Melania Crushes Leftist Loon

great American again. The Buck Sexton Show begins Analyst sadly, but with confidence and humility, with allegiance to our founders, and are heart full of love for America. Today, I am asking our chairman to proceed with articles of impeachment. I commend our committee chairs and our members for their somber approach to actions which I wish the President had not made it necessary, and signing the Declaration of Independence,

our founders invoked a firm reliance on divine providence. Democrats too, are prayerful, and we will proceed in a manner worthy of our oath of office to support and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic, So help us God. Welcome to the Box Section show. They're impeaching Trump, just like I said they would, just like I've been saying they would for over a year now. Really no surprise. The best part of this, though, this

was Nancy Pelosi's announcement this morning. Was just the way that the Democrats try to set all this stuff up with a heart full of love for America, divine providence, a somber approach, prayerful about this terrible thing we have to do to President Trump that we just we really don't want to do. I mean, we've been talking about it since the day he won the election, but we we really don't want to do it. Oh no, what are we going to do? My friends? This is an

important reminder. This is what we're up against. The Left pretends that they care about the process. They can, They pretend that they want to protect institutions, and they tear institutions down. They burn the village down in order to save it, so to speak. And this is a perfect example of it. I mean that hearing yesterday I went on for hours and hours and hours and hours. Some of it I was able to talk to you about on the show, but it was still going till almost

six thirty Eastern. I think last night, I mean the hearing, and I will give credit to a fellow on Bret Bear's pennel last night who said what was obvious but needed to be said. The whole hearing meant nothing. It was an absurdity. There's a waste of everybody's time, except for perhaps the academics who used it as an opportunity to audition for MSNBC and CNN contributor jobs, and that I think they were successful in doing that. I think

is quite is quite clear. Let's just get into a bit of it because there's obviously the political implications here. And by the way, we're not going to spend the entire show today talking about impeachment. I know there are other things. So for those of you who are already tired of it, and look, I get tired of it because it's so obvious what Nancy Pelosi and Schiff and the rest of the Democrats are up to here and Nadler, it's so clear the game that they're playing and the

brazenness of the dishonesty from them. It's it's tough to take digging and down Nancy Pelosi. Oh, we're prayerful. We don't want to do the Come on, who is so stupid that they believe Nancy Pelosi when she says that? And so if no one believes her, why say it? I mean, it's just all a show. I mean, these people really are crazy and they've turned into a pack of loons. You can't reason with them. It was a fantastic piece by my friend David Harsanyi, who is great

when he calls it. He's fantastic writer, really good guy. He calls in. He was like, yeah, I don't know, politics is a crazy thing. He's got a little bit of a laid back almost. He's almost like the surfer dude of Denver, though now he lives in DC. He's very chill about these things he wrote. He just wrote a piece touching on what I was saying, yes or not what I said, but the same subject matter that these professors clowned themselves. I mean you had some of

them saying things that are just outrageous. I mean they're just dumb. It's it's not something that you could hold as an opinion and be considered an intelligent person or an honest person anyway. I mean they were trying to say that this president thinks that he's a monarch. Even play yeah, this was Professor Gerhardt Play nine. What matters in determining whether particularly misconduct consutes a high crime and misdemeanor is ultimately the context and the gravity of the

misconduct in question. After reviewing the evidence that's been made public, I cannot help but concluded that this president has attacked each of the Constitution's safeguards against establishing a monarchy in this country. Both the context and gravity of the president's mist conduct are clear a monarchy, he says. This president, at best is going to have four more years in office.

This president has been willing to abide by universal injunction set by left wing activist judges on the federal bench who in bad faith shut down executive power well beyond what should be their purview and their reach, just because their hashtag resistance. This President's a monarch, please, Monarchs do whatever they want. This president has to deal with insane liberals who refuse to let him actually be president because they refuse to accept that he won the presidency. This

is where all this comes from. That simple fact liberals are still in a state of denial, the left, the Dems, the socialists. Let's start using that word more, by the way, it should be used more in the context of talking about our political opponents. Or they are socialists, they are collectivists, they are statists, they are all of these things. They can call themselves Democrats as their official party name, but they're a socialist party, and why should we have to

pretend that they're not. But they are socialists who believe in different layers and levels of capitalism within their economy, but they want overall control of it all, and they want to be able to redistribute wealth, and they want to use taxation not just for social engineering, but also for addressing the imbalances of a society making it more equitable, essentially appealing to envy, which, while bad for economies, is

good politics. There are a lot of envious people. Unfortunately, there's no shortage of those who are bitter that things have not worked out the way that they wanted them to. People can vote the intend to vote Democrat. So here we are now faced with the reality that we've all known was coming. Nancy Pelosi saying that they're going to put forward articles of impeachment. They're going to impeach his presidents.

This is when I had even my friends were ahem and Sean Davis on earlier this week, I said, guys, I mean I'm still ninety five percent. I'm really one hundred percent certain. I mean you got to say you're maybe ninety nine percent certain because we could be invaded by space aliens tomorrow. You know, no one really knows the future. But this was effectively a certainty because if the Democrats had backed Office and pushed for a censure vote, that would have been an admission that they didn't have

the goods. And if they didn't have the goods, why would they put us through this process? Why the rush? Why the disrespect of the Constitution while claiming to be upholding and defending the Constitution. We should all find this to be simply disgusting, but it is what we have to do with. Oh no offense. Eeldman, who looked like he was auditioning for the role of a professor from the Harry Potter movies. He was up there as well,

talking about monarchy and dictatorship yesterday. These people are absurd, They're they're hysterics. Play thirteen. Please. The abuse of power occurs when the president uses his office for personal advantage or gain. That matters fundamentally to the American people, because if we cannot impeach a president who abuses his office for personal advantage, we no longer live in a democracy. We live in a monarchy, or we live under a dictatorship.

That's why the Framers created the possibility of impeachment. Okay, so this person is a moron. He's a tenured professor of law at Harvard's all. He's a moron. I don't care. I don't care what he's done within this system and how he's tried to impress people within that system to get to this purchase. He does not have basic critical thinking ability that is necessary for good judgment in a

realm as complicated as the law. He's really just a partisan who talks the talk and walks the walk, and so he's been able to accelerate himself saying, look at Lawrence Tribe, another professor, Lawrence Tribe is a lunatic. Look at his Twitter account. This guy's trying to teach future generations of lawyers. Law schools now are churning out little activist libs who don't really understand the foundational precepts of law in this country, or even law in general. Why

does law exist? What is the law? They don't know Socrates, they know social justice Warrior. This is a big problem. He says that where if you can't impeach somebody to monarchy or a dictatorship. And then I also love how Schiff pointed out and by the way, no one is claiming that you cannot impeach Trump. No one says that you cannot do this. It's just ridiculous to do it.

It's absurd, it's an abuse of power. And one of my favorite moments in the entire area yesterday was when Professor Jonathan Turley, who's the only one not a Trump voter, by the way, wanted to bring the Bush administration up on war crimes. I mean, he's a left of center guy, but he's not totally nuts. He's smart and not totally Trump deranged. He said, you're going to make You're going

to make something. Now, this is the claim that Democrats have that because Trump, as the executive branch head, is saying, all right, you want to take my executive branch people, we're coequal branches of government. We'll see you in court. We'll see you in court now, which has been the standard until very recently that everybody accepted, is now itself an impeachable offense. The attempt to push back against the left tyranny is used by the tyrants as evidence that

their tyranny is justified. That is what we are up against. Professor Turley just said, you can't. You're abusing to Congress, you're abusing your power. Gets say it's he doesn't have recourse to the courts. Do what I say, or else the Congress says no, Then the courts adjudicate between two coequal branches of government. You know which way this will go. They accept this on all number on all kinds of

other levels. You know, they didn't speak about tyranny. And this is the part that really just was goading me yesterday, because it isn't it isn't indefensibly, indefensibly stupid thing for someone to say that this president has has committed the worst crimes, the most impeachable conduct of any president ever, which is the claim that Schiff has made, which is what these professors yesterday, we're making a case for that this president is a threat to our democracy. Who else

would they say that about. And this is where I go back to my friend David Harsani, who was writing about this in National Review. But you could just think, off the top of your head. Did they say that Woodrow Wilson was a threat to democracy when he was locking people up for opposing US intervention in the First World War? When FDR took Japanese Americans and locked them in internment camps, when Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus because he said so, Were any of these people a threat to

democracy in their actions? Impeachable? Perhaps? Oh, of course not. I mean, Wilson was a racist in the way but he was a Democrat, of course. And they don't like to talk about this. Wilson was a racist in the way that liberals today loved to pretend most people on the right are meaning that Wilson was an actual racist.

Woodrow Wilson, real deal racist, and yet the most impeachable conduct of all time, more so than even Nixon, of course, more so than presidents who the left, the socialist left in this country effectively accepted tyrannical, monarchical moves from them. F DR Woodrow Wilson. Go back in time, you will find plenty look John Adams. This is mentabeas corpus, John Adams. Go back to the Alien and Sedition Act. I believe it was of seventeen ninety eight. Lock people up for

saying things that didn't like you. You don't think that's a bit of a breach of the First Amendment of the Constitution? Friends, there have been so much more egregious abuses of power, egregious abuses of authority. And here's the real problem. Trump didn't abuse his power. All the things they're saying are lies. It's not true. There's nothing wrong with what he did. He broke no law, he broke no statute, he broke no ethical boundary in Ukraine or Russia,

conduct none. So this is how upside down they're thinking is. This is how absurd and derange the Left has become in the era of Trump. Because he has broken them. They now will make the claim that someone who has not done anything that is impeachable is the most impeachable president of all time. This is disconnect from reality. This is derangement. This is people seeing pink elephants flying in the sky and thinking that they are geniuses for calling

it out. Both hilarious and scary. I have to tell you, well, I did. I saw it. It's a joke. Everybody is saying it. I will tell you it is a uniform sapent. I think pretty much, pretty much right down the road, that's what they're doing is a very bad thing for a country. It's of no merit. And the Republican Party has never been more unified ever, They've never been as unified as they are right now. I'm happy to say I think the President's analysis here is spot on across

the board. Any fair minded person watching those things that it's preposterous. It's just ridiculous the whole thing. Democrats are just lying, lying and lying. There. They're gaming and scheming and then lying about it, and then lying about their intentions and lying about you know, the fact that they don't really want to be doing this and they haven't made up their minds yet. How is it that we all knew they were going to impeach to the president.

We've known this for months, really known this for years. How could we know if it was evidentiary, if the final conclusion was going to be rooted in some understanding of what the actual information is that is presented. Oh, that's right. They didn't allow for the collection of facts through a special counsel. They didn't have a ken Star investigation. They didn't have anything leading up to the would be

impeachment of Richard Nixon that involved independent investigators pulling together facts. No, they they're just running with whatever they can do. It's all a scam, a scheme, a hoax, a fraud. And these people that are perpetrating this against America are the ones who are always complaining about about Trump. Oh, he's has problems with the truth. Oh he's an exaggerator, he's a BS artist, you know, like Buck Sexton, my initials.

You know, he's one of those. It turns out that they have quite a problem with the truth on areas that really matter. But I am happy to say that the Republican Party is now I think unified. This is turning into something of a Kavanaugh moment. We are seeing the other side acts with no good faith, no respect for any process or principle. More importantly, there's only one principle under which the Democrats are operating right now. Stop Trump at all costs. That constitution. The country be damned.

Oh as if the leftist professors were not be clowning themselves enough. Yesterday during this marathon series of hearing, what was the hearing about, No fact witnesses, just people showing up who have already said things, very stupid things, by the way, incredibly dumb things like the president could be impeached for a tweet. One of these guys, the one to look like the Harry Potter, Professor Feldman, he actually had already written that, and the gout Gerhardt, professor from

I think UNC. He's the one who says that the the president is going to be this is going to turn into a monarch. And these people say idiotic things at the time. But Professor Carlin, who's at Stanford Law School, had some very worthwhile moments. But this was the best because it really showed you. It showed you who she is. It showed you what the left is really like. I mean, this woman was just combative, grandstanding, just the most typical

really left wing pseudo intellectual you could find anywhere. Not thoughtful, not nuance, not wise, not steeped in the knowledge of her supposed craft and expertise, a partisan, an activist, dressing it up with a few fancy words here and there. This is really actually typical for leftism these days. I can't tell you how many leftist intellectuals I meet or even discuss or debate with who just aren't impressive, who

aren't smart. They have been trained in a very specific way to a specific ends within their fields, but they might as well be the people standing outside of an end culter speech with signs saying you know, white nationalists not allowed and screaming epithets and curses at her. Because

they have the same mindset. This is why when I tell you that Harvard law professors now share the politics of assistant gender studies professors at Oberlin or Brown or Read College or one of these like left wing loon factories, it's true. They share all the same ideas. It has. The consolidation of thought in the universities is mind blowing. It was bad when I was there years ago. I had the only conservative tenured professor on my entire college campus as my advisor. There was only one. How is

it possible? That's possible because the libs are totalitarians, and so they control access and they crush people that don't agree with them, and then they create a little monoculture that create the echo chamber of the faculty lounge and the faculty lounge creates an echo chamber of the greater campus, and the greater campus that includes the law school portion

of the campus. And then that means that you have lawyers running around the country who think that the law is whatever they wanted to say, because whatever makes them feel good and gets a monologue of praise from Chris Haze or Rachel Maddow is what really matters. The Constitution be damned. Who cares? Oh, you think I'm you know, I'm not exaggerating. I don't exaggerate. I speak the truth. That's why you listen to the show. That's why you

watch this show. We have Professor Carlin of Stanford Law School showing us who she is and how she thinks about things. Please, Producer Brandon Clip five. Things could do no wrong because the king kings could do no wrong because the King's word was law. And contrary to what President Trump has said, Article two does not give him the power to do anything he wants. And I'll just give you one example that shows you the difference between him and a king, which is the Constitution says there

can be no titles of nobility. So while the president can name his son, baron. He can't make him a baron. Oh Man sit burn Yo. Yeah, bring the president's ten year old son into this hyperpartisan testimony. Disgusting, disgusting, And by the way that was practiced, you could tell her by the way she delivered the line she had thought about that beforehand. She had been waiting to drop this one. Yeah,

the social justice words. I'm sure they love that over at the huff Post, and you know, the semi illiterates at the young Turks, you know, I'm sure they thought it was great. Milannia Trump, though, crushed the smug COMI with the following tweet quote, that's right, the first lady getting in on it. Because you mess with Mama Bear, you deal with the consequences. A minor child deserves privacy

and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Carlin, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering and using a child to do it. End quote courtesy of Milania Boom. By the way, the most fashionable first lady of all time, and yet all the fashion magazines don't want to give They won't dress her, they won't put her on the magazines because they're appalling leftists.

No surprise there, that's right. Professor at Stanford Law, a tenured professor, probably making three or four hundred thousand dollars a year to brainwash recent college grads into thinking that they really understand the law and that you know, things like yeah, Roe v. Wade, that's that's a good way to interpret the law. Look at that. That's a thumbs up. Yeah we'll invent something and this other thing, and you know, there we go. The law says whatever we want. It's

a living constitution. You see that. The words are alive, and they can move around based on our orders, based on our whim Yet here we are Pamela Carlin lecturing the country, all these professors lecturing the country. What exactly do they know? What do they to the table? Nothing that was unexpected. She did kind of apologize, which I thought was also worth hearing. Play clip twelve. Then if I can just say one thing, I want to apologize for what I said earlier about the President's son. It

was wrong of me to do that. I wish the president would apologize obviously for the things that he's done. That's wrong. But I do regret having said that. See, I regret her being dumb. I mean, the fact that she brought the president's very young son into this conversation is completely unacceptable. I mean, look, I'm not crying big tears about it. I mean, wait, I wasn't she brought him into it. It was a petty thing to do, but it wasn't you know, she didn't call him a

little idiot. I mean, there have been leftists who have been in the press who have said horrific things about Baron Trump, I mean horrific things, and they have been allowed to. I mean, if you ever want to understand that the press really isn't that different now, We're just better at seeing who they are, go back and read some of the stories that the left wing rags would put out about Sarah Palin and her family and her child and who back in the two thousand and eight election,

liberals are appalling, no honor, no dignity, new class. It's just it's become their culture. There are people within that culture who do have good qualities and do have those qualities, but the overwhelming culture of the left now is a totalitarian self righteousness. They know what's right about everything, they don't want to exchange it with any ideas with the other side. They want to force you to do things.

They want you to repudiate all you believe in. They want you to bend the knee and then apologize that it took so long for you to do so, and then accept that they're probably going to have to destroy you anyway to encourage the others. There was oh, I said, why was I upset about, Professor Carlin? The stupidity of saying the president can't do whatever he wants? How could anyone pay attention to politics in this country for five minutes and think that the president is of the impression

he can do whatever he wants. How many times has he been blocked by the courts? How many times has he gone to Congress? You know, was he able to get the healthcare plan that he wanted? No? Was he able to just do what he wanted on immigration? No? Time and again the courts, the courts, the courts challenging, and he's right, by the way, they're wrong, the people in the court system, or the members of Congress, or the states that are bringing these challenges, they're being shot down.

They misinterpret the law. But how could he think he does whatever he wants? No? In fact, one of my complaints about Trump is that sometimes he doesn't do what he should do, what he does have the power to do, because I think he is too deferential to some aspects of the system that's in place. I think that he does get a little bit too swayed by some elements of the national security apparatus and the forever War lobby

in DC and across the country. I think that on the issue of immigration and on the wall, there were ways for him to proceed without having to go through all this series of court challenges. But how could any would say that the president thinks that he can do anything.

The reality here is at the president of the United States, according to Democrats, cannot be on a call with a counterpart head of state, engaging in foreign policy and make a passing reference to information about possible corruption in a country known for corruption. He can't even do that without them thinking that he should lose his job. And he thinks he can do anything. By the way, it never happened,

nothing happened, There was no pressure, is all. This is all a conjured fantasy of the left, which is why it's not working. But they have to do this. They have to impeach him. They want to tar him with that. They want to have the asterisk next to him, just like they wanted to do with Kavanaugh. Asterisk. He doesn't really count. Any of the Supreme Court decision doesn't really count. This is a childishness that is the basis of a

lot of liberal viciousness. They don't accept that they've lost when they've lost, and so going forward whenever there should be the next step, whenever people should look at the precedent and what do we do now, it's oh, no, we haven't moved to a further stage in the discussion. Whether it's about the Supreme Court, or about immigration, or about anything. The initial fight must be had again, because the initial victory, whether it's Trump's election or it's at

the Supreme Court, was illegitimate. Not just that I disagree with it, It was illegitimate. It is not binding on me. Liberals don't really understand, or perhaps they understand and don't care. Is that their mentality isn't It is accelerating in its extreme, it's extremism, and they will eventually bring us to the dissolution of the form of government that we've lived under

now for a couple of hundred years. If they don't stop with this, they can't continue to destroy institutions, to undermine them while claiming to be the great protectors of them. They can't allow, for example, President Obama to do things as president that he himself had said he does not have the right to do as president, and then to have beyond that. The courts slap down the Obama administration numerous times Obama lost I think it was close to

a dozen times on major issues his administration. The courts had to be like, you can't do that, can't do that, that's a power grab. Oh, but he was Obama. We couldn't criticize him, couldn't say anything mean about him. People who say, who attack this strong end that Trump can't do anything he wants to do. Nobody thinks that, and

nobody would be okay with that. I wouldn't be okay with the president saying, yeah, Congress, we're going to just say you're not in session and I'm just gonna write laws. I wouldn't be okay with that. I mean, I get to sit here and establish with you. I have read lines even for this president, and there are things you could not do. I'm upset that he's spending so much money twenty three trillion in debt, Folks, gonna be thirty trillion before you know it. You want to see what

this is, what the impact of this is. Look at millennial wealth at this stage, and then look at boomer wealth. We have an intergenerational theft occurring in this country on a massive scale, and people don't want to think of it that way. That is what is happening, and it's because the single most important driver of the economy right now is federal government policy. In a lot of ways. You know, whether the market's going up or down, it's

the Federate. It's the Federate. Do they raise interest rates? Hugely important to the trajectory of the economy. Look at all the ways that we have an over hyperregulated economy. I mean, I like to say that sometimes just because I'll go down the rabbit hole. But a conversation for another time. I've got problem. There are problems with this administration, no question about it, impeachable, absurd. The president deserves four

more years. And here's what I will tell you, And I don't want to keep repeating this because I don't want us to get complacent at all. The good news is that the shrill liberal lunatics are losing and they know it. That's the good news in terms of Trump in the election, in terms of the culture and the trajectory of government and the growth of socialism, and we'll talk about whether Bernie Sanders is a commune in just

a little bit. I'm more concerned about that this impeachment would rival that Johnson impeachment as the shortest in history, depending on how one counts the relevant days. Now, there are three distinctions when you look at these are the three commonalities. When you look at these past cases, all involved established crimes. This would be the first impeachment in history where there would be considerable debate and in my view,

not compelling evidence of the commission of a crime. Second is the abbreviated period of this investigation, which is problematic and puzzling. This is a facially incomplete and inadequate record in order to impeach a president. They're abusing the process at every step. They're trying to shoehorn this into a completely politically determined timeline, and they're pretending all along that somehow this is about the constitution, the core values. What

did an say heartful of love for America. Oh please, these people are destroying America. And I don't like to come on air and exaggerate about these things. I don't like to be the one that's, Oh, this guy is falling and we're all doomed. You know, there are other shows you can listen now. We're all gonna die tomorrow if you know, you don't buy whatever from my sponsor. I mean, there are other shows that do that. I don't do that. I'm trying. I love and respect this

audience too much. I'm like Nancy Pelosi things. She loves the country. I actually love this audience. But they really are I've said it, They're kicking at the load bearing walls of America at this point. I mean, they're messing with very combustible stuff. They really think that trump Pism, the Trump movement would go away if they were successful in removing the president. Here. Here's I think the little reality.

The DC insiders that are pushing this whole thing, the Pelosi's, the Shifts, the Naddlers, they want to impeach him because they hate him and their base demands it. There's a part of me that realizes that, or that believes I should say that they've felt like the Senate was a kind of firebreak all along. The Senate was a stop gap.

They knew they wouldn't get removed from office. Because as much as the people I'm not talking about the left, the left would love Trump to get removed from office, I'm talking about the Pelosis and Natlers of ships, they would have to know that if somehow, by some ill fated turn, there are some Republicans who defected and you had a two thirds and you will remove this president from office, and the backlash in this country, the sense that the system is rigged and broken and that the

totalitarian left will do anything and stop at nothing, the Trump movement would be growing tenfold in the years ahead. That's what I just think. It would be an unstoppable because at that point, even I would say no more not playing by their rules. Time to establish new rules, and they wouldn't like that. How much of this is really just driven by Democrats hating Trump. That's a part of this that I think we should evaluate a little bit.

Their ideology is out of control. They're further left they've ever been before. But also there's something very specific about Trump, what he represents, who he is the way he is not deferential to the elites, the way he does not speak the way the elites demand we do to and about aggrieved minority groups. For example, he does not speak the way that we are all told you must speak to people about you in this way, about issues in

this manner, use the following words. Trump is like, now, he's like, if I want to say that MS thirteen or animals, He's going to say that MS thirteen or animals because they're murders who kill people and they're really bad. You're like, I'm not going to be told all. I mean, I remember when that happened. You know, Nancy Pelosi is Oh, the spark of divinity lives within MS. Whenever Nancy Pelosi starts to hide behind her Catholicism, you should be really

skeptical of whatever's going on. In fact, you just you know that she's kind of cornered and she's looking at Pelosi's a slippery, dishonest politician without peer. I mean, she whatever she has to do, whatever she has to say. I mean, look, how else could she be the top of the Democratic Party. There's no scruples, no moral compass,

doesn't stand for any stands for Pelosism. But when she goes, oh, she starts to try to think back to, you know, Sunday school and when she was taught about the divinity of Christ. And you know, she starts to when she goes Preacher Pelosi, Trust me, she's about to pull some nonsense. She's about to lie. She did about the MS thirteen thing when Trump said that they were animals, and this

just came up. Now I didn't see it initially in her press conference this morning, but a reporter, I'm going to assume a conservative because liberals don't ask real questions of Democrats once every six months, maybe like Jake Tapper, Fake Tapper will ask a real question of a journalists where supposed to go, oh my gosh, she's so brave. The guy's a jerk in a buffoon. But Pelosi got asked a question that she didn't particularly like because it

goes to an underlying truth. It's the one that I sure now with your here the first we have a representative Commons who was saying this. Let's just hear him set this up yesterday because they really do hate Trump. Let's not forget that play Collins, please Brandon. They're already drafting articles. Don't be even fooled. They're already getting ready for this. We've already went after this with the Ukraine after numerous failings of Muller Cohen, and almost the list

goes amoluments, The list goes on. But the American people are fox they failing to see us legislat But if you want to know what's really driving this, there's two things. It's called the clock and the calendar. The clock and the calendar. What's interesting is that the Chairman talked a lot about the Founders from the quotes, and again this is why we have the hearing about the founders being

concerned about foreign influence. But he also didn't quote was the founders being really really concerned about political impeachment because you just don't like the guy. You never liked him, says November of twenty sixteen. The chairman has talked about impeachment since last year when he was elected chairman two years ago November six seventeenth, before he's even sworn in his chairman. So don't tell me this is about new

evidence and new things and new stuff. We may have a new hearing room, we may have new mics and we may have chairs that aren't comfortable, but this is nothing new, folks. This is sad spot on. He understands what this is really about. They just don't like him. Yeah, they want power and Libs the left, they have a lust for power, and they can't handle the thought of not being in a position to make you do whatever they want to make you do. They can't handle it,

and they get a love freaked out about it. That's all true. But they just also feel like Trump's presence and the fact that Trump is president is an affront to their very being, to their dignity, to their sense of self, their sense of self worth. Trump bothers them in a way that goes beyond the usual political fights and disputes. You know, they didn't like George W. Bush. They mocked him, they ridiculed and they thought he was

a bad person, a war criminal, a buffoon. But they didn't stay up late at night going into fits of rage over the fact that George W. Bush was president, not the same way they do with this guy. This is something that they just cannot handle. They cannot abide it, And so Collins is right. A lot of this is that Democrats are just giving in to that impulse to trash Trump because they hate Trump and they simply can't

help themselves. So Nancy Pelosi back to when she was asked this question, and I wanted to get this in because I thought it was a very telling exchange. And just remember whenever Nancy starts going, excuse me, I'm very Catholic, and I really I believe in jeez, I mean this. Nancy Pelosi, who, let's understand something, is a huge proponent now not just of of gay marriage as a Roman Catholic and avowed Roman Catholic likes to bring it up. She's also a fan of lgbt Q rights and transgender

children and transitioning pre pubescent children. And you know, she's in favor of pushing those policies because that's what they are, under the rubric of it being a human rights issue. But she's she's well out of stow. And the first thing that I want to bring up, of course, is Nancy Pelosi believes an abortion all nine months of her pregnancy, all nine months, month, eight month, nine doesn't matter. Babies

do tomorrow, Nancy, Nancy. People who say that never happens, well, then explain to me why Nancy Pelosi if you asked her, if you said, you know, mother just decided she can't handle the emotional tumult of the of her unborn baby. Can she can she aboard and therefore have that baby term to kill the baby ninth month of a pregnancy. Nancy Pelosi will not tell you. Under any circumstances will she ever say no, you can't do that. She won't do it. It's the easiest thing, most clear moral calculation

one could possibly make. She will not do it. She claims to be a Roman Catholic. They'll claims to and devout by the way. You know, I need to be a better Roman Catholic. Nancy Pelosi likes to pretend that she's a good Roman Catholic. That's even worse. Here is what Here's how she handled the I think very valid question. Is this just really because you guys hate Trump? Is that why we're going through this entire charade? Play at Brandon hate the pie. You don't hate anybody, not anybody

in the world. Don't don't. And yet May suggested that the Democrats are doing the simplicity if they don't want to, God, I have nothing to do it. Let me just say this I think the President is a coward when it comes to helping our kids who are afraid of gun violence. I think he is cool when he doesn't deal with helping our dreamers, of which we're very bad. I think he's in denial about the Constitute, about the climate crisis. However, that's about the election. This is about the elect take

it up in the election. This is about the Constitution of the United States and the facts that leads to the president's violation of zoth of office. And as a Catholic, I resent you're using work hate in a sentence that addresses me. I don't hate anyone. I was raised in a way that is full heart, full of love, and always prayed for the president, and I still pray for the president. I pray for the president all the time. So don't mess with me when it comes to words

like that. Nancy Pelosi's a liar. She doesn't pray for the president all the time. Sorry, don't buy it, don't believe it. Nancy Pelosi also isn't parapher for the unborn babies that are constantly being murdered and planned parenthod clinics across the country, which Nancy Pelosi will defend to her last breath. But she pulls out the Catholic card. There isn't that so interesting? She doesn't. Oh, here's another one. I think she does hate Trump. Actually, I think she

really does. I think that the public figure of Nancy Pelosi and the private person of Nancy Pelosi, it would be a shock for either of them not to be deeply full of rage and disdain for Donald Trump, given what she has devoted her life to. And then there's just one other thing I have. I can't help but throw this into the mix, this new reverence that liberals have for the Constitution and the founding fathers. I thought the Constitution was really old and outdated and founded to

protect slavery. They say, this is what comes up now, and all these liberals, Oh, it's all about it was all about protect the institution of slavery. That's the most important thing. Just look at the New York Times sixteen nineteen products. The single most important thing in America was

whether this is not true. Maybe I'll spend some time actually debunking this lie that the Left is now embracing and trying to teach school children across the country, as well as absurd progressives who don't know anything about actual history, but the most important thing in the country. They say, no, that's not that's just not true. Just like Trump isn't the worst president in history, even if you believe what he did is what they say it is, it's not

even close. The worst thing of president's not in history. It's absurd. But I thought the Constitution was this really old, bad document that we wish we didn't have to get constrained by. I thought we should have just democked a direct democracy, mobocracy, oclocracy. I thought we should just have that instead. And I thought the Founding Fathers are a bunch of racist, slave holding white guys that nobody should

listen to anymore. Oh but now now to cloak themselves in higher purpose, they invoke the Founders, they invoke the Constitution. And when that's not enough for this ongoing part is an ambush, then Nancy pulls out the big guns. I'm a Catholic, Sir, Nancy Pelosi, you should be denied communion by every Catholic priest in the country. But she's a Catholic, sir. Black Rifle Coffee is celebrating it's fifth year anniversary. So

to celebrate they started Black Rifle Friday. Look, I know it sounds like a fictional holiday, you know, like Valentine's Day, which is just a cast grab. But you know you wouldn't be wrong. But since it's actually Black Rifles fifth year anniversary and the spirit of radical transparency, which is I think Black Rifles really into. Black Rifle Coffee is making an early play for your holiday spending with new products,

special discounts, and extra perks for Coffee club members. Not a coffee club member, no problem, sign up and see all the great benefits you get when you belong to the most patriotic coffee club in the country. Let me tell you I start every day with a delicious cup of Black Rifle coffee. My favorite roast is silence or smooth, but I also like Freedom Blend or caffeinated as blank. Check them all out. They're delicious. Don't choose basic batch coffee.

Go to America's coffee Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck to get twenty percent off your first purchase. That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck again, twenty percent off your first purchase Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck. Oh, the journos, they have so few principles left. You will recall that they had shift pull phone records, phone records that included a attorney for the president, included

a member of Congress and also a journalist. And not only did they pull those records, which it seems legally they can do, but then they published them published those records. This, my friends, is unheard of. I saw Devin Nunis last night on Fox saying that he, at least in his time, he's never heard of this before, and it raises some very troubling questions. Please please, this is a congressman Nunist

who's also on the Intelligence Committee of the House. This is what he had to say, Look for the new chairman of your committee has Intel committee somehow pulled the phone records of the president's lawyers. But my question too is how did he do that and on what pretexted how did this happen? So he has subpoena power, So when the Democrats gain control, they have subpoena power. We knew he had issued. He notified us that he had

subpoenas some phone numbers. We didn't know who those numbers were, and of course, because it's in this if and it's classified, we can't talk about it. I'm trying to subpoena it from home. He subpoened from AT and T phone record. Why that's a good question. That is a very buzz off, you know, take it to court. AT and T should have at least went to court to try to see if what they were going to do was the right thing. Could they do that from my phone records or your

phone records? I mean, it appears like they could. If Adam Schiff now wants to go out and subpoena, they've now set a precedent. Or Adam Schiff can go and get any phone number that he has sent it to AT and T, and AT and t's going to comply. The answer to Tucker's question, it's a very important question. The answer to Tucker's question is yes, they absolutely can

get his phone records if they want. Now, AT and T could also go to court, and there could be more of a check in balance here from the private sector about just giving phone records to Congress. But my friends, this this is getting pretty close to the congressional equivalent of all our war. I mean, what else is there they're going to start pulling people's phone records and then just sharing them. Oh, how hard do you think it

would be. I can sit here and come up with the pretext right now for whether or not we need Tucker Carlson's records as Democrats who are running this impeachment scam. Oh, Tucker has clearly had Juliani and John Solomon and you know others on his show, or maybe it would be Hannity and not you know Tucker who had John Solomon on. But the point is you can come up with some pretexts and just grab his phone records. Yeah, I want

his phone records. It's gonna pull him huh. Because usually that power and as I've said to you, I've I've requested phone records before in the course of a terrorism investigation. Usually that power is in the hands of non partisan law enforcement officials, and there are strict guidelines and rules in place, and there are courts also that oversee this. And by the way, that doesn't mean that it's perfect look at the whole fives A situation, but there's something there.

What's the check on Adam Shift's subpoena power? M If private companies are just gonna say, yeah, sure, Adam Schiff wants your phone records, We're gonna give it to him. There is no check, my friends. I mean, yeah, somebody could challenge in a court. But Shift's already got your records, and the records are going. He's requesting them behind closed doors, goes to the company, company gives them the records. You

there's no injunction you're gonna get. By the time you even know he's got your phone records, you might say, well, block, is he gonna do that to me? No, I don't think Adam Shift's gonna pull your phone records. It's you gonna pull other people's phone records. Though. This is the dirty game they're playing folks. Here is, for example, Jim Hines, another Democrat on the Intellience Committee, saying, you know, just imagine if we should do more of this. We should

pull everybody's phone records. We should start giving giving them out like hotcakes, just phone records all over the place. Play wherever Himes is. The eight sub poenis for documents out of the State Department. That's another story that has yet to be fully told. Exactly who knew about the

firing of Marie Ivanovich. We you know, just because Gordon Sondlin decided that he was going to show that he was not operating as a loan actor, we got a few emails that indicated at the Secretary of State knew what was going on. Imagine if we had a comprehensive set of emails, of documents, of phone records. You know. One of the things that was interesting about the open hearings, John, those open hearings, you know, oftentimes they don't produce a

lot of new information. But it's hard for me to remember one hearing in which somebody didn't appear with new information, whether it was the tale of the phone call that was overheard in Ukraine between Sondlon and the President, the famous phone call, phone records, complete phone records. They want more phone records, not enough now now they don't have enough.

They want to use this new power. John Solomon, who was my colleague as you know, at the Hill, and I've had I've actually had him on the show a number of times, and I know John Well, John Solomon's journalist. His phone records were published. Now liberals like to do this thing of well it's not illegal. Oh I'm sorry. Is that the new standard for everything, for the press to use their first roman right to share their thoughts. And if you know they want the president out of office,

he's a tire in he's the worst. He's a monarch. All this stuff one of their own. John Solomon he had his phone records published by a congressman. What if what if that record had showed John speaking to a confidential source. That's out there now for everybody. There's no redactions, there's nothing. And where's the journal outrage? Where are the frauds, the outright frauds at CNN, by the way, owned by Time Warner, which is the company that gave the records

over real quick? Where are they on This doesn't seem like it's a little bit of an abuse, Remember, Congress, you can start pulling phone records, by the way, phone records, that nothing, They proved nothing, there's nothing illegal, there's no problem. Just as soon as you're gonna start pulling people's phone records, yeah, I want to see it. You know. He start to wonder, how far how we know if he's got subpoena power

on the phone records? How far is Adam shift from saying yeah, we're just gonna start tapping people's phones, he starts to eat better question. Put it aside the legality for a second. Do you think that if Adam Schiff had if he thought he had the capability to tap phones of people in the administration, if he thought he could do it, would he do it? Answers Yes, clearly, he would do it, and he'd feel justified because he's

saving the word. If you're saving the republic, just like if you're saving the world from climate change, which again only derange brainwash people believe. But if you really believe that the justification is built in, you don't have to explain anything beyond that we all know. And that's where

this is. Let's take a moment, take a breather here, friends, to talk about the Democrats in the presidential election right now, so be a recurring, a recurring theme, to be sure, something that we will be talking about quite a lot in the time ahead. Oh wait, before I do that, I just said, CNN frauds. CNN. Also a lot of people over there that we're supposed to think our journalists are bright. I think that they're bright. And Donald Trump, I believe, has said more than once at least on Twitter,

that don Lemon is the dumbest person on television. I think that's what Donald Trump said, which is a big that's a because you know, there's Anna Navarro was on television, Matthew Dowd at ABC is on television. I mean, these are really stupid people. But President Trump said Donal Lemmon is a dombest man on TV. And I like to be mean, but there's there's some rich, smug, bad people that are hurting the country by what they're doing on TV and being dishonest about it all the time, and

they should be called out for being dumb because they are. Um, I will let you come to your own conclusions about this, but this, uh, this happened last night on AT and T owned CNN. Please play clip two. Don't act like a child and expect to be treated like an adult. Don't act don't be disrespectful to people. Are not respectful? Disrespectful I think it is not actually a word, But don't not be respectful to people and then expect to

be treated with respect. Disrespectful is not a word. Who doesn't who that's like very it's not even that's a very common word. Who doesn't know that that's not a word. Yeah, unrespectful. There you got the guys. I think he's making like three or four million dollars a year at CNN something like that. Yeah, Jeff Zucker knows how to get the best talent up there. All right, Um, I supposed to be the Democrat debates. This was this was this was kind of stunning. You have a few things going on here.

One is the the Democrats are getting a little self conscious about something right now. And the self consciousness comes from the following. Um, they are supposed to be the party of diversity. There's supposed to be the party that is going to make right the wrongs of the past by advancing oppressed and aggrieved minority groups going forward, and not just ethnic minority groups, any kind of protected minority group,

you know, sexual orientation and whatever whatever else. Illegal alien status, you know, people that are illegal immigrants, they're now are protected group. They break the law and now they're special. Now they should get extra attention and love from from Congress, even though they're not even supposed to be here. Uh.

That's something that you see happening. You have the Democrats now unfortunately realizing that they have a lot of old white candidates and Corey Booker, who is still in the race technically, although I don't think a single person in the country, including Corey Booker, believes that he's going anywhere in this meaning he's going to go anywhere other than

out of the race. Here's a Corey Booker. I had to say, please play clip six if you would, well, let me just say Kamala before she was a senator presidential candidate, she was my friend, who was my sister,

And so today I'm a little angry. I have to say that we started with one of the most diverse fields in our history, giving people pride, and it's a damn shame now that the only African American woman in this race who has been speaking to issues that need to be brought up is now no longer in it, and we're spiraling towards a debate stage that potentially we're still fighting to get on it, but could have six

people with no diversity whatsoever. The way this is shaping up, especially with the rules of the DNC, it is preferencing millionaires and billionaires and a lot of other things that don't ever translate into viability in Iowa. Now, is he right about the DNC rules. Maybe I don't really care as far as I'm concerned. DNC on DNC fighting is great,

you know, go for it. But I think it's so interesting that the Democrats now have to face this reality that they have an increasingly very very white field of candidates, and this is inherently viewed by the left as a problem. This is a bad thing, and I would just want to know what is really the alternative. I mean, what Kamala Harris. For example, Kamala Harris did not get a

majority of black support in the primary. And I think understandably from the perspective of a lot of black Democrat voter of Joe Biden, if you believe in Democrat Party policy and you want somebody who is you think electable and will implement those policies, I understand why the Black community with that person. If that is the perception that is widespread, which I believe most of the pole show it is, I understanding a black community be like, yeah,

I'm like Joe Joe Biden. Also, of course, the association with Obama being Obama's vice president for eight years very positive, firm and than that community. But you know, the black community and the primary Democrat voters at least was not excited about Kamala Harris. So why, you know, whose fault is it that Kamala Harris's campaign didn't gain any traction? I think it's Kamala Harris's fault. Whose fault is it that you know? I am Spartacus Corey Booker was not

able to get more traction and excite more voter. I mean, I think we all know the answer to that too. He hasn't dropped out yet, but he's he's gonna have to drop out. You already have and saying that Kamala Harris is a possible VP for him, and I could I could see that. Um, I think that. I think think it would make a lot of sense from Biden's perspective. Actually, but you know, who knows because vps does anyone even

really care? Vps almost exist, and it's at least in the context of electoral politics, it just gives something for the pundits to talk about. I mean, no one really votes for the VP, no one really cares all that much. But then you also have, you know what, when when do democrats. It's it's fascinating to me to see the way they talk about any lack of diversity in certain situations.

And then they mean they mean skin color diversity. They mean a different they mean different skin colors represented by individuals in any in any situation. They certainly don't mean ideological diversity, and not we're talking about a Democratic primary, but also not in general. Ideological diversity is not diversity to Democrats, they mean skin color diversity. Um. But they

also reject that people. They reject the story or they reject the narrative that there are some people in some circumstances who are advanced explicitly because of non white skin color. That is, you cannot Democrats will not say that that is a thing that happens. They'll they get very uncomfortable vary. And yet they will also say that, hey, guys, there aren't enough non white Democrats in the presidential primary right now.

They can't really these two things cannot be. This doesn't make sense, right, You can't advocate for someone on the basis or advocate four non non white candidates because they're non white. And then say, but but no one who's a non white candidate in the Democratic Party is really getting any support as a result of their skin color, right, I mean no one. No one's being advanced as a

result of this. I mean, this was one of the fascinating One of the fascinating tensions you had with Democrats went back in the Obama era, was there were so many people who were expressing excitement to vote for the first African American president, which I understand and I know where that comes from, and I think that that sentiment is is perfectly fine. But then when you would say that, then they would also turn oun and say, but it was a he overcame that to become president. And I

was sitting here saying, I'm confused. I mean, if if if the polls show that a vast majority people, especially everybody was voting for Obama, felt really good about voting for somebody because he was the first African American president. Why so we have to believe that he that this

is something that everyone should be excited to do. And I think people were excited to do it, and I get that, But then we're also told that he had overcome this insurmountable barrier of being the first non white president. You sit there and say these things, This doesn't make sense. I don't know how they can. But identity politics always devolves into confusion, into self contradiction. That's really the takeaway

from this identity politics can't continue. It is a and not just imprecise, it's it's ultimately a problematic way of looking at any person. Right, we shouldn't look at any person based on skin color and make any distinction, designation, or judgment about them, period positive or negative. If this brings me to the now really timeless line from I think it was Justice. Was it Scalia or Aldo? I

think I can't remember now. It might have been Aldo that the best way had to stop discriminating by races. To stop discriminating by race, that means positive and negative discrimination. We have to stop doing these things so that you have this You know, the Democrats, some of the Democrats now or are feeling this moment of almost shame that they have so many white candidates, almost entirely white candidates

now in a very I've been a very large Democrat primer. Also, we talked yesterday with my friend Tiana Lowe about how somehow being Asian American doesn't really qualify as a minority on the left, even though they're an ethnic minority and have actually faced discrimination in this country. Discrimination as a matter of law too. That No, that's that's something the left never really grapples with, never really tries to make

sense of. So I don't think that Corey Booker is going to all of a sudden become a top tier candidate, because there's going to be anything that he can say or do that'll change people's minds. But the fact that he's just it's just there's kind of a why question, Why Corey Booker? You know, there's that question that comes up, But there's the lack of diversity issue I think is only going to rise because Corey Booker is not going

to last that long on this thing. And the left doesn't really think of and treat tells see Gabert and Andrew Yang as minorities. So we shall have to see where that goes. Let's continue our conversation, folks, about where

the Democrats are and what's happening in that primary. It's interesting for us we get to watch all this back and forth with just eating popcorn and enjoy enjoying the fight as it plays out, but there's also lessons to be taken from it and indicators of policy fights ahead, and just also where the culture is going we have our friend Chadwick Moore who has joined us once again here on the show. He is a journalist. He's a

columnist for Spectator USA. You often see him on Fox News. Chadwick, good to have you back, sir, hey Buck, great to be here. All right. So I thought this was really interesting. Mayor Pete as he has known now because his last name is so hard to say, Buddha judge, the mayor whate the third or fourth largest city in Indiana, I think the fourth largest. Actually, he is getting criticism now from LGBTQ advocates because there are does of him years

ago helping with the Salvation Army. Now, Chadwick, you're a former Liberal and you're also um open member of the LGBTQ community. What the heck is this all about? Well, we're seeing exactly what the LGBTQ AI plus two as community is all about these days, which is, of course, really has nothing to do with the individuals that purports

to represent or fight for. I mean, gay rights as a battle that's kind of over, and it's uh, it's more about just sort of well, instant instance, hating Christianity, trying to dismantle anything that's that's remotely Christian traditionalist. You know. They they are so up on these narratives. It's sort of like the Chick fil A thing. And Salvation Army is just another example that they think that these groups are some kind of hate mongering or organizations that have

it out for them. Um, they don't don't discriminate against gay people just because they happen to maybe have uh different views on marriage or after we happen to be more traditionally Christian. Um. You know, even that is just something that that LGBTQ cannot tolerate. Uh. It's any anything remotely that goes against their their narrative and their prescription for society, which is really what we're heading towards with

these groups. Um, is simply not acceptable. And um, you know, the the lgbt community really doesn't like mayor Pete and they haven't for a while. Uh why why is that? Did dig into that one a little bit for me? Well, he's um that you know, if you if you were called not too long ago, there was an article in the New Republic by a writer who's a sort of far left commy, openly openly communistic, and um, he really

went in on mayor Pete. He basically stole all my talking points from a right wing publication and um, and then he got they took the article offline. He got limb basting for it. But it's very true that they don't like him. They don't see him as gay enough, they don't see him as radical enough. He's not he's not into the gender stuff. He identifies as Christian, but at the same time he tends to think that he's the best Christian in the world, and he'll attack Mike

Pence and whatnot. Um, they don't like him because he's too vanilla. They don't like it. They especially don't like that he's white and a man. You know that. Uh, that's that kind of right. I know I carry that. I carry that burden around every day too. Yeah, I know, yes, um and uh and and one thing that I've sort of talked about before is that, you know, he's thirty seven.

He came out of the closet in his in his thirties. Uh. And I think gay people were kind of on the in the most accepting time possible, and that where it's not an issue to be gay. And I think a lot of gay people look at him and think, you know, he's kind of uh, you know, he had so much shame for his ire adult life. He's maybe kind of a coward. He's not really you know, prancing around with the rainbow flag. Um, so they don't they don't like him for for mainly those reasons. He's maybe a little

too normal for them. Andrew Sullivan, by the way, wrote on Twitter today, this is and Andrew Sullivan. Of course probably, I think you'd agree. Chadwick one of the best known openly gay writers on the scene, has been for a long time. He's just a very well known writer period. But he wrote that the gay left hates and wants to persecute Orthodox Christians, however much good they do, and they've taken over the movement. Is that true? That's exactly right.

That's that's how I would certainly see it. You know. I was a good example of this is I was having dinner the other night with someone who was arrested at Stonewall in nineteen sixty nine. This was this is the the riot so called that sparked the modern gay rights movements. So why you have gay pride? And he's a Republican and he was telling me, you know, back in the Stonewall years, nobody asked if you're a Democrat

a Republican. And because he's an open Republican and supports all of the sports Republican candidates and President Trump, he's been completely dragged in the gay media. They call him a liar, They say he wasn't at Stonewall, that he's stealing a legacy. So it's gone from the gay rights movement.

It's kind of gone from something that was more libertarian minded socially speaking and more diverse ideologically to this just completely co opted by far left radicals, by feminists, and by the Democrat Party which thinks that it owns these people. And of course a part of that is hating Christianity and wanting and meanwhile, you know, completely silence about Islam, completely silence about the persecution of gays in the Middle East and in Muslim countries, which is even more telling.

We're speaking to Chadwick Moore. He of course has also taken the Helm here as a guest host in the past. He is a columnist at Spectator USA. Actually, Chadwick, we want to keep you and talk a bit about the state of play and the rest of the of the Democrat field. So can you take a beat and we'll come right back. Sure of course, all right, everybody, hold on one sec. I understand it can be a little bit awkward when you have to think about life insurance.

You don't want to have to consider what would be unthinkable, but you have to prepare for an uncertain future and make sure that your family is safe and secure. I've gone through this process myself. It's something you need to do and you should go to the place that makes it easy for you, no hassle. That's Ethos Life Insurance. Ethos is modern life insurance for people who just don't want to waste time with fine print, extra appointments or

fees they really just can't afford. Ethos has a simple approach. They take industry expertise and they blend it with technology so that you can find the right policy to protect your loved ones in just a matter of about ten minutes and you can apply online. You should check it out for yourself. You'll be taking the first steps to ensure that your family has the financial security they need in case of the unexpected. This is the responsible thing

to do. Get a fast, free and personalized quote right now at ethoslife dot com. That's ethoslife dot com. Life insurance that actually fits your life. All We're continuing our conversation here with always intriguing, brilliant and edgy Chadwick Moore. He is a columnist at Spectator USA. You often see him on Fox Names All Right, Chadwick, So Kamala dropped out Corey Booker's complaining that there's not enough diversity in

the field. I want to ask Pete Buddha. Judge doesn't seem like he gets counted in the diversity pool, which is interesting, isn't it right? Yeah, you're you're, you're good to point that out. He really doesn't get counted in the diversity pool, which goes to show how far what's really happening. And they're they're ever shifting hierarchy of the victim classes. You know, who's on top now and who's on the bottom now? Um white and gay, white, white male.

It definitely trumps the gay with him and in the eyes of the left. Now, can you explain something to me, you know, within within the gay community. I know you've got you know, you're here in New York City and I'm sure you got a lot of liberal friends or

at least you know, know a lot of liberals. Um. But I know, I've always wanted to know, why is it that Trump gets really it seems to mean zero credit at all for being the first president ever too while he's running hold the gay pride flag, has never wanted to change or or you know, have anybody overturned Oh Burke Fell believes in you know, as a supporter of gay marriage, and like they, I see a lot of people from the gay community protesting in different places

and acting like Trump is a is a horrible threat to the gay community in some ways, and I just don't understand how they can square that with reality. It just doesn't seem any So can you speak to that a little bit? Why why doesn't the gay community like Trump? More? Great question? And you know, and other things too. Just this week they launched the Administration Launcher Initiative to get pre Prep to two hundred thousand people who don't have insurance.

That's a drug that prevents HIV infection. And they also have Ambassador Grinnell's decriminalization effort where they want working to decriminalize in what sexuality? Why? Um, but this gets no credit? And you know, it's it's almost like we've come to a place. And on top of all that, too, President Trump is hilarious. He is a campy figure. I mean, gay people love camp He's should naturally like him because he's sort of ridiculous and and and funny and trolley.

He is theatrical, for sure, extremely theastrical. Yes, and uh so it's you know, it's it's a great question. It's just maybe we It's obviously not all gay people because what you see and here it's sort of the ten fifteen percent that is that are just hard line, insane activists. He's you know, who went who will come out of Marxist universities and whatever. They're the most vocal, they're the

most unhands, they grab the microphone. They don't like politicians that don't treat them like special little people and and pander to them. And that drives him to saying that President Trump doesn't pander to the gay community. He simply treat everyone that, you know, the gay is just like anyone else. He's not gonna go out of his way

to do to harm you. He's not going to go out his way to help you, uh and more any more than he would just any other person, which is what a lot of conservative gays really like about him. They see through the malarkey if you will of the Democrats and um kia. So I think that's it. If you talk to more, if you just start to gay people anywhere, you'll find that they're not that interested in politics. They vote Democrat, they don't really know what's going on.

They're just you know, living their lives and uh and and more people than you realize, even here in New York City actually do like him, but but you don't hear from them because the people who have the mic are just be the crazy activists. So, now that Kamala is out of the race, it seems like we're starting to get the first round of consolidation among the Democrats. Where do you see all this going? I mean, do you do you have somebody that you really believe firmly

is going to get into this thing. We had Bloomberg enter the fray um and and actually get some support off the bat. Where do you Where do you see this Democrat primary playing out for the next month. So it's really it's really up in the air right now. And you know, people still say that Hillary is going to jump back in the heads. I hope so. Um and uh, I still see people saying they think Michelle Obama is going to jump in. Michelle Obama could I don't think. I don't think she will at this point,

but that's probably the only person that could maybe beat him. Um. At this point, the party seems it does seem to be the Warren or Biden split. Um and the party bosses that the chiefs really want Biden for some reason, but they I don't think they see what the rest of us are seeing, especially with all his strange comments and speeches. Um. I mean, isn't it isn't that thing that he said about the blonde hairs on his legs

standing up and and and corn pop and everything. I mean, that's the weirdest thing I've heard a major American politician say, perhaps in my lifetime. It was. I know, it was so bizarre and creepy. And who are his hand Is he mentally fit that that alone should ask? And who

are his handlers? You know that that he already has this reputation for being kind of creepy and hair snippy and around children, and so he's doubling down on his creepiness with children saying that in that same speech thing you know he loves it when they sit on his lap. It's like, okay, Joe Biden, maybe don't say that when you already have this reputation or suspected reputation. Do you think that the impeachment, by the way, is going to

backfire on Democrats? I mean, you know today we had the big announcement about Pelosi's saying, well, we all it wasn't even really I mean, never knew what she was gonna say before she said it. I mean, the whole thing is a sham. We all know what this is about, we all know where this is going. But how do you think it plays out? I think it already backfired. You have you have something like sixty percent of independent voters who said they're not even watching it. They care

so little they're not paying any attention to it. I kind of fall into that camp. I'm not doing. I don't want to give them the ratings or the eyeballs right now. I was going to ask you good to tell everybody, but you like refuse to watch this thing. So you're interesting because you're very involved in politics, but you're not like sitting through the hours and hours and hours of the hearings, So you're kind of representing like a normal American. I think, yeah, that's that's I think

so too. I could I intentionally, I'm just I'm not even gonna you know, I spent all I could all I put it on Russia, and now I'm like, I'm not going to give them this time, I think, And I think that does represent the average American, especially the swing voter who you know, it's it's so abusive how the Democrat Party treats their base because they keep giving them all these false folks that they know isn't going to go anywhere, and uh, and the base still just

hangs onto it and believes that you know, suddenly Chump's going to be removed from office or commuting some crime. Um. He's not. It's not going to happen. Um. But the party, the people who are who are not too hardcore or I believe, seeing this and just really throwing up their hands and asking what of the Democrats doing. They're wasting everyone's time and money. Uh, they are not proposing anything. They don't care about doing or fixing anything except going

after the president. What are you writing about next Chadwick. Where should people look for your stuff? Spectator USA, uh, Spectator dot us and you can find next week I'll have a column, really interesting column about online dating as something's happening in the online dating world. Whoa hold on? I want I want to hear. I want to hear them about the tell me, tell me about the online dating world. What do I need to know? Well, I'll give you little teasers that they're feminists. I was on

a news sturteer. There's some activists and feminists who wants um online dating apps require them to um uh do background checks on everyone on there. Well they say everyone that they mean men and then sort of alert some too if there's a a sexual predator. That sounds really nice in theory, but I've got a lot to say on it and why it's actually a terrible idea, and what women should be doing to protect themselves. So you

should you can find that. They'll be up next week, early next week, all right, everybody, Chadwick more Spectator USA, Chadwick. Great to have you, sir, We'll talk soon. Great, Thank you very much. Global Verification that work is the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. They are federally certified as a vetitown small business and headquartered

in Chicago with offices throughout the nation. Their risk mitigation experts can work with startups all the way up to Fortune one hundred companies, and no data or client information is ever offshore. Unlike a lot of their competitors, Global Verification Network has all employees located throughout the United States and they do not outsource or offshore any of the work you give them. Give Global Verification Network a call

eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Again, that's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. You can also go to MYGBN dot com. Again, that's MYGVN dot com Global Verification Network for all your background investigation, ending vetting needs. Leave no stone unturned. My belief is

very strong belief. Is this nation, of the course of its incredible wealth, its technology, its natural resources, in fact has the capabilities of providing a decent standard of living for every man, woman and child, and not just not at this point a utopian vision. The distribution of wealth in this country, as you may or may not know, is one of the most unfair and distortment in the entire world. You know, no matter, how can you practically

change that very an even distribution. Well, I think you can change it politically. I think you change it through tax laws. I think you change it through public ownership of significant parts of the economy. Public ownership of significant parts of the economy. That, my friends, is definitely socialism,

and Bernie Sanders a socialist. But once you start talking about state control of the economy, of the means of production, and the ability to transfer wealth, in fact, the mandate to take from people to give to others, and to provide for everybody not just a not just provide for their most basic needs, but to provide them a good living, a good standard of housing, and healthcare and food and all these other you know, what does good mean? That's

this is what the Soviets promised their people. I mean, this was the promise of the Soviet Union, which is, by the way, where Bernie Sanders went for his honeymoon. Now that's an old clip of Sanders from like the eighties, I think, I mean, it's tough to know because Bernie Sanders producer Brandon hit it right on the head. Bernie Sanders has looked seventy four years old, for like the last forty years, just to go back and look, always has the same sort of voice, same sort of socialism,

save that same duck. Nothing really is changed with Bernie. I do give him credit for consistency. At least he's not one of these left wing politicians who changes what they believe every five minutes based upon whatever will be of the greatest short term benefit to them, which, by the way, right wing politicians, let's keep it real. Right wing politicians do that too, sometimes not as much as the left. There's not as much room for hypocrisy. There's

not as much acceptance of hypocrisy on the left. But here you're feeling the burn. Here in the burn, say some stuff that's pretty radical, and you, I think are fully within your rights. I think you would be making perfect sense to ask the question, does Bernie still believe that? Does Bernie still want ownership of large sectors of the economy? This is where I start to get into why and

how would that happen? How would we find ourselves in a situation, in a circumstance where all of a sudden you might be able to have a government takeover of large parts of the economy. Well, if I were going to war game this out, if I were going to create the scenario that would bring about a government takeover of much a member the control of the means of production, because if you control the means of production, then you're also inherently engaged in a central planning of the resources

necessary for that production. And then you're also going to be engaging and under the wealth redistribution rubric, who gets what from that means of production? You are controlling society top down. You have public owners you have public ownership of what should be private property, but what they will say is public. The problem is that you switch from

socialism to communism. The real switch just has to do with control in the hands of a revolutionary committee of sorts, whether it's you know, the commun they call it the communist party, but it doesn't really matter. All you need is a small group of individuals, or doesn't have to be that small, but a group of individuals. Because who directs We don't. We don't have a government agency currently deciding,

you know, how many pairs of shoes are made. We do have a government agencies, though we have a bunch of agencies. They'll say how much yet to pay people what working conditions are like. You know, there's a lot of regulation that is pushing on the door of socialism already, or that is a means of achieving socialist ends without socialist words or nomenclature. But if I were trying to bring about the opening for socialism to happen in this country,

what would I want to do? Continuously expand government we're doing that. Government just gets bigger and bigger and bigger. I mean, we should all recall that the sequestration. Remember the sequestration fight is kind of a political nert thing and some people remember some people don't who cares, really, But that was a big thing back under the Obama administration because Republicans said, fine, you could even cut defense spending.

We're going to cut overall spending. There's big fights and oh my gosh, and you know, the Republicans are stealing mouth from mouth, from the food of food from the mouths of babies and all this stuff. That was s questration. That huge food fight on Capitol Hill was a decrease in the planned increase in government spending from already record level and unsustainable level debt. That's what the huge fight was about. It wasn't oh my gosh, these draconian cuts.

It was, well, we're expecting to keep spending further and further into debt at this level, you're gonna tell me you can only spend a little less in it? No, no, no, pas acceptable, as Macron would say, or perhaps Trude thou, who do we think? Oh? Now we know Macrol is more French. Trudeau is more fun to make fun of. But Macrol is more French for sure. So if you wanted to create the opening in this country for a takeover of major industries, you know what you'd want to do.

You'd want to create an unsustainable debtload that would eventually crash the economy, perhaps end the US as the global reserve currency forced people to make decisions under duress, political decisions about who they're going to put in power when the country is in a panic. And as I have said, as much as I would, I wish it would be the case that when this day comes, when the debt is finally too large, when the music stops, there aren't

enough chairs, maybe there's no chairs. I wish it would be the case that people would say, ah, but this is what the you know, the acolytes of Milton Friedman have been saying what happened all long? I mean, this is what Of course, this debt eventually became unsustainable. Of course it caused massive dislocations in the economy. That's exactly what Friedrich Hyak would have said. Or von Meses, Yeah, von Meses from the Austrian school Gutsen talk, That's what

they would have said. But that's not what happens. People say, I'm scared. I want to know that there's going to be healthcare for me, that I'm gonna have a place to live, there's going to be food on the table, that my family is going to have food. And instead of understanding that all of that is much more possible, much easier, and much better if you have you maximize the functions of the free market within a society as

wealthy and prosperous and educated as we are. What happens people say, oh, the politician, the demagogue, the Elizabeth Warren, the Bernie Sanders, that Joe Biden, any of them. But the person who comes forward and says, the rich push this economy off a cliff. They did not pay their fair share, and we need to make sure that there's a fairer future for everybody, and we're going to pay for all of your stuff, and we're going to soak the rich. Those people they get in charge when the

crisis hits. So Bernie Sanders, I was going to say, is playing the long game. You know, he's obviously up there in age, and I hope that he's healthy and has a very nice long retirement. But the socialists in this country are certainly playing the long game. I mean, you know there are going there's a movement. Now you're seeing it more openly. I'm it's not new, but it's a movement of socialists that recognize the overall trajectory we are heading towards socialism as a country. People don't like

to hear this is true. We're heading further and further in that direction. Trump maybe has slowed down some of us, although the Trump administration spending is far too high. But if this continues as is, we will, either step by step or in response to a crisis a catastrophe, we will be a country that is effectively a socialist country. I do believe we are heading there, and I think we're close. I think we are closer to it than

anybody on the right wants to admit right now. I mean, I just saw that this pushback from price transparency in the healthcare market, all these doctors and all these different you know, facilities and insurance and they don't want price transparency. That, my friends, that we can have an argument over one sixth of the economy is not allowed to be directed by prices. This should be a much bigger and people

fight against this. When finally the Trump administration says, hold on, you need to be able to know what something costs. They fight this. They don't want there to be transparency. They want it to be, as Bernie Sanders says, decided by politics. And it's decided by politics, not the market. You know who decides Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren Ocasio Cortez speaking of people who are socialists who are playing the long game. Here they get to decide, and my friends,

you get to suffer the consequences. This is where the country is really This is beyond twenty twenty. This is where the country is really heading. I saw something yesterday Producer Brandon that really got me so excited, and I had, I had, I had to sort of tone it down a little bit. I had to sort of rein it in pull it back, and she lacks a little bit. You know what I saw? What's that Santa? Who? Santa Claus? I mean that would be amazing, Okay, I mean I

probably could see Santa. It's probably a fake Santa though, who's got like half a ham sandwich still in his beard. It's drinking, you know, drinking some some bourbon um. So here here's what I found. There is currently a bill making its way through Congress. Useless Congress. Everybody doesn't do squat speaking squats, I gotta do some popa bucks getting weak, but doesn't do squat, and uh, they're looking at passing a pretty aggressive bill about robo calls. Robo calls are

a scourge. They are they are the audio equivalent of the bubonic plague. Do you know they made there some Remember they've made billions of robocalls just in the last month in this country. So you think there's only three hundred million people, So there's you know, every person in the country is basically whoever is behind these things, whatever countries behind robocalls, should hand over these people to us. Who should be five who should be bankrupted? I would

say it's a form of like harassment, mass harassment. Or look, if you can get people for wire fraud, for like minor white collar stuff, this should be this should be absolutely illegal. And I know politicians liked robot calls too, by the way, which that but at least that season only can only do it, you know, leading up to election, But even that should be gone. No more robocalls. And any country that harbors robocallers, you're either with us or

you're with the robocallers. And if we have to bomb some people, I'm saying, I think we got to bomb some people because this is unacceptable. I sit here during the show and I can't tell you how many times people say, Buck, why are you looking your phone? So my phone's ringing? Everybody who knows me knows you don't call Buck during the show, right, What kind of disrespect is that? It's always Hi, You've won a cruise. I'm like, I will Mini Mouse stop calling me. I will crush you.

Drives me insane. And we live in there the NSA. We got all this fancy stuff, all these crazy programs I used to know about the stuff. He's to work in the government of CIA, who we got all these why can't we get they canna tell me? They can't find who the robo callers are. I mean they're coming from somewhere. I don't believe that at all. My mom actually has been complaining about that a lot to me as well, Like who are these people? She thinks they're

prying phone calls? But a lot of them, by the way, are committing fraud. I mean what they want is they want you to give them credit card information other things, and then they you know a lot of it is foreign based. But I mean we should you know, we should go. I mean if it should be the Great robocall War of twenty twenty, like if we I don't care what you know. If it's coming from Belarus, feller Us,

you're on the hit list, I know, absolutely. And I hate when it's a local number, when you think that's what they spoofed, the local number. I think it's because you and me we book s, so we always kind of answered our phone. Yeah, and it ends up being you wait a second. And even if it's a block number, it's like what if it's President Trump waking up and finally realizing he should make me a White House Press secretary?

You know, like you know what about that? You never know and then you get mad, you know, and then I missed that call and he'd be like, yeah buck buck, missus chance he just just called. I'm like, yo, I'm right here. Oh it's infuriating. It's absolutely infuriating. Yeah, have you gotten the texts as well? The robot test? But it's great with the text, oh yeah, which is basically the same thing, just in text for him. But they may be passing a law that would allegedly deal this.

And here's why I can't get too excited. It's Congress. I feel like they're gonna mess it up. This is the easiest thing. Though, this is so bipartisan. I gotta say, I don't even know. I mean, if a Democrat managed to take care of this issue, would I vote Democrat? I don't think so, but I'd have to think about it. Dry be insane drives me insane. Almost isn't a robot calls need to go and then the backup noise on

trucks needs to go to all vehicles. Yes, all this is like, this is my great campaign for all of Humanity's the dumbest idea in the universe. The things are way too loud. They developed this sound. Some Japanese guy, an engineer in the seventies, developed this sound. It actually is at a decibel level that's much higher than it needs to. It's the whole thing is trash. But OSHA won't change. I mean, you know, Buck wants to wage war on OSHA and the robotcallers. You got my boat,

you know what I'm saying. Twenty I mean, you know, there's the rent is too damn high, guy, there's the robot calls. They're too damn much guy. That's me. I just completely lose my mind on this. Can't the government do something worthwhile for once? You know, I can't say anyway, it's just serenity. Now, we'll see if this ends up actually actually happening. By the way, there was also a I keep telling you about these gun laws in New

York City. This was great though they've essentially admitted also that the gun laws that they're trying to fight for does not make anybody safer, which is just amazing. So now we've gone to the point where they're not even doing make lived they're not even pretending that these gun laws are about safety in New York. The lawyers are like, yeah,

we just have them. This just goes to the point that I've often made in the past that I want you all to remember that much of gun legislation is really about not liking gun owners instead of making people safer. It's a way to stick your thumb in the eye of people that believe in the Second Amendment, who are now overwhelmingly conservative and on the right. So by passing laws to harass that constituency, you are doing something that just makes liberals feel good. They like it. They like

to just stick it to the gun owner. They like to show gun owners that they're not good people and they support the wrong politicians. I mean, New York has admitted as much that the stupid rules that I've told you about, and I know what those rules are, the stupid rules about how you can own a firearm transport a firearm. They don't even know whether the rules will be enforced in certain ways. That is all because they don't like gun owners. That's it. Just like I've just

like I've been saying for a long time. This is why when you point out after there's some terrible gun massacre or some crime happens, that's unspeakable involving firearms. They want to pass laws that wouldn't have stopped that crime, because it's not about stopping crime. It's about blaming gun owners for all of societies ills. That's what it really is all. I think they're sixty million gun owners in

America something like that. It's a pretty big swath, a pretty big bunch, and of course over three hundred million estimated firearms in circulation. But we live in the People's Republic of New York, Man. It's not a good scene here. Sometimes, ain't no party like a Team buck party, because a Team Buck party don't stop. Yeah, we got Buck turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. It's the role of the call. The roll call that really made sense. But it was close enough. I call us. The people

know what I'm talking about. Facebook dot com, slash buck sexon or Team Bucket. I heart media, which I do. I heart it. iHeartMedia dot com. Also, please continue to check us out on channel two forty eight on Pluto TV. Pluto TV is an app. Go on your smartphone. Just type in Pluto p l u t O TV, download it, go to channel two forty eight. Super easy, totally Free looks really slick. A lot of other channels you can see on it too. It's not just for the show,

but the show is obviously awesome. Me Jesse Kelly the First on Pluto TV channel two forty eight. Do check it out. And you know whose birthday's coming up later this month, Brandon Buck. I don't know why I just regarded myself in the third person, but and so we have the birth of Jesus and the birth of Buck in the month of December. And what do I want for my birthday? I want everyone listening to this show to get one person who loves freedom in America to

download to actually subscribe is even better. But download and subscribe to the Buck Sexton podcast on either iTunes or the iHeartRadio app or wherever they listen to podcasts. And if they've never listen to podcast be like, well, this is the one you should start with. So that's where it's at, all Right, let's get to it, Katrina, Right, Hey, Buck, been watching you and Jesse on Pluto TV. Well, good job, good job, Katrina. That's the way to do it. Glad

I have another conservative outlet out there. I hope the First continues to grow um, all right, she'll tie. Thank you so much, Katrina appreciate it. Let's get to Angela. Hey Buck love the show, Angela, the show loves you. The Irishman is definitely a must see. Peaky Blinder season five also a must Well. I gotta tell you, Angela, because you like Peaky Blinder season five, it makes me more inclined to think that I should listen to you about The Irishman the way I think we're gonna do.

When producer Mark comes back brand do you like hockey? All right? And is there hockey in January and February? I think so I should know this. Yeah, I think it ends in April, and I'm wearing an Islanders had ye winter time and I feel like you guys are skating around on a big block of ice. The winner makes it. It's not like you should be playing hockey in July. Really, No, No, I think it ends in like March April. All right, So we're gonna I'm gonna try to sponsor a you know, pop a buck over here.

It's gonna sponsor a freedom hut ice hockey because I want to keep an open mind. Okay, So I'm gonna get tickets for you me and Mark. Oh that's my plan. Yeah, Mark comes back, so would you come? Yeah? All right, and do we see that? Do we see the Rangers or the Islands. I mean, if it's possible to see an Islanders Rangers game, you might see Mark and I fight. But oh, you're on opposite sides of this. Yeah, oh,

we gotta do that that. I mean, we're gonna be The seats are gonna be crappy, by the way, I mean, the Freedom Hut is still growing. But like, we'll go, sure, we'll go, you know. And I'm just saying, this is a plan we have. So there, there, there you have it. Angela says she binged it on both last weekend. It was well worth it, Jack Ryan, this season can't get past episode. To Angela, I agree Jack Ryan's crap. It's

not good. It's not good. They shouldn't They should have just paid, throwing a little little cash to the buster. I would have explained to them how to make some cool stuff happen, give them a little cia razzle dazzle, and the show would have been watchable. But now it's crap. It's a garbage show, and it's really bad. I'm very disappointed because I actually the first season was hyper unrealistic and there's some cheesy stuff, but like a move that was pretty good even though they like get the guy

at the end of this. Anyway, this I should probably just do a new show where I just get to talk about whatever is in my mind, like pop culture stuff, and just let it rip and people can listen to that if they want, say, gets Some people like it. Other people are like, where are you on the political philosophy? Stick in your lane, sir? How dare you? Sir? But I love all you guys, and I just want to share with you some of my thoughts on the things. I just want to be friends. Team Buck Boots. Oh

that's actually his name. That's awesome, Boots and Buck. That would be a great name for a bourbon Boots and Buck Solomon. Solomon was displaying a number of questionable donations funneled through a fake business. The top Dems reason for the rush so they can claim retribution. M Boots, I don't really know what you're asking me here. I think you're referring to John Solomon, but I'm not really clear

on the question. So I'm gonna have to ask you to send in a clarifier on that one for me, Steve, right, Hey, Buck, love a show and always find comfort in the freedom Hut. You mentioned with Sean Davis. You were surprised that piracy and counterfeiting weren't included in these so called crimes by Big bad Orange Man. How about Felonious Mopuri had tipped Dan Bongino. I mean, you must remember Orange Man bad heading down the escalator at Trump Tower way back, even

before he won. You know, he had to be planning something nefarious anyway, this is what emanated from the district of Crazytown. Buck, My arms are getting weary, but still keep the shield held high. Well, my man, Steve, that's how you gotta keep it. It's no use if it's down, down by your down by your ankles. You gotta keep the shield up otherwise the phaeleanx begins to fail. That is, of course, where we get shields. Sigh. It's perhaps a little bit nerdy, sure, but we love history. We love

ancient Greece fantastic, so that's why we are. Shield time comes from back in the day, holding your shield up in the field and the phaelenx shoulder to shoulder, shield to shield it's actually a form of warfare. The last of very long time leaving around the the Vikings Splurger my Viking sounds a beat like my German. It's sure to save exhipt a leader morching song. I didn't know the Swedish chef was a Viking. My name is Blurgen

Klergan from the Flurgen Furred. They had something, I mean, for somebody who doesn't do a Swedish accental it's not terrible, but they had the shield wall, which if you've watched Vikings on the History Channel they show you that's great. And they also have it in the Last Kingdom, which is a I think the first season is a phenomenal show. I think it's a great show. Have you seen Last Kingdom? Do you like like, do you like dudes with beards and swords fighting? And you know, sure? Yeah, yeah you

should check out Last It's on Netflix. That's great, really quality. Yeah, check that one. Watch a little bit and you come on, you tell me if my recommendations are good. All right, you got it. There we go, Ethan wrights Buck. I think your movie choice is usually pretty spot on. But oh but yesterday you said Timothy Dalton's Bond movies, we're weak. I recommend going back and checking them out again if you've never really watched them. T dalt uh t dalt.

That's the first was actually a fantastic bond in the movies. They just didn't play well to an audience who had gotten more used to Roger Moore's silly, campy version of the role. I've only seen I think Dalton's License to Kill, and all I really remember is that he fed a guy to a great white shark in the beginning of it, I think, which is not a That would not be a good way to go. No, you know, if you gotta be eaaten by something, I mean I take I

think I take bear over shark. You know this is people come to the show for the really high level analysis like this. You're gonna be eaten by something, You go bear, you go shark. Are those the only two options? Dude? You're getting eating one way or the other. Because I would want to be eaten like by a whale, just be one and done. Yeah, but no, dude, then you'd be in the Then you'd like slowly asphyxiating its giant gullet. Touche. Yeah, I guess I'm thinking a Pinocchio got out. So yeah, no,

it's not there's not that much room in there. It'd be kind of gross, you know what I mean. I mean, Okay, here, let's play. Let's play the game for a second. Producer, Brandon, you have a choice. You've got to be eaten by a crocodile or asphyxiated by a boa constrictor. I gotta think crocodile, me too. Yeah, I feel like the massive blood loss means you'd at least pass out pretty quickly. Or is the boa constrictor You've got to be thinking? Come on, man, I'm going out constricted like this, and

that's a more manly way to go being eaten. Maybe you're still punching the exactly you can fight? Oh why you sit there the bulk and striking stare at you while it slowly squeezes you. Yeah it's not good. Helpless, Yeah, helpless? All right, So we established that one. That's why all the important analysis is done here on the Buck Sexton Show.

H Kyle Bucker, how are you talking about golden eye skills? Sorry, but a truly great player doesn't need to use odd job to win Our house rules We're no choosing odd Job because of the unfair advantage of his height. When you can be playing as Jaws instead, you have bragging rights. Damn, damn, my man, Kyle knows what's up. That's true, odd Job. That's why I like the odd Job. He's sneaky. You can sneak around. You couldn't couldn't shoot him as easy.

You learned something. I see, Kyle, I see your game. I know I know what you're starting the dance floor. You move pretty good. All right, everybody, fantastic show are They're gonna be great tomorrow too. Please do spread the word about the show and we'll talk to you. Then she'll tie