Kamala The Radical

Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again. The Buck Sexton Show begins Sexton Sex No, Welcome to the Buck Sex and Show. Everybody. Great to have you with me here. We have so much to get to today.

You know, it's one of these days where I feel like there are there are two main issues to tackle, and I wasn't sure which one we would kick it off with because it can make a case for either. We got our friend Andy McCarthy joining later on this hour. I'd really just walk us through the legal ease and the sound constitutional analysis of what's going on now with the Muller probe with Roger Stone Stone looking very dapper today at chord. Everyone's of course, of course focused on that,

but we'll get into into that and more. I think we're going to bounce around on some topics today because there's so much on both the Stone Muller probe situation and what is hopefully it's final chapters, although I don't know how long those chapters will be, and then also in the reminder of what we are up against with

the Democrat at party. You see, for two years now, for two years we have been living in in a country where with the media environment that has saturated the airwaves with Trump is a he's a bully, he's a sexist, he's a rapist, he's mean, He's this it's just crazy. He's the twenty fifth Amendment is going to have to remove him from office because he's not of sound mind.

All this stuff right, he's a Russian agent, all this craziness they've put out there, and those of us who have been trying to make sense of some of the difficulties the administration has had getting things done. The wall is obviously still very much an open question. Why didn't they fund planned parenthood. Why hasn't the why haven't the

Republicans in Congress taken more definitive action on healthcare? And well, we know, I mean John McCain wouldn't even let them do the downsized version of a of an Obamacare, if not replacement, at least reducing of Obamacare. And now we are reminded that the Democrats have twenty twenty firmly in their sights and are having to be open about it, are having to open themselves up to well, who are you?

What does your side represent? Who are these people that from their various perches and either the media or in the government as members of Congress, senators and all the rest, you've been making it sound for two years like you're the ethical, reasonable, intelligent, competent people to run the country.

Now you and I haven't been buying that, but that's been part of the pitch we're you know, the Democrats have been trying to say while Trump is doing his very unorthodox presidency where he has gotten a lot done, and I think it's been overall. You know, I'm I'm happy, but I'm not I'm not satisfied. Happy but not satisfied. As how I think we could describe a lot of

folks who look at the Trump administration. But now when Kamela Harris comes out, who is clearly all the fawning all to sit down that the Jake Tapper sit down on CNN. Wow, isn't that just so nice that CNN, you know, kicks off for presidential campaign like that. You know, this is why when people talk about campaign financer form and oh, you shouldn't be able to you should only be able to give this much money into a cannonade

or this was money to a pack. I mean, Jeff Zucker is giving the equivalent of free media to people who based on what, well whatever their newsroom says, Well, if advertisers have to pay for exposure on CNN despite the week week sauce ratings, you know, there's a reason why the media has the power still that it does. It's effectively an in kind contribution for them to put certain people on TV. There are other people they obviously won't do this for, but putting at a side for

a moment. The great thing about seeing Kamala Harris up there onstage talking about what she wants is that it is a reminder that the Democratic Party in twenty nineteen is crazy. These people cannot be trusted to balance a check book, never mind run the United States government. Their ideas are absurd, their ideas are destructive. They will not

work in practice. They don't even work in principle. Kamela Harris made it clear she wants to take away and I am not exaggerating, I'm not playing games with her purpose. She wants to take away all private health insurance. She believes in a Green New Deal. She wants to bed all semi automatic weapons, which means, I mean, unless you've got a side by side Elmer Fudd style shotgun, guess what,

your weapons pretty much gonna be gone. So she's anti constitution, anti personal freedom, anti individual responsibility, and wants to tell you what to do and then some. And she's the centrist among the Democrats who have thrown their hats in their rings. So far, she's supposed to be the least

crazy of all these crazy people. She is speaking about policy ideas, and I don't even like to call them policy ideas because they're really just something that a bunch of you know, college sophomores at Hampshire would come up with between bong rips, you know, she's coming up with these ideas of yeah, they used to like let's just make college like no one pays any debt, but like also no, no private for profit college. You know, no,

you don't know what you're doing. And if you think, and you know, I had tip our friend David Harsani over the Federalists for a very good, short and to the point piece today on this. You know, if you think that Kamala Harris doesn't approach government as effectively in her mind, a benevolent authoritarian in our minds, a very dangerous authoritarian. What is an authoritarian? She wants to take away your car. She wants to take away your gun, She wants to take away your ability to keep what

you earned. She wants to take away your private health insurance, take it away, just gone. She really really believes that that's a good way forward, a single pair. Here we are what is it. Let's let's call it eight nine years later. And I remember because it was the start of my media career, doing all this reading and research on healthcare and Obamacare and where it was going and the fight over it, and and conservatives like me, and

I'm not pretending to be alone here at all. This was we knew the right knew you, the intellectual right had an understanding of where this was all heading, which was it was just Obamacare was an unworkable but politically saleable monstrosity that would get us to a place where we are going to be told, oh, the only way to fix this a single pair. We were saying this, We were saying it was a pathway to socialize medicine.

We were told, we were told that we were way off base, that we were racist because we just didn't like Obamacare, because of Obama, all these crazy things. We were told we were right, we were right. Turns out that when you actually have an understanding of how the insurance market works and how governments function and dysfunction, then you can predict these things because they're entirely predictable. Now we have the favorite candidate of the establishment, female African

American background. You know that they love this notion of President Kamala Harris, at least until president or would be president. Pardon me. Biden throws his hat in the ring, which

is going to happen. I think he's worried that that Camela is stealing too much thunder here, but she's the one that they're pointing to as the Hilary esque safe sound option, and the Democratic Party has been pulled so far left that I would say these people are un serious, except they seriously want to destroy very important foundational concepts aspects, legal protections, cultural traditions of this country. This is great though, for the country, in a sense that we at least

have the ability to see this now and early. We are now going to be able to switch into a mode where we're not just being told all the time. Oh, you know, look at look at what Trump said. Look at Trump's tweet. Ha ha ha. He's got small hands, he's orange, look at it. You know, it's just the media has been acting like a bunch of Brady sixth graders, as as Charles Cook and his wonderful essay on a bad press on Nash Review Online makes it just a

slam dunk case on. I mean, they act like mean spirited schoolgirls, all of them male female, everybody in the media, that's what they act like, people that you know, just really care about their popularity, their influence. They create this little in group and they're all just snickering and he he he he, and being nasty to anybody outside the group, CNN, Washington Post, New York Times, huff Po, BuzzFeed, all these places. That's how they act, That's how they've been conducting themselves.

Now they are going to have to switch from just being in this relentless attack mode. You also having to talk about what they want their people, because they're activists. They're not journalists. They are active participants in pushing for certain political ideas, and they are They're frauds and liars for not admitting that publicly. But they are now going to have to say, oh, yes, let's here's a splainer

on vox about the Green New Deal. The Green New Deal would be the single most economically disastrous thing we have done since the era of the Great Depression, and in some ways might even be worse than the Great Depression if they really went all in. Ninety percent of our energy is going to come from renewables. Does anyone realize what the costs of this would be. We have to just have this great leap forward, and I make

the connection to what happened in China under MAO. Purposefully, we're going to have this great leap forward into green energy that will annihilate our economic growth, destroy trillions of dollars of wealth and all because they really believe that CO two right, CO two, which plants need to survive and which is a tiny percentage of our overall atmosphere, is going to melt the world unless we decide that we're going to give up on all of our economic

and technological progress in one fell swoop, effectively just destroy so much of what we've built and then try to rebuild it in this new green energy amount. These are not ideas where we have a difference of opinion. This is negotiating. This is debating with people who have no connection to reality. But because of the media apparatus they have, it still is very powerful, because of the Silicon Valley apparatus they have, which is overwhelmingly not just Democrat, but

far left progressive. You want to talk about influencing an election, who knows who could even gauge how much Google and Facebook and Twitter have done behind the scenes with some you know, cya rubric of oh, we're just trying to make our platform better, but all of a sudden, Democrat ideas get out there much more frequently and get shared much more easily. Who knows how much they've already tilted elections.

We are in for a truly epic political battle leading in the twenty twenty and it's going to be incredible. And I'm so happy that I have all of you gathered with me as we do it, because it's going to be a wild ride, and there's going to be

some crazy days. There's gonna be some really sad days, but I am I'm excited for a shift in the national conversation, hopefully away from the Russia collusion delusion, which is the greatest waste of time and injustice perpetrated by the Department of Justice in my lifetime, and move toward what do these Democrats who pretend to be the adults in the room and the Trump era, who say they've always got a better answer? What is their answer? What

do they really think we should do? And the moment that you drill down into what they're suggesting, you only come away with one conclusion. It is for anybody who is honest and intelligent, it is an unavoidable conclusion. The Democratic Party has lost its mind. These people are crazy. The stuff that they want to do would be massively destructive, and unfortunately, we're going to have to fight this one, because if we don't, they can win, and a lot

of people are going to suffer. Eight to eight nine two eight two five eight eight eight nine hundred buck. That's the phone line if you want to call in the lines? Or did I give the right number? John? Sometimes they get the wrong I mean, Brandon, pardon me. Sometimes they get the wrong number, wrong DJ, wrong number? Does that sound right? Eight eight nine two eight two five eight to eight nine hundred buck? We got a much more show. Any McCarthy's gonna drop knowledge bombs around

the Russia Muller Stone circus, So that's coming up. Made a little radio boo boo before Sorry about that team. The lines are open, but I should probably tell you the right line. Eight four four wait, wait, wait, Mike, eight four four nine hundred two eight two five right eight four four buck. In my defense, I had to commit to memory the Glenbeck phone number when I used to fill in for him, the Rush Limbaugh phone number when I used fill in for him, and my own

phone number at the Blaze. So there are a lot of and it becomes very mechanical blah blah. You just kind of say it, you know, And that was so yes, eight four four nine hundred two eight two five eight four four nine hundred bucks. Sorry about that team. Anytime I'm like, well, I'm gonna get the number right, I always get it wrong. Good good job, good job son. I should co read myself. I'm gonna know how that would work, all right. I was talking. So here's how

we're gonna break this down. I was talking about Kamala Harris and how the Democrats are embracing the radical left of their own party now. And I don't think it's just a people are gonna say, it's a primary ploy. That's the ploy. This is where the party is. This is where the Democrats are. I want to break that down issue by issue. But we're gonna kind of switch gears from him because we could only get Andy McCarthy.

He's a very busy man to join us in just a few minutes to talk about Stone Russia, collusion, Whittaker, all that good stuff. So we're going to kind of return to the socialism. Kamala Harris. Where are the Democrats? Why are they so here's a really interesting question. Why are they so very very upset with the notion of Schultz running. Here's here's a point that the media won't focus on Yes, it could theoretically split the vote. I

get that, and that's a lot. I'm not saying that's not a big concern from the crazy anti Trump left, because of course it is. They're single. The single most important thing for them is that Donald Trump does not win. Right. Everything else is way, way, way distant to that. The single most important thing for Democrats is Donald Trump cannot below to win the presidency. But there's another component of Schultz that that is problematic for them. And you've seen

this in the last twenty four hours or so. Remember this is this is the former High five producer Mike for making sure I got that one right. The former CEO of Starbucks until twenty seventeen. What was he the bathroom policy guy, by the way, or was that am I getting my timetables off? Here? Was he the like, yeah, you can just come in and you know, do your thing and you don't have to pay You remember that when that whole thing happened. Yeah, that, I'm almost positive

that was under the new CEO. But when he left in two seven twenty seven team he became an executive board member, so he was definitely in part of that Okay, okay, So because I wonder, I'm wondering how that how that shook out. My guess is that most people probably managed to h you know, they managed to buy a cup of coffee, if they got to use the bathroom. But anyway, his underlying capitalist instincts and understanding are a problem for

the modern Democrat Party, and that's really important. This is not a little thing. This is a very, very important thing that the modern Democrat Party really does now increasingly have an aversion to cap not an aversion to wealth.

Look at Madurou there are very rich socialists and aversion to capitalism, to business and commerce and the success thereof He's holding the line for America bug Sex in his back, comfortable that the decisions that were made are going to be reviewed, you know, either through the various means we have. But right now, you know, the investigation is I think close to being completed, and I hope that we can get the report from Director Muller as soon as we

as possible. No responsible official of the Department of Justice would make those kinds of comments about an investigation coming to a conclusion in the near future. If Matthew Waker was briefed about the investigation. It's the last time he should be briefed because his comments were totally irresponsible and reprehensible. Democrats seem very testy about the notion of the mother probe at an undetermined stage to maybe wind down on

its own. They they've really gotten very attached to this thing. It's like the precious and their Smiegel. Let's spring in somebody who can actually make sense of all this and tell us what's really going on. Our friend Andy McCarthy has made some time for us tonight. He is, of course Fox News contributor. You see him on Fox all

the time. Also National Review where he's got great columns and they do a podcast over National Review that i'd recommend to you all this Well, mister Andy McCarthy, great to have you back. Fuck how are you? I'm good? So you know, we got a couple of things we gotta get through today. Andy. One is just you know, you heard their Whittaker having his say about the Muller investigation close to complete it. Who knows what that even means. Bloomenthal obviously gets very upset about it. What do you

make of this? Bloomy and Democrats are making me dizzy. I have to say, I mean the rule of the road, as we know from the Justice Department and the intelligence community, even this goes double for them. But you never confirm or deny the existence of an investigation, right, and you

certainly never identify the subjects of the investigation. At a public hearing in March or twenty seventeen, then FBI Director Comy gets up in grand style and announces not only the existence of the Russia investigation, but says that the Trump campaign is a subject of the investigation, even though the investigation is counterintelligence and it's classified and you're not supposed to name subjects. And he goes on for good measure to say and will be checking to see if

they committed any crimes too. And I think my recollection, as the Democrats thought that was just peach. So you know, to hear them now say that the guy to whom Muller reports, which is Whittaker, and you know, mind you I know they want to treat Mueller like he's generalized, how are out there or something, But you know, Muller is just a line prosecutor. He's not even confirmed by the Senate, and he's in a chain of command. He works for Whittaker. Now you know they may not like

that because they don't like Whittaker. And you know, Mueller is this legendary person engine all that jazz. But that's that's the fact of the matter. So all the guy who is running the investigation, or or to whom the investigators report said, was that it looked like it was winding down. He didn't say anything more than that. And now they're up in arms. But when the thing got announced, which was the violation of every single rule in the justice part of the FBI, they thought that was great.

I mean, Eddie, I can't look at this whole situation, especially given how much we hear about how Trump and his and his people are always undermining institutions. For me, that that the DOJ has been caught up in this whole thing the way that it has a lot of the decision making that we've seen on the FBI side, the DOJ side has been shoddy at best, and perhaps, you know, unethical. And I would argue that some of

it is unethical. And yeah, we're supposed to believe that this process is playing out and it's just the way it's supposed to be, and it's fine. I feel like, why should we why should we have faith in this institution of the Special Council, given all the things that have happened. Yeah, that's exactly right. I mean, what other investigation buck do you know of where they assign a

prosecutor to run a counterintelligence investigation? You know, the Justice Department has a unit of lawyers their National Security Division that lends assistance to the FBI, which is our domestic security service. When they need a national security wire tapper, they need some kind of assistance from from the court. Otherwise, in the Justice Department, counterintelligence investigations don't get a prosecutor because they're not prosecutor work. They're not supposed to be

tailored to building criminal prosecutions. They are information gathering exercises in order that the president can carry out his national security and foreign policy functions. And they don't get a prosecutor. So I mean, procedural regularity it seems to me has gone out the window from the get go on this. And I you know, I don't want to keep making jokes about being being busy, but you know, I must say,

now they suddenly want procedural regularity after everything that's gone on. Here, we got a guy who was apparently monitored for close to a year, four separate FISA warrant applications where they evidently relied on a read of opposition research from the from the opposition political campaign, and now they're going to

start worrying about whether whether we have procedural regularity. I gotta tell you, Eddie, you know, I know that this is more of a gut feeling thing or but after spending a good amount of time on air and off air talking to Carter Page, the idea that they got four fires A warrants on this guy. Keep hearing people say, oh, but the FISA process is is so respectable and good.

I'm sorry, no, it is not. If you can get four fires A warrants on this guy who is speaking to the Special Counsel without a lawyer and has apparently no charges against him at all, then there's a massive problem with at least abuse of the FISA process, if not the whole way that it goes down for counterintelligence investigations. Yeah.

I've always wondered, Buck, you know, in the part of a wire tap, whether it's criminal or national security, where you have to tell the court why you need the wire tap where you have to say alternative investigative techniques, you know, less restrictive or less intrusive methods of doing investigations. You have to tell the court why they've either been

tried and failed, or they would fail if tried. I've always wondered, what on earth did they say to de Fies a court that would have convinced anyone that they couldn't have brought card a page in and interviewed him, which they had done in the past. Anyhow, you know why they needed a warrant on this guy. If I met the guy a couple of times, he's a you know, he seems like a perfectly nice guy, but you know, with due respect to him, you can't shut him up.

So's he's the worst. He's the worst person that you could find if you looked really hard to try to run an international conspiracy to tip an election with I mean, you'd be better off grabbing a random person off the street than having Carter. And I don't mean that in a mean way. I just mean exactly what you're saying, which is he's very garrulous, he's very open, right, and when the Russians tried to to recruit them as it asked that in twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, and that didn't

work out. What did the Russian guy say about him? He's an idiot. Yep. So so you know, Eddie and I are trying to be trying to be nice here, but yeah, this is not a guy. He's not an international man of mystery that was the center of this huge conspiracy. But you know, Andy, if I asked you, and you know I and I spent more time than I ever thought I would talking to libs about this, about this whole Muller prob issue. What for you is the single what's the most egregious part of the whole thing?

I mean, what's the one thing that you just can't get over? You're like, this is not right, whether you want to call it a witch hunter or whatever, that this process is fundamentally tainted and it's just political and

meant to get Trump. I think it's it's two things. First, the quality of justice that was accorded to the Clinton emails investigation versus the Trump Russia investige Asian where we're all supposed to get the same quality of justice, and as somebody who knows the stuff and has looked at this long and hard. I see one case where they bent over backwards not to make the case, and one case where they scorched the earth to try to find

a case where there wasn't one. And I don't see how anybody could look at those two things and say that we have one standard of justice in this country. And then the second thing, but that continues to just royal me, is that you know, I know people don't like Trump, and I get that, but you know, Trump is not always going to be president. And I've always thought this really isn't about Trump as much as it's

about the presidency. And when you investigate, when you put the presidency under a cloud of suspicion, that really screws up the government's ability to govern, even down to the point of not just dealing with Congress and dealing with foreign countries, but good people to come in and work for the government. You know, nobody wants to come into a government that's that's under investigation and they have to lawyer up and you know, spend lots and lots of

money on that sort of stuff. Um. Now, we had this wonderful principle that no one is above the law, which means if the president is reasonably suspected of having committed a serious crime, then even if it means our government and our governance is going to be screwed up, we have to suck it up and deal with that. But I don't think that should ever ever happen unless someone makes a showing at the beginning that there actually is some serious crime that there's a reasonable basis to

think the president is implicated in. And it just seems to me that they didn't even care about that. Here, can we can we hold you over to talk a little bit about Stone on the flip side. You gotta run on the Fox. You got a minute? Sure? Okay, great, guys, we're talking to Annie McCarthy, Natural Review, Fox News contributor. We'll be back with him in just a moment. What it is all about is not just their lying, but what they are lying about, and what they are lying

about is colluding with the Russians. And you see that with Stone and Wiki leaks, you see that with Cohen and the Moscow Tower. Quite a stretch, if you ask me. But let's ask Andy McCarthy, National Review writer and also Fox News contributor. Andy, you know they're now all in the it's about the lying mode. But the lying, they say, also proves the collusion. If the line proves the collusion,

why can't they charge collusion? Yeah, somebody want to let Muller know that maybe he was absent from law school the day they taught law. I guess, yeah, I'm being flipped. But I mean, don't these guys think that if that was true, that Muller would have charged conspiracy here in charge collusion? You know, the thing, Buck is, we've always objected to this word collusion because it's such a weasel word. It doesn't mean anything. I mean, if what they're saying

is it should be conspiracy. You've said this before in the show, and you're right that that would be the charge. Yeah, right. You know, if what they're saying here is that a number of people had contacts and by the way, I don't think I don't see any evidence that Stone did. But if what they're saying here is that people had contacts with you know, Russian people who were connected to the Kremlin, people who connected to Putin, Yeah, I think

they did. I think people inside the Clinton campaign did. Bill Clinton himself, you know, gave a speech over it in Moscow that he could given his speech or in his sleep that he got paid about half a billion dollars for and then had a face to face meeting with Putin and Medvedeva. You know a lot of people had contacts with Russia. But would prosecutors care about what this investigation is supposed to be about is conspiracy. It's not enough to have an association or contact with someone.

You have to agree to commit a crime. And they've been at this for over two years. There's not any evidence that anyone was involved in a criminal conspiracy. Andy. You know, the Stone indictment lays out a bunch of a bunch of different allegations of lying, and you know, maybe some of them he did. You know, he's obviously

pleaded not guilty today. But I see a trend. I mean, having having read I recently went back and just took a look at USC one zero zero Yeah, USC one zero zero one, because Border Patrol is telling me that effectively it's illegal to lie to Border Patrol and Immigrations and Customs enforcement about really important things like I'm fifteen, actually you're forty. I mean, but that is never charged. Really, I mean, in rare circumstances a charge even though it

is illegal. And I think it's interesting because they're supposed to be a standard. I mean, you'll know that this specific legal legal verbiage. But the lie is supposed to matter, right, I mean they're not supposed to use one zero zero one to go after people who say, as I believe Stone, did I spoke to him on the phone. Well, no, you spoke from the phone and you emailed him. Okay, well they have your email, so who cares? Can you?

Can you weigh in on this? Yeah? Well, the standard is low buck, but it's materiality and the the either the affirmative misstatement or the material omission, so you can you can can lie either way, right, I can tell you a positive lie, or I can conceal something that I'm under the circumstances obligated to tell you. In either of those events, it has to be material. That is, it has to be important to the investigation in order

for it to be actionable. Now, materiality, I don't want to confuse people or mislead people into thinking it's a very high hurdle. It's not. And under circumstances where you know, even if they even if it was easy to find

this out if Stone told them. You know, look, it's really stupid for Stone, if he had a zillion text with somebody to tell the committee that they never spoke other than orally on the phone, and to do that under circumstances where he's obviously trying to withhold the string of their communications from the committee, and he's otherwise putting pressure on this guy, Randy Kretico, not to turn information over to the committee. So I get that. I don't

have a problem with that. I worked in the process for a long time, and I think people who try to subvert the process, you want to prosecute them for it. I did that. I'm fine with that. I think there's a lot of overreach in Muller's indictment. But to the extent that you know, Stone told stupid black and white laws that he shouldn't have told, then he you know,

then he gets what he deserves. But the point would he have been investigated at all if it weren't for you know, nobody here committed a crime until the investigation started, right, I mean, and so when you mentioned overreach, and we got about a minute, Andy, but just where is the overreach? As you see it well. For example, Buck He says in the indictment, for example, that Stone tells Jerome Corsi, you got to go out and get to Asange and Wiki Leaks because they may have a bunch of Clinton

Foundation stuff. And the way the indictment reads, you would think that Stone must have an inside lead into or you must have an intermediary in Wiki Leaks. And it turns out that Mueller leads out that that morning Stone was blind copied on an email from a friend of his that included an email from a reporter named James Rosen, who was at Fox at the time, which said, I hear that there's going to be a trove of Clinton Foundation emails coming out. So obviously Stone didn't have a

line into Wiki leaks. He was blind copied on. Yeah, he's email very shady and not by not an accident. You mentioned lies of omission before. I think that's an interesting one. Andy McCarthy of National Review, everybody follow his stuff on nationalview dot com. Also you can follow him on Twitter and mister Andy McCarthy, my friend. Great to have you back, and we'll talk to you soon. If

you're in a relationship. There are a couple of important dates that require roses, Birthdays, anniversaries, Valentine's right around the corner. So you know, when you're looking for the best roses you can possibly get, I've got the answer for you. Check out my friends at one eight hundred flowers dot com right now. You can get eighteen red roses for twenty nine and nine, or you can upgrade to twenty four roses that'll only make an impression for only ten

dollars more. This is an unbelievable offer from one eight hundred flowers eighteen red roses for twenty nine nine nine, or for just ten bucks more you get twenty four beautiful red roses to give to your loved one. Okay, these are flowers that are picked at their perfect time and are shipped overnights. You have fresh, amazing flowers to order eighteen red roses for twenty nine nine nine, or upgrade at twenty four red roses only ten bucks more. Go to one eight hundred flowers dot com, click on

the radio icon and enter promo code Buck. That's one eight hundred flowers dot com. Promo code b u c K Hurried Alfred Stires Tomorrow Buck Sexton permission decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence mag no mistake, American, You're a great American. Again, this is the Buck Sexton shows analysts Sexton, it is Buck Sexton. No, what do the Russians have on Donald Trump? Politically, personally or financially?

What is putin blackmailing President Trump Trump with personally, politically or financially. So again I asked the question, what do the Russians have on Donald Trump politically, personally or financially. The Russians must have something personally, politically or financially on President Trump. Now, I don't think that Nancy Pelosi is a total nincompoop. She obviously has some good political instincts and fundraising ability and is utterly ruthless and desperate for

power all the time. So those will get you some places in life, for sure. But I say that because I don't believe that she is so stupid as to believe that the Russians have blackmail material on the President of the United States. But she as the person who is third in line for the presidency. Okay, third in line for the presidency, we all need to remember that

he's running around. We just played that for you. We could have found more clips saying that the Russian government has blackmail material on Donald Trump, and I just want to say, what would that even be. What let's think about this for a second. What information could the Russians really have that would allow them to blackmail President Trump. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it is hard to fathom. Keep in mind information that has not already come to light.

Because Donald Trump's tax returns are with the IRS, the federal government agency that looks over deals with investigates and prosecutes people for tax irregularities and fraud. People always say, oh, we need to see his tax returns. The IRS has them. It's not like he hasn't filed taxes and the government doesn't know the government very much knows what's in his taxes. So it's not that as much as they're say, oh, it'll all be This is one of the dumbest things

that I hear. It's all in the taxes. If he just releases his taxes, that's will all see because because the IRS given all the attention. You think what we've seen with the dj and the FBI and some of the weaponized bureaucrats against this president, and when he was a candidate. You think that no one in the irs might have said, hey, I'll take a little look at what's going on here. Maybe there's some suspicious wire transfers from Russia. This is only people that are brainwashed or

are just stupid could believe this stuff. And I don't know if Nancy Pelosi thinks that her constituencies across the country, because he's really more of a national figure than even a local congresswoman. I don't know if she thinks they're stupid or brainwash, but it's one of the two or both,

because she keeps saying this. The other part of this is to say that the president that there's some information that they have on him that is so damaging that he would sell out his country, be a trader and do Putin's bidding, which he isn't even doing, not doing an opposite of that in Ukraine, opposite of that in Syria. It's a Trump administration that decided to really go after

isis hard core from the air. It's the Trump administration and that blew up two hundred Russians in the Syrian desert who made a run for a Kurdish allied outpost in the Syrian desert, two hundred Russians blew them up. That was this president. But he's doing Putin's bidding. You see, he's doing Putin's bidding. That that's what they keep telling us. Oh and by the way, the blackmail material that the

Russians have to date. Muller, who can pull all of your phone records, all of your emails, every communication you've had, electronically, put anyone he wants under oath, question them for as long as he wants, bankrupt them through lawyer's fees alone, and you know he can do that, and he hasn't found this blackmail material yet. Wow. It's because the Trump team must be really good at hiding things from Muller

when they have a Russia blackmail angle. That that somehow Nancy Pelosi knows about her intuitions going off, but the Muller team hasn't been able to figure out. This is This is for crazy people. This is not a rational, normal thing to believe. The country is in the grips of a mass hysteria with it not all of us,

but a lot of people. One day. I mean, if you want, I'm I'm happy to sit here and have a conversation, right, all of us talk a bit about, you know, sem of your thoughts, calling whatever you want to do about the mistakes Trump has made. Trump has made a lot of mistakes. Of course, you expect the president of the units is gonna the United States is gonna make mistakes. But I mean, I think he I think he's picked. I think he has bad judgment about people.

I don't think there's really a much of a debate about that. I think that he puts people in positions of authority that they can handle and are not qualified for not everybody. I think he's got some good picks in there too, But I think that he's got some some Maybe it's, you know, he just has a personal affinity for somebody, but you know, it overrides whatever other judgment that he could bring to bear. And I think

that's a problem. It has definitely hurt his presidency. I think he should have pushed for action on the wall and for the stop the funding of planned parenthood way earlier than he did. There's a lot and and never mind the tweets, and you know, yeah, some of the tweets I don't really like that much. Some of them,

though I love and some of them are amazing. And the Trump the honesty that he has brought in the conversation about particularly CNN, which is just a cesspool of of pseudo journalism and fraud, is is a breath of fresh air. It's it's a great thing for the national conversation,

in my opinion. But they focus all their attention on this fantasy, the left, the Democrats of you know, instead of actually drilling down on what policies Trump has failed on, or ways in which, you know, what he's trying to accomplish are bad for the country, or they oppose him on the on the economy, or whatever it may be. They've they've turned this Russia fairy tale into the main

gathering point for all their anti Trump reige rage. I mean, this is the basket in which they don't all of their anti Trump psychosis, psychosis an animus, so not good, not good for the country, not good for anything. And and I'm hoping that it will it will come to and end soon. But I also and this is perhaps a little bit of foreshadowing of where we're going to go in a moment here where I talked about Kamela Harris, I think it's because there's also gonna be They're gonna

have a tough sell the American people. Hey, you know that really strong economy and super low unemployment, and government that is slowly but surely through deregulation and just more sane policy making within the fourth branch of government, which is the permanent bureaucracy, you know, taking it. It's boot off your neck a little bit, not entirely, but a little bit. You know, all that stuff that was going on,

Throw that out the window. Let's put the people who thought that that Hillary Clinton was honest and good and decent and a good leader. Let's put all those people in charge now and just with somebody else as the figurehead, so that they can destroy the economy, destroy the constitution, and destroy everything in this country that makes it so much better than so many other countries all over the world. They're gonna have a tough sell there. That's not going

to be an easy thing to the commits. I know. I said, lines are open, and we got some calls up. James in Georgia, my friend, welcome to Buck Saxon Show. Thank you for calling in. Yes, sir, yes, sir, I'm glad. I'm glad to be on the show with you. Thank you so much for calling in. I love Georgia. Savannah is one of my favorite places to visit. Yeah, baby, you need to come to the borough. I don't know where that is, but it sounds nice. Yeah, there you go. Hey,

I'm living a farmer community. I'm around a lot of immigrants, and a lot of them are really good people and are trying to make a decent living, and a lot of them they send their money back over to Mexico and the Central America and South America, and that's all well and good, but we don't hear anything in the national news of if they want to have what we have in this country, they should build it in their

own country and we should help them do that. Well, you know, brain, brain drain and skill drain is a very very real thing for for a lot of countries all over the world where because of the increase in mobility, particularly in the in the twentieth century, now in the twenty first you know, it's a lot easier James for people to pick up and go somewhere else, and so you know, they they want and there are libertarians I would note who argue they forget about the importance of

an actual nation state and citizenship and patriotism. But they'll argue that, you know, the free flow of people all over the world is just inherently a good thing. I disagree. But it's a lot easier to move around and look for that better economic opportunity than it used to be. You don't have to get on a ship for you know, eight weeks or whatever across the Atlantic, six weeks, hover along the Atlantic voyage taxs, you know. Now you can

just hop on a plane and get there. And and so that means that you do have this role on good talented, hardworking people. And I appreciate, by the way, what you're saying about how yeah there are I mean, I know illegal immigrants too. There are a lot of good people within that community who are trying to the best by their families. But we're trying to deal with policy and with sustaining the country as it is, and that means you're gonna have to make some tough choices.

To your point about the people that are sending back money and why don't they just better their own countries. Yeah, we are subsidizing Mexico and some Central American countries with our economy in the sense that there are untaxed remittances being sent back to Mexico to the tune of about twenty billion dollars a year. And that's an estimate. I mean, they don't really know, but it's about twenty billion dollars a year in cash that we are sending back to Mexico.

You know, I think that, James, what they would say is that it's just too corrupt and too far gone, and you know, in the long run, we're all dead, and they don't feel enough of a bond with their own country or enough of a they don't feel that they can make an impact. Now I'm speaking for obviously some of Eagles who have come here. I don't know, but my guess is they're just like, look, I've just got to get what's better for me in my family.

But that does have the effect that you're alluding to of, you know, who's gonna make who's gonna make honduras a better place, Who's going to clean up Honduras's corruption and end the the horrific street violence and gang violence that is a very real thing there. If a lot of the hard working, good people leave, you know, it does make it harder for those who are behind. So you know, you identify a very real problem. Yes, all righty, my friend,

thank you so much for calling it from Georgia. Do we still get to Charlie and Maryland on a lot er to Charlie bounce he dropped, Oh thanks Charlie. Yeah, Hey money McCall buck. What's up? Man? Oh, I just talking about this Stone invasion and stuff. Uh, Andrew Weishman is ahead of that, and he's done this three times and I think he made a mistake on this last one when they televised it. Okay, why can't he be

charged with abuse of power? Oh? Well, you know, Okay, so you've you've touched on some on some important points here. So so Charlie's talking about the the I think technically, I don't think it was pre dawn. It was probably around six am, but his very early raid, early morning raid on Roger Stone's house in Florida. By the way, I was on Tucker Show last night, just as an aside, Charlie and Tucker is like, and you know, Tucker, people forget he worked at CNN for many years. You know,

I worked there for a couple of years. Tucker worked there for like a decade, I think, and Tucker is like, this idea that CNN was the only news organization that happened to stake out his house that happened to remember, it's not just the reporter. He had a camera crew there ready to go. That that's a little bit of a This isn't just one guy who's like monitoring the house at Tucker is like, this is just the idea that they didn't get a leak from from Muller's team

is preposterous. He said that last night on the show. I mean I was saying that initially too, but I was surprised that Tucker went so all in on this one. But obviously they're doing this to send a message, and the message is that the Special Counsel is to be feared. You know, if you mess around with it, you do so at your peril. And it does stink of police state tactics, and you know it's it should bother people.

And I know that Roger Stone is a fun character for people to you know, he brings some of it on himself and he is a weird guy and everything else. Got a giant tattoo of Nixon on his back. If you've never seen it. It's an amazing photo. Yeah, I know I still have to when I think about it. But given all that, I mean, there is something very real here. You know, he's facing years and years in prison, which is going to be a terrible thing for anybody.

And you know, they didn't have to do it in this way, and there should be some judgment shown by prosecutors, by people who have the force of the state at their disposal, to make sure that they're not abusing it. Now to your point about is there any accountability for that abuse, Charlie, Unfortunately, answer with prosecutors is no. It is really hard to hold. I mean, they there has to be provable malicious unethical misconduct. It can't just be

you made a bad call. It has to be you know, they've got an email if you're saying, I hate this person's stupid face, so I'm going to ruin his life and like terrify his wife by sending in the squat team. I mean, if you're dumb enough as a prosecutor to send that email, you might get in trouble. Sure of that. You really don't, you know, the Duke Lacrosse prosecutor Knifeong I followed that very closely, so I remember a fair

amount of the details. He was he was disbarred and was fired from his job, but he was a guy who had entirely exculpatory evidence and was like, I don't care. I'm gonna send these white kids to prison for, you know, twenty years to prove a point about social justice or something short of that. Man, Charlie, we need real reform here.

I mean I think that I think that prosecutors there should be a standard, but beyond which if they abuse their authority, they should be personally, personally at least liable from a civil perspective, so you can sue sue the pants off, I mean, not actually take their pants up. They don't sue them into oblivion. So Charlie, I'm with you on that, man. I think that that needs to that needs to be addressed. And I thank you for

calling in and Shields High. You know, there's there's some interesting stuff that's coming out now about asset forfeiture civil asset forfeiture, which is abused in many many jurisdictions across the country, and a lot of federal prosecutors know it's bad, but they just don't seem to care, and they keep doing it. This is the branch of the government that is the most likely to ruin your life. I mean

to mess up your life. It's the irs. But the branch of the government that is the most likely to ruin your life as a decent, otherwise or fully law abiding American citizen is the prosecutorial arm of the government. Remember that it is important for all of us. We're going to talk a little bit about Camela's crazy policies when we come back. Stay with me. You're probably somebody who's familiar with hearing at least about the AAARP. You know,

you might already know somebody who's a member. You might be a member. But did you know that the AARP is a lefty progressive organization for seniors. They fought tooth and nail for government control of healthcare. All about the Affordable Care Act Obamacare stood against tax cuts from middle class Forget all that. All right, If you want all the benefits but none of the progressive drawbacks, try AMAC.

I recommend it. Why AMAC, Well, AMAC gives you all the upside of AARP with even better deals and conservatism and pro American policies at the center. Of the agenda. This is an organization that gives you benefits while also promoting the America that you, as a conservative senior want. Stand with AMAC as they fight the good fight. Become a member to today join right now at AMAC dot us slash buck that's am AC dot us slash fuck.

AMAKI is better, better for you, better for America. The idea that a twenty nine member swat team in full tactical gear with assault weapons would surround my house, that I would open the door looking down the barrel of assault weapons, that I would be frog marched out front, barefooted and handcuffed when they simply contacted me. But as you know, it's pretty standard for that to happen. No, it is not stepping up ads. No, it is not

standard for that to happen. It's standard for the Muller probe, and it's his team of Democrat psychos. Sure, but it is not standard. That is a lie. The main argument for why they did this that that has been offered up is so he wouldn't destroy evidence. My friends, he was saying, Roger Stone was saying last summer on my show on Riser, he was saying, you know, they're probably coming from me anything. Now. They already have all of his emails and what records could he destroy? They have

his phone records, they have his emails. They're prosecuting for stuff. It's already in their possessions. It's a lie. No, this is this is how they do things. You know. They they're the big, bad, tough special prosecutors who are going to restore democracy and blah blah blah all this other crap. But notice how you have I mean, this is just

the media is a disgrace, bad press. As Charles Cook says, the media is a disgrace because they can't even let a fellow American citizen talk about how he was frog marshed out of his home, you know, at at at six am or whatever, barefoot with a couple of dozen guys in tactical gear, and that that this is you know that he has to jump in. Stephan Appos has to jump in and say, oh, that's it's like the fault, George, you're a little you're a little you know, Clinton clintonite hack,

all right. The fact that this guy makes one hundred million dollars to host a show, it's just because he's

friends with the executives in the media company. The media company is always owned by a larger company that actually has money and makes stuff, and the media executive who runs the the media wing of the much larger company can determine whatever salary he or she wants for this person, because you know, the actual company is like selling you know, internet, you know, internet access or something, but the little media company underneath it, it's just it's all about being clubby,

clubby and buddy buddy with each other. We replaced Stephanopolis tomorrow and the guys there's nothing remarkable or interesting about him whatsoever. And he can't even let Roger Stone finish without saying something stupid, and that betrays how opposed to not just Roger Stone, but any criticism of the Special Counsel. You know, you're talking about dudes with guns, oh scarias, all rifle guns that liberals are supposed to hate, come in through the door and acting like they're you know,

going after Pablo Escobar back in the day. And it's Roger Stone. I mean, can't you let the guy at least get his asscot and his velvet slippers. He's back with you now, because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops at Trump, you egotistical billionaire, go back to get Ratio on Twitter to talk over the other billionaire league how to run the world. Oh Man, the former CEO of Star wicks their shoults getting heckled, I mean getting heckled big time. Do you want Trump

to win, you egotistical billionaire? Peep? Oh Man lives. They have created a culture of outrage and craziness. And ah, they're always outraged. They're always so emotional, aren't they. They're just so upset about things. I mean, here's a guy who's like, Hey, I want to run a really centrist campaign and give people more options, and and don't you dare run for president. They are so mad about this guy.

And it's yes, as I've said, it is because he would he would split the vote, and he would probably siphon off some Democrat votes. And you know you're looking at ten twenty thousand votes here or there in certain states. Difference, the difference between winning and losing. You better fight for every edge. Some of you will catch that reference too, well. That would be some ninth level black belt ninja stuff

if you caught that. But some of you will catch that reference between living and dying brand that you have anything. What I'm talking about famous speech, famous speech, but I'm not gonna I'm not gonna give it away because I want to. We'll see who in the team buck audience is industrious and can figure out what that is. So they hate Schultz because he would be a problem for

the Democrats. And also if you have somebody who is a sane alternative that is socially liberal but at least understands mat math, which is why the Libs hate him. They hate him because he understands math and doesn't pretend not to understand math because he had to run a major company. You know, unlike people a Hillary Obama, these people don't They don't math math, schmath. They don't care. Math to them is math is the abstraction. Their good

intentions are the reality. Right, Math is that we can make it up as we go along, but their good intentions will carry the day. Schultz is upsetting to them, and and it's because of it's because of this, it's because of his understanding of how finance works. And look, I think Schultz are probably really annoying and be a bad president, but at least he's not Elizabeth Warren, the multi millionaire who talks all the time about how rich people have it so easy. I'm like, Elizabeth, I don't

have I don't have a million dollars period. So I really don't like to hear from people who have got fifteen or twenty million who are like, it's so hard for people who are just being ripped off by the rich people all the time, like, well, yeah, you're a rich person, Elizabeth Warren. They hate to break it to you. But Schultz went on speaking of people who speak like

this that are very upset about things. Schultz went on the view where they have opinions and they want to share them and and here's here's how that went with Joy beiha, Hello, it's Joy. I've missed you. We haven't talked in a while. I'm all this, I don't read. I don't know too good, but you know I'm here now. Your entry into the race pretty much guarantees that a Republican is going to win. But I know I don't agree with you. I know you don't I don't agree.

In fact, not only do I not agree with you, but I think if President Trump runs against a far left, progressive liberal Biden hasn't. Bisen hasn't come into the race yet, but they just let's finish if he runs against a far left progressive person who is suggesting sixty seventy percent tax increases on the rich and a healthcare system that we can't pay for. I don't know President Trump is going to get reelected. Oh my gosh, they do not. What what are you? What are you talking about healthcare?

It's got to be cheap when the government runs it. They do not want to hear what Schultz is saying because what he is saying, and this is not a this is not a oh, I'm just gonna say this so we can all own the Libs and laugh, laugh, laugh about it, although obviously we do a lot of that on the show. What he is saying is objectively and demonstrably true. If the Democrats run a far left candidate like a Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren, they're going

to lose. They're going to lose. He's right, and they don't want to hear it. This is anathema, this is sacrilege. Now, on the left, you have to sneak the socialism into

the conversation. You see, you have to allow the media to engage in its work of propagandizing so that people think, oh, yeah, Kamala Harris isn't really an authoritarian social She just wants the government to control all aspects of your life, the means of production, for business ventures and for commerce to occur, and to essentially have a total say over every aspect of what's going on day to day in this country with very few, if any restraints. But she's not a

Democrats or she's not a authoritarian socialist. No, no, no, she's a She's wonderful. You see, she is just wonderful. That's what they'll tell you. She's amazing. Look at her story. There are some parts of her story, by the way, they've already come out that people are not going to

want to look too closely. Yet. Now, in fairness, we are not going to be in the game here of looking it's it's it's not really, it's a no go zone if you will to get too deep into you know, if somebody's you know, somebody had an affair, or somebody's got that personal baggage. Folks, we're not democrats. We're not going to be rank hypocrites about this. The Trumpster has a slightly unorthodox past when it comes to women and

his marital tendencies. Okay, the Trumpsters, He's led a he's led a full life, very full So I don't think that we're going to spend too much time talking about the various personal foibles of the of the people that are running. I want to focus on the policies. I want to focus on the substance of what they are saying. That's what I do with Trump. What is the message? What is he promising to accomplish for the country, and

how will that affect all of us? And how does it affect the constitution and the future of this nation? And it sounds like I'm running for office right now, how does it affect the future? But really that's what I care about and that's what I want to focus on. But Schultz is the fly in the ointment right now. On the left, they are very upset about this because they can't they can't have somebody who has any credibility

on the left. I mean, Starbucks, man, this is this is an American institute, but a liberal one, always has been, always will be. Starbucks is liberal. I mean coffee should be something that's not you know, should not be politicized unless it's delicious, freedom loving, patriotic coffee, black Raffle, cofee dot com, slash buck, you know, unless it's that, then coffee should just be something you go get, you know,

in the store. Whatever. But they're already jumping all over Schultz because he is speaking the truth, and the Democrat primary is going to be even more of a mess. If you have somebody who is center left speaking the truth.

You need people that can get away with the most spectacular falsehoods about how government will be more efficient in the delivery of healthcare, about how your healthcare costs will go down if you currently have private assurance, but then the government is in charge, about how your care will be better. All lies, all lies, And I'm I'm the person who's sitting here telling you, yeah, that's right. We've been predicting single payer for years and here we are,

here we are. That's they can't have somebody who is yelling from the rooftops about what's really going to happen to this country at the Democrats win. So that's why they hate Schultz, which brings me to what they're doing. And this is colasssic what they are doing right now in order to destroy, because you know, the left is very good at personal destruction. And so what's happening now

is that they are turning. They're turning all these they're activating all these journalists activist types, which is basically journalists who are on the left, which is journalists. Because if you're a conservative journalist, people they'll call you right wing conservative commentator or whatever. If you're a lib journalist, they just call you a journalist. This is one of the

big dishonest games they play. But they are mobilizing against Starbucks right or well, against Starbucks one and against Schultz. They've already threatened a boycott of Starbucks because the FORMERCYEO. All right, the former CEO might run for the presidency. Are you guys kidding me? Like, well, why why you're gonna you're gonna harm this company that employs thousands and thousands people? Starbucks a good company. I mean, it's it's

an American institution. Now, I think the coffee is overpriced, and it's pumped way too much sugar in our veins over the years. But I guess you don't pump sugar in the vein, you know what I mean, in our blood stream um. But that said, you know, why, why why are they coming after this thing? Is he's not even a part of it anymore. I mean, maybe he's on the borders somebody. You know, he hasn't run it. You're gonna boycott Starbucks because he's thinking about it? This

is just crazy talk. But that's even not enough. It's not enough for the activist left and its journal accomplishes to threaten Starbucks the company. They're also going after just anything they can to humiliate and destroy Schultz preemptively. This is a piece from The Daily Beast, which is a a woke dumpster fire of a website. Over twenty one years, Starbucks released and sold two hundred and sixty two records using discogs dot com. A good percentage of these were

compilations like Music for Little Hipsters or British Folk. The single artists albums, though, are overwhelmingly from white musicians. According to her review by The Daily Beast, the only living black artists we could find among the two hundred and sixty two Starbucks releases were Herbie Hancock, Mary J. Blige, sly In the Family, Stone Al Green, Ben Anice Singer, Angelique, Kid Joe, and jazz trio, Soulivai or soul Live. I don't know. I'm sorry, I don't know how you can

say that Blige to the youngest among them. She's forty eight years old. So that's the right, folks. In order to discredit Schultz because he's speaking truth about economics, you now have journalists who are doing a deep dive into what crappy CDs Starbucks used to try to sell you at the checkout counter. And the big problem with them, too many white artists, Starbucks artists, so white. That's that's what this is. We can't let these we can't have

let these people run the country again. I'm sorry. We cannot let the crazy left run America. They're going to run it into the ground. They will ruin this place, they will ruin it. Oh, you can't make this stuff up. Oh I haven't even gotten a camel Yeah we got. We got a little deep dive into some of the Camelo stuff here. I'm just having too much fun tonight on the show. Actually got enough sleep last night, which

is always always a good thing. Um Facebook dot com, slash buck sexy if you want to send me thoughts for those of you who are listening on delay on the podcast. Make sure that you subscribe even if you are a live listener to the podcast, so you always have the buck Sex and Show on your phone. So if you just want to listen to it on demand on your own time, you can do so. It's on iTunes. We will well, it's on iTunes. We'll be right back

to reiterate. You support the Medicare for All bill, I think, initially co sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders, you're also a cosponsor. I believe it will totally eliminate private insurance, so for people out there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it. Well the listen. The idea is that everyone gets access to medical care and you don't have to go through the process of going through an insurance company, having them give you approval, going through the paperwork, all

of the delay that may require. Who of us has not had that situation where you got to wait for approval and the doctor says, well, I don't know if your insurance company is going to cover this. Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on nonsense, crazy talk from someone who should know better, but I'm not sure she does. Let's move on. We can just move past this private insured.

The reason that people have been concerned, or rather the reason that the left has been concerned for a while that they would have to build up to this moment where they can push for this Medicare for all. And keep in mind, Medicare for all isn't even really an accurate description. They want single payer. Single payer is the government gives a check for your healthcare costs to a provider.

Medicare actually has cost sharing, Medicare has states that kick in money for it, and individuals have to This is why there's Medicare supplement plans, and this is why there are you know, it's not as simple as just everything is paid for, everything is done. Medicare is also the single, by far biggest reason we are twenty two trillion dollars in debt and counting and going to be insolvent. So what you have here is getting a free infomercial from CNN.

They didn't do this for you know, they didn't do this are some of the other candidates they announced, What

a surprise, CNN's a trash bag. But here you have the single biggest driver of our debt that is only going to get bigger and bigger over time, which also means that interest payments on the debt will simultaneously be getting bigger and bigger as we go deeper into debt and crowding out the rest of spending and the stuff that we want rights do the government spending that would actually be good, and a whole lot of other things. I get ready for that war we're gonna have with

China in about twenty years. So here they're saying that the answer to the nation's ills at a time when Obamacare has failed its core promises, and it's just it's just shifting money from some people, from people who are kind of you know, making seventy to ninety thousand dollars a year to people who are making, you know, thirty thousand dollars a year. I mean, that's what Obamacare is largely done on the healthcare market. Depends on what state you're in and all the rest of it, but it's

just redistribution of wealth. Now, the answer is, let's just double down on the government running healthcare and making all the determinations about care. If you think that you're going to be and I know you don't when I say you this is like the Royal You asn't you know the people out there, if they think that this is going to be making healthcare easier to get with less bureaucracy and less red tape and less frustration, it's like

they've never spent a minute dealing with the government. Remember, Medicare is too expensive as it is. It is robbing from future generations to pay for the program we already have. That's just a fact. People pay take out twice what they put in on average, meaning that their taxes are half of what they take out in healthcare at the end of their lives. That's just a system. I'm just telling you what it is. Future generations are going to

be crushed under this debt. And their answer is, let's just let's just take this which only affects people that are sixty five and over, so it's only a subset of the population and expand it for everyone. It's insane. It's insane. And people who are gonna tell me, oh buck, they do this, and they do this in other countries. Let's talk about what the country is. Let's talk about the population size, Let's talk about its economic growth, Let's talk about its GDP. You know, I don't want to

be in another country. I want to be in America and two Democrats. That's increasingly a revolutionary concept. I don't want us to be Denmark. I want this to be America. Can we all get on board with that? If we're gonna have this presidential rates, can we at least all agreed that we're trying to pick the president of the United States and not the president of Sweden. Global Verification Network the only dual certified, veteran owned background investigation and

vetting company out there. Okay, this is a unique organization that can tailor whatever needs you have. They can tailor the program so that it fits perfectly. Whether you're a huge business or a small business. You're going to need to have background checks done on the people that you're hiring, people that you're bringing in. If you need someone or a deal or anything to be vetted, this is the

organization to go to. Global Verification Network. They are based in Chicago, but their risk mitigation experts are spread out across the country. They can handle your business wherever you are, large or small business. So call them at eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine again. Global Verification Network eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine, or go to MYGVN dot com. Again, that's MYGVN dot com. Make sure they know that you're a

part of Team Buck. You heard about them here on the show. And remember Global Verification Network leaves no stone Buck Sexton remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence nor Again, this is the Buck Sexton Show. Sexton would not be standing here were it not for the education I received, And I know man of many of us will say the same thing. And I believe a child going without an education is tantamount to a crime.

So I decided I was going to start prosecuting parents for truancy. Well, this was a little controversial in San Francisco, and frankly, my staff went bananas. They were very concerned because we didn't know at the time whether I was going to have an opponent in my reelection race. When I said, look, I'm done. This is a serious issue, and I've got a little political capital and I'm going to spend some of it, and this is what we did.

We recognized that in that initiative, as a prosecutor and law enforcement, I have a huge stick the school district has got to care at let's work in tandem around our collective objective and goal, which is to get those kids in school. There you have Kamela Harris talking abo When she was a prosecutor in San Francisco, she was going after people for their kids not going to school. Now, some of you might actually, I don't know, some of you might might kind of like this as a general ideal,

though it seems to me kind of harsh. How do you know, you know, how would you even make the determination as whether the parents are really at fault or whether the kid. You know, usually it's not ten year olds aren't showing up to school, it's teenagers. The kid is ditching, the kid is just not showing up. Who's going to make that determination? And also is this a

wise use of prosecutorial resources? Beyond that, though, there's also a philosophical issue here, one that is going to haunt Kamala Harris as she is now held up as the she is overnight. This is why Tapper sat down with her on CNN to do this, to do this advertisement for her campaign. That's what they call it a town hall. It's a CNN ad for a candidate that's what it is. But they they did this, and they're trying to prop

her up. They're trying to at least put someone forward who's not doing, you know, doing damage to herself for himself in the first moments of candidacy, right, I mean someone I mean Elizabeth Warren with the DNA thing, one of the greatest self owns, one of the biggest owned goals I've ever seen anyone manage, period. So they're they're hopeful that this will at least make their crop of candidates look a little bit more serious. And the other people,

who's this castro guy? You know, you look at the names, He's like, who exactly is you know, Elizabeth Warren? Who else is in there? I mean, it's a it's kind of a not a very exciting proof for the the Democrats. The problem she's going to have those that she has a record as a prosecutor and a record for locking

people up. She is going to because of the Democrat narrative around women, women of color, she is going to want to present herself as a champion of particularly minorities and and you know, people who get to get the rough end of the criminal justice system at all the time Meanwhile, when it suited her, she was a pretty pretty rough and tumble prosecutor, going after people pretty hard, pretty statused in her inclinations. He's arresting people, prosecuting parents

for truancy here, that's unusual. Now the Left is going to try to make all that disappear, but it's going to be hard because they need to make that excuse for it, because ultimately they're going to get into this mindset of electability, and they believe that Kamala Harris is electable. They think that she can do it, and therefore they'll make excuses. They're just gonna make excuses for a long on the way. There's some other interesting things that came

to light in the discussions. She was like, oh wait, we have a little more on her on her truancy comment. This was in play play fifteen. So to that end, on my letter head, now, let me tell you something about my letter head. When you're the DA of a major city in this country, usually the job comes with a badge, and there is often an artistic rendering of

said badge on your stationary. So I sent a letter out on my letter head to every parent in the school district outlining the connection that was statistically proven between elementary school truancy high school dropouts who will become a victim of crime and who will become a perpetrator of crime. We sent it out to everyone. A friend of mine actually called me and he said, Colin, my wife got

the letter. She freaked out. She brought all the kids into the living room, held up the letter said if you don't go to school, Kamala's gonna put you and me in jail. Yes, we achieved intended effect. I'm sorry, but that's that's that's a creepy thing, this idea that you know you have to go to these First of all,

they're they're factories of progressivism. I mean, overwhelmingly, the public school system in this country is just is brainwashing kids to become a little Democrat voters, a little automatons for the Democrat Party, which is really disconcerting in and of itself.

But beyond that, I mean, I understand she's really playing this up like she I wonder how many people she actually prosecuted, if any, But to threaten to use prosecutorial resources and and and power to take away possibly somebody's freedom, even if it's only look I know, she's not gonna lock people up for decades for truancy, but you know, theoretically, at least she would have had to threaten to arrest people take away that I mean, take away their freedom

for a day or two. To me, seems harsh. And that you know that the whole idea that your children should it should be a criminal act for you to not send your children to school. That should that should be disconcerting. I think to folks, I really do all the stuff she is saying about dropouts, and yeah, there's other problems all that, But what about parents that just don't want to send their kids to the public school, they want to homeschool them. You say, oh, buck, they

can know they make that hard in some states. You know, there's a lot of ways that this can blowback on parents. Oh but then, speaking of blowback guns, Kamala Harris talked about what she thinks about guns play thirteen. We have got to have smart gun safety laws in this country, and we've got to stop buying this false choice. You can be in favor of the Second Amendment and also understand that there is no reason in the civil society that we have assault weapons around communities that can kill

babies and police officers. She even went as far as to suggest that we should have people see the victims of gun violence. Legislators should be forced to see the dead bodies from gun violence because that would change their mind about the Second Amendment. A bizarre, ignorant, and truly obtuse thing for her to say, as though those of us who believe in the right to bear arms don't

care about the innocent victims of violence. Quite the contrary, we don't want to be the innocent victims of violence, and we want to be able to protect others from becoming the innocent victims of violence. But Harris is a statist, a socialist, and a disaster in waiting. That Russia is our number one geopolitical foe. Yes, right now, I think they're the most determined foe to work against us, because

they actually did attack us in the last election. You've become this outspoken voice on foreign policy, specifically the Russia, because of your Intel Committee assignment. But if you ask all of the heads of all the intelligence agencies anything that they agree on besides agreeing that Russia interfere in our twenty sixteen election, the thing they most agree on is that China actually presents the most severe and significant long term economic and national security threat to this country.

Why if that's the case and you believe that, do you spend the overwhelming majority of your time on Russia? Yeah? And I don't spend the overwhelming majority of my time on Russia, but the certainly on talking about it, certainly on television, certainly on your tweets, and certainly also on your legislation. I mean, the largest bulk of legislation that you've written has been in response to the President and

also with respect to Russia. I would say it reflects that the times that we're in and the threat that we faced. Good for Margaret Hoover, old associate of mine from back in the day, for what she did here by getting that was Swallowell For those who don't know, Smarmy Swallowell from the sound of his voice, who's a one of these Democrat congressmen who has made made his whole brand, really made his whole name about going on TV and saying crazy and irrespond constable stuff about Trump

and Russia and Russia collusion. I mean, there's a there's a Hines Congressman Jim Hines I think out of Connecticut he's won Um Swallowell obviously the grand daddy of them all is that incredibly oly aginists because I learned that. I learned that the proper pronunciation of that word because of the incredible brilliance of Team Buck. Thank you the

oly aginist fellow, Adam Schiff. These are people who are only known really, I mean, this is this is how they have built their political brands by being Russia conspiracy maniacs. I mean, just people that are making it up as they go along, and they'll say whatever. They'll say whatever Rachel Maddow, whatever morning Joe wants to call them, or want rather wants them to say, sorry, that's what That's

what will happen. Um. That's the way that they go about representing the people as this pathetic hash tag resistance mentality where anything you can say on Russia is going to get you applause and plaudits from people that really believe that the president is an Asian of Russia, which, as we've been discussing, especially if we are finally in the latter stages of the Muller probe, which I am not, I think the latter stages of the Muller probe means we have six to twelve months left. That's what I

think that. You know, when they say latter stages, they mean it's not going to stretch for ten years. But they're they're not going to finish this until the election year. In my opinion, that's if you ask me to put money on it right now now, I could. This is a wild guess. I can't. None of my sources in DJ will. I think they honestly just don't know. I think only Muller and his team know, and they probably

haven't even decided yet. But if I were putting money on it, I would say, the Muller probe wraps up next you know, next fall, you know, maybe around October November. So we're when we say we're close to the end. I mean, it's all a question of what does close mean.

But I want there to be a acountability for the idiocy and the viciousness and the stupidity, the lies, all of the stuff that has characterized the way the Democrats have acted this whole time, and the cost to the country, you know, the cost to the US government, to the confidence that the American people's choice in an election will be respected by the establishment. We're always told, oh, he's

undermine Trump's undermining our institutions. And I always respond, well, in a lot of ways, but one of them, but one of the ways I respond is by saying that what could undermine our institutions more than the people who are supposed to be the neutral Uh, you know, executors of the institution, people that work in the government bureaucracy, people that work for Congress on Capitol Hill, And you know what could undermine our institutions more than all of

them working to undo the clear choice made by the people of the United States and last election to vote for Donald Trump. And look, I agree, it's it's crazy in a way that Donald Trump is president. Now, I didn't see it coming. Some of you did, and I probably one day i'll sift through the email box and the inbox on Facebook and just go back to the early days of the primary, when some of you were like, Buck, I'm trying to tell you. I'm trying to tell you

Donald Trump is going to win this thing. You're not listening to me right now, but you will listen. I did listen eventually, but you were like, I'm telling you, this is a movement. I'm telling you this is different. And I look, I was always humbled by the fact, as one should be in media, right that some of you saw this so early, And I was like, I just can't I just can't see it. I don't think this guy can beat the machine, and sure enough, I

am the machine. Very few of you will get that reference, but those of you who will will be like Buck, that was a great reference. So Swallowell is one of the clowns in chief here for the whole Russia thing. And I mean, here's an another example. I mean, on I always want to say NPR, PBS, the other state media thing that is funded for old people to watch.

That's where she asked that question. But then there's just the kind of stuff that this guy Swollwell says on a regular basis without evidence, as is noted here played too. At what point you draw the line and not accused the president of United States without any evidence of being an agent of Russia. Yeah, he's betrayed our country. And I don't I don't say that lightly. I worked as a prosecutor for seven years a night betraying the country. By the way, we want evidence before you say that.

But you said, an agent of Russia. He works on their behalf. After it was revealed that the Russians were attacking our democracy, he went to a press conference and said, Russia, keep doing it. We're familiar with that sequence of events as a prosecutor, as you know. But as a prosecutor, that wasn't the evidence in court. I mean, as a prosecutor, do you know the difference between hard evidence and circumstantial evidence. I'm not hearing the evidence that he's an agent of Russia. Yeah,

I think it's it's pretty clear. It's almost hiding in plain sight. Is he delusional or just a decrepid, dishonorable liar. This guy represents a congressional distory. He's a member of Congress. He gets on TV all the time. Trump is an agent of Russia, says says who how Oh you know, he just is. It's right there in front of you. No, crazy person, It's not right there in front of us.

Why should this person, Eric Swollwell be taken seriously? Why should anyone take him seriously when he says this kind of stuff. I mean, the answer is he shouldn't be the answer is this guy is way out of line. Oh, bio. He mentioned, you know Trump saying keep doing it. There's a lot of loose a lot of loose talk around what Trump said and how bad it was at one time. And Trump occasionally does you know, Look he's running around, he's throwing long bombs verbally speaking into the end zone.

Sometimes he gets picked off. It's gonna happen. Okay, it's gonna happen, and it has happened. But they always feel this need to exaggerate what Trump said, which tells you a lot, doesn't it, or to misconstrue the exact words are usually not enough. They have to do something else. Here is what remember Swalwell said that he told Russia keep doing it. Here's the reference. Actually, playclip three. He's

a total lack of respect for President Obama. Number one, he doesn't like him, and number two, he doesn't respect him. I think he's going to respect your president if I'm elected, and I hope he likes me. Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the thirty thousand emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded

mightily by our press. Yeah, he's just saying that. Visually, he's obviously trying to be a little tongue in cheek, but he saying, yeah, if Russia, if you got the emails that Hillary deleted from her illegal server situation, Okay, they including the classified hundred plus emails that she deleted when emails were under subpoena. That's destruction of evidence. Not only did she traffic and classified on an unsecure server

in clear violation of the Espionage Act. And James Comey, in his I'm America's Last boy Scout routine stood up in complete contravention of dj guidelines and jumped on the hand grenade to save the Clinton administration. To be in addition that she was destroying evidence, she was destroying evidence, and we're supposed to believe the big problem is Trump making jokes about the destruction of evidence that she had.

And he says, you'll be rewarded minorly by the press. Yeah, as in the press is going to cover that story a lot. That would be a big story. One other part of the whole Hillary email Russia hacking thing and the DNC hacking in all, but that never seems to get much attention. This stuff was all true, I mean, is that allowed to factor into the calculation here a little bit. I mean, there are a lot of news publications New York Times, Washington Post in violation of the law.

They think it's not, but it is published classified information that harms US national security on a regular basis, in violation of the law. We just our DJ chooses not to prosecute them. What about the the wiki leaks, dump on the DNC and podessed his emails? What about that is so outside the balance of what the Washington Post and the New York Times, oh, because they did it

for a foreign power. We had a foreigner paid by Hillary's campaign, Christopher Steele, using foreign sources who were Russian, to weaponize the intelligence community against a presidential candidate, which one of those things sounds worse to you. We're gonna have to hold these people accountable, the liars, the cheats, the thieves, We're going to have to hold them accountable. Because if this Muller probe does wind down the way that I don't know when, but I know it will,

it's going to go out with a whimper. If it does wind down that way, they're going to try to move this to being a political crime, something that needs to be impeached, and we need to make sure that we hold them accountable for all of the lie, all the stuff they've done that is so destructive and so untrue. People like this super clown Congressman Swallowell his district should

be ashamed. By the way, We'll be right back, hey, team Buck, It's time for roll call by the night and the freedom have my friends, we have covered so much ground. Thank you for being here with me and hanging out man. Wherever you're listening across the country, or if you're listening even the next day. It reminds me podcast If you ever missed the show live, you can always always listen on iTunes. Just type in the Buck Sexton Show on iTunes and you can also subscribe so

it'll always be waiting for you. Podcasting is fun and great, so you should check that out alrighty the Facebook in box. By the way, one thing I'm with my beard, my beard struggles. Is it supposed to sometimes get too long around the producer Mike, do you have any input on this. It gets a little long around your mouth so that it kind of can scratch and irritate. Does that mean you got to bust out the trimmers? Or do I

just need to man up microaggression and let it keep growing. Yeah. Man, well I'll give you my point of view, and then we know, we all know Brandon's a beard expert. Me and you are new to this scheme. We're kind of beard neubs. Yeah, he's really the beard specialist. Yeah. No, what I do is I get the little it's mini scissors that come with your oil clipper kit, and I trim around the you know, so it doesn't like get in your food and all that you know stuff. But

I do trim it up. They always say, like, let it grow as much as you can. But it annoys me sometimes, but that's what I do. I do trim it. Brandon, Well, how do I get it to fill it on the sides? Man? Because you got a man beard. I got a baby boy beard. I need a man beard. You have to nurture it like it's a you know, a chicken, like a baby, like an egg every day, helpful baby grow

every day. Yes, you're supposed to let it grow for a while, but then you're supposed to It's like getting your split ends cut on your beautiful main that you have, Like you have to keep it, you know, even and out every day I'm trimming something so I don't look like I'm homeless. I wish I could take some kind of credit for the for the swoop, but it's just the jeans man. Papa Sexton's got great hair. You know.

You know, my mom's got great hair. She is technically a ginger, So my mom's got very red hair, but my dad's got a great swoop. Yeah. So yeah, there we go. Alrighty, let's get to the roll call. As I sit here and scratch my face a little bit, we have TJ up for his book. I appreciated your commentary on the Punisher Netflix series. I think we're about

the same spot where you stopped. And when the whole homosexual Russian connection came up, I about threw my hands up and said I'm done, but I must persist and finish the series, because you know guns from the get go. I said to my wife though, that the bad Christian guy doesn't make much sense, and not because a Christian can't be bad, it's just the context of his character

doesn't line up with the church he goes to. He sounds much like an Italian mobster whom everyone knows, or Catholic and he dresses like a priest from a Western or possibly an Amish or Mennonite person. However, the church he goes to is clearly not Catholic, and no one attends his church dressed in simple garb as you would expect from Amish or Mennonites. It's pretty clear to me that they did not consult a Christian for this character. They just took a bunch of stereotypes from a bunch

of different denominations and blended them into one character. Yeah, and it's just it's so dumb, it's so annoying. It really. It ruined it for me, man, it just ruined it. And you know, I'm gonna tell you something. The first season had some flaws. It dragged in some places. You know, that guy Billy, who's basically like a fashion model that we're supposed to believe is like some you know, highly trained tactical killer. You know, he's not Billy Russo he's

not a compelling guy. I think in the role the woman who plays you know, the woman who plays the uh FBI agent, Madonni is her name, and you know she always looks like she's walking off a fashion shoot too. I mean I'm not saying, Look there, I've worked with, I knew some some very lovely FBI agents. I'm not saying that it's just her character is wrong. It's just not uh, it's not a good fit. Um and and and she's kind of boring a little annoying and anyway,

so I got a lot of problem. The only thing I'll say that's good about Punisher is the action sequences are well executed. And the guy Brandon you know the name he was in the first two seasons of Walking Dead. You know what that guy's name is, John. He was like the best friend that betrays the He was Shane in the Walking Dead. Yeah, Shane in the Walking deadhal something like yeah, something like something like that. Um, he's what do you think about him as the Punisher? I

think he does a good job. I like the character, but I agree with what you said yesterday. In addition, he gus forcing certain things, so I'm not I quit this season also, So I'm with you. Yeah, but I like yes. And I also have a rule and it's a rule that I will I will say I think is a good one for for everybody to adopt. And it's really my lost rule. I establish it from watching the show Lost. When you know a show has gone bad,

do not. And obviously TJ wants to. He says he wants to watch in our inbox here because of the guns, which I can respect that. But when you know a show has gone bad, do yourself a favor. There's so much good content out there. There's so many shows that will really, you know, stick with you, entertain you, inspire you, whatever. Don't don't get caught in the I'm halfway through, so I have to finish. No. I watched the first three seasons of Lost, and I remember I came to the conclusion.

I was like, there's no way that that JJ Abrams can make this make sense. It is not possible to, in some bit of writing brilliance, bring this all together. It's just it's just all these fragments of what seem like cool storylines that aren't going to make any sense. No joke. I'm watching Lost currently for the third time, all the way through. You've got to be kidding me. I wish I was. I know what you're saying, but there's something about that show that it does kind of transport.

You mean, I love the first two seasons, but in the third season. I watched the third season. I don't even think I finished it, and I was like, there's no way, and it's all I mean, I know we're we're ruining the show for those who haven't seen it. But it's Hurley's dream, right, That's how this all ends. Yeah, it's like a little well, I don't even say that that's the official reason. I think some of it's left up into an interpretation. I just think that I just

think that it was all a dream. I used to read word at magazine. I just think that that's that's the laziest writing trick, that that it possibly exists. I enjoyed the ride, That's what I guess. I look that the characters are well done and that I made it through halfway. But I'm just glad that I bailed. I would tell you that there's some other by the way to producer, Mike, do you have a Do you have

a vote on this one? Lost? Yeah? I lean more towards you on this, Like, I forget where I left off, but I do remember getting to the point where I just didn't care anymore. So I just bailed. Yeah, I'm making my girlfriend finish it, though, thet's our first time watching Lost, so I'm enjoying this. So it's my third time watching someone for the first time. Get frustrated, dude. There are so many series that we could sit down and talk about, Brandon that you probably tell me you've

already seen Breaking Dad. Yes, okay, you've seen The Wire. No, that's on my list. Unacceptable. You have homework. You must watch The Wire. It is a fantastic show. There are others that I could out of the mix. I would actually say I think Peaky Blinders is in my top ten. Now I think Peaky Blinders it wasn't my jam in the very beginning. I kind of liked it, but I was like, ah, it's a little depressing, and then it

just takes off. Man, It's it's a it's a top ten show for me, which I did not think was going to happen. I also love the first season of The Loss of the Last Kingdom, but I would say that the second and third season are not. It's kind of a lot of the same storylines happening over and over again, which gets a little bit boring. Anyway, Okay, this is not supposed to be This is supposed to be the team speaks. It's not supposed to be Buck rambles about TV shows. Let me hit a quick break.

We'll come back. We'll finish roll Call in just a moment, with all of your insights, all of your fantastic wisdom, knowledge, jokes, all the rest of it. Stay with me, all right, all right, so roll Call, Sorry about that. I got distractics. We're talking about shows. TJ got me all fired up with his comments about the Punisher, and yeah, I'll save you the time. Don't watch it. It's not worth your time. The first season, maybe second season not so much. Rick writes, Hey, Buck,

I use iTunes to download your podcasts every weekday. Today iTunes cannot access your most recent podcasts. Thought you should know, producer Mike, Is that correct? Not that I know of. Do we have to code red Apple, because I'll do it. I'll code red there. I mean it's you know, I usually I hear complaints when those things happen. Haven't seen any We are transitioning actually internally to a new content management system. So maybe there was a hiccup, but I'll

look into it. Alright, alrighty, all right, thanks. The producer Mike is the one who has the answers. I'm just the dance and bear. I just dance and dance on radio. Mike, actually make sure that like things happen. H Spencer writes, Hey, Buck love the show. I use cast box to get the podcast. Now, Mike, we got a problem when when there's a couple of people in a row in the inbox, we got a problem. Didn't get Monday's show. I'm missing

my buck fix Mike? Can you can you send out a terse, but but professional email to whoever needs one about how our podcast is not getting up for people listen. That makes me sad. Yeah, let's check it out. Yeah, look into it because because we know when there's when they're these are back to back messages in the inbox here, Yeah, something must to happen. Something's up, guys. I'm sorry, you know the new up make that three messages the newest Bucksaction Show is not on. Okay, guys, so well we're

on it. I'm sorry this was Monday. Yeah, I don't know that's what they're saying. Damnit Buck, damn it. Um we'll fix it. Guys. Don't don't worry. It's gonna get I mean, I'm the one who's worried. Really we do we do this phenomenal show and then when you can't listen to it when you want to, I get very mad. Another another message about the podcast. Last episode posted is twenty days ago. Mike, what all right? Guys, we're all I'm not going to read any more message about the podcast.

Thank you for telling me about this. We are on this. We will look at what's going on on iTunes, but clearly this transition to a new content management system needs some work. Friday's podcast is definitely up, I'm looking at it now, but Monday's it looks like there might be in this show. Mike, We're gonna we're gonna have to take matters into our own hands here. Um, Let's let's see if we can get that one fixed. Rachel writes, Hello, Buck, I just want to let you know how much how

much my husband and I really appreciate your analysis. We don't want or listen to the lib news media, but we're able to know what's truly going on in the country because you do the research and filter through all the crap that is out there that is true. I am neck deep in liberal media crap on a regular basis. Just wanted to say hi and encourage you to keep up the all some work Jesse and Rachel in Callie Well, Rachel and Jesse Shields Ye, and thank you so much.

And I can see here in your profile photo you have an adorable family, so very very wonderful and cute and good for you. And thank you so much for sending me the note. I appreciated. This is my favorite part of the day every day. John writes, Heybuck Shields, Hie, where is the Charles Cook article on bad Press? How the media failed? John? If you go to National Review Online, look at me. I'm plugging my my friends websites that I don't even work for. Go to nash Review Online.

It'll still be there. But an easy way to do it. It's just type in on Google Charles Cook and it's c O k E. Charles Cook Bad Press, and the piece went pretty viral, so it'll pop up in your in your search results right away. I texted Charles he was on vacation. I'm like, wow, I haven't heard back from him. Of course, it's very like Charles too. For those of you who remember Charles Cook from the Real News days when we used to work together at The Blaze.

He was a frequent guest on my show. And it's very much like Charles to write a piece that the internet like, it just catches fire for for forty eight hours, and Charles is like, oh, I was I was going doing some sporting clay shooting. You know. He just he just didn't even he was gone while his piece, because everybody's like, Charles, this is amazing, and he didn't respond to anybody. And now he's back and he's like, oh,

I'm glad you liked the piece. Like, yeah, Charles, it was one of the better editorials I've read in the last year. I'd say, so it's really really good stuff. And all those you're listening, you know, so many people spew out, you know, there's a lot of just spewing out content and spewing out, you know, crappy opinion pieces

all the time. Read the Charles piece to get a sense of what a really good editorial can be like, and then maybe read my piece from last week, which also went viral on the Commington Kids on the Hill dot com. I'm just saying, Rob, all right, Buck, I listened on Okay more Wow, Everyone's you know, I got I gotta skip past the messages where they're complaining about do tell me, guys, I'm not saying that, but we get it. We had it, we had a problem. Thank

you for the heads up on it. Sorry, guys, we'll make sure that doesn't happen again. More and more the whole inboxes messages about how we don't have a podcast. I'm gonna We're just gonna have to We're just gonna have to create an email address where you can just complain directly to producer Mike so he can complain directly to whoever's supposed to be filing these TPS reports. Randy writes,

a great job on Talker tonight. You'll have your own show soon, bring back Real News with some personnel changes of course, shields Hie. You know, Randy, Real News on the Blaze was a great show. I mean, we had so much conservative pundit talent that assembled on that show over the years. I mean, you know, you sit here. There is nowhere else where I know of outside obviously of Fox News. But remember this was in the early days.

This is before a lot of these people were at that level in their careers that were going to be on Fox as as paid hosts or contributors. We had se Cup Wilkin, Teras Set Mayor, Amy Holmes, Guy Benson, Katie Pavlich, Pete Hegseth Nick or Matt Matt Welch. I mean that's just off the top of Ellison Barber, Jedediahbila. I mean, and I'm not saying these are people that just appeared on the show. Those were regular guests. I

mean those were panelists on a regular basis. So we had and we were fighting about conservatives of all the time, which was always funny. I mean, there was a lot of I wouldn't say overly heated arguments, but there were definitely definitely some back and forth. Holly Rights, I just saw your report on Tucker Carlson. You're right on the money. You should also look at the other types of immigration

fraud occurring after those illegally crossing make entry. Besides gaming the asylum system, they're gaming adjustment of status and all kinds of large scale fraud schemes going on that end with these individuals fraudulently gaining work authorization, lawful permanent residence status, and citizenship another huge incentive for illegal crossers. Holly, you

are absolutely right. There are a number of crimes that often, not always, but often accompany illegality of people that you know of the illegal crossing itself and document fraud lying to federal officials as you point out different types of fraud that occur to try to gain the system. You know, there's marriage fraud. There are a lot of things that go on where people are making a mockery of our immigration laws, and unfortunately it's become so widespread that there's

very little will to enforce it. There's very little desire to pay attention to what's on the books and actually do something about it. So that's that is frustrating gym rights. What about Mexico siding Russia on Venezuela's president one more good reason to build the wall. Well, you know, Penyonieto, the president of Mexico is a far left socialist and he comes from the PRII, which is the Mexican the Mexican socialist party that had run the country for seventy

years until Vicente Fox came along. So you know, he's somebody who comes from this from the machine of Mexican politics that is outrageously corrupt and very left wing and very socialist. And social justice minded, and there is a kind of a comrade ship if you will comd I know, I gotta bring back Commy Beartt's been forever. You don't even know who Commy Bear is anymore. There's been a comrade ship between Mexico and Venezuela recently because of that connection.

That's gonna be it for the Freedom Hunt tonight, my friends. It has been real, It has been fantastic. Thank you so much for your time. We will talk tomorrow, Shield Tie. When you're in a relationship, there are a couple of important dates that you gotta remember and they require roses to really make it special. Birthdays, anniversaries and Valentine's Day,

which is right around the corner. So when you're looking for the biggest and best quality roses out there, I want you to check out my friends at one eight hundred flowers dot com. Right now you can get eighteen red roses for twenty nine ninety nine or upgrade to twenty four red roses for only ten dollars more. This is an unbelievable offer from one eight hundred flowers. Eighteen red roses for twenty nine ninety nine or upgrade to twenty four red roses for only ten dollars more. These

are the best roses you'll get anywhere. They are picked at their peak freshness and shipped overnight. To order eighteen red roses for twenty nine ninety nine or upgrade to twenty four red roses for only ten bucks more, go to one eight hundred flowers dot com. Just go click the radio icon at one eight hundred flowers dot com and enter the promo code buck. Really important. That's one eight hundred flowers dot com radio icon. Click on it promo code buck. Hurry offer expires Wednesday