Maybe Mitt Isn't The Worst

can speak to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No welcome friends to the bucks Sexton Show, and honor is always to have you here with me. Now, let's get right to it. Looks as of today, Blake Trump has the votes in the Senate to get a Supreme Court nominee confirmed and through to the seat recently left vacant by Ruth Bader Ginsburg's departure. So now we have to figure out what are the Democrats planning next?

Because right now I understand the inclination would be for all of us to say, okay, the Republicans have every right to do this, as much as Democrats whine about it. Doesn't matter. They have a constitutional not only clear designation for this, they have an obligation. I think that's a better way of putting it. Here is the Vice President saying just that play fourteen. President Trump believes that he has an obligation under the Constitution of the United States

to put forward to nominique for the Supreme Court. There've been twenty nine times that there have been vacancies since George Washington through Barack Obama. In all twenty nine cases, the president has made a nomination to the Supreme Court during an election year. And President Trump believes that it's his responsibility and his duty to do that. Again, the Senate's role is to advise and consent, and we're working already with the Republican leadership in the Senate to make

arrangements for the process to move forward. But we believe, judging from history, I believe Justice Ginsberg was confirmed within forty three days of her nominations. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in less time than that. So it's been done in less time. It's been done many times under the same circumstances, and there's no rule, there's no law, there's nothing to prevent it. There's not even a president to prevent it.

So the Libs are flailing right now. They're trying to come up with some argument that will turn the tide in favor for them, and they're not succeeding because we do have the ability to go back and look at what's happened in the past, and we also understand that there's the obligation of politics here too. Why do we vote for the president as Republicans? Why do we vote for these various senators if when they finally have the opportunity to do what they have been promising to do,

they don't do it. How could we think they have the courage of their convictions if they refuse to take the opportunities that come to them to fulfill promises. I mean, it would be a choice to not fulfill this promise to Republican voters. Why would they do that out of some misplaced sense of fair play? I gotta tell you, I had been thinking that mitt Romney would find the first opportunity possible to try and back out of this just because of spite against Trump. But it seems perhaps

mit Romney recognizes that there's no real argument here. There's no real argument against what the president's trying to do. There's the only pseudo arguments, bad faith arguments. I saw a piece by never Trumper's David French and Jonah Goldberg making the rounds about how what's best for our republic would be to cave to Democrat demands here under the promise that they then won't pack the Supreme Court, as

if that's a concession to us. First of all, if anyone believes that Democrats would keep a promise not to pack the Supreme Court based upon this nomination battle, they probably also believed that Jesse Smolette was attacked by two Maga hat wearers on in Chicago at one o'clock in the morning yelling this is Maga country. If you believe one, you probably believe the other, which is not a good indication of one's intelligence. Democrats will break their word, all miss.

Democrats were all the opposing side of the table in twenty sixteen. They did not or twenty fifteen, No, sorry, twenty sixteen, they did not care. They simply it doesn't matter to them that they're all on the record telling us that we have of course, the president has this power in election. Of course you should be able to. That was when they thought they could strong arm us

into going with Merrick Garland. That was when they believed if they had the media and enough enough whiny law professors and former prosecutors and other people that were supposed to revere. And I don't know why, but if we had enough of that, they believed that we would be able to we would cave and they'd get what they want.

But it didn't happen. Didn't happen. And Mitch McConnell deserves a lot of credit because they tried the pressure campaign, then they tried all the stuff that they're making in terms of arguments now plus now you got to add to they're camping outside of people's homes. No sleep for Lindsey Graham, no sleep for Mitch McConnell. Looking for weak links in this chain. I thought Romney would be a

weak links. So far, we'll see. I'm not. I'm not giving Romney an at a boy until we see whether or not he actually does his duty here to the voters of Utah, KNRS a great station out in Salt Lake City having added us to their lineup. I know the folks in Utah, not all of them love Trump.

A lot of them do not all of them love Trump, but they do expect somebody who is a Republican Senator from the great state of Utah to support this most important of tasks for conservatism, for constitutionalism, and the Republican Party getting us a judge that will truly tip the balance away from what it has been for decades. You see, Democrats have gotten a little too, a little too smug and emotionally and intellectually complacent when it comes to the court.

They're so used to at this point just being able to count on the court coming up with nonsense with legislation by thought of a bunch of lawyers who have been appointed as judges. And Ginsburg was one of the best examples of that. I mean, Ginsburg was using the Supreme Court as a super legislature, which is not what it is supposed to be. But it was always the

stopgap against legislation. It was a stopgap against representative form of the representative form of government that we have our republic, that even if the people wanted something, voted for someone, and that leader then tried to execute on the promise, the lib Supreme Court would step in and say nope, we see a different thing. Here we see a right that no one else had been able to figure out in two hundred years. We see an interpretation of this

language that's not English. But who cares. We make it up as we go along. That's what they've been doing. In fact, Mitt Romney correct when he points out, Look, Mit had his good moments back in the day. He crushed Obama in that first presidential debate. Of course, Obama went on to win, but it was an embarrassing performance for Barack Obama. Everybody knew it. And Mitt Romney does have his capabilities. I wish he hadn't marched with BLM.

That was the lame, cowardly move, but he did. But here he is at least understanding what's going on with liberals and the court and their perception that what has been will always be not the case Play seventeen. Well, I think it's straightforward in terms of the qui qualifications you look for, which is someone who is an expert of the law, someone who has a record of fairness and judgment that you think is consistent with the law.

I prefer choosing those folks who are, if you will, stric constructionists mean that they look at the law itself and the Constitution as opposed to sort of looking into the sky and pulling out ideas if they think be more appropriate than either of the law or the Constitution. So I recognize that we may have a court which has more of a conservative bent than it's had over

the last few decades. But my liberal friends have over many decades gotten very used to the idea of having a liberal court, and that's not written in the stars. And I know that a lot of people are saying, gosh,

we don't want that change. I understand the energy associated with that perspective, but it's also appropriate for nation, which is, if you will, center right to have a court which reflects center right points of view, which again are not changing the law from what it states, but instead following the law and following the Constitution. What Mit says here is correct. Truth is truth, whether it comes from it

Rami or anybody else. The Libs just believe that there is some sanctified, imaginary right to always have a liberal leading Supreme Court that will give them what they want. I know, people say, oh, but Buck, what about what about you know Bush Gore in two thousand, Oh, you mean the court case where the swing vote right, this

is where were the swing vote was. Like, guys, you can't just pick districts that are Democrat majority districts and only recount those and pick out the ones where you think you might be able to harvest more votes and not to recounts in other places in Florida where there have been equal Probably they were trying to scam the system,

and it was obvious. But on all the major social issues and most notably abortion, gay marriage as well among others, the courts left lean has been obvious and has been unbroken. But we may enter a new era now and one in which we will see whether liberals are willing to abide by the rules that they were pretending were sacrosank when they were going in their favor. Let's all be

very clear about this. Democrats are effectively at this point already telling the American people, if we don't have a Supreme Court that we can count on on the big social issues that are very emotional for us and the drive a lot of the Democrat Party's power, if we don't have a Supreme court that will do that, we will break down, subvert and destroy the system. They're they're pretty explicit about this. I mean, here's Don Lemon, who is sometimes too dumb to be subtle or to obscure

his intent, but he's definitely a big lib. Here's what he's saying over at CNN play ten, everybody, We're gonna have to blow up the entire system. And you know what we're gonna have to do. I don't know. You know what we're gonna Yes, what you have to do, you just got to honestly, from what your closing argument is, you're can have to get rid of the electoral college because the people, I don't see it, because the minority in this country decides who the judges are, and they

decide who the president is is. They need a constitutional amendment to do that. And if Democrats, if Joe Biden wins, Democrats can stack the courts and they can do that amendment and they can get it past well, you need to third in the Congress and three quarters of the state legislature. They may be able to do that. Yeah. Yeah, about as big a waste of time as the Convention of the States project to talk about. By the way,

but here we are, here we are. That's what Democrats are promising that they're going to be able to get a constitutional amendment that they're going to change the whole system. They're going to change the whole system such that it comports with their desires. But we've listened to the system for a very long time. Right, we've been obeying. We who are pro life. We've said, okay, I mean, this is the law, even though it's immoral and wrong. But I we're gonna We're not gonna break the law, subvert

the law. I mean, people aren't going to advocate The Republican Party doesn't advocate for you know, shutting down with force the way that BLM does, shutting down with for his businesses that they don't like, shutting down abortion clinics that the right has not been doing that. We've said, okay, this is the law. That's work to change the law. And now we see the little tyrannical side of the Democrats where the law is just an impediment to their desires.

They don't care when the system went against the right, what did the right do. Let's rebuild, Let's let's win elections, and when the time comes and we have the legal right and authority to make certain decisions, will make different decisions. The Democrat view is when we have the power, that's what we do. When you have the power, we shut down the system and make sure that you can't use it.

And people want to talk about good faith and fair play with them, I mean, are Goldberg and David French are they No, they're just never trumpers who have boxed themselves in to intellectually ridiculous positions. Now now, among many other never trumpers who have done the same thing, a lot of them are part of this Lincoln Project garbage. Now it's always you know, they can conservative case for a portion, the conservative case for undermining everything you believe.

This is what never trumpers have been turned into it. It's quite sad, actually, it's really rather pathetic. That's where it is. That's what we see happening. They are telling you if they don't get their way, they're going to break things. They're going to disrespect, undermine and alter the system itself. They're going to change the rules of the game. They're not going to try to win the game with

fair play. This is the Democrat approach to everything in politics now, but particularly around a judicial nomination like this. This is the same thing as saying Okay, you know you have a four quarters to win a football game. We're going to change it and now it's going to be whoever can get the most field goals in the first two quarters that's the winner. Well that's a totally different game. Oh what are you Oh, that's what they're gonna do. Or they're just going to pay off the

refs and just openly cheat. Whatever they have to do, they will do. That's what you're seeing, which is why I want to tell you right now this pause where it feels like, wow, Romney is being sane, which is okay. Look when it happens, I'll say it's a good thing, and you know, credit where it's due. Truth is truth, credit where it's due. Two principles on this show. If Romney casts the right vote here, we're gonna say, hey, high Fivedmit Romney for not being a total sellout coward.

Good job. But I don't think we can get there yet. Well obviously it hasn't happened. But I don't want us to become complacent at all. Remember the analogy I use right, this is a rabid squirrel that we're injecting meth into. No one really knows how this is gonna turn out. This is gonna be crazy. The Libs aren't going to just quietly allow this process to play out. They're gonna go full of Lynsky on this. Yeah, they have no parliamentary procedure to play they have no means of stopping this.

It would be like trying to stop a presidential pardon. I mean, the president's allowed to pardon, we wants to pardon. But they're going to go to that level of what if we take the pen out of his hand, What if we don't allow him to you know, write it down? What if what if we prevent the president from you know, That's what we're going to see. I believe that they're going to physically block members of Congress from being able

to hold a session. I think that they're going to do things that Right now, if you set out loud, people would call you a someone who's being you know, worrying too much, who's being hyperbolic. No, I think that's what we're going through. I don't know what it is yet, but always leave room for crazy, my friends, I've been saying that to you for many years. Always leave room for crazy. And these Democrats are completely nuts and will do anything that they think will be successful to stop

this Supreme Court nomination. You're in the Freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Well, the Democrats are going to hang together, and I think the American people would be very interested to know that is it asking too much to have Republicans actually live up to their word? Already?

Wec that Lindsay Graham. It's not that we see that, Mitch McConnell, it's not so Republicans can't be touched this to keep their word, and the American people should know that we will explore every tool that we Democrats have to keep Hitch McConnell from shoving this nominee down our fook. They're going to come up with stuff that you and I can't even think about right now because they're emotionally

deranged over this. Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat George Stephanopoulos's wife, it was reported in Daily Mail, I forget her name, she's like a third third pier actress. Or was she cried for forty five five minutes? Obviously this was told of the press. Cried for forty five minutes with her whole family in the car when they heard Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away. That's bizarre, that's not normal. You don't know this person, you don't love this person, give the

relationship with her. You're gonna cry for forty five minutes with your whole family because a judge who we all know is really a political figure passes away at the age of eighty whatever it was. Really they think that's normal, folks, they think that's sane. Thanks for listening to the past. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Another rule for life, not just for politics, but for everything you do. Never

take advice from your enemy about what's best for you. Okay, don't take advice from people who don't want to see your future your go well, who don't want to see you succeed. When they say, hey, you know what you should really do, Listen to that thing and do the other thing right, Listen to that thing that they're telling you, and then go back to whatever you know is a

better option and feel even more confident in it. That's how you should feel about people like Nancy Pelosi coming out to tell you that this is bad politically for Republicans. It's gonna be like the twenty eighteen midterms. Right here here she is, Nancy Pelosi play. So people know that, and that's why the Republicans are rushing. They want to get it done so they can overturn the Affordable Care Act. And you know what, they're going to be paying this

price for elections to come, elections to come. Everyone's looking at what makes a difference in these senatorial races. We'll see, But what they don't really understand is you're going to see two eighteen again and again and again. It could not be more ironclad. It could not be more clear to any of us who are paying attention to this that Nancy Pelosi telling Republicans that if they put through this Supreme Court justice, whoever it may be, we don't know yet. I think it's I think it is gonna

be Amy Coney Barrett, but it could be wrong. But Pelosi telling you that this would be bad for Republicans is a is a one hundred percent certainty that Republicans will pay a terrible price if they don't do this, which we already knew anyway. But notice how shameless she is. Oh yeah, sure, it's gonna be so bad for this is just whining. Republicans. You're gonna lose forever if you do this thing. A promise. No, there were probably in party would be massacred in the next election if they

didn't at least do everything they can. Now, when I say everything they can, I'm worried that. You know, Democrats are going to go to a whole other place that I can't even psychologically really get there. You, I'm like, how, Remember they were willing to lie about a man who

was manifestly innocent of any wrongdoing. They were willing to read into the congressional record as Kamala Harris, the current vice presidential nominee, did unsubstantiated, completely outrageous and insane and obviously false gang rape, high school gang rape allegations about now Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. If you're willing to do that, you have no morality that will stop you from doing something.

It's just a question of are you worried about the punishment for doing certain things illegal things, for example, open violence to stop this from happening. You know, one of the reasons why Democrats, I think wouldn't necessarily go the open violence route to keep the seat is because there are enough people who believe in the law law in order that they would be punished for that, because I do worry. I worry they're gonna be threats of violence.

I'm sure they're already are against the very Spreme Court nominees, but that they'll become more intense and Republicans we do not do a good enough job of protecting our people who fall under this ring of hatred from the left. I mean, all of a sudden, it's like the eye of Soron pops up and is focused on one person on the right, and we all say, oh, you know, I hope they've got a nice personal security detail or something we do not do enough. Never happens in the left.

When was the last time a prominent Democrat had a mob of morons outside his or her home shouting threats and epithet insanity over a political issue. We don't do that, they do. Look, not all political parties are created equal, my friends, or are equal. Not all of them are are similar in their and their aspirations, their morality, their culture of respect for rule of law, for open discourse, for human and individual freedom. They're not all the same,

all right. You know, the the Bolsheviks winning in the Soviet Union was not just something that had to happen, and well, it would have been the same if anybody, No, it would not have been the same. If some other party had won, would have been better. Almost certainly. I don't see it's possible. It couldn't have been, right, you know, And then people and I don't like the Nazi analogies of Democrats to all the time, but you know, the

Nazis were democratically elected. They cheated and threatened people and used coercion, but Nazis were democratically elected in Germany, so it's not like that's it, that's impossible. But they were clearly much more moral political options in Nazi in Germany before it became Nazi Germany. I'm just trying to tell you, folks, you know that when I say the Democrats have gone and saying and their party has really lost its way, I'm not exaggerating. I'm not saying it for attention. It's true.

It's clear. Look at what is normal for them and it's not normal for us, and anybody can see it. Conservatives sit around saying, okay, what are the laws what really matters? How do we protect people, How do we make sure that everyone has, you know, as good and safe and prosperous and happy a life as possible. Democrats, if this makes me feel upset, and I will ruin your life because of it. That is their ethos, and

they will even threaten your life because of it. Now, I mean, I always see these insane libs of things that they send me. Here's a rule. If you ever you know, and I know no one listens to the show, would ever do such a thing. But if one ever sends a threat against a person or his family because they don't like that individual's po pics, they're a loser. That person is a loser and somebody who really needs to re examine all their life choices. It's a rule. Normal, happy,

well adjusted people do not do that. Okay, And we should all understand that the Democrat Party has now gone to a place where it's it's ideologically incoherent. You have all these different factions that don't really share any philosophical core other than the pursuit of power, just raw power. We'll band together so that you know, you can get what you want and I can get what I want.

When the Democrat Party, that's it. There's no real philosophy other than moral relativism and whatever it takes, whenever you need to do it. So it's effectively pushing us toward a thugocracy, especially as they're openly talking about destroying the very institutions that keep this country together. They they complained from the beginning of Trump's presidency about how he's tearing how he was tearing down institutions. He did not tear

down any institutions. It's not true, all right, And he did, and I would have liked you have seen him go after some things more than he did. But he didn't tear down institutions. That was a lie. But beyond that, beyond that, they now openly threatened to destroy the very institutions that they pretended to care so much about for the first few years of Trump's presidency. Again, there's just hypocrisy,

flip flop, it doesn't matter. They'll say today something that's in direct contradiction to what they said yesterday or last year or ten years ago, and never explain any transformation. They're thinking, it's just well, I want this thing now. Yeah. Democratsy the equivalent of someone who says, yeah, I don't think it's fair for me to pay rent, tell the landlord that I don't want to pay, and then someone who is a renter from them turns around and says, well,

I don't want to pay you rent. They say, no, I'm the landlord. You have to give me money. That's what our contract says. Is there a principle there? No, of course not. It's just they want what they want and that's the plan. That's all that matters. So we should understand that right now. And that's why it's hilarious to mean when you hear Chuck Schumer making a making

a case, making an appeal to honor and decency. Oh gosh, Chuck, play nine is in the kind of country we live in, This election and this vacancy mean everything, and by all rights, by every modicum of decency and honor, Leader McConnell and the Republican Senate majority have no right to fill it. No right. In the final few weeks, sensing her failing health, Justice Ginsburg told her family that it was her quote most fervent wish that she not be replaced until the

new president is installed. First of all, they have every right legally, by precedent, by history, by the system. They have every right. There is no question about this. They're breaking no law, no regulation, no constitutional norm, so they in fact have every right. What he's doing is just gaslighting.

But also, and I want to really put this delicately, so the Libs in the way way back who are quietly listening to this because they know that I'm smarter than all the Libs that they listen to, and they want to understand why is this guy so much smarter than all the Democrats that are trying to feed me, you know, crap on their podcast. I don't give a blanking blank about what Ruth Bader Ginsburg told her family in the last that's for her and her family. It

shouldn't even be publicly discussed. It has zero barrier in anything. Do not care would say this anywhere to anyone. Do not care at all what she said. I don't care if her last words were you know, I'm actually a space alien from the planet Zarga, or my fondest constitutional dream is that the next president and not Trump. It doesn't matter. It's the same thing, same thing in terms of it matters to me. Zero. It matters to the law, to the Constitution, to our system. Zero. But they keep

repeating this. It's pathetic. It's pathetic, but let's remember who we're dealing with. While it's irrational, while it's not a real argument, it does drive an emotional response. It does go to this cult of RBG that was created over many years, and that had, as I've said to you, people who think that they're really hip and cool praising the amazing fierceness of the RBG gym workout, which is just it was a weird thing. Was it was creepy cult like thinking from people. But you're not dealing with

normal adults here, my friends. You're dealing with people who now believe that with the passing of Ginsburg, the entire country is at stake, which also goes to show you how much emphasis they put on the Supreme Court as a super legislature and how much they've gotten used to this and it really unsettles them. You know, they think the foundation of this country is I get what I want, and if I don't, at least I know that at the end of the day, the Supreme Court will give

me what I want. And on the issue of abortion alone, for how many decades now, if people have been raised with this it's constitutional, it's the law of the land, which, of course it is not. It is not constitutional, it never was constitutional. It is violence to the constitution to even pretend that Roe v. Wade was well decided. Honest liberals, honest legal scholars on the liberal side, we'll even say.

They'll say that they think that abortion should be legal, and here's why, right, but they'll say that the reasoning in row is preposterous. Right to privacy that creates it is you can do this with anything. But that's the whole point. Libs want to be able to do whatever they want through the law and pretend that it's the law, which in fact undermines the very foundation of our legal

system every time they engage in in that practice. But imagine what it's like for them to wake up and realize that, no, you no longer can just just shout people down with it's the law. It might be the law in some states, not the law in other states. There was a period of time on a profound moral question in this country. A profound evil was being done in this country, and there were some states that were legally much closer. They weren't where they of course should

have been. At the time, but they were much closer to being righteous than others. There were the evil pro slavery states and the states in which a black American could live in freedom, not equal rights not. And that's what I meant by it wasn't perfect, but you know, one side was right and one side was wrong on that. And once we get away from the constitutional umbrella decision, I mean this make believe of Roe v. Wade. Now people are gonna have to say, Okay, at the state level,

what should the law really be. It's not just going to be this blanket protection for the practice all nine months of a pregnancy, which is the Democrat standard right now, and it's a super right as well. You can't even block access to a clinic, and you get they create all these special exceptions and carve outs to protect this practice, a practice that is morally odious and evil. Slavery was morally odious, it was evil. Abortion is also odious and evil.

And the whole, the whole lib mentality of the last fifth years, we'll get a new look. Well, all of a sudden, it'll have to defend itself. I can't just say that that's the law, deal with it. That's the law. Deal with We have been dealing with it, we may not have to keep dealing with it. And that's what the liberals really can't accept. Chuck Schumer's claims about decency and honor are laughable. He's a man with neither decency nor honor, So in that sense, he's a perfect spokesperson

for the Democrat Party. Right now, you're in the Freedom This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Sixty two percent of Americans think that the Supreme Court seats should be filled by the nominated by the new president. Sixty two percent of Americans. We're currently being ruled by minority in this country. And at Blue raised one hundred million dollars since Friday. The Democrats are mobilized against this outrage that is going on with these hypocrites in Republican leadership positions.

And you know something this they are so beneath any kind of shamelessness that it's impossible to even talk to these people. So you know, you were going to show the clips of them and the stupid things that they'll hypocritics, lie things that they've been saying. Joy Behop may be the dumbest person on TV, but she understands the Democrat mindset. She gives really a really clear picture of what Democrats

think right now. Republicans are beneath contempt for doing something that they are clearly and there's no question about this, clearly legally constitutionally allowed to do. And they keep referring to the hypocrisy of Mitch McConnell. That's a lie, Mitch McConnell. The Senate is not in the hands of the opposition.

That's the McConnell rule. I don't know. I mean, they just they're just desperate, saying everything and anything, which is why I'm telling you they're living in an alternate universe. They have no argument here. Tough, blank is all I can say to them. Tough they have nothing. You know. It's kind of like they lost an election in a sense, right, they lost the election in twenty sixteen. The Supreme Court

seats open. Too bad. Maybe they shouldn't have been all encouraging Ruth Bader Ginsburg to keep going and going and going and going. I mean, she was too old for the job. That's just reality. No one's allowed to say that for some reason. But she should have retired just for political purposes of talking about it. Now, the Democrats made it. There was a calculation here, you know, and they thought Hillary was they wanted Hillary to replace the

Ginsburg seat. Or you know, well too bad, too bad libs. That's really the that's really the headline here. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. And one liberal justice nominated by a Democrat, they had their life ruined. They're talking about changing the electoral college. If they keep the House, the Senate, and

the White House, this country will change fundamentally. The electoral College will be obliterated, will go to a popular vote DC, and the Puerto Rico will become states. So will be one hundred four senators. It goes on and on and on. There'll be additional members of the Supreme Court. They'll all be liberal. They're going to take the process, the rules and change them to their benefit. Now that sounds scary, right. Perhaps you could try to comfort yourself by saying, well,

it's politics. Things get heated, and you know, it always gets more attention to be a catastrophist. It always will get you more attention. It's a better SoundBite to say that everything is going to be destroyed, everything is going to be ruined. But here's what I gotta say in defense of Lindsay Graham, or or just in further into what Lindsay Graham is saying. Here, he's just telling you what the Democrats are telling you. They're they're openly threatening this.

They're saying they will do this. And yet when you hear Republicans say it, you think, I mean, come on, They're not really gonna do that, are they? Oh yes they will, Oh yes they will. Friends, they tried a soft coup against the president of the United States based on a lie. Some British bureaucrat loser x m I six guy asked a couple of his buddies what they

had heard from other buddies about Trump. Route it up, called it a dussier and then fed it to the FBI and the American anti Trump news media and tried to engineer a coup against the president. And this went all the way to the Special Council. The entire national news media, with you know, an exception of a one network and a few or whatever five percent of the media wasn't on board for this. Everybody else went along

with it. That was what they did. They've never apologized, they've never even had any sense of shame from it. In fact, their only problem with it is that it did not succeed. And we think that the Democrats are just going to let this process play out as it is. And we think that if they were to win this election, they would not do everything they could to abuse as much power as possible. They will transform the system and it would be a transformation into what they wanted it

to be all along. Anyway, they don't like this bulwark against their tyranny that the Constitution provides. They don't want protections for individual rights and minority I don't mean racial necessarily, I just mean minority viewpoint rights. They don't want that. They want the power to tell you what to do. The Democrat Party is a socialist party. They are socialists. Socialists are first informists. You always hear about it as oh,

making sure everyone has enough whatever. Socialism is always about the implementation of a plan. There are a bunch of people who have an idea that's going to make everything better for everyone, but they demand obedience and no check on their authority to do the thing that they need to do the plan, whether it's the Green New Deal or any number of these Democrat plots to increase their power and their ability to have a say over everything in your life. You're not allowed to push back, You're

not allowed to say hold on a second. There should be some humility in government processes. Government can do a lot of damage. In fact, it does do a lot of damage to people's lives on a regular basis. We should have some agreement beforehand about what the rules are, what the government can and cannot do. Democrats want to erase all of that. They're telling you, they want to erase all that. This is not some theory that I've come up with. I'm not seeing something that nobody else thinks.

Is there there open about this? Understand what the stakes are then in this presidential election year where it's effectively if we don't win, we will burn everything down, we will break the whole system. That's what these riots for months have been about. It's been it's a vent of it's a ventilation. It's a exposition of rage that has built up among Democrats under four years of Trump. They don't think they can emotionally and psychologically handle four more

years and they're letting us all know. If you think you're allowed to vote for this guy again, think again. We're going to come up with a way to stop you. We're gonna come up with a way to break the very process that legitimizes this fascist dictator known as Donald Trump. These people are simply put nuts. They have lost it, and they believe that all that they hold dear is on the line right now. They're raturing this up. Republicans have for a long time now lived with a court

that slaps them in the face with bad decisions. We've never we never say we're going to pack the court. We never say we're going to destroy the whole system because it did not give us a desired outcome. That's not our approach. It is the Democrat approach. There's a difference here. The two sides are not the same. There is socialist AOC talking about what she views as on

the line here. If the Republicans fill this seat, play twenty one, it's extraordinarily important that we understand the stakes of this vacancy. Our reproductive rights are on the line, Our labor rights are on the line, Our right to healthcare is on the line. Labor and union protections are on the line, our climate is on the line. With

an early appointment. All of our rights, the rights that so many people died for, voting rights, reproductive rights, healthcare rights, all of those rights go right, are at risk with this appointment. And so we need to make sure that we mobilize on an unprecedented scale to ensure that this vacancy is reserved for the next president. Mobilize to one end, republic This is do or die for every Republican senator's career. They know that. If you're a Republican and you don't,

I mean, you know, Murkowski and Collins, they're done. People recognize who they are. You know. Maybe people would say, oh, it's a political calculation. The Republicans want them for some things. They'll let them on this because they have the votes. All right, maybe theoretically, but the part that's only because

they have the votes without them. Trust me, if they were if they were too necessary votes in this process, no Republican would ever want to cast a ballot for either than Ever, again, we understand what the stakes are. She is telling you, aoc here is telling you that they're going to do an unprecedented mobilization what's the point. What's the point of that mobilization. We know what they think, we know what they want. They're not going to change

our minds. It's not going to happen. But there's a I believe and implied menace to all of this. The

Democrat Party has been mobilized for months. We see it on the streets, demanding people ben venet literally ben venet, demanding people profess their allegiance to a Marxist racially divisive movement known as Black Lives Matter, Demanding that people stop in their cars and quake in fear or else burning down businesses, setting fire to government buildings, attacking police officers, shooting lasers in their eyes, throwing bottles full of urine

feces at them. That's what the Democrats have done for mobilization. You know, they could have had peaceful marches across the board, or they invited Republicans to come down and talk to them. They wanted to convert people they want an independence, to understand that Democrats would provide better governance, better quality healthcare, more for no. No. Instead, you've got a bunch of maniacs who justify political violence and who think that if

you don't believe there are thirty seven genders. You're an evil, anti science bigot. That's the Democrat Party today. And then let's just look at a couple of the areas, a couple of the issues that AOC outlines for being under assault. Here are reproductive rights. I know we often don't put it in these terms, but given what Democrats are willing to justify as part of the abortion industry, what do you think they're really not willing to do to their

fellow human beings. It's a harsh question, but I think it's an important one. Ask a Democrat politician, should you be able to abort a baby at eight nine months? Eight nine months in the womb? And they will say yes. I mean, they might try to dodge the questions that, but ultimately they will say yes. If they're willing to do that. Do you think that they have some guiding moral compass on other issues that's all of a sudden, humane and decent. Now, I'm afraid that they're they're moral compass.

I'm afraid that their very souls themselves become corrupted in this process. And when somebody who has been a party to evil ideas for a long time is challenged on them and might have to face the reality of the widespread recognition of the moral deficiencies of those ideas. They become desperate. Nobody wants to think they're the bad guy or the bad girl. Nobody wants to think that sometimes the mirror shows you things you don't want to see. Climate is on the line, they believe, and I'm not

exaggerating this. I'm not going beyond the most mainstream rhetoric from the most powerful Democrats in the country. They believe that climate is an existential crisis that threatens the entirety of the human race. Our species will go extinct unless you listen to people like Gavin Newsom and take shorter showers and use renewable energy that is hyper expensive and very inconvenient. Right now, that's mainstream Democrat thinking. They really believe this. I still can't get a great deal on

beach run property in Palm Beach despite the science. But you're supposed to believe this, friends, You're supposed to believe twenty years, thirty years, it's all gonna be underwater. Okay, sell me those beach right, Sell me the Obama Mansion and Martha's vineyard for you know, couple one hundred grand, I'll pay a couple of hundred grand. I could probably take out a bank loan and a FOURD that. I think he paid eleven million for his house. But I

thought it's all gonna be underwater. But they believe they have convinced themselves it is an existential issue for the human race. What would you be willing to do to save the human race? What would you be willing to do to protect the legacy and future of your party from the recognition of its deep moral stain with the abortion practice of the last forty some odd years. What would you be willing to do? I can't tell you. I know what their plan is, but we're about to

find out. This is the calm before the storm, and it's not even that calm because we're an election cycle. Well, we've got a few days here while all that's happening is there's silence. Is the enemy, so to speak, is preparing its artillery shells and getting all of its magazines in order for an all out assault. That's where the Democrats are right now. Will it be successful? I don't know. I certainly hope we'll be able to hold the line, but They're not going to go quietly on this. Friends.

They have no real legal recourse, They have no mechanism within our system to stop this. So you're effectively guaranteed they will go outside the system or break the system. That's it. There is no they sit back respectfully and allow the game to be played by the pre established and agreed upon rules. That is not an option. And for these Democrats, do not be fool You're in the freedom und This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.

I don't believe that Donald J. Trump, Donald J. Trump People gets to name three justices to the Supreme Court. The guy can't even name three branches of government, but he gets to name three justices who served for life. This is the same guy who's had to fire everyone he's hired because of how bad he isn't hiring people for life. Trump can't even pick his own partner for life, but he gets to do it for America. Wow, this country's rock and roll. Wow, this guy's not funny. Amazing,

really really stunning circumstances. Situation that Trevor Noah is a comedian who focuses on American politics despite being wildly ignorant of them. Nonetheless, here we are. Yeah, the president does get to pick three crime or libs. I know what else to say? This is the system we have. You know, when Barack Obama won reelection in twenty twelve, and you know, just kick Mitt Romney's butt after kicking John McCain's. But I was annoyed. I thought the American people made the

wrong decision. And then I thought, okay, let's you know, prepare to make the argument and be in political opposition of bad policies and get ready for the next election. That's what adults do. That's what serious people with principles and values and a sense of history and a need for stability and continuity within our system. That's what they do. That is not what Democrats do. And they're promising I mean, I'm not making this up. They're promising that that is

not what they will do. Well, there's another issue here. Biden is not willing to tell people who he is going to put who he would put forward as a Supreme Court nominee. Isn't that an interesting one? For a second? Play clip twenty Joe Biden has refused to list the names of his potential justices because he knows they're too

extreme to withstand any form of public review. If Joe Biden and the Democrats take power, they will pack the Supreme Court with far left radicals who will unilaterally transform American society far beyond recognition. Let's all really dig into this for a second. Pruser, Mark, Do we have Biden actually saying that that's all he's got to say on that. I don't know if we know that, Okay, because I

know that he said, there's a clip of it. But anyway, he's just basically said, I don't want people to focus on me, Let's focus on something else. When he's asked who he would appoint or would he put forward a list, even give him some time to pull together list. Shouldn't he have a list? He wants to be president of the

the United States. You don't think there are a lot of left wing legal groups out there that have already thought long and hard about which judicial activist, left wing climate change alarmist nut they're going to put on the Supreme Court. Trust me, they've thought about this. Why won't Biden tell us? Well, this gets you back to a continuing theme between Democrats and Republicans. Republicans tell people what they want to do, right, and then they try to

do it in office. Sometimes they're unsuccessful. Sometimes Democrats don't want the general public to know what they're really going to do because they won't win any independent votes if people actually knew how crazy they were. So Democrats always pretend to be less Democrat when they're up for election. If anything, Republicans are often not Republican enough. They lose

votes because the base doesn't believe them. You know, Republicans lose votes because people on the right think that they'll become a you know, a chicken when they get to DC, and they'll be a chrony capitalist, chamber of commerce stooge. Democrats are, We're not that crazy. No, we wouldn't do that. We're we're centrists, man, We're Joe Biden's party, man. Yeah. Sure.

And then the activist class gets to make all the decisions when it actually when push comes to shove, and then the socialists are the ones who get on TV, who run the party's agenda, who pushed for the most radical I mean, look, Obama wanted single pair of healthcare and couldn't get it because they didn't have enough Democrat support for it. But that was what they were initially going for Obama wanted amnesty and Republicans almost went along

with it. And Obama tried to get massive climate change regulations done, rules and laws passed. How much more left wing is he really going to be under the circumstances at the time. I know, I know that he couldn't go full Carl Marks, but certainly moving in that direction. But we're reminded here Biden won't tell people what Trump says.

It is absolutely true. Biden will not tell people who he would put on the Supreme Court because it would be a left wing activist and people would get to know exactly what the Democrat plan for that seat is. Got to hide the truth. People. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,

the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Back then, we were not aware that forty to forty five percent of people were asymptomatic, Nor were we aware that a substantial proportion of people who get infected get infected from people who are without symptoms. That makes it overwhelmingly important

for everyone to wear a mask. So when people say, well, why did you change your stance and why are you emphasizing masks so much now when back then you didn't and in fact you even said you shouldn't because there was a shortage of masks. Well, the data now are very very clear, and that's why we have to act on the data. So we need to put that nonsense behind us about well they keep changing their minds. Masks work,

physical distancing works, avoiding crowds work. Thank you Sanjay for giving me the opportunity to be on television now to say that that is the fact. So people should not worry that that's wrong or worry that that's something that's going to change. This is where we are and it is based on fact. Okay, where are the studies that show the reduction and transmission from mask wearing? I'm just wondering. I asked that question. Honestly, I'm sure there are some.

There are probably some studies. Just why why don't we see them all the time? Why is it that Sweden doesn't have masks required and is now at basically zero close to zero deaths a day and very very few infections and has no plans to shut down. The UK currently is about to shut down. Wait, I thought that America was in a bad place the summer from COVID because we're such a bunch of red state Bible thumping Trump supporting morons. Right, that was what the media was

telling us all summer. But now Europe is having its second wave. Oh wait, maybe maybe what you do by locking down is delay the spread of the virus in a community to a population of people. You don't stop it? Is that? Is that a theory that holds water? Someone give us some thought on your own. But Fauci here saying, oh, we didn't realize that there was all this asymptomatic There was this asymptomatic spread that was going on, and we

thought there was gonna be a mask shortage. How much confidence can I have in this guy's judgment when he really thought that the United States of America was going to run out of bandanas and cloth masks. Anybody we'll get a run out? Wait? Oh yeah, I can't can't wear a mask looking out of masks. No we're not. But I don't even clue. Now they're given out. I got to places they're giving out masks. Now here you go,

here's a mask. Yeah. It's the issue here, as always has been, is this aerosol eyes in a way that mask wearing is largely ineffective or largely effective. If it reduces, you know, the transmission of virus by five percent, it's not worth the hassle. It's just not for a virus that kills point zero zero one percent or point zero three percent or whatever it is now of the people who get it. But we're gonna be wearing masks forever now, folks,

that's the new rule, at least for another year. And as I've been telling you, the Democrat plan is not to finally relent and let America have its have its life back. The Democrat plan is to use our fear, our frustration, and the almost un restricted powers that they now have in order to ram through policies that they want and to and to change our political culture too into one of obedience. Do it because we say so? Wait, hold on, don't I have rights? Don't I have liberties? No?

You don't you have what they tell you you have? Now? Oh? Interesting, you know, the doctor fauci here is never this guy's This guy's not not honestly a person of judgment, not a person that I would want to listen to for a personal health need like I wouldn't go to doctor Fauci and be like, oh, yeah, this guy says that this is my big health problem. I got to tackle it the way that he says. Nope, no faith in

this guy whatsoever. But of course Trump can't fire him because then that would seem like he's you know, political, It would just give them a narrative before the election. It doesn't really serve I think any I don't. I don't think it serves a purpose. It's a political calculation

not to fire him. At this point. What I'm trying to say, they did change their minds, and the fact that here you have a scientist who is kind of smarmy about the whole mind changing issue of just goes to show you that, you know, they don't want anyone questioning them. They don't want anyone saying, hold on a second,

what is this all about? You know? Sure enough? Now now now we're at we're at asymptomatic spread, so everyone has if asymptomatic spread is what they say it is, they'll have a case then that we'll have to wear masks all the time for years and years to come, because who knows if maybe it's a COVID nineteen variant now and it could come back and you don't know,

you could have it. There's only one thing at this point that I want to tell Fauci and the lockdown chorus, and it's two words, and the second one is you, and the first word is I can't say it on radio. That's what I want to say to them. I'm tired of this. I'm sick of this. They've been wrong all along, and now we're getting into the politics, even of the aerosolized virus. You see this with the CDC. They changed their guidance on this. They said it was a draft,

it wasn't yet ready. That's kind of a big thing, isn't it. You're the Centers for disease Control. People have been wondering for a while, like what you really do? And then COVID nineteen comes along, and oh, okay, and now we've got a purpose. And you mess up the whole thing from the start. You mess up the testing kits when it was most useful to know how fast and where the virus was spreading. And now you put out that the virus is spread through aerosol as opposed

to droplets. And this is a pretty this this is an important distinction. Droplets is spit and things coming out of your mouth and including when you talk or saying or you know, do things like that. Droplets would be actual physical carriage of the virus in in fluid, even you know, very small. But and theda here is that, okay, Well, a mask will stop those droplets from being in the air aerosolize virus, which is what the CDC guidance just was temporarily and then they took it down, they changed

their minds. Would be well, just by speaking, the virus is actually getting into the air in micro droplets that evaporate. But then you still essentially you have virus clouds in the air around people when they're talking, right, and viruses are all over our environment all the time, so there

shouldn't be a surprise there's virus all though. There's virus right now on your hands, there is virus on your body, there's virus in your mouth, not covid but although maybe but they're you know, these viruses are in our environment just like bacteria, just like all these other you know, go back to your basic sixth grade science class. It's all over the place. But the aerosolized virus claim that was so interesting because oh, so it's can linger in the air and it's so small that it can stay

suspended in the air for a couple of hours. That was what the CDC guidance was now saying. But people that are walking around with the mask down so their nose is a little bit exposed, or that have gaps above the mask and below the mask, they're totally protected from this. Right because of the magic properties of virus protection. I'll tell you this, The cloth masks that people are wearing would not work as a as a prophylactic device

during amorous moments to prevent you from having children. Right, it's porous, But the cloth mask is supposed to protect you from the aerosolis droplets in the air. That now the CDC is saying, well, no, that's not really a thing. That's not really a thing I'm just putting out there. Do we think it's possible that at a time when we've already we've already heard the CDC told us that they were they were adjusting their their dictates, their guidance

they call it. But it's really a dictation. We're supposed to do what they say over mask wearing because they were worried that people would that the healthcare providers would run out, so they lied to us for our own good. On that one right, they've admitted that. But now when we're about to enter the second right, when they were supposed to be finding out about a vaccine, we're getting a second wave of panic here, this is what they

want to do. No, or really, no, I'm sorry, a third wave of panic about a fall winter wave of this virus, and they're shutting down their own guidance that was published, but they said it was a draft and they were ready. Yet that says that the virus is so small that it stays in the air once an infected person has been breathing there for hours. And you're supposed to believe that a loosely fitted piece of cloth over your mouth and nose is a serious means of

protecting yourself from that. Okay, don't ask any questions. Don't don't ask any questions. Now does it protect you at some level? You know? Is it better to have one than I mean, maybe, under certain circumstances, maybe it's five percent fifteen percent more effective than did not have it, because yeah, maybe some of the particles are big enough that they get. But this idea that mask wearing is the panacea, which is really what we've been led to believe.

Now we've gone from don't wear a mask to maybe to sometimes to oh my god, masks will cure us. All that's now the new theory. Masks will stop this thing in its tracks if only you did more and wore more mask. No, not buying it. Not buying it. This wasn't the guidance for influenza seasons in the past, when people were dying in large numbers tens of thousands, not quite two hundred thousand, but tens of thousands dying from pandemic disease during influenza season. So you know, they

don't They don't want you to ask any questions. Just do just obey. That's the that's the new way forward. They'll tell you you're in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Doctor Anthony Fauci overnight may clear that he thinks we will be and should be wearing masks probably for all of twenty twenty one. Yeah, you know, that's that's the thing people talk about. The vaccine, which I think people are optimistic about, although we still

haven't seen data on that. That's another issue that people have creating all these schedules and the sort of being optimistic about it, and I am as well, but we haven't seen the data from this Phase three trial. It's a blinded trial. No one has really seen this data yet.

But I think what doctor Fauci has said, what others have said as well, is that it's not going to flip a switch even when the vaccine comes, and that wearing masks indoors, especially now at the knowledge that this can spread through aerosols, is going to be important for

some time to come. Until we get to that that, you know, sixty seventy percent at least to the country being immunized and staying immunized, it's going to be hard to to let her are down telling you you're gonna be wearing masks at least in the Blue States under law until at least at least let me think this time next year, and probably beyond that. So if the Democrats have their way, you're I would say it's going to be March of twenty twenty two before they stop

acting like mask psychos. I'm outside, I'm by myself. There's no more than thirty feet, I'm wearing a mask. Oh yeah, that's right, And tell me that it's not a political prop. When Joe Biden is doing interviews from his basement in his home and there's no one obviously within fifteen feet of the guy you can see on the shot, and he's wearing a mask during an interview like a moron. Oh no, no, no, there's no there's no reason. Why are people putting masks on for their profile photos on

social media? Democrats are doing this in particular? Why it's a it's a prop of a sick country, a country sick by because of Donald Trump, but one that will beat this thing if we all just take the collective action dictated to us by the expert class of Faucian Company. It's unbelievable. It's it's unbelievable. I mean, never before have we had such a willingness for healthy people to live as though they are sick people because there are some people who are going to get sick no matter what

the healthy people do. That's not good. That's not good quarantine policy. That's not good health policy. But that's where we are. I told you that even if if Biden wins, you're gonna get a national mask mandate. They're gonna politicize this even further. We're not done here, folks. I know people are sick of this, tired of it. Puck Mask goes to the mask. They're taking away your freedom. They are making decisions for you. They do not have the right to do. Do people care about this or not?

Including in some of the writer states, And look what's been going on in Texas. This is not just a New York thing of the New York is the worst. Just remember, we're gonna be told to wear masks as we walk into a store for thirty seconds, but you're not gonna wear a masks sitting down in indoor dining. And you have been wearing masks in indoor dining all over New York State. New York City is just gonna

be opening up soon. But you know, doctor Fauci wants you to know it is not true that they're putting too many restrictions on people and that there's too many costs from this. He's oh, I'm sorry, is he a policy expert? Now? This guy is really a third tier intellect. He's really not very bright, folks. I know we're not always a scientist oh, beget the and O'Neill before high priest fauci this, this guy is no squad. When was he right when it mattered? When was he right in

advance of something? No? All along he's like, you know, I think we're gonna do this, and then, you know, listening to experts the data live in fear forever shut down the economy. You know, maybe one day, given a few years, it'll go away. How would we have been better off, or rather what we have been worse off without the CDC even existing. I'm just wondering what would have been better if we had no CDC. That's a

question that I want to ask. But here he thinks that people who are complaining about this are you know, we're being babies played two. It really depends upon the level of virus in the community that you're in, And that's where I think we get a lot of pushback and concerned. If people think that our recommendations are being too stringent and we're interfering with people's freedom to do what they want to do or getting in the way of opening up the economy, that's not the case at all.

You've got to adjust your public health measures in this context of the situation you're in. Okay, fouch five people died from COVID nineteen in New York City, which has eight point seven million people. Yesterday, five people still can't go into a restaurant, sit down and have a cheeseburger. Five And I say, oh, buck, but that's not important. It's kind of important to one hundred and fifty thousand people whose jobs, whose ability to pay their bills and

have healthcare. It's kind of important to them that we can do that. But we're adjusting our health policy. He says, five hundred new cases in I'm sorry, no, no, two hundred and sixty new cases in New York City eight point five million, larger than a whole lot of entire states. That's how big New York City is. This place is vast. A few hundred people, a few hundred people of cases, of whom will be totally fine. And of the five people who died, it's very sad. Every life is precious.

I'd be willing to guess, just based on the numbers we've seen that the average age was seventy five or eighty, which is to say that this is dangerous to older people. The rest of us should be able to live our lives. This is nuts, but the mask mania is increasing right now, even as cases going down in New York because it's political. Friends, Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or

wherever you get your podcasts. But this is what the president wants to hide from us. He's got something going with Vladimir Putin. We know that he's got a bromance with all of the dictators across the world. And it's not just Putin, but there seems to be something special regarding Putin by you talk about Urtawan, you talk about Deterto, you talk about Kim Jong Owen. He has he loves these guys. Now, this is the president who wants to

be authoritarian just like them. This is why the America have a choice in this election, and we're gonna have the continuation of the Trump killos and interference with institutions that would be should be telling us American people the truth or are we gonna have a Joe Biden who will tell us the truth? You know, lying is not something that Joe Biden does, but it comes out of the President's mouth. Since the very first time he even set foot, even before them in the White House. Who

and why he votes for this imbecile. I mean, I just want to know. I want to meet someone in Hawaii who who cast their vote for Maziehrono and feels good about it. You can say you don't like the Republican if you're a Democrat. I get it. You know whatever, Fine, I'm not going to win that argument. But I just want to know who's like, yeah, Mazie, that's who we want to be making important decisions for our state. Trump

has a bromance with the dictators of the world. Foreign policy has been one of these areas during the Trump administration where the results are just objectively better than what you had under the very haughty Obama foreign policy team that came in and oh, we're not going to do stupid stuff, they said, and then they did really stupid stuff. It was Obama who drew the red line in Syria

and then didn't do anything. Obama and Hillary Clinton really that pushed for the toppling of Kadafi and Libya without any real plan or idea of what was going to come next. The rise of Isis, which led to mass casualty, terrorist attacks on European and US soil. Things getting worse in Iraq, worse in Afghanistan, our relationship with I mean Aim, a country we had that was a place where where we were challenged beforehand, and you will have a place

that Obama made things worse. But this line about how Trump loves dictators so much, it's just too much fun for the Libs to say, it's just too too easy to take this cheap shot all the time. Look, Trump, you know he tried his unorthodox approach with Kim Jong un and it has not worked. Okay, it hasn't worked. I live in reality. He tried. But the thing that the Libs never understood about North Korea diplomacy was that Trump made no concessions. There was nothing lost in this,

There was no there was any other all. But he's talked to him directly. Well, how are you ever going to get a breakthrough if you don't actually have a real discussion with the leader of a country that's a true autocracy. Trump tried. Hasn't worked yet. Maybe it would work the next four years. But unlike when Obama was on the world bowing toward all the different dictators and then giving pallets of cash to the Iranians and signing

that horrific or on nuclear deal. Unlike the Obama administration, there's nothing you could point to that is a problem here that has been made worse as a result of Trump's foreign policy. If anything, it's the first president in a very long time who hasn't started a war in a country it is possible, it is possible, and not to get drawn into a war or go deeper into a pre existing war as president United States. That is something that we have seen now that is not beyond

the scope of possibility. And they hate the president for this. They hate him for this because foreign policies are particularly for people who worked in the news and the news media. They believe that it's a way to separate themselves from the less knowing. They think that their sophistication shows because they know the name of a foreign capital before they go on air that they just googled five minutes before that.

They think that this is how they distinguished themselves from the Hoi polloi and all of this, and that's why they one of the reasons why they hate Trump so very much right now on this issue and why they're going to continue to talk about how he is a stooge for dictators, or he's got a bromance, as Mazie Harrono says, I mean Obama had a bromance with the Castro regime, with the Maduro regime in Venezuela. Obama was

bowing to the Mullahs in Tehran. You know you're not gonna You're not gonna have ISIS doing what it did under Trump administration. Isis figure that Obama was going to be too risk averse to really handle the problem. And they were right. They were right, and we saw the results of that. But on foreign policy, you're not gonna hear that much about it. They're going to keep with this nonsense about the bromance, that all the rest of that, because anyone who's really watching this would say, hold on

a second. Trump was supposed to be a catastrophic failure. We're gonna get World War three, they said, and instead you get Midias peace deals that none of his predecesses were able to get done. You get no new wars, and you get a confrontation on trade with China where everyone said, don't do that, don't do that. Trump did it, and he was right. He was right to do it. He was right to finally confront Chinese predatory trade policies that they were enriching the Chinese Communist Party at the

expense of Americans and American companies. Obama administration didn't do a darn thing about it. They sat around, and the Republicans were in a sense also guilty on this one because they went along with it. They figured, we're all going to be more We're all gonna be more wealthy because well, at least they're gonna be not you. They were going to be more wealthy because of free trade and big corporations shoring jobs. Who needs jobs in America.

We're all just gonna have really cheap stuff from Walmart made in China. That was the deal. Wasn't a good deal, was it. President understands that the Biden record, especially on foreign policy and on China and a whole bunch of things, the Biden record is a major week spot for these Democrats. Play nineteen Joe Biden should not be asking for your support. He should be begging for your forgiveness, and he should

be Biden supported the disastrous Transpacific Partnership. This building wouldn't be here if you ever did that one, which would have been a death sentence for the US auto industry and other industrials. He supported the horrendous Korea deal. Okay, how about the South Korea Deal. It's a disaster. So that was a Hillary Clinton deal, I must say, not him, although I guess he had to, you know, his advice. Hey, you know what's interesting with Biden? So he always says,

why didn't the president do this? And what did the President do that? And why didn't do this? Sent the guy he's been there for forty seven years, but he just left like three and a half years ago, you know what I mean? He was there, and I keep saying why didn't you do it? Why did you do it? You know, could have done it. It's not like he was twenty five years ago. They were there three and a half years ago. Why didn't you do it? Sleepy Joe? What is the big Biden accomplishment? Did anyone want to

point to it? An I want to explain. It seems to me that his biggest accomplishment has been to be an intense mediocrity who's gotten reelected to the Senate over the course of several decades. That's his biggest accomplishment. He's the quintessential politician who just wants to get reelected. That's what matters to him. Wants to be in that position, get that salary, have that influence. That's it. There's been nothing else. This guy's not about public service. And he's

also not about saying the pledge of allegiance correctly. Place sixteen. This was Biden yesterday, America. I've pledge of leegures to the United States of America, one nation ended his wonder God for real. Huh. It's like the truncated Biden version there. They know he's a loser, folks, but they think this time they can just make him into a winner. They can carry him across the finish line. That is the plan. And here is his promise to all of you in

the meantime. Play fifteen. I'm running as a proud Democrat, but I'm not going to govern as a Democrat or president. I'm going to govern as president. Are you criticized for saying this? Sometimes so some in my party, But that's not what I'm going to do. I'm going to fight as hard for those who supported me as those who did not support me. This is not a partisan moment. For God's sake, this has to be an American moment.

He's really insulting our intelligence, there, isn't he? Yeah, sure he's got How is he going to fight as hard for those who didn't vote for him? By having more government regulations on the businesses that they want to work for or start and open themselves, By increasing government intervention in a whole bunch of different ways in the marketplace, to raise the price of things, to raise taxes. Well, what exactly is Biden you gonna do that makes your

life better? Hopefully he won't, as we've seen with previous Democrat administrations, come up with some humanitarian quote humanitarian reason to send your sons and daughters off to some godforsaken country to go fight a war that we don't need

to fight. Look to this day, I learned quite a lesson from the Bush years, and it's one that I also learned from doing at some level, having gone to a rock in Afghanistan during the Bush years, and there was a lesson learned there about the Republican foreign policy establishment, Neo Khan interventionism and never again, folks, not something we

should ever do. And the Republican party, instead of focusing on themestic policy issues that really mattered and should have mattered to the American people, did go with some foreign adventurism, if you will, foreign policy interventionism that had very negative outcomes and was not worth the was not worth the price tag, certainly in lives lost and also in treasure spent.

So I think that we're past that now as a Republican party, where we're not going to go to war because some bad thing is happening in some other country and it makes Libs feel sad on their way to the farmers market in you know, Palo Alto. That that's actually not because they're not the ones who are going

to be all fighting that war. By the way, just remember that the you know, the think tank interventionists and the various neo cons within the government, they're not the ones that are the ones that are pushing for these ideas. Often they're they're not signing up to fight anything sending you over there, sending your children, your grandchildren over there. So that's a big foreign policy shift too, because remember Democrats are very happy to go to war when it's

not just in America's interest. They're very happy to go to war just because it makes them feel good about some issue. Right, They'll actually send people off to fight so that they feel better about what's happening in some other part of the world, which is, in my view, a grotesque betrayal of what it should mean to deploy US military force for the policy class. It should not be for the benefit of non Americans in someplace that is not as strategic and critical US national security interest.

So I hope that's a lesson than we've all learned. But just on foreign policy in general, their criticisms of Trump are annoying. Oh and I forgot. There's a story today of Politico I saw about how there's a secret CIA not so secret anymore, apparently a secret CIA assessment that says that Putin is running information operations online to defame President Biden. I don't even know if if I have the the patients to go into this in any particular detail. I mean, this is just stupid beyond words.

First of all, as somebody who used to write assessments for the CIA, there are a lot of things that get written in that building, and most of them are worthless, and a lot of them are wrong. I'm just telling you the truth most CIA analysis is just the process is the product. We're paying people to look at this thing, and they're writing papers that very few people who actually

make any decisions. One of the reasons I let the CIA, I was like, what am I Even if I want to influence the administration, I have much more influence now than I did when I was a CIA analyst. Even when I would go on Capitol Hill or go to the White House, I mean occasionally getting to speak the President directly. I guess you have some influence as a CI analyst. That was very rare. People were shocked I was so young I was able to even do that. But you know, in general, it's a lot of just

busy work, a lot of nonsense. But oh, the CIA, the same CI that had the m D assessments, right, that's CIA for the Iraq war. They're now saying that Putin They're they're not certain, They're saying that they think probably probably Putin is doing information operations to defame Joe Biden. You know what, the best information operation to defame Joe Biden is letting the man speak, letting him out of the basement. I think today they put a lid on Biden.

They call it on the campaign. Sorry, liddle on Biden, let me out, Let me out. It's not like that. They put a lid on the campaign, which means that they're shut basically shutting down any public appearances or statements or thing for Biden for the rest of the day. They put it a lid on at nine am. This guy doesn't have it, folks. But they don't remember the same attitude they have about they'll burn down the system. They'll tear down the system, they'll do whatever they have

to be in power. The mission here is just to get people to fool people who are not partisan Democrats into voting for Joe Biden in some swing states, and then they'll do whatever they have to do afterwards to get what they want. That they don't care beyond that right, they don't care what norms they break, and that's all. It's all nonsense. Understand the opposition here, and you will

understand exactly what's really possible. So they won't feel they won't be upset if they end up, but they won't feel ashamed if six months after a Joe Biden victory they go, yeah, it looks like Joe's not feeling well, so he's gonna step aside and Kamala Harris is now the president the United States. They're gonna think they've pulled off a coup or you know, a planned transfer of power.

They think they're gonna have pulled off an amazing, an amazing scheme and will have saved the country and the process. That's what they really believe. So I don't think that there's anything that's really beyond them. You're in the Freedom. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. One thing I just want to know from yesterday before we get into into roll call here, you had build the Blasia

who's so upset. You had this DOJ designation of New York, Seattle, and Portland as zones of anarchy of the de Blasio administration because he's busy ruining New York City. Blasio administration was. It was fascinating what he had to say about this play twelve. You know, I was out in Elmer's Queen's this morning. I saw peace, tranquility. I saw people going about their business, people excited that this the first day of school. I saw anything but anarchy. So this is

just another one of President Trump's games. It's thoroughly political it's part of his campaign strategy. It makes no sense. It is not based in the facts in the least. It's insulting to the people in New York City, and his effort to withhold our fund is unconstitutional. Yeah, sure it is, buddy. It's oh man, it's amazing to hear de Blasia talking about this, the guy ruining the largest city in America, and he is the really the Democrat,

the Democrat epitome of poor government, a governance. Now, that is a drag of what you see happening in these major cities. This is a drag on the Democrats hopes this fall. We all know it. They're just pretending like it's not actually happening. But you know, in New York, even Governor Cromo was like it was an embarrassment. That night, the purge night I call it. When there were mobs running outside my own home here in New York. This

was very real to me. I could hear them, I could I saw the shattered glass and broken windows and everything. Next morning, and this mob that was running around was effectively able to run free. Because de Blasio doesn't want riding, lawbreaking cry babies to have to do with the big bad mean mypd So they get to break stuff, ruined stuff. You had those two pampered lawyers through a Molotov cocktail into a cop car here. That happened in New York, folks.

I mean this is let's not forget the insanity that this country has been through, all because of democrats, all because they didn't get their way or they feel like there's too much oppression or there's injustice, and then gives them a license to act like total maniacs, gives them a license to just ruin things for everybody else because they feel like it. Oh okay, wow, I gotta tell you, it's pretty astonishing to watch this continue. But the only

way we get justice. Friends, November third, just remember that that's the only way. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Liberty, Truth and Great Hair. Feel those funky beats. It's time for roll Call. Roll Call Everybuddy, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton Team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com. If you want to email us and remember buck Sexton dot com go check

it out. You can listen to the podcast. There. We have the Best of Buck Now Daily. If you just want to listen to a forty five minute condensed version of the show, but it's about forty five producer marks that right an hour under an hour. Usually we try to keep it under an hour. We'll keep it under an hour. We'll shoot for under an hour, you know, an hour or less. I think it's what we'll try to shoot for. You know, it might be sixty two minutes one day and fifty four another or whatever, but

try to keep it under an hour. But if you want to listen to condensed version of the show, you've got that option too, And that way we kind of pull the ones be thinking most because sometimes I go two or even three segments on one topic. So the condensed version of the Best of Buck Daily will be we'll move along faster into the different topics, so you'll kind of get a shorter version of the show. For those of you that like to listen on demand of

the podcast, please do check that out. That's in our it's in the same feed. You don't have to write, they don't have to subscribe to anything new. It's just that's what's popping up in their feed now is that right? Yes? Okay,

that is correct? Just making sure and also go to bucksextonbook dot com if you want to buy the Socialism Survival Guide dealing with the biggest issues than this election, it's really an election and beyond book looking at the economy as well, and there's some advice for my friends at Stansbury Research about financial decisions that you can make in response to these political realities that we're facing now of socialism. So bucksextonbook dot com sign up for a

Stansbury newsletter. There you'll get to copy the book. Please do check that out. And with that I moved to your thoughts, your comments, your musings, and another wonderful acts of whimsy. And that's I'm kind of run out of my ability to um producer mark, where did it? Where did it go? I'm trying to I'm actually trying to find the role is it in the thing? It's the same email every day and the same emails every day? Correct?

All right? Dan is up first, He writes, this is an interesting way to start one as a degenerate sports gambler. I find it quite simple to gauge the strength of one's conviction bet on it. Not long ago, my liberal friend from Boston was pontificating on the recklessness of professional sports for resuming in the US. We strongly disagree on

the dangers of COVID for those younger than sixty. So I proposed a bet if anyone across all four major league sports MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL, and even soccer dies of COVID it in twenty twenty, I will pay him a thousand dollars. He would owe me a thousand dollars if no one dies. Surprise, surprise, he declined. My offer still stands, and I even sweetened it to include anyone who is simply hospitalized. Forget death. Liberals don't believe any

of this nonsense themselves. They enjoy whatever illusion of authority and entirely false pretense provides, as their real lives consist of no real control. My wager offer stands, and if you know anyone who would like to take me up on it, then, in the immortal words of Al Bundy, Let's rock, were you married with children? Watcher back in the day, producer Mark, I've seen episodes here and there, but I think it was a little before my time. It was a little earlier I was. I was very

young when that show was on. That show I remember was really popular for a while. That show was like a phenomenon. I've definitely watched episodes in syndication on like TBS, you know, when I was a kid. Yeah, yeah, Oh. All. She went on to be in Sons of Anarchy, the who played Peggy Beal. I think is her name something Beal anyway, not Jessica Bile. I was gonna say Jessica Biale. No Mary justin Timberlake, I know, whatever. You can't be

sad about that anymore. You have the snow Princess, correct, correct, Well, obviously it all worked out in the end, So there's that. Plus, she's a I think she got in some trouble for some anti vax Oh Katie Katie Katie Seagal I think is her name or Siegel Seagal, I don't know, not being confused with Steven seagal Man. I watch a lot of martial arts movies back in the day. That's actually my big complaint, my only real complaint about the Cobra

Kai series. I just wish the martial arts were a little better, you know, I mean karate, you know, if you're throwing I'll throwing like high kicks in a fight. I mean, good luck to you. You're probably gonna get your face pounded in. But I'm just saying, but I know someone's gonna write be like book, I could throw a flag tornado kick that would that would take down

any assailant, armed or unarmed, instantly. And I'm like, Okay, I'm glad that Taekwondo has convinced you that the spinning high kick is a high, high percentage move in a life and death self defense situation. But anyway, um, yeah, I wish I just wish the karate in. I wish the karate the Karate Kid was better. You know, Ralph Maccio never learned any karate really, I mean he did a little bit for the for the movies, but the Zabka and I'm really I'm really kind of a Johnny

Lawrence fan. I'm just gonna say it. Zabka, who plays Johnny Lawrence in the in the Cobra Kai as well as the original Karate Kid movies. He became a green belt. He actually, you know, got a grounding in karate, so I gave him credit for that. I feel like if you're gonna be known for being the bad guy from the Karate Kid, like you gotta learn a little karate. But Ralph Maccio, I don't know, too busy doing other things. Uh. Fun fact producer Mark, My mother was in a bubble

yum commercial with Ralph macchio. Um and it is on YouTube. Huh yeah, nineteen seventy nine, nineteen eighty something like that. My mom was was in commercials back then. And yeah, she was in a commercial with Ralph Moncio. And it's actually a good commercial too, Like it really you know, it sells that bubble gum. Tell you that it makes you really want to chew gum. Yes, it makes you really want to chew you know, to this day, I can't. I can't blow a bubble. Yeah, I can't either, and

I've tried. I've been laid a car before and I've been that. My dentist wants me to start chewing gum. Because I talk so much during the day, my mouth gets dried out. It's very bad for your teeth. I don't know. If you know that, it doesn't have to talk a lot. Your mouth gets dry and then it's I probably should be drinking water instead. Of coffee, which I'm just reminded of that now, although I love my coffee. So anyway, the great Ben Scully used to chew on

jolly ranchers in his mouth. Have the jolly rancher in his mouth during every game. I'm pretty sure that would turn your teeth into a rotting session. Sugar Okay, yes, yes, hard hard sugar candy is not good for your teeth. See I believe in science. Hashtag science hasta, hashtag dentists. Totally all right, Richard Buck, Hello, my friends. So at first I was on the fence with replacing the notorious RBG. The Biden rule has been around since pushed the elder right.

But there's no good faith from Madams and Obama to dispose of that rule. So why should we let the Democrats dictate the rules? I think I read Carter appointed a justice during the lame duck session before Reagan. It was okay, then, what's wrong that now we should win and put a conservative in? Now the Dems are gonna writhe and rage. It's going to get crazy. Hold your gabbles and shields high well, Richard, I agree with your final assessment that we should just do this thing. I

think that's the right move. And I think that all this talk about self imposed uh you know congressional I mean a congressional rule that's not really a rule, meaning it's just something that someone in Congress says. Is just a statement of politics, right, Oh, we're going to vote on this now, or we're not going to vote on this now, because we're Anything that involves discretion for these elected leaders when it comes to appointments of people to

these offices is just political by its very nature. So I don't care what was said before. I don't care what they said. It was a different time, it was different, you know. I'm not gonna Yeah. Of course people left flip flop depending on which side of the issue now benefits them. And that's what I expect. These are politicians. That's what they do. They mislead. It's part of the job. Unfortunately, Michael writes book, you asked, if Trump isn't reelected, will

the goop survive? I've thought that many times in my life. But the gop is more like the cat came back. But we thought he was a goner, But the cat came back because he couldn't just stay away. Producer Mark Is that like a song lyric is what a song layer? The cat came back. We thought he was a goner, but the cat came back because he just couldn't stay away. What is that? What is Michael trying to? Is that

some inside thing? I I'm just saying, I don't think so. Yeah, like cats just wander, I guess I always think of Cat Stevens and you got a lady over, you got you got some zema, you got a six package. There is a song I just googled, the Cat came back. There's a song in a movie there. See it's a reference. That's I could smell reference there or read it, I suppose. But yeah, God, I missed the late nineties Friends, Zema, grunge rock, or good shows like Seinfeld. Seinfeld not as

good as Friends, but still. Uh. What keeps the GOP alive is it's belief and moral base and the thought where are we all going to go? Also people like Reagan, Trump, Cruise Meadows and the new up and coming people that convince us there's hope and to try once again. Unfortunately, we in the GOP get stuck with the McCain's, Romney's, Murkowski's, Collins and Bushes who are more interested in their personal power and gratification and are at best chair warmers for

the Democrats. They see their place and don't care about the future of this nation or their own party for that matter. Yeah. Look, there's no shortage of disappointing Republicans out there. I don't think there's any question about that. And look, I hope that the most dire prognostications about the future of the GOP if Biden were to win this thing, I hope that those are untrue. I hope that we are able to come back. But I can see a future in which it's not. It's just remember this.

Let's say the GOP only goes into the political wilderness for one of your thirty years. Well, that's much of the rest of my life. So so do I really care if the GOP comes back to be a majority party in forty years? I mean, yeah, for my imaginary yet kids and grandkids maybe, But for me, is I gonna make all that much difference. So it's also why it's so important for everybody to have parts of their lives that are not political and to think about things

other than politics. That's why I totally get why producer Mark just wants to watch sports and why these days I'm playing a little bit of Call of Duty on PlayStation four. I mean, you just need to give your and I really should be like, you know, praying and working out more. But you need these areas of your life. You understand where all this stuff. Ultimately, you don't want to be a nihilist like nothing matters, but can't let

the politics seep into every realm of your brain. You got to have those those places where you have inner peace and you have a greater sense of purpose. That's why people of belief in God is I think so necessary, not just helpful, but necessary in life. Michael, Oh no, we already did. Michael. We'll come back with more in a sec. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast TJ Wrights Buck. I agree with you and Rush that cocaine Mitch should consider foregoing

the Scotus nominee Senate hearings and go straight to a vote. However, I would contend that, assuming we can still get the vote done in a short amount of time following the hearings, such hearings may actually be politically expedient for Republicans as they will show in some form or another the complete lunacy of the left, especially in regards to the anti Catholic bigotry you mentioned yesterday, that will only create a

bigger divide between sensible people and the Democrat Party. With all that being said, for the sake of the future nominees integrity, the most respectable thing to do would be to forego the hearing process to avoid the libel and slender that will undoubtedly be on show for whomever Trump's nominee is. My prediction, hearings will be held and one, if not both, of Collins and Murkowski will end up

voting for the nominee. Yeah, TJ, I didn't know that the Great Rush Limbaugh agreed with me on this one, So thanks for letting me know that. I think we should have a vote right now. Namer. That's gonna be a her Namer vote on her. Get it done. There's nothing to be people that say, oh, we'll see how crazy the Democrats are to m Yeah, but you're said,

who knows you're taking risk? Friends? You know why, you know why even speak to the FBI if you don't have to, even if you're innocent, you're taking a risk, say nothing right, you know some of my most What are the two things of advice that I'm positive when I tell you, we're comfortable shoes, never talk to the FBI's I feel like I'm making people's lives better by just them those two things. For the for the purposes of the Bucks Exton show, We're comfortable shoes, never talk

to the FBI. And I don't see I don't see the advantage here. I don't see the upside in putting or putting her through this. So there you have it. There you have it. I just think that this is all downside and I could be wrong, but we're taking a risk. Remember what the Democrats try to do with the FBI investigation of cabin They were just stalling for time to put more pressure on people. You don't know what kind of pressure they're they're gonna bring to bear.

You don't know what member of the Senate all of a sudden is gonna get a you know, a phone call from some oppo research or some Republican senator. You're not even thinking of saying, hey, you know your your daughter is you know, she's a principle of this company, and we think there might be some some financial and proprietory going on there. I don't want her to be caught up in a white collar criminal thing. But you know, you really got an important vote here, Senator So and So.

You know, I mean, that's the kind of pressure I'm talking about. I'm not talking about just you know, shrieking lunatics yelling at people like Jeff Flake, and then Jeff Flake soils himself and the scag. I'm talking about real pressure. You're just extending the time for them to figure out a way to get to couple Republican senators, a couple of them. It's all it takes. Julie Right here. In O Claire, Wisconsin, we have an ice rink in town

by the name of Hobbes. The Liberal City, County and Health department have the homeless population housed on one of the rinks. The kids have now started hockey in other ice skating practice, they are sharing the building with the homeless. This is under approval of city management. In addition, the skaters are required to wear masks while on the ice playing hockey. This is not recommended by the CDs SEE or USA Hockey. We continue to struggle with how to

stand up for our kids and make changes. Julie, I'm sorry to hear that. And you know you're seeing a lot of this. I've seen this too, that I have to wear a mask in my gym. That's not CDC guidance, that's CUOMO guidance. Why are they making this crap up? Or at least it's not World Health Organization guidance. I don't know. Maybe it is CDC guidance now, I mean, but don't ask about why they're changing. Ye're changing because it's so important. Now, Oh, okay, sure it is. Anybody

who believes that crap, I don't know. That's too far gone for me to be able to save their minds at this point. But yeah, the arbitrary restrictions the use of power during this period of time very very troubling. I'm sorry about that, Julie. But just you know, keep your kids safe and just stay in the fight. We'll get through it, seem that's my message for all of us.

Stay in the fight. We'll get through it. It's gonna be one heck of a ride here as we get close to the election, But understand this that the relief if the election goes our way, we'll be short lived too, so she'll tie