How The Left's Parasitic Ideas Ruin Minds - podcast episode cover

How The Left's Parasitic Ideas Ruin Minds

Mar 12, 20211 hr 48 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Season 5, Episode 50.


Joe Biden gives his first primetime address and comes off looking like a lunatic, the southern border is getting more and more open each day and the left's next authoritarian push is gun control and climate change. Plus Gad Saad and Pedro Gonzalez join the show.


Please subscribe to the podcast! And get more exclusive content from Buck at BuckSexton.com.


Subscribe to Buck on YouTube: https://bit.ly/2UNT1Or


Find Buck on:

Twitter @BuckSexton  

Facebook @BuckSexton 

Instagram @BuckSexton 

Email the show: TeamBuck@IHeartMedia.com

Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript

Speaker 1

This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Follow fuck on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. I've been telling you for a while that they weren't going to release us from their grip. They weren't going to let us get out from underneath their thumb.

The authoritarian democrats, so brainwashed, so in love with the sound of their own voices and the ability to tell you what to do, that it wasn't just going to be a function of the case load for COVID going down, that we couldn't just say, hold on a second, look at mask mandate states and unmasked mandate states or states that didn't require it, and see the data and come to the obvious conclusion about what worked and what didn't work, come to the very clear consensus that so many of

these so called interventions and mitigation measures barely worked, if at all, and created enormous costs. That they would look at the data on schools, they would look at what happened to small businesses, and realize that this was a mania, a lunacy that they were all on board with because it meant they could be Trump. But now we have to actually suffer through the consequences as a country. Now that Daylight is emerging in America from this pandemic. We

see the full scale and scope of the damage. They're not going to relent, But the big social media companies aren't going to relent either, and they are constantly tracking you. This is a really big problem. You can't trust these companies anymore. I don't trust them. I don't want them tracking me. I don't want them being able to know everywhere that I've gone because they keep that information, they run it through algorithms, and it could be used against

you down the line. Who knows. There's a lot going on right now in the world of tech that should put you on edge, and so you need to use tech to your advantage where possible, to protect your privacy, to protect your online viewing habits. That's why I've got Express VPN. This is the most trusted, the best name in a virtual private network you can possibly get. Express VPN make sure that when you search for something online, when you watch or click a link, it isn't getting

tracked the same way by big tech companies. When I use Express VPN, companies can't actually see my IP address at all. My identity is anonymized by a secure VPN server. My data is also encrypted for maximum protection. Don't let these companies get rich off of violating your privacy and also perhaps using what you do against you down the line. You know you have the wrong thoughts about fauci. If you're like me, you're already targeted by Facebook, You're already

targeted by Google. Make it harder for them. Use technology to your advantage. That's Express vpn. This is a must. You have to have Express VPN downloaded to all of your devices. This is the company I trust. Stop handing over your data to big tech companies in the government. Defend your rights, defend your privacy with the VPN that I trust. For online protection, visit Express vpn dot com slash buck. That's Express vpn dot com slash buck. To get three extra months free, go to Express vpn dot

com slash buck. Right now, Biden finally emerges to give a speech addresses the nation, and my Lord, was it depressing. I mean, this was the speech in tone, in tenor that you could have expected perhaps twelve months ago from a president. But even then I think it would have been tone deaf. This is exactly what the Democrats have become. Listen to us or else, don't look at the data, don't look at your own experience of what's happened in this country. Do what we tell you, or terrible things

will happen to you. For a lot of us will look at this and say, hold on a second. We have over five hundred and twenty five thousand dead in America right now from COVID nineteen over the last twelve months. Who thinks that this was well handled? Who thinks that our mitigation measures as Fouchi says, we're a success? Oh, because we're the country that doesn't listen well. As you know, on a per capita basis, the UK, which had more extreme restrictions, had a higher death count than we did.

So it's not just America, it's not just Trump supporters. They can live in this fantasy land as much as they want. They failed, The lockdowners failed. We have the data, we have the information. There is no honest, good faith argument anymore about their success. The only question is how catastrophic, how painful was their wrongness for all of us. I mean, I honestly wanted to scream profanity at the TV when

I'm watching Joe Biden. Tell me and tell everybody else across the country that if you if you do everything I say, you know, maybe you could actually have a barbecue with your family members next him. People are barbecuing right now, Joe. All across the country. People are indoor dining, People are living their lives as much as they possibly can. Despite the lunatic libs running around saying triple mask, where's

your triple mask? Why don't you take it seriously? They're all so frightened because of the panic porn that has been out there. They say things like we denied, like the Trump administration denied the virus. Virus deniers. That's a stupid slander that only morons could say out loud. Trump shut down international travel twelve months ago, block flights from China, but then also block flights from all over the world. We shut down travel, We had lockdowns. Trump extended the

lockdown request. I mean, I know it was in the hands of the States, but he said, this is what we should do. There's no virus denial. The only difference here is people who think that if you get constantly hectored, if you're being nagged incessantly by a bunch of powermad hall monitors from the CDC and from the corporate media about washing your hands and social distancing. If only you get nagged enough, we're gonna save lives. Didn't work. Didn't work.

They can keep pretending like they're great heroes and all the stuff. But the virus ripped through the country. We have tens of millions of confirmed infections, more infections that we can actually count right now, we don't even know. They say forty percent of cases are asymptomatic. Let me ask you this, do you think that forty percent of asymptomatic cases have actually been caught? So? Do you think we've even gotten to close to half of the number

of asymptomatic cases that are of course not? Whatever happened to psurology testing we used to do that? Why did we stop? Ask yourself these questions. All the people that come at me that are so angry, it's really because they're both afraid and they're vain. They think they're smarter than they are. They think they've really thought this through. I remember when we were being told that test and trace was necessary to reopen at all in New York.

It was actually considered a requirement. We can't open, We can't open restaurants, we can't open up businesses until we get to a certain test and trace level. Well, that was idiocy because we were never going to actually get to that level of test and trace because you can't actually chase down every contact and every positive case at any given time in any populations down of the country. It doesn't work. We've never been able to do it.

But they thought that that was necessary. That was last June. I'm not talking about one hundred years ago. That was in twenty twenty. Whatever happened in sourology testing in New York City. Surology testing showed last June, twenty percent of the city had already been infected. Oh, we were masking all right, masking everywhere. We had shut down businesses, we had all kinds of procedures in place. Twenty percent of the city got infected with this virus. How many do

you think have been infected by now? Just take that as an example. We had the most cases, the most deaths, the worst outbreak of the virus yet over this winter. So you have to assume another twenty to thirty percent of people were infected in New York over the wintertime.

I mean, that's just common sense, and so when we're getting to forty fifty percent of people that have already been that have already had the virus, and we've now added into that large numbers who have been vaccinated, So we're getting pretty close to the end of this thing for real. Does it sound like that though? When you hear Joe Budden, why are they doing prology testing? Because people would realize this notion that we have to get

the whole country vaccinated is crazy. We've had tens of millions of people that have immunity to the virus from having had it already. Are they supposed to get vaccinated too? We're supposed to pretend that what we know about over a hundred years of medicine and vaccination that it doesn't count anymore. Notice you don't even see why don't they

do any psyology testing? Why is it never publicized? Why haven't you seen a story on it where they draw blood and they look to see what the antibody levels. Aren't a population they check for previous infection? Ask yourself these questions. They don't have good answers. They just get mad at you. They say, listen to the science, obey fouch, you listen to the science. That's all you'll ever hear from them. And what Joe Biden was saying last night, I mean it honestly, it enrages me. It enrages me.

I get angry about this now because these people are tyrants. They're not living in reality. They're pretending that they're also rooted in the data, they're also smart. It's laughable now, except it's deadly serious. But it's laughable that they still cling to the belief that they knew what to do all along, that they had the answers that Joe Biden and his team. You know, he walks out there, he struts out to the podium. He's wearing his mask for the walk up of the podium, and then he takes

it off. Yeah, that's really that's great, really keeping people in the empty hallway safe until you walk up to the podium. And now you're so, what exactly was the mask wearing? It was all for show. It's virtue signaling, it's vanity from people like Biden. The guy's already vaccinated, you're still wearing masks after vaccination. I want you to

remember something. It would have been considered lunacy a year ago to suggest that vaccinated people with a ninety five percent protection rate vaccinated people depending on I know, if it's the modern or the fiser vaccines would still have to go through all these restrictions. Afterwards, people would have said, well, that's crazy, that's where we are. Don't let them gaslight you. Don't let them pretend that what you know to be true is not true. I don't let them get away

with stuff like this. I mean, this was where it really reached a peak of mania. Joe Biden talking about what's in your future if you do every thing that you're told play one. I need you. I need every American to do their part. And that's not hyperboleate, I need you. I need you to get vaccinated when it's your turn and when you can find an opportunity, and to help your family, your friends, your neighbors get vaccinated

as well. Because here's the point. If we do all this, if we do our part, if we do this together, by July the fourth, there's a good chance you, your families and friends will be able to get together in your backyard or in your neighborhood and have a cookout and a barbecue and celebrate Independence Day. That doesn't mean large events with lots of people together. But it does mean small groups will be able to get together after

this long, hard year. That will make this independence day something truly special where we not only mark our independence as a nation, when we begin to mark our independence from this virus. But to get there, we can't let our guard down. This fight is far from order from over. As I told the woman in Pennsvania, I'll tell you the truth. On July fourth, with your loved ones is a goal. But a goals, a lot can happen. I've

been seeing my loved ones for twelve months now. We've taken certain prescription, you know, taking certain precautions at different times, especially in the earlier days when we didn't know more about the virus. I'm sure that ninety percent, nine nine percent maybe of those of you listening right now across the country have also not not seeing your loved ones. It's like Fauci and Biden don't actually live in America.

They just go from a hermetically sealed box to the green room, or you know, to the satellite hit they do on CNN or MSNBC, and then they go back to the hermetically sealed box. They've got to be kidding me. Do you really think anyone's going to be listening to them as the case load has already dropped, not because of masks, not because we've done anything, all right, that's just ridiculous now to hold this position. Oh, we fought so well against the virus. No, the winder time is ending.

The flu season, which is now the COVID season has dissipated, because that's what happened last year too. We've all seen this, all right, We've all seen the curves go up and come down. It hasn't changed. We know what's going on here. Listen to me, and maybe you can be with your loved ones. By July. I just want to tell Joe Biden. I mean, he we're at a point now we just have to say Biden really just needs to go fauci himself. And it's not like you have a choice in the matter.

That's clear from the Biden's speech last night. It's not like you're allowed to say, you know what, I just want to live my life. No. They want to continue to meddle and control and poke and prod and be in charge. I don't want to give that up. I much prefer this power. They've got other things they have to use this for. They're not done with you. You don't have a say in this America. Joe Biden and the scientists think about this. They used the term the

scientists on ironically. I mean they're being serious, as if there's some group called the scientists that determine what policy is and there's no debate, there's no judgment calling it whatsoever. Meanwhile, doctor Fauci now has to admit, yeah, we don't actually have the science on this, but we'll make in judgment calls. But Biden goes up and gives a speech about the scientists.

All say, really, what about the thousands of scientists that signed the Great Barrington Declaration that said that we should just do focused protection, that all of this is essentially kabuki theater. That's right, virus kabuki theater. Thousands of scientists they sign their name to it, from places like you know, Harvard Medical School and Cambridge University and places that actually usually get a lot of credibility on the left. Ignored, ignored, Wow,

people in charge really think that they must be so smart? Huh? Or maybe there's something else going on here, Maybe there's a deep insecurity at the fact that they pushed us into this madness and we were all now suffering the consequences that they didn't actually save us, they didn't protect us,

and they made things worse. I would argue that the lockdowners and the Fauciites made everything worse and by taking this out of the hands of individuals to take their own precautions and making the using the force of government, because that is what they did, use the force of government for universal quarantine measures, which were understood in the medical community to be unthinkable and counterproductive for about a

hundred years until twenty twenty. To use the force of government to make us all for a mass quarantine of the healthy for months on end, was known to be insane until what feels like about five minutes ago. And if you have any problem with that, you're the bad person. You're the wrong person. And they don't care that you can now point to the data, you can point to

mask mandates. They don't even deal with the facts. The CDC says, within the margin of error, mask mandates bring down case and within the margin of error, was that really what we were led to believe they had The CDC directors say masks were more effective than the vaccine. That is, you know, he said it. That is a you know, roughly speaking, a quote, but that's what he said. You know, I would even go so far as to say that this mask is more guaranteed to protect me

that a vaccine. That was I think exactly what he said. That was. Director Redfield of the CDC think guys are moron. These people are idiots. You think a mask is you nine? Do you think if we were all wearing masks and that create a ninety five percent protection whenever you're wearing the mask. In fact, there's a very strong case to be made. And they don't want to hear this, but it's true that people were actually more willing to be around other people and expose themselves to the virus because

they figured, well, I'm wearing a mask, I'm taking precautions. Okay, you're taking precautions until you pull the mask down for a moment, you know, because it's a little long comfortable, you want to scratch something, and you know there's virus flowing in the air, goes into your nostrils, goes into your mouth. Now you're infected. You put your mask bask back up. Though, and oh I'm really protected. I'm really protecting myself. I mean, go look at the numbers of

frontline healthcare workers. I know they're exposed to more the virus, but you know that it's not ninety five percent effective to be wearing a cloth mask, even in a clinical setting, because hundreds of thousands of doctors and nurses got infected. They're wearing ppe. You just all you have to do is think this through, and all these arguments they make just falls apart. Now they pretend, well, it's worth it

for one percent. Really, the dehumanizing, uncomfortable effect of mass mask policy and what that does to our psychology as a nation and to us as people, is worth it, even though I'm telling you that there Fauci himself said that there were dangers from mask in the early days.

There were people the head of infectious disease at the government level, and Weedon was saying, people are going to think that they're safer because they wear a mask, and they're actually going to expose themselves more So we shouldn't convince people there was all this has all been forgotten. Now listen to them or else. Biden says, here he is on you better be vigilant, which means do whatever I say or else play too and getting back to normal.

It depends on national unity. And national unity isn't just how politics and politicians vote in Washington, what the loudest voice is saying cable or online. Unity is what we do together as fellow Americans, because if we don't stay vigilant, and the conditions change and we may have to reinstate restrictions to get back on track, and please, we don't want to do that again. We've made so much progress.

This is not the time to let up. Just as we were emerging from a dark winner into a hopeful spring in summer, is not the time to not stick with the rules. The rules. The rules. The rules are arbitrary, The rules didn't work. The rules they make them up as they please. These are policies. This is not science. These are judgment calls. This is not a mathematical formula. You we either as a kind. I know, for a lot of you're in places where you feel like, oh,

it's you know, it's pretty normal around me. Yeah, but you know, air travel and train travel, and on federal grounds, federal buildings and a lot of private businesses, national chains. They're all just going to cling and cling and cling to those little little dirty masks we've all been forced to wear that we're sneezing in and coughing in. It's gross. Gott to wear it all the time. Yeah, just just ask somebody when when the next time someone gives you

a hard time. But I'd say, show me the show me the data on outdoor transmission of coronavirus in open air. Show me that data, show me, show me where those cases are. They'll say, I believe the science or I believe it's science. They actually don't. This has become a religious belief for people that don't like to read. But nonetheless, whatever Fauci says goes will reinstate restrictions. Oh now, you could say the federal government doesn't do this, the states do.

It's the Democrat party, folks. What Biden says, every blue state is going to do. And even some of you Red states, you know, Governor Abbott in Texas really weak on this stuff. He's got a little better recently, but not much. Some of those Red states highly disappointing. So it's not like you haven't suffered through the two If you live in a city if you live in a densely pompulated part of the country, you've basically been put through this unless you well, even in Florida, that's not

even true. Even in Florida. Miami's got a lot of mask mandates. You know. I had somebody that I was talking to from ten feet away in an outdoor kiosk tell me to put on a mask to talk to them from ten feet away outside because it was Miami law. And I feel badly for these people because what they're saying is moronic. But it's not always their fault. We've got work to do to ensure that everyone has confidence

in the safety and effectives of all three vaccines. So our message to you is this, Listen to doctor Fauci, one most distinguished and trusted voices in the world. He's assured us the vaccines are safe. Vander want rigorous scientific review. I know they're safe. Vice President Harris and I know they're safe. That's why we got the vaccine publicly in front of cameras so for the world to see, so you can see us do it. The first lady and

the second gentleman also got vaccinated. Talk to your family, friends, your neighbors, the people you know best who have gotten the vaccine. We need everyone to get vaccinated. We need everyone to get vaccinated. Does that mean children? They think the kids who are at effectively zero risk from this disease need to get vaccinated. Really, is that going to

be a condition of opening schools? And I'm sorry, I am not willing to forget the fact that Kamala and Joe were willing to spend real time during the campaign casting doubt on the safety of the vaccine because it was useful for attacking Trump. Does the vaccine work? Well, you know, you can't really trust Trump and it's it's his FDA that's approving it. So that created a lot

of mistrust. Now they're they're acting like their heroes for cleaning up a mass that in part they made by casting real aspersions on the safety of the vaccine in the first place. That came from Kamala, that came from Joe Biden. Because that's how ruthless these Democrat politicians are. That's how ruthless they are. Whatever they had to say, And don't ever forget that so much of the media around this was just a function of whatever's necessary to

defeat Donald Trump. Whatever they had to say about the vaccine, about the virus, about everything around it, lockdowns. As long as it was useful in their quest to beat Donald Trump. They were on board. They were willing to do it. And it's it's something that I will not I will not let go. I will I will not forget that. And I just think it's it's amazing they they hold up Fauci. I mean, he's become this this uh, this symbol really this this emblem of the of great scientific uh,

you know, great scientific knowledge. What exactly has he done? Well? What is the basis for thinking this guy has great judgment or is even a genius in his field. He's a bureaucrat who's been going around releasing, you know, public safety announcements about the flu for the last twenty years and saying wash your hands. Great. Wow, I'm impressed. And now we find out and they just forget this that hand washing probably does very little. I'm not saying it's irrelicant.

Lots of little things can help, but they can't stop this. And it's not as though if they constantly nag us about all this, we're going to be so much better protected. But go back and see what Fauci was saying about HIV in the eighties and the way that he was terrifying people and the misinformation that he was spreading. If this guy actually worked in the private sector and there was any accountability for what he does of what he had done, he would have lost his job. But there

isn't any accountability as a bureaucrat. This guy is not impressive. Biden holds up Fauci, like, how could anybody argue with him? Fauci twelve months ago scoffed at the idea of masks as an effective public health measure, as Fauci calls it, for stopping this virus. What did we learn? What did we learn? After that? They say, oh, well we didn't know about asymptomatic case spread. Okay, well we thought the virus was substantially more lethal when Fauci said that than

it actually ended up being. And it was a question of should you wear a mask as a means of stopping the spread of the virus? Is it good protection for you? Does it stop you from infecting other people? And Fauci was like, nah, doesn't really doesn't really work. It's not really worth it for the public, which is by the way the correct answer. They can pretend now like, oh no, there are all these revelations, and we had a mannequin and the mannequin did a spray through a thing.

They're telling you that the scientific consensus. If you believe the scientific consensus of twelve months ago, that was the scientific consensus on this issue in the West for a hundred years. If you believe that, you're a conspiracy nut and you don't believe science, that's where we are. That is just a straight recitation of objective reality. As you can tell, I am very angry about this. They've destroyed

lives friends. We had the most overdoses from from drugs in this country in our history last year, over eighty thousand, and that's just an indicator. It's like looking at homicides in a city as an indicator of overall crime. There's a lot of drug abuse, spousal abuse, child abuse, self harm, deep psychological depression. You know, people that don't understand mental health issues can't have an appreciation for this. When you're in a mental health crisis, it is as painful and

awful as any physical crisis can be for you. I mean, it's it's a true prison of terror and fear and awfulness, and we did that to people with our policies in this country because of people like Faucci. We blocked them off from human contact, We blocked them off from loved ones, and lots of people died of the virus anyway, weren't allowed to see their loved ones, weren't allowed to have any time with them at the end. Because you know, doctor Fauci is king of the world. People should be

deeply embarrassed about the cowardice. Really, the character and ethical cowardice that they showed by just handing over all their critical faculties to government bureaucrats. That is what this is. There was another way. They can ignore it as much as they want. They could pretend that there wasn't, but there was, in fact another way, and some people in some places were able to take it. I bring you, Governor Ronda Santis, Great State of Florida, Play thirteen. The

thing I hear. I was just talking to a friend of mine who was in DC, and he's like, you know, the different between Florida and DC's like it's dead. It's totally dead. Here. People are living life, they're happier, and things are just want to be here compared to that, and I think that that has an effect far beyond these nursing homes and there, but I think it's most acute in the nursing home. So God bless those nursing home residents. They've been through an awful lot over the

past year. And but yeah, we got to do whatever we can to bring fulfillment to them. So if any of those facilities have any need for the state to help them out on any of that, we're ready willing enable. We were the first with the testing, we were the first with protections against the discharges in the facilities, first with the vaccines, and we want to be first to

help them reach the fulfillment that they need. There's so much about the Florida model that needs a lot more attention, but the media won't do it because they were all parts of the of the stupidity, the fraud, and the panic there. There has always been this this false, this false argument that was made during the pandemic last twelve months by Democrats, by lockdowners, and by some Republicans too.

By no means, So I do I think that this is only Democrats, but it was you know, really if you look at the data, you show democrats are like, I'm gonna ask up forever. A lot of them they're crazy. I mean, it completely lost all sense of proportion and reality, some of them, not all of them. But well, when you look at this, the false argument that was always presented was either obey Faucism, like he is your god

king and there can be no questioning. Or you're out there, you know, spraying virus in people's faces, virus denier, vax denier, no science, flat earth. You know, this was a total caricature the whole time, a complete and utter fraud. This doesn't this, this is not the the opposite of what they're saying. Rather, this is not the opposition to what

they were saying. It's a caricature of the opposition. Was it was possible to do focused protection in nursing homes and to allow businesses to continue to operate, to continue to stay open, to allow people to be out. I mean, at the beginning of this, folks, they were telling people you shouldn't go out into public parks. You remember, they were shutting down playgrounds, the experts, they were arresting people.

You know, they forget about all this now and they don't want to talk about it because it just shows how crappy their judgment is and how full of it they were, because they were saying that was about the science too. I mean, this is like the Democrats with COVID are like a stockbroker who loses you money every time you give him money to invest on your behalf. You know, Hey, I'm your financial advisor. You keep losing money. Oh, don't worry about this, this idea, If I'm an expert,

this idea is going to make you the money. Say hold on a second, your last five ideas, I've lost everything. Why am I going to on on? What are you talking about? I'm the expert. I'm the expert. Listen to me, or else listen to me, or or you're gonna miss out on this big bull market. A lot of Democrats say, all right, here you go. Poppa needs a new pair of shoes. You know, let's roll the dice, let's go

for it. It's absurd. The difference here was whether we allowed for individual localized improvisation, individual choice, and and actually paid attention to what states we're we're functioning well and what states were not under different approaches to the virus. Look at California, Look at Florida. Florida is better on all of them, all of the numbers, all of metrics. California was an extreme lockdown state. Florida allowed for a

continuation of life. There were still restrictions. There was even still indoor masking, which quite honestly, if I were in charge, I mean, I think that a government indoor mask mandate is not supported by the data that actually you look at restrictions and what worked and mask mandates and difference. I mean, we have the data from the CDC on this, but you know, I think in some ways, even even Florida got pushed into more than it really should have

had to do. But at least it was sane. We were shutting down restaurants, We shut down outdoor dining in California. Think about that, you shut down outdoor dining? What they shut down schools? Why? It's not only that children are at entirely acceptable risk from this virus, which means almost no risk. They don't spread it to adults and we don't even really know why, but it's very hard for adults to get this from children. They still have us

shut down. This is a fight that we cannot, we cannot relent, We cannot let them get away with this. I know that they think that they're smart. I know the lockdown or is the left, the Democrats, the corporate media believe so strong they listen to the science. These are people without intellectual curiosity or intellectual honesty, who have all become invested in this for reasons that have nothing to do with actually stopping the virus or saving lots

of lives, as much as they may pretend otherwise. This is about vanity and virtue signaling and the refusal, the refusal to accept the fact that they were unwilling to take a country first approach to dealing with this virus in twenty twenty, because the first priority of Democrats in

twenty twenty was not beating COVID, it was beating Donald Trump. Well, absolutely, and I think at the end of the day, not only her comments, but certainly comments that the administration is made over the last several days, I think you have to say that the crisis that we currently see is the Biden Plan is what they had in mind to all along. Whether they thought that they would get the numbers as quickly as they have is up for a question,

but I think this is their plan. But when she talks about inhumane or a humane policy that there's pent up demand, I vehetmainly disagree with that. I think it's the most humane inhumane message that you can give, and you can sell all of these individuals a lie. And what do I mean by that. We know that the vast majority of these folks do not qualify for asylum, and so they are eventually going to have to be deported or leave the country and go back to their

to their countries of origin. They know that the Biden administration knows that, so they are selling these individuals a lie, encouraging them to put their themselves in the hands of smugglers and traffickers. And so my opinion is that is the most inhumane message and inhumane policy that you can deliver. So Chad Wolfe, who was acting DHS chief for a while, saying here that the border crisis is the Biden plan,

He's right about that. But there's a part of this that I would add, there's a part of this that I think he's honestly not seeing correctly, and that is that the Biden plan is actually for that. Yes, it's to pretend that they're going to get a silet's to tell people, come here, you will get asylum. But they're going to stay. They're not going to get deported. That's the part of this that I think Chad is actually

not seeing. They're not going to get deported. That's the whole point the illegal immigrants who are coming to the country right now, and remember, their first act on US soil, literally on US soil is the illegal crossing, which is a violation of US law. It's a form of trespassing, it's a form of violated US national sovereignty. That's the

first thing that they do. And then they've been coached because the word has been out for a long time about this, to claim defensive asylum or secondary asylum, which is essentially throwing themselves on the mercy of the United States and saying, oh, I know that I shouldn't have come like this, but I'm just desperate. If I go back to my home country, I'm going to be killed by,

you know, the secret police or something. That's why we have this so that if you're fleeing the Soviet Union and you happen to get to you know, the shores of New York or you know, you made your way to the shores of Florida or wherever, and you say, Okay, I know I didn't come through your legal process, but you guys got to give me a chance, because if I actually get sent back to my home country, I'm

gonna be killed. These are Central American migrants who are coming largely it's not all from Central America, and they're saying, I want to be in a I mean, there are real motivations. I want to be in America because it's better wages, better infrastructure, better government, and a better system. That's just called being an immigrant. Right. They want to be immigrants, and I do not. I have no blame

or disdain or you know, I understand that impulse. You know, life is not fair being born in a country that is a dysfunctional mess versus being born in America. That is an unfair disparity that human beings are going through all over the world every day. Right, being born in North Korea is worse than being born in you know, Oklahoma City. Okay, it is worse. We understand this, and unfortunately we can't make this entirely fair because then the country that is better is going to cease to be

a country. If you no longer have control over your borders, you don't really have a country anymore. We all understand how that works. If you don't just think about Okay, go tell a country you know the size of the Netherlands that they need to take in five million, you know, five million immigrants from Syria, Afghanistan, you know, Libya, you know, you name it, countries that have had wars in recent

years and that are having terrible problems. And then tell those people in the Netherlands, well, your country is going to be the same. You're just taking an immigrants. Well yeah, but we're we're actually changing the character of the nation because we're changing the people of this nation dramatically in a transformational way. That does not allow for the kinds of you know, the kinds of processes that bring people

into a feeling of community in the same nation over time. Right, we're supposed to have that, that's supposed to be up a part of all of this, and yet they don't really talk about this. They don't have that as even a discussion point anymore. It's allow for mass migration into your country or else you are being unfair. Allow for mass migration of the country or else you're a bad person. Actually,

you're you're a racist. There are a lot of countries that don't allow people to just show up and become permanent citizens with voting rights and the ability to demand resources from the state. Right, we're supposed to have a process in place, but the Democrats, the Biden administration is intentionally undermining it. We have an open border, friends, that's what this is. Press secretary smites Fox host that disc

diversity in the US military. You might be wondering, why is Buck reading a headline from the comments or from from a blog post at Slate dot com or huff Post or one of these other lunatic left wing you know, garbage heaps. But no, that's actually from Defense dot gov. That's actually on a government news website. We have to get into this right now. We've got our friend Kirschlichter joining us. He spent decades in the United States military, still active in the Army Reserve, and he's a senior

columnist at Townhall dot com. You should always look for his work. Kirk great to see again. So here here's the at the heart of this. The United States military, quote is the greatest the world has ever seen because of its diversity, Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby said during

a news briefing. Kirby addressed this because a Fox Cable host used his show to denigrate the contributions of women in the military and to say that Chinese military is catching up to the US military because it does not allow women to serve the percentage in the United States does. I want to be very clear upfront, Kirby said, diversity of our military is one of our greatest strengths. I've seen it for myself in long months at sea and the combat waged by troops in rock and Afghanistan, and

I've seen it, right, yeada yadya okay um. First of all, why is a an employee of the of the DoD uh press? Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby attacking in a Tucker Carlson like Why spend his time doing that? Is he a pundited? It's because what it's his masters want done. Look, if Donald Trump's people had did it, this would have been the greatest assaulved on free speech in the history of assualtype free speech. It would have been literally violence.

I'd be literally shaking you'd be literally shaked. The whole world would be literally shaking. But remember Buck, there are no rules. There's just power, and unfortunately they have it now and they're using their power to new to the American military. The thing is Tucker called them on it. He told the truth, and they don't want to hear him. Now. To actually discuss this, I have to put on my trial lawyer at because this is a little bit of

sleight of hand. Argument wise, Tucker said, Hey, the American military is an unseerious organization because we're focusing on things like maternity flight suits and transsexual surgery. This is indisputably true. The Chinese are focusing on killing Americans, which is also indisputably true. Now they don't want to talk about that because it's indisputably true. So what they want to do is lie and pretend that Tucker is running down the

contributions of women in the military. That is again a lie, and it's a lighthold by people who have failed to win a war in the last twenty years. I think that's a much bigger issue than anything else. Now, how does social justice, I mean the social justice focus that the Pentagon Brass have you know, what are the ways in which I mean you mentioned like maternity flight suits.

I mean essentially, what is the you know, Tucker was making the arguments, as he admit, he's not somebody who's served the military, but he's obviously in contact with a lot of people who are, and he's a commentator and that's what he's doing. He's sharing his view on what's happening. I also think that you know, this is a fascinating new standard where the United States military now when it comes to Tucker Carlson, if you didn't serve, you're not

allowed to have opinions on it, right. I mean, it's supported by tax dollars, it defends all of us. But what is the case in your mind that that Tucker is making. I mean, what do we need to be aware of what Tucker is accurately pointing out that our military is concerned with social justice nonsense, because that's why it is and not winning wards. Okay, let's let's review the last twenty years. And I think this is a significant point. I mean, on Twitter last night and most

of leftist Twitter collectively wet itself. I pointed out that Tucker has as one as many wars as our present military leadership has in the last two decades. But Tucker has actually lost your wars that our present military leadership has in the last two decades, and they don't want you to talk about that. The American military is not

ready to fight China. Instead, it's chasing its tail with nonsense about quote unquote diversity, which I want to come back to in a second, and all this social justice garbage, because that's what it is. Let me tell you what diversity is in the military. Diversity is everybody wearing camouflage. Okay, it shouldn't be an issue. Who you are shouldn't matter. Now, capabilities do matter, and there are realities of differences between men and women that need to be taken into account

and need to be discussed. Women and men are different. It doesn't say anything bad about women, And I was sent the implication that somehow pointing out that a one hundred pound woman is going to have trouble carrying a one hundred pound backpack is somehow an attack on her. Let me make you a buck. When I was a platoon leader in Desert Store, I ran a heavily armed carwash.

So I'm wondering if I'm allowed to speak since I wasn't in Delta Force, but we'll just assume I fit within the rules of who can talk about the military for now. When I was there, I had a female squad leader who had a photosensitive skin disease, which she hid. Now that's a big problem when you're in the desert, but she hid it because she wanted to be with her troops. I had to send her home. Her heart unquestioned, her patriotism unquestioned, her courage unquestioned. And no one's questioning

any of that. And it's a lie to guess talking about that instead of the reality that we are cutting, we are trading combat readiness for political correctness that is indisputable. Tell me we're not slamming destroyers into cargo ships we are. Tell me we're not driving pilots out of the Air Force we are. Tell me all American brigade combat teams are ready to deploy. They aren't. Now, there was a story that I saw as well this week, Kurt, that

was a war game exercise. I'm sure you saw this too, about how it would go right now if the US had to had to fight a straight up force on force war against China not a cyber war, a you know, guns going boom boom war, and it didn't come out well for the US. No, it didn't, and they don't want to talk about that. The simple fact is that Chinese have built up their military. We have weakened arts. We have weakened arts because we have gotten away from

the basics of military leadership and military culture. I consider the fact that we have not built up our navy to be a critical fact. I think a worse fact for America is that we have not demanded that the officer corps focus on you're fighting instead of this political

correct garbage. I mean, we've got raygions own. Lloyd Austin is now the Secretary of Defense, and his big thing is making sure everybody thinks exactly the same way, just like Joe Biden, well to the extent Joe Biden thinks and isn't told what he thinks and rooting out conservative people within the military. They call him extremists. That's another lie. But what the military should be doing is preparing to deter our enemies or defeat them in high intensity combat.

It is not ready to do so. This failure of leadership, and I'm terrified to this buck, this faire of leadership is going to lead to a disastrous engagement where thousands of Americans die unnecessarily because they are not well trained, not well equipped, and not well led. This I am not happy to say that. I am not excited to say this. This makes me sick to my stomach. And you know what also tears me up. After twenty seven years in the military and I loved it, I no

longer recommend people join the military. Somebody says, should I join the military, I might stop. You need to really think. You know, if you do, that's great. Do I think the military is a organization that's going to treat him correctly? No? I don't. I do not think it is. How did this And we're talking to Kurt Schlicht. He's a senior columnist at Town Hall and an Army veteran. So the Kurt, how did we get to this point in your estimation

where you're now saying this. I mean, this has got to be for somebody who spent over two decades serving, this has got to be something that's tough for you to say. And I know there are others. I've even talked to you with others who are military present where we were discussing this, who feel very much the same way. I'm sure you're talking to guys who are on the inside. Guys and gals are on the inside of the DoD who feel this way. How do we get to this

point and how do we get out of it? Well, look, buck, a commander, troops do what commanders chat. And in the Obama administration, they made it very clear that you needed to toe in liberal line, and they promoted liberal channels, and people down the line understood that, and that's what they enforced. So now you see these uh, now you see these bizarre reading lists, you know, for for of all these commanders, and it's all full of this racist garbage.

I'm an anti racism training for four star generals is now necessarily Yeah, it's just garbage. And they all do it. And why did they do it? Because that's what was rewared in the Obama administration. Why didn't Trump do anything about it because unfortunately, like many civilians, was impressed by the military and deferred to the generals and didn't go in and change it. This could change tomorrow, This could

change in a heartbeat. You need a conservative president calls in the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and says, here's how it's going to be. And if it isn't, I'm firing you. And then I'm going to fire everybody in the chain of command, and I'm going to retire you or sending you to No Molaska to hand out volleyballs. And you put a couple of figurative heads on pikes, and the military will conform. That's the thing. That's why it's vulnerable. It is a military conforms to the vision

of its leaders. If the vision of the leaders is social justice nonsense, then that's what the military is going to be. If it's combat readiness, it will come back. So I'm hoping we get a president who is white, willing to demand that we have a we're fighting organization and fire generals until he gets one. And believe me, you put a few, you kick a few of these guys out and put them to pastor the rest of

generals will conform. Kirch, look to everybody, go to townhall dot comference, lets column follow him on social Kurt, I always appreciate man, thanks for being with us. And what we know is that we need a federal solution guns don't respect state borders. In New York State, seventy five of the guns that are used in crimes in that state are bought outside of New York, in states with less strict gun laws, where criminals can buy a weapon

without having to go through a background check. And so in order to protect all of America's children, we need to pass universal background checks and close the Charleston loophole to protect the children. Notice how gun control is about protecting the children. As we know a very small percentage of gun crime. Mean, every gun crimes is horrible, Every homicide is a tragedy, and especially when it brings in

innocent children into the situation. But they're going for the emotional appeal appeal here, of course, suggesting that this is going to protect kids. And so if you have a problem with this, if you think that this is not in a good way going forward, if you don't agree with this, you are the problem, right, you don't want to protect children, That's what they're saying. That's the way that the emotional manipulation here at the hands of Democrats works.

But I just want to say that they're pushing these things right now as quickly as they can because they know that as we see more of this Biden administration, the incompetence, the enormous spending, the payoffs a special interest, the lack of accountability for the dumbass lockdown policies, all these things, people are going to get increasingly tired of being told what to do, and they're going to get

tired of the Biden administration using a crisis mentality. I'm gonna see the administration, I mean, the whole Democrat Party right now, the Democrat Party is really it feels flush with power. I mean, they feel like they're just they're they're in the best position they've been in in ten years, and they're going for it. And they want to push gun control. Now we're not out of the pandemic. We still have these restrictions, and they are telling you that

they're going to save lives by improving background checks. I mean, really, this is what the House bill that that has been passing on the sales that they're gonna they're gonna save lives by making it slightly more annoying for people to legally purchase firearms. You know what this guy left out

of this. You know Senator Murphy left out of this when he talks about a federal response to gun violence, what he left out of it is that most of the guns when they're when they're talking about the guns that are coming into states that are being used in crimes from out of the state. Yeah, guess what, that's illegal.

These are illegal gun sales. So their response to illegal gun sales is to pass another law that makes it harder for there to be legal gun sales, or more annoying or more tedious or slower or whatever it may be. Their their idea to stop gun violence is to make law abiding gun transactions more onerous. This is this is always the left mentality on this. But remember whenever they want to get something thought, you know, it's about about

the children. Right, here's Nancy Pelosi play fifteen today on the floor. We go to that fourth place, a safe environment which our children can thrive by passing the background chech legislation. It's hard to imagine legislation being more popular than the Rescue Plan seventy five percent whatever. This legislation background checks closer to ninety percent bipartisan support across the country. Receiving a support of gun owners, hunters, and the rest.

They've all had to do a background check. Why shouldn't others. Our chairman of the Task Force, Mike Thompson is a hunter, is a veteran, and is a gun owner, and he has had again protective of the First Amendment rights of gun owners, but also protective of the survival of our children. Nancy Pelosi, the First Amendment rights of gun owners. I just wanted you to hear that. Hey, I have a big I have a big believer it the First Amendment rights to bear arms. Um, Nancy, I got news for you.

I mean, this is what I say. These Democrats they have never actually they've never read nor understood the Constitution. I mean, some parts of it have been spoon fed to them that they know, some of the phrases that we all learn in grammar school about it or whatever, you know. But you know, it's like, Nancy Pelosi, I really believe in the Constitution that it says for score and and you know, yeah, no, no wrong speech. But that's okay. It doesn't matter constitutions on a speech, of course,

But you get what I'm saying. Nancy Pelosi has no idea what the heck is going on when it comes to actually deducing violence or dealing with criminality in this country because their party was largely favorable to the massive surge of violence, of criminality that happened as a result of the BLM movement and the Ferguson effect on police officers where they realize, Okay, we're not going to be supported, we're not going to do our jobs as much. That

results in more people getting killed. It happened, and I think it was forty seven to fifty of the biggest cities in the country last year had had two digit increases at least some of them had more like a fifty to one hundred percent increase, but had at least a double digit increase in shootings and homicides in a pandemic year when they're far fewer people in the street. But really, the gun control issue, they're gonna keep doing this.

They're gonna do things that they know there'll be no bipartisan support on because they're gonna throw all this at the Republicans. They're gonna claim obstruction all the time. And then what will happen is on one of these issues than I believe it will be amnesty. But on one of these issues they're gonna say this is we've tried and tried. They haven't actually tried at all. They just say do what we say or else to the Republicans. But they're gonna then claim we've tried to meet them halfway,

which is a lie. But we've tried to meet them halfway. They won't do it. So we have no choice but to obliterate their obstructionism by eliminating the filibuster. And once they do that on one issue, understand, then it's open season. Right then they're gonna go for it on every issue. And this is why the Democrats are picking these things

where they know that they want it. They know they're not going to get any bipartisan support on it whatsoever from the Republicans, and they're gonna stack all these up so that one of them will be the issue. And I believe I could be wrong. I believe it will be amnesty. They're just going to break the damn and say our way or the highway, you know, deal with it, Republicans. I mean this gun control thing, background checks, there's no reason to believe that even if the Democrats got what

they want, it would save even a single life. But it will annoy a lot of people and it does the incrementalist approach to restricting. Not your first Amendment right, Nancy, your second Amendment right. Cuomo in some increasingly hot water. The governor of New York now has more allegations against him six last time I counted, and they're getting more serious. Something even more serious involve actual unwanted touching, groping allegations

out there. And then there's also the nursing home scandal, which I still think is by far the biggest problem that he has, but the Democrats don't want to focus on that one. Of course. Now that is the media. Our friend Pedro Gonzalez is with us now assistant editor at American Greatness. Pedro, thanks so much. Oh, always a pleasure to be here. So well, what you've got a

piece out on the Cuomo situation. Tell us how you're seeing it, because I will say, people that I know who understand New York pretty well, new York politics well, are saying that they're actually now crossing over into maybe

he's not gonna politically survive this right. So that article was published in the National Interest, and the thesis is this that whether or not there are people, mainly Democrats and leftists, who really do find sexual harassment a greater crime than fifteen thousand senior citizens dead followed by an abusive cover up, Whether or not that is actually the the the driving motive for this, these calls for resignation or not, still, I think reveals how how messed up

the worldview of these people are. So the nursing home thing and the cover up that predates the sexual harassment stuff. But for the most part, it was it looked like Cuomo is going to emerge out of this whole thing unscathed, Like he was downplaying at the media he had basically he didn't apologize for it. You kind of just said, I apologize for your ignorance of like, of my greatness

and of what I was doing. If I didn't communicate as well they should, it's because I'm so busy being a great governor, so you know, cut me some slack, and and you know, it looked okay, and then you have these allegations. At allegations, he asked her a kiss at a wedding. You know, so you may or may not find that inappropriate, but that that is a headline at the New York Times. Governor Cuomo single man asked

her a kiss at a wedding. And it was only around the time that these these women started coming forward and started Cuomo tried to kiss me or Quomo did this that then you started to have top Democrats withdrawing their support from him, saying we want you gone and oh and also the nursing home thing was not okay. But it was not until the me too stuff that Cuomo started to really look like he was in trouble.

So I guess what I'm saying is that it shows that even the people who don't really believe the the you know, the kiss me allegations are that big of a deal they think, and they want him gone for other reasons either, you know, like Cuomo seems to have a lot of friction between him and the Democratic Party in general, but they still waited for those allegations, and that I think that shows how how deranged this world view is and how everyone is behold like they're all

slaves to it. You're not allowed to criticize somebody like Cuomo until something like me too happens, and only then can you Oh, by the way, it wasn't okay that you killed or responsible for the deaths of fifteen thousand senior citizens. Now, what do you think ends up happening here? Pedro?

I mean, where do you see this going? Because it feels like the Democrats have all of a sudden turned on him on the issue of the unwanted kiss or toucher, you know, and the media, but they're still sort of protecting him on the nursing home thing, even though Latsia James, the Attorney General for the State of New York, has has put out some information already suggesting that there was

a cover up. Right, well, I think it's not beyond the pale to say that he's going to survive this, because people seem to survive almost anything these days, especially Democrats. If you're on the laft, your chances of survival in a in a situation like this are much higher than

they would be for I think a Republican. But it does seem to be that the again, the sexual harassment allegations seem to have provided a pretense for not just for getting rid of them, to save things for the nursing home thing, which is really, like you said, like that is the true crime. But there's also a lot of other I guess there's a lot of other backstory.

To this. It seems like a lot of people, a lot of Democrats, have a bone to pick with Cuomo, and this is they feel their chance to finally do something against him. And there's there's so many other reasons, uh to to, you know, to criticize him. Under Cuomo, you also saw violent crime go up, even though like Democrats were the ones pushing for eliminating cash bail, and like you had Democrats and left wing, left wing bureaucrats in New York releasing looters almost as soon as they

were caught. And so there are all these really actual valid criminal reasons to get rid of Cuomo, but again everyone decided to wait until the inappropriate behavior allegations came forward. Pedro, you also speaking to Pedro Gonzalez, assistant editor at American Greatness, tell me about switching gears here for a second. The DOJ investigation about Facebook and discrimination against hiring Americans. I feel like this doesn't this is not getting nearly enough attention.

I mean, we talk about Facebook and big Tech and these companies that are actively suppressing conservatives, and that's certainly happening, but what is this with discriminating against hiring Americans in favor of hiring foreign nationals, especially given the immigration situation that's playing out right now. I feel like people should, you know, in our southern border, people should know more

about this, right. So the reason that this got buried, I think is because the investigation, the news of it broke in December. So you what you have last year, You have riots and rallies, a contested election, you have all these things that are distracting us from this I

think huge story. And that story is that the Justice Department, at the end of the two year investigation, found that Facebook actively deliberately discriminates in hiring against Americans in favor of foreign nationals, and that in that two year span they found more than two thousand, six hundred positions for which qualified, available American applicants were deliberately rejected, which is

against the law. And what the investigation found is is it all of this is technically legal, that basically Facebook had complied with the Immigration Act of nineteen ninety as it was written while actively discriminating against people. And obviously the DJ says, well, no, it's not illegal. This is

a violation of American civil rights. But Facebook's response has been and their lawyers have been will we cheat at Farren Square, and you can't blame us because we found ways that like, you know, cheat within the rules without

breaking any laws. And so there are so many different angles to this, and the big one I think is that you often hear Republicans and Democrats say, you know, legal immigration is good, you know whatever, We can quibble about illegal immigration, but legal immigration is just an unqualified good thing. And what I think that the big takeaway from this investigation is is that the legal immigration itself

often acts as the legalized displacement of American workers. And in the case of the like Facebook, these uh so called high skilled visas, although that's really dubious, you're actively displacing like basically the American middle class, professionals, people that go to college and or vocational training for like computer science. You're discriminating against them. You're you're literally, quite literally killing

the American middle and it's a it's all legal. I mean again, the DJ you know figured out that Facebook was was, you know, doing things that are just totally unethical, and that's why they're getting sued. But technically no laws were broken. Now Pedro, it feels like Republicans aren't even really sure, what the argument is that they're trying. Sure,

there's an open border, this is what Biden wants. But Democrats are executing on their plan here, which is to bring more and more legal immigrants into the country in preparation for a massive amnesty. I don't I don't hear a unified voice from the Republican Party about what we

want to have happen and what should happen here. Right, No, right, And that's I think that's that shows how far we are from even getting to the issue of legal immigration because we're so we're still behind on the issue of illegal immigration, which I think is even easier to handle.

It's just a no brainer. But I think one thing that is causing the GOP to approach this with trepidation is there is this rising notion of the big Tent, which I mean, it's noting new, but every you know, every now and again, this this becomes the talking point, the big Tent. And basically, I think you have a growing number of Republicans who are open to amnesty, and not a few of these have I think unfortunately, like the nod from Trump. Like one of them is Maria

Salzar in Florida. She received an endorsement from Trump. She's open to amnesty, she's for gun control, she's in favor of a carbon town. And she recently accosted Stephen Miller, former Trump advisor, and I guess gott into an argument with him and said, you know, like, I'm the new face of the GOP, and you need to be more accepting of basically of immigrants, because you know, we have just as much of a right to be in this party as anybody else, which I mean, that's true, but

of course it's it's basically moral blackmail. You know, to be against illegal immigration is basically to hate Hispanics, which is just phenomenally stupid. But that's that's the kind of argument that Maria Salazar's deploying. And then I think what's really telling about how how messed up the GOP is right now is in Texas, what has Governor Greg Abbott

been doing about illegal immigration. Well, it's not really clear, but yesterday he released his statement against gab a social media network that the Texas GOP has an official account on calling the platform and by extension, his own party and every single Republican voter in Texas on the platform anti Semitic and like the vice chair of Texas of the Texas Goop News cat parts, he's also been talking about the Big Tent and kind of like hinting it, well,

we need to we need to soften up on immigration so that we don't alienate voters. And this is just like the absolute tragic comedy state of the GOP at the moment. Talking to our friend Pedro Gonzalez at American Greatness go to American Greatness dot com for his latest piece, Pedro, Always appreciate your appreciate your perspective. Man, Thanks so much

for joining. Always a great time. Thank you. Well, I think there's been a lot of confusion about what's been happening at the border as it relates to people who are coming across and what happens when they come across. And I know Governor Abbott down in Texas has expressed some of his concerns and many of those have not been based in fact. So let me go through a few of those, because I know we're all interested in

facts around here. One, Governor Abbott has referred to what's happening at the border as open borders, as thus having an open borders policy that is absolutely incorrect. The borders not open. The vast majority of individuals apprehended or encountered at the border continue to be denied entry and a return under Title forty two. As we've already mentioned. Also, he has suggested that we are not vaccinating CBP officers. Again,

we like to deal with facts around here. There's no higher priority than the health and safety of our federal workforce, and the Department of Homeland Security and CBP has been clear that currently more than sixty four thousand frontline DHS employees, including members of US Border Patrol, have received a vaccination. Wait, so sixty four thousand people in DHS, what percentage? I just, since she's going to be miss numbers here, I want to ask zackybaumb Okay, well, how many Border Patrol agents

have actually been vaccinated? Because that's what the that's what the issue was. It wasn't DHS, which is enormous, a giant loaded bureaucracy with hundreds of thousands of employees, which how many people, how many of them are in Border patrol. You you don't get to say, you know, if I told you, oh, you know, no one in the Marine Corps is getting vaccinated these days. That's a problem. You said, well, there are a lot of people in the armed forces

who have been vaccinated. I'd say, well, okay, but what about what I said the Marine corp. Are they getting vaccinated at what rate? Right? And by the way, that's a totally that's just an example situation. I'm obviously not saying that's what's going on, but that's that's one way that Saki can avoid looking at the actual numbers here. But this notion of the open border, we're seeing this happen. I mean, they're gas lighting and we see what's going on.

If everybody arriving at the border was being turned back, do you think that people would be arriving in the border the numbers are we making up? The videos that are circulating all over the internet now of hundreds of people streaming and walking right across the Rio grand They're coming right in, right the Rio Grande whatever. You know, They're coming right in And what is this? We know why? Because they claim asylum and then they get released the

interior of the United States. A majority of the people are being turned away. I explained this to Babe. This is fascinating. This is the White House Press secretary. They always claimed they're about facts in truth. If a majority of the people are being turned away, okay, give us the numbers, give us the data. What are they won't though, they say, oh no, you gotta go somewhere else for that, and we don't have that number right now, you got

to go to DHS for that number. Well, then how can they know if a majority of the people, a vast majority, i think is what she said, are being turned away, they're lying, do you, folks, They're lying to you? Because this is a this is a problem right now. It's so obvious what's going on and what is an open border. An open border is one in which people can just come with a belief that they'll be able to stay in a country. That's what's going on in

our southern border right now. I mean, yeah, there's if you show up and they have you in the system as like a mass murder or something. I'm sure there are some circumstances where they're not going to let you into the country at all, But overwhelmingly, it seems if you just show up and say you're fleeing a violence, you have a credible fear you're going to get to stay in. That's why they're all coming. If they were all being turned back, they would stop coming. We've already

run this experiment, we've seen how this plays out. But also they won't they won't even admit that it's a real crisis. Play eighteen. Now today there are we're thirty seven hundred children, unaccompanied minor children in border for chronic custody. They're spending on average over one hundred hours four days in these facilities that are jail like facilities, not meant

for children. So how can you say that's not a crisis. Well, I think what Ambassador Jacobson and Secretary Yorkists were conveying and what I've conveyed is it doesn't matter what you call it. It is an enormous challenge. Well then why not just admit that it's a crisis. Right, it doesn't matter what you call it, but we won't call it the thing that it obviously is this is a classic Democrat moment, and it's amazing. Bit Jensaki is the White

House Press secretary, It honestly is really. I mean, look, there have been some Republican White House Press secretaries too that I thought, you know, we're not very we're not very competent of the job. But this goes to show you. But you know, you just got to be up there and keep on spinning, keep on spewing the nonsense. It does matter what you call it because the public's attention on this change is depending on what the description of the situation is. And she knows that, which is why

she won't call it a crisis. We're not dumb. We understand what's going on here. We see what's actually happening here. So I just wish there would be a little bit more honesty from the Democrats. But we know that's not going to happen because there now is their window. They view it as this is when they can get away the American people. You know that the Democrats won this election.

They did all these shenanigans. They convinced people that Trump basically created the virus himself and was they and all this stuff, all these lines, all these promises. Now is when they think they can get away with all the progressive insanity because within you know, six to nine months of now, we're going to see the results and say, oh my god, just like we saw into the Obama administration, and the Democrats are actually bad at governance. It is

time for the voice of God. That's right, our friend God side is with us now. He is the author of the parasitic mind. How infectious ideas are killing common sense? God? Good, good to talk to you again. Thank you so much for chatting with me. Yeah. I mean, this is a time when it seems that ideas killing common sense. It's

happening more now than ever before. We're getting rid of cartoons, we're pretending that there's no real biological difference between men and women, that this doesn't even matter in sports or in military combat roles, that it just there's all this out there that people that believe there is such a thing as common sense would have to say, this is

contrary to that. What is going on? Right, So, the general idea is that there's a bunch of idea pathogens that were spawned on university campuses maybe forty fifty years ago, each of which eradicates part of our edifices of reason. And so that's exactly what I explained in the Parasitic Mine.

I basically argue that very much the way we today have the COVID pandemic, we've had a raging pandemic of the human mind, whereby these parasitic ideas have completely removed our capacity to recognize that there is such a thing as the sun above us, that there is left right down, up down, that there is such a thing as women menstruating. And so each of these dreadful departures from common sense comes from a different idea pathogen. So maybe I can

discuss a few if you'd like. So. Postmodernism, for example, is arguably the granddaddy of all idea pathogens, because it purports that there are no universe, so truth, there's no objectivity. We are completely shackled by our personal body. Where does this come from? I mean, give us a little For a lot of folks, well, we'll hear the term postmodernism, which even as a term it sounds kind of bizarre. What what is modern and what is post I mean, you know, where do we put this in the in

the timeline of the history of ideas? So just to give us a little sense of where does this come from? Yeah? So, I mean a lot of the original famous postmodernists were French intellectuals, or Jacques Derrida, Jacques la and in there in each in their own way, they wanted to contextualize truth within some relativistic framework. Right. So Jacques Derrida argued that, you know, language creates reality, and therefore this is what

he called deconstructionism. You deconstruct labels and language because that's what creates reality. There's you know, there's no reality outside of the language that is used to describe reality. And so this kind of framework might be appropriate when you or you know, studying some literary narrative or some art movement, but it becomes problematic when it becomes an epistemology. Right.

The scientific method is liberating and is the grand epistemological tool that we use precisely because it offers us a very unbiased way by which we adjudicate hypotheses. Right, Well, postmodernism comes along and serves as a form of intellectual terrorism. Right. I always analogize the nine to eleven hijackers who flew planes onto our buildings are akin to the postmodernist, except that the post postmodernists are flying planes of bs into

our edifices of reasons. So it's complete nihilism, it's complete lunacy. So that would be one example of how you can get an idea pathogen. Do you want me to discuss other ones. Yes, of course, take us through the idea pathogens, right, So, for example, take now militant feminism. Well, it starts off as a laudable idea. Equity feminism is something that you and I would certainly agree with women should not be somehow different under the law, and of course we would

agree with that. The problem is that in the service of that laudable objective, militant feminism comes along and it metamorphosizes the original good idea into the following. There are no innate sex differences between men and women. All sex differences must be due to the patriarchy, must be due to toxic mosculinity, must be due to social constructivism, which

itself is another idea pathogen. So we engaite truth in the service of a laudable goal, and I argue that I could chew gum and walk at the same time, I could completely get behind the pursuit of laudable social justice goals without ever seeting a millimeter of truth in that service. So what now are the other idea pathogens that are driving us to this cancelation frenzy. Well, so the cancelation frenzy comes from several mechanisms, one of which,

so here I analogize. If you look at Isis, for example, most of the people that Isis killed were not non Muslims or as they say, the Kuffar, the infidels. Most of the people that they killed were fellow Muslims who weren't muslim enough, or at least, according to them, weren't puritanical enough in the pursuit of their faith. Well, that's what happens with progressivism. It I don't need to go

after those being Trump supporters. I could turn inward at my progressive club and start canceling those who are not woke enough. So it's it's a reflex that you see in all sorts of fatalitarian ideologies, where it's I call it a form of orgiastic self cannibalism, the proverbial, you know, snake eating its own tail. So I think this is what ends up happening with the cancel culture. Right JK. Rolling the Harry Potter author. You would have thought she

had the full bonifiti credentials as a progressive. Well guess what once she said the horrifying statement that only you know what do you mean? Women menstruate? Isn't that what we call them women. People went completely after her. So the fact that you think that you are progressive, or the fact that you think you're a Muslim won't protect you from the Isis brigade or the walk brigade. Now we're speaking to God side. He's the author of the

parasitic mind. How infectious ideas are killing common sense? You know, God, There's there's another another thing that I always wonder about, you know, virtue signaling and and a kind of intellectual vanity seems to me to be the most the most apparent reason for a lot of why people push this stuff.

Because it seems to me that you can have a very cheap source of patting oneself on the back or this is a examples of this would be doing things like putting the black square on your Instagram right like everyone says, Oh, you're a good person because you did this. It costs you nothing, You take no actual risk because of what the trends are at the time. Is that what's pushing this? Why do people want to do this?

What is the appeal? You know, parasites sneak into your system, often say through your food, and so that's how they get there. But this is like people. It's almost like people are saying, no, give me the parasite. Why So let me answer the first part about the virtue signaling. So in my book, I have a whole section where I contrast virtue signaling versus costly signaling, and the distinction is actually rooted in a very profound evolutionary biological framework.

So maybe I could take him an order to explain it. So, if you look at the peacock's tail, his tale couldn't have evolved through natural selection because having a big tail makes it actually less likely that you will survive. So how could evolution have led to such a big tail when it reduces the animals survivability? While the answer to

that is through a process of sexual selection. The PN the female is choosing this smile with the big tail because the tail serves as an honest signal and saying, look, despite the fact that I've got this burdensome tail that reduces my survivability, I'm still here, So you should be picking me as your optimal mate. So for a signal to be for a signal to be valuable, it must be handicapping. Therein lies the problem between virtue signaling and

costly signaling. Most people put hashtag in justrihar Charlie, which carries a zero risk. Try to speak out against the Saudi government while you are a blogger in Saudi Arabia. That's a costly signal. That's exactly what rife Beta we did. He's been in prison now for six seven years in Saudi Arabia because he dared criticize the Saudi government. So for most people, they think that simply by engaging in that fatuous virtue signaling, it will get them the brownie points.

But someone who understands evolutionary biology knows that they are utter frauds, so it doesn't even provide them the same benefit. The level of benefit that they assume is that is that basically what you're telling It's like if everybody in New York City puts up, you know, hashtag double mask, which is something for example, that drives me completely insane.

I mean, you know, you and I could talk, we should actually talk a little bit about the science and the notion of the science as a thing that is that is true and factual and objectively measured, when they actually mean policy judgment and an often arbitrary decision making But so if everyone writes double mask in New York City, I mean, aren't they showing each other that they're good people even if it's not particularly valuable since it costs

them nothing. Why not, right? I mean, even if it's if it's just a quick dopamine hit of I'm part of the mob. Sure, you're not going to elevate yourself. But isn't being part of the crowd the whole point?

But as long as so what you're saying is true, as long as I can create the sterile echo chamber where every member of that echo chamber is equally duplicitous and fraudulent as I am, right, But once we bring in doctor Good Looks also known as God Sad to the mix, then I'm going to smash you into oblivion because I realize that you're a fraud. So this is why you need to regulate people's speech. This is why God Sad becomes a pariah in academia because I am

disrupting their sterile echo chambers. Why is this guy calling us out on our fraudulent behavior. Can't he just fall into line and also come up with a hashtag Charlie By the way, that's one of the reasons why my mockery. Not only is it very effective, but it causes great concern to many of my colleagues. Some of them end up on following me because there is no greater, more powerful persuasive strategy than to use satire to demonstrate that

you're a complete charlatan. We're speaking to God Sad, author of the Parasitic Mind, how infectious ideas are killing common sense? God, I want to take a quick moment here, a quick beat where to come back and ask you about the actious idea around the infection of COVID that people should just listen to doctor Faucier. You're up for that. I am up. Let's try it all right. We're back with author Godside, author of the Parasitic Mind, How infectious ideas

are killing common sense. You can get it right now

on Amazon or wherever you get your books. God, I want to ask you about this because you know, a year ago you're talking about about infectious ideas, and obviously we're going through a great actual viral infection right now with this pandemic a year ago, Doctor Fauci and I keep using this as the basis for my argument that we've been listening to this notion of the science or faucism as I call it uncritically, and that people have become largely brainwashed and they act like sheep and they

just do whatever they're told. And this is why I've been able to predict things months and months in advance. Like I guarantee you folks, he will start to say, oh, we need double masking or oh we need an ninety

five masks. I've been saying that since the summer of twenty twenty, and sure enough, here we are the I am the Faucci made that the science did not support masking, and then to switch over to actually, we all need to be masking because the science says So this caught on like wildfire, and this caught on like the virus itself in a sense, you know, mentally with people. Why why do you think that? Because to me, it seems like that's just there's a bunch of different factors you

can point to. But this is a perfect idea of a rather a perfect example of a parasitic idea, which is just listen to Fauci and the state and you'll be safe. Yeah. Absolutely, I mean there's a lot to the couple there so one thing I would say, and this is something that I discuss in the context of the parasitic mind, but more generally in terms of how do you seek truth? And so in chapter seven of my book, I talk about something that I referred to

as nomological networks of cumulative evidence. If I want to prove to you scientifically that the position that I'm taking is correct, it's actually a very very hard process. I will get data from you from across cultures, from a cross time period, from a cross methodologies, from a cross frameworks, across dependent measures, all of which, if they point in the same direction, then results in a tsunami of evidence

in support of my position. So when you're doing that, you also recognize the flip side, which is epistemic humility. Epistemic humility is when a scientist knows what he or she knows and knows what he or she doesn't know.

The problem with Fauci is he's got zero epistemic humility, right, So in other words, he always pronounces positions that are going to have gigantic downstream effects on hundreds of millions of people, even though on Monday he said a and then Tuesday he says not a Now most people follow because you know, he's wearing the proverbial white robe. And so if Lord his Eminence Fauci says skip, then we all skip along. It becomes a fast and frugal heuristic

for us to organize our lives. Not unlike, by the way, how religion achieves the same thing. If my mom or my rabbi or my priest says you have to do this, I don't question it. I do it. Well, Now we do have a grand priest of quote science. His name is Fauci, So shut up and obey rupe. Yeah, that's that's what we see happening. And it's been happening now

for many, many months. And I also think that that one problem I wanted to broaden this out a little bit, but but the Fauci point, I think is an example of it, and that is that people when you tell them they have what you what you describe as a parasitic idea, I think there's a sense of of I don't know vanity is the right word, but perhaps an arrogance that turns into a delusion. Oh, I'm not caught up in an idea that doesn't make any sense, that

isn't supported I'm too smart to be fooled in that way, exactly. Look, the capacity for human beings to engage in self deception is infinite. I'll tell you a very quick story. I walk into class. I haven't done in a few years, but I used to come to class and I would ask students to pull out a paper and then write down whether they think of themselves as below below average and intelligence, average and intelligence or above average intelligence. And I would ask them to do the same thing regarding

their looks. Well, it turns out, Buck that my students are always supermodel Einstein's meaning what they all We tend to have an erroneous sense of ourselves right now, and to some extent, that's a good thing. You want to kind of walk around life with a chip on your shoulder so that you could tackle life's challenges. But as you pointed to your original question, people have this uncanny ability to self deceive. Oh no, no, I couldn't be

engaging in faulties thinking I'm too smart for that. Therein lies the problem, and that's why you need to be reading the parasitic mind. Give us just what the case. You've got a couple of minutes here, God, the case for optimism about how our society can get through this. I won't even say will, but can get through this because right now it feels like the bad guys are winning. It feels like the parasitic ideas have taken. Parasites like

to stay on a host. They don't like to kill the host, usually because they want to continue to feed off of it. It starts to feel like the parasitic ideas in our society could actually kill off a free society like America. Look, there are a couple of things that might sound cliche ish, but they're actually quite profound because most people are unable to meet the challenge. So let me give you a couple. Number one, don't contract

your voice to others. In other words, a lot of people will say, well, I don't have your fancy professorship, I don't have your big platform to affect change. Well I understand that, but you don't have to have a large platform. You could still affect change within your unique sphere of influence. If your principle starts imposing in saying, teaching lessons at your it's elementary school, intervene, write an email request to see them. If your friend says something

on Facebook on Facebook that is completely insane. Challenge them politely. If your professor says something that you think is wrong, challenge him or her politely. In other words, we all have a voice to affect, however big or small, a change that we can A second thing that you can certainly do is what I call activate your inner honey badger. The honey badger is an extraordinarily fierce animal. It's the size of a small dog, and yet it could withstand

an attack of six adult lines. How does it do that? Because it's insane. It is so fierce that nobody will approach it. Well, you need to have that same sense of ferocity when it comes to defending your principles, if they are well articulated and well reasoned. This is why you know some people ask, well, how come you're not cancelable professors at Well, because I'm a honey badger. If you come after me, you better not miss, because I'm

coming back after you ten times harder. And so there are reflexes that we can foster in us, so that if in unison we all stand up together by next Tuesday, we'll destroy all the parasitic ideas. If not, it'll be a long long train ride to help the parasitic mind. How infectious ideas are killing common sense? Our friend, God sad. God appreciate it. Man, thanks so much for joining us, and everyone should check out the book. Thank you, buddy.

Great talking to your cheers. The show ain't over yet, folks. It's time for roll call producer Mark, you ready for the weekend? My friend? What did it tell? Tell everybody? What's on the producer? Mark? Uh? You know, list of awesome things that he wants to do. I'm gonna celebrate Saint Patrick's Day. I'm not Irish at all, but it's an excuse to be with my friends and drink. Isn't that? Is it this weekend? I think it's like Wednesday? Yeah,

it's like the seventeenth I think, isn't it? Yeah? It doesn't matter when you sell them, right, It's just an excuse to celebrate. But what is this now? So you guys are gonna stand, you know, twenty feet apart outside drinking green beer. How are you gonna? How are you gonna celebrate? But that it depends on who's asking. Well, I got you okay enough? I like I like where your heads out on that one? So that's nice. You're gonna be outdoors, you're gonna be indoors. What's the plan?

I guess it depends on the weather. I don't I don't know what the weather is like in uh, in this neck of the woods this weekend. But it's been nice out, so maybe we will go outside. Fair enough? Fair enough? All right, missus Mark, have any fun plans? Well, usually she's with me. I'm just making I don't know. Maybe she let's see, it's like the guys do the same Patrick's Day thing. I don't know, just it was just an idea. One of my friends had an excuse

to hang out. Yeah are you a beer drinker? Um? Yeah, I don't know if it's my number one, but yeah, absolutely do you have like what is what is the beer when you walk into a bar that you order? Um? Well, usually bars will have fairly common beers. So like maybe a blue moon? Like, well that's what I mean? Yeah, oh you're a blue Are you a blue moon with an orange slice? Guy? Look at you? Look at bougie Mark. Everybody.

I had a feeling. We know there's we know there's lots of it's very blue moon with an orange slice? Producer Mark You're talking to a lot of people across the country who drink bud Light, damn it, and there they love it. I have no problem. I like bud Light, but you know, if I'm drinking a beer to enjoy myself, I prefer not even just blue Moon, like that type of beer. I don't even know what it's called. I see you drink it, some delirium tremens, you know that,

like fancy Belgian beer that people have. I do like the Belgian German style beer. Oh yeah, that stuff is delicious. I used to drink beer, so I know about these things. Now I can't drink it. Don't they have good gluten free beers now? Nah? Not really. They've got good cider because it's made from fruit and not from grain. But the problem with like, you'll drink a big thing aside, it's like double the sugar that you'll even get in a Coca Cola. It's terrible for you. Ciders delicious, but

the seltzers are all very good. Wow, it's producer Mark. I appreciate this. Producer Mark is so confident in his producer markness that he is letting all of America know right now that he drinks white Claw, and he's not ashamed of it. It is there's no better summer drink than a white claw or a bud Light Seltzer. Even they've come out with bud Light lemonades, which I'm very interested in. John. I'm just telling you, I there's like ten percent right now of our listeners across the country

are not in their heads up and down. Producer Mark knows it's delicious, and I'd say, you know, it is somewhere in the eighty to nine percent range. I're gonna produce their their side to side. Very upset that producer marts you think, Yeah, you know, you might be a little cobkey, a little bit worried. There are a lot of people who love the white Claws and the Seltzers that won't admit it. So here's my here's my theory. White claw is to drinks what creed is to music taste.

Everybody says they hate it, but when no one's looking behind closed doors, people are popping their white claws and listening to their creed. You know that's what's happened. I'm pretty sure you've said on this show before that you have tried it and enjoyed it. I mean, I can neither confirm nor to note this is your Creed neither oh Man, and I always tell I'm like, I like Creed. I actually I do think Nickelback is just not that great.

It's not because everyone trash is Nickelback, but like Creed is the original Nickelback, and Creed is way better than Nickelback, which everybody should know. So I know, like three songs from both bands. That's about. Yeah, I've been I've been on a on a nineties rock kick recently. When I'm trying to go to the gym, which the gym is working out fine, it's the stop eating so damn much part of it. That is, that is the challenge that

I find. Like I'm getting stronger, like I'm lifting more weight and stuff like that, which is nice, that's encouraging, but to really get the uh the more esthetic effect, you know, I have to stop eating cookie dough in between meals and put down chocolate bars and you know what it's like, what's the fun in that, though, Producer Mark, what's the funny? It's all one step at a time. First you get in the exercise routine and then you work work on eating better. Yeah, that's one step at

a time. True, very true. All right, let's get to um. Let's get to a JR. Who's kicking us off here with roll call bucking Mark King Edward and Brave Heart lamented. The problem of Scotland is there are too many Scots. Will breathe them out, the Democrats lament. The problem with the republic is there are too many Republicans. Let's cancel them out. Yeah, I think that j Your point here is that Democrats don't want Republicans to actually be around.

I think, unfortunately that's kind of true. It's pretty sad. Really, Oh wait, you got more. The deeper insidious goal of the left is globalism. Hence climate change must be a global effort. A global effort demands that there are no borders, a centralized world government must rule. Exceptionalism is to be utterly obliterated. The Mighty must be brought down, and we

will all live as one. From my own personal experiences, how has been percolating since the sixties and in other parts of the world prior to that, either intentionally or by happenstance. The Democrats are setting a course that was supposed to continue after Obama. Through Hillary and to whoever was next, it would have been irreversible but for the

damage by Trump. It's easy to understand their contempt if you see it from this viewpoint, Shield's high didn't save Rome, or even Shield's hide didn't save Rome Jr. That was kind of a bummer. Jared's kind of bumming me out. Man. Yeah, I guess technically Rome did fall. You know, I think America's got a little more time in it before we dissolve into something else. But no nation state lasts forever.

Friends and Democrats are trying really hard. They're kicking at the load bearing walls of our republic and they think it's hilarious. Think I think it's great. They're they're drunk with power these days. But at least we got each other. Team, we got each other. Oh you know, producer Mark, a family member brought up last night that she has as my mom that she's like, where are your team buck T shirts? And I agree, shouldn't we do this? Wouldn't

we get T shirts? We have a great website bucksexen dot com, so shouldn't we get to T shirt set up? What do you think we should get a whole merch store set up? Yeah, I gotta I gotta get that guy. I know we brought it up before, but now we at least bucksex and dot com. You can listen to the podcast there. We do post stories, I post editorials there. So that's all going well. But I would love to get some merch we could create. Do we want to

create a producer Mark penalty box T shirt? You know where you're just like we we get you in like one of those REFS shirts and you're like waving your finger back and forth or something, and you know we'll come up with some we have. There's smarter graphic designers out there than us. We should do it though, or rather we should have it done, you know. That's what I'm at the rate we usually do stuff coming soon by twenty twenty three. Yeah, it's happened, But I like

to put I'm an ideas guy. You know, we're ideas guys here on the Freedom Hunt. We have plenty of ideas. It's just the execution part, that's true. Matthew Buck. I want you to make I want to make sure you know I sit on the other side of the aisle from you politically. I don't always like what you say or how you say it. Okay, However, I believe an open dialogue and for you to have the right to your platform. Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean

you shouldn't be able to speak your views. With that, I went on and gave your review on Apple Podcasts. You work very hard at what do you do and deserve the right to say when you need to keep it up. Hey, Matthew Man, I'll take it. Thank you so much. I appreciate that. Hopefully you didn't give me one star on Apple Podcasts, but I appreciate nonetheless that you gave a review and it sounds like you respect.

Don't worry, we haven't gotten any of those recently. Okay, good you respect the Are we still a producer, Mark, We're still seeing some folks pitching in. Yeah, a couple more trickle in every day. Alrighty guys, keep it going. Please keep those reviews. Remember you go on Apple Podcasts. Five stars. You can, you know, just write Buck is awesome. He keeps me safe and warm at night with his podcast, and producer Mark keeps him in line. So it's a

great show. You should check it out there. You can just you just say that, just write that you know that's all you need to do. Really helps us out, and we appreciate it. Dave writes, Hey, Buck, I'm seeing on Facebook my friends posts going to good county schools. It looks like the rules are so unreasonable that they want their kids to stay virtual. I'm surprised they're not surprised. The administrators are making them possible for these kids to

go back to what they expect to be normal. The progressive mentality is spread from the city to the counties. Keep up the great work, Bucking producer Mark. Yeah, Dave, you know there are a lot of counties where there's a lot of blue going on, even if you're not in a city. And that means that there is this

mentality that we got to do the faucism. And I'll just say this that, look, we got to remember that these schools being open, that's a very broad term, right when they say open, I mean Biden gives this whole thing about we're it over one hundred Robert Blood schools, one hundred days. That does it mean one day a week? Does it mean four hours a day? Does it mean shifts rotations of students in the classroom? Uh? You know that that they some days, some kids come in, other

days other kids come in. I mean, the reality is that schools should just be open, Okay. The reality is that schools should be open across the country everywhere fully.

And it was fascinating that at the Dalton School here in New York City, which is one of the most elite and expensive schools in New York City and in the country, there was there was an article written in The Atlantic about how the parents there was a kind of revolt among the parents at Dalton because a lot of other fancy private schools in New York and for those you're wondering how fancy or how expensive these schools are if you had a fifth grader, Let's say, if

you had a fifth grader who was going to Dalton, you'd be paying about intuition sixty thousand dollars a year. That's right for the fifth grade, for the first college. Yeah, fifty sixty fifty to sixty thousand dollars a year. Yeah. And there's a lot of schools like that in New York City. I went to a private school called Regis, which is a Jesuit school, where the tuition was twenty dollars a year. I'm not kidding. That was for the

laboratory fees and admin fees. Twenty dollars a year was what my school costs producer Mark, I think I think mine was a better a better deal, better bargain slightly. Wow. Yeah, yeah, So this the sixty thousand dollars a year schools though, which were not as the kids were not as smart as my school. I'm just saying. But anyway, because I got I got into all those sixty thousand dollars a year schools, I didn't go to them. And I know, I know that's not even a humble brag. I'm just

being I'm just being that guy right now. But the point is that one of the schools wasn't open, and that school then had parents, particularly had parents who were doctors. You know, parents have children there who are doctors. They're like twenty of them, and they they wrote in they're saying,

where is why aren't schools open? So when it affected them, I guarantee you these parents are almost all liberals and Biden voters because Dalphin's are very liberal school But when their kids aren't able to go to school and they're paying for it, their attitude is we're scientists. We're doctors too. Why can't our kids other schools are open? Why can't our schools be open? This is the classic democrat mentality. They know what the herd is supposed to do with

the democrat herd supposed to do. They know what they're supposed to believe, and they don't want to challenge it. So what they do instead is they just go along as long as their kids are fine. They go along with what's the consensus because they don't want to be, you know, pushed out of the circle of the elites. So that that just but it was it was amazing

to see how you had doctor. I haven't seen that, you know, any other in any other setting where you had a couple of dozen doctors who are parents all come together and say what the heck is going on in general with schools, but no their children. They're paying sixty thousand dollars a year and their kids were doing virtual learning, and they're saying the science doesn't actually support this. Well, if it doesn't support it for kids whose parents are rich,

I don't think it supports it for anyone's kids. Does it? Exactly? Check me? All our more role call to kick us off for the weekend, Nick Buck, what would the money compared to population be? I'm here in Denver, where over the last ten years the progressives have come in and ruined the state. But if you were to compare populations the amount given in this ridiculous package, would things look

would things look correct? Let me see, I don't really understand if you were to compare population the amount giving this ridiculous package. Nick, I'm sorry, man, I don't really understand. Please write back in with what you mean comparing money to population. I don't really get it. I don't really I'm a producer, Mark, do you see what the question is? I'm confused. I kind of understand, but I'm not really clear what he's asking me. The last ten years progressive

has come and ruined the state. But if you were to compare population to the amount given in this ridiculous package. Oh, I think he must be talking about like how much New York got versus how much Oklahoma got? Oh? Yeah, no, okay, fair enough? Yeah, Nick, I don't I don't know. I haven't looked at that at that breakdown, and and I'm sure that that's you know, if it looks bad for Democrats, you'll have to look very hard to find it, but I will see if I can find it. All right,

more here from Jamie. I've been listening to you since the first time you filled in for Rush. Your Lepanto Deep Dive is an annual part of our homeschooling life. Wow, thank you so much. That's amazing. In the last year, in particularly the last four months, I've given up on most news and commentary, I feel that if I'm not being outright lied to, I'm being agitated and depressed intentionally because someone somewhere has calculated that's beneficial to their ratings.

But I trust you, Buck Sexton Shields High Well, Jamie, thank you so much much. I try to be worthy of your trust always, and you know I'm not. I'm not perfect, I'm not always right. I don't always see things with absolute clarity. But I tell you who I am, what I believe, what I think, and I tell you to you honestly. So I appreciate that that clearly has some some meaning for you, and and the fact that you do the Lepanto Deep Dive. And I know I've said, guys,

we have the history podcast coming. I'm not that's a it's a business thing. We're just we're trying to get uh some major corporate sponsors for a series of six history deep dive podcasts. They're they're ready to As soon as that happens, we're ready to go and release them. But that's the only way that we can get the work and labor and everything into them editing and have producer marks. They up late at night to get it going. So that's that's the part of it that's holding it up.

It's not the work from our end, it's you know, we're waiting to get them pitched and to get them lined up with podcast sponsors. So that's what's going to be happening going forward. Addie. Right's good morning, Buck. I've been listening for a while now. I enjoy you and producer Mark tremendously. Just so you know, I'm listening to you from Israel on the iHeart Apple. That's awesome. I'm

an Israeli married you're an American. By the way, if you want to hear a horror story about immigration, I can give you one and maybe people will understand the injustice of illegal immigration. I wish there was a little bit of talk about the hardship that legal immigration has to prove and versus and reality versus the government just handing illegal immigrants. I'm crossing my fingers for our great country. We're all going to survive this administration. I hope you

and yours are happy and healthy. Well, Addie, thanks so much for writing in when we appreciate it, and great to have Team Buck Israel in the house. Alex, Hey, Buck and Mark, I know you often say Trump didn't get many sustainable things Dunder's first four years. He did sign a bunch of eos. That's not the same as legislation. I agree any EO that he did sign has now been undone by the druler in chief. The issue is

with the way you frame it. I believe that during Trump's first two years, when Republicans had both the Health and the Senate, half of the idiots actually believed the GOP, actually believed Trump colluded with Russia and didn't support his agenda. I just think he was hamstrung from the get go. What do you think? Love the show and Express VPN and Black Rifle coffee and my pillow stay in the fight shield, Hie. Alex, You're a Team Buck superstar. Thank

you so much for supporting our sponsors. That means the world to us, keeps us in business. And as for your assessment or Trump, Yeah, I think you're I think you make valid points entirely. Team. That's it. Have a great weekend back Monday, Shield Hie

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android