Mueller Time Pre-Game

assess together here in the Freedom Hunt. Also, the fight between Trump and the squad continues on what does this tell us about the direction of the general election for President Trump in twenty twenty And also a transgender individual who is insisting that women provide a service that they only provide to women. This is a crazy story. We'll get to that and more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with

actionable intelligence. Mistake American, You're a great American? Again the buck Sexton Show begins. Analysts, remember the nid No, do you believe President Trump is a racist? I believe he is, Yes, no doubt about it. These are folks and women who who love their country, and they work very hard, and they want to move us towards that more perfect union that our founding father has talked about. Tragically, the President has decided that racism is good politics. Racism is a

good political strategy. There's a reason why he keeps returning to attacking these women of color and the rhetoric that he uses. Are you accusing the president of being a racist. I'm accusing him being worse than that. He is somebody that he's using race like a weapon to divide our country against itself. Worse than a racist, Cory Booker says. In Affinity plus One, Corey Booker goes with, welcome to

the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody, I see that my travels through Latin America with the Secretary of States over the last few days have not allowed the fur or from the left over Trump's comments, Oh it's so racist, Trump's comments to die down a little bit. We know that the leftists seem to have a propensity for calling people racists. We know that this has been a weapon that they have deployed far too often and far too cynically for

many years. And so I'm at the point where regardless of what you think about whether Trump's comments about the the squad as they are called, talib omar aoc and who am I, Oh Pressley, there we go, She's she's the really the fourth the fourth member of the squad, or she's the one in the band who if she were to not show up one day, they would probably be able to find somebody else to play that instrument. But nonetheless, the other three are certainly getting a lot

of attention these days. They're in this fight with Trump. And here's what I take from it. All one is that the Democrats never tire of calling Trump a racist, and anyone who supports President Trump knows that it doesn't matter what he has said or will say going forward, they will always call him a racist. And this is just the way that they will approach the election. This is what they've been doing for the whole time. Nothing here is going to change. But it does also show us.

I think that the President of the United States understands that he cannot ever back down or bow down to these accusations. It really doesn't matter what he says. It doesn't matter what he could say. Something that even the President would admit, Oh, I've bold I misspoke, That's not what I meant, or that clearly could be taken it away that I did not intend, which could happen to any of us. The moment the President says, okay, I'm sorry,

I made a mistake. Then they just go and finish finish him off politically, they make sure he'll never win another election. They'll that'll be all that, all that they talk about. So I'm not surprised for some of the conservatives out there who have been upset, and I know plenty of them, at least in the media, upset at the President for the recent comments. I just say, can we focus on the country. Can we focus on the more important things that are happening around America right now?

Can we focus on the border where I am upset with the lack of action from the administration perspective. Got some new numbers in today, thirty five arrested in the Immigrations and Customs enforcement raids that were much touted in the last week or so. Thirty five people, folks, You got over three hundred and thirty thousand Central Americans have come into the country claiming quote, asylum. They're not asylum seekers there. They are immigrants who are skipping the line illegally,

that is what they're doing. But thirty five got picked up by Ice, So there's that. I have to say that I am disappointed right now with the situation of the border. But first, let me just dispense with all this focus on racism, right, the racism of the president. One is, I've known this was going to happen for a long time, the same way that climate change has become a posture completely bereft of any intellectual substance whatsoever.

You just say that you believe in climate change, because by establishing that belief, you are telling all the people around you what a good person you are, how wonderful you are, how fantastic you are. It has nothing to do with the science. You say I believe in climate change, and the left pats you on the head. That's what they've been doing. They've expanded the term beyond meaning for

political purposes. Well, I'll also tell you that the term white supremacy has intentionally been expanded beyond all meaning by the left because they want to just use it as a catchall weapon against their ideological opponents. This has been happening for quite some time. You have aoc running around saying that the President of the United States is in fact stoking white supremacy and neo Nazi groups play clip four.

He is stoking white supremacy, and he is allowing frankly neo Nazi groups to go off unchecked, because that is a key part of rousing his base. But we cannot allow and give into that. This is such a slender from AOC who increasingly I have to say, she's just someone who doesn't do the work. And what I mean by that is she's not a person with whom I disagree, But I could at least say she's informed, she understands her argument. She is a walking, talking, emotional blackmail and

talking points machine, that is what she is. She spews all this claptrap about socialism, doesn't understand the microeconomics. Forget about macroeconomics, because that can't really tell you very much most of the time. The microeconomic theory behind why socialism isn't just flawed in practice, it is flawed in theory. It doesn't work well, and it's wrong, and even if you could implement it the way you think you could, it wouldn't be a good idea. She doesn't understand the philosophy,

she doesn't understand the theory. She doesn't even know how companies or businesses or commerce really works. But she's lecturing the whole country about this all the time, and the way that she does it is from the perspective of the victim. That's why it's so important for her and for the rest of the squad and for the rest of the Democratic Party to use race as often as they can, because they feel both protected and able to go on offense all the time. How could you question

ABC talking about Trump on white supremacy. You must be a white supremacist too. These are the disgraceful games that they play, and the end results are particularly distressing. I have to tell you the you know, you had these NYPD officers, these NYPD officers who were trying to affect an arrest in New York City, and I was a civilian analyst assigned to the Intelligence Division, so I never I never had a badge, a badge and a gun

in the NYPD. I help them track down the terrorists as essentially they're operating in New York City and understand them. But I have a particular affinity for the men and women of the MYPD because I worked with them. I mean, because I saw what they do day in and day out. But the comments and the smears of people like AOC have consequences in real life. Calling everybody a white supremacist saying that if you support President Trump, you must be

racist too. There's so much racism all over the country, so much that they have to manufacture it. Often in the media talk about fake racial incidents. There, Jess Smollett and Erica Thomas down in Georgia and so many others. You know, all these people on campus that find racist graffiti on their wall, or find a noose hanging from a treason where it turns out that the individual reporting it put it there. We have so much racism, so much nasty, vicious racism in this country, that there's hoax

after hoax after hoax going on. What is that all about? This is really ultimately about power and about trying to transfer power from those on the right to those on the Democrat and identity politics obsessed left. They want to force us all to submit to their incredibly stupid ideas. If there's one, if there's one major overarching theme that I want to get into today, it's how dumb the

Democrat ideas really are. I do believe that they have convinced themselves that Donald Trump is a horrible racist, but I also think that they have an intellectual insecurity at least the ones who are smart enough to understand the real implications of their ideas. They have an intellectual insecurity because they are taking positions that normal, sane, rational people with basic knowledge about how the world functions could not

support in good conscience. Position after position, rashided to lead twenty dollars minimum wage. We'll get to that pretty soon. AOC, the Green New Deal, abolish ice. Lots of Democrat members of Congress say we should do that, So just get rid of just create an open border. Bernie Sanders saying all college should be free, it will all be paid for, all trade school, everything. These are completely unworkable, absurd, obtused

positions that have been mainstreamed by the Democratic Party. I mean they have taken that, they have taken the road to crazy town, and they are letting it loose. They're having way too much fun being nuts. But the rhetoric has consequences. Their ideas are clearly horrible, and we'll talk

more about that in this hour. But the things that they say about white supremacy and all the rest you know you have and the police even when they're minorities, I would note, according to leftist theory which I have to spend a lot of time reading about and learning about.

According to leftists, the police themselves are instruments of white supremacy even when they are not white, and so anti police feeling is always very strong among those on the up, especially local police, those who enforce laws that tend to be more morality based and more civil order base instead of a lot of the federal level stuff, which is

it's illegal because the government says so. But some NYPD officers are trying to affect the arrest and people were dumping This is in my hometown where I'm moving back in a few weeks. People were dumping water on them and laughing. Play sixteen not invol Oh they not stopping, Oh my god yet making plan? Oh are they laughing

at dumb abolish ice? Black lives matter? You look at these different chants, these groups, all coming from the left, and the disrespect, in fact, the demonization that they engage in a law enforcement has consequences. People like AOC saying that concentration camps are operating at our southern border and therefore those in charge of the camps are the equivalent of then SS that has consequences. They are willing to

tear down what is around them on the left. If they can't be in control of it, something you have to remember. And their ideas are stupid. They may the best thing you could say for them is that they're well intentioned. But well intentioned means nothing. The path the hell is paved with good intentions. I'm sure you've heard. So they talk about racism all the time to get us off balance, to silence us, to make us feel like we can't support this president despite the excellent job

that President Trump is doing as president. That's the initial that's the covering fire fuel. That's to keep our heads down. And then they try to run up the middle in a full own assault with the dumbest, craziest ideas you could ever think of at a national government level, things like the Green New Deal or twenty why not a million dollar minimum wage? Let's take apart some of the stupidity, shall we. There's nothing that we can do to get

them to stop calling Trump racist. The President knows that he cannot and should not apologize for anything because it will get him nowhere, and they don't want an apology, they want his destruction. We'll get into that and more coming up. Stay with me if the Democrats, I guess are forced to embrace her, and I call it AOC plus three. Okay, not that AOC is a bargain because she's not a man. She's no bargain. Look, I mean we'll go into it at some point. I'll tell you

all about AOC. I got more an AOC. A Trump knows that making this group of four congresswomen the most known and visible group in the entire Democratic Party can only help in twenty twenty because the far left is now at the helm. They're now in control the Democratic Party, and the American people need to know that. Why do we think there's been this this clinging to Biden that has been going on. Biden is deeply unimpressive and everybody really knows it. But Biden has the outward trappings and

resume of the somewhat centrist moderate Democrat. You know, somebody who's was tied to the Obama administration, who understands how DC work has been around a long time. Why not allow the Democratic Party to put forward one of the ideological vanguard, somebody that is pushing for the ideas that motivate Democrats to go vote, motivate them to go to the polls, because if they did that, they would get destroyed.

They know this, the three or four percent of the American voting population at least until Amnesty goes through and destroys the Republican Party. But conversation for another day. The three or four percent who are up for grabs, whose votes can still be one by one side or the other. They don't really want to hear about the trials and tribulations of transgender individuals who insist on female appointments being

kept for them that involve a very specific grooming. I We will talk about that later in the show, because it is going on in Canada right now and people need to know that the left still defends this stuff. There is no level of insanity around what are called transgender rights now, which is just whatever a transgender individual says they are. There is no level of insanity. The Left will not defend what. We'll get there. Oh and also Al Franken, they're trying to rehabilitate. Hey h, we'll

get to that as well. I thought Al Franken was going to be out of the game now, but guess what he wants to come back. We'll talk about what's going on there. Man, do they hate this president? And they really do plan to do everything they can to make it socially unacceptable to vote for him. That's a

huge part of this whole effort from the squad. You say, you you tell anyone that you're voting for Trump, they can call you a racist, and a vast majority you can pretty much count on any Democrat who would over here, that's a yeah, that's right, that's racist. What does that mean for all of the Latino and black and Asian and other Americans who vote for Trump? By the way, I think this somehow never gets factored into conversation. Did

they are they They've been brainwashed somehow. Oh, we could take the quote from Aana Pressley that she does not want quote what was it, I think I remembered exactly, but quote brown faces that do not want to speak for with or for brown voices or be a voice for brown That your skin colors should determine your ideology. The left is open about that now. They will say that, which to me is just a definitionally racism. I mean that is racism. Your skin color is X. You should

think why that's racist? Or you must think if you do not think that you somehow lose your racial authenticity. The left clings to this stuff, still believes this stuff, in fact, more so now than ever, I believe because Trump has broken them. I mean, I do worry about the emotional and psychological stability of most lib journals if

Trump wins reelection. But the spasms of lunacy currently gripping the Democratic Party with calling everyone a racist who supports Trump, calling Trump a racist a thousand times a day, having all these different news channels getting in on this, it's because the party does not have good ideas. We will transition to that in a moment. So recently I introduced the Boost Act. This legislation completely repeals the GOP tax scam that is wholly helping wealthy individual the rich, the corporations.

And do you know what I did with that money? Do you know what I said, We're gonna go ahead and put it into the pockets of folks like everyday Americans. If you make less than one hundred thousand dollars, you're gonna get up to six thousand dollars in your pocket. And if you make less than fifty thousand dollars, you're gonna get three thousand dollars. That's what we do with our public dollars. We give it back to the people. The people that earned it. Dollars are not public congresswomen

to leave. They belong to individuals. The state doesn't have any money, It only has our money. What she was doing there, that was at the twenty nineteen NAACP convention, one of the squad, one of the four is in very clear and explicit terms telling us all that socialism is the order of the day for the Democratic Party, that socialism is really what the Democratic Party is all about. I wish they would just adopt the name and be

honest about that now. And those who say, oh, we're not socialist, you know, they play all these definitional games. They would say, oh, we're the Democratic parties not so social security doesn't make a socialist. Well as social security in some ways is in fact a socialist program within the government, and there are others. There can be an entirely socialist economy, or there can just be socialist sectors like healthcare, for example, a very large sector. But it

can't be a defense the left. The Democrats in this country can't defend themselves against allegations of socialism. By saying, we're not the Soviet unions, We're not socialists, okay, you aspire to be. According to Bernie Sanders and many other Democrats, similar to the Nordic country Scandinavian countries that are democratic socialist states, although not really nearly as socialist as many Democrats in this country want to believe. So which is it.

Are they trying your drag us toward democratic socialism a form of socialism, or is any charge of socialism going to be shouted down as racist? A lie? Speaking of lies to leave lied there? Do you think that any mainstream media reporter that asks her this question is going to or rather that that overheard that is going to ask her? Why do you say that only the rich got helped by a tax cut? It's a lie. Eighty percent of taxpayers period had more money as a result

of the Trump tax cuts, eighty percent plus. So that's a whole lot more than just rich people. Because eighty percent of people paying taxes, and I'm one of them, can tell you, and not rich, and little extra money in the bank really does help. And the government is spending too much of our money. They are creating a systemic burden, a risk that can collapse. Ask anybody who understands complicated financial systems, or just as somebody who reads

the history of Fiat currency. AOC's top advisor right now for economics is an adherent of modern monetary theory. This is very straightforward, folks. It's just print whatever you got to print to give people whatever you got to give them money wise, this is a recipe for destroying the American economy, destroying our way of life, and turning this place over a period of time, but not that long. If you really did that, you turn yourself into a

much bigger version of Venezuela very quickly. It would not take all that long, because the problem is that once inflation sets in, it's very hard to control. All modern monetary theory says, it's just keep inflating until it gets a little bit too scary, and then figure out how to stop the inflation. This is the equivalent, and this is AOC's top advisor, Bernie Sanders. People or adherents of this.

There are a lot of people on the left now who and the ones who aren't modern monetary theory devotees essentially agree with the idea spend whatever you got to spend on whatever programs you want to spend them on. But this would be like saying, yeah, end inflation once it starts going, just target it really carefully. This would be me saying, you know, play with a lit match around the drapes of your house just when they catch fire, like,

just put it out right away. Okay, Yeah, but what if I can't, and what if the whole house catches on fire. That's what modern monetary theory with the inflation, that it can very quickly create risks for all of us. The fastest way to destroy a country short of a nuclear war or a pestilence that you know, takes out half of us. Either one of those things are possible,

but very unlikely. The fastest The only real way that America falls is either from a complete political dissolution, meaning our own polity comes apart, which given the open borders added to the left, that's increasingly a problem. We don't we don't agree on things anymore. Even the Constitution, folks, can't protect us if a solid majority of the of the individuals living in this country don't believe in all

this constitution. Founding Father's America stuff. You can go back and read about the rise and fall, really just the fall. The rise and fall would be given, which is a very long history. But you can read Adrian Goldsworthy about the fall of Rome and one of the There are a lot of things, a massive, unaccountable, highly expensive bureaucracy. That was one major problem with the ancient Roman Empire.

Another was just the constant inflow of what we're then called and you know, I'm not saying this is what we're dealing with now. What we're then called barbarians, which actually came from the ancient Greek barbar which was a reference to the way that people who worked Greeks spoke because their language is essentially like Gibberish speakers. Oddly enough, in a at Rome, there were parts of Greece that

would later be referred to as barbarian. But you had these inflows of different groups that were not that did not feel Roman, but they came inside the boundaries of the Roman Empire, and then they had to be they had to be ministered to by the central government, and they were never truly on board, and you had what would we would call today secession movements. They would call them uprisings or revolts, and it just over time dissolved

because people did not feel roman That's one way. Another way, and probably a much faster way, is just completely destroy the currency of a country. Just just annihilate that currency and see what ends up happening. It creates a panic, and that's what Democrats are willing to risk so that what we can have free college. Here's the thought, folks. Too many people are going to four year colleges. Colleges

are too expensive. University in colleges have become far too powerful, not as institutions of higher learning, but as gatekeepers into elite society. Enough is enough. We need to rethink this whole process, not double and triple down on the expenses of it all. But the Democrats are just they're running around wanting to spend the public treasury like drunken sailors. No offense to the sailors who are listening, but sometimes

you guys like the party spending too much money. Rashida Talib is saying that they're just going to take money from you and give it to other people. Oh and also universal basic income. I would tell you I heard a I just want to deal with this because I haven't talked about it on the show. I heard a fantastic and I rarely will promote someone else's podcast here unless they are guests on the show. But he doesn't care because he's I think, got the biggest podcast in

the world. So you know, occasionally I will listen to Joe Rogan stuff and I saw Rogan talking to Naval Ravocant something you may know who he is. Neval is the founder of angel Lists. So he's a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, very very smart guy like me, grew up in New York City and has an interesting has an interesting backstory. I would say it's well worth watching the I will recommend that you watch the entire or leasten

to the entire Rogan Ravocant interview. Some of the guys that Rogan has on I just I have no interest in hearing what they have to say. Ravocant was really insightful and he spoke about universal basic income and he nailed it. I mean what I've been trying to say and is some of this is I think quite clear. And this is going to tie into are minimum wage just go We're about to get in a minimum wage folks. Don't where we're gonna talk about that? In a moment.

But because Democrats are crazy on that too. I mean, they're just they have just it's unfettered left wing lunacy now all over the place, and they're just trying to keep us off balance with racism, racism, racism. Meanwhile, yeah, let's destroy the entire uscon to me with our ideas. And you might say, buck, they'll they'll never win, they'll never be empowered to do this. Yeah, remember what happened in two thousand and eight. You don't think that can

happen again. But Rabican back to this interview with Rabican and Joe Rogan nevall as the guy's name. He was talking about universal basic income. He says, for one, the moment that you just have money, it had, making it not means tested is just, on its face insane, right, because you're giving a thousand dollars to a billionaire. Just because you're giving a thousand dollars a month everybody, makes no sense in any world. Okay, So start with that.

If it's not means tested, that's absurd. And then the moment it's not means tested, you're really dealing with what is essentially it might be very widespread, but essentially a welfare program, So then the politics behind that change. But if you create a broad enough direct deposit program for everybody through universal basic income, you find yourself in a position where or you will will soon find yourself in a position where fifty of the people who vote just

want more money for themselves. Every time someone says, well, it's not gonna be a thousand dollars a month for universal basic income, it's gonna be two thousand a month, it's just this constant invitation to use the politics of the mob to override market forces, to override what the economy will bear, and just say, or you know what the market will bear rather, and what our economy can sustain.

And that temptation is obvious to anyone, and it is in a sense a precursor to where we are in this minimum wage debate right now, which there's some amazing stuff of Bernie Sanders. And then the last part of it is universal basic income cannot which you know, Andrew Yang, at least he's got ideas. I think his ideas are generally bad and or wrong, but at least they're real ideas, and some of them are kind of new ish. But you need to give somebody more than just a check.

People need purpose. And this is a mantra of mine has been for a very long time. Everyone needs purpose. Why do you get up in the morning. Why do you do what you do? Is it to do a great job at work? Is it to be a fantastic neighbor and mother or father or take care of your family? Is it to just work on your relationship with God?

And you know whatever? But everyone needs purpose. And in the world of employment, when we're talking about you know, money and economics, people need purpose in their day to day lives that does not come from just getting a check. So that's what I feel universal basic income I do want to get more into. Look, it's just there's crazy all over the place the Democrats these days, and I think that they're not going to be able to move

away from this stuff. They're not gonna be able to move away from raising their hands and saying they all want to give healthcare to illegal aliens. Are not going to be able to move away from claiming that they all want to give they all want medicare for all, except for Kamala Harris, who's trying to play both sides and hope the media covers for her. So again, we're going for a joy ride into the into the bowels. I guess you can't joy ride inside the bowels, right,

but that's kind of unless you're really small. But we are going for a cruise here through the left wing crazy like single payer. Let's talk about single payer, stay with me and all of us done without a middle class tax hike, without a middle class task. Yes, thirty trillion over ten years. There are ways to pay for it. Also understanding the investment that we are going to be making in a way that is going to read great

benefits in terms of other costs. When people question that there is no formula for this, that you are going to find money in magical ways is not realistic thinking, how do you respond to that? Statisquo is not enough. That's not an answer. Kamala Harris, thirty trillion dollars folks for single pair over ten years, three trillion dollars a year. It's basically doubling. It's effectively doubling government expenditures every year for single pair. And she's claiming that we can do

this without raising taxes in the middle class. That's just a lie, or she's not very smart. There's no third option. You know how the media is always lectures. Oh, Trump lied, and Trump got two scoops of ice cream and everyone else got one, and he's so terrible. Where is the Where are the guardians of truth in this one? Where are the democracy dies in darkness? Folks? Where's the how many Pinocchio? Is we gonna give Kamala Harris here? Thirty

trillion dollars over the course of ten years. You're not gonna raise taxes on the middle class. You're just gonna find the money elsewhere? There are only oh, I'm sorry, pardon me. There is a third option here. There is a third option, and it's the scariest one. The first option is she's just not very smart and doesn't understand the mathematics of this, which I don't. To be fair, I don't believe it that's true. I think that Kamala Harris is bright. You know. I don't think she's a genius,

but I think she's a She's a bright person. Let's let's always be fair about every individual politician, and it seems like where where they are in terms of their intellectual gifts and cognitive ability, Kamala Harris strikes me as bright. I don't know her, but okay, so that means I think she could just be lying to this person because it's convenient now that I totally believe, right, And that's the likeliest. She's too smart to know that thirty trillion

dollars is just going to come from wherever. So she's just saying this because she'll get through the interview, and that it lets the crazy left here what they want to hear. Okay, that's one. There is that third option. We're just going to inflate it. We're just going to print the money to pay for this, which will destroy the savings that you have in your bank account right now,

which will annihilate your wages. I mean, the people that really get hurt in an inflation are the people who are working for wages for a living, who are close to you know, economic pain all the time, who do not have financial stability. They're they're the ones that just get wiped out. Those who own real estate and gold and you know assets, real hard assets, they're in much better shape. I mean, they maybe realize the mad maxine

that's going on in the streets around them. And we all live in this, we all have to live in the same country. If we're going to be in the same country. But they can do they're better off, to be sure. But commonly here is trying to tell you that they're just going to find the money somewhere if their plan is to just print and I think that

there's enough, there's enough lunacy on the left. This is look at what Look at how much money Obama spent over his eight years, and then look at every president before him combined. If you look at a chart of federal spending, you cannot look me in the eye and say we aren't on the precipice of a huge disaster here. And I know Trump hasn't cut this off, has not

turned this around. You have. The problem is, folks, you can't have the power to do anything this country anymore unless you're just going to spend and spend and spend. Trn't realizes that no one wants to be the one that says that Santa Claus isn't coming this year. No one won't. And if you are that person, you get pushed out. And then the total lunatics of the left, the Democrat crazies, they say, oh, yeah, Santa will be here, and then they get to do all the other stuff

that comes with getting the votes. For saying Santa is going to be here, I got more worried. We haven't talked to a minimum wage yet. That's got to come up. All ownership. Is that its lowest rate in fifty one years. Thank you very much, thank you. I will say the Bernie Sanders people had far more energy and spirit. I will say, good animal. So Rashida Khalib was back in twenty sixteen. This video has gotten a lot of play. Completely out of her mind. Had to be physically dragged

from a Trump event screaming stuff. Now she's a member of Congress who has the entire media in her back pocket, except for a conservative media that's only about ten percent of the media. That's who's running the show now, folks, people that get dragged out of events screaming like lunatics, that's who wants to be in charge of the economy into You know, there's so much that they say about

Trump all the time. Trump has run companies, has run businesses. Yeah, and you could say, oh, Buckley, he didn't run them so well whatever. Yeah, they guy's worth billions of dollars. I know he inherited a lot of money. But he's run companies. Okay, they're Trump buildings all over New York, They're Trump buildings all over DC, all over the world. He's doing something right, so we can all have dispenser. That's old. But he's not sure. You know, he's not

as good at business as he says he is. Whatever. I mean, he's good enough. He's better at business than Rashida Talib and Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren because he's had to operate in that real world where facts matter, where numbers matter, where it's not enough to just wish that things would be a certain way, but they have to be that way. But that when I talk about the psychosis and the craziness of the left, and I

worry my friends because I do believe. I also will refer back to the naval ravocant Joe Rogan conversation because I agree with so much of what was said, and I think I do say a lot of it here.

The radicalization of the left is being assisted. There's an echo chamber effect that has turned from the left wing sphere just bouncing around everyone hearing what they want to hear, watching Matt out to a crazy Russia staff just following the people they want on Twitter and just seeing the news they want on Facebook, Hollywood, reflecting back all their left wing prejudices all the time. It's gone from just

that's created closed minded a closed minded left too. I believe it has created a truly radical left that is ascendant. There's a left wing in this country right now that has been brainwashed, and not just brainwashed on a couple of issues, brainwashed on the most important issues that hold our country together, that create the rule of law and the prosperity that we all care so dearly for. And I think that Rashida to Leib among others, is representative

of that radicalization. And I think Trump also understands that that's what's going on now. Now. Has Trump also been a part of this just by existing? I think yes. I think that he's broken a lot of people psychologically, which makes them more How do you brainwash people often? Now I can get into the jihadest pipeline of how they would take people from you know, disaffected youth to suicide bomber. Right, one of the things you'll do is you'll you'll you have if you have found someone who

has not already been broken. You break them down psychologically, and then you build them back up in a certain way. You tell them that they're cowards for not fighting for the cause. Then you say, ah, but I will give you, I will give you the pathway to retain your your manhood and become a shahid, become a martyr, and you know, suicide bombings and all the rest of it. I think

that people have been broken on the left. They've been broken by Trump, and now you have this constant digital media apparatus that seeks to put them back together only through the most extreme, distilled version of Democrat left wing socialist nonsense. In America, you have people now that believe crazier stuff than at any point in my lifetime, and a lot of them, and they're getting elected to office. Look at the Democratic Party under Obama, Look at the

Democratic Party under Clinton. Go you know, you go back in time. You can see the progression for yourselves. Things are getting wackier and therefore more dangerous and more destabilizing for the country. They think Trump is undermining institutions. You have an entire movement within one of two major political parties right now to undermine capitalism capitalism is defective. AOC says it, Bernie Sanders says that, Elizabeth Warren says it.

And I can assure you if Corey Boker and Kamala Harris and you know, name another Democrat who's a little more establishment leaning, if they thought that it meant that they would win the election, they'd be all on board too. They're just not sure yet. They're not sure. They're trying to they're sitting on the fence, really. But here's just a let's take one issue, all right, the minimum wage. Minimum wage is it's you can't make this go away.

You can't make people understand that it does. Once you know the mechanisms of a minimum wage law, then you understand it does not serve the purpose that it is supposed to serve. Then you recognize that it does give some people more money. But overwhelmingly those who get more

money from minimum wage are not low income workers. They're usually people who already have a job, and they often live in a householdhere somebody else has a job, and their overall combined income is pretty pretty close to, if not middle class. Those who really suffer from minimum wage laws are people who now can't get jobs because there are fewer of them or whose hours are cut back, and that that well, let's just first we have Rashida to leave here, who I really do believe is an

economic illiterate. But there are plenty of leftists who are economic illiterates, and they've gotten very, very powerful. There are plenty of people who in fact Marxism is based on economic illiteracy. You cannot understand how human beings function in the context of companies, corporations, day to day transactions. You cannot understand complex systems and want to be a Marxist.

Marxism can work within a very small you know, my high school used to joke the Society of Jesus, the Jesuits, you know, they're kind of a Marxist organization and they all share and they don't have private property. And it can work in a very small on fine, you could even say that, you know, with within a family or within a frat house, you could be Marxists. You can't have a Marxist society though, you can't understand human beings and think you could have a Marxist society. But the

left right now is ascendant with this. They think that this is in fact where it's all going and if we don't make the case against them, they're happy to try this whole thing out and just see where it goes. Rashida Khalib is openly calling for not just a fifteen dollars national minimum wage. Right. This is the federal government stepping in saying that everybody has to make fifteen dollars

an hour, but it's actually gonna be Uh. She's not happy with the job destruction that would result from that. She wants even more destruction of jobs. Play seventeen we started it. I think you should be twenty dollars. Everything gone up. Ah, and so here we go eighteen to twenty. No notice how she even adjusts the figure as she's going along. This is just a dick tote from the commissar. Yeah it should be it should be twenty. Yeah, maybe

it should be eighteen. Oh maybe nineteen. Well whatever, we'll figure it out. But it's gonna be a lot more money. Fifteen dollars minimum wage. Producer Mike sent me this year destroy one point three million jobs. That's what they guessed nationwide. One point three million people lose their jobs. Twenty million. Twenty dollars minimum wage would destroy even more jobs than that. Of course, and you know who found out recently how

economics really works, Bernie Sanders. Because the Bernie Sanders campaign wasn't going to pay, wasn't pay people fifteen dollar minimum wage. Now they're going to pay people with a fifteen dollar minimum wage, and they're cutting back their hours because of it. Exactly what people like me say happens in a minimum wage situation. The market sets the price. Individuals decide on voluntary transactions. That is the only way to really set

a price. The moment you have government intrusion into the market, all you do is invite more intrusion from the government to deal with the imbalances that it will create. It's a fancy way of saying the government will mess it up and then show up and say, hey, we're the cleanup crew for that whole mess. Let's do more stuff a higher minimum wage. Not enough people with jobs, not enough people at the lower end of the economic spectrum

doing well, Let's let's do another program here. And to any left is I would just say, why not a hundred dollars? They don't have an answer to this because they don't understand the basic microeconomics behind why minimum wage is not a good idea, and I know it's popular. I know can servants who say, yeah, you know, but on balance, you know, tomato tomato, and make an olmet, you gotta break a few eggs. You know. Minimum wage is something that people like, and it is popular. It's

a popular idea. But the moment that you have to put this into practice, all of a sudden, people realize, oh wait, it's not what we thought. It would be kind of like socialism. If only we could get the Democrats to understand that, I think we'd all be in much better shape. I gotta say, Corey Booker is somebody that I just wonder how anybody who knows anything would want to support, even a Democrat. I don't understand it.

The guy. To me, it all just seems so phony and so forced, and he's so desperate for votes, for power, for prestige, and he does this whole you know, he tries so hard to emote, tries to connect with audiences in his whole I am Spartacus moment, and he should be ashamed, are shamed of his role in the Kavanaugh the Kavanall smear campaign, But he's not. In fact, I'm sure he's proud of it because it helped him among

the radical left Democrats. But here's Corey Booker, a producer Mike pulled this for me, talking about how he feels. You know that we've got all these people running around saying that, you know, Trump is such a such a racist and he's so terrible, he's such a bad guy. You know you have Oh, here you go here, I mean here, here's ilhan Omar for example, just to give you a sense of what she says about the President

United States. But thirteen Now, even when we're talking about the president, people will say, you know, they're his remarks are racist and will forget the inherent racism that has always been part of him, and how much he always takes an opportunity to others to filify them. Who is she even talking about. You don't get any any specifics there too to otherwise who is being otherwised all the time? Illegal aliens ms their team, Well, people that break the law.

I think we're allowed to otherise. I think that other rising in the sense that if you break the law, that should be punished and that's bad. Yeah, then that's another that's not based on ethnicity or skin color, it's based on the law. She of course does not see it that way. She sees everything that Trump does through

a lens of well, white supremacy, white nationalism. Still this day, never met a white nationalist, never met well I'm not saying they don't exist at all, but they are far less prominent in American society than you know, flat earthers who are also anti vax who are also you know that they're is just it's a fringe of a fringe. We're always told that they're the next great threat in this country. But back to Cory Booker for a moment if I could, because but I want to play that

because we're always being lectured about race and racism. In the first hour, I know, we talked quite a bit about and I think this is real. On the one hand, there is this emotional that the left has, this emotional need to always suggest that the president is a racist, right, that they need to believe that or else they'd have to look at the results of his presidency and they'd have to say to themselves, what, wait a second, it's going really well, oh no, it's terrible, He's a racist.

But the left has so many problems, so many contradictions with race, with bigotry that they never deal with, and the media gives them a pass on this because it is all about narrative. Oh one more thing about about the I know of talking about this other podcast. You know, raba con said at one point that there's no such thing really as objective journalism anymore. I'm paraphrasing here, but ever since the Internet, we don't need people to tell

us a huge news organization to tell us facts. So what we have are massive activism organizations that are pushing agendas, that are promoting one side of the argument against the other, pretending they're just presenting you with facts, which is exactly what I've been saying for years. It makes sense from a business model perspective, right, Why would why would c an N be able to make money just giving you the facts, man, I mean the facts you can get online in two seconds. We don't need see an N

twenty four hours today just presenting us with facts. There aren't enough interesting facts for them to give. But that's why they've become narrative purveyors instead of fact purveyors. That's also why they are so invested in the narrative of a racist right because they are activists and this is a storyline they've been feeding to their audience. It gets eyeballs, it gets clicks, and it serves a purpose. It's exactly what these major media organizations and the Democratic Party along

with them, are looking to do. But they never give us answers about. Well, hold on a second, what about the racism of the left, which is very real, or the anti Semitism of the left, which is very real. Here's Corey Booker talking about straight up, real deal anti semit Lewis farrakhon play seven. I want to ask about something that you were recently asked, and that is about whether or not you would meet with Nation of Islam leader Lewis Farakhon. He's unambashadly anti Semitic. He said, quote,

I don't you said quote. I don't feel like I need to do that. But I'm not one of those people who says that I wouldn't sit down with anybody to hear. What they have to say is that still where you are. Well, first of all, that is completely taking out of context that larger conversation. Okay, you know I have met I live in Newark, so we have famous Mosque twenty five. We have Nation of Islam there. As mayor, I met with lots of folks. I've heard mister Farrakon speeches for a lot of so I don't

feel like I need to do that. But I'm not one of these people that says I wouldn't sit down with anybody here what they have to say. But I live on a neighborhood where I'm getting guys on the streets offering and selling his works. I am very familiar with with minister Lewis Farrakon, and is believes in him. Why not repudiate Farrakon? Notice how he doesn't jump at the opportunity to say, well, Lewis Farakon is an anti semi.

Do you think that any Democrat could hear the name of of a true racist like David Duke and not immediately say, oh, that guy's a racist, which is fine because he is. But then add to it, and he supports Donald Trump every chance they get, They'll say it all the time. Why doesn't the left ever have to answer for this? Because the people that would make them answer, or at least that would get the responses to those questions out there, are in the media and the media

is completely in the tank. I mean, the media is broken. There is no objective journalism anymore. Those people are liars. There are some objective journalists, but journalism is not an objective profession. It has become a propaganda fight. It has become a battle of ideas with partisans on all sides. And then there's just Corey Booker sounding like a clown sometimes, which you can make your own decisions about this, played twenty four. Donald Trump is a guy who you understand.

He hurts you and you and my testosterone sometimes makes me want to feel like punching him, and which would be bad for this elderly, out of shape man that he is. When I did that, there's physically physically obyfically yeah, Corey Booker is a punk, So there's that. He's just

an insecure wanna be and a punk. We need a commission on child separation because what these commissions are charged with doing, just as the nine to eleven Commission did when they said what went wrong in the nine to eleven commission, they had, they were charged with investigating and making sure they dug up every nook and cranny of what happened and how it happened in our system, and I think that that kind of study is what's going to be required in order to reunify as many children

with their parents as possible. The only thing we are allowed to talk about when it comes to the border, according to Democrats, the only thing is treatment of migrants who crossed the border illegally in detention. And we need to just have a loop a cycle of let's revisit this, let's go back to this, let's have more investigations about this, because, just like with Russia collusion, even if it goes nowhere, it's the story that the Left likes to tell, and

it's a distraction as well as an attack. The distraction of focusing on the southern border and all the migrants and the concentration camps running on all this is a means of avoiding what the Democratic Party really stands for, at least having an open conversation about what does the Democratic Party stand for right now, because the answer is open borders, and everybody that says otherwise is either deluding

themselves or lying. Every enforcement mechanism that comes up every time there's an effort, whether it's to clear sanctuary cities or to deport people that have had all their due process and have been put on a list. Democrats oppose it. They do not ever come up with ideas to better enforce immigration laws. All they do or come up with ideas to make those who break the laws less accountable

and more comfortable, literally more comfortable. So that's one component of this, and the other is just the attack oh Republicans, because this is all part of the Republicans are racist. Trump is racist. Trump must be a rasis because he does not want the border to be open. Obama didn't want the border to be open either, at least he said he didn't. Some of you are probably yelling he did, buck, but he said he didn't, and the press didn't criticize

him for that. That was considered to be sane. And what is the opposite of saying insane? What are we doing right now in this country? What is going on with our southern border? What is happening right now? It

is crazy? But I have to tell you, and I just spoke to some people very close to the president before coming on air about this, and I because I express some frustration tonight on a special report with Brett Bear, I told I told people well, I told whoever I was watching the show, you can't keep having this, Oh, we're going to deport people. We're going to deport people, and then no deportations occur. It reminds me of the line from the movie about the Wall Street collapse that

I'm actually forget are too Big to Fail. It's actually a pretty entertaining movie where I believe it's Bernanke, or maybe it's it's Paulson says. The thing about having a bazooka in your back pocket is you've got to be able to use it. And the thing about Trump saying there's gonna be mass deportations or even just a surgeon deportations of those who are unquestionably legally not supposed to stay in the country anymore, that's you know, you have to do it. You have to actually make it happen.

You cannot allow this to be a thing that keeps getting brought up. Oh, yes, we're gonna deport all these people. And this is where and my understanding is the White House is very frustrated. They're saying, why can't ICE pull this off? Is Ice Immigrations and Customs Enforcement incapable? Are some officers unwilling. Why isn't this happening? Thirty five people is the number that's been published in just the last few hours. Thirty five people. And Trump is frustrated. I'm

sure he's frustrated. How could this be Each time he brings up deportations, we hear very serious numbers, and that would send a message. You have to have the other side of this equation in place. You absolutely must have punishment for violating the law. And what we have right now is just a complete mess where it's not clear who's fallen asleep on the job. Thirty five people come on. And this is where you have to look at the

foreign countries that are involved in this process too. The fact that guatemal in Mexico won't give us third safe country agreements. We do have to cut off eight to these countries. We you know, we really have to do. And this will This is the equivalent of the nuclear option in diplomacy wise, all right, not actual nuclear option. Said some stuff. I'm gonna tell you, Trump said some stuff about Afghanistan. Do we have that mark from I think we had it yesterday, but I don't know if

we still have it. On the Trump said some stuff about Afghanistan that I get what he was saying. We got it, Oh, we'll find it. I understand what he was going for, which is that he could lay waste the entire country in a matter of minutes if he wanted to. But that's not the same thing as winning the winning the war in Afghanistan, and that's not a serious policy option. So it'll look Trump sometimes, you know, the swagger gets a little bit ahead of the policy.

To put it mildly, Oh, we do, yeah, play it. We wanted to fight a war and Afghanistan and win it. I could win that war in a week. I just don't want to kill ten million people. Does that make sense to you. I don't want to kill ten million people. I have plans on Afghanistan that if I wanted to win that war, Afghanistan would be wiped off the face of the earth. It would be gone. It would be over in literally in ten days. And I don't want to do that. I don't want to go that route.

So we're working with Pakistan and others to extricate ourselves. Nor do we want to be policeman because basically we're policemen right now, and we're not supposed to be policeman. We've been there. We've been there for nineteen years in Afghanistan. It's ridiculous. This is one of these moments where Trump is going to get us to the right policy, which is all I really care about, which is end this thing and get us out. But the way that he

speaks about it turns into some frenzy in the media. Oh, he's saying he's gonna I'm assuming that he means nuclear strikes in Afghanistan, which no one really thinks he's going to do. And I don't think the president would ever do that unless there was some imminent threat from Afghanistan, which is not realistic. But I do believe that he will get us to the right place in the end

of policy. But that just reminded me. I was reminded of that because I said nuclear option, but the nuclear option in dealing with Guatemala and in dealing with Mexico countries that are just intransigent on this issue of Look, Mexico sending more troops and that means there'll be fewer there are fewer illegal crossings going on right now at our southern border, and they're saying, oh, look at us, we sent more troops. That's troops to their border with Guatemala.

So this is all now the migrant corridor that's coming into the United States. But keep in mind that it's the summer months and people were expecting there to be some drop in detentions over the summer months. So here

we are. Is it because of Mexican effort or is Mexican government effort, or is it because there are just fewer people right now trying to cross because you can die of heat exhaustion very easily in these desert areas, and especially if you get in vehicles, and there's there's been some recent captures of smuggling efforts involving a tractor trailers and vans and people stuck in the vans and the tremendous heat, so that that may be all a part of this too, but these need to be safe

third countries. We need agreements with Mexico and Guatemala that anyone who's trying to well with Guatemala, they'd have to stop in Mexico. But in Mexico, anyone who is from Guatemala or Honduras or Al Salvador, they need to stop and ask for asylum in Mexico first, the nuclear option. If we really want to exercise it is going to be remittances. Remittance based. That is where the administration could

really get everyone's attention very quickly. Guatemala received almost ten billion, nine point three billion dollars last year in hard currency sent back to it from migrants abroad, twelve percent of its GDP, and the United States is Guatemala's top trading partner. So these countries need to get it together, all right. We are we are asking them for something that is entirely reasonable. We are willing to help them in that effort.

But Guatemala and Mexico right now, not don't look like they're really on the team, not as much as they need to be, that's for sure. Al Salvador, as I told you yesterday, based on what the presidents saying, does sound like it wants to be on the team. But Alsalva is very, very poor, and who knows how much they're able to do without more substantial US assistance. But you know, you got to start the deportations because that sends the message if you show up, you're not going

to get to stay. Right now, the people who are crossing illegally are responding to very straightforward incentives, the incentives right now or if you get here, you're good to go. That has to change. That's why Democrats try to fight it at every turn. They don't want there to be more enforcement of the law. They want the storyline that's passed along the migrant cord or to be that if

you get to America you're good to go. There must be there must be consequences for the actions of people that violate immigration law, or else we're just open boarders, which we know is what Democrats want. But we can't give up this fight because unfortunately immigration becomes the issue that determines all other issues. This is the way that Democrats win in the end, even though they're losing the American people. They just replace the American people. That's the plan.

We'll be right back. When it comes to the counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign, is anybody providing kind of a deep dive to look at what happened? There? Is that part of mister horowitz charter, Well, I would I think I would let Inspector General horrowitld speak for himself about the scope of his investigation. But as you know, the Attorney General has doing a review or has commissions for people to do review, and I think that's part of his job, it's part of mine to get some

of those questions answered. So Christopher Ray, FBI director, testified today in front of a lot of a lot of folks on Capitol Hill, and there was definitely, I think, a sense that there's gonna be some disappointment tomorrow on both sides. Ray didn't want to get ahead of where things are. Tomorrow's Mullard Day. Everyone's all, Oh, it's Mullard Day. Oh,

It's Mullard Day. Yeah, Muller Day. Yea. And here's what I have to say about that, there's very low likelihood that you're going to have any kind of revelation that there's gonna be anything that anyone finds out of particular interest, based on the fact that Mueller's testimony has already been bound officially within the framework of the report itself, within what the report says. So just like remember when James Comey testsfied, everyone said, oh, Coomy, we're gonna hear all

this stuff. I think Comey just said, I do not recall. I am James Comey, and I just love the sound of my own my own voice, and my self righteousness could choke a hippopotamus. But he just said he didn't remember anytime things got a little bit tough. He didn't remember pretty easy right that Rudy Giuliani, for example, understands what's going on here, with what was going on with Comy all along. I just want to get this in because Rudy's got He's had Coomy's number for quite some time.

Rudy actually told me that he knew that Coomy was bad news all the way back to when Komey was the one pushing novel and discredited legal theories to try

and really prosecute viciously. Martha Stewart, here's here's what Giulian need to say about the sank to come he played twenty There's no way that Coomy can explain how he signed an affidavit in which he got somebody surveiled, and the affidavit basically says if the skill Dacier has been verified, and then four months later he went to the President and said it's unverified, and no one's asked, Comey, how come you didn't try to verify it. Isn't that your

job as the head of the FBI. You got a document it makes all these allegations about a presidential candidate and then the president elect, and after four months of having that document, you walk into the president of elector president and say it's unverified. Isn't it your job to verify it? Wasn't Comy just trying to put the squeeze on the president. Absolutely, it was a complete shakedown. That was a shakedown, that was you better keep me in

office because I got this dirty information on you. He doesn't realize you can't do that with Donald Trump. I mean, you can't do it. Comy read a little too much Jed your Hoover fan fiction, I guess, or maybe just history. But he thought that he could pull that off on the President and he couldn't. Didn't find out. Didn't want to know what was true about the Keystone document. For this entire Russia collusion farce. I never wanted to get that. This is what the the IG report look the reason

that tomorrow is not going to be as interesting. And I hate to be the guy that says that I should be sitting here saying, oh, oh, the Democrats are running for cover, folks, Oh no, things are I just I can't tell you things I don't think are true. They'll be There'll be both sides claiming victory. There'll be a lot of oh my gosh. You know. Democrats will say, see, he would have charged him if he could have charged him, but he didn't charge him because he couldn't charge him.

That's what they're gonna say, meaning that the only reason that there weren't criminal charges was because he's president. And that's now that that's the story. That's the little safety blankie that keeps the Democrats feeling like they're all safe and warm at night. But here we are now wondering what's going to come out of this whole fiasco tomorrow. Oh. Rudy also mentioned the IG report and gave his thoughts on it today, and I'd say I appreciated Rudy not

pulling punches. He does not mess around. Twenty one. I know that the Steel dossier is a complete fraud. The whole investigation of Mantaford is premised on a false piece of evidence. The real collusion here, the real conspiracy here was foreign people. Is Hillary Clinton. First of all, she paid for the Steel dossier. The steal dossier is based on its face on Russian information that's paying for foreign information.

It turns out as Ukrainian. Same difference. There's a guy in the Ukraine that the Ukrainian court found guilty in December of giving dirty information and getting and getting looks like paid by a Russian for it for the Hillary Clinton campaign. I think all of this is going to come out. I hope he's right about the IG report.

But again I have to tell you what we know from what's happened in the past, and in the previous iteration of the IG report about the Hillary emails and the politicization, was there was there political bias that investigation. The entire report was an owde to a symphony of political bias, all laid out for you. And then in the key findings, the executive summary, the final decision was, oh, no, there's no bias in the whole Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Of course there was bias, but they couldn't write that because if they had written that, then there would have to be consequences. So what they do is provide you with the information and then beyond that, make sure that there's no determination based on the information that would force a real accounting, a real accountability at the FBI, at the Department of Justice for what happened. Because these institutions, you have to remember, they want to defend themselves more

than anything else. They do not want to be in a position where the entirety of the institution no longer has the confidence of the American people. I think we're already there with political investigations involving the Department of Justice and career officials that served for a long time in the Department of Justice like James Comey Life, Robert Muller, Mike Rosenstein, good on the list. Never mind that clown show of Struck and Page and others, McCabe at the FB.

So how do I know that it's gonna be a part as in Mess Tomorrow, the Mueller Day, It's Mueller time. I do miss beer commercials from the eighties and the nineties. It's a it's a more fun, more carefree time when you could just have a bunch of dudes at a pool party or on a beach who were average and very paunchy, open a can of very watery tasting domestic brew of some kind, and all of a sudden, the Swedish Bikini team would appear and start dancing around them

and you'd hear cool music from your youth. Yeah, we don't really do that so much anymore. Not the patriarchy when it comes to beer commercials is no longer alive. And well, but how do I know that tomorrow there'll be a lot of I don't even know how I got talking about that, but they'll be Oh, yeah, Muller time, Miller time. That's how. Here's a perfect example of why this is gonna be a mess. Perfect example. Jerry Nadler. Oh, I don't know why anyone listens to this guy, but anyone.

Jerry Nadler decided that he was going to try and attack the administration for or the Department of Justice, I should say, for putting a letter out which you can which I read and you can see it's public, a letter that says what the parameters of Muller's testimony should be. Jerry Nadler thought that he had stumbled upon a fantastic issue here was which he could attack the Republicans. Please play nineteen. You don't think they have any authority to

instruct him in that way? Must he comply with that letter? No? He must, No, he does not have to comply with that letter. He doesn't work for them, and that letter asks things that are that are beyond the power of the of the agency to ask. Even if he still worked for them. Who, I guess he's got them. Huh, I guess he's really cornered. The Republicans here, they're trying to fixes in. They're saying they're gonna stop Muller from telling the truth about a massive conspiracy with Russia to

throw the election that didn't happen. It didn't happen. Take a deep breath, Libs, it did not occur. Come into the real world. Stop living in fantasyland. They won't do it. They just they cannot help themselves. They are so stuck on this fiction. Nonetheless, Nadler says that the DOJ cannot give This is a This is a perfect example of

what we're gonna see tomorrow. He's going around giving interviews of Sana all listen, Camarasa, and he's saying things about how the Republicans are of course bar Republican appointee in the DOJ. They're trying to stop the truth from getting out. Here's the problem with that. It's a total lie. And

Nadler's an idiot play eighteen. Here's the Attorney General himself that his press conference Bob had said that he intended to stick with a public report and not go beyond that, and in conversations with the Department, his staff was reiterating that that was their position, and they asked us for guidance in writing to explain or to tell them what our position was. So we responded in writing. The department sent the guidance they had requested, so Muller actually requested, yes,

this is what we're up against, folks. Democratics are saying, Oh my gosh, do you realize what they've done here? They're giving Muller guidance about what he can say. It's a terrible thing they're doing. It's horrible. Except Muller asked for the guidance. They wanted it in writing so they could refer to it. So everyone's on the same page. This is just establishing the rules of the road. You're

not a bad guy. When someone says, hey, what are the rules of this game, and you say, here are the rules of the game, you can't then say, do you see what they're doing forcing rules upon this brave patriot. Bob Muller's going to take down Trump. It's not going to happen, but tomorrow you'll see. I mean, first of all, I know all of you are not going to start

watching this at nine o'clock in the morning. There are bars here in DC that are opening up early, and there have been advertising I've seeing where they're planning to serve their full menu. Letting to serve their full menu, because this is a swamptown and everyone wants to see what the swamp rats will be up to you up on Capitol Hill. So it's quite a spectator sport. And you just have all these members of Congress sports so unimpressive and so annoying. On the Democrats side, some of

the Republicans aren't as great as they should be. But I gotta tell you, I rarely see a Republican member of Congress and think I wouldn't leave that person in charge of a lemonade stand. And I see plenty of Democrats or I'm like they would just they would run that lemonade stand in the ground, no idea what they're doing, no ability whatsoever to make good decisions and understand what's

going on. So yes, indeed, that is the reality that I see happening here tomorrow, Oh Trump, you got to hear from We got to hear from the Trumpster himself about what he expects for mullotime twelve of it. I'm not going to be watching Mueller because you can't take all those bites out of the apple. We had no collusion, no obstruction, we had no nothing. The Democrats were devastated by it. They went crazy. They've gone off the deep end and not doing anything. All they care about is

a phony investigation. Where the report was written, it said no collusion, there's no nothing. They're wasting that time no collusion. Of course, Democrats are all going to come out of tomorrow's investigation saying I'm sorry tomorrow's testimony, rather saying that the investigation proved that Trump broke the law even though he was not charge with anything. You are now you are now innocent, or rather guilty until proven innocent under Democrat rules. This is what we're all going to see.

This is what the expectations shall be. I do not think that we'll find out anything all that interesting tomorrow. I don't know. Remember Mueller testified, or I should say, spoke publicly at a press conference and was not compelling and seemed very I'll be on it. He seemed a little too old to be doing this. Was just didn't wasn't effective at all. Then you have the reality of what happened with Komy where he just didn't answer anything, and that may be the case as well. So you know,

I'll do enough of the pre game. I've had enough pre gaming of Mueller time for one day. We'll cover it tomorrow on the show. What he says, what he doesn't say. There's going to be a lot of whatever's in the report, is my answer. My answer is the report. I'm telling you it's probably going to be yes, the phrase that everyone hates because it's a cliche out will be a nothing burger a vec fromage. We shall see, though, I'll be watching. Yay, what an exciting day I have planned.

We'll be right back. I don't know how to tell you about this story other than to tell you so we're just gonna have to dive into this one together. And yeah, let me just say that I know that sometimes sometimes they're young ones listening to the show. I would give you a fair warning here that while I the language I use will always be cleaned and broadcast worthy. The subject matter here is about to get pretty gross, but I don't know how to get around it. And

it's a real issue. It's a newsworthy issue. It's something you should know about. As bizarre and appalling as the whole thing is has to do with the latest extreme iteration of transgender activism, I'm saying, fuck, what what do you mean? Trench interact with what's going on here? Isn't transgenderism just about love wins or loving people or letting people be, you know, do do what they want to do.

I saw recently a whole piece where they kept referring to a biological male as a female, and there was another male and a female, and I was trying to keep straight who was It was a whole entrapment thing and a paternity case with false and I just couldn't. I'm pretty good at reading. I couldn't keep straight what he, the she, the who? The whare the There are reasons why we have pronouns. I know the Left pretends like this isn't that there are reasons for pronouns. It is useful,

it's helpful he versus she. These are real things, These are real distinctions that we should be aware of. But here we go. This is the story, folks. A Canadian man is suing thirteen different esteticians. This is a real thing. A Canadian man and I'm sorry, a transgender woman has decided to sue thirteen esteticians. By the way, you noticed that, I don't even know how I could talk about this

on Twitter. I'm not sure I would get banned. Basically, this transgender individual is saying, if you don't, if women will not wax his male parts, which are still male, he is, they're violating his human rights and this is discrimination. That's right, folks. A guy can go into a women's beauty salon now and claim that the unwillingness of female estheticians employees of this establishment who will not handle and wax.

I don't even really know how to describe this. That area of this man up close and personal are bigots. And you might say, buck, this is such a crazy story. No one takes it seriously. Canadian law does. Canadian Human Rights Council is taking it very seriously. This guy's filed fifteen I'm sorry, sixteen complaints about against estheticians in the last year, claiming that being denied quote services on account of her gender identity was discriminatory. That's right. If you're

a female, imagine this for a second. Imagine to the men listening to this, your your wife works at a beauty salon and a rather portly, clearly male individual comes in and says, all right, ladies, I'm stripping down on this table and you're gonna give me the full you know, Brazilian wax treatment. I think it would be okay if as a husband, if your wife was being told that, you would be really, really upset. I know I would.

I don't have a wife, but I can imagine. But people in this country who are transgender activists are They're not outraged by this. They're like, yeah, that's this is a see. This is where the real, the rubber meets the road, so to speak. This is where the reality versus the unreality becomes a thing, and it's all around them trying to use the left, trying to use pressure and politics to get us to admit things that are just false. Male body parts are different than female body parts.

We could sit around all day and talk about how that's mean, and some people feel sad about this, but male body parts are different than female body parts. This is a This is a real thing that we're all very aware of. This is about as basic as knowledge gets, too, isn't it. Who's a boy, who's a girl? This is one of those things that you start to learn when you're a toddler. Who's a boy, who's a girl? How to boys act? How to girls act? We all know this is real. This is the world we live in.

They reject this. They reject this to the point where you are supposed to be handling male anatomy as a female esthetician and pretend that it is female anatomy, or else you are legally libel. He's gonna run these women out of He's going to destroy their businesses. This isn't just some exercise in you know, in theory. We're not sitting in some classroom saying maybe this could happen. This guy's actually he's an activist and he's going around suing

people because he says he's a woman. He goes around. You know, there's this photo of him. I mean, this guy is and there's all this other stuff too about it. It says horrible things. A clear person is clearly deranged, person's clearly suffering from mental illness. Do we get to say that, do we ever get to discuss a link between transgenderism and mental illness? Do we ever get to say that transgenderism is in fact a form of mental illness.

This we've we've now dispensed with that. Very interesting. You know, biology is the science that is the most under assault by the social justice left, and then they're really trying to destroy it as a discipline. They have so politicized it that you can no longer expect even a biologist to say things that are obviously true that you learn in freshman year high school, that you learn in the first grade. Actually, boys have one thing, girls have another.

You learn this at a really early age. You understand why there's the separation between boys and girls, why there's you know, different bathrooms, all this stuff. They're trying to erase this. And you could say, buck, this is just one case, it's one story, but it just shows how insane the left really is in Canada. Is they're right alongside us with it with all this stuff. I mean,

Canada is like the fifty first state. Let's not pretend I'm not telling you about some story in a village in Pakistan somewhere that is a distant culture that we have nothing in common with. This is the Canadians, and you have American transgender activists who were going along with this. I've been saying it all along. They will try You've

seen it a little bit. But there will be an effort on the left to suggest that or to demand that straight males must be willing to consider transgender females men who claim to be women through transgenderism as a heterosexual male. If you do not find a transgender female, meaning a male who has male parts but says a female attractive, that's not a preference thing. That's a bigot thing. You are bigoted, You're a bad person. That's where it's

already heading there. I've seen some articles. I've mentioned this before. It's but this is the real that they want everyone. This is Soviet level rejection of objective reality. That's where we're heading. You must agree to something you know is false, or else you must live your life affirming something is true that you know is untrue or else. I mean, transgenderism has just turned into a form of bullying the rest of us into saying things are true that are

not true. And I'm feeling I'm losing some level of freedom to discuss these things. I could get kicked off of Twitter, I could get kicked off of Facebook. Who knows what corporate sanctions could await me for saying things like boys have one kind of equipment, girls have another. These are not the same things. Wasn't there like a sesame street thing? Which of these things is not like the other? Boys and girls? One of these things is not like the other. They are in fact different. So

I know that this is it's just one story. It's up in Canada. But if these women are gonna lose their lively, they're all gonna they're all gonna get sued in Canada's going to uphold these laws, uphold the judgments. Rather, so you're gonna have a bunch of women who are bankrupted because this one guy who also here. This was another story that gives you a sense of who we're dealing with. Her Yaniv Jessica Yanev is this transgender individual,

accorded nash Real View. Here is quote seeking permission from a Canadian local council to hold three topless swims for people aged twelve and up and parents would be barred from attending. This swim would be for children who identify as LGBTQ two s plus and would include topless twelve and up girls. Openly, this activist is pushing for this. Well, it's young teen girls to be going around topless at a at a pool party where parents aren't allowed to attend.

And this is where the Canadian court so far, or the Canadian law at least, is signing with the Canadian Human Rights Commission is saying, yeah, this is somebody that we're gonna send up for you. It's British Columbius Human Rights Tribunal is making decisions on this. I mean, they're taking this seriously. They're really looking at this instead of laughing this individual out of the building. Jonathan, Now, Jessica YANEV, you know, when is it When is it too much?

When do the Libs realize that there that their side has just completely gone crazy? I wonder what that is? There? Anything now? Is there anything for the world's gonna end in twelve years? Open borders is no problem. Men and women aren't different. You know, killing a baby that's nine months old in the womb is not is not an immoral act. I just is there anything that's too crazy for them anymore? I don't know what are the outer limits of the crazy. We'll be right back. Who remembers

Al Franken? Remember that guy a painfully unfunny comedian, which if you're a leftist you can get away with that. You just have to make jokes that attack the right. The right people meaning people on the right, usually white Christian males, Republicans, conservatives. You don't have to be funny. You just have to carry water for your side, and then they'll make sure that you get jobs and all kinds of stuff. Okay, So al Franken was at one

point at US senator won that race in Minnesota. He will also recall that he won by a few hundred votes, and if you look back at the story of how he beat I think it was Norm Coleman was the other was the Republican. It was super shady. And anyone who says a little bit of voter fraud is no big deal doesn't know what the margin was in that Minnesota Senate race, because it was hundreds, I think even

two hundred at one point or so votes. It's like a local high school gymnasium of people standing in line voting. That that was the difference in who got to be a US senator, So that's one point. But Frankin fell from grace very rapidly, and it was because of me too. It was because he had or rather videos of him had emerged, I'm sorry, photos of him had emerged where he was grabbing a woman who was asleep on the chest.

Now I believe she had body armor, but he was mimicking groping her and it was a weird, creepster thing to do. And then Leanne Tweeden came out and said that he had forced to kiss on her I think during a USO tour. And then seven other women came forward and said he's a very sexually aggressive kind of pervy guy. And you know, seven of them all right, And Kristen Gillibrand, who had been a friend of and she just by the way she is just she is cold,

des ice manaman. She'll say anything, She'll tell you whatever you want to hear, switches her positions like it's nothing. I mean, it's just a really a shockingly brazen grasper and grifter, you know, whatever she has to say in the moment for the benefit of Christians. Look, she's a classic politician. I suppose you could say, but she said, Franken has to resign, and so Franken did step down

from his Senate seat. And this was because the Democrats knew at that point in time that their ability to weaponize against Republicans any me to allegation was really going to be hampered by Okay, this guy has seven women come forward and he gets to stay in his job. So for the benefit of the weaponization of me too from the left, Franken got fed to alliance. And guess what. Now, Jane Mayer has come forward, who's a left wing hack writer, and she's written some puff peas in the New Yorker

looking at the accusations against the senator. It turns out she claims now that essentially, I'm trying to make sure I get the exact verbiage here, but it's that nothing that these women said has been corroborated at all, That there was no evidence that anything that what they said is true. And now that's not true because there's a photo, right, But all the other women who claim that he grabbed them or groped them, that there was no evidence and

that it didn't check out. And Jane Mayer is now trying to launch an effort to rehabilitate Frankin's image because maybe they want to bring him back. At one point, Frankin was thought of as a possible challenger for Trump. At one point, Franken was a guy that people were thinking as a comedian, he could mock Trump and he'd be he'd be able to go on stage and deal

with him. And and they he got me too. And now he's sang in this piece and elsewhere that he regrets that he regrets stepping down, which he forgot the rule. There are rules, folks, and the rules when you're dealing with the leftist mom you never apologize. He only apologize if you, as a human being, feel you've done wrong and for your own conscience and your own honor, you must apologize. You do not apologize because they demanded, because then they just use your apology as a confession for

further punishment and destruction of your life. This is now, you know, they've they've gone beyond what you used to be. They wanted to humiliate you publicly, but you'd keep your job. You know, conservatives would have to get you know, this ritual humiliation, but you weren't. It wasn't the end of

your career necessarily, that's all changed. Now it's oh no, they want you fired, they want you finish, just like the the young woman when I was at the Hill who wanted me fired for saying that ilhan Omar is an attractive woman. I was to be fired for that. That was the that was the demand for tweeting that I was supposed to be fired. Didn't bother anybody, didn't do anything, but I should lose my job because the left, especially left wing feminists, the left wing feminists are among

the very worst. I mean, they're completely out of their minds and they're vicious and they're bitter. But here I think frank In, you know, seven women came forward. I think he is a creep. Like I think he's obviously he's doing gross stuff. There's photos of him. But what's amazing to me? Or I should say just astonishing? It's not amazing. I mean, it makes sense, really right, but you just you want to just say what the heck.

May Or is the woman that published the article about the During the Cavanaugh confirmation hearings, Mayor went forward with the second accuser, who took a week of meeting with lawyers and therapists to try to remember if in fact what she thought she remembered was what she remembered. And then they went forward with this even though one of the witnesses that that accuser sighted was like, never happened.

That's not a thing that happened. So Mayer published unfounded accusations against without any any journalistic due Dillens and by the way, Ronan Pharaoh also mister, oh, mister, meet you guy. Yeah, left wing partisan activist hack. He also put his name on that, which was a disgrace. But I mean, I never expected that guy was particularly honorable. He's just all for himself. But now you know she wants to rehabilitate Franken and say, well, the witnesses against him, we can't

corroborate any of their information. You don't say now all of a sudden, we want evidence. Now you know, we're gonna go back to a theory because it's good for Franken, who I think Democrats really do want him back in public life. They really liked he's an absolutely za vicious left wing partisan, nasty, really goes after people and says exactly what the left wingers in Hollywood in New York. And you know that you know, he knows exactly what they want to hear, and he does. He delivers it

every time. I think they want to bring him back, just like they try to bring back Spitzer. You know, they try to bring back these left wing attack dogs, these Democrats and give them a Spitzer got a TV show at CNN, and what an embarrassment. First of all, the show stunk. It's horrible. It's unwatchable because that guy's unwatchable. But as Buddy Jeff zucker knew that, you know, Spitzer was a good soldier for the left wing cause he took himself down. He was guilty. Franken also a little

little soldier for progressivism. Does anyone think that he wasn't guilty? What seven women were? They were all making it up, all seven of them. I thought women had a right to be believed. Can I just know what the journalistic standards are here for publishing these accusations? Oh? I think I know what they are. If you're a Republican, you are guilty the moment anyone says anything, even if it's crazy, the evidence is against it and there's no evidence to

support it. But if you are a Democrat, then all of a sudden, the rules of evidence and cross examination and all the rest of it apply. Oh okay, well, I'm glad we've established that this is just all a big hypocritical exercise and power. That's what me too has become. Thanks Jane Mayer and The New Yorker and Al Franken, We'll be right back rock and roll, fellow patriots. We made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Indeed, it is Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. This is

where all the role call magic happens. You know that team, or if you don't know that, now you do, and you can send me all of your thoughts and stuff. By the way, I will be doing a live event for Republican youth. So I'm not sure there's an age limit, but it is young Republicans. That will be in early September. But just for those of you who are in the New York area, if you want to go to the Young Republicans of New York event. I will be posting all of that on Facebook and Twitter and all of

that as we get a little bit closer to it. Also, I have another announcement for next week something I'll be doing that I think you'll be excited to see. But I don't want to say until the week of because you can always have these things change or get canceled. But the buck is going into the lions Den, my friends. At least that's the plan right now, and all of you will be able to watch it from the comfort

of your own homes. It is going to be Shields High full real Ted rights, Hey Buck, listening to your podcasts on Latin America from where Irapuatu, Mexico never even heard of it. These people are very friendly and helpful. To be honest, the people here seem very happy or they don't make a lot of money. Shaking hands and hugs in the morning is a daily routine, unlike American

teens of barely saying hello and generally unhappy people. Great show, Shields High, Ted, Well, Ted, I hope you're enjoying Irapuato. That sounds like a fun is It reminds me of whenever I say that of the place from the end of In the end of shaw Sank Redemption, I think it's see what Tanejo is where he's mark you know, I'm talking about where he goes to the beach, to the end of Shaw Shank. Oh, I know it's a spoiler. The movies like twenty years old. Du I do not

know what you're talking about. You don't know what I'm talk Mark. You know you're being like horror movies. You're busy wedding planning. Yeah, there you go. Horror movies. What's the best? You know? I haven't actually seen any good horror movies in a long time. What's the best horror movie to come out in last year? Mark? Put you on the spot. Well, I just told you I don't like horror movies. So why would I know that? Oh? I think you said I like horror. No, I don't

like horror movies. Oh all right, well then you wouldn't know that. But Shaw Shank Redemption isn't a horror movie, dude, So what are you talking about? I always thought it was, Oh my god, gosh, it's about a guy who goes to prison. I mean, it's not a happy thing. But all right, back to back to a roll call producer Mark Sandal kinds of stuff today, Julie right Hey buck excellent interview with Secretary Mike Pompeo. Very glad to have

him in Trump's Cabinet. A while back, I read that people born between nineteen seventy six nineteen eighty four, we're not quite gen X and not quite millennials, but are zennials. We've had an analog childhood and had a digital childhood or a digital adulthood. Rather, while zennial is dumb, and I suggest we are the mixer generation. This makes it easier to distance ourselves from the AOC millennials and whatever weirdo twin peaks stuff the gen X crowd pines for.

Thank you for the great analysis, Julie. Julie, I've seen it both ways. I'm not sure there's really even a technical definition of millennial, though I have been told that if you're born after nineteen eighty you are considered a millennial. This is why I am, in fact a true gray I'm a graybeard millennial in all senses, because I do have some gray in the beard. Should I clip the gray out of the beard or should I leave it

in there? You know? Do you do a bit of manscaping or the beard to get the gray hairs out on the face or what? I don't know, inquiring minds, Actually no one cares. We'll see what happens in my poll between whether bacon or eggs is the one thing you'd want if you could only have one for the rest of your life. I will tell you as of today, it's running for seven days. We've had thousands of votes so far, Bacon is winning sixty forty. Patrick writes, I'm

doing a hopper jump off the Trump train. Still listen to your show, but the defense of the go back where you came from is is irreprehensible. I think you just mean reprehensible. As a centrist and a libertarian, I can no longer back this present because of more religious values. I'm Catholic too. I can allow support the crazies on the right, I can't support the crazies on the left. Well, Patrick, look, I understand some of your frustration. I think that Trump misspoke.

And it's just a question whether you although the sentiments were clearly meant, we know what he meant by or rather we know that he doesn't like the women and what they represent ideologically. But go back to where he came from. He just was being Trump. It really was, and I really do not believe that he meant it as a as a racial insult. I think he meant it as a these these individuals, these women in Congress, do not love our country and tear it down, So

maybe they shouldn't be here. And it wouldn't matter where they were born or what their skin color was. That's just how he feels about it. I assure you, if they were a number of Italian lawmakers whose parents had, you know, immigrated here from Italy and they were saying terrible things about America and how we have concentration camps, Trump would have said, you know, go back where you came from. Just the same. But I can understand your frustration.

I appreciate you writing in and thanks. At least my show is smart enough that even people who don't support Trump will listen to it. I always take that as a special, a special compliment. There are there are lives who listen to this show. There are a lot of

centrists who listen to this show. I think it's because they realize that I spend all day learning about all the things, so that I can come here on radio and talk about as much stuff as I can and give you real information, not just the insights of analysis, but help everyone learns stuff. The stuff that I'm learning. I want to be able to share with all of you. It's like a most This is like the most fun class ever, as far as I'm concerned, Hopefully you feel

the same way. Adam, right Buck, When are you going to hire an intern a whisper in your ear? You're only a man? Well, everyone compliments you on roll Call Shields high. Well, Adam, trust me, my friend, I work in media. I do not need anyone whispering in my ear that I am mortal, because I am constantly reminded of my mortality by various media executives and other media personalities. Even so, trust me, you do not have to worry

about a lack of humility with the Buckster. Even if he refers to himself in the third person, he does that in a self effacing way. Let's see Nadine right Buck audio on the podcast I Listen to iHeart is still an issue. Bumper music, et cetera. Playing for guests comes at a higher volume when you're speaking. Is there a way to turn your mic up? The volume turn all the way up, Shields, Hi, guys, I don't I

don't know what's going on here. I'm look I'm moving to New York in a few weeks, will be in a brand new studio, We'll have a We'll all be together in the brand new Freedom Hunt in New York City. So you know, hopefully that will that will allow us to fix this problem, whatever it may be. Moses, right buck, I'm a former Marine and former employee of DHS. I wanted to share details from discussions I've had with one

of the vice presidents the National Border Patrol Council. My concern is from the men and women on that border. My hope is that a voice like yours can help with getting those agents the resources and the platform they need to push back against the narrative the Democrats the media are pushing every day. I want to share these ideas and plans I've had with Chris Cabrera. Border Patrol would love to hear your thoughts and also if you can help well, Moses, my friends, send me whatever you got,

all right, send me here. You know how to find me, what you want me to pass along and I will. I will see what I can do, all right, Team, that's gonna be it for the show today. Always an honor, a privilege, and a pleasure to get the chance to chat with you, get a chance to hang out with all of you, which is really what it feels like. I am getting my last week's here in DC. I'm going to be an emigray from the Swamp. I'm going to be saying adios to the Swamp very soon and

back to the Big Apple. Hopefully there's a lot of you that listen to the show who are in the Big Apple area, because we will be trying to do some live events and other fun things there. But until tomorrow, my friends, Mueller Day, which I will tell you right now, is not going to be nearly as exciting it. The media has to pretend like it's going to be exciting, but it's I think it's going to be a dud, a dud and then some. That is my honest assessment

of where we're going on Muller Day. But until then, my friends, please do send me thoughts and share via Facebook, Facebook, dot com slash Buck Sexton. That's the best way to reach me. Right now. We are getting an email address set up. It only take us like ten years to do that. We will talk to you tomorrow here on the show. Shields High