Mini MIke Gets His Soapbox In Nevada

help battle depression? Stack show coming up? This is the bus Sexton Show or the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, Bring here a great American again the buck Sexton Show begins.

Remember the animidty to look at Bill Barr and what he's done, and you look at the fact that he has started a search and destroy mission against all of the president's political perceived political opponents that the president concocted when he talked about Barack Obama tapping the phones at Trump Tower back in March of twenty seventeen. And he is chasing down every conspiracy theory that the President is

putting forward. At the same time, and more disturbingly, Bill Barr is providing aid and comfort to the president's allies. Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. That was a morning Joe as dishonest and stupid as always on what's going

on right now with the Department of Justice. They're all now switching from a narrative of the DOJ is sacro saying, how dare anyone ever question its ability to be fair and impartial and highly political cases, to now that you have an attorney general who understands what's really going on, who has not, because of public pressure, been sidelined as

was the case with Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Now that you have an attorney general in bar who wants to get answers, and these should be answers that everybody wants. Right somehow, this country has been lulled into a false sense of normalcy when it comes to a two plus year long investigation of a president, a sitting president, for betraying his country and cheating in an election and working with Russia to do so, and it was all a lie,

never happened, didn't occur. A special council was convened to look into something that did not happen, that there was no evidence of happening, and that was all effectively a conspiracy theory, a conspiracy theory that overtook the media, that ran its way all the way up through the intelligence community and up the Department of Justice chain of command. And now some of us would like answers as to how something so colossally stupid and wrong and unfair could happen.

And what are the Libs doing? And the Libs and their lackeys, right, the Libs and the people that do whatever they say for the right amount of pay in the Libs employ people like Joe Scarborough, among others. I don't know how Scarborough honestly gets up in the morning and does this. He's already plenty rich. He's married to a rich lady. They've got plenty of money. What's the problem. Why why do the dance? Oh, that's right, it's personal.

He was a big booster of Donald Trump's He was a big fan of Trump's, as was Miss Bridginsky, his now wife. After they left their respective families after hosting a show together for a while on TV, they have decided that now Trump is the enemy, and so they feed a left wing audience at MSNBC a steady diet of Trump derangement syndrome gruel every morning, but they do it with this air of oh, where the cool kids.

We're the cool kids. We have all the really connected Wall Street insiders and CEOs come sit at our table, and people from respected news outlets like The New Yorker and the New York Times they'll sit with us too, And the show is an intellectual abomination. I mean, just start with that. But this is just one of many efforts out there right now to make sure that whatever truth Bill Barr is able to find about this Department of Justice sham. I mean, it's really wrong what has

gone on here. It's it's a massive political scandal, and we should be getting answers. And there have been some of these probes. And keep in mind that the the initial impetus here for the investigation of Donald Trump by the Department of Justice was driven by people that we now know to be partisans, that we know to be deep state operatives who were working behind the scenes and

abusing their power and discretion for political ends. Comy Bar, I'm sorry, Comy McCabe, struck page, go down the list. These are all individuals that we've seen through their text messages, through their actions once they've left government employee. We know who they really are. Now we have a much better sense of what they're really all about. And it looks bad.

All of it looks bad. It looks like these are people that really hated Trump, that hated what Trump represented more than anything else, which was a challenge to their sense of superiority. Trump was not supposed to be able to do these things. And there are all these people who had built careers, had burrowed themselves into the existing power structure, especially in DC and especially in the Democrat

corporate media. And Trump comes along and does not show them the deference that they demand, does not show them respect that they think they're due, and they go completely apoplectic. I mean they lose, They lose it on him and try to try to find ways to end his presidency and to take him down. Now you've got an Attorney General bar looking into this, and already they shift their narrative to bar Is doing the dirty work. Well, Muller

was able to find no Russia collusion. And then the Muller team, a bunch of Democrat prosecutors as we know, came up with this. Well, here are ten counts of possible obstruction. We can't say their obstruction though, just as slimy and underhanded a lawyer's trick as you could ever conceive of. But they found nothing on the impetus for that, the initial reason for the whole investigation of Russia collusion.

They got nothing. And it's worth asking how did the top echelon of the federal government's bureaucratic apparatus under the Obama administration. What did Obama know, by the way, about this. We never get answers on that. They never tell us. We're never allowed to find that out. Oh, sure, there was all this happening, There was the investigation of the Republican presidential campaign, and no one ever briefed Obama on it. No, of course, not like we're all supposed to be so stupid.

Joe Scarborough here also does the usual, Oh Trump lied about the wire tap on Trump Tower. No, the lie was what was told to the FISA court to continue to get surveillance under of Carter Page because he was a Trump campaign associate. Remember, they weren't surveilling carter Page under FISA because they thought the Carter Page had access to classify it and was trying to sell it to

the Russians, that would be a standard espionage investigation. They were surveilling Carter Page under the theory that he was a go between for the Russians and the Trump campaign. He was the centerpiece of collusion. That was the theory, a theory that an intelligent human being who speaks to Carter Page for five minutes would know, or five seconds, quite honestly, would know as absolutely absurd carter Page, who would helped the FBI with other intelligence related concerns when

it comes to Russia. And now they're acting like they now they hate information about him to make him appear to be a trader to the FISA court. All the malfeasance that's been done, the leak of top secret information to the Washington Post in order to entrap General Flynn. Send over some FBI agents member the Kisliak Flynn phone call. Somebody would classified leaked that information. That's a felony. So when we look at what's gone on here, there's all

this bad action. We have what the fourteen serious instances of PISA abuse, all these different things, all these different areas that you can you can add together and say, well, hold on a second, there's more than just smoke. We've already seen fire, so shouldn't we find the source of it? And that's what the Attorney General is trying to do.

And this is why you're you're already seeing the narrative come up now of people who don't want the truth about the plot to undo this presidency, which is what it was. It was a plot to under the presidency to use the Department of Justice and the lib corporate media as a bunch of mouthpieces to get rid of President Donald J. Trump. So they're now coming up with all these these explanations in advance of any facts. Oh, Bar is doing Trump's bidding. Bar is a stooge for

Donald Trump. As I've told you many times before, this just flies in the face of basic facts. This guy's already been Attorney general, longstanding career, well respected by anybody who knows anything about the DOJ. Donald Trump has turned him. Well, it's like Donald Trump is a vampire and he bit Attorney General Barr and now he's a Now he does

whatever Counterracula tells him too. This is insane, but this is what they have to do because they recognize that eventually more information is going to come out about how duplicitous,

how false, how stupid, how incompetent, how dishonest. The origins of this whole nere that gripped the country for years, The primary news story for more than half of President Trump's first term in office was about a left wing conspiracy theory bought and paid for, literally bought and paid for by the Hillary Clinton d n C. In twenty sixteen.

That was the primary news story in America for almost three years, really, and it's still in some ways haunts the current administration because it gives the Trump deranged an excuse at any point in time for why they hate Trump, because they still believe that there was collusion, even though there's been proof only to the contrary. So this is what gets us now to this two thousand former Department of Justice officials who are calling on William Barr to resign.

These are called Democrats, folks. It's not complicated. This is not hard. And the Department of Justice has about one hundred and I think it's actually one hundred and twenty thousand employees if you add it all in. So to have two thousand people who formerly worked at an organization that has over one hundred thousand people that doesn't really

mean anything. Who cares? These are democrats. One of the great tricks that the media polls is deciding whose voices get magnified as somehow worthy of public public scrutiny, worthy of public attention, and who's Don't you know if some group of ten doctors comes together, I mean, there's you know, hundreds of thousands of mds in the country, right If some group of ten doctors comes together, all of a sudden, you'll see headlines on ABC News Donald Trump unfit for office?

Say doctors? Okay, well there's ten of you know, who cares? Two thousand former DOJ officials? Who cares? This doesn't matter, But the media is running with it. They're running with it. It's propaganda, folks. This is shaping. This is shaping the

battlefield of ideas. Before any facts can come out about what bars investigation really Derm's investigation, the US attorney up in Connecticut of the Russia collusion origins, will be get ahead of it, undermine it, destroy it, erase the credibility of anything that Barr is doing before we even know

what he's done. That's their plan all along. There is zero proof of any kind that the Attorney General changed his mind about Roger Stone because of what Donald Trump tweeted, And anyone who looked objectively at what they were doing to Roger Stone would say, this is absurd. But you can't have a normal conversation. You can't have a rational conversation with a Democrat about this, because they'll also tell

you that it was normal. I've heard people go on I mean, CNN is the word defender, CNN is actually has actually become insane as an organization. I mean, they've completely lost their minds. They have no sense of balance, no sense of responsibility. It's really it's really frightening them. It's a grotesque place. But they'll put people on TV

who are supposed to be law enforcement experts. We will say, well, of course, of course, you know, thirty men or so with long guns had to go into Roger Stone's home at five o'clock in the morning to affect that arrest. Of course that was necessary. I don't care what expertise someone claims to have or how many years in the job. That's an idiotic thing to say. Only a moron would say that with a straight face. But there are many of them out there, and in fact, they're paid to

say that with a straight face. At every phase of this, what I tell you turns out to be true. Our analysis here in the Freedom MHUND is correct, and the so called legal and law enforcement and political experts such as they are that are going on on CNN and MSNBC and ABC in these other places are wrong, wrong, wrong. They never change any of their analysis, though, and they just either lie to their audience or they move on.

They ignore, they pretend it didn't happen. They're going to have to at some point confront the reality of the soft coup against the president of the United States that they engineered. And they're really just hoping that the American people don't see this before we have to cast ballots in the November upcoming November election. That's that's really what is at issue here. And that's why I when I see this, this this breaking news story about the federal

judges who are going to have a call. I mean, no one had even heard about Oh, let's be honest, had anyone heard about the Federal Judges Association or whatever the whatever the heck they're calling this thing before today. No, but they're going to tell you that this is a really big deal. They're going to say that the fact that federal judges are expressing concern in this way, here we go the Federal Judges Association is called an emergency meeting.

Oh my gosh. After DOJ intervened in the case of Trump ally Roger Stone, DOJ doesn't intervene in this case. It's a DOJ case. The people who are prosecuting Stone or DJ employees, they are subject to the chain of command, the rules and regulations of the DOJ, and they do have oversight and there are there are superiors that they answer to. And this ultimately comes down to do people really think that it was justice to ask for seven

and nine years for Roger Stone? Well, as we know that were one of the guys who was a prosecutor. Here was a former senior White House counsel to Obama. Does anyone think that that guy's not a huge damn a huge lib Come on, and then there's another one who prosecuted Papadopoulos. I mean, these people are all Trump collusion truthers and they're getting a shot at Roger Stone, and we know they just want to run the school were board up. The more years associated with anyone who's

in Trump's orbit. The better because then they can run this graphic that I've seen before in MSNBC for stupid people. Look at all these prosecutions, Look at all the years they're getting in prison. Yeah, it's prosecutions for getting jammed up in the course of the sham Russia collusion investigation, or people who didn't pay their taxes, which has nothing to do with Russia Trump collusion whatsoever. This is the

old Democrat plan. Investigate, investigate, investigate. The process is the punishment. Put people through hell, and even if you don't care what you want at the end, you've put them through hell. It sends a message to the political opposition. It tells Republicans, It tells the GOP Trump supporters, we may not even win in the end, but we'll ruin you in the meantime. That is what we are up against in this election.

It's also what Attorney General bar is up against, with these former DOJ employees and the corporate Democrat media and all the rest of it trying to band together against him to call for him. Who resign? I don't think so. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast and in case you want to know just how unhinged things can really get with Democrats. Producer Nick just gave me this quote from Maxie Waters. Quote Bill Barr should not only be disbarred, but he Donald Trump

and Roger Stone should be sharing a jail cell. End quote. Sitting member of Congress Folks Democrat. I mean, you know she couldn't. It would be hard to think of somebody who would come up with a dumber comment of any kind on the spot than this, max Maxine Waters is not somebody that I think anybody would turn to for legal analysis, or really any analysis for that matter. But nonetheless, sitting member of Congress Democrat, Trump, Stone and Barr should

all be in prison. And they say that our side isn't nice, They say that our side isn't respectful. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Two thousand former Justice Department officials of both political parties calling on Attorney General bar to resign. Do you join their calls for his resignation? Absolutely positive. This has been the most of the greatest abusive power

I have ever seen. At the hands of this president who has no sense of deceness You're understanding of the constitution and bars of facilitating it is beyond my comprehension. I've been around a long time, used to chair the Judiciary Committee for years. No president, no president, no president, has ever intimidated a general attorney general and abusing power as much as this man has custom the worst abuse of a president. I mean, did you hear the language

user in there? This is about how many years Roger Stone's going to go to federal prison for for what exactly? For being disrespectful of a process that shouldn't have been going on anyway. See. See, democrats get to they get to you know, they get to sick the DJ like a bunch of trained attack dogs. They get to use the special counsel, They get to use these different bureaucratic apparatus pig or apparatus apparatti, I don't know, apparatus apparatuses.

How about well go with that one. My grammar school Latin is failing me here. But they get to use all these different institutions within the bureaucratic system as weapons against Trump. And then when it comes out that they're using those weapons against Trump and his associates and people around him improperly, unfairly, illicitly. Oh well, we shouldn't have been doing in the first place, but you shouldn't have

done what you did when we were investigating you. And that then brings me to one of my favorite irony moments in recent days. Although the irony in politics lately has been coming fast and furious, one of my favorite irony moments is that Andrew McCabe, the acting FBI director, who will face no federal criminal charges for what he has done, no federal criminal charges for lying under oath.

Because if you're a person that democrats like and that the media favors, and you come from within the institution, that bureaucracy of the government, you know, the unelected fourth branch of government, that are civils, that are quote civil servants, but really there are overseers, there are bureaucratic overlords. If you come from that class, you get away with things, You get to lie, you don't have to play by

the same rules that civilians do. I wonder how many times McCabe sat in a room and had to look somebody in the eyes whose life he was ruining. For a minor process crime lying to the FBI some financial impropriety where they could have just asked for restitution with

the FBI. FBI, you know, one of the problems you have with the federal criminal justice system is that there's always this pretense that we should treat white collar crimes as seriously as other crimes because of any demographic disparity and who's committing white collar crimes versus violent crimes, and so there's a political pressure to more harshly prosecute sometimes white collar criminals just to show that, yeah, that you

accounting fraud that you committed against the company that cost them, you know, one hundred thousand dollars or it could be billions of dollars. I know, these things can be vast, but you U should go to prison for ten years for that man. But then we find out that people that walk up to someone on the street and slash their face with a razor blade, which but just just here in New York on Valentine's Day, right after Valentine's Day date, a French tourist was walking around Harlem and

he was slashed across the neck. Just I mean to say, no reason is obvious, right, just he was just walking on the street. Someone saw him. French tourist visiting in New York, you know, And that's the kind of thing that Europeans are going to remember for a long time and they'll say, oh, look what happens in America and it's unsafe and you know, so there's a ripple effect to that too, beyond the horrific act of mutilating someone

in that way. But it's just disgusting, right. I wonder how long that that individual when they finally catch him, If they catch him, we'll get in prison. I bet you it's not nine years in federal but I mean it's not a federal crime. But I bet you it's not nine years. M not going to serve nine years. Roger Stone should serve nine years. Though, this is the

world that Democrats want us to live in now. People who are vicious and a threat to public safety and a menace they they you know, we got to talk about criminal justice reform and we have to get into whoa what's really going on here with mass incarceration. And you know, anyone who commits a violent crime should be in my mind treated entire almost in a different sector of the justice system from non violent crimes or violence

against human beings. You know, rape, assault, murder, you know, assaulved the deadly weapon, and threats of imminent violence and armed robbery. Those are the most serious crimes for good reason, and anyone of any background or ethnicity who commits any of those crimes should be treated with the utmost harshness. Lying under oath, come on, come on, lying under oath

about something. It's one thing, lying under oath against a person who you know that that lie, let's say, is going to send someone else to prison or you know, these things should be weighed by by the way that that also is often not enforced the way that it should be. People that lie under oath when they make accusations, for example, the Duke Lacrosse case comes to mind. There are others they are not punished as severely and they should be. But this was a lie. Who is the

victim here? The government, the Muller team when Roger Stone didn't tell them the I'm not saying he should get away with it. That's not even the conversation. No one saying he's not guilty of this, and you have to have sanctions against people for this. But nine years in federal prison. Why not fifty years in federal prison? Why not a hundred because you realize that's crazy, But yet liberals make this argument that this is in agreedious offense.

Joe Biden is calling on the Attorney General to resign over this. Let's just really unpack this for a second. The Attorney General of the United States should resign, according to libs right now because Trump associate and longtime political advisor in General and the Republican Party, Roger Stone might end up serving two or three years in federal prison. This ensing its schedule for Thursday, by the way, two or three years in federal prison instead of five or six.

Attorney General Barr must resign. Who thinks that this is a normal thing to think this is an understandable position. But there's there's no semblance of proportionality with the Democrats anymore. There's no rationality that they've become deranged in the era of Trump. And this is insane and it's it's shameful too, because it's starting to undermine faith that the rest of

us have that we can get a fair trial. Right now, if you're a Trump associate in the District of Columbia and you're being tried for something, You're not getting a

fair trial. We know this. I don't think if somebody associated with Trump was tried in New York City they would be getting a fair trial either, because the jury pool is so tainted, because the media has done such an astonishing job of propagandizing about how Trump is an imminent threat and everyone around him is so terrible and he's so awful, and I mean, while the country is doing better than it's done in my adult lifetime, the country's in better shape right now than it has been

in my adult lifetime and probably in my lifetime period. The country is better now that at any point it's been in almost forty years, speaking from my own personal experience. Do you get any sense of that from the media. Do you get any sense of that from the way they're reporting on things now? Of course not. Instead they're

doing they're doing an impersonation. It's a bit like Ben Affleck when he is the best thing that Ben Affleck I think has ever done, when he did an impersonation of Keith Olberman on Saturday Night Live, Miss Precious Perfect, when the co op board would not let my cat,

Miss Precious Perfect stay with me. You know, this whole thing, and I kind of complained to Mumsy, you, sir, should resign, and you know, Keith Olberman yelling and you know, acting like he was a really bad Keith Olberman's whole stick was staring into the camera and letting libs believe that a guy who sounded like he was doing a bad impression of a person doing an impression of a Shakespeare

actor like it was a few levels remove. You know, this is what someone sounds like when they're trying to get the role of Keith Olberman steps in that this was intellectual and this was worthwhile for anybody. And also Keith Olberman has a reputation for being among the worst human beings in the media of any political background. But the whole thing about it, you should resign. Everyone should resign, right Everyone on the right should resign. Anybody that libs

don't like should resign, lose their job. This is what democrats have been reduced to right now, And I mentioned that at the top of the show. It's wanting to go back to it for a second. You think about the Department of Justice under the Obama administration and what was allowed to occur. Then the way that Attorney General Holder just made sure that there was no accountability at all. There was no effort to investigate, there was no oversight

of the irs targeting Conservatives in an election year. Lois Learner admitted this, they did this. This is real. There's no question that this happened. The only question was how far did it go and who gave the order? They just made that go away. Eric Holders like, WHOA, I don't we don't want to look into that operation fast

and furious. Even Democrats, yes, you could say that voting to hold Eric Holder in contempt of Congress is a political act fund but even Democrats, and I think it was a whole bunch of them, maybe about seventeen of them in the House went along with that and said, yeah, no, he is this is this is contemptuous. He should not

do this. The Obama administration was telling gun store owners to make illegal sales to individuals that they knew were going to then take those weapons and sell them to the drug cartel south of the border, and that resulted in the deaths of over one hundred people and including the murder of Border patrol agent Brian Terry. Do we ever find who gave the order for that investigative, that operation,

we don't know. Yeah, there were some low level people that were, oh, you know that their careers were derailed or something in the ATF, and but no one ever found out. Don't you think that's the kind of thing that they would know in DC at the highest level that they're doing. It's very risky telling people to break firearms laws. It was really an effort to break federal firearms laws by the federal government so that then they'd

have an excuse to enact much stricter firearms laws. See all this terrible violence going on with the drug cartels, it's because we don't have strict enough gun laws. Even though they were breaking their gun laws in the first place to get those guns to the drug cartels on order of the government. We didn't get to find out what happened there. Eric Holder didn't want to get the answers the REDDA Lynch never recused herself in the Hillary

Clinton email investigation. Just think about that. She never recused herself, And not only that, she didn't recuse herself after the Tarmac nittee with Bill Clinton, which I know you could say the investigation didn't go on that much longer, but investigation could have been reopened. She didn't know, and it also would at least sent a messers like, yeah, I definitely shouldn't have done that. But we all know what was going on there. That was behind the scenes collusion

by powerful Democrats. Of course it was. Yet they want to lecture us on the Just Department. The Civil Rights Division under Eric Holder was effectively a bunch of community organizers and activists who ended up getting overturned by the courts numerous times. The Obama DOJ was an activist DJ, especially the Civil Rights Division, which was far left and trying to enact a social justice agenda in violation of law under the guise of implementing the law. That's what

we had for eight years under the Obama administration. And we're supposed to get lectures now about Attorney General Bill Barr. Please, Libs, just get ready for what's coming. Get ready for the report that Durham is going to put out, and then we'll watch as they because they they'll never admit that they were wrong, but we will watch some and the Democrat corporate apparatus, media apparatus squirm as they try to

justify the enormous hoax. That was the Russia collusion investigation, all meant to help their incredibly weak, dishonest, corrupt cam Hillary Clinton glide into the White House. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. So it's November. People who just what just won the election? And the current occupant says, no, this is all a hoax. The Senate agrees with him. Fox News starts going on about it. What does president elect but to just do

about this? Yeah? What he doesn't want to leave? So well, what I said to Bill Mars, this is going to be pretty awkward when Chaston and I are moving in our furniture. I mean, if he won't leave, I guess if he's willing to do chores, we could work something out. But what is this this liberal mythology or that this liberal fantasy that if Donald Trump doesn't if Donald Trump lost the election, he wouldn't leave. This is this is amazing for a number reason. One, there's just no evidence

that this is the case. There's no reason, there's no reasonable reason to believe that. But also, we're going through so much of what we are as a country right now, and the political conversation has really been dominated by one thing, and that is Democrats refusal to accept the twenty sixteen

election results. So Democrats refused to accept the twenty sixteen election results, spawning a special counsel investigation and countless conspiracy theories, and all these removed Trump efforts, and quite honestly, the impeachment effort and the Senate trial that then acquitted President Trump. But they refuse to accept twenty sixteen, and then we have to hear from it. And also they refused to

accept two thousand one Bush beat Gore. And now we are told that we should be concerned that Donald Trump is not going to accept the twenty twenty election results. You know, fool me once, as Bush said, can't get fooled again. What are they doing here? Why even go there? It's also meant to be an insult, I should note, and this is another This is a common tactic you have against the truly Trump de arranged Democrats. It's a

way of undermining Trump supporters. It's a way of attacking us without having the stomach to actually say what they want to say. So they'll make claims that they know are only possible, they know could only be true. If Trump supporters were willing to go along with it. So what I'm saying here is when they claim that Donald Trump could do something really horrific right, or Donald Trump could just declare martial law, which I've heard libs say,

or or that he's a dictator. I mean, if he's a dictator, he's the worst dictator ever, because all he does is go to court and obey the rule of law, including when there are lawless judges trying to overrule him at the national level with these universal injunctions. But we all know that he couldn't do the things that libs are worried about him doing if his supporters all of a sudden decided that he had overstepped that he was no longer in the in the right, and that he

needed to be removed from power or moved from office. So, of course, if Trump loses the election, which would be would just be a sad day for America if that were to happen, though, those of us who had voted for him would say, yeah, he's got to go, And if he just pretended that he wasn't going to go, then that would be a problem. But even in trying to play Kate, libs crazy fantasies. You almost give some degree of credibility to it, like we have to explain

this to them, like, yeah, guys, that's right. If Trump really was going to nuke Sweden tomorrow, we would stop him. I promise we wouldn't be like, yeah, Trump, go for it. You know you don't like IKEA anymore, Go ahead and fire off a bunch of ICBMs. Of course, But in having to even say this, it's like we give some credibility to the absurd assertion in the first place. And this is a game they play that with Trump not

leaving office. Of course, if he loses, he's going to leave office, and his supporters wouldn't insist because we believe in the rule of law, and we believe that you have to obey the rules that everyone agrees to. Only Libs think the rules change depending on what they want. Only Libs believe that nothing matters when they feel like there's something more important and there's nothing that can obstruct them in their will to power. So it's troubling. I just think this is a dumb thing to have to

keep hearing. What if Trump doesn't leave, Well, they should just think about what happens when Trump wins. Thanks for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. But it is not only it is not only a rigged economy. It is a corrupt political system. It is a system that allows billionaires like Trump to get massive amounts of campaign contribution from his billionaire friends.

It is a system that allows a multi billionaire Mike Bloomberg worth sixty billion dollars and I missed Bloomberg, like anybody else, has a right to run for president. He does not have a right to buy the precedents say. It is like somebody was writing a script and they were coming up with a way to make Bernie Sanders seemed like he knew what he was talking about, because he is looking like he's going to be running in a sense against two billionaires in a Biden. That sounds

like the worst sitcome ever. Two billionaires in a Biden. Oh hello, fellow billionaire, How is that poor fellow mister Biden doing today? Perhaps he can get some family members on the board of a corrupt Ukrainian gas company to help him pay some bills. The poor chap you got these two billionaires, Trump and Bloomberg, And let's be honest, Bloomberg is like an ultra billionaire. Trump is a billionaire, but he's not a fifty million I'm sorry, a fifty

million fifty times over. He's not a fifty million billionaire. He's not a fifty times over billionaire. That's that's special territory that Bloomberg is in. One of the wealthiest men in the world. And Bernie Sanders loves to talk about the billionaires and the oligarchs. And it turns out that there are some billionaire oligarchs who are quite powerful in this country. But we will get into which side they tend to be supporting, which I think is something that

does not get nearly enough attention. Right, we will often be told that the Republican Party, and this is one of these enduring myths. I don't know how we can get rid of this other than to keep knocking down this lie. The lie is that the Republican Party is the party of the rich and Wall Street. Meanwhile, if you were to look at who for example, and this is you know, hat tipped Ted Cruise on this one today.

Senator Cruz who pointed out that of the ten richest men in America, seven of them, Buffett, Bazots, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg, Page, and Bryn are Democrats, and they are funding Democrats to include today's Democrat socialists. And then Cruz wrote, not coincidentally, massive government power consistently preserves massive wealth and prevents new people from acquiring wealth. It is, in fact the Democrat party that has the majority of the ultra wealthy supporting it.

It is now the Democrat Party that has not one, but two billionaires running in its primary, Tom Steier and Mike Bloomberg. I think Stier's an interesting character just insofar as he's a reminder that you don't have to be you don't have to be wise, and you don't have to be charming or even seemed to be all really that good at anything to be a billionaire. You just have to be at the right place at the right time and be relentless, and you two can probably become

a billionaire. Better lucky than good, as I'm fond of saying, I've seen that play out in life far too many times, in far too many ways. Better lucky than Good's true, and conservative media too, by the way, mostly a lot of the people that you see who have done very well to media in general, but conservative media people that you know, happen to be in the right place at the right time, got very lucky, got the platform, got

the opportunity. Because there's so much that goes into being successful that it's impossible for just to be merit based or just skill base. You gotta get a little lucky too. But back to this Ted Cruise tweet ten and richest men in America. Seven of them are big Democrat donors Buffett, Bezos, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg,

Page Bryn. This is a reminder that the branding that the Republican Party has as the party of the elites and the rich is merely is one dishonest, it's not true, but it's also a deflection from what the modern Democratic Party is. The Democratic Party does have a plutocrat problem. It does have far too much It does have billionaires who have far too much say in what's going to happen and what the future of that party will be.

Here's a perfect example, Bloomberg. I keep trying to, you know, hammer this home for people because we've heard in the past, Oh, someone's trying to buy their way into an election, and usually that meant they had raised a ton of money and they could spend a lot of money on a campaign. Bloomberg, this is an entirely different situation. I mean, I saw

Stacy Abrams was standing up for Bloomberg recently. Stacy Abrams still pretends that she won an election she lost for the governor's race in Georgia, but she had some nice words to say about Michael Bloomberg, who's under a lot of criticism, a lot of pressure right now as a result of his support and implement his implementation of stopping frisk policies. But Abrams, as I understand it, you know, has received Bloomberg money in the past, you know, in

her in her bid to be governor of Georgia. I mean, think of all the different mayors, for example, that have gotten a lot of support Bloomberg funds this you know, Mayor's against illegal guns or whatever it's called. The Bloomberg anti gun project. Bloomberg's war on the Second Amendment is what it really is. But he has more or less unlimited funds with which to run that organization or to

have people running that organization in his name. I think of all the mayors, all the politicians, the Democrats side that that group has helped by pushing, by pushing their candidacy and by attacking their opponents just on the issue of guns. You know, it's possible to buy people off at the and buy them off in numbers that it will matter, because I'm not saying that Bloomberg and either

technically you can't do this. It's gonna walk around having people hand everybody one hundred dollar bill vote for Bloomberg. Although I'd want to see what the numbers if you're only going to remember, I think it was ninety thousand votes total that separated Trump from Hillary in a handful of states in the Midwest, Right, Wasn't that there? There were somewhere ninety thousand votes? Was the was the difference

maker about roughly called roughly ninety thousand votes? You know, it's not that hard to pay off ninety thousand people, right, if you've got billions and billions of dollars. But he's not going to pay off individual voters. What he does is payoff influencers, payoff powerful voices. And there are so many ways that that can be done. And now we are starting to see is it possible to corrupt the political system in this way, or rather, is it possible to just write a big enough check that you can

be president? You can become president of the United States. Now, I don't think anybody could do this. I think Bloomberg is an effective manager. I notice how I'm not as like, I'm not as as quick to do what I've seen a lot of conservatives doing lately, which is just trash everything about Bloomberg because they view him as a as a threat to Trump already. I'm not I'm not convinced

that that's really the case. And I also don't think that we should do what Democrats do, which is pretend that things that they don't, pretend that things about their political opponents are true that aren't, just because it's it's, you know, the orange man bad approach. I'm not going to orange man bad Mike Bloomberg. Libs do that to Trump,

I'm not gonna do that to Bloomberg. Bloomberg is very bad on a number of issues, but he's not dumb, and he's not incompetent, and he did do a pretty darn good job running a crazy liberal city, all right. He's not the governor of San Francisco. I mean the governor of gosh, the mayor of San Francisco today, he's not build a Blasio, He's not. I think it's Garsetti in Los Angeles. I mean, these guys are doing a terrible job. So let's be honest about where the criticism

should be. Do I think that Bloomberg would be as good a president as Trump? No, not even close. He's horrible on a whole host of issues. And will I be absolutely as hard charging for Trump's reelection if it's Bloomberg a versus Trump as opposed to any other candidate. Sure, but Bernie Sanders is an existential threat to the economy. Let's keep it real. Bernie Sanders, it wants to do things that no sane person wants to do when it comes to economics, when it comes to healthcare, it comes

to college, when all these things. Bloomberg is actually more of what you'd expect to be an establishment Democrat platform, which is bad. But we could recover from it. You know, we could actually have a Congress that holds him in check.

And I just think it's fascinating to watch this whole thing play out, because now the Democrats who have been talking about how Republicans buy elections and all the money and politics, and it looks like they might be saved from themselves by an ultra billionaire who is doing more to buy an election than any human being in the history of this country. Who's throwing around money, personal money. Remember this is personal money. He's not raising any money.

He's just writing checks, just writing checks. He's throwing the money in a way that nobody's ever seen before, and it is amazing. Oh but speaking of the mayor Deblasio, Mayor de Blasio, who of course supported his fellow commy Bernie Sanders, de Blasio is a Sandinistas style Commi, whereas Bernie is a more old Soviet You know, Bernie is he's a purist. He's a Soviet Union style communist, as we know from where he spent his honeymoon. But here is what the current mayor of New York says about

Bloomberg Play nine. It's important for people to understand what's happening here. Bernie Sanders as creating extraordinary momentum on the ground, energy excitement because he represents change. He's been consistent about it throughout his life. Michael Bloomberg represents the status quo, and it's important to talk about it. He has used an innorting the amount of money. We've never seen anything

like it in the history of the United States. But what it is masking is a lifetime of supporting those in power. He is the epitome of the power structure in this country, and it's important for people to start understanding what he's really about, given that he's spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars to portray only one side of the story. I think it's fascinating because you have Deblasio here saying this about Bloomberg, and we know New

York City is and I speak from experience. I'm on the subway four times a day here in New York City. I mean I'm I'm out there seeing the city, you know, up close and personal all the time. I live right in the middle of Manhattan. I work in downtown Manhattan, constantly on the move. And Deblasio is destroying this place, and he's destroying this city because of social justice policies. And this is the separation that I want to with de Blasio on criminal justice reform and a whole host

of issues. But bloom Burg offers you Sweden more or less. I mean, this is a rough approximation. When Bloomberg is saying, Hey, you know, you're gonna have nanny state, big government, higher taxes, but there's still going to be a private economy that works, and we're gonna have the trains run on time and the streets will be relatively clean, and you've got somebody that is not a just a crazy idealogue in charge.

That's what he offers. That's not good, but it's not Venezuela, which is what Bernie Sanders and de Blasio offer you, which is the rapid social and economic deterioration that comes from instituting more radical Marxist policies, more purely redistributive and social justice based laws and regulations that are meant to

promote radical equality in a society. Radical equality leads to ruination because we are not in fact, when it comes to our talents, gifts, ability, hard work, etc. We are not equal in those regards where equal human beings in human dignity and in the eyes of the law. But we're not all the same in terms of how much stuff we're gonna have and how good we are things

and the choices we're gonna make and everything else. The socialists have a false promise to people that those because really the ultimate promise of socialists like Sanders is rooted in envy. They won't talk about it this way. They'll just say the other guys are so bad because they're greedy and all this other stuff. But the impulse that they capitalize on is human envy, coveting thy neighbors fill in the blank. That's what Sanders does, that's what de

Blasio does. These are people who rabble roles, who go to the darker side of human emotion, who go to the recesses of the human brain, that see other people that they think are doing. By the way, no one even really knows about how happy or truly successful. I mean, I know, I know plenty of stories personally of people that you look at it and say, oh wow, that person. Then you find out that they're struggling with some chronic elments, can barely get out of bed in the morning, and

are thinking about ending at all. And I mean, I really mean that people that you'd see are really successful and wealthy and attractive, you know, you don't know, but socialist Marxist that they don't get that. They look at this just from a a very sterile lens of If you have more than me, that's a problem. If you're better off than me, that's a problem. It's never did I make choices? Could I make different choices? Can we

both be happy? Can we both be prosperous in society without Now that that's not the way that it's viewed. It's always that there's the evil that exists is the fact that the Sanders supporter, the socialist, looks at what other people have and says, that's not fair. I should have that too, or nobody should have that, which is what it turns into, you know, nobody should have what that person has. And then eventually this and this is this is true. This is the socialist cycle that plays out.

It's played out in societies all over the world. Eventually, the class that implements that radical equality, or that that effort at radical equality, elevates itself and becomes what Gilas Milo Gilas calls is an excommunist The New Class, which is a very worthwhile book, by the way, if you ever character read it, about the elevation of the bureaucratic elite within communist societies that are supposed to be so equal until you realize the people in charge is making

things equal. They're not equal, they're above. And what Ted Cruz was pointing out in his tweet is that the ultra rich in a society like that, they want the elevation of that bureaucratic class to keep everybody else in check. But the ultra rich always find a way to stay ultra rich. It's the middle class, it's the strivers, it's the builders, it's the people that want to be better off.

They're the ones that are crushed down. They're the ones that Bernie Sanders is going to make life miserable for. But the ultra rich and the ultra dependent, they think they'll do great in a socialist America. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show Podcast Number one. One of the things that this is we knew the most difficult when they did all the all

the all the all the cross the cross tabs. Though, one of the foremost difficult states for me to win was going to be in Iowa because and they're good people. It's all white, it's all Midwestern. It's a lot of it farming and it's uh, and it was going to be it was going but we did. Okay. If you take a look at what happened there, I mean, it was kind of unusual thing that I hope doesn't happen here in terri of No No. I mean in terms of the actual running into the caucus, how how it

worked out. It really is time for Joe Biden to spend time on the pier feeding seagulls with a nice comfy blind get across his lap. It's amazing that he's still it seems that he's the only person who really

believes that he's going to be president the United States. Still, I think that he would get crushed in a general election against Now, when you say crushed the third states that are going to go Democrats, I mean you're really only talking about a difference in the electoral college that will result from a difference of a few hundred thousand votes in total. That's how that's how separate, that's how

polarized the country is. But I think that Joe Biden doesn't flip those votes toward him, And I think that the Democrats are realizing that this game they're willing to play all along, that Joe Biden was something other than what he is, which is a deeply, deeply unimpressive politician, always has been, always will be, is coming back to bite them. And that's where Bloomberg saw his opening. And it's also why Bernie Sanders is at least technically here

right now the front runner. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I don't know what he can do either, but I think the challenge is that we can't just settle for a speech or a tour of speeches asking for forgiveness.

There ought to be some effort on his path, on his pot rather to say, and therefore, I want to try and repair the damage is done by this, some kind of criminal justice initiative, some kind of effort for

those that were scarred. Stopping frisk is being raised as the primary objection of the left to vice pres I mean, to a presidential contender, Mike Bloomberg, stopping frisk, which is an interesting issue, and I've said before I think that there's a lot that you can there's a lot of discussion around whether stopping frisk is worth it or not.

The numbers would say, based on when they ended stopping frisk that at least in the immediate term, there was not a major spike in crime or homicides or shootings. But then people might also come back and say, okay,

but these things take time. And with that change in perception among the very small percentage of people who are committing most of the serious crimes, almost all of the serious crimes in any neighborhood, including minority predominant neighborhoods here in New York City, that once they believe they have greater freedom, that that criminal element within the broader society has greater freedom of movement, greater freedom of action, than

over time, that results in more crime. And look, it's a it is a broad, broad based criminal justice philosophical discussion. But I do think it's fascinating that this is the way that they're going after Bloomberg, as well as bringing up all of his old comments. But the thing about the old comments is that Democrats don't care. They really that they don't really care about and I'll tell you

this too. If they believe this is going to be such a test of what the principles of the left, if there are any what those principles are, because if they believe that the only way if the left, the Democratic Party believes the only way they can stop Trump is to get on board with a former Republican liberal billionaire from New York City who has issues like stopping frisk in his past his mayor, as well as saying, I mean he said, he said stuff about women that

you know would be a problem for a lot of candidates, I mean, Trump obviously with it. Please, you don't have to tell me. All we ever hear about is Trump's crash with women and Trump did this and the Billy Bush tape, and I please, I know all about that. I'm just saying they would raise this just because Trump has gotten attacked, And it doesn't mean other people wouldn't get attacked on those issues. But they really think or

will be willing to forget all about all this. I think they're willing to put it all aside if it means that they have their best shot to defeat defeat Donald Trump. I also think it's interesting that Bloomberg doesn't really have a home in the in the Democratic Party today based on what he thinks he can accomplish or what he would want to do that would make people have a better life, or whatever I mean here is

part of Bloomberg's. What I'm trying to illustrate here, and these are the nuances of bloomberg Ism, is that the Democratic Party has ceased to be first and foremost about what it used to pretend to be, which was helping working class people, poor people, and minorities have better lives. Now the Democratic Party has really morphed into an ideologically based activist group that seeks to destroy political rivals and then wants to foist a far left socialist agenda on

all of us. That's a different thing than you know, hey, I want to have better schools and have a little more funding for it. I mean that that was an incremental socialism. They've largely abandoned that incremental socialism, which can, at least in the short term, look like it's trying to address real problems and bring in a revolutionary new

version of American society under this umbrella of socialism. So this is a monumental shift within the Democratic Party, and so they're not speaking about things in the way that you've heard them in the past, whether they meant it or not here is a problem. How do I solve it? You know, kids aren't doing well enough in public schools. Let's put more money into public schools. Now, that doesn't solve the problem, and they're wrong. But the point is

a can go to b Now. It's kids aren't doing well enough in public schools, and let's turn the public schools into the only school system that anybody can go to, because we're going to it's so hard to actually raise any money for raise any money to go to private school for yourself, or to send anyone to charter schools. And oh, by the way, these schools are going to be indoctrination factories for the little socialists of the future, etc.

Et cetera, et cetera. Right, I It's just it's a different a different tone you could say in the Democrats today. And you know, here's, for example, what Bloomberg says about his political goals Play thirteen. I've been working on these issues of racial equality for years, and in the White House, I will bring together a diverse team to double down on that work. Everything we've ever tried to do in

public life comes from one motivation. I've always worked to help people live the longest, healthiest, most fulfilling lives they possibly can, to make the real promise of freedom and equality for everyone in our country, and to help make the world a better place for our kids, our grandkids, our neighbors, and our community. That's not what Democrat base

voters really want to hear these days. No, that's that sounds at that sounds way too old school politician want to help people lead longer, healthier, more fulfilling lives and enacting policy that will accomplish those goals. No, no no, it's not accomplishing goals, it's what feels good. What feels good to Democrats today is saying that there are thirty seven genders, that there is no such thing as there's no such thing as biological the biological determinism of sex. It doesn't

really matter. What feels good today is to reject the history of socialism destroying economies and pretend that it's never really been tried properly and we'll do it better now.

To tell people, I mean, just just go down the list of what gets the climate change is an existential threat to the whole world, and no one really is going to change their lifestyle, but through government policy that ruins the economy will save the world, even though the US is twelve percent and of overall CEO two missions. We'll get into some of the climate change craziness in a few moments. Bloomberg doesn't really have a home in

that political party. Bloomberg is not somebody who they can look to is, but they'll if they got no choice. If it's Bloomberg er Trump, will the Bernie Bros. Go along? I mean, he's certainly trying to do what he can to blunt the attacks on him regarding racism and some of the comments he's made in the past. Here's a Bloomberg pitch that you would think voters that view politics as a transactional exercise of what are you going to do for me? You'd think that this might have some residence.

But in today's Democratic Party, I do not think it will at all. Play twelve and we're going to triple the wealth of black families to substantially close the racial wealth gap. Together. Let me tell you we will get it done. I know how to do it. We did it in New York City. We can do it here.

Part of our work will involve helping more black Americans get on track to a successful career, and that means we will trip with funding for historically back colleges and universities like Alabama State, which I visited last weekend and Texas Southern just down the road here in Houston. Go Tigers. What do you mean, Boo, Go Tiger? Does anyone think that that's really gonna work from Bloomberg? I don't know.

I I doubt it. I doubt it. Bloomberg's not woke and you have to at least talk to talk when it comes to being woke to be a Democrat in good standing, at least a Democrat in good standing with

the media, with the left. So I don't know if anything will work, But I just think it's so interesting that he's he's going around saying, Hey, I want to make democrat and just Americans, but I want to people's lives better through the following initiatives, let's say, and Bertie Sanders is just promising, you know, fairy tales and nonsense. And somehow how Bernie Sanders, according to the Bernie bros. Is the one that's really gonna say, you know, that's

really going to do the most good for people. It's it's crazy, but this is where we are, and I think this is how you're going to see this continue to play out going forward. So the Bloomberg factor, he's on the d oh, I don't even mention he's on the debate stage. Tomorrow, He's gonna be on debate stage Mini, Mike, it's gonna be up there. It's like, do I really have to explain to the fellow Democrats who are kind of dumb and very very poor, even Tom sty or

Tom you're like a baby billionaire. You're not even like a real billionaire. You're like barely a billionaire. Look at that tie. It's absurd. You know, That's that's what you're gonna expect from Bloomberg on the debates. There's no way he's gonna light it up. He's saying, now we can't have medicare for all. That's crazy, it's not gonna work. Why are people he is so stupid on this stage? Why do you not? Okay, Klobe Shaw, you're not an insane person, but you're like, you know, you remind me

of like every soccer mom I've ever met. I'm sorry he was that a little sexist. Well, I'm Mike Bloomberg, I say sexist things like this is this is what you're gonna get from Bloomberg on the debate stage. It's not gonna be anything that is mind blowing. Will it really move the numbers? Who knows. But I gotta tell you this, Biden be Biden better be number one or number two in Nevada or else. He's done unless he clearly wins South Carolina. There's no I don't even know

if he. I guess he makes his super Tuesdays. He's got the money, but he's he's done. Though. This is a big one. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Now Donald Trump he thinks that climate change is hey hoax. Well, I think Donald Trump is a hoax. Oh man, feel the burn. I think that Donald Trump is a hoax. Oh snap. You know, do you remember producer producer Mark Back. I know you wouldn't remember because you were like not even a fetus yet.

I remember when I was growing there was a time when when you would say something like that, every would go, oh man, ooh that's cold. Do you ever yeah, like in school everywhere? Oh yeah, but like that's cold. You know, I don't know about that's cold. That's what everyone would say. You're old. That's what I'm saying. There was a time when you say that's cold. There was a time when in the common vernacular, people would say, oh, man, that's fat. pH At you missed that. I think, yeah, I just

got called fat. Yeah, but pH at ben that something was was cool or hip. And it turns out if you ever call something hip, you are not being cool. I've since found out. Also now I've I've been I've been chatted once or twice for saying saying lit and then two letters after it, because apparently there's two letters are naughty lit A Oh yes, yes you're not. This is a thing. But also if I say lit, now, I'm like the guy that's walking around in Dad jeans

and New Balance sneakers referring to things. Nope, I'm wearing duck shoes I have. I do have the Dad New Balance sneaker wear them often. I gotta have kids, just so I could dress like a dad all the time. I only wear New Balances though, so they're very comfortable. They're very very comfortable. You gotta have comfortable fee if you're gonna be a radio host. This is the truth. You have to walk around the city, go to the you gotta move all over the place. You gotta sit

here and do your thing. But anyway, so so Bernie is, oh man, he's got that sick burn. See what I did there, sick burn against Trump calling him a hoox on the climate change thing. I'm never gonna let this go, Bill Nye. The so called science guy has an undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering. That's it, doesn't have a PhD, doesn't have an MD. The science guy is as much of a science expert as anybody that has an undergraduate degree in math or science field, which is fine, but

not only that impressive. But he goes on TV and because he has a bow tie and people know him as the science guy, because he used to play with beakers and I know, syringes and whatever else. They don't know whatever the stuff is he used to do in high school biology class. He goes on TV and he's attacking eph chief of staff for her. Well, here, I'll let him make his own stupid comments. Play clip aith please. The other thing that I find striking about she and

her husband, Missakara, is they have two kids. They have two young kids, and they're going to inherit this earth, and they're going to have to interact with their parents when their parents have been strong advocates of putting more carbon dioxide in there, and what they do, are you a common in the environment the people that they have hired the Environmental Protection Agency of Way concluding mister Wheeler is confused or try to blur the idea that carbon dioxide,

although not a traditional pollutant, is a problem. Carbon dioxide is the problem. Yes, methane is a problem. Some other greenhouse gastles are the problem, but because there is so much carbon dioxide, it is the main thing that we need to address. I promise you there is no there's no future in which normal kids will grow up and say, Mom, Dad, why didn't you stop all the CO two from happening?

But this is what the science guy is going on TV saying that an EPA senior EPA official is going to have to deal with, you know, her kids one day looking at her saying how could you not have done more to stop all the CO two in the air? America is only as I've said, I think it's twelve percent now of of global CO two emissions. Put us for a moment whether or not the whole climate change catastrophism is real based on the science, I tell you it's not. And I just point to them being wrong

all that. They're just wrong all the time. They just keep being wrong, keep being wrong, keep being wrong. But it's kind of like Democrats about Trump. They they're wrong, they're wrong, they're wrong, but none nothing ever changes. I can't admits that they're wrong. I can't admit that they're really not that smart, not that clever, and certainly not wise. That's way, that's way to way too much at this point. So that's why you have the same thing with the

climate catastrophist. They'll keep saying, oh, how you know this time around, we've got the all the scientists agree with us. Well, but what about this scientist he doesn't agree. Oh, that person is paid off by the fossil fuel. It's always it's the same routine, all the time. But Bill ny is telling you that one day you'll have to stare at your kids, and I just wonder if those kids will look at you and say, how dare you? How dare you? Yeah, because you're responsible for all the co

two in the world. This is how much how much dumber? Can a comment really be And this is why you know, I'm sorry, but I get I get annoyed every day that I have to throw out throw out my garbage at home, my apartment here New York City, and I have to separate out all this different recycling. Now, it's such a waste of time, it's so dumb. It's not even good for the environment. It doesn't do anything. I'm

never gonna let this go. We are we are ruled by idiots when it comes to climate change, environmentalism, and because of that, we care less about things. We spend less time on real issues that affect the environment. You know, we spend less time. And what is really in our water and some of these urban cities is we know we got problems when it comes to clean drinking water, but we don't focus on that. And also what's in the air never mind CEO two, how about like coronavirus particles.

You know, there's stuff to be really concerned about and where dollars that are going to the scientific community should be focused. But instead of focusing on that, what do we have? Oh, climate change? Bill Knight. Bill Knight wears a bow tie, so clearly he must be really smart. Clearly he must know a lot of things. That's you know, what he learned from his undergrad degree in engineering. Thanks

for listening to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Team, I have some breaking news here. Courtesy of ABC. President Trump is expected to commute the sentence of former Illinois Governor Ron Blogoyevich via multiple senior sources. They'll have more on this. Look at that. President Trump may say that blog may let Rob Blagoevich out. Even remember,

this is not a pardon. This would be a commutation, and a commutation just means that there's a lessening of the punishment attached to the sentence. It does not do anything to the actual guilty verdict or the sentence and rights. Your rights are not fully restored after a commutation. I believe maybe maybe the President has the ability to do that too, if they if he specifies it. But you really, just your sentence is end. That's what tends to happen.

All right, You've served ten years. You're out now, even though you had a twenty years sentence. Bligoyevich has been in prison for eight years for you know, interesting circumstances. Exactly what was that he was going to sell a sentence seat? They said, talking about a quid pro quo. Um, But I thought this, this is this is very interesting. Um. There doesn't seem to be any good explanation to me of why Bligoyevitch should still be in prison much longer.

It doesn't seem to me. You know, I think the guy has suffered enough. The guy's got good hair too. I'll put that out there, so well, we might have more for you later in the day on this one, and I think that that's well. I might not, but we'll have more for you on this tomorrow if it actually ends up happening. Well that I wanted to talk to you about something that I just find interesting. I

thought about going into some detail. I'll hear about the latest on all the coronavirus cases, and I just see right now you're getting up to seventy thousand confirmed cases. People are saying it is considerably more deadly than the flu. You know, it's really tough to know if this is going to spread well beyond China. I know there are cases outside of China right now, or if this will

be relatively contained, and I don't know how much. I don't know how much the policy should change without knowing that there's a much greatly enhanced risk parameter from where we already are. I think that unfortunately, the media gets caught in this game of well, informing people about the risks to the maximum degree, you're kind of covering yourself,

and so that's good. But then also by making the risk perhaps seem even greater than it is, there there's a bit of an incentive for the media to do that because then they can get attention, and there's been media. Media likes attention, Media likes people to watch their shows, click on their stuff, listen to them. So I do think that there's a little bit of a of an incentive there that does not necessarily go in the public interest. So I don't have much for you on coronavirus today.

I did have something some thoughts on a couple of issues of science hashtag science. We were just talking about that before with Bill Nye, the science guy, and Bernie Sanders and people that really try to abuse science for political reasons, which is always troubling, and the scientific community is I think increasingly under pressure in a lot of ways to go along with cultural fads and go along with political dictates instead of this is what it is.

I mean science. We like to think of science and math we really to think of as areas where there are answers, there are truths. There's not my truth or our truth, there's just truth, which I would say that's the case no matter what field we're talking about, but certainly with math, right, four plus four what is it equal again? Oh, that's right, four plus four equals eight. There's only one answer to that question that's not four plus four equals two million. And this is that very

very straightforward statement. If there's a right and there's a wrong extends. We'd like that to extend throughout science. But it's a lot more complicated than that. That brings me to some very interesting studies done out of the UK about how long term offenders, so people that have been criminal offenders stretching from you know, from childhood all the way into adulthood, have different brain structures, observably physically different structures in their brain from people who are not long

term offenders. This has been a field of study that has been getting attention for a while. But there's always this tension that I will get into a moment about how far the science is allowed to go. Oh here, but here's just what the uh. This is a study done in the UK, and it's you know, they they've been they've been looking at whether you should be concerned if you have an adolescent particularly we're talking about adolescent

males here, because it's right men. We're never allowed to discuss men and women as different in some areas until it comes to things like criminality, where we realize that violent crime is essentially overwhelmingly as a problem of public policy. Violent crime is a male issue, meaning not that the victims are all male, but the people perpetrating violent crimes

are over ninety percent mail. All right, so men are the ones that engage in violent crime, not always, but over you know, there are all these shows people love to watch, these shows about you know, like you know, women, women who kill. There it's like they're always they're always poisoning their husbands too, which is really unsettling. That's not the way that I'd want to go, like slow poisoning

or things like that. Or it gets violent when they get the the lover involved, you know, and he tries to be a part of the whole plot to get rid of the husbands. They can get the life insurance money. So anyway, the study that they that they're talking about here this isn't. The Guardian, which is a left wing paper in the UK, looked at this and saw that if you are a teenage offender, essentially adolescent males can

break the law and it's unlikely. You know, it's clear that they are much less likely to be criminals into adulthood than people who are problems early on in childhood. Research will say quote. They find that adults with a long history of offenses show striking differences in brain structure compared with those who have stuck to the straight and narrow or who transgressed only as adolescence. These findings underscore prior research that really highlights that there are different types

of young offenders. They are not all the same, They should not all be treated the same. It could well have just been that life course persistent group were choosing to lead their lives in a difficult way and could have chosen differently. I think what we see with this data is that they're actually operating under some handicap at the level of the brain. She said, adding that while such individuals may have committed serious crimes, the study suggested

a level of compassion was needed. Think about what this would do now. By the way, this study only looked at white males, which is interesting. They only that was the only group they were allowed to study in this way. And this is telling us what people who look at at this particular part of science, people who look at neurology and the functioning of the brain, have been basically hinting at for a long time, which is that there are differences in brain structure that an for a whole

bunch of things, including aggression intelligence. How do you measure intelligence? Some people measure it as Q, and this thing goes into people talking about I Q and the which is obviously a different The acronyms don't line up. At the point is that there's measurable cognitive ability. And this gets

into some very interesting public policy areas. You know, we somehow understand that we have different physical abilities, right, And this is something that I've talked to many of my friends about how when I was a kid, I thought, man, if I if I just trained hard enough, maybe I could be a world class this or a world class athlete. I think the answers for most people, that's not true. There are some people that do have the physical ability and train that hard and therefore and they do become

world class athletes. But you know, I was never going to be an All star NBA player, no matter how many jump shots I practice growing up. That was never going to happen. I just didn't have the physicality for it. It wasn't. So we understand that there's God given gifts, God given talents that are physical, that are that are actually something that you uh, you know, you inherit it from your parents essentially, that that you've gotten lucky genetically

in this way. But we all also want to we won't. We want to believe that brain structure that we all kind of start from the same basic you know, basic slate, that we're all we all have the same kind of brain, all of our brains have equal capacity, and it's just how hard you study. That's not true, that that's not that doesn't make sense. That would be illogical and it's not scientific. And once you start getting into different none that's not to say that you know, everybody shouldn't read it.

You know, this is just like everything else, you want to be the healthiest you can be. Some people are born and just naturally very healthy. Other people have health issues to overcome. But everyone wants to be as healthy as they can be. So it doesn't change your approach to any of this. But when you look at brainst and brain structures start to have associations with specific behaviors, notably violence and criminality, people get very uncomfortable even measuring this.

Looking into this, now, some liberal researchers in this in the medical field here are going to take away from this that, well, there's there should be greater I mean here, here's at the bottom quote. It's true that these researches are consistent. Research findings are consistent with the hypothesis that life course persistent anti social behavior arises as a result of abnormal brain development. Um. But and then there's then they get into how there should be greater compassion as

a result of this. So there is a liberal mentality that says, well, if we can measure let's say, violent anti When they say anti social behaviors, they mean people that are that are causing problems for other people, often through violence or or threats of violence. So if we can measure violence as a function of brain structure. Then then we start to ask the question, Okay, should we

do that? Do we do that? Dude? Do you start to look at this now when you have somebody at a young age who's been arrested a few times at a very young age, and see if this is and what do we do with that information? And do we start to collect that information and large enough numbers that you have aggregate data and then you start to look you know this is This begins to get us toward very similar debates about IQ, where now we are we are told that really IQ measuring is out of style.

To say, the least you know to measure IQ is to start to trapes around in areas where we are told that that's not worth it, and it's wrong and it's not exact, and people will be judged based on this. There's a lot we could know about the human brain and the functioning of the human brain and what it means for social policy public policy if we were willing to pursue these things and just get the answers. But the truth is, there are a lot of reasons why

we don't just want answers. There are political sensitivities to measuring and mapping out brain function that come into play very quickly. And some of this has been seen before. And as I said, the IQ debate and how that turns into IM and just you can listen to it was fascinating to listen to a debate on a podcast between now I should I don't want to ever give

this guy a podcast shout Actually he's horrible. But as Recline and Sam Harris, who's actually a neuroscientist, and they were talking about IQ, and Klein effectively just wants to sit there and just say that Harris talking about IQ

and aggregate population differentials in IQ is racist. And Harris is like, I'm an actual scientist and I understand the data and I've looked at this and I'm trying to have an adult conversation about what the implications are of the research of the science that we have, and as our clients just sits there and kind of goes, yeah, yeah, yeah, racist. And that's this sum total of where that conversation goes. And that's just discussing IQ and disparate IQ, disparate IQ

levels among aggregate groups, among groups in the aggregate. Right, So you can imagine. And this also came up with with the book The Bell Curve, where even raising the issue of IQ and IQ in the mean for different groups, I mean, the average for different groups was for all eternity, Charles Murray is branded by the left as a racist even for it's one chapter in the book The Bell Curve.

Once you start looking into brain structure and effect on violence, everyone becomes very Everyone just becomes very tense about this. And you're going to continue to see this. They're just going to be areas where do we even want science to get us answers? Or would we as a society, or you know, would we just rather not know certain things?

These are these are real questions. I mean when when they started looking at this, I mean, imagine if they could scan your kid's brain and let you know, at you know, age eight, your kid has a propensity for violence. Would you want to know that? Would would you want to hear that? And what do we do about it? And then you get into do you medicate preemptively to try to address those brain structures? And there's a there's a lot here that once you start to open this up,

you can see, I mean's fascining the human brain. There's so much that we don't know. It's such an amazing system, but it's also tissue at the same time, and once they're talking about measuring gray matter and the differential and behavior from measurable gray matter, you know, thickness of gray matter in certain parts of the brain. Fascinating stuff, also very combustible stuff. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is

the Buck Sexton Show podcast. And then in the same morning, I'm sitting there drinking my coffee as I am known to do, and I see and I'm thinking about the brain and human brain mapping and all the different implications of it, and I see this piece the food that helps battle depression. The brain is not very well understood. It's it's still something that you know, we we think that science really has figured this out. People just assume, oh, yeah,

because we can, Hey, we can map the brain. But there's a lot about the brain that we don't understand. And there's also a lot of just about food that we don't understand. And I'm somebody maybe it's a surprise for somebody who's in the conservative media space to be as interested in not alternative explanations of health phenomenon that

currently lack explanation, you know. I mean, there are so many different conditions and medical issues you go in for and you ask doctors and they may have a way to treat it, and then I know what it is, but they don't really know what causes it. They don't really know how you got to this point. And when you get into psychiatry and brain body connection, people who work in the field will tell you that it's certainly

there and everyone knows it, right. I mean, you know, you get really bad news, you'll feel physical manifestations of that. Well that that clearly shows that the brain can control. You know, you feel it in your gut. You know, you feel gut punch when you hear something really bad. Food is something that we all have this relationship with what we need it. We like it, I mean I like it more than most. We need it. We like it. We know that it's it tastes or it can taste

good and you can give us pleasure. We need it for sustenance, but it also plays much a much larger role in health than I think a lot of people don't generally think. Right, it's just oh, I eat enough food, I have enough calories, I'm getting enough food. Well, the different types of food can affect whether or not you're more susceptible to certain diseases. And you know there's all these promises. Man, oh, you know, drink like pomegranate juice.

You'll never have it'll help with your heart. I mean, yeah, not really, that's not how it works. But overall, food choices really make a difference. And this food that helps battle depression piece I thought was very interesting. They're looking more and more into just can changes in diet affect the neurochemistry of the brain so that it's an effective treatment for people who mean depression is in the brain.

It is a real thing. People that have never dealt with mental illness or been around somebody who has mental illness, it can be tough for them to understand this. But there's a problem in the machine. It'd be like saying my computer has a virus, but that's not really a thing because the computer I can still type the keys, it still comes on, it still has lights. Yeah, but the internal functioning of it, something has gone off, has gone wrong. Food maybe an alternative way to at least

help with depression. And there's certainly no side effects to eating healthier food. And basically the article says that something along the lines of the Mediterranean diet, which is just lots of fruits and vegetables, healthy oils and fats, nuts and you know, fish and lean proteins basically, and they say whole grains. I can't really have green because the

Celiac disease. That might help with depression. And we're just in the early stages of understanding this too, So I mean, eat a cheeseburger, but also maybe have a salad sometime too, and see if it helps you feel a little bit better. Thanks for listening to the bus sets in show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts like Soft Butter on Warm Toast. Time to spread some freedom coast to coast. It's time

for roll Call. Roll Call Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton, Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you want to email us, go to Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. Let's keep that roll call box full, my friends, We'll get through a lot of it. I got producer Mark actually now he's the wrangler of roll Call, so he makes sure that we get print outs of it now and I get to more of it than I usually would. We've also expanded our time because we don't we're not

taking live calls these days. We do a lot of role calls, so your voices can be heard here on the show and there we there, we have it. Um, let's get to it. Daniel Buck love the show. I've been listening since your first Rush Limbaugh fill in. I've always thought of you as almost a brother with all the office base, Big Trouble, Little China and Diehard references. That was until today. How have you not seen Band

of Brothers? It is on par with, if not better than, Saving Private Ryan watching Peaky Blinders and go back and watch Band of Brothers. Also, Bernie should hire Commie Bear as a campaign manager. Shields, Shields High, and never forget it's all in the reflexes, Daniel. To be fair, I have seen a couple of episodes of Band of Brothers and it is very, very very good. So I have not seen all of it. I shouldn't have said I haven't seen it. I haven't seen all of it. I've

seen a couple of episodes. I should go back and finish it. It's just it's it has been a while. Yeah, Peaky Blinder season five. I'm actually in Narcos right now, Producer Mark, have you not seen Narcos? Did we already talk about this? You've not seen Narcos? Right? I started it and I was kind of like boring to me at first, so I just wow, stopped. Maybe I only saw the first episode or two Ideosmo, you need to go back and push through that. Man, I'm telling you,

it's that it's really good. I have to you know, the real story of Pablo Escobar, Like, yeah, of course, Okay, looked into it. Yeah, but I'm just saying, like the stuff that happens because they stay pretty the first two seasons really just about Paulo Lesbar and then they expand it out to the overall drug trade with Polly Cartel and then Mexico. I think you would like to have you seen probably would too. Have you seen The Wire? I started that too and never finished it. But that

was a long time ago. The Wire was when I was a child. That's true, but it does hold up from what I've heard. Yeah, I would I would recommend. Yeah, I would say first Narcos because it's a little more current, but The Wires are a great show too. What is your favorite show of all time? Do you have one? I mean, where are we going? Genre like comedy? You know, I mean you can't put a sitcom up against the dramama drama? Are you like on the Shield guy? Well,

breaking bad? No? No, we agree on this, Okay, Yeah, it's the best show of all time. I think that's fair. I think it's the best show of all time for for a drama. Do you what's your favorite comedy? Seinfeld? We talked about this, Yeah, and I'm like, like a total savage ipre for friends, which is completely I know, it's unacceptable, it's unacceptable, it's unsophisticated. It's a bad thing. I mean, I would agree with you, but yeah, but

I mean I know. Yeah. So so there's that. Paul Hey Buck, I am surprised I've never heard a steak aficionado like you mentioned. Try tip. It's hard to find outside of the People's Republic of California, but properly done, it can hold its own against a porterhouse. Next time you're in La, find a good three to four pound one, Find a friend with a grill, and follow Bobby Flay's grilling instructions, especially the resting time. Not only will it be reverse yere tender, but you can do cold sandwiches

for a week after. Also got to say shields, Hi, thank you? All right? Cool? Yeah? Man, I've never have you ever had tried tip? I've never heard a tried tip. I've heard of it. I don't know if I've had it. Yeah, that's what I've never had it. I made last night, for the first time ever, a red wine sauce, red wine pan sauce for yeah. Oh yeah, I made a red wine. I was home alone. I figured I got a little time. I had some leftover red wine my parents over on Sunday, A beautiful meal. I actually could

so Sunday night I cooked. Am I getting in trouble if I said that I ate Veal? I feel like people are gonna get mad at me. But I've had it right, It's delicious. I'm sorry that it's a baby cow, but it is delicious. Maybe I do need to listen to the anti milk lobby. So anyway, I had veal piccata, So hopefully I'm not going to have Peter throw paint on me when I walk out of the studio. Today. But it was amazing, man. I mean, Peccata is like, when you do it right, that that butter sauce with

those capers is out of this world. To get the fresh herbs. So I made that the form and for mom and Dad had a great time, a very very lovely company. We had a whole group come together. And then I had some leftover stuff and so last night I had a steak that I pulled out of the freezer and made a little bit of a I guess it's a border Les sauce. It's really worth it if you get a little bit of red wine and you

do that sauce properly. It's so easy. You just need shallots, red wine, plenty of butter, a little bit of fresh herbs and you're good to go. Man, I mean you're salt and pepper. I really think this YouTube page is going to work. Yeah, and my mom has been saying that you really should just start doing like cookie and talking about this stuff like is your apartment kitchen big enough to get cameras? Yeah. I've actually talked to a friend of mine and setting it up. I feel like

we could do this. But what we do is i'd have you over. For example, one if we could get the camera set up and I cooked dinner and we would talk about things as I'm cooking, and then we cut it up and make the show, and I have other people from the political world come in and we'd, you know, and I'd make them dinner because I have a kind of an island, you know, an island kitchen setup, small, but it's there's an island, and so someone can sort of sit there at a stool while I'm you know,

making the stuff, and I turn around and anyway, it'd be kind of fun. It'd be like every other cooking show, except you talk about politics exactly. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, that's true. We talk about politics crushing libs while crushing black peppers, all that good stuff. Bill, hey buck, It's not Hillary's choice whether or not she'll be Bloomberg's running mate. One thing I've learned about the Clintons is they are always for sale. If Bloomberg believes she is the one,

he can definitely afford to pay the price. As a side note, the okay yeah memes will be hilarious. Thank you so much, Bill, I do appreciate that. And yeah, no, I think that's we're in a different realm of buying people off. When we're talking about Bloomberg money, Bloomberg is like, do what I want, I'll change your life. Money. That's

a new thing. That's a different thing. Maureen, Hey, buck As always love your show, but I've been scared and perplexed by your insistence that you want Bernie to win the nomination. AOC backs Bernie, and if her guy wins the nomination, that will only empower and embolden her and her ilk even more, and their voices will be even more strident than they are already. Plus there's always a chance he'd actually win. The Dems do cheat, you know. So then what for America you scare me with this Bush?

Please explain Biden would be easier for Trump to beat. Also, why do you think Bloomberg will agree to one term? I've never heard him say that. And do you honestly think Clinton's ego will allow her to accept the number two spot? I sure don't. Other than those two rather bizarre things, I agree with you in every other way about what you think in share with all of us, which keeps us safe and warm at night. All right, Maureen,

Thank you? Maureen's She's fired up on these points. She's I don't want to let her down, Okay, I want Bernie to win the nomination just because I want because I'm very confident that Trump would beat him in a general election, and I would I would bet. I would bet a pretty large sum of money for me on that I know where to go to do that bet. So I feel very confident that Trump would be Bernie.

And I also think that the country should see where the Democratic Party really is, and that Bernie Sanders as the Democrat nominee as a socialist would finally force us to deal with the fact that the Democratic Party is really a socialist party. As for Bloomberg agreen to one term, that's not a I'm just hypothesizing now, that was completely That was me doing what I make fun of a lot of pundits for doing constantly, I try to do it less, which is just speculating, right that he could

do this Hillary. He could ask Hillary, she could say yes, and Bloomberg could say he's going to do one term. But you know what it could have should I mean, I don't know if any of that stuff is going to happen. So do I think Hillary's ego would let her. Yeah, I think Hillary would rather be vice president to be wandering around the woods drinking chardonnay and thinking about yoga class. I think that she would rather be a vice president

than that. I don't think that she has any interest in, you know, just being sort of like a you know, hanging out, being a grandma and all that. So, yeah, that's what I think about that. Ike John Deere is high tech information technology. Bloomberg and AOC are completely out

of touch with where their food comes from. Well, I know, man, and it's you know, it was not a strong moment from Bloomberg, even though his comments were a little look, he's a smug, condescending jerk, but they were a little bit misrepresenting his comments and that whole thing so because he was really talking about agriculture through human history, and agriculture in a thousand BC was not particularly sophisticated. Right.

It's a different thing now than it was then, but you could argue it was sophisticated for its time because it was what was feeding people. Earnest Buck, you mentioned parasite on the show while your producer was talking about trained to bussan. Both are engaging and go far beyond the type of film they appear to be on the surface. Parasite was translated incredibly well, but what made it great

were the constant plot twists blended with comedy. I felt it was an introspective movie, making you ask yourself whose side you're on. Don't want to give it away, all right, Ernest, I will check out Parasite for sure. Trained to Busan probably not, because I find that really violent, scary movie stuff doesn't really sit well with me. Um, I'm not a scar I'm not a scary movie guy. No, Producer Brandon when he when he comes in here to hang

out is all about it. You're not You're not a horror movie guy either, right, that's not I'm not rucer Mark is not all Brandon sitting the seat for three days and this is what happens every time with that fail. He brings up some horrific Oh yeah, of course, yeah, yeah, no, you know he's told me on movies. He's like, he's like, no, Buck, I don't think you should watch that movie. And I'm like, uh, whoa, Okay, He's like, I've watched this. It's absolutely horrifying. Don't watch it. Yeah, No,

he's in it. He told me that his girlfriend likes Dave Matthews a lot and that that was almost a deal breaker, which is hilarious because I like Dave Matthews too, So I'm glad that he got past that. What's wrong with Matthews? He hates Dave Matthews. He's he's an interesting dude. Man. He's got you know, he's got a lot of tats. He loves guns and roses, and he loves horror movies. Like that's kind of you know, you put those things together.

Person has their thick Yeah. Ever, ever, everyone's got that thing. I mean, I'll have to sit here and talk about making you know, red wine reductions. So yeah, we got we go. While I'm watching sports. Yeah, how is by the How is Producer Marks Healthy Diet coming along? Uh? Completely down the tube? Oh yeah, well that's what happens when you're laid up for a few days. Yeah you

want ice cream? Yeah. But in general, though, I mean, like get back to you know, when I moved a couple of weeks, I'll have a gym right right in the building. You know, Producer Mark's going to be closer to the hut, which would be greats you know, that'll work everyone. Yeah, exactly is this is gonna be fair. We're all gonna be a good boot around here. I should have just told you that I was moving. No, No, this is great. It's like early Christmas present for me now.

But yeah, I've been doing I've been actually getting the gym war and doing dead lifts. And the problem I find is that when you do compound lifts, while they're very effective, I am I'm an old man. Now I'm tired the next like the next day I'm actually fatigued. Sure, it's not really the day of, it's the next day that I'm actually I'm tired to lift back to back days. Well, no I know, but I'm saying the next day I'm tired, like I don't want to do work, I don't want

do anything. I'm actually I'm not tired, like I'm sore. I have no energy. Just get into a routine, then you won't be and do cardio in between. We're just drinking enough coffee. I just can't be that guy. I can't be that guy who's on the elliptical. You can't go to the gym and just be on the elliptical for a half hour and go home the elliptical guy. Are you friends with the elliptical guy. I'm the elliptical guy. Sometimes I like it better than the treadmill. All right, fine,

producer Mark says, okay to the elliptical guy. I feel better now, Sarah. All right, Buck, you are awesome, Sarah, you are very kind on the coronavirus. Have you listened to war Room Pandemic. They've been reporting on the coronavirus for almost three weeks. It seems to be pretty bad for China, maybe not as bad for the US, but I worry about how this will affect the economy. Keep being awesome. Yeah, the war Room guys, I mean, I've met Steve Bannon once or twice. Obviously, I know Rahim

Kassam very well. He's a friend of mine, a great guy. I have not heard their pandemic podcast, but I will check it out. I don't think it's gonna be that big of a deal for America, but it's obviously already a big deal in China. The guy who runs the hospital in Wuhan, which is the center of this whole outbreak,

he's dead from the virus. So that's troubling. That's one part of being a healthcare provider that i've I used to think that I wouldn't be okay with being a doctor because I wouldn't want to see like the blood and the guts stuff. But then I think about how someone comes in and they say, oh, and forget about coronavirus is in general, if I was a nurse or

a doctor, I don't know if it's medical tech. The person who comes in and takes your readings initially, and someone's breathing in their face, who says that they think they have the flu, Like, don't they get the flu? I mean, aren't they really at risk for getting all these I wouldn't like that. I'm a tiny bit of a hypochondriac. Not that bad, but I definitely I do not like getting sick. That's the most obvious statement ever. No one likes getting sick. Good job, Peter. Watch Beetlejuice

both movie and Broadway show. The Broadway show takes from both the movie and the cartoon. It was amazing. Train to Bussan was okay better than most zombie movies. In my opinion, there are only two good zombie movies, Zombie Land and Planet Terror. Zombies are frankly boring and ridiculous. Give me a good alien alien invasion or a vampire movie. Well, Peter, what's the best alien invasion movie? What's the best vampire movie? Man?

You can't leave us on the edge like that. And I would say that my favorite zombie movie is the I think it's the Romero directed where they're all stuck in the mall. Do you know what I'm talking about, Producer Mark them Dawn. I think it's Dawn of the Dead where Ving Raimes is in it and they're stuck in a mall. That's a very watchable zombie movie that I think is well executed. Twenty eight Days Later is

also a very good, very terrifying zombie movie. The whole innovation of that is what if the zombies run really fast instead of going I walked so slowly. I don't think they say that when they walk, but I'm on radio, so otherwise I was just going to be doing a zombie thing with my hands. And unless you're watching this on Pluto TV, gosh, Pluto TV channel two forty eight, the first you would not have seen my my, my

zombie impression. Uh yeah, zombies don't talk. Buck, Michael Buck, you probably knew this was coming when you said none of us can build a computer? Well, what, who exactly did you mean? Seeing that I am a graduate student researcher in the Electrical and Computer engineering department, I am perfectly capable of building a computer, just saying, Also, why am I not in the middle of reading a history

book by the great author Buck Sexton as always shields high. Well, Michael, hopefully if we get stuck on the island after a three hour tour, you'll be able to make the computer out of the coconuts. You know what I mean? You got to have a scientist, and I want I'm a I was, Yeah, I was always a Merry Anne fan too. Forget Ginger, Ginger's trouble, Ginger's high maintenance, Mary Anne was Where was that? Did he build a coconut computer? Yeah?

He would build like a radio radio out of cocon Yeah. Yeah, like he would build things out of coconuts. I did not watch Gillion Island, obviously, you were not not even close to a live Yeah, but I saw some of it. But you can tell me, you know Ginger or Marry Anne. I feel like that tells you a lot about a guy. I'm a Merry Anne guy, all right, Ginger's trouble, Ginger's trouble.

All right. That's gonna be the show for today. If you can check out what I'm gonna say on w o R seven ten am here in New York City Tonight six pm, Shields Hie