Libs Sick Indoctrinated Kids on DiFi

Buck SEXTONSI decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American analytic, You're a great American again. This is the Bucks Sexton Show, Tuma CIA Analysts. I can speak three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometime. No, welcome to the Bucks X and show everybody. Thank you so much for joining. Hope you had a

great weekend. I was out on Sunday doing quite a bit of sporting clay shooting, did some busted out the twelve gage for a bit, had some fun with that. It's good. It's one of these things that's a perishable skill. Man. I don't get enough time out there otherwise you started to get a little rusty, start to miss, then you start to miss too much, you start to swear, and then it's all of a sudden, you get the sadness. But no, I had a lot of fun. It was

good times. Well, let's get right into it. I've got this amazing clip to share with you. We got to talk about Okaza Cortez on the show, The Green New Deal. Libs are doubling down on this. They're completely insane. Kim John Un and Trump meeting in Vietnam this week. Also, big trade deal with China could be on the horizon. They're pushing back the deadline from March first, hitting the twenty two trillion dollars debt ceiling coming up in a few days. And we got a lot to talk about Venezuela.

Are we gonna help out this punk Maduro or should we stay out of it? What's going on in Syria? Man? I got I have so much show in my head right now and even know what to do. I mean, I can't even contain all the show that's in my head. But I gotta start with this because this was amazing. Diane Feinstein, sir woman who has been in the game for quite a long time. She is a she is a wily political survivor, to be sure. And she had this group come visit her. I forget what they're called.

There's some name for them now, these groups, these like environmentalist agitator kids basically that show up. But they showed up to Congress, and I want to play. I can't play the full fifteen minutes, obviously because it's a radio show, but we picked the best moment of this. Imagine you're

a sitting US center. You've been doing this for us, She points out decades and a group of kids, and I don't mean kids, like, oh, those kids, and they're twenty five, because you know twenty five year olds as somebody who was twenty five pretty recently, they've got a lot to learn. The Sunshine movement. It's called thank you, producer, Mike, the Sunshine Movement. They show up though, to a US

Senator's office and they're not there. You know, you know, I remember what it was like to be ten, eleven, twelve, maybe thirteen years old going to Congress. You would think, ooh, like this is where the government stuff happens, and there's some sense of awe and majesty when you're a kid, I think of being in our nation's capital. I actually never did a class trip to DC, so I'm just assuming.

And we did a class trip to Mystic Seaport, you know when I was that age, and we were like, ooh ah, look at the old ship and all the barnacles on the underside of it. And there was some dude who was dressed as a pirate who was like, what what do we do with the captain's daughter? What will we do? Early? You know, they're doing the whole pirate songs and stuff. I don't know, you have no idea what the heck I'm talking about. Don't worry about it. Don't worry about it. The guy was sealing this, not

sealing singing pirate songs for us. Anyway. You would think they'd be awe and majesty from kids that show, But no, there were demands. There were straight up demands made of a sitting US senator by these kids who were twelve years old. Thirteen years old, you have we're gonna talk more. We're gonna break this from down in a second here, because I mean, this is the Libs love to do this.

They never learned their lesson. Nobody should give a blankety blanking blank blank about what kids think about politics and policy. I'm sure many of you listening to this have won. I was just over the weekend at a house where there were all there were kids aged two to twelve, actually, I think running around like six or seven of them. Wonderful kids, great families, everything else. I do not care what they think of the top Marshall tax. Right though, I do not care what a twelve year old thinks

about the board. It's not that I don't care, like I disagree with them. I don't care, as in it does not register for me as an opinion that I should or need to listen to. If they have questions, I will answer them if they if they want to learn, I will explain. But their opinion to me does not matter, as in, it should not be taken into account for the purposes of legislating. Right. They could have opinions to

their parents, and that's great. They got opinions to their friends, but their opinion to a US senator should Whether it's gun control or climate change or any of these issues, kids don't count when it comes to policy decision making. Okay, that's right. They don't. They don't get to have a say in this one. This is why we actually have

age limits about things like voting. Diane Feinstein caught the brunts of brainwashed kids deployed by liberals for the purposes of shaming her into some kind of action, and Finestein wasn't having it. Sit back and enjoy this one, folks. Play clip one. We are trying to ask you to vote yes on the Green New Deals. Okay, I'll tell you what. We have our own Green New deal. Some scientists have said that we have twelve years to turn this around. Living well, it's not going to get turned

around in ten years. Is the government. You're supposed to be flint the people and by the people. And you'll know what's interesting about this group. I've been doing this for thirty years. I know what I'm doing. You come in here and you say it has to be my way or the highway. I don't respond to that. I know what I'm doing. So you know, maybe people should listen a little bit. I hear what you're saying, but where are the people who voted you. You're supposed to

listen to us. That's here I'm sixteen, I can did any plan that doesn't take full transformative action is not going to be what we need. Well, you know better than I do. I think one day you should run for the Senate. Oh Mike, wasn't that amazing? Man? That was beautiful. I also loved it, like we voted for you. She's like, actually, kids, you're not old of the vote. That's amazing. But you know why somebody who sixteen would say we voted for you, because they're all just parroting

what their parents and teachers have told them. Those kids were all saying talking points. You know, we need your leadership. It's like, no, you. I also the one kid it was, I mean, the kid was Look, some of the kids were really cute, and they don't know any better. I'm not here. I have no criticism of the kids. I mean, maybe they could be a little more respectful of their elders,

But I'm not here to criticize the kids. It's the parents and the adults and the teachers that are with them, though, who deploy these kids like some kind of trump card on how to get Diane Feinstein to vote a certain way on the or to push for certain aspects of the Green New deal. This is this is crazy. But they did this with the Parkland kids too. You know, they were teenagers. Some of them were close to or write at about eighteen, but they were they were teenagers.

And because they were students at that high school, we were supposed to listen to them without criticism, listen to them without comment. They were supposed to be in a role where they could say whatever they wanted to, call the NRA a blood soaked terrorist organization, say the NRA has has the blood of children on itsives. They could say whatever they wanted. And if you criticize them, how dare you? These these are kids who are victims. How

dare you? They were deploying young victims to make political points for the move on dot org and you know far left Democrat base really just unseemly unethical and and I think really disgraceful conduct for the adults who do this and for the young adults that engage in this behavior too. Um. But you know that, Notice how they're they're telling her this one kid is, you know, but we need you, we need your leadership, you know, the

whole thing. And and it's just where do they get these ideas that that we only have twelve years to save the planet. Do you know when we only had ten years to save the planet thirteen years ago when al gores we only have ten years to save the planet. Well that was thirteen years ago, and we seem just fine. These people are part of a delusion. This is a this is a massive story, this climate change stuff. You

libs have become detached from reality. The world has existed for billions of years, has been through countless true natural disasters and calamities, and yet here we are and it's all going to be okay. I want a world that exists that can sustain life for many millennia to come. I have no concerns. I'm not a little bit concerned about climate change. I am zero percent concerned about climate change. I think hurricanes are real. I think natural disasters will happen.

I think pollution is real. But that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about c O two emissions into the atmosphere. CO two, which is a naturally a naturally occurring gas in the atmosphere. It is what plants need to survive and for photosynthesis. And yet here we are being told that the world is going to end. I tell you now, it is a form of child abuse.

It is psycho logical abuse of children to tell eight, nine, ten eleven year olds that the world is going to end unless they go and mob an adult in power and cry and beg for the policies of an imbecile Ocazio Cortez to be implemented at the national level. It is child abuse to tell kids the world is going to end in ten years, which is what now is. And I am shocked at some of the people who are jumping on this bandwagon because it is politically fashionable

for the left right now. It is particularly fashionable because Ocasio Cortes, who they really just like because of all the all the superficial aspect. They like the way she looks, they like the way she sounds, They're like her background, they're like her youth. The obsession with Ocasio Cortez is the liberal obsession with optics. There's no substance to what

she is saying. She doesn't know what the heck she's talking about, but they've become just engrossed in this perception, in this in this character that is Ocazio Cortez, and she's out there, she's out there telling people all the usual scaremongering stuff, and she had a moment that was just jaw dropping. She's doing these live streams, which you know, hundreds of thousands, probably millions of people will watch, where she sits there in her kitchen, and you know, she

is better at this than Elizabeth Warren. I'm gonna get me a beer, you know, hello, fellow young people. I'm going to drink a beer like a cool person. Now. Ocazio Cortez is young and seems normal and cool to

young people. And she sits there and she does these kind of policy gives these policy declarations while she's you know, chopping up an onion or whatever, and she says things like, well, I'll get into the craziest one a moment, but first, you know, don't have She's telling people that there's a that they're not having kids because a climate change play twenty three. Our planet is going to fit disaster if

we don't turn the ship around. And so it's basically like there's scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult. And it does lead I think young people to have a legitimate question, you know, should is it okay? To still have children. They always go back to these Malthusian fallacies. Remember John Thomas Malthus from back in the day, We're going to run out

of food. Population keeps growing and our ability to make food is going to peak, and then we're going to run out of food and you're gonna have die off from starvation around the world. Yeah, he was considered a brilliant, brilliant mind in his day. He was really wrong, wasn't he. But there there is a desire on the hard part of the hardcore left. There's a negation of humanity that's at the core of a lot of their beliefs. There's

a nihilism, you know. Yes, the Green New Deal is about the implementation of a communist feeling within the left, of a kind of traditional socialist but socialist in the original Marxist intent feeling on the left. But then there's also just this desire to view human beings to borrow from the matrix and agent Smith, we're like the virus on this planet. You know, we take, we despoil, we exploit. Human beings are a virus. Agent Smith said. We all

you do is replicate and take and destroy. That is also a philosophy that is represented in the minds of many people on the left who embrace this Green New Deal. Nonsense. There are too many people. We're too destructive, We're not at harmony with nature. Nature is actually destructive. Nature involves a tremendous this amount of predation and death and loss and catastrophe. It is in our conquering of nature that we can achieve peace and prosperity and beauty and the arts.

This is what the Libs don't understand. You know, they should just go try to walk around in you know, the rainforest naked for a few days to see how that goes for them before they start saying, oh, let's get rid of all the light bulbs. I've got more to stay with me. Morning coffee is an American institution. I drink it every day, and that's why when it comes to starting my day right full of freedom, promise and patriotism, I reach for the most delicious, most American

coffee on the market, Black Rifle coffee. This is how I get my day started. I tell you, it's delicious coffee, and I'm somebody that really cares what is coffee tastes like. Also, it's got quite a punch to it. But if you want decaf, you can get decaf. Two try Black Rifle Coffee. This will become your coffee of choice, just like it is for me. I get it delivered every month. It's

roast to order, guaranteed fresh delivered to your door. And while liberals threatened to further tax your hard earned money with their socialist agenda, Black Rifle Coffee is fueling the fight for freedom by upping their offer to twenty percent off. It's a great deal. Take advantage by visiting Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck and receive twenty percent off your entire order. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck for

twenty percent off Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck. And I read it and I was like, you know what, I don't care anymore. I don't care anymore because again, I'm at least trying and they're not. So the power isn't the person who's trying, regardless of the success. If you're trying, you've got all the power. You're driving the agenda, you're doing all this stuff. Like I just introduced Green New Deal two weeks ago, and it's creating all of

this conversation. Why because no one else has even tried. Because no one else has even tried. So people are like, oh, it's unrealistic, Oh it's vague. Oh it doesn't address this little minute thing. And I'm like, you try you do it right, because you're not, because you're not. So until you do it, I'm the boss. How by you heard it here? Yeah, no, you're not the boss though, AOC. I hate to break it to you. You're a freshman

member of Congress. There are four hundred and thirty five of you, and so far it's not not exactly impressing anybody who's paying attention to the content of what you say. Your social media game is strong, but your policy game is ignorance. Ignorance is bliss. So I just like this, though you know, I'm the boss. This is like what a I imagine because many of you have children and I don't, but I know enough to about kids to know that sometimes walk around and say I'm the boss.

You know. It's a fun thing for a kid to say, and you're like, no, no, little Timothy, like you're not. Yes, I've got boss, you know, And they get to walk around and say this I'll tell you a funny story actually real quickly. Um, I a friend, I know what I'm even. It was. It was it was Pete hegseth over at Fox. When we used to work together at Real News. He had these adorable kids, I mean, really

really cute kids. He brought one of them to the office one day and to the studio, i should say, and he said to me, we're waiting outside to go up in the elevator after the show, and Peach with his kid and you know, happy dad and the whole thing. And he says, hey, Buck, make sure that you let it. May make sure that you let him press the button

for the elevator. And I'm like, oh sure. So he presses that, you know, the the up button, and the elevators reaction in the basement, and he presses the button and then I step in and without thinking, without thinking,

I just got in the elevator. I thought, okay, well he pressed the button to get up, and so now we're good, right, So I pressed lobby the elevator, and all of a sudden, I hear this yelling, you press the button I was supposed to press the butt he starts yelling at me and screaming and causes a scene, and there are other people waiting for the elevator and Petze look at me like, oh, I'm so sorry. Man, he has to press all the buttons and oh, man, So it's kind of like AOC. I'm the boss. I

pressed the button. I pressed the button. Don't let her press the button. Guys, If it's the Green New Deal, it's gonna be really, really bad. It's gonna work out very badly for all of us. Got more on this, Kamela Harris Klobischer eating salad with a dirty comb. That's coming up. There's no question we have to be practical. But being practical also recognizes that climate change is an

existential threat to us as human beings. Being practical recognizes that greenhouse gas emissions are threatening our air and its threatening the planet, and that it is well within our capacity as human beings to change our behaviors in a way that we can reduce its effects. That's practical. Can we afford it? Of course we can afford it. Two and a half three trillion dollars a year from Medicare

for all By some studies, I don't. Depending on which portions of the Green New Deal you pick to do first, that's money that you know what the Republicans are going to say, tax and spend liberals by in the sky. One of the things that I admire and respect is the measurement that is captured in three letters, ROI, what's the return on the investment? People are in the private sector understand this really well, it's not about a cost. It's about an investment. Oh okay, it's not about a cost,

you see, it's about it's about an investment. What this is nonsense? Right? I mean Kamala Harris here first of all that she look, she understands that the left wing environmentalist base it's a cult. It is. These people are nuts, but they have a lot of money, and they have a lot of a lot of sway in media and online in social media, and so you have to you have to play this game now of climate change is

an existential threat. If you want to get through the left wing lunatic primary, you have to play this game. I'm not saying that you have to from the perspective of being a saying an honorable person, but I mean, if you want to win the Democrat primary, you've got to be a climate change alarmist. So I understand that the cynical reasons for her taking this position, I get that right, I'm up on that. But even the rest of the stuff that she says, here the costs, what

are the costs? Oh, she doesn't want to focus on the costs. Why is that? Why doesn't she want to focus on the costs? Well, because there's a report out today, I think it says I read it or but I think it said that there is the expectation is that

the Green New Deal, if implemented throughout. So if you went all in on the Green New Deal, if you really did the Green New Deal the way you say you're the Libs say they want to, the cost overall would be ninety trillion dollars over the course of the implementation of it, which obviously would be a number of years. But the bottom line is that it would be a vast drain on the economy. So how do they get

around that? How do they get around the fact that the Green New Deal is going to mean that you're I'm sorry, ninety three trillion dollars according to the American Action Forum, and it could cost every American household sixty five thousand dollars a year. Do you think that the Green New Deal is worth sixty five Would you want to write a check every year for sixty five thousand dollars to fight CO two in the atmosphere? CO two which is point zero two I think, or point zero

five percent of the atmosphere. Okay, it's not even one percent of the atmosphere. We're talking about a small percentage change in less than one percent of the overall atmosphere. And people like Kamala Harris are coming out to say that this is an existential threat to US ninety three trillion dollars over a decade. That's what the estimate is. Do you want to pay three four ten times as much for electricity you will under a Green New Deal?

Do you want to pay a lot more for all the consumer products in your life because they have to be transported to you that requires energy. They have to be manufactured that requires energy. They have to the facilities that they're made and have to be built, that requires energy. Where's it all going to come from? Solar wind? This

is idiocy. I keep wanting to say that it's unserious intellectually, but it's deadly serious from a policy perspective, because this stuff is going to mean that a lot of us suffer more, are poorer, and there's less progress throughout the economy. I mean, this really is a massive drag on overall productivity. And so how do they try to reframe it? What do they try to try to say about this so that it does not seem as horrifically stupid and also costly? Right,

what is this going to cost? CNN's as in Kampbell Harris, and she just just skips right past that and says, Oh, it's about return on investment. Investment. You see, who thinks that the government is going to be a good investor, a good fiduciary if you will, of your money? That the government should be in the business of financial speculation on your behalf, because that's what they're telling you. Oh, give us money, so that meet meeting the government, and

not just give us. We're going to take it by force, because that's what taxation is. It is seizing your money under the threat of force. That is taxation. Do not forget it. The government is saying we're going to take your money, but we're going to do such great stuff with it that even though the technologies don't exist right now.

To make this feasible, We're going to make it work that even though right now this would be immensely wasteful, immensely destructive to economic productivity, just give us the money, will invest it for you. You'll get more back. Just wait and see, my friends, we're going to hit the debt ceiling. I think this weekend twenty two trillion dollars, we're going to officially be at twenty two trillion dollars in debt. You think that this government's going to manage

this Green New Deal effectively going to spend your dollars? Well, does anyone really believe that? I would like to talk to that person and try to walk them through the facts of life quite a bit, you know, the reality of the world around us. California was expecting to spend. Now, the projections were for seventy seven billion on one train line from San Francisco to Los Angeles. Seventy seven billion dollars they barely got. They didn't even get to first base,

they barely even got up to bat. And now they want to keep three billion dollars. They can build a leg of this thing from Baker's Field to Sacramento or something, or Baker's Field to somewhere I don't even know, somewhere else in California. You think, you think that the federal government is going to be a lean, mean, analytic machine when it comes to how to spend money for a green new deal. This is insane. Look, it's the Great Green Leap Forward. It really is the Great Green Leap Forward.

Mile's Great leap Forward resulted in the starvation of sixty million people. Now, because we're already a very wealthy country, we're not going to starve because of this, but this will set our economy back decades if they manage to

do this. That's what's at stake here. This will mean that, you know, the wealth that we all enjoy as Americans, We have been getting wealthier as a society, although that wealth is not evenly distributed in the last twenty years in terms of the increase in that wealth, we are getting wealthier as a country all the time, and they will put a halt to that. They will set us

back decades. By the way, Also speaking of Kamala Harris here, she made it very clear that her plan is to go a to go after Trump, and that's what that's what she's planning to do when she runs against him. And I think that you're going to see Democrats who are willing to say that if they be Trump, unlike the Republicans that could have gone like Trump, that could have gone after Hillary and charged her and brought real criminal charges against her that are not fabricated or not

trumped up. I think they're gonna they're gonna make the case to the left wing base. They're gonna go after Trump play twenty six. I guess the last piece is this, we're gonna need somebody who knows how to prosecute the case against this president. Now, that may be a rhetorical flourish because she was a prosecutor one it was very fond of putting people in prison for nonviolent offenses, by the way, prosecutor who really liked to flex her muscles

and hurt people that weren't bad people. But I think she's also engaging in a little bit of a dog whistle situation here about prosecuting Trump and those around him. And this is going to slowly enter the discussion of twenty twenty, and it will eventually become normalized in that discussion where it's not just we're going to do feat Trump because the Democrats should be in power, but we

wanted defeat Trump. The Democrats wanted defeat Trump so that they can bring criminal charges against him and his family when Trump is out of office and no longer has their protections of office and the power of pardon. I think you'll see that openly talked about by Democrats going forward, which is the sort of thing that you expect in

a third world hellhole. Democrats are going to say that about this president and people who say, oh what about Hillary Buck Hillary flagrantly and openly violated the law to engage in a corrupt scheme. They're going after Trump just to go after Trump. We got more coming up. We have one of the most generous policies and I wish

every employer had this. We have twelve weeks of paid family leave, and there was something that was in there from the past that we changed and we never actually enforced it about how you had to work after you came back for a certain period of time. We'd never enforced. It's been changed, and I think the overriding story here is we have twelve weeks paid family leave, and I think every employer should have that every employer on twelve

weeks paid family leave. That's that's Amy klobaschar or snow woman, as Trump calls her now because of her initial leap into the presidential field, where she was as a snowy minnesote a day. Twelve weeks paid family leave. Well, what happens if you were at a small business that has let's say, has four or five employees, can you afford to give one of them twelve weeks of paid leaf? No, I don't think so. There's a lot of stuff that, by the way, the notion that I would For example,

I mean here, I am sitting here. I've never had twelve weeks off for anything. I've never expect to get twelve weeks off for anything. I take a week off from work, and it's and it's like a shock to everybody around me. I mean, the notion that you would have. I don't think I've had a full week without working in I don't know how many years now, at least two or three a full week without filling in for rush Lomball, without without doing any work at all. It

might even be like five or six years. I mean, it's been a long time. A long, long time, twelve weeks off and what are we like kids in this is summer break. I'm sorry, this is this is fantasy land stuff, but I really just wanted to so the paid family leave thing end up. Look the administrations pushing this, you know, we're we're starting to get we're getting so close to a European style welfare state. Some might argue, we're really We're really already there in a lot of ways.

We've just got a few more things that the Libs can can change and all of a sudden will effectively be a European welfare state. But this is my favorite

of the stories from over the weekend about any presidential candidate. Klobashar, who, as you know, has been out there with There are these reports that she's an incredibly mean person, that she prevents this is from her former staffers, and that she prevents people from even being able to get other jobs when they want to leave, and you know, all that, right, all that stuff, and I believe it all, and I've

heard from people that know that she's terrible. I'm also from people to know that that Kristin Jilibrand is terrible. For those of you that care about that too, not a nice person. Huge huge phony, huge phony, which is I'm sure not not a big shock to any of you. But Cloba shar now is. She's trying to push back on this. And look, Cloba Schar her name might as well be I'm not going to be president, because we

all know she's not gonna be president. So this is just a razor national profile and in a sense, people like me even talking about it is kind of giving her what she wants there. But man, there was a story over the weekend that I just, I just you had to love this. So she told staffers this is

in the klobaschar abusing staff category. She told staffers to get her a salad, and she got a salad, and the staffer this was when she was traveling for some kind of I don't know, I don't campaign stop or whatever it was, but I think it was probably on the campaign. Get her a salad. They bring her a salad, They didn't bring her a plastic knife and fork. So she decided, I'm not making this up, all right, don't think that this is me just trying to be funny.

She decided to start eating her salad with a comb, a used comb that she had on her and then oh no, it gets better, It gets better. Then she decided to tell her staffer that got her the salad without the fork, that it was up to that staffer that's that's paid as part of her senate staff to go wash out the comb that she had eaten the salad with. Oh, the whole thing is so gross. I mean, what's next? Is she gonna ask somebody when she has a little ice cream cup but no spoon for a

used Q tip. Oh, I know it's gross. I know it's gross. I'm grossing you out right now, deal with it, Deal with it. Take the pain. Uh you know it's yea, who's gonna catch that movie reference? That's a that's a sly one. Um. But you know this, this just tells you everything you need to know about this woman that sho would I mean the fact that you would even eat I mean, what kind of savage eats a salad with a comb? Why not just eat it with your hand at that point, right, why not just eat it

with your fingers then wash your fingers. I mean I'd rather go I'd rather go that way, you know, eat it like you're at Ethiopian style restaurant. You have the injudra, the bread, and you you soak up all the stuff with the injurra and you eat it. And the opening food it's good. Eat the opening Food's good, little little funky sometimes, but it's good. Uh. You know, the same people that would use a comb to eat a salad would probably ask for a paper straw, because we all

know paper straws. Come on, folks, we are not savages. We don't eat paper straws. We want plastic straws. Plastic is a great invention. I want a plastic straw. Do not want a paper straw. This is ridiculous. But Klobaschar is gonna have a tough time living this stuff down.

And if SNL were really a comedy sketch show and not the the you know, video propaganda arm of the DNC, which is really what it is and not a very effective one either, they would they would have had a sketch this weekend of just Amy Klobaschar just shoveling salad in your chunky blue cheese dressing and you know, bits of breaded chicken and just just just bb chewing with her mouth open with a big comb and then flicking

that comme at or Stafford. It's like, wast this man sl If they could, if they should just bring me on and let me do one or two conservative sketches a week, man, we would turn that whole franchise around, because it'll be But I wouldn't just be conservative. I would just be making fun of what people should make fun of. What is actually funny. That's out there. A senator who wants me president, who eats her salad with the comb. This is funny. It kind of reminds me

of Uh. I think it was Trump who said, I always laughing about this because it's so silly. But it's so true that that John Kasik, who is one of the most unlikable and surly politicians, you will you will come across that John Kasik eight eight pizza like an animal or something like that. I always thought that was so funny that he did something really not that you know, he doesn't need it. Some people knife and fork their pizza. I'm okay with that. I actually I got no beef

with that. But that Kasik was a somehow eight pizza like an animal. I don't remember how he described it, but it was just, oh that it was funny, But yeah, klomaschar the next president eats her salad with it with a comb that has been used. Gross. We'll be right back. Background checks are a necessary part of running your business safely and effectively. You need Global Verification Network to do them.

I know a lot of you might already have people for your HR department that you work through the do background checks. Call Global Verification, tell them about your needs, the size of your company, that business you're in, and hear them out about the kind of program that they could tailor to your needs. Because Global Verification Network is the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and vetting company out there, and they differentiate themselves from their competitors

by doing all of their work here. A lot of those big background check organizations they send this stuff to be done overseas. They just run some database checks. They don't even control where their servers are for this stuff. They don't have control of the data, they don't have control of where the work is done. Global Verification does it all here in the US of A. By friends. Call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. That's eight seven seven six nine five eleven seventy nine

or go to MYGVN dot com. The hard left is perfectly willing to demand the presumption of innocence, as they should for Smolek, but they weren't prepared to give a presumption of innocence of the non existent Maga hat wearing assailants. They immediately assumed the story was true, immediately convicted these

people in the court of public opinion. And so what we see is the presumption of innocence, like so many other aspects of our life, is selectively employed by the left against the right, sometimes by the right against the left. We have to have a presumption of innocence on both sides. When somebody deliberately frames somebody and deliberately makes up a false report of anything, that person must go to jail.

Couldn't agree more of the Dirsh on that one. And you know, the Dirsh has been himself subject to public allegations that he went he went thermonuclear in his opposition to I mean, he has he wanted to take legal action. I mean, he got very very angry about that. And I will tell you there are a few things that will make there are a few things that will make an innocent man more angry than someone trying to take away that man's reputation, dignity, honor with a false allegation.

Which is why, for example, Bill Clinton's unwillingness to publicly state his innocence about Jennifer Flowers and other cases not of sexual harassment of sexual assault always stuck out to me as this guy is, this guy is scump because any man that I know of any honored integrity, who was accused of of a sexual assault or any kind of egregious sexual misconduct like that that he did not commit, would I don't care what the pr agents that everybody

else tells you, You're going to come out against that with everything you've got because it goes to your very core of who you are as a man and who you are as a person, and you cannot let that kind of allegation sit out there. But the point about selective presumption of innocence, this is this is something that we have to really fight against. We saw this with the Kavanaugh hearings. Now we've seen with the Covington kids

and Smolette. You know, when do they say I'll wait for evidence and when do they go all in on the narrative? And this is where bias really shows itself.

This is when you see how the left plays dirty and why it is that we have to always be willing to fight back against these falsehoods, because if we just allow them to continue with what they do without any pushback, they'll convince enough people that certain individuals should be destroyed, that certain ideology should be anathema, and over the long haul, they'll manage to achieve greater power and they will be rewarded for these practices. That's what all

this is about at the end of the day. It is about the Left trying to achieve power. That's why the double standard exists. If they were really concerned first and foremost with the mistreatment of women, with the with hate crimes, with these different areas we've seen this this conversation come up, there wouldn't be a double standard. There

would just be a standard. But if the left wanted to eliminate racism and hold a very high standard of even previous conduct, that you could then be held accountable for decades later. They would have had a couple of resignations in Virginia, wouldn't they. They would have had the governor and the state attorney general for Virginia, Mark Harring, and it's the attorney general, and then Ralph Northam as the governor resigned. They would have had them resign, but

they're not. Neither one of them is going to resign. Even though they've admitted to black face, they lied about black face, they've sort of come clean about it, but haven't really come clean about their pasts with this. That's because they, like the left, likes to set these standards as trapped for conservatives said, these very very very high standards that the moment a conservative even just gets close to, they want to just tear them down and destroy them.

But they want to keep the option open for really important leftists, we'll get a pass like Bill Clinton. Talk about a leftist who got a pass on sexual assault. For a very long time. You know, it was only after Hillary lost, after his wife lost the presidential election for the second time, that liberals were willing to say, Okay, maybe maybe we don't have to sit around or just make excuses for Bill just chasing skirt and grabbing ladies

and be a disgusting pig. You know, maybe then they were okay, they decided that it was time for them to, you know, let Bill go off and ride off into the sunset as the sketchy, shady individual that he is. But before them, they're willing to back him up at at at every juncture, and with Smallette, we see them trying to do everything that they can now to slow walk. They know that that Smallets, they know that he's a liar.

They know that he falsified this, but false reports. A lot of false reports in the past have gone unpunished to police. I bring up to you that the liar at the heart of the Duke lacrosse fiasco, which is another of the worst racial hoaxes ever perpetrated in this country, because because right at the heart of that whole issue was that privileged white lacrosse players raped a black woman, gang raped a black woman. That was the narrative, and

it was going to ruin all of their lives. The coach, for heaven's sake, who wasn't even there, it had nothing to do with this, was fired. And there's a very inspiring story about how that coach from the Duke Lacrosse case ended up going to I believe it was Bryant University in Rhode Island and turned their Division two team into a national lacrosse powerhouse and refuses to leave that school because they gave him safe harbor when he needed

it and deserved it, and nobody else would. Guy did nothing. The guy was punished for an event he had no control over that did not happen. Yeah, Duke University another place, Just all these universities sham run by shameful cowards, shameful cowards of these elite schools all over the place. But the accuser in that case, and I'm sure that sure the dursh would feel the same way about this. Crystal Mangum was her name. She filed false reports against all

these boys, totally lied about it. They knew she lied about it. They never charged her. And you know, later on, you know what happened. She committed manslaughter. She murdered somebody, and then they finally sent it a prison. You know, maybe maybe somebody would be alive today and maybe Crystal Gale Magnet wouldn't be spending the next decade or so in prison or I don't even know how long she got for it. If had applied the law as it is, you know, this is there's not just a double standard

in the presumption of innocence. We are seeing a massive double standard in the application of the law to the left and the right in all aspects of law when it comes to whether or not you're held responsible for lying under oath, as we see from various people caught up in the Muller pro versus people a dj FBI who were lying Hillary her top aid, so oh, no,

no effort to get them to lie under oath. These double standards are toxic to the public's ability to believe that there is a real justice that we are trying to achieve here. So they can try to make all these excuses for a small at he should absolutely face charges for a false report, and if he takes this thing to court, they should punish him to the maximum of the statute, because this is as bad of a

false report I think, because you're gonna find anywhere. This is a fall support that had real ramifications, that took up real police resources. And I'm sick of the liberal media creating these perceptions, these public narratives that, oh, you know, Jose Smallety is a drug problem always. You know, they don't do this for conservatives. No mercy for the right, nothing but mercy for the left. This has to stop. Everyone has to live under the same law in this country.

Oh that includes a legal immigrants by the way, everybody has to start living under the same law. No more separation for people based upon their political affiliation. And I think the dursh recognizes this has to stop and it's a real threat. And there are many others as well who agree with me here that the biggest threat to our legal cohesion in this country is the politicization of prosecutors and judges. The left owns far too many of them.

It needs to stop. Yes, the most well known organization for is the AARP. And I'm sure you probably know somebody who's a member of it, right, But I'm here to tell you AARPS actually left wing organization. Okay, AARPS all about Obamacare. They're not into securing the border, They're into higher taxes in the middle class. So why not get all the benefits of a seniors organization while also supporting what you believe in and the policies that you

think matter for this country. That's why I recommend AMAC. AMAC has over one point five million members, and that number is growing all the time. AMAC offers the same kind of money saving benefits at AARP offers but without the liberal agenda items. So this is the conservative alternative to AARP. Join AMAC, stand with them as they fight the good fight by becoming a member today. The benefits are great, but the cause is even greater. Join right

now at AMAC dot us slash buck. That's AMAC dot us slash buck because AMAC is better, better for you, better for America. So why would we be surprised that a self proclaimed nationalist would not speak out against a self proclaimed white nationalists. Why why are we acting like this is a space that Donald Trump is going to go in on behalf of the American ideal. No, he's not. And these are his people, all right. And he's not going to thank law enforcement because he's probably not happy

about what law enforcement did. Where we are. That's where we are. I mean, I call the space where we are where we are. I mean, I'm just not going to try to dress it up and be all, you know, pie in the sky and hopeful that already in the next incident, Donald Trump will actually get it right, that he will have matured in his presidency enough to act act like a president. That's a brave thing to say.

Former Republican Nicole Wallace now MSNBC shill for whatever the powers that be over there wanted to say, and the fact that this woman was associated with the Bush administration. Now she goes on TV and call what Michael Steele, their former RNC chair, says brave. I mean, Steel should be ashamed of himself. That is the most insidious, disgusting, unfair, and monumentally stupid thing that I have heard a pundit go on TV to say since at least the last

time that Steve Schmidt was on MSNBC. And it is a really dumb thing to say that the President United States is unhappy. This is what he said there, folks, and on a panelful of people who were like, yeah, yeah, that sounds right. The former RNC chair, Michael Steele, who's got a he's got a show on serious you know, I gotta tell you, I mean, I have no interest in ever, you know, being on his show. But if we ever had a conversation, this little moment here would

have to come up. I'd have to clear up right away whether he really believes that President Trump supports a white nationalist who was planning to kill large numbers of people and bring about a race war, because any person who believes that is a moron that I will not have a conversation with about politics or about this president

because they don't deserve that respect. So if Michael Steele wants and maybe he's already apologized, I don't know, though I haven't seen that anywhere, if he would want to repudiate that, then then then we could have a conversation.

Sometimes people get heated. Sometimes people are you know, not moving as fast in their careers or aren't as as powerful as they'd like to be, and so they just try something like this get attention to to placate they're the people that are paying them over at their channel or whatever, you know, whatever they've got to do. They're willing to abandon their own principles and their own conscience to try to get ahead. If that's the case, I mean,

at least I know where he's coming from. If if if the former chair of the RNC though really believes the President United States that his people includes this guy who is just arrested in Maryland, the Coastguard guy who was planning to bring about a race war with a mass assassination list and with stockpiling weapons. Then Michael Steele is is really stupid, for one, and also is somebody that I don't I don't think should should be engaged in political conversation by anybody of good faith in the

right period. You know, I'm not saying that, you know, he should be anathema from society. Every mean, he's a human being too. He might even be a really nice guy. I don't know him, but I won't talk to somebody about politics. Who's going to say that about the President United States without evidence, as the left likes to say, and for Nicole wall say, that's a brave thing to say, it's it's the dumbest thing that I have heard on It honestly is probably the dumbest thing I've heard on

MSNBC in about a year. And MSNBC is full of people who say very very stupid things on a very regular basis. So that's that's a pretty a pretty high bar that they have to get over to be the single stupidest thing you've heard on unearlier in a long time. But you know, this is also where you see you see a couple of things come out. One is the dishonesty of many folks in the media who you know, they put at MSNBC the fact that they find these

former Republicans or these kind of establishment Republican types. It's one thing to disagree with Trump on SA Look, I disagree with Trump on some things. I think Trump has failed to get it down on the wall, and I'm very unhappy about where he is in the wall. I think that Trump has lacked focus on some issues. I think that Trump has been distracted by the power of his tweets sometimes from actually getting results based on the

promises he made. Now he's still got a lot of time, and I'm still supporting him every step of the way in the agenda. But I have criticisms of Trump. It would be bizarre if I didn't have criticisms of Trump. I have criticism of every politician, of every person who's in power in this country, and that's the way that it should be. But what you have here are these Republicans or in some cases former Republicans in Max Boo, Michael Steele, that that guy Doubt at ABC, who's another

one of the dumbest people on television. He's the chief political analyst at ABC. He's an independent now after running you know, Republican campaigns for governor and elsewhere. Now he's an independent, so he can, you know, be invited to the the proverbial lib Upper West Side cocktail parties now in New York and says the dumbest stuff and is as one of the worst, one of the worst minds in terms of lack of knowledge, but really grandiose sense of self that you'll come across on Twitter as well.

You know, these are the people that get these perches because it's they're they're considered to have some kind of voice from the center or or from the right, when they're just doing the bidding of leftists. They are doing the bidding of leftists. You know, Nicole Wallace is up there like a dancing bear, doing what democrats want her to do, and it's just pathetic and shameful. I know

what this is. Like I was at CNN and they wanted me to dance a certain way and I wouldn't do it, and I left, and thank god I was willing. By the way, I didn't have I had no money in the bank at the time I had. I didn't have any TV prospects right away to go to. You know, I was still at the Blaze, but you know, I left CNN because it was a dumpster fire. I said, no, thank you, I don't want your money. I don't want to be on your air anymore. That's the truth. They

didn't cut me, I cut them. So I know what it's like to be in this position. And you know, Nicole Wallace, I guess that paycheck is just too sweet. So she'll abandon everything that she supposedly used to stand for as an adult in public life. Michael Steel same thing, everything that he used to stand for in public life. He will work for the other team now. And this

is what really gets to the core of that. And this is these these idiots at the bullwork too, you know, these slimeballs, Charlie Sykes and all the rest of them over there. You know, they've they've now said openly their mission is to try to trash the the pro Trump conservatives that they think need to be brought down a few levels. They think that that's their mission that's really

going to serve their purposes. You know, we are seeing a fight now between capitalism and socialism, between the constitution and stadism, between life and infanticide. I mean, these are these are the breakdowns on political issues happening day in and day out in this country. They're going to culminate in a huge election in twenty twenty, and you have so called Republicans who they think that their role is

to fight for the other side. Now I'm supposed to take those people seriously, or believe in their good faith, think that they are wise, think that they have something to add to this conversation. I'm sorry. It is just unacceptable. What Michael Steele said was grotesque and he should be ashamed. And what you see is the egos of many of

these never Trump people. They thought that they were going to make some huge bet on Trump flaming out and that they would keep their privileged positions within the GOP hierarchy on TV, at conferences, at think tanks, you know, all the rest of it. And they went all in against Trump and since then it has just been about their own personal vendetta against the Trump movement because they're bitter.

This never Trump movement has turned bitter because they're not relevant, because they aren't powerful anymore, because they aren't as rich as they used to be and or as well off, you know, depending on who we're talking about. And most of all, they've been willing now to become traitors to what they claimed they stood for for in some cases decades, all out of spite against Trump. These people are shamed full and I'm here to call them out. But we

haven't seen the actual connection. We haven't seen an actual proof of cooperation and collusion. So what am I missing here? The Russians offered help, the campaign accepted help, The Russians gave help, and the President made full use of that help. And that is pretty damning, whether it is proof beyond a reasonable doubt of conspiracy or not. Can you agree that there has been no evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy that has been presented thus far between the Trump

campaign and Russia. No, I don't agree with that at all. I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. Last March, you said you had more than circumstantial evidence of treasonous collusion with Russia. What specifically were you referring to, And please be specific, because if it's true, I do believe Americans have the right to know a year later what that is. If you look at the facts that are already in the public domain,

they're pretty damning. Starting with what we know about George Papadoppol. All you have right now is a circumstantial case. Actually, no, Chuck, I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence. Now, so again, I think you have seen direct evidence of collusion. I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and is very much worthy

of investigations. Adam Ship is a slimeball. If you didn't already know that, that montage we just played for you, I think makes quite clear what his game is. He's the Democrat who's made a name for among others, made a name for himself by trying to invert reality on its head. What does he do? He goes around saying that there is collusion. It has there. There's proof of collusion. I just can't tell you what it is. Well, now

we're ending, so we hope the Muller probe. We are seeing the end of the Muller probe, and people are asking some questions like, hold on a second shift. You're a member of Congress, you're on the Intelligence Intelligence Committee, you've been saying that there's all this, all this evidence of collusion that's out there, it's already been, you know, or rather it's it is something that people are going to find more about. Where is it? What is it? What?

What can you tell us? What's there? And then shift just runs into the same dishonest, you know, talking points that are meant to evade the core point, which is that there is no collusion. It did not exist, it did not happen. They cannot prove it. So now now that he can't get away with the old game, which is, oh, can't tell you about that. You know, you're you're not. The public can't know about the collusion that I know about because I am a member of Congress and I

have so much information. Now that that's he's running out of room on that one. He is saying, oh, we already proved collusion. We already proved it. It's our out there in the public. And you, I'm sure, because this audience is brilliant, insightful, honest and kind, you are sitting there probably at home thinking what is that moron? Thinking what is he talking about? Of course, when when you know, when Adam Schiff says there's collusion and it's already out

there and proven, So why do we need them Mueller probe. Oh, it's not proven. There's just evidence of it. There's lots of evidence of it, that's what he says. But because we can't prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. And notice how he keeps moving the goalposts. No, no, no, there is actually not the reasonable doubtstandard would be in a prosecution. Could it be proven beyond a reasonable doubt? That's a

question for a jury. When the prosecutor is making a decision to press charges or not, you know, that's up to their discretion. You can, can any aspect of this be proven beyond a reasonable out the product the prosecutor gets to make that callum, and the prosecutor can provide evidence beforehand to try and pressure the person into taking a deal even if they think they think that they can't prove it. But what is the evidence, what is

the evidence? Where is it? What is it? They keep saying, Oh, there's so much in Russia and Russian help, and they're just they are like that guy from a beautiful mind writing in in gibberish on the walls of his of his garage or whatever, I mean, they're just it's just nonsense. Now. But what they're gonna do, as I have been telling you, is they're going to create this smoke screen of incoherence, and then they're gonna sort of know, whip it all up and change it around. And look at this. Now

we're looking at the Southern District of New York. All of a sudden, we're gonna move right past the two years of Oh, there's gonna be Russian collusion. Oh, we're gonna figure all this stuff out. Just wait, we're gonna have it for you. We're gonna blow right past that and get into Oh, okay, the Southern District of New York is going to investigate Trump's finances. Now, that's right,

that's the plan. They're going to investigate Trump's finances. They're going to look for some deal and they'll be leagues to different newspapers about how he you know, this vendor says that he got ripped off from a Trump deal from nineteen eighty seven. And there's gonna be all this stuff. This is because they can't actually win a public policy debate against this president. They're worried their candidates are jokers. I mean, the Democrats that they're putting forward. These aren't

serious people. They're a serious threat to the country because of their stupidity, but they're not They're not people that are well versed in the in the issues and also have good, good ideas and good judgment. You know. They some of them present well and some of them seem earnest in their advocacy for socialism, but they're not seriously going to be able to beat this president as is.

That's why they need this other component. They need to bring charges of some kind against the president, or at least the appearance of willingness to bring charges via all

these investigations that they're going to continue going with. Meanwhile, on the other side of the coin, I want accountability for the deep state rats nest at, DJ and FBI that has been unearthed here that we have seen stretching back for many months, and that the more we learn about, the more obvious it is that they exceeded their they exceeded their authority, they abused their power. They were partisan actors. They were on a mission to get Trump at all costs.

You know. I want to know when we get to find out about whether they're held accountable and you know Trey Gaudy, who's out there now, mister speaker, he's on Fox News now. Trade Gaudy's out there. He's talking about things here and there. I think my trade people don't. Let I think my Trey Gaudy sounds like Trey Gaudy, and people just don't, you know, they don't. I don't know, you guys, let me know. I mean, the Beato is obviously great, and the Birdie is great. I think my

Trade Gaudy doesn't get enough love. You know. Granny McCabe during this and during thathing, he's here and there and everywhere. And here's what he said about the investigations place sixteen.

And the reason I say three investigations. You had the July twenties sixteen investigation that was initiated and signed off on by Peter Struck, that was into the Trump campaign, and then when Comy is fired, Andy McCabe proudly told CBS that he launched his own counterintelligence investigation into whether or not Donald Trump was an agent of Russia. And then for good measure, he launched a criminal investigation into

obstruction of justice. So I'm not great with math, but that's three separate investigations into a duly elected president, near as I can tell, simply because he fired Jim Comey does seem like a lot of legal jeopardy with the firing of Jim Comey at the center of it, right, that does seem to me to be perhaps a bit a bit excessive, especially given that you are dealing with a president of the United States. You know, the bar

for investigating the president. For the FBI and the Department of Justice, who are inferior employees of the president, they work for the president, for the executive branch, you would like to think that that bar is pretty high. What we saw, though, is if you were a Hillary partisan, if you are a status working in the upper reaches of the federal bureaucracy, then you were willing to bend

the rules to go after Trump. However you could then all of a sudden, the barriers to investigation came down and it was justify this however you can wherever you can. And I really do think that there needs to be a much more serious accounting for what happened FBI DJ than what we've seen. I mean, I think we should have I think we should appoint a special counsel to look into the special counsel. How about that one? How about them apples. This is in America where hate groups,

hate crimes are on the rise. The reality is there has been a rise in hate crimes. There has been a rise in intolerance. We know that hate crimes are on the rise. A lot of people don't want to accept that. They want this to be trumped up. They keep saying this, They keep saying this, but it's not true. They keep telling us that hate crimes are on the rise and that if we don't do something drastic, we're

going to be overcome by hate crimes. It's it's one of the most repeated lies you'll hear in the media now, especially now that the Just Smollett situation has just completely imploded, right, I mean, that guy's facing charges and everything else. Here's a piece from Elizabeth Nolan Brown that on reason, you

know reason they're they're libertarians. Libertarians are smart. Sometimes they can be a little annoying with their whole like, you know, legalize marijuana and who's going to pay for the roads and all that stuff, But you know, I like libertarians in general, and they're libertarians a reason to a good job.

They're smart, folks, and Elizabeth Nolan Brown writes, the following presidential candidates, TeV Punnets and others keep trying to contextualize actor Jesse Smallt's false report by saying that even if this one wasn't true, hate crimes are on the rise in America. Just look at the most recent FBI statistics.

They say. Similarly, human trafficking tall tales like this week's uber sex trafficker that wasn't Tendrabol comments about how this case, even if it wasn't true, in particular, such crimes are growing problem. Why just look at the data? The problem, Elizabeth writes, with both of these claims is sim our data sets keep expanding. We have higher numbers of incidents, but we also have more and more police agencies participating

in the voluntary reporting system. In twenty seventeen, there were about one thousand and fifty more bias based incident reports than the previous year seventeen percent rise. There were also around seven or sorry, around one thousand additional agencies reporting. This means it's not obviously the case that hate crimes are more prevalent in twenty seventeen. The government just probably

did a better job of counting them. In twenty sixteen, there were two hundred and seventy one more incidents team hate crimes than in twenty fifteen, with two hundred and fifty seven more law enforcement agencies reporting. As pointed out when the data came out, the number of hate crime classifications was higher in twenty sixteen than any of the four preceding years, but lower than in twenty eleven and down significantly from two thousand and sixty two thousand and eight.

There were also a fewer victims in twenty sixteen, seven six hundred and fifteen down nine thousand, six hundred and fifty two. We saw no significant rise in hate crimes from twenty two thousand and four and twenty fifteen either. A Bureau of Justice statistics study found that the rate of violent hate crimes in twenty fifteen was not significantly different from the rate in twenty two thousand and four, and this held true for violent hate crimes both reported

and unreported to police. So look, it's it's just not the case that there's some huge spike in hate crimes. It's just not that the numbers don't support it. I mean, when you're talking about a seventeen percent rise in overall incidents in one year, but a thousand additional agencies reporting on them. The likelihood is that you're just getting higher incidences of reporting, and you're also expanding the categories of

what is considered a hate crime. As I told you, based on the FBI statistics, a lot of what are so called hate crimes are just comments. Someone reports that someone said something race or anti Muslim or whatever. I'm not even sure that you can really call out a crime, folks. I hate to be the one to break it to all the libs out there. Mean disgraceful, Yes, hate crime, I'm not sure it's a crime. First Amendment allows you to be a racist jerk, unfortunately, but it does well.

It's actually the reason that the First Amendment does that is very important to our society, even though people that choose to use the First Amendment that way or gross, but it does. The First Amendment protects people from saying things that are hurtful and racist. This is the way the First Amendment is set up. Libs kind of play games with us though, and say, well, no, it's a

hate crime. Is tantamount to violence when speech is used to dehumanize them when they have all this rhetoric that they use that's essentially just a way of trying to say that they can criminalize speech that they don't like. But it's just not the case that hate crimes are out of control and all this stuff. Let's get to the next next one here, which is when they're talking about the real problem is the Chicago Police depart This is this stuff is a disgrace from the media trying

to run cover for Smalletts. Here's what they'll do play club five. I think we need to see some of the evidence. I think it's very concerning that all of these leaks came from the Chicago Police Department. So frankly, all we have as leaks from the Chicago Police Department. Now what they said in this press conference and what Jesse small Letting his team have said. This police department did in twenty sixteen openly, through their union, support Donald Trump.

So to have a police department that hasn't been as cooperative as they have been this round, do not openly give information, do openly lie and mishold information in cases, and then to know that they are open have openly supported Donald Trump in the twenty sixteen election. A lot of activists on the ground are saying, wait, what's going on here? Who do we believe out of these two

suspect people. Can I just just just to clarify here, everybody, you have pundits going on TV now after these smallet ridiculos listeners. I mean, the guy is a joker, a total, a total dufus, a liar, did something really disgraceful, really dishonorable that actually really affected police resources and defamed a whole group of voters in this country that's half the country basically, And MSNBC and CNN are putting people on TV to say, well, the Chicago Police Department, maybe the

Chicago Police Department's lying. I wonder if these same idiots would say that about the arrest of R. Kelly, who was once again facing charges for underage sexual activity. I've read that there's a there's even a video that's supposed to be presented it as part of the charges, showing him having sex with an underaged girl. I mean, R

Kelly is a true predator. And I'm guessing that they don't think the Chicago PD is I'm hoping they don't think Chicago PD's lying about that, but they'll insinuate the Chicago Police Department's lying about smalltt any anything to try to protect a little stupid Jussie who was, by the way, obviously very dumb. But then they also take one more shot here because yeah, maybe this wasn't true that Trump supporters attacked Jessie small Att, but it's still true in principle.

It's just not true in the facts. Trump supporters are still awful. The left says play six. If it is true, didn't he in fact attempt to paint the MAGA supporters as these racist and homophobic people. I think I have to is true that we but Michelle I have to respectfully disagree. I think MAGA supporters have painted themselves as that. I mean, when you look at footage, when you hear things they say, these are this is the honestly goodness truth, and we have to be bold enough to call it.

Wi Ah, Yes, that very very dumb person I don't even know who it is, but that dumb person on CNN wants you to know that what we really should take from the small At hoax is that even though it's a hoax, it's true in principle, because yes, they have to fabricate MAGA supporters acting this way, but that's because the left believes that's who MAGA supporters really are. That's what Republicans and conservatives really are. The left things.

This is not a fringe belief on the left, by the way, they really think this about you and me. Be sure to remember that going forward, you are now entering the Freedom Hontagital Operation Center. All sensitive programs MUSTY can't strictly need to know. Team Buck is cleared and ready for the Buck Brief. I don't believe we're going to get what we've wanted from the first summit on which is a inventory of their weapons, a timetable to

support the nuclearization, and a commitment for independent observers. I believe the administration has pulled back from that. I suspect what we may get is a commitment to end the war, the armistice, etc. All the countries become signatories to that, and that would be progress going forward. What KIMS alone is seeking two things, economic prosperity and security, and what we'resaken one thing, disarmed nuclear weapons, disarmed ballistic missiles, test

prey and cour has been upended by President Trump. We've put real economic pressure on the North Koreans. We've built out a global coalition. One of the critiques is that we go it alone. We've built out the world's coalition to communicate the chairman Kim that that was the time. Now is the moment, and I hope will make real progress on that this week. Quite a summit this week expected in Vietnam between President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong un. Kim is taking in armored train, maybe

barring from the California Bullet Train funds. Who knows the bullet train that will never be, but they want to keep their three billion dollars in California anyway. Kim is on his way to Vietnam via train from North Korea, two thousand, two thousand mile journey. I'm sure that there's lots of lovely scenery along the way. But he's going to arrive there and they're going to try and hash

out the next steps for a nuclear agreement. I will tell you that I think that Trump is right, but I don't think he's going to I don't think he's going to get what he wants. Let me explain a little bit. I think that President Trump knows that the alternative to some kind of diplomatic effort is eventually going to be military strikes against North Korea. I just think that that's that's where we're heading, and that's something that

we want to avoid. That's something that would be catastrophic for the North Korean state for sure, and for South Korea. I think it could be very, very damaging and deadly as well. And so Trump is doing what he can. He's essentially adhering to the principle that war should be an absolute last resort. That is always the right thing in my mind. I mean when that doesn't mean it's not a resort, it just means it's the last resort. So he's going through all the motions here and doing

everything that he can. And I think that he believes because he is well, because he's Donald Trump, but he certainly does not lack for confidence that he'll be able to get some kind of a deal here. I think the fact is that there is not going to be a deal with North Korea that truly denuclearizes the peninsula. Now I hope I am wrong, and I could very well be wrong, but that would be This is a Hail Mary Pass. We should understand it as such. There's nothing.

The downsides of this have been greatly exaggerated by Trump critics. So those who say that Trump has caved dictators or he's coddlage dictators, they don't know what the heck they're talking about. The sanctions against North Korea are as strong as they have ever been. In fact, you could argue they are more targeted, and therefore they are even stronger than what they have been in the past. But he's

trying here. He's trying to give North Korea an opening, and you can tell he also is trying to sell the North Korean leadership on the benefits of some kind of a softening. I mean, you see the economic miracle that South Korea has been, and what is possible for North Korea even if it adopted let's be honest, it's not going to go with a South Korea like model. If it adopted something that's closer what China has, an authoritarian capitalist economy, or or removed in that direction, it

would be so much more prosperous. It would be so on such a stronger footing, and if it was able to open its markets for raw materials the rest of the world and get raw materials. I mean, the economic openings for North Korea if it just stopped being this this nuclear blight on the international community and this this threat to its neighbors, particularly to South Korea and to Japan. The economic Trump's right, I mean, they could be a miracle.

And that's why I think Trump's sense that he needs to focus on something of the positive here, I understand where he's coming from. Playlip twenty nine. We talk about something that frankly he never to scope to anybody about, but we're speaking. It was speaking aloud, and I think we can have a very good, a very good submit. I think we'll have a very tremendous submit. We want the nuclearization, and I think they'll have a country that will set a lot of records for speed in terms

of an economy. If if he got to nuclearization, North Korea would would turn into I think assuming that they then, look, they're not going to turn into a Jeffersonian democracy or anything. We all know that, right, But even if they if they just moved toward a Chinese model with an authoritarian regime, you know, with with with a strong man at the top, but was not engaged in all this. We're gonna kill all of our enemies in a fier receipt of nuclear

waste and all this. You know, if they just did that, it would be an incredible, an incredible success story economically, I think in a short a very short period of time, you know, five or ten years, But I don't know if we'll get there. I would not it. Also in Iraq in terms of the I know I'm jumping around here, but Iraq's GDP now compared to what it was. I mean, Iraq is still a security problem and it's now in a largely an Iranian client state, but the Iraqi GDP

is up tremendously. It's up a thousand percent since before the invasion. So the economic output of the iraqis is way better than now than it was before. So just to give you and that was after fighting a major war. So you can imagine if we can avoid the war with North Korea and just think of all the all of the improvements in day to day life, it would not be true freedom. It would not be a regime that fully respects human rights. But you know, we got to work with we got to work with the reality

we're in down. I think Trump's trying to do that and just stop being this psychotic hermit kingdom of the most bellicos warlike rhetoric and posture all the time. I don't think it's gonna work, though I wish I could tell you otherwise. I think the North Koreans are just going to cling to their nukes and try to ride

this whole thing out. And they're going to hope that they get a Sanders administration or a Warrant administration, or some left wing loon who's running things who is going to be completely able to be hoodwinked by whatever they've got planned. You know, whatever the North Kreenis is gonna do. And the North Koreans have certainly lied to us plenty of times in the past. In fact, that's one of the big problems we have going forward with them. Or Ari Fleischer, who I've got to say he's become a

commentator lately that I appreciate his insights. I think he does it. I think he does a good job on a lot of subjects. But Ari Fleischer spoke about this because he had some experience with seeing an administration getting bamboozled. Here's what he said nineteen and the North Koreans lie. They've lied to three administrations in a row. The question is will they make of four? So I praise President Trump. I think the President is pushing and getting them actually

to move in a good direction. The lack of tests, the President points out, is a productive development around the world. But will they denuclearise or will they lie? North Korea does have nuclear bombs, but they can't deliver them. That's the issue. They can't deliver them far. They can't deliver them to the United States on intercontinental ballistic missiles. Yet they don't have the technology, they don't have the abilities,

and if they don't test, they'll never get it. Will they go beyond that and denuclearise, get rid of all their nukes? You know, that's a goal that we've always talked about. I just don't believe it will ever happen. I think North Korea will always hold on to them. You know, I hadn't actually heard the end of that clip from Fleischer until we just played it on air. Now, obviously I agree with him, I just don't think the

North Koreans are going to do it. That doesn't mean Trump shouldn't try that's just that's just my opinion, and that's just sorry. Fleischer's opinion doesn't mean Trump shouldn't try there. There's always that, there's always that chance for something of

a diplomatic miracle. Understand this. If Trump achieves true denuclearization of North Korea, not at this summit, but if it starts at the summit and then going forward, if he does that within the next six years, that's right, baby six of his presidency, it will be the most incredible diplomatic achievement I think since the Well, it'll be the most incredible geopolitical moments since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and it will be the biggest achievement I think in

many ways since the World War Two, since the World War two era, post World War Two era. Rather, so, we'll see. As to China, by the way, I'm hoping here's a little previous things to come. I'm hoping to get to China myself in Buck goes to China, like Nixon goes to China in May. So we'll see if that happens. I don't know how I'll be able to

do the show from over there. There's a part of me that would worry that if I tried to do the Buck Sex and Show from China, I would end up in like a cell somewhere, So I might have to take a couple of days off, guys. But it's not for a few months. But I'm hoping to get to China myself and to meet with business and policy leaders there and hear about what's really going on, because Trump is engaged in the pivot to Asia that the Obama administration and that the left for eight years under

Obama was always talking about but never really did. They didn't do anything visavi Asia, they didn't accomplish anything. They had such a focus on appeasing Iran that they never really made headway on Asia. And I think that they just were talking about Asia because they knew that that's where a lot of the geopolitical challenges of the future lie.

But they didn't have any expectation that they'd be able to do anything, Which brings me to just real quick here Trump is extending the extending the trade deal negotiations with China. President Shijin Ping and Trump are going to

be talking about this in a Maral lago. I think coming up there were supposed to be a ninety day deadline of March first, and on that deadline there were going to be new tariffs ranging on two hundred billion dollars of Chinese goods from ten percent to twenty five percent. But they're not going to do the new round of tariffs. They're gonna wait because Trump thinks they're making some progress.

I am, you know, whereas I am not particually hopeful for full denuclearisation with North Korea, although there might be a ratcheting down if there already has been a ratcheting down of tensions because the lack of missile tests, I'm really holding out hope for Trump on China. In fact, I'll just tell you this. I'm somebody who owns some Chinese stocks that have just gotten crushed, and I do not, I cannot, nor would I ever give anybody stock advice

here on the show. I'm just saying, though, I'm somebody that's a believer in Trump's ability to get an agreement with China that, if it is instituted, will actually be good for the Chinese and American economy. So I mean, I put my money where my mouth is on this. I'm an investor in Trump's ability to get China to the deal table and to get something done. So I'm holding out hope. Would I tell you to put your money, No,

I would not. The odds are probably against this, really if you're looking at it, and I think that there's a very good chance that it'll just turn into more delay, especially going into Trump's reelection. You remember, everything that he's trying to accomplish right now also has to go through the lens of how does this affect twenty twenty and what will that mean? And you know all of that,

right so, and foreign governments know this too. They know that if they can stall until twenty twenty, then it gets completely lost in the reelection mess. And you know that the president would love to get a deal done then, but he's going to be very distracted by other things, understandably, so so I just I would remember that as we go forward here. So big summit in Vietnam this week will have obviously analysis for you from that as it happens the next few days. And also this China deadline

has been put off. I am I am hopeful, but not expecting a lot out of the North Korea talks. I am cautiously optimistic about real progress on the China talks. But this is Trump's pivot to Asia, and it is bold. You can say that much about it. Let's see what kind of dealmaker he really is. Morning Coffee is an institution. That's where when it comes to starting mind day, I reach for the most American coffee on the market, Black Rifle Coffee. It is my coffee every single morning, gets

my day kicking, gets it going the right way. One. It's absolutely delicious, Okay, so that's super important with your coffee. Also, if you're like me and you're like a bit of a kick from that caffeine, Black Rifle gets it going for you. And also it's a company that is owned and operated by veterans that does a lot of give back to the veteran commedy and first responders. These are great eyes, their former spec Ops vets that started this thing. I subscribe to Black Rifle Coffee and I get coffee

from them every month, sent to my door. And while a liberal threaten a further tax your hard earned money with their socialist agenda, Black Rifle Coffee is fueling the fight for freedom by upping their offer to twenty percent off. Take advantage right now, go to Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck you'll get twenty percent off your order. That's black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck for twenty percent off.

So we've been trying to say from the time you're born, you know, you're wrapped in a pink blanket or you're wrapped in a blue blanket, and from there a whole set of expectations and esthetics and opportunities are put on you, and that can be really limiting. It doesn't let individuals sort of be whoever they actually are. It puts us in these very distinct, very arbitrary categories, and the gender Reveal Party moves that even more forward. So you don't even have to be born to be wrapped in the

binker the blue blanket. You're still of fetus and your parents are announcing to the world. You know that you're going to be either guns or glitter. You're going to be yeah, tractors or trs. That's one of these feminists who's actually a pretty well known leftist feminist railing against gender reveal parties, not because they are lame, which some of you could make that argument. I'm not going to make that argument right now because I've never had a baby.

Some of you who have had babies, you get to weigh in on this. You have an experiential component to this that I do not. Our gender reveal parties kind of lame, don't. It's a new thing that I hadn't even heard of until six months ago or so. But she doesn't have a problem with it because it's just we now have all these excuses for adults to have parties at all these different phases in their life for

no apparent reason. I mean, I went to a baby shower with Miss Molly that were the docks in tried to rip my face off the carpet shark remember that story. That baby shower lasted like five hours. It was the longest party. And it's watching an adult open presence for babies. No, no, this is not something you should make your adult human friends do. This is not normal. This is not cool, and nor should you allow your face to get ripped

off by a carpet shark. But the problem that this feminist has with it because feminist, as we know have they have no sense of humor. Um, you know what's what's the joke about the feminist who walks into a bar why are you so sexist? You know, it's like, oh, whoa, I guess it's not a joke. I guess there is no joke. So you know, feminists are are not are

not an amusing bunch at all. They find no humor in anything, and they're they're fighting against not just millennia, but really the the dawn of humans as a species up until now, where there is a difference in the way that people approach and think and deal with life based on their biology and their gender. And they can keep pretending that this is not the case. But you know, boys and girls, when left to their own devices, boys do play with certain things. Girls do play with certain

with other things. Right, Boys do tend toward certain uh, you know, physical and spatial activities. Girls are into more visual and creative. And you know this is this is the science supports this. It could not be any more clear. And you know, men and women are very different, you know, in a lot of ways. You know, I mean, all you have to do is spend some time around some you know, some teenage boys or some and some teenage girls.

I spent the weekend at a house where there were I think six or seven young kids running around, and the boys and the girls are all very different. And they're not different because of just societal norms or whatever.

They're different because they're different. I wish the Libs would would stop with this nonsense, but they really do view gender as yet another thing to destroy in their Marxist quest to in their in their cultural Marxist quest to create this radical equality of all peoples, that we are all these cogs and this bigger machine that they are building.

And remember the ultimate really the the the foundational relationships in society are among parents and children and among spouses, and you know, the the male female dynamic in particular is one that the left really seeks to not just to downplay, but increasingly, I think, to subvert and to destroy and act like there is no there is nothing about gender that is meaningful, and that's just crazy. The science does not support it, society history, this is a

bizarre concept they've latched onto. But it's the same reason why. Now you know, women will openly feminists I should say not women. Feminists will not that feminists aren't women, you know what I mean? The subset of women known as feminists will openly advocate for transgender women to be able to fight in MMA tournaments. Well, this is just crazy.

I mean, this is a man fighting a woman. I mean, the physical differences between men and women are very, very real, and the amount of test, the doscar and your body can change. But still the physical structure of people that are XX versus XY, the bone density, the bone structure is different, and you know, taking some pills doesn't change that. So liberals on this are not just nasty and undermining, but when it comes to the eradication of gender, they're

rapidly anti science. I did not watch a single minute of the Oscars on Sunday night, and not a minute. I didn't feel the need to tune in just to sort of take a peek and like, oh, what are you wearing, Like let's talk about the red carpet. I didn't feel the need to do it at all. I know a lot of you are like, yeah, buck Well, welcome to the party, pal, But there was just no

There was even no curiosity. Right, I'm not even somebody who would have said I would watch the Oscars in previous years, but now I'm I tune in for a second and see of some celebutante was going to make a fool of himself for herself, and it just was so clear to me that, based on the movies, there was no need for me to watch any of this. I mean, Bohemian Rhapsody got four awards, right, I heard Bohemian Rhapsody is actually a fun movie and it's a good watch, so I might watch that at home at

some point. But Roma, Black Panther, and Green Book won three Oscars each, and I sit here and I don't care about who wins this as in, oh, like, I'm so disappointed because, as I've told you before, the Shape of Water one a year ago for Best Picture, and it's a movie about a woman who has sex with an aquarium pet that can't speak or communicate with human beings.

That's really, really weird. You can call me old fashioned, but I think the human beings should only have sexual relationships with human beings, and I don't think that movies should celebrate sex with non human beings. So there's that. But I look at this more as just the cultural indications of it, all right, I mean the fact first all, I'm sorry, Black Panthers not a good movie. It's not a good movie. People. I know we're supposed to say

it's a good movie. I know that there's a lot of cultural pressure to say Black Panther's a good movie. It's not. It has crappy screenplay, crappy dialogue, bad storyline, cheesy looking action sequences. Not all of them, but a lot of them. It's just not a very good movie. And I wish we didn't have to pretend. But I didn't see Green Book. People told me it was okay. I don't think anybody saw Roma, but that apparently did well.

Here's why I'm bringing this up. Hollywood really is losing its power, and that's not something that we as conservatives should celebrate because the power is just going elsewhere, and it is not going into a more bipartisan ecosystem. It's actually shifting to Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, YouTube owned by Google. You know, you look at all of this, and you look at the trends of trajectory here, and the digital superpower, so to speak, are now in place of what the

old Hollywood studios were. It used to be that the Hollywood studios would buy up cable channels and buy up these other content distribution mechanisms because they were so big, because they had these movies that had you know, one hundred million dollar budget and make a billion dollars, and movie studios are losing their grip and they're also losing their cultural influence, but that influence is being replaced by Netflix,

by Hulu. I just got a buddy of mine to watch The Last Kingdom over the weekend, him Outred, son of Outred, and now he's hooked. He's like, my wife hasn't seen me in days. All they do is watched The Last Kingdom. Like I told you, dude, I told you it's a great show. And that's a show that I learned about from a member of the team. I would know, one of you told me about The Last Kingdom via Facebook and I went and I've watched now three seasons of it. But that's where the culture is going.

I mean the stories. You have to remember that, the stuff that we see on TV and movies and just just video content in general, those are the stories that we are seeing and that are points of commonality between all of us, right, I mean, I can sit down and talk to any any By the way, I actually have gray in my beard now, so I truly am at Graybeard millennial. But I can talk to any of my fellow graybeards and discuss movies from the late nineties early two thousands, and we all had kind of profound

memories of where we saw them. And you know, every guy know who saw Braveheart in the theater remembers thinking that it was an incredible movie, for example. But these are commonalities that have a real influence on our thinking and on and yes, on our politics. Breitbart very very correctly said that politics is downstream from culture. So Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, why do I care about this? These are all liberal enclay, So pay attention to this. The OSCARS shows us. The

OSCARS is dying. Hollywood studios are dying, or they're at least going to be a shadow of what they once were. They're all going to get bought up by Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, Google that's or Hulu's i know, owned by another one. But they're gonna get bought up by the digital supercompanies. And those super companies are lib institutions. We need to do something about that. Hey, team Buck, it's time for

roll call. Just a little plug here. I will be having a conversation with Mark Teason of the Washington Post, a debate. Actually, if we're gonna be We're gonna be frank about it. We're going to have a little debate on the situation in Syria and US troops whether they should be pulled out of Syria. So that is that is this Friday at sea Pack, which is at the

Gaylord International Convention Center, I think it's called. So if you feel up to it, if you want to come by Seapack this Friday, if you're going to be at Seapack this Friday, at about eight thirty am, I'll be up on the main stage having a debate about Syria. Good times for sure, and let's get to the so please do show up team if you happen to be

their team. Buck campus represent In previous years, I've had colleagues in the media who told me that that people went up to them and said, well, in one case are you Buck Sexton, which was the guy I don't think looked very much like me, but nonetheless it was nice that somebody was thinking of me. And then in other years people have said, well where is Buck. This is my first time at Seapack, actually my first year

going to be at Seapack. So if you get a chance to do do come by and say him well, you know, chat about Syria or whatever else you got in mind. All right, Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton if you want to get in on some of the roll call action. Alice first up, Hey Buck funny story.

My husband Dan just a little Washingtonday for a meeting, and on the plane or our entire Vermont Congressional delegation, Pat Lahey, who was charming fellow passengers, Peter Welch, who was working their room, and old Bernie Bernie Sanders, who stuck his nose in his iPad and barreled into Dan in the restroom without an apology. But here's the good part. Lahe and Welch flew coach Bernie the stinky socialist flew

first class. But you don't. The seat. They've got to be bigger because his brain is bigger, his mind and heart are bigger. Fum making this socialism work. You know, if you're gonna get free stuck to everybody, you've got to give a little more free stuff to yourself. First class,

three houses. You'll understand. That doesn't surprise me. I think it's so interesting that there are people who were part of the Hillary Clinton campaign who have leaked information about Bernie Sanders private jet travel to the press just out of spite, just to kind of mess up the Burns day a little bit. They have leaked this information about Bernie Sanders traveling on private jets, and yes, it is, in fact, it is in fact the case that the burn does like his private jet travel. But it was

for Hillary Clinton that he was doing that. He was traveling around trying to help her out, which was obviously a thankless job. Matthew Ryan's buck. I can't wait to listen to your show every day. You are the new Rush hand down, the best commentator on the radio today. I mean that well, Matthew, you are very kind. I appreciate that. May I give you an action movie quote? Yes, you may, Matthew's Let's do it now. You know what I do for a living. I'm not perfect, but you

should have waited for me. I was worth it, man, Matthew, I got no idea. My action movie skills have probably faded because we haven't done it on the show in a while. I bet there are a lot of people that listen to the show now who don't even know about action movie quote Friday. Should we bring it back? Let me know if you think we should bring it back in Facebook. In the Facebook comments, Andrei's rights whoa howdy bucking team? After my workout this morning, I thought

to check the news on my local AM conservative radio channel. Oddly, there was chatter about Lady Gaga and Bradley Cooper. What the h E? Double hockey sticks? Why am I telling you this? Buck? Well, Buck, you and your team put together a thoughtful mix of news analysis, or rather put together a thoughtful mix of news analysis that matters to us. It is because of this assembly of town and information that we all tuned in to support you in the

associated sponsors. You and your team definitely set the high bar higher than most. So when I hear chatter about the latest entertainment romance, I'm a conservative AM channel. I long for the cerebral pleasures of the freedom Hut your humor, insight, impressions and analogies. Dear listener from the other day, keep and grow your audience, stay the course andres well andres Man, you're very nice. I'm getting some really really kind stuff from the team today and I and I do appreciate it.

Um it means a lot, so especially as uh, let's just say, I have not radio related, but there's some other professional not personal. Don't start, don't start making guesses about any kind of personal life changes. Not yet, not yet. But I have some consence coming up about some professional projects and things. So your support is always team helped push through the transitions and changes. Radio is of course just great and growing. It's not radio related, but there's

some other things. There might be some shifting going on in the in the Bucks day to day schedule. I know, person, I'm sorry, I should code red myself. Kristen not to be confused with Kirsten. Can we just guys, can we just all agree with the name is Kristen? Can we stop with this Kirsten? Kirsten liked the Beto impression, y'all? Can we just, like, please like, can we just have a big Kurston and not Kirsten. I I just don't believe in Walt, and I don't believe in Kirsten. It

should be k Kristen. I can't even say them right back and forth. Beto can't say them right either, but Kristen right. Hey, Buck, I've been listening to your podcast for about three years, and you're the only postion I have to hear when you post. I skip the other podcast, but yours is a must listen. My birthday is today, that would be February twenty fifth, and I hope you give me a shout out. Thanks bunches. Keep up the

great work well, Kristen. Happy birthday to you, and thank you so much for listening to the show and being such a part of what we do here. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Happy birthday. I hope it was a wonderful one, and please please keep listening. James, we share first names. Buck. I've been trying to buy a Shields High T shirt from your website for many months, but every time I checked, there's only small medium in XXL. I need a plain old large. Will they ever be available?

Love the show, James, James, Uh, I gotta check website has been We've been revamping, redoing. I gotta get some stuff going for the website. Um, you know, let me see if, let me see if I can make that happen. Uh. Yeah, Well, I don't know what's going on with the T shirts. I can't even ask your producer. Mike's not a charge of it, so I don't even know. Let me look into that, man, We gotta we gotta up our up our digital store game quite a bit going forward. That

would be really really helpful. Uh, Michael writes, Buck, did you hear what Bill Maher said? The right wants to be the left? Wow? Talk about a high perched bubble. You say it all the time. The left does not understand the right. You're correct as usual, Bok, the left is out of touch. Shield hie, my friend. Indeed, Michael's referring to Bill Maher saying that liberal states have Chef

Wolfgang Puck. Red states have Chef Boyard. Interestingly enough, Chef boyar D was actually an entrepreneur who became a multi multi millionaire and came to America with nothing. He's an immigrant, so you think that maybe they'd be a little more excited about his story. But also, if we're going to talk about cuisine and food and Red states versus Blue states, I think Texas, Louisiana, Tennessee, the Carolina's you know, I think there are some places that are gonna want a word.

And I'm not trying to leave you out. Indiana. I have been to some fantastic steakhouses in the wonderful state of Indiana. But if you're looking for, even what would be considered innovative cuisine, there are some Red States that are at the very top of the list. And don't even get me started on barbecue, because I know that there is not enough homage that I can pay to Southern and Texan barbecue and the New York equivalent of it just it just doesn't doesn't get it done. It

doesn't cut the mustard, as we would say in NYC. Seth, Right, Hey, I heard your response to my message on the podcast. I thought she was a show sponsor only because I listened on podcasts, so normally I only hear what you guys put up and not a radio ads. Perhaps it's an ad in sort of buy a podcast app. Sorry, yeah, Seth. If we have apps running on the on the podcast, you know that's something that I would I would know what the or rather ads running on the podcast. I

don't know what those ads are. I mean, some of that has done via our ad sales, and that's kind of out of my hands. But obviously the sponsors of the show that I do live reads for, I know those products very well. I use those products, and I'm very familiar with what they're up to. So there is some difference and how the selling works. And this is where I always tell you all you want to ask you to check out Black Rifle or AMAC or any

of our wonderful sponsors. That is a way for you to get a great product and also to support this show. It really matters. Every single purchase that you make using the URLs that I say on this show every day is a vote to keep this show on air and to keep it growing, which we have been doing without fail. Now, for the gosh, this is the third this is the third year we've been on air in this time slot.

So every time you get a chance to check out one of those products, I really really do appreciate it, and so do the entrepreneurs and the business owners that we work with, and remember their people who are willing to a lot of companies get all, oh, I don't

want to go near your conservative talk. You know, I don't believe in traditional America and being pro life and either good on this whole list, and those companies don't want to advertise on conservative anything, conservative radio, conservative TV. So it's it's in your hands. It's in your hands whether our side of things, whether half the country gets a voice in media or not, I really mean that, Aaron rites Buck, thanks for the segment on finding meaningful work.

The disconnect between compensation and meaning really resonated with me, and it was inspiring to hear you talk about finding meaning in your career. On an unrelated note, I love your impressions and would love to hear a segment with you. Ben Shapiro and Stephen Crowd are doing dueling Impressions of the Democrats twenty twenty clown Car of Lunacy shields high Aaron, Well, Aaron, thank you so much for the kind note and the and the support for the show. And yeah, I got

a lot of feedback. I didn't really read much of it here on the show but today, but a lot of feedback about meaningful work. And I think in particular being a janitor that helps heal people's brains, that's that really struck a chord with people, because well, we all have that ability, we all have that that chance to make someone else's life every day a little bit better, a little bit easier, a little bit more fulfilling, maybe a little bit less lonely, a little bit less dark.

So that really struck a corporate folks and I appreciate Aaron that it did with you as well as for our Crowder and Bend. I mean, those guys are great, and that's a that's a fantastic idea. I'd be happy to join them anytime to talk about whenever they want to talk about. So let's see if they'll do it, you know, reach out to them. I'll fly hey, I'll take a trip out to LA on my own dime just to hang out on the Daily wire set and talk to those guys. But whatever they want, that'll be

it for today. Team, I'll talk to you tomorrow. She'll tie