Islamic Terrorists Murder on Easter Sunday

to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Mag no mistake American. Ready, you're a great American Again, The Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now. What was supposed to be a joyful Easter Sunday was marred by a horrific wave of Islamic radical terror bloodshed. Heartbreaking that the country, which it strives hard for peace in recent years, has been targeted by these terrorists. We warned the loved ones of the victims, some of whom we can confirm

were indeed US citizens. This is America's fight too. Today, our nation grieves with the people of Sri Lanka and we stand committed, resolved to confront terrorism together welcome to the buck section. Show everybody, I trust and hope that you had a joyous Easter weekend with your family and

joyous Passover feast. But the weekend was marred by what happened yesterday where you had multiple attacks in Sri Lanka, a large island off the southern tip of India, multiple tacks that killed so far two hundred and ninety people, injured at least five hundred more people, and specifically went after Catholic churches Catholic congregations in Sri Lanka on the holiest day of the Christian year, the day of Jesus's Resurrection. This is an atrocity that is a reminder of some

of the darkest days of the war on Terror. It is an unfortunate reminder of the fact that Islamic jihadism is the single greatest destabilizing violent force on the planet today, continues to be the greatest threat to international stability and the primary reason for terrorism around the globe. And it is not even close. Despite what you will hear from many on the left, the world is not in the grips of some white nationalist terror surge. Entire countries do

not stand on the brink of collapse. Are not approaching genocide or not in the midst of sectarian bloodshed flooding the streets because of white nationalism. Despite what MSNBC and CNN and The New York Times and others, what have you think, Islamic jihadism is still the greatest threat to peace and stability and decent lives for people around the world of any ideology that inspires violence. And it's still not even close. It's still not even close. Here's just

some background in case you're wondering why. Why is Sri Lanka a country that has had more than its share of violence already. Sri Lanka is a mix of different religious and ethnic backgrounds and has been in the midst of a civil war for decades. It just ended a few years ago. The Sinhalis, who are a majority Buddhist, felt that the Tamils, who are a majority Hindu, were

always unfairly favored by the British colonial lords of Sri Lanka. Remember, during the British occupation of India, Sri Lanka was also occupied. And then when the British left and Sri Lanka became independent, you had the sinhalize because they're a majority Buddhist majority, they were in charge, and there was all of this sectarian jockeying for power and oppression and all these dynamics

of the anger and resentment of that bread. And then you also beneath that have a sizable Muslim minority and a sizable Catholic Christian minority. The Liberation Tigers of tamil Illam Ltte were a militant group fighting against the Sri Lankan government for many, many years. And that's the war that just ended recently, just a few years ago. And that's one of the very few cases where you had

non Islamic suicide bombers deployed. Which is why Sri Lanka something that I even studied when I was at the CIA and before that when I was doing my academic putting in my academic time on terrorism and jihadism. Sri Lanka is studied because it's where you had suicide bombers who were Hindu, suicide bombers who in some cases were Christian, because they were fighting a war based on more national identity and linguistic and cultural background than on religious identity.

That also use suicide bombers who were female in Sri Lanka, which was a kind of tactical innovation at when it was deployed. So there's been a lot of violence in Sri Lanka for a long time and it's finally quieted down and now you have this horrific mass casualty event. This incident clearly obviously on Easter Sunday for maximum psychological damage and impact, as well as the prevalence of soft targets. A lot of people were gathered together in churches, in hotels.

There were churches and luxury hotels attacked in what is a classic Gee Hottest target set. Now there is a Gee Hottest entity in Sri Lanka, but it's considered to be small. It's considered to be not one that people know about, including even those who are generally up to speed on national security issues. This National Taoist Jama is

the group that has been singled out. And there was intelligence that was shared among the Sri Lankan government about ten days ago of suicide bombers targeting churches, so that somebody clearly knew something and precautions, sufficient precautions. We're not taken here, we may have already. Now the head of the head of this group has been established. People are talking about how we're going to look for links to the Islamic state, which I think is a very likely

scenario here. And you have this dynamic where a jihad can pop up anywhere at any time, anywhere where there's a radicalized Muslim population in the world. All that you need is one group of hardline radicals who decide that they're going to engage in something like this and hope it they'll be reprisal attacks and that the sectarian divide will grow larger and there'll be greater distrust within the society and you could have the start of a sectarian

war and that's all that's all you need. And then the jihad is put out all this propaganda for how the Muslims are oppressed and it's everything's terrible is happening to them. And they didn't they had you know, they were completely innocent until this, and people will believe that and they'll be all these videos. You'll have Mujahadeen showing up. It's all it takes. It's all it takes. Whether the cases in Nigeria or Syria, or Eastern Europe and Bosnia,

you name it. This narrative of you have to come aid in a fight, a jihad where your Muslim brothers and sisters are under siege. It's not a hard story to tell if you're willing to engage in a lot of bloodshed and violence to get there. And if there is in fact an Islamic state tie here, maybe they've decided to expand out the the Dar al Harbor, which is the land of war, and include Sri Lanka into that fight. Maybe maybe this is a one off that

does not lead to a whole lot more. But this is the kind of attack that would require a large scale planning effort, the sophistication of it. Many of the bombs went off within very close proximity. The bombs were obviously devastating in their efficacy. You did not have a lot of suicide bombers who's vested in work or who bailed last minute because they did not want to become shahid, they did not want to become martyrs. There have been some other there have been detonators and other IDs found

in Sri Lanka that that did not go off. But obviously this is a devast dating, mass casualty attack. But there's one component of this that I wanted to talk to you a little bit about beyond just giving you the basics of the national security situation, which given my background as a former CIA counter Terrorism Officer CTC, I thought that would be worthwhile for this. The media reaction

to this on Easter Sunday was illuminating. It showed us a phenomenon that you and I are aware of, but that every time it comes up, it's still very much rubs me the wrong way, and that is the way that some of the most powerful Democrats in the country.

We'll talk about an attack that targets Christians versus attacks that target non Christians, or rather attacks specifically that target Muslims of this kind terrorist attacks, versus a situation like this where it was very explicitly and clearly meant to kill as many Catholics as many Christians as possible. There is a difference, a difference in the word choice, a difference in the degree of outrage, a difference in the focus that the media has on it. I want to

break some of that down for you coming up. We also have some new information in the ongoing what Next post Muller report, so we'll have some of that for you. A very high level player has already been subpoenaed by the House. So now after two years of the Muller probe, it looks like we're going to head into two years of redo of the Muller probe by the Democrats in Congress. I hope that the Republicans in the Congress are prepared

for the fist fight that lays ahead. We have a lot of show my friends, a lot to get to today, so stay tuned, they'll be right back. So the way that the Democrats, some of the biggest Democrats out there, referred to these horrific terrorist attacks that I have all the hallmarks of Jehadas strike, and clearly we're targeting Catholics on Easter, as well as some international hotels and places

where there would be Westerners and Christians. But the attack at the churches, which was the primary attacks and killed the most people, those are specifically to kill Catholics, they kill Christians. And you had tweets from people like Barack Obama that's at the following quote. The attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers in Sri Lanka are an attack on humanity, on a data voted to love, redemption and renewal. We pray for the victims who stand with the people of

Sri Lanka. I mean, look, the end, the end part of that is boiler played. And I don't think that Barack Obama is bereft of sympathy for the people that you know. I'm not taking that opinion or that position, but I do think it's a strange thing for him to say the attacks on tourists and Easter worshippers and the attacks on Catholic churches, Former President Obama, that's what

this was. This was an attack on Christian churches in Sri Lanka by jihadas psychopaths who we can all say they don't represent the true Islama or whatever, but they are Muslims and they attack these churches. I'm sure it's just a matter of time before we hear that the real threat in Sri Lanka is Islamophobia. Someone will say it, you watch, give it a few days, someone will say, the real problem is the Islamophobia that's going to happen. But Easter worshipper is a strange thing for Obama to

say or right, because no, they're Jesus worshippers. They're not Easter worshippers. Very strange, and Barack Obama's not somebody who does things like put out a tweet after a terrorist act like this without thinking it through. Hillary Clinton, on this holy weekend for many faiths, we must stand united against hatred and violence. I'm praying for everyone affected by today's horrific attacks on Easter worshippers and travelers in Sri Lanka.

What is this with the Easter worshippers? Why is Hillary Clinton also going with the East? How about Christians? Why can't we hear why can't we hear Christians? Is that is that triggering? Is that upsetting to people? I think we owe that to the victims to at least refer to them. They were targeted, they were martyred for their faith. They were killed in a church celebrating the resurrection of Christ. Can we refer to them as Christians? Or no again,

Hilary Clinton, this Easter worshippers. Have you ever have you ever referred to somebody that way? I mean, I was at church yesterday. Was I in Easter? I was worshiping on Easter? But I don't worship Easter. It's very strange. It's almost like there's a messaging effort here. Nancy see today's heartbreaking attacks and Sri Lanka come as the country has worked hard to build a common future after years of war. Our thoughts are with the injured and the

families of those killed in today's Easter Sunday attacks. No mention of Christian Catholic Church, nothing, nothing. Is that an accident too? Are we? Are we supposed to believe it? That's here's how Hillary Clinton. If you want to compare how she responded on her official Twitter account after the attack on the mosque in New Zealand. Quote, my heart breaks for New Zealand and the global Muslim community. We must fight against the perpetuation and normalization of Islamophobia and

racism in all forms. White supremacist terrorists must be condemned by leaders everywhere. Their murderous hatred must be stopped. Very specific in who was targeted. You know, who are who are the victor here? And who are the bad guys? Hillary will name them when it's a white supremacist psychopath in New Zealand killing Muslims. And fine, right, that's that's all true, And she's she's right about you know, white supremacist terrorists. Dirt eggs must be fought and destroyed and

in every way at all times. But I just want to know why that same standard doesn't apply when it's chieh hottest psychopaths who are blowing up churches on Easter full of men, women and children. Mean, there were little babies in these churches, There were old people in these churches. There were men and women you know who we're looking forward to spending the rest of the day with their family,

with their loved ones. Their lives are taken away, lives are ruined when you're talking about an attack like this. The hundreds that are wounded, a lot of them aren't wounded like they are going to be out of the hospital a couple of days. They're wounded like they're missing an arm. They might be blind, they might have been burned over or you know, thirty or forty percent of their body with second or third or third degree burns, horrific wounds, life altering wounds. And that's on top of

the almost three hundred dead. I can't help but read through the Democrat politician response to a mass murder of Christians by jihadists in Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday and not feel like there's a little bit of a sterility to it. It's you know, yes, this is sad. Violence is bad. Violence bad. Okay, thanks Hiller, we know violence bad. But why is it that the New Zealand attack it was we must stand and fight against the evildoers of white supremacy and stand with our Muslim brothers and sisters

always in solidarity. I'm cool with that. I'm with that. I just want to know why that also doesn't apply to the other side too. You know what, where where's the sense of outrage on behalf of where's this sense of solidarity, shoulder to shoulder, shields high with our fellow Christians all over the world. Why is it that the Democrats have such ease condemning the one and such difficulty

naming and shaming jihadism? You know, they probably want to refer to it as a you know, a radical non Islamic faith tradition that sounds Islamic and has Muslims that are in it, but they don't really count for some reason. They say, what doesn't make It's all babbel, isn't it. And there's a reason for this. I've got a little more on this, actually, and then we'll switch up topics to go to the latest and the Muller probe. So stick around team, He's holding the line for America. Buck

Sexton his back. Here's a taste of the reaction you get from democrats from the left in this country after a mass casualty attack, after a mass assassination of Christians at prayer on Easter Sunday, gathered together in churches in Sri Lanka, the Washington Post puts this out not as an op ed, but as an as news analysis. So with the imprimater impremature of the Washington Post newsroom, and what they have here is Sri Lanka church bombings stoke

far right anger in the West. Oh, isn't this fascinating? So? You mean almost three hundred Catholic Christians murdered on the holiest day of the year for them, And the Post wants people to know that the real problem here, you see, is that far right anger in the West now has been stirred up by this. Shouldn't everyone be angry about this? Shouldn't everyone view this as an outrage against humanity as as the most grotesque persecution imaginable of Christians. Two five

hundred injured. This is what the Washington Post writes, quote to some, it was further proof that Christians and many parts of the world are under attack. Several churches were targeted in Sunday's bombings, along with hotels and a banquet hall. At one Catholic church in Nigambo, more than one hundred people were killed. The attack took place on Easter, one of the most important dates on the Christian calendar. Can

I just repeat how that paragraph started? To some, it was proved that Christians in many parts the world are under attack. Is there anyone who is not a complete and utter moron who thinks that this is not proof that Christians in parts the world they're under attack? Is there? You know? One of the dumbest political analysts, actually not even at a cable news network, but at a one of the other three letter you know, big old school news networks and I had a testy exchange once on Twitter.

He actually ended up blocking me because he thought it was laughable when people brought up that Christians in the Middle East are persecuted. He thought that was just that was foolish, and that the real threat is in the Middle East is always to Muslims. I said, well, you're you sir, and I won't name him because he's not worth being named. Are a moron, and he is. He runs political coverage or a political coverage. He's the chief

political analyst at ABC News. A very stupid and nasty person and doesn't know what the heck he's talking about. And he got schooled, so he blocked me, as one tends to when they come up against me on some of these issues. And that's a pretty common elite position though that there's no real threat to Christians around the world. The only real persecution, possible religious persecution, according to the left, involves Islam. Right. That is, the Islamic faith is the

one that we have to be always protecting. It's the second largest faith tradition in the world. Meanwhile, it's not really much of a minority faith. It's going to be larger than Christianity very soon. But we have to always be worried about being too harsh or too mean or two Islamophobic or whatever the case may be. And Christians can't really be under siege because look at how wealthy and dominant the West is, which is the seat of

Christian civilization. But as we all know, Christianity in the West is in decline, We are increasing living in secular societies, and Christianity outside the West is in many places under constant assault. Christians in Pakistan, Christians in Iraq, Christians in Syria, Christians in Nigeria, Christians and go down the list murdered for their faith on a fairly regular basis and grotesque

and graphic fashion. They've had child suicide bombers, Islamic suicide bombers in Nigeria deployed and oftentimes young girls to walk into crowded Christian churches in Nigeria. How often do you see that covered in the news media here? And how often do you see the people that are at the top of the media and political pyramid on the left

make a lot of noise about Christian persecution. Why is it that when I bring up Christian persecution in the Middle East, a lot of people that seem to think they know about the Middle East say, well, that's not really a problem. Yes it is. There are many people that talk about these issues that I think either don't know or just quickly forget that Christianity started out as a religion of the Near East, that the oldest Christian

faith traditions, that exist. The oldest churches, the oldest gatherings of Christians were in places like Syria and Iraq and Turkey and North Africa. But our media elites the same ones that know nothing about guns or God. It's amazing when they try to write about these things. They don't have any of that background, it seems. And if anything, there's a kind of sneering contempt for people who say

that Christianity is under assault, because it is. It's culturally under assault in this country, but it is physically and from a security, from a life and limb standpoint, under assault. And much of the rest of the world. Christians are not treated well in China. Christians are obviously not allowed in North Korea. I mean, you go down the list a lot of countries. And the Washington Post, though, wants you to know that there are some people in in the West, on the far right, who are angry about

what happened in Sri Lanka. So that's what we really have to worry about. You know, maybe the Post should be more concerned about a possible Isis franchise getting its start in Sri Lanka and turning that country into a hell hole for the next twenty years, because it will draw recruits from all over the world, who will think that they are fighting for the embattled Muslim minority there, just as they do in other countries and in other jihads all over the place. I think there are bigger concerns.

What about just the rise of isis once again as an ideology doesn't have to be in Syria. All it takes is one country to lose control over a piece of its territory and something akin to the Islamic state in Syria popping up again. And if it seizes enough territory draws enough recruits, we could have quite a problem on our hands. The world could have quite a problem on its hands. But you see the real problem is Islamophobia.

The real problem are the right wing extremists who will react badly to this jeehottest mass murder of Christians on Easter. This is how the left sees the world. I wish I could tell you that it was going to change. I wish I could claim that they would be more rational and more reasonable going forward, more even handed and

how they approach all this. But ultimately, the left thinks of Islam as a non white religion of minorities, predominantly non white religion of minorities that must be elevated and protected. It is a bulwark against traditional Christianity and the American right in this country. They view it as a counterweight, to counterbalance to believing conservative Christians, and they think of it as a minority religion that therefore falls into the

same kind of left wing intersectional identity politics of this country. Meanwhile, Islam is the majority of religion in dozens of countries. It is the oppressor and not the oppress e in many more countries. Then the Democrats like Hillary Clinton seem to understand or care to understand. But it's never possible for Christianity to be really under assault because look at how successful it has been in the West for many people.

What happened and Notre Dame wasn't just the destruction of a blessed symbol and an incredible architectural feed It was

also a metaphor. I mean, I believe that it wasn't an accident, but it was a metaphor for what's happening right now in the Western Christian world, that we are abandoning something that is central to not just how we conduct ourselves day to day, and our culture and our sense of ethics and morality, but is central to our spiritual health, central to our sense of ourselves as a civilization. We are abandoning it. Other faith traditions are not They

are growing. They are growing in their ambitions as well as in their size. Maybe the left should take another look at a lot of these countries and see who's doing the oppressing. And then then they can come back to me and tell me that we should be really worried about what a few right wing idiots say on Twitter or Facebook here in the West. We'll be right back. There was a clear intent to collude with the Russians.

There was a willingness to receive Russian help. The president himself called on the Russians to assist his campaign by hacking Hillary Clinton's emails. And if you look at pages one eighty to one ninety that discussed that Trump Tower meeting, it wasn't that they found a lack of evidence of all the things that I talked about. In fact, the meeting did take place. In fact, they did offer dirty Hillary Clinton. In fact, the president's son did say you

would love to have it. In fact, the president's son lied about In fact, there was involved in dictating that lie. All the facts I set out are proven, and yet nothing was criminal. And also Ship is a liar and he's highly highly unethical, dirty player. He ignores the fact that the foundational theory of the Muller probe was a lie, that President Trump did not in fact conspire with the Russians to cheat in the twenty sixteen election. He just

sort of skips past that. Yet, of all the conclusions that one could draw from the reason they released report of Robert Muller, the absence of so called Russia collusion between Trump, his campaign and the Russian Federation is by far, without question, the most important revelation. Although to you and me, it's not a revelation. It's just confirmation of what we already knew. It is time for reckoning here, my friends. Now they've moved on to well, perhaps he did not obstruct,

but he showed a willingness too obstruct. What does that mean if it's in my power to do something? You know, if I am standing in a room and I'm going to turn the light switch off, I either do or I don't. And if I don't try to do it, if I merely talk about doing it. You can't get me for attempting to do it because I did not attempt to do it. The president could have fired Komey. I'm sorry, I could have fired Mueller. He did fire Komy at any time. It did not happen. There was

no obstruction and there was no underlying crime. Democrats are desperate and they are disgraceful in this whole process. But we can't expect Adam Shift to be any better than this. In fact, the media and Shift, instead of taking this as a learning experience as a cautionary tale, now we see the anti Trump opposition has just shifted, shifted the outrage narrative. It's not collusion that worries them now now

it's obstruction. While Special Counsel Mueller didn't establish that a crime of obstruction was committed to his report, he also could not exonerate the president. They say Mueller's obvious political positioning here is a total slap in the face to prosecutorial ethics. Now they're jumping on this bandwagon of obstruction in place of collusion. This is because they're changing the rules. They're in fact moving the goalposts as they play the game.

There never would have even been an investigation to obstruct if it were not for the initial conspiracy theory about Russia collusion and no actual obstruction occurred. This whole theory also rests on the idea that Trump told people to do things and they and meant for them to actually

do it. Wasn't just blowing off steam. You know, I think that we all have heard enough trumping bluster that we understand that sometimes the guys being a salesman, sometimes he's you know, just sort of talking the way people talk. And Trump says that this story that's out there that well, that's in the Mula report, and that's being getting a lot of focus now that no one that that people wouldn't do what he told them to do. Trump takes

issue with his play fifteen. If you could hear that or not the audience A great nobody disobeys my orders, the president says, nobody disobeys my orders. So that would mean, if that's true, that someone along the line is either misinterpreting what they were told by the president or they're lying to the Special Council. It's tough to know which it is. Now for those who say buck but come on, and we're talking about a battle of who to trust, if it's Trump versus some of these fine public servants

or his own employees in the White House. Let's remember that Rod Rosenstein claimed that it was a joke that he wanted to wear a wire in meetings with the President, and then later it came out that no, it was not in fact a joke, which would mean that Rod Rosenstein was lying when he later claimed it was a joke.

But these are the nuances that are very real, that are very important when it comes to recollections of conversations that could well have influenced what was in these Special Council's reports, specifically about the issues of a willingness to obstruct. I mean, they keep stretching out what the standard is here, that they make the standard even easier to violate, They make it even more transparent, more obvious that the purpose of all of this is just to find a way

to get Trump. Nothing else matters to them. They don't care, They do not care. And then there's the Dershowitz, and we'll talk about the dirshmore later on. In this the Dershowitz position is that Mueller doesn't even know what the heck he's talking about. He's just wrong on the basic concepts of obstruction, that the president can fire whoever he wants to fire, who works for him play cliff seven. Mulla got the law completely wrong on obstruction of justice.

And I lay out what the law in obstruction is. You cannot be charged with obstruction if you're the president and you simply exercise your constitutional authority to fire Comey or anyone else. I lay that out carefully, and the best precedent for that is George H. W. Bush, who pardoned cast for Weinberger and five other people on the eve of the trial. The special prosecutor said he obstructed justice, but he couldn't be charged with it. And they never

mentioned the Bush case in the Muller report. Mueller was in the Bush administration, Barr was in the Bush administration, and they deliberately omit the Bush case as the leading president, which would preclude a president from being charged with obstruction for simply exercising his constitutional authorities. Put simply, as Professor Emeritus Alan Dershwitz of Harvard University is telling us all here, if the president does what the Constitution says the president

can do, that act cannot be obstruction. This is even a whole other This is a whole other part of the argument. This just goes to show you how many layers and levels and how much tortured logic and how much dishonesty had to be piled the top dishonesty for Muller and his little team of angry Democrats to come up with this smear job. That is the part two of the Muller report. That's just meant to take down Trump. It just meant to make him look bad and humiliate

him and humiliate his people. It's not rooted in the law. Mueller is a partisan hack. This was a disgrace, an absolute disgrace. Got more on this and also free College that's coming on. Back in February, Leadership Institute organizer Hayden Williams was out in the field. He was trying to help some conservative students recruit for a group at UC Berkeley, and he was punched square in the face by a radical leftist thug. Sucker punched at that. President Trump understands

that this is unacceptable and he's taken action. He signed an executive order to protect conservative students free speech on campus. But more action is needed, and you can be a part of this fight, support the Leadership Institute and defend conservative students on campus. All you to who's going to take back the campus dot org? The Leadership Institutes the

premier organization for educating and training conservative college students. With your gift of as little as five dollars a month, you can help conservative college students stand up to intimidation and physical attacks. Can also help them win the future for this country. Please make your urgent gift to the Leadership Institute today. Go to take back the campus dot org again, take back the candidat. No country builds a future by crushing the dreams and hopes of its young people.

That's why I'm calling for universal free college and the cancelation of student loan debt of up to fifty thousand dollars for forty two million Americans. My plan will wipe out student loan debt entirely for about seventy five percent of those with debt. It will help close the racial wealth gap, and it will provide an enormous economic boost to America's middle class. The cost of my universal college and debt cancelation plan can be covered entirely by my

ultra million and airs wealth tax. That's a two percent tax on the richest seventy five thousand fortunes in this country, those with more than fifty million dollars in assets. Just two percent, and we can do this. This is the kind of big structural change that expands opportunity to everyone. There. It is wipe away a trillion dollars in student loan debt, folks, And by white boy, I mean socialize it so that the American taxpayer is on the hook for at all,

because that's what this is. This is removing individual responsibility. This is removing the process of picking and paying for your college and putting it in the public's hands in a sense, or rather, at least the bill goes to the public. You still get to make the decision if you want to go to one of these schools. I would also want to know, does this only apply to people that have run up those debts? What happens to those who run up debts going forward? Oh, we know

what will happen. They'll insist that they shouldn't have to pay either. No one should have to pay, you see, because it's always someone else's fault. Class warfare is a very powerful and very dangerous thing. Because it appeals to people. At first, it appeals to our sense of fairness, perhaps our sense of envy. Life is unfair. Therefore, there's always unfair things that you can point to and say, well, I want to solve that, or I want to help

you with that. I'm from the government. I see what's unfair. I'm gonna make things more fair. Is that really true? Will it really work? Who knows? Worth a try? Maybe that's the pitch, that's what they'll tell you. And she says she's smart enough here to say in Ultra Millionaire tacks two percent tax the estimated seventy five thousand families

with fifty million dollars or more in wealth. That's a very small subset of the American population, that granted has a tremendous amount of obviously wealth to throw around, so they have disproportionate political influence. But is anyone going to cry any tears for them to do this? So you start to see you can just fight yourself. You say, oh, hold on a second, buck, I mean, how how bad

is it really? This would allow students to have fifty thousand dollars in debt or less to be canceled for everyone with a household income over under one hundred thousand dollars whoa those who make up to two hundred and fifty thousand would also get some debt cancelation. If you make over two hundred fifty grand, you don't get any debt relief whatsoever. This this plan, I'm telling you, this

is going to get support from people. This might revive you know, Warren was at something like seventeen percent in the polls this summer and has just plummeted. I mean she's in a single digit somewhere because her whole you know, foka Hanus one one twenty fourth Native American thing was just a disaster. A disaster no way around it. I Mean, there was no way that she could try to spin that as anything other than a total and complete mess. That's what it was. But now she's trying to come

up with the big ideas. One idea is that she wants to impeach the president, she said that over the weekend, and the other ideas that she's going to give a whole bunch of money from the public, right from you, from your pocket, from your your taxes that you pay to pay off the debts of people that wanted to go to college and didn't really think through what the expenses were going to be and how difficult it be

to pay off. You know, there's there's so much in this discussion that will not get the attention it deserves. And one part of it, just off the top of my head, for example, is that we need to rethink, dramatically rethink what it is that we're trying to accomplish with the colleges and universities that we currently have in

this country. If everybody goes to get an undergraduate degree, the truth is that the undergraduate degree becomes more like high school was thirty years ago, which is just a bare minimum standard for a lot of jobs out there, and then you'll just have the arms race for well, now I have to get an advanced degree, and that's going to be even more expensive. Most colleges and most

universities are credentialing programs. They are not truly institutions devoted to education that is useful for the purposes of employment. And I know that this a lot of professors, a lot of people would yell, oh no, that's not true. It is true, right, People that get into especially in the elite schools, there there's a when I say elite, I mean if you if you go to a top three hundred school in this country, you know, certainly a top one hundred school. The reason you're there is the

name brand value of the school. That is why you are there. You can get just as good of an education in the Internet era at any number of state and even community college. State college is even community colleges as you do at these schools that have enormous endowments and very very fancy aspirations for what they're trying to do with their student body, you know, create the next generation of I mean, they're all trying to create the

next generation of leaders. But these are credentialing programs. They are not first and foremost about educating people in a way that is useful to them. Maybe educating them about some things. And certainly there's a social education that goes into these these college experiences these days. But I'm talking about a system that is mostly used so that people can get jobs based upon the brand value of where they go. But that even gets a little deeper in

the weeds that we need to hear. I mean, ultimately this is just about Elizabeth Warren wants to soak the rich to give money to people that have run up debts. Why stop with college education? What about people that have subprime auto loans? It's a trillion dollars of those, by the way outstanding right now. What are people under underwater their mortgages? They work hard, they try their underwater their mortgages. Why shouldn't you pay for all the problems other people

have based on their financial decisions. I don't know if Elizabeth Warren has an answer for that other than the because it don't be nice, it's not good enough. The only dual certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company out there is Global Verification Network. Whatever business you're in across the country, whatever industry you're in, you're gonna need

background checks. That's just the way it gets done. But if you want them done properly, if you want to make sure that when you call, you get somebody on the phone that can answer any question and handle each case efficiently, please give my friends a Global Verification Network

a call. Their risk mitigation experts can handle your caseload and develop a program that fits your company's need specifically, So, whether you're in the HR department, yourself or you're a CEO or somebody who's starting a small business, whatever size your company, whatever industry. For background checks, call Global Verification Network eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine again eight seven seven six nine five one one

seven nine, or go to my GVN dot com. We're actually making the Green New Deal come alive here in New York City, so we have our own Green New Deal. It's three very basic ideas. One the biggest source of emissions in New York City is buildings. We're putting clear, strong mandates in the first of any major city on the Earth to say to building owners, you gotta clean up your act, you gotta retrofit, you gotta save energy.

If you don't do it by twenty thirty, there will be serious fines as high as a million dollars or more for the biggest buildings. And this mandate is going to guarantee that we reduce emissions. We're going to ban for the classic glass and steel skyscrapers, which are incredibly inefficient.

If someone wants to build one of those things, they can take a whole lot of steps to make an energy efficient but we're not going to allow what we used to see in the past and the City of New York to government, which is is about as much energy in a year as do the people and the businesses of the state of Vermont. We are going to get all of our energy from renewable sources in the next five years. Build a Blasio aka Kavilhelm because his name is foreign Villehelm. It he's not build a Blasio.

He changed his name. Yeah, he run to the sea. Relatable, So he run from build Blasio to Kaiseevihem or rather vern Wilhelm to build Blasio. Yeah, but the guy's an imbecile, and that he's the mayor of the biggest city in America, the wealthiest largest city in the United States, one of the most important cities from an economic and cultural perspective in the world, is really off putting to me. I think that up to this point he's not I really believe that de Blasio is too lazy to do that

much damage up to now. That's really the problem. He's much more concerned about taking oh that's right, his suv an hour every day each way so he can go work out at the Jim he likes in Brooklyn. He lives in Gracie mansion, which is in Manhattan, takes an hour ride out to Brooklyn to go to his gym where he, you know, does a lot of ankle stretches, and then comes back an hour two hours of his

day spending an seuv going back and forth. I'm just saying, you think that the mayor might have better things to do with his time. I mean, the guy's not exactly, you know, training for a you know, a beach bikini shoot or something. I don't I don't know what what he thinks he's doing. But the guy's an imbecile. And you know, I know he went to Yell, but that doesn't mean anything. People go to all these schools, and a lot of them are complete jackasses. But he's going

to try to destroy New York City. And now that he's managed to entrench himself deeply enough, I think he's got some really horrible ideas for New York and one of them is this, this municipal version of o'callagio Cortez is Green New Deal. I mean, the Green New Deal is too stupid for any serious person to take seriously.

But build a Blasio thinks that it's something that New York City should go off and do essentially on its own build a. Blasio thinks that the Green New Deal is a place where New York City should lead the way, and sorry, New York City should be leading the way.

Here here, here's what the plan says. The Climate Mobilization Act will reduce the city's planet warming emissions by setting caps for a variety of building types, with the goal of achieving a forty percent decrease in greenhouse gas emissions by twenty thirty. They'll be huge fines, as to Blasio said, They're up to a million dollars of eliment. It's an

enormous fine if you don't do this. The most dramatic measure would require buildings of more than twenty five thousand square feet, which are responsible for thirty percent of the city's carbon emissions, to conduct retrofits such as new windows and insulations to make those buildings more energy efficient. The aggressive bill is a crucial step toward the city's vulnerable coastal communities, said the Queen's Council member who spearheaded the legislation.

I mean, this is just straight up more on stuff here. Quote. No single handed policy can completely reverse the effects of climate change, but This policy, when enacted, will be the largest emissions reduction policy in the history of New York City. This is taking an eye dropper full of cold water and putting in the ocean and telling me that you're changing the temperature. This is stupidity on steroids. They aren't

really going to do anything here. Even if you believe that climate change is real, which I well, this is where I'd say, yes, the climate is changing. Do I think that human emissions are creating a catastrophic warming effect that will destroy the world as we know it unless we take traumatic action that will have tremendous financial const No. In fact, I am sure of it. I am as sure of the wrongness of the climate change alarmists as I am that the sun will set tonight and rise

tomorrow morning. I mean, I'm as sure as I can be of anything. But we're going to speak later on about the mental health effects of the Trump era. On the left, climate change is a faith based tradition. They think it's and they won't agree to that. They won't say that it's faith based. They believe it's science based, but it's actually faith faith based. It has to do with the elevation of the physical earth and the state

in charge of that earth in place of God. The people that do not believe that there is an all knowing deity or you know, whatever your sense of God is. I'm trying to get too theological here. But they replace that need that the human mind has with climate change alarmism. And now in the city of New York, they're going to try to make massive developers, you know, the biggest

buildings in the city, much more costly. They're going to run their costs way up, and they're gonna create a whole bunch of oh that's right construction, which is why these people are all excited about this, I'm sure in some of the city councils, because you're going to create

a boom in retrofitting construction. But that's just attacks on these businesses because that doesn't make their you know, it's one thing to build an addition to your business, right if you if you build a an extra bay for cars, if that's what they call it where they do their work, an extra an extra garage slot, we'll call it that for a car. If you work in an auto mechanic place, now you can take more vehicles, you can do more

work you have greater efficiency. There's a business purpose. If I walked into your mechanic shop and said, I need you to install brand new windows in here, and I need you to have only solar panels on your roof, and I need to that doesn't make you more efficient. That runs up your costs and it doesn't improve your business at all. And it's not market based. It's just

a mandate. It's just a regulatory cost. Kaisa de Blasio wants to institute these costs for buildings across New York City because he thinks that this is going to set some example for the rest of the world. I mean, is he so stupid that he thinks that in Mumbai, or in Shanghai, or in name another megacity around the world, they give a crap what Deblasio thinks about climate change?

I mean, is he that delusional? And when I say that they care about it, I mean that, yeah, they might notice it, some of them might even say, oh, that's nice, but that they're going to change their behavior. This is fundamentally unserious stuff. But the Left is that all they have to do is be normal and rational, and I think that they'd have a chance to maintain the House and maybe even take the Senate. That they're crazy, and that's why I don't think they can win the

presidents either. I mean, they're just crazy. What they say doesn't make any sense. No human being is going to surround and convince me that New York creating a man. Don't think that this isn't gonna come to your hometown, folks, or your city. Some of you're like, oh, buck, but I live in a red state. Yeah, just wait, may Or Pete comes from a red state a lot of ways, and even if you live in a red state, the federal government's gonna try to do this to you if

the Democrats are in charge. They've said the Green New Deal is gonna be a federal program, so it doesn't matter where you are, it doesn't matter how good your state or local government is. Okazy of Cortez said they're gonna have to rebuild all the buildings, and we all laugh and said that's crazy, because it is. But just because it's crazy doesn't mean they don't want to do it. In fact, when it comes to the Green New Deal, the crazier it sounds, the more into it they are.

Better O'Rourke is around talking about World War two level sacrifice to tackle climate change. Sixty million people died in World War Two, so he's talking about that level of sacrifice. I mean, I know, maybe he's just going for the rhetorical flourish, But you know, I don't think anybody should compare the long line they had to wait in at lunch to get their you know, poke a bowl to storming the beaches of Normandy. I don't think that's a

rational comparison. That's what Beto's doing on the Green New Deal. Now we've got this happen in New York City. This is if they can get this done in New York, they're going to be pushing for this in cities and blue states across the country. And not only that, they're gonna then try to kick this up as soon as they have the power to do it in DC. They're gonna make this a federal issue. I don't even want to I can't even imagine what the costs are going

to be of retrofitting all these major buildings. Remember, so that they reduce their carbon emissions. This is a non problem. This is a problem that we should not have to solve because it's a non problem. But the costs of solving this non problem are going to be tremendous, absolutely enormous, and they're all on board for because remember Beto saying World War two levels sacrifice. They're not going to back

off of this. I thought the Democrats would have to walk away from this going into the election, but maybe they are just this crazy. Maybe the Green New Deal is something that they're signed on for and won't walk away from. The media basically accused the president of treason for two and a half years with no proof and

no evidence. They lied about this man. And when we actually went through all of the process, the thirty five million dollars, they spent, more than a million documents, two thousand, eight hundred subpoenas, witnesses and warrants and wire tap and the whole thing. No collusion, no obstruction, a total exoneration for this president. And look, there's no doubt that there's some level of excitement and a cloud being lifted, but there's also some righteous indignation and anger here going. Why

did this all start in the first place. It's just completely wasted the American people's time and money, that's right. Why did it all start in the first place? When do we get that answer. I want that answer. I want to know how, because what they've told us so far as a lie. They're lying to you right now. The FBI is lying to you. The federal government is lying to us about how the Mueller probe, Russia Origin investigation, all that stuff, how all that began? Because you can't

have a Muller probe without a Russia conspiracy theory. Well, how do we get to the Russia conspiracy theory? Papadopolis and Carter Page. No way, that's not it. That's not enough. That is not enough. There must have been more. You've got to go back and look at some of the threads that we haven't been able to fully chase down yet, things like the unprecedented unmasking requests. People say, oh, buck, they unmasked. No, no, no, they were. There were people

asking for unmasking in the Obama administration. Who would It would be very unusual for them to do that, and they were doing it with increasing speed, with increasing frequency. Toward the end of the Obama administration went oh, that's right, there was a presidential election going on, right, That's something else that you need to be aware of as we go here. There were some concerns early on, not just about the unmasking, but also the leaks of classified information.

The leak that got General Flynn jammed up. We need answers about who did that. That's a crime. Someone hated Trump and hated Flynn so much that he or she was willing to risk felony prosecution and prison time just to make sure that Flynn couldn't be the National Security Advisor anymore. That's a degree of Trump' arrangement syndrome that should concern all of us. That's a person who certainly should not have any role whatsoever in the administration or

the execution of federal laws. Because I think it's somebody. I do think it's somebody at the DOJ. I have all along. I can't tell you who. I've got my suspicions. I don't know. But this Muller report isn't just something where we should and to the point that was being made there by Hogan Gidley, the White House Deputy Press secretary, It's not just oh man who Trump got passes, it's what was that all about? Man? Why are we put

through this in the first place? And there are also questions about the veracity of some of the things in the report. None of this was challenged in a court. A lot of people said, oh, buck, it was all sworn testimony. Oh, sworn testimony. You mean like what Michael Cohen gave And now I was going to prison for people lie in sworn testimony all that. Just because it's

sworn testimony doesn't mean it's true. But that's what we're being told now because so much of the testimony that is included in the Muller report, which I have now read and which you know, yeay, and so how I spent some on my weekend, that just all at it all adds together in a very negative anti Trump fashion. That's what it's meant to do. John Dawd, who's a former Trump attorney, he is unimpressed by much of this.

And well, actually wait before we get into that. Remember this is the media reporting on how Trump was about to fire Robert Mueller. Play clip nine. President Trump ordered the firing of Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Last und to fire Muller is attempt to fire Why he moved to fire Robert Muller? That the President sought to have Muller dismissed In June trying to stop Robert Mueller from doing

his job. Stop Muller from doing his job, you mean from conducting a fake investigation for two years, or rather an investigation of a fake premise. Robert Muller was chasing Bigfoot for two years, that's what he was doing. There was no Russia collusion. President Trump was interfering with Robert Muller's Bigfoot quest. Why is Bigfoot of the mind? You'll see in the next hour. I've got a special surprise for you all. It's pretty funny story actually, so you'll

have to stay around for that. That's right. That's what we call a teaser in the business. But you know, Robert Mueller spent tens of millions of dollars looking for the Locknest Monster, and now that he didn't find it, they want to tell us, well, you know, Trump tried to stop him from finding the Locknest Monster. Guess what, there was no monster, and he didn't stop him. But now they're saying that he thought about or are talked about, stopping him, and that's a crime. That's there's a solid

case he made that. The president's constitutional authority allows him to fire Muller for any or no reason. John Dawd, president Trump's former attorney, he certainly has some thoughts on this play ten. That was a signed to deal with Muller. At no time did the President ever say, you know, John, I'm going to get rid of him. John is not going to do it. It's just the opposite. Here's the message the President had for Bob Muller to me to carry one, you tell him I respect what he's doing.

Number two, you tell him he's got my full cooperation. Number three, get it done as quickly as possible. And number at number four, whatever else you need, Yeah, let me know. So that was always the message. And that's exactly what we did. And as you know, we produced everything without a document. Miss ain't sure about a lie.

Can you imagine it, Washington? Somebody without a lie. Not only did President Trump not obstruct this investigation, the cooperation that he gave was far and above what I would

have honestly probably advised him to give. I mean to not claim executive privilege, which would he would have been well within his rights to do and would have probably saved a lot of the you know, it's sort of embarrassing behind the scenes conversations and They're only embarrassing because the president is expressing his outrage at being set up at what was a frame job, and so he's trying

to So I'm not even sure it is embarrassing. It's just that the media says, oh, well, in order to try to, you know, beat the news cycle that day, he misled them on this issue or that issue. Oh Trumps such a liar? Where was her? Trump? Such a liar? And the people that obviously Trump such a liar, you know, they're the ones that we're trying to get Hillary Clinton to be the next president United States. I haven't forgotten about that. Hillary who, you know, wiped her server what

with a cloth? Hillary who said that she landed under sniper fire in Bosnia. Hillary who said there was nothing mark classified in her email. Hillary who said that she didn't know what the sea marking meant confidential meaning for classification in her email. Hillary who claimed that she turned a thousand dollars into a hundred thousand dollars trading cattle futures by reading about it in the Wall Street Journal, when the Royal Street Journals pages of that time had

no cattle futures coverage. There were other reasons how she made that money had to do with her connections in the state of Arkansas. But joined to sit here. I mean, Christopher Hitchins wrote a book. If any of you are curious, it's short, but man, it is good. No one left to lie to about the Clintons. The Clintons lied as

much as anybody on planet Earth could ever lie. And not only did Bill Clinton do that for eight years, including lying under oath, which she was not charge for, but then Hillary built an entire political career olines and they wanted her to be the president. They want to tell us a little time, How could you support Trump? He lies? Oh? Yeah, like the Clintons aren't lying all the time. Let's say, buck, two wrongs don't make it right. Okay. I'm not saying what Trump does is right when he lies.

I'm just saying guy fights fire with fire, and I'd rather my side wind. It's a pretty straightforward calculation for me. But they're saying, oh, he tried to fire Muller. He doesn't try to fire Muller. If the president wanted to fire Muller, you know what you could do. You call over to the Department of Justice to say I'm the president of the United States. I'm the leader of the free world. Hey Mueller, you're fired. He didn't do that. So this is all just grasping at straws. This is

this is nonsense from the Libs. But libs are full of nonsense on a scale of one to ten. When you look at the Muller Report, where you give it, oh, that's enough, complete enough, how used to have a strike for US? I ran cases just like this poorly done. Are things are missing? There are parts of its just aren't right, And I would say they have a junior writer from the New York Times to it. It's very poor. A lot of political gamesmanship in the Mulla Report, no

question about that. A lot of stuff that when you read it and you try to apply the why would they include this if they're really being non partisan prosecutors, you can't come up with any good answers. But that's because Trump arrangement syndrome has spread far and why it even spread into the authors of the Mulla Report. There's a real problem that the anti Trump left has handling reality. You know, I am occasionally wanted to talk about very

gern very gergen schniction for Reagan. He spoke about how he's worried about how millennials will be able to process the fact that Trump was not taken down Watergate style, that Trump was not destroyed by the media. This is this is a concern now that the Libs have, but they've essentially out outpaced expectations that they are under performing after over promising on how they're going to the media is going to be able to end the Trump presidency

one way or another. Here's Ers Gergen himself over at CNN Play seventeen. There's a poll that's been done by the Insissuit of Politics here at Harvard and it finds that the millennials and Generation Z mar expressing a high degree of anxiety are about life and for the first time,

politics seem to be disturbing their mental health. This whole notion that politics are beginning to disturb becoming a problem for the mental health of the young, new or mental health or young CNN doesn't understand the culpability that they have in this, and I also think that they're diagnosing others without understanding where they would fall on the anti Trump spectrum here really and the Trump and the Trump

Arrangement syndrome spectrum CNN is like Stage four. CNN is no longer a serious news organization because of Donald Trump. But the mental health aspects of a Trump presidency just go to how emotionalize this has become for the left. You know, you'd see these stories in the weeks leading

up to the Maula Report. I almost couldn't believe some of these stories about how people who were in their last months of life were concerned that they would not live to see the Maula Report because they wanted, they needed to know that America would endure, and that justice would be done, and that Trump would be prosecuted and run out of office. These were news stories, folks, that people were running. These were things that we were being told. And my initial reaction to that was always what a

sad state of affairs? I mean that any that any human being, and I really mean that any human being would be more concerned with what with whether they could see the end of the Muller Report than how much time they were able to spend with loved ones or and I mean this just you know, reading a book with the sun shining on their face somewhere. I mean, you know, my friends, this stuff is not as important as a lot of people left have made it out to be. It's just not It does not matter as

much to their lives. It should not matter to their sense of well being and identity. But there you had the most revered political analyst at CNN, probably gurgling gurgen. There you had him talking about how young people's mental health is affected by this. But it's not just young people, it's democrats of all ages, you know. I see this now more and more in DC, where people will tell me that, you know, they'll they'll be on a on a date, you know, people that are my age or

little younger, they'll be on a date. And if the person finds out that there are Trump support or the date's over, that's it. That's bogging. I can't imagine having such a closed mind about my fellow human beings. I mean, I can't imagine being out with someone in flesh and blood and spending time with them and just automatically thinking, well, oh, because they voted, out of two options for the presidency, they voted for one that I don't like, so I

guess technically it's three options. Did anybody listening to the show vote for McMullen aka McMuffin aka what was the guy's name from super Bad? What was his name on the fake ID? You know, I'm talking about mclovin aka mclovin. But of those two choices, if you voted for the wrong one, there are people who think that they should not talk to you anymore, that you can no longer be friends, that there's nothing really to discuss. That's that's sad. That is very sad. But I also think that it

has become commonplace. I think that for Democrats having a such a strong feeling about Trump, that it affects your overall sense of well being and your relationships with people and your willingness to engage with them and to to you know, make new friends. And this is just this is just nuts. Producer, Mike, do you have a story to share? Come on and share your story, dude, Come on this having them all it's pretty funny. There we go. Yeah, I got a you know, it's a mutual friend. We

went out. She's you know, a friend of mine said you should go out with this girls many years ago, not many, twenty sixteen, um. And we're sitting there and she starts talking about politics. I'm like, I don't really want to get down on this road, but I'll indulge. So I was listening and as she's talking, the bartender where we were like listens to her and he was a huge Trump supporter, which you don't find in New York.

And he's like just railing on her about Trump's great, Trump's this, and she starts losing her mind and I'm like giving the guy like the wink. I'm like, yeah, buddy, keep going. And she turns to me and she's like, do you believe this guy? I'm like yeah, I'm like he's absolutely I do. She looks at me like what and I'm like yeah, I'm like he's gonna win, like it or not. I mean, you hear this all the time.

I hear this from from friends of Mountain DC that you know, if you voted for Trump, swipe left or whatever has become this is like a social media and online dating phrase. Now that you're here where they're like, if you if you vote for Trump's swipe left. This is not normal. Yeah, this is not normal. They want to you know she I mean it was over in less than five minutes. She's like all right, I gotta go. I'm like Okay, see it. I guess I guess there

was no second date. How producer Mike, there was not a love match. No, there was not, m You know, I always got to be aware of these things, my friends. The hot crazy scale is applicable to politics as well. For Mike, everybody wasn't She wasn't hot enough to be that crazy either, So I'll tell you that. Oh well, then then there's that Mike. There was gonna be there's

gonna be a note day too, regardless. Bucks. Yeah, I guys with Hey, thank you producer Mike for bringing it a little bit of realism towards today on the Bucks Extit show. Oh Man, Yeah, but the mental health man Gurgan's worried about the next generation mental health. Meanwhile, they're the ones that have been fear mongering about how the President of the United States is basically a Russian spy.

But our concerned REX generation millennials shod or. I don't know if they have enough sheby de Oil to calm them down. But I don't know why anyone listen to that guy. It's a jokester. Hiring can be tough, no question. You know that if you've had to shift through all the resumes and try to make sure you're most in

the right places. Takes up a lot of time and there's no guarantee you get the right people unless you do what I did because I used zip recruiter and I've got fantastic colleagues that I work with now every day. Because zip recruiter dot com slash buck is free to use and lets you post the job that you want to hire for. In fact, zip recruiter sends your job to over one one hundred of the web's leading job boards.

They don't stop there. With their powerful matching technology, zipp recruiter scans thousands of resumes to find people at the right experience and invites them to apply to your job. So as applications come in, zip Recruiter analyze each one and spotlightstop candidates. You will never miss a great match. Right now, my listeners can try zip recruiter for free at this exclusive web address zipp recruiter dot com slash buck. That's zip recruiter dot com slash buck one more time,

zip recruiter dot com slash buck. Zip recruiter is the smartest way to hire. Follow the river back up to the road. Flack someone down easy, guys, there's an accent on the road. Does anybody have a cell phone? But we're just trying to get back. There's there's something in the woods. Indeed, it's Bigfoot. Everybody, not to spoil a surprise. That's from the movie Primal Rage, which I mentioned to

you recently on the show. Somebody asked you had the best big Foot movie, and I had late one night recently, just decided I want to watch a big Foot movie, and I went searching for it and I found it and it was this movie, Primal Rage. But then I did have some comments about, for example, the lead the lead actor protagonist in this I think could use a little more time in acting school. And I had a few remarks as radio hosts do well, folks. It turns out that one of the lead actors from the film

is a member of Team Buck. He listens to this radio show and he read out to me directly from his verified account and said, hey, man, that's my movie. And I said, you know what, this is amazing. We're going to talk about your movie. Marshall Hilton joins us. Now. He plays the kind of leader of the bad guy Rednecks in the movie primal rage, but he actually does a very good job in his role. Marshall, great to have you on the show. Thank you very much for

having me. I am honored to be in the Freedom Hunt. Yeah, man, great, great to have you. So just you know, I have told a few people about this movie, and it's so funny. As you pointed out, you never know who's listening. Man, here I am talking about a movie that just came out what was it in twenty eighteen? But you know, tell me a little about this. I mean, how was it? Where do you guys film and how was it making? What I would have to say is the best big

Foot movie I've ever seen. Oh well, you can need to put that on a clip so I can send that to the director. Okay, we have to forget a copy of what you just said. It was a pretty amazing ride. We actually shot it in twenty fifty. It was shot in two separate sequences, as we did about a month in twenty fifteen, and then we wrapped and then we came down here and looked at the footage, did whatever we did, and went back up the exact

same time. Touriod in twenty sixteen, so the lighting would match for cinematography, and we shot it for another three weeks. We shot it up in Oregon and California. We stayed in Crescent City, so we were on a private reserve of about twelve hundred acres of first growth redwood forest. And in the scenery, I will say, and the cinematography in the scenery is right what you would expect for a big for a big Foot movie. I mean, you're in this really deep, dense dark woods to the Pacific Northwest,

so that really comes across. There's also some stuff in the movie where it seems like they dug a little bit into the lure of Bigfoot. I mean, what can you tell me about did you work at all with the writers or have any input into how they're going to depict I mean, also, your Bigfoot is not the Saint Harry and the Henderson folks. He's not a cuddly guy. No, he is not. He is. The best description I think

I could give it is it's very predator. Like Patrick McGee be doing pre production on the movie for almost twelve years, and it was it was it was just an amazing process to be up in the mountains filming that thing. Um, what was first for your question, you're getting to my question, which is just you know, the backstory of how you pull this thing together, because I've

always been surprised. I mean, I think that Bigfoot. You think of all the Dracula movies, and you think of monster and horror movies, big franchises, and whether it's Sasquatch, Abominable, Snowman, big Foot. Not a lot done on this, and it lends itself so easily to especially to the kind of you know Blair, which horror authenticity genre, and you guys did capture some of that in this film, along with some really violent stuff. So there's that. Yeah, yeah, there

was some very violent stuff. As far as the Native American slant up in that region, the Native American Indians called Bigfoot Omah, and the original title is Primal raised a legend of Omah. But right, yeah, that's what I mean. You got into the backstory a bit, right, right, right, And so he was more of a legend, a mythical legend. Bigfoot's been around forever. I mean, you know, he's called he Haddie and Russia. He's called all kinds of different things all around the world. It is a kind of

a fable, so you know, they called him Omah. Distributor didn't think that the title was all that sexy, so they wanted to get rid of the Omah, but they left all that Native American lare and that's where that came from. I don't think anybody's ever done that with a Bigfoot film. And most of the Bigfoot films you see is you know, you see a shadow of something behind a tree, and that's obviously a guy in a

rubber suit. You know, they're not done really well. This suit was six years in the making, three fully animatronic heads. All that hair was done by hands, single hair stuff and was cast. The director of the movie is actually in the big Foot suit, Patrick McGee six ten um. And he's a big, tall guy. So you know, we were getting directed by big Foot in some of these scenes, which is a completely different, hilarious story in and of itself. Um. And you know it was his baby, and you know

I wasn't. I was invited to his studio. I went and saw his his his production stuff. He showed me the suit and I just turned to him. I said, I'm in dude. He goes wondered my script and said no I'm in. It's a very look. It's it's very watchable and I've got a few people in my office to check it out. How did I didn't get a chance to check this and I probably shoot it before he brought you an air? Did it? What was the reception like? Did it? Do? You know? In the bigfoot genre?

Were people? Were people least happy? There was something that got added into the mix that was that was entertaining. Well, you know how purists are, right. We had some purists that are you know, very fanatically into it that kind of pooped on the movie. They didn't like it because it was too intense. You know, it was a completely different presentation. You know, we just kind of blew up the mythical you know, free beings. It's hiding from people.

This guy actually goes after him. He you know, he does his business. U And then other people have said it's one of the most amazing things I've ever seen. I know it's done a Europe runs. I know it's done you know, Asia, China, Tokyo. I don't really know how it does over there because you know, I can't read their writing. I have no clue what they're doing. It seems to be doing. Okay, you know there are people nibbling on Patrick, can maybe do another one? I

don't know. I was gonna ask because there're gonna be a sequel. Yeah. Well, you you brought up the abominable Snowman thing, and that would be pretty dope if I really were to think about it. But it would be cold as hell shooting that thing. Yeah, I never think. We know that the audience never thinks of that, and we figured that you pampered after types, you just deal with it. You know, you got to bring up the experience, my friend. I'm not pampered, dude by any stretching the event.

You know, I get down and dirty, and you know, I got to do what I gotta do. Um. You know. Unfortunately, unfortunately, I've had an opportunity to work on some really big movies and some really small ones. Just was a small one, but the heart was gigantic. It was so pure that way, and I think, you know, it's probably one of the most enjoyable shoots I've ever worked on. It was cool, man,

I appreciate it. It definitely served its purpose. When I was like, I just want to watch a movie where I can lose myself and whatever the heck's going on, And I was just glad that I didn't have that big, that that big scary Bigfoot on my trail because he was he was not a cuddly fellow. Marshall, do us a favorite. Well, next time you've got one coming out, whether it's about Bigfoot or not, reach out to producer Mike and we'll get you on. Let's let's get you.

It's nice to have a member of the team who's out there doing the Hollywood thing. Well, I gotta tell you, you know, I was just listening to your show, eating my dinner like I usually do around six o'clock when i'm when I'm not preempted by some sports thing which happens out here on the West Coast with your show a lot. And when you mentioned that, I literally spit my noodles across the table. What the hell? You know,

what's going on? I'm in that movie? And then you know you took your shot at the bad acting, so you know I had to come back. No, of course, your acting was good. I'm a fair man and I speak the truth. Your acting was good. The lead guy good abs bad acting. That's what I would say. Yeah, well, you know, anybody that put the star tattoo in the middle of their back is questionable. It was an interesting choice. I don't know if that's real or not. But whoever,

whoever decided to get that was real. That was absolutely real. I'll tell you a very quick story about that guy, which we almost didn't finish the movie. When we wrapped the first December. About three weeks after we got back, that guy got in an accident on his motorcycle and lost his leg. Oh my gosh. Really And then I yes, and I got a call from the director. Patrick Is says, dude, I don't know if we're going to be able to

finish our movie. I go on, what's happening? He goes, you know, Aj, he got in an accident and they had to amputate his leg. What oh man, Well, now I feel badly for criticizing the guy's acting. I had no idea for the record, everybody, but I hope he's okay. If you have to act with your leg here in the wrong profession anyway. So anyway, it turns out they were going to put him in shorts during the first part of the movie, and they chose to put him in jeans if they were to put him in shorts.

The movie's done and we're not finishing it. But this guy is a gymnast and he's incredibly gifted with his body's very in tune with this physique. He was up and running on a prosthetic titanium thing. And so a year goes by, he gets back up there and he filmed the back half of the movie in his pants, and they redid some of those fight scenes with a titanium leg and a plastic foot. Wow. Good for him, all right, So I got a I got a whole new respect for that guy too. We gotta get him

on the show now. You tell him, we'll have him come and talk to us about his next project. But Marshall Hilton, everybody you can, you can follow him on Instagram And are you on Twitter? I am on Twitter? I don't really I'm not a big Twitter play. You know, I don't have strike, you know, breaking news all the time. Yeah, well, we'll follow you on Instagram for the cool movies for sure, But Marshall halt him in Primal Rage is the movie. Marshall is the actor. Great to have you as part

of team back my friend. Thanks so much for giving us your time. I am very thankful you had me, and you've got a fan. All right, thank you so much. Here you too, you too, great job. Talk to you soon. Chill tie, yeah, all right, everybody, we'll be right back. Don't you love it when you find a hundred dollar bill that's just waiting for you inside of a jacket that's been gathering dust in the closet for a long time.

It's an amazing feeling. Right Well, imagine finding hundreds, maybe even thousands of dollars that are sitting in your filing cabinet or in boxes that are up in your attic. You know it's from that old four oh one k the paperwork that you forgot about because it was the job before last. Well, that money is just sitting there doing nothing. It could be working a lot harder for you in a precious metals IRA. My friends at Noble Gold can see if you qualify, they'll do all the

heavy lifting for you. It could make you thousands, cost you nothing. Give Noble Gold the call at eight seven seven six four six five three four seven or text my name Buck to five eleven five eleven and received their free Investors Guide plus for all qualified iras above twenty thousand dollars. They'll also include a complimentary rare graded Morgan silver dollar valued at one hundred and fifty dollars.

So please text Buck to five eleven, five eleven or call eight seven seven six four six five three four seven today. Individual results may vary invest wise, standard text rates may apply. So the truth is what's in the report, and Don Juniors exonerate, Hopix, Don Senior is exonerated, and you're just going to have to move on and start covering issues. And Americans are telling you in your own polling is important to them, healthcare, which we work on here, education,

the economy, foreign policy, to denuclearized North Korea. Like, we have a lot to solve in this country. I said to you two and a half years ago when the president was elected, I said that we have we're going to have joint custody this country for the next four to eight years. We got six to go, five and a half to go. We got to find a way to manage actually custody. This country's got to be honest

with American people jin that there's no collusion. Oh wait a second, you mean there's stuff to talk about other than Mulla Report, Kelly and Conway blowing minds over at CNN with that whole monologue. There's other stuff than Russia collusion that American people would like to hear about. Oh my gosh, how is that even possible? How can I even think such a thing. We know that they're not

going to move on. I mean, they will cover other things as well, but they will stay on this because all along it has just been an opportunity for the media to defame, undermine, and they tried to destroy the Trump administration. And now that this OPO research exercise of hundreds of pages worth of information that has no criminal

prosecution value whatsoever. No criminal charges resulted from the Muller Report as it was released, right There were charges beforehand against people who in a variety of ways got caught up in the machinery of this pro but they were not in any way colluding with Russia, as we as we well know. But the media is now pretending like they were just great. You know, the media is kind of like the kid that shows up to class and hasn't done any of the homework and answers the questions

and the teacher entirely wrong. But then walks out of the classroom and thinks that they're brilliant. That's that's the mainstream media in this country. They will still say that, well, maybe they couldn't prove collusion now, but there still was some kind of collusion. You know, maybe maybe that doesn't rise to a criminal charge. But there's something else there. There's something that we all need to focus in on.

And I would just like to see the Democrats make a case to the American people about what it is that they think that they can do better. What will they improve on as compared to the Trump administration, What will they do better than the Trump administration? And there are some things that Democrats with it's all healthcare and everything, but okay, make that case of make that argument. Instead, what they want to do is just continue to drill down into this, continue to fixate on all things Trump

Russia collusion. Continue to insist that just because Muller couldn't find it with all the resources and the subpoenas and the powers that were at his disposal, there must be more. There must be more to it than that. But if you want a sense of how dishonest the media really is on this whole issue, this was this was great. Um. You know, I tell you a lot about how CNN is a has become a bad place, and it wasn't always a bad place. Keep in mind that for years

Tucker Carlson how to show at CNN. There I've been periods where you could be a real conservative. You know, my former colleague Dana lash was a CNN contributor. Or. Eric Ericsson has been a CNN contributor. I think at one point. I don't know if Rush Limball was a CNN contributor, but I know he's appeared on CNN many times, right. I mean, you know, real conservatives, you used to be able to go on CNN. Not really anymore. Trump has

broken them. And I've said that to you, and I really mean that there's been a kind of a psychological collapse that the entire institution has suffered because they really convinced themselves while trying to convince the general public that Donald Trump is some existential threat to America and it's obviously not the case. But I think a lot of

them have taken that propaganda. Whether they believed it in the beginning or not, I can't tell you, but I do think that they've taken it on board, and there are many people, it's not just me, who will tell you that CNB became a really hostile place for conservatives. Well, now CNN's not just a hostile place for conservatives, and this is i think, still considered the gold standard cable

news network. I mean, the ratings are way down, but it still makes a ton of money because CNN is a brand, and it's a globally recognized brand, So they make all this money off of CNN International and CNN dot Com and so you know, the ratings aren't great, but it's still a monster media operations, huge and still very very profitable. Unfortunately, but it's not just conservatives. They

aren't welcome over there anymore. Now Now people who are just not on board with the anti Trump Russia collusion narrative, they can get in trouble. Here's Alan Dershowitz explaining how he, like me, is persona non grata over at CNN. Play six. CNN, which used to have me on all the time, they didn't want was a centrist liberal who went against their narrow So here do you know you've said that the CNI president Jeff Zucker essentially, or did you banned after

you took these positions. But do you know that for a factor? Is that a sub position? No? I do know that for a fact. I've been told that by several people within CNN. They had a choice of a Harvard law professor for fifty years who's been getting it right, who's a centrist liberal and who has credibility, or Michael Evanati, and they picked Michael Avanati. In fact, one night, I remember getting a call from CNN saying, oh, we have to cancel you. We have Avanati. He's coming on tonight.

And he became their go to guy, and every one of his predictions turned out to be false. What else do you have to know? My friends, Michael Avanati versus Alan Dershowitz for Legal analysis and CNN, Okay, you got two liberals there. It's not like they're talking about a conservative versus liberally. Got two liberals CINN though in its current incarnation, CNN today chooses Avenatio over the Dirsh, and I don't agree. I've debated the Dirsh on things before.

I think he's I think he's very wrong on guns of their issues where he's not particularly well versed. And holl on TV and talk about them, but when it comes to the law and jurisprudence, he knows what he's talking about. And they went with that scummy ambulance chasing dirt bag Avenati instead of instead of Dershowitz. What else do you really have to know about that network? And that same mentality, that same lack of sound decision making

has been apparent in the whole organization. It's been apparent in all their coverage on Trump related issues. That's trumped arrangement syndrome. To pick Avenati over Dershowitz. When your TV producers Democrats, but TV producers, that is a symptom of trumped arrangement syndrome. And no one's going to convince me otherwise because I'm right. We'll be right back. Is that you're finished, sir? Why didn't you make a recommendation to

Congress one way or the other? Are you going on vacation only somewhere the Attorney General will accurately characterize your positions on conspiracy and obstruction service. That's MSNBC reporter Mike Vickiera who ambushed Special Counsel Muller outside of an Easter church service to try and get him to say something for the record, although you know this is journalists do this a lot. He wasn't really trying to get him to say anything. He knows Mueller's not really going to

say anything. The chance of Robert Muller saying, yeah, I'd like to have a really in depth conversation with you about the report that just dropped that is the single biggest news story in the country right now, I'd like to really have that discuss I mean, there's there's no real or realistic chance that that was going to happen, which then brings me to this. You know, journalists often act like punks. It's a profession full of very slimy,

unethical people. Unfortunately, I wish it weren't the case, and it's also very clubby and journalists tend to protect one another as long as they're on the left. As long as you're a Democrat, mainstream media journalist, then you tend to get people that will just automatically give you the benefit of the doubt. They'll defend you, they'll protect you

because you're part of the crew. I am not part of the crew, and I am not somebody that feels the need to defend journalists who act like idiots, and this is just that. I mean, this is somebody whoever

it's Easter Sunday folks. You know Robert Mueller as much as I think that he engaged in partisan hackery in the report, and I think that he allowed his hatred for Donald Trump as an institutionalist, right, Mueller's an institutionalist, believes very much in institutions like the FBI, and I think that that clouded his judgment, or at least influenced

his judgment, and it shouldn't have. But Robert Muller is a human being and he's you know, a family man, and he's a former marine, I believe, and you know, the guy wants to go to Easter Sunday service should be left alone. I mean, this was a this was a low brow move. This was a low blow kind of thing to do. Now, I'm not saying it's some huge deal. Robert Mueller could handle it. He's not going

to go off the corner and cry. But it does just indicate that the media when it comes to all things Trump, Muller, Russia collusion, Special Counsel related, when it comes to all these issues, they really just don't have any any governor. I mean, they don't have any sense of what the boundaries are or should be. But this MSNBC report thought it was a great idea. I thought it was an opportunity to making a name. Look, I've never heard of Mike Vickara before, so in that sense

it worked. But this is where the incentives in journalism often run against common sense and decency. There are some things that you just should know not to do, and I think that this is very squarely in that category. You know, I was going to say, is nothing sacred to the media, Well, obviously Easter Sunday is not sacred to them. And there was that story and I didn't

get to it last week. It's a great story about how the New York Times, when referring to some of the heroic acts of a priest, you try to pull important items and artifacts out of the burning cathedral of Notre Dame. They thought that a statue. This is the New York Times. This isn't some random paper a statue of Jesus had been removed. It wasn't a statue. It was the Eucharist, my friends, which Catholics believe is the

body and blood of Christ through transubstantiation. The actual body and blood of Jesus Christ, and that is the miracle that has performed at every church service, and the priests removed the body and blood of Christ. The New York Times reinterpreted that to be Oh, it must have been a statue of Jesus that they took out the body of Christ. These are the media elites, my friends. That are the ones that are supposed to inform all the rest of us of what's going on in the country

and around the world. This is this is supposedly the best of the best. Buck. It's time for roll call, Jazzy roll call everybody. That's right. It's all the reflexes. So may the wings of liberty never lose a feather.

Let's get to it. Chadwick, Chadwick von chadwin Stein. Hey, Buck, love your show and have been following you for years, and I just want to ask, did I detect an unofficial Romney buck slap on the Friday Show as somebody who enthusiastically endorsed Romney in twenty twelve and thought he would have been a fine president. I'm now officially done with him. Romney's piety and self righteous droning on about

the personal morality of Trump rings extremely hollow. The fact is that while Romney is an exemplary moral man in his individual life, he is extremely lacking in judgment of moral clarity when it comes to realizing the political stakes involved in what is now trench warfare for the heart and soul of America. Romney's unwillingness to get tough with Obama in twenty twelve cost this country dearly as we experienced a continuation of the morally costly lurch to the left.

There is more than one's character than the sum of your personal morality. For politicians, they're judged by their loyalty, rolling up their sleeves and fighting for they know to be right despite the criticism, and falling through on their promises. In these ways, Trump is miles above Romney and character. Trump takes a sling arrows because he loves the country. Romney has shown himself to be run of the mill political animal who only cares about his image with the MSM.

That being said, I fully endorsed you giving him a full fledged buck slap rather than the half slap you gave him on Friday. Chadwick well put, That's why I read your whole message here. I would agree with you that Romney doesn't really understand the political moment we're in, and I'm I'm very uh. You know, I admire his personal probity and decency, and I mean that, I'm not

that's not some snide or backhanded compliment. I think that that individual decency and ethical behavior are always something to be applauded. But in the case of Romney, once you

get beyond that into his public life. You know, he was the governor of Massachusetts, and if memory serves, he was the you know, pro life I'm sorry, pro choice governor of Massachusetts for a while, and I think he's been willing to make policy adjustments to his moral compass, which to me is in many ways if you're talking about a politician, much more problematic than somebody who makes personal judgments to their moral compass in the case of

someone like a Donald Trump. So I'm with you, Adam writes buck Jack quotes Jack Burton from Big Trouble and Little China, and you skipped right over it. Come on, man, shields high. Well, Adam, I don't even I don't even catch that one. I can tell you that I did watch Big Trouble and Little China last night, and it was fantastic. It's such an underrated movie, you know, such an underrated classic. I do think that you could do a really cool remake of it, because the production value

is not great, a little cheesy. Some people say that that adds to the charm of the movie. I think you can make that case. But I personally would like to see a much spruced up version of Big Trouble Little China. Although if you try to make that movie today, you may run into some folks who think that that is not okay. You know, they would probably find some aspects of Big Trouble, Little China to be cultural appropriation, to be inappropriate for one reason or another. So we

shall see. Richard writes, happy Easter, this was yesterday, obviously, Well, Richard, happy Easter to you two. I hope it was a joyous day for you. He is risen. I mean Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, not Richard. Although Richard, we will all be risen because of Jesus Christ. So that's the good news. Let's see. Dueane right, A little snippet from an article regarding Scandinavian eating abbots. I was trying to learn about their die because I've been told so often

there's so much healthier than Americans. There is a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in this area, mainly due to the high intake of saturated fats in sodium. Stomach cancer is also very common due to the high intake of salt and salt cured foods. Obesity is on the rise. Well, Duade, I don't know much about the Scandinavian diet or Scandinavian health. I just know that generally speaking, there's a how do I put this, at least a perception that these Scandinavians

live longer, have fewer health problems than we do. But ultimately it's all about balance and eating whole foods. Not the place going to whole foods, but eating real food instead of processed, processed crap. Kenneth right saw you on Fox Media Buzz. Keep the whiskers groom to about one. The look suits you. Thank you, Kenneth. Kenneth knows what the frequency is. Thank you, Kenneth. I think that the beard look I've I've grown, I've grown accustomed to it now.

I think that so far it is, it's staying. Will it make it through the summer months when it gets really hot. I can't speak to that, but I do enjoy the beard for now. It also gives me something to stroke other than my ego. Ron Right, it's good job on media buzz today. Easter blessings to you and your family. Well, Easter blessings to you and your family, Ron,

and thank you for watching me on media buzz. I would post the clip, but we couldn't get the clip because producer Mike had this whole oh spending the holiest Christian day of the year with his family thing, so he wasn't able to get the clip. I'm just kidding. Of course, that's way more important, but I'd like to give him a hard time sometimes. Jennifer Buck on the topic of beautiful buildings, I wanted to point out that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints Mormons

still builds beautiful temples. Perhaps you've seen our temple in Washington, d C. The Salt Lake City Temple is stunning and took forty years to complete. In fact, it we'll close on December in December for a four year renovation, after which it will open to the public to tour prior to its reddication. Anyway, they're over a HU fifty operating temples worldwide and each is beautiful and inspiring. The Rome, Italy Temple was just recently dedicated and many photographs are

available online. Google it beautiful shield tie, Jen. Well, thank you, Jen. I have to speak honestly about this, I don't know much at all about the Mormon temples that exist in terms of their architecture and what. Yeah, I have no familiarity with that. So I was speaking in very general terms about about really just architectural trends, religious buildings included, but but more broadly speaking, just that there's a there was certainly a period in the seventies where everything that

was being build was just hideous and disgusting. Do you see all these municipal buildings from the seventies, and especially in this country, these public high schools from the seventies that just they look like they look like everybody was supposed to study in like an insane asylum or something. I mean, it's just very former Soviet block. Uh. You know, a lot of geometry over esthetic, you know, just a lot of squares and rectangles, and it's just it's just ugly.

I can't evenly describe it. The the hideousness of the architecture of the of the seventies period, but it was really bad. I'm kind of anti seventies as a general rule. I know, people say, oh, book the great rock and roll. Now, I don't like the fashion I don't like I'm I don't like that period in American history very much. I am not a seventies guy. I gotta tell you, I do not like disco. Um, it's not it's not my thing.

Let's see here, Troy, all right, Buck, has anyone mentioned to you that your Beto impression sounds exactly like Keanu Reeves and point break always makes me laugh? But like, yeah, dude, um, Troy, no one has said that specifically, but that is a very apt comparison. I must say you are on the right track. My friend. Area is definitely a Keyanu slash Beto vibe. Betto is kind of like a cross between

Keyanu and Napoleon Dynamite. I'm just like running for president because like, I just want all Americans to just just you know, open their hearts. He is all about the flowery rhetoric without any substance beneath it. But may Or Pete came along and was like, oh, look at that tuna sandwich you got there, yink, it's mine. Stole Beto's

lunch right out from under him. Ray right, you lamented in a recent radio broadcast the lack of about how modern architecture served as portals to the divine or relax being portals to the vine and the wake from the dam. I share with you sadness would have lost this beloved monument. As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints, may I suggest you take a look at the two hundred temples built by our faith. Wow, Okay, more more from them? All right, guys, I get it

the Mormons. The Mormons are flexing on this one. They're like, hey, you want beautiful temples. We got beautiful temples. I got them right here. I want to check them out. I'll show you some beautiful temples. Hey, guys and gals, I defer to your superior wisdom on the subject. Let me

take a peek. It's some I've never been to a I've never been to a Mormon temple, and I can't even think off the top of my head of what one particularly looks like I've been to obviously countless Catholic churches, because I'm a Catholic and I've been to a lot of I wouldn't say a lot of. I've been in probably dozens of Episcopalian churches over the years for a whole bunch of different reasons, but I have never been I've never even been inside a Mormon temple. I'm just realized.

I've been inside many mosques, many mosques, and a few Jewish synagogues, but I have gosh, I just realized I've probably been in more mosques than anything except for Catholic churches. That's a whole that's a whole other conversation. But I'll have to check out the temples of the Church of Jesus Christ allowed to saints. I'm very curious to see how they have brought about a new, beautiful twentieth century aesthetic. So obviously there are people that feel this way. David Rites, Hello,

Buck Love the reports. I'm new to the area. Have you ever sneezed on camera? David, I have not sneezed on camera in memory. I have started sweating profusely on camera because the studio was too hot, which is really not fun because when you look like a sweaty mess on TV, no one cares what you have to say.

But no, I have not. I have not sneezed. I did once knock over a huge a cup of like a venti size Starbucks coffee all over Glenn Beck's radio studio equipment right before I was about to fill in for Glenn on radio and had had a heart attack basically at when that happened. But no, I've never never sneezed. I think on camera. Let's see here, Matt hey buck back to being an ex pat and your podcast is my link to the craziness going on at home. Random

thought I wanted to throw out there for you. I think AOC is being groomed to be Democrats candidate for president in twenty twenty four. She's twenty nine now, making her thirty five winter term is up in the next election. She gets massive media coverage, has been made into the darling of the party. I tend to believe people are too shortsighted to plan long term regimes, but she has everything they want planned or not. I bet she'll be on the ticket in twenty twenty four. Matt I assuming

the ages you have here are correct. Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised at AOC rand. I wouldn't be surprised at all. In fact, I think if they run Bernie and Bernie loses to Trump, the built in excuses that it's just because he's too old, and so they'll be this huge push among the Democrat left to the socialist krat left to go with a really, really young Canada. The next

time around, Victor rides Bucker. Kenny G impression sounds like sweetish chef doing Kenny G. Love it well, Victor, I don't even know what my Kenny G impression is, but I'm glad you love it so thank you. That's gonna be the show for today. Team back in the saddle every day this week. I will talk to you then Shield's high. You know how the left calls the Green New Deal bold, or how they'll boldly defend an anti semi and the Democrat controlled House. I think they don't

really know what bold means. I define bold of something else, like the taste of freedom I get every morning with my black Rifle coffee. This is how I start everyday, friends with a delicious cup of black rifle coffee. In fact, now I'm making it in big batches that I can leave some in the fridge for ice coffee. I don't care whether you like it hot or coal. The best coffee you'll get anywhere is Black Rifle Coffee, and they'll deliver it right to your door. So please just join

their coffee club. It's hassle free. For a bold cop of America's best coffee, visit Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck and get twenty percent off your first purchase. That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck. For twenty percent off Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck. No more lines are running out, Just incredible tasting coffee brought right to your door by freedom loving all American veterans. Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck,