes that he would inflict upon the country. In favor of the poor, when in reality the poor would actually be the worst hit by it over time. That's what always happens with socialism.

Look around the world, folks, that's that is the way that it goes. And people who keep pointing to Sweden and Denmark, those countries are moving away from socialism. Those countries have a lot of free market and free enterprise laws on the books. They just have high taxes and guess what, folks, they're also not exactly economic powerhouses. Okay, you know, we don't want to be Sweden. That's part of the that's part of the issue here. That's what democrats seem to forget. I don't want to be a

country of ten or you know, fifteen million people. That's kind of you know, just getting by. You know, do you know a lot of Swedes who are lighting the world on fire with the amazing stuff they're doing these days? I don't, all right, it's a it's a lot of very different expectations for you know, the pursuit of happiness in those countries than what you have here. And I

think that's important to remember as well. I want to talk to you more though about we're gonna continue to talk about this issue, of course, because this is socialism and its normalization on the left, especially going to the mid terms. This is going to continue, It's going to become more pronounced, and we're gonna follow it here in the Hut team. So we'll be right back planned to get single payer of paths, it needs to be pulled into the governor's office, executive needs to lead it. Obamacare

would not have happened. It was just EXCLUSI to be a legislative fiat. That said, Nancy Pelosi did a magical job of organizing it, but it required the concerted contributions in the president nited states, I'm not naive about it. I did universal South Carolina's mayor fully implemented regardless of pre existing condition, billy pay, and regardless your immigration status. Sam's because the only universal health care plan for all

undocumented residents in America. Very proud of that. That's Gavin Newsom. It's talking about the way that the left is normalizing some of these far out their ideas. Let me ask you this, do you think Newsom or any of his rich buddies in San Francisco do you think that they go to uh, you know, a public e er and wait in line for their if if they had a real problem. No, they pay a lot of money to

go to a private healthcare provider. So as much as he's gonna sit there and talk about how he wants free healthcare, how they push free healthcare in San Francisco. By the way, San Francisco is a very poorly run city. As you know. They literally have a poop patrol that's going around trying to deal with all the human feces on the streets because of their policies towards vagrancy. And and Newsom that wants to extend this to the entire

state of California. We're gonna talk about Cuomo, the governor of New York and how he uh and and Cynthia Niction are battling it out and she wants the same thing in New York, folks. I mean, you have now at the state level conversations going on where they want to do state mandates on on healthcare. So you know that they tried Obamacare, they try to do that the federal level and one size fits all for everybody, and now the big push is to get this at the

at the state level. And some of the biggest in terms of you know, their economies in popular sations with the biggest states in the country. I mean the notion that California would be able to shoulder the burden of paying for everybody's health care, including all legals. Let me ask you this, do you think that might be a bit of a magnet for illegals in California more so than what they already have? Show up, we will pay for your health care full stop. How how are they

going to do that? I don't just mean economically, I mean how do they think they're gonna they're gonna provide the actual services that everyone Well, of course, you're gonna have lines, you're gonna have waiting, You're gonna have shortages. That's you have rationing, government mandated shortages. That's what's gonna happen, or rather, government mandated uh lines and queues in response to shortages. And he's not even the craziest out there right now on the left. That so he's one governor.

You've got David Garcia Arizona nominee for governor who basically just wants no border. Play three. I want to just take a second and imagine, let's just imagine just imagine no wall, no wall in southern Arizona. And as Attorney General, I will continue to speak out against ICE. I will prosecute ICE for their criminal acts. I mean, that was Zephyr teach out, the New York Attorney general candidate saying she wants to prosecute Ice. How's that gonna go by? There?

You're gonna have local lawenforce and start arresting federal federal agents for doing their jobs under federal law. That's not gonna work out well. But you know, no border between Arizona and Mexico. Imagine, Yeah, I wouldn't that wouldn't that just be so great? You know? At some point, are we allowed to say I don't want to live in some country that doesn't that that doesn't actually think of itself as America anymore. That's just open to everyone and

any anyone who shows up. At some point, sovereignty does matter. We're not allowed to say that at all, I guess. I mean the lift is really lost in folks. And keep in mind, they are taking positions now openly, and where I've played some of them for years. You can hear them. They're taking positions that a year ago they would have been a little more uh you know, shy about and ten years ago, no way they would have done. Okay, So there this is. This is moving moving to the

left hard and fast right now. And I hope that enough enough Republicans understand this and show up and turn out in the mid terms, because if if we turn power over to to them, even just in the House, it is gonna grind the rest of government to a halt. In terms of the Trump agenda, it's gonna be a disaster, and they're gonna run a far a far left loon against Trump. In if we have a big economic downturn, they might be able to get that person in office,

which would be devastating to this country. Home security is critical. You know this because you don't want to be worried when you're away from the home, and you certainly don't want to want to be worried when you're at home about the possibility of a breaking a home invasion. You want to know that you're covered. Simply say has got

you covered? These guys obsess about the details, Okay. They are all about making sure that whatever problems you may have, whatever can come up when it comes to home security, whether it's a possible break in, uh, fire, water damage, you name it. They have your back, all right. You want to go check them out for yourself and see protect your home today. Visit simply Safe dot com slash buck. That's simply safe dot com slash buck. I have the system at home. It takes just minutes to set up.

It works off your WiFi. It's so intuitive. You'll be totally covered and you can download an app to your smartphone and then monitor the whole system wherever you are. Simply safe dot Com slash buck. Again, simply safe dot com slash buck to protect your home around the clock. Buck sext Mission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American? Again?

Is the Buck Sexton Show? Analysts, No, I think it's killing sports because all the athletes are one thousand percent addicted to social media. The entire national anthem controversy is being driven by social media. These guys are addicted to retweets, likes, and mentions and followers, and so again, there's no real substance to what they're doing other than trying to build their social media brands. It sounds great when they get old.

We're trying to raise awareness about police brutality. They're trying to wear these awareness about their social media brands. That's what they're really doing. Take a Lebron James. He's got forty million Twitter followers, he's worth more than a half billion dollars, but he's addicted to social media. That this is you know, all of these young people and look a lot of us in the media that aren't even that young are completely addicted to social media approval. Our

brains have been hacked. I completely agree with Jason Whitlock there that was That was him on on Fox Sports on on this issue, and he's She's stroll across the boarder and this, folks, this has profound implications in in society, and this is stuff that we this is so new now we've come to accept it and and think of it as just the way things are now. I didn't even I remember when I left the c i A. I had a very basic Facebook account. I did not

have a Twitter account. I knew nothing about Twitter, and this is twenty ten and I had, you know, basically wasn't posting anything on Facebook. I was not involved in social media. You know, over the course of less than a decade, now every buddy social media obsessed all the time. I mean, this is a constant thing. And the implications for sports, I think are very obvious, where now you have all these athletes, you know, let me let me step it, let me step this back for a moment.

The reason that the neutral mainstream media can't play the oh, we're just objective journals game anymore. I mean, the reason that that's really falling apart is because of social media,

not just the sharing of articles among people. You know, we do our own curation now, right, if you listen to this show, if you make certain choices in your in your media consumption, you know, you can also interact with other people and you're part of this information ecosystem, right of sharing and liking and sending and all this

other stuff. And and that means that the media doesn't have quite the same although the social media platforms are are skewing this, but the media companies, the content companies, don't have quite the same ability to curate that narrative for you based on whatever they want. And there there's a little more of a give and take with the public now, which I think is in general very good thing.

But beyond that, what you have now are journalists who all day long are sharing the snarky, ist, most woke, you know, politically correct sentiments on any number of issues. And then they expect the public to read their you know, their latest piece in the New York Times, or they expect that when they go on TV at at CNN or ABC or wherever, that we think that they're completely neutral, fair minded and just want to get to the facts.

And it just, you know, it doesn't work anymore. And they haven't figured out what to do about this because they can't disengage from social media, but they also can't control it enough that people like you and me who are attention uh aren't going to figure out or haven't figured out already who is a partisan who is an activist, And they can no longer hide behind this facade, right this uh, this falsehood of being objective, neutral journals. But in the sports world, you know this, this is now

becoming a big issue. And look, I'm not somebody who spends a ton of time focused on professional sports. I do like professional football. I watch I'm watching the US Open this week on tennis. I mean, I like sports. Don't get me wrong. I mean I am a red blooded American, but there are people with way, way, way more expertise on professional sports than me. And I don't just mean those who do it for a living. I just mean a lot of you listening to this, for example,

you're gonna just know a lot more than me. I know nothing about baseball, and my favorite baseball player to this day is probably Don Mattingly, just because he's the only one who I can name off the top of my head. But I know somebody like, what, that's a weird Hey he had a great mustache. A great mustache. Uh. The truth, there is no that you got these play is. And it's not just Kaepernick, and they get Lebron and others who are trying to weigh in on the national

political conversation too. And this is going to create some tensions, folks. I mean, they're gonna be ramifications to this, because, for one, you now have the public aware of who these players are in a way that's not through that filter, not through that prism of you know, a gifted athlete working with the team overcoming you know the opposition, and and

you know their opponents and all this stuff. Now it's well, what do they think about gun control, what do they think about police brutality, what do they think about Trump? And there's no barrier, there's no coach or PR team or anything between their particularly Twitter is the main one, uh,

but between Twitter and the rest of the country. And the problem is that, you know, with some of these players, when they say things like they think Trump is a racist, well the same way that, uh, you know, I don't want to see a Tim Robbins movie, particularly because I find him to be an odious person who makes discourse less intelligent and more aggressive and and stupid about any

political matter. I mean, you know, I don't want to go to a Michael Moore movie because I don't want to support who he is or what he stands for. But I also and and sometimes I mean I have to be really turned off, really annoyed. But there are some actors w don't want to go see. With the NFL and this whole kneeling controversy, you know, they get. It's clear there are some players who feel like they get all this support from you know, within left wing circles,

from within the black community. At least a large percentage of the Black community that they interact with on Twitter is very supportive of this and the kneeling. What what they don't understand, or maybe they don't care or they can't foresee, is that this is going to affect the way people feel about the sports. Sports are for us and Eski eight and now with with movies at least unless there's a lot of political messaging, which there are

a lot of movies. But you know, with movies, you cannot like the actor, but you're not rooting for the actor in the movie. You're rooting for the character. It's different in sports. You're actually rooting for the person. You are rooting for the people on the field or you know, on the ice or whatever, and their personal story and your investment in them and that team affects how much you care. Well, you know, do do you want to spend your time and money to go and watch a

bunch of people play football, for example? If you have become aware of their disdain for not just their disdain for for Trump, but their thoughts about police, and their thoughts about you know, the the national anthem, kneeling and all this other stuff, you know that I think some of these athletes have honestly overestimated because they get so

much positive feedback from woke social media circles. I think they've overestimated what they can what they can do without consequence here meaning I think that they're used to everyone telling them how, you know, how gifted and amazing. They're so highly paid and you know, there are a few things in life from a purely material perspective, materialistic perspective, I mean, to be a gifted professional athlete, and don't even get me started. There's a whole conversation here about

how at that level. Yes, there's a lot of hard work that goes into it, but they're gifted, meaning that this is a god given gift that a lot of these athletes have. You know, Buck, no matter how much I worked out in the gym, was never gonna be taller than six feet and was never going to be able to jump or you know, run beyond a certain

hider speed. And that was just my reality. You know, these athletes are gifted and and there's a sense of and for some of us, at least with the social media stuff ingratitude that a lot of them have for their positions in society. And then there's also you know some of these athletes, they're gonna get ahead of their skis. They're they're not that well read, they're not particularly deep on the issues, and they're gonna make fools of themselves.

And this is going to create some problems for the teams. Also gonna create some uncomfortable public exchanges, I think so. I agree with Jason Whitlock on this one. They're addicted to social media. They're gonna be consequences. We'll be right back. The FBI calls home title theft one of the fastest growing crimes. Brace yourselves, because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for once

an identity thief takes control of your home's title. Identity theft programs, my friends, and insurance policies they don't protect you. And once you see how easy it is for the bad guys, for cyber thieves to use your home's equity and to steal it by replacing your home's title with an alias, you'll realize you need something to protect you from this. Right Only home title locks safeguards your home's

title from cyber thieves and hackers. It forms a virtual perimeter around your home's title the instant, someone Tampa is with it, They're on it, and they help shut it down. For just pennies a day. Home title Lock protects my most valuable asset, my family's home. Registered now for a free analysis and discover if your home's title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value. Free visit home title lock dot com again, that's home title lock dot com name. He has the M T A like an A T

M and we see the result. He has had seven and a half years to avoid this very avoidable crisis in our New York City subway and he has done next to nothing over Why would the next four years be any different? Governor, my opponent lives in the world of fiction. I live in the world of fact. Let's do Let's use a few facts. Okay, the subway system is owned by New York City. Can you stop interrupting? Can you stop stop lying? As soon as you do some of you may be saying something. You may be

saying fun. Why are you playing? What is that? Well? That was That was the gubernatorial debate for the state of New York, my home state, last night with uh quote Governor Cuomo, who likes two men explained two women that they don't know the facts because he is missed the fact. Mr f A something after that, t M the fact Cuomo and he does not like when a person who is a lady is telling him to stop being so terrible at his job, because he thinks his job is to be terrible. Cynthia Nixon was the one

going out for him there. You may know her, some of you, and I know some of the guys are gonna say a book. I never yet, Right, sex in the City, you've seen an episode, producer, Mike, come on, come on, come on, Mike, don't lie to me. We we we've seen some sex in the City, right, guys. It was a cultural phenomenon in the nineties, although it actually I think tells women to pursue a lifestyle that will make them, in the long run miserable. And I think you see a lot of that in the show.

I find Sex in the City actually quite depressing. Wait if you and now I'm admitting that I've seen a fair amount of it. Okay, fine, I'm admitting yeah, fine, I know. Take away my man card, just take it away, awesome. Might as well tell you that I like riding around in my electric scooter. I don't care what anybody says. But Cynthia Nixon, it's so she's now an active issue. Was an actress. She made a lot of money doing sex in the city. I gotta tell you, though, she

was really going after Cuomo. I mean, he was getting ticked off. You know. He's like, why must you be so mean to my face? Usually people just prefer that I not say anything to them, so they leave me alone. Uh. You know, Cuomo is supposed to be a very you know, a guy who's who's quite quite dirty when it comes to politics in a lot of ways. You know, he had the Moreland Commission, which was to look at corruption set up, and he did shut it down, and he

had a senior aide. And this came up in the in the discussion is most trusted advisor is going to prison? Apparently New York politics is at the state levels a lot of dirty pool, a lot of dirty stuff going on. But the most interesting for me, the most interesting component of this, other than just I love watching democrats fight. It was great. She's like, why don't you stop lying? He's like, what do you mean, lie? Lie spelled l?

Why I don't to stand uh, you know, there was a lot of back and forth with them, but on the issue of but on the subway, not that any you really care about this, but it is for the subway in New York is a disaster. It is a disaster. You'll wait, you can wait there in the middle of the day, sometimes for thirty or forty minutes. You'll get stuck in between stations. People have lost job interviews, people

have lost working hours. I mean, it's really bad. But the issue that comes up, and this is what you're seeing between the Democrats and the Republicans much more broadly across the country is on single pair on on what they're now. They're really going with this Medicare for all issue. And I'm telling you this is this is really the tipping point for the country when it comes to our budgets and finances and well the debt and the economic

future of this nation. We we simply will destroy all the momentum, all the progress that we've had under Trump with pulling back regulation and and us uh you know,

less onerous taxation. I still think we're tax way too much, by the way, but we will lose all of that progress if we start switching to a state by state Medicare for All plans, because I can tell you what will happen is it will be very popular in those states, and the states will have these massive budgetary shortfalls, and then they'll try to turn to the federal government for money to shore them up and or maybe even bail out their systems, because once you give people something, once

you create an entitlement, it is very, very hard to take it away. The budget for New York State would double double if you created Medicare for all. This is true and pretty much any state, uh not necessarily it would double, and the numbers were change a little bit, but it would be a massive expenditure. And does anybody really think I mean, I can tell you this, folks.

I've been to a doctor's office when I had pretty crappy insurance, and I've been a doctor's offices when I had actually really good insurance, like when I worked for the federal government. And you're gonna everyone's gonna be in the giant waiting room full of people and their appointment is not being respected, and they've waited a couple of months to see a doctor. If it's especially if it's

a specialist, that's gonna be our our shared reality. And you know that if they get Medicare for all, then the next step will be, well, we should also have Medicare for all for illegals. They will be covered under this too. So now you all people who are not even legally entitled to be in the country getting And at that point you start to say, well, then can people just show up here and get free medical care? Can somebody take a flight to New York and say, Okay,

I want a heart transplant, Now make it happen. You know, they're they're just trying to defy the basic laws of economics here and and they will fail. But it's popular. You see, people cheer for this stuff. They think, they really believe that somehow it would be a good idea, that it would be in the interests of this country to have the government completely in control of of healthcare, at least on a state by state level. Now part of me wants them to do this, though, because I

think that catastrophic budgetary collapse would happen relatively quickly. The only part of me that really gets worried about this comes from the realization that democrats don't learn from their mistakes. They just blame somebody else. They'll find some other way of explaining, well, why do we have this massive shortfall in the budget. Why isn't this medicare for all proposal working as we thought? Well, well, clearly the rich aren't

paying enough in their taxes. Clearly the corporate tax rate should be even higher than it is than it has been raised to under their proposal. And that's what I think your expectation should be. H That's why federalism for me gets a little scary, because yes, states should be laboratories, but that's assuming the people that are watching the experiment play out are going to be honest about what's happened. And just as we see with socialism and Marxism and communism,

how it's implemented correctly. And that's why it's had massive failures. With single payer healthcare, even if it's done in a state by state model, the left will find a way to justify it because they really, ultimately this is philosophical, my friends. For the left, single payers not so much about getting health care for everybody, because that's a part

of it. I'm not saying it's not a part of it, but that's not that's not the entirety of their Why there's this real impulse that they have toward it, it is because ultimately they believe that the state should provide this for people, and that we have a an obligation to have the state take from some of us to give to others to provide for healthcare. Uh. That's and they want to fundamentally transform the relationship that we have in this country between a citizen and state. That's why

single payer for them becomes so important. That's why they believe so strongly in it, because it would have a lot of there are a lot of ramifications, a lot out of consequences of this that don't even have to do with healthcare. But anyway, that debate was fun. Why are you being so mean and calling me a liar when you, Cynthia Nixon, are clearly the one who is telling the untruthful things that some people define specifically as

a lie. The spelling of which is a word that is complicated because there are multiple spellings, and also multiple is a big word, which I used Governor Cuomo out he's holding the line for America buck sex in his back that you're right, different words for effect to enhance the bigoted agenda and now you're gonna sell it, and it's a mistake. On this show, I said very clearly, and people can check my words. You break the law,

you're a criminal and a thug. I said, don't create an immoral equation between those who preach hate and those who fight it, because not all punches. And I stand by, but I never endorsed. I hate cell bs to my face, to it, behind my back when you're better at it, No, Chris, I'll do it to your face. Antifa, by the way, hates a whole lot. If you watch the Antifa, not pro Antifa, I don't even know who makes up the organization.

And if they break the law, their criminals. And this is what I'm talking this is what I'm talking about, their anti hate, your way of camp. Listen, this is my point. Steve. You know if you looked at the words, which unfortunately we both know you didn't. You read your little buddies at bright Bart and a little niche places that you say need to have more time on Google, and you came up with Cuomo didn't beat down Antifa not. You know, that's as a show on CNN, folks, that's

in prime time. It's pro Cuomo, and you know, he was somebody that they would have said until about five minutes ago, maybe they still do, is a nonpartisan journalist. And there he is just just with all his snide, nasty little swipes at conservative media, his nasty little thing. He's supposed to be a news anchor, and he is everybody as as opinionated in partisan as anyone on TV. I mean, that's why CNN is a joke. That's why I love Trump's tweet about them, because he's telling the truth.

It's it is the truth. CNN has become a parody of a journalistic enterprise. It's preposterous. You know. The guy he's arguing with there, Steve Cortez. I used to do some hits with Steve over at Fox. I don't know Steve, I've worked with him. He seems like a good guy. He's uh, you know, he's he's good at good at doing TV. I want to be like Steve. Don't don't do it, man, Leave CNN. It's just not worth it there. They don't respect you. They're not trying to have you

on to hear your point of view. They're having you on the way they used to have me on during the Trump era, not really before that, but in the era of Trump. They would have me on so they could throw food at me in a cage like a zoo animal. That's why I would go on CNN. I wouldn't get to talk, they would cut me off, they wouldn't put me in a position where I could actually make any points. The anchor would jump all over you.

And by the way, I didn't even play this. At the end of that clip, Bro Cuomo is like, hey, do you even lift? Bro hands the segment over to Angela Rye, who's a a left wing Democrat pundit, so that she can kind of button it all up and get the last word in and slap Steve down again on the way out the door. It's just it's just nonsense, right. But you'll notice here that that Cuomo is indicative of this this mindset over there at CNN that we won't

remember what they do and how they act. They can just they can keep this facade going, they can keep playing this game of being objective journalists even when we see clips like this. You know, little fans at brank Bart that you want more time with, then google that whole thing. First of all, Pomo is making an ass of himself because the social media platforms have admitted at this point that they have they have been discriminating and

viewpoint against conservatives. They have admitted this. They've said, yeah, we're left wing of Twitter has admitted it. Facebook has admitted it. I mean, they come up with justifications and rationalizations for why it's happened, but it's definitely happened. You know, some of you asked me yesterday, you reached out to me and said, why, Buck, you can find glue guns

on Google? You know, why didn't you do a certain No, no, no, it's under shopping specifically, if you go under Google shopping and things that have gun in the title have been at different times completely pulled out of the shopping uh component of Google. So yeah, you can still find that, you can do internet searches on these things, but that's different than being able to go into the shopping section and buy whatever you want via Google, which you'll say, Buck,

that's so dumb. Why would Google even do that? Exactly, it's done because of politics. It's done for political reasons. So I think that that's. Yeah. Look, we keep hammering hammering these points because it's important that we get to

live in reality. You know, if CNN wants to live in some kind of a dream world, if CNN wants to pretend that bro Cuomo and company are not members of their hashtag resistance, they're not never Trump uh posers who say their journalists when they're really activists, that's on them. But we don't have to play along. We don't have to play their game anymore. It's one of the greatest things about the Trump era is that now that this this passes into a new phase where we can have

an honest conversation about this. But you know, the whole debate was about uh with that segment, I know, I got a little loss. I just played it because he just it was really just Cuomo. This guy's you know, it's now some overpaid baby over at CNN saying that, well, there's no moral equivalence between antifa and actual fascists or you know, whatever he calls it. What what he doesn't understand is that anti FU considers people that are mainstream

conservative thinkers fascists. So when you start saying that there's no moral equivalence, meaning that you know, Antifa punching people even if it's illegal, is not as bad as actual fascist punching people. You know, you're you're you're playing fast and loose with the definitions of who's a fascist and who's not in this whole discussion, because there's basically no real Nazis. This is what you know. There's there's a handful of them, and the media acts like it's some

big movement and they are reviled. They're a joke, they're disgusting, and everyone hates them. But but it's like David Duke, David Duke, have you heard about him since the election? Folks, have you heard about No, of course not. You only hear about David Duke as though he matters to anyone when it comes national election time and they want to ask a Republican candidate a hundred times, do you denounced David Duke? Do you announced David Duke? I mean, this

is this is why they're dishonest jerks. David Duke is not important. David Duke is, uh, you know, is somebody that the media only trots out when it benefits them to smear conservatives. That's what they do. Uh, you know with Cuomo here, I just it all comes across, folks. You know who these people are now they can't really hide anymore, and that's why they're so upset, because we know the truth about them and they should just own up to it and then we can have a real discussion.

But I can't have discussions with people like bro Cuomo. We're gonna say, oh yeah, man, I'm just a big j journalist, you know, just the facts, straight down the middle, balder dashing Buck. It's time for roll call. All right, everybody, Roll call Facebook dot com, slot Buck Sexton. If you want to get in on this role call action and let's get to it. With that in mind, we have Mark up first. O MG, I just heard the most

racist band ever. Hey hey, we're the Monkeys by the Monkeys, and look they even spelled it wrong to make it so racist. Thank you to the left for pointing this out to the world. You need to burn every trace of this hateful group. And song Buck, you're the best shields high Yeah, guys, I I don't know. I'm I'm shocked at some of the people that are saying that. Well, you know, even if it wasn't racist in intent, if it has a racist connotation that one can infer, then no, no, no, no, No,

that that's not how this works. Okay, that's not how any of this works. You cannot be guilty of racism if there was nothing racial about what you said or what you were thinking when you said it. I think it's really dishonest. It's honestly just despicable for people to pile onto the santists with this stuff when it's it's just so clear to me that they're they're exploiting this and uh, that's that's what's going on here, alright, Aries

rights buck. People who think America is the most evil and racist country on earth are nothing more than domestic enemies and should have the gumption to just denounce their citizenship and leave. Their propaganda has real consequences and can be proven, as we see in every cop and Caucasian uh that is murdered by thugs and every race riot I can remember. Yeah, I wish people didn't think aries

that the country was evil because they're wrong. But that is a pretty widespread belief among many on the left that there's deep problems, and um, yeah, I wish it wasn't the case. Nathan writes, I watched your interview with Alyssa Milano on Rising I completely disagree their politics, but we'll give her major props for sitting down with you. Well, Nathan, you are a generous fellow. I will tell you that, uh,

she didn't realize who she was sitting down with. And I don't mean that as in like she didn't know who she was sitting down with. I mean she literally had She had no idea who I was. And that's why she got a little throne when I asked her questions that weren't so why are you so amazing? So why have you done so much for women? So why are you saving lives with your gun control positions? I was very polite. Look, I'm in if someone's home, all right,

and I think she doesn't know much. But she's you know, she's a mom and a wife, and I'm in her home, and she gave me her time, and I was asking her questions. So there is a basic decorum and gentlemanliness that I must bring to the situation that all said. You know it. She was prickly when I started to uh ask her real questions. And it's because I think she thought the Hill dot Com is journalists political journalists of political journalists are left wing and so she just

assumed that I must fit into that category. She did not realize that she was getting a real deal conservative who was polite. But Nathan, I'm glad you watched an interview of any folks missed that. We posted some of it on Facebook. You can also go to Hill dot tv slash Rising and watch the full interview. We're gonna post more of it next week. We got she spent twenty five minutes with me, Uh, straight through, so I

must not have hated it that much. When the buck's got some skills, she respects the swoop, whether she'll say so or not, and writes hi buk. I listened to the last night's show in the morning hours. As always, it rocked two points one red Meat report. I've lost seventy pounds over the last two years by eating a higher fat, low carb diet. Eating quality fats gives you energy, keeps you full, and remove cravings for carbs. Why is it the left of the only ones that hear conservative

dog whistles? I knew what the santis meant, and I don't believe for a second that he was making a racist comment. Don Lemon can take a seat, uh and look, I obviously agree with you on the de Santist comment. I think it's really really gross, really disingenuous for people to try and make this case about how he's you know how, I just it's not there, folks, It's just

not there. And and they take the sentence and they they separate it out the one where he said monkey it up, and they separate it out from what he said right before it, because in context, it's abundantly clear that he was not saying anything about his opponent or anything that was racist at all. And as to fat and eating fat and it being better for you, I look, I'm a believer in this too. If I weren't working

so much these days, i'd be leaning. Mean, my diets actually pretty clean, although I do eat a little too much chocolate. I just don't have time to work out and happen in months. So I'm I'm putting on a little bit of dad bought action here. But I know that when I've got the time and the energy to take it off. UH good fats, good proteins, and uh fruits and veggies, honestly, mostly veggies. That's really the that's

really the secret. Sauce. Just eat meat, eat protein, eat green vegetables and if you build your diet around that and eggs. I believe in eggs very much. And if you build you're died around that, I think you're in good shape. Uh, I really do. I'm glad you've had some success with it too. And Greg writes Buck, while your stance on the Second Amendment is pretty clear, I haven't heard you comment on matters related to your sponsors and their stances. Well, Greg, let me just jump in

here and tell you I don't. I I don't discuss the particular politics of any sponsor that we have or anither. Uh, just unless I have something that really bothers me or is deeply problematic. Um. But I only work with sponsors on this show, I turned business down here. UM. I only work with sponsors who have companies that are do in a great product and and are people that I trust. And generally the companies are run by people that I know. Uh,

I have a have a personal relationship. It's not always true, but it is generally true. I usually know the CEO, and if there's ever an issue or anything, I can get them on the phone and and say, hey, you know, can we address this one way or the other. But I am very the same way that I will. You'll never hear me trash a friend in media, even when I think a friend may be wrong. I will not criticize sponsors because they are partners of mine and we're

working together for a purpose. So just I'll leave I'll leave it with that, my friend. I'm honest about it. I tell you I do not criticize sponsors on the show. I never will and I never would. But it's a fair question for you to ask. Now you know my policy. Uh In writes thoughts on a Good American It's a Netflix doc on a special access program, thin Thread. It's damning of Hayden, but so sensational. I'm skeptical in I have never heard of this. Can neither confirm nor deny it. No,

but really, I've never I've never heard of this. I don't know anything about it, so I can't really tell you what I think about it. I'll have to look up a little more on it. Uh Janelle write saying, how about rabid for really bad Iran deal? Well, Janelle, you are a clever lady, and thank you for sending that in. Chris writes buck, I'm a veteran though I didn't serve in combat. I respect McCain's military service, but don't you people as part of some identity group. I

judge them by their actions at the current time. McCain was a very vindictive, petty, self consumed person. All you need to know is that he didn't give up his seat after it was clear he couldn't perform his duties. He put me in a terrible position of having to wait for him to pass, and I resent him for that.

The sad truth is that a combatant who spent significent time as a pow under savage condition sans uh should not hold higher office, except under extreme circumstances, such as the aftermath of a total war like World War Two, where many leaders had to serve in war and there was no other bench to pull from. The trauma is just too great and the damage lasts a lifetime. That's

not fair. But then life is like that, Chris, I I gotta disagree with you on this idea that you you wouldn't want somebody who had served and had been through that to be a leader. In fact, I think that it could be h incredibly not just the bravery that's displayed in the and the strength of character, but but also I think it could be instructive about one's

views on a whole host of issues. Interestingly enough, McCain, despite what he suffered as a pow, was very aggressive as a politician when it came to US military action and US foreign policy. Among the most aggressive, McCain and Lindsey Graham were the biggest advocates for hard power in the Senate, certainly in my lifetime that I'm that I'm aware of, so that that doesn't necessarily go in the direction you would think. But thank you for writing in

and appreciate your service. Sir Monica writes, Hey, Buck, heard you talk about scooters and ear tattoos today. Makes me ponder when you're getting a tattoo of you riding a scooter behind your ear? She'll tie, Well, Monica, I don't think it's gonna happen, and I think you're gonna have to wait a long time on that one. I don't think that's gonna happen anytime soon, but we will see. I'll let you know. I can tell you this for

the team. I do not have any tattoos. I am uninked as of now, and as I've always just never gone to tattoo. All right, That's it for me, folks. Tomorrow is gonna be our last show before the Labor Day weekend extravaganza that I'm sure we all have planned. Uh so please do download the show, tell a friend about it whenever you get a chance this coming weekend. I'll be with you tomorrow, alive in the Freedom Hunt from the swamp in d C. As always, She'll tie.

Hiring is a challenge, my friends. But there's one place you can go where hiring is simple, fast and smart, a place where growing businesses connect to qualified candidates. That place is zip recruiter dot com, slash buck. Zip recruiter sends your job to over one hundred of the webs leading job boards, but they don't stop there. With their powerful matching technology, zip Recruiter scans thousands of resumes to find people with the right experience and invite them to

apply to your job. I had to hire for my team at hill dot tv, and we use zip recruiter with great success. I set up an account couldn't have been more straightforward. Set up all the different parameters keyword search made sure that as the applications came in, I could sort easily through them. I got great matches, and now I've got great colleagues thanks to zip Recruiter. With results like that, it's no wonder. Zip Recruiter is the

highest rated hiring site in America. Right now. You can try it for free by going to zip recruiter dot com, slash buck again, zip recruit utter dot com, slash buck