Nobody Likes Bernie Sanders

is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American great, You're a great American Again, the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now, now he used to impeach this president. You did not allow him to call any witnesses. He could not have a lawyer present during the House Intel Committee. This has been a partisan railroad job, and you're asking for fairness and Senate.

You violated every norm of what we do. It took five years for Star to look at Clinton, Mueller looked at Trump for almost two years, and you took forty eight days. So here's what I would say. The sooner this is over, the better for the country. When get back to the business of the American people and do things that really matter to them. I've seen. I've been very consistent. I supported Mueller. I trusted him to be fair.

This has been a political hit job. This is political revenge, and what they're doing to the presidency is a danger to the institution itself. Welcome everybody to the Buck Sections Show. Hopefully you recognize the voice after a few days of being out, very successful and somewhat relaxing trip in California. I'll tell you about later on in the show. That's the most that I plan on being absent the Freedom Hut until after election Day. So that's it. It's just

me and producer Mark here in the Hut. Ride or die. Producer Mark, We're not going anywhere, my friend. We ride together, We die together. Bad boys for life. Oh, I'm taking a couple of days off here. Okay, well he's gonna take a couple of days off. But I'm back, baby, and I'm excited about it. Yeah, my man, Lindsey Graham there laying down for you the truth of what's really going on with this impeachment sham. And it is a sham,

as I have been telling you. We've seen now the schedule, we know more or less how this is going to shake out. The President's not going to be removed from office. That's been understood from the beginning. But Democrats are increasingly desperate. They know it's not really going to work, and what was this all about. There's fighting among Democrat candidates that's getting nastier and nastier as the Iowa Caucuses approaches. The tension is rising and people are more linth than ever

to lie to misdirect. That's why you come here to the Freedom Hut, because we will crush all those commies. We will slash and burn all the lies. That is what we do here. So we know that there's going to be a apparently truncated Senate trial that could change depending on how the witness portion of this goes. But over the next couple of days, you're going to have the Senate producing Senate Democrats, Senate Republicans, looking at the different components of the trial and coming to a conclusion.

And this just reminds me of what I've been saying all along, which is that I don't think that they should allow for there to be more witnesses to be called. I don't think that they should do the work that the House of Representatives the Democrat House was unwilling to do. To borrow from John Madden because producer Mark is always teaching me about sports and his video game Circa two thousand and two thousand and four on PlayStation. Don't try to intercept it. Just wap it down. Just wap it down.

It's not my new favorite thing to say. Some of you will remember that. Others you're like, what is Buck talking about? It means don't try to get cute, don't try to make the Democrats marinate in the agony of their hypocrisy. Just shut this thing down. That's what should be done here. That it should be dismissed with prejudice. And that is also what is said in the trial memorandum. I read the trial memorandum. It's about one hundred and

ten pages. It's it's worth at least reading executive summary if you get a minute. Well, actually know, I'll tell you about it. You don't read it, That's why I'm here. But then the rest of it goes into some greater detail.

Here the top lines on it. Here, here's the most important stuff, because this is finally the president getting people on his side to present their case formally in a written document about I guess all documents are written in some way, right, but about how this whole thing is absurd, it's wrong, it's unethical, it's a desperation play by very desperate Democrats. And here's one line from it that I

particularly liked. The articles of impeachment quote should be rejected and the president should immediately be acquitted according to his trial memorandum, at least none by the White House. He's got his legal team, he's got people that have finally come together to make the argument. This is what I've been saying. No, No, the Democrats want this to be a circus. A circus is better for them, even if it doesn't work out in the end with the president

being removed. They know that won't happen. But they also don't want people to pay too close attention to the arguments that Democrats are going to be making against each other. Right now, you see one of the problems they have is that anyone and you see this, and we'll get into this in more detail, who tries to take down Biden as the front runner is going to make arguments that by their very nature tie into the arguments Trump

will make about Biden's corruption. For example, about Biden being too old, out of touch, too white, too male, too whatever. These are things that Trump will be saying down the line, so there's that risk. Democrats would rather have this just fought out among primary voters and in the Democrat friendly media. They don't want too many people paying attention to the nastiness among these candidates on the left. They also don't want people to look at what's really going on in

this country. Oh, the war you were on that didn't happen, the genocide of the Kurds that didn't happen, the collapse of the economy that didn't happen, the trade war with China that we are winning. By the way, where is it exactly that Trump is such a massive failure, I mean a point of failure. They don't really have much,

do they. And if they didn't have the ability, if the media, the Democrats one and the same, if they couldn't fill the airwaves with all of these stories about the impeachment and how Trump is so evil and must be removed and fighting out about all this detail, treating this like a criminal, leading legal proceeding when it suits them, and then abandoning any pretense of due process. That's what the Democrats do the second that it won't work out

in their favor. Anyone who is fair minded looks at this and understands exactly or is this has been a partisan hitch job from day one. Lindsay Graham is correct. The articles should be rejected, the president should be immediately acquitted. The plan, by the way, is Senate trial to start at one pm Eastern Tuesday. McConnell wants to give each side twenty four hours to make their case. Of course,

of a couple of days. Democrats, well, this could end before Trump even gives the State of the Union address, and I certainly hope that it does. It's going to be quite a State of the Union address, by the way. We'll be entertaining that much, I can't assure you. But there are some very important parts of this trauma, random about the impeachment that I wanted to spend some time with you on. And then we'll move on to AOC as a Marxist, a full on Marxist. Okay, this is now.

We're now past the oh we're gonna be Sweden. We're not gonna be Sweden. You've got Democrats now that really do want this place to be much closer in structured Eventezuela. They just think that it's going to work out differently this time, as well as the Democrat in fighting. I'll give you my thoughts on the rally of Second Amendment

patriots at the Virginia State House yesterday. We got a lot of stuff to get into today, but just here here if you will, is I thought the most important if you're looking for a consolidation of the case that this whole impeachment is absurd and really quite damaging to the country, and the Democrats who are involved in this are involved in something that is shameful. Not only are

they incorrect, it is shameful what they are doing. Here's what is said in this defense of Trump that has finally been released after focus group testing, charges House Democrats settled on two flimsy articles of impeachment that allege no crime or violation of law whatsoever, much less high crimes and misdemeanors as required by the Constitution. They do not remotely approach the constitutional threshold for removing a president from office.

The diluted standard asserted here would permanently weaken the presidency and forever all to the balance among the branches of government in a matter that offends the constitutional design established by the founders. House Democrats jettisoned all precedent and principle because their impeachment inquisition was never really about discovering the

truth or conducting a fair investigation. Instead, House Democrats were determined from the outset to find some way, anyway to corrupt the extraordinary power of impeachment for use as a political tool, to overturn the result of the twenty sixteen election and to interfere in the twenty twenty election. All of this is a dangerous perversion of the Constitution that the Senate should swiftly and roundly condemn end. Quote yep,

pretty much says it all, doesn't it. I Mean there's more, and we'll get into a bit more of it, but let's just start with this one House Rather, the abuse of power is a made up standard. This is not a standard for removal from office. That they made this a standard of impeachment just goes to show you that they don't care what the precedents are, what the rules are, what any sense of fairness would mandate here. They just

want to do it their way. They want to result the process here is meaningless to them unless the process gives them the conclusion that they seek in all of this abuse of power is a made up standard. There are some headings in the memorandum that give you a good overview of what the defense here is of the president. And I want you to be familiar with this team. I want you to know about this because the media

is going overtime here. I mean, they know this is their last chance in their minds to at least turn this impeachment into some kind of political win for the Democrats and their hopes to gain the presidency in twenty twenty. The rest of us look at this and say, what a joke the media is saying, Come on, everybody, it's all hands on deck. Have to do everything we can against Trump. For the Democrats, that's the plan. Ultimately, they recognize the likelihood of Donald Trump winning four more years

in office, they find this untenable. I don't know what happens. They've already been emotionally broken. Now they're emotionally broken, and Trump would be rubbing salt in their emotional wounds for four more years. I don't know what happens to them if they have to deal with this president again for another term. They've already lost their sense of rationality, of decency, of normalcy. I don't know what else they have left to give or to lose, and they know that too.

So there's a desperation. That's an important word to keep in mind, your desperation to make a case that is absurd on its face. Here is one of those subheadings in the memorandum. House democrats can coct the theory that the president can be impeached for taking permissible actions if he does them for what they believe to be the wrong reasons. This would also expand the impeachment power beyond

constitutional bounds. It would allow a hostile house to attack almost any presidential action by challenging a president's subjective motives. This has been a feature of hashtag resistance opposition to President Trump for his entire time in office. If Trump does something, it's illegitimate because they can see into Trump's hard and find illegitimate motive, even if he has the power, even if as a function of his office he's allowed

to do something, When Trump does it, it's wrong. This is kind of the opposite of Nixon Enough, the president doesn't it's not illegal. Right. This is now President Trump who is breaking the law by doing things that another president would be allowed to do. But you see he's Trump. There are federal judges Obama pointees of course, who have

taken the same approach. Well, because the President said something that leftist didn't like during this was a real judicial opinion, folks, This was a real federal judge writing this down and making a determination using his power to this end. Because Trump said things during the campaign that showed a bias

against certain people. According to this judge, he was not allowed to institute a ban on people traveling from seven countries under certain conditions for a certain period of time, even though that is an executive that is a presidential prerogative. But you see he's Trump. Same thing applies here. They've created a make belief standard where well, even if he's allowed to have the conversation with Zelenski about Ukraine that he did, because it's Trump, we know it's illicit. It's

Trump derangement syndrome. That's what is undergirding, that is the foundation, the underlying architecture of impeachment against this president is Trump derangement syndrome. The defensness memorandum makes it clear. And the people that are still attacking the president are getting sillier and sillier and as I said, more desperate. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. The question of witnesses in any trial. In any trial,

all relevant witnesses must be heard. Whether if you're accused of robbing a bank, testimony that I saw him robbed the bank or he was somewhere else he couldn't have ribbed the bank is admissible. It's not negotiable whether you have witnesses. And this whole controversy about whether there should be witnesses is really a question of does the Senate want to have a fair trial or do they or are they part of the cover up of the president.

Any Republican senator who says there should be no witnesses, or even that witnesses would be negotiated is part of the cover up. So you're saying, no way would Hunter Biden ever be called to testify. Well, I'm saying that Hunter Biden has no knowledge of the accusations against the president. So wait, I'm sorry, I thought Jerry Nadler there, you know he wants the witnesses, But I mean not witnesses.

It doesn't want you gotta have witnesses, you see, that would be a principle, by the way, a principal Democrats already abandoned in the House when they had the votes, when they had the authority to make this process up as they went along. No, no, forget forget about calling certain witnesses right, forget about adjudicating that through the court system. Just just move the thing through as fast as you can.

Just ram it through. That was the approach. Why didn't they ask for these the witnesses that Democrats think are important for the Senate to here from. Why didn't the House try to push that issue because they had to create impeachment. They had to get it across the goal line and then try to add to it. Oh but hunter Biden, Hunter Biden is irrelevant. This goes to the heart of the matter in many ways. And this is now going to be a moment where I tell you

I've been telling you this the whole time. The defense that many Republicans were trying to use of this president was there a quid pro quo? Was it? They have skipped over a critical fact here, and that is there is nothing wrong with the president asking a foreign counterpart to look into corruption that, by the way, would happen to touch upon real allegations against the Biden family. Sorry, they have no immunity. There's no special Biden clause in

federal law. It's just too darned bad. That is the ground that Republicans should have been defending President Trump on from the beginning. It's what I've been saying from the beginning. Why do we concede that they're oh, yeah, it was well, he could never have asked about Hunter Biden, you know, in a quid pro quo way. He could never asked about Joe Biden and what was going on there, and that was you know, that was something that was a problem. No, no,

he must ask those questions. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. It's been the whole issue has been a sham. It shouldn't have gotten this far. The House acted improperly in passing it on to the Senate. Why is your party dragging this thing out? Why is this happening? Why go through all this business about witnesses. Do we really need more witnesses?

It's going to add months to this thing. We should stop this, this bogus, inflated case and get on with business of governance. Will these people just get down to business and leave this impeachment thing alone. It's going to be an enormous distraction to the White House and all kinds of issues that the Congress ought to be considering it. There's a long line of the people's business. It seems to have been put aside, and apparently it's going to

be put aside for weeks, if not months now. Oh wow, so many voices in the media speaking out against what the House did and against witnesses, and this is a distract. Oh, that's right. Those were some of the biggest voices in the media. A bunch of leftist Democrats, of course, a bunch of smug libs. Oh, but they were referring to all these different processes when a Democrat, Bill Clinton was

going through an impeachment. Okay, And now some of those same voices, by the way, are very much involved in this today and it's just completely a question for them of whose ox is being gored. You know, this is not a what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Situation, right, this is not a standard that is applicable to both sides. There's a Democrat standard, that a Republican standard. And this is why the people that always claim that Trump supporters use what about ism? What

about ism? Is destroying this country right now? In so far is we have to always say, what about the same standard being applied? You know, it's it's one thing to bring up something that's a non secret or distraction. Of course, that's a logical fallacy. If I'm talking about what's going on with this impeachment and someone else says, well, hold on a second, you know, what about what about what Barack Obama did in Libya? It's like, well, that's not that has nothing to do with anything right now.

But if we're talking about an impeachment of a president and what the process should be and what is fair for that president, what is due process in a political process, which impeachment inherently is, you would think that it would be an applicable standard of both sides. Right. The law at its core is not really law, it's not moral order if it is not applicable irrespective of who it affects and what the politics of the situation may be. Right, you establish things that are true or are not true.

You know, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal. It's not thou shalt not kill unless you know, we think that you're doing some really good policy work, and then maybe we'll let it slide. People say, oh, buck, but what about it about when you kill someone at self defense? Right? That's a universally applicable standard. If you kill somebody in self defense, no matter who you are, what political background you have, what race, creed, or color, any of those things, we all, as human beings have

a right to self defense. And these are universal standards. This is very simple stuff, and I know it almost feels like a waste of time to go through it. But Democrats have been in this as though it's nothing. They make this standard up as they go along. Oh well, that's not like that. They're the party of cry baby, whiney children. You know, if you tell kid and I don't have kids, so I have to I have to do this from the perspective of, you know, seeing other

people dealing with their kids. And I also did a little babysitting for my silding's growing up. And if you tell kids, okay, you know, if you want, you know, if you also want to play with you Bobby's bicycle or what a tricycle let's say, sounds more like a kid thing. You know, if he has to share his toy with you, you have to share your toys with him. Democrats the party of Now, he shares his toy, I don't have to share my toys. No applicable standard to

both sides, No principle. There's a principle involved there. They don't don't have principles. They have a loss for power. That's it. That's what has been so obvious, so clear in this impeachment proceeding. They just changed the rules as they go. Does anyone really think what the House did was intended to be fair to the president? No, no counsel for the president, no representation the president. The Democrats

get to bring whatever witnesses they want. The Democrats get to just have this these hearings where they put forward a bunch of of deep state Democrat cry babies. Oh, Trump was violating the policy. He sets the policy. Oh but I'm an expert on Ukraine. Great, this is really the buck defense that has now come to the forefront though in this impeachment fiasco. This is from the memorandum.

House Democrats. Charges rest on the false premise that there could have been no legitimate purpose to ask President Zelenski about Ukrainian involvement in the twenty sixteen election and the Biden Barisma affair. It was entirely appropriate for President Trump to ask about possible Ukrainian interference in the twenty sixteen election. It would have been appropriate for President Trump to ask

President Zelenski about the Biden Burisma affair. The only reason that the only reason for raising them would have been to obtain an improper personal political benefit is obviously false. Even if the president president had raised those issues, there were legitimate reasons to do so. Bam, who's been saying this all along? Every just stopped with Oh, but he wasn't really and he was just general corruption. No, Hey, did the Bidens do some sketchy stuff? Find out for me,

you know, ask your guy. Let me know what he's not allowed to ask that? What if the Bidens did do some sketchy stuff? Ah, This is where the media apparatus leaps in discredited, debunked, conspiracy theory, says who how, I don't know. They just jump right to it, though the propaganda effect keep repeating it. Debunked, discredited conspiracy, debunked, discredited conspiracy. Hunter Biden, as is noted in this defense

of Trump, had no qualifications whatsoever. In fact, he's a crackhead who impregnates strippers in the back room of sketchy DC striptease establishments. Look, that's that's just fact, Okay, I mean, kicked out of the military for doing crack, kept doing crack at all, kinds of problems. Welcome. The guy's a sad case. Let's be honest. I mean, he's got a

lot of problems. I don't I don't mean to me mean, but you know, the future of the Republic is being called into question here if Trump get to win reelection and Hunter Biden somehow in the center of this. So we've got to deal with reality. Hunter Biden has no qualifications whatsoever for the seat that he sits on. He is compensated, as the report points out, more richly in that role than board members at Fortune one a hundred.

Energy giants like Conico Phillips, so serious energy companies that are in the top one hundred most valuable companies in the world are not paying board members eighty thousand dollars a month. Nope, that's not what happens. So why is Hunter Biden getting paid that much money? Why? Okay questions, why is he on the board at all? We know the answers because of who his dad was, and the at least the appearance of invincibility from corruption investigation at

Burisma because of who his dad was. Okay, that's one. And then too, why is he making so much money? Because they knew it was shady? They knew it was shady. This is this is where we are, my friends. This is absurd. But these are the defenses that need to finally be raised. I've been saying, Oh, I'm so happy that these lawyers who have gathered, who finally circle the wagons necessarily in defense of Trump as he's being ambushed

by these insane Democrats. I'm so glad to see that they understand what the real defense is here, that there's no special invincibility or in vulnerability for the Bidens just because Biden is leading in the polls now for the Democrats, which tells you all I can know of this Democrat Party is pathetic. The best they can do. They know this is the best they can put forward. Joe Biden not even sure what state he's in. Some of the time, the guy's too old and too dumb. But this is

the best we've got as Joe Biden. People always they love the Oh I love people they put They put Trump down for his businesses that failed here and there. First of all, I know tons of ask any entrepreneur, either personally or how many other entrepreneurs here she knows who ended up being really successful? How many failed ventures they had? First? Are they losers because they took a long shot and it didn't work the first time out? Or the idiots? You know? Because Trump has had failed

businesses here and there? See, well, somehow he was a part of the most successful reality ran really effectively was the centerpiece of the most successful reality TV show of I think his generation, maybe American Idols the early days, is more successful. Somehow, his name is on buildings all over the world. His brand obviously has a value. I mean, the market has spoken. Trump is a very very wealthy guy. Yeah, he inherited money, but he also did a lot with

the money he inherited. I know plenty of rich kid wastrels hanging out all over New York City. They know they're not They're not Trump. Okay, so Joe Biden is what they're offering us. Where the where's the record of success for Biden? Now people are starting to look at what other Biden's got rich. By the way, what other members of the Biden family all of a sudden, through connection and through the assumption of access, became very wealthy people,

while Joe is just doing his best for America. Please, like, we're all supposed to be a bunch of complete and utter buffoons. That's what they're assuming here. This is what the Democrats offer up to you. That you cannot use your powers of deduction here. You cannot actually sit and think about this. It's disturbing, my friends, it's disturbing to say the least. But the truth is, the case that's being made against the president all rests on false assumptions, misdirections,

faulty premisses. The eradication of fairness is central to this effort, and that is what they are doing. There's no due process, there's no effort to make this seem like it's anything really other than what it is. If you're paying attention the last gasp of the hashtag resistance weaponizing the bureaucracy, weaponizing the process against the President United States in an

election year, why are they so terrified of voting? Because what would it mean to all the people who have told us that Trump was basically hitler, which, as you know, a lot of very prominent Democrats and pundits and writers

have been saying for quite some time. What would it mean if they've been telling us that he's the worst person in the world, and then when it comes time for voting, the American people step forward and say, actually, a majority of us, as seen through the Electoral College, I think the president has done a really good job. Eight years of Trump. That's what you get. Establishment, that's what you get. Swamp, deep state, hashtag resistance. They can handle it. They are in a panic. This is not

brilliant strategy. This is the kitchen sink strategy. Pelosi and Schiff and Schumer and Naddler, they're just they're flailing now. They're just someone who's just trying to keep throwing whatever they can at Trump, anything that they can come up with. This isn't going to work, So what are they doing. They're just hoping that something catches, which is why I go back to my initial premise cocaine Mitch should just wap it down and this farce put it to bed.

Let's see the Democrats trying to mount a real campaign in the public to try and defeat this president at the ballot box. That's what needs to happen. If they're serious about about the republic that they claim so much to care about. We know what they care about. They care about power. They do not care about what they have to do in order to get there. That's what impeachments really have really all about. You're in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. There's been some

discussion about lately. For I'll just say various reasons. A Minnesota euphemism is about a woman dealing with him. I think a lot of people think, oh, look at him, can a woman beat him? I first point out the facts that Nancy Pelosi does it every single day. The second is that you don't have to be the tallest person in the room. You don't have to be the

skinniest person in the room. We need to start thinking about these women that have been incredible that have one racist in really hard districts and brought people with them. Oh yeah, Democrats with the woman car. All of a sudden, here they got a run with something. Not a diverse field. We know that no racial diversity of the Democrat candidates left. Oops. For people who preach about this constantly, Democrats certainly seem

to fall short when it really matters. Huh. And now we have Democrats who are saying, well, it's all about we have to elect a woman because the best candidates that they have right now, according to the New York Times who endorsed the editorial board, they're endorsed editorial board. Endorsements matter in so far as it gives other people, the media something to point to and either say yay or nay. That doesn't doesn't move the needle. Nobody really cares,

I think, But they endorsed. This happened while I was still out Clobe Shar and Warren a double endorsement, which isn't that really no endorsement at all? If neither candidate is good enough for you to say this is the candidate, maybe just don't endorse anybody. But to endorse both of them seems to be an admission of sorts that they don't have one candidate who's good enough to endorse. And yeah, they skip over Bernie and Biden because well, Biden is

too old and really just not up for it. Biden's just not somebody that we really want to be making any important decisions. And who knows what Biden even really stands for him. He's just a Democrat who will say whatever Democrats tell him to say in any important time. He's almost like a puppet Democrat. He just does what the apparatus wants him to do, has no area where he breaks from the party consensus. Is not a maverick on anything. Remember, if you're a Republican and you trash

your own party, you're a maverick. If you're a Democrat and you break with the Democrat party in any way, you're a traitor. They're very clear on that. Those So I'll talk about rules that are different depending on who you are, But they won't say that. The New York Times won't endorse Biden, won't endorse Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders,

I think it's understandable why. I mean, the Democrats now are going to have a very tough time going forward, especially if Bernie Sanders becomes their nominee, that their party is not a socialist party. Bernie Sanders is advocating for socialist policies flat and calls himself a socialist. The Democratic Party platform is very close to socialism on most of these issues, and as an outright socialist advocacy on others. So where exactly is it written that we can't say

that Democrats are now socialists. I need to understand this. They are socialists. They are American socialists a little different, not Venezuela and not sweetist. You know something else. We got our own version of it here. But all socialism is subject to time and place. Difference is subject to the way it is implemented in one particular nationality or another, in one period or another. It's never exactly the same, even if you're talking about a hardcore communism. Is North

Korea the same as the Soviet Union? Know? Very different in many important ways, but similar enough in certain ways that you can call both systems socialist. Democrats are a socialist party, and there are some who are smart enough now to realize the party has been hijacked. They are smart enough to understand the implications of this at the ballot box. You see, they want power. They want power so that they can eradicate a lot of cultural norms

that are considered more traditional. They want powers they can have planned parenthood and a woman's right to choose, as they say, to be an unrestricted right that is untouchable that can never be changed. They want the federal government to be more involved in every aspect of your life than every before. They want climate change to become an enforced secular religion of sorts. They want you to pay

for other people's stuff. They want anyone from anywhere in the world who comes here to be able to stay here, and you have to pay for whatever they need. That's the party, the Democratic Party has become. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. We're providing unprecedented support to ethanol, support like they've never

had before yet. The radical left in Washington wants to demolish these games, and they frankly wanted to destroy your way of life. They are not for the farmer, they are not for our military, They are not for secure borders, they want open borders, they want sanctuary cities. Is that too strong? Is that too much? What President Trump says? There the Democratic Party, the radical left, is that really

what they've become? Well, you know, I think the answers of course, yes, But letting me make the case to you, because you will receive a tremendous amount of a pushback of outrage. Dare how dare you? How dare you? Sir?

Chill Greta chill, As Trump says, if you were to suggest the Democratic Party has become a socialist party, and yet when you line it up and you look at what they say, you look at their beliefs and what they suggest should happen in this country, the kind of kind of power that they want to have, you'd have to ask yourself, Well, hold on a second, how exactly are they different from socialists? President Trump says that they want to destroy many aspects of your way of life.

If you view economic systems as inextricably linked with individual freedom and choice, as I do, then the way the Democrats approach controlling more and more of our economic system so that they can engage in endless social engineerings that they can dictate every little aspect of your life in whatever way that they can, my friends, that is a threat to your freedom. It's not an overstatement to say that.

It's not an overstatement to say that they are using the force of law so much of what they get away with rhetorically. The Bernie Sanders, the Elizabeth warrens is they suggest that this is all just going to happen because people will understand these are good ideas once they pass these laws, and then everything will be fine. But no, if you don't want to go along with their plans. Elizabeth Warren, who was a plan for everything, I think

Elizabeth Warren has a five year plan for everything. If they suggest these things, though, and then they make them laws, and then you say I don't want to you will not comply, then they will send eventually men with guns who work for the state to take away your property and perhaps your freedom. That's how this works. That's what laws are, you know, if you're serious about laws, not like immigration law, which Democrats think somehow is not the law.

And we saw and we'll get into the Second Amendment rally in Virginia yesterday. People understand that there is a real threat to freedom now from socialists in America. This is a socialism versus freedom election in twenty twenty, make no mistake about it. And if you think, if you think that that's too much, oh no, Bak, it's not true. Really, who is the single most beloved by the media and by the by the left, and by most of the Democratic Party. He's a single most beloved figure in elected

office in the Democratic Party today. I would argue it's not Nancy Pelosi, the one that they think is the future of the party. Obviously that Nancy Pelosi is not the future of the party. Not to but you know, I don't think anyone believes that who's the future of the Democratic Party? Oh well, we know that there are a few possible answers here, but there's one answer that really comes to mind. Aoc She had an interesting discussion

over the weekend. Ocasio Cortez, someone who has not even a working knowledge of economics, has no idea or I don't know if she's you stupid to know or doesn't care that she does not know how the American economy works and why it is so good, why it has been such a powerful force for raising standards of living across the board. Yes, even poor people in America today are better off than poor people were fifty years ago. It's not even close. But she doesn't seem to us.

She either doesn't understand or doesn't care that she doesn't know and has no real sense of what works and what doesn't. Here's her view of politics in America today. You have to hear this to believe it. Please play fifteen and what you said earlier too. I wanted to go back to what you said about our left party. We don't have a left party in the United States. Democratic Party is not a left party. The Democratic Party

is a center or center conservative party. We do not advocate for we do not We can't even get a floor vote on Medicare for all, not even the floor vote that voted down. We can't even get a vote on it. So this is not a left party. There are left members inside the Democratic Party that are working to try to make that shift happen. She's telling you explicitly. She's saying there are leftists in the Democratic Party. Yeah,

there are socialists the Democratic Party. But so that's one revelation that I think is important for us all the year. These are socialist folks. There's a word for the left and the context of the policies we're talking about. These are socialists, and they can try to tell you that they're going to be socialists along the lines of what you see in Europe, But the reality is that everybody

in Europe in those countries that we look for. First of all, the reality in places like Sweden and Denmark is that there's a lot of free market capitalism at work, and that true socialism was tried much or much something much closer to true socialism in Sweden, and then when they basically started running out of money and realize the economy is stagnating, they said, okay, let's try the capitalist thing for a while. They just have a massive welfare state.

But everybody pays into that welfare state, everybody, middle class, lower class, everybody. That tax twenty five I think in Sweden, which is highly obviously a high regressive tax, right, it goes after anyone who buys anything. And so then you have to ask yourself, We'll hold on a second. We keep getting told that the rich will pay that. The rich people, it's all their fault, you see, they'll fund all this stuff that's Marxist. Now, now we're getting into

class warfare. Now we're getting into the evolution that Marx believed would occur from capitalism into socialism. And there were arguments among the Marxists in the early days about whether or not that was the proper path, or whether the revolutionary dictatorship, that's the word they used to use, the dictatorship of the proletariat of the working class. Yes, that's what needs to happen, a dictatorship made up of a

collective commune of people. There were arguments as to whether or not they should even go through the stage of capitalism. See the helpful thing for socialists when they try to transition from capitalism as capitalism accumulates wealth and creates prosperity. Right, people, there's more stuff, So you want to have that period of more stuff before the socialists, the statists, the authoritarians come in and start just contracting and siphoning and contracting

and siphoning. California, for example, very rich place takes a long time to ruin it. Democrats are ruining it. I was just out there. I'll tell you some of my observations about that later. They're ruining it. Socialists are ruining California. That's what's happening here. But she says, we don't have us. We don't have a left party, we have a centrist

Democrat party or center conservative. I mean, from her perspective, you have to think, well, maybe that's true, because she's so far left that nothing would be considered left to her except for going you know, full che Givara. I don't know. It's tough to understand really where she thinks she's going to take this country, other than down a pathway of misery, collectivism, and despair, like those things. Collectivism equals misery and despair. These are things that always go together.

But then there was a moment when the mask slipped. There was a moment when you saw what's really at the heart of this. There are some things that I repeat to you frequently on this show, things like, oh, democrats don't care about principle per se. Democrats don't really, it doesn't really bother them. What they do to the process, what they do to fair play, good faith, and what the law term ramifications that the republic may be from

their actions, that doesn't really bother them. What bothers them is the lack of power. They want power. They perhaps have a psychological and emotional attachment to it. I would even argue perhaps an obsession with it. That's what drives so much of their desire on a policy level and just in general, the discourse, the way that they present

their arguments to the public. AOC, while she's engaged in a Marxist class warfare demonization of rich people, AOC told you exactly what motivates her, exactly what she thinks needs to happen here play thirteen to be ethical. If you're a billionaire today, the thing that you need to do is give up control and power. So I don't want your money as much as we want your power. The people, not me. That's going to get cut and clip. We want your power. Yeah, it is gonna get cutt and clip,

because who says that? What does that mean? We want your weave? The people want your power? What people does? Ay AOC really thinks she represents, oh, a congressional district here in New York full of leftists who don't know anything great. No, she means much more than just that we want your power. You also have to wonder does does Jeff Bezos, who owns the Washington Post, is he have to give up his power? Does Mike Bloomberg, who is making more waves in this Democratic primary than many

people thought. Does he have to give up his power? Who are these mythical billionaires that get to control everything and have no accountability whatsoever and can just enforce their wi their whims of the American people? Ross Pero ran for president? How did that go? Oh? He was a Republican? Thought he's a bad guard. I'm sorry. He was an independent or whatever we call him, a kind of a libertarian. He was a ross Pero. So she wants their power. Also fascinating to pros some mark. Do we have the

clip where she talks about how making making widgets? Did we get that one? Now? Okay? She goes on in this She's sitting there with Tanessie Coats and he says to her, it's a reasonable question. You know, well, don't billionaires make a lot of widgets? And they get to And she says no, because they pay slave level wages, she says to people today in order to become billionaires. So she takes the very Marxist proposition that capitalism is

exploitation and that this is a form of theft. And then it's not really that anyone who has become a billionaire has engaged in an exploitation that is inherently immoral. I mean, as I sit here and I've got an iPhone on my desk, and I think about all the things I've ordered from Amazon that are going to be waiting for me at home. Three that saved me maybe an hour at the store. How many hours of my

life have I gotten back? How much more enjoyment and how much more ease of communication have I had because of my iPhone, because of Amazon, because of these different things that have made billionaires of people. Microsoft, they've got an IBM, and right there's an IBM in front of me. I know that's not Microsoft, but it runs on Windows. So don't they get rewarded for those things? Shouldn't they be rewarded for those things? No, it's theft. It's theft

people who oh and she goes. You also suggest that billionaires just sit on their couches while other people work really hard. Like, I gotta tell you something, I've come across a lot of low level employees in the government and the private sector who are really lazy. It's a real thing. People don't do a good job. People who mess around at work all day. People don't really care.

It's a real thing. They're also people who work really hard, right you know, you know, we have to try to to try to motivate people to be those people who, even at the low end of the wage scale are working very hard. We have wages, and you hope that the system, the market will reward people more for diligent work over time. Now there are pressures on this. It's

not perfect, but what's the what's the alternative? The alternative is AOC think there needs to be a redistribution, a redistribution of Well, look, some companies recognize that giving their employees a little bit more, a little bit extra is good business for them, keeps them, retains them, keeps a good work wars. Delta Airlines had a great year last year, and I think now they're giving out over a billion

dollars dividend. People are going to get who are employees for Delta, not including senior executives and people who are high are up the chain. They're gonna get a think sixteen percent of their salary and a lump sum producer mark. Are we getting that? Not that I'm aware of. That sounds like fun, though, I think we would both. You'd take me to a Rangers game if we got a sixteen percent lump sum of the salary, that'd be nice. Okay, an Islanders game close enough? Why would I get around?

Are game disgusting because it's cheaper? Oh yeah, yeah, thank you. It's all the other option. Now, you're definitely gonna taking the Islanders game Forget the Rangers for you. So AOC is effectively advocating for socialism based on the Marxist principle of capitalist exploitation of the laboring class. It's like we've learned nothing. It's like society hasn't gone through, we haven't run this experiment over and over again and places all

over the world. Do you want know nothing? Authoritarian idiots like AOC to determine who gets what money and when and what they do and what's enough and how much taxation they get, and all these different components are left to them, the central planners. They get to be the ones who devised the plan. And anything that goes with the plan is good, anything goes against the plan is bad.

Or do we want individuals pursuing their own destinies, using their talents and leveraging whatever assets they have as best they can, to be as productive as they can and be rewarded in the marketplace. This is the choice, my friends, This is the choice of twenty twenty. This is the

choice of the direction of this country. Even if AOC were to win, if AOC were to become president tomorrow, which I know she can't for a whole bunch of reasons, would have phase your president tomorrow and she are present for the next ten years, and the country would be in bad shape. It it'll take a law long time, I don't think a long time to see, because of all the accumulation of intellectual and financial capital in this country, of all the social cohesion which is constantly being afraid

these days to really destroy this place. But I promise you socialism can do it. History tells us beyond any doubt socialism can do it. And AOC is advocating for that. The Democratic Party is advocating for socialist policies. It's just a question of whether it's incremental or revolutionary. Is it step by step? Is it the way that Biden and Hillary want to take you there? Or is it as overnight as they can make it. It will never really be overnight. But is it leaps towards socialism. That's what

AOC and Sanders and Warren want to do. But it's all taken us to the same place, my friends, socialism. You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I always said on a communist I'm ready to start tearing bricks up, and I started fighting. I'm not. I don't know, no con brom I'll start. I'll started to get arms. I want to swim on our shoe

and go Trange. I'm ready to revolution, right, So do we just see we just just hold the Senate also use grants and had some day like Bernie Sanders and you're havinge to people make all the decisions for the finding. I mean, I'm serious, Shops. When we send all the Republicans to the re education in the con oh god, he would survive into twinty Grahamitian I'm like him, stre founded as re education right, the first fool of those opened.

Have you heard about the Bellam working out from America solo working out for the Soviet Project for the Omnist proct There's another video from Project Veritas of another Bernie Sanders Field organizer speaking in really stark Marxist terms, Communist terms, actually guillotine the rich now. And look, I know it's off. You know, he's off. He thinks he's off the clock, and he's probably in a conversation with someone. He's letting some things fly. But who says that guillotine the rich?

I mean, that's you know, that's chopped the heads off for rich people. And I know he thinks he's being rhetorically edgy or something, but he's also speaking with fondness and laughing about sending Republicans to the gulag. This is somebody who's working for the Bernie Sanders campaign, somebody's politically active in this country. What exactly are we supposed to

take another one different than the one from before? Can you imagine for a moment if Trump had anyone working for his campaign who was sitting around laughing about rounding up Bernie Sanders supporters and putting them in camps. I don't think so. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Right now, thousands of gun rights activists, white nationalists, militia groups all swarming the

Virginia State Capitol. There are a lot of people nervous about what's going to happen. Authorities in Richmond are on a high alert. It could be a tense stage polarization. What may happen in Virginia. Several hate groups supposedly some white nationalists, white nationalists, white nationalists, white nationalists, white nationalist groups, white supremacists, white supremacists, white supremacists, white extremists. This entire rally stands in opposition to the meaning of this day,

Virginia on the edge. How concerned are you that there might be some people in this crowd that may want to get violent. There's certainly a lot of concern here, raising fears of a dangerous confrontation that could be violence, and there is real concern there about what the intention

is behind them. Zero violence, not a mostly peaceful assembly of tens of thousands of American patriots, many of whom open airing firearms in order to show the exercise of their Second Amendment rights, that the Virginia State Legislature is now trying to unconstitutionally infringe on no violence, none, no, no even arrest that I'm aware of. I mean, my understanding is that afterwards many of the people in attendants

try to help make sure they cleaned up. This is why when I tell you that the left is full of self indulgent cry babies, and there really is an emotion first political ideology, you see it play out that way time and time again. I mean, I came into political analysis, then I left the CIA, build the Bergs Illuminati. I left the CIA, and all of a sudden I

found myself in media. But it was right at the time of the ascendency of the Tea Party, and right after the mid term election of the Tea Party swept into power. But the Tea Party was a major force in American politics, and people a Tea Party rallies were overwhelmingly, almost entirely, almost without exception, kind respectful of laws, assembling in large numbers. And they weren't They weren't assaulting people, they weren't kicking in the windows of stores. They weren't,

you know, saying that Starbucks is oppressive. I want my loft tabe, but then I want to kick in the door. I mean, that's that's what leftists do. That's what leftists did when they lit a limousine on fire on Trump's inauguration day in downtown Washington, d C. The leftist culture of protests involves people saying horrifically nasty things to even things like the Women's March, and the march for signs by the Women's March was just an anti Trump march.

People have finally realized that. But should we knew that all along? Were just women who don't like Trump marching a thing. We're women, we don't like Trump and other stuff. I mean, that was it. That was all oh knows about something, And of course not it was classic a Lynskyite mobilization though right, used people's identity, affinity and then just get a big group of them together and with

a whole bunch of different causes. But then you've mobilized them for something and you can use them for what you want, which was anti Trumpism. That's what was really going on there. And then you have this Second Amendment rally and the media. How could you think that they weren't in some ways really rooting for there to be violence.

Do we believe that there are any members of the mainstream media who if there had been violence on Martin Luther King day after Virginia State Capital from the thousands of people assembled, many of whom had guns, as a whole lot of semiomatic rifles being open carried by people in compliance with law there. If there had been any violence, the media would have absolutely loved the ability to blame it on Trump, to blame it on white nationals. Also,

I thought it was so intriue. You'll see a lot of people in the media who will just dismiss a group for being if there are too many white people at an event. Now it has become somehow a point of criticism. So now whiteness, according to the left wing media, is inherently a cause for concern. And I just mean it doesn't have to be entirely with just there're too many white people. That's now a concern. This does not

exist with any other racial group in America. You can get any other group of people together if they have an issue that they care about, and there being too many of them together is not considered a problem. But whiteness is a problem. Too many white people white nationalists, Well, they're not white nationalists, they're people that were just gathered there because I mean, they've got a guy who dressed in clan robes and black face. We're not sure which

one is. The governor who's a Democrat. They got a guy below him accused by two women of sexual assault, Oh what happened to me too? And a guy below him, Mark Harring, who was also not sure if he ever wore black face, after saying the guy at the top north of should have stepped down because he had a photo of him in blackfaced or a clan robe. We're

not sure which one. He's not sure which one. These Democrats for your friends, absurd, right, they're so worried about all these all these these racist white people getting together. But there were also I saw the photos, I saw the videos, had a lot of friends covering this, a lot of minorities there. In fact, the history of gun control and liberals absolutely hate this and they just ignore it,

they prevent it's not there. The history of real gun control efforts in America, where they're trying to take the guns out of people's hands. You're not laws as a citizen, you're not lawfully allowed to arm yourself was very much pushed by Democrats in reconstructions in the Reconstruction era South, who did not want black Americans to be able to defend themselves against for example, the clan, so they did not want them to be able to arm themselves. We

want all Americans to be armed. We want our fellow Black Americans to arm themselves who are lawful citizens. We want Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans. We want everyone to be able to be armed, because an armed citizenry is a reminder to the state not to transgress too far. Because there is, in fact a bulwark against tyranny. We can

fight back if we need to. And when you hear people who are involved in the political process laughing and joking about guillotines and goolags, people who are working for socialists who are doing very well, by the way, in getting enough very foolish and unwise Americans to support them, we're really supposed to believe that they would not try to control us. They would not never underestimate government's power to destroy and be unrepentant about it. Governments always have

an excuse. You see, no one's responsible. It's the accumulation of power without really any individual responsibility. Necessarily, governments will do things that individuals would never be able to bring themselves to do. The collective is usually so much more dangerous than the individual. And for those who are saying, well, what about individuals who become despots, who become totalitarians? Right,

they always leverage the collective. The way they trample on individual rights is saying I represent me, I represent I embody, everyone and their will is evidenced or is put through me. You the individual that I have to make disappear from his home in the middle of the night, that I have to disarm so that I can more easily make him disappear in the middle of the night, you don't count because I represent the collective. I am the collective.

It's a dangerous word. You should be concerned whenever somebody wants to tell you that they themselves can interpret and can then therefore wheel the will of the people. Here's MSNBC's Chris Hayes, who looks like somebody who reads a lot of books but says a lot of really stupid things. But all you have to do is look if you look like a walk liberals inherently think you're smarter. This is kind of like I get mad at Americans. I think I've got a British accent, and actually you've got

to have a fancier accent. If you're going to think you're really smart. No, having British accent doesn't make you smart. Looking like a nerd with glasses doesn't make you smart. People need to stop with this stuff. But here's here's Chris Hayes. He says stupid things on TV all the time. And I heard he used to be a nice guy. I've heard he's gotten really full of himself. Actually not surprising, you know, because the Libs have elevated him, And I'm like,

who is this guy? Reminds me of every annoying left wing nerd I went to college with who thought that they had great arguments and never had to really argue with anybody. Their arguments were garbage. Here's fourteen. The inescupable fact of this kind of event is that, yes, it's peaceful protest, it's First amend and protected speech. But the implicit and explicit message of a bunch of have we armed marsh going to says capital is this, don't you dare and act your policies. If you do, we will

use these guns against you. Oh, it's a threat of force. Here's the problem. Every firearm in this country in private hands of a citizen is a reminder it's a little personal rebellion against the government's ability to just come in and force you and your family to do what they want. It is a reminder that you do have as a citizen an alternative option, and that if they were going to violate your rights in a way that you would have to think about using that option against the state.

There would much there would very likely be the violation of many more people's rights. That is the check, That is the check on tyranny. The Second Amendment exists for liberals reject this. Liberals reject this. It makes them. It makes them uneasy that there are people out there who do not just accept that whatever whatever the big s state tells them to do, they must comply with. No. No, there are limitations, there are things that there are laws

that could be passed. What if they passed a forced sterilization and forced abortion law in this country because of overpopulation, because of climate change. If someone came into your if agents of the state were sent to your home they tell you, sorry, you have to We're going to sterilize you or perhaps your children because too many, too much population. We got to save the world. Right, Listen to the crazy crap they say about climate change. We're gonna get

into that in a little bit. Would you let those agents of the state do that. They've on this in China for decades. This isn't just something that I've concocted out of nowhere. No, there's a limit. There is a place at which tyranny crosses the threshold. There is a place at which this state is no longer able to safely and without reprisal, trample on your rights. This is central for many of us to what it actually means to be a free citizen of the United States of America.

That idea is very basic. It is very central. Democrats who think, and they are socialists, who think now that they should have control of every aspect of your life. That nothing is beyond the whims of the majority wielded by Nancy Pelosi. And if they get the Senate, Chuck Schumer and some Democrat in the White House, there's nothing that you can count on as a right that is inviolate. There's nothing that they will not be able to do

if they choose to do so. They like that they are pettitotalitarians, and if you let them, they'll just be outright totalitarians. This is why they hate the Second Eiment rally so very much, because it does remind people of something that just because you have the votes does not mean you have the right, And if you try to do something that is not right in a free society with an armed citizenry, the state can find out the hard way that they have gone too far. You're in

the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I do not support in any way, shape or form Governor Northam's and the Democrats gun control. What I also don't support is the fact that every news piece you've seen on this this weekend, they've always brought up the issue of race, as though it's nothing but white rednecks and hillbilly's out here who care for the Second Amendment. Would actually Black Americans, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, Americans in

general care about the Second Amendment. I work in a gun store part time, and I can't tell you the number of customers I see of all races, all colors, all creeds who care about the Second Amendment and who just want to peaceably live their lives, enjoy their rights and the Second Amendment. So that's why I'm out here and big media mainstream media. Be damn. If you take a good look at me, you can see I'm a black American and all I'm out here for is to

enjoy my Second Amendment rights. An excellent explanation of why that particular patriotic American was at that rally. There were minorities and attendants in support of the rally. They were welcomed with open arms by their fellow Americans because their fellow Americans recognize that the Second Amendment is not about race.

The Second Amendment is about individual dignity, the right to defend one's home, one's family, and yes, the right to defend against tyranny, which every human being deserves and should have. Governments go tyrannical. This isn't just something that's theoretical. You know, we always are told by the Libs to pretend like, you know, history has only been around for twenty or thirty years. He and I know a big deal. Yeah.

How long ago was it that the Soviet Union enforced a near half of the globe in some kind of communist tyranny? I mean, how long ago was it that we've had Look at that Azuelo today, look at North Korea. Mean, there are tyrannical regimes scattered around the world. Still, what do you think can prevent Oh, America's too sophisticated, America's

too wealthy in order to go to tyrannical. Well, what about Germany in the nineteen thirties, my friends, an industrial superpower, probably the third in you know, the third greatest industrial output at that period of any country in the world, just behind the United States, the United Kingdom. I think it actually very quickly exceeded the UK's production in certain areas.

But if you look at even just steel output, for examples, America, Britain, then Germany, and Germany went utterly tyrannical, and it happened very rapidly. So and never look at the Soviet Union, the First World War and the Russian Revolution. These things can happen quickly. And if you think that there won't be enough ideologically brainwashed officers of the state who will enforce, will even enforce the will of the quote collective, even if it is in violation of what we should all understand,

our basic moral truths, you're mistaken. Historically, there will be people who are willing to do that. They'll be scared, they'll be doing it for their own self interest. They'll be a variety of reasons for it, but they will do it. And so that is why that second rally so important. And then there's just also on the policy level.

I know, I'm getting into the underlying secondment philosophy, but on the policy level, all the stuff they're talking about doing is just gonna harass people that don't break any laws and don't hurt anybody. I mean, they're serious about gun violence, which they always claim they are. You're gonna go after assault rifles. Assault rifles are less than one percent naturally of homicides every year. So what should you

really be going You should be going after handguns. And what is the primary area of society where handguns are used for violent crimes? Of course, drug and a lot of it is drug and gang activity. That's where you have most of the homicides occurring across the country. It's why you have these places like Baltimore, in Chicago and Philadelphia where there's a lot of gun violence, still New Orleans and a lot of it revolves on the drug trade.

But that's not what they're doing. They want to harass people. This is a way for Northam and the libs in the Virginia State legislature to just stick their fingers in the eyes of people that had never broken any law. Does anyone really think that they're they're in danger because their law abiding neighbor Phil or Bob or Bill or Tony or Jamal or you know, Diego or whoever, their law abiding neighbor has an AAR fifteen, they're scared because

of that. Law Abiding gunners I mean concealed carry permit holders for example, are more law abiding on a per capita basis then law enforcement sent My law enforcement friends don't like that statistic, but it's true. But yeah, let's just pass a bunch of laws to turn them into felons. By the way, felons, you know people, they get incarcerated. Thanks for listening to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever

you get your podcasts. But to embrace the possibilities if tomorrow we must reject the perennial profits of doom and their predictions of the apocalypse. They are the heirs of yesterday's foolish fortune tellers. And I have them, and you have them, and we all have them, and they want to see us too badly, but we don't let that happen. They predicted an overpopulation crisis in the nineteen sixties, massed ovation in the seventies, and an end of oil in

the nineteen nineties. These alarmists always demand the same thing, absolute power to dominate, transform, and control every aspect of ours. We will never let radical socialists destroy our economy, wreck our country, or eradicate our liberty. America will always be the proud, strong, and unyielding best of freedom in America.

We understand what the pessimists refuse to see, that a growing and vibrant market economy focused on the future lifts the human spirit and excites creativity strong enough to overcome any challenge, any challenge by far, they've ever heard of Republican president speak the way that Trump does about the left. I've been through a couple of Republican presidents in my lifetime. I don't remember anyone who would say things like these are radical socialists who want to control every aspect of

your life. That is what they want to do. Trump gets it. He's right, and he speaks about it the way that he should because it's reality and climate I mean, this is the this is the place now where I just cannot I cannot see. I mean, I'm trying to think worth it. I have to take them seriously because they're crazy and they're dangerous. Their ideas are wrong and dangerous.

But I think that they're worthy of ridicule. These people that believe the world's gonna end in eight years unless we do this, that the other thing, they're worthy of ridicule. This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Unless we do what. Oh, there's this great article by Walter Russell Meade over the Council and Formulations the Wall Street Journal, all Aboard the Crazy Train, and it's about Davos. It's a quick step back for a second. You know, Davos

is this gathering of the global elite. Quinn of England, the Builderberg, the Illuminati, buck section came out of CFAR and CIA. Google it. But the Davos set is this group that gets together. It's world leaders, celebrities, you know, social entrepreneurs, whatever the heck that means, billionaires, fancy fancy, fancy people. That's what Dabos is. And it's a little little town nestled up in the Mountains of Switzerland, your leo.

That was for your producer Mark. And this is where they get together to discuss a couple than global poverty and global climate change. But really global climate change has become the big thing. To give you an idea of the intellectual seriousness is what Walter Russell Mead points out. The intellectual seriousness of this Davos conference where a renting a one bedroom, one bedroom apartment in a certain part of town in Damos, a small town, can go for

five thousand dollars a night. All right, it's a very very expensive proposition to go to this this conference. I think I forget what the fee. I think the fee is like fifteen or thirty thousand dollars a person or something. I mean, it's very expensive. But when you arrive this year, everyone is being told that at the conference they are not distributing paper maps of the town of Davos because of climate change. Not making this up. Wow, that's really

going to show that climate change gods. No paper maps, folks. This is what this is what we are supposed to take as what we should the kind of mentality we should all embrace about this issue. And this is absurd. People I don't know how any who would say this with a straight face. Think about how much trash you throw out of your apartment or your house in any

given week. You think that them giving out what would it be a few hundred, a few thousand pieces of paper producer Mark Prince sent out probably in a week here in the Freedom Hut, just giving me all the different you know, cutsheets and live reads and things we have. It is absurd, maybe not quite that much, but that's because he's very environmentally conscious. So when do we get to just recognize this for what it is, for it being foolish. I mean, this is this is not a

serious ideology. They take it very seriously, but it could only be believed in by unserious people. And they think they're so smart. They think I'm crazy. They're the ones worried. They're the ones that have set projections for the world being put on a path to extinction unless we do things that I guarantee you we are not going to do. The world is not going to do the things that I promise you. I need it. Plays a bet on this. I've got an idea where I can do it. It's

not going to happen. But the people that believe that unless we do the thing that I guarantee you we are not going to do, the human species is on a glide path to extinction. Those people think I'm crazy and you're crazy, and I think science is on their side. Oh wow, science, huh. They also think that we should be lectured on this issue by a I think now, sixteen year old girl. I guess so when she's eighteen, then we can really criticize her, right, that's I guess

there will. But when you're sixteen, if you're a global icon for a political movement being used as a human shield against criticism for adults too stupid and cowardly to make the case themselves, then you're you're not supposed to be criticized if you're sixteen. Here is Gretta Thunberg. I'm not child bashing here. Okay, the Daily Beast and those other idiot publications can say that all the much child bashing. We're gonna hear from her, and we're going to discuss

the ideas she's putting forward. Play eighteen. Yeah, we've talked a lot about the inspiration and hope you're bringing to others, But obviously there's a flip side to that, and what can we all learn from all of you about how you deal with the haters. I would like to say something that is, there's think people need to know more

than how I deal with haters. In chapter two, on page one hundred and eight, in the SR one point five IPCC report they came out in two and eighteen, it says that if we are to have a sixty seven percent chance of limiting the global average TEMPERATUREIZE to below one point five degrees celsius, we had on January first, two and eighteen, about four hundred and twenty giga tons of C or two left to emit in that budget. With today's emissions levels, that remaining budget is gone within

less than eighty years. These numbers aren't anyone's opinions or political views. This is the current best available science. Though many scientists sages these figures are too moderates, these are the ones that have been accepted through the IPCC. I know you don't want to report about this. I know you don't want to talk about this, but I assure you I will continue to repeat these numbers until you do. Well. We're reporting on it right now. So guess what she's

at Davos. That's why I brought up Davos before lecturing the world on this issue. And this is where you don't have to be a scientist to understand that this is,

this is preposterous, preposterous. I'm sorry, there's only a sixty seven percent chance, a sixty seven percent chance that you know, the four hundred and twenty giga tons of CO two blah blah blah, really not not a seventy percent chance, not a sixty two percent chance, A sixty seven percent chance according to the IPCC that if we want to avoid a one point whatever degree you're this is all made up nothing. They don't know, they can't predict this,

the numbers. They're just pulling this stuff together. They put garbage into the models, and they get garbage out of the models for adicting climate. They don't know. I mean, a weatherman cannot predict the weather accurately ten days in advance, but they're going to tell you what the global climate temperature is going to be, an average climate average temperature reading. Rather, this is this is the best, the best available science today.

It's because it's not science. Science is not about prediction. Science about fact and the ability to repeat to repeat results through experimentation using the scientific method. It's not a science, it is not about prediction. This is this is a the club. This is all crap. It is all nonsense. And here's the other part of this, that they just don't know how to deal. We're not We're not this four hundred and twenty, you know, gigatons of CO two.

We have eight years. I mean, you know, God willing, I'll still be on the air, Producer Mark will be here, We'll be on the air in eight years, and I'll be able to tell you I I guarantee, I would bet, I would bet every dollar I have if there are a way to do this, that we are not going to meet this this eight year standard that they, you know, are of reduction in order. No way, no way. And yet we're told if we don't meet that we're going

to be past the point of no return. We're being told us by a sixteen year old with no background in science whatsoever. We're being told us by a human being who, in a normal circumstance would still be told by her parents when to go to bed and when she could leave her room. If she's been naughty or something. You know, she could be grounded. That's who's telling them.

And that's where the media is like, please tell us more about this, and yeah, I mean yeah, is it a little humorless when an interviewer is asking you a question trying to get to know you, and you're just gonna like read off the IPCC report again. But this is this is what this girl is being trained to do.

She is being trained to do this so that idiot lives in places like California where I just was, can have someone championing, you know, getting all this attention from the media and cannot be a sale because ultimately there's a deep intellectual insecurity that people who believe this stuff must have because they can't they can't actually have this debate.

They can't actually sit down with somebody and look at the look in the eye and say, yeah, unless we do these things, though, we're going to be on an extinction path no more human beings. Well within, by the way, we went within a hundred years, been fifty years, two hundred years, five hundred years. Come on, this is the best available science, right, sixty seven percent chance they're telling us about they don't know. Of course, they don't we know,

they don't know. Here's another problem. This is where they the Davos set really has no answers for you. China is building a coal fired power plan every week on average the new CO two emissions globally for the last certainly the last decade. I think it's the last twenty years. Sixty percent of it is due to China. You add India in there, and India and China are the country is responsible for the most CO two emissions by far. And do you think that they're going to And China,

by the way, is in the Paris Accord. China is a yeah, sure we'll do that, Yeah right, sure, though we like the good press. Yeah we'll sign up for that thing that no one's going to enforce. But whole Trump is evil for leaving them. I mean, if you think the Paris Accords were important, you're just not very smart. You're just not very smart. I don't care. They can show me all the degrees in the world and I'll look at this and you know, I got a eight hundred on my SAT math or whatever. I mean, I

don't care. They're just not very smart. They're not able to have the synapses in the brain fire in such a way that they can come up with a very obvious but important conclusion here that this fear mongering is laughable, that they're wrong, they're wrong. I'm right, they're wrong again. Oh you turn on all the journalists. I remember at CNNA once or twice I got to discussing climate change. Oh you don't believe and you don't believe in climate

ever gets so huffy. You don't believe in climate change? What does it even mean? Yeah, the climate change is all the time, not worried about it. I have my level of anxiety, and I'm somebody who you know. I do want to I do want to have kids. I do want a good future for all of humanity. Believe it or not. The level of anxiety I have a climate is zero. But that's why I also, I think the people that really worry about this, unfortunately, it's a

it's a psychological disorder. This is not this is not the result of people who are thinking logically and soundly about things. I do think it's a mass hysteria. It's a mass delusion, and there should be much better studies done of this. I start to think that there's a kind of psychological contagion that can occur. We know it can happen in totalitarian societies, but I'm starting to think that this happens within the bubble of liberalism or leftism.

I don't like calling them liberals, where people can finally, people have finally reached this conclusion that we're all going to die unless we give the government the power. The government that can't that is inept, invariably inept in what it does. But the government should have the power to declare to do anything that wants in your life in order to save the world. And we're all the governments the world there to come together. I mean, Davos is a joke, by the way, folks is a laughing stock.

These are just people that are desperate to feel important and cool. That's what Dabos is does nothing of any value. People still go globalize. It is virtue signaling for globalists and private jets, and at least they get to go on a fancy trip. The rest of us just get to get lectured about climate change that no one's going to do. Oh that's right. They all took private jets to get the Davos. By the way, they care so

much about the climate. So they're using more CO two in one day than you will use probably in a year. But they're the good people, you see, they're the messengers of the movement. These people are people are just just absurd. You're in the Freedom Henty. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I think, what's it? The heart of it is who you ask to be a judge? Who do

you want on your list to be a judge? And I'll tell you what the esra's been for Donald Trump, because I've seen this guys homophobic, that's in racist, that's in sexist, Oh yeah, most definitely, and anti voter. That's been a big qualification. He has named one person after another who And I don't mean we have kind of a sense that that's who those people are. I don't even look at their written records. Look at the activities they've already engaged in, Look at the fights they've been in,

in which side they were on. I like that. Elizabeth Warren were described in the New York Times and Door spent up her, but also Klobuchar as a good dude storyteller, a gifted storytell That's right, it's a fake Native American gifted, a telling that story for about fifty years. Good job. Oh just remarkable. Good good. She can just spin a great yarn and I would just just tell the tale. Oh man. I also have to say I love the Babylon Bee, which has done something. The Babylon b is great.

I really impressed they had this. One of their tweets was that it was this Elizaeth Warren quote. Bernie Sanders once told me in private that The Princess Bride is a garbage movie and those who enjoy it are human trash. This, of course a reference to the private conversation she had about whether with Bernie Sanders or whether or not a woman could be president, which then she made public in an effort to take him down, which I think is gross.

Of course, people who love Warren will somehow defend this, but I think it is quite gross that she did that. And I think it's The Princess Bride, it's not a garbage movie. But I do not think now people are gonna get mad at me. I think it's great when you're a kid. It's a great thing to watch when you're a kid homesick from school. It's not like a movie as an adult that I'm in a rush to watch. Ever, I mean it's gets a little so, you know, some

of the effects. I don't know, people have every nostalgic about it. All right, all right five, But you're certainly not a guardage. I like it just just saying just saying, oh, but Hillary came out, Hello, Hillary came out recently. She's got this documentary that's all about how amazing Hillary is and how wonderful and warm and brilliant and fantastic he is on Hulu. You know, these platforms other dominated by lives again Republican billionaires. Where are you. I'll start it.

I'll start a conservative based entertainment platform tomorrow. We will start making good movies, good shows, things about you know, stories that people care about, where there are good guys and bad guys, and there's drama and there's really you know, it's not all just going to be like elevating democrats and you know, making everybody bend the need of that, trans writes Agenda. I mean, this is what you see

and all the latest entertainment that comes out. Whenever there's anything political, it's always left wing politics, as you know. But they got this Hulu documentary and Hillary says I'm trying to find the quote. It was pretty amazing, but it was basically, nobody likes Bertie Sanders. He was in Congress for years, he had one center to support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants wants to work with him. He got nothing done? Ouch, Hillary, what happened? Thanks for

listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll call. A lot of roll call stuff sort of closed the show out with today First producer Mark Scalp one to ten. How much did you miss your favorite radio host? It's very important that everyone knows. I haven't listened to Howard in a while. That's cold, it's cold, It's rough. Dude,

He what does he making? Like? One hundred million year? He doesn't. He doesn't need three shows a week? Now? Oh man? Can I get on? Can I get on? One hundred million dollars a year? Slash three shows a week? Make Yeah? You'd be down for once you get really old, that's what you do, oh Man, three shows a week? That would be great. But these guys, you know he's gonna be doing radio for the next twenty years. He guys, never want to retire. He's gonna be like Larry King, Hey,

I'm coming back. I was surprised when he said he wanted to retire. Larry King, He's on like Oracle or whatever. He's like, hey, yeah, or a TV Oracle TV Larry Larry. I don't know. He's never gonna give up. Yeah. Well, I did watch Ghostbusters recently and I figured Larry King makes an appearance there, doesn't Yeah, yeah he does. Uh, it's a great movie. So what else? Oh yeah, California, by the way, California was was actually kind of cold. I was a little sad about that. It was the sixties,

it was not really Wait were you there too? It was in San Francisco. We went, I was colder for you. What's okay? So what I want to ask you about? And now I remember, Um, did you you know how there's this whole thing with conservative about how these places the California is being ruined. Sure, which I will say I have a couple of anecdotes about that. But I want to hear did you see any of the mess in San Francisco or do you just stay away from it. I mean, I saw some homeless people here and there

I did. The only thing that bothered me about San Francisco, besides the hills and walking around that that is absolutely awful. I don't know how people walk up and down those hills that that's awful. That's just geography. That has nothing to do with me. Yeah, the liberals, But the garbage, like, you can't you can only have one bin of garbage or two bins of garbage per household, and if you have more than that, you have to wait and leave

it in your house. And if you find if you put too much garbage out like that that was just weird to me. Oh yeah, gress. So I will tell you a couple of things. First is that when I was in La I spoke to a lot that's a bunch of friends who are La natives, and they said that they're hearing now more than ever before, from lifelong Los Angelinos that they're thinking about leaving the state. That

it's actually it's actually become too much. The traffic has gotten so bad, the taxes are so high, and the dysfunction so consistent, so present around everyone of the people who are lifelong California is like I'm out. So that was interesting because you're starting and there is this big outflow of people who are leaving. The problem is, of course, not everyone can leave, right if you own a home there, and they might raise taxes a bunch on properties there,

which makes it really hard to sell your home. I mean if you've got to Let's say you got a two hundred I mean, just to make it easy, two hundred thousan dollars home, which in California would get you, yeah, cardboard box to live in. But let's say you had a two hundred thousand or in Los Angeles, a two hundred thousand dollars home, and and you you know the taxes on that are going to get jacked up. So you know the taxes are ten or fifteen grand a year.

I mean that really hurts the value of your home. Yeah, dramatically, right, So I mean that's obviously a rough approximation of what but there's a concern that that's what's going to happen. So now people who want to leave can't leave, and then you just get duck rent. See the problem with property taxes, you're really renting your home from the government, even if you have no mortgage. You don't own your home.

You're renting it from the government. You're not allowed to own that property without giving money to the government every year. So that's a big problem. The other thing, and this is I gotta tell everybody this. I don't know to say. I did Fox at a Tucker Show on Friday, and we're sort of poll we were, you know. I was in a suburban, as one does, and and I'm driving along and we stop at a red light in an area where there's it's like a you know, mini mall

or whatever. You know, there's one of those malls. I'm from New York City. I don't know what you call these things. You know, a strip mall. Yes, it's kind of like a strip ball. But there are people milling about, walking around the shopping center area. So there's some people walking around and and it's not a not a like a particularly dodgy part of town. And by the way, just just safety warning for everybody. What I'm gonna tell you.

For those of you who are eating, you may want to just turn them the volume for a second or whatever,

because but I do need to share this. I would drive along and there's a guy who is near like, I think he's near a tent that is probably the tenth that he's now, you know, inhabiting, and he just goes up and stands and is making a lot of is sort of making a lot of noise and again content warning for everybody, and he he drops trou right there in full view of like thirty people, and I'm just the whole thing happens right there on the street with you know, it's nighttime, but they were you a light,

you could see everything. Whatever. He just goes and I'm like, I I've seen that before. I have no no, no, it does not happen in New York City like that. He's not happy number one. Yeah, yeah, well no, no, that's different. That's different. I've seen it in the Third World. I've seen it. I've seen it in the nastiest countries I've ever been to, and I've been to some very nasty ones. I've seen people do that where they just will go. This was in like Los Angeles, you know,

near Century City or whatever. It was crazy and nobody was even phased by it. So I gotta tell you, just for a personal anecdote standpoint, all the stuff you're hearing about California, San Francisco, La, Ten Cities MESSI all the stuff. Yep, it's real. I guess I didn't go to the right part to San Francisco or you did go to the right part to San Francisco. Uh. And then I got on anything for you? Are you a UFC person? Is that a part of your I mean,

I'll watch the big fights, did you. I mean, this was an easy one to watch because it lasted forty seconds. I saw was gonna say so the highlights. I watched the fight on Twitter. Yeah, after the fact, I was thinking, it's funny. I mean, people, I know that I'm gonna get yelled at by some UFC watchers for this, but I think it's interesting to hear people do the analysis

of UFC. I'm like, yeah, I know when someone's gotten hit hard too, they're like, oh man, you know what really you know what really set him up for the knockout. There was that like right cross to the face and then the knee like into his temple. I'm like, yeah, I know, I don't I'm not gonna beat the crap benefit. Yeah, he beat him up really badly, and that is how he got the knockout. It's kind of kind of an

interesting way to look at it. Um, but you had Connor McGregor, who was the victor tweet out phenomenal president, quite possibly the USA greatest of all time. He put a goat symbol in there, which I just because I'm cool, I know that that means greatest of all time. I'm glad, thank you most certainly one of them. Anyway, as he sits atop the shoulders of many amazing giants that came before him, no easy feat early stages of term, also incredible,

congrats and happy Martin Luther King Junior Day America. Connor McGregor, are they going to try to cancel Connor? Now? He says Trump is one of the greatest, perhaps the greatest of all time. I mean, I think everyone kind of knows. And this isn't saying this is nothing derogatory against Trump, but Connor's kind of out there. Not that only out there people would you know, vote for Trump. I'm not trying to say that I got to pick on the

Irish guy. I wasn't, but you know, Connor's out there, so yeah, he says, everything just goes over everyone's end. It didn't he make one hundred million dollars for fight fighting Floyd Mayweather, which wasn't that great. It wasn't right now, the whole time, I was like throwing knee yeah, spin kicks. I would like to see them UFC. Yeah, I don't want to see the box Connor. I think Connor McGregor would would would completely like just crush him at a UFC style fight. But it was not good for him

in the boxing match. But my point is because he's a little out there, nobody cares what he says. Yeah. Can you imagine that if you had paid like I mean front row seats. I'm sure at a UFC event like that amounts of thousands of dollars, right, I mean, I mean that's not the only card. Obviously you're gonna get five or six fights, right, but but the big

fights count in the last forty seconds. Yeah. And it wasn't even like it wasn't even like the end of like a Bruce Lee movie where he finishes off the main bad guy with like a giant like yeah, like kick in the face or something. You know. It was kind of like, you know, hit him with the shoulder a couple of times. He did have one high kick that he sort of blocked a little bit, you could tell connected, and then the guy just sort of stumbled and felled to the ground and was getting punched in

the face. Would you pay money to see UFC fight? Like I feel like i'm because I know that I loved Team Buck and so many of them loved the UFC. Yes, of course I would pay money. No, I'm talking about in person or on television, because I feel like you in person, you don't see much. You say, you go into Madison Square Garden, they have fights there. You're in the top row. You're not seeing a thing. I'm gonna tell you something. I back in the day with a

bunch of friends. I forget even what it was called. But it wasn't called uf it was pre UFC. It was a different There was like, you know, there were these early fighting leads and they were trying to ban it. There was this whole argument around, you know, whether it was like, you know, two too brutal. And I went to see I forget what it was called, but it was a similar thing to UFC. And I had some friends over and we ordered it on pay per view.

It was like fifty dollars, and this is back in the nineties, and it was the most boring thing I've ever seen in my life because it just turned into wrestling, like it turned into like Olympic style wrestling without actually Olympic wrestling where you have guys like like essentially it was all on the ground. It was all ground and pound and it was just dudes like wrestling each other to one and gets exhausted and then he like hit him a couple of times in the face and the

guy would tap out. Yeah, it was like, this is the most boring thing I've ever seen in my life. That's why I don't think you can do that in UFC. Yeah no, no, now that's right. They changed it because of that. But I saw it in the early days and it was a really bad like what I saw was a really bad product. So the Olympic college style wrestling boring. I don't know how people watch that. Yeah, I've never even tried. Although Fox Catcher is a very

good movie. If you haven't, you would like it, I'm gonna put that out there for you would like it. And Steve correll who Steve Carrells, is incredible. He plays the main guy. And if you you would you have to do is watch Fox Catcher and then watch on YouTube or something. Just watch the guy that he plays, because there's a video of him and you're like, oh,

he becomes him. It's it's crazy how well he does this character who's a really weirds a billionaire, really weird guy from the from the DuPont family and a fox Catcher is a good movie. Yeah, so UFC thing happened, um California. I saw a guy do that thing that he did. Trying to think what else? Oh and I saw any I saw an iHeart concert? Oh which one m I saw? Alter? Ego, Ah, wasn't Coldplay there? Yeah? I'm so jealous. Yeah, Coldplay was great. Well invite me.

I mean I only could get one ticket. H Coldplay was great. You know that's my favorite band. I did not know. Yeah you like cold love Play? Did you not hear my first dance song on my wedding Yellow? I thought that was her choice? No? It was yeah really yeah, it's right. The range is hot today producer Mark Um. Yeah, I think Coldplay was great. Also. Billie Eilish Haylish, I've never seen before a little weird, little out there. It was interesting. I don't like her music.

I don't care what she looks like or anything. There was a woman named Shade who performed, who actually is amazing vocals. I was very impressed just with her vocal talent. Um Blink one d eighty two. They're they're a little old. It's a little old, and they're not good anymore. It's just it's like dudes who look like they're all, you know, dads, and they're like late forties, early fifties who are still playing that kind of music are still performing. Yeah, it's

a little bit. It's a little bit like they're a little like I don't know about this anymore. You know, it's not like classic rock. It's a little of like punk rock in that style. Whatever you call Blink with eighty two, you know, I don't know if it called emo. Music is not emo? Emos? Yeah? Is it green Day? Blink one eighty two emo? The audience is gonna call you out on this disco like all that. Well, packs, I'm different now I'm throwing a flag. Emo is like boy,

Emo is like, uh um, what's it? What's it called? You know? Better than Ezra? Yeah? Yeah, yeah, emos? Emo? In my arrow, it was green Day in the like, well, anyway, So I saw him trying to think who else? Oh, I didn't it was Black Keys was too late and they're actually my favorite. And I was like, I'm too tired. It's past. It's like past eleven thirty left the concert. It was like it was past eleven pm. So and I had enough. Also, why does everyone stand? We have seats?

It was a seeded venue. Why does everyone stand? There were you in the venue? I was like in the back, Oh yeah, no, I'm not important kind of have to stand. Yeah, well no, but everyone was standing. Everyone was standing out a country. You want to dance. No one was dancing. They're just standing. But they have seats. Sit in the seat, don't stand in the seat. Very frustrating. So there was that, But you know, I think I'm missing one. Im just

happy I heard that you said cold Play was great. Yeah, lou and Ears were actually good too, but Coldplay was the best by far. Cold Player was. I mean just and I'm not They're not even my favorite band. I like Black He's a lot more personally, but in terms of a live performance, they were on a whole other like there was a whole other level from the other stuff. Just what they did the presentation, the you know, the song choice and everything else, so um yeah, they were

they were very very good. And uh oh and now we'll actually do some role call. Sorry you're in the Freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast team. I promise we'll do it. We'll do a double session because I've been out for a few days that I've missed you. Also, we'll do a double session of roll call tomorrow because I know we producer Mark and I got a look excited about talking about the things. So let's get to your messages now they're on Facebook. Brandon

is first up. Welcome back, brother Buck. Our shields are high in Virginia. Yesterday I was at the VCD l Lobby Day in Richmond. It was amazing. We a small group about seven patriots, mostly with medical background than I, the only grunt of the group, showed up prepared for the worst with backpacks full of medical supplies. We left Richmond with all our equipment, along with smiles on our faces and hope in our hearts. The mood of the

event was of hope, friendship, brotherhood, and patriotism. I believe the reason the event was peaceful. I had little to do with Virginia's governed declaring a state of emergency, and more to do with people like my beautiful bride who led over fifty people from all over the country to pray and fast for our protection. I had credit God and people like my bride for the peace and safety of yesterday's event. Thank you all. We wrestle not against

flesh and blood, but against power and principalities. By the way, I shared your podcast with many patriots yesterday. Take care of Brother Airborne all the way. Well, Brian, thank you so much for your note. Also appreciate you very much sharing my podcast. As I always say, that's the single most helpful thing any of you who want to see the Bucks Exton show thrive, telling a friend or ten or two or fifty about it is the most helpful thing to say. They can listen to the iHeart app

subscribe on Apple Podcasts. Producer Mark is going to be in charge of putting up our YouTube channel soon, which is going to be up. So we're gonna watch you all the subscribe and it's not quite there, are we are? We are? We No, We're not quite ready to launch. Close by next week. I think we'll be ready to launch on YouTube. So that is the plan, and that way you'll be able to watch the show the Pluto. The Pluto TV show we have we will put on

YouTube as well. So that's the plan. You can check it out and please do subscribe to the podcast and then the YouTube channel. Brian rights Buck, Ben did a great job filling in. I was wondering if you had plans to give him a slot on Pluto cheat TV channel to forty eight the first. If you do, he should call his show Ben's wind Garden where the roses are always read and the analysis bears fruit. Wompomp. I don't think I don't think he's going to all at

that right, Ben's wind Garden. What do you think? No, I don't think so, but I do appreciate your writing in thank you. I'm glad that Ben benja buddy of mine, is a great dude, very smart, good man. Should we always try to have the best host we can in here, Jesse buck Sexton showing us me with your co workers. But CNN stands stands for Certified nutty Network. Okay, Jesse, thank you. Daniel rights Buck enjoy your commentary and listeners.

It doesn't change the message, But as a former US n R, I'd like to remind you that it was General Yamamoto. I'm sorry, Admiral Yamamoto, not General. My bad, sorry about that. Yes, still a vala target for US Air Force. P. Thirty eighth. Just finished the book Wounded Tiger.

It's good, okay, it's astonishing, true story, showering our faith and changed to follow Christ can have I no, okay, thank you so much, Daniel, appreciate it man, thank you for writing in the story is about a capture Doolittle raider, a missionary's daughter he never met, and others. Huh, okay, interesting, I've never heard of that before. Let's see here, Steven Buck, you're discussing the movie nineteen seventeen the other night. It

sounds like a good movie. However, the real deal, literally from movies about World War One is They Shall Not Grow Old, which takes actual footage. I suggest you see it, Steve, and I saw it. It is fantastic. You are correct. They Shall Not Grow Old by Peter Jackson is amazing and if you care about the First World War, the history and really what was going on, you absolutely should watch it. I watched it on a plane it was great,

highly highly recommend teams. So good to be back. I won't be out for that many days again till after the election. So excited to be with you in this journey ahead. As always, Shield's High