Libs Lied About Carter Page

This is the bus Sexton Show or the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with assionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American. Again the Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. No, welcome to sex and show everybody. Man, It's Friday, Producer Market. It flew by this week. It flew by. You know. It was a quick I guess that's what happens when you only work four days in a week. It's like that, huh, that's all right? So what were you? Were you on

honeymoon for like six months or something? Two weeks? It's what I thought. Yeah, yeah, So we got a lot to get to you today. For you folks here in the hut, I actually didn't even mention this at the top of the show, which you know, if we were doing a breakdown of the traditional radio skills, you're always supposed to tell people what you're going to talk about, and then that's a promise to the audience. My brain goes in a lot of different directions over the course

of the show, so sometimes I forget things. Sometimes producer markets a little surly and we have to address that, and sometimes there's just other stuff that breaks during the show. But rarely do I leave off the for me, the top news item at the top of the show. So this is kind of like a fun, fun surprise, a thing that you wouldn't expect, and that is, we have new information that confirms what I've been telling you all along.

This shouldn't be even a little bit surprising at this point because we were lied to by many, many, many people about what was really going on with the carter page of the FISA surveillance, right, and this this goes all the way back, And if I can, I'll take you a little trip this Friday down memory lane. In the early days of what was it? This the what

was it? Twenty seventeen? Going into twenty eighteen, people are starting to think, Hold on a second, what really is going on here when it comes to the investigations of Russia.

Was there spying on the Trump campaign in the In the early moments when that was raised as a possibility, there were all of these people who rushed out there, and you know, James Comey and McCabe and the the national security media industrial complex, all these people who are generally deeply unimpressive bureaucrats who would go on TV at CNN, MSNBC doing the work of parts while pretending to be

non partisan experts. That's the best way. If you want to be a national security expert, the best way to do it is to pretend you have no partisan acts to grind, and when, of course you do, you're not gonna get on TV at CNN unless you're an expert, unless you're somebody who has a specific knowledge useful in the trashing and opposing of Donald Trump and all those who support him. But the idea that there was spying on the Trump campaign was ridiculed at first. We have

to remembers it was ridiculed. Oh what a conspiracy theory, kind of like what they're saying now about Ukrainian government efforts to interfere in the US election. Oh, that's a conspiracy theory, or that Hunter Biden. Maybe there was something corrupt going on there. I mean, there was something corrupt, just a question whether it was criminal. Oh, but they

call that a conspiracy theory as well. Okay, So we go back though to the first days, the first weeks and months of the consideration even of spying on the Trump campaign, and it was something that we were mocked initially for and then when it came out. Oh no, in fact, there there was a process investigation. But it was a good investigation. You see. That's what they told us because in Russia, Russia, Russia, Trump, Russia collusion, the Kremlin, prudence,

puppet Trader, all this stuff. They threw all this stuff at you. And one of the great problems we have with holding the media and the left and the Democratic Party accountable for their lies is what I was called the slow roll technique, right, the slow roll technique. Politics has a momentum. People focus on something and then they focus on something else. Anybody who's ever worked in pr understands this quite well. Anyone who's ever had to do

any public communications knows. And this is why if you're listen. Crisis communications. There are certain there's certain tools that one uses, including for very unsavory clients, but sometimes very savory ones need crisis communications to make sure that you minimize the perception impact against your client. And one of the most effective ways to do that is to extend anything, to extend out if you can. If it's going to come

out right away, you get ahead of it. But if it's going to take a while, you slow role that you want it. Okay, well, let's let's drop this. It's another version of the timing that you see at work, from the government, from corporations, from individuals the Friday afternoon before a long weekend document dump. Right, that's another perfect example of us. These are ways that people are trying

to manipulate and shape and direct perception. Now I'm talking to you about this because the entirety of the Russia collusion conspiracy theory, which is what it was, we now know that, based on all the facts, based on exhaustive investigation, a conspiracy theory that has destroyed, for anyone who is honest and serious, destroyed the pretense that the media has that they're not partisans, that they don't take a particular

side of these political arguments. That's gone. I mean it has been gone for a long time if you've been made close attention. But after Russia collusion, we know that no longer exists. But we found out that there was spying, right, We found out that there was spying, and then they said the spying was duly predicated, it was acceptable, it was fine, it was necessary, in fact necessary to protect the republic. Spying on a presidential campaign, my friends, Attorney

General Barr has said it. God bless him for standing

behind that assessment of what is clear bold reality. Obama's top national security officials engage in spying on the Trump campaign, on an official connected to the Trump campaign, including all the communications of everybody that he was talking to, looking to see what was going on there for eight months, and they've told us all along, oh well, it was necessary, and then they said, okay, it was necessary, but there were there might have been some mistakes in the process.

This is what came after the Inspector General port might have been some mistakes in the process, but ultimately it was all legitimate and there was no political bias, is what they tell us. No political bias. Turns out that's a little bit untrue. There was no problem with any of this, that this was duly predicated and legitimate investigation. Story up today, carter Page fis a warrant lacked probable cause. The DOJ has admitted in a declassified assessment at least

two Remember there are four fizes on carter Page. Each one is two months long, half to be renewed. At least two of them. The Department of Justice has now had to come forward when they're doing this review internally

of their fives or procedures were illegitimate. That means that they continued to spy on an American citizen tied into a presidential campaign, American citizen who has never not only have they never brought a charge against him, they've never even been able to insinuate as slimy as McCabe and Weissman and these other left wing hacks trying to take

Trump down are. They've never even been able to produce the beginnings of evidence that carter Page was disloyal to his country or even considered being disloyal to his country. Carter Page is one of the most unfairly maligned people in America of the last decade. People were calling people still call him a trader. I was in the green room at Fox News a lot long ago with a female Democrat contributor who was still saying, Carter Page is a traitor. I don't care what the report says. Well,

what are we going through all this for that? Well, this is where the Democrats are. Though they've they've constructed all these narratives. They believe them, They've tied their identity to it. They believe so strongly, and Trump as a traitor to his country and that other people around him worked with Russia to steal the election. That they'd rather continue to believe that than except that they were dupe and they're just not that smart, because they just aren't

that smart. People never want to believe that. Much better to deny evidence than to accept the reality of just not nearly being as clever and bright as one had thought before. Humility is a beautiful thing. Humility is something that we should all embrace, especially when we need a little humility when we deserve it. Libs don't do that, though, better to double down, continue with an air of unearned

intellectual superiority. All the virtue signaling they've done on this and so many other issues when the facts are clearly against them, just ignore the facts, get more angry, become more shrill, yell louder Carter Page as a trader. They say, based on what now, the Department of Justice, this just came out of last twenty four hours. Two of the four FISA warrants were not predicated properly. That means there

was no justification for them. So now the person that they used among the most sensitive surveillance tools the federal government has. It's effectively a national security carve out to get around the Fourth Amendment. That is what FIS is, and it's all the self looking ice cream cone of the bureaucracy. They make sure that the only people that get to see this are the same people that get to make the decisions about whether or not it should

be allowed. There's no real gatekeepers here. As we know, the FIES accord is a rubber stamp. But we always assumed on properly. As it turns out, we had been led to believe that they would only use this against terrorist terrorists and spies. Turns out they used it against the presidential campaign of Donald Trump. They were fishing. Now I had said this to you many times before. Part of the problem here, I think for these FBI officials is that they believed, they believed some of them the

early stories about Russia collusion. They believe that there must be something there. And then they opened up this fize on carter page and then they renewed it and they got nothing. Well at that point, and they also, by the way, we had to deal with the reality of Donald Trump winning the election. So you look at this and you say, we'll hold on a minute. It's not what we've they had assumed going into Russia collusion. Going in the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, the assumption was Hillary

Clinton's gonna win. That's what they thought. And that way, no matter what, they would just be considered, you know, great patriots going to pat on the head from from Hillary when she became the commander in chief, and maybe they even get a scalp or two of somebody from the Trump campaign which they then get to offer up

and maybe that makes them director right. You can understand the motivations of some of the people, not just ideological motivations of those inside the FBI who were using this for their own purposes, But then why would they why would they double down. Why would they push for a Fizer renewal when they had no information to support that renewal.

And as we know, even in the initial two phases of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on usage on Carter page that there were mistakes, lots and lots of mistakes, egregious mistakes withholding information everything else. But these last year they've said they weren't even they weren't even close to passing MUSTER. And we don't know yet if the first two past must they haven't. They haven't ruled on that yet.

Now why am I so focused on this? Because this has been This is the biggest political scandal of my life time. There's no question, there's nothing else that even comes close. There were Democrat deep state operatives working under the Obama administration in collusion with the American liberal press that tried to thwart Trump from winning the election, and then after it tried to tear down his election. And we have a Senate trial going on this week where

they're trying again to do that. But Russia Trump collusion was this was a saga for almost three years, a special Council, countless hours of news coverage devoted to this This became the way that dishonest leftists in the media built whole careers on this. Rachel matt out night after night, huge ratings while she did this whole kremlinology conspiracy. It might as well have been mystery science theater with people laughing at the screen. It's absurd what was going on.

But when you look at how they've extended out the timeline, how long it takes for us to finally get the fact. Imagine being able to go back to the beginning of this debate, this national discussion about spying on the Trump campaign. Oh, it didn't happen, No, it happened, but it was really necessary because they're bad guys. Oh no, it happened. We made some mistakes, but it was still necessary to now. Oh no, this wasn't even justified under any circumstances. Spying

on a presidential campaign wasn't justified under any circumstances. By the way, never forget they keep saying Carter Paige wasn't that important Carter Page. Well, their whole premise was Russia Trump collusion with Carter Paige for Trump to win the election, So they were he was being spied on in his

capacity as a person connected to the Trump campaign. And when they say, oh, but he had left the Trump campaign, they thought they were going to uncover the efforts that they thought existed before he left the campaign to collude with Russia, as well as being able to suck up all of his old communications, because I know how this stuff works, they could suck up everything that was in his email, inbox, all of that, as well as look

at who he was in communication with. I mean, it's like it's like having a bunch of FBI guys sitting in the room with you while you're typing everything on your computer. They see everything not even justified. Imagine Imagine the outcry that the American people, well, the honest ones who aren't just anti Trump zealots, which is unfortunately a

big chunk of the country, but normal Americans. Imagine the outcry if we were able to say right away that the spying on the Trump campaign done by appointees and people that work for the Obama administration. There were the ones that are signing off on this. Those are the ones,

you know, Comey and McCabe, Brannan and these people. Imagine we are able to say immediately that this is what happened that the spying was not was not just very duly predicated as just a fancy we have saying not justified, not legitimate, not legal. They falsified things, they omitted things, they lied about things. They wanted to double down because once they had already crossed that rubicon of spying on a presidential campaign, they might as well just keep fishing.

Make it seem like there's something there are even when there's not. I think some people in the FBI I thought they would just get away with this and it would always remain secret because Hiller would be president. But there were others who probably figured, well, now we have to make something out of nothing. You have to make it look like there's something there or else. Oh my, what have we done. Just remember this because it's taken us now we're in year four of Trump's first term.

It's taken us four years from Trump's election to get to this point where we can finally say that there were Democrat deep state operatives who spied illegally, unjustly on the Trump campaign. That happened on Obama's watch is the biggest political scandal of my lifetime, and the media pretends like it's nothing after lying to us and saying it was all justified the whole time. No it was not. So let's not let them use the slow roll to get out of what this really means. You're in the

freedom heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I'm glad. Our leader started by saying that the President has said that he is going to cut Social Security, and the reminded me of in the midnight hour on Tuesday, when Sippaloni got up and said that the President is a man of his word. I wrote on my notebook, what a whopper. It's not the only time the house managers definitely not here Aaron laughing. They're trying to destroy a presidency, folks.

I'm glad it's also humorous, right, Chuck Schumer's there, She doesn't mean a hamburger, Maizie Arono the dumbest person in Congress. These are the Democrats put forward on this. What a scam. But I have good news for you. There is an upside to all this that I want to remind you of. There's something that we should all be mihall take some pride in. Actually this week, as we see this all play out, I'll tell you about it. Thanks for listening

to The bus Essen Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. So we've all had to sit around and hear a lot. If you've been paying attention to the media, you've been watching what's going on. We've we've had all of these countless hours of lectures from Adam schaff about how much he loves the Founding Fathers, the Constitution, Thomas Payne,

George Washington, Ukraine cares a lot about Ukraine. I mean, the ever seen Democrats care as much about a country as they do about Ukraine. All of a sudden, Wow, I would you know. They always do this thing where they ask people. They ask you know, average Americans to find something on a map. You'll find it Ron on a map. We talked about that recently, which again people are used to seeing things with names in a map. I get it, but you should know Iron is not.

You know, there are people who thought it was in America. That's a little bit of a problem. I would love to see if you do the same thing, if you ran the same experiment, how many of these members of Congress without names on a map, If you just gave them the countries all on a blank map with the borders shown. How many of them could actually find Ukraine? Would I would bet money. I would bet money that

Maisie Herono could not. I'm just telling you, I would bet you money that she would not be able to do it if someone just presented. And I think we should know if it's gonna be so funny to find out about how average Americans who have other things going on in their lives. You aren't sitting on the Center Foreign Relations Committee or aren't involved in all these discussions about Ukraine. It's all, oh, look people can't find this, and look, we should be better geography as a country

than we are. That's that's true. But these members of Congress or imbeciles, a lot of them, not all of them, but a lot of them. And I think that it's what's good for the It's the second time I've used this phrase. A zoe it was good for the goose is good for the gander. I feel like that's kind of an old timey, old timey phrase. So it's a gaggle of geese, right, I think that's right. Yeah. A murder of crows is my favorite though you know that's what that's what a group of crows is called a

murder of crows. You have some cool names for groups of animals out there, so it's a fun trivia effect. Next time you're at a cocktail party or you're on a date and you're run out of things to say, be like, have you downloaded the Buck Sexton show? He's amazing? Check him out on the iHeart app. And then once you've gotten past that, if that still doesn't start, if that doesn't get the party going, be like, do you know what you call a group of crows? Sir or madam?

Sometimes I wonder why you're single? Now I don't. This is one of the moments I don't it's cold. Then I know that's cold. It's got a frosty here. I have to put all out a jacket because a producer mark, it's always cold here. That is true. It actually is

a little bit little bit frigid. So anyway, um, why should we be taking a little bit of If not, maybe I said pride, you could say that there's certainly a feeling of there's a silver lining here, there's some solace you can say from this complete sham this week where they're arguing in an election year to remove Remember when not confirming a left wing approved judge in an Obama in the Clinton Trump election year, Remember when that was like some grave insult to the will of the people.

The Democrats are, Oh, I know, we're all supposed to sit around like Merrick Garland. What happened with Merrick Garland? And who cares? But the Democrats acted like it was a huge affront to the constitution. Now we're going into election year and they don't really want to allow the American people to make the choice of who will be the president unit States for the next four years. That is happening and it's troubling to see. But we also have to remind ourselves of the following. In a way,

all of this should have been expected. Of course, the left, which is increasingly insane, the Democratic Party which is increasingly socialist, the totalitarian Libs. Of course, they absolutely despise this president and are doing everything in their power and then some. They will break any rule, They will knock down any regulation. There are no guardrails that will keep them on any path when it comes to Trump. They anything that destroys Trump is all that is needed. That's all that they

care about. But here's why there's there's a sense that we are at least we are reminded that this shows we've been right all along. Trump came into office without ever having held elected office before, not being a politician, saying he was going to drain the swamp, he was going to be a disruptive president, he was going to shake things up, he was going to upset the elites, he was going to upend the establishment. We heard all of that, and that's what's happening. So of course they

are throwing everything at him. Of course they're flailing, and that desperation that I've been talking to you about it is all coming out now. We're seeing and we feel it because this is their worst nightmare. It is impossible to look at the last three years going into now the last year of his first term, and say that he's a bad you know, they say he's a terrible present. The country's in bad shape. You know, everyone should be

upset about this. No reasonable person has that conclusion. Only ideologically driven people can have that conclusion, not fighting some horrible war. And I think about when I, you know, when I came out of college and there are two wars going on, and I joined the CIA, and you know, people are coming back and friends of mine are going to Walter Reed and people are getting limbs blown off, and there's PTSD and there's you know, we're what are we doing in these wars? Can we win these words?

All these things that are going on. You know, economy drops like a rock at the end of Bush's second term. You know, Obama comes in, all this spending all you look at all these things. The country is doing better now than at any point in the last two presidencies. So it's not even just you know, it's such an easy thing in conservative media in particular. Oh, Obama's you know, a bad president, he was, but Trump is better than Bush. Trump is better than Clinton. I mean you to go back.

I mean, how many presidencies. The only presidency in my lifetime that you'd say, okay, maybe this guy's achievements line up against Trump's are Reagan And some of you might even start to well, you know, you need to see what happens if Trump gets four more years and Reagan de feed of the Soviet Year Union. I mean, let's give let's give Dutch credit where it's due, But come on,

that's the reality what's happening. So, you know, while we're seeing this play out, and it's so obvious and grotesque, and the Democrats will say anything, and you know, oh, they're complaining about the rules. It's not a fair trial in the center. But it wasn't a fair impeachment in the House. So why all of a sudden should we feel the need to give them what they want when they just shoved it on our f when they had

the votes. You go through all of this, and the one piece of comfort that I like to give you, or the one piece of solace in this whole process, is they're doing this to Trump because he didn't sell out. They're doing this to this president because he is delivering on promises. He does not bend the knee to the media. He does not care what the establishment thinks about him. He has kept the faith with those of us who have voted for him. That is why they hate him

so much. And so while we see the hatred playing out, we see the animosity, We see this fervent desire to tear this president down to just you know, rip his presidency to shreds. Remember, as much as we have to be vigilant and understand who the enemy is and take very seriously that they would remove him from office if they could, which fortunately doesn't look like they can. They absolutely will do everything they can to defeat him in

the election coming up this fall. But this is all happening because they hate him so much for all the reasons we want them to hate him. They hate him because he tweets and fights back against the media. They hate him because he does not play the game the way they want. They hate him because today President Trump is speaking to the March for Life, something that previous presidents.

Marchal Life has been going on for decades. Previous Republican presidents did not deign to put on their schedule, presidents who said that they were pro life. You've got one hundred thousand people who are going to be marching for the most clear eyed, morally righteous cause you could find.

And it is this president, for all of his you know, personal shortcomings in his own life whatever, it is this president who will speak to the March for Life and bring them even further into the American consciousness and perhaps more into the mainstream. And the media is going to do everything they can to downplay this but this is a march of one hundred thousand people that happens every year. That's got a very straightforward message. Let's save babies lives,

very straightforward. President Trump is the one who says I will stand with them publicly at their most important event. That's why they hate him. That's why Adam Schiff is going through all these histrionics. It's why Nancy Pelosi will use any trick in her book. It's why the media has debased itself. I mean, the mainstream media has gone to the ends of the earth already trying to tear this guy down because he has done all of the things that make them upset that we would want him

to do. So just remember that this week, as we have this Senate trial and we're going through this impeachment process, they are impeaching Trump because he kept faith with you as a Trump voter. They are impeaching him because he

didn't sell out and he didn't bend the knee. That should make you feel better going into this week, and that should make all of us who support what this president is doing, especially today as he is speaking to the March for Life, That should make us all feel a bit of pride and honestly a bit of thanks that this is where the country is right now. It won't always be this way. There are socialists all over

the horizon, my friends. Things are going to get ugly, and things are going to get worse than they are now. It's just a question of when. But for right now, this president has kept his promises. He hasn't sold us out, and that is the most I've usually said. And I would modify perhaps this a little bit that what upsets

the left the most about Trump or his successes. That is true, but it's his successes while doing what he promised the base he would do and keeping the faith with them, the people that fied conventional political wisdom and gave this brash billionaires everybody calls him, you know, three marriages, reality TV star, casino magnate, all this stuff you heard about him. Gave this guy a chance. He has been

the fighter that he said he would be. He has pushed the policies he said he would push, and he has not given an inch to these lib totalitarians that want to control everything in your life and do so badly and expect you to say thank you, not this guy, not Trump, not on his watch. Remember that as they give their speeches during the Senate trial about how he should be removed. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is

the Buck Sexton Show podcast. The fact that the president only wanted a public announcement and not the investigations to actually be conducted, demonstrates that his desire for investigations was simply and solely to boost his reelection efforts. There are many false premises, excuse me, many false premises that this president relies on. I'm sorry that this impeachment relies on many false things, including that the investigation, for example, the

request for it is illegitimate. The request for it is not illegitimate. There's plenty of reason to believe that Hunter Biden was engaged in some sort of corrupt scheme. There are reports to that end. Asking to look into something is within the prerogative of the president United States when it affects an American interest in a country where we're giving money corruption. I'm sorry, it's legitimate. But notice how

shift skips to this. There are all these conclusions that are force fed to the people, all these things that you have to buy into for their narrative about impeachment of this president to hold together at all. And one of them is that now we're being told he didn't want the investigations, just wanted an announcement of them, just an announcement of an investigation. Does anyone really think that that was a game changer for the Trump presidency. But

let's be realistic for a second. Hillary Clinton was being investigated when she was running for president for committing a felony, which she did commit, and Democrats still all voted for her. Can we just apply some common sense, some reason, some understanding of history and preced into this. The big scheme here was just to get an announcement of an investigation into Hunter Biden. Wouldn't have changed a vote. It's not

even This is what the Democrats keep doing, though. They come up with some elaborate conspiracy that they can't prove, whether it's Russia Trump collusion in the election or now this Ukraine investigation Hunter Biden thing. They come up with this elaborate scheme, they hyperventilate over how damaging it is, how dangerous it is, and then they never actually stop and think is this even a good plan from the perspective of the person putting it for Would it even work.

I remember being in the Oval office with the President and asking him about this. He's like, it's not even it's not even a good idea. Russia Trump collusion. Think about this. You're gonna have Carter paid, try to do some release of DNC emails or Hillary's emails. You don't know what's in those emails. You're going to create an electronic trail that links you to I mean, if there had been collusion, that Trump would have got nailed. You

have to be a moron to do this right. And now they're saying, oh, he only wanted an announcement of an investigation because we're not even sure. We're not even sure Joe Biden is going to be the nominee. First of all, he's going to this great length. They're assuming this is all done in bad faith. When what if he really thought that there was corruption going on with the former vice president and his son, which now there's more and more stories about this Biden and that Biden,

different members of the family getting really rich. All of it just influenced pet. But look at the way that they covered for Hillary Clinton and her Clinton Foundation, which was a global influence peddling scheme done in plain view of the public. Yeah, a Russian state bank really paid Bill Clinton a half a million dollars for a speech because his speech was so good. Sure had nothing to do with his wife being Secretary of State. This is

the center of the swamp. There are a lot of people in DC who like being on the boards of companies because of who their relatives are. They like, you know, because they know this person or that person. They get a big speaking engagement, you know, worth fifty or one hundred thousand dollars, you know, more than the average average American makes in a year. They'll make in a thirty minute speech over lunch somewhere nobody remembers. There are a lot of people who like this to continue, who don't

want to see this end. They also don't want anyone to start to look into what they have done. I'm talking about politicians. I'm talking about hangers on of politicians, family members of them. This is the center of the stinky swamp. And meanwhile, you have Adam Shift going around saying he didn't even want the investigations, he just wanted the announcement of them. Would that there's no way that

that is true. And if that was the perception of something people around Trump it's just because they aren't very smart themselves, which is also possible because Trump does not always pick the best people. Unfortunately, I'm sorry, it's the truth, not even close to the best people. But of course he would want the investigations because he clearly thought there was something up here with Hunter Biden, his son. Because anybody would think there's something up with Joe Biden rather

and his son Hunter. Anybody would think that. So why wouldn't Trump think that. Guys making a couple million dollars for you know, him and his partner at Seneca whatever it's called, the LLC, they had set up a couple million dollars to do nothing when they have no credibility or expertise whatsoever in the subject matter. Yeah, that looks dirty.

This is how corruption cases starting all the time. By the way, the appearance of corruption is what often leads the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to begin an investigation. There's more than just the appearance of corruption. In this case, it's corrupts the question of is it illegal? But Shift says he just wanted the announcement. No, that makes no sense. And then you also have to get to even if the investigations had happened, Democrats weren't going to abandon Joe

Biden because of that, and everyone knows it. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Will Trump get the wall done before reelection? This is important. This is not a minor question. This is not something that we should just skate past. We should be We should remember that one of the primary chance heard at Trump rallies, those incredible rallies. Hopefully I'll

get to one this year. You know, I've never been to a Trump rally. Producer Mark never been to one. I mean, I feel like I've watched dozens of them at this point, but I've never been to one, which maybe we should do. You want to go sit up and do one at some point. You want me to come to one with you? Yeah, of Core, you will go to rally if there's one of New York. Probably not have to go somewhere, go hang out, Go hang out where real Americans live. That sounds like fun instead

of this this commy cement box his New York City. Somehow, I don't think he's going to Madison Square, Parker. Yeah, that will be fun, though it would be fun anyway. The build the Wall chant was one of the defining, one of the defining sounds of the Trump election campaign back in twenty sixteen, and if you look at what has happened there has been there's a lot of debate still over what the likelihood is the president's going to

manage to get a lot of new wall up. Although upgraded wall, I can tell you I've seen it, I've been there. Upgraded wall is dramatically different from what is there. It does help, it does matter. The old fencing and a lot of parts of the border is six feet tall corrugated metal that you know you could get over, and it doesn't slow you down enough at all to allow for arrest. You move across it too quickly in

too many places. The thirty foot tall fence that has been put up in place of that six foot fence, about one hundred miles without I think has been done. That matters a lot. That helps a lot, and it is assisting Border patrol with their with their job. Now we're supposed to get hundreds of miles of new wall, new, new meaning in areas has never been wall before. We'll have to see that's a court battle. There's an issue right now. I think there's a judge in Seattle who

is looking at this right now. All it takes is one federal judge who decides that it's not acceptable anymore, that the Trump can't that the Trump presidency is doing everything that it can to build a wall, and you will have a big problem. They'll just put a universal injunction in place and you won't be able to do it. So I don't know. I don't know if it's going to happen or not, but I want to give you some updates in the wall. First of all, this got

very little media coverage. A few When was it two days ago? You had an area of the Mexico Guatemalan border. Remember that it's a lot of Central American migrants who want to make their way through Mexico and then into the United States, and they've been claiming asylum and going this process. Now we've tightened up the asylum procedures a little bit, there's been a drop off as a result. But I do think as the weather gets more conducive to it, you will see more people in the months ahead,

probably trying to cross illegally in the United States. But there was an area of the US I'm sorry of the Mexico Guatemalan border where migrants just overran the soldiers there and said, what are you gonna do? Shoot us and just we're running across a river that separates the

two country. So be prepared for this to ramp up again, especially in the election year Democrats because of their kids in cages rhetoric, and as an aside from this, because I've already seen some of this today, Among the dumbest and most dishonest talking points you will ever hear is when people say Republicans don't care about being pro life because they're not pro life for the kids who are

in cages at the southern border. The kids are being held in temporary detention facilities for like twenty four hours only a moron compares that to killing a baby in the womb. That baby's not gone for twenty four hours,

gone forever. I don't know, but you'll hear this. This is also like the dodge you'll hear from some members of the clergy, including Catholic clergy, who I feel a particular animosity toward when they stray from the tenets of their own faith and try to give these you know, these socialist totalitarians at MSNBC and CNN, somebody in a Roman collar to give them some greater credibility for their schemes of state control and redistribution of wealth and oh yeah,

and being pro choice and you know all these other things. You'll hear them say, well, I'm not just pro life in the womb. I'm you know, as a democrat. I'm pro life for all phases of life. The stupidest stuff. I mean, people are so gross with how they talk about this. There's nothing to do with anything. I mean, imagine if I was walking around saying, hey, guys, you

need to raise money. We need to raise money for cancer research, and somebody shows up and goes, well, well what about this this you know, shelter for for kittens down the street? You know, don't they count two? Why do you hate kittens? No, I'm trying to what does that have to do with anything. I'm trying to raise money to save people's lives with cancer. You're gonna talk about something else? What does this mean? But it's just it's just a distraction because they can't. They again, they

can't win the arguments. So what they do is all these externalities come into play, and you know you see this anyway. It is just remind you'll see this at the border when people because you have the March for Life going on right now, and I've already seen people on social media saying they don't really care about life. The only care about life in the womb. Yeah, why

don't we start there. Let's not allow for the killing of life in the womb, and then we can also all have conversations about what being pro life for the rest of one's life means. It means that you get to just come to any country you want and take welfare benefits, break the law, break other laws. And does this mean the dissolution of the nation state as we know it because anyone can just show up and we don't have what does it really mean? Democrats on the

issue of immigration have become an extreme party extreme. They are extremists in a few areas, abortion, climate change, immigration, increasingly on the issue of you know, the country's finances and the economy in general, but they're incremental there. They need to achieve more power before they can put in a more fully socialist scheme. That's the plan. This is really the choice between Biden and Sanders. Isn't a choice between a socialist and a free market capitalist. It's a

choice between a slow socialist and a fast socialist. And I don't mean in like a foot race, obviously, but you know, somebody that will get us there very rapidly versus somebody that will continue the incremental drift towards socialism. And the Democratic Party has been engaged in for the last well for as long as it's been around the last hundred years as it is constituted today, so that brings me they know, what are some of the things

that Democrats say? I mean they obviously they opposed the wall, even though everyone will tell you that a wall wall works. Rodney Scott I selling producer Mark Rodney Scotts, now they had a border patrol. Carla Provost had been had a border patrol. I'd done some interviews with Carlo when I was in DC. Rodney Scott's the guy who was very kind and hosted me when I went down to the US border at San Diego between the US and Mexico and spend a lot of time with me and walk

me through all their processes. A great guy, and he's now the head of Border Patrol. So you know, Trump does get some very good people in some important places, and this is one of those. I mean, Rodney Scott's a plus guy and he's going to be trying to make sure that in this election year we enforce the law and that Border Patrol is doing its job and not going to have this hands off left wing open

borders policy that's constantly being advocated. But to really get a sense of who these Democrats are on this, you can just hear what they say about immigration and about immigrants, and that tells you all you really need to know. Here is, for example, Joe Biden speaking about DACA recipients, play thirteenth place. These kids have come, they've done well. Most of these kids is over There's a lot of them. And they're not just Hispanic, they're Asian Pacific Islanders as well,

and they in fact have done very very well. In many cases are more Americans than most Americans are because they had done well in school. They believe what the basic principles that we all share. I think they should be in fact fine put on a path to citizenship. A path to citizenship. Not even remember back in the Gang of Eight Days when he had Marco Rubio, and politically he never will he never recovered really for a

bunch of reasons. But you know, back in the Gang of Eight Days, you had all these promises made about how amnesty would not lead to citizenship, which obviously also means voting for people that are here illegally. And now you got Democrats saying, oh, no, no no, no, it's citizenship for people DOCA. And if it's citizenship for people under DOCA, it'll be for their parents too, It'll be for their families.

All of a sudden, you know, the one point seven million UNDERDCA becomes five million, becomes seven million, becomes it's a mass amnesty and they're all citizens. Goodbye, Republican Party. Every win another national election in your lifetime. By the way, do you think the Democrats aren't aware of that? I think they're not seeing this for what it is. Of course, look at the look at the scheming and the plotting of Pelosi and her and her co conspirators in this

whole impeachment fiasco. You don't think they're aware of the long term demographic implications of a mass amnesty. Of course they are. That's what motivates them so much. That's why they get so excited about the prospect of this. But Joe Biden also says here that doctor recipients are in many cases more American than most Americans because they have done well in school. What the heck does that mean?

First of all, can we stop with the like, everybody who's cover UNDERDACA is you know, winning like a Westinghouse Science Prize, and they're all geniuses and National Merit scholars in brilliant and amazing. I'm sure some of them are, but I'm sure a lot of them aren't. So I hate this game that the media will always do of like, look at the people who are here illegally. They're all

amazing and doing amazing things. And then we say, okay, well, what about what about these people covered under DACA who are like members of MS thirteen who are literally cutting people's hearts out and like amputating limbs and stuff as part of their getting activity. Why are you being so that's so racist for you to bring that up. But there are people that come from other countries and cultures who are covered under DAKA, and then they're you know,

involved in bad things. Well, why do we have we can hear about that there's something involved in good things. We can't hear about some involving bad things. If they're using that everybody in Dhaka is a valedictorian as a talking point, so that we would say, okay, fine, I guess they all got to be US citizens rewarding their parents for breaking the law and a legal activity. That's

what that is. Right. If if your parents cheat on their taxes and your parents give you a new ferrari or a maserati, I'd probably go to the maserati if money was no object, but just because I think they look cool. I guess what when the taxman comes and that that maserati whatever, either one that you have, you don't get to say, oh no, no, but but my parents gave it to me and they cheated on their taxes, but it's mine now. No, they would take it from you.

They would say sorry, ill gotten gains. That principle they're saying doesn't apply here. Now. Trump has been willing to negotiate about the fate of DACA recipients if there are other very important changes made on immigration. That's you know, politics is God, I was going to say, politics is the art of the possible. It's like, people don't come to this radio show to hear such a trite nonsense. But there is some negotiation involved in this. You have

to work within the reality around you. But Joe Biden's attitude here, I mean, he's clearly trying to get the left wing base and particularly minority and Hispanic voters fired up for Joe Biden's candidacy. He can say, they'll say things like this, and in fact that the common refrain from a left for a long time has been that illegal aliens are better than Americans, like they're just better people based I mean, there's millions of them, there's a

lot of Americans. Is a strange thing for American politician to say, but this has become culturally acceptable. This is a form of virtue signaling. If you say that we're lucky to have all the illegal aliens we do because they're more hard working, do the jobs Americans won't do, get in trouble less with the law. They have this all these statistics that they'll cite, which by the way, are also usually cherry picked and not true. But that's

a whole other thing. They always will conflate legal and illegal immigrants to get to the conclusions they want about quote immigrants. But when you look at illegal aliens and you actually look at criminality tied to their illegal status, false documents, not paying taxes, etc. Etc. It's a lot of lawbreaking going on among the illegal alien community on a regular basis, things that would get you and I

in trouble, but that don't get enforced against the illegal aliens. Also, just notice how I call them the legal aliens, because that's what it says in federal statute. That is the designation for people who are here illegally, it is not undocumented. That's an Orwellian, politically loaded attempt to change the way we think about a group of people who are in violations of the law. You don't want them in violation the law. Change the law and change the way they're

describing the law. Don't expect me just because a bunch of morons at CNN will do whatever they're told by their social justice overlords. Don't expect me to just change the way I speak about it because that's what they do. I don't think. So you're in the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton show podcast, and since we're talking immigration, I'm also meant to get to this. There's a story earlier this week about the efforts of the administration to crack down on birth tourism. As I say, so, this

is it's pretty straightforward, right. People come here, particularly these days, the largest numbers they're seeing people come from China. I think people also are coming from Russia, but it's most from East Asia. You're having large tens of thousands of people come to America explicitly so that they can give birth on US soil, which will be paid for, by the way, by taxpayers. Oh yeah, you get to pick

the bill up for that. If you're an American and you show up at a hospital and you're gonna pay Friends of mine who have had babies, which I have not done yet, it's like, I think it costs like twenty grand on average. I mean, it's expensive to go through the whole process of having a baby if you're

actually going to pay for the services yourself. So they come here and they get to just go to the hospital and obviously they don't turn away somebody who's in labor or pregnant, so you just get to have the baby and then go back to your home country. But oh, that's right because of or it's not because of the Constitution.

Is because of an interpretation of a constitutional amendment that has never been tested in the courts about a natural about a natural born citizen and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, right subject to the jury diction thereof is the key clause here. But they say that if you're born in this country, even if your parents are here illegal and you're only here temporarily, you're a US citizen. So people

game the system. It's exactly what they're doing. They show up nine months pregnant, they go to a US hospital, they have the baby here, baby gets birth, birth sigarette leads to passport right. They then are US citizens, and then they'll go back to China, or they'll go back to Russia, or they'll go back to wherever. And so they live in the other culture, and there's no allegiance to America whatsoever. There's no effort whatsoever to be Americanized

or American. They're foreigners who continue to live in a foreign country. But they've just gathered the nice little benefit of US citizenship and they get to hold on to and then when they want to go to an American school. Guess what, you want to go to university in California. Oh, you're a US citizen. You're good. Just move there, live

in that state. All of a sudden, you can be somebody who's lived the first eighteen years of his or her life in Beijing, and you get to have the taxpayer, including federal taxes that goes to all the subsidies for not just student I mean all the federal taxpayer backing student loans, but then also all the subsidies to go directly to these universities, which there's a ton of taxpayer dollars that are being funneled into, especially state schools, but

schools across the board. And you have this option. And the Trump administration has instructed under visa and the way that you get a visa, you gotta go, You sit down, you talk to a consular officer. I mean, I'm not I haven't gone through this process myself, so I've only read about it. But effectively they can now ask questions about, hey, are you just coming to America? Are you just getting a visa to go to America to have a baby, and can you pay for it? If that's what's going

on to try to discourage this practice. And of course the left and the mainstream media are outraged, and anybody would try to discourage this. I mean, they're pretty open now about how they want America to get scammed. I mean, they want the United States to be scammed as long as it's being scammed by foreigners who are likely to return here and vote Democrat. That's it. No honest person says that we have a we have a sound immigration system.

When somebody from China or any foreign country will show up here, get you know, for a couple of weeks, give birth here, have a taxpayer, pay for it, go back home, and just keep as a kind of option value citizenship, full citizenship for that child to be used at a later day whenever he or she decides that they want to use it. This is the system we have. Does anyone really think that's what the foundering fathers had in mind? Come here, have a baby, and then all

they needed to come here as a US citizen. By the way, all the welfare metafans. You know that you're entitled to all the benefits of voting, all the benefits of citizenship. Perhaps never until you're an adult living a day in this country. That's the system we have in place. Maybe somebody should challenge that. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,

the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. I was listening to Ross Garber, who's one of our analysts at CNN, who has been a lawyer for many impeachment trials, and he was saying that there's too much focus on the facts and the evidence and not enough on the

emotion and maybe even visual aids. The sound buys, for example, have been the most compelling, maybe things like maps of Ukraine to really hit home what they're talking about when it comes to the dire consequences potential consequences of what the president unintentionally sound analysis here from Donna Bash of CNN. At CNN has this whole this whole crew of like

Democrats who kind of take the NPR. We're just going to be very mellow and our analysis all the time, so it seems like it has more gravity tossed than it does. But they're just all pushing the same off. They're all Democrats. They never say anything critically interesting. They're not particularly learned, but is where it is. But Donna bosh there actually stumbled onto some truth I think accidentally. First of all, that they're focused so much on the

facts and not on emotion is laughable. So she's wrong on that. She's wrong on that because you had Adam Schiff. I mean, this guy, it's like he was auditioning for some really self important, pompous Aaron Sorkin movie. I mean

you could just hear. The whole thing was like straight out of the that that TV show, The West Wing or The American President with Michael Douglas, you know, oh, all these I used to have to watch this stuff growing up, and I was like, why is the Democrats are always the good guys and there's always some bad guy, usually with a Southern action and who's like a Republican who's a bad man. And you know, you're like, why is this always the entertainment that we get? That's because libs.

Libs dominate media, libs dominate Hollywood. I don't know if you saw this. It turns out that I think it's almost one hundred to one in terms of donations for professors college professors. I think the Campus Reform Group had that out this week. It's some crazy number. Basically, all college professors who donate to a political party donate to Democrats.

I know that's not surprising, but when you see the numbers, it's staggering how politically not representative colleges, colleges and universities are anyway. So Dona Donna Basher is saying they're focused too much on the facts, not the emotion. This thing is all emotion for Madam Schiff. That's they're just this

is all just anti Trump theater. But I do think that she's also reacting to the fact that it was She says, oh, we need more maps and things like such as the Iraqis don't have them, and the maps like such as the Iraq some of you will get that. And the truth is it's just so boring that they know they've law. I mean, every day the ratings are going down, less and less people are watching or no, fewer and fewer people are watching Boom because we can

count the number of people. Uh they're they're not watching because there's nothing really to see. We already we know the argument. They can keep trying to make it a big, gaseous speech about how this is the fate of the Republic and Adam shifting and then you know, speaking of gashes, you know Jerry Nowdler comes up there. You know, the whole thing. It's just it's a total mess. When ultimately it just doesn't, it just doesn't. It's not gonna fly, it's not going to get it done the way they

want to get it done. And there's some long term damage that is being done in this whole process. I mean, here's here's Lindsay Graham has been good on this. I gotta tell you, Lindsay Graham has been good on this particular topic. When Lindsay's over the target, he does a good job and he's over the targeting. This from playlib E Looven. Because I've been involved in two impeachment trials, this is a second one. I just want to make

an observation here. What the House Managers were proposing yesterday is basically to destroy the institution of the presidents as we know it, make it naked when it comes to partisan impeachment, not have a venue to go to court and litigate privileges that have been exercised by prior presidents. When it comes to Donald Trump, they're willing to destroy the institution of the office in the name of getting him. So bottom line, the Clinton impeachment was conducted by outside council.

There's none here. Ken Starr spent five years investigating the President before we took up the matter in the House. The President was allowed to cross examining ken Starr at the House Judiciary Committee. He recommended eleven browns for impeachment, and President Clinton utilized the course extensively on his behalf. He's right. They are attacking their undermining institutions while pretending to defend them. This has become a Democrat a Democrat

recurring theme, and that's what we see happening here. It's stunning that they pretend that the best thing that could happen for this country right now would be the removal of the president. Think about that for a moment. I was telling you in the last hour about how one of the reasons they hate the president so much here is because he is successful and he has also kept faith with his base. But let's even think about what it would be like the day after the removal of

President Trump. Thinking about what Trump voters, with the contempt, the rightful contempt that they would have for our elections for our institutions. A president has never, never, in what two hundred and thirty forty some odd years at this point, never been removed from office. Presidents have have started wars

they shouldn't have started. Presidents have put people in internment camps, issue and presidents have you know, there's a lot of things that have gone on here, folks, president has never been removed. You're going to remove this guy for this? You think that this is impeachable? Jay Seclo actually in some of his better moments, I mean, he raised this issue too, But do you think that this is enough

against this guy? Play clip five? Please? You know, we've got something very different than what you're hearing up here. You're hearing, you know, video clips of tessimony. We've got lawyers that are would be put forward when this when our side of the days goes. That represents multiple schools of thought on what is and is not in the

peaceful pensive. They have one thing, encount that the accidents allege and the accles of the president do not reach that level no matter which school of stout are wanting. And we're not afraid to put out both of those schools of thought because Our position is you still have to meet basic fundamental constitutional obligations, and they have They certainly have not. They haven't won. I've not heard or seen a single Republican that I know who has been

even the least swayed by any of this. Because anybody who is intelligent understands the politics that are driving all of this, and this is an entirely political exercise. They can dress it up as much as they want, pretend that it's something else, it is not something else, and then you just have the there's the institutional realities of this, what it does the institution of the president in town. Now, all of a sudden, Trump does not have the same

rights at presidents before him have had. But that's that's nothing new related right this is Democrats will change any rules they want as they go along. But then there's also the prospect of the removal of this president and what that would do. Given that we're in an election year, and I mean the election is not far off. It'll be here, We're gonna be sitting here talking to you, producer, Mark and I are going to be talking to you about the election in very short order as it's about

to happen, and as it is happening. They really think that removing the president in this year, in this way is fair. Let's use that word. Let's use the F word here. Fair. They think that's fair, fair to the American people, fair to the people who voted for Trump, and fair to the people who are going to be

voting in the future. I can't get over that this is just a desperation play by Democrats who recognize that their electoral prospects, given the field they've put forward, are not strong, and they'll do anything to try to rig the game in their favor. Lindsey Graham again, he gets it. Play clip producer Mark play clip one. I have said consistently, I'm not going to grant witness requests by the defense. They could have called all of these people if they'd

wanted them in the House. They denied the president his day in court, and I'm not going to legitimize that. There are a bunch of people on my side. I want to call Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. I want to end this thing sooner rather than later. I don't want to turn it into a circus. I think Schumer said yesterday, we're not willing to trade Joe Biden for anybody,

I think, I know why. I want the American people to pick the next president, not me, And so what I think is the best thing to happen is to have oversight of Ukrainian potential misconduct and move on to the election. I am not going to use my vote

to extend the trouble. You know, I'm consistent on this one because after Benghazi, after Benghazi attack and the lies told by the White House under the Obama administration, by Susan Rice, by Barack Obama, CNN's efforts to help Obama, and the debate against Romney via Candy Crowley, with all that going on, I remember saying, and those of you who have been with me now for many years watching the show, listening to the show, that our chance for

real accountability went away the day Obama got reelected. It was up to the voters to factor in Benghazi and the incompetence, the lies, the lack of response when our people downrange were in jeopardy. But I said, the moment and people who want to hear it, by the way, oh we're going to get him in the hearings, I said, no, No, with the not with Obama and his people in place in the executive branch. No, you're not. You know, we want to have the hearings to find out some more

about what happened. All right, fine, but it was never it was never going to move the needle, my friends, once Obama got reelected. And that was why going back to slow roll, that was why it was so important that it wasn't thought of as a terrorist attack. On nine to eleven, right before the American people went to the voting voting booths, right had to kind of delay delay, Oh, we'll get the answers later. We'll get the answers later. Once Obama was reelected, there was never going to be

any accountability for that. But I accepted that that was reality, you know, and they know, the left, the Democrats know that if Trump gets reelected, a lot of the schemes they've put in place won't have borne fruit, won't have been successful. But then this is where I get into I don't know if I've made this prediction yet on this show. I believe that the House of Representatives, if it is in Democrat hands, will refuse initially to certify

the presidential election when Trump wins. I also believe and I tweeted this out that the Democrats will impeach Trump again in a second term. They'll find an excuse, they'll do it again. And this isn't entirely This isn't just a political thing that has it's a perception battle. There are consequences that are I think being forgotten here. One of them is with the Senate tied up. My understanding is with the Senate tied up as it is right now in this proceeding, you know they're not they're not

putting judges through. And Trump has been to the best president of my lifetime, better than Reagan. Okay, let's be honest, better than Reagan on judges. Trump has been the best president of my lifetime, putting constitutionalists on the bench, all levels, Supreme Court on down. He's a McConnell, give him credit too, lean, mean judge, confirming machine, cocaine Mitch gets it done. But right now they're being tied up by this whole nonsense of the Senate trial. So there are consequences of this.

But I do believe that the Democrats will refuse to certify the election results, and then we'll also impeach the president again. We'll be back here again. They they have a fever and the only prescription is more Trump impeachment. I mean, they can't help themselves. These people are nuts there. They've reacted to this whole Trump presidency in in deranged fashion. So don't expect that to stop anytime soon. That's going to continue. You're in the freedom hunt. This is the

Buck Sex and Show podcast. President said in an interview yesterday at Davos that he will take a look at cutting social Security and other entitlements after the twenty twenty election, and that it is, actually, he said, the easiest of all things. The President promised that, unlikes other Republicans, he wouldn't touch social Security and Medicare. He's already broken that promise and gone after Medicare. Now it looks like social Security is in the President's crosshairs as well. Even as

this trial. Even as this important trial continues, Americans should hear that the President is casually talking about cutting their social security at a Swiss Ski resort with the global financial elite. Don't you just love the demagoguery here? You know, every president goes to Davos. I mean, I think the whole place is pretty much a joke. But you know, presidents go and maybe there's some worth while the discussions that happened there among world leaders whatever. But Chuck Schumer's

you know, he wants to take yourselfials security. He's in Davos with the global elide. Also once with Chuck Schumer having wearing like reading glasses that are down around like his upper lip. I mean they're way like his glasses are falling off his face all the time. Is this like a look is he going for this? Is this a new style I'm not aware of. Not that I'm some style critic, as Bruce Mark will tell you, but I gotta say it just struck me as a little odd.

But oh, the usual, the usual demagoguery from Democrats about dealing with entitlement programs. Look, this is where this is where we see if conservatives have the courage of their convictions. We are spending too much money as a country. No one likes to hear that. This is like boring. I feel like everyone just wants, oh, let's get back into the fights over Trump. We are structurally unsound in our finances as a country. We are twenty two trillion dollars

in debt. The overwhelm whole. I mean, the overwhelming majority of the whole in our finances. Our deficit yearity year outcomes from Medicare and somewhat from Social Security. Social Security is not that hard to fix. It's going to run out of money in twenty thirty something, I think. But that's when the trust fund runs up, that's what they say. But you'd have to just do You'd have to raise the retirement age and do means testing. That's it. People

don't want to hear that though. They don't want to hear that, and a lot of older people vote. As we know, so our Republicans are going to follow through

on this that the answer is probably not. In the meantime, I think what you are going to see is a continued effort to just have people like Chuck Schumer go forward and just lie about this stuff, just be unwilling to be truthful with the American people about how problematic it is that we have the debt that we have, that we are spending this money in this way, and that we have to Politicians cannot continue to get votes for themselves by giving out benefits to people today that

future generations have to pay for. That is all that is happening. Boomers don't like to hear that. Boomers, I'm sorry, that is reality. There's a reason why a lot of millennials, a lot of people in their late twenties early thirties are walking around saying, so, I'm never going to get to own a house. It's really hard to build a family and get married under the under this circumstances of

the economy. These days, you've got Obamacare that's already taking money from people in the individual market who are healthy and young to give to older people who are sicker. That's all that. It's just a redistribution scheme from young to old. That's what our entitlement system is right now. And people say, oh, but I've paid into my whole life. Yeah, but you're taking out twice what you put in. That

doesn't work. That's what medicare is. It doesn't work. I mean, this would be you know, you get back from the bank. Would you put into the bank? You know, with interest, you don't get back from the bank twice, would you put in because somebody told you that that's what you're going to get, and that's the system that we have. So Schumer knows that this is very This is a highly effective plan to just attack Trump on this issue.

But I think bad news for America. But good news for Trump is that he's not gonna do He's gonna back off with us. Nobody will touch entitlement's folks. I'm here to tell you no one's going to touch him until we all face a lot of economic pain. Thanks for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, it's our three here of the Buck Sexton show Man If Friday is flying by,

which is very exciting for me. What's also very exciting is that we can talk about Elizabeth Warren. Elizabeth Warren, Oh, she could walk in any moment, Buck, Why are you making fun of me on your show? I just want to help the people. I'm only worth about twelve million, so I want to make sure the rich pay more in taxes and pruson Mark likes to say that she

just gives out free stuff. So if we ever do bring her in for an interview, how much you gonna ask you for a producer, Mark, do you think you can get from Lizeth warrens I'm not a greedy person, maybe like one hundred bucks something like that, Hunt, but I mean doesn't sure should have just carried barrels of cash around with her to give out. Andrew Yang wants to give everyone a thousand a month though, I like

thousand dollars. But he would say, you only get one day's worth, probably, which is what's a what's one day of a thousand thirty bucks? Yeah, roughly take any free money. That's probably a good point. Yeah, I want that Yang. I want that Yang cash, that UBI Universal Basic Income Yank cash. He's worth a lot more than twelve million dollars. Oh he's rich, isn't he. I thought that was this Zilicon Valley guy. I actually know what he's worth. We

should find that out. I know Lize Warren's worth six to twelve million, but you know he's not worth six or twelve million dollars. The guy who went up to Elizabeth Warren and said, hey, I got I got a question for you. Um So I really struggled and really worked hard and worked two jobs and did everything I couldn't pay off my daughter's student loans, and we're paid off.

But you're telling me that I could have just like gone out and got a new car and done whatever I want, done whatever I wanted, And then you would just say, well, for the people that still have loans, I'm gonna buy your vote by having the taxpayer come in and give the money necessary for to pay off these owns. Producer Mark, would you please let's hear from this gentleman. Clip fourteen at questions my daughter money money, so you're gonna pay for feelings? Didn't say any money

one knows of us did the right thing. My money had fun by hard little vacations. I see he made more than idea. But I worked in the double shield before he actually large, you're laughing. He tell those guys actually upset, and he clearly has personal, uh you know, as this personal experience of having worked very hard to

pay off loans. And then turns around and then you know, he turns around and he's being told by Lizabeth Warren, Oh, you know, well, if you've got two loans, work so make them disappear or gonna make them go away, because that's the right thing because the millionaires and you know, she gets that higher register when she starts yelling and go oh my gosh, make it stop. Hello. It's not that it's not quite Hillary bad, but the millionaires and

the billionaires gonna pay more in taxes. That's not gonna not gonna cut it. But yeah, you gotta over a trillion dollars or student loan debt, and she's gonna just make it a trillion trillion with a chief. Folks, there's a lot of money gonna wipe it away for everybody who makes less than fifty k a year. I think it is up to fifty k and debt if you make less than one hundred thousand a year or something like that. And it does raise a race of very

interesting question. I know people who and I remember this. So I went to this Jesuit scholarship school in New York called Regis. It's a very good place, and you go for free. So I went to high school on a full ride, a full scholarship to a private school, but didn't pay a dollar to go. And there are a lot of kids who are my classmates who had to make the decision as to whether they would go. I remember one student in particularly, a friend of mine. It was he got into Harvard. He got into UVA

UVA offered him a full ride Harvard. And this is before Harvard. Now, now Harvard is need blind, so you can actually go and if you qualify your your you don't pay. But this is before that. This is you know, I'm old. This was a long time ago, and Harvard was going to be roughly, you know, forty five fifty k a year. This is back in the late nineties.

And the guy chose to go to Harvard and his family, you know, had to try to come up with a way to help him do that, and he took out loans and had to pay them off, and I think he's paid them all off. Now he went to work, and I think as an investment banker, no surprise there a point of her being. This was a decision that

millions and millions of people have had to make. I just spoke to somebody recently who made the decision to go to a law school at a state school as opposed to go and to a considered a higher ranked a private institution for law school because of all the money that he got to go to that school. And you ask, okay, well, these are decisions people make based on the economic realities of the time. Now we're just gonna come along and just sweep away the debts of

how is that fair for someone? There are people in this country right now who will have paid off their student loans this year. They'll be there. I don't know how many there are, but there'll be people that make their last payment this year. And someone will have been paying off loans for years and years, maybe decades, And if Elizabeth warrewins the presidency, other people are just gonna get fifty k wiped away, just boop, you don't have to pay it anymore. How is that fair? Do the

Democrats have an answer for this? And I have a different question as well. Okay, maybe I didn't take out you know, maybe I didn't take out student loans, but maybe I ran up credit card debt because I paid I paid for my education, but I also then had to make different, you know, economic choices elsewhere in my life. So let's say I've got twenty thousand dollars of credit card debt, which is really scary, by the way, because a lot of credit card is the APR, and that

it's going to be about twenty five thirty percent. I think I think the APR and my credit card if it goes along is like thirty almost. It's crazy. That's every year, just bloop. They're just taking money from you, right, so can I can then I apply and say, hey, well hold on, I don't have student loan debt. I have other debt. But I went to college and because I had to, you know, I didn't want to have non dischargeable student loan debt, so I had to make

other Do you get those debts wiped away? Why not? People? Is it less? You know, is it less necessary to have gas in your car and food on your table than it is that you went to get a four year degree somewhere or in a graduate degree. Why does Elizath Warren get to do this? And remember she's not saying, oh, we're just going to go through the Congress. She's claiming that she's just gonna direct if she becomes president. This is just a giveaway, folks, and giveaway to millions of voters.

It's a buying them off with taxpayer of dollars. She is claiming that she will just tell the Secretary of Education under her presidency to modify the loans so you don't have to pay them anymore. This is very similar in theory to what Democrats in the past have done, including Barack Obama, with using prosecutorial discretion as a means

of getting around with law. Actually is so what they'll say is, oh, we're not enforcing a de facto amnesty on immigration, for example, We're just not going to deport people that fall into the following categories under our prosecutorial discretion. I am also somebody who has been and I'm truthful about this always. I'm always truthful with you. I've been favorable toward the legalization of marijuana in the past, but

it should happen at the federal level. This state by state thing, this isn't really the way it's supposed to go. The federal government still has it on the books that it's illegal, and so by giving this wink and nod system to states to say, well, we're going to kind of let you do it in your state, even though that's not what the law says, that's lawlessness, folks. It's

not good. The federal government or the federal legislature should take action and say, Okay, we're gonna we're going to leave this to the states and take marijuana off the Controlled Substance Act schedule one. I believe it is they should do that because that would be a more lawful approach to this instead of what they're doing. So Warren is just saying that she'll tell the Secretary of Education that these loans should go away. But you know she

had no answer for this guy whatsoever. And because the real answer is political expediency. The student loan issue is just a it's a giveaway. It's just okay, we're gonna we're gonna pay off people who are going to vote for this platform. Notice, you know President Trump didn't come into office saying I'm gonna wipe away a trillion dollars of student loan debt just because this is a Democrat plan.

I mean, this is the equivalent of that person who runs for student council on high school and is like shown up with with cookies. By the way, speaking of which, producer Mark who showed up with a warm donut for you today, who showed up with a warm donut for producing you? You did? That's right, thank you? And was it was sinnamon and you enjoyed it. Yeah, it tasted like French coast. There we go. Yeah, that's actually is

from my brothers company. Which is called Susie's so O o z y S. They have fantastic gluten free baked goods, muffins and donuts and soon to be bred and I eat one every morning, and so I wanted to bring one in from my friend, producer Mark today, and that's what I did. Yeah, if you didn't tell me it was gluten free, I wouldn't have known. I mean, you were eating it right, well, that would have been yeah, really away, that's really yolo stuff for me to just

be like, I'm eating gluten today, that's not good. He's running running in and out during the show. Yeah, that would not be fun for anyone. But so you know, we brought in some sometime. I'm glad that you liked it. I could actually tell he actually ate it, folks. It was They're delicious. I mean, it's fantastic. But people sometimes have to try gluten free products to understand how good they can really be. U. But yeah, I know Susie's my brother's company. It's a great They do really good stuff.

So I was thinking of warm. Oh but if I showed up with warm donuts for everybody in my student you know, a student council election, they might vote for me, but I'm kind of bribing them, right, I mean, this is essentially a taxpayer funded bribe va Elizabeth Warren to all of the people who will have their student loans modified so that she can she can be the next president the United States. This is not good. It's not

the way it's supposed to go. I do not approve of this, my friends, And she does not have an answer for the question why is it that this is If this is an issue of fairness, why is it fair that the people who did the right thing and paid off their loans all of a sudden now that it was a really a wasted effort, that was money that should have been put toward other things in their lives. All it took was Elizabeth Warren to come forward and

be become president. Well, I'm seeing a lot of people that I know think that it is going to be Warren. I've seen that this has been happened in the past, but I've seen a surge of people saying that, you know, this is the We're going to see this play out in Iowa, New Hampshire. But they really think that it's gonna end up being Warren. I know, I don't know. I don't know. If I don't know, nobody really knows where this is going to go and how this is

gonna shake out. But Warren is every bit on p Let's see, Warren is really every bit as bad as Bernie Sanders. There's really not much of a difference between them. She's a socialist, folks, She's a socialist. She's just one that seems a little more polished and areudite than the kind of crazy crazy Bernie running around. But making no mistake about it, I mean, that would be a really really bad path for America to go down if she were to become the president United States. And I think

that it's a very realistic possibility. And things like student loans and raising the minimum wage, these are areas where it doesn't matter how many studies we show, it doesn't matter if we win the argument. People like this stuff. They like the idea of debt, of student debt forgiveness. They like the idea of raising the national minimum wage so that it becomes fifteen dollars an hour. They like these things, and Warren is pretty pretty slick with all

of it. And then I'm also just still in utter amazement that after her debacle of oh yeah, I'm Native American, I'm one one twenty fourth Native American. That she's even a serious contender after that, you almost have to respect how shameless she has been since that, but really how shameless she's been all along. I mean, it takes a certain determination and a certain junie qua to go through life as a fake, and you go through your professional

life as an adult as a fake Native American. That's a that's a challenging thing to pull off, and she has. I mean, you got to be a little delusional, very dishonest, but she is those things and more. Friends, So don't count her out for the election, and we'll see what ends up happening with this student debt forgiveness situation. You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right. I really think that the Drudge Report is

going overboard here to try to get her. Everybody really scared about coronavirus. Um, you know you've got now there's a case in Chicago. Drudge Report, I see says here, and you got all these different states on alert. I really don't think, um, I really don't think that this is going to be something that turns into a pandemic.

I don't know, but I do know that we've had all these different scares in the past for you know, H one N one, you know, bird flu, swine, flew all these different flu strains, and as I said, the flu kills thousands of people every year. So the flu is I mean, I was gonna say, nothing to sneeze at that's terrible, but you know, sorry, that's the only that came to my mind. But I mean, the flu is a serious, serious business. Um, did you like that

was something? It is something to sneeze at. Actually that's a that's a good point. But everyone needs a calm down a little bit. Is it's gonna be It's gonna be okay, I think will be all right. Um, there's quarantines in China, but you know, China quarantines people for a whole lot of things. And and I've got to say, um, the one thing about this that has gotten a lot of attention for me is did you see this prucer mark that they think that it may be a result

of people eating bat soup. And there's a total of animals too. There's circulating that they're people in the world who will have a bat effectively in their soup like an action. You can see it's a bat as like part of the whole thing, and they eat the bat and the broth that is surrounding the bat. I will tell you. I hear that it tastes like rat, which taste like lizard, which tastes like chicken. You ever had rack, No, I'm totally making this up. I have no idea. That's

a totally false tha. That was absolutely fake news. But I gotta say, if you're telling me about an animal that I have to eat, not including insects, an animal that I have to eat, and you have to have the whole animal in the thing that you're eating, that would be like top ten least Yeah, you know, top ten like least exciting things for me. Some weird things in Asian countries. I'm familiar. I know you've been there. No, but I mean, like I know that there's some there's

some stuff that gets eaten. I mean I thought I was pretty badass because I ate crickets in Mexico, but that's not that's like like an American thing. It's becoming. I know, there's like crushed cricket pro seatle Mariners are famous for that. Now toasted crickets. And then that's one of the things they have in the ballpark. You're kidding, not kidding, they say, in an American Baseball stadium, they served toasts every year. They have like a Major League

Baseball like food thing. They've view an NYC and that's the thing the Marinders send. That's great. I did not know that. Yeah, that's crazy. But how okay, Now this is the question. I'll ask you how much for bat soup? How much would I have? I mean cash on the barrel, wounds of money, and but you and you're taking a risk of getting coronavirus. There's no amount of money. I'm

not risking my life for any amount of money. Yeah, but like I mean, come on, I'm sure a lot of people have bats soup and are just fine after, which is fine after Yeah, it seems like that it's a delicacy. Yeah. No, I have thanks to live for, you know, wife, eventually kids. Yeah, not happening. Yeah, that's like the scene in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, which I think is the lesser of the three real Indiana Jones movies. You know, some people think it's the best.

I think it's probably the worst. I think the first one is the best, and then the last crusade probably comes after that one. But when they see sees all them, she was such pretty birds, and he's like, they're vampire bats, and it's like, oh, vampire bats are kind of scary. Yeah, I wouldn't go to eat them, that's for sure. Yeah, bats are among the creepy and there's a reason why Dracula. It's like bats, rats, wolves, wolves are cool, but like

they can be scary. Obviously cool looking, Yeah you're looking. They're scared dogs. Yeah, you wouldn't want to get too close to one. But yeah, I know bats are like very They're just above tarantulas and snakes and scorpions for me. In the creepiness fact, there's a reason none of those animals heard us. Yeah, and it's interesting to me that this is what people are now saying, is how this outbreak may have started. I'm just I'm just gonna put this out there. Maybe we should think twice about bat

soup as a thing. You think, yeah, yeah, but then again, there are also parts of the world. This is a thing that you know, in the in the global illegal global animal trade. There are people that will they want um rhinoceros horn for their soup because there are these stories that that'll make you it's just keratin, it's what your fingernails are made out of. But there's this belief in some indigenous cultures that that'll make you a particularly

shall we say, a particularly manly man. And so that's been part of the rhinoceros horn trade. That's why they kill rhinos so they can use the horn for this like powder that they'll put in soups and things. They were they're very endangered. Yeah, they're not totally extinct, and I think the I forget if it's the white of the black rhinoceros is one of the most one of

the most endangered animals. Is a very illegal thing, to be highly illegal thing, but people still really believe it's There's also they also take a part of it, which will not talk about it ever. They take a part of a tiger and use it for a soup, which they also believe is for virility. You know, people eat that same part of a bull like as a delicacy. I mean, have you ever had a Rocky Mountain oyster? No? But I will tell you that bulls, you know their food,

Tiger is not food. We're tiger food. Bulls are you know, steer or food as far as I'm concerned. Okay, so you can need to By the way, that reminds me I have I have a little bit of bragging, a little bit of bragging to do about something which I want to share with with you and the rest of the team. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,

or wherever you get your podcasts. So, Bruce and Mark, I have my family over for dinner, my parents and my sister, and they're adorable, very chubby French bulldog that I'm now not allowed to say looks like a baby seal. According to my mom she heard that, not allowed to say it, so it does not look like a fat white seal that just moves its blubber across the tundra. No, that is not what the French. I cannot say that. Um, but I made them a roast chicken dish. As I

told you, I'm actually decent in the kitchen. Because of my celiac disease, I hard to learn. I did something that I've I've had done before, but it's been a long time. I did a reverse seer on an American Wagu style. I think it was a butcher steak. It's a Wagy style butcher steak is zeb I think it's called Zabony steak or something like that. I had some

kind of funky name, but it's ways America expensive. It was, it was good, but I made one for myself because I wanted to test it out, and of course I wanted to be a little bougie with my red meat choice, and I did the reverse seer technique. You gotta try. This is a game changer. So here's here's all you need to know for the reverse seer. And by the way, this you will make a steak for yourself and for everyone listening. I'm gonna have to make a video of this.

Someone could see me do it. You will make a steak for yourself that is restaurant quality at home without having a grill. You know, you know there are other things you can do where your steak is gonna be amazing. You know this is stovetop of and all you need the only things that you need to do this properly. Really, I mean, the only sort of additional tool kit cast iron. Gotta have a cast iron because that's you're not going to get the heat up enough on a and you

know Lodge. But I would love to get Lodge as a sponsor because I have like four Lodge cast iron things at home. I got the whole Kid game changes. We'll get the sales team on Yeah, we gotta get the sales team on that, because Lodge is great. Um, but you gotta have a cast iron. And then here's what you do. You put the meat in the oven. And the thing that everyone skips is you gotta let that meat rest get to room temperature. Do not put cold red meat in the oven. You gotta get the

meat to rest to room temperature. And you feel in touch it be like, okay, this meat is like it's been left out of the you know fridge. Now it's time to go in salted as soon as you take it out, so the salt will seep in salt and pepper liberally, because I remember, you're also going to cook some of that off, so you let them meet come to liberally. That's right. The only thing I do liberally season in my meat. Thank you, producer, Mark correct, And so then you put it in the oven two fifty

and you leave it about depending on how thick. You know, this is the only part of it. You gotta sort of you know, got a game it out a little bit. I would say leave it for thirty minutes and then check every five minutes. But you have to have a thermometer because otherwise you're not gonna know because it looks terrible. When do you do this, Like it looks like your meat, Like the meat looks kind of almost like it's like

a meat loaf. Yeah, exactly, it looks like a meat like it's like kind of gray red, like it's not really that that appetizing. You stick the thermometer in there. You want it for me medium rare, one twenty it's perfect. You can go to one twenty five if you're gonna be a little you know a little bit more on that, and if you go to one thirty year, a whimp. But that's okay. It's your choice. It's your meat. And then you take it out. You put that lodge cast iron.

Don't use olive oil because olive oil we're burned. You use a higher heat oil. I actually used bacon fat that I saved for this purpose, which was amazing bacon fat in the lodge cast iron. Wait, I mean turn that heat up until you're you get you see smoke rising off the path. That's when you're good, and then you see her about one minute each side that steak.

I'm telling you, man choir of angels singing reverse here, you will make a perfect if you do it right, and it's not hard, it's just you just gotta be in the process. Because here's the problem. If you don't do it this way. If you do it this way, you're gonna have an amazing steak and it's gonna taste like something you get at a steakhouse. And pay in New York seventy eighty dollars for my mistakes in New

Yorker are crazy. That's why Jesse Kelly has to buy me a steak here because I was right about Nancy Pelosi and I want to make him pay. So steaks, you know, can be very expensive if you don't do the reverse here and you try to cook on the stove. Thought, the problem is you're always trying to guestimate the internal temperature of that meat as you're cooking, as you're cooking as you're cooking, and if you miss the window, you'll

overcook it. And obviously if you take it out too soon, and you know, you get your stone cold in the center, that's gross. Now you've ruined your So it's just a lot easier to get the perfect internal temperature of that meat cooked to medium rare, which is what civilized people eat, the red meat at the biggest problem I have with Trump, biggest problem I have with Trump? An you a well done guy, well done with ketchup. I don't even know what to say about this. I did that when I

was a kid. I know, well done with ketchup. I mean. Other than that, thank you President Trump for saving saving America. But we gotta get you started eating. Get your rare meat. This is just I mean medium. I would let it go, but just well done. It's crazy. So I know people their steaks black and blue. Check out. Yeah, I know that's a little much for me even but I would say, check out producer Mark. When you're gonna cook for missus, producer markin there's one problem with that. Well, she does

not eat red meat. Kes her sick. She's chicken and pork and everything else. Okay, she's beef beef mixers. Wow. Yeah, okay, so the focus for yourself when she's gone, dude, go. The other thing is that I usually eat steak out. I've learned the cuts. This was an expensive cut up. But butcher steak, if you can get it somewhere, is a great, inexpensive cut usually. It's why they called the butcher's butcher steak because usually the butcher keeps it for himself.

It's inexpensive but really really tasty. Butcher steak is great. Skirt steak um, I mean, Ribby is fantastic, But you get a dry age Ribby, you're spending you know, even for one steak. For one, you're spending twenty twenty five bucks. Try age better. I never know. People always say that, they say that the locks in more of the flavor, you know. I kind of go with it. If it's marketing, I don't care because I love red meat, so I kind of go for it. But it's more. It's more

expensive for sure. If I've ever had one. Because it's so expensive, I'm like, I'm might as well get the regular Ribby. Yeah, I mean it's worth you should try and then and then you could compare but I'm telling you, man, when you're cooking for yourself, do the reverse here. I made it for myself last night. Oh to the M, to the G. I'm sure you can do that with other things of steak. Yeah, probably like a pork chopper. You can do with all all kinds of these things.

So some good times, and with that, why don't we do some roll call if we would, sir. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping every yell. It's time for roll call, all right, Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. If you want to be in on the action here um and again, you can also send us a team Bucket, iHeartMedia dot com, which is the company that we work for. So that should when that should be pretty easy to remember.

Let's get to it, zach Uh, here we go, he writes, Hey, Buck, just want to let you know, let proucer Mark know that I too use roughly three stirring straws to drink my mixed drink. Look at you, you got you got a kindred spirit on your excessive straw usage, you environment bacher. It's not that abnormal. Yeah, I've never heard of this before. I'm learning something new here, So you go three straws.

It gives you just more more more stirring capability, stirring capability, and you know, drinking your drink up to your stirring gauge. I just prefer strata, you know, especially with mixed drinks. A gilly I solo berate. Okay, all right, we'll check it out, fair enough, Adam, Hey Buck, So on the new logo, did Prucer Mark talk you into the full underwear model photo shoot? Shield? Si? I don't think it's producer Marks fall, non't even do. I don't even know

you did a photo shoot until I saw the pictures. Yeah, yeah, no, I mean, you know, artistic rendering. What can I tell you? But it is there are some interesting posts you did. I mean hopefully they're not all up on the on the internet. No yet, No, no, I have them all. Oh man, yeah, I just did whatever they told me. They're like Buck put on a man, Kenny. I was like, let's go for it. Yah, just kidding. That's very awkward when a photographer is taking a photo shoot off you. Look,

I did the wedding engagement photos. It's just like I don't want to I don't stand in these positions. Why am I yeah. I just also want to be like, excuse me, like I'm a model, and I just like I can't work on says this pressure because I'm very I'm sure you actually did voices very perfect and sensual,

and I just want you to capture all of my essence. Yeah, yeah, No, I'm not the one thing, the one thing in media that I'm never particularly comfortable doing is the photo shoot stuff, just because I'm like, there's a reason, there's a reason that I do radio. So, Andrew, here we go, Hey Buck, newly commissioned Marine Corps officer here. I really enjoyed Ben wine Garden filling in for you. He's an excellent host,

very smart and informative. I listened to your daily show and it helps passing on my downtime here in training. I'd love to hear any stories you might have about marines in particularly work with during your time in the CIA. Keep up the good work, love the show, Andrew, Andrew, thanks so much, man, and also thank you for your service, sir, and God bless and I hope all's going well in

the Cores. I worked with a number of former Marines SO guys who were active duty, and some of them had been in combat roles, in infantry combat roles, and then joined what I was doing the CIA later on, And I'm the short version is I just love marines. Man, They're awesome. So there were always really fun guys to talk to, really good at their jobs. You could trust them, you knew they were all in for the mission. So nothing nothing but love and good things and good feelings

about about the Marines that I worked with. You know, they always acquitted themselves incredibly well, both professionally and personally. I'm a big fan. I'll try to think if I have any any specific stories, but the stories I would have would be the Marines in doing stuff in CIA officer capacity, not as marines, so it'd be a little bit different. Be like, hey, man, like did you did you manage to change the filter on that coffee machine? Who? Yeah?

Because with CIA analysts do a lot of coffee drinking. Uh. David shields hot whoes as a list is a long one, Shields, ye, buck, we need to beat them at their own game. And then David writes a lot more David, thank you. I can't get to that right now, but there we go. Hold on a second, Ruth, Hey, why do you have Bloomberg advertisements on your podcast? Producer, Mark, would you actually like to handle this one because you know the answer to this one. Why do we have Bloomberg advertisements on

our podcast? So I don't know if it's directly with the law, but you can't you know, equal opportunities for both sides. So we have to give Bloomberg ads. We have to give Trump ads. Yep, it's not up to us, guys. The way it is the same thing with like your local TV station. They can't just run Republican ads. There's FCC stuff that yeah, FCCC and maybe FEC but yeah whatever, Yeah, there's there's regulations that come into play. So we if we're doing political advertisements on the show as we are,

you know, pick campaigns can buy space. We got to sell the both sides. That's the way it is, and that's on the podcast too. I don't control those ads. Those are automatically put in. So yeah, I'm sorry, turn your radio down for thirty seconds if you really don't want to hear it. But they're gonna be there through the election. Yep. Um, all right, casey yo, Buck. Why do you guys have such difficulty getting your podcast up?

On iHeart Radio. You guys have about a twenty five percent success right with uploading your podcast prior to six pm Pacific time? Come on, okay, specific time? Yeah, that means nine pm Eastern. No, So I did see this message. I was hoping you would read it on air. I don't want to automatically just say that's false. But it's got to be your phone because I'm all those tweet you see from at buck Sex and the Facebook messages those are me, and I'm taking the iHeart link an

hour after I posted, and I'm tweeting it out. So if that's around two or three o'clock Eastern time, so there's no way it's not up six hours later. That's definitely on your phone. Yeah, I mean because I would. We also would have we would have thousands of these messages. Are not one if this was okay? So okay, Casey, it's I think it's my friend. I think it's a tech issue with you. But we do appreciate that you want the show up sooner, and thank you for that.

And if you still have a problem, just address it to Grouchy Mark and he'll handle it. Julie, Hey Buck love the show. It's truly the best one. I just want to say that Bill Clinton's impeachment matters so little that Hillary Rodham Clinton was a legitimate presidential candidate twice and then no one seemed to legitimately care that he had a chance of being back in the White House in a position of power. Trump's impeachment doesn't matter now, and it won't matter to any side of history ever.

This is all for nothing, And it's almost always appropriate to quote Wayne World. So keep it up, shields high, Julie. Well, thank you, Julie, We're not worthy. It is. In fact, I agree with you that this impeachment thing is gonna all be It's gonna be viewed as a whole lot of Remember when you said the government shutdowns, and there's a lot of theater around that all the government shutdowns, and then like it never really shuts down for long and then it always goes back to normal and no

one really cares. This impeachment is not really all that much more momentous, I would say, than those government shutdowns. I don't think it really I don't think it's going to change anything, but it does show you how crazy Democrats are. So you gotta remember that the Democrats are absolutely nuts, Susan Buck. Is Nancy trying to help Joe Biden to the nomination with the delay of the articles of impeachment? Why would anyone think the Democratic nomination wouldn't

be rigged. It's possible, maybe probable, that Biden has to win in their view, so that they keep the dark secrets and they will be kept in the dark. As Susan, I would think Nancy probably is a Biden you know, if she had to her pick, I think she probably would want Biden to be the nomineel. Though I don't know what what Pelosi and Warren's relationship is like. That would be interesting. I have no idea. I don't even think I've ever heard one talking about the other that

I can remember in any meaningful way. I think Pelosi's probably a Biden supporter, and I don't think that she's trying to gain this out to help Biden specifically. I think the most important thing Nancy Pelosi is Nancy Pelosi and still being Speaker of the House if she can starting next year. At this time, she wants to keep her position. Tom Buck, first time writing, long time listener, love the show, veteran law enforcement and love the insight

concerning the big issues Shield sign. Keep up the good work. Tom from Minnesota, Thank you, Tom, thank you for keeping her streets safe and thanks for writing in to tell us some nice things about the show. Producer Mark and I, who both work our respective butts off on this show, very much appreciate it. So thank you. Thank you for that, and let's see what we have here. Next. We have Gina. Thanks Buck for reading my comments. I never comment all the things I listened to you for I have total

command of all that is happening. I listened to talk talk radio twelve hours a day, literally, so I keep it to the off side topics that I seem to know a little about myself, my family. Adore you. Keep doing what you do, and I'll be there to discuss powder wigs and Emo. Gina. Well, Gina, thank you so much. And yeah, we had some more notes about EMO. I think people said that some of them bands that we brought up as EMO were perhaps like pop. Was it pop?

What was the thing that they called it? Pop punk? That's what I was trying to say. Yes, they've gotten more poppy over the years, Yes, yes, pop punk. What was the last live band producer Mark Saw Oh, it's been a while. Probably Coldplay. Really realistically, I like that you like cold Play so much because I could picture you as the kind of guy that would make fun of somebody for liking Coldplay. But you're all about it. Yeah,

you just dig into it. People I've seen the most are cold Play in the red Hot Chili Peppers on My Chili Peppers are great. What is the best cold Play song? I mean, only you only get one yellow yellow, all right, yeah, fair enough. Yeah, I have to say that that's from Parachutes or was that from the other album? You know it was Parachutes. That was early. It was like their first thing, that was their first big one. Yeah, yeah,

I remember that. Yeah, look at that, Ryan Buck. Every want to hear some technical guests coming on the show to talk about the case for mammade climate change. I follow many. Some of them are actually the midst of a say we're in the midst of a cooling trend when the data fraud is accounting for If you're on board this, let me know. Send some suggestions, Ryan, please, I love getting suggestions. We don't do a lot of guests here on the show because I am I guard

my time with Team Buck jealously. Um, you know, I have a lot that I want to say to you every day. We don't do a lot of guests as a result of that, but I'm happy to review any recommendations you have. I'm certainly up for learning new things and talking to you about what may work, and so by all means, you know, I don't have all the answers, just almost all of them, but I don't have all of them a lot of them. Please do. Speaking of answers, when someone asked a question, Hey, what should I do

with my weekend? Listen to The Buck Sexton Show. Also watch us on Channel two forty eight Pluto TV, the first that's the channel that we are on. We have new exciting stuff. Dana Lash just joined the channel, which is great. We're so happy about that. We've got more awesome people coming on board as contributors, building a little conservative revolution Digital Baby check it out. Have a great weekend, everybody, Shield tie