Maxine Waters Plots Political Revenge

is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American. Again the buck Sexton Show begins, no say to you. We have an election November six. This is big. This may be the most important one that you've ever had to experience. This is the midterm election. And oftentimes people only vote in the presidential election because they don't think this is important enough.

But this is absolutely important. That's all the insurance covertes, that's all the banks, and so of course the CEOs of the banks now is saying what can we do to stop vaccine waters because if she gets in, she's gonna give us a bad time. I have not forgotten you. Four clothes on our houses. I've forgot forgotten that you undermine our community. I have not forgotten that you sold us those exotic products, had a sign on the line for junk and from mess that we could not afford.

And in doing that, I have people who are on the homeless, who have never gotten back into a home. What am I gonna do to you? What I'm gonna do to you is fair. I gonna do to you what you did to us. Retribution, promised by Congresswoman Maxine Waters there at an event earlier this week. Maxine Water is the California congress froomen. She she believes that she will be the have the chairmanship of the Financial Services

Committee in the House. That's when she only a very powerful role on economic matters and looking at the banks and insurance companies, and she wants there to be payback. She is saying here she wants to go after the bank. She wants to go after business, go after corporations. Still upset about the financial downturn in two thousand and nine, almost ten years ago. Now she's she's saying that there's

gonna be there's gonna be health to pay. This is a reminder, my friends, and welcome to the bucks and show This is a reminder of exactly why we should all be concerned going into this midterm election. The left is not playing this game the same way that we are. They don't approach these issues with the same perspective about what is Is this really just all about good governance and how do we let the American people achieve maximum freedom and and live without the the yoke of an

of an oppressive state on their shoulders. No, no, no, no no. They want to get into power so they can get their's and they can take out all their frustrations on the rest of us. That's the that's the whole point from the Democrats. They will do things that are destructive to the economy, that are bad policy, that hurt the majority of American people, but it'll feel good when they do it. They like doing it. That is the motivation, the only motivation they need for a lot

of this economic redistribution. Raising taxes were the most important things that Barack Obama ever said was that, you know, raising taxes, you know we should do it because you know it's it's it's the right thing to do. And also this notion of paying your fair share, even if it's bad economics, you see even if it hurts the economy, which hurts it hurts everybody. Democrats like to do this stuff because so much of their political appeal is built

on resentment and envy and victimhood. Everybody has frustrations in life. Everybody has their shortcomings, has the things that have gone against them. Some of it is our own poor decision making, right. Some of it is stuff that just could have gone either way and we didn't get lucky. We all have that. We all feel that way about any number of things in our lives. Every person listening to the show, you know,

knows that. But Democrats tell you, oh no, no, the the things in your life that are frustrations for you, the things that have not gone the way you have wanted them to, there's a reason for that, and you are not the reason. Your decisions, your choices are are not in any way responsible for the problems that you

face as an individual or that the country face. Is now overall meaning that are collective decision making about things like government spending and about whether we are a rule of law country, for example, in the issue of immigration. None of that is the issue. Is the bad people who are doing bad things, and we're going to come into power and we're going to punish them. That's the whole point. Remember Trump came into into office saying He's

going to make America great again. The Democrats want to take the House so they can make America pay again. They want to make the American people that they don't feel that they represent, that are on their side, that aren't part of this progressive, transformative agenda for America. They want to exact punishment. They want to make them, you know, feel what it's like to be on the wrong side

of the Democrat political apparatus. And this is also where after remind you that Democrats all they really have to do to be an effective alternative, an opposition party, the Republican Party, all they really have to do is not be crazy, and they can't do it. These are not people that can be trusted with power. These are individuals.

These are political groups on the left that have a very destructive sense of justice, that do not adhere to universally applied principle, that believe that everything is subjective, everything is up for debate discussion, and the way you've solved that debated discussion is with brute force, political or otherwise you know, you don't like what someone says, d platform them, you don't like the politics they espouse, Investigate them, maybe throw them in prison. This is the stuff that you have.

And we should all just be very clear that the point of the of the Democrats taking the House for the next two years is really only gonna be one thing and one thing only, and that is to try and tear down Trump in his administration. That's gonna be it. They will there. There will be no broad based solutions, no effort at bipartisan activity or any of that. It's not even that's that's ridiculous. As far as Democrats are concerned,

this is not gonna happen. We're gonna see one committee hearing after another about it, or go back to Russia collusion and Trump, and they're gonna dive into Trump's finances and where's where's Trump's tag returns and what you know and and to you and me, this is counterproductive, it's an abusive power. It's crazy. But just listen to Maxine Waters. She's gonna go after He's gonna punish the banks. She's gonna do to the banks what they did to what I mean, all this stuff, right, it's just this is

about revenge. Political revenge. That's gonna be a primary motivator against Trump for them. That's what it's all gonna be about. They are angry that they doesn't matter. The country has done really well last years. They don't care. They are angry that Trump has been in charge. They're angry the Republicans have had the House in the Senate and they want payback. Some of that payback, by the way, will

be financial. I mean they're gonna try to do whatever they can to bankrupt their political opponents with endless investigations, including criminal investigations, of whatever it is that they can concoct. I mean, if they could make most of the Democrat Party believe the Russia collusion fairy tale, I mean, they can can conjure up anything, and there's nothing that's really beyond the scope of their machinations. I don't know what

the primary focus will be of Russia collusion. We gotta see what what Mueller comes out with it his final report. No matter what what the report says, they're going to claim that it justifies all their delusions and hysteria around this. So no matter what the final papers have written on them, that Mueller releases to the public. We're gonna be told, Oh, that's right. See it just it just proves the Russia collusion.

It just proves that this was really happening. We just don't necessarily have all the evidence, but it's all there, you see, it's all there. I really hope that we have a surprise coming on Tuesday. I really hope that enough Americans listening to this show and all across the country understand the stakes and understand that there's one party that is serious about governance, not perfect, makes mistakes, rented.

There's one party that has an adult view of the world and another party that is a bunch of screaming, crying babies. And that party is the Democrat Party. And that party will do things that hurt the entire country but will feel good. They are planning a two year long political tantrum if they take the House. I hope to God the American people can stop them from getting the power they need to do that. At this very moment, large well organized caravans of migrants are marching towards our

southern border. Some people call it an invasion. It's like an invasion. They have violently overrun the Mexican border. You saw that two days ago. These are tough people in many cases, a lot of young men, strong men, and a lot of men that maybe we don't want in our country. But again we'll find that out through the legal process. But they've overrun the Mexican police, and they've overrun and hurt badly Mexican soldiers. So this isn't an

innocent group of people. There's a large number of people that are tough. They've injured, they've attacked, and the Mexican police and military has actually suffered. And I appreciate what Mexico is trying to do. I hope not. I hope it's the military. I hope, I hope there won't be that.

But I will tell you this, anybody throwing stones, rocks like they did to Mexico and the Mexican military, Mexican police, where they badly hurt police and soldiers of Mexico, we will consider that a firearm because there's not much difference when you get hit in the face with a rock, which, as you know, it was very violent a few days ago, very very violent. That break in. It was a break in, it a country. They broke into Mexico and you look

at what's happening in Guatemala. Just to mention Guatemala along with El Salvador and Honduras, it's disgraceful that those countries aren't able to stop this because they should be able to stop it before it starts. And the United States pays them a fortune, and we're looking at not doing that anymore, because why should we be doing that when they do nothing for us. President Trump speaking in very

strong terms there about this caravan. You know, he's making some points that can't be avoided if you pay attention to what's going on the news. The caravan did overrun offense line. The caravan has thrown rocks at police and has engaged in violent behavior. I spoke to a friend as a journalist, and she was telling me that when she was down with the caravan, that there were guys with MS thirteen tattoos that were proudly showing them off

to her. But you know what we're told, there's there's nothing, no no concern, nothing to see here, no worries. It's all gonna be just fine. It's all gonna be great. When we bring in this entire group of people and invite even more to come in and more and more. Now, I'm sure President Trump is gonna get a lot of heat, a lot of pushback for saying that will treat a rock. Uh Like did he say like a firearm or like a weapon? I gotta go back and uh, you know,

I gotta back and check that part out. Oh yeah, he said we'll consider that a firearm. He's gonna get a lot of pushback on that. But then again, there does have to be some rule. There do have to be some rules of engagement for what do you do when a mob has pulled together and are engaging in violent behavior against the police. I mean, you know, in this case be border patrol and customs, but you know, you might have to have a situation where you do

some crowd dispersal. You might have to have a situation where you're not able to just you know, ask politely and say okay, you know, and now we're going to affect some arrests. It's just not gonna fly. It's not gonna work. And I think Trump is prepared for that because I think that the left here is planning to make a real, a real debacle occur at the border.

You know, there are absolutely organizers involved with this. We don't really know who or to what degree, but look at what was done with Hamas and with the Palestinians Israelis at that border fence in Gaza. There were casualties that were taken there, and initially there was all this reporting about how, oh, it's just innocent civilians. You guys will probably remember this. Oh they're all in Distan civilies.

That's what the media was saying. And then Israel released you know that the forty some odd or fifty some odd guys that were killed were known Hamas operatives who were in the process of trying to storm that fence. Now they were they were had been there for weeks. There were other people. There are people who weren't a

Moss operatives. And I'm certainly not advocating for the military or border patrol to engage in violence against people that just show up at the border want to turn themselves in. But I worry that the left is gonna try to create a real spectacle here. They're they're gonna make a scene. They're gonna they want footage of people that have been hurt, and they want there to be bloodshed at the border. Because think about what the narrative then becomes. Then it's

oh my gosh, we've militarized the border. We're so racist, were so terrible. You know, you got to think about what the other side is willing to do here, what lengths they're willing to go to, And I think there's very little that stands in the way of them right now when it comes to really dangerous and destructive uh plotting. I mean, I think that from it from the perspective of the kind of things that they're saying. And you know, they've referred to what goes on to the border with

the detention of some immigrants as concentration camps. Well, if you think of the anti fascist resistance, which they do, and you think that the government is setting up concentration camps at our border, which they say, wouldn't you be willing to do some pretty extreme stuff in order to shake things up down to the border and show that the good guys and gals, so to speak, are the ones who just want to let everybody in, Let everybody in. That's gonna be great for this country. No other country

does that, but that is their plan. That is the plan. Increasingly, so what the rules of engagement will be for US forces, all US personnel down at the border. That is going to be a very interesting topic. I think, assuming the caravan gets all the way to the border, assuming that its numbers are still large, and that there's this aggressive element. Look there, there are a lot of women and childre I'm sure they're going to turn themselves in to the

first facility, the first border patrol agent they can. That's their plan, that's been the plan all along. But this other element, these other individuals. You know, what happens if had a port of entry you have five hundred military age males who you know, they're not they don't have to have weapons, but they just decided that they're going

to try to overrun that checkpoint. What happens if there and I mean literally overrunning, I mean they're actually just gonna you know, run across, run through you know we we think we have enough border patrol agents they they're gonna be able to tackle everybody. And think about what a scene that would cause. This is what it means to to think ahead in these scenarios, because this is you know people, Look, people are desperate, they're being exploited.

There's a lot of anger and rage in this country. And the one area, in the one area of our politics in the last nine months where the left really felt like they were making headway with the American people and that they were essentially on the winning side of a major political issue. The one place was separation of families at the southern border. The video, the audio, the images of that the people in intended. Yeah, I know Obama did similar stuff, but that doesn't matter. This is

what they're thinking about. Where was the Where was the most effective propaganda opportunity for the minute was at the southern border. It was it was separating those families. So you know that they want more of that. They want to create this showdown. Remember, Trump's not behind the caravan. Other people are. Trump's responding to the caravan. So we gotta try to think like the other side is thinking. Here, If making it easy to be an illegal alien isn't enough,

how about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant? No, no same country would do that. Right. Guess again, if you break our laws by entering this country without permission and give birth to a child, we reward that child with US citizenship. And the Democrats want to continue giving automatic birthright citizenship to every child born to an illegal allea.

Hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrant children are made automatic citizens every year because of this crazy policy, and they are all made instantly eligible for every privilege and benefit of American citizenship. Back before the Democrat Party went crazy, they also opposed this practice. Harry Reid said, no sane country, quote, no sane country would grant automatic citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants. That's what he said, that's before he

went crazy. Trump's right. I know it's not the first time I've said that here on the show, but he's correct. The idea that any country would have written laws that would benefit people for breaking laws, that is exactly what we're talking about here here. We know at the fourteenth Amendment was about making sure that slaves and the children of slaves, freed slaves, you know, former slaves in this country, um, would have their full constitutional rights and citizenship. That's what

the fourteenth Amendment was about. We know that. We know that had nothing to do with oh, I just got here on a plane or you know, across the southern border from a foreign country. I'm gonna have a kid here now, and that person will be a citizen. We know that was never the intent. But when you go beyond even just what the words were thought to me at the time, think about what is at stake today

and what the other side is suggesting here. They're saying, yeah, you know, even if people are going to exploit our laws and take advantage of our of our kindness and compassion as a country, we we shouldn't deter that. That seems mean. That's one of the things about the immigration debate that I don't think it's nearly enough attention, and that is that our compassion as a country is often

used against us. Our desire to be inclusive, to be kind, to be helpful to people all over the world is used by people that want to uh engage in all kinds of demagoguery to say, Okay, well, if you're so compassionate, if you're such a good person, why don't you bring in another you know, another million? You know, why don't you bring in another caravan? Why do you make any

Why do you complain about this at all? And the American people, I really think when they know this issue, when they understand these stakes and what's going on here, I really think that they are on the President's side. I mean, for example, he he spoke about border security this last night play clip nine. Democrats want open borders, and they want to invite aravan after caravan into our country,

which springs crime upon crime. If you want high taxes and high crime, vote for the Democrats, vote for the Democrats. Do they not want to bring more caravans into this country? That's a think that's I think a very fair question and one that you won't hear. Many libs asked, why why stopping just this one caravan? In fact, here here's an idea. Why don't we just tell anyone who wants to come to the Unit States from Honduras, Hey, your

country is really violent. We know that you're abusing asylum laws to really do what is an economically economically based relocation leaving Honduras for the United States. But why don't we just give an open an open call anybody from Honduras wants to come to American just get to come and stay. Now. I think that's terrible idea, obviously, but I want to know why Democrats think that's a terrible idea. By the way, they wouldn't say it's a terrible idea.

They would just say, oh, that's not what the issue. You know, they always dance around this. The fundamental question that Libs will not answer is who does not get to stay those gold criminals? Criminals look, okay, fine, if you're a criminal, will deport you. If you're a dangerous criminal, will will deport you. Although even then sometimes liberals get a little a little squishy. It's easy for gonna talk a big tough game and how they wanted to port

all the criminals. But when you actually, when when push comes to shove, you know they're not exactly Russian out there to do it. They've got a lot of excuses. Think about the guy who was responsible for shooting Kate Steinley. He've been deported seven times, I think, got right back into the country. No one ever enforced the law on the books about how do you get deported more than once? It turns into a felony. Now, they didn't want to be mean and didn't want to do that. Instead, what

they just say is, oh, well, Republicans are racist. I say, well, okay, let's stop talking about whether Republicans are racist or not, just for a moment. If the caravan had seventy thousand people, should be let it in. If the caravan had seven thousand people, should be letting how many Americans right now even know that sixteen thousand families just last month presented themselves at port of entries and at the southern border

to go through the asylum program. Sixteen thousand. So let's say there's an average of an average of three people in those family units, although who really knows, I'm just making up that number. That seems like a fair number could be four. But let's say there's an average of three, and you're talking about roughly fifty thousand people last month alone showed up at the southern border. Remember it's eleven it's eleven million. I will note the former acting director

of ICE under Obama. I had him as a guest on Rising today, and he said, it's at least eleven point two million. That's that's the terminology that he's at least, which is a very gentle way of letting everybody know it's more than eleven million. It's a lot more than eleven million. I think that the government actually is unwilling to ever really get that in there. They don't want

to have that information. They don't want to know because if the American people were ever definitively told that twenty million illegal aliens have yes infiltrated almost entirely across our southern border the last twenty years or so, thirty years, whatever the time frame we want to use is. I think that people would be disgusted with their government. I think that there would be a real political revolt against the elites and against our master political class here in America.

We would just say, you know what, that's enough. So they don't want that true. They don't want that information to to ever get out there. They would prefer that we live in this gray zone, this gray area, and that's that's where it is right now. I mean, we we don't really know how many people are here. We don't really know what's going on. But one of the Trump will do is he'll actually make the case about how there's some downside illegal immigration. So they won't remember lives,

won't tell you who can't stay. They also won't say what's the what's the bad part about illegal immigration? They won't even discuss it. They want to talk about it. Well, fortunately for us, Trump will play Clift twenty. I'm sorry, play cliftent. There's a lot of feeling about the horrors of the illegal immigration problem. What people think, They're just gonna come into our country and take over our country, and it's just not gonna happen. We're not gonna let

that happen. But the Democrats want to let that happen. It's crazy, never gonna do. Want to let that happen because it benefits them from an electoral perspective, and that's all that really matters to them. They care first and foremost about their power, and that drives all of the immigration discussion for them. It's not about compassion, it's not being nicer than Republicans. It's about lying and demagoguery and virtue signaling, all in an effort to acquire more power.

For the progressive left, that is their immigration policy. Do not forget it. Yeah, the support that we provide to the Secretary for Homeland Security is practical support based on the request from the Commissioner of custom to border police. And so we don't we don't do stunts in this department,

thank you. We don't do stunts. Secretary Defense Mattis says, Does this mean that Led liberals will now finally back off that talking point and I've been hearing for all, well, all this week and all last week for sure, that all this stuff about immigration is Trump's fault. He's he's playing politics here. First of all, I'm pretty sure Trump didn't arrange the caravan okay, that that we could probably

all agree on across America. Trump was not like, Hey, I'm gonna I'm gonna come up with this for a caravan and then I'm gonna just talk about it a lot on TV. I know what liberals really are upset about, in part with all care event situations, they would much rather talk about the pipe bomber and and try to score political points off of that if they could that.

They much preferred that narrative and that news cycle to what we've got going on right now where there's a major policy issue and there's a really important difference between the two parties on this one. And that's why when you when you look at this, you know that Democrats, I think get a little nervous about the whole thing.

I think democrats get uh concerned that if people realize just how much the Democrats are willing to essentially abandon rule of law here because they're so favorable toward a leal immigration, then there could be some real consequences for them on the ballot box. Um. And and that's and I debate debate Libs on immigration all the time, and I'm just always it's always your mark to me how they don't even stop to the very basics when it

comes to, well, what is my position really mean? If I take it, if I go all the way to the logical conclusion of what I'm saying, If immigration is always good, if all immigration, including illegal immigration, is good, if it makes us richer, if it, why not have open borders? I don't really get. And by the way, they'll say, oh, no, we don't want open borders. We

need to know who's coming. Okay, if you just have a way station essentially at the border and ports of entry where people come and go and you note they're coming, but no one is denied entry unless there are you know, major security risk. But if no one's really denied entry,

that's open borders. So if immigrants only contribute to the economy, if immigrants only make our country stronger, and I mean illegal immigrants now, um, well, well, there would be no such thing as the legal immigrants we had open borders, right, if anyone. But but if people coming and going, if that only was good, if there was no drawback to this whatsoever, why not just have open borders. They don't like the phrase open borders, but I'm pretty sure they're

favorable to the reality if we could get there. Um, you know, Trump Mattis was talking about how the military is gonna be assisting at the border, and you know, I think Trump is really is really planning to take action here and and to do it, you know, not just to send the troops down, but he understands that this if this caravan whatever, however much of the caravan actually gets the border, if they're letting the interier of the United States and then there's no interier enforcement, I

think they people are going to be upset about this because they're gonna realize that our laws the border are kind of a joke and none of it can really be taken seriously. So Trump has to take action, and that's why he's saying there's also there's not gonna be catch and release play big changes of a couple of days ago where going to no longer release, We're gonna catch, We're not going to release, They're going to stay with us until the deportation hearing or the asylum hearing takes place,

so we're not releasing them into the community. We have millions of people that over the years have been released into the community. They never show up for the trials, they never come back, they've never seen again. And those people, they know who they are, and we know a lot of where they are, who they are, and those people will be deported directly deported. A lot of scams being run on the American people, and I think we're all tired of it. And this is one thing the President recognizes.

We are all sick of the way that we've been lied to by the media on this issue and the way that these is always presented as oh no. The process is that they get to claim a sound the process is well, the end result of that process, as we all know, is what the President described, which is that people get led into the interior of the United States and then it's all over. It doesn't matter what

what the system decides, they're gonna stay. And you see all these different issues that are coming up the Trump is bringing up on imgres, they're all linked anchor babies

and citizenship. It's linked to you know, abusing things like asylum laws, which you're linked to security at the border, which are linked to whether our foreign partners places countries like Mexico are really working with us to try and stem the flow of illegal immirance into the country, which you know, but it all eventually points back to the Democrats who prefer to live in America where the rule

of law is not respected. By the way, what one thing that I wanted to know to your about, well, I still can, um, remember what a big deal the Kashogi killing was. Remember when we were told that that was a huge moral stain on our country and it was terrible. And you know what happened there Kaushogi, by the way, Uh, you know, it was almost certainly ordered murdered by Mohammed ben Solomon, the head of the effective

head of Saudi Arabia, the Crown Prince. I heard so many liberals walking around on air saying that we need to take dramatic action against Saudi Arabia. We wanna do all these things that will teach the Saudis a lesson. And yet you don't need that much better anymore. Um. The Crown Prince is going to retain power. There's not gonna be any major response to speak, at least nothing that I've seen. So that then that then raises the question why isn't the media more focused on this right now?

And it's because they used the brutal murder and uh, the torture and murder of a journalist in a foreign country,

in a foreign consulate. They used that first and foremost as an op as an opportunity to bash President Trump, and they did it, and they did it and it wasn't though useful for the purposes of the mid terms anymore so by by complaining about Trump and his response to the Koshogi murder is cathartic for journalists, they like they just they like to attack Trump, and it was way to attack Trump, but they had to back off

of it because they had to switch to something else. Yes, there were news that there was a major news events that that we're filling in the gaps, But even more than that, at the end of the day, American people

just don't care that much. You know, the journal class here in d c. And and in New York they care a whole lot more about the Koshogi murder than you're average American who's not gonna say, you know what, I'm not going to vote for this congressman who's saying we should lower taxes and increase you know, economic opportunity in in my state or in my district, because you know, I don't like what Trump did on that Kashogi th But it just goes to show you that that all

that outrage and all the oh my gosh, Trump's not doing not doing enough, that only matters until it's inconvenient for Democrats, and then all of a sudden we have to move to some other, some other stores, some other way of attacking the president. I just I would get exhausted doing nothing but bashing the government of the United States. As as somebody who worked in the media, I would get exhausted. Um And I remember Guy worked in Obama years in media, and yeah, we criticized Obama up, but

we talked about a lot of other things too. The obsession with Trump is like nothing else I've ever seen. So much of your life is online these days, and what if you're doing your most sensitive financial transactions, what if you're exchanging information with loved ones, do you really want that to just be out there for anybody to

access and use? For whatever purposes they want. You're being tracked online by social media sites and marketing companies, and if you're using public WiFi, well you're putting yourself at risk in all kinds of ways. That's why you need Express vpn. Express vpn has easy to use apps that run seamlessly in the background of my computer, phone and tablet, and turning on Express vpn protection takes only one click, costs less than seven dollars a month. Give yourself peace

of mind, protect your data all right. I've been trained in security matters. I can tell you you want to make sure you are safe and not sorry. That's where express vpn comes in. You can protect all your online activity today and get three months free with a one year package at express vpn dot com slash buck. Again, that's Express vpn dot com slash buck. Yesterday's visit to Pittsburgh was about coming together as a nation to comfort

and to heal. After this day of unity and togetherness, I came home and sadly turned on the news and watched as the far left media once it in use tragedy to sow anger and division. Sadly, they took a small group of protesters far away from where we were because we could not have been treated better, the first Lady in myself, but we're representing the presidency, and they did everything in their power to try to play it up and push people apart. That's what's happening there, pushing

people apart. It was fake and it was make believe what they said. I came home look forward to seeing it and it was sad. And when we talk about division, this is a big part of the division right there. Trump went to Pittsburgh to try and help the nation heal. The media covered Pittsburgh in such a way that they were trying to so further division, make things worse for

the country. And that's why I just have no tolerance for sitting for for hearing these these media organizations individuals, you know, all these big fancy journo type sitting around complaining about Trump's overheated rhetoric, and oh, how could Trump say that, that's so so he's so wrong, it's so terrible.

The guy's going to essentially pay respects at a city that is going through a mass funeral for eleven Jewish Americans, eleven of our Jewish brothers and sisters in the city of Pittsburgh, and they try to make this a big

political thing, you know that they're covering these protests. They The New York Times is writing about this group a Sorrow's son founded political Action committee, and they called it quote Jewish leaders in the city of Pittsburgh, and they were clearly misrepresenting how this was, what what the intent behind it was, how it was received. Yesterday we had that to see and actually we we have just just played again for a second, just to remind everybody what

was it like at the hospital. Remember they said, oh, President Trump not welcome all these different stories. Here's what it sounded like when the President actually got there and saw people that were dealing with the aftermath of this play eight. Thank you President. You know, I thought about that yesterday when we heard a we've heard of this,

that's yeah, you get the idea. But I thought about it because you know, I was a I was a very I was a very strong critic of Barack Obama's for all eight years, and I think that Barack Obama's policies did a lot of harm to the country, and I think that he actually in many ways made our political division far far worse. He was not even remotely a uniter or a healer. That was all a lie. And that's what that's how he ran to start. At least Trump never ran on saying, Hey, I'm gonna make

everybody like me. I mean Obama originally was you know, I'm the what is it. There's no red white or there's no red America or blue America. There's only the

United States of America. I mean stuff like that. And you know that that was really a bill of good that we were sold by the Obama administration that said, if you know, President Obama were to show up in my hometown in New York City, let's say, after we had suffered from some kind of a mass shooting event like this or something, and he really was just there to comfort the families, I would respect that because he

was our president, he was a commander in chief. And well, it doesn't mean that I would all of a sudden be an Obama supporter. I would respect the move. I would I would understand what he's doing. The left, I feel like, just has no respect. They have no basic sense of decency or good faith when it comes to dealing with Trump and with the other side in general role and I find it really troubling you. I think it's something that we should spend much more time examining

as a society. I mean, I believe that, uh, they have reached a point now where they're so disconnected from the truth that they don't even realize that while they say they want less division and less anger, they're actually making division and anger worse in this country. While they say they want the political RHETI director become less overheated and less nasty and less you know, full of vile, they make it worse with what they're doing. And in fact,

they really have instigated a lot of this. You know, Ari Fleischer um has I feel like he's been getting better at TV. You know, he says more interesting things in the last six months. Maybe maybe the in the Trump era, he's kind of, you know, loosened up the collar a little bit and let it rip. But you know, I really thought that he he well, he says something

here that I've said on the show many times. Not that I say everything that's worth saying, but you know, this is something that I've we've explained here in the Hut. But play fifteen, where already gets into the heated rhetoric issue. Yeah, the Democrats have to look in the mirror. The words that they use, calling calling for the resistance. Boy Connie has inaugural, the activities they immediately undertook without even giving

him a chance, and you know the word resistance. Those are the French freedom fighters against the Nazis, against the collaborators in France. Are they applying Donald Trump is a Nazi? Is Hitler? What about their words? What about their stir in the pot? They need to look in the mirror before they just attacked Donald Trump. I think they need a lot more than that. I think they owe the country and apology. I think that the media needs to

make amends for what they've done. I don't think that we should be sympathetic to them when they complain about how Trump has treated them and everything else. I think we should be disdainful. I think we should have disdain for the way the media has made the conversation Arab Trump so much worse. They have written think pieces at the most prestigious publications in the country, editorials and other things about fascism in America, how Trump is bringing about fascism.

It is commonplace for people who are supposed to be luminaries in our society, who are supposed to be, you know, the most elite, the most season the most educated, from government and from the media to make casual references to Trump as a Nazi, And you know, I live but a short walk away from the Holocaust Museum, and I want to know, what would anybody who's who throws out, you know, whether it's Steve Schmidt maybe now the dumbest person on TV, I think, actually dumber than Anna Navarro,

which is which is quite something, and he's in at least he's number one. But I would wonder if he could walk into the Holocaust Museum, walk around to some of those exhibits and then just so casually refer to the President United States as a Nazi or a Nazi sympathizer. Do they really just not understand the full weight of what they're saying. Do they really want to essentially downplay what the Nazi regime really did? Six million Jews murdered

in concentration camps, eleven million people total murdered in concentration camps. Um, that's on a scale that shouldn't even be in the same universe of conversation as anything Trump has done period. In fact, not only is Trump out a Nazi. He's actually a freaking great president so far. So they have a problem. I mean, they really have a psychological disorder, and that's why they're saying a lot of these things.

But these these notions of the resistance, for example, I mean, that's that is explicitly to tie anti trumpers to anti fascism too. That's right, anti fa in a sense. That's what anti fascism or anti fi is is anti fascism. And the only fascist that anyone ever thinks of the Nazis. Yeah, there's Mussolini and Italy. But when people think fascism, they

think Nazism. And for people to who are anti Trump to use that as some kind of rhetorical club to just bash the president, and to do so so reckless and without any real effort to think about the impact those words they're having. And then it turre out electrics about how we're so divided. Really, that's what's supposed to happen out now now we get to hear about how, you know, we need to all be friends. I mean, this is this is what we've had for the media

for the last few weeks. It's we need to stop being mean to each other, you stupid nazi racist. That's a summary of what the media CNN, MSNBC, New York Times, Washington Post, all the left wing libsites. I mean, that's just you know, the real left ones. It's actually interesting to read, to read the Nation, you know, or to read the huffing in Post, and then to turn on the New York Times or read the New York Times or turn on CNN, and you're like, what's the difference.

The answer is really nothing. There's very little difference, very little difference in tone, very little difference in ideology and in positions. You know, at least the Young Turks, which is that online digital thing that's got a very big digital audience. I mean, at least they're honest. They're like, yeah, we're basically a bunch of commies. Okay, they say yes, they say democratic socialist, but I mean they're far left, far left. CNN doesn't even accept that it's left wing.

And the people that are trying to pose as the responsible adults in our political conversations are among the very worst offenders when it comes to saying things that are completely out of line, completely out of bounds, and that haven't obviously deleterious effect on our national political conversation. By the way, is that a bucket humor? Is that? I feel like that actually a word. I'm making up a lot of words these days, but that's a real word, right,

Thank you, John, John's got my back. I think that's a real word. It's a fun word to say. Deleterious. Well, hello, what are we having for dinner tonight? It's deleterious, I assure you, although that's completely the wrong definition, as you know, but um, yeah, So that's I'm glad that we're I'm glad that we're at least able to speak to each other honestly about here in the hut. The lives are making the conversation worse all the time, and when they pose as people are trying to make it better. I

just can't stand it. I just can't. Really drives me nuts. We'll be right back. You've got to have so much trust in your employees, right you know that you're gonna be giving them access to you, what's your cyber infrastructure, ease, sensitive data, trade secrets, all that stuff. You want to make sure that people you can trust, and a big part of that is making sure that anyone that you hire is who they say they are. Now, most of the time you've got no problem, all right, but sometimes

you will. That's when you need somebody who's a real partner in the background investigation and vetting business. Global Verification Network is your answer. Whether you're from a huge company or a startup, Global Verification can tailor their services to your needs. This is the place to go. They have risk mitigation experts in office throughout the country. And unlike the other guys, they don't offshore, they don't subcontract this out to some overseas guys. They do it themselves. Go

to my g VN dot com. That's my g VN dot com or called Global Verification Network at eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. He's running on impeaching the president. You know, I don't know what he's thinking about impeachment. I mean, this is a guy that took bribes from an undercover FBI agent, took money from a lobbyist, did favors for the lobbyists. Maybe we should impeach Gilham as mayor of Tallehathi. To be clear about this, Uh, I have never in any way compromise

my values, my morals or the law. I've been elected official for fifteen years, and I've been elected repeatedly by doing right, not by doing wrong. I don't know what is going on in Florida right now. And to the Floridians listening to this, I know you are on the right side of this issue as in who to vote for. But Gillham is a few points ahead of the Santis. And this is of all the races that I think could go you know, could be a win for the Democrats that we're gonna hear oh so much about. It's

this one. The media is really going to focus in the you know, they know that cinema with their whole Yeah, like just go like join the Taliban, Like that's not that doesn't do well. So Arizona, I think we're good with McK sally. Um, I think that I think Heller's to win in Nevada. I think that very likely. Um, you know, I think you very likely have hide Camp. She's been done for a long time because of what she did with the Kavanaugh thing. Um, so that's gonna

be a Republican pick up. And I think Joe Donnelly's in trouble. Also in Indiana, Joe Donnelly, who I don't even like to quote what he said because it's like it's so uncomfortable, and the things that he said were so yeah, my this person is this person is such and such ethnicity, but they do a good job. It's like, wait, what, That's not what you're supposed to say, That's not how this works. Uh, but yeah, Gilham is points ahead of

the Santists going into this whole thing. And Florida's you know, Florida, Ohio, those are mega contested political states right now on the map in These are states that people get really energized about, really interested in covering. And if if a Democrat takes Florida, we're gonna hear about how oh see, this is the change. This is for the governorship obviously, right, but this is gonna this is gonna change the game for and Florida

is gonna go blue now and bla blood. I don't know if that's true, but I really just want to know who is a persuadable in Florida that really thinks that Gilham is gonna be able to deliver on Medicare for all. I mean, who are the undecided voters in that contest who are looking at these two candidate and saying, you know what, I think Florida really needs a lot of progressivism, higher taxes, lower economic growth, and inefficient bureaucracy telling me what to do. And I just think that

that's a bad idea. A lot of platitude from this guy. Oh, speaking of speaking of platitudes, because I know a lot of probably didn't see this interview, I got to sit down today with Martin O'Malley, who you will remember. Martin

O'Malley was that guy who, oh yeah, that's right. He also ran for the Democratic nomination and for the presidency, right he I think he got one percent of the vote, or he was getting he was pulling in about one percent as when he was in the primary, and he'd be up there on stage with Bernie and Hillary and everyone's like, ah, yeah, okay, that's a guy who's on stage talking. Man. He sat down today and I asked

him some very straightforward questions. He's running, by the way, I mean, very clear to me, at least he thinks he's running. He was pretty bitter about the fact that he didn't get more debate time, which just makes him sound like a whiner. You can watch the interview, it's on It's on you know, Hill dot TV, Slash Rising.

But I sit there, masses guy questions And if you are trying to find a platitudinous politician out of central casting who will not answer any questions, who will not tell you really anything, you can't do better than Martin munt I mean, this guy's were a larger sting that we do to real established the roots of our democracy and spreading our democratic ideals throughout the country through a more equitable and and fair democratic process. And I'm sitting

I'm like, what the heck are you talking about? It was amazing, I mean it was it was boring, but it was kind of amazingly boring. This guy is sitting there trying to tell me about why he would have been a better candidate or why he could have been

a strong candidate for the presidency against Donald Trump. And I'm sitting I'm like, I don't even know what you're what you're trying to say, other than just a lot of stuff that you think other people want to hear, or that you know that sounds smart, and and it was. It was a little bit for me. Oh wait, Mike's got an update for me in Florida. Here. Florida's that Republicans have outvoted Democrats by two percent and absentee so far. So that's a good trend because usually they're behind at

this point. All right, Mike, thank you. That makes me happy. Because Santus was mentioned in that are I thought that was relevant. He planned that out today because Florida is generally traditionally late developing for Republicans, and the fact that they are ahead at this point, I think he thinks puts them in a good place for election day, and they're actually ahead of projections in his point as, So I thought that was important. Oh, I mean, I certainly hope.

So yeah, I mean, the Santist it's not a great candidate. I think he'd be fined. I don't think he'd be the most compelling guy in the in the history of the state of Florida. But you know, look, it is an important state and I do hope we pick it up. So we'll we'll continue to follow this one pretty closely. And by the way, I didn't get a chance to mention this before, but we are gonna do uh some special hill Dot TV election coverage um Hill dot TV

election coverage that will be on Tuesday. So right after this show, I will be on Hill TV pretty much all night. It is gonna be the longest day in the history of broadcast for anybody. I'm gonna basically working twenty four hours. I don't even know how this is supposed to I'm just being don't even not supposed to work. I told him them, like, you guys realized I might just pass out and MND be gonna feel bad about it, like I will pass out on camera at some point,

And they said, yeah, you know your thought. You'll you'll figure it out. But if you want to watch, guys, it's totally free. It's all units internet connection. We're gonna be streaming it on Facebook on the Hill, so just go to the Hill dot com or the Hills Facebook page. We'll be streaming the whole thing. You can watch. I'll be there to be a lot of great conservative guests, some libs too, as we know, it's a both sides show,

so we get libs and conservatives. But that's gonna be from I think eight eastern to midnight this coming Tuesday. So if you want to hang out with me for election night. I'll be on after this radio show, so you can hang out with me from eight eastern to midnight on Tuesday. Just go to Hill dot TV or the Hill dot Com. It'll be streaming there. The ad echoes the notorious night Willim Horton campaign act. It's reminiscent of the notorious Willie Horton at Roger Ailes cast a

long shadow. Roger Ales has died, but he was the amount your mind behind. Willy Horton and his acolytes are in the White House. This ad is drawing comparison to the Willie Horton ad. That Willie Horton ad. What is Willie Horton In Spanish? People are comparing this to the Willie Horton ad. I called this a Willie Horton redux that add Willie Horton. Oh my gosh, what is the Willie Horton ad? Folks? What what is the media all upset about? At first, they're they're comparing an ad to

Willie Horton. So why don't we just take a little, a little moment here to go back in time and look at exactly with what they're what they're saying. Okay, so Willie Horton was a he was a murderer, and in the presidential campaign, um it became an issue that Massachusetts had a furlough program where people who were in prison will be let out on furlough. And Willie Horton was let out on furlough and he killed somebody, and they brought this up in that presidential contest in an ad.

We actually have the audio of the ad right now, Play thirteen, Please Bush and ducacasn crime. Bush supports the death penalty for first degree murderers. Du Concas not only opposes the death penalty, he allowed first degree murderers to have weekend passes from prison. One was Willie Horton, who murdered a boy and a robbery, stabbing him nineteen times. Despite a life sentence, Horton received ten weekend passes from prison. Rton fled, kidnapped a young couple, stabbing the man and

repeatedly raping his girlfriend weekend prison passes. Ducacas on crime. That's a pretty tame ad, isn't it. I mean, what is it about that ad that is so upsetting? Whether the facts are accurate, it's not a lie, it's all true. Think about that for a second. Math choose. It's du Caucus. It was a joke of a candidate. Du Caucus supported the notion that people should be able to leave the

prison on weekends furlough. What how would how would anybody feel if they were a relative or friend of the the raped and murdered individuals that because Willie Horton was let out of prison, you know, we're no longer with us? What about that? You know, it's just so interesting. This is one of these things where the left we yelled this.

It's just become a talking point and no one ever is allowed to think about it or actually come up with a historical background of what's happening here, what's really going on? And you know this is this is a situation where the truth is what the liberals are so

upset about. The Libs are angry because it was a very effective ad that Willie Horton a very effective because there was a time when there's a lot of crime in the country, and you know, there there's nothing about the Democrats on crime in the eighties that anybody is gonna really want to talk about. Let me tell you that Democrats that a lot of oh it's all about root causes and we need to be more gentle with like murderers and rapists and figure out why they're so upset.

And you know, they were really awful on the issue of crime. So you know, I just think it's so interesting that keeps say, oh, my gosh, it's like Willie Horton. Adah, Willie Horton was a convicted rapist and murderer that they were letting out of prison. That seems like a pretty good thing to point out about your political opponent. There's nothing they say, Oh, because Horton is black, it's a it's it's a racist ad. Why because you know he's

got a mug shot. I mean you could see the mug shot of him, I think in the ad um. But I mean that we played you something like it was just an audio ad and so but this is in reference to an ad that's running right now, which we have the audio of for you. Please play clip eleven. Greatly step out of the haulway different break up, Who Kill War? You know there's too warm. She says. He wants to apply for partum for the felony who committed on another attemptive murder. So I know you couldn't really

pick up that much for him. And the guy's yelling about which I killed more? That was an illegal alien he was in the country who killed cops. Okay, that's a that's a guy who was a cop killer. And he's in court. They're telling the judge he wished that he had killed more. Now they're they're saying, this is it's racist. Why is it racist for them to show an I legal alien who who was on the other side of this whole spectrum that we're always told is

it's just everybody who comes to America illegally. We're led to believe is a is a soon to be rocket scientist, you know, graduated top of his or her class, valedictorians, smarter than Americans, better than Americans, harder working than Americans. That's that's part of the leftist mantra on immigration, is that especially illegal aliens, they're better than we are as people. It's not just that they might need more you know,

that it's a lie that they'll need more benefits. They say, it's a lie that they will commit more crime than the native born population. They say, whether they always mix in immigrants overall into this category, and I'm talking about illegal illegal immigrants um, you know. I mean, here's the producer might point us out to me, the caravan. There's thousands of people in this caravan. We know nothing about them at this point other than the videos we see

and some of the interviews they've given. But the media is completely convinced that this caravan is full old of future Rhodes scholars and rocket scientists. That's and if we don't bring them in, our economy will suffer and we are terrible people. For the meat is sure of this. Just listen to them and tell you play sixteen. All of this for a group of people, a lot of whom are mothers and children, who pose no imminent threat

to the United States called us an invasion. Uh, it might be the most pathetic invasion of a country in world history, if if this were actually an invasion, But of course it's not. Presidents sending troops to the border to deal with a caravan that hasn't proven to be violent. Stop saying their monsters, they're more mothers than monsters. Don't say it. Why don't any of you say that? Now? I don't think anyone's calling the monsters. So that's just a straw mancy. This is what this is what the

other side does. They say things that are not are not really at the part of the argument on the other side, they get up. I mean Obama did this all the time. Obama was always at some people, sir, where should at all we should be feeding our children two monsters? And I say no, watch, let's give them healthcare. It's like, no, no one's saying feed our children and monsters. What is going on here? This is crazy. But that's what the left do is they create strama arguments to

the side. Actually, I don't think I talked to you about this. Um it was a story from a while back. But I read this this this testing that they did. Uh, this testing that that I forgot. I think maybe it was Quilette did this where they asked people on the left to say what the right wing argument was for something and they completely missed the mark. And when people on the right or asked what do liberals think, we get it. We know when liberals are asked what do

conservatives think? They have this this ridiculous, uh, completely exaggerated or just playing wrong view of what we think. It's not that they it's not even that we're right or wrong, but that they don't even know what our positions are. Conservatives know what lives believe. Libs don't know what conservatives believe. They make it up. They tell us what we believe, and they're wrong. They're they're they're not in a position

to dictate that to us, but they think they are. Um. But I just think it's so interesting how much they just bleed on. I mean, the Lives just bleed on about racism all the time, and and you know, I wonder at what point people will just grow tired of it once again. I think in the era of Trump, there's been this elevation of the rhetoric around race, and there's been much much greater focus on it. So perhaps now people are not they're not as desensitized to charges

of racism as they had been for a while. You know, when Obama was president and they were still calling you know, the liberal media was still calling everybody racist. It's like, Okay, well we've had a black president now for six seven going on eight years, and a lot of people that don't like his policy, he's voted for him. Uh So we don't always need to be told that every every bit of opposition to Obama was rooted in racism. But but that was a that was a ploy that the

left used many many times. I mean, that was something that they clearly, at some level clearly believed. And I mean I just note that you know here we or whether they believe it or not actually doesn't matter because they just knew that it was. It was useful and calling people names, calling them racists in particular, is a very powerful political tool. But I just don't see anything in this in this ad. I mean to call it racist to say it's unfair to the illegal alien population

of this country. By the way, people tell me this now they say, don't say legal alien. I look at when I say, that is what the Federal Criminal Code says. If I can't use the proper legal term for something, I need someone to explain to me what the proper term is and not the term that they like. I've also noticed by the way it's switched from undocumented to unauthorized. There's been a switch, folks. Undocumented immigrant has turned to

unauthorized immigrant. See they're moving it down, they're moving it on that pendulum. Uh. They originally it was a legal immigrant. Then they don't they don't like the whole illegal component of it though, So then they made it undocumented immigrant. But that doesn't really sound quite as compelling or quite as easy to fix, right, but what about unauthorized immigrant. Well, all you need to do then is authorizing. All you need to do is authorized them at the government level,

and now you're fine. Now there's no problem, Now there's no crime. That's how they played the game, constantly trying to stock the deck by changing the words and calling the other side, calling the pro sovereignty pro law side

of the equation racist. Brian Kemp's getting the support of all kinds of working, good people all across Georgia, and Stacy Abrams being bankrolled by by Hollywood liberals sending their support into the state, and some of them come into the state, like I heard Oprah's in town today and I heard Will Farrell was going door to door the other day. Well, I'd like to remind Stacy and Oprah and Will Ferrell I'm kind of a big deal to them. I like a little bit of swagger from the vat there.

Vice President Pence later down, I'm kind of a big deal too. My library smells of rich mahogany um I but I was looking I think a little bit of a little bit of Pence. A little bit of Pence swagger is a good thing. And he's out there on the campaign intro. Let me just tell you now that I will be interviewing the vice president tomorrow in Missouri. I will be at the American Conservative Union event in Kansas City, Missouri. I'm gonna tell you this right now.

It is a true thing. See, guys, I I don't hide things from you, right I tell you when I've got some areas where I need to shape up a little bit, and some of you're gonna laugh at me. But I did have to have one of my wonderful producers at the Hill help me when I said, Okay, I think I think these are the flights that we should all take with my with my camera crew and stuff. I think we should get out there on this flight. And she had to tell me, Buck, you're not going

to Kansas City, Kansas. That's a different thing. You're going to Kansas City, Missouri, to which I immediately turned out and said, excuse me, Darling. I didn't say that because that would be bad, but I said, excuse me, madam. Obviously I knew that we'll just take a taxi from Kansas City to Kansas City because they must be very close to which she had to explain to me. No, in fact, Kansas City, Missouri is about three and a

half hour drive from Kansas City, Kansas. So I had to eat a little bit of humble buckpie and recognize that my Midwest geography needs a bit of work. My mid East geography is excellent, and geography I should spend a little more time with the old maps, you know what I mean, check them out. So that's just a little bit of a little bit of honestly time. But no, I'm serious that I'm very excited to get a chance to talk to Vice President Pence tomorrow. And one thing

that I was thinking about. One of the reason I wanna tell you this is obviously I'm gonna be out tomorrow. I'll tell you at the end of the show, who are a very special guest fill in will be because we've got a we got a really fun guest host on the showw So don't you know, don't be like, oh Bucks out tomorrow, I do. No, no, no, You're gonna want to hang out on the Freedom Hunt tomorrow.

We've got a great, great guest house for you. Uh, but you know, I wanted to put it out there for you that if you want to share a question with me and you if you send me a great question, I might be able to get into the veep and you might get your question asked to the Vice President United States. But you got to send it to me tonight. So Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton is the best

place to do that. And you can send it there and I'll probably get a whole bunch of different suggestions which I really appreciate, and if one of them is just just fantastic, I might just have to pose the Vice president. I really like the Pence is taking the taking the role in this administration that he has. I think that he's very loyal to the president, which is

obviously appreciated by the President. I don't think that he ever has a moment where he's thinking about, oh, how does this reflect on the Pence brand at the expense of the actual president United States. I don't think that he's playing, you know, I don't think he's trying to play five D chess or whatever and and use um use anybody around him or anyone in the White House orbit in a way that isn't conducive to the best interests of this administration. So I think he's been a

really steady player, and you know, it's it's impressive. He's an impressive guy. So I'm looking forward to getting a chance to talk to him tomorrow. And and like I was saying, if you're out in Kansas City, Missouri, John, do we think is it? I mean, I'm from New York, so we all say Missouri. But do people in Missouri? Do people in Missouri say Missouri or is? I don't nothing that. I don't know either, you know, I don't know that. Our listeners, yeah, some of them are certainly

in Missouri, so they let me let me know. I remember, I remember somebody said that my pronunciation of Louisville wasn't bad, and I was like, ah, because many years ago I actually dated somebody from from Louisville and I say Louisville. She was like, that's not how you said, and then I got a little better my Louisville. But I don't know how you're supposed to say Missouri really if you're a local. But I'll figure it out when i'm out there. But if you have a chance, I think it's a

huge it's in an arena, it's in a stadium. Team So any of you who are in Missouri, you can or in the area at least of of Kansas City, Missouri, you can go to this American Conservative and the intervent. And I mean I'll be there all day. I'm gonna be there all day, just walking around talking to folks, interviewing the v maybe interviewing some other peeples, doing the thing, you know, doing the whole reporter thing. It's funny. And I I read a column, I do a three hour

radio show, I host a TV show. I go out there and do you know, field interviews. You know, I'm a I'm a buck of all trades. That's how I

like to think of it. But if you get a chance to come up and say hi, tomorrow, I'll be out there walking around with the folks at the UH High V I think arena or something that's I forget what it's called, something like that, but I'll be out there and say at the American Serving Univent in Missouri tomorrow st not St. Louis, Missouri, buck in uh Kansas City, Missouri. So come by and say hi, what the heck happened to getting the truth about Kavanaugh, folks, Hold on a second, wait,

hold the phone. If you recall from about mid September to early October, claims about now Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. We're all over the media. It was the biggest story in the country. People that I know, left and right, we're taking time off from work to watch that hearing, both blasi Fords testimony and kavanaughs testimony in its entirety. I watched every single minute of it live, except for the parts that I had to skip to come to this radio show, and then I went back and watched

the rest of it later. It was a true spectacle, and it had the absolute attention of most of the country and certainly most of the media for weeks. Well whatever happened to it? Though, our friend Molly Hemingway over at the Federalists asked this question. She says, if Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh is really a rapist and a sexual assailant, as Democrats and the media have claimed, shouldn't the story continue to be covered? Um? Shouldn't we continue

to get, you know, get updates on all of this? Ah? Interesting? There is a lot of reason to believe that they have stepped away from this, not because they are willing to move past the issue of Kavanaugh and not because they really are hoping that we can come together and

heals the country. Here's what I think. I think that they understand ultimately that if people started to into which is what would happen, especially if there's gonna be some allegation of Remember there was there was talk of oh, there's no technically no statute of limitation on sex crimes in Maryland, so maybe they'll they'll open up a criminal

case on him. That's what they were saying. That was the that was the discussion, and now that's all gone, by the way, said but you know, the thing about a criminal investigation is that you then also are gonna have to have the accuser on the record. You're going to have the accuser, um, you know, in a position where she's going to have to answer questions about what really happened here and the people around her that she says might have known. Here's my here's my bottom line

on this. You're not hearing about the Kavanaugh thing, although you might again once the Democrats take the House, but that will be a process that they can control. The media has stepped away from this because they know that if if we look into the particularly sweat Nick claim, and I think the Blasi Ford claim, we are going to find evidence of foul play. We will find that this was uh and I already think that this is the case, but I'm saying we'll be able to prove it.

We would be able to prove that there was dare I say, a collusion underway with senior Democrats, the media, and some of these accusers in the case of Avanadi and sweat Nick, that this was a claim that should never have been taken as credible by any ethical lawyer, which I know for a lot of you are laughing at that very concept. But and you know, we know NBC News sat on information that was exculpatory for Um,

information that was exculpatory for Cavanaugh. This was an all out of effort by the media to get a desired outcome that we had nothing to do with journalism, with ethics, with decency, with the truth, and that's why they have let it go. Um. Here's what Molly writes in her piece, by the way, which I think is very good, very interesting for you to take a moment to read. If you can. The Senate Judiciary Committee just made a criminal referral of sweat, Nick, and Avanati to the Department of

Justice for making false claims. After each outlandish claim was made, the media would dutifully report that an additional claim had

been made. One journalist admitted she reported on a story that the claimant was unable to substantiate precisely because additional claims made the first claim more believable, even leaving aside the claim of an underground serial gang rape cartel and the New Yorkers kavan accuser Debora Ramirez, who a few days after his hearings ended ended claimed to sort of recover decades old memories of a Kavanaugh assault and the

various anonymous and merchantic claims about rapes from Colorado Rhode Island. What happened to blasi Ford? Blasi Ford's modeled claim about a violent attempt at rape and an undetermined location and time in high school could not have been more generously treated by online, print, and broadcast media. It was given

nothing but the most respectful hearing by the media. The Washington Post ran a very favorable version of the story to break the news see ann Fox News and MSNBC all said her claims were credible and that her testimony at the reopened Kavanaugh hearing was devastating the Kavanaugh's confirmation case. Obviously, the media coverage was misaligned from the political mood of the non progressive portion of the country, but it was well aligned with the progressive political movement. Do they no

longer care about Blasi Ford? Huh? And quote there, Molly's raising a very interesting question. I thought they wanted the truth, right, you can't handle the truth? No, But I thought that they we're all about justice here for Blasi Ford. Why did they move past this so quickly? You know? Okay, so kavanaughs on the Supreme Court that that doesn't mean that that does not mean that they can't continue to get to the you know, the bottom of this that

they wanted. The journalists can do whatever they want in terms of tracing stories. Oh you know why they you know why they toned it down right now? My friends? You know, the real answer is because I'm not sure they've done with it forever, because they may go back to it in order to um you know that they may go back to it if they get a majority in the House. But the reason they dropped it in the in the last few weeks is because it wasn't playing well across the country. It became a liability for

Democrats going into the midrooms. That's why they dropped this Blasi forward thing. Um, there's more here for Molly quote. We're told that she had no incentive to lie and gave up a great deal by coming forward, although one journalist has reported on the nearly one million dollars she raised from progressive donors. All the media that reports she had no incentive to lie. Oh, if you were to fully investigator claims, don't they well? Blossy Forward is unclear

in the precise location the claimed assault. Maryland Police said they would fully investigate any allegations brought to them. Has that been done? The argument that the multi weeek delay in September was insufficient for a proper investigation of her claims. If that's true, what has been done in October? Why have we heard nothing? Molly just hammers them here because then we know that they have no They have no answer to this because this was always from the beginning

a political hit. There was nothing about honor, decency, or integrity about it. Certainly not about getting to the truth, and the moment that it was no longer necessary as a political hit, they dropped the whole thing. They couldn't care less, no longer matter to them. That tells you

a lot, doesn't it. Think back to all the people that were acting like this was the most important story they had covered in years, This was so essential, so so critical, and then think about how they were just liars and all this stuff about oh, we need more investigation, we need more investigation. All the people who said that we're liars, they just want to delay because they wanted to derail Kavanaugh's nomination. There's a lot of bias in

social media sites. You see stories better all the time. And you know that Silicon Valley is a bunch of leftists running around these days, right, It's run by people that don't share your values and beliefs, and they think that they have this messianic need to spread progressivism around the globe. Well, guess what if you just want a place where you can share your thoughts and opinions, do what I do. Check out snippy dot com. Snippy dot com is a new social media site, totally free to join,

totally free to use. All you do is set up an account and then you can post, follow people, share photos, share information, and just get in on the conversation. None of the conversational health nonsense you're hearing from Twitter and Facebook and these other places. Snippy dot com is a place where you or voice is valued, or the conversation is free and open. Find like minded folks on a whole host of issues, established rapport with people that really

believe in this country and patriotism. Snippy dot com again, s N I P p Y dot com. Now, the media may be done with the whole Kavanaugh situation for now,

but I'm not done. You know that they may have decided that it no longer suits their political interests as we've been discussing, but I think that it's necessary for all of us, and it's necessary for the good of the country and certainly for the good of the media to enforce some accountability on these people for the debacle that they made of this, of this entire confirmation process, and and the you know, the media we're front and

center and all of this. This was uh, one of those moments in the in the whole Cavanaugh saga where if it was and surrounded with all these other incredibly outrageous circumstances. I think people would have made this a much bigger news story than than than it was treated at the time. But Matt Continetti over at Commentary has written a piece on the New Yorkers shocking dereliction, and

wow does he take them to task. Now. The New Yorker, for those of you who don't remember, was where Ronan Pharaoh and UH and Jane Mayor decided that they they're both writing for The New Yorker, which is a very offensive, very highbrow publication. Um, but they decided that they were going to throw in their support and Ronan Pharaoh as part of this was because we look, Ronan had written these big expose s and taken down some people in

the past. By the way, I want one thing that I want to know is how did Ronan Pharaoh come up with all this? Are we really believe that Ronan Faraoh just was a dogged investigator and just figured out this Weinstein stuff himself. I feel like he's gotten more help behind the scenes than he's than anybody has UH been willing to say publicly yet, which doesn't discredit what

he's doing. I just think it's interesting that really this guy probably the worst, the worst cable news show in the history of cable news was the whatever the thing was called with Ronan Faro. I mean it was. It was an embarrassment, not just to watch, but it was an embarrassment for anybody who was within the vicinity of the show. Like I feel like the guy delivering FedEx packages to the NBC building if he walked past the set of Ronan Farao show was probably like, damn, that's rough.

So uh. But Ronan Faro has become a big, you know, household names, celebrity and all this stuff because of his reporting on sexual abusers, in in sexual harassers within Hollywood. And he put his name on this story. And the story was about the second accuser, not sweat Nick. Sweat Nick was third um, but this second accuser from from college who claimed that there was an effort Ramirez Ramirez was was it was Debbie Ramirez that Kavanaugh stuck his you know, man part in in her face and she

swatted it away at some party. And it was so flimsy, the entire story and everything behind it, and you know, continent. He is not letting, not letting Mayor and Ronan Pharaoh here just slide off and and pretend that nothing really happened. This is how he starts this piece. He goes, quote, let's pretend you're the editor of a magazine. Two of your reporters say they've learned of a woman who alleges that a prominent man exposed himself to her while the two were at a party in a college dorm more

and thirty years ago. Her story is an ironclad, her recollection is hazy because she had been drinking that night. She's been asking longtime friends that they have any memory of the event and has come up short. The man in question denies the allegation. No one seems to have any direct knowledge of what the accuser was talking about. There was one gentleman who refuses to go on the record, who says he heard about the incident from another person

sometime after it happened. Question, do you run a piece without corroborating evidence or do you tell your reporters to keep digging. If you chose the second option, congratulations, you have better judgment than the editor of The New Yorker, As the old campaign ad had it. Yes, the New Yorker and quote, I mean you get into some of the details here, and the fact that they ran this was that this was a political hit that couldn't have been any more obvious, that could not have been anymore

blatant in its partisan intent. And this is something that we should not we should not move past. So people say, oh, you know, there's the fake news. Don't say fake news, the press of telling the truth. They just concocted this thing. I mean, they crafted out of essentially nothing. They crafted a story that had it gone a little bit differently. You know, the second accuser, that's always a big o oh,

there's a second accuser. Now, the third accuser was such an obvious lunatic and liar, Julie Sweatnick, that it didn't really you know that that that it actually went against the anti Kavanaugh crowd. And they can all thank Avanati for that one, the scam artist. But the second accuser here, this was a really damaging moment back in the whole Cavanaugh saga. And and here's how CONTINENTI Puts puts it about what happened. Quote, Pharaoh and Mayer were up front

about the fact that they lack corroboration. The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party, they wrote. The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident. Many did not respond to interview requests. Others declined to comment or said they did not attend or remember the party. The exception was an unnamed source who said that he is sure that he was told at the time that Kavanaugh

was the student who exposed himself to Ramirez. If one of my Free Beacon writers had come to me with these caveats, I would have told her she had zilch. Just how weak was this story? The evening it was published in the sixteenth paragraph of an article about Ford's

agreement to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Cheryl Stolberg and Nicholas Fandos wrote the following in The New York Times quote, The Times had interviewed several dozen people of the past this week in an attempt to corroborate ramire as a story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Mr Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates, asking if they recalled the incident, and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr Kavanaugh was the one who

exposed himself end quote. All right, let's take a step back for a minute here, my friends, Not only was there no evidence and no corroborating witnesses, they reached out to dozens of people, many of whom had already talked to Ramirez, none of them remember this incident at all. And on top of that, the only belief, the only reason for belief for this second kavanac user, the only reason that anybody should have even thought for a second that this was credible, was this one woman who came

forward and told this story. And it turns out even she wasn't entirely sure that it was Kavanaugh. Think about the mentality here for a second, before we even get

back into the press responsibility. Think about the mentality of somebody who, at an incredibly vulnerable point for for an individual like Cabinet, was in the public eye in this way, she's not even sure, she's not even sure that it's him, but she comes forward anyway, and then she goes on this whole tracking down somebody to corroborate her, and you know, hoping that that somebody's gonna say, yeah, yeah, I remember that thing happened, now, you know, There's a part of

me that wonders, at what stage of this process did she maybe stop and think or did she refuse to stop and think, Hey, maybe I've got the wrong guy and I shouldn't just be part of a pylon here. But oh, that's right. It was never really about the truth. It was always about destroying somebody who was a threat to the right to an abortion. That's it. It was never about the truth. It was actually not about sexual

assault either. For the left, alt aid Lee, the ultimate aim of the Kavanaugh ambush was to make sure that abortion rights would be protected. Sexual assault was a secondary consideration to the closest thing that the Left has to a sacrament, which is abortion. Uh, and to their everlasting shame and discredit. And they're continuing and obvious moral inferiority to conservatism and the Republican Party. There there's no two sides to this one. We are we are in a

morally superior position. We're ethically on the side of righteousness on the issue of life, and the Left is on the side of evil. And they don't like to think of it that way. They don't like to talk of it that way. They use all these weasel words and all this nonsense to obscure what's really going on, what they really support. But we need to have clarity on this issue. But that's what was at stake here for the left, and that's why they were willing to do this.

And you know, Ronan Pharaoh, it should be noted, is a partisan hack. He's done some good reporting. Lots of people have done good reporting. When push came to shove, he was willing to sell his credibility to help the movement. That's not what journalists do. That is what activists do. Man, it does feel kind of like everybody these days getting a talk show, you know, it does feel like, Wow,

everyone's got their own channel going on. There. There's a lot of that, you know, because the digital era we live in. Um. But this one was a bit of a shock. I gotta tell you, this one I did not see coming, and usually I got I got pretty

good sources on this. But some of you will recall that I had a very interesting conversation with Mr Carter Page not long ago on this set of Rising, and we had him for interviews about what happened with this whole this this farcical nonsense about how he uh was necessary it was necessary to have open FISO surveillance on him. And it's just it was just crazy. I mean, the whole thing is completely bonkers. And I remember talking to this guy and thinking, you know, he seems like just

a very nice and honestly pretty harmless guy. Now, he did go to the Naval Academy. I think he might have gone to Harvard for graduate school, so he's also he's also smart. But he's a little cookie. He's a little bit of an off kilter guy, you know what I mean, A little different, very nice. I really like talking to Carter Page. I got nothing bad to say about him, but he's all, you know, he's a little unusual. I did not guess that he would get his own

show on cable news. This is a surprise, that's right. Conservative cable news network one American News has given a show to Carter Page. Who will start a new show called America in the World with Carter Page. Huh, what an interesting turn of events. This is, my friends, I do not think I could have seen this one coming. I have to wonder now, is pop adoppol is going to get a show? And if pop Adopt gets a show,

then why don't they get a show together. You'd have the Page Pop Adopt duo and they could talk about how the government cannot be trusted with some of the extreme surveillance powers that it has given to itself in such a hyper political era. But you know there's another part. It feels like, Okay, so I can sit here and tell you, wow, Carter Page getting his own cable news show. But you think about some of the other people that have been given shows over the years, and you've got

a bunch of real, real misfits. Remember Alec Baldwin. I think he's got a show again now. But Alec Baldwin had a show on MSNBC for like five minutes. It felt like I think he went on some rants in the street where he yelled a anti anti gay slur or something, if I recall, I have to check back on that, but he definitely got fired for some some kind of misbehaved here. I think the ratings were also terrible.

There's a big difference between being an actor where somebody else writes the lines for you and having to carry your own talk show, and that those these are very different things. Um Oh, Elliott Spitzer had his own show for a while that was that was quite a debacle at CNN, no less, But Carter Page man get his own show. So I gotta say, I think there's a pretty decent chance that yours truly might at some point

be a guest host I'm sorry, a guest. Not again, well maybe a guest host two, but a guest on the Carter Page program. I just wonder what this is gonna be? Like? It? What? What? What America's thinking? Carter did not strike me as the kind of guy who would carry a show by himself. Let me just let me just put it that way. But you know, you never know. Then again, you look at some of these empty suits over at CNN. If you put enough stuff on a prompter and you can create That's why I

love radio. Radio separates you from the frauds. He can't. Nobody can fake a radio show for you, especially a three hour radio show. You know, some people have a lot of guests and a lot of stuff. You know, people ask me that, So why don't your work guests in radio? I say, because I want to talk to I want to talk to my audience. I want to

talk to my team. Yeah, I've guessed sometimes and sure, I mean if there's people that bring particular expertise, but I I don't trust anybody to be more considerate and respectful of your time than me, and so I always feel this obligation to do the show myself, which is why I take very very few guests and don't really

get a whole lot of calls. We had a lot of role call, obviously, um, but we we tend to get through a lot of segments without hearing from too many other guest voices and uh car Carter Page man, I I was shocked, That's all I can tell you on this one. I was like, Wow, one American News. I guess they've really decided that there's enough of an interest here and in this whole Russia collusion phenomenon that this will somehow sustain its own show. I guess that's

where we're going. So if Carter will have you, I'll be a guest on his show when it launches. Rock and Roll. Fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call. You heard the man, Time for your thoughts via roll call one of the best times of the day every day. Got to love the roll call action, and with that we get right to it, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton if you want to

be a part James right. Paul Ryan has and always has had a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of immigration. He is quoted as saying, the purpose of immigration is to improve the lot of the immigrant. That is not the purpose of immigration. The purpose of immigration is, with the okay of the citizenry, to bring in people who will improve and benefit the existing society. That is the actual purpose of immigration, not to improve a lot of

the immigrant. Come back with your shielder on it. Keep destroying those shield tosses, Brother James, H James that you're correct, and it is about it is supposed to be at least about making this country better. Our immigration program is not supposed to be a kind of welfare program that that is not what's supposed to happen. So I I agree with you and Paul Ryan on immigration, as I've been saying, is really bad. Is not not good on

the issue immigration at all. But he'll be running a think tank soon enough, and I don't know how much cable news he'll be doing. He's not particularly interesting on cable news. Wayne writes, Hey, it's Wayne, Wayne. Wayne, I got you know that song that's no and then no, no, nobody nothing Nirvana. Um. I think that's what I think, he yells Wayne, although I could be wrong about it, Wayne writes, hates me a shield time. My good sir, you are aware of the time honored way that people

fled desperate circumstances and saw a new home. They jumped into the greater capacity of the new home line homeland, and offered themselves as slavery. Slavery was not imposed on captives and their children, was the way that the bankrupt or destitute could find employment and security Apart from crime.

Illegal immigrants can expect one of these outcomes one human trafficking to drug trafficking, three, depending on laws and their enforcement, oppression and resentment, or four continuing to be manipulated, politically resistant, cultural as similar Sian and attempting revolt. All our outcomes comparable to that up slaves. What a wonderful opportunity for which to leave your home. Well, I don't think they're

all comparable to slavery. I wouldn't go that far, Um, but I think you're definitely gonna have a difficult circumstance coming into this country as an illegal alien unless the Democrats say that you are no longer illegal, and then you can get all the benefits offered up via our trillion dollar welfare annually trillion dollars spent on the welfare staying in this country. So there you have it. Adam right, the movie was Cat's Eye with the ogre and the

cat defending young Drew Barrymore. Uh, you are correct. That is the name of the movie that I used to think was scary. I didn't realize Drew Barrymore was in that, but the little ogre was a really scary looking little dude. I had nightmares about that little ogre back in the day. Somebody else writes, Buck, please do not read this on air, so I will skip that one. Eric writes Buck, don Lemon keeps on running his mouth. He's just sending more

and more people over to our side. Also, from here on out, anytime you're talking about CNN or MSNBC, you should refer to them as the radical media. Well, while I understand Eric that where you're coming from with this, let me just say that I don't want to call him the radical media because I don't want it to sound like they're still cool and hip. And radical man like hey man, radical media man. We we just certainly

don't want that. So but yes, thank you for sending in your thoughts on the Don Lemon controversy this week. Don Lemon was never particularly nice to me. I did not, do not have fond memories of doing that show back in the day, and it was early enough in my career that I really was under the miss the miss h impression. Is that a word? No, but it's a buck is um if it's not a word like degreatory, uh,

which is also not a word. But I was under the mistaken impression that they would reward intelligent conservatism if it was done politely and and respectfully. And no, that's not really the case. So CNN should be um receiving all the criticism that it does from most of the people that I see on the right. It deserves the criticism for sure. Uh. David writes, Hey, Buck, there's definitely a movie where a cat is sitting on somebody's chest

stealing their breath. Scared the hell out of me when I saw it as a kid, great show to night take care. Yeah, David, as we interesting than a few of you, really remember that that movie was uh cats, I so yeah, there you go clothes. It's called cat's eye, sir. Yes, another one, this one from Eric. Okay, okay, you guys are right. You're right. I get it, I get it. Thomas writes, good segment on your show talking about the media.

Madonna's buck Christina I'm Not Poor has forgotten. Oh I get it, like I'm on poor, I'm not poor has forgotten as of all the media elites that they're no longer exercising journalistic ethics. Of all people, John Stewart has to remind them of it, and as usual, they failed to comprehend what he says. Keep holding them accountable, Buck, good work, shields high well, yes, indeed, thank you so much. Uh Larry right, Buck, I haven't checked in for a while.

I just want to let you know I'm still out here trying to help rally the troops in southern Oregon. Got some good news for a few days ago. You are now on our news talk station k c MX eight eighty here in Medford in the ten pm to one am slot. Before he showed up, the only option that slot was Alex Jones. Needless to say, I approve of this change. Keep up the great work Shields High Well. Thank you so much, Larry. I'm glad that there's an

option to listen to me out there in Oregon. I would love for there to be even more options to listen to me in Oregon. I'm working on it. Man, We've gotta going, Jonathan Right, listen to yesterday's podcast, and it amazes me how the media thinks they can be pro jew yet anti Israel. Maybe they're just rallying behind

Democrat Jews. Uh, Jonathan. There's always been this split in the Jewish communities country between support for Israel and some of the conservatism that that often implies, at least in terms of national security and geopolitics, and the strong majority of American Jews who vote for the Democrat Party, so that that really is just continuing on now. Uh, in in different ways. Casey Rights, We're both conservative libertarians and

no hard feelings. Love the show. Buck. Your Friday show was talking about the best worst costumes the wife and I wanted to share ours. Oh man, you guys have great costumes. Casey. You guys are really cute couple, by the way, so very cool. Thanks for sending in the pot. Dan Rights, um Buck you need to turn your the Boston station you're on a turn up the juice. It's too low power and hard to catch reliably. Dan, I will send them a strongly worded memo requesting politely that

they turn up the juice a little bit. That mean nice gets more wattage at that station. That would be cool. Uh, Aaron writes, if you think you're that to call the UH, I think you're right. To call the founder of Islam merely Mohammed would risk ambiguity, but your critics are also right that is wrong to call him the prophet Mohammed. I always call him the false prophet Mohammed, which seeds no ground to those who would call him a prophet. Well, Aaron, I'm sure you are quite the hit over at the

local mosque. On what else to say, but thank you very much for writing in. Keith writes, Buck, your referral of Peaky Blinders is spot on, except for not understanding the accents. There's a wonderful feature called subtitles that helps immediately immensely. The only drawback is my lips get tired after one episode. Um m hmm. Some titles. My lips get tired after one episode. Oh I guess because you mouth the words to yourself as you read them. I don't.

I didn't really understand that part of it. Glad you're enjoying Peaky Blinders, my friend. It is a very very well done, very entertaining show. And yes, I told you about the about the subtitles, I believe Jar writes excellent old school reference with the trust treat comment. We're talking about your Rising segment. Thank you, Jar, look at you.

You caught a movie quote in Rising. You get extra points for that, Steve Hey, buck just listening to Friday Show, degraatory equals a bucket is um and I love it anyway, shield side, Thank you, Steve. It sounds like it's a word, so I feel like we should make it a word. You know, it's close enough that it should be a word. I think, Hannah, Hey, something so funny. It's parents teacher conference week at my kids school, and I went yesterday

my youngest daughter's first grade conference. After all, after all of the must have of grades and behavior reports, her teacher tells me that my daughter will get excited or happy about something and say maga under her breath, maybe laugh so hard. I knew you'd think it's funny. You have a great weekend, Hannah. I do think that's funny. That's great, that's a great story. That's really cute. I kind of like that we should just turn Maga into a an exclamation of joy, you know, so instead of

yelling bingo when you win, you're like Maga. You know what I'm saying. I think that would be a good way to go to him. I want to take a personal moment if I can, um tell you a couple of things. The first one is that I am gonna be out tomorrow, but I have arranged for a very special guest to take the Freedom Hut into his control for the for the after, for the evening, and that

will be our friend, Raheem Khasam. So those who who always say you want more Raheem tomorrow will be a Rahim Kassam athon for three hours here in the Freedom Hut. He's gonna he's gonna do a great job. I mean, Rahem is a really interesting, insightful guy. Um. And we'll obviously have the Godfather Michael Pelca back on soon two over the holidays when I need to take some time to do things in life. Uh. Speaking about life today, November one is my mom's birthday, so I wanted to

say happy birthday, Mom. You're the greatest mom in the world. And for those who listening to the show, I can tell you that, especially in the early days of me working the media and still more often than I would care to admit, my mom is the one who has kept my head in the game. And she is somebody

who listens to this show all the time. She's been supporting me every step of the way in a business that is just brutal, and she always encouraged me, encourages me to keep going and keep doing my best because she'll say things like, you know you owe to the team. You know, stay in there, make sure you're doing your best, do your best show. So she is a fantastic advocate for everything that I do here. And I just want to say happy birthday, Mom. You look about thirty six,

so whatever you're doing is amazing in that regard. I just want to put that out there and also just want to say thank you for always supporting me here on the show. I love you very much. Have a great birthday, and um I'll be up in New York to see you as soon as I can. With that team shields high,