Man of Action

much more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, let me rank You're a great American again. The Bucks Exton Show begins, Ana, no, quite, frankly, Uh, It's either we hold them in contempt, or we get the documents, or we impeach them. And and the only thing that we have control over is the ability to

bring impeachment straight to the floor. We care about doing the right thing. It might have been a hundred twenty years since someone's been in peace, but when was the last time you ever saw the FBI. Take a disproofing document with no no credibility, no validity, no corroboration, take it to a secret court. Not tell the court who paid for it. Not tell the court that the guy who wrote it had been leaking information to the press. Win of your and not just once, four stinking times,

and the last one Rod Rosenstein signed. It is appropriate that we conduct oversight of the executive branch and then we get full compliance with the executive branch on what are very legitimate document requests. Uh. Do I support impeachment of Rob Rosenstein? No? I do not. I don't think we should be cavalier with this process or with this term number one, number two. I don't think that this rises the level of high crimes and misdemeanors. So it's

really high standard. They would want to hurt Rosenstein so that they could hurt them all our investigation. But hopefully saner minds will prevail on the Republican side and they won't bring this up if they did welcome their voting on undermining our democracy. Welcome to the Fox Sex to show everybody. Notice that talking point there, Notice how that goes everything Democrats don't like now is is undermining our democracy. That's right, Producer Mike. If you use straws, you're undermining

our democracy. You know what I will say. If you're somebody who leaves a little bing noise on your cell phone, you're definitely undermining our democracy. People need to stop doing that in public places. You know what, I like a little the little bell noise whenever you get a tax or an email. I don't want to hear it, folks, nobody wants to hear it. Okay, it's called vibrate. That the way it should be if you don't do it. As I said, undermining our democracy. But Pelosi is crazy there,

so what a surprise. So here's what we got. Uh. There is a whole slew of whole slew of different things coming together here and and we had the I had the good fortune of sitting down with Devin Newness. So I'll tell you as I said, it's not noon Yez. It is not even Neunez. He has americanized it to Newness. I know this because he told me so. I talked to Newness about all this stuff with the Rod Rod Rosenstein and the d o J and what's going on there.

But today they also put out that they're thinking about impeaching Roden scene. If you go back, they've impeached some people. Oh, let's run. Why do they impeach me? I just wanted to just you know, I just want to spread the Bill Clinton love. I just wanted to give hugs and smoochie smoochyr bouci, you know, just want to grab some ladies, say hi, what's up. They impeach Bill Clinton. As you know, they've impeached the number of If you go back in time,

they impeached the number of federal judges too. And way back in the day, like the nineteenth century, they would they would impeach people for like drunkenness and slovenliness and to butchery. That's basically like ye shall be forthwith banished from the federal bench for acting like a fraternity brother. You know, they would basically kick people off that that's what the House used to do way back in the day.

I bet that. I bet the House was a much more interesting place and like the you know, I don't know the twenties and it is now. So anyway, that's the that's the big fight. I talked to Newness about it. I'll give you something my perspective on this one, of course. And uh, there's there's two levels here. You've got to separate this out in your mind. There's are would they be justified in impeaching Rosenstein? And then is it wise to impeach Rosenstein? That's how you have to break this

whole thing down. So let's start with the first one. Would they be justified? Because this is where I think the Trump case is, or you know, the administration and some members of the Freedom Caucus in the House, how the strongest case because the answer is what the dj has been doing is not. Okay, We've got to the point here we have to ask the question if Trump just said declassify the whole five as a document and d o J said no, what would happen? You know what?

The answer is, nobody knows. Department of Justice is an executive branch agency, which means that it falls under the President's article to authority. But they if they refuse to do something, what are you gonna do? You're gonna have the Department of Agriculture arrest the Department of Justice. I mean, no one really knows what would happen that would be that would be unlikely. So no, one really knows where

that would go. You have a you have a true constitutional crisis, So people of bringing that up a lot. I actually asked Devin Newnis, who as you know, is in the House Intelligence Committee and has been among the most stalwarts defenders of why not even defender, He's just seeking out the truth of what really happened here, this whole FISA situation, this FISA document. If you want to see that whole interview, by the way, it's on Hill dot TV slash Rising, I would it's worth it. We

talked about the biggest national security threat. We discussed what's blacked out in that FISA, what's redacted in that FISA application? What could he tell us about it? He had some interesting stuff to say on that. There's a lot there. Uh So, ba's the Rosenstein impeachment situation. I would say that there's plenty of reason for them to remove Rosenstein, assuming a few things are true. One that he has

been the one slow rolling information. It's very The part of the problem of the bureaucracy is that it is intentionally set up by the people who worked there so that everybody can evade a oountability. No one is really accountable at a massive federal bureaucracy. I know because I work at the CIA. Right, Like, we invade this country, we invade that country, who is really responsible? You know? It's not us, somebody else who made that corp somebody

else's call. And that's why it's very hard to reform these enormous bureaucratic beemis. Right. So Rosenstein would probably say that the slow rolling of information, the slow walk of information on the Russia collusion delusion is somebody else's fault who we don't know, but not him, Right, it's the it's the office that handles redactions, or it's the office that handles liaison with the Congress, or it's the There's always something that they can point to. So it's tough

to get him on that. I'm just trying to be honest and realistic about this. And then there's the other part of this as well. If Rod Rosenstein did, in fact threatened members of the House Intelligence Committee with investigation because of their oversight duties, that alone, for me, would

in fact be grounds for impeachment from office. Remember, it's not they're not talking about criminally prosecuting, talking about removing him from office, Folks, so I completely disagree with Paul Ryan, and I would note that a lot of the Democrats mark my words, folks, Nancy Pelosi, who saying Anna man actor mac Nancy Pelosi, if in fact the Democrats heaven

forbid take back the House this fall. I know, I know I'm crying on the inside too, But if that were to happen, then I think it would be obvious that their position on that, her position and many other Democrats right now on how you know this is crazy and you can only it's only very serious charges that you would ever consider bringing against somebody, or that bringing somebody with impeachment to remove them from office. That will change.

They're gonna impeach Trump on whatever they want. They're just gonna make something up. It doesn't matter. Impeachment is not just about criminal offenses. As I said, go back and look. Drunkenness not a criminal offense. As far as I'm aware, drunkenness was grounds for removal from the federal bench. I guess if you showed up, hey he still is. She

still has three horses. No, alright, case closed. I mean that's probably bad, right if you're on the federal bench and you know, yes, you drove in with a giant trunk full of marijuana. You say, no, okay, next, Yeah, so I can understand why they remove people for that. That's that's that's fair game. Nonetheless, Rosenstein is a problem, that's for sure. Rosenstein is a an institutionalist and a

bureaucrat extraordinaire. He cares more about the d o J than he does about getting to the truth of what the d o J did here, because it's bad. There's no way around it. Docier. The dossier is unacceptable as a primary or even a a a component of any kind in my opinion of what went into that fives application. It wasn't all of it, but that doesn't matter. It was too much of it, just because you can see the way it was written into that released fines application

over the weekend. So I would just note that there's there's clearly what we call and I can't think of a better way to say this. I had to talk to something about this on TV recent Listen. What's a better way of saying c y A than I actually say what it stands for? Right? Um, But that's what's going on here, c y B. Cover your butt. That's what they're that's what they're doing, and that's what's motivating.

Much of the Department of Justice is slow rolling and slow walking and all these other things you see going on. So I think you need to keep all of that in mind. So that's only Did they have reason to do this? Is it fair for them to do this? And the answers, Yeah, they can remove rods and steam from office. He works in the executive branch. Congress has this oversight. They can do this. They have it for a reason. By the way, I think they should start

impeaching some federal judges on the Ninth Circuit, for example. Yeah, give that one some thought. Judges are just making stuff up as they go along. Judges, you think they have the right to override presidential authority on a whim. That's a big problem. We talk about high crimes and misdemeanors. Notice misdemeanors minor stuff. There's minor stuff too, So I think that impeaching Rosenstein is something that is justified on the merits. Do I think it would be wise? Is

this a good thing for the Republicans to do? Well? If you just me a moment, I will collect my thoughts on this one. I will come back and give you the full rundown, the fullest of rundowns. We'll also talk about how the crazy left wants to brainwash your young uh young sons into abandoning their masculinity because you know, it's toxic. Ob v L O L It's toxic. Let's talk about that, and also a bit on Trump and trade. Big week. I mean, this administration this week is it

isn't amazing how resilient. I mean, that's of all of Trump's characteristics, the resiliency of this administration. Date they went, they went to def Con one with media freak out over the whole hell sinky thing. Didn't leave a scratch on Trump's administration. Really doesn't matter. And now here we are what a week. Wee can change later and great week for Trump, Great week for Trump. So four to eight to five eight four four Buck. Also, if you

like Twitter, I doing this show live. You can tweet at me or whenever you want for that matter, at Buck Sexton. We'll be right back. It is the most short sighted and I have to say stupid thing I've heard in a long time. Here you have a president who the Democrats are trying to impeach. Can you impeach a president or anyone else when you don't charge him with specific crimes, just because you disagree with what he's done.

And now you have the Republicans making the case for the Democrats who want to impeach the president by offering bills of impeachment against Rod Rosenstein that don't charge crimes. Both sides do this. They use criminal law to go after their enemies. They use impeachment to go after their enemies. The big victim is the American public. Impeachment is supposed to be there for serious crimes, treason, bribery, other high

crimes and misdemeanors. If you don't like the way Rob Rod Rosenstein is responding to your subpoena charging him with contempt of court, bring him to court, but do not use impeachment. There's a dish the dirsh. You know, I've actually I've managed to also now dubbed Joe Concho my colleague here at the Hill of the Conch, and people that's caught on. People like it, like the conch she's in. Joe was great, um, But the dirsh, you know, sometimes

he's really spot on. I think he's totally wrong here by the way, not all in that it's a bad I I agree that it's probably counterproductive to get rid of Rosenstein. Who's gonna replace Rosenstein? Do we know he's any better? The person that takes over for Rosenstein could be another Sally Yates. We don't know. It could be another Deep Staters. So I don't think that this has the intended effect necessarily. Remember the problem here is the

d J bureaucracy. It's not just one person, it's the culture of these federal agencies that think that they're a law onto themselves. I also think dirsh wrong here. I think Dirtch is wrong on the issue of how Democrats will use this Rosenstein impeachment effort against Republicans later. Yeah, they will, but they'll do it anyway, meaning that they're gonna try to what the problem that he's citing is, Well, they're not pointing to crimes for why they should impeach Rosenstein.

And I'm saying, well, that's they don't have to. But I'll get into that in a second. But the Democrats aren't going to necessarily point to crimes for why they're going to impeach Trump. In fact, we know they're just gonna point to whatever the heck they want. Come ons, you're better than that. I expect more from And for those who are wondering, I have a little thing called history on my side at this one. There's this whole thing about how it has to be for high crimes

and misdemeanors. You mean, for stuff like drunkenness, which is why you had uh. The federal official known as Mark Delay Delay, Hey, our de la hay Delay, sorry, Mark de la hay back in eighteen seventy three, um perhaps graft and corruption with Milliam William Bell nap back in eighteen seventy six, abuse of power. A judge in Missouri named James peck Back in eighteen thirty one, drunkenness. There's my man, John Pickering removed March twelfth, eighteen o four.

So you know, there's some things here that when you look at you go hold on a second, Uh, you know, abuse of power. There's all kinds of things in here that are not necessarily crime. Certainly not that anyone went to prison for that at the time. Failure to live in his district Charles swain Back in Florida in nineteen o four. People have been impeached for these things. So his thing about it, it's only things like treason. The

dirsh is just unfortunately historically speaking incorrect. Um. Just like when he talks to me about guns. I wish I could find that seenun debate where he's like states with lacks gun laws have more crime. I'm like, you mean the wild West cauldron of violence known as Vermont, which has almost no crime and almost no gun laws. I mean as some gun laws, but I'm just saying it's very blacks by US standards. Um, great state, too great in the summer, I don't. I don't skie, so I'm

not I'm not undoing the winter time. But anyway, so impeachment is uh, you know I And then now it's the is it why side of things. I don't think it's smart for the Republicans to do this, and I know some of you getting Mammy buck, hold them accountable, hold them responsible. It doesn't have the intended effect though, because you're not gonna get somebody. Because here's the real thing. Do you want to impeach Rosenstein because you want to

get the documents? Or do you want to impeach Rosenstein because you think that whoever takes over for him with fire Muller, if if it's if it's door number two, we know that, and oh, by the way, there's door number three here. Or the third point I'm gonna add in I'm belaboring analogies and getting this all messed up. The third point I want to make here is I don't think we should. I don't Thinkmueller should be fired right now because he's got nothing. He's grasping at straws. Folks,

this is this is a bridge to nowhere. He's gonna write some pathetic report about how you know he he believes that there might have been an obstructionist state of mind the president had when he fired Come here something it's not. It's not gonna amount to anything. Will be no charges against Trump, There'll be nothing, and then we'll we'll be able to sit around and have a big laugh session at CNN and all the rest. We're going,

oh my god, it's Trump Brosure and collusion. Wrong. Um So I don't think he's I don't think firing him is a good idea, even though do I think Mueller could be would be justified and ending that probe sure, But remember, should you as different than Kenya he's the line for America, his back rough day for Facebook on on Drudge and on the stock market, neverwhere else. And the Drudge Report right now has up death to the algorithm.

Facebook spiral stock down almost today, the largest, the largest single day loss of wealth I think in any stock in US history, right and I think Mark producer Mike is my unofficial financial advisor, so I always check in with him. He's running. Dude, you guys are this guy? Seriously? I never see how he gets to work. I think it's in a gold plated Rolls Royce because he's very knowledgeable about stocks, bonds, you know. But he just keeps it quiet. He keeps on the down low. He hangs

out with hand of these people a lot too. Is you know, he's he knows, he knows all the good stuff he's got. He's got access to all the info, all the big CEOs and insiders. But producer Mike am I correct. This was the biggest one day, biggest one day drop in history for in terms of loss of wealth in one US stock billions and billions of dollars, Mark Zuckerberg wost sixteen billion. Personally. Yeah, you got hammered. There you go. Sa analysis you need he got hammered,

got hammered. Don't invest with people who don't understand conservativism. That's another rule of mine. Well there you go. I like i'd say this. It's hard for me. I'm trying to be a conspiracy theorist here. It's hard for me though, not to feel like it's not just this week, because this week we remember shadow banning is a Twitter thing. I should by the way, Mike, can we check and see if I've ever been shadow banned? Because I feel like I could have been shadow band at some point.

My name is Buck Sexton. I could be a Russian bot. Uh you know somebody one of the one of the lady national security analyst at CNN and tweeted at me not too long ago. Sound you sound like a Russian bot to me? I wanna be like, is that what we have asking me from my phone number? But well, according to Alex Jones, you know a very definition of the deep state, and then that is actually I have

the definition of the deep state. If I were the definitely deep set, I feel like I'd have a bigger apartment. But you know, yeah, it's it's true. I here secure smoke satisfied. I mean, Dallas is a substation. I've seen it. I've seen it. Barbecue's family. Was he saying that all his family were like former spies or something. I don't know. It's such a weird what a weird guy. But here's the thing, folks, I know, I know, and I know some of you are Alex Jones list. I know some

of you. I hear you. You you semi message, You're like, but buck like, come on, I mean something, I'm like, knock nup, knob, don't don't pull that. Don't pull that with me, that buck buck stuff. You listen to whoever you are, but don't try to convert me. Team. He said, No, he's really makes sense on the Chemp trails. No, no, no, no. You can listen to whoever you want. But I'm not saying he made fun of the hair. You come after the swoop, You've got to apologize. There's no there's no

coming back from that, Jones. Alex Jones made fun of the swoop. I'm I do not forge yet. Uh So, anyway, with the with the whole shadow banning thing, which that sounds so scary, doesn't you've been shadow band It sounds like something could happened to people in the Gulag archipelago

shadow band. Uh. It means that they down rank you and and I've been saying this for a long time because it's just I refuse to believe that these progressive companies were It's so easy to create algorithms that you know, down rank insert and search is a huge like Google is obviously best known for being a search engine, although it has all these other businesses now too. It's now called Alphabet. Don't even call I mean Alphabet is the

parent company that owns Google. Uh. But when you do search, whatever pops up in the first page is basically what the world sees, and whatever is in the first few results is really all that anyone cares about. For the most part. It's like a huge percentage of the actual traffic is the first few results. So, for example, for a news organization, if you show up in top of search results when people look up you know, big fire California or something, whatever comes up is going to get

a tremendous amount of traffic. Think of the power then that these search organizations or search engines have when it comes to supporting or not a media enterprise. Now that's true of Facebook, and it's true of Twitter. Facebook was and has been thought of as a better place for conservatives for a long time because it's so much about what the community shares with each other, and there's just

we've just known this. I've sat down with all these different social media specialists and you know, a lot of you listening to the show right now. Of the of the people that listen to this radio show, for example, I think it's a fair estimate that about of you are at least on Facebook. Maybe you don't use it, but at least you have a Facebook account, and something more like five pc of you are probably on Twitter. It is way way smaller, and it might even be

more like two or three percent. It's a very small amount of you listening to this show based on all the data that I've seen, are on Twitter. Facebook has been a stronghold for conservatives for a while. They get their thoughts out there, and it's also a way to go around the mainstream media platforms, which are still dominated by one corporations that often have CEOs and boards that that skew pretty left, you know places. You know. Ge

was the for profit arm of the Obama administration. For example. I mean, when you look at the way that some of these companies not just are are are acting in the public sphere, but also their political connections, they can be very left wing. They could be very left wing indeed, and Facebook is no is no different. I mean, Mark Zuckerberg is very much a quality a quasi open borders guy. He's somebody who you know, the guys are liberal. Okay,

so keep that in mind. But but this has been brewing for a while, and that there's this kind of perfect storm of the shadow banning thing on Twitter. We find out is real. It's real. They were doing it. Now they're saying, oh, sorry, we're just kind of like, sorry, conservatives, we're targeted with toads and accident. Sure it was, but so we know that that wasn't just something that we

were imagining. It's real. And then beyond that, beyond that, you had this months of gathering criticism about Facebook for all the Russia collusion stuff, and people like, oh my gosh, Facebook, it needs to do more. It needs to do more to combat untrue stuff on social media. This is thank you about this. It's not Facebook's job to do fact checking, and any of you who have any uh, familiarity with a little thing called PolitiFact. It's nonsense what they put

out a lot of the time. I don't know. I don't know if it was CBS is fact Checker like CBS News or politifacts. Fact Checker recently said that it's not accurate to call the dossier a Clinton campaign document or a Clinton funded campaign document. Yeah, producer Mike is like throwing things at the wall over there. I know, dude, it's crazy. It's crazy. How how is that the case? How is it possible that you could come up with?

But this is true on a lot of you know, whether it's the Washington Post with their you know there, I will say, I like their whole pants on fire thing, Right, isn't that no pinocchios not pants on fire? What am I saying? Now? That's not as cute? Would be better if they had like the pants on fire, you know, like you get three pants on fire, four pants on fire? Liar liar? Uh? You know, think of where this goes. We've already seen that they are turning against conservatives based

on the algorithms. If you give them not just more leeway, but a a sense that they have some obligation if the social media networks, which are the dominant information platforms present and future, My friends, Okay, a lot of the channels you rely on right now, they're they're not going to be the big the cable news channel, they're not going to be the big players the future. It's all

going digital. And if you're in a position to even make minor adjustments to what gets shared via Facebook and these other places, it look they've they've basically killed off news organizations already, and face by Facebook changing its algorithm, which it did a couple of years ago, largely said I could make more money, saying that, you know, you gotta pay us for this stuff. Now. Yeah, micro remembers that. What are you telling me now? That just reminded me

the New York Daily News. Oh yeah, Daily News. It's just it's tough to feel. Look, I feel badly for anybody who loses their job just because it stinks, right, and you're a human being, you don't want to lose their job. But I just was the Daily News cover wasn't psychotic. You know, if if they weren't running psychotic front covers, I'd have a little more like, Okay, they're doing journalism. It was. It was pretty pretty tacky stuff

that they're putting out. Um, I just I thought the daily news reporting and and a lot a lot of the editorial columns that they would print. We're just it just wasn't very good. Just honest, it wasn't a good paper. I don't know, So, you know, I feel badly for people there, except it's not a good It wasn't a good product. So does everybody get to this is this is something Mike, Mike has really I wanted to talk

about this. Journalists are so much quicker to like play the world's smallest violin for other journalists getting getting fired unless they're conservatives, and then whatever they get, whatever, like scorn they can heap on them, they will. But journalists always break out the world's smallest violin for other journalists,

but not for normal Americans. You know. So so when when you'll see that people you know at uh, you know, the New York Times, when they write about like massive layoffs in some town in South Carolina or something, they can do it with the sterility like we're just bringing the news on this. You know, this would happen ten thousand people, no more paycheck, no more healthcare, stings for them. But oh my gosh, the Daily News, like, you know,

half the staff fire there. Look, I've folks, I'm the guy who has I had to get on the phone many times and calm people down after Uh, this has all been well publicized. Glenn talked about it too. When I was at the Blaze, there were some tough times there we had. We had lots of people that get laid off, and a lot of them would call me and say, you know, what's next and what can I do? And you know, how can you help me? So I'm very attached to the human side of all this. But yeah,

the Daily News mm hmmm, I don't know. It's uh, it's going all digital. I think they're keeping forty people anyway. Facebook Facebook stock got crushed today, which thanks for buck. I hope Miss Molly likes rama noodles, you know, or maybe uh, we're gonna gon me up in my peanut butter. Count peanut butter if you're looking for calories in you know, if you're really just looking to I would go, I'm in butter. But that's a little fruitful. I'm about is expensive.

You got like a good thing of almond butter. It's like fifteen bucks. You get a thing a Jiffy, get it a Walmart. It's like two dollars, you know. And then if you don't cast shoe butter yet, man, that's crazy. Cash butter is amazing. Look at you, your dude, producer, Mike so bougie. I can't even see John right now, but I know John's into the bougie nut butters too. I'm look I'm all about the buggie nut butters. Like occasionally, if I'm feeling really saucy, you'll have some brazil nut milk,

which is delicious. I know it sounds. I know people are all these some of you are giggling. Yeah, yeah, I get it. But of the nut milks, brazil nut milk is is my favorite. Um a little. They tend to add the sugar to these things, though it's not pretty good for you. As we know, almond milk though these aren't milks, their juices. It's really it's really nut juice. We're gonna be clear about this because there's just they're squeezing nuts and making juice out of it. There's no

there's really no milk. Milk comes from an animal side note, Uh yeah, man. So Facebook is uh, Facebook stock got crushed today. I think it's because Facebook is trying to straddle this line of being a public utility but also a vehicle for social for social enterprise and for you know, being in charge of what people can see, but also just being a platform of what they can post. And there was a meeting today and this is what I meant to get to, and I'm sorry Mike got me

talking about nutmilk. There was a meeting today I blame Mike code Red where they had some senior Facebook executives and some journalists. And the journalists are like, well, what are you gonna do to stop fake news from being shared on I mean not fake news? What are you gonna do to stop Fox News with all of its fake news from being shared on Facebook? Like, you're gonna that's the most popular cable channel on cable TV. You're gonna you're gonna strip Fox News from Facebook. I mean,

this is what so called journalists are asking. And then they threw in for wars in there too, which you know, we'll see. I'm not yet sold. Alex Jones is beard. I gotta see how he really grows it out, and then we'll have a full we'll have a more fulsome discussion on this one. But he I think he is. Do we know, Mike, is he banned from Facebook yet? We're not sure yet. He might be banned from Facebook. I think he's saying he is. This is the new warfare,

This is the new mainstream media fight. It is not with the mainstream well, it's with the mainstre media, but it's the one of the future is going to be with the social media platforms because they are now the mainstream media. They're a part of it. They are the delivery mechanism for left wing narratives and for the suppression of conservative thought and for all the truth that comes with it. Eight four four nine to eight to five

eight four four nine d buck. We will talk trade, because it's a great day for trade, great day for America. We'll get into some of that um and and all those fine we'll talk about farms. If anybody out there in farm country wants to call in people that work on farms also known as farmers, if you have any thoughts or ideas on this, let me know. I'm very curious see what you think. And uh, we got that

much more so. Stare at their team. He should you're a real decent garbage and you look around and you see all these emptycats, and you realize, I'm eating in New York City. People will not call and pay money to hear you see it's a garden in your garbage. Person, you first secretary, Now you're lying in your book street don't call you a fire all right? You get the idea.

So that's that's uh, that's some I rate liberal? Or do I repeat myself at a book event with Sean Spicer where he just stands up at a Barnes and Noble in Brooklyn, I gotta say, Sean Spicer from Brooklyn. Brooklyn is crazy Libs central for New York. Now Brooklyn is where the craziest of the Libs gather. And I am a lot surprised. But you know, there's such a such a lack of civility. Dare I say that? We see once again you got them going after Sean Spicer.

Here you've got some other imbecile who took a pick axe to Trump's star on the Walk of Fame in Hollywood, which you know it's just vandalism, but why be such an idiot? Um? And then you had somebody else who loosed uh, what's your Betsy devas is forty million dollar yacht from its mooring and did ten thousand dollars of damage. Oh my gosh, who loosed the yacht from the mooring?

Such savages? You know, I mean, you gotta. I'm pretty sure if you're gonna be on a forty million dollar yacht, you have to wear an ascot and a hat with an anchor on it. Like. I don't think you're allowed to step on it without that. I think that's the uniform. But yeah, she's, uh, she's upset too about that. She's

she's upset, um, understandably so. But this is I cannot remember a single Obama administration official who faced any of this, any of this kind of nonsense, um, either while they were in office or or you know, while they were serving in government or afterwards. But this is I suppose we're we're supposed to accept this as conservatives. This is just the way that it's it's gonna be right, that's what they tell us. Um. Now, Spicy can handle it.

I think the biggest favor that anyone did him in the meeting was actually lista McCarthy impersonating him because that actually made him kind of likable. But spicy is gonna be fine. It is just a trend though, right. I can think of all those off the top of my head. Maniac liberals acting like maniacs. There is no equivalent on the right. They can pretend like there is, but they're just isn't You and I both know that? So Hey, at least on the side of the normal same people,

isn't that nice? Uh, we're gonna talk about Trump and trade and farms and China, oh my coming up. The economy is booming right now, and that means that if you're hiring, you are in a talent situation where you gotta get the best and you've got to get them through your hiring process quickly, right. You don't want any delays, and you certainly don't want to make a bad decision about who you hire. Global Verification Network is essential in

that process for everybody listening to show out there. If you are in the HR department of a company large or small, or if you're a small business owner, you want to make sure that you're getting the right people for your business. If you happen to be the CEO of a massive company, that's great to Global Verification Network is the background investigation in vetting company you want to use. You go to my g VN dot com or call them at eight seven seven six nine five seven nine.

That's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. They always pick up the phone when you call. They don't outsource any of your data. They're the only dual certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company. Global Verification Network leave no stone unturned my g VN dot com. Buck Sexton Mission, decoding the news and disseminating information. You have actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American Great, You're a

great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Analyst st No, even the politicians in Washington, nobody wanted me to be doing what I'm doing. The country was doing well, but ultimately it was gonna be a very bad thing for our country. So I did it, and I did it when we were the strongest. We're having the best economy we've ever had in the history of our country. This is the time to straighten out the worst trade deals ever made by any country on Earth ever in history.

These deals were made by people I don't know if they didn't understand, or if they didn't care, or if they didn't frankly love our country, but we have the worst trade deals ever made in history. But now they're becoming good again. Every time this president is told by the critics and the naysayers and they know nothing, you can't do it, you shouldn't do it, no one's ever done it, he goes and does it. He pulls out of the Paris Accords, he moved the the embassies to Jerusalem.

He get out of the Rand Deal, he got the corporate taxway from thirty on and on on, the deregulation, and now the trade And every time the naysayers and critics to it, they're just they're proving his point about being a man of action in the town's town to talk about getting rid of all these locknest monsters and other alligators here in the swamp. Why is it important. It's important because it goes beyond him just keeping a promise to the American worker and American interest to renegotiate

these imbalanced, unfair, non reciprocal trade deals. He's actually putting America first. But by standing shoulder to shoulder with other leaders, in this case the EU welcome back, folks. Good to have you here on the Box Section show. I'm I'm watching this whole trade situation play out, and isn't it? Is it amazing to see how even when when things are starting to look up for Trump on this, the the the naysayers, it's Kelly and comedy. But there She's right.

That's what they are, that the chorus of Oh Trump doesn't understandything, he doesn't know anything. They never think maybe maybe we were wrong, maybe we should hear him out, or even we should let this play out. They're still so set. There is a stubbornness that is a characteristic of the failure of previous elitist thinking on this issue.

And that's what's really at risk here. The same way that Trump causes so many of our permanent governing class in both the government and the media and corporate America to question how special and how wonderful they really are. And they hate that. They absolutely hated the trade experts, the international economist, the you know, the I. M. F.

Latte drinking set. They see what Trump is doing and it's supposed to be terribly disruptive and awful and crash the economy and and wait a second, what if he's right. That's the one thing they never factored into their considerations of this, one possibility that they never considered was what if Trump is right and these trade deals are in

fact bad. CNBC's Sarah Eisen got to sit down with Jack lou who some of you may vaguely recall as Obama's Treasury secretary, and she wanted to push him a bit on uh, on this this trade deal that is looking like it's gonna happen with the EU, which would be a great thing for the American economy, which is not a deal that people thought he'd be able to get done, and they were saying it's just gonna result in trade war. Instead, it looks like it's gonna result

in a better agreement. Oh, you mean a negotiation can involve some some sticks as well as carrots, some pushback, and not just getting pushed around. Isn't this a shock? Here is CNBC Sarah Eisen talking to the former Obama Treasury secretary about Trump's pending EU deal. Play it. I mean, we're creating part of the problem right now with our policy. Theoretically, this would avoid those auto tariffs, which I hope I

certainly hope that's the case. I'm in a little bit of a bad position to respond, not knowing the full details. I do I think avoiding auto tariffs would be a very good thing. Auto traps would hurt the American economy and certainly the European economy as well. But I mean, if this is true, this would be certainly a win for the administration, and it would show the world that

these tough trade tactics are working. This idea of short term pain for long term games certainly not the way you guys went about I kind of beg to differ on that. I think if you look at the role the United States has played in the world for the last seventy years, In the last few months, we've seen more damage to the U S leadership in the world that I could have imagined in a short period of time. What damage? Notice, how would just I was just waiting

for him to go undermining our democracy? Right that collision? I mean, what damage? Damage to leadership? How? Where? Where? Where is this damage? They say these things, and all the numbers prove otherwise. All the numbers look great comparatively to what they were, and in some cases comparatively, what they've ever been, but they'll talk about the destruction. Notice it's these are all word games with them. It's all narrative. It's all story that they create, they fabricate. It's fiction.

Dare I say it's fake news. That's the former Treasury secretary, and he can't even deal with the reality what that CNBC reporters putting in front of him, which is, you guys, didn't do this, but this looks like it's working. What do you think, Well, there's destroying a leadership in the whole world and stuff, and you know, destroying the leadership. And here's here's a here's a here's just a fun thought, folks. Obama doesn't know anything about the economy, or did not

at all when he became president. Perhaps he learned a bit while he was president. I mean, he's the guy who said that it was a good idea to put coal out of coal plants, you know, the essentially mothball them and electricity prices skyrocketing. I mean, he had a rudimentary at best understanding of and where it's not just economics of how markets work, of how business works. Commerce,

that's what matters so much more. It's one of the problems I have actually with our education system is that will teach these economic theories and economists can predict stuff, don't know nearly as much as they think they know, and have a terrible track record for being effectively useless. I'm just saying, it's true. Much better to learn about how does it how does a business work, how do

markets work? How does the economy actually function, not how do you think it would function based on some things you write on a board. And Trump understands that because he's been doing it for a very long time. Obama had never run a business. Obama's only business was the business of obama Ism. But we were led to believe that he was. You know, he was a great steward to the economy. His greatest contribution was essentially saying that

the rich aren't doing enough for the poor. You know, that the rich need to have more of their money taken away. In fact, when they mean rich, what they mean are people that are just beginning to hit their peak earning years. They need to give more of their money away to other people because they very rich don't care about taxes and redistribution. And the very rich are uh, there's there's plenty of them, as you know, we're Democrats, right, plenty of the super rich, and they'll rail on about

taxes all the time. But Jack lu goes right back to the talking points. Well there when when confunded with what if what Trump is doing is working? And I just hope we can continue with this until the mid terms, because what if? What an amazing affirmation of Trump's success.

It would be if, despite all the historical evidence that the partying power gets you know, gets crushed in a in mid term elections in the in the first term of presidency, despite all that stuff, if Trump is able to if the Republican Party and Trump are able to hold the House, it will send a really profound message to all the doubters and the haters, as Trump would say,

And this is this is what leadership is. Leadership is not getting up giving a speech that some other people wrote for you that you know everybody that you want to impress is going to say is good. And that involves no new thinking or no new processing of information and requires no risks. Leadership must entail some risks. If your decision making is always consensus, you are not a leader.

You are merely a vessel through which that consensus passes, which is what for liberalism and the left, Obama was wasn't really leading, especially on issues of the economy. So there you have it. There you have it. Um. It also means looking at the long term versus the short term, which Wilbur Ross becoming an increasingly visible part of this administration he managed. He made a very a point that

I've been making here. Don't you love it when some of these very important, powerful government officials sound just like buck Sexton later on after he's been saying it. I think it's great. Here's the world. We're all said about the situation right now with Trede Plate twelve. If you have to get into a spat with someone, the right time to do it is when your own economy is booming as ours is. You've seen the record low unemployment, you've seen people coming back to the workforce. That's right,

I gotta do it now. It feels a little bit like why rock the boat now? Why do this when things are going so well? Well? The point is a leader says, you know what, this is the time when I have the leeway to do what's necessary to perhaps protect our agricultural sector from intentional this is, by the way, it's it's foreign interference in our elections with the Chinese are doing. The Chinese are specifically targeting their economic policies

to hurt Trump in the midterms. That's what they're doing. I'm not saying that, oh well, it's the same as what Russia did. But people try to influence our elections in a million different ways. They always have and they always will. Outsiders, foreign governments, foreign corporations, and people are trying to do all kinds of things. Trump is showing some real, real backbone on this issue. And you know, steel is an area where also he's obviously been making

a lot of inruns. Here's the president about that. Play a team, do we do? We have eighteen? My friend, Over the last two decades, nearly two thirds of American raw steel companies went out of business. More than one third of the steel jobs vanished. We need steel mills for national security. Remember that this is and just price. This isn't just gee. We could do it for a

little bit less. We needed for national security. You know, there's there's a point here that I think often gets lost, which is that we always think about just and Trump is right to focus in on price. People say, well, look at Walmart, all this made in China stuff means you've got all this stuff. Let me tell you if somebody you just moved most of you listen to this, and you know this, folks, you know that you've got so much more crap in your house and your apartment

or whatever then you need. I mean, we're just drowning in a lot of useless consumer goods these days. It was some of it's amazing and great. And you know you've got more computing power in your pocket if you have a smartphone that than the whole NATO Alliance had

a nineteen fifty. Okay, so you you look at all this stuff, and it's worth keeping in mind that that price is not the only price is not the only thing that matters in an economy, and that matters to a country because we've lost this domestic industry, which also means we have to import a lot of this stuff ensure it's chee But you know what else would be cheap stuff that we're making here. You don't have to send it from overseas to us, right That that also

is is another way of looking at this. Um. You know, when you don't have domestic industry. You're also more at the whim of of international market fluctuations, and you know there are tradeoffs here. I'm not saying that this is a this is all win win, but it's kind of like you know that liberals are lying on immigration when they tell you that illegal immigration only has upside. It's just not true. It's obviously untrue. You know that the Democrats are lying when or it's not just Democrats. I

I retract that statement. You know that the anti Trump opposition on trade is lying because they make it sound like anything that Trump tries to do on trade is a bad idea. Anything he does in terms of fighting back against tariffs or trying to negotiate new deals is bad. NAFTA is over twenty years old. They didn't have the internet when NAPTA came into effect. But oh no, no,

don't touch NAFTA. Don't touch NAFTA. You know, this is stale thinking from people that don't lead and don't want to take risks, and sometimes you take You need a billionaire who doesn't give a what about what people think about him to get things done, and that's what we're seeing. Will it work? I hope so not sure yet. But mark my words, if if these I'm hearing, because I now I'm swamp connected, my the vines from my swamp perch here extend far and wide all throughout the district

of Columbia. Now, if those g d P numbers tomorrow are what I think they are, it is going to be a straight up buck slap to the Obama years with regard to the economy. Just just show we did not have to suffer through that anemic growth, We did not have to deal with such slow recovery from a cyclical recession. We didn't have to deal with all that stuff. It was bad policy, bad thinking, and poor leadership from

the Democrats. And I think tomorrow will be one of the biggest data points in that once we see these d I mean, they're looking like it might be three three for the year, folks, So well, well we'll get there eight four four to eight to five, eight four or four nine. Buck. If you want to give me a ring, I will be right back. I was dragging today a little bit. You know what I decided to do. I wasn't gonna have my third cup of coffee in three hours because I probably was on coffee cup number

four or five. When I got to this point, I needed something else, give me a little bit of a boost. I needed something to help me get some energy for the rest of the day. You know what I went with Strike Force Energy, Strikeforces Veteran owned and American made, my friends. It's so easy. It comes these little packets. What you do is you mix the liquid in the packet with water, with tea, lemonade, you can put it in some yogurt. You can even put in a beer

if you want to. And it is full of all of that stuff that you need in order to get you fired up for the day. It'll fuel you through your toughest fights, whether it's going to the gym, getting through your working hours, or just making sure you've got energy at home. Also, for every packet you buy, they'll donate one to military service members overseas. Go to strike Force Energy dot com and our discount code bucket check out. That's strike Force Energy dot Com discount code buck at checkout.

CNBC Wrap It Update, which is the medium of ten tracking forecast on the street running at four point two percent. That's a really strong number. You GDP four that are expecting tomorrow. That was CNBC just give me a little bit of audio on that one uh four over four percent. The best during all eight years of the Obama presidency was one quarter at five point two percent. That was over eight years and then included after a trillion dollar

hours of spending and coming out of a recession. When you think that we would have, you know, an economy that was just roaring and ready to go, but you know you didn't build that is not inspiring for business owners and for American American ingenuity. You know you didn't build that. Right, pay your fair share. These were you want to talking about rhetoric and the way that rhetoric

can affect things badly. I think that there's no question that Obama created a hostile climate for for business, especially for the new guy, for the upstart, for the people that were trying to get going, who wanted to better themselves, who wanted to be in a better position for themselves and their family. That's why all those stifling regulations were

so so damaging. The regulations hold back people who have new ideas and who want to compete, but they don't have the ability because they don't have the balance sheets and the entrenched position in the marketplace. They don't have the incumbent advantage, so regulations can crowd them out, take them down. And then there's just what what Trump is doing on China, which old It's been more time on

this one to play twenty one though. Last year they lost three hundred and seventy five billion dollars on trade with China, and that doesn't include the theft of intellectual property. Think of that seventy billion. It's crazy. I'm not gonna happen anymore. It's not gonna happen anymore. We're putting the world's trade cheaters unnoticed. No one rips off the United States of America, and nobody takes advantage of our workers

or our companies anymore. They think that he is so bad at words, and yet you I keep playing all these different sound bites from the President United States on this show, and you must think yourself, that sounds pretty good to me. I'm a very stable genius, exactly, John, You know what, what what's the problem here? All this positivity, all this positive rhetoric, But no, no, they'd much rather get into the latest, you know, with with Michael Cohen.

I do think I don't know why the president look I can't tell you why he would choose to have Cohen as his lawyer. And look, it doesn't make sense to me, but he is a complex figure, this president. I just care about what he's doing for the country. I don't I don't get too into any of the other stuff that's going on because it doesn't matter. It just does not matter. Uh, And I hope that the economy continues on with this, with this pace, because if it does, things will be very good. By the way,

Amazon has huge earnings. Amazon did very well today, So on the other side of things, you know, maybe Amazon is gonna I feel like we're all going to be employees of Amazon at some point soon. But Facebook got crushed there, but Amazon did well. So for those of you who are tech investors, there's that Jeff Bezos. I remember when he was the nerd who wanted to sell you books, as people are saying. Now he's the richest man in the world who will sell you whatever the

heck he wants to. So there's that. I want to talk to you about how feminists want to brainwash young boys, which is a bad thing, of course, and uh, that are more coming up. He's back with you now because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. I actually didn't think that it was real today. When I first saw it, I thought there must be some kind of somebody thought the onion was real or something.

But it turns out it is. In a New York Times piece, the claim has been made that Mueller is examining Trump's tweets in a wide ranging obstruction inquiry. That's right, folks. Trump has I don't know, forty fifty million Twitter followers. He's putting stuff out on Twitter, and the Special Counsel is coming up so empty handed with all this that now they're they're going through Trump Trump's tweets. Keep in mind, how could that possibly be obstruction unless he literally fired

somebody in a tweet. But guess what he can do that if he wants to. So what difference does it make. I don't even know. I can't even think of a way in which it's obstruction. These are people who work for him. Obstruction. How he can fire them for any or no reason and saying that he doesn't like their job performance. If he can't do that, if he can't publicly state that he doesn't like the job performance of

some employees, of the executive branch. Then Mueller thinks that he can override presidential power and authority because he says so, it's not the way that it works. I also find it's very frustrating because I at first thought that Trump's tweets were, you know, this uh, this vulnerability, and now they're saying, oh, they're big egal vulnerability. I don't think that's true. I have trumps tweets a vulnerability, but Pruce or Mike I actually have come to love the tweets.

I think that they are I think they're generally like there have been so many born newsdays. We're like, yes, look at this Trump tweet. It's amazing. Do you have a favorite, by the way, of all the Trump tweets? When when whenever he talks about the liars and the haters, I get excited. It's gold. It's instant gold. The greatest Trump tweet of all time. That would be a that would be a tough one. And whenever he talks about

CNN is the fake news. I I'm like, you know, any any doubts I ever had about this man, they are erased anew. Whenever he tweets about CNN as fake news, nothing nothing really amuses me more in part because it's true, and in part because he gets so upset about it. They get so angry. Meanwhile, Obama was very dismissive about Fox News all the time, and and and it, and on more than one occasion, suggested that Fox News was was basically hurting America, dividing America. He called out talk radio.

I think he even called out some talk radio hosts by name as people that were being divisive. That was always Obomus thing, you're being divisive. His great rhetorical trick if you're not doing what I say, they're being divisive was whenever you wouldn't just take an Obama policy directive as an order, you were being divisive. It's it's quite an amazing it's que an amazing thing to do to somebody. Right, It's like, do what I say? No, why are you

being so divisive? Now? Now there's a division between us, you won't do what I say, And if you don't pay attention to it, you're like, oh, wait a second, you're right, I guess I guess I am being divisive. Oh gosh, sure, look at that. So Mueller he's being divisive with his investigation to all this stuff. Uh, you know, I I think that one part of this that gets overlooked is that Mueller is just like Rosenstein that he say,

an institutionalist. He's somebody who really believes, I think, in the entity of the FBI as some thing, especially in the Department of Justice, right, FBI is under the umbrella of the d J, as something that is special and and and should be preserved as de facto and independent wing of the government. That's really what's being an issue here. And that's what you see with the possible impeachment of Rosenstein,

is that there there is a perception. They won't give full description of it, right they they won't just come out and say it, but there is a perception among a lot of these bureaucrat types that they would like to think of the d o J and the FBI as their own entity and kind of like the judiciary, right,

its own branch of government. Well, there's also the fourth branch of government, if not the permanent bureaucracy overall, the fourth branch of government is in fact the d o J and the f B. I THEO you ask for a miracle, and I give you the f B. Any of you who get that action movie quote, I'll be very impressed. Do you know what this producer, Mike, No, don't say it. Don't ruin it. Gosh, Mike, don't ruin it. Producer, Mike's about to jump on that one. I know you.

I can tell why the look on your face. You know, So, Okay, congrats, your action movie quote skills are pretty good. Joe Contra actually says he thinks he can go toe to toe with me on action movie quotes. Mike, we might have to do this. We might have to connect to you in New York and consci and I will be here in the swamp and we'll see who is the true

action movie quote Ninja. That's a great idea. I'll read them off to you and you guys, yeah, exactly, And well, you know, we could even do we can we can have like a like a neutral third party send you action movie quotes, and so they'd have a copy of it, so you know, and they everyone and and and we could do it. They could do it at a certain time so I wouldn't be able to see them. Are awesome listeners? Can this? Tweet them at here or hitch up on Facebook and I'll just go there, read them

off to you. There you go. We'll want to set this up. We're gonna have an action movie quote face off that'll that will be at some point in the future. Um, speaking of actually be quotes and other fun things with the podcast. Guys. Let me know what you think if you like the format we've been doing for the Freedom Hunt podcast of a of a guest who we're planning to have Jesse Kelly and Sean Parnell, just because I think they're both awesome guys who are a lot of

fun to talk to. We're just gonna talk about some stuff. Should be a great podcast. We're talking a lot of things. Um, they're they're really fun guys to to chat with and I have a lot of respect for both of them. So that's been Originally I was thinking to do more kind of deep divy segments, and now I've gone more in the guest direction because I do so few guests. People always amazing. I tell them, like, how many guests

today do you have on radio? I'm like, uh, point five, I'd say ish, maybe point to five, I'd say we. I'd say we have a guest every other day, our guest every three hours and radio. I have too much to say to all of you. I'm a little uh, I'm a little stingy with with sharing the audience of other people, and I don't I don't like to do that. This is the team. I don't get enough time with the team as it is. We'll also come back with

the Facebook lives. By the way, I'm actually setting up a studio to do that so it won't look like I'm a a kid who escaped his high school social studies class and it's like, Hey, lets Facebook live. I would like you to watch me on Facebook. Please tell your friends so we'll make it look a little more professional, you know, like I'm x C I a guy who is doing media now something like that. We got big plans, but please give me the feedback. Facebook dot com, Slashbuck Saxon,

what are you thinking about the Freedom Hut podcast? What would you like to hear? What would you like more of? And and be prepared I think for it will be a really fun show tomorrow if you haven't heard it yet before. iTunes were on Stitcher two, Mike, what are the platforms where people can it's Stitcher, iTunes? What else have we? Is there another one. I can't keep up

with all that Art nineteen platform. Other people can go to art nineteen and look, yeah, you can google it there, but I would go to I mean, how can we get on the Android app? I will look into that. All right, look into that. Team, Let's talk about feminists and how they're destroying everything we come back. Feminists are among the worst of the celebrated contemporary thinkers in America. I really mean that celebrated feminists are among the most

overrated intellectuals in American society. Dare I say I think that some of the feminist editorialists and columists I read lately, quite honestly, do not qualify as intellectuals of any kind. They are propagandists. At best. You might be able to say that they are polemicists. But they are not adding to the intellectual discourse. They're making it worse what feminists

can do. Four boys. We fought for young women in the patriarchy first, but budding patriarchs could use some help to this by Jessica Valenti is the author of six books on feminism. Or in the New York Times here this piece is a a giant A A giant pustule on your brain when you read it. I'm telling you it is an abomination. It's terrible. But I want to discuss why. Let me give you some of the some of the I was gonna say the highlights, but they're

definitely low lights. Quote. One of the many political ironies of our time is that feminism's most powerful cultural moment has coincided with the rise of extreme misogyny. While women protests, run for office, and embrace the movement for gender equality and record numbers, a generation of young, mostly white men, the white men or the enemy as we know, are being radicalized into believing that their problems stem from women's progress.

Whether it's misogynists, tororism, the rash of young men feeling sexually entitled to women, or the persistent stereotype of real men as powerful and violent, it's never been been It's never been clearer that American boys are in desperate need of intervention and quote. Okay, to put in the same paragraph, never mind the same sentence, which is what she did here. That the idea of real men as powerful is in any way linked to misogynist terrorism is intellectually dishonest, to

say the least. What you have going on here is a war on science and gender because of what a lot of people term cultural Marxism, which is really just another another way of saying radical collectivism, and it's all of its offshoots, which gives us this notion of intersectional society right, intersectional politics, which is a complicated way of saying, we're all broken up into these different groups, and all the groups are fighting each other for power, and white

men are at the top of the hierarchy and they're the worst because they're the worst oppressors, and everyone's more or less oppressed than the other. We need to balance this out with the power of the state. You see. That's how we're all collective. That's why it's collective, is because we're all thought of in the collective. We're a group.

You are not you. You are white, you are black, you are male, you are female, you are Asian, you are uh African, you're you know, you go good on all the different you'r lgbt Q, you are trans, you are all the different identity groups. That is your primary identifier in the cultural Marxist view of society, that's how people should think of you first and foremost, which is just one. It's it's intellectually uh flimsy and does not

stand up to reason and logic. But even beyond that, it's deeply destructive to society and feminism, which is just another version of the intersection of intersectionality, one of the

earlier ones you see play out. There's notion of like women as this oppressed class we have to fight back in the twentieth century has now reached a point where instead of trying for equality, which was a necessary fight under under law, on the suffering the suffer jets and it's now turned into no. Now it's a victimology movement, not an equality movement. And I just feel like contemporary feminism also doesn't do any real accounting of what it has done to women. Right now. Oh, I know this

gets you in so much trouble. Right I'm about to step in it. Watch out, watch your foot buck here you go about to step in it. Here's the truth. I think that a lot of what feminism has told young women is uh, it's not true. I think uh. I think that a lot of what is out there about from the from the more radical what is third wave feminism? Who knows what what wave? It's on them is really damaging, and they have been responsible, I think

for a lot of misery for young women. I I think I called the Sex in the City effect, and I've made converts that are plenty of women that I know. When I've talked about the show and my Sex and City is not about women being happy and achieving what they want in life. It's about women who are petty and narcissistic and superficial and miserable and obsessed with you know, shoes, meaningless sex and themselves. It's not good. It's not good.

I know it's clever in the writing and everything else, but it's really sending very negative messages actually the same way that Entourage for men. I look, I'm not going to pretend Entourage, which I've watched all of which in some places and the movie is one of the worst pieces of garbage I've ever seen. In some places, Entourage

the show is also complete trash. But this knows that you can kind of be like a loser and a slab and just have lots of beautiful women, you know, coming to your door and coming and going all hours of the night and everything. It's just a lie. This is not true, all right, I mean, you know you. So that's also not good for guys. The girl wasn't like a supermodel just gonna go out and date with me. It's like, well, why would a supermoto on a day with you, I mean be realistic? And why do you

want to do a supermodel anyway? You know, you really have to think through these things anyway. Uh. This article, though, that go it just goes on and clearly she wants to take some shots at Jordan Peterson. UH. And in part it is because Jordan Peterson is one of the few guys out there who is willing to say that men and women are different, That men in the aggregate have some different skills than uh, and different tendencies than

women do in the aggregate. That's not on an individual basis um, and we ignore these things that are peril. We ignore these things at society's peril. The fact though, that that this article also goes on to claim that there's no space for all like alternative versions of masculinity. I think that's also just a total lie. I mean,

vox dot com is beta male central. I mean, there's a lot of places where they celebrate being a generally speaking, a skinny self righteous, skinny jean wearing left wing hipster. You know, there are lots of places, and in fact,

hipster culture is is overwhelmingly left wing. So whether you're talking about Brooklyn or San Francisco or a lot of other places in between, there's plenty of space for guys for for you know, males to be males where there is not a focus on traditional traditional masculine virtues strength and courage and yeah, success and achievement and all that sort of stuff. You know, it's much more like, oh, I just you know? You do you? Is really the

rallying cry of the beta male left. And I think that this effort to try and take the in cell movement, which he writes about in here, and tie that to people who want to have honest discussions about gender norms and what's going on in society today, it's just a smear. It's just lazy. And the the intellectual laziness of some of the most prominent prominent feminist writers is really it's

really become their calling card. I'm honestly, it's it's amazing to see how in apt a lot of their analysis really is, and I just I hate to see the same way that I think feminists have been the cause of a lot of unhappiness for you, for young women, you know, in the last and the last twenty years. I think of in my lifetime, like the women I know who are like I wanna you know, I'm gonna be just like the guys. I'm gonna be an investment banker, just like the guys, and I'm gonna work eighty hours

a week, just like the guys. And then I'm gonna make a lot of money and like, you know, my I'm gonna Okay, some women, sure, I've had friends who have done that and that's who they are. But most women that's actually not what they want in life. Most that's not what they want in life, and it's okay, and we shouldn't try to reprogram them to be like men. And that's what a lot of contemporary feminism is doing.

And it also then tries to shout down people like Jordan Peterson or even people like me who just pointed Jordan Peterson and say, the guy's got some worthwhile ideas hear them out. Don't try to compare them to a anti female terrorist or whatever. It's just crazy. And also, let's not take young boys and tell them, yeah, be a whim, don't be don't show any courage, John so any fortitude, you know, just be as much of a you know, a boring milk toast, condescending lib as possible.

That's that's what masculinity is now. It's it's discouraging that people are actually latching onto this garbage, but you know, you're seeing more and more of it, and I just man contemporary feminism. It's it's just responsible for misery. I think that is that one day will be its epitaph.

The FBI calls home title theft among the fastest growing crimes out there, and brace yourself because I know there a lot of your credit cards to that is absolutely nothing compared to the mess, the hell that you are in for once an identity thief decides to take control of your home's title, it's so easy, folks. I have been walked through by the folks at home title Lock exactly how the bad guys do this. They do it

all online. It's so straightforward, and they just essentially use a simple forgery to steal your home's title online and then borrow against all the equity. You get stuck with the payments it's a nightmare. Don't allow yourself to fall into that trap. For just pennies a day, Home title Lock protects my most viable asset, my family's home. Registered now for a free analysis and discover if your home's title has been compromised. That is a sixty dollar value.

Free visit home title lock dot com again, that's home title lock dot com. Buck Sextsi decoding the news and disseminating information to is actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, you're a great American again, this is the Buck Sexton Show. Analysts. No, you are now entering the Freedom Tactical Operations Center. All sensitive programs must be kept strictly. Need to know Team Buck is cleared front of that and ready for the

Buck brief? What is it that causes the president purposely, purposely create distrust in these institutions and what we're doing. I just disagree with most of what you just said there, Um, you somehow disconnect the administration's activities from the president's actions there there, they're the one and the same. And this is President Trump's administration MC no mistake. Who's fully in charge of this and who was directing each of these activities that has caused Vladimir Putting to be in a

very difficult place today. I noticed that you are not responding to what I'm saying. I think I think I responded to everything that you It's the president's public statements that create concern amongst senators on both sides of the isle. This is one of the big problems we see, and and it's one that I really want to address now where they're they're creating this. Remember, one of the things we do here is both narrative creation and narrative deconstruction

or destruction, depending on what is necessary. Here we create a narrative of truth, of liberty and and conservatism and constitutionalism, and we take chainsaws, hack saws, rubber mallets, whatever you want to call it, to narratives that are full of leftist agenda, collectivism, and lies. And one of the big ones that you see these days is that, well, okay, yeah, maybe Trump's form policy is good, but he really shouldn't get credit for it because it's good despite him or

in spite of him. This is nonsense. This is not how it works. Pardon the phrase, but the buck stops with Trump. There's no other way for people to view this and I keep hearing this now because it's the single most effective refutation of the left wing media insanity. You come up with a come up against countless times now where they're saying, oh, you know, look what he said here, and can you defend this thing Trump said? And you and I just want to say, well, why

does that matter? Because on that issue he's been great. There's the president's power, and then there's the perception of the president's words. They're always playing these games of the president's words. Oh he said this, he's an idiot because of this thing he said, or he's a racist, or he's a misogynist or whatever it is. It changes every day because they are trying to interpret Trump's words for

you and to try to interpret Trump's overall meaning. And you don't need that help, and neither do I. But then after they've done that, once they've tried to construct this perception of Trump as a as a complete buffoon, doesn't understand foreign policy, and and they want to say he shouldn't get the credit for any of this, uh, because it's not happening because of him, And that's just insane. That's not that that doesn't hold water, right, that doesn't

hold off to scrutiny. But I'm hearing it a lot from people because they can't handle the facts. And Pompeillo, I think that a very good job here saying that, you know, the it's it's not fair or honest to disconnect the administration's actions from the administration. Let me think about this, right. It would be like saying, you know, well, you know you're not you're really not carrying your weight

at that at your job. And you'd say, well, I do everything I'm supposed to do perfectly, and I complete all of my task and have like yeah, but sometimes over by the water cooler, you know, you just don't sound as excited as as you should about about what you're doing. And you're like, well, I mean I disagree with that, and they say, and by the way, all those tasks you're completing, you're not really responsible for those,

those are just happening in spite of you. You'd you'd flip out, right, that's a just a bizarre thing to say. Your record of action is a single most important thing. You know. Maybe a part of this because because they're so a president's speeches, it's just sound like he's really really smart and everything and it talks down constantly to conservatives,

and it can rate off a prompter. And but he used to do this, Uh we do that, and you give you know, because they're used to Obama, who was all about the flowery words and the lack of action or action that's counterproductive. And they built that up into this into these Olympian heights of political megastart. Now they've got a president that, you know, just he just talks like a normal person and he reacts to things like a normal person. You know, I can tell you when

I'm not on radio. You know, people come up and they say something about this or that. Yeah, like occasionally maybe I drop a little salty language in there, and you know, occasionally meaning a lot of the time. But you know, I speak to people in my day to day life in a in it just a normal fashion. I mean I try to speak on radio normal fashion too, but I just can't use salty language. But he talks

the way we talk instead of this. You know. There there's kind of this old school approach to politics that's uh that that's exemplified by some of Trump's harsher Republican critics in particular. You know that George W. Bush. The Bush was really inarticulate. I'm just gonna say it. And the guy wasn't dumb, but he was couldn't really put a sentence together very well. It was It was shocking

sometimes how much trouble he had with that. But you know, if he had been a great president, I wouldn't have cared. I think he loved the country. I think he did his best when we were under assault. I think the assault was much more um existential threat, and people realized that. You know now, we realized that at the time. They we realized now. But there are a lot of other things that Bush wasn't great on. Wasn't great on the border,

wasn't great on spending, wasn't great on entitlement reform. I mean, there's a lot of stuff that Bush just either couldn't get through, it wasn't up with the task on. But you get the Rubio wing of the GOP now, and they always want to sound like they're giving some kind of declaration that high school students are gonna be memorizing and giving in ten years, and we just don't need that anymore. I think that's a facade I don't need. They look maybe at the shore. The State of the

Union addresses. By the way, I think the State of the Union address could just be printed. I don't think we have to have this pageant treated. That's a whole other thing. But the actions of the single most important thing. And what you have now is a media effort. And this is what Pompeo was swatting aside. And I'm just I'm hearing this all over the place now because they can't argue that the wreck heard. They can't argue with

Trump's record, it doesn't work. It's too strong, it's too strong in the economy, it's too strong on foreign policy. So now they're trying to create this looney tune situation of well, it's not Trump's foreign policy, isn't really his foreign policy. It actually does remind me a little bit of and some of you think know where I'm going in the Bush administration, it wasn't really This was a whisper campaign among the elite media, But it wasn't really

Bush who was pulling the strings. It was always Cheney who was the one that was really in charge of all this, right, Cheney was the brains of the whole operation. Chaney, I knew people and I knew people well on Cheney staff. I spent time in the White House dealing with different people there, and uh, nobody was pulling the strings for Bush and that are pulling bushes strings in that White House. Okay, that was just there was no respute in whispering in bushes.

Ear Ah. But they're trying this again. They're trying this with Trump where they're just making it up. They're making it up, and it's because they're desperate, as I've been saying to you. But by the way, speaking of the facts and and arguing with the reality here, Pompeo, who's who is a real, a real find for this administration, has been doing such a strong job. He took it to took cardon here on the whole Russia situation. He's like, can we stop with the Oh he loves Putin and

just wants to hug him all the time. This is what he's done. Play clip six. Was there any agreements reached in regards to Ukraine? No center, that's it agree to disagree that that is the U S policy hasn't changed. And you can see that right, And a new hundred million dollars since the Health Sinky Summit provided to the Ukrainians. I think there was lots of concern that and I saw it. I could find you all's quotes if you'd

like me to go drag them out. Concerns that President Trump would make a change in position with respect and there there there is none and it is it is a policy that the previous administration refused to undertake. And so I hear comparative. It's it's important, Senator, in comparison matters here because there's a narrative that has developed that somehow President Trump is weak on Russia, and it went

in fact the coin. Let let me just through. I heard you talking brag about the number of sanctions that are these were just facts, just facts, notice the Senate Jugie Calkin, Bragg Pompey. I was like, no, these are facts, these are real things that have happened. I had the experience here on on Rising held dot TV slash Rising

for those of you want to see. I had the experience of having a the guy who said he was the former NFC director for Ukraine under the Obama administration at the desk with me and I said, okay, so we're now sending along. I think he was surprised that I knew this much about it. But javelin anti tank missiles and sniper rifles to the Ukrainian government to fight against the Russians on the front lines in eastern Ukraine.

Right Russian paramilitaries and Ukrainian UH separatists were backed by Russia. And he said, well, that won't make much of a difference. Come. I said, well, that's really cute. That's a nice talking point if it won't make much of a difference. One, why are why are these are the Ukrainians asking for them? Which they are? And two why did the Obama administration refuse to give them? And he goes, okay, well, maybe

it would make I give the guy credit. He actually said, you know, actually I think that he had in his mind what the Obama administration line wants. But he said, yeah, you know, like they didn't want to take the risk. Oh okay, So that's what It's not that it wouldn't be effective, it's that Obama didn't want to take the risk, take the risk of what everybody the risk of angering Vladimir Putin. Oh, that's right. When I win the election,

I'll have more flexibility. Tell you know, LUNs, lad the mirror. You guys all remember it. They're completely rewriting Obama's history on Russia related issues. They're completely rewriting the way that he approached the issue of Ukraine and never mind Syria, and I mean, obama foreign policy was a disaster. A disaster because the bad guys knew they could get away with whatever they wanted to do on the ground with action and people suffering because of it, not because he

didn't give the most flowery speech. You know that. That's where we are now. You can have obama Ism, which is speeches that make people go, oh, listen to the and a lot of us were like, first of all, he's not even writing this speech, so he's really just an actor delivering lines. Side note. But or you can have somebody who's like, you know, I kind of get the situation. Let's make something happen here, a doer instead

of a sayer. That's what we have with Trump. Don't let them get in your head with this narrative of oh, it's us not he's not really running his own foreign policy whatever. That's how pathetic they are now that they know they can't beat him on the record, So they're saying it's not even Trump. Trump's foreign policy record isn't his record is what they're trying to tell you. Now, don't let him get away with it. I know you won't, but you'll see, now that we've talked about it, you'll

hear it. You'll see more of it. You know. It's tough to put a price on peace of mind, but I can do it for you right now. Fifteen dollars a month, folks, that's all a cost for peace of mind. Fifteen dollars a month for twenty four seven monitoring with simply Safe home security. All right, this is a great deal. I've got a simply Safe system at home. I'm not very tech savvy, uh, and let me tell you. It's so easy to set up and so easy to use,

and it covers you top to bottom. It gets everything that you need from a home security system without any of the drawbacks. The customer service is great. The sensors that you put in place make sure that everything from fire to somebody burglarizing to some all those things covered for you. And there's no long term contracts or nonsense.

Protect your home today. Visit simply safe dot com slash buck that's simply Safe dot com, slash buck, simply safe dot com, slash buck the only security system you're gonna need, and once you have it, it's the only security system you're ever gonna want. Go check it out at simply safe dot com, slash buck, and just remember what you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening. For President the United States to tell people to stop believing

what they see or what they read. I mean, it's what dictators, it's what authoritarian rulers say. I mean, it's it's kind of unbelievable in the truest sense of the word. Um. It reminds me of you know, there was a quote from Orwell in said, the party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. This really sounds a lot like what the President is said. Be paused for one second, because I want to keep going. We've got more of this

crazy media fear montage we pulled together, folks. But notice how that's Anderson Cooper being very smug, being very condescending to people saying, oh, well, because the President says, don't believe everything you read the media, they skip past. The media created this term of fake new news. The media are the ones who are out there saying, don't believe Fox, Foxes, State TV, it's propaganda. I mean the rest of the media, right,

the mainstream media, the the left Democrat media. So they're saying there's all this fake stuff out there, all these lives. They're the ones that are saying that Facebook has to clamp down on all the fakery. And when Trump says don't believe everything you read, what do they do. He's a dictator? Do they have no? They have no principal organizing principles for their thoughts. They just have emotions and

propaganda and agenda. Continue John from George Orwell's famous dystopian novel nine eight four, which cast partisan censorship of truth as the party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. Those comments that reminded some folks of John Pause, Lake Pause. You know who really won't wrote nineteen four was Brian Williams. He was there and kind Colonia with Orwell back in the thirties. I think it was thirty nine. On the front lines. Brian Williams

took two rounds in the shoulder. Didn't stop. Ryan Williams. He then grabbed the nearest pale for digging ditches and took out seven Spanish fascists with just that It's another day in the books from Brian Williams continue King. Something President Trump said with George Orwell's dystopian novel nineteen eighty four, do not believe what you see or read, echoes a line from George or Wills nine eighty four. The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears.

It was their final, most essential command. But how dangerous is his rhetoric. I mean, it's as though it was straight out of the book, because that language he used really closely mirrors language from Frankly, George or Critics are comparing that to a line from George Orwell's novel nineteen eighty four about a nightmarish authoritarian state. The party told you to reject the evidence of her eyes and ears.

It was their final. Oh my gosh. Producer Mike hat tipped you, man, that was a great that's a great run we had that. That's great audience here. That was that all the last twenty four hours. Mike, Yes, that's unbelievable. It's these people have They really only have three literary references that they know how to make in the media. Harry Potter Handmaid's Tale at least eighty four is a great a great work of fiction in the English language. And the other two I don't know. I'll leave it

to you to decide for yourselves. But those are the only ones that really that really get the left fired up. It's just so funny to me too. They don't understand that. I mean, Orwell, who was a socialist, essentially realized the

pitfalls of socialism throughout the course of his life. And uh, I think this notion that, this notion that the Trump is a dictator is hilarious on many levels because not a lot of dictators have an entire, multibillion dollar media apparatus constantly not just undermining everything that they do, but trying to get them and their whole family thrown into prison every day and with no actual consequence. I mean, this whole media thing. Look, I like Caitlin Collins. She's

a really nice girl, she's a friend, she's cool. I'm I don't I'm not. They shouldn't be banning people from events, but look, not my problem. I wasn't there This notion though, that DC based journalists, or oh my gosh, it's so terrible, look at the Trump error. What are we gonna do? They're fine, they're making more a lot of making more money than ever. Are you kidding? If you're an MSNBC, all this Trump stuff is great. You got hashtag resistance

just boosting your numbers all the time. CNN sucks because it's so boring and dishonest. But at least ms they're like, we're crazy and we own it, and there, you know, riding this to ratings victory. So I'm glad that they're they're exercising their capitalist impulses over there at MSNBC. But this notion that that that we're in a tyranny or that journalists have to be afraid and this is just complete insanity. What are we gonna do? It's all gonna be.

It's all gonna be fine, journals, It really is. It's there's nothing that you have to get so stressed out about. It's gonna be okay. No one's thrown you in prison. You know, I brought this up. Obama was the one who was actually thinking about indicting journalists. Obama was the one who was naming a Fox News journalist, a co conspirator and espionage complaint. And the press was like, oh, well, we'll excuse me, we have concerns about this. Excuse me,

Mr Obama, we have concerns. Yeah, maybe they've got concerns, but you know what, they weren't calling for Obama to have a special prosecutor. They weren't calling for Obama and his family to be thrown in prison. They're doing that with Trump all the time. A dictator. You have the former intel directors of the previous regime. Maybe we should start using that word because the Obama administration was really a regime, as we've seen now, much more than it

was an administration. And we've got them saying, you know, the Trump is a trader, and then they're not gonna be this is no. They might pull their clearances. Who cares, They don't even need their clearances. And they that's like saying, well, can the president fire somebody who calls him a trader? No? No, the first Amendment. And it's like, well, can you can work for somebody and call them a trader? I mean,

oh man, they're so crazy, folks. I know we talked at a lot, but it's really they are so nuts O. I'm glad you could hang out with me, because at least I'm pretty normal. You right back, he's holding the line for America, buck sext in his back. So this week has been sharp feat and I haven't really spend much time on that because you know, that's not an

area of particular expertise. Although for me, although I do know that the great white is actually in Latin the car Carroden carcarious, I learned from watching the movie Orca, which is actually about a killer whale that can kill great white sharks, which we now know is also true. Side note, but Shark Week has been declining in recent years. And let me tell you guys why in case you you know, you know, you don't know, or you haven't paid attention, or you could care less, which is probably

a fair amount of you. Uh you're like, yeah, buck, we just want to see the great white shark eating stuff and looking scary. Everything else is kind of me. You know, they do all the scary music. They're like, oh, well, the bullshark is so aggressive and has super high testosterone level and probably and can go and fresh water and salt water. It's like bull shark. Yeah, Okay, if I get eaten by a bull shark, it's a bad day for me. If I can eat my great white, that

is epically awful. You know, that is next level because the great white is super scary. So I feel like all of Shark Week is a bunch of people doing shows that are either about a great white shark or should be about great white sharks, because nobody cares about the other sharks. They always do this thing where they're like, oh, we're gonna just see the here's a little weird looking shark with big eyes we found in the deep, deep deep ocean. It's like, I don't care about your big eye,

weirdo shark, Mike, and I right, am, I right? Nobody cares about the little weirdo sharks. They want to see the big scary shark that eats everything. Yeah, right, I mean the great white. Everything else is kind of it really should be Great White Shark Week, absolutely. I think. I think that's just the case because you get these other things out there and people say, oh, the tiger the other way, they called the big three, those that are wondering. The three worst for attacks are obviously the

great white, the tiger shark, and the bull shark. Uh, And there's actually been some attacks recently, but you know that they I'll click on the headline and then it'll be like there was one I think it was a model who was trying to float. Did you see this? By the way, She's trying to float in shallow water, just surrounded by sharks, and one of them bit her hand. It's like, what are you doing? Exactly? Like what what

do you think is going to happen? Even if they don't want to eat you, they're like, oh, yeah, there's a thing I'm gonna bite because I'm a shark. Did you see Shaquille O'Neil in the shark cage? This was funny. He when he was part of Shark Week and he uh, they put him in a cage and the shark got in the cage with him and he like freaked out

and jumped out of the water. I mean that's totally legit. Yeah, I don't care how big you are, Like shack is obviously the largest human being ever, but I'd still be super scared of it. Was it a what kind of shark? Was it? Yeah? I don't know exactly what kind it was. You know, wanna I don't think it was a great white, but it was a smaller one that was able to maneuver through the opening of the cage and it just got in there super quick and like everybody started freaking

out and shocked dumped out of the water. It was you know, it's comical that he's certainly nothing happened to him. He's pretty funny is that he could have. He could have gone all Shazam on that shark and been like, Wow, I do remember that Shack was. This is I'm really doing a throw back now. Shack had back in the old old school Nintendo days, if I recall, though it might have been old school Sega. He had a a a video game called Shack Foo where he I'm not dude,

I'm not making this up. I'm googling it right now. Shock Foo video yup, you can check it out. A two D fighting game release for Genesis. That's what it was in. Did I just blow your mind? Mike? Do you just learn something new about I actually knew about that. You knew about Shack Food. I believe there's a Shock Food too as well food too. Yeah, I think I don't even know that was possible. This is a crazy. This is a crazy world we live in. But anyway,

so you guys can all check that out. I still think one day I want to buy one of those old school those packets where you can get the old Nintendo games. Especially I want to get dut Com We're Just you know, and the Little Dog Runs. You know. I used to play that all the time. That was a great game. Um. Anyways, Shark Week, Mike saw Sama obviously, so it's not not anything to get that riled up about. But I will say this. I saw by people who were talking about how Shark Week they try to make

it seem like shark It's acts so scary. This was a list that got circulated I don't know by some real journalists people killed annually by and then it has all the different lists of animals. Sharks ten people globally on average, Elephants a hundred. Don't make elephants angry, hippo's five hundred, Snails ten thousand, I don't know how that's possible. Dogs twenty five thousand, Yeah, they biting, They biting people

and give them rabies. Uh. Snakes fifty thousand, okay, Mosquitoes seven hundred and twenty five thousands, and I need to figure out now before I go, how do snakes kill people? Snails kill people? Rather? Um? Oh the larvae from water? You gross? That's super gross. I didn't realize that ill snails are gross. I think of escal Girl, which is delist yours. All right, I gotta hit of break stay

with me, Team Buck. It's time for roll call faces Book dot com, slash buck sex and that's all you need for roll call, folks, assuming Facebook still gonna be around in a few days. Oh, a bit of a rough ride today. Those those who on a little Facebook stock were like, ouch, you're hurting me Facebook. Why are you hurting me? Facebook? Go back to your hole? Dude? What's You're too good for your whole or your home? I forget what he says, and happy Gilmore. It's one

or the other. John is at hole or home and happy Gilmore. Are you too good for your home? I think whole? I don't it's whole? Yeah, you too good for your whole? Because he's kind of put the ball of the eight whatever was of the eighteenth hole get it in all right, Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton and uh, that's what you do. And a lot of

you did it, so let's get get into it. That's one thing I'll never be I may be able to borrow y'all from some of you, because we have so many fantastic listeners to this show who are from the South, from Texas, and they they say y'all and it's just it's so fluid, it just rolls off the tongue. But I don't think I'll ever be able to be one of these guys that can get away with saying get, you know, like the version of g ET that's more like g Y or g apostrophe y t or g

y apostrophe. I don't think. I don't think I'll be able to pull that one off as a Yankee from New York. Or maybe I'll try one day. Alright. Joe is the first up here. He writes, this is kind of sad. America is dead buck the stato of liberty. Uh all the corruption and the d O J and C I A with very few politicians caring, the media supporting it, and Ron Rosenstein is as corrupt as the rest and there's no one to stop him once they

get away with this. It is over Sessions coming out on loving Rosenstein with the fives, abuse and serious conflict of interest. No one looking into the Clintons and the organized that organized all this Russian propaganda stuff. It is all clear as day. No one will be held accountable. American Dead, the new United States of Banana Republic. From Joe also known as Mr Sunshine. Uh, you know what, Joe, I share your concerns, but I do not share your prognosis.

And the country is gonna be fine. Just remember, my friend, we now have gone eighteen months and Trump is just crushing it, doing fantastic work. As I've been saying, the GDP numbers that are supposed to come out tomorrow are going to be going to be a real eye opener for the country. Oh you mean that We've just had the best year we've had economically in a decade. I wonder why that is. I wonder what the differential is between say now and two years ago, or three years

ago or four years ago. What's different now? Everybody? Oh, I think we all know the answer to that. So there's some good things and you could have Hello, hell are Joe, America is amazing? Vote for me. We could have that, and we don't, Joe, So it's all gonna be okay, America is not dead. We're just we got some things to work out. And I will tell you that right now. If nothing else, food is better than it's ever been. So we've got that going for us,

which is nice. It's true wherever you are now you can get really good food pretty much everywhere in this country, you can you can find, you know, with relatively little effort, really high quality food. That was not always the case. Man. I remember some family trips back in the day. You know, we'd pull off somewhere and it was like, yeah, there's some guy named Phil who has way too much chest hair and a really tight uh you know, undershirt all

and who's cooking some burgers behind a trailer somewhere. Let's go see what he's got cooked up tonight, you know what I mean. It wasn't it wasn't always great. Wasn't always great. Food now is amazing. So at least we

we do have that to look forward to every day. Um. I'm obviously I'm hungry right now, which is why I'm thinking of this and wrote you just just heard you read this, YEA, regarding a mechanic a couple of years ago, my car's engine through a rod mm, because we are trying our best to live within our means and hate

car payments. We bought an old Volvo with cash. Having a mechanic technician that works on nothing of Volvos took that car from piece of junk to almost a cream puff and for a lot less than the dealership would have. You need someone to trust with your vehicles. Oh no, and you're you're right. I'm just saying the mechanic thing is changing a little bit over time. If you've got a newer vehicle. Uh, there's so much in the way of electronics in it that it's not just something that

somebody can work their way through. But look, I haven't owned a car in years now, um, and I don't miss it. I'll be honest with you. There's some things about me I should admit. There's some things about buck that are that are vaguely communists. Uh. And you know one of them is that I don't like baseball, And another one is that I don't put really love driving cars. I can drive. I've actually had advanced tactical driving. I mean,

I've done some some things in vehicles. I've I've driven cars in countries where just not not dying in a vehicular accident is something of an accomplishment, you know, in the in the third world. But you know, I just I'm not somebody I find a car is something that you It serves a purpose for me. It's not a joy like the notion of joy riding. I don't really I'd rather be joy jogging or joy walking. I'd have

no interest in joy riding. So again, I know a lot of you can yell at me, Buck, what are you You gotta remember people from Manhattan in particular, we you know, we we don't really we don't really count as part of the rest of the country. In some ways. We were a very strange, very strange group in Manhattan. Uh. It's it's such a little pocket of cosmopolitanism. We've got

a lot of people that like soccer, for example. Don't even get me started, all right, Karen, I'm gonna bail out of this one, U Karen, type in National Review magazine into Google, and the third suggestion is bias type in Atlantic Monthly magazine and liberal or conservative is the eighth suggestion, No bias. I could play this all day, Karen, You're right. Uh. And then the question is becomes are these Internet you know, search giants and these platforms are

are they? And I think I think the those of you listen to the show consistently would would would give me some credit for I've seen this all coming with how the politicization of the platforms and the search engines is now. This is now the new focus of the left, and it's it's gonna cause big problems. It's gonna be you know because because the old, the old media way of doing things, the old we're not We're just journalists going straight down the middle. Uh, that's that's for clowns

who don't pay enough attention. It's just not true. So people, if they want to live in that delusion, that's their choice. But if they want to live in reality, we all know that it is inaccurate for people to think that CNN and these other networks are unbiased. Um, but if they can make the algorithms by so now they take the human component out of it. As I've been saying, is Google populating those search results Karen in that way because that's what most people type in? Or do we

just have to take their word for it? And the answer is, oh yeah, we just have to take their word for it. We really don't know. We really don't have an answer as to what the what the truth of that is. So and it's proprietary and their private company. So what are we gonna do? What are we gonna do? Um? Let's see? Hold on what second? Here? Uh? I just lost It's okay, I just lost roll call. Here we go, Taylor, do me a favor when you have shown on the

Freedom Hunt podcast. Let them know Outlaw Platoon was a great book. I've listened to four or five, four or five times since you had him on the show. Can't wait for his next one to come out. You both should come to Utah. Check out the Black Ruffle HQ. I'll bust out the cannon and the b b Q. Let's party to freedom. Taylor, My man, you're on. Next time I head out to Utah, I'll shoot you a message.

We'll go shoot some cannons because I think you said you've got you've got your own you make your own cannons. If I remember, Taylor correctly told me a while ago that he actually cast his own cannons, which is which is pretty cool. I gotta say, jar right Buck. In regards to the we don't tip terrorists receipt story. My little thought was a little different than yours. My first thought was that it was employed to get money from people through donation in some sort of Go fund Me account.

You know, Jar, You've got a good point there. These days, if you become the subject of some kind of a very emotional viral news story where people are all feeling like the social justice warrior and them has to come out, um, you can make a whole bunch of money. Uh, people don't it all kinds of money to you? So you were right, Um, that's a possibility. At least I don't think that happened in this case, but that at least

could happen. Um. Hold on a second, Adam writes bad producer Mike podcast from s is missing from my Heart producer Mike. Adam is saying that you need a code read. I don't know, John telling me that's complete thickness, Mike. Mike's calling you out, Adam for fake news. I don't you know, you gentlemen can sell this on Facebook. I'm just I'm just the messenger. I'm just the messenger. That's right, Mike, Mike.

My game played no games today. ED is next up. Here, Hey Buck, I still on the show after all these years. Thanks Ed. I've noticed for the past few weeks at the phrase Russian collusion has been dropped by the media in favor of the phrase Russian meddling. What is your take on that? Oss original Saturday Squad, Ed, And I think you are a very astute fellow, and I think that you are probably noticing I have not noticed that trend, but it would not surprise me if that trend was

very real. Uh would not surprise me to find out that that was in fact the case. And so let me just say that I will look in this a little more and try to keep an eye out for it because Russia, remember, Russian meddling is whatever the Russians just did to us. Russian collusion would be whatever we did to assist the Russians in that or we mean, meaning Trump or his people, to assist the Russians in

their meddling. So there that is an important distinction. It's a real distinction, don't I don't think that that's something that we should just ignore your I think you're picking something up there, my friend. Very astute, and thank you for an original Saturday Squad. You know, who else's Oss John? Producer John who was with me in the earliest days when people are like, you want to do radio, You've never even done radio? What do you know about radio?

But John was always my friend. Thanks John. John used to on the board for me. They didn't think I was gonna laugh to look. I know, I know, I know. I'm just saying, dude, like they didn't think I was gonna lie. They're like, oh, you're a TV guy, radio is too hard for you. Blablah. Was like, please, I got me, I got producer, I got producer John, I'm GTG. Good to go. And then I actually became primarily a radio guy. So there you go. That's that's all life works. Uh,

let's see what we get here. Um, Joe writes onto politics, Russia hacked the election. When I hear this, I think computers kind of votes were tampered with. But from what I understand, Russia tried to hack the Republican and Democrat party computers. Some Russians also put up a bunch of Facebook propaganda. I understand the first being a crime, but I don't understand the ladder. Uh. And I'm a lawyer, Joe, You're right, people are nuts. They only need to calm

down this stuff. That's gonna be it for today. Tomorrow we have a fantastic Freedom Hut podcast plan, so please do download last week's and get ready for tomorrow's. Me and Sean Parnell and Jesse Kelly. It's gonna be a pro fessed extravaganza. Also, of course, we'll have a freestyle Friday here in the Freedom Hut itself. See you tomorrow. Shields high five am wake ups these days. That's what

I got on the alarm clock every day. But you know what I look forward to no matter what, making sure that I fuel the fight of freedom in my day to day with Black Rifle coffee. My friends, it is delicious and unlike a lot of other coffees out there. This isn't some fancy French import. This isn't something that comes from a bunch of commies overseas somewhere else. This is an all American, made in America company owned and operated by veterans, including members of the elite Special Forces.

You need to check them out for yourself. I drink Black Rifle every day. I get it delivered to my door every month. I don't buy coffe anymore. I just have Black Rifle sent to me. You should do the same. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck and receive fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Do you only coffee should be

drinking folks? And I know your coffee drinkers, So I want everyone listening to this to go check out Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck.