"Illegal Surveillance" is just "Fancy Spying"

decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Mag Noo, mistake American? Great, you're a great American? Again, The buck Sexton Show begins analyst, He's a great guy. No. I think our nation was turned on its head for three years. I think based on a completely bogus narrative that was largely fanned and hyped by an irresponsible press. And I think that there were gross abuses of faiza and inexplicable behavior that it

is intolerable in the FBI. In one area I do disagree with the IG, and that was whether there were sufficient predication to open a full blown counterintelligence investigation, specifically using the techniques that they did to collect intelligence about

the Trump campaign. The greatest danger to our free system is that the incumbent government used the apparatus of the state, principally the law enforcement agencies and the intelligence agencies, both to spy on political opponents, but also to use them in a way that could affect the outcome of the election. And I think when you step back here and say

what was this all based on, it's not sufficient. The core statement, in my opinion, by the IG is that these irregularities, these misstatements, these omissions were not satisfactorily explained. The question really is what was the agenda after the election that kept them pressing ahead after their case collapsed. This is the President of the United States. Welcome to

the Bucks Accent show. Friends. That was Attorney General Barr with some very important comments that everyone needs to keep in mind right now, given the unbelievable mendacity of the press, the willingness to skip past what has happened here. Oh that's right. The Inspector General that the media has been telling us, of course, is so trustworthy and great because he didn't completely annihilate every aspect of their narrative, just

the fact that the Steel dossier was a fraud. Carter Page did nothing wrong enormous mistakes, tremendous blunders, and we'll get into whether they were just mistakes in a minute. But the only thing they don't really have quite yet is somebody from the FBI saying, you know what, let's abuse the investigative process. Let's weaponize FIZ against a presidential campaign, signed agent so and so sending to agent so and so with a declaration and signature at the bottom. That's

basically all they're missing. But to protect the institution of the FBI, they're willing to say, we don't know. We couldn't get an explanation for it. I have some explanations to offer up today to you here on the show. It was sunning. I saw Carter Page last night. I was at Fox News. I had a nice chat with Carter. We've always gotten along very well. I know that Carter is now about to embark on a series of lawsuits.

I hope the Carter Page becomes a very, very wealthy man as a result of those lawsuits, because he deserves to be, not the nineteen billion dollars level wealthy that was written in the dossier. Again, at dossier that only morons could believe was true, and that was never verified, and that people from the most elite media institutions across the LIBS spectrum kept pretending was mostly true had not been discredited. How many times have you heard this? By the way, I just have to I have to hat

tip some of my friends in conservative media. Sean Davis has been a beast on this one. Molly Molly Hemingway also fantastic, both of them at the Federalists, among others, who are just going around and pulling out old tweets of these idiotic, dishonest frauds who are very well paid journos with big platforms at NBC and CNN and The New York Times saying things that are just now we know flatly on true. Do you sense any apology coming

from them. Do you sense any of them coming forward to say, wow, we really missed this one and let's all keep this in perspective. They're trying to just whistle past this one like nothing has happened. What did happen, beyond any reasonable doubt, is the weaponization of law enforcement against the presidential campaign of Donald Trump, and they continue the continuation of that weaponization past his actual election victory. For reasons that the FBI admits are utterly inexplicable to them.

I do not think they are inexplicable to us. I think we all know, my friends, if somebody in the law enforcing community signs that they have their suspect, they have their person, they know that they don't have to do a lot to keep going. They know that they don't have to change that much in order to get that one last warrant to search the person's home, or

to get that arrest warrant to bring them in. And if they're willing to break the rules, if they're willing to stack the deck, as I like to say, all it takes is, you know, drop a little DNA here, and drop a firearm there, whatever it may be. You know, place the murder place and prints on the murder weapon. You all watch detective shows, you know that's an egregious misconduct, right that violates the oath of that law enforcement officer

and violates the law. Now we are told, for example, and I would like someone to explain this to me, and I know that they can't. That's why I put out that challenge. I also know that they better keep these little MSNBC, CNN national security experts, all these other people that have built careers. Somebody wrote a book called Proof of Collusion. The guy's an idiot. There is no proof of collusion. Do you think he's going to retract that one? I challenged him to a debate ones that

was funny. It was oh, I would never never deigned to debate somebody, somebody who actually worked in the intelligence community has some idea what he's talking about, clown And none of them take any accountability for this. None of them care that they were lying about this in many cases, or that they ran with something that is It is unfathomable that they really could believe this. They have neither common sense nor sense of justice at the FBI and

the press. This is a national scandal. President Trump came into drained the swamp. In a sense, this is the swamp in self immolation. This is the establishment class in DC and of the press showing us who they really are and what they really believe in. No accountability, no honesty. Just stare everybody in the eye and say, what are you going to do about it? We're in charge and the other people who are supposed to make sure that we can't do that, Like President Trump, We're going after them.

That's what's happening here. You have the biggest scandal in terms of politics and in many ways in terms of national security, because this does what undermines our elections and undermines our institutions, is that now any president who comes into office who does not think that leftists throughout the bureaucracy are a threat to his or her presidency is being foolish. Not just the Russia collusion, mass prous or struck Page, McCabe, comy, look at all these individuals. This

is that that's the top rung of the FBI. These are the people running the whole institution. Tens of thousands of FBI agents commanded by these people, and we're told that, oh, no, there was a legitimate predicate, a legitimate predicate. You could only think that there was legitimate predict for the investigation known as Crossfire, Hurricane, and particularly the fives warrant of Carter Page. If you're a moron. They're telling us openly

now that they are completely and utterly stupid. And that is their defense because if we start to look a little bit deeper, we may find out that there's something

else there. You will notice that yesterday in interviews, and Sanctacomy is running around, and he's actually a great help to our side, the side of the truth seekers, because Sanctacomy shows you how rotten the federal bureaucracy had become under the Obama administration, and really for many years building up to that, just how utterly partisan and disgraceful the

top rung of federal law enforcement had become. And let's remember this, the most dangerous, the most dangerous organization to your liberty in this country is not the NRA, how to debate, how to debate, to live last, not Fox News as the NRA talking. But it's amazing, you know, the NRA is such a boogeyman. It used to be Haliburton. You know, this is just a thing that people say

when they have nothing else to say. The biggest threat to your liberties is, in fact, a partisan federal law enforcement apparatus that is scarier for you and for your ability to have your own thoughts, pursue your own destiny, pursue your own life and a freedom than anything else in the federal government. It's not even close. And once we are told that we should be acclimated to this kind of partisanship, what's left after that? Oh no, unless

they have a signed confession. I did this because I'm a hyperpartisan pro Hillary stooge. What are we told? Oh that's right, we know now, not explained why all these errors happened. Not explained? Huh. Attorney General Barr, who they're all going to say as a Trump stooge, But it's not going to work. Not only is he a world class legal mind, which anybody who's ever worked in DC in the upper reaches of the DJ will admit as true, by the way, including honest Democrats. He was the attorney

general under George H. W. Bush. The guy's been in the game forever. He knows exactly what kind of swamp games are being played here. And that's why he's such a threat to the left. That's why they hate him. Now they're going to, by the way, they're going to come after him with everything they have. I wouldn't be surprised if they had some emotionally disturbed person come forward and say, you know, forty years ago at a party, he made a move on me and then I said no,

and he, you know, grabbed my behind or something. I mean, just they'll make something up, anything to take this guy down now anything, because he is such a threat to the narrative. They're never going to recover if we find out the truth. No serious person could watch CNN and think that they're seeing anything other than dishonest, propagandistic, overpaid vain stooges. That is what the lineup is over there in prime time and throughout the day. Same thing at MSNBC.

Same thing with the New York Times editorial page, the Washington Post editorial page. These people have betrayed their charge of informing the public. They are propagandists without remorse. And that then brings me to the single most important hole in all of this, not explain the seventeen major errors in the Carter Page fives. I had a Democrat that I promp bumped into last night at Fox tell me that she still thinks that Carter Page is a traitor after I chatted with him a little bit, and still

thinks that it was legitimate to investigate him. These people are insane. Well, what's it going to take. We have the Inspector General saying there's nothing, there's nothing to prove Carter Page was a Russian agent. In fact, he was really working for the US government against the Russians, and then deep state left wing anti trumpers used the fact that in good faith, carter Page was trying to help the United States government against a Russian counterintelligence threat as

the basis for pretending he was a counterintelligence threat. But people still want to believe. They can't They can't accept that they were so swindled, and they also can't accept that maybe all their hatred toward Trump, toward carter Page, towards so many people in this saga was misplaced. Ultimately, though, I think it is about ego. Leftists love the pretense. They love to think of themselves as erudite, as brilliant, as worldly, as knowledgeable, and they've been swindled like silly

little children with this Russia collusion mess. All of them. They don't want to believe that, though they don't want to accept that this is reality not explained. They say, somebody tell me how this works. You are a senior FBI agent, who, by the way, also was one of the agents who tweeted Viva la Resistance in all those text messages that came out. But we're not supposed to believe he has a political bias. Folks, did you know that.

Did anyone mention that in the media. We already know that this is one of the individuals who was part of the whole cabal of anti trumpers at the FBI. That guy decided to find out if Carter Page was being helpful to the CIA, and then they said, oh, actually he's not being helpful. He has not in fact working for the side of the United States government. And this changed the information presented to the FISA court. Now I need somebody to give me an explanation for how

you could do that. That's not an error, that's not a typo. That's malicious, and it's maliciousness that we can point to and say, hold on a second, Is this just the one time that they got a little sloppy with the way they were stacking the deck? Is this just the one time when they thought they just pushed

a little too far? And then you look backwards, you work backwards from this proposition if it wasn't if it's not explained why all these errors happened, But this one seems to be inexplicable in a way that could only lean to one thing, bias against Trump. If this instance of changing what was in the FISA warrant on Carter page was about bias against Trump, work backwards backwards from that. Maybe all the other omissions, lack of checking the facts,

lack of presenting contrary information, maybe that's all biased. Two friends, this is what Coomy is concerned about. And this is why the Attorney General has come out and said, not so fast. We have somebody else looking at this. Come yesterday and one of his super smile interviews said that the Attorney general, and he's trashing the Attorney General. By the way, the Attorney General is ten times the legal mind and ten times the ethical human being that James

Comey has ever been. We all know that has Attorney General bar ever been slapped down by his own institution for breaking clear regulation as part of a personal vendetta against the President the United States Because James Comey has let's remember the facts here, James Comy also lied, lied to the American people. We will get into that. We have the proof. Do you know that MSNBC and CNN are not even running the hearing this morning? What does that tell you? They know they've got to skip past

this as fast. Hope, just pretend that none of this happened, that there'll be no accountability that nobody will ask any questions. How could they have gotten all this so wrong? Rachel Maddow Show has four million people watching this a night all about Russia collusion and Kremlinology and all this stuff, all lunacy. The has been made. They've been made fools of. They don't understand this. They've been made fools of. They've been exploited. Their their bias and political idiocy has been

used against them. Or perhaps they just accept that they're going to be exploited in this way and they don't care because it was entertaining while Rachel Maddow was pretending to present them with some complicated theory. But Comey lied, and there's more than just that. This isn't over yet. The Attorney General is going to make sure of it because he said, you know, if there's even a one

percent chance my wife thinks that's true, that's terrible. And I remember thinking, how would your wife think there is a one percent chance you were with prostitutes being at each other in Moscow. I'm a flawed human being, but there's literally zero chance that my wife would think that was true. So what kind of marriage to what kind of man, does your wife think there's only a ninety

nine percent chance you didn't do that? And I said to him, sir, when he started talking about it, I may order you to instigate that, I said, So that's up to you, but you want to be careful about that because it might create a narrative they were investigating you personally. And second, it's very difficult to prove something didn't happen. Did you believe his denial? Honestly, never thought

these words would come out of my mouth. But I don't know whether the current presidented states with prostitutes peeing on each other in Moscow in twenty thirteen. It's possible that, I don't know. It's also possible that James Comey was paid on by prostitutes. I don't know. I wasn't there. Call me is scum. Let's continue with our exploration here former FBI Director James Comey, who you will recall was a hero, really the grand hero of the resistance against

Trump for a long time. Comey is so ethical bypartisan served under multiple administrations of both parties. Oh, James Comey's fantastic James call me is an actual threat to your freedom. James Comey was somebody you should have been concerned about in the role that he had. There was about Trump and fascism. Trump has done nothing fascistic. James Coomy, on the other hand, likes the Soviet method of let's dirty you up and then present you with information and hey,

nice presidency. There be a shame if something happened to it. As if that's not enough. Remember he is the FBI. He was the FBI director. I am an FBI agent, some of you will catch that, but he was the FBI director and this is what he said. I think this was back in twenty seventeen. Remember this whole review was of the FIZA process, not the investigation origins of Crossfire Hurricane, although the Inspector General had decided to give a little bit of cover to his institution over that one.

But here is what Comey said about that phiz of process play twenty three. A total confidence that the FIZA process was followed and that the entire case was handling at a lawforce months away by DJ and the FBI. I think the notion that Fiser was abused here is they're a former FBI or the notion that fi was abused his nonsense. I ask you is called me a moron or a liar. I actually don't think he's a moron. I just think he is a deeply insidious liar, somebody

who presents himself as a guardian of truth. It's very much like our media. They pretend that they're offering up objective information, they're informing the public. They play this very important role, but in reality they are propagandists, and they hide behind this shield, call it the fake tapper. They hide behind this shield of neutrality, of objectivity, so they can't really be criticized or challenged because they're just trying to present the facts to the people. Call me here,

has always done the same thing. Oh, this is about the institution, the FBI. We got to just play it straight, you know. James Comey always speaks to us us the way a kind of annoying cub Scout leader used to speak to me back in the day. A little bit too paternal, a little too like pad on the head. Oh it's okay, Maybe one day you'll learn how to tie that knot except James Comey's a moron. James Comey is going around telling us things that we can check

and see are not true. Now maybe again, I perhaps shouldn't say he's more I think it's more just that he's caught here because yesterday so he might have no

choice in a sense. So now he's just going full propaganda, running around doing what he can, because he also is going to need the left wing media to rally to his side if and when the full truth of all of this comes out, which, by the way, I think is very much that Brennan and Comy and McCabe and perhaps Clapper two really just concocted this bizarre theory and

ran with it and then use the dossier. It just was the poison that seeped through the top of the federal government and anybody who wanted to believe because there's such cry babies that Hillary needed to be our president. That's really what the you know, they act like we could have had, you know, Jesus is our president. Although by the way, if you see there's a poll out that most Democrats actually think that Obama was a better

president to George Washington. So you know, I guess Jesus already was our president in the sense, you know, because he's the greatest president in the history of the world. No one could ever be better. Wow, But they act like there was some terrible tragedy that the wildly corrupt, an opportunistic, and self indulgent in self dealing Hillary Clinton who covered up for her sexual assaulting, philandering, lying, cheating,

disgrace of a husband while while he was president. By the way, I know some other presidents did some wilder stuff in their earlier days, but not in the Oval Office, for Heaven's sakes. And yet that poison of the dossier spread throughout the upper reaches of the federal government and gave an excuse to anyone who didn't believe it was possible that President Trump was going to win that it

couldn't be. Ah. This meant that there were some psychological escape hatch for those deep staters, whom I know very

well because I used to work near them. The ones who used to complain about anyone making a joke about the greatness of Reagan as a Hatch Act violation, or the ones who would snicker and tell petty jokes about how stupid the president of the United States was when it was Bush before they would go in to brief him because that used to happen, Or who would cover up for say, Nancy Pelosi finding out that the war in Iraq was going particularly well at one point had

turned around less US casualties, less Iraqi casualties, and she looked at it like we had told her that she wasn't getting any birthday presents this year. Yeah. People, they are in the federal government. They exist. I know because I saw them and I knew them. And some of those people took it upon themselves to try and destroy the President, and in the process they have absolutely shaken the faith that any of us should have that we can trust the Department of Justice or the FBI in

a politically sensitive matter to do the right thing. The FBI's defense, Let's be very clear about this, the FBI seventeen major errors in the Fiser report omissions. If they were building a case for prosecution, the people that were involved would be disbarred because they would have to they have to disclose this exculpatory The same rules, in a sense,

applied different punishments in this case. Penalties punishments got a lot caught up between the two there, But there's not really all that much accountabilit There's been some accountability from a cave call me got fired one of the best things Trump has done since he was an office. Should have fired him day one, and Commy knew that, which is why he was trying to play this game of Oh, I don't you know, I got this dossier here, I

don't know about this. Does anyone not believe that the federal government, probably Clapper, maybe Comey, leaked to CNN that the dossier was briefed to the president United States to create this as a news story so then they could report on it without reporting it. This is a classic propaganda technique, by the way, run it through somebody else as a cutout. That's what they did. I know propaganda.

I studied it. I'm actually familiar with how this works at different government when you look at what other governments do and how they influence the process of public opinion with a hidden hand, with what you'd call black propaganda, which is where they're pretending that it comes from somewhere it doesn't. There's great propaganda where you don't know, it's just like leaflets dropped out of a plane or something.

But then there's black propaganda, which is, oh, this comes from this organization, but it actually comes from the government, or this comes from the opposition, but it actually comes from the party in power. That's what we're talking about here in terms of the tactics that have been used. Lindsey Graham understands what's going on here. The Inspector General is testifying on Capitol Hill. As I said, CNN, MSNBC

not carrying this one live, Nope. Other things. Hey, let's talk about a there's a couple of ducklings that got lost from a local pond down in Tuscaloosa, and you know, fortunately a zookeeper came over, and they'd rather talk about that. I don't want to talk about the Inspector General report. Mmm. I'm amazed. I'm still seeing liberals pretending that this isn't anything other than devastating to their argument. Their only defense at this point is there were all of these lies

that were circulating about Trump and the Trump campaign. There are all these lies. They are all lies. None of it has been true. Russia collusion a lie. All the things that were being said in that dossier that were worth including in a dossia of that. I mean, they basically got the spellings of people's names right in the campaign. That's it. Everything else a lie, And liberals are saying, see, it was a legitimate investigation, A legitimate investigation based entirely onlines.

That is what they offer you. You're going to accept that. That's the new standard. These people are appalling, simply appalling. Lindsey Graham understands that. Now I mentioned to you the doctoring of information. How is this an error? How is this a mistake? Do they keep it? It says not explained. That's what we can't find an explanation for it. But because we can't find an explanation, we don't know. This is just another version with the Libs do with jeehottest terrorism.

We may never know the real motive. I mean, the guy was running around with an a long walk bar t shirt on an iHeart isis on his backpack. But you know, maybe he was upset because he got stuck in traffic that day. We may never know the real motive. I mean, you could do this with anything. Never really know. Can't get inside his head. We'll explain to me what you think the motive is here at play clip twenty one,

if you would please, Producer Brandon. When you read this report, what they find is that a lawyer supervising the FISO process at the FBI, according to mister Harrowitz, doctored an email from the CIA to the FBI, and he's going to be referred for criminal prosecution. Why is that important? Carter Page, who's been on the receiving end of all this.

The foundation to believe he was a foreign agent comes from a docier that we'll talk about it in a minute, and that docier provided by Christopher Still and we'll talk about him in a minute. They claim that carter Page meets with three people known to be Russians, Russian agents, people associated with Russian carter Page, while being wire tapped by his government, says, I don't know two of these people, and to this day, there's no proof that he ever met two of those three to this day. So why

was somebody referred for criminal prosecution? Lindsey Graham continues here play clip twenty two. The third person, he says, yeah, I met him. I told the CIA about my meeting because I was a source for the CIA. So they would have you believed that carter Page is working against our government, not with our government. So carter Page in the su twenty seventeen is trying to tell anybody and everybody I was working with a CIA. I reported my

contact with this person, and nobody believed him. The CIA had told the FBI it was true earlier, but it never made it through the system. Somebody got so rattled at the FBI they asked mister klein Smith to check it out. He checks it out. He communicates with the CIA. Is carter Page a source for you? And an email exchange they say, yes he is. What does mister klein Smith do. He alters the email to say, no, he's not, and you caught him. How is that an error that

somebody could make in good faith? You can't. There's no way. You can't come up with an explanation other than this person understood. Remember a person had tweeted out or texted out rather than not tweeted, you know, Vivla resistance. This person knew that the whole fiz on carter Page that they had. If it turned out he was a government source, that what's the claim going to be? That the Russians are running him as a double agent against the CI.

I mean, this is insane, but all of his contacts with Russians would be completely explicable, would be completely understandable in this context. And so they hit it. They hid something that would have deep six, that would have ended their entire fishing expedition against the Trump campaign. It was a willful act. And we're supposed to believe that this was just mistakes, just errors made here and there. No, I'm sorry, and I think Attorney General Bar knows that

that's also not the case. You know what the fun thing is, Spector General doesn't know what Bar knows. Komy doesn't know what Bar knows, and they're worried, and they should be. I want to know for you all, there was a very important exchange yesterday where you had Komy say that, maybe in during one of his interviews, because he's going on a press blitz now to try to save whatever remnants of his reputation he thinks he has.

I mean, he's he's about as honorable and decent as Michael Lavnati at this point, somebody who the Democrats at one point were raising as a possible presidential contender. But he said, you know, Barr is going to keep looking. Bar is going to keep trying to find things and maybe, you know, eventually he'll find some way to justify this. Oh I think he will. Here's play a clip two. Here here's Komy trying to trying to start the little

war on bar himself. The Attorney General has to be the steward of an organization that's a political so he has to be both a political appointee and a guardian of the a political nature of investigations. The justice statue wears a blindfold because you cannot be peaking at your

political boss or your friends when you're making decisions. It's certainly hard to explain a lot of his conduct over the last year as consistent with that role of balancing the political and a politically seems to have leaned on the political entirely. I mean, the only reason really for him to make a statement in a commentary about the Inspector General report, as with Dorham, is really too sent a message to the President that you know, don't worry,

we were still supports. Yeah. I know, it looks like that you told whoppers to the American people about a vital institution for two years. But I got this, We're going to find something. We'll keep dig until we find something that justifies what you've been saying for two years. I don't think that's a role for the Attorney General of the United States. You know why he's saying this, because Durham is going to find something. He's going to

find it. It's out there. Friends. They offer you no explanation. They offer you that this was just all a coincidence, that this just happened. It was just a bunch of oopsies.

They tell you that the single most important, single biggest investigation perhaps in the history of the FBI, in many ways, was handled by people who are such abject morons that they neither have any sense of fairness nor their own procedures and rules, And that somehow, if they were trying to continue an investigation against a presidential campaign and then a president despite the evidence, if that was their goal, they managed to do it. But they managed to do

it all by accident. It just happened that way. Where maybe there's something else here. I think we all know there's something else here. How did all of this get started? Who decided that they needed to even consider this crossfire hurricane investigation against Papadopoulos, who was under investigation by federal authorities. We know that it was Flynn, it was Maniford, it was Papadopoulus, it was Carter Page. When did all of

that begin and how and what stories were told. All we need, friends is one email, one text message from one of these deep state conspirators that Durham is looking at, and the whole thing comes crashing down. Wait and see when you want to spot that burglar when he's casing your home or after he's in, well, you can ask John who's Blink camera alerted him to burglars trying to break in while he and his family were home, or Shannon,

whose Blink camera caught a thief stealing packages. Both times Blink video clips were sent to police to help convict the crooks. Blink motion activated indoor and outdoor cameras are wire free, set up in minutes, and run on two lithium batteries that last up to two years. And when you're away, blinks Live feed option lets you monitor your home and check in on kids in's from anywhere using your Blink smartphone app. No contracts, totally affordable. In fact,

Blink systems start at just seventy nine ninety nine. Thanks to Blink, home security just got easier. Visit blink protect dot com, slash Buck, blink protect dot Com slash Buck Again home security made so simple blink protect dot com. Slash Buck also available on Amazon at a best Buy. Blink is an Amazon company and it works with Alexa. I just want to note that the Inspector General has said that is it is not possible to rule out political bias in the FBI's seventeen carter page fis errors.

They asked, can you say it wasn't because of political bias? And then the answer was I do not know. So they don't know. You know why, because how they how do they explain somebody doctoring information to look worse for carter page and therefore continue the fights against the Trump campaign and risk criminal prosecution. Friends, this is a big deal. You can't do that. I remember a long time ago a guy in the NYPD, I think he used as

turned into a scandal. He used a warrant for phone records for either his wife or his ex girlfriend or something, you know, to see if she was seeing somebody whatever. That guy got in a lot of trouble. I think he ended up normally getting fired. I think he lost his pension due and just barely escaped prison. If memory serves, it was a big deal, and I was just for getting some phone records of somebody that you know, I mean, not that that was okay, but wasn't a presidential campaign.

It's a big deal. They can't explain, Oh, we have no explanations. We're all we're all supposed to act like we're as dumb as the FBI's pretending that the people involved in this were. Oh, we don't know, it's a presidential campaign. Yeah, you get a little sloppy sometime times. You know, things happen a little bit. Oh who cares? Stunning, stunning stuff that we see. But like I said, it's

it is not over, thankfully. It just just a little more that I wanted to get to here on what you need because what you're being told about this today is a lie. What the media is presenting to you is not true. Lindsey Graham, I will say, has done a fantastic job today so far. My friend Molly Hemming over at the Federalists has this. Graham begins by noting that if you think takeaway of report with something about its predication, it's proof you did not read the report.

Says his goal is to educate people about the actual contents of the report and how it was spun by implicated parties. He'll says, he'll assume for the sake of argument, that the investigation started. Fine notes that there are essentially no standards for opening a counterintelligence probe. Discussing the violations of rule of law systemic failure, people at the bias

level of government took law into their own hands. It's as if j. Edgar Hoover came back to life, the old FBI that had a chip on its shoulder and wanted to intimidate people. Lindsay Graham read texts from probe officials like Struck in page showing extreme partisan bias against Trump. God, Trump is a loathsome human. Struck wrote, oh my god, he's an idiot. These are the people involved in this probe.

No political bias. But remember the inspector General report. I told you this before on Hillary Clinton's EMO said, yeah, there was some stuff here and there that wasn't handled appropriately, and but no, no no, no political bias. Well, if you look at the decisions, it seems that there is quite a lot of bias, And if you look at their communications leading up to those decisions, there's quite a lot

of bias. Graham's explaining how FBI blatantly doctored evidence and failed to mention exonerating evidence in order to use sorry yeah, Graham to use in order to secure a warrant to spine an innocent US citizen. Notes of the manipulation of evidence changed Carter pages help to his country. To the opposite, notes that attorney who doctored that evidence in order to violate Carter page of civil liberties also happen to have extreme partisan bias against Trump. Graham notes that news rooms

in America share this extreme bias. The FBI guy who doctored et evidence texted Viva larraisis stance. If you're wondering whether or not he's a part of the resistance, Yeah, they're lying to you. There's bias all over the place here. Couldn't be any more obvious, couldn't be any more clear. But they don't have smoking gun evidence of bias. But

that's asking a lot, isn't it. Haven't we been told all along in the Trump impeachment fiasco, which we'll get to in just a moment, have we been told all along that you know, you don't need to even be a firsthand, a firsthand source of something, right, You can just hear something from somebody else hearsay is better than firsthand evidence. They actually had people say that in Congress, better than firsthand evidence. But now, oh no, all the

rules change very quickly. Unless you have somebody who writes a confession about their political bias, you can't actually think that they did anything wrong. You can't think that maybe just based upon the decisions they make and what they've shared about the way they view the world, about the way they view the president specifically and the election, and

maybe they would have done things a bit differently. My friends, it is very damaging to the FBI that this has been allowed to occur, and I have to tell you it is a whitewash. You cannot trust the FBI anymore on a politically sensitive investigation unless there is a house cleaning. And by the way, FBI Director Ray should go. He's an institutionalist. I'm not saying he's a anti Trump zealot. He's an institutionalist. I've told you about this, I've broken

this down. People who have worked for these places for decades think that they are in fact more important than the elected leaders who oversee them, that their judgment matters more, that they're the true professionals, and that there's also a built in need to protect this edifice of government execution, even in the face of tremendous malfeasance. So this is where we are. They're not going to do They're not going to reform willingly on their own. There has to

be a lot more. By the way, Lindsay Graham also asked, is it spying of the Inspector General if we look at if the FISA court now reviews all this information and sees that there were omissions, there were errors, there were lies told to get that FISA on carter page, and that the dossier was a central and necessary part of it, which was a huge lie to media told for a very long time. Oh no, the dossier wasn't a big thing. The dossier wasn't a part of it.

Thank Heavens for some of my conservative for media friends who are just running around just just you know, rhetorically throat punching some of these lib journals on Twitter for the lies that they told in twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen. Oh, the dossier is not a big part of this. There's super secret sources you don't know about. That's what they

used to say, just to keep the narrative. Keep the lies alive as long as you can, let them do as much damage, Let them slow down the Trump presidency as much as possible. Perhaps you'll get more people like Roger Stone indicted for process crimes. Send in a bunch of federal agents to kick in his door in the middle of the night with automatic weapons pointed at his head while he's standing there in his silk pajamas having a martini. Is it spying, Senator Graham asks, it's illegal surveillance.

Inspector General Horowitz responded, my friends, that's also called spying. Surveillance is a fancy French word for spying. It can be legal or illegal, depending on the circumstances. If you lie intentionally to spy on somebody, that's a problem. If you lie to create the predicate for surveillance, then you are in fact engaged in spying. They did spy on a presidential campaign. They were trying to take them down.

And keep in mind the mere fact that they had this FISA open, the mere fact that Papadopoulos was being looked at, and crossfire hurricane, that story of Russia collusion was used as a weapon itself against Trump. So they created They use lies and in some cases intentional lies to create investigations, and then reported on those investigations to convince the American people that President Trump was a traitor.

That is what happened here. And there are people who have been covering this, running around with this story, throwing gasoline on the fire of the story for years. None of them. Yet, I have not seen a single person say I was wrong, I'm sorry. Not one. How is that possibly? Have you heard James Komy say that he's sorry that he was wrong? He had full confidence everything

was fine with the FISA. I'm sure now he'd do one of his oh you know, the Socratic coomy on the one hand and on the other And you know, some people say this about me, and I would never say anything bad about them, except those people deserve to be locked up in prison forever. And you know, Comy

is an absolute disgrace. And by the way, people in the FBI, including like Pajama boy over at c N who's former FBI and and Asha Rangapa, who's probably the worst national security analysts on it's between her and this this woman Juliet Kayam or two the two dumbest national security analysts on TV, I think, or at least at CNN. I mean, I'm sure there's some at MSNBC. Oh. I Malcolm Nance is also really wrong a lot at mc MAN. This would be a fun game the dumbest national security

analyst on TV. I mean, I'd go down a list. There's a whole there's a whole bunch of them. I can't remember. They had a couple of like, uh, you know, a couple of one star generals that used to go on CNN who are also just just I think Hurtling was one. I mean he might have been a three star, four I don't even know. Guy's an idiot. So they really find the worst of the worst. It's amazing. They

do a really good job of that. It's almost like the movie Major League, where they're trying to create the worst baseball team to have the most losses so they can relocate the team. That's how CNN picks it's national security analysts. Let's get the people that are wrong the most, that know the least, or that are the most compromised, the most un ethical. That's where you get the mccabees and the Brennan's and the Clappers and you know those guys.

These are the people who were running the national security apparatus under Obama, and gee, I guess it's such a shock that every single foreign policy challenge the Obama administration touch was a disaster, and how the Islamic State took over enough territory to control the lives of four or five million people at one point. We're getting hit with major terrorist attacks every couple of months, either here or in Europe, mass casualty attacks inspired by or directed by

the Islamic State. It's almost like the people that were running things under Obama had no idea what the heck they were doing. But back for a moment to this situation that we see unfolding here where everyone's spinning and spinning and spinning and trying to evade accountability for what they did here with the Russia collusion story, just remember this,

my fellow Americans. Since the lib journals are willing to pretend that spying on a presidential candidate is no big deal, and they're willing to lie about Russia Trump collusion for years despite zero evidence. There is no level of lying too disgraceful for them. None. They will lie about anything their mendacity knows no bounds. Keep that in mind as you see what has really gone on here. It is

disheartening as an American to see this. Be honest with you, people that I know who aren't even particularly or in any way supportive of President Trump, they see this, and the ones who are smart and who are honest say that this is this is going to haunt us for a long time because we do need institutions like the Department of Justice to function not as weapons of the

social justice left. We do need the establishment to be transparent and not to defend itself, not just at all costs, but as its first priority, which is what we see happening here in se in the swamp. President Trump has been so clarifying in so many ways, and while I wouldn't wish any of this on any president for that matter, it is astonishing to watch the President continue to take all this incoming and give it back twice as good

as he's getting it. It's pretty amazing. I understand you want to do whatever you have to do to keep your family safe and secure, but there's one thing that can feel a little strange and maybe you don't want to deal with it. Life insurance. The first time I had to deal with life insurance. I was in my twenties, I was deploying overseas and I figured, well, I've got to do the responsible thing and take out a policy

in case the unexpected happens. So you need to do the same to make sure your family is safe facing an uncertain future. And that's why I want you to check out my friends at Ethos Life Insurance. You see, with Ethos there's no hassle. It's modern life insurance for people who don't want to waste a lot of time and detailed contracts and people that are trying to oversell them. Something ethos Is approach is simple. They just take technology, industry expertise and a human touch to find the right

policy for your budget. Only takes about ten nights and you can make sure your family has the financial security they need. Get a fast, free and personalized quote right now at Ethoslife dot com. Again that's Ethoslife dot com. We got some political stories to get into today, other than the grotesque politicization of the FBI and the Department of Justice. We've got a Biden's story. We've got a poll about the best presidents according to Democrats, and Republicans.

That'll all be fun. But you know what's continuing on is this impeachment ruckus. And there's even a report that I saw flittered out there that maybe some Republican senators would vote to convict President Trump. Mitch McConnell, cocaine Mitch and have a none of that. He's out there saying that he would be surprised. I'm glad to hear he'd be surprised if there were, in fact sixty seven senators

to remove the president play twenty please Brennan. That would be They're totally surprised if there were sixty seven senators to remove the president. That remains my view. However, we are obligated under the Constitution to turn to it when it comes over, and we will. I have to say, I'm not hopeful. Well, no, I'm not expecting that Republican senators are going to use the Senate trial as an opportunity to really make the Democrats pay for what they've done,

because they should. That would be justice, that would be fair, that would be right. They should do everything they can to humiliate the sham put forward by Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler and all the rest of them. They should try to humiliate this narrative as best they can. I worry though, that the Senate, because it has this grandiose sense of itself as the place where the passions of the House go to be a bit cooled off,

that they won't do what they really need to do. Remember, you have Pelosi running around still telling people this, and I look at I can't imagine anyone is so incapable of sound thinking that they would believe it. But she still runs around saying that she really wishes she didn't have to impeach the president play a teen. I wish it were not necessary. I wish the president's actions did

not make it necessary, but he did. And we would be delinquent and our oath of office if we did not impeach him for not honoring his oath of office. Does anyone believe that, I mean, I really put out this. Please, if you're out there you believe that, send me an email. Let's let's let's get you to call into the show, or you know, I'll read whatever you're write it. I just want to know, does anyone believe I mean Democrats? Does anyone believe her. She keeps saying this, it's the

most absurd thing I've ever heard. But they've got to just try to dress this up, this whole impeachment nonsense. They have to make it seem like something other than what it is. It is an absolute joke, except it's unfortunately quite serious because it involves the President of the United States and institutions of government that do, unfortunately have a lot of power, a lot of power overall our lives. Even look, there are some out there who understand what's

really at stake here. Kevin McCarthy, for example, understands this play fourteen. You've got to understand what impeachment means. Impeachment is the removal of the highest elected person in this land. I don't care if you think Americans who support President Trump are deplorables, but you do not have the right to disqualify their vote just because you do not like President Trump. This is what happens when you have an entire ideology that has really fallen into a stage of totalitarianism,

which is the truth of the Democratic Party. They don't get have the power to be totalitarians, but they think in the terms. They think along the lines of supposedly benevolent totalitarians. They want to control every aspect of your life, what you think, what you say, what you do, everything, because they think they know better than you. They want to control the economy, They want to control your conduct in your home with your family, tell your kids where

they can go to school. There is nothing that is beyond their purview. At the federal level, mind you, they want to control all of it. They think it's going to be better for everybody. And if you stand in their way, you are an impediment to utopia. You are somebody that needs to be crushed and destroyed to encourage

the others to borrow from Voltaire. What we are seeing play out now, anything is justified because the power to make the United States a perfect liberal paradise is too compelling to skip, It's too compelling to pass, And so that's why they'll even go out there. I mean, Nancy Pelosi is making a fool of herself daily. No one seems to care. Adam Schiff is a liar, No one seems to care. Jerry Nadler is a joke, just continues on so a Team. I appeared last night on Fox

News is Fox News at Night. With Shannon Bream, and you all know, I think Shannon's great. I was on with a liberal named Jessica Tarlov, and she's a liberal. I mean, you know, she's believes the stuff that she says. I guess thinks that I don't know. If you watch the segment, you'll see it was just it's pretty amazing. We talked about this sheriff in Houston who had called out by name the Republican Senate, specifically Ted Cruz and also Mitch McConnell for not passing the Violence Against Women

Act that the Democrats have passed. Yeah, you had this a sheriff who says, you know who, Sidern, you are you on this police chief? Police chief ripped these two Republicans. And it look we can all sit around here and pretend that that's not a bizarre political statement for somebody to make, or an unfair political statement, because this is about a sheriff's as a sergeant I believe in his Houston PD who was killed by a male acquaintance. And this goes to the So the boyfriend loophole is what

is getting attention here, the boyfriend loophole. And this is a talking point. You'll hear a lot in the media when they decide to talk about this, because remember, gun control is really it's not about saving lives for most liberals, because they don't know any lives that it would save. It's just about the virtue signaling of I don't like violence, and oh my gosh, those big bad gun owners in

the NRA they do. This is such a brainless and destructive position, but it's a very common one among liberals that they really think the other side doesn't care about preventing violence against women. That convinced themselves that this is true. It's horrifying, it's untrue. But then again, liberals convinced themselves of a lot of things that are completely irrational beliefs

about their political opponents. They commenced themselves, for example, that we don't care about the planet's future, and if the human race is extinct because of fossil fuels, well we were getting paid off by fossil fuels or something, so we don't care about any of that. I mean, this is this is absurd. I mean, this is not a serious clan that could be made from one person another,

But liberals say it all the time. It's just become built into the system of the talk points and the memes and the bleeding of the sheep from Animal Farm repeating in a four legs good, two legs bad. That's what they do. Go back if you have it in a while, go back and read Animal Farm again. It's basically just an instruction manual for how limberals conduct themselves all the time. It's very readable, Precy Brandon, you ever read it, One of the finest, one of the finest

satires in you know, the English language. Really, it's amazing in this grade school but I think I need to It's one of those things you read it in grade school and it's fine, but and you get some of it. But go back and read it as an adult, different perspective. I'm sure it's a total Yeah. It totally nails the leftist mentality which has just put us in control. The

rules don't apply to us. They should apply to everybody else, though, because we're going to do this amazing stuff when we're in control, and so everybody else who has to get crushed along the way, that's too bad for them, because we're going to do great things. And all the hypocrisy and all the changing of the rules and all the maipulation of standards along the way, that's all justified, that's all justified. But back to this Houston police chief, Art

Asservado slimming McConnell over the Violence Against Women Act. The problem is that the Houston police chief, you would think you would know that state law in Texas already made the guy who shot this police sergeant in Houston, the guy was already a prohibited possessor. He had already been

convicted of dimesdimmunor domestic violence. And in almost half of all states that's already that's already a prohibited possessor situation under the currently existing Violence Against Women Act, which really is it's a whole bunch of things going to this. It funds education about domestic violence, women shelters, hotline programs, a lot of things to help with domestic violence. And it's been a bipartisan issue for years and years now.

Democrats refuse to just reauthorize it as is, even though they're still funding for the programs. They refused to reauthorize the bill which comes up every couple of years. They wanted to change it around and add I think LGBTQ and specific tribal authority protections, and then I think they try to work some other stuff in there, and it's

just turned into this. You know, Democrats are grandstanding, Oh, Republicans don't want to protect people from gun violence because of the NRA, suggesting that the NRA doesn't care about gun violence. Meanwhile, I mean, how many NRA members are ever responsible for any form of gun violence versus the general population? Go check out that statistic, and all of a sudden, the NRA is bloodthirsty killers. It evaporates as a talking point. But I just thought it was interesting.

I mean, I called out that ossiveto I mean, here we have an incident where the guy who got the gun was already it was already illegal for him to purchase a gun. We don't know how he got it. Necessarily, he might have had it after By the way, you're supposed to turn in your firearm if you are convicted of a domestic but maybe he just didn't turn it in.

So it's already illegal from to have the gun. And this this sheriff down in Houston is calling out Mitch McConnell and Kentucky for not doing what the Democrats say he must do. And a piece of national legislation that would have done nothing to stop this incident. Zero, it's already illegal, already illegal. What we're gonna make it even it's illegal to kill somebody for one, obviously, but it's also illegal for him to even have the fire in

the first place, so he got an illegal gun. So now you're gonna blame Mitch McConnell for not having another law that would make it illegal again. For it's just it doesn't make any sense. But you know, my counterpart last night at Fox who's a liberal. You know we have to stop gun violence. Okay, how oh you know nationally we need a nationalized background check so that we have a registry or you know, we need it. There's always and no, this wouldn't stop anything. We live in

a country. We live in a world where there are bad people who do violent things. I'm live in a country we have a lot of firearms. There are other countries where they have a lot of farms too, by the way, you know, and this is I don't know see where we just keep getting sucked into the same discussion.

But the part of this that gets me so annoyed New York that law that I told you about where you can't transport your gun out, And the New York lawyers for this, when pressed by by a Supreme Court admitted that they don't really know what the extent of

law is and that it wouldn't save anybody anything. They have that law because New York City is a Democrat stronghold, and Democrats ideologically, emotionally are opposed to legal gun ownership, and they don't like people who want to own guns legally. Those people are generally Republican, generally the others, so they want to find a way to stick a thumb in

their eye. And that's what the law was about. No person thought that law was going to save anyone anything, So why have them the books, but just to harass, just to annoy, just make life a little bit harder for legal gun owners in New York City. It's a little bit, really. You see this not just in New York. This is true in a lot of other places as well. They have laws in the books that no serious person thinks are going to save any lives. But they know

that it's going to annoy people who own guns. And if it annoys people who owns guns, well that in and of itself then is of course that's a worthwhile endeavor, something that we should seek to impose on people. It's very, very frustrating to see this, But it's frustrating to have a gun control conversation with shrill, emotional libs because they just want to talk about how they want to save lives and we don't, and that's idiocy. And of course libs also know nothing about guns or gun laws too.

And unfortunately that was a bit the case last night that I was dealing with. Just I was dealing with a counterpart on the other side in terms of a conversation over guns. She just doesn't know anything about gun laws or guns. So that the point is a liberal sits there and says, you don't care about dead kids from gun violence, and I sit there and say, well, let's talk about the laws and what we can do about this. I mean, I know I didn't hurt anybody.

I don't know what are we're having. We're having an adult policy conversation. We're having a ye're bad, you're Republicans, you like guns. This is what liberals do all the time.

That's the liberal approach. Because it's now a cultural issue, it's much more pushed by politicians as a way to separate out left and right, as a way to separate out people who believe in the supremacy of the state versus those who believe in individual liberty, the right to defend oneself, and the right to bear arms, the right to bear arms if necessary against the state. Yeah, that's why we have it as a defense against tyranny. Liberals

still think that that's so crazy. Look back in history, very sophisticated, advanced, wealthy societies all of a sudden go tyrannical, and the population has no firearms. Guess what, things go a lot worse. Of course, the left rejects all of this, and they reject any good faith effort from conservatives to work with them on trying to add to the mountain

of laws already in the books about guns. There's all kinds of laws about where you can take your gun, what kind of guns you can own, prohibited possessor, background checks, all these things. We already have all these laws, more laws, more laws, more laws, more lass. No. Endless regulation is not good for business. Endless regulation is not good for freedom. These are straightforward propositions that the left does not either understand or care to understand. I'm not really sure necessarily

which one it is. Speaking of guns and law enforcement, a really bloody shootout yesterday in Jersey City, which is just just across the river from Manhattan where I'm doing this show right now. I can actually see Jersey City from my bedroom window. And you had a one detective and three civilians killed during a shootout and standoff at a Jersey City kosher market on Tuesday. This was a story that you could tell they were ready to make this a big national, a big national headline, and then

it sort of dropped out of the headlines. It was mentioned last night briefly when I was on Fox, and then today you can see a lot of other news organizations are not are not picking up on this one in the way that they would if the circumstances were different.

And I think we have some idea as to why it was an attack on a kosher market, a Jewish owned delhi essentially delicatessen in Jersey City, and the people and the mayor has already said that he believed that there was that this delicatessen was targeted, and I was wondering, well, what do we mean by targeting? I mean, if they're talking about targeting them because they are Jewish. Now we're in hate crime slash perhaps terrorism territory, depending on that

motivation and what the background situation was. And it turns out that the two people engaged in the shooting have ties to a group known as the Black Hebrew Israelites. Now why is the media so much less interested all of a sudden in this story. Well, because this would be it looks to be at this point with the information that's come in, an anti Semitic hate crime, a murderous anti Semitic hate crime committed by an African American

male African American female. So two black assailants who are tied to this group or have been tied to this group in the past, the Black Hebrew Israelites. And so there won't be a teachable moment here about white nationalism, about how Trump is creating all of his anti Semitism. There won't be any of that at all. They'll just

say that this was a very tragic incident. Law enforcement responded, and maybe there'll be some discussion about guns, because I believe that one of the Hebrew Israelites had a long gun in this in this market, and there was this long standoff with law enforcement. But because it wasn't a situation involving the white nationalist that we always hear about from the media, this will not be a major news story for very long at all, and we all know that.

Perhaps also worth pointing out that the black Hebrew Israelites are the group that many of you may have seen back during the Covington kids fiasco. Remember the Covington kids that were reported on by a lot of major news outlets for you know, smirking, staring at at just a wonderful Native American leader and you know, spiritual healer or

whatever they were saying this guy was. And then it turned out that there are kids on a school trip and a bunch of adults were yelling racist epithets at them and antagonizing them, and that Native American activist guy went up in their faces banging a drum in their faces because some of them were wearing maga hats. And you're not allowed to do that, it seems, according to a lot of left wing adults, even if your kids

not allowed to do that. And they reported in the Commington kids in a way that was reckless, And now there's a major lawsuit underway, and I know, I look, I'm all for it. You know this is I see my friend Dan Bongino is suing The Daily Beast. God bless him. Dan. I hope you take him to the cleaners. I hope you you know, I hope you own the Daily Beast in a year called the Bongino Beast. I hope it's yours. And that's what should happen, actually be

a good, good paper. Bongino. Dan's kind of a big guy. Looked like maybe he's like selling some kind of a you know, supplement for the gun show, you know what I mean. But nonetheless, I'm happy. I think Dan's doing the right move there. The commingin kids are suing I believe you know, they're suing a whole bunch of different publications for the fake news that was spread about them. Devin Newness, I think, is also suing CNN for lying about him. I mean, it's it's time to start. Let's

test out some of these defamation laws. Let's test out these libel laws. Let's see what really works here and what doesn't, because these organizations need to be held to

account for what they do. But I can just tell you right now you're not going to see very much about they a black male assailant here tied to the Black Hebrew Israelites, murdering a couple of Jewish people in a delicate test in He left a note apparently as well, and I mean here, let me give you who are the Jersey City shootout suspects follow the Black Hebrew Israelite Movement, a group who believes the members are descendants of the

ancient Israelites. There was a note with religious writings in the U haul. He and Graham allegedly drove to the scene, but a motive, including any alleged nexus to Hayter Tara, remains under active investigation, so they haven't really found that yet, but they do think they went right to this Jewish delicatessen.

Law enforcement had no media details on Graham, but a neighbor tells News for she lived near him and he turned into a dark person after he met a woman who is a former health aide and claims Graham's coerced into a militant religion. He could not identify chanting and reading of the New Testament translated into evil and could

hear this from her home. It sounds like radicalization along the lines of what you'd expect from the Black Hebrewis relites who do a little bit of reading from parts of the Bible and then they, you know, they chant epithets at people. I mean, I've seen them on the streets. They call white people the devil. I mean, this is the this is the group. And they also are anti Semitic.

But because the target doesn't fit, you know, because this person can't be blamed on Trump, it's just not there will be There'll be no national conversation had about this. No one's going to come together and say, oh, we really need to focus on this. Let's have a whole bunch of panels on CNN with ten people at a time, all talking about how, you know, Trump is basically responsible

for the shootout in Jersey City. They're not going to do that, and this should surprise no one, because media is full of a bunch of propagandistic hacks who have no decency or ethics whatsoever. Not everybody, but most of them. I can't imagine they vote for it because we did nothing wrong. There was absolutely nothing done wrong. They've analyzed my conversation every way you can. And when you talk about you know, the word favor was mentioned, and it

was mentioned, not me a favor. If you just saw the way it was, it was nothing to do with me. This has to do with the United States. The word was us, Can you do us a favor? Then we talk about the country and we talk about seeing the attorney General of the United States. When you look at it, and that was just a part of it. It was a congratuental Toory Quoll And there were two of them. Nobody even mentioned the other one. We had another one

where they won. Originally he won the election. And I think it's a disgrace that people can make impeachment out of nothing. That was a perfect conversation. An impeachment out of nothing, my friends, that's what's going on. I don't want to spend too much more time on impeachment today. I just wanted to know the president understands what this is. And also really interesting comment here flagged by a left

wing journalist named Michael Tracy. He wrote that Jeffrey Tubin made an interesting point just now on CNN quote it doesn't matter what the actual articles of impeachment are. No one will remember. It just matters that Trump is impeached. Yep, that's all this is impeach him, to impeach him, Orange Man bad. That is the impeachment. That's all it is, Trump bad. They have nothing beyond that. And this is laughable.

By the way, I was very pleased there was all this legal analysis of that I saw after the fact. When I came and told you guys yesterday how absurd it was to say that he was obstructing Congress by going to the courts. A lot of prominent national lawyers were like, yeah, that's you can't do that. You can't say you're not allowed to go to court. That's obstruction. Sorry, that's what the Democrats are doing. It's it's preposterous. But that is where that is where it is, all right now.

I wanted to move on to something else. Oh wait, no, Michael Bloomberg. Michael Bloomberg still out there. He's still getting more votes, still getting more people to come to his side. How's my Bloomberg coming along? What do you think that's getting there? Right? It's a bit Morty Goldman from Family Guy.

I don't know that one, but you know, I think Bloomberg sounds a little he's like a little bit down here because he's about five foot two, he's worth fifty billion dollars, you know, and he doesn't like big sodas, maybe because they make him feel shut of. But here's what he said about his version or his view of impeachment. Play eight. I think it is very sad for this

country that I can say the following. But unfortunately the evidence seems to be serious enough that I would if I was in the Senate in the House, I would vote for impeachment. But I don't think we should do this lightly. I think it's a great danger you influence the political process fundamentally. I think the electorate should decide who they are led by, and they have an opportunity to throw them out every four years. Wow. That sounds almost at the end somewhat reasonable, Like how about we

just have an election? What could be more obvious at this point than that? And yet here we are, here is what we are being told. I am really trying to find I'm trying to find this poll that I you gotta see it. Oh, here we go. I found it. I love this one. This is amazing. So one of my consistent themes stretching back here to the many years of the buck Sex and show what of my themes has been that Democrats like the worship of politicians, and people say that Trump has a cult around him. I don't.

I don't think that that's true, although I do think that Trump is a very charismatic figure in a lot of people do support him in a way that is exceeds what you usually see for support of Republican politician. But Democrats tend to deeply invest themselves in their leaders. They deeply invest themselves and the people that they put intelected office. And Obama was a whole level beyond what because to support Obama was more than anything else, a way of telling everybody about who you were as a

supporter of him. And if you are of a liberal mindset, if you support Obama, you are a good person. You're not a racist person. And you want a better America. You want a multicultural, diverse America, you want socialism in or whatever all these. You want to help people. You want to be a good lib good liberals. You support Obambam and not to support him, you worship him. I mean you think that Obama is beyond any real criticism

or any real accountability. And I would also note and I'm not trying to take this back to the conversation we've been having on the show today about all the things going on in the realm of the inspector General report. But notice how all this happened while Obama was president. Very little talk about that, right, somehow it's never connected. They never make the connection to Obama. These people worked for Obama, he's the commander in chief, he's had an

executive branch. But there's no I don't think that's an accident. But this was a Monmouth University poll that just came out yesterday, and I love this that this is great tells you a lot who was a better president? Very straightforward question, who was a better president? Among Republicans, thirty seven percent said Donald Trump. Forty four percent said George Washington. So a lot of Republicans think that Trump is better

than Washington. But most Republicans do, in fact, think that the first president, who was also commander in chief of the military, defeated the British, etc. Etc. The first president gets the nod as as a better president in the grand scheme of things than Trump three years in Trump eight years in. Maybe a different conversation, but for now, most Republicans, I think are making that judgment call in

that's fine, but this was amazing. Among Democrats, twenty nine percent think that George Washington is better than Barack Obama. Sixty three percent of Democrats, I think Barack Obama was a better president than George Washington. Now, could I just based on what I just want to be based on what thing? What was the what was the transformational moment in American politics that Obama getting elected? Is that really by being elected he was a better president than George Washington?

Is that really what we're um, didn't win any wars, didn't didn't preside over some booming economy, didn't you know, no great foreign policy, state craft, or what's the what exactly is the you know, I'm kind of started the socialist revolution that we're in the midst of in this country. I mean, maybe I guess that's why the Democrats like him so much. But sixty three percent think he's better

than George Washington. That's that's a that's a solid majority. Um. And I think that if you ask Democrats is Barack Obama the greatest president of all time? You'd have a huge a huge number of them would say yes. Which is just I'm amazing. But you know, he's probably not going to be the Democrats all time favorite president no matter what, Joe Biden, because he's not going to be president. That's the main thing. I think that would probably slow him down for all of For that purpose, I also

would note that there is speaking of slowing down. It's a smooth transition. He's a smooth operato. That was not in tune, but it was a song lyric and I thought I needed to throw it in there. Biden has signaled to aids that he would serve only a single term, according to Politico Today, which is another way of saying, guys, I know him too old and I don't have it in me, but like, we can't let Trump win, so vote for me and then I'll pass the baton to

somebody else who can actually get this done. Now he won't. They say the guy said seven years old, folks, I mean he would be solidly into his eighties at the end of his first term. I mean, there's that anybody allowed to think that maybe that's a it's a little bit old to be pressed. I'm not saying it's too old to you know, write books, travel with family, you know, do cool things. Of course, right, I'm not saying people

are as young as they feel. But if you're gonna have the nuclear codes, I do think that people are allowed to ask questions about whether or not you are in optimal health and can handle the rigors of that job from just a physical and psychological perspective because of your age. Biden, well, his advisors are saying that he's thinking about he has not not yet done this, thinking about a one term pledge in order to get this done.

He's thinking about signing a one term pledge. And the idea I suppose would be that Biden would then pick a favorite of the establishment and a younger considerably so. Not gonna be Bernie Sanders. Is it gonna be Elizabeth Warren? No. I think he'd like it to be Kamala Harris, probably if I had, if I had to pick. But Kamala Harris's campaign was such a non starter that maybe that will look a little too a little too much like the elites don't care what the people who vote for

them actually think about who should be in charge. So here's what the political wrote about this. While the option of making a public pledge remains available, Biden has for now settled on an alternative strategy, quietly indicating he will almost certainly not run for a second term, while declining to make a promise that he and his advisor's fear could turn him into a lame duck and sap him

of his political capital. According to four people who regularly talk to Biden, all of whom ask for anonymity to discuss internal campaign matters, it is virtually inconceivable that he will run for reelection in twenty twenty four, when he would be the first octogenarian president. He's going to be eighty two years old in four years, and he won't be running for reelection. Biden's trying to He's got to change things up. He knows that he's a weak front runner.

I know that his support has been durable, but he knows he's a weak frontrunner, and that support would shift over in a moment if if things all of a sudden, if there was just a change in the narrative. So they know that Biden's not I feel very confident in my prediction to you that Biden is not going to be the guy. I still think that that is the case. I still believe that there'll be but then who, But then who? Here we are? I read about politics all

day long. I speak to people in d C, New York, across the country, trying to just pull sources and see, you know, who knows what about what campaign? Nobody knows who the Democrat winner of the primary is going to be. Nope, I mean I say nobody knows. Nobody even feels confident. They don't even have a pick that they'll say, yeah, I really believe that this is going to be the one,

which means that you're still gonna have this. You still have these outlied situations, And people say, Michelle Obama, I'm still hello, She's still there, folks. She's just waiting. It's doing a little bit of yoga, wandering the woods of Chappaqua, drinking some rose, just waiting for the opportunity to present herself again as your next president of the United States. Global Verification Network is the only dual certified, veteran owned

background investigation and vetting company. They are federally certified as a veteran owned small business and they are headquartered at Chicago with officers throughout the nation. Their rismunigation experts work with startups all the way up to Fortune one hundred companies. So for all of your background check needs, call Global Verification Network. No data or client information is ever offshore and all of their employees located here in the United States.

Keep it all here at home in the US and go with a veteran owned and operated company. For all of your background check needs Global Verification Network. Call eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine Again that's eight seven seven six nine five one one seven nine. Or go to MYGVN dot com Again, that's MYGVN dot

com Global Verification Network. Leave no stone unturned. Countries are finding clever ways around having to take real action like double counting emissions reductions and moving their emissions overseas and walking back on their promises to increased ambition or refusing to pay for solutions or loss and damage. This has to stop. What we need is real drastic emission cuts at the source. Greta Thunberg, everybody, Greta Thunberg Time Magazines

Person of the Year. Who needs the massive protests in favor of freedom and individual rights and human dignity and liberty in Hong Kong? Who needs any of that to be highlighted by a magazine that at least has name recognition, if not readership. It doesn't have readership. No, no, no, forget about Hong Kong im. Look forget about Trump or the whistleblower or all these other names that we're out there as possible. Time Magazine Person of the Year Greta

Thunberg is Time Magazine's Person the Year. I mean actually was sitting there talking about the complicated policy decisions that are currently being made by countries all over the world around climate change. You do have to ask yourself, hold on a second. So she's not doing this reason she doesn't know anying about any of this stuff, right, doesn't understand government, she's sixte years old. Doesn't understand government policy, doesn't know how parliament's work, doesn't know how you know,

just doesn't understand economics. None of this has no idea. Okay, remember when you were sixteen, you didn't really know any of that stuff. So and she probably knows less than you because she hasn't been in school in a year, so she's really, you know, a year behind. This is the media cheering for truancy, but someone's writing speeches for her. Now, I would ask this question, and I mean this, Would people be okay with me write or not forget about?

Takeing me out of this? Would people be okay with conservatives writing speeches and having a twelve year old recite them? And then would they? Would they then put that person on news channels and make them a global news phenomenon to have a twelve year old read speeches written by adults to attack their political enemies? What would anyone? Would anyone be okay with that? Will anybody huh? Nothing? No? Okay?

Then this is absurd. It's just completely bizarre. I don't know how anyone can take themselves seriously if they take this movement seriously. You've got a child going around telling governments that she knows nothing about, giving them advice about a scientific problem she knows nothing about. And now she's time. Now they're they're elevating her in every way that they can. I mean, it really is. You know how far liberals at this point from design, They're just gonna worship the

son or something. There's something of a of a a spiritual regression that the left is engaged in where they're just looking for some person to be the savior other than you know, like Jesus, but you're looking for someone else to be their their spiritual salvation. And you know this is this does remind me of a situation where

you have a false prophet. I mean, this is a person who is really there's a pretense here that the the Thunberg phenomenon is about combating climate change, but it's really a religious movement because you would have to the only way you could explain worshiping a sixteen year old who doesn't know anything and thinking that people should have to listen to her because government should have to listen to her and then use force to make their populations

do what she says. The only way that you could think that any of that is possible is if you in fact view this as a religious belief. If this is not really in any meaningful way about science or the data or anything else, then it starts to make sense. But this is you know, worshiping a child god essentially. You know, there are different societies where they worship you know, certain you know, animal figures as a god, although worship

you know different. You know, ancient Egypt, they had sort of huge, huge annoid animals that were elevated as different gods. You know, and then some cultures they elevate you know, child god. He's now on the cover of Time magazine for Person of the Year. By the way, not just this is the most important thing. She's done nothing, there's she's just got She's a big news story. It's just

all a construct of the media. But the people that are behind this, and I know you're probably seeing buck who cares Time magazine, Yes, but it's going to look at their psyche. They have an opportunity to actually shine a light on what's going on in Hong Kong, which is important, which matters. There are millions and millions of people. They're singing our national anthem, they're holding up our American flag. They want freedom from our greatest enemy and competitor on

the world stage, China. They want the continuation of rights that they have been promised under agreement with the Chinese Communist Party. And journalists who claim to be about in forming the public and making sure that credit phone. I'm also just I was still I'm never gonna forget. I mean, I can't believe that day when I was at Fox and they're saying, don't bash children. I was not bashing children.

I just was pointing out that adults who listened to children about climate change are not very smart, and they really can't defend themselves because there's no defense for thinking that Greta Thunberg is someone that anybody should listen to on this stuff. The show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real, It's time for roll call Boma Bad. That's one of my favorite one. That's a good one. I need some Brandon. Do you have a good Do you have like a good chill Spotify playlist you can share.

I need some new music, but like not, don't don't get I hate when people like, oh, I have a lot of great music and they just give me all this stuff from the seventies. Everyone needs to stopped worshiping all the music of the seventies. There's some good stuff there, but I want stuff from like the last you know, Oh, I have a lot of classic fifteen or twenty I know, But I don't need you to give me a playlist of the Rolling Stones. I can download the Rolling Stones playlist,

you know what I mean. I'll see I'm trying. Yeah, anything, There's not a lot of new bands that are really like I was told by Spotify that I listened to a lot of modern rock, and I was like, I guess that's is that the same as contemporary rock? I think it were splitting hairs, you know, like spy versus yeah, see call that see I like, I like where your

head's on on that one versus illegal surveillance. There you go. Yeah, I mean I gotta you know, And I still have the the Internet still out of my place and cable I have. It's like I'm Tom Hanks and castaway. I'm about to start talking to Wilson the volleyball. It's absurd. So are you writing your your book by candlelight? No, I have to go to a place I go to my my siblings or my parents, or I go to

an internet calf. I mean I have a coffee shop where they have I have to like go like you know, I'm like this vagrant now as to travel from Wi Fi hotspot to Wi Fi hotspot? What's taken so long? I don't know, man, Verizon FiOS, get your act together. It's out of control. It's been days how many? And they know? I mean, it's a crude. It's not just me. It's not like I don't know how to turn on my Internet. It's like hundreds and hundreds of people that

are affected. There was a fire apparently down in the you know, in the Wi Fi thing. I don't know, and hopefully they put the fire out. The fire's definitely out, but so is Buck's Wi Fi. And how can I spread freedom and crush commies if I'm not even connected to the internet and stream music? How can I get my my six Trump retweets in one morning NBD that happened today? How can I get that to be twelve if I don't have Wi Fi access? Uncalled for? I

think it's totally uncalled for it, you know. And also now we really didn't we need to start a campaign. I think I think the Trumpster needs the Buckster in twenty twenty. I think he needs him to help out down at the White House. I'm just saying, you know, Chief, they can call me chief propagandas are. I don't even care. Come up with some fun title. It'd be great, you know, But just they should say, Buck, come down to the White House. We need you to crush libs all day

for us. Just crush libs. That's the early job. It'll be amazing, many problems I would enjoy it so much it'd have to sound I'd be like midnight, it's still beat the White House, like who is next? Are you not entertained? Libs? Are you not entertained? I was thinking on the way here that you should propose to him an idea to have a White House radio station. It's it's it's a broadcast out of the White House. It's obviously his own bedia and you could be like the

program direct. I'm sure there's all kinds of laws that that would filate, but I like where your head is at right exactly. Oh, they say, they say that he's an authoritarian. Why can't he just set up a radio station? Then I have the bucks to run it. So I think that would be I think that would be kind of fun. Um, that's something something to consider for sure. Um all right. I did say, um, let's see who we go here. I did say we'd get to roll call,

so we will do that. I do not like when I take away too much of your role call because people actually get mad, they're like, hey, we don't take phone calls. Stop stop trespassing on the roll call time. That's when the team gets to be heard, and that is where we are right now. All right, Damon, this is coming in on team Buck on iHeartMedia at iHeartMedia dot com. Buck. Yesterday, as I listened to your show during the roll call segment, someone suggested another segment of

your show called buck fever. You kind of spoke as if you had no idea what they're talking about. You need to get out of the city more often, as if you had no Oh sorry. Buck fever is a state of mind while deer hunting and you have finally seen or have shot at a buck. The person becomes so pumped up with adrenaline they begin to physically be shaken to the point where they miss some of the most simple shots. Kind of fundy to harass another of

this horrific mistake shields high. By the way, if you ever want to try your hand at bow hunting, whitetail deer in Indiana or turkey hunting the spring, you let me know. Sean, US Army retired Sean, thank you for your service and thank you for thank you for updating me. You know, I thought buck fever is what happens at cepack when you know some of the conservative collegiate ladies have too many tequilas or something. You know what I mean. I was just about to say, after a first date,

you leave her worth buck fever. You know what I'm saying. I mean, you know when all the ladies are like, I need a selfie, you know, and I'm like, hey, we could take some self We got a little buck fever. You know that's fine. I wish that was what happened. I'm like, excuse me, whatever, I would like to take a full of me. I'm here. Hello. No, I don't think they want to take uh, you know, photos with um what's uh? I can't remember what I was. I can't remember I was saying. So it doesn't matter now.

But Sean, thank you so much. I appreciate it. Justin, hey there Buck love the show. In honor of your Christmas and Birthday wishes, I've been shamelessly promoting your show justin you're the man. Thank you so much. That really really means a lot. It does help. I've noticed the sound issues have miraculously disappeared in the absence of producer Mark. Guys, we're throwing you know, we'll leave a producer market. The trench is taking grenades, and I mean, what is the magic?

What is the you know the voodoo that you do so well, it's a spell. Producer, Brandon, what are you doing on the audio? First off, just so you know, none of these people writing in pro me I am not. I mean, how many family members do you have? Family members? I don't know. We gotta normalize everything. This brings me to my next point. Justin writes, Oh no, don't go anywhere, producer, Brandon. Catch up on a on a grilled cheese, producer Brandon,

How could you? This is the stuff of nightmares and commies. Tomato soup on the side would be a civilized thing to do. You savage shields high Justin? Justin, by the way, co sign on all of that. That's true. I would use the word adult instead of savage. Again, I have the palette of a middle school kid. I just I don't know. I like my cats up. Where are you on mayonnaise? Just with tuna fish. I'm gonna tell you something.

I was never really a mayo guy. But there's this mayo that's made by this company and they're not a sponsor anything. But I'm just you know, sir Kensington. Okay, that and I actually met a guy who was involved in founding this company a long time ago, and he's like, yeah, we're starting a Mayo company, and I thought Mayo. You know, Hellman's has got that lockdown for the last fifty years, right, everyone know this looks like it's like, uh, you know,

which is the ketchup? Right? Is there any ketchup other than other than Hines that you ever really see? What's wait, there's one other one of the people. There are other ones Hunts because I know this Hunts hums his bootleg Hines. Let's not get crazy. But I remember this guy told me this and I said, all right. You know, at some point I just picked one up at the grocery store. The mayonnaise is amazing. Yeah, like I look for excuses

to put it on things. It's that good. It's kind of way I feel about Natella, which is all Natella can make. You're like, oh, I'm really hungry. All I have is this old leather shoe that I found in the back of an alleyway. You spread some Natella on that old leather shoe. It's it's delicious. Dude, Natella, you put it on anything, You'll eat it. No Tela on Mazza. You should try that. Is that really a thing? Yeah? On that? Well, I like the Mazza, so yeah, I'll

put in Mazza has gluten. Those you're trying to kill me? Are you trying to take over the Freedom Hunter? This is you're trying to make trying to make the bucksure disappear. Has no yeast, but it has Uh yeah, I must say it has. It's because it's wheat. If it has weird, yeah, yeast is the Yeah. No, I actually can't even eat unleavened bread at church. So that's a problem for communion. But that's a conversation for another time. Let's see Jakester Brandon.

What have you done? I'm on team Brandon. Thanks from Jake. Do you want to just say thank you Jake for the this, this, this producer Brandon revolution that has occurring right now? Thanks Jake, whoever you are. Man, I gotta say, we got we got more, we got more love for producer Brandon while he's making sure the Hut continues to roll. Then that anybody could could ever imagine? Um? All right, John, and I do believe that's how I don't know if it's Joon or June. Hey Buck your show on December

tenth was awesome. Thank you so much for all your knowledge in this process and everything you shared. You know, I wanted to email you so many times, but damn that show was great. Well they'll call you jay On if it's June or John. But thank you so much. That's really really kind of you. And you know, I put a lot of work into show every day, so it means a lot when people care about it. I mean, you know, we go, we go all in, we go

all in. We do this show every single day, Jacob, So we're up buck arguing that Friends is better than Seinfeld's, like arguing that a grilled chicken breast is better than a ribi, or that soccer is a thing that Americans should watch or play. Bring back Commy Bear shield side Jacob, um look man to each his own. I just think, if you're really just going to ask me what's the most what's the most exciting show to watch? On the replay, I probably see The Office more than anything else, which

is just say I'm sheer genius. I mean that show because you can pick it up at any episode, any season and just throw it on and you're good. It doesn't matter, like what the story. Every episode is kind of a standalone, which is amazing. I mean, there's obviously storylines that go through it, but if you know the basic storylines, you can just jump in anywhere. It doesn't matter.

And the writing is incredible. I mean, Dwight Trude and what's his name Michael Scott are two of the best comedic act two of the best comedic characters, and the actors doing it an amazing job. Oh agreed, I totally agree, but I just can't. Seinfeld is less than than friends in your eyes. I just can't agree with. I know you can't. That's I understand. That's a controversial take, as they say, that's what the kids. That's the most controversial take.

That is my most controversial take. That And also, even though I can't drink beer, so people think it's a sour grapes situation or sour hops, perhaps because you know Celiac stuff, I always thought beer was kind of overrated. I'm just I was never like, oh, I really want

a beer, you know. And I saw all these beer commercials or everybody has like a six pack and they're dancing with ladies on a beach somewhere and everything, and I was like, hey, you know what when because I haven't had a drink in four years, but when I did drink, same thing I would rather have, like a soda or a milkshake, a strawberry milkshake. Somehow a strawberry milkshake doesn't sound as bad to me as eating strawberry

ice cream. And I can't explain that. I just feel like straw I know, I just feel I just feel like in milkshake form, it's a little bit more palatable. But I want to see that data from the food industry on whether it's really true that strawberry is the third most popular ice cream flavor, because I just think this is a lie perpetuated by the communists. I just think that there's no way that strawberry ice cream is really something that everybody wants to eat. I just find

it hard to believe. Jen Hey Bunk love your podcast listen every day. I was listening yesterday and you made some interesting points about what Schiff is doing. We're supposed to have three separate but equal branches, and yet it seems that Schiff has been lording over the entire government. Checks and balances seem only to be working in one direction. Some random judge is able to block Trump at every turn, but there seemed to be no check on what the

House is able to do. I realize there are benefits when you have majority of the House, but changing rules in the fly to push for impeachment seems contrary to our entire system. Everyone listens to show is like so smart and so nice. It's really an honor to get to talk to you folks every day. It's like I have the coolest, best group of people as an audience

of anybody in the media business, period anywhere. But she does write ps team Seinfeld at the end, so point for Brandon, point for the bad guys can tell you, yeah, producer Brandon gets another, gets another one on the board, Buck sexty. If you read this solid read, definitely read it would confirm you should read again. Then really you're not interested in Oh no, it's the guy who's gonna tell me how to how to care my celiac disease. Dude, stop stop, no more, stop writing in with this no more.

I've had enough. Tim Hey, Buck, regarding your uninformed opinions on veganism, who right out the bat, look at that shots fired? Please stick with your exemplary political inside info. That's where you excel, and I thank you for that. However, your take on veganism is so far off that I charge you with not actually watching the Game Changers documentary. The point of the movie is that we don't require meat for nutrition, with empirical mixed in evidence with anecdotal

posing to convince the kids. While so I agree, it's still a personal choice to meet in dare industry insures we don't have that right shields high also meet his all the best, Tim, All right, Tim, I'll take it. Look, Tim, I like when people disagree with me, especially when they wanted to be a little funny about it. And and I like that they're willing to be wrong as you are about being a vegan. But like that's cool, that's I'm just I'm just kidding. Tim. You're respectful and very

kind man, and I'll appreciate you. Listen to the show, and maybe you know, if I were vegan, I wouldn't have to try to work out so hard in the gym so that I don't explode behind this desk like job of the hut. All right, Roal Collin continues here and we'll switch to the Facebook side of the equation, and with that we have Amy Amy Rights. Hey, my name is Amy. I'm interesting connecting with some of the bucks actions show charged with internships. Here's how I can

be reached. Well, Amy, thank you so much for writing in. Unfortunately, we don't have interns on this show because there's only two of us, so we don't really I don't really have space in here, so we don't really have interns. Although that would be kind of kind of fun. I don't know, do you want to how to get interns? Could we could we get like a little producer Brandon, a little producer Brandon have to wear like the Brandon hat every day, the Brandon sweatshirt, you know, like the

rock DJ thing. Sure, okay, see we get a little little little mini Brandon maybe, but or brand Brand Debt Brandta Brenda. I've been thinking about that. Yeah, let's give us some thought. I'm sure if we asked, I heart, we could probably get an intern in here. But no, Amy, right now, thank you so much for interest. But we actually we don't have an intern program. We don't have interns. I don't even know what an intern will do around here. Probably just yeah, I think that what would we do.

I mean, we just have to have an intern there who stares at Producer Marks sometimes and goes, mmmm, behave yourself Producer Mark, uh, Matthew sent me, Oh, here we go. The batman grappling hook does exist. There even is one that goes in a cannon. It uses five five six blanks to fire and it goes on any ar fifteen lower Wow titanium grappling hook. Mini, that's a real thing. This audience is amazing, man, like they know they seriously.

The good news is that when the zombie apocalypse apocalypse comes, Team Buck is going to make sure that I'm x filled that here. I'm not even gonna have to like

set up a plan there. All of a sudden, there's gonna be black helicopters or that's right, they'll be black, and they'll just like swoop me up and we'll go back to the Freedom Hunt compound that you guys have all set up with all the delicious, storable food and munitions and clean water we could ever need, and lots of old history books and of course an ample store of chocolate and mescal and some bulldogs because you know, we need companionship of the canine variety and we're good

to go. So that's the game, Brandon, you come with us, you know. I mean we'll have a little like like rock area, you know, like posters of guns and roses and stuff. You know, you'll be you'll be good. Thank you my own personal grappling hook, and we'll get you a grappling hook, all right. I'm sure you take out some zombies with it, if nothing else, for sure, it's pretty helpful. I think team the show is done today, which is sad because the show is amazing and it

goes by so quickly. But we're gonna do another one tomorrow and pretty much every weekday after that until Christmas one. We'll be off for a few days, but we don't need to worry about that right now. I will miss you all, so please do spread word. Pass the buck. Pass the buck. That means you tell somebody about the show, say hey, download this on iTunes, post it to your Facebook page, the link on iTunes or on the iHeart app. Until tomorrow, Shields High