Is America Drifting Towards Socialism?

with the cartels. Coming up? This is the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a great American Again The Buck Sexton Show begins. No, Welcome to the Buck Section Show. Everybody, great to have you here.

I gotta say, this is one of these weeks, one of these rare weeks in the Trump era when we don't just have bombshell political story after bombshell straight I just all this, Oh my gosh, the world is ending. It's been Yeah, there's the election stuff and we get to talk a bit about policy this week. Isn't that exciting? I'm gonna discuss immigration where the administration stands right now. On that we'll also discuss the status of the Mexican

drug cartels and the Choppo Guzman trial. Have very interesting guests joining the show later on that one. I want to get right to it because I think the single biggest issue right now that faces the country. The number one issue is I was gonna say climate change just to mess with you guys, but it's Donor. The number

one issue is the drift toward socialism. I think it's the single biggest can certain we should have as a country because it really goes to the very foundation of the ideology that this country was founded on in our constitution, and it is a version of collectivism that erodes our individual rights and what is most special about this country or individual liberty and our devotion to that as a

political entity, as a polity. The formidable Thomas Soul, one of the great minds on the right who the left has always pretended like did not exist. He said the following about socialism. The strongest argument for socialism is that it sounds good. The strongest argument against socialism is that it doesn't work. But those who live by words will always have a soft spot in their hearts for socialism

because it sounds so good. He's absolutely, socialism as an ideology makes the people who are espousing it feel righteous, They feel good about themselves. They feel like they are kind and thoughtful and moral, and that their ideas will mean that people are better off and healthier and happier. Unfortunately, history shows that that's not true. History shows that in the long run, socialism is always doomed to failure, and many times in the short run it can create tremendous misery.

And also you look at some of these countries that they point to as successes when the democratic socialism, they'll they'll point to some of the countries in Northern Europe, for example. These are very small countries that were very wealthy before they tried socialism, very well off before that on a relative basis, and had a tremendou this amount of social cohesion, you know, had a basically a literacy

rate before that. I mean, these were very very wealthy societies that, as we see, also have adopted many free market and capitalist policies. They just have a large welfare state. But they're not socialists in the sense that they don't have the government and control of industry and the government making all the decisions about who will do what and where in the commercial sector. So they're not truly classic socialism.

That is why I say they're democratic socialists. Okay, but we're heading in that direction now if we do not put a stop to this nonsense from the left. Ocasio Cortez is now the youngest ever what will soon de be She has not technically taken her seat, but she will be the youngest ever member of Congress, and she is a something of a folk hero on the left. And I'm telling you right now, they want someone like o Calzio Cortez to run for the presidency. They really do.

They don't care that she doesn't have a background in politics. I'm not saying it will be her, but they want someone like her. They don't care that she doesn't know anything about policy or politics. Really in terms of what works. She speaks with the twang of the leftist. You know, she speaks in a way that is recognizable to the social justice warriors, and that's why they like her so much.

I mean, the the verbiant she uses, the phraseology, the way that she expresses herself is straight out of the Wellesley faculty lounge. But it doesn't make for sound policy, and it certainly doesn't show any expertise on the issues. It's just all slogans. It's just all jumbles of words that just like the strongest argument for socialism sounds good. She let a sit in today which was very interesting in the in the walth of Congress, and here is

how that went exactly play fifteen. Then you will know how flower I am of each and every single one of you for putting yourselves and your body and and everything on the line to make sure that we save our planet, our generation, and our future. It's so incredibly important. Everyday people doing exactly what you all were doing too. And is standing Ablacoda stood standing with allies, standing with indigenous tribes. Because we don't have a choice. We do not have a choice. We have to get to a

percent real energy in saverny years. There is no ab option. We have to get to one renewable energy. That is a plan to catastrophically heard our economy. I mean that is nobody that I know who deals with markets energy the economy makes the case that we're gonna get renewable energy without massive economic dislocation and disruption and destruction. But there are all these people, They're all assembled there. This

is where the mind of the left currently is. And I want to make my case to you now because we're gonna be revisiting this over the next eighteen months or so. Right now, her ideas are silly sounding to anybody who knows anything, anybody who's serious about policy. Here's what she says. And they say, well, she doesn't really have a grasp of the facts, and she's it's a lot of a lot of flash, not a lot of substance.

Here's the problem. We are in an environment where one there's still a sense of Trump momentum, and two, and perhaps even more importantly tied into the first, the economy is very strong right now. Unemployments incredibly low. Stock markets had a rough couple of days, but overall stock markets high, investment is high. There's a lot of reason to be favorable, not just the Trump administration, but towards you know, capitalism. If we have and I do get this feeling that

it is coming. I can't tell you when, but it is going to happen if we have another serious economic downturn, perhaps not as bad as two thousand and eight. But but in that vein close to it, then all of a sudden, the Occasio Cortez is the Bernie Sanders esque demagogues in American political life. We're saying, let's just wipe out your student loans. They're gonna wipe out the bank's debts again, they're gonna bail people out from the bad mortgages.

They're gonna do all these other things. Let's wipe out a trillion dollars student loan debt. While we're at it, why don't we wipe out credit card debt for people that you know, have less than thirty thou dollars in total assets. And why don't we have a millionaires tax on people who are making two thousand dollars a year. I mean, they're gonna do all this stuff, and they don't have to convince the whole country. This is what's

so important. They really just have to get of the vote roughly speaking, I mean, they really just have to get control of Congress and control of the White House. And even with the Trump movement that we've seen, it was a very close fought battle in with Hillary as we know, Yeah, the electoral college, Trump went a while more, but it was it was a tight election of the sense that the separation overall U Yeah, Hillary got more of the popular vote, but that's a silly dump talking

point because it's not about the popular vote. But if you look at a state by state breakdown, there were they were they were tight races and places Michigan, Wisconsin, there were tight racist there. They just have to win power and then they can do these things. They don't have to win the argument. And that's true of socialists

throughout history. They're not looking to convince you, folks. They're not looking to bring you over into the light of the glories of redistribute of economics and how everything will be fine and great and any No, they're gonna tell you here's your government healthcare, take it or leave it, and if you don't like it, that's on you. Maybe you shouldn't be reveling, assuming you're white, and a lot of listening aren't. But maybe you're reveling too much in

your white privilege. Yeah. There, there's not gonna be any any sympathy. There's not gonna be any effort at and outreach. Look at what you have with Obama, the the furthest left United States senator before he ran for the presidency. There's no effort at winning, winning over the other side. There was no bipartisan nothing never something that's conveniently left out of the narrative. Now Obama was scorched earth. Elections

have consequences. I want you lost it with That was his philosophy, and the press was holding them up for eight years as a genius god, which neither of those things were true. But nonetheless, now we see this elevation of Acazio Cortez, and I understand that what she says now to people who know better, who understand history and economics and are well read, what she says is silly. So it's like I can said, Harry, I do That's like in Parson and everyone's doing that kind of Acasio

Cortez impersonation. I get it. But she is not there to make a case to people who want to trade in facts and logic. She is there because the strongest argument for socialism is that it sounds good. She's just gonna make it sound good. That's that might be all she has to do. Doesn't have to How are you gonna pay for this? Whatever? We're a rich country, We'll figure it out. Rich people will pay. It's all Bernie Sanders ever says. And you want Swedish healthcare, you gotta

pay Swedish taxes. Does anyone ever bring that up now? Of course not. And by the way, I think that if you look at being sick in many cases in this country versus being sick in Sweden, our five year cancer survival rates are actually better than Europe's are by comparison, But that's one specific measure. People always compare also American health to European health. And look, here's the deal. We live a little harder here in America. I'm not afraid

to say it's true. You know, we eat what we want, we drink what we want, we go hard at life, and that has health consequences. We are in general less healthy than some of our European counterparts. But that's a a separate discussion. The left under Pelosi is going to emerge, and I think perhaps even try to consume some of the old leadership. I think you will see o'casia Cortez.

I think you will see Chuck Schumer pushed aside, if not officially, then in arms of the perception of who the leaders are remember this with o'casio Cortez back in the day about Pelosi and the future of the Democrat parties was just a couple of months ago, place sixteen. She is she is the leader of No No she I mean um um speaker or rather leader Pelosi hopefully um. You know, we'll see she's a she's the current leader of the party. And I think that the party absolutely

does have its leadership in the House. We have our leadership in in the Senate as well. Now, put aside the stumbles and stuff there. Notice how not really a big vote of confidence. They don't want to do business.

The Chuck humor way, the the lesson that the progressive left, which is now the the aid of the Democrat Party, the lesson they took away from was if you run a crony capitalist, uh you know Hillary like candidate or Hillary yourself, you can you'll you're gonna lose because it's there's no purity to it, there's no honesty to it. And people are now savvy enough, the elector to savvy enough to see through that Hillary is a kleptocrat and she loves big business and she loves lining her pockets.

She doesn't really care about poor people or minorities. That's all a facade, that's all a front. So you need authenticity, and authenticity on the left means radicalism. So if you're going for authenticity and therefore radicalism, it doesn't matter how much policy experience the person has, It doesn't matter whether they actually know what the heck they're talking about. How do they sound, how do they appear, do they get

the masses riled up? And can they convince them that socialism is a better path for this country if we have a major economic downturn that coincides with the election cycle. The answer is that's a real threat, that's a real concern. And you're seeing some of those seeds right now in place. You're seeing this German e slowly. I'm telling you it's going to get worse. There will not be any tilt

towards the center to be Trump. They are going hard left. Alright, Team, I've got we're gonna catch up on all the Florida recount stuff too. We've we've got much much more coming your way. An update on the whole Whitaker fiasco over at the Department of Justice and how the left is trying to say there's a constitutional crisis there, Jam Pact

show stay with me. Should the Majority looking to these issues related to President Trump that has come up a pace force yes, James Comby's firing yes, the travel ban yes, and the family separation puls absolutely, Hurricane relief in Puerto Rico it was absolutely inadequate. White House staff use of personal email, oh for sure. The president's business dealings abroad, absolutely, And I want to see his tax return of core. Of course she does, Producer Mike, did she leave anything

off there the need Nita Lowe or whatever? Did she leave anything off? No, I don't think so. Maybe like a home inspection or something like Yeah, I think so. You know, I want to see a collection of Trump's tonemail clippings. I really need to know how many die cooks. Let's he drink a day. American people have a right to know. They are going to investigate everything. And and what's amazing to me is that a normal person would say, Wow, what a waste of time and resources. They're just investigating

things as a form of harassment. There's not even that stuff that she's even talking about. But what she said of Puerto Rico is false. I've actually spoken to political leadership in Puerto Rico and they're like, no, we we had a lot of stuff sent to us. It was just really hard to get into the places we needed to get it. There was not a lack of response,

it was just difficult to respond. So I don't think she said don't even accurate, but probably you know that none of those things she said was anything for the American people, nothing for us. She's gonna investigate Space Force. They haven't even done anything yet. That was hilarious. She's gonna, I mean, really, this is a this is a congresswoman who's telling the American people she's gonna investigate Trump's tuna

melt from last week. Who cares? I mean, hopefully he didn't use too much mayo because that can ruin an otherwise delicious tuna melt, as I will tell you. Um. But now it's this is what we're this is what we're in for my friends. This is uh, this is the whole plan. This is the plan to win over voters. And what troubles me is that for a lot of a lot of leftists they think this is great. They they're like, oh, yes, sign me up for more of this. The more that they can get um Trump trashed by

members of Congress with any of these investigations. There are a lot of people that get happy about this. A lot of Democrats are gonna say, you know what this is, this is great, this is what I want to see. Just a constant, you know, water torture of the Trump administration. I'm just drip drip, drip all the time, and it's just gonna be so damaging. That's why I know the country's going hard. Left folks they got they've got nobody on the bench, nobody who is gonna be able to

leverage the old Obama Hillary network effectively enough. So their whole thing is gonna be to create a frenzy of left wing activism and just try to take Trump down. I don't think it will work, but that's gonna be the plan. You're gonna see some crazy stuff happening here. Um, we gotta get into Florida. Speaking of crazy stuff like that segue buck as smooth as silk. We gotta talk about what's going on in Florida and then some immigration discussion is like the best show. So maybe not the

best show ever, but it's like very good. We'll go it back Georgia, Arizona and Florida Democrats have to have the same message. Just make sure every single vote is counted. Every vote should be counted. We need to count the votes, count all the votes. I want every vote counted. Every vote has to be counted. Every vote must be counted. Counter every vote, every vote on account. Let every vote be counted. Why do you have to file a lawsuit

for that. Shouldn't every vote just get counted. At the end of the day, every single vote should count making sure every lawful vote is counted. Count every vote, count all the valid votes. Wow, that's so weird, folks. You got a bunch of left wing protesters in the Georgia Capitol building there yelling count every vote, and then you had all these media figures say the exact, exact same thing,

count every vote counted. This it's almost like the talking point has gotten out there and they're all saying the same thing. Meanwhile, there's nobody who says don't count every vote that doesn't exist, that that position is non existent. All they say is count every vote that is legal, legally cast vote. Count every vote that should in fact be counted. And that's what you get. For example, from Rick Scott, who's down in Florida trying to trying to

keep his lawfully one UH Senate seat. Play clip three. My goal is that we follow the law. And what we've seen is, you know, in the supervisor election in Broward and Pommide County, both of them, the courts have said they haven't followed the law. We know Britain snipes and mixed um illegal ballots with legal ballots. We know they have not let party officials in the courts have

said followed the law. So what I'm trying to do is get them to do what we what we expect the laws a sit up there to prevent fraud, and for whatever reason, they don't want to do it. Oh, for whatever reason, we all know the reason. Oh here's a fun fact. Because I've been saying this. I've been saying this all week. Remember, I keep saying, tell me when the Republicans, uh, you know, tell me when the Republicans managed to turn an election around by by playing

games and by extending things out. Tell me when when that happens. There have been only this is according to Jim Garrity over National Review, there have only been three recounts since two thousand where the result of a race has been changed. Republicans Jim Rights with long memories will notice that all three changed the same way, from a GOP win to a Democrat win. So since two thousands, since they straight up try to steal the floors, try

to steal the presidential election. That's what they did. That's why the Supreme Court had to slap them down. They were trying to steal that election. Three elections that have involved recounts have gone to Democrats zero for the Republicans. That seems significant to me, doesn't I knew that without even doing the initial Google search. You just know. You know. Democrats are the party of emotion and self righteousness, and therefore when they lose an election, there has to be

something wrong with the election. It's not something that's wrong with their message. It has to be the people that the mean bad Republicans who don't want to count all the votes. Katherine Harris, by the way, speaking of the two thousand election, she was Secretary of State in Florida during the two thousand election. Here's what she says about what's going on right now. Play eleven. So what's gonna

happen is there are laws that must be followed. Uh, there are laws according to who is an eligible voter. So if someone is a felon in this election, their vote is not counted. If someone is an illegal alien, are not allowed to determine Florida's future or the future of our nation. They're not. Their vote will not be counted. If absentee ballot signature doesn't match up with the absentee ballot on record, they're not. They're allowed to count that vote.

They have to follow the rule of law and the law in the state of Florida. Actually, our election laws are sufficient to handle this. It's just a matter of people are breaking them or not. Are people breaking the laws? That's what the fight is here. No one is trying show me one instance of a Republican official who has been sanctioned for being caught trying to not count a vote that should be counted. Um, I am not familiar

with any of them, with any of that happening. I'm not saying it's impossible, but certainly don't hear about it, do you. Meanwhile, Snipes in Broward County has already been sanctioned. She's already been been put on notice that what she's doing is unacceptable and everyone should just be prepared for this thing in Florida to get even what it was Thursday, they've got to tell what the count is. And they're saying, oh, we're not going to do it by Thursday. But this

is gonna it's gonna get worse. It's gonna I'm telling you, it's gonna get worse. You're gonna see the ugliest side of the Democrat Party here. Um. And and by the way, one of the one of the ways this is going to get worse is that as soon as Democrats start, you know what's coming, as soon as Democrats start to lose on the issue of the law, the rule of law, the election regulations that are in place, whether it's Georgia, Florida,

they've already won in Arizona. But as soon as that happens, you know, you know what, then the rallying crime becomes for them racism. Hey, you can't actually count those ballots because they weren't marked properly. We don't know who the person was really trying to vote for, So those don't those don't count under the law, under the rules. Oh yeah, why are you so racist? That's what's that's what's coming Susan. Uh Butcher. I don't know if it's Boucher or Butcher

one of the other. She said the following to the press about this whole issue. She's a Democrat obviously Place seven. She's the Palm Beach County Supervisor elections, so she's in the same position in the sense that Snipes is in in Brower County. Here's a Butcher says play seventeen. You know, very unfortunate that some of the highest elected officials in our country are trying to disrupt our democracy because they

don't like the demographics of our voters. I would wish that they would allow us to continue to count the ballots or just doing our job in accordance with law. How he's not disrupting me, it's disrupting you if you try to clarify when you're talking. I'm not going to clarify that demographics of our county. They don't like them. And you know why. That's all I have to say. Oh, she sounds really non political and uh neutral, a nonpartisan, doesn't she? Oh yeah, she sounds like somebody that you

can really listen to a trust on this issue. Huh. The demographics of our voters. I mean, look, you could say it's a you could say it's just that they're they're mostly Democrats. But I feel like she said demographics are not party affiliation, So not entirely clear to me if she just meant more, Oh, yeah, they're more minorities here. There are minorities in this county whose votes will be counted. And obviously Trump and the Republicans don't want that. But

this is once again they make it. There's at least a hint there that it's it's about it's about race. Uh, there's a hint, and we'll get into more of that later on. But also it's no ship of trying to disrupt your democracy there behind they're they're the ones. This is a classic Democrats actic. They're the ones who are breaking the law. They're the ones who are violating procedures.

They're the ones who have been caught doing it. And the problem you see is Trump and the Republicans who are saying, hey, you can't do that, that's not allowed. You're supposed you're supposed to tell people. For example, in Broward County, how many how many ballots were cast? How many ballots do you even have, because that establishes a baseline so that you can't just find an additional thousand here, a thousand there that you need when you need them.

It's a lot harder to commit fraud if you already established how many votes, because then there's already those votes that will be counted. But if you're gonna try to stack the deck, you have to leave the ceiling open. So it's really important. It's not a minor thing that they missed that deadline. It's not a minor thing that they haven't reported these things accurately, as much as they want to pretend that it is. Um Then you've got Bill Nelson, who what a He's such a creepy weirdo.

I don't know how else to describe. I think it's a pretty accurate to describe the guy. Play eighteen. The legal proceedings are ongoing. This process is about one thing, making sure that every legal ballot is counted and protecting the right of every Floridian to participate in our democracy, and that is to have their ballot counted and to count as they intended it. Now that all sounds fine, except why is it that, first of all, as they intended it you know, this is where you get into

these gray areas folks. Oh yeah, or we you know. Now we're having flashbacks and a dimpled and hanging chats and all that stuff. But as they enchanted it, huh okay. I don't think this process for the Democrats is about

one thing. I think it's about many things. I think it's about figuring out well, first of all, it's about trying to trying to make this somehow come out with the Democrat to Democrat victory is very important ones governor ownership and a Senate seat, So that's those are priorities one and two. But that also looking at how they get looking at how this plays out, what are the rules,

how can they adjust them going forward? I think they're preparing for the inevitable what they think would be inevitable recount, and I do believe it that ways in the minds of all involved here. But this idea that counting every vote is somehow going to be uh, that's the pantasy. And just count every vote now, just just count every vote? Yeah, what if an illegal alien cast the vote? What if the vote is not what if it's not clear on the ballot who the vote was cast? Forward, what if

it comes after the deadline? These are all very real things. Not everybody in the country votes. Not everyone in the country can vote. We're a nation of laws. By the way, there's a really Oh no, you know what. Matt Gets has been out there. Uh you know, he's he's been going forward quite a bit here. He's I've seen I just say gets Gates, not Gets. Leo Gets. You guys remember him from die Hard. Whatever you want Leo gets? What if Joe Pesci's lesser but more memorable roles. No,

Matt Gates Representative Gates. He's been he's been sounding the alarm on this stuff, and he's really been making the case. And we're gonna play some audio. I wish we could show you the video of it, um, but we will play the audio for you coming back here and just talk more about how this is all gonna how this is gonna play out, and what's gonna be coming up here with this election fight, because this week that you're gonna see, you know, who really wins in Florida. The

answers we don't know yet. I am not convinced that Democrats are going to let this thing go. Why can't we watch what's going on? Man, so we can't be here? Who told you that we can't watch what's going on out of the truck? Who's your super Yeah? I would love to see him? Until then? All right, will you tell me why why we can't know what's going in and out of that truck? And who? What's the name her supervisor? Do you know this? Do you know who's

her name? The supervisor name? Who? What's their name? Do you know their name? What is it we tell to me? Bring so Representative Gates? There he he comes out and sure enough he's he's saying, look, you know what's being loaded into these trucks in Broward County. I wish we should have called Matt and got him on the show. I just thought of this now. But you can tell what people that there's a maybe maybe maybe those folks were just doing their jobs. They're just a little uncomfortable.

They know they're on camera and I I can't show you the video right now, but you know what's being loaded onto trucks in Broward County. When it comes to these election offices, these should be very easy questions for people to answer. You think should be very straightforward answer and there's just a lack of This goes to the the lack of trust in the process because, as I've said, this is not conspiracy stuff when it comes to the

violations that have already been established. Snipes has mixed in ballots with with with you know, illegally cast ballots already. She's already done that because they want to count more than less. That was her justification for it. Uh, they're viewing this in entirely different terms than than what conservatives are. Democrats want whatever they can get in terms of votes for the Democrat Party. They don't care if they're illegal votes.

They don't care if you know, if they could have ten year olds voting for them, they go for it. Is why Democrats always wanted they want to lower the voting age, they want to you know, extend voting hours. I mean, their whole conception of this is let's expand the electorate as much as possible, beyond even what is currently legal, in the hopes that we can get to the number that we need. It's it's essentially changed the rules until you get the outcome you want and then say, oh, look,

we obeyed the rules. We did things the way that we had to under the circumstances to get the desired outcome. So this whole thing is very it is very troubling. Um by the way, you know, one thing you should be prepared for, and you're gonna hear it this week. But it's also just gonna be more of a of a steady drumbeat from the left going into well now and all the way until constant accusations of racism. We're gonna make a big comeback. I mean about every everything

now is going to be racist. That's gonna be And you can say, buck, that's it's so unfair and to the left, the left leader should know better. All that's true.

Problem is it calling people racist works a lot of time, and especially when you see how corporate America and these pressure campaigns have I've come together and had real consequences for people for not even doing anything that's particularly egregious or you know, just they get on the wrong side of the left and all of a sudden they're in trouble.

That's certainly true of allegations of racism. And you're gonna hear it this week, and you're already hearing some of it as we've played for you or at least the beginnings of it where people are saying that the reason and what was it? I think Joy read yesterday we had it. We played her audio from MSNBC. She said that the reason people are being so harsh on Snipes isn't that she's obviously incompetent and is not doing her job right. The reason they're being so harsh in her,

they say, is racism. Al Sharpton, yep, still still a big, big dude in the Democrat Party, big important, powerful figure in among the Democrats that everything. Remember the party im morals, folks, the Tawanna Brawley guy, Al Sharpton Party immrals. This is what he was saying earlier today about what the Congress

is gonna be like going for play thirteen. We you want to hear from our senators and our congress people on their vision than we want to visit them and and and have dialogue with them, and we want them to know by having these amount of people from these amount of states here, let them know we're gonna be in your face. We didn't just vote and go home. We did go vote and go back and eat turkey. We are ready for action because we are under the administration that has declared war on us, and we want

to know whose side everybody's on? Am I right, administration Al Sharpon says has declared war on everyone in the room at the National Action Network. I mean, I don't know what he means specifically by us. Get ready for a lot more of that kind of dangerous, overheated and

destructive rhetoric about racism. Team. I think you've heard me mention its snippy dot com, But you know, you really should go back and take another look if you haven't yet started your account, because if you've looked at snippy dot com and left, there's a lot of new stuff going on there that you're gonna love. Thousands of my listeners have joint snippy dot com, expressing their opinions and stirring up lively conversations. Snippy is an unbiased social media platform.

It's all about conversation and community. It's maybe not only encourages freedom of expression, but guarantees its users the ability to discuss topics freely without suppression from administrators. Okay, check into Snippy for any number of things, whatever topics that are top of mind for you, and you know what, you can start the thread just like I do. Go see for yourself. Snippy is a place where everyone is

free to express their thoughts and share their opinions. Totally free to join, open to everyone, Join us at snippy dot com and let your opinion matter. No shadow banning and no suppression of conservative thought ever. It's and exciting new features. Also available in the Apple App Store and now available for Android. Snippy your new alternative social media it He's basically trying to undermine at every turn to Florida. He weighed in on Arizona, He's weighed in on other races.

He's undermining the legitimacy of elections where he does where he doesn't like the results. And that is a hallmark of a failing democracy, of someone moving towards an authoritarian They just won't give it up on the left, will they? Trump undermines elections because of Russian Facebook trolls. How is that supposed to work? How does that Kremlin conspiracy really add up? Whatever? You know, Trump's a trader, That's what

they say. And now, in an act of breathtaking hubrists and stupidity, I guess a combination thereof we have people coming forward, prominent democrats talking heads on TV who we're all saying that it is Trump's fault that we have questions about the legitimacy of these of some of these elections that have not yet been decided mid terms. And oh, by the way, they don't see him at all troubled by the fact that there is an astonishing, a completely

astonishing level of incompetence. I mean, you have to be a complete buffoon to accept the buffoonery that has gone on in Florida. And what you see happening in Georgia is also just lawfare when it comes to elections. You know, if you if you aren't registered in the in the right county and you're registered to the and you voted to the wrong county, guess what, your vote doesn't count. That's the rule. The rule is not well, we think your vote should counsel. Let's pretend, because that's not how

this works, but they wanted to work that way. Um, here's Jake Christian Adams talking about I mean, there's there's so much going on. First of all, the fact that mc sally lost to this KUK cinema, I mean just uh, totally a space cadet of a lady I don't know what the heck people in Arizona are thinking. And to say with you, well, even if you hate Trump, mcs sally is a very solid, strong candidate, veteran, great background, got a golden retriever. For heaven sakes, I mean, you

know this is what you want, America. And yet they went with Cinema, who says joining the Taliban is no big deal. Well, we've got troops fighting with talent. Me Just who votes for this woman, who who trashes her own state of Arizona, says it's a meth lab? Who votes for this woman? Well, apparently a lot of people did, because she beat McSally, which is stunning in of itself. But here's Jay Christian Adams on what's going on down in Florida where you have Brenda's Snipes, who doesn't know

up the heck is going on? Apparently play five, what you're seeing is astonishing incompetence. We sued Brenda Snipes for incompetence in maintaining the voter rolls, and I got to know her very well. I got to know her employees. She was my witness on the stand at a federal court trial where she admitted noncitizens are on the voter rolls and Broward they're voting. She doesn't turn them in when she finds out about them. She admitted there's felons

illegally voting. She doesn't call the police when she finds out about them. There are people on her voter rolls who were born They have birthdates when Grover Cleveland was president in Broward County. So I got to see close up how incredibly incompetent both Brenda Snipes is as well as her entire staff. So this is not just her, it's the whole office. That stuff is is stunning. What he's saying, and he's talking about court proceedings, so there's

obviously gotta be transcripts of it. It's gotta be on the record. There are legal aliens registered. She doesn't an illegal aliens who actually vote. Oh I thought that never happens. Oh, it does happen, doesn't it. This is why Democrats are so testy about this issue. That's why they hate voter

I D so much. They hate election integrity measures because ultimately they think that the country will be saved I e. That will be in a single party state when you have illegals made legal and or just voting because they can. Then it's all over. For Forget forget this, you know, ninety thousand vote margin we had that allowed Trump to defeat Hillary in the last election in in a few key states. Forget that, We're gonna be millions of votes behind.

And they know that, right. So, for them, the illegal alien issue is really an existential political issue because they think that it is a secret weapon to end their fight against conservatism in America forever. That's not an exaggeration. That is really leave the long term plan of the

left here with illegal immigration. People say, oh, buck, but illegal immigrants in time, Yeah, I mean maybe there's no evidence is supported by the way that people that come here as illegals within three generations or two generations become conservatives. There's no evidence to support that. So I mean, I guess it's theoretically possible, but the country will already be ruined by the time that happens. The country will already

be a collectivist, democrat, socialist. Yeah, dystopia, at least from the perspective of people who appreciate rule of law. You know, what is the biggest difference between America, for example, in Mexico, I mean and I've asked, I've asked the U S Ambassador of Mexican, former us A bastard of Mexico. This, what's the biggest difference. Why is our society in terms of you know, violence and crime and the functions of government. Why are we so different from Mexico and how our

society functions. It's very simple. It's rule of law. That's what really distinguishes this country from from Mexico. Here, there are laws, we all know what the laws are. We forced the laws. And I'm not saying this is perfect and all the time, but as a general rule, in Mexico, people don't care what the laws are and the laws are not enforced. Why is it different there than here? Because of our political culture. That's it. That's it. So

do we want to protect our political culture? Do we want to continue to have assimilation occurring in this country of legal immigrants coming in at a rate that allows them to be integrated into the fabric of American society and also to have their first act respecting our laws. I certainly, I certainly hope that's what we're gonna do.

But increasingly the Democrats are just kicking open the floodgates because they think it benefits them and their power and their ideology in the long run and the short run. But what you're seeing here is just incredibly you know, Andy McCarthy also waited on what's going on in Florida, and he's that we maybe we'll have any joined later this week. He's such a good dude, and he's so spot on here play clip four. We have two different

things going on here. We have the potential procedural irregularity that applies to this particular election, and then you have the overarching Democrat approach to government, which is to eviscerate the distinction between citizens and non citizens. And we shouldn't be we shouldn't think for a moment that if you can wrap your brain around the procedural irregularities that their

overarching agenda goes away. It doesn't. So of course they're going to take the position that none of the votes of people who might not properly be voting should not be counted, because in their minds, those people are just as legitimate to count as Americans voting are to count. And that's why that's a big reason why our electoral

system is in the mess. That it's in count every vote, they say, folks, that it's not count every legal vote, kind of every vote, every vote, every person, people power for the Democrats. You see, that's the plan, that's what they're trying to do, or that's what they're trying to accomplish. And what you see is a media that is completely uncurious, incurious, does not care to get to the bottom of what the heck is really going on here. Somehow Trump is

the problem. Broward can't get its stuff together and and understand that the twenty twenty stakes here are obvious to anyone paying attention. Florida, just by by ballot measure, legalized four million felons to vote in Florida. Now, as you may know, felons are a very reliable Democrat voting constituency. I think they vote four to one in favor of Democrats over Republicans. So even if you have a pretty weak registration of convicted felons in Florida who want to vote,

guess what that could be. The difference the felon vote could be the difference as to who carries Florida in which could be the difference about who is the next president of the United States. That's how important Florida is. And once you add the governor's mansion into the mix, once you add another Senate seat, and that makes you start to see that this isn't just about the right now,

this is about the way forward. And you know, I also think that you can expect the Democrats are using this as a test run to see, you know, what can they legally and not so legally get away with when it comes to votes. You know they they view this, I'm telling you they're viewing this in Florida as a dry run for the inevitable razor thin election in Florida. And you know what they can do, what they what they will do in order to make sure that that

critical state goes goes blue. That's that's what I think you can expect to happen here. Um. But you know, they really should be they should be asked the question. Democrats should be asked to answer the question do you think do you think Chuck Schumer? Do you think Nancy Pelosium and just go down the line that illegal aliens should I'm not asking if you think, if it's legal, should illegal aliens in this country be able to vote? Should they? I'd be very curious to hear what their

answer is. I think they'd go into some you know, some dodge they're going too. Well, it's not technically legal, but we'd really like to have everybody's voice counted and we're all human beings and we're all people and all this other stuff. Huh, Because if that's really your philosophy, I just want to point this out. Why can't people living in Mexico, Why can't people living in Canada just show up here and vote. I'm Erica affects the whole world.

You can make a very clear case that the American election has massive implications for the global economy, for foreign relations, all these things. And if people are just people man, and the law of the United States doesn't matter, if our sovereignty doesn't matter, heck, why not just take mail in ballots from you know, Morocco to Malaysia and back again. I mean, why not just let anybody wants to vote

in our election vote. We're all just people. You know, they're gonna visit probably at some point, so maybe they want to say what goes on here? Plus we affect them. You know, there's a a complete lack of seriousness and intellectual rigor from Democrats, not just in the issue of legal aliens, but also the issue of what does it mean to have an election that is based in the rule of law. Voter ide has been upheld by the Supreme Court already as constitutional. You rarely will hear that,

but it's true. Voter I D is constitutional. But they fight voter i D through procedural measures. However, they can all across the country because they refuse to accept that it's constitutional. Now, if you don't have voter I D, you don't have to register in a specific place, and there's you know, no independent monitors that for the plus, you wouldn't be able to do that at every polling station across the country. How could you ever even know

if there was fraud. How could you ever know if in fact something has transpired that will all to the course of the country. I mean, people are cynical enough about politics because I think, well, they see how gross politicians are. Just imagine how they'll feel about it if they start to feel like their vote gets canceled out by people that are in the country illegally, by by people who are not filling out their ballots, by people who are not abiding by the same procedures and same

rules as everybody else. You know, Democrats are playing with fire ere folks, they really are. But it's it really all comes down to Trump and there mind, so they'll do anything. I was exhausted this morning, man, and because I'm not a socialist, I had to actually show up for work. But you know what I had to help me get through the day and get the day started right A cup of just black Black Rifle coffee. And I drink it black. By the way, I'm all about it.

This is delicious, premium roast to order coffee that you will absolutely love. If you have a k cup at home, or if you're somebody that does your own ground grinding, you can get the beans before their ground, get them ground up, but have it all delivered to your door via Black Rifle. It's so easy. I get it delivered every month, and it's what I drink every day. Everyone listening to this should get in on this action too,

all right. Nothing cures a bad attitude quite like starting your day with the most American fruitom loving coffee ever, Black Rifle Coffee. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck and receive fifteen percent off your order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Are you staying

in the Senate or you're gonna run for president? I've been thinking about it because, as we said earlier, what President Trump has been putting into this country is so disturbing, so divisive, so dark, that I believe that I've been called to fight as hard as I possibly can to restore that moral integor, to that moral decency. That sounds like so I'm thinking about it. Yeah, that's right, Jilibrand folks, the Democrats best and brightest or among them. Also, I

just find this this construction fascinating. The party of planned parenthood, transgenderism for twelve year olds and you know, no, no, uh no, crushed scenes in the in the town square. They're the party of morality now, the party of Bill Clinton and Hillary They're the party of morality now. Oh okay, isn't that in a sting the people who wanted to elevate the Clintons back into the White House after eight years, that same political party is now out there lecturing us

about morality. You cannot make this crap up. But Kirsten jilla Brand is deeply unimpressive. Every time she speaks on a shoe, I think to myself, Wow, this woman is a centator from New York. That's what the heck is going on with my home state. So I refused, even though I'm checking a resident of d C, I refused to accept it. I'm still a New Yorker. I don't know.

I'm not changing, I'm not changing daring it. But but jilla Brand is just you know, symbolical, emblematic, not symbolic, wrong word, emblematic of what we see on the left in general, which is they're just saying all this stuff and and you know they don't get really they don't get challenged on it. You know, one thing that's happened is because the meeting environment is so toxic now, you really don't have many people that will go and try

to even attempt us to talk to the other side. Um, but the Democrats are gonna have so many of these of these candidates who come forward, and they're all gonna be saying the same all gonna be saying the same thing. You know, He's not gonna be saying the same thing. Actually, is my my colleague from the Hill of Crystal Ball. Uh, the the wonderful and talented Crystal Ball. She is involved

with o Jetta, who just announced yesterday. We actually broke the story on the Hill that he's running for president for the Democrats. He voted for Trump, by the way, in two thousand and sixteen, but he he is. He has announced that he will in fact run. And at least there's a guy who is not going to be straight off the talking points from the right. So that'll be interesting. I mean, I don't think he's gonna win, but it'll be interesting. Uh, and he'll be an interesting

voice in the whole discussion. Um, but Michelle Obama way down the Democratic candidates or here's what Michelle had say, play one. What candidates do you see out there that inspire you to catch your eye? And did you did you hear recently recently one of Hillary Clinton's former advisors speculating that she could run again. Do you think she should? I? You know, I think at this point everybody's qualified and everybody should run. Like I might even tap Sasha, So

you know, everyone's qualified and everyone should run. I might tap Sasha. She she says. You know, Okay, it's gonna be kind of battle royale of Democrats. As I've been telling you, though, do not be surprised if this goes to the far left. Be prepared for your fellow Americans to really disappoint you with their knowledge of history and their political judgment when there's there's this lurch toward towards socialism in this country. I mean it, it's coming. I

really think it's going to happen. I do not expect through to be a Biden esque mainstream Democrat candidate. I think that in their view, the only way to fight against Trump is to find the Democrat opposite of Trump, and that's going to be a just and an open lefty Bernie Sanders heavy socialist instead of Bernie Sanders light. That didn't really makes sense, but you know what, I mean, more more of a fighter than Bernie Sanders and a leftist. Who is that gonna be? Yeah, I can't tell you

right now, but it's gonna be something like that. It's not gonna be Jilla Brand, It's not gonna be Kamala Harris. Trump will will crush those standard issue Democrat opponents. I mean, there's just no way, Bernie I think would be interesting. I don't know if Bernie has the fire in the belly to take on Trump, but at least the Bernie contest, you've got a guy who said, yeah, I'm all socialist. It's gonna be a basic socialism free stuff for everybody.

Forgot about Venezuela, but they got They got nobody who's waiting on the bench to take the reins. We gotta talk immigration, though, folks, I gotta I gotta talk about some I got some tough love coming for the Trump administration on this issue in just a moment. The Final shutdown? Delude, do do do? Do? I wonder if I don't want to get I don't want to get sued for like rights violations. I think I'm allowed to do a weird al version the final shut down. Because we got a

government shutdown looming. Everybody, Oh, I know all the humanity. What will we do? Ah? The answer is nothing. The answer is we will continue to fund the government, and there'll be a lot of tough talk about, Oh, we're gonna stand for principle, We're gonna we're gonna stop this shutdown from half Robbie, Robbie, Nope, Nope, we are not. We are not in fact going to do that. It is much more likely that we'll just have business as usual.

I saw Paul Ryan today, who you know, I think I've been a little I've always said he's terrible immigration, so you can you gotta credit me with that. He's horrible in the issue immigration, which is obviously very very important. But I've been a little Well, he's a nice he's a nice guy, and so there's that and that that goes a long way with me. But the whole notion of Paul Ryan as a budget walk, I don't know. I start to feel like that's that's a lot of posturing.

What did he do for the budget that was so great? What what legislation as Paul Ryan spearheaded that we all go, Wow, Thank heavens, Paul Ryan was there for that one. I just I think he's been a little you know, he's a he's a little cozy with the establishment. I'm sure he's gonna end up running like the Heritage Foundation or something pretty soon. I mean, he's a big think tank kind of guy. Maybe a I I don't know, one

of those places. I like Heritage, So don't get me wrong, I'm just saying he's gonna get one of those big think tank jobs. Um, but he's saying today that, oh, there's gonna be some kind of a you know something for this shut member in December. They're supposed to be a government shutdown unless they do this. We keep going on as a continuing resolution. The government run out on December seven of money unless they can reach an agreement

in the twelve legislative days before that deadline. And Trump has not ruled out. This is from the Washington Post that I Trump is not ruled out a shutdown. He said, quote, we need the money to build the wall, the whole wall, not pieces of it all over. So we will see Mark Meadows, however, of the House Freedom Caucus is quote not optimistic that they'll be able to follow through all this stuff. Let me tell you this, Okay, there's there's not gonna be a shutdown with Democrats about to take

the House. It's just not it's just not gonna happen. It didn't happen the last time, it didn't happen the time before that. It's not gonna happen this time. Republicans think that they lose and shutdown fights, all right. They think they lose. I mean, there was that very brief, that very brief shutdown, um and the Democrats actually blinked

on it, but they didn't really capitalize. And I think that when you look at this now, you see that there's there's just a lack of willingness on the Republican side to go to the math for the wall. I really think there are a lot of Republicans who believe that if they started, if they funded building a wall, uh, there would be a wipeout. I think a lot of Republican members of Congress actually believe that. Meanwhile, Trump got elected promising a wall and had a Republican majority, and

we did not. We did not get what was promised even though we had that majority. And you know, this is where I got to do a little tough love for the administration. You know, the the budget and this looming foe shut shutdown. It's not really gonna shut down. They're not gonna fight over. They're just gonna do a continuing resolution, I can almost guarantee. But this is a reminder that right now we are are losing the fight with the left over immigration. And I don't think you're

hearing that enough. I don't think you're hearing that from enough people in enough places. Uh. Border crossings of family units last month set a record sixteen thousand, six hundred and fifty eight family units were caught entering between points of entry, which is an all time record according to Customs and Border Patrol numbers, that is eight This increased thirty nine percent, by the way, all right, I mean

these numbers are going up big time. In October, fifty thousand, nine hundred and fifty seven individuals were apprehended at the southern border between points of entry. Almost ten thousand apprehended at points of entry, the sixty seven totals of single highest one month total of Trump's entire presidency. And folks, what what this is telling us is that the illegal alien market, so to speak, has spoken here. They think

that Trump is un serious about his promises. They think that with Jeff Sessions on the way out, and remember this isn't you know, this is an important life and financial economic decision for people that are crossing the bord. They pay attention to this stuff, everybody, and they have activist groups that are informing them what to say, where to go, how to do this. So they're getting help along the way too. But the word is out. The

word is out. The first year of Trump's presidency, there were there were far fewer illegal crossing is what we saw under the Obama presidency. But now we see that this is in fact business as usual. Business as usual. Um, this is what over over a Conservative review, very instring piece from from Daniel horowits on this year it's falling.

The points of entry are a huge loophole. Let's not forget that the caravans always come to the points of entry anyway, and an increasing number of the more low key migrants are surrounding themselves at the points of entry as well. The new rule is another giant invitation on a silver platter for arriving migrants to ask for asylum

at the legal points of entry. Well, there will be processed and released in somewhat slower motion under the same standards that have been placed all along, which results in nine of those asking for asylum being allowed to enter, despite the fact that only ten percent will ultimately be given asylum by a judge. This is what I have

been saying all along. They can anybody who is willing to go through a short detainment and knows what to say at our southern border, and is willing to lie can get into the United States pretty much free and clear, and there's no interior enforcement they have to worry about. They know that DOCCA is looming just over the horizon. I think the Democrats believe that they're gonna be able to get a compromise measure on DOCCA from this administration. I think that whether that's true or not, I think

there are many in the administration. I certainly think Nancy Pelosi is gonna push for that. And you know, my friends, this is not what we were promised. This is not what's supposed to be happening here. The Republican Party is letting us down. And yes, this is on Trump's watch. Trump I give him a lot of credit for when he follows through when he does good things. I love it when he Trump slaps Acosta and all the rest of them. But this is not what was said. Who

was gonna happen. This was not followed through on. And this is a big problem because, as I've been telling you, I think that while Trump in a normal universe could win, we have some very troubling far left radical trends in

this country. Right now, and if you were to see a backlash to Trump, and especially if it coincided with a massive economic downturn, and all of a sudden the left was truly emboldened to just pursue their wackiest dreams, then I do think there's the possibility of a major Democrat and the actual blue wave, right, the actual blue wave, the blue tsunami can hit just like it happened in two thousand and eight with Obama, and the first thing that they will do this time around, I assure you,

the first thing Democrats will do when they have the opportunity is legalize all the legal aliens in this country. Make it irreversible. And oh, by the way, that's also when people will say, because all of a sudden, you have all these people coming forward, Oh the number was twenty million. Wow, that buck Sexton guy wasn't such a crazy after all, because the number is not eleven million.

My friends, explain to me, how the number is eleven million, when, as I just told you, according to Customs and Border Patrol you had Let me just make sure I'm giving you the right number. Sixteen thousand plus family units caught caught between points of entry. How what percent. Do you think you're getting caught less than half? Family units are

at least two people, some cases three four people. You've got fifty sixty seventy thousand people that are getting caught between points of entry at the border crossing illegally last month. I can do math. You can do math. If we're getting fifty or sixty thousand people getting caught crossing illegally, that means there's got to be that number that are actually crossing successfully illegally, probably more than that. It's a hundred thousand a month. Do the math on one year.

You think it really stays at eleven eleven million. I don't think so. We are losing my friends on immigration. Someone needs to ring the alarm belt. Trump has not gotten it done on this yet, and we need to stay on it. I thank you, as president. Challenge you on on one of the statements that you made in the tailing of the campaign, uh in the mid terms, that here we go that well, if you don't miss, president that this caravan was an invasion, as you know

consider it to be. As you know as president, the caravan was not an invasion. It's a it's a group of migrants moving up from Central America towards the border with the US. Why why did you why did you characterize it as such? Uh, becas I consider an invasion. You and I have a difference of it. But do you think that you demonized immigrants this election to try to want them. I want them to come into the country, but they have to come in legally. You know, they

have to come in jim through a process. I wanted to be a process and I people to come in. And we need the people. Your campaign, your campaign, you know why would need the people do because we have hundreds of companies moving in. We need the people. But your campaign had an ad showing migrants climbing over walls and such. But they weren't actor not going to be doing they weren't actors. Well, no, it's true. Do you think they were actors. They weren't actress, They didn't come

from Hollywood. These were these were people. This was an actual you know, it happened a few days ago, and they're hundreds of miles away. Though they're hundreds and hundreds of miles away, that's not an invasion. Honestly, I think you should let me run the country. You run CNN, And if you did it, well, you're ratings. Let me ask you if I may ask question, If I may ask question? All right, so you guys remember that, right, just I just wanted But that's you know, Trump slab.

I enjoyed it. Of course, that was Jim Acosta trying to Acosta at up as he usually does in the in the White House where when he's at a press, press conference or briefing with the President whatever. And it turns out the CNN is letting this go. CNN and reporter Jim Acosta filed a lawsuit today claiming quote that the White House violated his constitutional rights by suspending his press access following an incident where Acosta would not relinquish

the microphone during a press conference. The White House's characterization of the events of last Wednesday have been ripped apart as an exaggeration, complete with altar video, etcetera, etcetera. But the account put forth and CNN's complaint is even more detached from reality. This is from Law and Crime. This

is a piece by Ron Blitzer. So here's here's what CNN in this complaint says, quote, Acosta asked a question about want of President Trump statements during the midterm campaign, namely whether a caravan making its way of the United States from Central America constitutes and invasion of the country, a significant feature of the President's messaging during the just end of campaign. This is a live folks, accomplain. Didn't really ask a question a cost Or, rather didn't ask

a question at all. He said, quote, I want to challenge you on one of the statements you made in the tail end of the campaign in mid terms. That's right, folks, this is a journalist ending up. Who's who thinks that his press pass is the right to get a televised debate with the president whenever he wants it. Now, you can call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure that that

is not what the press pass entitles him. Two, I'm pretty sure that a Costa is not supposed to be able to stand up and drown out any other reporters in the room hog the ball, so to speak. And more importantly, I gotta tell you something. He does not have a constitutional right to a daily White House access pass. What is that? Think about this from Jimmycasta. Because he's

so important and famous. According to see, an end has to be able to go to what there's there's a ton of other people in the and not just in the press, but in CNN who have hard passes, so they can't provoke a hard pass that CNNs that CNN's legal position on this, it's unconstitutional. By the way, the A c L you wait into. But everybody they're just it's always, oh, the press is under assault. The press

is under assault. This press is specifically trying to destroy the president, and they're destroying the idea that the Constitution is actually something that has meaning, that isn't just whatever you want it to be at any given time. That's what they seem to think the Constitution is, and that is not the Constitution. The Constitution is words that have meaning. It's not just what, It's not just something I don't like, therefore it's unconstitutional. I mean, it just goes on and on.

This was this was a guy who was acting poorly, and they are disciplining him in a very mild fashionment. I just want to know, is it is it the case now? Is it the standard that if you do anything in the White House press room that is completely out abound. Let's say you started what what if he

told the president to go blank himself? I know it's a horrifying thought, but but I'm just saying, what if a reporter stood up today, it's the president, you know, your your your mother wears combat boots or whatever, you know, says something stupid. You know, hey, go go blank yourself. And uh, you know, let's say that somebody said something to the president and it's you know, it's completely it's wrong, it's nasty, and it's not a journey within the bounds

of journalistic standards integrity at all. Is that person not allowed to be told okay, you're you have to leave. What if somebody stands up and refuses to stop shouting. If you had somebody who decides to go code pink in the West Wing, do they have a right to not just stay there and continue to scream and yell, but to continue to have a They call it a hard pass, which means that you can have daily access to the White House whenever you want. You can be

in the White House whenever you want. Is that really, you know, is that the new standard? I just want to know where CNN thinks it's legal boundaries are here. You know, what is CNN allowed to do and not allowed to do? Uh? And and The answer is they just want to make this a big moment for Acosta, and that's that's what they're going to do. But this is just why there's no there's no honest discussion here about what this guy has done on the left and

what a clown show he is making of journalism. I mean, it really is appalling, and he's making he is making the case for Trump. And look, do I think Trump likes it? Absolutely? Trump likes getting into it with this guy because he proves the lie that CNN is not an objective news source. That it is the It is the televised hashtag resistance. It is the the TV version of the elite revolt against Trump. That's what CNN has become,

even more so than MSNBC. And they should just own it and be honest about it and stop trying to hide behind these phony bologning. Oh, the first Amendment charges, first amendments, fine, the entirety of the press corps against Trump? Okay, the first amendments just fine. How would you feel if you knew somebody was looking over your shoulder and reading everything that you were doing on a computer all day

for a month, how about a day? Guess what third parties, social media apps, all kinds of different online monitoring occurs, whether you realize it or not. And that's not even including hackers. These are people who can track you, who can find out what you're doing online, who can download your information, who can sell it to other people you don't want that take your privacy back like I have

by using Express vpn. Express vpn has easy to use apps that runs seamlessly in the background of my computer, phone and tablet less than seven bucks and and you can take back your online privacy. Do it today called to Protect your online activity and find out how you can get three months free at express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months free with a one year package Express vpn dot com slash buck. You don't have confidence in him

as America's force an officer. No, I don't and don't test take it from me. There's bipartisan editorializing about this, that that he should never have been appointed, and that uh that it does violence to the Constitution and the vision of our founders to appoint such a person in such a manner to be the chief legal officer in our country and that's bipartisans. I'll go further. The his appointment is simply part of an attack on the investigation

by Robert Mueller, the Special Counsel. It's part of a patent of interference by the president, part of a pattern of obstruction of that attentive instruction of that investigation. We Democrats House and Senate UH will attempt to add to must pass legislation, in this case, the spending bill, legislation that would prevent Mr Whittaker from interfering with the Mueller investigation. There's no reason we shouldn't add this and avoid a

constitutional crisis. These imbeciles, these democrats, powerful democrats, all that you're hearing from there are leaping to conclusions without any evidence yet at all. And they're saying, and this is the greatest part, they're saying that they think that they're going to avoid a constitutional crisis by creating law or regulation or whatever. I think it will be some kind of resolution that will directly affect the ability of the executive branch. Was what the d o J is to

do its job. Do you want to talk about a constitutional crisis? The Congress does not get to pass a law to tell the president how to do something that the president is empowered by the constitution to do. Right. So, so, for example, Congress can't pass a law that says the president has no has no right to pardon somebody. I mean, Congress can pass that law, but it would it would

be constitutionally invalid. Just like the Congress can't pass a law that, at least then I'm aware of, that would say what that the Department of Justice official overseeing an investigation is not allowed to oversee the investigation. This is all hot air, This is all bogus. What do they even think that they are saying. But as you know, this is twofold one. They just have to make noise. They have to make noise around Whittaker and about Whittaker

because this is what their base wants. Notice how they went very quiet on this for a while because to win those you know, independent voters in Florida and a Rizona, to win people over who were still thinking about who are they going to vote for, the Democrats had to stop being Democrats essentially for a little bit. They they had to pretend that they were a little a little less crazy, right, a little less not so okay? So

with that in mind. Now we look at what is at the at the core of this, what is the core of their objection, uh, and that is that Whittaker is not has you know, there's this whole argument over advice and consent to the Senate. Whittaker was had to receive advice and consent to the Senate when he was a U. S Attorney and I don't even remember what the state was. Doesn't a is that the Midwest doesn't really matter? Uh, but he hasn't received it in his

role from what I understand, as acting Attorney general. But this is a complicated legal question because no one is saying that he is the attorney general. They are merely saying that until they can get somebody else through Senate procedure, he is the attorney general for now. That's it. He

is acting. He's a temporary Attorney General. And and this now goes to, well, does the president have the right to have somebody in an acting role that has not been through the advice and consent procedure of the Senate, which is prescribed for for a cabinet posts like this. That's since you can see this is not a it's not a straightforward thing that there's a there's a good faith argument to be made, or at least there is an argument to be made on on both sides of this.

But the other part of this is that the Democrats don't get to choose for the president. This is an executive branch agency. Congress doesn't get to say you can only have this person or or here's the person you put in charge of that agency. That's not how this works. So their complaint is that it shouldn't be Whittaker, it should be Rosenstein. But Trump is the head of the executive branch, and Trump gets to appoint the attorney general

and get the advice and consent of the Senate. So you know, you can see there's a bunch of moving pieces here, but they're skipping right past all that and just saying that this is unconstitutional and it will force a constitutional crisis. And meanwhile, this is all based, I mean, all their objections are based on this idea that Trump that Trump appointed somebody who is in his pocket, and we'll shut down the Mueller probe. And that's just crazy.

He's not gonna shut down the Mueller probe. The Muller probe is winding down. Folks running out of steam, people whom saying there's gonna be more indictments. Yeah, maybe they'll indict somebody who writes for info Wars for conspiracy or something. Who cares? Who cares? What a what a ridiculous joke, although it's a very unfunny one. This whole thing has become.

But they are impugning Whittaker's integrity because we see what they did to someone like having all right, so that that was a very important lesson in many ways, because they'll do that to anyone and everyone. We see what they're doing with Whittaker, which is to suggest that he's a crony. You can't trust him. He's uh, you know, he's gonna do whatever Trump wants him to do. Meanwhile,

why is Rosenstein who should have accused himself? And anybody who knows the regulations and ethics laws around accusal and is honest agrees with that Rosenstein absolutely should have procused himself. Okay, he cannot oversee an investigation that is directly looking at something that implicates action that he took, as in the firing of James Comey. He wrote the letter that was used by the Executive Branch by the President to fire

James Comey was Rosenstein's letter. Rosenstein, of course, though, is an Obama pointee and has shown some hostility to Trump and people who defend Trump in this whole Russia collusion fiasco, and so as a result of that, they want Rosenstein in this role. Rosenstein obviously has an interfere with Mueller.

But but they've concocted this whole story, and I just sit here and I say to myself, first of all, you know, why don't they just focus on who the acting or who the actual attorney general is going to be instead of the acting attorney general. But they view this as, oh, the timing is meant to so this is meant to subvert the actual investigation. I just think that that's honestly just a whole bunch of crap. It

really is. It's a whole bunch of garbage. It's not really based on on anything um other than their desire. They're desired to established before anything has even happened, that you can't trust this guy Whittaker. This nightmare that the Democrats have put the country through on Russia collusion is

something that we should all never forget. We always need to remember what they were willing to do in this in this case, what they have been willing to do because they don't like the president reminds you by the way of this, uh, this piece in the Washington Examiner, that this pole and and because I think the Russia collusion thing is really at the heart of this. I mean, they've really tried to convince people that President Trump is

a trader. I mean that's a word that people in the media, prominent people and former government officials have used. I mean that they will throw around the term trader. But here's what you have. The examiners six, according to this Zogby poll, say that the media is more divisive than the president. Sevent that quote the mainstream media has played a major role in dividing Americans along racial, general and political lines. This has led to a spread of

hate and misunderstanding among some people. Only two thirds said the same thing about Trump. So seven and ten people men and women agree the media is dividing the nation. H Only fifty of the press says that's because the hard or left loves what the press is doing. The press is an opposition party, not not opposition as in what a free press is supposed to do. The press is an ideological left wing, anti conservative opposition to the Republican Party and to President Trump. That is the role

that they fill. I know this. I've been inside, I've been behind the scenes. I know these people. I understand how they think. Having a discussion today actually with some colleagues of mine just about how whenever somebody lets slip that the who's a quote journal who is supposed to be objective, Whenever they let's slip how partisan they are. When they just mutter something about you know, blank Trump this or blank Trump that. You know, you're like, oh, yeah,

it's another Democrat. You never have somebody come out and drop some bomb and he's like, oh wow, that person is actually a conservative. What a shock. But this old Russia collusion thing, the notion that this is heading to a this is heading to a constitutional crisis. This is all being manufactured by the media, and it's in part for ratings, but it's also because of their deep ideologically

driven hatred of the president. And they're really hoping that Russia collusion is still gonna cost Trump the presidency essentially at least for his second term. They have not given up on this yet, and so that means they're really willing to not just exaggerate, but to just fabricate, to lie on this issue. You know what's not smart just sort of hoping that you're going to get the right resumes that magically flow into your inbox by posting on

some random jobs site. You know, it's also not smart wasting a lot of time by sifting through terrible applications that aren't even for the right industry. You know what is smart going to zip recruiter dot com slash buck to hire the right person. Zip recruiter doesn't depend on

candidates finding you, It finds them for you. It's powerful matching technology scans thousands of resumes, identifies people with the right skills, education, and experience for your job, and actively invites them to apply so you get qualified candidates past. That's why zip recruiters rated number one by employers in the US, and this rating comes from higher excites on trust pilot with over a thousand reviews. My listeners can try zip recruiter right now for free at this exclusive

web address, zip recruiter dot com slash buck. That's zip recruiter dot com slash buck again. Zipp recruiter the smartest way to hire. Try it for free at zip recruiter dot com. Slash buck incredibly tight security for one of the highest profile criminal drug trials in the country's history. Chapo Guzman is currently in New York City. He is being shuttled back and forth with the highest of high security around him to the Federal courthouse in downtown Manhattan.

They have to shut down the Brooklyn Bridge each day, twice a day to take him across. Every juror, every person involved in this trial has a tremendous amount of security. Uh. And this is because Guzman was the single biggest and most powerful drug trafficker in the world until he was captured. At least that's the reporting we're getting from the various

outlets that are covering this one. I want to bring in somebody who can shed some light on what it was really like in Mexico under Guzman's reign of terror and also what's going on now with the Sinaloa cartel that he used to run. We've got Jon Grillo calling us from the streets of Mexico right now. Yon is a journalist. He's also the author of the very excellent book El Narco's and gangster war lords. He's been covering Mexico and the cartels for decades now, Yan, thanks for

making the time. Boy, it's good to be here. So tell me about just just for the folks listening, what do they need to know about this guy who's currently facing life sentence on seventeen federal charges, essentially being a massive drug kingpin, Chopo Guzman. Well, the I I did to his home dudes up in the mountains of and he comes from yeah community high up in the mountains. Uh, there's maybe it's such a bit like people living in the very high appellations in the United States, people quite

cut off. And this community has been involved in drug trafficking for a century, right back since Washington first made the drugs illegal back in nineteen fourteen. From similar trafficking drugs, and he rose up to become the most infamous trafficker in Mexico. I think he's alongside Pablo escar bar and our Campone as some of the most infamous zoomings or

infamous traffickers of all time. Now, he was really made super famous by his two escapes from both of Mexico's highest security prisons, and that really put him into the stratosphere. But as well as that, I mean, I've been too many murder things around Mexico, sadly, seen many bodies mutilated, and I've seen notes buddies that is sometimes with the name L Chapo can And I don't think he wrote it personally that people in his name have been carrying

out these murders. And we're talking about hundreds, maybe thousands of murders ordered by Chapo, which means shorty, right or that's also what that's that's the the nickname that he has, uh that El Chapo ordered himself over the years. Well, that's very hard to note. In the case of the United States, he's not on trial for murder because the murders happened here in Mexico, and US on trial for conspirator to traffic drugs in our Nedos count and being

the head of a criminal conspiracy. Now, the prosecutors worked in thirty three different murders and they want to tie them to make the conspiracy case longer. And the judge said, well, don't wring in. You wutten too many murders. There's not a medicated as a drug case now in you know, in Mexico, the killing has been devastating over the last

ten years. That an estimate has been more than one hundred nineteen thousand murders UM, which are linked to drug carters fighting each other, urban security forces fighting the drug cars for a hundred nineteen thousand, that's more than many regular war zones. That is very very very hard to tell exactly who all of those and how the cart

Hood days. The most violent city for a time was to our quartest just in that city with nine thousand murdicants three years, and the similar card to off Chappel. The man was fighting there, but it's hard to know.

And actually in Mexico he kind of had a reputation as doing met one of the worst, most violent traffickers, these other traffickers who have a more violent reputation, and he in a sense has um it's sad to say, a kind of Robin Hood reputation in some of his communities that arriving in these poor areas, handing out dollar bills or pepper bills, building roads in hospitals and so forth.

So he's very much like like Pablo Escobar in that sense, and that there's this other mythology, this local mythology that was built around him, and that obviously is also an image that he cultivated for reasons of having popular support. I mean it's almost like he's if you're running a narco insurgency, the insurgents need some of the locals to actually be willing to at least turn a blind eye to what they're doing. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean that that

idea of buying support at which they do. It's obviously, you know, not always just about helping people. It's about buying people so they don't imform on you. I bought by buying their loyalty. I mean these communities, there are some people who who are against the drug happ because now, especially within level of violance has been and then you can talk to mothers whose sons have been blagged away

by marked man in the AK forty seven. Some of this legend of our Chaplin, I think it really is a legendary status he has um now a lot of a lot that s go around by songs as well. There's hundreds and hundreds of songs about old Chapo. And even when he escaped from proven the second time, people were writing songs, composing songs within hours and putting these videos, these songs up this kind of religion. Chapter had his

own energy. Even what he creates himself is somehow kind of mythology among people about the miral of this guy who runs Do we know who runs the cinealoa cartel right now? And and how is it in terms of it's its power and and the the influence that it has on the current narco narco war is going on in Mexico. So right after Eve or Donald fund being

inaugurated as presidents, Um, he's flown up in a plane. Uh. Why after that happened, the tear for broke out into narctell And on one side you had a couple of sons of Chapel known as the Chapepos, and on the other side you had a former prison guard who had helped Chapel escape and become a lieutenant and doing up in the organization. And these two sides were fighting. There

was these big shootouts and over the place. Now it seems that the Chapetos, the sons of old Chapel one and consolidated their control of the cartel and are now running the cartel. But then you have another cartel called the halis Goo new generation cartel, which is even more for it in an environment those list the cartel which is a very paramilitary type organization. Some of their guys once shot down and military helicopter with an RPG seven. They had a couple of factories making their own a

R fifteen rifles or assembling their own aar fisteine rifles. Um. And that cartel is fighting the in many places and might be becoming the most dominant cartel in Mexico. That's amazing stuff. Well, you all really appreciate are you calling from the streets of Mexico, Yo, and Grilla. By the way, guys, if you are interested in the cartels, highly recommend you pick up Jones book El Narco, which you can get on Amazon, and also Gangster Warlords. I have read both

of them, which is how I tracked you down. And now he's he's our man down in Mexico City. Yan, thank you so much for calling in. Its great to be here. It was amazing. I saw this photo of what was a high school graduation and in the graduation photos is in Wisconsin. That was out earlier today and NBC News was reporting on this that a that the boys were giving a Nazi salute, and this was one of these things where it was I could just tell that the outrage machinery of the left was going to be, uh,

you know, up in in full force. And this is the rise of white Nationale's This Wisconsin school, all boys and there looked pretty much to be mostly, if not all white in this photo. And I knew that this was gonna become a big issue. But there's a thing about it that maybe he's gonna slow it down a little bit. The Associated Press picked this up. It turns out the photographer who took the photo, so he's not implicated in in the hand gesture. He says that he

asked the students to wave goodbye to their parents. Um, and he said that it was a totally he said it was an innocent photo. He quote. He says he asked the boys to give him a high five for the photo, which was taken north northwest of Milwaukee, and he says to anyone who has hurt, I sincerely apologize. And police are investigating the photo. I mean, I look at this, and you know I'm not gonna lie. I mean, there there's some there are some things in this photo.

There's some hand gestures that really do look like they're waving. I mean, I'm looking at it right now as I talk to you, And there are others where it looks like maybe some of the kids thought it would be funny themselves too, and maybe that called on you know, it's not I'm not gonna say that, this isn't This isn't like the white nationalist hand gesture controversy, in which

was a non controversy. But they remember, they tried to make a I believe half Mexican, half Jewish adviser to Brett Kavanaugh a white nationalist because she stretched her arm at one point after hours and hours of hearings. Remember that, Yeah, that's right, that's your that's your You're so so serious

and ethical news media at work. But this is just one of these stories again where you can tell it's a minor incident, but now it's going to be made into a major national incident and the police are involved. And that's the part of it that I really have a question about. Why would the police be involved. Uh, making a gesture that's that's racist is not in and of itself a crime. This seems to be lost on

people now. I mean this people, I think really do have the notion that if you say something that is some kind of an ethnic slur, that you can go to prison. And that's still not the law, although it's getting closer and closer to being the law. Anyway, you can check out this photo for yourself. You'll see what I mean. There's some hands that look, you know, it looks like maybe these kids were, but there are others

were the kids. The elbows are bent and they're waving, so you know, you know, the photographer says, it's I wasn't intended as anything other than just given a high five and a wave. So anyway, it made me think though, because today I saw this, this little announcement. It's not gonna get much attention, but I think it's really interesting that there is an effort under way to create a journal of This is what it's gonna be called, the Journal of Controversial Ideas. This is from the Chronicle of

Higher Education, published just a day or two ago. So they're looking specifically at creating a an anonymously well or you know, pseudonym based, peer reviewed academic journal to tackle the most controversial ideas. Essentially, as long as it is intellectually rigorous, nothing will be taboo, and the editors will

stand behind publishing whatever it is that they publish. I think this is actually gonna be, if it gets off the ground, really interesting and could turn into kind of a big deal, because this is what we don't have anymore. We don't have the good faith and political debate and argument to allow people to pursue controversial ideas, controversial feces to their conclusion. We have left wing doctrine and dogma,

and you deviate from that at your peril. But some of the things that they may address here, things like a defense of colonialism, whoa hold on a second Colonialism might have actually done at least some very good things for the societies that that was a serious paper that was written and caused a huge controversy. Trans racialism, Oh you can change your genitalia, but you can't change your skin color according to the left Why And there's a whole bunch of other things that you could obviously put

in here. But one thing I think is so interesting about this concept is that it's needed. When you would think that academia would already be doing this. The fact that you even need a quote journal of controversial ideas tells you where we are in America right now? The intellectual life of America is stunted right now because of the left, because of the petty pettit totalitarians of the

progressive left. And then the other part of it is that, well, what controversies are going to really fit within this rubric? Things like free speech, basic concepts in this country are increasingly controversial. So what's supposed to be a journal of the most controversial ideas? I would not be surprised if we were to find out it's actually just a journal of some real ideas with the occasional controversial idea thrown in. Tells us where we are as a country right now,

doesn't it of more? Coming up? Team stay with me, Roll calls next. Ain't no party like a Team Buck party, because a Team Buck party, don't stop. Yeah, we got bucks turned up to eleven. It's time for roll call. All right, let's get to it with roll call. Keith first, out of the gate here, Jimmy man. Very few people call me Jimmy. You're ninety nine, correct, But yesterday you

were talking about the World War One, ur mistice. Also, you throughout that we've never fought the Russians U S soldiers fought Bolsheviks three months after the eighteen Armistice and lost. I know it's picking knits, but we almost never get the chance to with you with the other point one seven of the facts that you get wrong, Keith, Well, Keith, You're you're correct. Savor the flavors. It's not gonna happen again. Now, I'm just kidding. Thank you so much. You're you're bringing

up a very interesting point. They're harkening back to the America North Russia Expeditionary Force, which was five thousand or so US troops that were sent as part of an Allied intervention force into the into the Russian Civil War in eighteen and obviously decide that we backed lost, so it wasn't really a great move for us. But yeah, this is something that is kind of forgotten to history. People don't really remember that little moment very much. I

know a lot of you do. I picture all of Team Buck sitting around, essentially like me, with stacks of old books in either their living room, there, den bedroom, wherever it is you keep your books, particularly history books. Erica writes, I'm counting on my kids eighteen and twenty and their whole generation to save us from Michelle Obama.

They will never forgive her for destroying their school lunches, you know, Erica, I remember that was that was kind of a controversy for a little while, the whole destroying the school lunches thing. And I don't remember exactly what

it was. I remember the Michelle Obama. It was essentially pushing this and the media, of course, because the involved Michelle Obama didn't want to say anything but wonderful things about the school lunch program, and obviously it had to be fantastic because it had to do with Michelle Obama. And I did see the photos of kids that were supposed to eat like a piece of boiled chicken and some kale for lunch, and I thought back to my days as a kid. Man my mom. I had the

best mom, and she understood that growing boys needed real food. Man. I used to eat bagels and cheetos and hamburgers and nest Lee Quick. I mean, I'm telling some of some of my my guilty pleasures as a kid. I used to drink Nestlee quick and and wash it down with a blondie, or I guess wash my blondie down with Nestlee Quick, which is probably about a hundred and thirty grams of sugar and about you know, eight hundred calories

or so. But it was delicious, delicious, I tell you so. Yes, indeed, uh, thanks for writing in Erica, Thomas writes, I like your buck wild segments, common sense and to the point, this latest growing controversy over the temporary appointment of Whittaker to replace Sessions a g can be ended by President Trump declassifying all the documents relating to them, all investigation and fives A warrants that created it. That is what the

progressives are so desperate to protect. Once those are declassified, Whittaker will simply be a placeholder until the next Congress convenes and a regular process of appointment can be done for sessions full time replacement. Hopefully President Trump's legal staff will encourage him to take those actions and avoid another lame legal battle that will go nowhere. Keep up the good work, Shields Eye Thomas. Great to hear from you. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts on this one.

As to where I think this whole thing is going with Mueller and the investigation and Trump and the declassification. I still believe that Trump will end up declassifying a

lot of it. I think that he's holding it back now, as I've said, because one and he doesn't want to anger any allies that may have shared information with us, but also he realizes it's tremendous leverage because no matter what the Mulla report really says, I can assure you right now that the media will claim that the Mulla Report vindicates their insane reporting on Russia for the last two years. No matter what it says, they will claim

that this is exactly what they were looking for. And and maybe there's not yet criminal charges being filed against Trump, and he's not gonna be removed by the Senate, but there will be. When they get the real information, that's going to be what they say. So there you have it. Um Tom writes, I was part of Smokey Bears of Fink movement in the seventies and would love to see the article reference on Monday Show with pictures of the California Force from decades ago, and now if not, I'll

keep searching shields high Tom. It was a Forbes article that I was reading from. I do not remember the exact title of it, but it was a Forbes article, so that might help you a little bit. I hope Doug Doug e Fresh, Doug rights Buck, I called Friday Show on delay. I've been off the dating app for a bid, but I can confirm the top three statements that follow the phrase swipe left. If are you are a smoker, you are shorter than me. The girl says

that you are a Republican Trump supporter. Guess if you want a nice conservative girl, you have better luck looking at church than on tender Just saying, Lieutenant Doug, Lieutenant Doug, I think you're probably right. Uh, there's such a an acceptance culturally and dating and just in day to day life of an animust towards people who are Trump supporters. You know what another name for Trump supporters most of the time a Republican. And you know what percentage of

the country's Republican about half. So people who will cut out a hundred and sixty million or so of their fellow Americans, I mean not you know, I guess kids aren't necessarily part of the equation there, But you know what I'm saying, people that will cut out a huge swath of the country because they discute their politics it's

really sad. It's it's a sad state of affairs, and it's something we're going to see more and more of because I believe the left is radicalized and I don't think that they are able to see past these issues of political identity because it really is an identity for them. And being a liberal isn't about I want slightly higher taxes. Being a liberal is I'm not a racist the other people are. I'm for women's choice, the other people aren't.

I'm for transgender rights, the other people aren't. I mean, it's it's very much a statement of who you are as a person to be a liberal. Meanwhile, as a conservative, I mean I sit around that. I say, can I be wrong on that issue? Do I need to change my position on any on any issue that involves government action or in action? I mean, I do this with

foreign policy all the time. I think that to be a conservative who has been focused on foreign policy for the last eighteen years or so is to be somebody who has been humbled numerous times. I don't care who you are, you've been humbled by either being wrong or missing a major trend, or just recognizing that your previous positions weren't what you weren't as sound as you thought they were. So yeah, David rights in with hey, Buck, the fires in California are terrible, But it isn't like

this is a recent phenomenon. The Eagles made it pretty clear forty years ago that never reigned in southern California. If you don't like fires, Santa Ana, winds, earthquakes, et cetera. Move Um. I don't know that song, David, But I'm gonna tell you something that's probably gonna get some of you mad at me. But I cannot hide things from your team. We are friends, we are a family here. I cannot hide from you that I do not particularly

like the Eagles. I know, I know. Between that and the fact that I find baseball on TV at least boring, there's a lot of things about me that needs some adjustment.

I get it. I get it. I will, however, say, to distract you from what I just said, that I've learned a new technique for cooking uh filet mignon in the pan, which if you're gonna do what you want to do it right, because those little suckers are expensive and you want to roll the outside of the filet around the pan after you've seared the top on the bottom, and make sure that you have a bit of butter, and you based the butter slash whatever herbs you're using

out of the edge when you tilt the pan on that filet. I did it recently. It was amazing. See you don't even remember that I told you I don't like the eagles, And so that now we can all still be friends. Braiden writes Buck. Two things. First, movie quote, all right, here we go listen and understand that fill in the blank is still out there. It can't be bargained with, It can't be reason with. It doesn't feel pity or remorse or fear, and it absolutely will not

stop until you are dead. That is Kyle Reese in Terminator one talking about the Terminator raiding right. Second, it's not fair for you to lump lump Jake Tapper with Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper and the other clowns the communist News network. Tapper might be center left, however, he does try to be objective. Shields Hie Brandon Brandon, I appreciate you running in. I disagree with you on on Tapper. I think that for purposes of his own brand he's created.

He tries to create a perception of being fair, but that goes away as soon as it's a really important issue to the left. I promise you he if you were to look back over the last year, yeah, sure, he'll call out Keith Ellison, but you know you're allowed to call out Keith Ellison and still being good standing with the left. Uh. Look at some of the ways that the Tapper Show has handled issues like the Kavanaugh hearings. Look at the way that uh Tapper has handled violence

from the left versus violence from the right. There's there's clearly a bias in what he does. So I don't think that he's Is he less to to your point and to be fair, Braden, is he less overtly partisan than say Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo? Absolutely, But is he still clearly doing opinion journalism under the guise of objective new for journalism. Yes, but you do make a point, and uh, it's it's uh I think partially I would

agree with it, partially or in part. But thank you again for writing in and thank you for the movie quote, Gene, that's gonna be it for today in the Hut. It has been an honor of privilege and a pleasure as always. I will be out on Thursday. My friend Rahim Kassam will be taken the Khan, but we will be hanging out together tomorrow, so I'll see you then. Shields Hie. It's so easy to think that you're fine online and only find out at the wrong moment when something's gone

really bad, that you aren't protecting your online security. There is all kind of monitoring that goes on right now. They'll sell your information, by the way, a lot of these sites you use to third parties, and then when you add hackers in the mix, you've got to be concerned about what you're doing online. But if you want to make sure that you are good to go even

when using public WiFi, express VPN is for you. Express VPN protects you when you use public WiFi, keeps hackers and spies from seeing your data and downloading and attacking your stuff. Express VPN is your solution to make sure that you don't have to worry about your online privacy. Protect yourself today and find out how you can get three months free at express vpn dot com slash buck that's Express vpn dot com. Slash buck for three months

free with a one year package. Visit express vpn dot com slash buck