Impeachment Fever

approaching illegal aliens. That are more coming up on the Box Sexton Show. This is the Buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake America, You're a great American again The Buck Sexton Show. Games of former CIA analysts, Remember the Sexton No, the President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump is named a co conspirator of a federal crime. Is that ground for impeachment? Do

you think impeachment is more likely at this point? Impeachment? Teachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment. Does they move the needle at all or confidence to move forward on impeachment? The president facing impeachment, impeachment will be on the Democrats agenda. The I word impeachment, the eye word impeachment, the eye word impeachment, the eye word,

the eye word, and impeachment. Let's take a look at the process of impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, to impeach or impeachment, impeachment, he would have been impeached, all of it. Bringing impeachment back to the forefront. Talking about impeachment,

impeachment talk impeachment is and we're viable auction. Do you think it would be appropriate to immediately begin impeachment proceedings impeachment, impeach, frompeachment, impeachment, and teachment each meant eachment, engeachment, impeach, mint, impeach, each impeachment. I don't know how you can impeach somebody who's done a great job. I'll tell you what if I ever

got in peach, I think the market would crash. I think everybody would be very poor because without this thinking, you would see you would see numbers that you wouldn't believe. In reverse, if Hillary Clinton got elected instead of four point one up and each point is three and a half trillion dollars and ten million jobs. When I took it over, it was at one and it was gonna be down. It was going down. I freed up. I got rid of regulations. The tax cut was a tremendous thing.

But even before the tax cut, right from first day, I got rid of regulation. I approved the pipelines forty eight thousand jobs. But I did a lot of things. Had Hillary and the Democrats gotten in, had she been president, you would have had negative growth. Welcome to the Buck Section show. Everybody very very different views there of of impeachment. Of course that the media and we really we ran

through that. I think producer Mike pulled us together. It was a hundred and something mentions of impeachment on cable news in a twenty four hour period. I mean, that's just they're all over One thing that I have to say, I find very amusing. Is this this narrative now that they don't want it to be too blatant. Two I'm sorry, thank you, Mike. Two hundred and twenty two mentions of impeachment.

They don't want it to be too blatant. That they are all along playing this political game, right, So what they do is they say, oh, no, we are waiting until the facts come out. We're waiting until the Mula report, We're waiting until we see what Cohen has and all that. They're not waiting for anything. They're not sure if they want to be up front with anyone outside of their outside of their hardcore left wing base about the fact that they're only their only way of of dealing with

Trump is to try to get rid of Trump. They can't beat him, so they're trying to take him off the playing field, right that they can't match him. They don't have anybody who can go toe to toe with him, and so the response that that you get from him is just trying to take him out of the game, right. I mean, this is it's appalling, folks, but this is

who they are. This is how the left operates now, um, and we will continue to just sit here and here and hear them pretend that they haven't already made up their minds on impeachment. Does anyone really take that seriously?

I mean, come on, come on, this is like when you you have these uh I think is at least four different senators now who have come out to say, oh, we won't meet with we won't meet with Kavanaugh because Trump is an unindicted co conspirator, which is just a really a kind of legal ease way of slandering somebody unindicted co conspiracy. What does that mean? It doesn't really

mean anything. It just means that somebody thinks you did something bad, but they don't have the goods on you or the willingness to actually charge you with it, which means you have no ability to defend yourself, and it means it will not be adjudicated, won't go before a judge. So it's just like a thing that somebody says, Man,

it's not nearly as damn as they pretend. But you have these four senators who say we will not meet with Kavanaugh, and it's funny because they've all already i think, got on the record as not being willing to meet with Kavanaugh. I mean to see the posturing from Democrats about how this guy, this Yale law school educated super legal mind is is a problem for them. It's just pathetic.

They know they have to do it, but we all know that there's no there's no real basis for it other than pandering to their base, right, trying to trying to put on a show for the MSNBC watchers out there. It's not based in any principles, not seen any real Jurkor's prudential concerns. But the left is never really about that, as you know, about power, about seizing power, about attaining power, utilizing it. That is the prime motivator. That is number

That is number one. But this notion of impeachment, I just have to say, it's uh, it's something that we all know is there, and the media is now very much talking about it, and we can expect that if the Democrats take the House, that's what's going to happen. And oh, then we can hear that we can deal with all the unifying and healing effects of a drawn out,

let's say, eighteen month long impeachment process of President Trump. Boyd, we're gonna hear so much more about Russia collusion and all this other, all these other fantasies that these leftists have. That if nothing else, folks, we've got to get Republican turn out up high from the mid term so we don't have to go through that, just the endless hearings wherease people make fools of themselves. You know, well, I think Paupadupple, this was some kind of international Superspy and

Carter Page that were totally justified. And the fires are warrant on him. These are things that only idiots or liars could say. At this point, it's just not serious. But then they get plenty of Democrats who are who are un serious people, but they say that they're waiting to impeach him. They're not going to wait. It's just a function of trying to play little cat and mouse with the public here and not make it too obvious

that is what they want to do. There's a little bit of breaking news late in the data I wanted to get to with you though. That ties into all this David Pecker and people are already having a lot of fun with his name and the headlines and everything else. I will not do that here on the show because my name is Buck and I did not like it. When I was a kid and people who played the name game, you know, Buck Buck, bull Buck Fanana Fanna.

They used to say, we all know how that would rhyme and that would go and it was very sad. But people are playing games with David Pecker with his name and and uh, he's the CEO of the National Enquirer, which I'm sure, I mean, of all the guys in media who's who probably got some wild stories, this guy

is pretty high on the list, right. And if you could sit down with somebody and have a long chat about the stuff that they've been privy to and just everything else, I mean, yeah, obviously the National Choir publishes you know, the baby with the Horns of a Devil, will you know, born in the Arizona Desert or something, right, I mean, they do all kinds of really weird they

they are. They are a purveyor of fake news. Although they are the ones who broke the John Edwards story, which I always have to remind people that the the mainstream media, with all their resources, with all their investigative journalists, they didn't break the John Edwards story. John Edwards with his love with his love child and his mistress and everything else. That was actually a National Enquirer reporter who

broke that. Uh. And and they got a lot of heat for I think they actually ended up getting what you get, a bullets or something for it that I think they did actually get an award for it, or if they didn't, they should have. But they published a lot of direct a lot of nonsense too, And remember Edwards, that whole story. This is kind of interesting how it

comes full circle. The National Enquirer broke the John Edwards love love child mistress story and the National enquire and and that story rather is the closest approximation of what people are saying Trump did, unproven, unfounded, Trump did to pay off these two women. And so it all kind of ties in together, right, The John Edwards story of paying off the women was broken by the National Enquirer and now the National Inquirer CEO. And this is the

break news from today. Granted immunity in the Michael Cohen case. Now this could get lost in a lot of the other headlines. A lot so much other stuff going on, and Mana Ford and Trump sat down with Ainslei air Heart today, Who's just fantastic. I'm an Ainslei Airheart fan. But you know, Trump sat down and had this long interview today. There's a lot of stuff to get to. We've got more on Molly Tibbits. I'm gonna talk to you about what's going on with white farmers in South Africa.

A lot of a lot of ground to cover, with you today, as we always do. Here's what this story really shows you, though, I mean that there's the basics of it, or that Mr Pecker um not to be confused with Walter Peck, the EPA chief who is the protagonist in the movie Ghostbusters. Mr Pecker, who's the CEO of American Media, has shared details with prosecutors about payments Mr Cohen arranged in effort of silence the two women who have led sexual encounters with Mr Trump, including Mr

Trump's knowledge of the deals. According to the Wall Street Journal. Here, so we're gonna get more information about all this, but let me just go to go to this point, folks. They are walking around, meaning the Fed federal prosecutors are going around, and they're handing out immunity deals like candy uh and, and they are also flipping people by pushing. I mean, they're using every weapon in their prosecutors arsenal here against anybody in Trump's orbit to just get damaging

stuff on Trump. What we have seen is the Mueller probe turn into an OPO research arm with the authority to ruin people's lives and basically send them to prison for the dancy for Hillary Clinton's now much scorned losing political campaign. They cannot do this without us looking at how they treated Hillary Clinton the email probe. Did they flip anybody against Hillary Clinton? Did they put anybody in

an adversarial prosecution prosecutorial environment? Did they give did they gave out unbelievable immunity to people there to protect them as they were trying to find a way to justify what Hillary Clinton did with your emails? The ass of course, yes, this is not what about is um? If you are unwilling to see this, you are blinded bipartisan ideology, You're you're being again un serious because this was not long ago.

This involves two political candidates, it's all tied in together, and some of the same people that were involved in that process are involved in this process now. That's certainly the same Department of Justice. They're trying to flip everybody against Trump. They're trying to turn everyone around him in his inner circle against rum. I have to say, I think it's just a matter of time before they go after legally go after a member of Trump's family. And I think that is a a red line that up

to this point they have not crossed. But I'm starting to think that they're gonna they're gonna do it. They're going to really try to put Donald Trump Junior or some other member of the Trump family or you know, the inner circle in some form of legal je real legal jeopardy. That's how dirty and underhanded this anti Trump team is willing to play. This whole thing is a farce, my friends. We can't lose sight of that. When Trump says no collusion in all caps, as he did today,

he's just stating a fact there was no collusion. This is ridiculous. UM. I had the opportunity to speak to the former CIA and n s A director Mike Hayden. You can actually watch the the interview tomorrow and Hill un Hill dot TV. I asked him a question. I said, So, Mike, I worked for the c I A. You know, we had we had to around a nice exchange before and after the the interview because we worked together on some

very important stuff. We were on the same team. It was us against you know, I was obviously an underling, but you know, vaguely I think remembers me. But we're in the same team against the terrorists. It was America versus the terrorists. It was a good time, and I looked at Mike and I said, you know, Mike, you've been very outspoken. You're Mike Hayden, former ci A, former NSA director. You've been very outspoken about Trump and all of this, and you know this is uncharted territory and

this is unprecedented for former spot chiefs. And yeah, he agrees,

it's unprecedented. Okay, fine, I said, how is it that we are supposed to believe that with the massive intelligence apparatus that that the U. S. Government has at its disposal, which was turned against Trump in the campaign, how is it that we're supposed to believe that this group of what the media will tell us, bumbling fools who can't figure out anything, you know, can't work their way out of a paper bag, that they have been able to

hide this Russian collusion from us at this point. And Mike knows that I you know, Mike and I both know that we have some sense of the capabilities and what we're talking about here. Write him more him more so than me, at a higher level. But I'm I'm I was reading a lot of the same memos and I'm sitting there and he says, well, no, Buck, we already have all we really need. Oh, I see now that we won't find it, We're to say that the we're gonna find a way of describing the Trump Tower meeting.

We're gonna find a way of reforming the narrative such that the information that has come short will now be enough for impeachment. Now that collusion has failed as a concept to prove, they're going to say that the collusion was already proved in the course of that failure of evidence. We just don't know it yet. Folks. This is crazy, but this is where they're going. Eight four eight to five,

eight four four nine buck lines open. I'm out tomorrow, Michael Polkas informed you, So if you want to chat with me, today is the day and we will be right back. I don't know what's going on. I mean, Hawaii has had a had a tough era, a place that I always think of as as the closest thing I've probably ever been to to Paradise, and they had those lava flows with the the volcano. It's just crazy

when you see that stuff, and really destructive. And now they're in the in the path of this hurricane Lane, which is supposed to I'm reading. It's gonna have thirty in of rain, thoughts and prayers everybody out there. Two weeks of food they want everyone to have on hand too. I mean that the Hawaiian Islands rarely get hit with hurricanes. It's about to get absolutely walloped based on what we're

seeing here. So let's just hope that everything is uh ever and out there is all right, you know, keep your head down, stay safe, don't take any risks. Um We have Sandra in Boston the line. Hey Sandra, hi, umu can you hear me? Okay, yeah, everybody can. What's going on? Well, I I'm pretty disturbed by this whole business. And I just feel that, you know, sure, Michael Cohen is a fixer, he's no nice guy, but what Robert Muller is doing seems to be fixing on the government level.

And you know, he was the director of the FBI when Hillary Clinton was there and we had ben Ghazi. Was FBI going in three weeks after the the event we had. I simply don't believe that he didn't know

she had a private server. I'm sure he knew, And it seems to me he's covering up a lot of things and didn't he have some involvement in uh interviewing the people from Libya as the State Department people like what Gregory Hicks, I think his name was State Polly graphed him and demoded them and did all kinds of things to keep them silent. Um you Brennan. Now, wouldn't the FBI have been involved too? Yes? Yeah, absolutely, I'm not.

But I'm not sure if it was, if it was Comy, or if it was Muller or you know, I'd have to go back and check. I mean, look, I think Mueller is um. Muller is a guy who is an institutionalist. I mean he falls in that category of people that I think he thinks he's doing the right thing by protecting the FBI and the d o J. And the best way to protect them is to go after their

primary antagonist right now, which is Trump. You know, I do think that he's he's lost objectivity here and that's why he's going and they're just they're handing it out to the Southern District. I mean, this whole thing, this, this this investigation spiraled completely out of control. Sendra thank

you for calling in appreciated team. We've got more coming up, including I just want to take a moment to what would happen if they did impeach the president, and let's say they managed to either force him to step down or remove him from office. Do the Libs really think that we all just go on and happy and say, yeah, sure, voist a a president Biden or even a President Hillary on us. We'll get to that coming up. He's holding the line for America buck sex in his back. But peachment,

don't put all these allegations to the appropriate authority. I think a peachman would be totally horrible. I mean, there's no reason he didn't colude with the Russians, he didn't obstruct justice. Everything Cohen says has been disproved. You only impeach him for political reasons, and the American people would revolt against that. The American people would revolt against it.

That's something to keep in mind here, is that there's no way that you could view any action by the left to remove this president based on the information we have, as anything other than essentially a political declaration of war. I mean, it would it would really tear at this country because there's just no they're there. I mean, I was telling you before we had a former US spy chief. I always think it's interesting people don't like to use that term spy, Like we don't have spy agencies yet,

yeah we do. We like to call them intelligence. Age sees they spy, they are engaged in spying. We should we should not. Every other country when they think of our CIA, they think of spying. They don't think of oh, look intelligence in order to inform the policy community. No,

no spies, that's what they think of. Uh. But anyway, we had our former spy chief, and I said, I spoke to them today and trying to change the definition of what would constitute enough of a of an of an egregious act by the president to that way to the stuff we already know. And I can't help but think, Okay, if if we're being told now that the Trump Tower meeting is the cause of impeachment efforts or impeachment discussion, now, why weren't they Why wasn't it then that the move

was underway. It's it's political. We see this, it's obvious. Can't we all just speak to each other like adults and be honest about that? But no, they would like to continue to to play all kinds of games. But I love Trump's about. You know, you can't impeach somebody

doing such a good, good job. There's something to that, folks, there is something to the realities of what would happen in this country if they were to push for impeachment against the president who has beaten them at their own game so many times already, and done so in ways that have really benefited America. And the country is doing very well right now, and they and the Left can't

change that. They can't come up with some way to alter that reality that they've tried to beat us on the you know, to to to define success in all these different ways, so that the president is no longer successful. But that's just that's a fool's errand and we all know this. So they're they're going with the main plan here, which is to try to use lawyers and bureaucrats to

stop Trump. And I find that very troubling, by the way, you know, the whole notion of this as an he's an unindicted co conspirace committed some cry him, you know, the dirsh who got a little terse with me earlier in the week when I asked him about I asked Alan Dershowitz on my other show Hill dot TV Slash Rising. I asked the dirsh about whether you know he spoke the president, and he started telling me, well, he's a Democrat, you know, just every just everyone's very clear. Dersh is

a Democrat, which we all knew. But he's also a guy who still believes in the law, still believes that there is law and that it matters. And here's what he says about the payouts. That everyone they're already acting like this is a really big deal and it's criminal. Here's what he says. Play clip for Candidate Trump could have announced I'm funding my own campaign. I'm putting a billion of my dollars into the campaign, and I'm paying a hundred million of them to women who have accused

me falsely, et cetera. That would not be a violation of any campaign law as long as he reported it. If he if it was, if the campaign failed to report it, it would be on the campaign, not on the candidate himself. If he had written a letter to these two women saying you're gonna help, you're gonna hurt me in my campaign, I'm gonna pay you a hundred thousand dollars to help me get elected president, and you have to keep it quiet. It's hush money, no crime.

I challenge any of those who were saying it's a crime to find me anything in the criminal law that would make it a crime for a president personally or candidate personally to pay in order to save his own election. So what are we really talking about here, folks? What's all this impeachment talking based on what? What have they got? You know? And you know Trump spoke about this himself that I played the three later on. I knew later on did they come out of the campaign? They didn't

come out of the campaign. They came from me, and I tweeted about it. In fact, my first question when I heard about it was did they come out of the campaign? Because that could be a little dicey, And they didn't come out of the campaign, and that's big. So, you know, we're having all these discussions, all this talk about about the issue, and and it really could be a whole lot of nothing. Uh. The they have the press completely beside themselves with with outrage over this, but

but they're there are no limits to their outrage. I would have thought at some point they would get tired. You know, I would have thought at some point they'd feel like, you know, we we no longer can can play this game of being upset about everything all the time. But no, no, no, no, they they do. They think that there's always more, always more room to be self indulgent about their their emotional outbursts about all this stuff. And like, but I can tell Trump is also losing

patience with this. He feels like, you know, enough is enough, and he's gone through this process long enough. It's that's why he got a little he got a little saucy with my man Jeff Today Producer Mike, you know, we have a soft spot for Jeff, right, I mean, Jeff, Jeff just like comes and hangs out on our show. Sometimes he's like one of the He's like one of the guys, you know. He's like he's like Buck at

his what a cold? You know. I'm like, hey, here he is this my man, the Attorney General hanging out on the Buck Sex the show. I was like, it gave me my first first great interview at at Hill dot TV. And you know, so so I like Jeff, I'm not gonna I can't hide that from you, see. I tell you these things, folks, I don't pretend that I'm oh, I'm totally objective observer that said it was a terrible idea for him to reach. It's a terrible idea for him to recuse himself. And he's left Trump

high and dry on this one. And as much as I like Jeff, I'm like Jeff making me upset here a little bit a little bit, and and Trump obviously it gets a little nor with them too, because the problem is, folks, Sessions is great on immigration on the border. You know, he really understands the problem, and he's and he's a very ethical and loyal guy. But I think he's also a little bit of as I've said before, he's a boy scout in the street in a street fight.

And Trump is out there metaphorically speaking in the street surrounded by a bunch of deep state dams who have you know, got got baseball bats that are coming after him and Sessions. It's like, I don't believe in valiance, and it's like, no get in their Sessions. You gotta back him up, you know, you gotta help him out. So Trump is a little upset about this. When played twelve, the Dems are very strong in the Justice Department. I put an attorney general that never took control of the

Justice Department. Jeff Sessions never took control of the Justice Department. And uh, it's a sort of an incredible thing. Jeff Sessions recused himself, which he shouldn't have done, or he should have told me. Even my enemies say that Jeff Sessions should have told you that he was going to recuse himself, and then you wouldn't have put him in. He took the job and then he said, I'm going to recuse myself. I said, what kind of a man is this? So so he's it's rough. It's rough, Jeff.

Jeff's getting the right stuff. And you know, and I do think in this case it is it is somewhat. It is somewhat deserved because it was a big mistake. I know why Jeff did. He did it for the right reasons. He did because he thought it was the right thing to do and he thought it was ethical. But he's left our president in the very and a very tough spot here. Uh. And it's one where I think Trump is increasingly gonna just have to say, you know what, enough is enough? And there are two ways

that Trump can up end the Democrats efforts here. The first one is and I cannot get an answer to this question. Really I want Trump to declassify the rest of the FISER word. I don't believe it would put any lives in danger. I don't believe that. I don't believe it would expose sources and methods. I don't believe it.

I just don't believe it. And I'm somebody who has seen a lot of top secret, very sensitive information in my life, and I'm I'm just not I think that they are are redacting stuff that, first of all, we probably would already know a lot of it if it wasn't redacted in those FISER requests, because because I think what we'd see is that one the dossier was the

basis for the FISA warrant. You know, it was it was it was like se it in terms of substance, maybe not in terms of lines of written text, but it was the it was the main uh it was the critical that the sene qua non you like that, producer, Mike Fancy, thank you. I do what I can of of the entire without which what in Latin. Uh So, I think that that's that would come out of it

um and that's why they but Trump won't do it. Trump, but I also think that if he were to declassify, that we would find out that there were before it was even really a full fledged counterintelligence investigation, there were people at the top levels of the community. I don't know if it would be you know, I don't know if this is a Brennan c I A thing or if it's an FBI uh comey thing, but you know, somebody was was putting putting a source near the Trump campaign,

essentially doing doing a honey pot operation. And we've already Papadopolis and the professor, and we've seen some of this stuff already, we've seen it. But I think we'd have them dead to rights on this that they were essentially trying to honey trap the Trump campaign with you know, some kind of a Russia story or you know, whatever it was that they were trying to essentially in trapped them. So I want Trump to declassify, and I don't know why he won't do it or hasn't done it yet.

I don't know why because it's certainly in his authority. I asked a top national security lawyer yesterday, really one of the best guys in the business on national security law, and he said, the president absolutely has the authority to do it. By the way, he also has the authority to pull people's clearances, which were the left salt, No, you can't. Actually he just did and he can. Uh, so the president has that has that authority. The president could declassify. I would love to see him. I would

love to see him do that. And then the other one is pardons pardon power. Um, that's he was asked about pardoning man of fort. You know what, let me let me I want to hold off on that before we get into the pardon issue. Uh, let's let's take a quick beat here eight four eight four buck. We will talk about some possibly imminent pardons coming up here. Also, take any of your calls if you want to, if I can remember to in the next before we coming to the second hour. And by the way, we have

and Coulter joining us an hour or two. I've known Ann for many years now. She's great. We're I'm telling you, we always have a really fun conversation. It's got a new book out. We're going to chat about that, and uh, it's just gonna be a great show, folks, because that's how we do it here in the Freedom. Oh and don't forget if you are on Twitter and you are somebody who likes to tweet, follow me at buck Sexton. We'll be right back. Are you considering partnering Paul Manaport?

I have great respect for what he's done in terms of what he's gone through. You know, he worked for Ronald Reagan for years. He worked for Bob Dole, he worked I guess his firm, work for McCain. He worked for many many people, many many years. And I would say what he did some of the charges they threw against him, every consultant, every lobbyist in Washington probably does. Uh. If you look at Hillary Clinton's person, you take a

look at the people that worked for Hillary Clinton. I'm looking at the crimes that Clinton did with the emails and she deletes thirty three thousand emails after she gets a subpoena from Congress, and this Justice Department does nothing about it, and all of the other crimes that they've done, and they do. Look at Podesta. Podesta was supposed to be Manafort born steroids. They made him close up his firm. He was going to be indicted the next day we

heard it never happened. Instead, they would go after manifoort sounds to me like, uh, I might be getting a pardon. Sounds to me like Manafort is in a line. I do not think Cohen will be getting one. I think that much is clear. But Manafort could. Now you know, I don't know how this would work, and I need to ask a pardon expert about this. But I, in my opinion, Manafort should have to pay all the financial restitution. I mean, he shouldn't be pardoned in the sense that

you know he he suffers no consequences for this. I mean, he is a tax cheat. I think that's been proven. It's just a question of is he being unfairly treated compared to other tax cheats. Um, So we'll see. Dave in Arizona, welcome sir. What a great show. Thank you so much. Listen to you. Can you hear me? Okay? Alright? Great? I just be able to tell you every time I listen to you, I'm always you make me think very deeply,

and that's why I enjoy your show so much. And somebody was saying, you know that if if if Trump gets impeached, it's gonna be a revolution. The Trump was our revolution. This is a counter revolution by the ruling elites, the media elites, the political elites, and the mob against Trump. He is politically incorrect. We were sick of political correctness, we were sick of one party system in essence run by political elites. And he was sick of open borders.

He's against that, and I think he was our revolution. It's gonna be interesting to see what happens when the counter revolution tries to bring him down. Well, that's exactly. I think that's a very apt description what we're seeing now. It is a it is a counter revolution of sorts um and I think that that's that's why once you once you understand that level of of fervor from the opposition, then I think we can have a much or understanding of what to expect from them. Uh. They are anti

Trump zealots. They view this as a calling my friend David, as much as they do any kind of just you know, political payback. They think that there's there's a righteousness in their actions. So we should look, We're going to continue fighting and watching this closely. And thank you sir for your comwords about the show. It's an honor to have you as part of Team Buck. Julie in Tennessee. Hey Julie, Hey, how are you doing? Buck? Sh'll tie, She'll ty. What's

going on? Julie? Well, you know, I've been trying to get the news out of out South Africa for months actually, uh, probably longer than that. I have a friend in in South Africa. She lives in Pretoria, and um, this has been like a nightmare for her and her family. And it's not just the white farmers, and it's not just the whites in South Africa. It's also the black uh community who helps the white farmers and those in the white community. They're all being targeted. Yeah, that's have you

seen Have you seen Mugabe and the White Africa? I mean, uh, Mugabey in the White African No, I have not. I would if you get a chance on Netflix or if you can on iTunes or on demand, I would watch that movie because that's exactly what it shows, is that it's much more complicated than just these rich white you know, landowners and then you know poor people that need land. There's a lot of there are a lot of people who are who are Black Africans, who live who work

and live on these farms too. And by the way, when the farm gets redistributed overwhelmingly there, you know the farm is poorly operated and there's no produce from it after a while. So that's what ends up happening. Well, yes, and I have been getting messages through Facebook from my friend Rena, and I have been passing this through face to messenger, through Facebook, to Twitter, through social media as much as I can. And you know, we're gonna talk

about it. I mean, I'm gonna cut you off, Julie, but we've we've we're gonna be coming to our next hour here, but we are going to talk about it later on in the show. I'll go into some detail about why is South Africa taking property from people because of their skin color, because they're white. We'll get into

that team. Do yourself a favor right now. If you're a coffee drinker, if you're like me and you need a cup of coffee to get going with your day, go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck Okay. Black Rifle Coffee is a company founded by true patriot. These are veterans, many cases veterans of special operations who want to bring their love of freedom, their incredible sense of patriotism, and their sense of humor to also making sure that you are drinking the most delicious coffee you

could find anywhere. I bring Black Rifle into my office now for my colleagues, and let me tell you, I'm making converts every day, and some of them are libs, but they love the coffee because it's that delicious. You can go to Black Coffee dot com, slash buck and you will be able to get fifteen percent off Freedom Blend Coffee rounds, the Black Rifle Coffee, classic logo T shirt, Freedom Blend Coffee in a bag. It's amazing. Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck. This should be the coffee

of everybody in the freedom hunt. Buck Sextons decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Analysts, No, welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. Everybody. This hour, we got and Coulter joining and be a lot of fun to have that conversation about her new book, Resistance Is Futile, Because indeed, the resistance is futile. I think

everybody needs to understand that. Everybody should know that quite a bit. But I'm a little troubled right now, my friends, because I I worry that because things are going well, we are starting to lose sight of longer term problems, longer term trends that are going to become an issue for us. Because remember, it is when the downturn happens.

It's when the economy goes bad, when things go south, when you're home all of a sudden is underwater in terms of the where the mortgages, and when your four oh one k has gotten hit really badly, or your company has to restructure your your pension because you know there's investments have gone south and all that stuff. Right, Unemployment goes up. It's when things go bad that people start to get desperate, that people worry and they will

fall in line with bad ideas. Remember the President Obama came into office and one of the most telling things said by any of his chief lieutenants, any of the people are round him, was actually Rama Manuel with you know, a crisis is, you know, a terrible thing to waste. Essentially, a crisis is an opportunity. Now that's one of the oldest things. And I think that goes back to Sun Sue. I know, a crisis and opportunity has been around forever. Um.

Maybe some students said, I don't know. Somebody said it a long time ago. It's been around for a long time. It's obvious everybody knows this, right, because when things are in tremendous flux, that's when you can usually create the most change because you have the least amount of structural impediment to you wanting to reform things, shift things, revolutionize things even And that's why I see this. It's easy to ignore this, and this is a poll. It's not

being ignored. It's on Drudge Report and it's get a lot of clicks, but I mean ignore the underlying politics of It's on the Hill dot com, where I where I work, and it says seventy percent of Americans seventy p support Medicare for all in a new poll. Now let's let's just assume for a second the methodology here of the polis is sound, and I think it is. It's a Reuters IPSOS poll. Eighty five percent of Democrats

say they support the policy. That is not surprising, friends, the Democrat Party has turned into the Democrats Socialist Party. It's really just now the European Socialist Party in America. That's what they are, that's what they believe in, that's

who they've become. They are a party that has embraced statis um atheism, redistribution of wealth, uh, go down the line, and identity politics on top of that, which I will note is not really as much of an issue in Europe as it is here, meaning that you don't have in each country. And people are gonna say, oh buck, what about Basque separatists and you know, I know that there are, and then of course the Muslim immigration, Muslim

immigrants in Europe and how that affects things. But you know, we have in America much obviously a much larger country than any single country in Europe, and also are um diversity means that identity politics plays a much larger rule in our thinking. Anyway. Se Americans say medicare for all of something they want. Single payer is another name for it, uh, And those are very already politicized ways of saying government paying for your health care. It means government healthcare. That's

what it is, folks. You know, And when you started thinking in those terms. You do you like government cheese? Probably not. You probably won't like government healthcare either. What product, which is what medicine ultimately is, right, it is a service, It is a product. What product does the government give you that you like? Well? Money, sure, money comes from somebody else, and we're spending too much of it as

it is. Uh single payer. You would think you would think it could be good because oh, it'll be like medicare, where that's the government's reimbursing doctors. But there is not enough supply for us to have medicare for all. There's not enough room in the current medical system for that to be the standard. You will have doctors that will say, I'm just not going to take it. This is it simply will not work. You're gonna do a lot more doctors.

And that's when regulation comes in, when government mandates come in, and then all of a sudden they'll say, well, this isn't working. You know what, we should just have the government and control of this, the government and control of the hospitals, the government and what the National Health Service in in the U k. Is. This is troubling. This is not new. I know we've talked about this Bernie Sanders pushes all the time Medicare for all. It's gonna

be great. They're gonna pay for everything you need. No hip, somebody else pays for it. Uncle Sam gives you a new hip. H But the other side of this that I find troubling is that this poll says that fifty two of Republicans, fifty two percent of Republicans are in fact going to be or in favor of Medicare for all. Who are these Republicans? And what the heck are they thinking? These must be Jeff Flake Republicans. And I don't know.

I don't know who these people are. Do they not know that trillions and trillions of dollars would have to be spent on this? Do they not know that the government, whenever it gets involved in the production of a good or service, does a terrible job as compared to the

private sector. Why would they think this is okay? But here's why I start off by saying, I think that because things are going so well in the country right now, because Trump is actually in charge and the economy is booming now, it's easy for those of us to understand why that's happening. To ignore this rise in socialist sentiment, which is what's really going on, and it's easy for us to forget that the other side is just waiting

for the opportune moment to strike. Maybe in some cases literally doesn't go on strike, but in this instance, they're looking for a that that moment of downturn. They're looking for that crisis to exploit and say now is the time. And they are growing support for this UH in in ways that we should all be troubled by. More numbers here to give some context and clarity to this. According to CNS News, fifty of kids right now are getting are in households that are getting UH some form of

means tested welfare, means tested government assistance. Half of kids are in homes that are getting benefits from a means tested government program, which means either supplemental nutritional assistance, medicaid, public housing, supplemental Security Income UH, temporary assistance for needy families,

and the National School Lunch Program. Half, folks, I mean that we have a we have an expansive welfare state already, and we have this idea that the govern we should pay for everyone's healthcare, which is catching on and right now because the economy is booming. It because we have a capitalist in the White House who is unabashedly probe, probe business, pro individual ingenuity and growth. It feels like we don't need to worry about these cookie socialists all

that much right now. Even the Bernie Sanders wing the Democrat Party, the Occasio Cortez is yeah, like, I just like schism because it's like all the stuff gets paid for for free. Like all those people, I think right now, we we pushed them aside and think, well, they they're not. They are un serious as people, and their ideas are unserious.

But remember that the uh, the ground can shift very quickly under our feet with these issues, and it would not be difficult to foresee a future where if there were a major market downturn, uh, if all of a sudden people felt the sting of this spending that has been going on at the government level for decades now. Remember we're over twenty trillion dollars in debt. Nobody even knows what that's gonna how we're gonna get out of this? Is what we're gonna do with this? I mean, this

is this is a disaster. It's just a slowly unfolding disaster. And if if just by sheer, you know, bad luck Trump has to deal with the major recession. You're going to see a lot of people because they're gonna see their savings decline, They're going to see their loss of

jobs and everything. That's when I think the left all of a sudden starts marching in the streets and taking all that anger at Trump and putting it behind a straight up socialist candidate under the Democratic Party, I mean, a a Bernie Sanders plus, if you will, somebody that's even more adamantly in favor of soaking the rich, redistribution of wealth, massive government regulation, massive government mandated redistribution of wealth. Remember, it was only because of Obama that we were we

have Trump. Trump was a in many ways, a corrective to the excesses of Obama's ideology of Obamaism. But Trump is pulling pretty far in the other direction, which is great, great for the economy, and I'm obviously a big fan of it. But the left is already at a level

of shrill outrage that's hard to fathom and understand. If they actually get an opening politically to inflict their ideas on the rest of us, they will take it and It's very troubling that seventy of people right now, according to this Hill dot com poll, believe in Medicare for all. They obviously don't realize what it would cost in every sense, cost in terms of the expenses, but also the cost to their care, meaning how much crappier their their care

would get. That and is right now, and that Republicans are on board for this, I mean, are we Are we all just kind of you know, sitting around proverbially fat and happy and not really paying attention. I mean, what's going on here, folks on the right? You know what?

What is the mindset that we would see this massive expansion of the continued expansion of the welfare state, continued expansion of our debt, and on top of that, now this idea, I mean, by the way, Medicare for all is that's the camel's nose in the tent to democratic socialism across the board, which is just a nice way

of saying socialism light European style socialism. This should be troubling to us, and and it's something that the the Trump administration, I believe, needs to put a greater focus on combating. I want to talk about the Molly Tippot's case coming up here in a moment. I've got some updates and some thoughts on immigration and where the Democrats are on this, and and then we will have the

the irreplaceable, the irrefutable and could well. I guess some people refute her, but she'll be joining us here in just a few minutes. It'll be a great conversation. Be sure to stay with us for that, and you can also send me your thoughts at facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. We'll be right back. The FBI says that home title theft is one of the fastest growing crimes. Brace yourselves, because having your credit card stolen is nothing compared to the hell you're in for once an identity

thief takes control of your homes title. Folks, you might be thinking, how could they get to my title? Guess what your home's title is stored online? The information that the bad guys need to get about you so that they can create a fake version of your title and then take out loans against that title, basically stealing a whole bunch of money and leaving you with the payments. It's all online. It's not hard for them to get

I have seen Home Title Luck. Walk me through exactly what will be needed for the bad guys to do this, and let me tell you it's far too easy for them. And you've got to make sure you know that identity theft programs don't protect you. But for just pennies a day, Home Title Luck protects my most viable asset, my family's home. Registered now for a free analysis and discover if your homes title has been compromised. That's a sixty dollar value free visit home title lock dot com. That's home title

lock dot com. Molly is this beautiful young girl. She was killed by a horrible person that came in from Mexico illegally here. I just think it's so sad. We're building the wall, it's already started. We're doing a record breaking job, but we have bad laws. You know, when you have bad laws, you can do good, but you can do a lot better if you had good laws. So they'll all get changed, but we have to elect more Republicans. Every sheriff in America is a border sheriff,

and they will tell you that. And when criminal aliens brought here by cartels, remember you don't cross the border without the cartels allowing you to cross come to the heartland of America and grab this poor girl and take the life out of her. The town of people America better wake up. So I'm gonna need someone to explain into me how this isn't a situation in which there

is there's obvious hypocrisy. Right when there is a shooting, the mainstream media and the left in general that the political left in this country will immediately and you don't have to take my word for it, Google's you'll see it.

They will immediately try to blame not just guns, but in fact the n r A. They will do this even though every time they have done it that I'm aware of, which is likely the case that I'm correct, every time that I'm aware of it has never actually been an n r A member involved in a mass shooting. I am not aware of that ever having happened. And yet when there's a mass shooting, people will immediately say

the n r A is a terroris organization. It is then and then here's the real kicker, here's the real uh emotional psychological blackmail they try. They say, if it will save just one life, if it will save just one life, then the n r A should be in favor of abolishing h you know, handguns, so then the n RA should be in favor of a massive gun buy back program. Then the n ER, you know, whatever it may be. They can just fill in the blank with their desired policy, right the grab bag of whatever

policies that they want. But if if it can save just one life, they say, we must do it, or else you are complicit or else to borrow from David Hogg, who we can't I can't decide if if he is a victim that no one is allowed to criticize, or if he is if if he's like the future of the Democratic Party. I mean he's he said some stuff, by the way, that is astonishing. Earlier this week in an interview, Um, I've got a I've got to see this. David Hogg said in an interview that he wants an

age limit uh age limit for politicians. Quote older Democrats won't just move the move the f off the plate. Um, I want to be part of the change in Congress, he said. And what he goes on to say things that there's one crazy quote I'm trying to find here. I mean, there's a lot of crazy quotes. Anyway, that guy hug what would would run around saying that the n A has blood on its hands. That's what he would say. Uh, he is, by the way, he's going to be an activist. You're gonna see him very, very

involved next year. He's taking a year but in between going to high school and college, and the Left treats him like he's a combination of of celebrity and policy deity. I mean, it's crazy. But this storyline that we keep hearing is, or rather this this construct that we keep coming up against, if they can save just one life, and on immigration, it's very clear that it would be

if we could save a lot of lives. There are a lot of people who are killed by illegal, illegal aliens in this country year in and year out, whether in car accidents, in violent acts by gangs like MS thirteen, or in random, random acts of violence by illegal aliens like this, Uh, this suspect out in in Iowa that killed Molly Molly Tibbots. There are lives at stake, and that the state has laws on the books that if

it enforced, those lives would not be lost. So I do need somebody to try and explain to me how it's how it's unfair to apply the same logic that the Democrats do when it comes to guns, with far less of a justification and connection between these issues. Why can't we apply that logic to immigration and illegal aliens? I saw today a something tweeted out from Simone Sanders, whom I'm familiar with from her work on Seeing Then on Jake Tapper Show in particular, where she is treated

as as a revered and astute political analyst. Of course, because Tapper only has the most serious people on his show. Um, he takes himself very seriously. Simone Sanders, though, tweeted this out about this. She's a Democrat obviously, Um, she sits on Jake Tapper's panels, So what else do you have to know? She wrote? Molly Tibbitts was murdered because she told a man to leave her alone while she was jogging. Her murderer happens to be undocumented. This isn't about border security.

This is about toxic masculinity. Molly Tibbitts lost her life because a man couldn't take her saying no, full stop, no, it is not full stop, Simone Sanders. That is not accurate. That is not true. That is not what happened here in terms of the overall policy takeaway. All right, First of all, someone Sanders doesn't even know what happened here. She doesn't she's describing the incident. It's not even known

what really went on. And the fact that she used the term undocumented, that is such a That is such a tell, folks. Anyone who uses this term undocumented is immediately letting you, letting everybody know right away that they are opposed to rule of law. They're opposed to enforce

the immigration law. They view their primary mission when it comes to immigration as promoting amnesty and promoting as much as much as is possible getting as many people from the Third World into America as they can because they will vote Democrat. All you have to do is say on document, it's like talking about climate change. Undocumented for immigration is not like climate change when talking about the environment. It's a single word or phrase that symbolizes an entire,

entire ideological framework that comes with it. And it's also a form of signaling to you know, to your side, to your base in this case that to the left, that you're on the team. He's back with you now. Because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. What great do you give yourself so far? So I give myself an A plus. I don't think any president has ever done what I've done in the

short we haven't even been two years. The biggest tax cuts in history, soon to be two unbelievable Supreme Court justices. I'm sure that Justice Cavanaugh will be approved. Justice Corset has been a star. Um. You look at all of the things we've done with regulations. The economy is the best it's ever been in history. The only thing I'm I'm doing, Batlan is the press doesn't cover me fair. I thought after I won, you know, they killed me during the campaign, just killed me. I said, well, one

good thing about winning, I've showed them. So now I'm gonna get fair pressed. Guess what it got worse? It's worse the President United States. They're folks. Giving himself an A plus so far, perhaps no surprises, but also saying the press is unfair. We have a particular expert in both of these matters, joining us now and all things Trump and media and Coulter, the one and only she is with us her book which is just out this week, resistance is futile, how the Trump hating left loss it's

collected mind. I have my copy on the nightstand here, And thank you so much for calling in absolutely and thank you for playing that clear poo. You know, I um, whenever I think about the absence of a Wall, I want to strangle him. I hear an interview like that, and I remember why I love him again. There, So

there is so much about him. Yeah, there's so much about the Minute that is fair to Let's let's start with their resistance and and then and then I'm still we'll kind of go in reverse order here from what Trump said. Because your book is about how the left is crazy, I go on air. I've actually had a psychiatrists who are listener to the show call in, and they like the way I described this as as a mass delusion, that the press actually is having some kind

of collective psychotic episode. You clearly agree, tell us why. Yes, You'll get a lot of detail on that in in my book, because I mean, with with us psychotic or a mass delusion. Now, sometimes even you know you need medicine to overcome it, but you always feel like, well, all you have to do is point out um, you know, no, there is no spaceship there, or how about we go look at the spaceship. They don't allow the people um to come on their air to say here, you can

cut me. I blied, I'm not an alien. So so it just gets crazier and crazier. I mean some of I'm some liberal journalists who are my friends, UM, not a lot, but I see even them on the likes of MSNBC and CNN, and you know, I want to talk to them afterwards and say yes, but you're you're missing you know X y Z. But they don't want to hear it. The networks don't want to hear it. There will be no same people on the networks because it's a buzz kill for the viewers. And you know,

it goes even beyond the press. I mean when you talk about the resistance and how you focus on on the media in the books, as well as other things, the Hillary narrative around Russia collusion, how all that gets started. But from within the deep state side of things. I keep telling people who will listen to me, because I've spoken to Clapper and Hayden and and I worked for

some of these guys. The intelligence community I think what gets lost here is that the kind of elite ruling class from within the upper echelons of government, not even necessarily elected government, just government in general. They see Trump and the people around him, as you've put it as as ikey, but all so was interlopers, like they're just

not supposed to be there. Oh yes, I think there was one guy ex guy from the CIA, may have been Malcolm Nance, maybe somebody else, just you know, like matter of factly saying, oh no, the deep state this, they will not stand for this. They'll take this guy out. And as for the ones you mentioned, UM, James Clapper, who who Burson himself lied under oath, as he later admitted, UM and saying that that the government doesn't collect massive

information on millions of Americans. Um. He later called that the least erroneous answer he could give. UM. Brennan of course lied about the most the most celebrated military operation world history, the capture of Osama bin Lawd. And he just went out on TV and started talking about how, oh yeah, Sama was shooting back, and he used his wife the human shield, and then you know, poor Jay

Carney has to go and correct the record. The next day but most famously when he was head when when Brennan was head of the CIA, he spied on the Senate Democrats. No less um. Diane Feinstein's UH committee was was investigating corruption at the CIA, accused the CIA of of hacking into their computers the Senate, the computers being used by the Senate investigators. Clapper absolutely denied it up and down, just said, oh, it's just beyond the bounds

of reason. Um, we'll see, we'll see, the truth will come out. No, no, this isn't going And then the IG report comes out and yes, they were hacking into the Senate computers. So and then of course Comy came out with his second statement on on Hillary's behavior. These all three of these men, who are the men behind the seventeen intelligence agencies saying that um um Russia hacked at the n C and vidit He sum, these three men the left wanted to boil in oil and feed

to the dogs. So how did they become become honorable? Again, there's a very clear path to honor in America, UH, and that is start accusing the president of being a lunatic guilty of treason, who kills kittens and nails them to church doors. And suddenly, and I have the quotes along with the networks where they were called these things. Suddenly they're they're they're honorable, um, well respected. No one can contest anything. This person says, Wow, that's not when

you guys were saying a year ago. Yeah, literally worse than Hitler, as you say in the book. That's that's all you have to do is say Trump is literally worse than Hitler. And and then all of a sudden, you're speaking. Fees go up your your book, Your book advance would go up, even for books that I think some of these guys are gonna write or have written for them, that no one's going to read. So that there's obviously a path by way. We're speaking to a cult.

Their author of resistance is few toilets out. Now I haven't, I'm reading it. You all should too, you know, And I think that there's there we need to come up with a cool and you're the perfect person for this, a cool description of the mathematical equation that that we could describe that with greater success on the economy, and by the way, a whole bunch of other issues, including foreign policy, which they pretend isn't happening. But it is.

But with greater economic success in the Trump presidency, they actually get angrier at him. Right, It's it's it's the inverse of what you would expect. Well, it's the inverse of what you'd expect on a lot of things. Other things I loved about the miracle Trump campaign was he wasn't a lifelong or or or rather a down the line Republican. I think he was a lifelong Republican in fact,

but he wasn't just your standard cookie cutter Republican. As as the never Trumper is never tired of reminding us, um, he's not a real Republican. And you know, people like me said, great, fantastic, thanks for reminding me another reason to vote for him. There are a lot of the things he was saying and pushing are things that Democrats used to used to believe in. How about helping the working class, how about helping the middle class, But no,

they don't care. Then I think we could get they could fly smultaneously be saying, um, I'm literally shaking because he's literally Hitler. We could get the left to endorse

Hitler just by telling them Trump is against Hitler. I think I think their their opposition to all things Trump does extend to a place where you know, now I'm being told even when he does good, when he when something good happens in his administration in and this is where the foreign policy part comes in, it's in spite of him, But anything bad that happens is because of him. I keep pouring out to my friends. Do you guys realize how self justifying that is for your insane Trump patriots.

I had the former, I had the former, a guy all my I got my show. He said I was. He said he was the n SC director or something for Russia or for for Ukraine. And I said, so, so we're selling these missiles and stuff to the Ukrainians to beat up the Russians. Now Obama wouldn't do that. And he goes, yeah, but that's happening in spite of Trump. And I said, Trump is the commander in chief. What

is happening in spite of Trump? Yes? No, that is a beautiful description, though you are going to disagree with my penal submit chapter. UM. I really liked the Trump

campaign and I would like to get along with Russia. Um. And and unfortunately these Republicans, I mean they are giving in not only the ones who are who are completely I've gone hog wild attacking Trump to get their air time, um, but they're giving into this idea that Trump pastors just redoubled his his attacks on Russia, um, which I don't

disagree with Albama's approach to to Russia. And I think a lot of Americans didn't, um among the problems, and I mean I think that three the three pillars of the Trump campaign were um, um, you know crap. Immigration policy should be to benefit the people who already live here. Trade policy should bring back manufacturings and and job killing trade deals that helps Wall Street a lot, but really

doesn't help our own manufacturing base. And there are definitely no more pointless wars and maybe pulled back from all of are you know, policeman over the world stuff? And he really hasn't done any of those things. What what keeps the base loving him, including including me, is our response to the ridiculous, outrageous, hypocritical, lying attacks of the resistance.

So really the resistance ought to read my book and learn how to do it right there you go, and does not give him an a plus, folks, But he does take the resistance to task. Check it out. Resistance is futile. How the trump hating or other, how the trump hating left lost its collective mind, the one only and culture. And thank you so much, good luck on the tour. Thank you. Let's talk again after you've read it. I think that'll be fun. Absolutely love to have you back.

I am going to read it. I'll talk to you soon, tee, We'll be right back. It really is a moral issue. If you believe this, I do that this is God's creation. We have to be good stewards of it. So in any case, this was a big thing for us, and we had to fight some Democrats. Senator Bird had a cold powered plant of fueling the capital. That's that was now, speaker, that's gonna go. You know, without respect to West Virginia. You know we're not gonna have a cold powered plant.

This thing about coal, by the way, has really turned into a it's it's obviously been influenced by virtue signaling for quite a while, but they've managed to turn coal and West Virginia coll and all this into some kind of a proxy for other things. Now, you know the truth is that we are moving away. We are decarbonizing with our energy sources naturally because of greater efficiency, and it's happening as as a function of the market and

as a function of science and technology. You know. I was watching, uh, the show Silicon Valley, which I think it's one of the best. If you haven't seen it, I really really do recommend it. I think it's one of the best original comedies out there right now. It's a little you know, it's a little raunchy, and you know, it's an HBO, so there's some it's not for kids,

but it's a it's a really good show. And there's they have one of these guys who's a kind of nerdy, uh nerdy, Well they're all nerdy tech guys, but he's a particularly socially awkward guy, and he tells a story about how in London in the eighteen I think it's like,

I guess it's the eighteen nineties. I think he says they were worried because of all the manure, and the manure was was just becoming a big problem because you had all these horse drawn carts in the city and given the population density and the increasing population density they were, it was overwhelming. The city's ability to to take the manure out of the city. Right. So literally they're worried about drowning in in well, not literally, but they were concerned.

People overuse that literally thing so much. And I happens to me too, because you hear people doing it and then it finds its way into your speech. People were worried about too more, too much horsepoop. Uh, And they estimated and he tells this whole story, and they estimated that you know, within thirty years there would be you know, nine ft of horsepoop at any given time piled up

on the streets of London. Right, this is a classic Malthusian fallacy, really, right Malthus Thomas Malthus was this political theorist and economist who believe that we were going to run out of food, right because population growth is happening at X rate and we produce food at Y rate. And didn't never think, well, hold on a second, what what what if we get way way better at Why what if we can make food a lot faster, better, cheaper, more efficiently, and uh, in a way that is much

more reliable. Right, if we change our ability to make food, doesn't that change our ability to feed people such that we don't have to be so very very concerned about Yeah, people starving to death because of overpopulation, that was a big thing. But the mouth using time bomb thesis is wrong, and the horsepoop or horse maneure thesis of London at

the time. And now by the way, he could be making this up in terms of that story, but it it it's it's a version of other stories you could you could hear um or that we've seen in the history, which is that science moves in such a way that the predictions of today are often wrong, especially when it comes to oh, we're going to run out of oil. Oh, we're going to run out of food. Oh we're going to overheat because of global warming. Right, they keep they're

they're wrong on these things. But with Pelosi and the others on Cohl in particular, now people who don't know anything about Cole just know that they should be opposed to it. That that's what you see, that's the transition, that's the change point here is that if you want to be considered smart and and trendy and cool, you have to be somebody who is very opposed to coal. Uh. And and also this is this is an issue that is getting much more attention because it's part of the

Obama legacy. And that's what really upsets the left right because they they they thought Obama was this great president and he know these amazing things. But now what they're seeing is no, he just he just did things that didn't require leadership. They just required a decision from him. It was on Obama's whim right to to push for environmental policies only as a function of the executive branch

is shortsighted. And people said that at the time, they said, you know, just wait and and you know what it really is. It's a reminder to the left. It's a reminder that Obama's approach was the result of being unable to uh work in any in any really bipartisan fashion, and a reminder that Hillary Clinton is not the president they were much more comfortable with, especially in Obama a

second term. They were much more comfortable i think, with some of these Obama era decisions on the environment or others, because the assumption that baked in assumption was well, we've got Hillary waiting in the wings. You have to remember everyone, everyone in the left, the Democrats, they assumed that Hillary was just going to take over for Obama. She was gonna be a continuation of the Obama era policies. So by by changing these coal regulations, because again, how much

is this really going to affect? Well, first of all, it's about carbon dioxide, which is crazy. It's not a pollutant, and they um uh you know, they they shouldn't be penalized on the way they were by the Obama era. Um. And it's about carbon dioxide limits, which means that coal power plants will become more it will become uh more cost effective now and it will allow upgrades to older power plants without triggering this new requirement to install these

crazy controls. Right, So this is it's just gonna mean uh, it's just gonna be better. Um. You know, it means that they're able to produce energy electricity at a at a rate that it makes them competitive. So you know, this is this is what I what you're seeing here is just it's a lot of politics wrapped into this issue.

When you start to dig into the issue, um, you see that this is much you do about nothing from the left except that this touches on some very sensitive areas for them, I mean the most notable one is that this is Obama legacy stuff and oh, if Hillary were president, this wouldn't be happening, and that really really upsets them. Got a big Our three coming up and we're gonna talk about South Africa, what's going on there. So stay with the buck Sexton mission to coding the

news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake a great American Again, this is the buck Sexton Show. Activity Tom the CIA analysts. Not enough focus has been put on China, and that's been for a long time, and we want to have big focus is on Russia. Not enough focuses on China. The tax on that now coming in and I think that economically also helps us. This is very different, but it also helps us. And people are saying that's already having a big effect, and

it is already recollecting that money. It's a lot of money. Much of it is being collected. Some of it starts in a week, but it's a tremendous amount of money coming into the coffers of the United States, which nobody has ever seen that before. Who does he sound like they're folks. Not enough focus on China, too much focus on Russia. I mean, I can neither confirm nor to not as the President ever listened to the show. The

truth is, I have no idea. You're a smart guy. Well, thank you, but you know it's it's just I'm just just saying a little bit ahead of this one. I'm pretty sure that you were hearing that weeks weeks ago on the Buck Sexton Show that the focus on on Russia over China had just become had become crazy, The focus on Russia over China had gone to the point where it was it would be uh bizarre, I think to continue on as is without some some serious, some

serious pushback. Um, but you know, I want to tackle this issue of of meddling if I can in the in the election, because here here's what I see going on. Actually, well let's hear what Ambassador Bolton spoke about this today at play clip nine. Please. We weren't able to reach agreement on that, so we decided to go ahead. We'll each speak individually, which is what I'm doing now. But on the whole, I would say we made considerable progress.

I made it clear that we wouldn't tolerate meddling in uh, and we were prepared to take necessary steps to prevent it from happening. So we're gonna stop people from meddling, that's what That's what the you know, the National Security Advisor saying, UM, I don't know how we can. I

don't know how we can. Uh. And I think that you're seeing this little game of of kind of foot see with the media where they talk about the meddling, but they don't want to talk about it too much, which given how how absolutely petrified they have been about the prospect of meddling in our sacred elections once again, oh my gosh, good heavens, don't you think that they would be raising the alarms much more now? In fact, National Security Advisor uh John Bolton said recently that it

was actually last week. I think that Russia is only one of four countries that he is concerned about meddling in our election, China, North Korea, and Iran. Um. They're taking apps against those four countries at least could be meddling. You see what's happened here, folks, is that not only have the Democrats hyper ventilated about election meddling for very explicit political purposes, right because Hillary Hello lost the election. What happened. And now they've been saying this for a

while because it's to their political benefit. But it also means that other countries are paying attention and saying, oh, you mean, if we just create some Facebook accounts and and do a little bit of very basic, you know, political research on on American you know, debates right now in the election sphere, we could mess them up and get them all to turn on each other and get their entire media apparatus to go insane. Well, that seems

easy enough. I mean North Korea. North Korea is a very advanced cyber threat, and and that's important to remember that also does not care if it gets caught. It doesn't care what they don't are, what they do. You know, this was true back in the day also of of the KGB. It's it's an interesting reality of status intelligence services and espionage and the way the security apparatus works

in places like the former Soviet Union. Yes, they were effective, but they were effective because they had no constraints and they didn't have to worry about getting caught. You know, it's a very different thing. You know, here's the the the American version of of you know, uh surveillance, right if the FBI is doing surveillance on somebody eight, they want to stay low profile. They don't want to they don't want to get made. They don't want them to

figure out what's going on. And if they do that, they'll they'll drop the tail. You know, if you watch movies, you pick up all this stuff. The KGB version of surveillance is like you know, in the past, not always, but often would be you know, a couple of guys in a car dragging behind the target. Any the target lost them, they'd go find him at his house and beat the crap out of him. Don't don't let us lose you again, kind a thing. I mean, it's a

very different approach. And with North Korea on hacking, they don't care what we say, so we catch them, we don't catch them. It doesn't really matter them. But these countries are all possible meddlers in our in our election process. But as I've been telling you all along, the chances of that being effective or are almost non existent. Unless they can actually hack into the systems and change votes. Everything else is really noise. Right. We can't stop countries

from putting propaganda on the Internet. We can't stop countries from setting up fake Facebook accounts and and doing fake news. That's insane. I mean, think about what that would require. But this is again the whole problem has been magnified by the media and now they've created this monster. This this this perception of oh my gosh, there's gonna be meddling, and the meddling is going to be this really big

deal and it's gonna mess up our election. But the truth is, my friends, uh that they don't know how much to make of it right now, because what if the Democrats win the House back in the mid terms. I want to make a prediction right now, if the Democrats win the mid terms in the House. I don't think they're gonna win the setup, but if they win the mid terms in the House, uh you yeah, I know, there's gonna be it's gonna move to impeachment. And that's

an obvious prediction. And we all know that. But you who are very little about election meddling, and you know that this is this is a similar game that the media has played with the problem of homelessness. Right, homelessness has existing in the country, will probably for as long

as there's been a country. But you know, in the depending on the administration, whether it was a Republican and there have been studies that have shown this, right, you know, there when Bush is in office, there are these stories about national level homelessness and now it's on the rise, and when there's a Democrat in office, the homelessness problem

goes away. I think actually Bernie Goldberg in his book Bias, I believe, or maybe they had Culture Book, but I think it was Bernie Goldberg and Bias talks abou at this that all of a sudden, new new Republican administration, stories about homelessness, stories about the poor and how no one's helping them. Democrat administration, all the homelessness problem just

kind of fades away. I think you're gonna see election meddling in kind of a similar way that now that they've created this concept, there's this narrative that a bunch of you know, highly skilled uh you know, Russian hackers or even hackers from other countries can and the better, they don't even have to be hackers, they just have to be you know, cyber influencers really, but but that they can affect our elections in this negative way. When the Democrats lose an election this will be a story.

They won't say that the election, you know, they won't say outright that the election was a fraud, although I think they will say that if Trump wins reelection. I think they're gearing up for if if Trump wins in twenty which I think he is, they are going to reject. There's going to be a Democrat movement to reject the result as to suggest that it is it is not just that Trump is illegitimate because of stuff in the past,

but that the election itself is a legitimate. I think they're willing to go to that extent because they hate Trump so much and they're so crazy when it comes to all issues related to Trump. But just just pay attention to this in the mid terms. Now you'll see stories about election meddling, but not that they're gonna They're gonna make it so that they can say they covered it, and they have the option, depending on what happens on election day, of either saying, oh my gosh, look at

this stuff we've discovered. Right after if they lose, election meddling will be a big story, a big problem after the I'm telling you, they're shameless. If they win the House, that election medling will be you know, America stopped at this time around. Maybe they won't win. Trump's up for re election, but this time around it was Okay, that's

what I mean by these people have no principles. You can you can take each issue and look at it and understand where their hypocrisy comes into play and where their lack of scruples is glaring and uh and obvious. Strike Force Energy, veteran owned American, made one of the hottest new energy products on the market. Look. Strike Force was developed by a Navy seal who wanted to make sure that he had a product on the market that was all the best stuff in the most straightforward easy

packaging possible. Okay, what you do with strike Force is you add the liquid to some water, tea, lemonade, you can put it in a beer, whatever you want, and it gives you that little extra boost to get your day started, push you through the afternoon, get your workout fired up and ready to go, or just make sure you got the energy to take care of business whatever that may be. All right, you need to check out strike Force for yourself. Go to strike Force Energy, dot com,

energ discount code buck team. Make sure they know you heard about them here on this show, because every time you type in discount code buck everything you buy, they will match it and send it to troops overseas. Strike Force Energy dot Com discount code b U c K at checkout that strike Force Energy dot Com discount code buck. Try it, you'll love it well. The first thing that needs to be made clear to is to denounce the policy.

The administration needs to make it very clear that it is both immoral because it targets a specific group of people and I thought we were beyond that, and secondly that it would be economically destructive, so we need to

make it very clear where we stand. Secondly, South African government needs to be aware that the law, the African Growth and Opportunity Act, under which South Africa trades with the United States, requires the President of the United States to expel countries from a GOA that do not respect

property rights and due process. So South Africa needs to be aware that if it changes the constitution and legal isays what is essentially theft of private property, it will be kicked out of a GOA and further negative economic consequences will ensue. South Africa is in the news, folks, because of a policy that is both wrong and stupid. I think we're self defeating maybe a better way of saying it or both. Now, let's let's just first get to it. Why why is this getting attention? Well, well,

because there's been a change in South African policy. They've done something they haven't done before, which I will get to. But really it's because President Trump tweeted out the following I have asked Secretary of State Pompeo to closely study the South Africa land and farm seizures and expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers. The South South African government quote is now seasing land from white farmers at Tucker Carlson on on Trump's Twitter account. Um, now here's

what Here's what's happened, Um, South Africa. As you know, history of apartheid, Um that that ended Mandela African National Congress. You know, I'm skipping through a lot of history there, but you know there was a racial, a racist policy of apartheid, and then it ended through the efforts of Mandela and the ANC. And now they have had a policy in place for a while of willing buyer willing

seller with a government uh tries to find. You know, the government will try to buy land from the the willing seller, willing buyer they call it yeah where they try to buy white owned land and give it to the disenfranchised black population. Since apartheid ended in four and what happened recently, the the big change in this is that you have had the first large piece of land for which the government said this is the price, and this is what you're taking, and here's the date, and

you have to leave. And this is a white farmer and it's a game preserve actually, and they want to redistribute this land to black African So this is an explicitly racial policy, right. This is based on the skin color of the owner and based on the skin color of those who would be receiving the land. The government

is making decisions. The big difference here, what really set off alarms for people is that the owner of this land is claiming that the land ceased is worth about ten times as much as what the government paid for it. So once the government is forced first of all forcing a sale and then on top of it dramatically under paying for those assets, it feels a lot more like mafia activity than what a democracy, what an elected and

representative government would do. And this is also where people will point to what's happened in neighboring Zimbabwe right formerly the colony known as Rhodesia, and in Zimbabwe they had a similar situation, but in the nineteen eighties they started to redistribute the land from the wealthier white landowners to uh what we're supposed to be black farmers, but really it turned into a spoils system for people with connections to the the party that was in power um SO

that was and people that were connected to Mugabe. And there were some terrible violence and terrible things that happened in uh in Zim well leading up to Zimbabwe would previously had been Southern Rhodesia. So there was a lot of bad blood already in the country between the different

racial and ethnic groups. But Zimbabwe's land reform led, including its terrible government in Mugabe was a was a thug and addict cater a very bad guy, led to the country going from being the bread basket of Southern Africa, really the the in many ways the richest arable land in Southern Africa, to being unable to feed itself and being a horrifically uh impoverished country when it should have been actually a reasonably well off country for what it was.

Um so. And there's a movie that I think I've recommended before, in the show Mugabe and the White African um that I would highly highly recommend you. It's a documentary where these documentary filmmakers stay on They stay with a white family in Zimbabwe, one of the sort of last at least in the area. And I don't know how many you know, are left in the country, but it's in the dwindling minority of white landowners and and the intimidation they go through, and you know, you see

the full scale and scope of the story. You have all these farm workers, these black fami emili's who live with this white family, and they are very much in favor of this white family keeping the land because they work the land and they live there and they're happy and they're fed and they get paid and they're taken

care of, and you know, they're all working together. But this this politically connected thug shows up and he's truly a thug, and he keeps saying, you know, this land is now ours, you better leave, and and it turns to violence and they start beating people in front of their family members and and terrifying them and they finally have to leave. And the government is complicit in all this. So imagine that, right, it's not even like this is

happening and you report it. If you report it, they're saying, well, sorry, you know, this is what happens because you're not welcome here. So there is you know, what we would call reverse racism going on, but in fact it's actually just racism in the case of Zimbabwe, where the minority is in fact white people, and in South Africa now there's been a more radical turn and there have been white farm owners who have been killed. Although it's in the dozens. Uh,

it's not a it's not a large number. I mean, Trump, I think said large number of the tweet. I'm just I'm trying to stay with as always trying to stay with all the facts. Forty seven farmers killed. Well, no, that's always fifty people folks killed twenty eighteen. Now that said South Africa actually has a violent crime problem. Um,

but there are forty seven farmers who were killed. So people look at this and I think that they first of all understand if this were happening to anyone who was not white European, of white European ancestry, they would be utterly horrified, and CNN and the BBC would be all over it, and this would be a major, major

news story. But there is a sense, a sort of continuing sense that white people everywhere and anywhere are part of this leftist concept of white supremacy and that they are the they are ultimately the problem, even when other people are the ones attacking them. The left really does kind to believe that. And then there's also some Marxist

threads running through this. I mean, you have the African National Congress chairman making a statement last week you shouldn't own more than twenty five tho acres of land, therefore, if you own more, should be taken without compensation. I mean, they're talking about seizing property now, folks. And that just doesn't have an effect for those who own the property.

It has an effect for the whole country. Because do you think a lot of foreign investors want to get involved in a country where on racial on, under racial guidelines, they're going to seize property. Now, you don't want to be an investor there, You don't want your capital there, you don't believe in rule of law there, and the

country deteriorates very, very quickly. Always remember this, what really separates us from much of the rest of the world, most of the rest of the world, is that we have a rule of law that is understood widely and based in individual rights. And it's really the asis of our entire civil society has the Constitution, which is in

general the concept of rule of law. They're losing that right now in South Africa, and people are worried about the economic and even possible uh consequences of violence that could follow. Hey, Team Buck, it's time for roll call. All right, everybody roll Paul. I am going to out tomorrow by me or get into the little call just let you know. I'll be out in Los Angeles, a city that I have tremendous fondness for. Even though I talk a little New York City New York City style

smack about the West Coast, sometimes I do. I do love l A. And if you happen to see me walking around West Hollywood or Santa Monica and you're part of Team Buck, by all means say hello. Those are really the only places I spend any time in l A. I probably should get out to some other parts of l A. That's I don't go to Beverly Hills, I don't go downtown. I pretty much stay on the West Side, and I'd like to spend a little more time down in Marina del Ray. Actually here, it's very nice. Alright,

roll call, it's the Godfather, the doctor. He's not a doctor. I like calling him a doctor, Michael Pelka. He is in for me tomorrow's you will have a great time. Uh, Brian, first up here, rights hey buck. In full disclosure, I am a twenty nine year old black man incrstrated in a New York prison once. I was a criminal justice major and aspiring law enforcement officer. Obviously got lost along the way. But I'm a conservative who convinced his leftist wife to vote for Trump, and I have informed her

of the right way. If you've ever been in Utica, New York, doubt you ever will be. Check out the tattoo shop that she Run's okay, cool, it's the greatest tattoo parlor ever and it's secure thanks to simply Safe. All right, Brian, that's awesome, Thank you. I love getting little sponsor shout out here hopefully used promo code. Buck. Um, I listened to you each night, Buck and your caw debating, entertaining and knowledgeable as well as funny, more so than

Mark Levin, Bill Cunningham or the others. You got it hands down, my man. One day I'll listen to your podcast. Until then, I'll continue my mission and duty of converting the other fifty four thousand liberal progressive socialist inmates, one convict at a time. It's an uphill battle, Uh though, my friend, I support law enforcement. Oh yeah, uh, I get you some, get you some, and I support what you're doing. Um, before I forget shields high baby, well Brian,

hey man, shields, how do you? Uh? And thank you so much for the very kind note. And you know, honestly, it's it's it's inspiring to hear one somebody who's trying to just convert people to the righteousness of conservative thinking. But also, man, I really appreciate your attitude. I mean, clearly you're writing to me from being incarcerated, but you're you understand that everyone has no matter where they are, what they're doing, they can contribute, they can be positive,

they can uh continue to inspire people around them. They can build their relationship with their loved ones and and with God. They can be they can be forces for positivity and good wherever they are. And clearly, Brian, you've made that choice from where you are while incarcerated. And look, my friend, please keep it up, Please keep listening. Uh, it's an honor to have you as part of Team Buck. I'm sure you've got big plans for when you get out, to make the most of all of that time you

have left and everything that you can do. So God bless my friend, and uh, take advantage of every moment inside and and outside when and I'm sure you're gonna be outside soon. Just keep praying, keep taking care of those around you, and you'll be You'll be good. And please keep listening to the show. Monica, Hey Buck, please tell me the scooters story was a comedy skit. Lie to me if you have to, She'll tie from Team Buck. Okinawa, Monica, I cannot tell a lie, at least not to Team Buck.

I like those electric scooters. I know it's so hipster Left Coast Elite is green energy nonsense, but they're so I mean, it's fun. You get on there bo and that's by the way. That's exactly the noise you know, if you're on a motorcycle makes a real noise. If you're on al those little scooters, it's like you're on a little b by bubble b to what bubble b bubbo be? So yeah, it's fun though, it's I'm telling you it's fun. You know, you don't knock until you try it. I was knocking and I was like, who

are these dorks riding around the electric scooters? Uh? And sure enough I'm one of those dorks now, so I cannot lie to you. Monica, all right, now, it's Leanna. Who is up? Hey? Buck listening to Tuesday's podcast, you

were talking about Hillary running again. My thought from the day after Trump was elected is that if Michelle Obama will come out a year before the next presidential action like her husband did and run for president, just think the first black woman president with the Obama name would probably get the nomination. What do you think, Uh? I think that Michelle Obama, if she chose to run, would be a formidable candidate. I'd been completely honest with you.

I think that I think the Obama name carries a lot more weight, a lot more weight in Democrats. Circles now than the Clinton name does. And it's just a question of would Michelle Obama I want to do that? Um, and the answers. I have no idea. There you have it, Daniel writes, great show tonight, Buck, Maybe you can work in cuomo phobia sometime. Well, Daniel, I think I just did. I think I just worked it in work it So

I just did. Um. Robert writes, love the show. Just heard you talking about the list of things to do in New York City. What are they? I'm too slow and miss them. Do you have them posted somewhere? Well, Robert, my first advice for people in in New York City is, uh, avoid a few things here in my in my opinion, avoid Times Square because it's not New York. It's specifically designed for people who are coming to New York and therefore really has very little connection to the rest of

the city. I know there are some inexpensive hotels there, so if you choose to stay in that area, I totally understand. My recommendation, though, would be to stay elsewhere in in Manhattan when you're visiting the city. I would say even stay in the financial district, which isn't thought of as a place where people visit a lot, but there's beautiful stuff down there. It's the Battery Park is gorgeous, especially if it's a nice time of year. The streets that part of New York City are just fun to

walk around. You go see the Stock Exchange, go see Trinity Church. There's a lot of history in that southern part of Manhattan. And I think that because it's a lot of business hotels, you can actually get some pretty good deals down there, uh and and get some pretty you know, get get some good bang for your buck, so to speak. And then in terms of stuff to see, I'm a big fan of Central Park. But start at the southern end and walk up north. And I generally

say walk up north and then head east. When you hit the Metropolitan Museum of Art, go to the Metropolitan Museum of Art as well. Certainly worth it. If you're into modern art, go to Moment. I am not into modern art. I cannot lie, so I'm not a moment person. The place I always recommend for burgers is J. G. Mellon's on the Upper east Side. It's quite an experience.

Nothing fancy, all cash, but delicious, delicious burgers. And then I would also say you could go to the high Line, which is an elevated park which connects to Chelsea Market. This is in the Chelsea neighborhood, which is also just fun to walk around and get a sense of New York City. There's a lot of art galleries and Chelsea a lot of really good little restaurants and great coffee,

great bars, so I used to. I've lived in Chelsea in a couple of places, so I would highly I would highly recommend else and Greenwich Village, probably my favorite part of all of New York City, connects to Washington Square Park. Go to Washington Square Park, walk around that area,

go south of it, just just walk the streets. I mean, the thing about New York is that the neighborhoods are so different, there's so much going on that to really get a sense and really get a sense of it, you want to you want to walk around and and experience the city on foot as much as possible. So I don't recommend taking one of those busses and seeing stuff from the bus. I think you really want to walk the streets a bit. And then there's the other

the the big stuff. Uh that ye, everybody should go check out at some point, you know, the Statue of Liberty. I've never been to the Statue of Liberty. I know, I'm embarrassed. Rucier Mike is shaking his head in shame right now. I love America and freedom. I've never been a statue of Liberty, but I will. I will fix that at some point. And then also go to the top of the Empire State Building, go to the top of Rockefeller Center. Actually as well, if you want views,

go to the nine eleven Memorial and Museum. It's incredible. And that's actually that whole area has and revitalize in Manhattan. So that's my Oh, and pick a show you're in New York, go to you know, there's nowhere else like it for Broadway shows. I'm not a Broadway show guy, but if you're a visitor, certainly worth it. That's my And then in terms of restaurants, just just do your Internet research, folks, because the best food in the world. That's the best food in the world. I feel like

I'm getting little nostalgic for New York City now. I'm just that's my visitor's guide for you as a born and raised New York native. Uh, those are the things that I would do. And if, obviously your baseball person, you go to a Yankees game, I would not go to a Mets game. Just putting that out there. My my my preference. Uh. And Madison Square Garden has fun stuff going on too, but it's really for me. It's about the neighborhoods and walking those neighborhoods. All right, I've

gotten so diverted. I'm gonna come back. We're gonna finish out roll Call because I will not be with you tomorrow to do the roll call, so we'll come back to some more on the flip side. Stay with me. It's time for roll call, all right, second part of roll Call because again I'm gonna be gone for the weekend, which means I will miss you all very much. But the Godfather, Michael Pelk is in tomorrow, so you are in good hands, my friends. Uh, let's get right to

it though, to the roll call. I get to hear from all of you, especially because I feel like the podcast fam of Team Buck. You know, you guys generally don't get to call in on air, so that's why I love doing Roll Call. So your voice, your thoughts, your comments get heard by everybody. Uh, Jeffrey writes, I'll be impressed if you stay on this show over a long time, because Crystal is really exhausting in her points of you sometimes. Well, Jeffrey, I appreciate your appreciation for

my my patients. UM, but I am very fond of my co host and I think we are we are doing a very good job of towing a difficult line, which is to have a She is a a a a very progressive person political activists and strategists, and I am obviously very conservative. The fact that we are as civil to each other as we are, I think is is something of a testament to the show. But I thanks for thinking of being looking out for me and uh,

I hope that it goes for a long time. Um. Next up here we have hold on a second Willie who all right, somebody gave Cohen bad advice. Lannie Davis is a Clinton nut. Well, Willie, I I gotta tell you, UM, I don't know. I mean it's these lawyers A lot of them are really acting much more like pr strategists than lawyers. That they don't seem to have all that much interest in, um, in the legal aspect of things as much as they are trying to try the case in the in the public mind or the public eye.

So yeah, I don't know. And Lanny Davis here, he's a charming fellow, but yeah, he's a He's a Clinton easta no or clintonisto, no question about it. And I think that. But let's be honest here for a second, folks. I mean, we're always honest. But you know what I mean, do you think that Cohen is going to get a really a really good lawyer. I mean, do you think that you know his his uh, his judgment appears to be lacking from what I can tell. Richard Richard is

next up here. He writes, I'm on an elliptical at my gym in Upper Montgomery County, and I see on the two screens to my left and to my right MSNBC and CNN, with Fox on my screen in the middle. Just could not let that stand. I finished my workout and proceeded to change the other four screens to Fox. One problem. To do that, I have to get on

each machine and start peddling to start the program. Yep, I got on each one, moving down the line to changing the channels to the right station and putting on close capturing hashtag new rules, hashtag dancing. Uh. This one I think from our friend Dr Rick, dr Rick, my friend, you you get on that elliptical for freedom, my man, you you do it, get out there, you change those channels around. I can tell you that. Uh. In my old gym in New York. UM, I had belonged to

a few gyms. I I don't think I ever saw Fox News on. It was always CNN, MSNBC, ESPN. That was the lineup that you had. And sometimes E you know, because people need to know O MG, like what is CARDI b saying about that thing? That's why A A s um. Yeah, I never saw Fox in the gym. I think people, I honestly, I think people would complain. Uh. William writes, uh Alm. A second, I was at the Virginia Hospital there four branding the dead of my wife. She loves red vines the post at Twizzlers. You can

hardly find red vines anywhere, so we bought them. I bought a gatorade. I beat the ends off one of the red vines and direct my gatorade through my red vine straw. This is quite a story, William. Red vines are made in California. I'm a true capitalist. Red vines could be called the new straw. All the old veterans were laughing at me, and my wife said, you're crazy. But she always calls me crazy and a dirty old man. But I'm only forty five. I love making folks laugh,

especially old veterans. Well, me too, William. Replace plastic straws with red vines, delicious and environmentally friendly. Well you mean maybe onto something, my man. You know, it's very functional, It's a kind of hip. William also writes you Dan Bongino, Ben Shapiro and of course Joe Rogan. I don't watch much TV, mostly listened to you for Jokers at night. Best podcasts out there. Well, William, thank you very much.

I really do appreciate that. And and uh, you know, we are hoping to even expand a podcast audience more than than we have thus far. So please do spread the word. Tell all your friends, veteran friends, everybody, please do tell them. Um. Next we have Daniel, who writes the payments were not the illegality. It was not filling the proper declaring expenditure paperwork shields high. Uh well, yeah, Daniel,

I mean the payments that were or not. First of all, I don't think that they were illegal under any circumstances, because I think that it stretches the definition of a campaign expenditure to the breaking point. But beyond that, it's because they did not file those campaign expenses. So yes, I I think, look, well we'll get Obviously we're gonna continue to cover this, and uh, you know, I appreciate

you weighing in. Um. Next up here we have Sharon who writes, my faith in law enforcement in general has been severely diminished, not only because of the FBI people in the upper echelon, but also after the Parkland shooting. How over does the threat have to be before they take action? And now with that, with what this brend And guy is saying, I'm just disgusted with a whole

lot of them. You know, Sharon, I do think that this is one of the big unfortunate realities of all the stuff that we've seen with this deep state action against against Trump, is that folks like you and me don't feel the same way about senior law enforcement officials. Once you start to lose faith in d J, what,

what do you know? After that, all we got left to have faith in is our military, and as great as our military is, they're not in charge of us, you know, in the States day to day, right, So, Uh, they got a function to protect us from enemies. They're not policing our lives. So you know that's that's troubling,

and I agree with you that it's troubling. Alan writes Buck time for all the intelligence officials passed and present that signed a letter supporting Brennan to have their clearances revokes. Get with the program or get out of the way. Allan's not messing around here. Uh. Nick writes thoughts on the accuracy of the Looming Looming Tower on Hulu. Uh, you know, Nick, I haven't seen it. I've read the book by Lawrence right, I have not seen the movie.

So I would just say I can't give you an answer right now, but I will check it out, I think. And that's gonna be it for today, folks. I'm gonna talk to you on Monday, obviously here in the Hut, the god other Michael Pelka will be in for me tomorrow. Please do call him, make him feel welcome and at home. He he loves all of you, because you know he's oss.

He was with me in the earliest days of the show as one of my earliest guests regular guests, so there's a synchronicity there um and we always appreciate having Michael Pelka step in. I'll be out in l A this weekend. If you see me in on the West Side, say hi. And until next time, Shields High.