ICE Raids: Opposing Immigration Law

That plus and Cultur will join with the latest on Epstein, the census question, Immigration, Trump, and so much more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This is the buck Sexton Show where the mission or mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes American, You're a great American Again the buck Sexton Show began. He's a great guy. No, it's a bad guy. Is

that the President does not seem to share. And we saw this morning when he announced his heartless raids on families this coming Sunday. This goes too far because these raids, we're not what they signed up for with President Trump, and I think they're calls to the President made a difference. On Sunday. West of the Mississippi, our people are in church and as they prepare to go to church. They feel very threatened and scared by these raids. Welcome to

the Buck Saxons show, everybody. We knew this would happen. Here you have Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, very very powerful legislator, legislators, some would argue, really the most powerful legislator in the country right now, Maybe only Mitch McConnell up there with her. But you have Nancy Pelosi doing what we knew she and the Democrats would, opposing the enforcement of our immigration laws because it's just so mean,

it's just so heartless. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement is a federal agency that acts upon existing statutes, statutes that say, if you're in this country illegally, if you've had your days in court, or if you have refused to show up in court and you are supposed to be deported, you have a deportation order, you go home, you get sent home. That is what the law says, the laws that are created by the very body that Nancy Pelosi

sits atop right now over on Capitol Hill. But she and the rest of the Democrats are running around grandstanding virtue signaling about how horrible it is that a select group of people that were picked and then will be even beyond that looked over by immigration and Customs enforcement officers and prioritized that even this list of those are under our law supposed to be deported, they are not deported without Democrats crying about it, saying it's heartless, saying

it's awful, undermining our law enforcement efforts. They don't want this to happen. Trump backed off at a couple of weeks ago. When is it obvious what's going on here, folks? They are rooting for illegal immigration. They have no problem with illegal immigration. They do not want them to be punishment for illegal immigrants. They are hoping that illegal immigrants

are able to evade law enforcement. If they were honorable, if the Democrats weren't just a bunch of hypocritical, self righteous grandstanders, they would say, we want to pass a bill to to change the law so that you can just come into this country and stay, and if you're already in this country illegally, you get to stay. Now. You might say to me, buck, buck, that's never gonna

work because the Republicans won't go along. Okay, but at least the Democrats would be pushing for what they want as a matter of law, instead of what they have now, which is, oh, no, no, no, no no, we're not going to change the laws. But what do you mean you're enforcing those laws. What do you mean what is said on the page of the law books is to be taken seriously by federal law enforcement. They are undermining the very foundation of our system by doing this. They're undermining

our rule of law every single day. Every time they do this. They never explain why shouldn't someone with a deportation order be deported. They've gone through the system, we have a process. And this is where you start to see the radical Olynskiite side of the Democrats really exposing itself. You had mayor Peat today also say we're gonna make the prison population half its current size. Folks, this is

where we're this is what we're dealing with now. If this Democratic party that Trump is up against they want to empty out the prisons by half, it's gonna be a lot a lot of bad, bad folks out there. You know, the prisons are not full of half people

that didn't do anything wrong. I hate to break it to the Democrats, you know, open the prisons half of them out and then open borders, and everybody's here gets to stay, and anyone is here gets to have the taxpayers foot the bill for them, and we're just gonna keep spending and spending and spending. Nothing ever changes on that front. Look, I have told you to celebrate recently. I've said, enjoy this country for what it is right now,

Enjoy what's going on, because it's not gonna last. These Democrats are showing us it is not going to last. They are playing with fire, and I'm starting to think that they're not just playing. I'm thinking they're arsonists. Democrats have a disdain for this country. It comes out time and again from their public pronouncements. They want to fundamentally transform and change this country, and a great way to do that is to watch it crumble down and then they get to be the ones who build it back

up in their image. I'm starting to think that that's really what the ends date is here, folks. That's what they're hoping to accomplish. Immigration is just one way that they'll get there. We'll have more on this in a moment. Well, this makes America less safe. Look, I don't think anybody disagrees that there ought to be law enforcement protecting people from danger. That's not what this is about. This is targeting people who are caught in a broken system where

there should be a pathway to citizenship. And again, in a community like mine, if rumors start going on about raids, let alone, if it starts actually happening, it immediately makes

the community less safe. It makes people less likely to participate in the economy, less likely to talk to law enforcement when they need help dealing with something that really is a matter of danger, And it's really designed to strike fear into people at a moment when fear is something we've got way too much of in this country. No one's allowed to be deported anymore, folks, That's what the Democrats really want to say. That's where they are.

Maybe if you're an MS thirteen gang assassin, maybe then you get deported, but only if you've had a lot of taxpayer funded defense teams, and you know, you get to have your trial and then an appeal, and maybe go in front of an immigration judge separate from your trial and your appeal, and you know, only when you've absolutely exhausted and this is as an illegal when you've exhausted all of that due process. Then maybe you get

sent home. If you've really killed some people and you don't vote Democrat, you know, then you get sent home. Short of that, they don't want to send anybody home. And here's why this makes me so mad, because I was involved starting last summer publicly in the debates about what's going to happen, what is going to be the reality for all of these different illegal aliens crossing into

this country and going into the asylum process. They kept telling us, the Democrats are saying, just respect the process, just let them do the process. And we would ask, and you'd ask, Democrats go back. You'll hear them say this on the record, members of Congress. Oh, if they don't get there, if they don't get asylum when they go through that process, we respect the final determination of

our immigration courts, and they should be sent home. Well that was while the numbers were getting up, run up, run up on hundred and thirty one hundred and forty thousand a month, run up, run up, run up, more and more and more. Now that we realize this is really a crisis. We've got too many people coming in. They're saying, whoa, whoa, whoa Hold on a second, you can't send these people that have had all their due process, who came into country illegally, you can't send them home.

Now they are they are an absolutely essential part of this country. They're doing the jobs Americans won't do. They're

more lab them, they're better than Americans. Oh, you mean that we should have seen this coming all along, that it was all a con that they never intended to be honest about any of this, that they were just hoping that we would be in the situation we're in right now, which is that effectively, Democrats have turned this into a human rights issue where if you're in America, it is your human right to never get sent anywhere else as long as you vote Democrat. That's where this

is now. I mean, may repeat their claiming that law enforcement needs to protect people from danger, but not this. I'm sorry. Is anyone in danger if I don't pay my taxes? Does that endanger? Can they make that argue? Is anyone in danger if I don't pay my taxes? Is it in danger if you don't pay your taxes? The answers, of course, is no. Is it ain't even hurt by it? No? You can't make the argument, I

don't even really hurt by it. If you refuse to pay your taxes, and you refuse a judge's summons to come answer for why you didn't pay your taxes, men with guns are going to come to your home. Men and women perhaps will come to your home and take you, yes, separate you from your family, and take you to a cell. And if you say sorry, I don't want to do that, they're going to forcibly put you on the ground and handcuff you. And if you keep fighting, they're going to

keep escalating force. So why is that justice? Why should that be the law? If laws about immigration are no longer valid, laws about taxes should no longer be valid either. Let's see how long the dem lib status authoritarians can fund their little dream projects when people that are paying way too much in taxes already are like, you know what, I'm just done with this. And then we can also go on, oh, they're separating my family because I didn't

pay what What's what? Explain to me the difference? Someone? Please try? I mean, if they try, they get they get smacked around, so they know they won't because there is no difference. They say that, they say that there's fundamentally, the problem that we face now is that Democrats do not believe that illegal entry or illegal status in America is a crime. They don't think this should be a crime.

They don't think this is a crime. They think they see nothing wrong with That's why I keep saying, ask a Democrat what is the downside immigration? Not that they stick to these very service talking much. We believe in border security, we believe in rule of law. We okay, they'll say that those are talking points. What does a legal immigration do that is bad? According to the Democratic Party? And this is now a mantra for all of them.

They are All they do is contribute to the economy, make our community safer, and make out if and remember, these are not people that have been vetted or been screened, or they just show up, why have an immigration system at all? If we are supposed to assume, and we are being told assume this, or else you are racist, assume this is the case about illegals, or else you

are a bad person. You are to assume that illegals as a group are more law abiding, more productive, and better in this country, better contributors to the polity than Americans are, based on nothing based on just what the Lib media says and what the Democratic Party says, and you might see, buck, why are they so why are they adhere to this so much? One, it's a really handy weapon. The illegal immigrant issues a very handy weapon

against the Republican Party. They let's call us racist and xenophogues. And anything that allows Democrats in the short term to call Republicans racist is something that Democrats can't help but just immediately latch onto. But we all know here the long term game, the long term game is that this is how the Republican Party dies. This is how limited government, rule of law, individual rights, constitutional restraint, separation of powers.

It all goes away, and we just turn into one of these countries where majority rules and then majority sees is power and then power is everything. And you know, you can the Constitution is not gonna be worth a

whole lot of anything. The reason that all this works is because the people who are here, you me, my fellow Americans, we believe in this, and we have a culture and we have a history, and we have a way that we from California to you know, New York, from Texas up to Minnesota, we have a way that we think about the world, that we think about each other,

and that is unique and special to us. And if we just decide that that doesn't matter anymore and just anyone can show up, how can we pretend that there's even assimilation process at that point? How can you say that there's going to be assimilation? When is when is the number two high for there to be assimilation? No discussions whatsoever. The Democrats, though, just just more pandering, more

nonsense from them and just emotionalizing the issue too. This all you are going to hear is that this is about separating families. That is to talk about separating families. By the way, a lot of these families were separated by choice by the families by sending kids on accompanying to the border, handing them over to human trafficking organizations.

Oh buck, they're so desperate. I'm sorry. They're not stacking up bodies and they're not digging mass graves in Guatemalo right now, Like we know, we do have to have some sense of reality here. We keep getting told of these people are seeking asylum and they're fleeing violence and persecution. They just want to be in a better country. That doesn't make them bad people. But everybody wants to be in a at our country. Who's not in a great country.

There's not enough great country to go around, folks. This is what you know, We're getting to the point where we have to start having these discussions openly. You know. I mean, I don't I don't want to live in a country where the government doesn't care if you're a citizen or not. But they're just going to say that it's all it's all about separating families. It's a system that's abusing human rights. This is one of the Democrat

left wing Superstarsziona Pressley far left superstars. That is here's what she has to say, play one. It is unfortunate that our country is no longer standing by its promise of being a beacon of hope and haven for those like you seeking asylum. Instead, this administration has criminalized families and is now operating a fundamentally flawed system that is systemically separating families and engaging in human rights abuses on US soil. What does that mean criminalizing families? It's not

criminalizing families. Criminalizing a legal entry has been the law, you know, and still is the law. Congress isn't even trying to change that law. It's not criminalizing families. That's just a lie. It's just a lie. But we're not doing enough. We're not this on Democrats always saying we're not living up to our promise. We're not being the country we say we're on all this stuff. I'm sorry. We take a million legal immigrants in every year. We're

gonna have a million illegal immigrants in this year. That's a lot of people. At what point did we start to say it, We'll hold on a second. Can we focus a little more on the people that are already in this country. We got problems we've gotta fix here. You know, if they're just gonna say that it makes it better, and you know, if you're gonna take this, there's some radical libertarians to believe this too. Just open borders,

just let everybody in, all right. Look, that's an experiment where if you run it and you're raw, the country is over. Democrats want to run that experiment. They want to run the open borders experiment. They want to run the modern monetary theory just inflate the currency and don't worry about it. They want to run that experiment. They really do want to. They want to at least risk completely destroying this country. I mean that is not an exaggeration.

Absolutely destroying our economy, destroying our political culture. They are taking steps right now that push us absolutely in that direction, and they're willing to do it. They're willing to roll the dice. The question that a lot of you probably have, or maybe one that I pose to you, is do they know that that's what they're doing and they want to do it anyway? Do they think it's a risk or is that the end goal to bring about a collapse that they can be in charge of the reordering.

I don't know, man. Democrats say some pretty crazy stuff these days, but this is kicking at the load bearing walls of our civilization, of our country of America. That's what they are doing right now. Immigration is just a front line of that effort. Who is speaking up on this, Who is making the case? We need more voices who understand this and who are eloquent and who are persuasive and who get it. You got more coming up, Stay with me. The Democrats. All they need to do is

support border security and the government will be funded. But that that we're talking about the border control. The Democrats support border security, they don't support five billion dollars. Could you could? Could you identify will for me some of the kinds of border security you're saying that the Democrats. Democrats say they support border security, what where they don't we respect you? They voted against Kate's law, they voted

against ending sanctuary cities. They voted against supporting mister Team gang members. They voted against supporting violent criminals. They voted time and time again against a physical border. Walter's topic legal entry. I mean, where is the evidence that you keep asserting they're for border security. They haven't been. They opposed closing loophole asylum that flood our system with meritless clients. I want to move out. Yeah. If I were Wolf, I want to move on too. Because he just got

buck slapped. I guess, well, technically it was Miller slapped, but it's my show, so I'm gonna say it was buck slap exactly. That was fantastic Stephen Miller sounding like Buck s exit on the radio. Here. What do I say? All the time they oppose enforcement at every turn, every action, every measure, and then they turn around and say, oh, but word for border security. No, they're not. They're not for border security. They're absolutely not for border security. How

much more clear does it have to be? How much more clear could it be? Find one aspect of the border and securing the border, and then say do Democrats support this toy? Against it? Every time? Every time they're against it? So actions speak louder than words here, words don't even really matter. Actions are all that matters. That's very it's very frustrating, it really is, all right. On the census question, Democrats are there's such clowns, they're so

disingenuous the census. And we'll talk to and Culter a little bit more about this later on as well. I want to get ans take on it. But the census has been a question that's around. It was on the census every year, you know, citizenship rather was a question on the census every year until I think nineteen fifty or so. But now to have a question that was always there, and that makes perfect sense to ask are you a citizen? You know I have to check this box when I apply for a job. Are you a citizen?

Why is it so weird to ask people when you're trying to count who's in the country and what their situation is. Are you a citizen but Mayor Peach running around here? You know, Mayor Pete. He disappoints me because he's smarter than this, but he is that he has to say certain things to get what he wants to advance in this looney left wing Democratic Party. But here's what may Or Pete had to say about the census recently, Play five. This is racially and politically motivated manipulation of

the census. It makes the whole country worse off. It leads to underrepresentation. It'll lead to an undercount and in a community like mine, an industrial Midwest city that is finally growing but would not be seen to be growing if you netted out immigration, it threatens our ability to get access to resources. There's a reason why the court's ruled that this is wrong. I'll let other scholars talk about why the president's action may be unconstitutional, but it's

very clear that it's wrong. How could it be unconstitutional to ask a question that was on the census every ten years for almost two hundred years. How could it be unconstitutional? The government gets to decide what questions ask on the senses. This is a completely relevant normal question to ask, unconstitutional, but Democrats just use that word as a I don't like it, and I want to sound smart unconstitutional. I do believe may Or Peat is smarter

than this. But he's playing he's playing dumb because he's got to appeal to the dumb left wing bass. He's he's manipulating them, and I find that pretty gross. But that's what that's what he's doing that it's it's it's racially motivated. Why is it racially motive? We're asking, but citizenship, citizenship is not a racially is not an issue of race at all. There are a lot of citizens in America who are of all different races. Why is citizenship

a racially motivated issue? Because there are a lot of illegal aliens who are non white, Hispanic or Latino. Okay, well that's but that's not all of them. This is a completely universally, universally applicable question. We're just asking about citizenship. We're not asking are you an illegal alien Mexican. It's not a racial component here, and then just say that

it's it's politically motivated. Well, yeah, the data would show that there are far more illegals in this country that we even led to believe, and maybe maybe people should know that. Maybe that's the thing that they should be allowed to know. Jim Jim Jordan shirtless Jim. Does anyone else call him? Oh? No, it's not shirtless Jim buck Wow. Hey, hey Jim seeing his moves on the up of the dance floor. No, no, he's he's jacketless Jim. That's what I was trying to Shirtless Jim. Whoa, he's like he's

a Chippendale's guy, just got a little bow tiled. Jacketless Jim Jordan. He understands it's really gone on with the census Place six. Are we going to see an executive order here? What do you predict? I think we will, and I think it's a good move. Look, this is just common sense. We've been asking the census question, the citizenship question on the census, in one form or another, for two hundred years. And you go talk to any one on the street asking do you think we should

be asking a citizenship question on the census. Every single person you talk to will say yeah, and then they'll quickly follow it up with a second question. Let's say, aren't we doing that already? And of course you'd have to say. Yes, We've been doing it for two hundred years, so this is common sense. Everyone's for it, everyone understands it's needed. Except Democrats in Congress. Yep. Couldn't be more obvious that this is the right thing to do, this

is the right question to ask. And yet here we are, and we had we had. Trump finally announced that he's not going to include a citizenship question on the twenty twenty census, and he's going to take an executive action. As we go to air here at least this is the latest an executive action that instructs the Commerce Department to obtain an estimate of US citizenship through other means.

Why can we never ever get this information? Why does it always have to be there's some stumbling block, there's some reason why we cannot know how many people have come into America illegally and are living here illegally. It shouldn't be this hard, it should not be this complicated. But there is a there's a vested interest among the

left in preventing us from finding this information out. And also, just like they do constantly with their voter suppression, they're always yelling at voter suppression, and then there's like record high voting in the place they're saying among minorities where they say there's gonna be voter suppression. They like to pretend that this is another what is their favorite allegation against Republicans. Sexism is high, but it's not the high.

Their favorite is racism. They love to play the racism card. We'll talk later about how AOC is playing the racism card look in a subtle fashion, but she's playing it against Nancy Pelosi, you know, old old white lady. Pelosi's being a little insensitive to color, AOC has been saying. So that's that's interesting when we get that coming up.

But also Tom Steyer wants to give healthcare to illegals, means he wants to have the government take money from you and hurt your access to healthcare or long run, that's what's going to happen here. We'll get into that in a moment. Yes or no, would your insurance plan provide coverage for undocumented undocumented immigrants? And so the short answer is going to be yes. Once again, I want to talk about something broader, which is this, we have

a failed immigration system. We should have comprehensive immigration reform, which is a classic thing that this government has been unable to do for decades. So in that context, what are you supposed to do with people who are part of society, live here, contribute to society, and yet are somehow under the radar, are living in the shadows which they're a part of society. The good news is that Tom Steyer is a billionaire, which makes me think that

anyone can be a billionaire. So we've got that going for us, because this guy's deeply unimpressive. So that's the good news. The bad news is that now you've got a billionaire in this race who is not going to be open about this, but just listening to him, it's very clear that he is for effectively open borders, that he believes it, certainly believes an amnesty. Absolutely, that's a

whole all we're contributing in the shadow? Okay, so does anyone is the assumption we make that anyone who comes here illegally or otherwise, anyone who comes here, even if they're illegal, they are contributing and not a net taker. That's the assumption we have to operate. Well, then the way for us to get truly rich, remember that is

the assumption the Left operates under. But the way for us to get truly rich is to just take in as many we should take in ten million illiterate, non English speaking people from cultures that are very dissimilar to ours all over the world. Ten million a year will be the wealthiest country in the history of the universe. Because they're all. They're all. It doesn't matter, or does

it matter. Other countries have a merit based system where they try to assess whether someone because they recognize that some people are wards of the state, some people are a net drain on the economy. This is just the facts, this is just reality. You can't have that discussion. You're heartless, You're being You're bad. I think the Democrats have already lost the election. I think it's because healthcare for illegals

is a deal breaker. Anybody who has and my only concern here is that there aren't enough people who have a basic understanding of economics to tackle this one. But anyone who does, and not even economics, just math healthcare for illegals. We are running out of money right now for Medicare. That's already been talking with the president. We're running a big deficit and we have not. We have not curb spending at all on this President. Look that the facts are the facts. We're running out of money

on medicare. You're not going to give medicare to illegals. So then how do you distinguish between somebody who shows up and says, oh, I've been living here for a couple of years, working in the shadows, and I need I need a heart surgery, and someone who comes from anywhere in the world and just says, Okay, I'm here, give you my heart surgery. Now, heart surgery costs a couple hundred thousand dollars, half million dollars, depends on the surgery.

Does anyone anybody have an answer to this is the answer? Yes, So so we get to pay for the rest of the world's healthcare. That because if we open this up, we're seeing this in the southern border. If you show up with a kid, you get to stay. Guess what now, people from China and Bangladesh and all over the place are shown up here. I got a kid, you gotta

let me in. Do they really think that if we start giving healthcare to anyone who's in the country, paid for by the taxpayer, that there won't be people who engage in kind of benefit tourism. Show up in America, get your heart fixed, show up in America, get your hip fix. Now this is where the smarmie libs jump in and say, you're so mean, don't you care about

the people are Okay, I'm so mean. I have to pay onerous taxes every year under penalty of being thrown in prison and obey all kinds of stupid laws that libs will defend to the hilth and say it's the law, it's the law. Let other be look at your show up here illegally, have a right to a doctor's labor, have a right to taxpayer dollars, And you and I will be told that's right, American citizens. We're gonna be told, Yeah,

you know that you've got You've got that surgery. You don't have to wait a couple of years for that one. And if what if I'm in pain? If what if I die because I'm waiting for the surgery, Oh, there won't There won't be scarcity. There's not going to be an increased drain on the healthcare system when the entire healthcare system is being paid. When rather illegal immigrants can rely on the healthcare system to pay entirely for whatever care they get. Does any serious person really believe that?

I already know there are a lot of doctors who won't take Medicaid because Medicaid reimbursement rates aren't high enough. Increasingly, doctors aren't gonna take Medicare because Medicare reimbursement rates aren't not gonna be high enough. And some doctors also have just left practice because there's so many there's so much paperwork,

so much box check. I can't tell you I don't I don't want to go to the the doctor because every time I go, well, first of all, modern medicine, like fifty percent of the time completely lets me down, takes my money, and does nothing to help me. But I don't know if any of you have had the same experience.

I'm just telling you the experience I've had. I'd I'd say my satisfaction rate going to an MD with a problem is about fifty percent and about fifty percent of the time, and they either have no idea what's wrong, or they're like, yeah, it's probably gonna be that way maybe forever. You know, here's a bill for five hundred dollars don't want to do our hitching the way out. Thanks. That's my experience with modern medicine for the most part, fifty percent or actually like yeah, that's a you know,

an ear infection. Here are some drops, but you know, it can be very very disappointing experience. But you fill out all this paperwork, you have to check all these things, and now you do it online, you show up, you gotta do it again by hand because they're not sure that they're gonna be able to It's just a nightmare. We do not make this system better because we have decided that this is a right, it is not a service.

And that is why our cell phones get smaller, faster, better all the time, our healthcare gets slower, crappier, more expensive. We never learn the lessons, or at least the libs the socialists never learn the lessons. You think Tom Styre is gonna wait when he went it's time for him to have his angioplastic or whatever. I mean, he's an

older guy. I think he's gonna wait. Please, He's he's gonna see the best who is the best heart surgeon there possibly is, and he will go to that person and he will not wait to see that person because he's a billionaire. You, my friends, you have been paying into medicare your whole lives. You will wait. He might wait until it's too late. But if you have a problem with that, do you not care about immigrant illegal immigrant children? Do you not care about the people who

are fleeing poverty? And you know that there also was a difference the people that used to come here and flee to this country where claiming asylum here. They would tell you stories. I've spoken to many, many, many of them over the years to tell you about how much they love this place, how amazing this is. You know, here's a little experiment. Ask somebody who was a refugee from the Khmer rouge from Cambodia came to this country

what they think of America. I've had that experience before it and it's it's humbling to hear how much those legal refugees who told true stories what they were fleeing, how much they love this place and how much they appreciate it, how much they don't want it to turn into some status hell hole like these other countries have become. Ask a Cuban who fled Castro's regime, what do you think of America. Do you appreciate this place? What is freedom?

Meet in America? Ask someone from the former Soviet Union, Ask a pole, ask a check what do you think of America? And then listen to what you hear from people like Ilhan Omar, who is not a is a legal immigrant and now a member of Congress. Now America caused the problems America owes me this. America should probably apologize for all the bad stuff it's done to me. And I'm here now and now I get my piece

of this, whatever that means to me. I wonder, I wonder if those who are coming across our southern border from the so called Northern Triangle countries, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatama All. I wonder if they're showing up with nothing but gratitude, or as soon as they were exposed to enough MSNBC and community organizers and Democratic Party agitation, they say, yeah, we have nothing to be thankful for from this country. You owe this to us, America. Where's my free healthcare?

When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. Every time the professor said al Qaeda, he sort of like his shoulders went up, And you know, it's al Qaeda, you know. Hospital, You don't say America with an intensity. You don't say England with an intensity. You know, you don't. You don't say the Army with an intensity. CARE was founded after nine eleven because they recognize that some people did something and that all of us were starting to

lose access to our civil liberties. We need to abolish ice had all in the Maine deportation at contension progress. We need to fight back against the criminalization of immigrants and those crossing the border. The left has really fallen off, the fallen off the map of politics in terms of how far left they've gone, folks. I mean, this is this is stuff that you would not have heard in

mainstream political circles even a few years ago. But they have this new hard left vanguard, as I've been calling it. It's not a fringe. It's not like they can be excluded, it's not like they're not important. The media narrative, I mean, think of a member of Congress who's gotten more attention in the last six months than Ocazio Cortez. I think it's very easy to argue that Occasio Cortes has gotten more attention than even Nancy Pelosi, which is really kind

of astonishing, but that's where we are. Ilhan Omar, though, has gotten perhaps the second or third most attention among members of Congress large because of things she says that make people uncomfortable, or that upset people, or that are offensive. And then you always have left say, oh, snowflakes, you get offended by everything. No one says that nothing is offensive. It's just that the Left gets over offended, are offended

by things they should not be. That does not mean there's no such thing as an offensive comment, but the Left that they can't exercise judgment and be adults about things. They always have to make just supercilious and bad faith arguments. Ilhan Omar. Here's her talking, just by way of review about her tweet about the Jewish people Play nine. You wrote, Israel has hypnotized the world. May all awaken the people

and help them see the evil doings of Israel. You've commented a lot since then trying to explain what you meant by that, and I wonder just what your message is this morning, as the first on our Game Changers series, two Jewish Americans who find that deeply offensive. Oh, that's really a regrettable way of expressing that, I don't know how my comments would be offensive to Jewish Americans, doesn't

know how her comments there be offensive a Jewish Americans. Okay, there you go, one of the most by the far left, one of the most beloved members of Congress out there right now, and she doesn't understand why anybody would have a problem with what she says. Huh, isn't that interesting? Pelosi has started to have a problem with this though. Pelosi has recognized that she doesn't really seem to be

in control anymore of her own party. That in the era of social media, what really gets more attention, or here's a better way of putting it, what is driving more of the conversation at home and within the left wing basse Pelosi holding a press conference where yeah, she's usual, thanks always says, or AOC going home, you know, cooking some avocado toast. I guess you don't cook that, you

prepare it, but you know what I mean? That was supposed to be a millennial joke for that was weak sauce, cooking whatever it is that she cooks, and making a live stream video of herself where she says stupid things We all know what the answer is. It's AOC doing her home video and reaching out to her millions of millions of followers. I do find it distressing that so many millions of people want to want to Well, there are people that want to know what Occasio Cortez says

because she's dumb. And there are others though, and I think the number is probably larger among her followers who believe that she has a lot to offer, that she has insight, there's stuff that she brings to the table that we should all want to hear in depth from her about. But Pelosi's had enough of this. I mean, Pelosi is like, look, they we got to get people here to stop stop causing problems and focus more on

the Democrat agenda. And guess what turns out that AOC doesn't want to play by Pelosi's rules, doesn't want to sit down and listen to her elders on this one. No, no, not at all. In fact, Occasio Cortez has, in classic whiny lib millennial fashion, started to complain in public about how she gave me too much work played nineteen. The last time I kind of spoke to her one on one was when she asked me to join the Select

Committee Young Climate Change. What did you say, I said, no, I think that that ultimately I'm fine with the decision, especially given the committee assignments that I was ultimately given, which were very intense and very rigorous. I was assigned to two of some of the busiest committees and four subcommitte So my hands are full, and sometimes I wonder

if they're trying to keep me busy. Oh, it's so hard to be a member of Congress and show I mean, anyone who's spent five minutes covering politics knows that there are a lot of idiots in Congress on both sides. I mean, the Democrat idiots tend to be I think, a greater level of shockingly stupid idiot. But but but there are dump There are dumb folks on all sides, no question about that. And it can't be that hard to be a member of Congress when you see who was

in the Congress. So we start with we start with that. But obviously AOC is chafing a little bit under the leadership the old Democratic Party. Now keep in mind that's the leadership that got them to very close, very close to Trump. I mean, they obviously lost pretty big in the electoral college, but one the popular vote. The popular vote doesn't really matter though, because it's not the race they run, but you know, they turn out votes and if they're going to try to win those states though,

for the electric college, that do matter. What is a what is a more likely formula for success? To have the Okazio Cortez abolish ice, open borders, climate change, green new Deal, emergency wing of the party pitching people in Florida, in Ohio who are persuadable voters, or to have Pelosi and the old school Democrats, you know, do their usual Oh yeah, no, we're reasonable. We just want a bigger, a bigger, cuddlier welfare state for everyone and the rich

people to pay more. Which is the more or less the water down basic pitch of the Democrat Party for a long time. Now, oh, with some identity politics and other things thrown in there. But the woke side of the party, the woke left, they are untested at the national level of politics. Remember Obama, People say, oh, well, look at Obama. He was not. Obama ran as a healer and a centrist. It's not what he was, but

that's how he ran. He ran as a traditional marriage candidate, and he was gonna, you know, and also Obama was a unique, a very unique situation. He's gonna stop the rise of the seas and everything. And people were just completely in love with the whole Obama situation. They didn't think about what he was saying, that his love that

he was saying it. But AOC went from whining a little bit about her committee assignments and saying that Pelosi is, you know, doing some stuff or maybe maybe trying to just keep it running around so she can't cause trouble to just straight up calling out the most powerful Democrat in elected office right now, Play eleven. It's singling out for individuals and knowing the media environment that we're operating in, knowing the amount of death threats that we get, knowing

the amount of concentration of attention. I think it's just it's it's just worth asking why do you think she has racial animals as you race? No, no, absolutely not no, no, oh no, you're not saying that, but singing out four individuals, all women of color. And this has become a thing now we've started to hear more from some of these women of color about how they think that they're being singled out for reasons that no, not gonna They're not

gonna say it's races. But Okazio Cortez has accused Pelosio repeatedly. This is from the Hill singling out women of color, and it's outright disrespectful. Huh. You see, Pelosi is about to find out that people who use bad faith allegations of racism as a cheap weapon in any debate are really really annoying and aoc is. As I've said, the Prince Joffrey. You have to watch Game of Thrones just so you get this reference. She's the Prince Jeoffrey the

Democratic Party. She has far too much power and influence and far too little knowledge and humility and wisdom. And this is where the Democratic Party is going these days. You'll notice who's are up and coming right wing superstar in politics. I think most people would who follow politics

would say Dan Crenshaw down in Texas. That's one of the There's some others you might throw in there too, but Dan Crenshaw, who was a seal, a decorated seal, and you know, I went to Harvard and from everything that I've been told about him, is a very good guy, and he's trying to service country well, and he's trying to be smart and thoughtful about what he does. Their superstar is Braddy ignorant, social media obsessed Ocasio Quartet. I think that tells you a lot about where the parties

are right now. You know, increasingly the Young Republican Party feels more like the Party of Crenshaw, not that it's necessarily be behind him, but that he is. Dan Crenshaw is representative of the young conservative movement in this country now and AOC is representative of a young left wing movement in this country right now. And I think that we should all remember that, and you should feel even more comfortable about the decisions you've made based on that comparison.

There are just people that have it, and she just has it. Yeah, I mean you could. I was watching that rally. You could see her with a political future right here at the Democratic Convention. Yeah, I mean you know a speaker. Yeah, surprised me, actually, I mean either. And she's also willing. She doesn't have that flinchy thing when asked, she'll get involved in political causes. Well, you go to Washington. I saw on one of the shows.

Let's say, yeah, absolutely. I got to watch him. Mega World does not really want to pick a fight with this, with this woman. I mean when she called the shop, people are going, you know, you shouldn't be talking about not going to the White House before you win it all. Well, she put that pressure on herself and then she delivers. I mean she just stands there and she strokes the

ball in and I mean that's something. I mean, it's she's remarkable woman, and she's probably that's the coolest woman in America right now, Pino, you make us believe God bless you. Oh like the coolest what about America right now? It's Charlie Sykes from the Bulwark. I was a radio host. He's a conservative for a long time now was over at SPCs. It's say whatever the Democrats wanted to say.

The coolest woman in America. I don't know. For those of you who listen to show up in Wisconsin, I don't know how I used to listen to that guy. I'm just gonna say it had him on the Hill TV. Once ignorant about the border, doesn't know the laws, doesn't know the reality, doesn't know anything but real smug, real smug. He he I don't know what he's doing in m SMEC. He should go right to CNN, where all the most smug ignoramus's hang out. That would be a better, better

usage of his time. Here, coolest woman in America? Who is the other with Nicole Wallace? There, you know, a former a former Bush person who now goes on MSNBC to trash Trump. And I, I just I can't imagine being in the in the role of turning my back on everyone that I had worked with and on the movement that I had fought for, just because I felt like I wasn't sitting at the cool kids lunch table anymore. There's so much of that in conservative media and the

era of Trump. And I'll tell you that I think some of the people who are at the cool kids lunch table in the Trump era, so to speak, some of the some of the individuals that Trump has brought into the administration, some of the people who have a lot of access to the administration, are are not good. They're not good. That's just true. Some of them I know very well, and I can tell you they're not good. And some of them I'm just more aware of. They're working.

I can tell you they're not good that all said. I don't run around doing this thing of you know, because I you know, I thought I was going to get to work in the West Wing and oh no, So now I'm gonna help the Democrats attack the administration. This is what they do, the former Conservatives who run around abandoning everything that they've alleged to stand for for the last twenty years. You know, I did see this. This piece was in an American Greatness on George Will.

You know I would I would offer you that it's worth checking it out, because I'm sure a lot of you are. Will is a very talented writer, and I don't know him. I've never met him. I think he's a from what I've heard, he's a He's a gentlemanly fellow, although I don't know if that's true, but I always appreciate that. I like good manners. I like people who are who are treat people, you know, decently and well. But you know, George Will used to be much more well.

Let's just say he has switched in what he has believed at various times his career based on his writing. He believes in he used to believe in legislating morality, and now he believes very much in like a more leisa fair approach from the government when it comes from Rality, and you can say you evolved everything else. But what's so interesting about Will and this piece, and I'm just basing it off the quotes that I saw. I mean, the argument I found pretty persuasive is that he's always

the true conservative. He can switch and still be a true conservative. He can change he change his position and still be a true conservative. I think there's a lot of that run around in DC these days. I think there's a lot of that in the belt Way for sure. I would hope and maybe the revisiting of the Kavanaugh storia. I think there are some specifics that we can point to here that might be. But I would hope that people who just couldn't stomach in the conservative movement couldn't

stomach voting for Trump the first time around. Now realize that we see when that we see who the left puts forward, who the Democrats want to have in power in this country, that that's just not a You cannot vote for these people and call yourself a conservative. You cannot support their agenda and back them rhetorically, politically, financially,

perhaps and then say, well, I'm the real conservative. I think we should have the attitude of keeping the door open to anybody who realizes the error of their ways. I'm but I'm I'm amazed. I go back and look sometimes at some of the individuals, even people I've had on radio over the years, who used to be conservatives, and they have not just turned on Trump, but they

have switched to being Democrats. I mean they will now go on MSNBC to fawn over Rappino, for example, because that's what the cool, woke left wing people want, so they'll just jump on that whole thing too. No problem with throwing the flag on the ground, No problem with unnecessary cursing at the public of people who oh, men

curse too. They curse on the field, you jerks. They don't sit at press converces and drop f bombs, and if they do, people have a problem with it, right, especially representing the national team, expectations are different than even in professional sports. But oh, we're throwing out all the different throwing out all the expectations that we're allowed to have because the only thing that matters to them is,

oh Rapino is so awesome. Oh she's so great. And we all have to sit around and talk about how great she is. And if you don't, well, then you're not welcome and you're not welcome at that cool kids table, now the left wing cool kids table. You're not welcome. You have to say that she's fantastic or else that's troubling. Yeah, can I give you some good news. Economy is kicking. But here's BT founder Robert Johnson just bringing you a

little bit of a little bit of cheer play. Twelve. Well, I think the economy is doing absolutely great, and it's particularly reaching into populations they here before have had very bad problems in terms of jobs, unemployment, and the opportunities that come with full employment. So African American unemployment is at its lowest level Hispanic unemployment women. So I get

President a lot of credit overall. If you look at the US economy and you've look at the number of people who are no longer looking for jobs but now sort of seeing the opportunities for job growth, you gotta give the president an A plus for that A plus. Robert Johnson says, I agree. Donald Trump was friends with Jeffrey Epstein. The relationship between President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, Trump and Epstein, Epstein and Trump Epstein. He's rich and

was once well connected to people like Donald Trump. The sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein and it's ties to the Trump administration. Epstein and ties to Trump ups. That's the headline you get from a lot of these news organizations. We have somebody joining us now who has been covering the Epstein case long before this latest spade of news stories. I got Ann Caulter back with us, folks. That's right, the one end only author of over a dozen best

selling books. Audios America may be my favorite. Also a fan of Demonic However, see I can go back into the archives a bit. I have to tell you I have read them all, so I'm very familiar with the work. So let's let's hop right into this. And I have some big questions about the Epstein thing. We've been talking about it on the show this week, so people know the basics of Okay, this guy is a he's a crazy serial pedophile and incredibly rich. Can we just start

with how did this guy make all this money? I've been asking friends of mine in New York on Wall Street. I worked at Hedge Funds, and they keep saying this doesn't add up. What do you think happened here? Oh? Thank you Buck. I think that's the biggest mystery of all. In fact, I originally that was the theme of my column this week. It was just too long and I really wanted to go after the main villain of the case, Barry Krusher, so I ended up I'm saving the money

part for next week. So the truth of the matter is no one knows, and it's interesting. The one thing that is known about his billions, Jeffrey Epstein billions of dollars, is that it does not come from what he claims it comes from. Oh is genius investing, and it'll only take clients were worth a billion dollars, no more. No,

somebody is funding this guy. Um. And perhaps as a little montage you played at the beginning of the show indicates, I've I've been screaming from the rooftops begging the media to cover this case since two thousand and six. I feel like I've woken up from I'm I'm I'm where I'm sleeping, and this is a dream where it's every show I turn on, there's his ugly mug. Um. Finally, it's being covered, and why is it being covered? For

one reason? This insanity? Oh, Donald Trump's best friend, Jeffrey Epstein. Okay, it's insane, that's not true. But don't tell them, Please don't tell them, or this case will disappear and he will get off Scott for you. Once again, I do think getting to the bottom of who is funding him, we'll explain a lot of things, including, um, how it

is he keeps escaping the noose. This this arrest this week marks the third attempt to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein for essentially the same cases of child molestation, certainly the same behavior, um. And every time, somehow, somehow the case falls apart um,

the prosecutor backs down. Well, you know, if they why do you think that is an I mean, that's where you know, how how is it that somebody could do the things that he's done Usually, you know, for just a run of the mill person, one case of sex with a minor, and you're you're in a hole, You're in a whole heap of trouble, like registering, going to prison. You know, life is never going to be the same

for you. Dozens and dozens and dozens and trafficking and all the stuff I mean, and paying and all these enhanced penalties that would be attached to all this. How could anyone have that kind of influence? How could Acosta? What do you think of the Acosta press conference yesterday? This guy's looking at us like, yeah, well I did my best. Not good enough, buddy, No, not nearly good enough. Though he isn't half as bad as the original profutor.

I mean, these are state crimes. God bless the Feds for stepping in both in Florida and now Southern districts Southern District of New York. Let's see if Southern District of New York does the same thing, they could back away too. Though, I based on the history, I do think there's there's a chance that a year from now, no one will remember his name and Peggy Siegel out in Hollywood will be throwing big parties to reintroduce Jeffrey Epstein's society. No, you're totally right. This is not This

is not like other cases. This is not even like other cases involving um prominent powerful democrats take you know, Harvey Weinstein or Woody Allen, Which is why I think it is connected to who is paying him. I think I think he gets to the bottom of that and we'll have a much better understanding of what's going on.

I mean, the reason Accost backed down, as he himself described in a Daily Beast article a year or two ago, was that his office came under relentless attacks the defense counsel had they had Jeffreys lawyers and investigators were turning the assistant US attorney's lives upside down, prying into their personal lives, you know, upsetting their families. Yeah, okay. They were doing that to the victims too. They were doing that to the Palm Beach police, and they didn't back down.

The FBI agents didn't back down. So even though what Accosta did does not come close to what Barry Krisher, the first prosecutor to get this, who was supposed to prosecute and by the way, he was totally gung ho according to sworn testimony of the chief of police, who was the total hero of this story, and his garbage was being gone through by Epstein's guys. He and his policemen were being followed by Epstein's guy that they were worried about their families because of Epstein's guys, and yet

they didn't back down. But Acosta and his lawyers, and they're fancy jobs in the US or in the office. No, they backed down even if someone put the thumb on a Costa. Though, do you think someone told a Costa you're going to have to back office. There was that weird question about an intelligence asset or something, and Acosta gave a very strange answer. Possibly possibly, but it wasn't US intelligence, right, And as Vicky Ward has pointed out,

I think quite ably. You know, Epstein gets all of his fancy friends to go around talking about how brilliant he is and oh my gosh, he's so brilliant in the math, because well there's no evidence of that to anyone who's ever met him. That is very strange. There's a lot Hey, where do you think this goes? I mean, you've been on this all along. It has been one of these stories where it somehow they managed to convince a lot of people that this was something only conspiracy

theorist would talk about. No, there is this billionaire weirdo who's a peto, who's hanging out with the president, our former press and Clinton, who's hanging out with all kinds of celebrities. I mean, you see the people that he's been been peeling around with. This is all real. What happens now, though, do you think we get answers? I despair of that. I think it's at least possible that Epstein himself will finally see justice and that he will

go to jail. I mean, I just don't. You can't put anything past our media, but I can't see how they can be this hepped up on the case. How they can go on and on and on. I mean, he's worse than a Russian spy in their eyes this week, next week, all because they can call him Donald Trump's bff. What was with the Palm Beach DA or state attorney whatever? He was ya state attorney, that's Barry Krishner. He was following the case. Obviously, the Palm Beach Police had to

keep going to him. He had to oversee the investigation. So Michael Ryder, the chief of police, he's testified under oath that I was keeping Krishner updated. We've worked together very happily, have a good relationship. I'm getting subpoenas from him, but I wasn't telling him the name of the person I was telling him the evidence we were getting, and Krishner was gung ho, saying, this is someone we have got to stop. As soon as he gets the name of who the purp is, he was probably hoping it

was Russia. Limbaugh again, no, no, no, finds out that it's big Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein, and suddenly Michael Ryder, chief of police, testifies. Suddenly his attitude totally changed. He would not allow him to issue any more subpoenas. He said, Oh, I think this is a bad case. Some of the underage girls I've gone, I've gone to their MySpace pages and they mentioned alcohol. Seriously. That was his argument. I

can't take this to it to a jury. So he took a powdery by presenting a case to the grand jury that we will we weren't present for, but we have reason to believe he may not have done his best work in his presentation to the grand jury, because all they returned was an indictment for one count of solicitation of prostitution, nothing about miners at all, nothing about Epstein's co conspirator conspirators. It was a total outrage. And by the way, you know, I think accosted did a

bad thing here. Again, not at all compared to Barry Krusher, state attorney, whose job it was and whose police turned over all the evidence we ever needed in this case. But how about the media look at itself? Like I say, I spent two thousand and six, and by the way, I did get Bill O'Reilly to do a beautiful segment on it. God bless him when he was good. He

was very, very good. And that segment he did in July two thousand and six, as the story was breaking about this sleeves bag Democratic prosecutor Barry Krisher, who had spent three years harassing Rush Limbaugh for back pain medication. But he's presented overwhelming evidence of this child molester living in Palm Beach and oh no, we'll we'll just give

you a probation. What do you think of the Clinton time here, because Clinton apparently has already lied about how many times he hung out with this guy that seems to have been reported just in the last twenty four hours. Yes, yes, well, I think, I mean, I think it goes back to your to your original question, which I think is a big question. Who's paying Epstein? It certainly seems to be

a blackmail extortion operation. Epstein apparently reportedly had cameras all over the Lolita Express, his private seven twenty seven, his various mansions, he had cameras, and the girls have have reported that they were asked to service these various powerful men, prime ministers, ex presidents, the member of the royal family. After doing so, they were to report back to Jeffrey F. Epstein about what happened. This is collecting information and the cameras.

There are a lot of powerful rich, whether they're celebrities or through power through politics, a lot of people that they've got compromot on, and I just it's just hard for me to believe that the mysterious the black hole source of his billions of dollars has nothing to do with the fact that this case keeps being keeps being thrown by the prosecutors and the fact that he was

collecting information on powerful people. It does seem to be Yeah, I believe it's some sort of intelligence operation, not an American intelligence operation. But maybe that's the reason we're never going to find out. Guys, We're going to come and do a quick break here. We'll come back with Anne on the border, the census, things that she's gonna, I know, have lots of thoughts about we'll be right back, all right, team, We're back here with a culture. The one and only

author of thirteen best selling books. I hope I got the number right there. So many hard to keep track, most recently Audio Samerico. At least that's the most recent one that I'm go to reference right now. We got we got the border. We got the border going on. I've been down there a few times. It's an absolute mass. I've been saying it's a mess for six months. It's the worst it's probably been in my lifetime. This is happening under Trump. Before we get to the census question

and just how can the border be fixed? Can it be fixed? They can be fixed in all the ways Trump promised to fix it when he was running for office. Um, I I feel a little like um. Remember George Bush used to say about, you know, how we win the abortion issue, and oh, we have to change people's hearts and mind Um, well no, we for all we know we've changed the hearts and minds of the vast majority of American people. What we need to do here, see,

mister president is overturned. Rovy Wade and I feel the same way with immigration. Most, even even in the conservative media, most people were not at all woke to the immigration issue. Um well, back before I put out Adios America, Oh my gosh, our people woke on this issue. Now. I was just talking to somebody because you know, Ross Perrot died this week. I love that he's getting some lovely encomiums then, and my friends happens to have voted for him twice. I said, good for you. He said, yeah,

he had some great ideas. He had had some dumb ideas too, that thing about how everybody we'd have like Plubis sites on everything, people who just vote in their homes on things. No, I would so love that. For should we have a wallow? Well, I think that the popularity of it was national referendum should we deport illegals and build a wall? I mean, I think we had that referendum in the two thousand. I don't think Republicans have the backbone for deportation. And they keep saying that

Trump is going to do this thing. I don't. I don't think that we're I don't think they're going to do it. I don't think they're even going to start and the people are there. The people wanted the people keep voting for a week. It's like Brexit. We can't get it. It's amazing. By the way, the census question is what is I don't think I've actually heard the an hot take we're seed in anywhere on how liberals are fighting knowing how many illegals are in this country

truth and nail. So I mean, is there more to this than that or what am I missing here? Not? You're absolutely right. I also want to mention because I don't know, maybe this is well known to your listeners. It certainly isn't well known to the viewers of MSNBC and CNN, everyone acting like, you know, this is some crazy little scam the Republicans came up for people who research genealogy. The census has always asked about the citizenship. You can go back to colonial times. They have like

three questions. They weren't asking about, you know, do you have mold in your bathtub like they do these days. No, that was that was one of the basic questions. And that was back before we were a massive welfare state. We just wanted to know how many people are citizens here. It was ended in nineteen fifty. Of course it should be added back in. You know they talk about the

Russians interfering with elections and oh democracy it's so important. Well, we have all these congress districts across the country where you know, you need like three citizens to vote for you to win because your districts is determined by how many people are living are living there and not how many citizens are living there. So it takes a lot more votes to win in a congressional district where it's all citizens living than in congressional districts like Maxie and

Waters they're like half illegal aliens. And the administration did they mess up on this one? How do we get to this point? Because it seems like such an easy and easy thing to do. Yes, I have not studied this closely. It kind of looks like the administration did screw this one up. Why don't they just say we want to know they don't have to come up with this thing about what was there? Right? It would like

to pursue the voting rights. Actually, there are a lot of questions Act to ask on the census that don't don't have any practical application whatsoever. Immediately this one actually does how much federal funding, you get, how big your congressional district is, that sort of thing. It actually does make important differences in a lot of ways. But um, I don't think it's up for Congress or the Urem Court to be deciding this. That seems to be and again I've been paid that close attention to it. It

looks like they made a bad argument. And by the way, contrary to many reports, just as Roberts didn't say you can't ask this, he said, the justification you gave is clearly a lie. We're going to send it back to the district court. So I think they could win in the courts, But why even bother? I like Bill Barr's approach of just saying, yeah, we're going to be including it. I like that approach too. By way, Bar is pretty great, isn't he. I'm a fan. I've been really Oh my gosh,

isn't it wonderful having someone smart work for Trump? Can you imagine if we had Chris Koebeck at Homeland Security? It is pretty amazing. I mean, to this day, is there a precedent for it, then it's unprecedented. It's one of my favorite things. Do you have happened in any press conference. So that's a bar original and call to everybody.

Check out Audios America. That's the one we'll talk about immigration, or pick up one of her other dozen or so books, and always appreciate you joining us from the left coast. We'll see you soon. Thank you. Oh man. I cannot believe we're in this, in this position, or even have to have this argument, have this fight. But you know, Democrats,

they're they're they're utterly shameless, you know. And anything to prevent people from knowing how many legals are in this country, it wouldn't even be a great way of finding out. What does real repression look like? What what does it seem like when a when a government has crossed that threshold into into tyranny and darkness. People often talk about Venezuela these days, and especially in light of the fondness that much of the American left seems to have for socialism.

We look at Venezuela and we say to ourselves, oh, huh, that's what happens when you spend way beyond your means as a country. You create massive social welfare and entitlement programs, and you do absolutely nothing to expand your economic base to expand your GDP, and you just hope that everything somehow works out. And then there's more beyond that too,

price controls under the auspices of social justice. So when all of a sudden you start to have inflation because you've debased your currency, that's why they did in Venezuela. When the inflation kicks in, now prices are going up for items on the store shelve, the government says, oh, no, no, you can't do that. Okay, Well, now the businesses can't because they have to pay in Venezuelan bolivars and they have to get food shipped in and good shipped in

from the rest of the world. Now they can't put them on the shelves. And then the government says, oh, they're just being greedy and they won't. You know, this is and this was the economic death spiral of Venezuela. But there are economic death spirals and then there are death squads. And that's what I wanted to talk to

you about. Here, a story that I don't think got anywhere near the attention that it should have, and it should be remembered by all that the Venezuelan regime still has in the West in America, some people who, if not outright defenders of it, will go to pretty extraordinary lengths in order to blame someone else, blame us, usually for the failures of the Venezuelan regime. And we know that there are there's deprivation, political crackdowns, incredible corruption, terrible

violence in the streets. But this story really tells you what's going on in Venezuela and what's behind the scenes, what's really happening here. This was a New York Times story, actually was a Reuter's story in New York Times, picked up from a couple of days ago. Venezuelan security forces are sending death squads to murder young men and stage the scenes to make it look like the victims resisted.

This is a United Nations saying this in a report issued by its Human Rights or Human Rights chief last week. Government figures show that deaths ascribe to criminals resisting arrest numbered five thousand, two hundred and eighty seven last year and one five hundred and sixty nine by May nineteenth this year. Many of them appear to be extrajudicial executions. This is a reference to Venezuela's Special Action Forces FAS.

These guys arrive dressed like paramilitaries there in all all black pickups, no license plates, they have balaclavas on their dressed in tactical gear, and they will just go into a house and they separate the men from the women and children, and then they'll just, according to witnesses, go and execute them now. And then they stage the scene and they set it up so that it looks like all this person was Persone's resisting arrest. You know, we had to do, we had to do. Let's understand what

this does to any political opposition. And when people talk about why, given how poorly Venezuela is run, given what has been going on there now for years, and the real pain that people have been feeling, the loss, the misery, the suffering, why is it that there isn't a more generalized and there have been people in the streets and there's the Guido oppositional though you'll note Maduro still in charge. People are all talking about, oh Guido any day now,

any day now. Nope. Thugs are good at one thing when it comes to governance, and that's rule by force, rule by fear. They know how to do that. Maduro knows how to do that and this usage of government paramilitary assassination squads is I think one of the most obvious manifestations of how a government can really, a government like this can can oppress people no matter how bad

things get. You know, if they can just show up, they can show up and kill anyone they want to kill right now, and there's really no recourse that anyone has. So if you're living in a country like that and they'll make it look like it was it was legit, you know, they'll make it look like you were resisting. What can you do about that? The answer is there's there's very little that can be done about it. Um. But this is this is a window into how true

oppressive and totalitarian states operate. You know, we get all these people after during and after the Fourth of July ceremony here in DC, with Trump doing a having a military flyover and then the tanks ruling down the streets, get all that stuff going on. People said, oh my gosh, it's terrible and Trump is awful, and they have all this all this freak out and people talk about fascism in Tianamen Square. This is what the early days of

fascism looks like. People showing up in paramilitary squads and exec shooting men who might be regime opponents, who might be in one way or another considered to be a problem. All right, That's That's one thing that I think people need to really keep in mind here that they can get rid of anybody, you know, anybody they want, for whatever reason they want, and that really changes things. So

here we go. Next up is Iran for a second, my friends, I wanted to get to this really quickly because you know, we had this British warship that had to chase some Iranian Iranian ships for a moment to get them away from it from a British flagged tanker. Look, Iran is going to keep doing things like this in the hopes that they can create a pressure situation that will result in Europe and the United States separating from

each other. Here's some of the just the latest analysis out there by people who have pretty pretty good grasp her Ari Flasher I think is good on Iran. Here's what we need to say. Place seventeen, as we know from Israel, when they raided the Iranian depository that Iran was lying from the start. Also under that deal in October of twenty and twenty next year, the arms in bargo on Iran will be lifted, and Iran's obligation not to provide her arms to other nations will also be lifted. Now,

Iran is already in violation of that. They're regularly supplying arms to the Hoodie rebels in Yemen as well as to Hezbollah operating out of Syria. So Iran is violenting it from the start. But the language of the deal is so bad. The world would lift the arms embargo in a mere fifteen months and in twenty twenty three, just in four years, Iran would be free to develop all the ballistic missiles at once. Forget the nuclear side

of it. This deal was terrible on the conventional side, not to mention the billions that was paid to Iran, which they used to increase terrorism around the world. Other than calling the rebels in Yemen hoodies like Hoodie and the Blowfish, it's hoothy, pretty good stuff from R. Fleischer there and Marco Rubio. I mean, Marco talks a big game on foreign policy. He fancied himself a big foreign

policy guy. Here's what he says, play eighteen. The deal allowed them to continue it They could continue to build these missiles and they didn't violate the deal. They could continue to pour millions of dollars into Hezbollah and other proxy terrorist organizations and that wasn't a violation of the deal. They could carry out sanctions of Asians on behalf. The Syria president was right to get us out of the deal. Yep, wasn't a good deal, folks, But you know who thinks

it was Joe Biden. Sixteen, The historic ran nuclear deal we negotiated blocked Duran from gaining nuclear weapons, with inspectors on the ground, international inspectors confirming that the agreement was being kept. Yeah, Trump cast it aside, prompting Duran to restart his nuclear program, become more provocative and raising the risk of another disastrous war in the region. If Tehran returns to compliance with a deal, I would rejoin the agreement,

of course he would. You know why, folks, Because Biden has been wrong on every foreign policy issue for the last forty years, so he wants to be consistent. He wants to be wrong on this one too. He can't let this opportunity. Biden never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity in foreign policy. That's that's his mantra. Another viral video, I want to talk to you about this one. The audio pretty much tells you what you need, pretty much gives you everything that is needed to know about

this story. But a guy in Long Island at a bagel shop. Um was having a bad day, having a bad day. And it turns out this guy is five feet tall and he's he's so he's he's on the man, a full grown man. He's on the shorter side, and he just was in this bagel store and he thinks that some lady behind the counter laughed at him or something, and he proceeded to completely flip out. Here is what do we have this? What's this guy's name? Morgan? And

something more? Chris Morgan. Here's what Chris Morgan of Bay Shore in Long Island. Here's him having a pretty bad day in the bagel store. The audio we had to bleep out some stuff, but this was all on video. When viral play it the great Why is it okay for women to say, oh, you five feet on dating sites? You should be dead? That's okay? Who here? Nobody? Women in general have seven on dating sites? Did think I'm

making that up? Everywhere I go. I get to say, it's smart with the fighting with shut your mouth, you're knock or my father or my fourth dude want to step outside? You want to step outside. I'm not standing out. No, no, you shut up. Two. You can't see exactly what happened there because a radio show. But this, this this fellow of slight stature, it's pretty much at Frodo Baggin's size. Uh. He just he's running around running his mouth and you know,

you're not God, You're not my father. And a guy who is looking to be more like around six two or six three does in fact tackle him to the ground in front of everybody. So there is a little bit of a moral story here, which is when you happen to be a slight stature, you don't necessarily want to go around saying I'll take any man in the house. And there are a lot of men in the house who could actually take you. You know what I mean,

You gotta you gotta watch that. Uh you know, Mark, Mark, I don't know about your neighborhood, but in any neighborhood I've ever been in, and if you're the smallest guy in the room, you don't want to challenge every guy in the room to a fight for no reason. Yeah, not your smartest idea, not the smartest, especially on Long Island. But here here's what. Yeah, oh on the Strong Island, man, you gotta watch out. Every every everybody on Strong Island is ready to throw down if you, especially if you

make fun of Strong Islands. But look, this guy's having a bad day. One thing I did find kind of noteworthy. And some of the ladies might give me a might give me a little bit of a lip over this one. But I will tell you this for all the the the cultural hubbub out there about how men are superficial when it comes to women, and you know, we care so much. We only care about looks of all that stuff out there. Women are very comfortable out in the

out in the dating world. And I am a man who is unmarried and has been on his fair share of dates in life. They're very comfortable being hightists, and they will have height requirements. And of all the things that you could be limiting your dating pool based on height, is one of the among the most arbitrary, the most superficial, and also one that the person cannot change or do

anything about. Right I mean, I would argue to you that to have a limit on a person's height is you know, even more superficial than to have a particular body type in mind, because you know, you can all at least change your body type a little bit here or there. There's some action you can take. By the way, did you see that people were body shaming Jason Momoa saying he had a dad bod? Do you know what

I'm talking about this? You know, the guy who plays Aquaman, the photo he's in that people are shaming him on the internet. I'm like, I'm I'm actually like never going to a public pool ever again. Like he's still very jack. I think this is a problem that people see all

these these superhero movies and stuff. They see these guys and who are actors who get super jacked for that role, and they don't understand that that's because they're eating chicken breast and working out two hours a day, five or six days a week and eating incredibly clean and like this is their job is to look like that, but they don't look like that as soon as that is no longer their job because it's a lot of work, it's a lifestyle, and unless you're a bodybuilder or something

like that, You're not going to maintain that physique indefinitely. It's just not reality, right, So I just think it's got a funny People like, oh, he's got a dad bot. I was like, dad bod, that's not a dad bot. That that guy's god our a little five foot tall friend here. He does have a bit of a dad bod. He's a little bit, you know, which is fine. I

embraced it. I embraced the dad bod. But he just should have been a little more aware of that before he decided to pick fights with everybody's much tall on them. But I tell you the story, and I know we're having it. We're having a little bit of fun of this individual's expense, but there's a happy ending. See. That's

why I'm okay telling you this. Because it turns out that, according to the New York Post here, he's now become insta famous And sure enough, the guy who says that women were laughing at him on dating sites and saying he was too short is now getting dates. Quote, my phone is blowing up, like the President. Morgan told the New York Post, I haven't even got to my friends. I got girls hitting on me that I don't even know. He says, the rant scene around the world has changed

his luck with the ladies. I gotta say that's a little I mean, it's a little bit of aid. I feel like, if you are the guy in the video saying you can't get a date, and then you freak out and you get tackled, I wouldn't assume Mark that then you get dates really easily after that, But apparently you do. There's someone out there for everybody. There is

somebody out there for everybody. You know. Whenever I start to feel like maybe this dating thing is too hard and they're never gonna actually settle down, I gotta remember that, Hey, there are guys who who are in prison, who get married while they're in prison to women they've never met, who they're just penpal friends with. So you know, there's hope for all of us, right, producer, Mark, you're not married? Are you? I'm getting married soon? Really? Yes? Look at you.

I don't even know funding it on the radio. That's cool. Whin's the wedding in November? Look at you can Congratulations sir, that's very exciting. You said that with a little bit of trepidation there, like you don't want to actually congratulate me. No, I just was I was actually just having a sip of coffee as okay, saying. You know, older married men all say, oh, welcome to the club, like they say that if it's a bad thing. Oh dude, I've never

been I know you are. I knew you aren't, but still, yeah, I've never been married. Me and producer Mike Man, we're gonna be. They're gonna make a reality TV show about us called like the Bachelor's or something. That's right, man, that's what the bachel radio guys. Yeah, pretty much, you know. I mean, we're we're out there. We're out there on this seen DC and NYC, respectively, just trying to live life. And everyone's always like, hey, you know, when when are

you gonna have kids? I'm like, well, I'd kind of like to get married first. So's I call me old fashioned, but that's I'd like to put the you know, put the cart in the right position with the horse, you know what I'm saying. So we'll see. But Mike, did you see this video with the bagel the bagel rant guy? Yeah, it's amazing, it's amazing, right, like, how does he how does he think it's gonna end when he's going around

challenging every guy. Every guy in that store is noticeably bigger than because he's not just five feet tall, he's five feet tall and like little and pudgy. Yeah, man, every guy in that store is bigger than him, and he's challenging them all to a fight, one after another. I wonder if this you know, they had that small man's disease? You ever have? We used had this lay in high school. One of my little friends who was like and I'm not a big guy. I'm not. I'm

like five nine, that's not tall. But one of my buddies in high school, he was like five five he is you know. We always used to break on him here and there, but he had a mouth on him. Man. He just thought he was way tougher than he was us. And we always said, you have a little man's disease. Yeah. People always say that they call it a Napoleonic complex. Not true. Actually Napoleon with five to seven, which was actually slightly above average height for his time. Yes, he

was not. Yeah, he was not short. So people who say that this is like when they talk about burning the ships with Cortez whatever his name was. He said that this week. Nope, that's not what happened. They scuttled the ships. They sank them, They did not burn them. Ah. That's why Buck is here, folks, to set to set everything right, to set everything straight. We'll be right back the fight over words. I'm a radio host, so I care about words a lot. We all care about words

matters to us. It's how we communicate. The Left tries to win debates, often not by convincing you or bettering or besting your arguments, but by forcing you to use certain words. If you use the words they want you to use, you've already conceded so much that perhaps the rest of the argument, the rest of the debate is moot, does not really matter anymore. And here we have an

instance of something like that. An editorial in the New York Times call me they the subhead here is the singular they is inclusive and flexible, and it breaks the stifling prison of gender expectations. Here's what this guy goes on to, right, he is not what you should call me.

If we live in a just, rational, inclusive universe, one in which we are not also irredeemably obsessed by the particulars of the parts between our fellow human's legs, nor the ridiculous expectations signal signified by those parts about how we should act and speak and dress and feel. There would be no requirement for you to have my gender assumed and to and you could just refer to me in the common tongue. So why does standard English imposed

gender requirement on the third person singular? And why do elite cultural institutions, universities, publishers, and media's media outlets like The Times still encourage all this gendering. To get to my particular beef. When I refer to an individual who's gender I don't know here in the Times, why do I usually have to choose either he or she or he or she? Okay, let's play this out for a moment, shall we. This is this is what was. It's been

coming for a while, folks. Now, now, in order to cater to the transagenda, we are all to abandon the use of gendered pronouns. That's right, this is this is this, This is published the New York Times. This is a

real movement. There is, in fact, a character in the show Billions who is non binary and gender fluid, you know, trans transgender, and Taylor Mason is the character's name, and Taylor Mason is referred to or asks to be referred to as they, and everyone in the show just is always your Ferny tailor Mason as they, And it's kind of confusing. You're like, wait, what they did this? Or you know they did that, You're like, who's they? It is confusing because here's the big problem that they have

to get over with this one. They refers to multiple people. So unless we are going to somehow assume that transgendered individuals have a multiple personality disorder and need to be referred to as multiple individuals, you have a singular versus

plural conundrum. You have a problem here. And this piece and others like it are out there because they realize that using z xe or z or ze and all this stuff that automatically notes that a person is within the trans community, and so they think that that's that's not acceptable. They they want a person they being plural people in the trans community, and the people that are pushing for this idea, they want pronouns to be used where you can't tell. Now, they say what's the big deal?

This is the argument often with these these issues, especially on language. They'll say this to me about about quote, undocumented immigrants. What's the big deal? Why can't you just say undocumented? Okay, Well, I can argue, like a third grade or two, what's the big deal? Why can't you just say illegal alien? Oh? Because illegal alien sounds bad? Maybe because breaking the law is bad. Maybe that's why

it sounds bad. Maybe undocumented will sound bad in time if people started to use it all the time, because they'd realize, oh, that means illegal, that means breaking the law. But they change the word because they understand the power of connotation. But this is the argument they then make with they for transgender individuals, that we should all start to use day, not just for transgender individuals, but for everybody. Everybody should just be There's no more he or she,

they they plural. They say, what's the big deal? Well, I think the big deal is that language is about communicating ideas and facts and truth and stuff, and gender is still a thing. They can pretend that it's not, they can pretend it doesn't matter, but it does matter. Gender is still worthy of description. Gender is still out there for all of us to observe, and it has effects. It has impact on life, on everything around us. They can try to make us change the words, but they

can't change the reality. And because they can't change the reality, I'm just gonna say it right now. I'm sorry. I'm sticking with he or she because there are still he's and she's in this world. And that's how I'm going to refer to them. This is gonna get bigger, though, folks. They're gonna push hard on this. You watch rock and roll, fellow patriots, we made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll call Facebook dot com slashbuck Sexton four, Roll call time. That's right. You know how we do.

You know how we roll? You know how the Facebook gets down? Yo? All right, I'll stop, but no, it's kind of a very dark and rainy day here in DC. So I hope wherever you are you can sit back, relax and enjoy a warm bath of my radio time. That's a Duke Silver reference. Very few of you will probably get that. But alrighty, John Shields Eye, how does one spend a lifetime to become a representative for an American sport team? If you hate the country so much

saw them throw the flag on the ground. I'm just curious how they can be so angry. Well, John, it's really unfortunately the case that wokeness for a lot of folks now is not only politically advantageous, but there is an additional layer of the financial advantage of wokeness, as in, if you are able to promote yourself as somebody who is very social justice aware, then you will make more money, your career will advance, you'll be somebody who gets commercial

benefits as well as political ones. So I mean, I can't answer beyond that why some of the women on the national team decide to act the way they do. I wish they wouldn't, but it's not up to me. There we have it. Let's see here. Brandon all Rights heard the story of Jayleen Hinkel, who plays for North Carolina Pro women's soccer team, who chose not to play for the national team because they demanded players where pride

jerseys that went against Christian beliefs. Was going to buy a Hinkel jersey to support her, but looking at the NWSL shops that are filled with pride stuff, there's no way I'll buy anything. How they're going to generate revenue that gets them into billion dollar range if they insist on agendas of the sport that no one really cares about that much to begin with. Well, you know, Brendon, We've got a couple of problems in this new era

that we all live in. One is that we everyone is a celebrity now, which is a question of how much of a celebrity. Everyone's on social media. Everyone's creating their own brands and presenting themselves and signaling to everybody else all the time what they are, and everything is politicized as well, so we do not have these personal and individual silos and separations that we used to. It's now just a total free for all with this stuff. It's frustrating. It is frustrating. I wish it was not

the case, but it is the case. Jim writes, Okay, Buck, I understand how kneeling before the flag during a sporting event commute as unpatriotic, and for the most part, I agree. On the other end, athletes who take a knee but still pay reverence to the flag can also be viewed as peacefully protesting the government, all while being observant. I just ignore their actions and respect it in my own way, even from home shields high. Well, Jim, you're certainly entitled

to that view of it. I would just say that they recognize the people that do this tend to recognize that take a knee during the anthem, that it is upsetting to other people. They're not doing this in order to just they know that the way they get attention for this is because it bothers folks who view it as disrespectful. So they're doing it with the knowledge of it being perceived as disrespectful, whether you know, we could

always argue about acts like this, whether it's disrespectful or not. Wow, it's like a monsoon here in DC right now. This is crazy, you know. This is this is where in Karate Kid Part two, daniels Son has to go and break the big beam across the Oh no, that's not Daniels On this mister Miyagi has to break the beam that falls across the guy's chest. You know, I started just a little. I just had an observation on Twitter last night, and this is It's always the stuff on Twitter.

It's never when I'm going hard against the libs, you know, whenever I'm just lighting libs up and talking about Democrats and policy. That's not when all of a sudden I get left wing blue Check Pyla, and it's always, you know, I just think that chocolate's a better flavor of ice cream to vanila. People go, oh my gosh, you're so stupid and ugly. Why would you say that about vanilla ice cream when chocolate? It's ridiculous. I'm like, I thought, I thought we're in the trust tree. I thought we

were in the nest. I thought I could just share an opinion. So I just I don't even remember what I was watching, but I was watching something and they had another one of these moments where and it wasn't I don't need to be I don't need this to

be explaining to me. No one had superpowers. Okay, I'm not saying, oh, but you know Superman can fly and like you can't really flause, you know, not being a moron here, I'm just saying that there's a tendency in Hollywood to always if the guys are fighting, then the girls have to fight too, And girls are often fighting guys who are much larger and stronger than they are and just beating them all up all the time. Now, I understand that all fight scenes are a little bit

stylized and all that. You know, there's a degree of suspension of disbelief that we accept when we watch things. I just think that watching one hundred and ten pound women who don't have superpowers beat up five or six guys in a row who are all like trained thugs and outweigh or two to one, it's just for me, it's like this is it just gets ridiculous after a while. I mean, these are these women couldn't lift lift a

ten pound weight. I mean, they're obviously very beautiful, which is why they're on TV shows or on these different movies. But you know, it's one thing. If you're gonna cast Ronda Rousy and she's gonna fight some dudes, I'm like, all right, Like she looks like she can can complete that storyline. I mean, she looks like she could play that part. But when you have some bikini model who looks like she hasn't had a cheeseburger in quite a while and she's fighting like ten different dudes, I'm sorry,

it's just it's just ridiculous. It's just ridiculous, and all a blue checks. It's the patriarchy. They're all come it after me, and I'm like, why do we do we really all have to pretend that that, you know, one hundred pound women are just as capable of fighting as a one hundred and eighty or two hundred pound guy. I mean, is that really the world we have to live? Oh? It is the world we have to live in now.

We we have to suspend all that is obvious in the pursuit of whatever the left says will make people feel equal or more equal anyway. I just it was ridiculous. Man, people come after me on this. I'm like, what, I'm sorry, is that offensive to you? It's it's offensive to not to you listening to this, but to people out there that anyway, I might even I'm even gonna get it's ridiculous. Everywhere you go down there are all these you know, very skinny, very attractive women on TV who always fighting.

You know, he's like punching guys and throwing them over their shoulders and all. I'm like, no, no, it's not how it works. Yeah, okay, if it's a Mark, if it's Miss Marvel, if it's a superhero, or if it's somebody who has some you know, special super Cia training, which, let me tell you that doesn't exist. Uh but you know, okay, fine, But if it's just someone who's like a detective on the police force, then all of a sudden, she's throwing fly kicks and no, no, I know, I'm alone. Maybe

I'm alone on this one. I'm a little crazy. I don't people think that I'm I'm people think I'm the weirdo. What did I didn't even realize what I'm talking about here? Anor rights? Are you available to chat? Well? A Noor? I don't think so, Jack bad Buck News, iHeart radio seems to be fine, but I had to google you. They haven't updated your podcast since the twenty seventh of June. H Man, keep doing great work out There is our shield, Hie against a lovecrafty and beast that is left. Yo. Man,

I'm sorry about the podcast situation. I don't know what to say. I'm we got all these different platforms. I don't know why this is so hard for this to just stay the way it's supposed to be. But I'm trying. I am on it, and I'm trying. I can tell you that Tyler, this Epstein thing goes deeper than you know, follow the money and CYA shields high Tyler. I do think this Epstein thing goes goes very deep. I think

that this is this is a story. There are a lot of people that don't really want the truth to come out about not necessarily who are involved in this, but who didn't do anything to stop it, or who when I mean involved in it, that didn't necessarily directly do anything for or with Epstein and involving in these girls. But I do think that there are people that turn to blind I do it, that use their influence to make this thing, you know, go away legally speaking for

Epstein as quickly as possible. So I think that's true. I think that's the real direction all this is heading. And we'll see if they're able to shut it down then, Stephanie, right, if they want to tack AC, how about they turn their AC off in their car all day see how they feel. Then I'm sorry, No, I love my AC. Well, Stephanie, you have the right attitude about air conditioning. Darn it,

I'm with you on that. Here we go next up here, Todd right, spuck, You're seriously one hard host to track down. Couldn't find your producers contact infos. I thought i'd take a shot here. I'll be brief. Given the forum, cops often don't have what they need to keep themselves safe for deployed troops off and don't have what they need to do their jobs. That's where this American comes in.

He's got organizations cops direct, troops direct. All right, I've seen you step up for American heres in the past. I hope this guy qualifies best. Todd, Well, Todd, you got through to me, and you got through on the air too. I will look at this organization and see if it is something that we can help out with or get involved with. So thank you, Michael and Buck love the show. Only concern is that you, like all others,

continue to call Democrats crazy, delusional, and idiots. This description may be accurate for your everyday live walk in the street, but the top Dems running the party and the media aren't crazy. They're just bad people. They know exactly what they're doing, and calling them crazy may give them an excuse to fall back on shields high. Michael, I gotta tell you, I think that some of the people that are very seen the Democratic Party, I think they're true

believers my friend. I don't think that it's all just an act. I don't think they're clever enough or machia valiant enough for to just be something that they put on. I do believe it. There's more to it than that, But you could be right. We'll see team that's gonna be it. Thank you so much for joining me here. Appreciate it. As always. I will talk to you tomorrow, same time, same place. Tell somebody about the podcast. Please, let's get those podcast numbers going high for the month. Shields High