Immigration Vindication

But zipp recruiter is how right. Now my listeners can try zip recruiter for free. That's right free. Just go to zip recruiter dot com, slash buck. That's zip recruiter dot com, slash buck. One more time, tryed for free. Zip recruiter dot com, slash buck, zip recruiter. It's the smartest way to hire. Once you check out their interface and you see those candidates come right into your inbox, you're gonna realize it's a great choice. Zipp recruiter dot com,

slash buck. You are entering the freedom hunt. Huge victory for President Trump today at the Supreme Court. He has been vindicated and yes in fact, we saw that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is a hashtag resistance ridiculous nous. We will also get into all of the latest today on other Supreme Court decisions and the fight over civility and immigration at the border. That and more coming up

on the Buck. This is the bus Sexton Show, where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American great, You're a great American again The Buck Sexton Show. Beginst No, Welcome to the box, Sex and show everybody. I told you that Trump would be found to be right on the travel Band those who listen to show. Now, I've been saying all along. It's constitutional, it's plainly within his authority

as the chief of the executive branch. And he is right. And it is a great victory. And in fact Trump said so himself. Play clip eleven. Please, you have probably all seen otherwise you wouldn't be at the top of your game. The fact that today's Supreme Court ruling just coming out a tremendous success, a tremendous victory for the American people and for our constitution. This is a great victory for our constitution. We have to be tough, and we have to be safe, and we have to be secure.

At a minimum. We have to make sure that we met people coming into the country. We know who's coming in, we know where they come from. You just have to know who's coming here. We have to know who's coming here. The president, you will recall, got his first big dose of anti Trump venom from you know, as as the new president the United States, from the media on this one in a way that that gave us a taste of things to come. This showed us that the opposition

to Trump was going to be unhinged. Uh, it was going to be unhinged, and we have seen it. That is in fact the case here that people opposed Trump in ways that go far beyond just not liking his policies. Just the notion that they called this a Muslim ban, when in fact a vast majority of Muslims and Muslim countries were not included on the band goes to show you there's dishonesty in their language. There is dishonesty in there intent. There's a quick overview here what happened today.

See the Wall Street Journal that a divided Supreme Court upheld President Donald Trump's latest ban on travel to the US by people from several Muslim majority countries a sweeping reaffirmation of presidential authority and a victory for the White House on one of its most central and controversial initiatives.

The Court, in a five four opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, said Tuesday that Trump didn't violate federal immigration law or the Constitution last September when he put in place restrictions on US entry by people from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen, a measure he said was necessary to protect national security because those countries don't provide sufficient information for

US officials to assess whether their nationals are a threat. Look, I had to notice today people are like, oh, it's the third version. It's the third version. Yeah, well guess what the Ninth Circuits that the third version wasn't constitutional either, and clearly was. This is all about opposition to Trump, not about the Constitution. By the way, Mike, do we have a montage of the craziness that they were saying

originally when this happen? Ben? Do we you know one thing I was hoping that we would get together today. It's just if we recall, uh, what we've got, which one is it? This is what they were saying about the travel band play nineteen. The message is simple. I mean, this is uh completely an American This is an unlawful order. What Trump is doing is harming our national security. It will incite attacks against us. It is not within the

President's authority to discriminate on the basis of religion. It is simply isn't so. I hope President Trump will reconsider I think it's it's discriminatory, it's counterproductive. This ruling gives kind of a green light to the president to continue his discriminatory policies toward the Muslim community, of the Hispanic Latino community, and other people coming from countries that are not desirable in his eyes or in the eyes of

his administration. Oh boy, A lot of people saying it's discriminatory, it's illegal, it's unconstitutional, it's un America, and all that stuff, and now we find out it's actually completely constitutional. The fact that it was five four though, is interesting, isn't it. Um. This goes to show you one of the central themes that many of us we're hitting on during the election itself, which is, if you if you had a Ginsburg clone.

If you had somebody who was David Suitor Part two on that court now instead of Neil Gorcich, just look at what the courts would be doing. Look at how important that is. And this is also where we see that the facade of the Supreme Court as a political

has been ripped away. This is an instance where a primary objection, a primary objection to President Trump here was that while the law itself may have been constitutional, there were people and I mean legal scholars so to speak, who were out there saying, oh, but because Trump is bigoted, the law is not okay for him. Because Trump is Trump essentially, uh, this is not a power that that he has. Well, what happened today was the Supreme Court, by a five four decision, said that the law is

the law. Um. So it's astoniestly you have. You had an exchange I saw today between some New York Times reporter who wrote, the Supreme Court seems to have ruled that what Trump says about his policies doesn't really matter as long as his lawyers can clean it up. And then a response to that that I saw here from Kyle Salmon is this is the opposite of what happened in Trumpy Hawaii. The court below would have invented a principle that the president's powers are reduced when he says

nasty things. That idea is found nowhere in our constitution or case law. If the president has the power to do something under law, he has that power, whether he is a jerk or not, whether he acts for the right reasons or the wrong ones. Folks, liberals just don't respect the notion of law. They just don't respect that there is such a thing as the law, that it has meaning, and that it is not something that just

changes based on whatever you wanted to say. If the court had ruled differently today, we would have had a circumstance whereby a precedent would be in place that some presidents would have I mean, this is this is the Obama delusion made real here, meaning that for Obama to have done this, liberals would have said, well, that's constitutional because Obama. But Trump can't do it because he said mean things about Muslims and immigrants when he was running

for president. That's not how the law works, that's not how authority works. That's not that's not okay, But people think it's okay. Four Supreme Court justices came down on this and said, yeah, you know, we we we would have actually ruled against the president here. And this is I would note you're going to see more made of this because national security as something in the president's per view as it relates to the border specifically, very important

right now, a very important discussion. So don't don't think that this is going away. This is going to be

very very important marker. I think of other issues that are going to get tied to this in the future because the President may decide and I think this is going to happen, that the board is really a national security issue, and that the congressional legislative acts or lack of action to try and find a better way to deal with the surge of immigrants who are actually illegal aliens engaged in a conspiracy to violate US immigration law,

that's what's happening. But that there there's a very good possibility that I think you'll see the president realized that he has the power and that they'll they'll they're already challenging we're talking about this, they're already suing the president over what's going on the border. But just back to this Muslim band for a second. You remember the hysteria. There were protests in the airport there. People said, all of them repeating what they had heard on MSNBC in

other places. All this repetition of this is so unconstitutional, it's so evil. Trump's a monster, He's so bad. And then when real jurists look at this, not the Ninth Circus, which is a clown show, which is completely and utterly ridiculous, the things that that their decisions, and we're gonna talk

about another narrow decision today that is very troubling. That's gonna get way less pressed because it's not as it is, getting way less pressed because it's not as closely tied to Trump of this administration, but religious liberties hanging by a threat First Amendments hanging by a threat. In this country, freedom is under real assault from the left right now in ways that we have to discuss and have combat.

We have to defend our basic liberties because there being taken away from us by a progressivism that is just drunk with power, its ability to publicly name and shame and destroy people and tear down people. And there is a lot, a lot to discuss here, a lot to

work with so on the on the Muslim ban. Also, you know, all these different objections and it's worth seeing the well, I always say things like, yeah, you know, if you get a chance for you know, it's it's about almost a hundred pages, so I don't know if you really want to take the time to read through

the whole case. When I was reading through it today, though they deal with the different arguments against this, and and there there's all these people say, oh, well that it wasn't One of the objections was it wasn't effective, it wasn't smart. That's not anyone's called. When it's the president's decision, that's the president's decision. No one else gets to say you can't do that, Mr President, because I

don't think that's a good idea. Another objection here that was raised legal object Now this is what they were thinking they were gonna do. Another objection was, well, Mr President, why don't you um, you know, well, you can't use this power because you're a racist, you're a bad guy, you're a bigot. Laws don't change because of who the individual is and whether you like them. Laws the law.

Democrats have a really hard time with this on immigration, on the so called Muslim ban on a number of issues here um that certainly deserves our our attention and deserve a lot of our analysis today on the show, which we will certainly do eight four four five, eight four four nine, Buck, We have much much more to discuss. What do you think about the cases that came down that they're my friends? How does it feel to be

vindicated on this side of things? How does it feel to be in a situation where everyone was saying, oh, Trump the Muslim man, it's so unconstitutional. Actually no, actually it is constitutional. So there's that. We'll also discuss the US in the border, by the way, I'm not I'm not taking my eye off that one, and we've we've got a lot a lot of show coming your way, folks, will be right back. Well, first and foremost, I think this decision is a shot across the bow or lower court.

What was unprecedented was the degree to which the courts, like the Ninth Circuit, relied upon the president's tweets and public campaign statements as the determinative factor in their decision. We've never seen that. You can't ignore that. We have historically given presidents sweeping deference as to who can enter the country. As I said, I don't support the policy, but I don't believe that it violates basic civil liberties

or constitutional law or human rights. Again, there's a line between opposition and saying the kinds of things that some of the opponents have been saying. So I don't think I do agree with the extent to it's just a soda my ear condemned the policy of the administration. I think it's wrong, but but I don't think it's an anti Muslim band. I think that's a mistake. Soda my hors is wrong all the time. I don't. I'm deeply unimpressed by her her legal reasoning, writing everything under the

soda mayor byeline, so to speak. She's not a journalist, but it's not good. I've never seen her on any issue before the Corps. I said, yeah, you know, she's making some good points here. I can see no very very weak in my opinion, or jurisprudence is lacking. But there are a lot of people out there who were

really really upset about this whole situation. There are a lot of folks who decided that they we're gonna call this a terrible, terrible thing for American Remember we've had you know, we've been dealing with this now, the concept of this, for for quite a while. And you look at this band and you think to yourself, who's really affected by this? Exactly? Well, what's the big Why are so many liberals who live in l A. And New York and Washington, d C. In other places, why they

also upset about this? Huh? I'd like to get upset about things. This is what at least one senator had to say about this play club nine. This is a dark day for anybody in our country who cares about checks and balances because what this five um just this decision was very close decision obviously says that the president can pretty much do whatever he wants to discriminate against groups of people. Uh, and say this is for national security.

And the court ignored all of the comments that the president had made that he had every intention of banning Muslims from our country. You know, the comments are not relevant to the law, and the comments are not relevant to presidential power with regard to the exercise of the law.

And that's also yet again another instance here where they keep moving around with the what is the objection is the objection that the president doesn't have the power to do this, or that this president doesn't have the power to do this. They it seems to be particularly clear. Also to say it's a Muslim ban is just on its face inaccurate. We know this, We know that the only bands a small percentage of Muslims from entering the country.

But this gets into other issues too, about how the Democrat left seems to believe that everyone has rights in America, even people who aren't in America and aren't citizens. So foreigners have rights in America without even being here. Foreigners have a right to the judicial system. Foreigners have a

right to you're finding out of the border. When they talk about do process, our our due process is going to is going to evaporate because we're gonna have to wait ten years for a basic civil court date, because we're gonna have so many different people over the world that can just sue in a U. S. Court that think they have standing to come to the country, to stay here, whatever it may be. It's just not the

way it's gonna work. Folks can't be that way. And I think that we had a look at the narrow victory five four, no question about it, but at least it is a victory. Jason and Phoenix, Welcome to Buck Sexton Show. But yeah, my question for you, and it seems like all the cases should be more like a five three ruling because Ruth Dada Ginsberg. Um, if I remember, she publicly, uh said a bunch of bad things about the president, so it seems like she should be retrievably

accused from any case. Yeah, what she did was was it was pretty universally considered to be you know, out of bounds, an unethical. But she's all she's become kind of a folk hero on the left. Uh, they call her RBG. They've even tried to make it seem like she's cool that which, okay whatever. Um, she didn't recuse herself because for liberals, power as its own justification for the left, whatever works, whatever works, she's not gonna accuse herself.

But uh, they're also much lower to accuse themselves on any number of issues. Right, So I think that's that's an important thing to keep in mind here. Thank you for calling in. Jason Tracy in Ohio. Tracy, Welcome to the Box Section Show. Hi, Buck. Just a couple of comments, Um, one of them doesn't have enough to do what you're saying.

But like during the election process, during during election, all these Hollywood actors that there said that if Trump got to be president, they was going to move to Canada. Are they in Canada? Are they still living in Hollywood and no making big money? And the other one is like he said a little bit ago about you know, these people from these other countries are well s don't apply to them. So they actually stepped foot in our country. So if I go to their country, I have to

go buy their laws. So if they don't, you know, if they say I'm not allowed into their country as I'm American, I can't you know, get in there either and stuff. So yeah, well just the notion of do what you're gonna see is the expansion thanks for calling and Tracy, the expansion of due process. This is gonna

come up with immigrants in particular. Notice, but the expansion due process to include a citizen's full access to the U. S. Court system and all US protections of law, even people who aren't even in the U. S. Or then they say, oh, buck wolf An immigrants here and they get killed. Isn't that we're not talking about that we're talking about the right to challenge. Yeah, of course that the law still applied lows blood. Everybody on US soils are people who

need to remember. But that doesn't mean that you have access to the US court system and its entirety when you're not on US soil, when you're overseas, and when you want to come here. Um, but what you're going to see is the expansion of due process to include whatever left wants. Also, just another thought, look at how much time the Democrats spend advocating for non Americans. It's tough to get around that, isn't it. Whether it's a legal immigrants or people covered in the Muslim band who

are non citizens, non US residents. A lot of Democrat time spent on not America issues. He's holding the line for America. Buck Sexton is back. No man, no man, no day, tell you about it. We're a president that wants to tear families apart. This is a moral moment in our country. But there's a pre court decided today is not just long, it is dangerous. It makes us less safe, and it undermines the values of our country. And we are not defined as a nation by what

happens to us. We're not defined as a nation by hateful voices. Yeah, they're still protesting, they're angering And that was Senator Corey Booker. You know, people are all upset about this, saying it makes us less safe. I like to know how it makes us less safe. And it's one thing to tell me that the travel ban, or is I like to call it the temporary restriction on travel from certain countries by non American citizens were permanent residents. This had waivers on a case by case basis in place.

This was a justice so it did not affect anybody who's a permanent legal resident of the United States, you know, So there were carve outs here. It affected states, not religions. And so many of the idiots I see in the mainstreaming are like, well, these are all there only Muslims in these countries. No, that is not true. Mostly Muslims in these countries. But North Korea also covered under this band. And guess what, not a lot of Muslims in North Korea.

Not a lot. In fact, I don't know if you could get even into the three digit range, I don't know, but not not a lot of Muslims in North Korea that much is for sure. Venezuela also covered by this. There's some Muslims in Venezuela, but not a lot more than North Korea, I'm guessing, but not a lot. So they're just lying about this, right. It's so it's a lie to say that this is a Muslim ban. In fact, that very term is a lie. It's false. It is

not a Muslim ban. It is a not You could say it is a limited nationality Bandit bands certain countries people from certain countries. Um. The presidents well within his rights to do this. By the way, there's there there's a law Immigration or Nationality Act of nineteen fifty two

with the following. Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or any class of aliens in the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he made by proclamation and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens, as as immigrants or non immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Comes from a

little place called the Congress. They passed that. That's pretty straightforward. Isn't it. President can say, sorry, national security, you're not allowed in. That's it. That's what that law says. But yeah, a lot of legal animals, a lot of people out there saying, oh, well, the scrimination a sort of scriminator they think that I don't like is the same as it's unconstitutional. This is the big problem you have with

the left. They think that that bothers me or I I prefer something else, is the same as that's you know, not the law, which is untrue. And they will find out, I think in due time that it is untrue. Um, they will find out that they cannot continue on this path where they just make the law up as they go along. I certainly hope they can't continue because it degrades the law overall. Every time they manage one of these victories where they rewrite the statutes. You know, like

Hillary Clinton wasn't reckless with the classified emails for example. Right, Well, you know we're gonna say she was incredibly careless or whatever. We'll come up with something else. But let's let's pretend like this law doesn't really mean anything. That's what they did. That is what they did. Um. So when you look at this there's that it was five fours is troubling on its on its own, that needs to be said.

There is no real This is the four justices and with Soda Mayora the most notable one who went against Trump on this one, they were mostly just venting bile at Trump. That's what this is all about. That's how much they hate Trump. It's even poison the mind of Supreme Court justices. They can't look at the law objectively. They have to look at Trump law, which means that something that is okay for one president is not okay for this president. That doesn't doesn't work, doesn't fly, not acceptable.

Justice Roberts, by the way, went after this because you'll see a lot of this. There's notion that this is similar to the infamous Karamatsu decision. Karamatsu was the Supreme Court decision had to do with the interment of Japanese Americans during the Second World War, and Roberts. Justice Roberts, in the majority opinion here took this notion to the wood shed. Here's a quote from the decision. Finally, the

Descent invokes Karamatsu v. United States. Whatever rhetorical advantage the Descent may see in doing so, Karamatsu has nothing to do with this case. The forcible relocation of US citizens to concentration camps solely and explicitly on the basis of race is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of presidential authority. But it is wholly an apt to liken that morally repugnant order to a facially neutral policy denying certain for

nationals the privilege of admission. The entry suspension is an act that is well within executive authority and could have been taken by any other president. The only question is evaluating the actions of this particular president and promulgating an otherwise valid proclamation. Yep, this this should have been a nine oh decision, my friends, This should have been nine oh.

Any realistic person who has any legal training or just can read and understand legal ease I would know that there's there's no there's no question that the Ninth Circuit didn't the Ninth Circuit try to strike this down and try to, you know, put a stay on this and prevent it from being the law of the land. Just crazy. Where do they get these judges? Oh? Well, there are usually Obama pointees. Of course. In this case in Hawaii,

I believe it was an Obama point. I think actually the judge in Hawaii, because this case was the United States of the Hawaii. I think the judge may have even been a friend of Obama's, but I could be wrong on that. Uh So they got it right, but just barely, and that is a warning for all of us. One more thing here, speaking of getting it right and just barely. There was another case came down today that

dealt with free speech, the issue of free speech. I want to walk you through the issues there because this is really important and it shows that there's another area where the left is deluded. The left goes off the rails and along no longer matters, and all they want is just victory at all costs. Trump is one of them. But there's another area that's really as powerful when it comes to deranging the left and on issues of law

and in general. The one thing that gets the progressives as fired up, as angry and as unreasonable as Trump is the issue of abortion. And that is at the heart of another Supreme Court decision that came down to they we'll talk about right after this break. The other major case that came down today was n I f L. A. The best, Sarah. And this is a case that was also five four. Don't forget friends Trump, whatever whatever conservatives

may think of him. The what corsa line is they think that it's said with irony or or in mocking. It's true, Okay, Gorge is gonna be around a long time and it is gonna save liberty and freedom on numerous occasions as a result of it. So they can say, but gorstch all they want, Yeah, you're darn right, but corsage. But n I F l A v. Sarah. Here, here's

what and here's what? What's that an issue here? California, which as we know, has just been becoming more and more looney left, not just Democrat looney left wing as a state and as state legislature and its policies, had something called the Reproductive Fact Act, which made it a law that licensed and unlicensed women's health clinics, which includes pregnancy resource centers or crisis pregnancy centers. I say, you'll see a lot of liberals, liberal publications. Here's a tell.

And on abortion, by the way, they're very careful about language because the Democrat Party is an extremist party on abortion. Important that we all know that and then we're all clear about that overwhelming majority of the American people do not believe that there should be abortions beyond the first trimester. That it's a baby. Let's not even get into how

in the first trimester it's a baby too. But beyond the first trimester, overwhelmingly Americans believe, by clear majorities in the sixty s range, it is uh not, it should not be permissible have an abortion. Democrat Party is abortion all nine months day before your due date? Abortion is fine, not just fine, should be celebrated as some act of female liberation. It is the most heinous thing about contemporary America, the most heinous, But here we are. It's a central,

a central foundational part of the Democrat Party. Uh And it is a stain on our nation's moral character that I don't know if we'll ever be able to get rid of, but it is, it is there. Nonetheless, California passed this law that said that crisis pregnancy centers must inform women who come to them about abortion providers. Not only remember so they're not necessarily providing any they're not providing medical services. They're just there to like help people,

you know, really like a counseling center. And some of them have Christian roots, some of them are Christian associated or affiliated, and the reason they exist is to help women not have abortions. I've actually been you know, I'll tell you that I've been to you a a very excellent uh charity events several times in New York City for a group called Avail. And this is what they do. They help women have babies. They don't they don't get

very political. They're not looking to they're not condemning people or anything else. They're just come to us, will help you. You're pregnant, you need help, will help you, but we help you have a baby. You want to do other stuff, that's not what they do there, right, So I've been to their benefits, so I've given the money, and I've been involved and talk to their leadership before. UM so

I understand how crisis pregnancy centers working. What the mission is right there there to help women have their have children, have babies. That is the mission. So you can imagine California passes a law that says, oh, hey, crisis pregnancy center, that the reason for your existence is to help women not feel so trapped or so scared or so socially

pressured that they have an abortion. You have to sit there and as a matter of law, not just inform the women who come to you about abortion providers nearby, but you have a prewritten script that you must read that the state writes out for you. You know, it is our duty under feder You know, under California law blah blah that you also have the right to see the following abortion providers and blah. You know, I don't know what the specifics of the wording was, but think

about this. I mean, this is like telling that. This is like telling a Catholic church. You know. You also have to have a script for whenever somebody comes in before Sunday Mass you can say, you know what, guys, I just want to be clear. This all is this all could be fake. There may not be a God. The Bible may just be one big hoax and a big joke and God is dead or God does not exist, and you're wasting your time here and this is all a scam. Just wanted to let you let you know

that's possible. Now, let us pray right. Think about that. That's sort of like what's going on here California wanted crisis pregnancy centers to say, you know, you also should think about abortion, and the reason that they have these centers is to help women not do that. And I would just also note what's the real purpose here. Let's

think about this for a moment. Is there any is there any any woman who's pregnant who is able to find her way to a crisis pregnancy center who doesn't know that there's such a thing as abortion and that their abortion clinics. I mean, do we really think that Planned Parent hasn't done a good enough job of advertising itself, doesn't have enough centers across the country, isn't getting enough hundreds of millions of tax parent knowledge? Do we we

think we really didn't? They really need help? No, this was an exercise enforcing those who are pro life to bend the knee to profane their own beliefs. And that this decision also came down five four should be a warning to all of us, my friends, the Democrat Party is a party of abortion extremists. First Amendment, you you can have no, you have no constitutional protection from They're invented, completely preposterously, farcically conjured out of nothing. They're invented constitutional

right to an abortion. You have no you will have no protection against them. If you try to stand in the way, they will find a way to make it illegal for you to protest against it, to speak out against it, to organize against it. They will they will

do everything and anything they can to protect this. And you know, I they're there are a couple of directions like, oh this on the On the one hand, I think maybe and this is the part of me that feels well that I think is more hopeful in a way that the Democrat Party and the pro abortion left in America can't allow us to ever have a full accounting or a full understanding of what's going on in these planned parenthood centers across the country day in and day out,

because it would they they couldn't really process it, if they really thought about it, if they had to live with the moral and spiritual consequences of their actions, it would just be overwhelming. So they create this alternate reality

that living where it's all fine. I I think that that's one version of how they can go about this and how Supreme Court justices could take four of them could take a position that you're gonna make people who are devoting themselves to helping babies, helping you know, babies get born in a healthy and safe fashion, to you know, to mothers who can you know, I can say a lot of things. I have never in my life met a woman, and I'm old enough now that I know.

I've known plenty of people, who have you gotten pregnant? Who are my peers? I have never met a woman who said I wish I hadn't had the kid, And I have met people who said I wish I hadn't had the abortion. And I don't know what to say really to the ladder other than you know, I'm sorry. I know what to say to the former because they've got kids and they're happy and they made the right choice. I don't know what to say to the ladder. I

just I sometimes it have lost for words. I've been in a situation where people have brought you know, I've been told about this by people, and even surprisingly sometimes people I didn't even know all that well. Um, so this was it was a victory for freedom and for life today, but a narrow one under the circumstances this this should not have been a close call. That it was a close call. Five four decision on this California law goes to show you just how much the Democrats are.

As I said, they are extremists on this issue, and they will trample your free speech rights, and they will trample the right of people to support life whenever, however, as often as they can. We're gonna talk immigration. Come on up here in the next hour and also some updates on the civility conversation. Stay with me. Nine Line Apparel is about much more than getting dressed every day.

They're all about being proud of this country and they make sure that whatever you put on your back, whatever clothing that you've decided to wear with nine Line logos and designs, shows that you believe in being relentlessly patriotic, pulling no punches and refusing to apologize for your love of country. This is a brand for of and by patriots, my friends. They have veteran inspired, Second Amendment inspired and first responder supportive gear. They are all about this great country.

You gotta go check it out for yourself and see visit nine line apparel dot com. Use the coupon code buck twenty to say off your next quarter. Nine Line apparel dot Com coupon code coupon code buck off. Let me tell you, the lined canvas jacket that I'm looking at right here on the website is awesome. It looks like the kind of stuff that I saw overseas worn by our guys. So check it out. Nine line Apparel dot Com. Buck Sexton permission to coding the news and

disseminating information is actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American Again. This is the buck Sexton Show. Activity analysts, No, Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show. I got some breaking news for you actually, as we're here on the air. This courtesy of NBC. The Secret Service will begin provide security at the home of Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, according to a law enforcement official. Yep,

that's right, folks. We now have to expand armed protection of people who work for this administration because the Left is a bunch of maniacal, dangerous, whiney cry babies. That's what this is. Now, now we can allow them to We can't allow people to just have their jobs, do their work, disagree with them politically and leave it at that. No. Now, now there's public shaming, shaming of conservative, shaming of Trump people has become fashionable, so fashionable, there are very real,

incredible threats against members administration. Can you imagine for a moment, the way the media would be talking about this issue, the way not that they talk, Oh we talked about this, we talk No, No, it's not about it's not it's not non coverage that I objected with the media. It's the way they cover things. It's the context that they give it or don't. It's the words they use or don't, the narrative that they're trying to form the perception of

the issue. They're trying to create in the mind of the reader or the listener or the viewer. You imagine if you now there had to be Secret Service stationed at yeah, Jake Jake Harney store, or if if you had secret service that had to follow out, or you know, an additional secret Service detail. I don't even know who gets Secret Services protectually, be honest with you, other than the President, his family and you know, the some other folks.

So you don't even know if off my head, I gotta think about that, who actually qualifies for Secret Service protection? But I know it's expanding right now that much. Producer Mike do me a favor find the help me find who in who in the world of the White House actually gets Secret Service protection. I'm kind of curious about that. So anyway, Yeah, they're they're gonna stand it, Sara Hugby Sanders, You've got They went to Stephen Miller's house last yesterday,

kind of tracking people down at home. It's getting worse and worse. But you know, we can count on the big voices in media to really set as straight here

and tell us what's going on. We can count on the the gray haired shage wisdom of folks like our friend David Gergen a k A. Gurgling Gurgan, who I will tell you said something today that was so stupid on TV that I was embarrassed for him, because I'm actually I'm a nice person, probably too nice for this business sometimes, but I'm a nice person, that's the true thing. Not always. But I can be crowd, I can be graduate. I get angry for sure. If I don't get enough food.

I need to sometimes just sneak a granola bars. Act is particular kind of bar these days. I'm really into. But I want them to sponsor the show, so I don't want to name them just yet. He might. I'm always thinking, commerce baby, it's right, gotta make a rain up in the freedom hunt. But but Gergen, who is the guy? And I remember occasionally having to sit on panels at CNA and they're like, all right, little child, you'd be quiet. We need to hear from Gurgen. Now

he's got some gurgles for us. And this isn't I will say this before we get to because this is a good one. I mean, this is this goes in the gur the Gurgling Hall of Fame, Reagan for Obama Administration, reminition, Ford and Reagan nuction. This really goes in that special category. Uh, but it's not even the dumbest thing said on cable news in the last twenty four hours. We have a dumber thing. You have to stay with me the third hour, so dumb that it's worth listening to this whole show.

Even if you're like, I'm not even loving today's show. You should stay until we get to that because it's it's the it's the stupidest thing that you'll hear if you didn't already hear it, which I doubt many of you did. This one didn't get much play today from another cable news analysts, they just say say the stupidest stuff on TV. It's amazing, isn't it. But Gergen, I want to just let it, let it play out. You

can hear it from Nickers or civility issue was rigged. Uh. He goes into it here and listen to what he says, and then we're all gonna have a good laugh about it afterwards. Play the clip please. Uh. There are large number of people on both coasts who think Trump is totally Today we're adrift and the country is very very much on boil. I think the emotions are running very

high on all sides. Uh. There are a large number of people on both coasts who think Trump is totally unethical, that he's a moron, all the other kind of epises that's one can think about. Uh. And there are people in his base who not only are strongly formed, but they're more strongly for him now. And they're fed up with what a press and the last they think has

been Carping doesn't give him any credit. Uh. There's the economy. Uh. And gradually, I think I think both sides have now reached the point where they're so frustrated and so fed up and so impatient for change that this could lead on the today where it is extraordinarily that I said, I cannot remember at times the anti war movement and Vietnam, the Civil Wars movement, you know, in the sixties and early seventies, both of those were much more civil in tone.

Even the anti war movement was more civil and Toumba certainly of the civil rights movement among the people who are protesting. The anti war movement was more civil in tone. This guy, he he appears on these shows to give you know, historical context and gravit toss and work for every person and every person ever are busually live. I've lived in the White House. There's a special room for me under the West wing where I just come out.

You know, it's a little the anti war movement, there were domestic terrorists running around, people were playing things, bombs, people were killing people. They had to call in the National Guard. There there were people getting shot, people getting blown up, people getting stabbed over the Anti war movie.

It was more civil. I mean, I just you know, it's sometimes it'd be like somebody said, yeah, you no World War two, a little bit of a little little fighting going on, not not really that big a thing. It's it's just a dumb thing to say. I don't even know where to go with that. Any war movement, No, no, no, not not accurate at all, not a true thing to say, not a fair thing to say. Uh, look I don't, I don't. I really just like to do Gurgan's voice

and I'm not trying to be overly nasty. Minutes and we've all said, you know, I've said stuff on TV and I was like, ah, that probably wasn't really the best one ever. But yeah, the anti war movement set off bombs. The anti war people help the enemy. They engaged in armed robberies. There were there was terrorism, there were riots, there were people were being assassinated, and people were accusing each other of being pigs, commies and all

the ugliest language, the nastiest stuff. And this was coming from the left, anti war left in this country, right. But that but that's more civilizing now, m hm. You know there's a part of me that worries that this kind of rewriting of history is uh. I mean, let's let's hope, you know what, let's hope it's accidental. I'm gonna give the ben I'm gonna hope for all of us that they really just they don't know. You know, Gurgan, Look, he's on TV a lot. CNN thinks that he's got

a lot of great things to say. He was on with Poppy Harlow there by the way, who who I remember? I had a really fun exchange with the producer Mike wants over to CNN where they kept introducing whoever. It wasn't Van Jones, it was another but you know, somebody like a Van Jones, just a Democrat partisan on air.

It's fine, right, I'm but they would always introduce me in this segment as conservative media, like a conservative political commentator, and the other person, the Democrat, was always political analyst, just political analysts. And that's really at the And I brought this up with it with Poppy with Harlow, and she just looked at me like huh, like like it wasn't you know? What do you mean? Like what does

that matter? Why does that? I'm looking at him like because I'm a right wing not so this is the way CNN sets this up. We need to let our audience know that, yeah, and we need to let her audience know that this other person is just a political analyst, just the facts, you know, the other person's just the truth, just down the middle. You're crazy, and we want to make sure we established that beforehand. I mean, they never

bring I've never once seen them. And all my time over there watching it or doing it at seeing and I've never seen them bring somebody on and say that this is a liberal political or even a progressive political analyst, but conservative political commentator all the time. What they're saying is, yeah, like look at this guy. He's got a side party,

wears boat shoes, blah blah. You know, he looks like the bad guy from a movie where the fraternity of all the all the white dudes with side parted hair were blazers and talk about yachting and where where shoes with no socks. That's the that's the subliminal messaging here. You know, I'm the guy from PCU who's like, that's not my BMW. That is you know, like I'm that, I'm I'm David Spade and PCU that's what they're setting

me up for on CNN. And you know, if that's the game, can we all just be honest about it? But I don't like, what do you mean I'm like, do you really not know? I don't know what's worse that you don't know or that, But this is the same thing. Go on the Twitter accounts of any number of CNN anchors and they'll say, oh, I'll just yeah, see what they retweet, see what they like. They're Democrats.

It's very obvious they're pushing a Democrat narrative. But they're all over I'm non part I love these guys who also these these uh, these journalists who are I'm I'm a registered independent. Oh, you fooled me there. I can't figure that one out. You know, you guys are slick, you registered independence. There's one over at one of the networks, so I want I won't name on air, it's not worth it, but he's some kind of political energy. I'm

a registered independent. Now like, yeah, you're also just an idiot. But hopefully I guess for you. Lucky for you, you're well, you're a well paid idiot. Um. There was also this is now, look, I'm being a little I know, I'm I'm having a little a little uh, a little fun with this one. But there was a a still shot from south the South Carolina Rally. We're gonna talk about the whole Acosta thing later on because it's great. It's

great speaking of people. You know, when you go through their Twitter account, you know exactly what they stand on stuff. We'll go through later. But there's a still shot the Daily Caller put out and under the cod it's it's Jim Acosta and behind him somebody's someone's holding up a sign right in the shot CNN sucks. And I'm like, you know, I gotta go to one of these rallies. I gotta get a CNN Sucks T shirt and uh, I gotta just drink it all in because they're my

kind of people. It's it's just speech. It's just speech. I know. Journalists think that there's like this long, dark knight of tyranny that descends on the country. You know, they can trash conservative journalists and conservative hosts and commentary folks and everything as much as what they want. You know, call us racist, we're dividing the country, we're scum, we're liars.

You know, that's all fine. The moment that you know they're the ones that are in the hot seat on this stuff, it's, oh my gosh, what's gonna happen to democracy without the the gatekeepers at CNN and oh, oh gosh, terrible, it's really it's really appalling. Um, So there's that eight four or four nine eight to five eight four four not at the buck. I do want to talk to you bit more about immigration and where things stand with that. First of all, the Congress is gonna let us down.

I've been telling this all along. You know I'm right on this one. I was also right on how this Supreme Court would have pulled this. I like to know when I'm right, Supreme Court would up hold the Trump travel band, and they did. But I also I've been telling you that Congress isn't gonna do anything on immigration, and there's just this this continue the status quo is a lot of talk and then dysfunction. A lot of talk and then gridlock. And and also a part of

this is there's more legals coming to the country. The system is getting more broken. The political weight in favor of illegals because of the population change in this country is only becoming larger and more serious. So this is something we really need to keep an eye on. Um. And uh, we'll talk about what's going on with it in just a moment. Eight four eight to five eight four buck much more. Come and stay with me. I want to solve all of your coffee needs right now

to buck. This is the easiest best way you can possibly go. Black Rifle Coffee. You know, Black Rifle Coffee has a coffee club that make sure that you don't have to worry about lines anymore. You don't have to run out to the store. You can get great coffee ship to your front door every month. Plus, when you join Black Rifles Coffee Club, you'll receive discounts and offers

not available to other customers. By choosing Black Rifle, you're supporting a company that gives back to veterans and first responders and serves coffee and culture to those who truly love America. Visit Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck, receive fifteen percent off your first order. That's Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off, and join the coffee

club Black Rifle Coffee dot com slash buck. If you vote for Trump, then you the voter, You not Donald Trump, are standing at the border like Nazis. Are you suggesting that they're racist or there. Yes, admit the people who vote all the people who vote for Donald Trumper. Yes, if Republicans weren't so racist, they could encourage black people who are morally conservative to be on their side. These policies that this administration is putting forth are intentionally cruel.

They are racist. Anybody who votes for and supports a racist is a racist. You are culpable white America. I'm sorry, how do you? Is this the temptation to run up and bring her net in the country, whether it's are hardcore racist. They do not want to see brown people coming into America. Certain individuals and institutions. We will, as per Chief Jim Hopper, punch some people in the face when they sit to destroy im to and we will

do it. All this so hard out there are still generations of people, older people who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die. Look at everybody here's makes money, works hard, pay taxes, does a great job. You're smarter, you're better, you're more loyal. We have the greatest face in the history of politics. There you have two competing

visions of Trump supporters. One is just a collection of really nasty comments from media figures, Hollywood celebrities, and there you have Trump speaking to his people. I there's a part of me that almost doesn't want to speak about this too much and bee too loudly, because I don't

want Democrats to catch on. I want them to keep thinking that the way that they win elections at a time when they are in the worst political position in terms of actually winning elections that they've been in decades, some would say, really in the Second World War period. You look at state houses and what's gone on there and governorships, but their their default is to call people

racist and call them evil and bad. There's no good faith or goodwill, there's no decency extended from their side to ours, and they just keep doubling down on it more and more all the time. That the only reason Trump was able to win, or the only way Trump was able to win the last election, was because states and individual counties that went for Obama twice in many cases when for Trump this time around, doesn't factor into

their analysis, right. You See, if if you live in Michigan or Pennsylvania or anywhere in the country for that matter, and you voted for Obama, and then you voted for Trump because you just figured that the Obama policies and the economy weren't very strong. You didn't want more of that, and you wanted somebody who was gonna fight for you and gonna do more for the American working class. You know, really, it's just because you're racist. That's what the Democrats want

to tell you. It's not because you want to have an easier time putting food on the table, less regulation on your business, a greater chance at the life you want. That's that's not what it was. Just because you're racist, just what Democrats say. I have friends who are Democrats and they kind of agree with this, and look at them, I'm like, look, it's a good thing. We don't talk politics too much. We're hanging out because you're way off base.

But as I've been saying, I I don't know if I really want to even make too much noise about this. I want them going. I want the Party of Nancy Pelosi and Truck Schumer going into the mid terms with their most compelling vote for me slogan being Republicans are racist, and I would like Hillary to put down the rose and the yoga just long enough to be like, I should be president and just show up. You know, we should just do an ad. I should just volunteer to

do ads for Republicans across the country. Where I do we do like a pretend Hillary thing, you know, like I have like a Hillary puppet. What do you call what, Mike? What do you call the guys you know what I mean, the guys with the they talked through what do you talk through? The the little guy that sits on the leg? What do you call it? Fantriloquist? Thank you, sir, producer Mike on the on the ball today, do a ventriloquist thing with Hillary. They'd be amazing. I think I'm really

getting myself into some trouble here. This could actually be a thing. Hi, I'm Hillary. I'm just sitting on bucks flap. Doesn't he have great hair? You know? We can do this whole thing and and just kind of go from there. Um, I'm getting ideas. Friends, Hey, if it'll save our republic? Who am I to stand in the way? Who am I to deny my my Hillary voice talents to the cause of freedom? Eight four four buck if you want

to chat eight four four nine five. I said, we talked immigration, immigration policy, and what's going on in the House and the Senate that's coming up. He's back with you now because when it comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops. No man, no man, no dad. I'll tell you about it. I'm always glad when people are talking. But the President and the administration can solve this problem on their own. That's the quickest, best and easiest way to solve it. As I said, the President

created this problem. The quickest way to fix it is administratively. The president can do that. He can do it quickly, he can do it efficaciously, and that's ought to be the first step here. People. I'm glad people are talking. They should continue to talk. But that's the way to solve it. That's what we need. Voter security, we gotta get going. A lot of bad things are happening, and I think we're doing it incredibly well. We have no tools, we're bad laws. We have the worst immigration laws in

the history of the world. Okay, it's a joke. People who can't believe in other countries look at us and they say, how is that possible? You know, the laws on the books actually aren't aren't really that bad. It's that we won't enforce them. But the presidents write the laws are in some ways also at this point because of our inability, you know, we we have to now change the laws that we have because it's not just enough to enforce them, because things have gotten so bad

that you need the loss. So you got you got a few problems. What I mean by this is at the border, we are overwhelmed, right, they they have overwhelmed the system. So even now if we try to enforce the laws at the border, there are challenges and there are problems. So then you have to deal with well, what about the you know, asylum seekers, how do we handle that? Asylum is supposed to be a one person shows up. Oh my gosh, if I go back to

my country, they're going to torture and murder me. Please take me in, please please please, And we take people in. That's really what the that's the that's the idea, the idea behind asylum. It's not I don't like my country, it's poor, I want to be in America. It's better situation here. That's immigration, that's not asylum. So you know, we need and I know, like I mean, you can argue other ways where we could just be very rule of law focused and believe that law is the law,

and that I would certainly help. But I also think that we need to change some of these loopholes because this is where the Democrats play the games. And this is also why you need a wall, because the wall. That's where we started with the people chanting outside of the Supreme Court, no band, no wall, because the wall is there, it is fixed, it is by definition immovable and real. And if it's no big deal, why do

democrats hate the idea so much? Wall is very effective. Remember, a wall is not just about preventing people from getting over it. It It also creates a physical fortification for the enforcement of that boundary. So this is why you know, if you look a look at walls throughout history, it's they didn't just put a wall up there and then up you know, somebody can hop over it, or they

can build a tower or something and get over it. No, it's because then you also have four deployed guard towers and sensors and other things that come along with the wall. It's all part of a package. You could dare dare I say it is comprehensive in nature. Democrats are fighting a tooth. And now though, because they they like this, they like to be able to pretend to want to order the immigration system when they actually leave it open

for as much illegal immigration as possible. You know what gets lost in so much this discussion too, we take in between people that become US citizens and permanent green you know, permanent residence green card holders. We've taken a million people a year, a million every year in this country. It's like, you're now part of the American family. You're here,

you're good, you stay. That's legal immigration every year. And because we want to cut down a little bit the illegal immigration that's coming into the country, we get told that we're racist, we're xenophobic. And you know, I look at this and I say, this is an upside down world we're living in. I mean, this is bizarre o land. There's no real connection to a reality, to normalcy. We are so open minded and with open arms towards immigrants. It's we should be giving ourselves pats on the back

all the time as a country. But instead, oh, you know, we're we're not doing good enough job handling the asylum seekers who look at the same thing they do with dreamers and others and changing the language to undocumented. They're not asylum seekers. There are legal aliens that are lying to the government about why they are coming into the country or how they're coming into the country, in many cases so that they can stay. And I do feel

badly for these people. Well when I hear things about how, oh, we're creating internment camps or whatever. No, well we actually have our effectively refugee camps, which lots of countries have, and those countries, by the way, we say, are you know, doing good work? Thank you? Like when I was in the Jordanian refugee camps, jordan refuge camp of Zotary, with a hundred thousand people living in tents in the middle of the desert, miles from the Syrian border, with the

Syrian Civil war just raging on. Uh, nobody was saying, look at the Jordanians. They're so mean, they're so evil. These people in refugee camp. They're saying, no, these people are alive because the Jordanian government took them in to save them. So people are saying that they're so mean and terrible, right, that's that's not fair in this case. You'll notice, right, look at that comparison. In this case, people are saying, well, they're fleeing violence and desperate circumstances,

and we're we're the bad guys here. Why why are we the bad guys? We're taking people in. Some of them stay, some of them don't. Most of them who have claimed asylum have gotten to stay, by the way in the past, or those who have been released into the interior of the United States, they've been allowed to stay. But you'll notice we we hold ourselves to the standard of we can't really enforce the law at all against any of these people. That's what the Democrats want, that's

really what they believe. And I saw this of this video last night of from Rachel Maddow's show on MSNBC where they showed a an undercover video of these child detainment facilities. They're calling them right or whatever it is that the current term terminology that's being used. And I saw the video and okay, it looked like a video of any reasonable public school classroom anywhere in the country.

There were books and maps and tables and chairs and food and teachers and you know, ah, to to call this concentration camps and Nazi like is so is so moronic and so beyond the pale, and so also by the ways, it's just so disrespectful to what actually happened in the Holocaust and what the Nazis did, I mean in disrespectful to the memory of those lost that it's it's hard to argue with these people because I'm like, are you are you actually a bunch of are you

really just idiots? Are you just not smart enough to have this conversation in an adult way, or are you deeply dishonest and involved in the worst kinds of demagoguery. I think there's that old line, gosh, who was it? I forget it was. I'm just gonna steal it now. Somebody else said this that a demagogue is somebody who says things he knows to be untrue to a room

that he knows to be full of idiots. Basically, you know, that's that's what the Democrats are are doing to their own constituency here, pretending that they're saving these children from Nazism. It's just outrageous. Okay, So now we get to the legislative fixed part of this, though, I just want to note I don't think anyone else has made that point refugee. Usually countries have taken refugees, there's a there's a a gratitude to the country and from the people that have

been taken in. We are taking people in. And by the way, refugee status is not that doesn't mean that you're they're permanently living in that country. It just means they've been given safe harbor. We are giving all of these asylum seekers safe harbor. Some of them are being detained and process for, you know, misdemeanor illegal entry in the United States, but they're all safe, they're all clean,

they're all fed, and we're the bad guys. So if there are asylum seekers, I just want to know why we're not being held the standard of other countries that taken refugees, and it's supposed to be thank you for taking us in, not oh gosh, you didn't do this fast enough, or you know. It's it's pretty remarkable when you start to see the way that we the way America is on this and and the standard that it's held to by the Democrat left versus the rest of

the country. But all right, so now we get to the legislative fixed side of this and what could be done here and here's the the quick and dirty. Courtesy the Wall Street Journal, House Republican leaders work to build support among GOP lawmakers for a broad immigration bill tentatively set for a vote on Wednesday, aiming to minimize defections after President Donald Trump vacillated good word Wall Street Journal

on whether he backed the measure. After meeting behind closed doors with rank and file Republicans, GOP leaders planned to spend the day counting how many votes would be gained from proposed revisions that would make it harder to work in the US without legal documentation and to establish a

new agricultural guest worker program. If the bill fails as expected, the House could move as early as Thursday to a targeted bill dealing with the uproar over a Trump administration policy that's led to the four separation of thousands of migrant children from their parents. End quote. Okay, bill is gonna fail, that's for sure, which then brings me to the maybe we really do need to think about changing the rules so that in the Senate you don't need

sixty votes to get anything done anymore. And this is just it's just nonsense. This is not the way it's supposed to be. This is an artificial constraint the Senate puts upon itself so that it really just creates political cover for senators so they never have to take tough votes. You know, they don't want to be in a position where they're the fifty feet vote for something. Um. So that's that's a part of this discussion that I guess

I'll put off for another time. But they're not gonna They're not gonna do anything big on immigration, especially right in advance of the the midterms. This is all for show. This is a show vote. And beyond that, I think that they will get through this way to you know, deal with the families, keep them together. Though We'll be interesting to see how Democrats try to demogogue that part of the issue as well. They're gonna they're gonna make sure they squeeze as much out of this in the

new cycle as they can. You know, Trump is hitler, Trump is a bad guy, all that kind of stuff. That's what they're gonna do here. Um. But in the meantime, our our immigration policy continues as an unsustainable and uh broken. So it is broken, but people have broken it. It's not because it's it's not that the system itself is inherently flawed, that it has been broken, and it's been broken by an unholy alliance between the Democrats and waves

of illegal immigration. That's what's happened, and no one seems like they want to fix it. You know, eventually, you're gonna have You're gonna have real problems in this country when we realize that our debt when when we feel not just realize that our debtload is unsustained bowl and we turn around and we say, okay, So we've been subsidizing the poor from the rest of the world by bringing them into this country in an economy where they are unlikely to be able to be net contributors. And

also that has changed the political culture. Mean Democrats are okay with changing the fundamental political culture of the United States through legal immigration. They're fine with it as long as they vote Democrat, as long as their status. People that want a big welfare state, a lot of government regulation, intrusion, a lot of what you see in most of the rest of the world. So I find this all quite troubling. Republicans are disappointing on this issue. I gotta build a wall, folks,

we were promised the wall, I Trump said today. I know we we started it, not enough. We've taken one step on a thousand mile journey here. It's not enough. So, like I said, the vote is going to fail, and then they'll pass something that will be narrowly tailored to

keeping families together in Democrats. Democrats will claim victory on it, and I hope that no one pays attention to the fact that they have lots of Democrats running around, Democrat activists at least, who won't be abolition of immigrations and customs enforcement entirely. They're trying to. They're trying to quiet them down now, down now, because they don't want the American people to figure that out. All right, eight four buck will take some calls when we come back. Stay

with me, Welcome back team. We got calls on the well, calls on the line. That's not really a thing, I guess, but right, but we've got calls up. We are lit. The Freedom Hunt is ready for action. Don in Omahana Braska, What up? Don Wow? What a privilege to talk to you. Privilege to talk to you, sir. Yeah, thank God for Dorset. Yeah, oh wow. Well, Actually, gonna be be honest with you done. I mean, yes, thank God, first and foremost, gotta thank

Trump for Corset. Without Without Trump, without Trump, you'd have you'd have some smarmy leftist in judges robes on that court just dispensing with rule of law, with constitutional norms in favor of being hashtag resistance hero number one. That's what would be going on. Oh, absolutely no, you're You're absolutely right. But I just gotta say My comment to the screener was this, I had lost I gave up cable for the summer because I figured I was not

gonna watch how much TV. So the only channel I can get now is CBS, and so I watched the morning news, and it's just interesting to watch the facial expression of the people as they content on the news stories, especially when it comes to when it comes to immigration.

I think her name is gay Old Keen Media, the black girl, and there's a white down here, and they just look when they report, they look at each other like this is this look of disdain, and she's always going to make a little snide coming on the end of every story that with with immigration and Trump, and it's just so obvious what their biases are. And it just shows me a total lack of objectivity when it comes to the media, and and it gets the point where it's so glaring that it just it's very off

putting after a while. Yep, I I totally agree. I see it. To my friend, Uh, it's it's very clear to me who's a Democrat pretending to be an objective journalist in the media, and you know, and who's, uh, well, that's what they all do. So I guess it's very clear to me when they're doing it. Though, Earl in Shelby, Ohio, Hey, Earl, to talk to you in. I agree with the last guy. I The only thing is is I don't understand how

the ones on the other side. I think that it's okay to write law anyway, because that's what they're supposed to do when they're Spring court judges. They're supposed to look at the law and take it as it is. And if they were against what Trump did and they were trying to write law. But what I really called about is I think Trump could take care of of our problem at the border tomorrow by closing the border and you have to apply to come in and we

will look at you for ninety days. And I'm sure, there's a bunch of those people that we wouldn't have to look at very hard and they would never get to come into the come across the border. All right, earl, thank you for thank you for your thoughts on with my friend. We gotta run into a break and it's a second here, I a uh, I'm in the next hour. And the dumbest comment I've heard on cable losing the last twenty four hours, which give him what Gurgan said

before is really quite a bar. But it's the single dumbest I think that I've heard, maybe the dumbest all month. Uh. And then also civility, civility discussion. Oh, isn't it so quaint? Isn't it so cute when democrats pretend to care. We'll get into that and know so much more. Don't forget tomorrow. The Freedom Up with Buck Sexton downloaded on iTunes. It's gonna be a fun show. It's gonna be a quick show.

It's gonna be different from this show. So if you haven't already, please subscribe, check it out on iTunes and team back in just a few The FBI calls home title theft one of the fastest growing crimes out there. And if you've ever had your credit card stolen, as I have, it can be a really stressful and terrible experience. Having your homes title stolen is way worse, my friends. And it's so easy for the bad guys to do. Here's the scam. They just need internet access. They target

American homeowners. They take your name, they replace it with alias, and then they start taking out loans against your home. You find out about it when the requests for payment from the bank or whomever they've borrowed money from start showing up at your front door. And guess what, if you've got insurance, if you've got identity theft protection, that doesn't stop this. You need home Title Lock for just pennies a day. Home Title Lock protects my most viable asset,

my family home. Register now for free analysis and discovery. If your home's title has been compromised, that's a sixty dollar value free visit home title lock dot com. That's home title lock dot com. Welcome back to him. How with all the talk of civility out there, you know, it's just a matter of time before some folks in the in the media do the whole Oh no, it's

so hard for us. Trump is so mean to us a Trump supporters or so, I mean, they're so on civil and you know, because the media these days it's all about pretending they're not making the story about them, but they are making this story about that, right, That's that's the game that they play, one of their favorite games, really, and there's nobody who does it more egregiously I think, then, uh than than Jim Acosta, who just him. And then there's a few of them, right Acosta, Tapper, Uh, Cooper,

I don't really, I don't. I don't watch enough of his stuff to really know, quite honestly, these days what his you know, don Lemon, these people are there there there journalists who just happened to always shade their narrative

towards the Democrats side of things. Their journalists who happened to be in good standing with Democrats all the time and never seem to really do anything too greatly upset them and at a costa though in particular, you know, he's tweeting out that president's a liar, the President's come and then he's like, why don't people treat me like I'm just a nonpartisan journalists Because we're all supposed to be a bunch of complete idiots. But sure enough, um,

sure enough. We have Acosta at a rally where he came him into contact with some Trump supporters and things got things got interesting. Blake clip four. Please, we have about a couple of thousand people listening to him so far. They are letting the press corps here know exactly how they feel about what we're doing here. Wolf a thing

it is, though secret. He is going to hammer the issue of immigration right up until the bid term elections come, and even with families being separated with their children at the Board of the President believes this issue is a winner for the Republican Party. I don't know if you got it all, but they were yelling go home, Jim, and fake news Jim. Oh, it's amazing. Oh, it's amazing. It's so great. It's the funniest thing I've seen in

a long time. Also, I have seen some coverage some signs that people have Fox News real news, CNN fake news, MSNBC disgusting. We love Sarah. You see some of these signs up. But there was a woman who got right up in Acosta's face. She's just great. She's right up in Acosta's grill and uh and you know he's he's doing like it's fine. Nobody actually threatened anybody. They're allowed. Well, you know, why aren't they I don't understand. You know, the media is saying, oh, you know, protest is fine

of this thing. They're just they're allowed to chant things. They're at a rally, folks, They're not a Jim Acosta's home. As I've said, I wouldn't be okay with that. Don't mess with Jim Acosta in front of his family. Don't mess with Jim Acosta when he's out having a meal. That's not cool. But you're at a political rally, people can chat things at you. Okay, that's just the that's just reality. Though this is a very but see, they pretend to blur these lines. The left. They act like

they don't know the difference. They act like they have no ability to reason out. You know, what's what's a completely understandable expression of disagreement? Shall me shall we say with seeing adversities, what is you know, crossing the line going too far? But you know what costa he got a little he want to let everybody know he was upset. Later on, he talked about the civility point. Play that

clip too. And with all of this talk of civility, well if I can tell you that not all of the people in this crowd here in West Columbia, South Carolina treated us with that level of civility that we all think that Americans should be entitled to across this country. While we have had some people come up to us and be very nice this evening, I did have uh, an elderly woman come up to me just a short

while ago. We have some video we can show you where she came up to me and said that we a CNN should get the f out of this auditorium at this high school in West Colombia. She then turned to the crowd and whipped them up into a frenzy, uh, calling on us to leave this auditorium before President Trump arrives. Wolf. But of course, as you know, we are here to do our jobs and report the news and report on

this rally. And so there's part of the the woman is it is an elderly woman, Okay, And look, I can't say that I I would shout profanity at reporters and you know that that's that's not a move I would make but she's allowed to not like these reporters.

And I just think it's so interesting that you know that this is the place we are now, where at political rallies we're gonna talk about civility, but when people want to have dinner with their family in their off time, then it's more of a well, you know, your policy

is really bad at the border. By the way, in the photo of the of the elderly woman I can see here on Fox news dot Com, there's there is a guy who is clearly he's his shield, his badge is showing on his belt right next to the so so, Jim Acosta is being heckled by an elderly woman who is standing behind a metal barrier with a police officer standing right there and watching, and he's concerned. It seems

he's worried about what this elderly woman. You know, maybe she's going to I don't know, she's going to take a cane out and try to poke him with it or something. I don't know. I don't know what the big worry is here. Nothing bad is gonna happen, Jim. It's all gonna be fine. But you see what the what the media keeps doing is is trying to shift the goalposts here away from a discussion this week about

just how disgraceful the conduct has been toward Trump people. Uh, and what one of the things I do now is they just say, well, because Trump is bad than anything that anyone else does is in response to Trump. See, they have this magic trick of making Trump responsible for all bad behavior, including bad behavior that they themselves do or that comes from their side. Play clip two. Should someone who lies constantly and enables the president's lies be

openly welcomed in society wherever they please? I would say that the polite discourse is inappropriate when there are babies and cages. Now, does that mean that we're going to be violent? No? But does that mean that Sarah Sanders can have a nice, quiet dinner with her family when she's taking our tax dollars to implement this policy. I don't think so. It wasn't until we had three year olds in cages that these people couldn't go in the public.

Too bad on that, But this fulgarity that exists represented primarily right now, pushed by the president, now coursed on either side of the aisle, has made it much worse and much harder to do anything in this country. Those comments were stated a significant backlash from members of both parties and from the President, who we should not lied about waters what waters it said, and appeared to then

threaten her with violence. You know that they're doing everything they can here to make it how it's it's just Trump's fault. It somehow is always Trump's fault. And what what they don't understand this whole process is that if that's really their position, if that is really their belief, then I guess anything is justified. Right. Anyone can say anything to anyone at any time and say, but Trump is so bad, I hate Trump so much. Did you hear what Trump said to that guide or in the campaign?

This is we talked about what about is them sometimes? Or two wrongs don't make it right. This is the most basic stuff that you could ever see, the most basic version of a non argument argument. Right. The the comments that Maxie Laughter has made, the comments that some of these other people have made the last week are are just disgraceful. It's just disgusting. And as I don't care what Trump says, Okay, Trump's not making these other

people say anything. And you know when when when they tell us about how they want, they're so upset that Trump isn't civil enough, they turn around and then they act this way. We realized that, oh no, they're just upset as Trump fights back because you know what, they were on civil like this before Trump too, folks. I remember they were calling Trump a Nazi and Cheney's a Nazi. I'm sorry, Bush a Nazi and Cheney's a Nazi, and you know, war criminal Chinese a war criminal. You know

this is this is not new. This is who they are. This is how they are. They are character assassins. They smear people, they destroy reputations. They they will not extend any good faith to the other side in these political arguments. They just won't. They won't, and they offer you a choice, you know, get co opted by us on the left. Come over to our side, be an anti an anti Trump conservative, which what does that even mean these days?

You're going to oppose all the really good conservative stuff that Trump has been implementing as president because you don't like the guy. Were you gonna throw a little tantrum That strikes me as really unwise. But your options are either go over to the left and be useful to them, or they'll destroy you, or they'll ruin you. That's what that's what they proposed. Although you know they they were at Stephen Miller's house yesterday. Now they're actually tracking down

senior advisors. You know, they're gonna try the cabinet officials. I don't even talk about how at the Red Hen I'm seeing reports from the Washington Examiner. You know, the Red Head is where Sara Huckaby Sanders was chased or I'm sorry it was was harassed. It turns out that she may have also been chased to another place, to a restaurant across the street. I needs someone to explain

how that's okay. You know, originally it was, well, it's her place, you know, the owner's place, the owner's rules. It turns out that's not really how it happened. Kind of kind of turns out that we're in a situation where they were just that this owner was deranged and trying to make a big statement about how much she hates you know, Sarah be Staners. You know, it reminds me I remember a long time ago, early on the administration.

You know, Ivanka took a like an exercise class somewhere in d C. And the exercise class owner was posting about how you know next time she's gonna pull Ivanka's side and have a conversation with Earth. I doesn't want to talk to you, doesn't have to talk to you. That's not that's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. But you know the Left that that you know there their biggest problem. I keep saying it, The biggest problem is that all the terrible calamities that

they said would befall this country have not happened. The country is actually doing really well, and it's doing really well under someone that they said was evil and terrible and dumb. Well, who looks dumb? Now it's not us, it's not Trump. We'll be right back. Alarm companies get a lot of complaints from the Better Business Bureau of my friends, and that's because they're trying to always lock

you into these long term contracts. I can help you fix all of your home security needs, simply safe home security. If you go and check this out, you'll see for yourself. I've got a simply safe system at home. It just runs off the WiFi. It couldn't be any easier, and honestly, It looks cool if you're somebody that likes Apple products, if you're somebody that cares about sleek design and a really easy to use interface and total accessibility remote accessibility.

I should add you can use an app to do it. It's so straightforward and it protects every aspect of your home. It looks good in your home, It's easy to use, runs off the WiFi, no long term contracts, no alarm company style scams can be any easier. Simply safe dot com slash buck. Check it out for yourself. Simple please safe dot com slash buck. Again, try the same system I have at home with simply safe dot com slash buck. Huge high stakes gamble and it would take on the outsider.

Somebody liked Donald Trump, and I say this to his credit, to try to shake up the system, particularly vis of each China, where we all know China has been picking our pocket and stealing from us, and we just acquiesced. Donald Trump comes along and says, I'll fight. I'll fight for America, I'll fight for American workers. I'll take on China. We don't know if he'll win the fight, though, And that's what Harley Davidson shows when the presidents slapped tariffs

on Europe. Europe slapped tariffs back. The tariffs hit Harley. Harley moves to Europe so they won't be hit by European terrorists. That's how trade wars go. If Trump can pull this off and make the rest of the world lower their tariffs and get back to more free trade, boy will he be a successful president. We picked up about eight trillion dollars in value doing what we're doing. Now we've got a little bit of uncertainty because of trade.

To me, there's no uncertainty, and other people that happened to be smart, there's no uncertainty. But we can't allow the European Union two take out a hundred and fifty one billion dollars out of the United States. We can't allow Mexico to have enough to deal that gives them over a hundred billion dollars. And I call it a profit. You know, you can divide that up anyway you want

to do it. I call it a profit. So the trade issue is getting some attention again this week, and you know, I think that that Ari Fleisher's point there, and then of course we heard from the present right after him really relevant to this discussion. There is a risk here, you know. Trump says, look, there's uncertainty. I don't think there's uncertainty. But this is a This is a a negotiation, and one side can do better than the other side of negotiation. There's no guarantee that everyone

comes out of negotiation feeling like it's great. That's not how this works. But one thing that is guaranteed is if only one side negotiates, or rather one side dictates the terms of an interaction, you're not getting a good deal. You have to use the possibility of either walking away from a deal or using your own leverage to bring the other side closer to your side. Right, so you say, okay, you know, I'm if they're gonna if they're gonna act

this way. With regard to all, they're all kinds of tariff the EU has in place, which I think it's so funny, and they don't have their leadership class, they don't have the elites and the EU single may we be yeah, we must get the widos it tariffs. It's so tarriball they're not I'm apparently everyone in Europe is French, but they're not saying that. Although there are some vaguely

euro accents that you're here. Sometimes you're like, are you just kind of from Spain, Switzerland, Germany, England, like kind of all over the place. You know you'll hear this. I can't really do it, but I know when I hear at the vague European accent. But there's gonna be some disruptions here. There's going to be a little bit of unease in this process. There would there would have to be. It wouldn't make any sense if there wasn't. Right, we know that there would have to be because you've

got two sides that are in conflict over something. It's a trade conflict, but it's not. It's not something that can just be resolved by wishing it away. And the point about China that couldn't be any more obvious. We're being told all the time, the trade wars are so bad,

the tariffs are so stupid, tariffs or attacks. Meanwhile, China has. China, with its massive systems of not just tariffs but intellectual property theft and cheating on trade in a whole variety of ways, has kinda gotten richer or poorer over the last thirty years doing what it's doing. It's gotten astronomically richer as a country. So what does that tell us? Clearly, you can still do very well even if you're putting tariffs in place. I don't think the tariffs just for

their own sake or a good idea. I don't think they're a good idea for political constituencies, particular ones at home, which we already have tariffs. By the way, that you a sense of tariffs at place. I mean this. The more I've learned about this, and I'm telling you, I'm just like many of you. I've been diving in and reading about tariffs as we go along. And that's why I can tell you, you you know, I can start to get into how you know, some tariffs or quota based,

some tariffs are percentage based. Some tariffs aren't really even about the money so much as they're about the process and the regulations you have to go through to bring something into a country. Right. There's there's all this. It's a it's a very intricate part of international uh commerce, but it's all and it's a very important one obviously too. But we're just beginning to have this discussion. People have been saying, oh no, we're just about I'm a free trader.

I just want to be wealthy. I'm all about free trade. Yeah, that's right, free trade for me. What does that mean? Are you a free trader if you have the EU putting tariffs on your products and you're just like, well, I don't want to upset them. So, you know, with China doing all the stuff that it does, are you free trade If you just say, yeah, well, you know, we don't want to mess with China on trade, it

doesn't make any sense. You think this stuff through, and you see Trump's point of view on this is much more understandable. And is he right We'll see. We don't know yet, meaning meaning can he make this thing work? Can he actually get other countries to back off their tariffs. Maybe not, Maybe some of them find their domestic industries that they protect with their tariff systems to be too important. That's also possible. I'm not saying he's gonna win these negotiations.

I was just saying least he's trying, and the economic dislocations and uncertainty that we're feeling in the meantime, of course, you're gonna get certain companies that are gonna hyperventil it over this of course you're gonna see uh, circumstances where people are acting like this is the end of the world, because it's all about the bottom line for them, right, It's all about you know, Harley Davidson's gonna say, well, you know, we were now gonna move, We're gonna off shore.

But you know, Harley Davidson, there's already international corporation folks, they were They've got a facility in Thailand. This is what doesn't make it too the headlines. It's got a facility in Thailand to serve the Southeast Asian markets. So we think of these iconic and these great American brands and go, oh no, you know they're gonna because of Trump's tariffs, they're gonna off shore. They're already off shoring

in many cases, they've already got international operations ongoing. So you know, if if they're going to react in that way, if they're gonna say, okay, well, that's their right. They're allowed to make decisions based on their own economy, should make the decisions based on their economic self interest, but that doesn't mean that should dictate the rest of national policy. When it comes to trade. This you start to see

it turns into a war of anecdotes. You know, who's gonna tell a story that seems more compelling on the nightly news, either the Trump administration or an individual company in any one of these areas. By the way, all this stuff you're seeing and this really bothers me. People say, oh, Trump, he's picking winners and losers, and he's calling out individual companies. Obama would would rate companies over the coal when they got in his way. You know, he would call them

unpatriotic if they, you know, trying to avoid taxies. But you go back, you look at the obaministration record. He called out companies too. This is just nonsense that people say. But you know, there's a lot of a lot of hoopla, a lot of nonsense out there these days. I want to tell you about something coming up in them just a moment. The dumbest comment I've heard on cable news all month. And we're pretty deep into June here, so

that's that's really saying something. But for a a political on air analysts, I think this was the single dumbest comment that I've heard all month. And you know, some people are just trying to one up each other with who can be the most hyperbolic about the situation at the border. We have a winner, folks, tell you who it is and you can hear the comment after the break. There's a lot of bad analysis on cable news that that's not new to you, Right, That's not something that

we avoid talking about here in the Hut. There's there are people who get paid a lot of money to go on TV and say really, really dumb things. But this is almost in a class by itself, which, given what happening these days, is it's a surprising thing to be able to say that. Right, there's so much stupidity out there, but this is a special kind of stupid, aggressively stupid, you could say. And it happened on on Morning Joe, where they have this analyst Schmidt, who's also

the guy who recently said he's no longer Republican. He's no longer Republican because of Trump. So now it used to be pro life. I guess now he's gonna help Democrats get pro abortion candidates elected. Right. Used to be in favor of the second a moment, Now he wants gun confiscation. Used to be uh in favor of commerce and capitalism, and now wants environmentalists to strangle private enterprise and have regulations piled on tap of, on top of

small business owners so that they can't get anywhere. Okay, all because of Trump, right, that's but just put that aside for a moment, though it it is necessary context for we're about to go here. Just listen when it goes. First, you get you get Joe Scarborough, who I will say, decent hair. The law you can say about your Scarborough decent hair. I mean it's not handity hair, but it's decent, you know what I'm saying. It's not like Hannity's, like top level. Joe's hair is okay, So I respect the

hair a little bit. The commentary sometimes though not so much at all. It's very it's very high school gossip table at the morning Joe A lot of the time. That's the way it comes across to me. But just listen to this play the clip. I'm not a theology, I'm not a theologian. A chara to make me go to Baptist churches four times a week for about twenty one years. You're so folks, that didn't take. But I

do remember a lot of Bible verses. It is one of the few times in the New Testament where Jesus hasn't say we are saved by faith and we are saved by grace, which we are. It's one of the few times, though Jesus says, this is what you have to do to get to heaven, and if you don't do it, you will not get to heaven. One of the few times he says, this is it, and it is giving a cup of water and the Master's name, feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting those in prison,

and and again helping the least amongments. Extraordinary preach Joe, preach by the way, messenger, Okay, okay, okay, alright, so it's just positive for a second, all right, yeah, and then okay, thank you for the the Sunday school lesson from from Scarborough there. I wonder do you think in one of Joe's uh several mansions, is there room for some refugees to take off residents? I would assume the

answer is yes. I'm sure the I'm sure the servants quarters at whatever massive properties he owns in New York, Nantucket, Washington, d C. I'm sure there's ample room for refugees. So you know, we can all play this game. Also have to love how you get these TV pundits. Well, I'm not gonna delve into people's personal lives and try to

avoid that. I'm not perfect with it. But but but all of a sudden, they they find Jesus when it comes to virtue shaming the Republicans right then there, Oh, you know what about you know, if you can't passed through the eye of a needle or something like that with the camel and the you know, give to poor people. All of a sudden they've become oh so Christian And you say, well, what about a man and a woman? What about binary gender is? What about marriage as a

sacred institution before God? But you a man of Omen, how dare you? You, Biggert, take your bigger Christian Bible out of my face. Right so they're all a joke. But listen to what Steve Schmidt. This is just he decided to remember this all that immigration, it's all about talking to Latin American people that immigration is what Steve Schmidt has to say flat Jesus talking extraordinary and astounding

hypocrisy of it. To see the constancy of the assertion of Christian virtue by political leaders in this country who have established internment camps for babies and adler's. And by the way, and I never in a millionaires thought I would sit here or anywhere and say this. But the difference now between Venezuela in Cuba and the United States is this Venezuela and Cuba or the countries without internment

camps for babies and toddlers still ahead on board. That is the dumbest thing I've heard on TV all month, the single dumbest thing. Congratulations, Steve Schmidt. Uh. To compare, Cuba has had political prisons for decades, were they torture and murder people who are political opponents of the regime.

Cuba also has a horrific record not just on basic human rights and politic free association and political representation, but also of oppression, of gaze, of going after the LGBT community in ways that are are true oppression and true discrimination. And Venezuela is like the the eighth circle of Hell. These days, you have a government that can't do anything to turn around the fact that when you have social justice determining your economic policy, you run out of toilet

paper you don't have. There's no milk on the no milk on the shelves, or no bread on the shelves in the store, no milk in the freezer, no freezers for the milk even or electricity for them. This is I don't know how much dumber it is going to get in that, I really don't. But this is the kind of stuff that you will hear from people, and some of them get paid a lot of money to

do it. But he wins the prize. Steve Schmidt, dumbest thing I've heard on TV all month, obviously knows nothing about a true totalitarian country, hasn't spent much time or doesn't remember any time in a country where there's real tyranny, and uh, it was just preposterous. But we've got a roll call coming up, so stay with me. The show ain't over yet, folks, It's time for roll call. Matter how, cartoons back in the day used to have really great music.

I remember watching all these bugs Bunny cartoons and other cartoons on whatever. I don't remember where the channels were now I've gotten sold, but they just had they had really good music, and there was this old time cartoon vibe that was a lot of fun. Anyway, that music kind of reminds me a little bit of some of that roll call. If you want to get in on

the action, you know how to do it. You just go to uh Facebook dot com, slash bucks extent, send me your thoughts, send me your ideas, friends, Team Buck countrymen, lend me your ears or your Facebook messages, same idea. Alrighty with that, I think we're in a in a perfect place here to get into the roll call. Uh Nate Nathaniel also in his Nate, I'm guessing I don't know why I jumped out. I'd like to shorten your name. Sometimes you call any rights. I don't know how you

do it, but you're doing great work. I see you've got more time for your thoughts on rising this morning. It's time for a North Korea date. I see some subterfuge from the leftist propaganda papers, but it looks like some real changes are happening in North Korea. Well, that's a very important thing for us to look at, and I will get after it. So thank you Nathaniel for that. Next up, we have a Milucci, cool name, great Facebook

live broadcast. Buck One suggestion, though, have the printer flipped the image of your show logo horizontally printed on the back of that one, so you have a dual use sign. Shields high MILUCI. That is a very good idea, hopefully on you know, hopefully we've made the necessary changes here going forward to make the best Facebook Lives possible. One thing is I'm used to doing radio and not looking into a camera these days. I used to do at

The Blaze. We did a simulcast for a while. It was a full TV show on cable of of the radio show that I was doing at the play. Um here, I guess I'll have to get used to looking at the camera while I'm doing the show. Maybe if we're going to continue with the Facebook Lives. Chadwick also cool name, Chadwick right saying, Hey, Buck Shields Hie. I've been listening to you since you had the two hour show on The Blaze, and I love all the content you put out.

Thank you, Chadwick. You have fantastic taste and content. It seems to me, amidst all the haphazard Democrat allusions to Nazism on a daily basis, that the Left is projecting their affinity for absolutism and brown shirt tactics onto Trump supporters. Is there anything more Nazi like than dehumanizing your political opponents to a caricature in order to justify an abandonment

of decency and an escalation of political violence. Seems like these radical leftists are not interested in sharing the country or seating power when they lose elections. Uh, they're desperate. Rhetoric is taking us to the brink of violence, and I don't know where these self styled resistance folks would go from here should Trump win real election in it's a scary time, Chadwick, It's a little scary, but this will pass. Their hysteria is exhausting, and eventually it will

not because they've turned to sanity or reason. They'll just kind of cry themselves out, you know, when you know what a baby or or a little kid is crying and then eventually, like the crying just becomes too tiring. That's what the leftists, that's what's gonna happen. I'm not saying bad things can't happen in the meantime, but eventually they will run out of liberal tears. You know, Eventually they won't be able to keep keep the nonsense going.

At least not continuously. Brian writes, Buck, You're doing great things with all your new avenues of media, and appreciate your approach on Rising, being respectful of Crystal's misaligned views while also finding common ground. Nice dedication on Charles Crottammer on radio the other day. I would be interested to hear who the other four writers whose columns you actively sought out in your youth were. Also to your points

on talking to someone before they leave this world. You should try to do an interview on Rising with economist Thomas soul Or on your radio show. He is eighty seven years old now, and the younger generation needs to know more about his brave, intelligent at this brave intelligent

and outspoken individual from Brian. Brian, thank you for the very kind and thoughtful message you asked what the columnists that I read stretching back to about let's say high school for me junior senior of high school, the columnists that I would seek out their columns was crod Hammer and Coulter, Christopher Hitchens, and then the fourth was kind of a wild card. Um, you know, basically whoever you know I would I would kind of peruse National Review.

So those would be. But those are the ones that crod Hammer, Coulter, and Hitchens worth the three. You know, I think I said four, It really is more three. There were some others that would be in that same kind. I might be forgetting somebody right now actually in my list of four. Or maybe I'm just whimping out about the fact that I used to read a lot of George Will Maybe I'm whipping out on that one now

and I just don't know it. That's that's possible to Oh, Pat Buchanan, Sorry, that was the one I was missing. Pat Buchanan, I just pulled the Rick Perry, you know, the get rid of the departments, the full department of three departments or whatever it was. Yeah. Pat Buchanan, uh and Coulter, Charles Crodhammer, and Christopher Hitchens were the four calumnists that I would seek out in my youth for their for their writing. Um. So there you have it. Those would be the big for me, the big four.

I mean, I've always helped. Buchanon's columns are very very thought provoking, very very interesting, and and Coulter. When Coulter hits it, she you just want to like, you just want to high five somebody. I mean when Coulter's Inner Strike Zone, it's great. And Hitchens was just such a good writer and very provocative, and you know he's he was really bigoted against Christian entity, and you had to know that when you were reading his stuff. But was

a really intelligent and interesting, uh author, storyteller, thinker. So I liked Hitchens a whole lot. I actually used to watch videos stretching back to my time in college and then afterwards in the early days of the year, I I just watched videos of Hitchens debating, debating different issues because you could find them all on YouTube. And I always thought he was really good, you know, And now

I'm feeling bad Like Victor Davis Hansen. I've read a number of his books also, really really have always enjoyed his columns too. I mean he's right in that for me, that same that same tier of of greatness. So all right, but see, you got me all got me all excited with your with your roll call message here, Brian, so I jumped into it. Keith next up her book. I was finally able to sit down and watch Rising. I think you two have hit it out of the ballpark.

We finally have a conservative and progressive and team who can sit side by side and have a meaningful dialogue and then professionally interview people without letting your own political ideologies get in the way. Shield high bro. One more thing, selfishly, I hope you can come to Austin, Texas. Uh again, I was not able to be there last time. PS. Being gluten free in Texas is not an easy thing, but I'm proud to say that I'm doing it well.

First of all, congrats on being gluten free. I don't know if it's for health reasons or just dietary choice, but I'm buck is part of the War on gluten, all right, I'm I'm a colonel in the War on Gluten, a four deployed operator in the War on Gluten. I've never been to Austin still, and I talked about it. We've got a wonderful affiliate down there, a truly great radio station, k l b J, and all the folks listening on kl b JS want to say thank you.

I know I'm I'm relatively new into your world, but we're getting great listenership in the Austin area and I really do want to That's my that's my pick. For where I want to go to do a team and bucket van as soon as I can. As you can all imagine right now, I am a stretched to the limit here with doing a one hour early morning show and then a three hour radio show in the evening, and then during the day reading, researching, writing, so a

lot of things going on, a lot of things. But Keith, thank you so much for your message, and I will make it to Austin for the first time in the next six to twelve months. I think that's fair to say. Ah. Hannah writes, Hey, man, I got a question. Might not be something you talk about on roll call. Oh okay, Hannah, Well then I won't, but thank you for setting to give the question. Um. And next we get Josh, Hey buck I listen to your podcast all the time and

half for years now. I tried leaving a review for The Red Hen and Google was blocking it. Do you think Google is controlling too much of what facts are? Well, Josh, I just would say, I hope if you're leaving a review for The Red Head and you're leaving it for the right one. Uh. And because that's been happening people, it's it's one in Connecticut at those Massachusetts people have been confusing the red Head of Massachusetts with the red

Head of Virginia. I guess the popular name for a restaurant. I think Google is too powerful. I think that these various, uh, these various Internet platforms are just in general, um, astonishingly powerful and and it's something that we need to we just need to consider what's really happening. I know it's

they have so much control, folks. They are changing right now the content business in ways that content companies are having a a tough time with because of what they m because of what they are, you know, able to do with regard to advertising dollars and CPMs. Anyway, It's maybe a boring conversation, but Facebook and Google are going to control everything soon in terms of what you see. The only way around it is going to be direct subscription.

I'm gonna tell you this now. My My dream is to just eight the freedom hunt as as really a in a sense, a content pirate ship where we be sure, uh sure we can, you know, we can do whatever we can and try to use different platforms, but I really want to be as independently in control of content as I possibly can going forward and work look, it's just a dream of mine. That's why I love the podcasting, the FaceTime, well Facebook actually live, which there you go.

See it's really hard to get around these things. Um, I'm gonna leave it there. In my conversation for where the future of media is, that's for another day. Please do subscribe to the Freedom Hunt podcast, folks, The Freedom Hunt with Buck Sexton. It is on iTunes. We are hoping to get it on Stitcher this week. It'll be out tomorrow in the afternoon. Looking forward to that and much more until tomorrow, my friends, Shields High