Hunter Biden Is An Absurd Selfish Mess

has been for a long time. It's also now very apparent when you look at the major bureaucracies out there, you look at what's going on with institutions like the CDC right, So it's gone beyond just the private sector wokeness. It's gone beyond college campuses and universities that have Marxist running all over the place. Now what should be nonpartisan government federal government institutions are provinces of the left effectively and are working for progressive and woke ideology in whatever

way they can. This is a major challenge. This is a threat to our freedoms and liberty. It's when we have to take very seriously. But you also have to focus on what's going on online these days, and as you know, the internet never forgets. And there's never been a more important time to protect your Internet activity than right now, given all the politicization and all the ways that big tech are punishing people. That's why I urge

you to get Express VPN. Everything you search for, a watch, or click online can be tracked by big tech companies. They can match your activity to your true identity using your devices unique IP address. When I switch on Express VPN, my computer, my phone, whatever it is I'm using has a masked IP address. Makes it a lot harder for websites to identify me. Use Express VPN and up to five devices simultaneously. It's so easy to use. You download the app, you'll have it set up in a minute.

Stop handing over your data to big tech companies. Go with the VPN I trust for online protection. Is it Express vpn dot com slash buck to get three months free on a one year package. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck to get three extra months free Express vpn dot com slash buck right now to learn more. I've been warning you all along that the CDC was going to get addicted to all the power and influence

that it's had. This is an institution, This is an organization of the federal government that has been largely resigned to putting out flu advisory notices. You know, once in a while, they'll they'll be an ebola scare, or they'll be a haunt of virus outbreak somewhere, and they'll they'll call someone of the CDC for comment on the news.

But generally speaking, the CDC was something that you mostly knew about because in zombie apocalypse movies or in some you know, some some sci fi thriller, the CDC would make an appearance right the show The Strain, for example, and the hero as a CDC scientist. It's actually a good show. I think it holds up pretty well for what it is. But now we see that, just like all the other federal bureaucracies, the CDC is involved in not just partisan politics, but in progressive politics, in Marxist

identity politics, and it doesn't want to step away. As the COVID pandemic slowly fades, it's going to be a long, painful extrication from the overlords that we have now at the CDC telling us what we can do, where we can shop, whether we can go and breathe fresh air outside without some smelly rag across our face. Right, that's not going to be an easy process in and of itself, But the CDC wants to be involved in the national conversation.

That's why they have Rachelle will Lenski is the director. Now, this is somebody who is a progressive and a left I mean she is, I assure you, entirely in line with all of the political positions of a prime time MSNBC host. And if you were to sit down, Robin will Lenski of the CDC, I'm sorry, Rochelle will Lenski of the CDC is somebody who would believe and of course a woman's right to choose, meaning terminate a pregnancy

for all nine months. She believes, I'm sure in all of the whole panoply of transgender rights, even the ones that are being created as I'm still sitting here speaking to you, I'm sure she believes in giving puberty blocking drugs to ten year olds who think that they're a different gender than they are. Whatever it may be, find a left wing issue, and the head of the CDC, and I'm sure all the people around her too, because

these are science bureaucrats. Who do you think goes to work for the CDC, people that are really going to cure cancer, or people who want to be working in the government. You went to med school for four years and then did your residency, or you have a PhD in microbiology and you want to go work at this at the CDC so you can do what exactly if you're really good generally speaking, aren't you going to go

to big pharma. Aren't you gonna actually work at a place where they're coming up with new drugs that save people's lives, sup pointing the South folks as we all sit around worshiping Saint fauci As that this guy knows anything. But here they are weighing in today, we're still in the midst of this COVID pandemic. It's fading out, but there are a lot of cases still, and people are dying every day, and you've had a real spike in cases in places like New York in Michigan, which we'll

talk about more later. Yet they're immediately shifting focus because they don't want to lose the ability to be front and center in the public conversation. They're shifting focus here to racism as an urgent public health threat. Now, there are a lot of ways that we could tackle this conversation. You can get into this, but let me just give you a sense of This is the statement from Rachelle Wilenski, MDMPH, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Here's

what she writes. The COVID nineteen pandemic has resulted in the depth of over five hundred thousand Americans. Tens of millions have been infected, and across the country people are suffering. Importantly, these painful, etc. Etc. Okay, the disparities seen over the past year were not a result of COVID nineteen. Instead, the pandemic illuminated inequities that have existed for generations and revealed for all of America, unknown but often unaddressed epidemic

affecting impacting public health racism. Wow, the real public health epidemic, I guess is in COVID, the one that we're gonna have to struggle with for generations. The real public health epidemic is racism. Think about this, How is racism a public health epidemic? Where can we can we isolate racism in a Petrie dish? Can we actually do a test for you? Know, antibiotic resistance when it comes to racism,

and what are we really talking about here. No, this is the transference of a supposed institution of science which is really just a massive government bureaucracy that's a tremendous amount of sloth, waste, and abuse, and it's been catastrophically inept during the COVID pandemic. Let's remind ourselves of that. Remember when in the early days messed up all the testing,

The CDC messed up the testing. And also, who is telling you at the beginning, guys, testing for this disease is just one of a hundred steps to try to deal with this. But there was such a focus on it because it was it turned into it was Trump's fault that the tests in the early days weren't coming out and the numbers that they needed them to, meaning they weren't producing enough of these tests. Anyway, the CDC

has been an abject failure. They were they didn't have the backbone, the institutional backbone to say, sorry, lazy teachers, unions, the schools should be open, all of them always. There was no reason to shut down K through twelve education. Ever, in this country, the data never supported it. It was never reasonable. CDC too cowardly to do that, because did you think that if you took a poll of CDC employees, what ninety five percent of them voted for Joe Biden.

That's what I would guess about ninety five percent. And if you wonder where I get these statistics from, if you look at the federal government and federal government bureaucrat donations in the Hillary Trump campaign, guess what, over ninety percent went to Hillary Clinton. So you've got a whole bunch of CNN watching leftists working at the CDC, and now they want to get in on the next big challenge,

race as a public health threat. And you know they cite for they cite in this health data about life expectancy, they cite that white Americans live longer than black, black, and Hispanic Americans on average. And so this is racism. It has to be racism, they say, Right, what's so fascinating is do you think that white Americans have the longest life expectancy because you know, white supremacy. When they

talk about racism, the only racism they're fighting against. It's not Black on Asian racism, it's not Hispanic on black racism or or anything else. It's white supremacy. We all know that that's the only racism that concerns the left in this country. There is no other racism as far as they're concerned, even racism among other races. They will tell you, and you know this is true, is the result of white supremacy. So white people are the are the reason for all racism all over the world in fact,

which is insane, but that's what the left believes. Somehow, Asian American have a considerably higher life expectancy I believe it's over eighty than white Americans do. Which is interesting, isn't it, Because Asian Americans also have higher average household income than white Americans do. But but the system of white supremacy cannot be We can't say that this is an exaggerated construct of the left. No, no, we all have to bow before the terrors of the white supremacist

system that exists all over our country. Look, there's a tremendous amount uh, there's a there's there's a tremendous amount of misinformation out there about all of this. Right, there's a tremendous amount of people who are sitting around saying, hold on a second, maybe the CDC has actually got this right, and they and they and then as I said, they have to they have to bow down to this notion that white supremacy is influencing all of our institutions.

It's it's in everything, it's everywhere, it's all over the place. Maybe can we can we have a conversation as to whether that's actually exaggerated and that's harmful and that separates us and that that pulls us apart? Right? Can can we have a conversation about that? Or were not allowed to? No, we're just supposed to accept their premise. We're supposed to accept their premise that even the health disparities from COVID

are a function of white supremacy and racism. Structure, structural racism, white supremacy, these are the same things. They're used interchangeably now. They didn't used to be white supremacy. Used to be guys with you know, neo Nazi tattoos and shaved heads who were you know, really bad people. Now white supremacy as well. There's disparate representation in the you know, MIT electrical engineering program among different ethnic groups, so that looks

like white supremacy to me. I mean, it's it's abused all the time. It's abused all the time as a as just a concept now to silence people. And then that brings me to the CDC. I've been worried all

along that the left has seen something here. The left has seen that if you can terrify people based upon their health, or if you can go for something what's really perhaps the most personal thing for all of us, our health, our ability to enjoy our day to day lives, and to stay alive, and this is a really effective means of control. This is a really effective means of getting people to do whatever you want them to do.

We've seen this during the pandemic. I've said, they're going to go from the public health emergency to the climate change emergency, They're going to go from the They're going to go from the public health emergency to the gun violence emergency, which they've already done. And in fact, as you know, the CDC always wants to study gun violence as that the CDC has a role in this, but it's using a large federal bureaucracy under the guise of

health to control you. And they say that this is now all about racism because then all these equity challenges all across the country. It turns into listen to the science. That's what they'll say, listen to the science. And as we all know, that hasn't been true about their approach to COVID, it's definitely not going to be true about their approach to what they call now white supremacy, which

is it's almost hard, it's hard to define. It's whatever the left decides it is, and now it's whatever the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control decides it is. Perhaps we should call it the Centers for Racism Control. Now you got in this CDC statement put out by the director Wilenski, very political obviously if she's going to get that job in the bidenm and we will continue. Sorry, here you go.

As the nation's leading public health agency, CDC has a critical role to play to address the impact of racism on public health. To say that there's racism in public health that they never will say who's committing the public health racism. That's what I want to know. I want to know who's actually doing the racism in public health. Now, if they want to argue that there is an economic

disparity for health outcomes. That's absolutely true, and we should look at how that happens, why that happens, where that is. But if they're going to say that the racism requires action by individuals, that is immoral. That's what racism has to be premised on. That's what racism has to be based on. So who's doing it? Are doctors not treating

minority patients because they're racist? Whose fault is it? If one community drinks more sugary soda, for example, and more foods that are likely to tribute to type two diabetes than another, do all ethnic groups in this country actually have the same risks from different diseases? And actually turns out if you look at the numbers, there are some diseases that all of the world disparately affect certain populations

based on ethnicity. That's just a genetic reality. Some people, some groups, ethnic groups, national groups are more susceptible to certain diseases. I mean, one that comes to mind is sickle cell anemia, for example. So there actually are some health disparities that are just there that aren't the result of racism. It's worth noting that. But how do they expect how's the CDC going to say that we should tackle this. Well, you see an example of it in Vermont.

This is from Scientific American Vermont to give minority residence priority for COVID vaccines. This was just just recently. States have tribe with limited success to get vaccines to people of color who have been disproportionately killed and hospitalized by the virus. Starting Thursday, Vermont explicitly gave black adults and

people from other minority communities priority status for vaccinations. It follows Montana, which in January announced that Native Americans other people of color, because they're at higher risk of complications from COVID nineteen, would be allowed to receive the vaccine. All Black, Indigenous residents and other people of color who are permanent Vermont residence and sixteen or older are eligible

for the vaccine. Okay, so we're actually now prioritizing people for life saving for what we all understand as a life saving vaccine based upon skin color. That is happening in America today. You think that this is the beginning of this, or you think that this is just a one off. You think that they're going to do more of this, or they're going to do less of this

going forward, Right, this. When I say this, I mean using race as a means of making distinctions about health that really matter, distinctions about public health authorities and states, sources and ways that really matter. You know, what, would it have been fair? I mean I had to help my family members. I had to help my parents get vaccinated. They're both seniors or my mom's close to being a senior. I had to help them get appointments and figure out

and it was not easy for them at all. Would I resent the idea that people who are younger than my parents but are of a of a preferred by the CDC racial category would go ahead of them, even though the risk, as we know, is first and foremost determined by age. Yeah, I think that that's a problem. I think that's racism. But that's not the way that the left sees this at all. They are pulling us apart.

They are Marxist identity politics obsessed. That's what's happening now across the country, and that's what's happening with the CDC's involvement in all of this. And you know they're they're they're doing things at CDC like here's here's how they're tackling this, right, let's ask about what are they really doing. We're expand ending our internal agency efforts to foster greater diversity and create an inclusive and affirming environment that's going

to save a lot of lives. Yeah, I'm sure the CDC is going to be really successful in that we're launching a new web portal Racism and Health as part of our ongoing commitment to serve as a catalyst for public and scientific discourse around racism and health and to be accountable for our progress. Oh, I'm sure they're going to be really accountable. Here's how they finish off this statement. Confronting the impact of racism will not be easy. I

know we can meet this challenge. I know we can create an America where all people have the opportunity to live a healthy lifestyle when we each take responsibility and work together. I am committed to this work. I certainly helpe you will lean in and join me. This is all just, this is all just the same stuff that you see, the kind of you know, Marxist equity babble

that you see from college and university admissions offices. I mean, they're really pushing very hard on this notion that I'm America is this really evil, racist country, and that there is no in fact equal protection under the law. The law has to be making constant distinctions between people based upon race. This is an enormous moral regression. This is absolutely wrong. This is absolutely going in the wrong direction.

And it started with smaller things like, oh, a little bit of affirmative action in school is a little bit of firmative action and hiring. Now you've got states that are saying, oh, you're black or Latino, you get priority access to a vaccine over other people, including other people who are at higher risk because of their age and comorbidities, because equity. It's actually happening in this country right now in America. The Biden administrations, of course pushing all this

stuff as much as they possibly can. That's right, rich old white guy Joe Biden is trying to convince America he's so concerned with equity. Sure he is. It's a fraud, friends, but unfortunately it's when we're going to have to fight back against because this is just the beginning. The CDC as a woke agency is a reality. You really got to fight to get to the truth. These days, the media is lying to you all the time, more than ever, but it is worse. I just want to say that

it's worse than it's ever been. And also, people are more politically locked into their beliefs and they've ever been before. People are more certain that whatever whatever they're saying is the only proper way of and I'm talking about even the words they use, but just their positions as well. We are in a polarized and ossified political environment unlike anything that's ever been before in my lifetime. It's existed in the past, but it's gotten worse. It keeps getting worse.

And you see this even over the gun control issue, in the way that Joe Biden is talking about gun control and you say, hold on a second, why is

he coming up with this? And he's had so much time with all these different advisors and people that are actually writing these speeches and the legislation in Congress, and he lies about stuff, and we're supposed to think that that's not a big problem, Like it's not an issue that when it comes to a constitutionally protected right, you have the President of the United States saying things that are just not true, and then if you bring that up, people yell at you like you're a bad person. The

truth will get you in trouble. Well, the good news is there are other people out there like you who share your beliefs and you know this. But if you try to share your political opinions on social media lately, it's hard to have a civil conversation. Luckily, there's Caucus Room dot coms, a social media network exclusively for conservatives. Caucus Room is an online community for conservatives to gather and engage locally. Only real people who are verified conservatives

can become Caucus remembers. But Caucus Room will never share your information with anyone ever. Sign up process ensure as you're communicating with real conservatives in your neighborhood, no bots or trolls. It's a great way to get engaged on issues where you can make the biggest difference locally. At Caucus Room, you can participate in live virtual meetings that are so secure. The platform plate host over a dozen

virtual Republican Party conventions over the past year. Caucus Room is made by conservatives for conservatives to get organized and make a difference. Join the Buck Sexton Listeners group on caucus room dot com. That c Aucus Room dot com to interact with other listeners just like you again. Caucus room dot com, c au cus r oom, Caucus room dot com. Join the buck Sexton Listeners group and interact

with others just like you. Most people don't know. And you walk into a store and you buy a gun, you have a background check, but you go to a gun show, you can buy whatever you want, no background check. Not true? Does anybody care anymore when things are not true when Joe Biden says them, or when a Democrat says them, or oh, I know, we can apply that Don Lemon standard, which is well Trump lied so much that no lies matter anymore. Now I don't I don't

agree with that. I don't agree with any of that, but that's the standard they're trying to apply now to cover up for Amtrak. Joe. You know, here, I am them. I'm just gonna you know, I'm just gonna say the stuff. And you know, I'm no joke, friends, you know, just kind of little breathy, a little a little bit of stop and start listen to me, because I'm so earnest, such a such a straight shooter, not like a gun shooter,

like a different kind of shooter. It's not true that you can go to a gun show and buy a gun without a background check. As a matter of policy, that's not the case. If you're a federally licensed firearms dealer at a gun show, you will run a background check. So when Joeiden says that you can just go to

a gun show and buy one, that's not true. There are some wiggle room in the law for hobbyists and enthusiasts who aren't engaged in selling guns as a as their business who are at a gun show, But the overwhelming majority, it turns out, of people that go to gun shows and buy a gun will actually have to pass a background check. There's a whole other part of this argument too that I think is worth noting, and that's a lot of really bad people can pass background checks.

If somebody has a criminal background, they're gonna know that, and they're very likely to ignore whatever the gun laws are if they want to get a gun. But a lot of other people, including people that have severe mental illness or are going to go on some kind of a shooting spree, they when you look at it, they would pass. They do pass background checks a lot of the time. So I understand that there are a lot

of security measures. I'm not one of these people that's going to pret and that there's no need for things that aren't one hundred percent effective, right, I mean, this is what the left does with vaccines. Now, well it's not one hundred percent, so you still have to mask up what that's crazy? Sorry, not one hundred percent? All right, they're playing games here. Yes, vaccines are incredibly effective at preventing the virus from being spread as well as individuals

from getting it. It's not perfect. I understand that you can make a case that background checks are are going to work sometimes, and they do work sometimes in stopping people from getting farms. But let's also not overstate the fact that a lot of mass shooters pass background checks. So you know, you're you're throwing a bunch of things at this in the hopes that it's going to reduce

violence in a meaningful way. And what you really get with the background check stuff, for the most part, is going to be the if it saves just one life mentality, which is not how we make policy. If it saves one life is the basis for a truly irannical government. Because think of all the ways anyone who's going to argue with me on this one. The speed limits should be ten miles an hour. We would save tens of thousands of lives a year. It's true, ten mile an hour.

What you have to go so fast? What your business wouldn't function anymore? Too bad, it'll save lives. We don't do that, do we, Although I worry these days that the mentality in the era of COVID has changed so much that people would say, yeah, actually, you know, we probably should have a ten mile a ten mile per hour speed limit. You know, I think we actually should have that. So the gun show thing is not true. But more importantly, you get to the underlying philosophy of

Joe Biden and his underlying philosophy of the Constitution. Here's what he says, play too their phony arguments suggesting that these are Second Amendment rights at stake for what we're talking about. But no amendment, no amendment to the Constitution is absolute. Isn't that so interesting? Because the only amendment to the Constitution, and this is just obvious, the only amendment of the Constitution that Democrats believe is absolute is the right to an abortion, which is not in an amendment,

nor is it in the Constitution. But there can be no restrictions on it whatsoever, no limitations whatsoever. They will fight any number of things that have come forward that including making abortion centers have doctors with admitting privileges at a hospital. Democrats, they left, will fight against that like crazy, including saying that you need to have a surgical grade medical center to be performing abortions. Democrats will fight against that.

So even what we would call safety measures for abortions, never mind stopping of abortions, they will do everything they can to stop. They'll do everything they can to shut that down, and unfortunately they're very successful in it. They are abortion absolutists. That is true of Democrats, that is true of the left. So that's one thing they do

believe in. And it's just ironic that the only amendment that they believe is absolute is the one that doesn't exist, or the only constitutional right, which is the right to an abortion, which does not exist. And they can continue with this lie as long as they want, but it's absurd. And then you have something else that I thought about, where Biden pulled the fire in a crowded theater line. It's remarkable Democrats keep doing this. I mean a lot

of politicians and Republicans will do this too. Sometimes fire in a crowded theater comes from a Supreme Court decision Shank v. United States, where the Supreme Court wrongly held that a person passing out flyers, a socialist pacifist who was opposed to the First World War, passing out flyers against the draft and against Woodrow Wilson, who was a tyrant, by the way, against Woodrow Wilson's desire to enter the US in the First World War, clearly protected political speech

that that was quote, the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded theater. So Democrats think this is clever. Biden thinks this is clever to say, well, there are limitations on rights like yelling fire in a crowded theater, and he actually cites a a pseudo intellectual justification for the tyrannical shutdown of speech, because that's what that actually refers to. But you just never you never expect democrats when they speak,

when they speak about the Constitution. I will just say this, it's a little bit like when Democrat politicians speak about the Bible. You can they're always they're always a little uncomfortable. There's always a little bit, you know, you know, a

little blue collar joe here. I'm just you know, doing my thing, and you know, I get kind of folks here, and you know what, get little breath here, and you know something, you know, four score and on the seventh day, and the thing, you know, they just kind of mutter off into nonsense because ultimately Democrats believe that the Constitution is a question of utility. They actually don't think that.

They're that, you know, they don't think that there are universal truths that the founding fathers saw in those documents and in the document the Constitution, and in the Bill of Rights that are more important than whatever the Democrat agenda of the moment may be. Shared principle doesn't matter. Look at how we've switched from a country that wants equality to a country that now wants equity, which is

just this is just a pathway to Marxism. If this means the same ends, you get what the state says, you can have as much as possible. Make that true. Not the state will treat you and another person equally under the law. You have the same recourse to the law, you will have the same protections under law. And then it's let the best man win. We have a great society because we are willing to have an unequal society.

We are not equal in terms of talents, we are not equal in terms of hard work, of intelligence, of you know, beauty, of health, of all kinds of things. It's not fair. Life is never going to be fair. But a government that tries to create a utopian society by having absolute control, we see what this does, and it results in misery. It results in in the shared shared misery. As a Churchill and it there's always a Churchill quote. There's always a Churchill quote when you need one.

Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings, and socialism is the unequal sharing of misery, or rather the equal sharing of misery. You can't mess up your Churchill quote. That's not good. But here we have one of these times where you see very clearly the Democrat agenda, lady before you, and on guns, on health, on all of these things. It doesn't matter what argument we make. They've decided they want these things. They have an emotional impulse to get it,

to get it done. And that's why you just you see that it all all the facts and figures that you can put forward it falls on deaf ears, doesn't matter. It's already decided in their minds. So it's very, very challenging to see this as anything other than a power grab when you actually get into the facts and figures with Democrats on gun control, and it's not going to save us, meaning it's not going to save a lot of lives, it's not going to deal with the enormous

gun violence surge last year. The gun violence surge was the result of undermining law enforcement and emboldening criminals, which was all part of a left wing narrative that America is a racist place and the cops are racist, and that there's a justification for the destruction of businesses and rioting in neighborhoods because of that, that's what led to the worst murder rates we've seen in this country in over twenty years. But no, instead, we're going to talk

about ghost guns. We're going to talk about how we can have some change made to to guns at gun shows. I mean, all this stuff. Oh, we've got a new ATF director who doesn't like the Second Amendment. Okay, that's really going to help, right, This is garbage thinking. But the Biden administration as you've seen there's a lot of not just bad policy approaches, but bad faith in the way they talk about this and the way they view

the other side. This all began with the disdainful narrative of everyone who voted for Donald Trump was somehow a part of the January six insurrection, which wasn't an insurrection. And the more we found out about it, the more we realized it was. You know, it was a mob that got out of control, didn't actually kill any cops, and is being treated like it was some kind of militia effort to overthrow the United States government when it was really a bunch of misled losers who did something

very very stupid and very foolish. But that was the beginning narrative, you see, because the Democrats now they view you and me through that lens. So they're not gonna listen to us on guns, they're not gonna listen to us on COVID, not listen to us on anything. We just get pushed aside, swept away one of those January six insurrection supporters. Even though we've been condemning that thing

the whole pot, it doesn't matter. They don't care. Said a moment ago quote, you go to a gun show, you can buy whatever, or you want no background check? Is there a special exemption in federal law he's referring to, or just do FLA dealers not have to do background checks when our got a gun show? All right? Are you asking me if he was referring it's okay. Were you asking me if he was referring to like a specific circumstance or I'm sorry to tell me a little

bit more about your question. I mean, is it the president's belief that you do not have to undergo a background check when you are a gun show? No, it's not his belief. He believes that gun that background checks should be universal. Right, he says no background check. Well, we know what his position is, right, so let me reiterate that, which is that the gut background checks or something that should be universal. They're supported by more than

eighty percent of the public. He's supported legislation, advocated for that, and advocated against loopholes as well. So that's his position, and I appreciate you asking for the clarification. Yeah, well that's really interesting, Jen Saki, another sake bomb dropped here because he said very clearly we all heard Joe Biden before he said that you can go to a back you can go to a gun show, no background check.

That was no background check, that was the quote. Not pretty much always a background check, but maybe under some circumstances you might be able to get a farm without a background check. That's not what he said. So when she says, we know his position, okay, but what he said isn't true, and it should matter what the President of the United States says on a policy issue like this, where the facts are really what we are talking about.

The facts are really what's at issue here. Vice President Harris is also out there on the push for gun control. Here she is playing nine. Over the course of my career, I have seen gun violence up close. I've looked at autopsy photographs. I've seen with my own two eyes what a bullet can do to the human body. I've held hands with the hand of parents who have lost a child. I have seen children who are traumatized by the loss

of a parent or sibling. And I have fought my entire career to end this violence and to pass reasonable gun safety laws. Time and again, as progress has stalled, we've all asked, what are we waiting for because we aren't waiting for a tragedy. I know that we've had more tragedy than we can bear. We aren't waiting for solutions either, because the solutions exist, They already exist. People on both sides of the aisle want action. Real people on both sides of the aisle want action. Okay, what

action do we supposedly want? The panning of ghost guns? Is the banning of ghost guns? I remember, I'm just wondering if we went down this list. Let's let's take a look at a city like oh Chicago, which had a massive increase in shootings last year, and it's already

far too violent as a city. With the banning of ghost guns, or the background check provision changes that they want, or anything that Biden's talking about, classifying modifications to a pistol, so that'll be a short barrel rifle and you'll have to register it under the National Firearms Act. Would any of that stop a single one of the shootings in Chicago last year? Let's just take that as a as as one point here. Would any of them do that?

I don't have the answer. I bet the answer is less than one percent of those shootings would have been affected by those things. But this is the action we have to take. This is what we have to do. It's about so much more than that. There's a fundamental philosophical difference between the left and the right on the issue of guns. They think that guns are a little private rebellion in the hands of individual American citizens and

they cannot abide it. And we think that that little private rebellion that each one of us has by essentially having the opportunity to tell the state there is a line that you shall not cross. There is a break against tyranny. There's a bulwark against tyranny that has an individual hands, which is the right to bear arms. That's very important to this country. You know, advanced sophisticated democracies in the past, with a high standard of living and

have gone fully tyrannical. They did not have an armed population. We have an armed population, and we wanted to stay that way. Democrats want to create registries and harass lawful gun owners in every way they can change the culture, change everything about the gun ownership reality in this country so that they put it on a glide path to eradication.

That's what's really separating the two sides. Sarsani time friend David Harsani from National Review dot Com is joining us right now to talk about guns and maybe even some Hunter Biden stuff if we've got the time. David, great to have you. Let's jump right to this man. This seems to me like it is absolutely as predictable as anything could be the Biden administration. We're a few months in and we're having it's the same gun control debate

we had under the Obama administration. Time and again. They never give up. I'll give them credit for that. Yeah, I was thinking about that about that the other day, about how I'm constantly I feel like I'm writing the same thing over and over again. But it's really not my fault because they keep coming back with the same exact arguments, the same exact policy proposals. Actually they're getting a little worse. Like Biden said a lot of particulous

things the other day that are completely false. I mean, their lies about gun shows, you know, not having to have a background check when you buy guns at gun shows, about are fifteens about everything. So I'm not sure exactly why they're doing this because it seems unlikely the legislation will pass, but it definitely will rile up gun owners will probably see another huge spiking gun owner you know, people buying guns. If the manufacturers can keep up with it,

I'm not sure. And what do you think they really hope to accomplish by this? I mean, if we were we were able to sit in in a meeting in the Oval, let's say, with Kamala and Joe and you

know the Ron Klaine. Is this to drive up the Democrat bases enthusiasm for this administration and just to drive up donations or do you think that they really believe that they're going to because I mean my thing is, even if they got these things, no one who understands the numbers and the statistics thinks that a change in ghost guns is going to bring down the violence rate or you'd be able to show how this is actually saving lives. So what do they think they accomplish with this? Well?

I think it's two things. First of all, I think there's a lot of pressure from left wing groups to do some things, so they decide to, you know, pretend they're doing something ghost guns. You know, when you're when you're going the executive order route, there's only someone you can do. It's unconstitutional to limit people, you know, AAR fifteens or whatever. So they're trying to sort of nibble at the edges to allow people to get excited about

them doing something. The second part is if they do something, if they somehow get something through the point, you know, AAR fifteens are used in only a small fraction of murders in the United States. But if they get something through, it's incrementalism and they want to take your guns. I have zero doubt about that. And they're just trying to figure out ways in which they can move forward, constantly,

move forward. I am you know, I'm against any like it doesn't matter what I'm forward, but I'm against any legislation that moves forward more gun control. We have forty thousand gun laws on the books. We don't need anymore. We need enforcement of gun laws we have. We need someone to investigate Hunter Biden, see why you had a weapon, and why he led on his background check form, and why a gun was stored out in a garbage your school,

for instance. Well, can you, David, we dive into that because I actually haven't covered that yet on the show, and so I want this audience to know exactly what you're going and we're going to talk about Hunter Biden in general and all the stuff that's come out. But tell everybody what happened with a Hunter Biden gun situation. Well, he you know, when you buy a gun, you signed

a background check. A lot of people don't know that because Democrats always lie about it, but you know, eight ninety nine percent of people buy guns have to go

through a background check. Every gun has gone through a background check, and Hunter Biden has a I believe it was just some kind of semi automatic gun that he bought at a gun shop, but he lied on his background check form because he said that he wasn't I don't know how it's phrased, but it's doing drugs, right, yeah, using drugs that he wasn't doing crack so um and he was, which is fine, I mean not fine. But maybe he's getting over it, maybe he's in rehab. I

don't know what he is. But he lied on his form, which is I believe it might I think it's a felony. So he's lying to the FBI. So a lot of people lie on those forms and there are very few prosecutions. Let's go after people lying on those forums. Let's go after let's tighten up the system. Like in Charleston, the local police hadn't informed the FBI that there was criminality. You know that shooter had done drugs as well. So um anyway, so I think you know, there are plenty

laws in the books. We need to tighten those up. I'm all for, you know, going after people who lie on background checks, but we don't need any more laws. And what was the disposing of the gun hunter Biden near a school or something? What's that? I don't know the particulars exactly, but something like I think it feels like this is just how it feels like after reading

it to me. Or what seems like is that his girlfriend, I guess it is, felt that he was a danger to himself or a danger to others and took the gun and just threw it out in a nearby garbage which happened to be across the street from a school, which is and you can it's it's I'm not sure in Delaware what the laws are, but you're not supposed to throw out guns in in that way, and I supposed to dispose of that's that's not a safe I mean, if you're not supposed to dispose if you're any biotics

in the trash, you know, or or any prescripture. I'm pretty sure it's supposed to throw a glock in the trash and just hope that nobody finds it. But um, I'm speaking of David Harsani of National View here and David on the Hunter Biden stuff. So so here's my thing, and I think you will you alluded to this, this feeling or just a couple of moments ago. Yeah, addiction is a very very serious crippling thing, and it ruins families, and it is quite sad. I think it's perfectly fine out.

I think it's actually just being fair minded to say that, Yeah, Hunter Biden is an addict, and that's something that we can sympathize with. Hunter Biden is also a really narcissistic, spoiled, destructive scumbag. And and if if he were Donald Trump's son, or even any Republican son for that matter, he wouldn't be going on a book tour right now. Jimmy Kimmel

is basically giving him a BackRub on TV. Yeah. I mean, I never or very rarely were write about stories that have to do with like infidelity or drug use of politicians like I just don't do it because we don't really know what the situation is all usually, but here's the thing. This is the This is now the president's son, the vice president son who only made a you know who made fifty k for a Ukrainian energy firm because

of his last name. And we're not allowed to talk about this sort of thing because it makes the president look bad and it's just insane. I mean, if, like you said, if this was Don Junior or any of Trump's kids, it would be all over the front pages of every newspaper. He's a bad guy. I'm sorry. You know, the things he's done are immoral. It's not just the drug use that I know addicts and I know that people make mistakes and etc. But that's not the case here.

He doesn't seem to have any much remorse about him. But moreover, he is benefiting from it still. Now he has a book and he's and he's playing himself as the victim where you know, a major media institutions aren't investigating what he was up to in China, in Ukraine and et cetera. They would just not be the same for any other president's son. I mean, any at least any Republicans. It's remarkable as well, David, to see Chris Hayes,

for example, over at MSNBC. Who he's He's I guess if you're like a Brooklyn Liberal, you know he's your. He is your your, your great champion of progressive causes. I don't know. I've never understood how this guy is someone that people listen to about anything but that's me. Uh. He had some tweet about you know, maybe maybe is it possible that Hunter Biden's laptop was actually real? And I look at that and I honestly can't come to a conclusion. I can't analyze with certainty in my own head.

Is he just really not smart and so he he doesn't believe that the laptop was it's clearly real. There's more information that's come out about it. It's obviously Hunter Biden's laptop. If it wasn't, they would have been able to bunk it right away. Or is this now kind of a game? I mean, is gas lighting on something like this for people who have large platforms and the media on the left part of the fun I don't know.

I think that many times people convinced themselves of things like the Russians are you know, the Russians planted Hunter's laptop with the New York Post. I mean, I still see people say stuff like that. It's just in saying that story. Those stories had far more journalistic integrity and the people who did them at far more journalistic integrity the most stories you see on MSNBC about Russia or

whatever else. So I don't I don't know what the answer to that is, but it's it's increasingly clear now we you and I knew this, and we talked about it at the time, that those stories were censored on purpose to help one, you know, one candidate when the presidency. It's corrupt, the media's corrupt. I refuse to say things as a matter of course, even if it will benefit my my you know, I'm a registered Republican, even will benefit the Republican Party, it'll I refuse to say things

that make me feel like I'm a moron. And I don't see that among very prominent people on the left. I mean, I went on on a tario recently because on Joe Scarborough Show on MSNBC in the morning, he went on this whole thing about how you know, vaccine denialism is for moron Trump supporters and like they're a bunch of you know, toothless rubes who are drinking their

you know, Budweiser at Nascar. I mean it is just he clearly makes us about anybody who was a question about or vaccine hesitancy is some idiot Trump supporter when I mean, in reality, the biggest vaccine hesitancy bulge in the demographics is among minorities. But you know, it's like he's not embarrassed to say something that's just so very stupid because it serves the purpose in the moment. Yeah,

I mean it depends. So I think that a lot of people on the left who are smart, you know, as far as their IQ goes, or will do anything because they feel like Republicans are evil and anything is fine to say as long as it, you know, helps them achieve the goals that they want. I think there are other people like Joe Scarborough, who is just not very bright to begin with, but also it will say anything for ratings and will say anything that people want

to hear wherever he is. I mean, when he was running in Florida, you know, he pretended to be this one type of person and now he's up in wherever what is it in New Jersey or wherever ms MSNBC films. He pretends to be whatever is good there. When Trump, when Trump was bringing him ratings, he said whatever Trump wanted to hear. And now that you know, Trump was unpopularly, so he'll say whatever he wants. But so it depends

where you're talking about. But I think there's a lot of ends justify the means stuff there, and people sort of are in bubbles and they repeat things and they start to believe them, or if they don't, they just want you know, it's propaganda. It's basically a propaganda, or keep repeating it. And you know, I can't bore into the souls of some of these people to know if they actually believe what they're saying. I'm embarrassed for them.

Quite often, like Jennifer Rubins of the World, I just think it's a sort of emotionally driven hatred of certain kind of people. Or Tom Nichols at The Atlantic, I think he just hates the aesthetic of people who wear America shirts or are too flag wavy, you know what I mean, or people who live in places that he doesn't visit, so I think that's a problem too. So I think it's a bunch of different sorts of sort of you know, they're different sorts of trends going on.

Is this Biden administration at this stage more left wing even than what we saw in the first year of the Obama administration in two thousand and nine. First, Buck, I just want to say, I love that you let you team me up to go after my least favorite people in the media. So I just wanted to quickly say I appreciate that. But moving forward, let's to displace my anger on this show. So the second thing, Yes, I mean, obviously I think the party, the policy wise,

they're far left. I mean they're they're far left of of Obama. And this is just accelerated in ways that are incredible. So today I saw Joe Biden is going to have a study group to look into packing the courts. I mean, you know, why would he do that. It's not popular among the normal people. It's not probably even popular among most Democrats. It's popular on the far left.

Because the far left is the loudest, the most activist, the most you know, the people who raise the money, the people are out there marching and he has to placate them. So I think that I think Joe Biden's not left or right. I think Joe Biden is wherever he thinks the Democratic Party is. It's been that way his whole life, in from nineteen seventy three when he

was posing up to segregationist to now. But I think that yeah, I mean, policy wise, it's it's it's incredible the language they use, the racial identitarian sort of things that he says, the anti gun rhetoric. You know, it's just all far, far to the left. So I don't know how that's going to work out for them in the elections. But I mean, like this gun thing, what was the point of that, just to rile upright wingers and make yourself look even farther to the left. I

don't know. I don't know what they're doing. David Arsani, everybody Nashalview dot com go check out his peace there and David always a pleasure. Thank you, Buck. I think that's right show, and I think that's part of what is driving both the overwhelming bipartisan support in the country, not Washington, and in the country for the COVID relief measures. And for this infrastructure bill that the administration is trying to push forward. So that's a big thing. A paradigm

kind of shipped. Maybe. I know you we've been talked about this for several weeks here, you know, the Roosevelt era to the Reagan era. Are we on the verge of a new activist, progressive era? Lad in an unlikely way by Joe Biden. I think that's not impossible. But here's the problem with it when it comes to guns is the guns have become largely a cultural issue and not so much an issue about economics. Guns are definitely a cultural issue, and it's that the left has convinced

it's adherents that gun owners are bad people. They really believe that. I mean, they actually have disdain for people, the kind of people who own guns or the wrong

people you see in their minds. And I think that we all need to remember that there's a there's a sense of the gun owners of America, according to Democrats, are the red you know, the red flyover state, people who have who listen to the wrong kind of music, eat the wrong kind of food, go to the wrong kind of schools, and vote the wrong politicians and that's it all gets wrapped in together here. But the talk about Biden as a very progressive candidate now or progressive

president rather, is something that we shouldn't ignore. It's very real, and we do have what's going on right now with the Biden administration unveiling before us a commission, a commission to take a look at court packing. Folks, if you're wondering how extreme they're willing to be, this is the New York Times. Biden creating commission to study expanding the Supreme Court. They're really doing this, They're really going to try to push this. The commission will also examine other

potential changes, such as term limits for justices. Progressives are pushing President Biden to add seats to balance the court's conservative majority. President Biden on Friday will order a one hundred and twenty days study of adding seats to the Supreme Court, making good on a campaign year promise to establish a bipartisan commission to examine the potentially explosive subjects of expanding the court or setting term limits for justices.

As according to the White House and written in The New York Times today, the President acted under pressure from activists pushing for more seats to alter the ideological balance of the court. After President Donald Trump appointed three justices, including one to a seat that Republicans had blocked his predecessor, Barack Obama from filing for filling rather for almost a year. This is a reminder of something that is always true

about Democrats. When Democrats are out of power, anything in the system that stops Republicans is sacred and must be protected. When Democrats are in power, anything in the system that stops them is racist or obstructionist and must be destroyed. If you remember that, you'll understand so much of the propaganda and demagoguery that comes out of the Democratic Party on a regular basis. If you can just keep that

in mind, so much else will make sense. There's no principle here, There's no shared value that we're looking at when it comes to the Supreme Court. No, No, they want an outcome. They don't respect process that does not give them the outcome they demand, always and at all times. You see this with everything, with elections, with the DOJ, with the court system, everything. Democrats don't get the political outcome they want, they trash the system and minded they

get the political outcome they want. It is sacred, it is not to be touched. And anyone who who even brings up criticism of the way the institution is functioning is undermining our institutions at our democracy, That's what they say. Very difficult to argue with people who have no principles, but that's what we're constantly forced to do with the

progressive left in America today all the time. It's very hard to have a conversation with people who have no moral core about moral issues, obviously is very important these days. Taking care of your tech really matters. We all see this now with the whole hundred Biden laptop situation, right. I mean, what you're doing online and what exists on your devices that can really come back to bite you.

And that's if obviously you're somebody who's doing all kinds of crazy illegal stuff like Hunter Biden was, but also for the rest of us, your politics becomes a problem. That's what everyone's seeing now. I think I think everyone's becoming more aware of the fact that if you're a conservative, you simply cannot trust big tech. You know. They took down a Ron DeSantis YouTube video where he had a round table of top health experts talking about how lockdowns

have failed. YouTube just took it down. They said, not in line with the consensus on mask wearing in lockdowns. Not in line with the consensus. Oh I'm sorry, So now the YouTube standards folks are health experts. Really, something else is going on here and they've shut me down too. They come after me in the past, as you know. But you can take action to protect your privacy online.

You can anonymize your internet connection, surf the web freely without wondering who's going to get a hold of your search history or viewing habits or what they'll do with that information. I mean, do you really want the government or big tech to be reading over your shoulder everything you do online? Exactly. There's never been a more important time than now to protect your Internet activity. That's why

I urge you to get Express VPN. When I use Express VPN, the big tech company he's can't see my IP address at all, my identity. My identity is anonymized by a secure VPN server and my data is encrypted for maximum protection. Stop handing over your data to big tech companies now and to the government. Defend your rights with the VPN I trust for online protection. Is it express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot

com slash buck. To get three extra months free, go to Express vpn dot com slash buck right now to learn more. Does it make you crazy when you hear someone like Donald Trump Junior saying that the only reason he does is because he's a Biden and because of his last name, And how just wildly comical that is? I mean, because it is wildly comical? Is that that's putting it lightly? I think? But but you know, I really what I've learned is this is that I don't

spend too much time thinking about I do. I think about it all the time. I'll think about it for you. Well, maybe that's why, because I have other people to think about it for about it? Do you know Donald Trump Junior? No, you've never met him now, not that I know of, Not that I know you say that. I know, pretty pretty rough place. Yeah. Um, so here we go, here we go. Now, now we're gonna have the media saying that Hunter Biden is not that you know it. Look,

Jimmy Kimmel, isn't this amazing? You get you get these comedians, You get these guys who are supposed to be making people laugh. But what you really see is that they're political actors who also make some jokes. What you see is that they're they're serving to to aid the propaganda purposes of the Democrat Party. That's what Jimmy Kimmel does. And that's why when you have Hunter Biden in this way, you have Hunter Biden, uh getting you know, he's laughing

and he's fine. If you see the stuff that is out from the laptop now, I mean Andrew Biden, it's really disturbing. I mean, he's he's got multiple prostitutes. He's making videos with prostitutes. They're you know, on top of him naked. I mean it's like, you know, this is not stuff for anybody, you know, any of anyone under

eighteen to be seeing that. They're blurring it out in the media outlets, but you know, uh, this is just crazy, right when you see what's going on with him, you see what a bad guy he actually is and the things he's doing. I mean, it's just all gross and it's degrading and it's wrong. And then of course there's also the stuff where you just get him. I think he's a he's in a feathered boa in one photo

in Tidy Whitey's. You know he's in He's in a very scale I look, I I'm just reading the news, folks. This is what's out there. This guy's taking these photos. I mean, he's like fifty years old. What is he doing. I mean, he's got alimony payments he's gotta make and and he's going to compare himself to Don Trump Junior, Donald Trump Junior. Is it a whole different category of responsible human being compared Hunter Biden? But oh yeah, they're

gonna make jokes about that. Oh nepotism or whatever. Yeah, Look, there is nepotism in the Trump family. There's no question about that. I don't live in some delusion, but there's nepotism in the Trump family where you have you know, Don Junior and Ivanka and you know, graduating from Ivy League schools and presenting well and speaking well and working in companies that, yes that they work for their father's company, but they can at least talk to talk, walk the walk.

I mean, Don Junior gives a good speech, he's good on his feet, you know. And I hate nepotism and politics money, but nepotism in the private sector is just a reality. You know, somebody who starts a company is gonna want to give it to his children. That that's just the way it works. It's property, that's how it happens. But to compare this with a Hunter Biden, but hundred Biden was getting a fifty thousand dollars a month, fifty thousand dollars a month to be on the board of Barisma,

And now we see these photos. I wouldn't pay this guy five dollars a year to advise me on a hot dog stand. The only reason he was getting that money was because of his of his dad, and we all know it. His dad was the vice president too. So it's it's something that affects all of us in the sense that he's a a public official, a powerful public official at the time, and here he is talking about how you know he's actually he was qualified. You know, Oh,

I know A hundred Biden went to Yale, right. I mean, this is the truth when you're when you're a Democrat politician. Because I did say before they went to everything schools. Look, I knew Ivanka growing up a little bit. She was a good student, she was smart. Everybody knew. It wasn't a great student. I mean, like I was a better student, obviously, but I'm just saying she was. She was a fair a B plus kind of student. She's a pretty good

student at good schools. And h you know Andrew Biden, his guys clearly just a total, a total waste roll. But he says, oh no, he got his board spot. Here's why I play five. You wrote in the book, use I do want to talk about this, you know, the Ukraine and or Ukraine and and it became some an issue, it became something. It gave Donald Trump something to grab onto. He almost got well, he did get impeached as a result of it. But you wrote, did I make a mistake by taking a seat on the

board of the Ukrainian Gas Company? No? Did I display a lack of judgment? No? Would I do it again? No? Yeah, and I met what I said. I meant. What I wrote is that, uh, you know, go to the beginning. Is that you know I went to Yale Law School. Um. I served on at least a dozen boards before Breezema. I was a vice chamber of the board of Amtrak. I was a chairman of the board of a World Food Program, US largest supporting the largest humanitarian organization in

the world. I had an expertise in corporate governance. I was asked to serve on the board for corporate governance, and I was a lawyer at boy Schiller and Flexner, which was how I was first approached. However, what I didn't take into account was the way in which they would use the perception against my dad, and for that I wouldn't do it again. For that reason. Yeah, that's

the only reason. It's because the perception thing, not because the whole thing is so absurd, not because it's so clear that this was the worst kind of nepotism, right. Nepotism that involves private companies and corporations is one thing. A nepotism that involves leveraging your familial ties to somebody in a high public office is a different thing when it involves a country like Ukraine, When it involves foreign countries and interests, I mean, this is a whole different level.

But again, look at how dishonest the media is. Look look at what they're willing to do here to make it seem as though, oh yeah, it's all the same, you all. Hunter Biden is such a such a sympathetic guy. You know, maybe maybe we should just give him a break. Actually, he's kind of a likable guy. He's a good guy. This is somebody who impregnated as stripper and now says

he doesn't even remember meeting her. This is somebody who's got photos of his meth mouth and photos of him with multiple prostitutes that he's paying to sleep with it. I mean, it's just disgusting. This is Joe Biden's son, the President's son, and the media makes him into a likable figure. I mean, it's one thing if he was going to go off and get treatment and you know, live a private life whatever. He's going on the talk

show circuit. He's putting himself out there. I mean, it's unbelievable, unbelievable, but I guess it is believable. This is the way it happens. This is the the double standard of the left on display. And they just and the left wing media nothing, no truth matters to them. You know, he's on the team. He's on the team. Biden is their guy now, and anybody that's affiliated with Biden is on the team, and they'll protect them and they'll do all

that kind of stuff. So it's a really stunning situation, isn't it. Yeah, Hunter Biden, anyone who says the laptop is not real is either a liar or a moron. You know, the laptop wasn't Hunter Biden's, I should say, any any who claims that it's laughable. And yet many big voices in the media have been saying that all along, They've they've been making that a part of this. They've been acting like maybe, maybe, just maybe it is in

fact the case that this was Russian disinformation. In fact, I'm I'm still upset about how former intelligence officers very much debased themselves. And I'm talking about big names in the intel community Clapper and Brannan and I think Hayden and Panetta, they all signed that letter right before the election about how it was Russian disinformation. It absolutely was not Russian disinformation. That was a lie. So these people

are either liars or they're idiots. I mean, it's gone to the point I've been saying this where for me being you know, XCIA myself, although only for a few years. I look, I joined the CIA to help find bin Laden and some of his some of his co conspirators, some of the bad guys and I realized what the federal government was really like after about four or five years and decided that, you know, I want to go to other things. Quite honestly, that was what ended up happening.

So I'm not some CIA careerist, but it's gone to the point now where I feel like we're having worked in the intelligence community. The CIA is now like somebody having worked at Enron in the mid tooth thousands, you know, early two thousands, where yeah, I don't I don't think you want to want to brag about that one, you know, Oh, CIA guy, I don't know. The brand is very damage. I mean, yeah, I learned a lot of stuff there. I know things that are useful, particularly no things about

the truth of the intelligence community. But man, the brand, it's just like people I know work the FBI. James Coomy, Oh my gosh, the FBI is never gonna be the same at least for a generation or two. Now people are going to realize, oh, it can be run by partisan hacks who do injustice in the name of justice and who are really just hatchetmen for the Democrat Party, and they can run the FBI as James Comey did. This is this is the country we're living in now.

It's it's concerning, but this is where we are and this is what we are continuing to deal with. Yeah, the Russian disinformation. Think about how elaborate that plot would have to be. I mean, that's really the best the Jus could do. First of all, the Russia conspiracy theories from the Trump era used against Trump are so outlandish that now it's really hard. It's really challenging to think of something that's too crazy or stupid for Democrats to believe. Right,

what is beyond the pale for them? What's it? And we see it with the return of this Russia mindset, Russia with the laptop which was clearly Hunter Biden's. And if you see the photos, you see what's going on. Like I said, you know, what is to say about Joe Biden's parenting skills? Are we allowed to ask that question? Is that not? Now? I know he's the president, he's not the parent in chief, but he kind of poses like he's America's grandpa. And what a mess this guy

Hunter Biden is. And I'm not just talking about the drug abuse and a lot of people can get caught up in drugs and it's a sickness and it's it's you know, I do have a lot of sympathy for that. But there's a difference in being a drug addict and being a drug addict who flaunts it and makes money off of your affiliation with your family in ways that are corrupt and gross and is paying off prostitutes too. What a time and making videos of it and taking

photos of yourself basically naked and smoking crack. I mean, what a just what a disaster this guy's but yeah on Jimmy Kimmel Show. Hahaha. It's also funny. They're all such good buddies and friends and everything else. Sure, you know, because must be good to be a democrat. This is

something that you know. It does cross my mind. It must must be a really special, privileged thing to be able to be a democrat who can always always count on the media to catch your back, always always be there to take care of you in one way or another, as long as you're as long as you're important to the cause. Think about walking around with that kind of protection, no matter how much of a scumbag you are. It must be a remarkable thing to be a famous democrat

in America today, we have this under control. And what the Biden administration has done is very deliberate. So we're all ringing our hands because Kamala won't go down to the border. Well let's say she does. Let's say my orchist does. So what they don't want to change this?

This is very deliberate. They took very willful steps to reverse Trump administration policies or remain in Mexico policy, to silent cooperation agreements, stopped building the wall, and maybe more importantly than all about send a signal to people that they're welcome here. This is important for everyone to know because because Crenshaw actually gets what's happening, he understands this

dynamic too. The Democrats weep, we keep assuming, or there's this mindset of, oh, the crisis at the border is that we have so many people coming into the country illegally. That's not what Democrats think the crisis at the border is. They view it as a problem of whether or not the people can be processed quickly and efficiently enough and be kept comfortable as they're led into the country. What do we think Kamala is going to do if she does go down to the border. I mean, we know,

of course very little. But I mean, just what do they think. They're going to talk about more resources. They're going to talk about more people down there to process the intake of those who cross illegally into the country. But think about this for a moment. That just means then more people will want to come. They're actually we're working at cross purposes with the Democrats on this, or rather we're thinking about this atros cross purposes with the Democrats.

Their view of all of this is that they would like a better, more efficient entry process for the hundreds of thousands of mostly Central American migrants who cross illegally and then want to stay here. They want that process to be smoother. We want this to stop, but for it to stop, there has to be a change in the incentive structure. And they're not going to change the incentive structure because that would mean turning people away. In fact,

as I've said, they're making this easier. They're making it more likely for people, more likely for people to want to come, because they'll say, oh, well, now I know that if if I send my children to cross the border, if I send my kid to cross the border illegally, he or she will be well taken care of in a very nice facility and allowed to stay for sure and get schooling and healthcare and everything and be placed. And why are more people going to come? Why isn't

that going to result in even more illegal crossing? This is why the problem is only going to get only going to get worse. And as I'm getting ready myself to head down to the border, you know now there are people who are making videos of them. Members of Congress have made videos where they're just standing there and there's just just people walking. And this happens particularly at nighttime, just walking across the border in large numbers, large numbers

of them. But don't call it an open border, they say, oh, it's not open. Yeah, it's so secure that hundreds of people at a time, in different places all over the US Mexico border are just going to walk into the country. That is. That's where we are right now, That's where

this is. And I just I gotta tell you, it's it's amazing to see how the Democrats have no way of explaining this to people other than to just focus on the humanitarian and emotional impulses around the issue while not dealing with the fundamental fact that as long as people can come into the United States illegally and are likely to stay under comfortable in the whole process, they're going to keep doing this. It's not going to stop, and in fact, it's going to escalate. They'll be even

more of this. So I don't know where there goes. I mean, it'll drop down a bit in the summer because it gets so hot that it becomes dangerous and just uncomfortable for people to try to cross into America illegally on foot. But I don't know what happens beyond that, other than I think it's likely to continue and you'll have you'll have this going on for the first two

years of the Biden administration. The only way this stops is if Democrats feel like it's a true crisis for their poll numbers, then they might have to do something. We talk a lot about online censorship these days. We have these discussions on this show about how people like me are being suppressed, being shut down. What can we actually do about this? We have to fight back effectively in the war against big tech suppression and censorship of

conservative ideas. We've got somebody who knows very well exactly how we can do that now with us. Matt Needler, he is the CEO of Caucus Room dot Com. Caucus from dot Com is somebody that I work with as a sponsor. Or. We're very pleased to have hi, Matt On. Matt, thank you so much. Thanks for thanks for having me

and thanks for supporting us. So tell me what we have heard recently from Supreme Court Justice Thomas that seems to be be sticking with people as as a beginning point for the conversation of how we can start to get rid of the big tech monopoly by treating it like monopoly. What do you see and tell us about

what what Thomas says and how you see this moving forward. Yeah, I mean Justice Thomas really, uh, you know, kind of put a shot across the bow to the real big tech platforms, especially I think the app stores and Amazon, the folks that that took down Parlors. We know. A few months ago, he pointed out in an opinion he wrote around the Overcort's decision about President Trump blocking people on Twitter. They actually just ruled that opinion as moot

because he's not president anymore. But but in the he put in an opinion associated with that that said, hey, you know, Okay, so maybe President Trump shouldn't have blocked

these folks on Twitter, but Twitter blocked President Trump. And like the power of Twitter to do that is pretty extraordinary, and we need to be looking at not only that, but but how these app stores and others are treated in terms of whether or not they are offering a public accommodation kind of the way, like a hotel can't turn someone away because of you know, some arbitrary reason, but you know, if they if that person is violating

the rules of the hotel, they can. So he was likening it to a public accommodation and then also usibly as a common carrier kind of the way like a train company can't refuse one kind of product but to accept another, you know, competitor's product or something like that. So so he pointed to those two things and it was basically just an invitation for someone to bring a case to the court. And um, so we were watching

that with a lot of interest here at Caucus Room. Um. You know, as you know, Caucus Room is a social network for conservatives. Um. And so we've we're always pretty wary of you know, legislative and you know, uh, legislators getting um in the mix because they'll probably screw it up.

And you know, we don't exactly you know, whatever the court decisions are is usually kind of an up or down or or nuanced decision with some specific issue like that Twitter case that you know probably doesn't relate to the way Caucus Room works. But but we watched it with a lot of interest. You know, we certainly had our own issues with the app stores and are still trying to get onto the app stores. So we've learned

a lot. But it was a really important decision and one that we're still kind of chewing on this week. So so tell us of a year, and we're speaking to Matt Needler, who's a CEO of caucus Room dot com, which is a social media site for conservatives and one that I've partnered with as a sponsor. And I want to know, Matt, uh, why can't you get in the app store? For example, what's the reason that Apple, one of the most powerful companies in the world, gives for

why you can't actually have an app? Just like you know, it seems like there are millions of them these days. Yeah, you know, it's uh so there's a lot of answers to that. I mean, the first few times we were rejected were perfectly reasonable. You know, we had bugs, we had didn't load properly, or it was missing a couple of basic you know, security features that that Apple wanted to see or something like that. And so we've addressed

all of those. We're going to be resubmitting really soon. UM. But one of the things that that UH is there's kind of a key term which is called user generated content, and that's the official jargon for what a social network is UM. And when you think about user generated content like that could be anything. Could be the pictures people put up on Instagram, it could be UM, a text that someone puts in onto Twitter. UM. And you know,

anybody's ability to preemptively moderate that is virtually impossible. There are some screening things and whatnot that Apple requires, you know, in terms of like like we don't want you know, pornography on on Caucus Room. Caucus Room is a place for conservatives to caucus We It's a lot like uh, sort of nextdoor dot com, where it's you know, oriented at first and foremost around your neighborhood, but you can join larger groups. In factors that there's a great buck

Sexton group getting started this week. Um, it's a buck Sexton club that because we have clubs, newsrooms, and causes anyway, so when people join Caucus Room, keep an eye out for that. But the point is user user generated content is something that the app stores have extra requirements for. So if you're uploading a game like a Tetris kind of game or something, they've got one level of screening. But if you have user generated content, they've got a

whole another level of screening. And so we have been working for you know, the better part of nine months too, and it kind of feels like sometimes the goalposts are

shifting on us. But uh, you know, the latest thing that they had was, you know that we because we screen people who want to join Caucus Room and participate in our you know, the discussions, post content, create a group or something, you have to be a real person and we got to know that you, you know, you share the same generally share the same conservative values that the other members share on the site. And so we

have a little screening process. So Matt tell me this, I mean, this is a different thing that you're doing with Caucus Room. How do you verify conservatives? Yeah, so we do a few different uh, we have a few different methods. We've got a few you know, commercial data

things that we can run against. So u you know, one of the things that we've that's very clear is that liberals hate it when conservatives talk online, right, and so there were you know, one of the problems that Parlor fell into was that, you know, there were a lot of people joining it just to sabotage the conversations and to sabotage the site from the left. And uh, you know that is that's always a concern they you know, poll after poll shows that the only people who feel

totally comfortable talking online are are the most liberal. And so when we built Caucus Room, we wanted to at least do some kind of a screening system to keep those liberal trolls out and um, and you know, for the most part, I think we've been we've done a really really good job that as we've been growing. But the you know, so, so you we use some commercial databases, and we also allow you to to vouch for a friend.

So if you've got a friend that you you know, it's sort of on you if they join Caucus Room and misbehave. But the point is like we were trying to set up a system where you know, we are here to caucus as conservatives to have some you know, conversations, you know, who's the city council candidate we like in our neighborhood, who's the UM you know, what sort of slate of school board candidates do we want to support, and then all the way up to the national level

talking about national conservative issues as well. But we don't feel like people will be able to comfortably have those conversations unless we kind of clear the room of um, you know, the troublemakers first. So so that's our that's our goal. But UM. You know that said, you can now join and at least look around a little bit without a screening process, So we have a limited access before we screen you if you'd like to see what

it is. There's so there's one level of people can to sort of see what's going on if they go to Caucus room dot com and then to get more involved than to be posting and things. That's where this verification comes in, UM, and just give us a sense of what are some of your plans downline as this grows and expands. Yeah, you know, we UM I'll put it this way. Our verification system is so closely mirrored

to to the way we're based here in Colorados. We launched in Colorado, and it's so close to Colorado's caucus system. You know, when you go to the caucuses, you actually have to show your ID and you have to show that you're a registered Republican in our in this case,

in order to participate in your Republican caucus. And it's great because then you meet your local neighbors who are Republicans, and you talk about the local issues, and you nominate, and you know, you work your way up the chain to nominate people at the various assemblies for state legislator, county commissioner, and then you know, all the way up to governor and president. And so that's how you know, a lot of the caucus states worked. And I found

a great value in that. I'm a former state legislator. I didn't have I was very young when I ran. I didn't have a Christmas card list. But the caucus system gives you sort of an instant support network of neighbors who are you know, share your values and want to help people like you get elected. So going through the caucus process is great for you know, a young local candidate just getting started, and we felt like we should see that online. So it's open to not just Republicans.

As long as you're you just share conservative values, you can join. But that was the inspiration for the site. It wasn't We didn't want to be like some other social network. We wanted to be an organizing tool for conservatives, both locally and nationally. So that's where we're that's where we're headed. We're in almost every county in the US, most major cities. We've got hundreds or if not thousands

of members already. UM and with your help and uh, you know, and and a bunch of other folks, we're growing really really fast. And so we're um, you know, we're just getting started. That's great. And so here in New York I can find other people who are like minded through caucusroom dot com. Right, that's right, yep, yep. You'll find them in your county. You can find them

in your state. Uh, you can. You can start a group if I was a you know, if I'm a if I'm thinking about running for office, um, especially like state legislative level. You know, we've had some people already, you know, announcing for Congress, et cetera. And they're they're setting up caucus room groups so that they can find a local support network of verified conservatives to kind of

help them get started. Fantastic one. All right, every everyone should definitely go check out the Buck Sexton group at caucus room dot com. Matt and Leedler, CEO of caucusom dot com. Matt, thank you so much, man. We really appreciate it. Hey, thanks for having me. Thanks Buck. Yeah, there has been a change, and I think a lot of Americans, especially hard working, poor middle class Americans circinis,

start behaving differently. You're going to start voting with their feet, going to start looking with a little bit more of a suspect I toward what's happening in Washington, DC and within the Democratic Party, because look, these policies are not sustainable. The spending levels are out of control, and these are all going to lead to economic catastrophe. The Senator want to double back and on topic we were discussing here in New York. If you yeah, the spending levels are

not sustainable. I know that we didn't talk about this, and I used to bring it up occasionally and I would say, you remember if you've listened to the show for years now, which some of you have been listening to the show almost ten years. But I would say, hey, the situation here of spending, even though the Trump administration is not good, folks are spending too much money. I know, no one wants to hear it, you know, Maga, You know, no one wants to hear anything other than how awesome

everything is. But we're spending too much money. And it was true. Now we're spending way too much money. I mean, this is crazy, and it's like we're putting our currency through a stress test to see if we could just break the whole thing. We're trying to see if we can find a way to create inflation. Almost that's what it feels like. And eventually this is going to be a big problem. And I don't mean in ten years,

I mean in this first Biden term. And inflation is so damaging because what ends up happening is that you have people with assets, who own assets, they can raise those prices or those assets will be inflated, particularly in the stock market, which has already been happening at some level. But you know, if you are somebody that owns property and you rent it out, well you'll you'll raise prices in order to keep up with inflation. But if you're

somebody who relies on wages, it's more difficult. And if you're somebody who has savings, your savings will purchase less. Your savings are worthless. You are eating away at people's savings with this process. Uh. You know, every every action has an equal in opposite reaction, and the most basic truths of of economics and of objective reality are being

forgotten in this whole process. And I understand it's it's not politically appealing to people to hear that there's not some magic money tree that's going to make everything so much better. I understand that. But at the end of the day, we have to be honest about this, and that means confronting the fact that while nobody wants to be the one who's telling everybody how bad things are right now, well maybe a little bit because Biden's the president.

I get that, but you know, I don't want to be a downer, folks, But this is going to get out of control. And the problem with inflation is that when you figure out that it's happening it's often too late to do very much about it. I mean, well you can do things about it, but you've already got a problem. That's a better way of putting it. And here's you know, Claire McCaskill is saying that the GOP is the party of grievance and negativity, darkness and doom. Now,

I I was just talking about some negativity. But you know, sometimes negativity is something you need to talk about. But I think the Democrats are really the ones who well, they're the ones that that view America negatively. I just I just view this as a function of math. Anyway, here's Claire McCaskill Place sixteen. Yeah, it's kind of weird. I mean, what is the Republican Party for right now?

I thought it was really interesting yesterday that that Joe Biden led so strongly with the message bring us your ideas. I mean, the Republican Party has become the party of grievance, negativity, darkness and doom. This is so far from the profile of Ronald Reagan. It would give you whiplash to look at the two different models. They just are against everything. No, we're just against what Democrats are doing because they're doing

dumb things that are hurtful to the country. Overall, it might help some people, but overall they're bad and that's how we feel. And it's just so funny, isn't it. We're the party of negativity. For four years, Democrats while Trump was president, spent spent all their time trying to explain to us how Trump was basically a fascist and how they were ruining They were we were ruining the country by having somebody who was a Hitler like figure

almost as president. But oh and there was a Russian plot to steal the election and he wasn't even really the president, and the country is so racist and there's white supremacy everywhere, and all these things that they say, and then now they turn around when they're in charge, it's like, why are you guys, so you know, why

are you so negative about the country? Oh? Okay? The entire Democrat agenda for four years under Trump wasn't to convince everybody that the country was basically spiraling into the seventh circle of hell im And I think we can all see exactly what was happening, and I remember it. But I do have to say that on the question of or on the issue of massive government spending and

trillions and trillions of dollars. We have to look at this and understand that, yeah, they're spending too much money, and this is going to have really negative ramifications for people. This is going to affect you, it's going to affect me. And by the time it's clear that it's a problem, you know what they're gonna do. They're not gonna say, wow, you guys were right. They're gonna say it was Trump's fault, It's the Republican's fault, it's the rich not paying enough

taxes fault. It's something like that. They'll have some excuse even though we can all see this train of inflation is coming down, coming down the tracks, and it's it's gonna get ugly. Friends, rock and roll, fellow Patriots, It's time for roll com for Aducer Mark. What was it like going to opening day of the New York Baseball Mets? How was it incredible? It was so nice to be back at City Field after a very long time, beautiful day.

It was in the mid sixties, high early low seventies, and it was sunny, got to eat some hot dogs, have some beers, watch a baseball game. It felt like normalcy again. Yeah, it was a little weird. It wasn't a full park, but it was as close to normal as I personally have gotten in a long time. So it felt good. Very nice buddy who ended up winning the game? The Mets one. What was the score? It was a three to two They walked off, walked off

hit by pitch? What does that mean? That means the batter got hit by the pitch and the basses were loaded, so he gets to go to first base. So that means the runner from third scored. Is that I mean, it's gonna ask. Is that a little anti clubactic? It's like completely It was actually a very weird situation. Nobody in the ballpark knew that it hit him because the umpires signaled shrike three. So me and a lot of fans started booing because the guy at the plate had

grounded into a double play with the bases loaded. He'd been bad all game, so we started booing. Then all of a sudden, the umpires signaled that it hit him and the Mets won the game. So it was very weird. It was the strangest ending to a game I've ever been to, that's for sure. But the Mets won. That's all the matters. There we go, What was your what was your ballpark food of choice? I didn't go with anything crazy. A lot of stuff wasn't open because of

the it wasn't full capacity. So I just went with the staples and with the hot dog when with some beers. You know, nothing crazy. See, I will say when I used to be able to eat the gluten, the hot dog with the bun is was. There was something pretty nice about it. I was always though. When I was a kid, I was a ketchup guy. Then I got older, I became a mustard guy. Oh no, I definitely go ketch up. I don't like mustard. M Yeah, you like all that sugar, don't you. I mean, I'm not worried

about the sugar on a little bit of ketchup. I'm telling you, I'm sure, of course there is, but you know it's delicious. It's not like I'm looking. I'm I'm a weirdo though. I I go, and I have no shame about this. I just I think that mayonnaise with French fries is amazing. And I know that people I know like a total savage mayonnaise and French fries I love it. I love it. The smell of mayonnaise makes me want to vomit. Yeah, wow, really hate man is

a great condom. So many, so many of my red blooded American team buck listening across the America right hours saying producer Mark Mayo is them. I've said this before. If you like Mayo, great, I just don't like it. You know, Aoli is just Mayo with with oil in it, you know, a little extra oil and flavor. Fancy aolis? All right, let's get to it. Facebook dot com, slash

buck sexty. When I said, it's a Facebook message, somebody send me, by the way, they they send me a message on Instagram and said, Buck, how do I I want to text a couple of friends your show, which, by the way, that's a huge, huge favor and we thank you so much for anybody who could do that. But how They said how because it wasn't that easy to do In the iHeart app, I'll just tell you you can go to buck Sexton dot com slash podcast

and just cut and paste that UURL. Just just do a copy paste rather that UURL send somebody that link buck Sexton dot com slash podcast and it goes right there and you press them, just click the play button and you're listening to the Buck Sexton Show. So please, that's a that's a really easy way to do it. If somebody's not that familiar with the iHeart Radio app or with Apple Podcast pretty smart. Can you can you text people Apple from the Apple podcast story? Can you

can you text links? Can we do that? Yeah? Can you can go and search for the Buck Sexton Show, you believe. You click on the show page and there should be like the three little dots that you used to share things. You can either share an episode or the full show and it will give you a link. Really, I think you can do that on the IHRBH more thing. Um. You know, Mark, the snow Princess came back from from

Buffalo yesterday and I got to see her. It was so exciting, so happy because I had COVID for two weeks, couldn't see her then. Then she had to go home to Buffalo where she's from, so I didn't see her then, and so I hadn't seen her in like three weeks, and so we saw last night. We had a great, great you know, catchup time or union all that, but we were just it was kind of late. We want to watch some kind of a movie, some kind of a show. We put on the number one the number

one thing on Netflix. Just you're like, all right, we'll just give this a shot. I knew nothing about it. We got about thirty minutes into it maybe, And I'm pretty sure it's about a guy who's having a relationship with a woman and the daughter of the woman is figuring out that the boyfriend is a human lamb prey, which is like a fish that grabs onto another fish and sucks its insides out. Pretty sure that's what this movie's turning into. And it just makes me want to

because we watched this one. We had another Netflix movie recently about like the crazy babysitter, who's like sexy but crazy kind of a thing. You know, this is who is writing this crap? Mark? Like, who comes up? They have? They have such deep pockets at Netflix and Amazon and Hulu. Can't they just make good shows? Why do they make such trash shows? Yeah? But I don't have a clue why Netflix makes this trash but people are obviously watching it. I mean, why else would they be making it and

spending the money if people aren't watching it. I think they're very hit hit or miss. But that's the point. People like some stuff, some people don't like other stuff. I guess it just reminds me a little bit of how I remember I grew up in my family. We were I was fortunate, I guess in the sense and that we had my dad likes My dad likes to watch stev He's a big reader, but he also likes to watch TV. And and we had like all the

different HBO channels. And if you're watching all the different HBO channels, like like I was, occasionally something would come on late at night and in the movie would be it would be so bad. I mean, it would honestly be such trash that the thought process even as like a teenage as teenager watching this stuff, I think, who thought this was a good idea? I mean who who? Because they spent money they made this movie, you know

who thought that making? And the one that always comes to mind that I brought up before the show was LEPrecon five. Remember producer Mark, do you even know the leprac am the Leprica? Do you have the LEPrecon movies? You know what I'm talking about? No? And based on how you're describing them. I don't want to. I'm the Leprica coming lady. You know, he I'll eat your face if you'll try to take me put gold. You know, there was this little guy. He was actually it was

a it was a little person. He actually was a little person um named Warwick Davis, who was an actor who played the lead character in the movie Willow, which was a Disney movie that it's kind of a Dungeons and Dragons fantasy genre movie. And so he's a little person. But then he went on to make a whole bunch of these movies called the LEPrecon. And you know, I always think of Leprecons as the guy from the cereal box,

the frosted lucky chart arms that are magically delicious. You know, do you remember that I'm going of course, yeah, he's a nice little LEPrecon. You know, he wants to hand you little marshmallows that are different charms, and the whole thing and lucky charms. I used to eat it. I thought they pretty it's pretty yummy. It would turn the cereal milk weird colors. Anyway, the lucky jibs and and I see that's a the Warwick Davis. LEPrecon character is

a mean LEPrecon who like like kills people. He's very bad LEPrecon. They made LEPrecon in Space, LEPrecon in the Hood. True story. Uh, they made so many of these movies, and he just watch and he like bites people and rips their faces off and all this stuff, and it's pretty violent sometimes. And I just remember thinking to myself, like, who is the screenwriter for this? Who makes these trash movies?

But then I guess I'm sitting here talking about them, but I kind of watch some of them, So I guess some people will watch stuff even but it's garbage. But Netflix is this is all my way of saying, Netflix producer Mark is making, is making some pretty trash stuff these days. They're either going to either win Oscars or some sort of award or they make tresh. It's there's no in between. There's not a lot in between.

They don't do a lot of gentleman's b. Plus you know, it's either an A or A or a D. There's not a lot of mid mid range stuff. And the shows over the So anyway, I guess the sostance we might finish this. I don't even know if this is finishable, Like we got through the the you know, sexy college student nanny who you know, I can't even explain it. That was number one on nept We got through that,

which was absurd. I mean, it's so bad. But anyway, I'm looking for something good to watch this week, and if any of you have recommendations for me, I'll never forget. It was this audience that told me about the masterpiece theater show Poll Dark, which is available on Amazon, which is a great show. What you can watch you with the whole family. It's a great show, really well done. You know. I I recommended recently for one of my

family members Outlander, which have you watched that? One? Producer more Yeah, a long time ago. Yeah, I enjoyed Outlander. But I will say it's really leave violent, and there's a lot of sexy, sexy, sexy, naughty time stuff going on in that show and special fun fun time exactly. That's that that thing, and and it's uh, you know, it's a little too much, a little too much of that. Uh So I I couldn't I have it able to

finish shoutlet. So I'm looking I'm looking for a new show anyway, that's that's I've told you about ted Lasso about one hundred times and you still haven't watched it. Yeah, I think i'll do it. Where is is it on? Is it on Apple TV? Oh? See, that's why I don't have Apple TV. Just download the app and get a free trial. Okay, maybe I'll do that. Then is Have you seen the Superstore show? Yes? Fantastic? Someone else said that, so I might check that. Where is that Hulu?

That's on Hulu? Yeah, okay, I'm gonna give that. I'm gonna give that a shot. Have you seen Brooklyn nine nine? That's also Snow Snow Princess. We're gonna check out Superstore? Okay, she she's hearing me. Uh and uh Brooklyn nine nine. Yes, that's the Andy Sandberg. It's a cop comedy. Is that one? Good? Hilarious? Love it? Okay? All right, So I got a couple to add into the mix here, let's get to your thoughts team. We got John up here. Hey, but a quick question. Did the number of deaths in the US

go up last year? Not taking into account how I wonder if the rate was redistributed to COVID, if there was a significant rise, I'm also curious if it changes if we adjust for the rise in suicide and murder. I know COVID is real. I want the actual impact things. John, I have not independently dove into, dived into dove into these numbers. I have not done that yet. I will tell you that my understanding is that there is excess mortality, substantial excess mortality in the era in the COVID year,

So a lot of people did die from COVID. Who you know when you look at so expected mortality is in any given year in the US, how many people die, and excess mortality is a clear separation from I guess a standard deviation at least above that and or a deviation from it. We could just put it that way, and there were a few hundred there were there were

hundreds of thousands of additional deaths from COVID. Vast majority of those deaths are people over seventy So you start to get into well, there are more people dying that from COVID. But there's also a high percentage if you're looking at just the excess mortality questions the function of numbers, there's a high percentage of people who died who were near near life expectancy in the US anyway. But yes, the answer question John, is that a lot of a

lot of people did die. Hundreds of thousands of people did die from COVID based on everything that I've seen, Burke rights, you sound like a an elitist snob when you denigrate states with less population. Density isn't necessarily a good thing most people. We don't want to live right on top of one another. And frankly, leadership is leadership. Population size has nothing to do with it. If you can lead, it doesn't matter if you're governing Florida or Montana.

Christy Noome is disqualified not because she's in a small state, but because she caved to wokeness over the issue of biological sex. Okay, Burke, well, let's actually so, I appreciate you writing and taking the time, let's actually address what you're saying here. I didn't say that density was good or bad, so I don't know why you're thinking that

that's what I was saying. I was pointing out that comparing the leadership shown by Ron de Santis in Florida with a population of twenty one million and a lot of density during COVID and comparing Christy Noome in South Dakota, with a population of about two million and a population

density similar to the South Pacific. As I've said, islands in the South Pacific is not an apt comparison because COVID density translates directly to more cases and higher mortality, and so it's not as impressive as a leader to be in charge of a state that is much smaller with much lesser density, because those things factor so much. This is like saying, why aren't we New Zealand, Burke, Why does New Zealand have such a better COVID response

than we do? It would be intellectually dishonest to suggest that you could compare those two things. New Zealand has a much smaller population and much less density than the United States does overall. So I mean, you can call me whatever you want to call me, but listen to what I'm saying. Don't get angry based on what you're interpreting or your interpretation rather of what I'm saying. I have no I'm trying to move to a less dense place myself. I don't know what. I don't know why

you think I like density? Density stinks? Too many people is too expensive and obviously in a pandemic and density is a real challenge. So Burke always free to write into criticize. But on this one, my friend, I think, listen more closely to what I'm saying. Let's come back in a second with more roll call. Coming back here with rollcall. Remember Facebook dot com, slashbuck sexon, or you can email us Team Bucket. iHeartMedia dot com. Richard Buck,

I'm very glad you survived the rona. We should all take inspiration from our Bostonian patriot ancestors and have a coke party. I mean assume he means the soda producer Mark. We should record dumping out coke products and setting them to coke and coke CEO. I'm tired of these lib crazies, and these companies need to feel some kind of pain. Major League baseball is just as bad, but I don't have any baseball stuff to burn. Let's have a coke party while keep it our shield hide. Not like a

like a hundred Biden coke party. He means like the caffeinated sugary beverage. So just to be clear, but yeah, Richard, thanks for writing in, and thank you for being glad that I survived the RONA. I certainly am too, Dave. Hey, Buck, listen to the podcast late night as usual. Our VP literally just said, strengthening up our economy over water policy. Are you kidding me? I'm looking forward to you in producer marks strengthening up your podcast to make sure water

is managed properly, no pressure. What the hell are these people talking about? David? That is a great question. What the hell are the Democrats talking about when it comes to things like infrastructure, and as we've said, anything they want to make infrastructures infrastructure, Well, that's not how that's not how words work. That doesn't make any sense. But yes, we see it for what it is, and we will continue to focus in on what is true and what

is real. Dam I want you all have a great weekend. Thanks as always for being here with me. Please do tell one person texts them a link to bucksexon dot com slash podcasts say hey, listen to this guy. It's the best conservative podcast out there. Talk to you all Monday, Shields High