Hold The Line w/ Buck Sexton - 07-07-22

of crickets. Gross. I'll explain why this is nothing more than the same elatest population panic we've seen for over a century in tonight's old welcome to hold on, I'm Buck Sexton. They want you to put down your hamburger, folks. They want you to, of course, stop using fossil fuels, ride bicycles, take shorter showers. You'll notice, conservation is always at your costs, not there. Somehow, it's not even really conservation.

It's actually just the reduction in your standard of living under the rubric up saving the planet, the water that you use, the air that you breathe, everything that you buy at the store that you need, all of that they want under their thumb. They want to control things. Well, my friends, here is a reality. They also want to control the burgers that you will eat. CNN headline, here to help save the planet cut back to a hamburger and a half per week. First of all, I'm just

going to throw this out there. Who eats a half a hamburger a week? As in either one or two? Right, I'm not half hamburger guys running around, That's not really a thing, is it. Maybe you split one with your

or your husband, your girlfriend, whatever. But anyway, here's from the CNN article, Americas will The Americans will need to cut their average consumption of beef by about forty percent and Europeans by twenty two percent for the world to continue to feed the ten billion people expecting to live on this planet in twenty fifty, according to a new report from the World Resources Institute. Goes on to say about nine point eight billion people will live on the

planet by twenty fifty. That's up from seven billion people in twenty ten. Demand for food is projected to outpace population growth, increasing by more than fifty percent as people's incomes in the developing world are expected to increase, according to the report. Now, order and where did this all come from? This notion that we're just going to overpopulate

the earth. There'll be too many human being and then we'll all run out of food, and so they'll be massive reductions and population because we won't be able to actually handle it. We won't be able to feed the massive population on this planet. It's not a new idea, and it's one that returns in cycles over time. You could even go back to Thomas Mouthless. He was an English cleric and a scholar the turn of the nineteenth century. He wrote an influential essay that claim that population growth

would eventually outstrip food production, leading to mass starvation. Essentially, you're going to get to a point where there are so many people you can't feed the people you have, no matter what you do, and then you're gonna have massive die off until they get back down to the level that the earth can actually sustain. This might sound right if you could predict the future, if you knew where technology was going. But you can and they didn't, and so it was really wrong. But this is a

graph that shows Malthus's theory in action. Population rises exponentially in outstrips food production. You see what he didn't think about was m maybe there will be more food production along with the more people, because one we'll just get better at making food, and two we'll just use more of the very abundant resources on this massive planet of ours to make more food. Right, we make the food for the people. We're not trying to make food to

store and massive mass if silos that no one ever eats. Right, We're trying to feed the population we have. Of course there is some food storage. But you get what I'm saying. What was mouth is really all about? Well, his solution to this was essentially to kill off poor people. Yeah, it sounds like a libelite, doesn't he. We should facilitate the operations of nature in producing mortality. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits in

our towns. We should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the play. This English intellectual from just a few generations back, a very influential one at that, really believe that we should make life miserable for poor people so that they're living in filthy conditions, and maybe then the play will come back and kill them off, and then we'll have enough food for the middle class end more importantly, of course,

the rich people to have. I mean, this is some crazy stuff, right, except it hasn't gone away from This is infused in the climate movement of today in so many ways. And the globalists, the global elite, the Davos set, they're always so worried about how we're going to feed the world and the drain on our resources and our climate. This is still going on now. You may have seen, for example, these Georgia guidestones, the Stonehenge of Georgia they

call It's been around since nineteen seventy nine. There was an explosion and then they tore it down. Someone tried to blow this thing up and then it was so messed up they had to tear it down. I guess because it was unsafe to be around. Now, look, don't destroy property. It's not nice, but that's bad. That's suppose it destroyed property. That is a vandalism. But what was more interesting, I think as part of this story was when people found out about and maybe this, I mean,

who knows what the real motivation was here. The ten principles on the Georgia Guidestone maintain humanity under five hundred million in perpetual balance with nature, guide reproduction wisely, improving fitness and diversity, unite humanity with a living new language, rule, passion, faith, tradition, all things. And it gets a little more boring below that. But being not a cancer on the earth, leave room for nature, Leave room for nature. There's a kind of

environmentalist radicalism underpinning all this. In fact, there's a Malthusian go back to every buddy Thomas Malthis Malthusian ethos at work here. Five hundred million people, perpetual balance with it. Who says that's a perpetual balance five hundred million, but where it's seven billion right now? Right? So what am I missing here? So we're supposed to we're supposed to kill off six point five billion people, that's their idea, or just watch them all die or something. What are

they really saying here, folks? There is, as I've said, not only in malenthusiasm, but also a nihilism and a desire for totalitarian control that is infused in these environmentalists and sustainability movement, so much so that not only the telling you to lay off the cheeseburgers, peasant, you don't need those cheeseburgers looking a little tubby anyway, right, that's

what they're telling you. But they also want you to really consider seriously, because you know, got to be responsible stewards of the environment, that you should be eating bugs is from the World Economic Forum website. Five reasons why eating insects could reduce climate change. Time magazine says, they're healthy, they're sustainable, So why don't humans eat more bugs? CNN? The food that can feed and maybe save the planet bugs The Guardian. If we want to save the planet,

the future of food is insect you know, libs. I just want to say, why don't you choke down a mouthful of cockroach first? You know, let's see them do it. Instead of Bill Gates walking around with his giant belly and his billions of dollars trying to control the whole planet telling everybody what they should be eating. I want to see Bill get on a treadmill. Okay, I don't really need advice from these people about how to live my life. But it's not just advice, it's control that

they want. They want to tell you what you can and can't do, and they come up with these extremely grandiose convoluted and honestly insane theories in order to justify this level of control. This is behind the Biden administration pushing for all of these reductions in climate in emissions to protect a climate they say climate is an existential threat. This is behind the Dutch farmers being told they can't actually farm food anymore, or at least not the way

they're used to, because of climate emissions. This is all about control and adherence to a religion that is actually nihilism. It's not really a religion. It's the complete destruction of meaning of humanity and replacing it with the earth. That's what matters. Not humanity nor the Earth is here for us, humanity's playground. Deal with it, libs. All right. President Biden continues to struggle with the out of control inflation situation.

We come back, Carol Markowitz going to break that down for us, the raging dumpster fire that is the Buiden economy. Permon you are. Let's talk about protecting your online data. A lot of companies are going to say your privacy is guaranteed. We know that's not true though. That's why you need a new privacy and cybersecurity application tool called

Secure it's spelled sek You are. Secure is using proprietary encryption and offering secure instant messaging and email with secure all of your communications based on servers and data centers hosted in Switzerland without using any of the big tech platforms. Privacy is a big issue now. Without real security, people can read your emails, messages, even your bank information. Secure will never mind your data and never ask to your

phone number. You can send emails to your doctor, banker, lawyer, or anyone else with a total confidence you're not being spied on by your internet provider or big peck. Secure is your solution to stop the constant theft of your digital identity. Costs only five dollars for the messenger only ten dollars for the messenger and email combination package. Go to secure dot com and take back your privacy today. That's sekure dot com and use promo code buck for

twenty five percent off. We'll be right back with more. Hold the line. President Biden is struggling to get a handle on soaring inflation, so much so that members of his own party seem to be viewing him as political kryptonite. Do Democratic candidates in Ohio even declining to share the

stage with him at an event in Cleveland. In a recent op ed, New York Post, comms Karl Mark Whitz says that Biden's economy is a flaming dumpster fire, writing as a stock market continues to tank, inflation stays high, and people really feel the crunch. Many experts think a recession is on the horizon. The ship needs to be turned around, but the president first needs to recognize that he's set sail at all. Yep, I agree, He joins me on our discuss Carol Mark. Who's good to see Carol.

What's up, Hi, Buck? Thanks for having me. I gotta say, it's always a bad sign when your side of things, as we're seeing with this White House, kind of changes. The messaging feels like almost every day. Some days it's the economy is actually great, you know, you stupid peasants stopped complaining about gas. Other days it's we've done an amazing job with the employment situation, so don't complain about how inflation super high. And then it's putin's price high.

Maybe things aren't so great. You know which one is it? And I just wonder, I mean, I'm still holding on to that sixteenth cents we saved last fourth of July. But yeah, you know, it's funny because when the Biden administration points to successes, like unemployment is very low, that is because of them. But when there's something wrong, like the gas prices are very high, that's because of somebody else.

It's really quite convenient. And you know, I think that you know, what we have going on with this administration is that they don't know what they think. They don't know what they're supposed to be doing, and they get mocked by people like the Chinese state media. And it's scary to watch because the president is out to lunch, so we have no idea what is actually thinking. Last night in Cleveland, for example, I didn't hold supporters that you know, they're they're doing some work on inflation or

something watched. We got a long way to go because because of the I call it the Putin tax increase. The third reason I ran was to unify the country. Do you unify it? That's been the harder part of it right now. No, I'm serious, because we've become so divided. I mean, it's stunning. He really it feels to me like the Biden White House now the pitches just to really dumb people or people who are living in total denial. I mean, this Putin price hike thing, no one really

believes that's what's going on. No, nobody believes that's what's going on because gas prices were going up before Putin invaded Ukraine. So no, of course it doesn't make any sense. And you know, the actual scary thing to me was when the White House Twitter account tweeted that the gas station should be reducing the prices, and it's just like, if the president really believes that the individual gas stations

are setting these prices, that's that's terrifying to me. Buff I mean, it's just econ one oh one that they don't seem to grasp. And then again the Chinese media weighing in on this and saying, well, look, the president finally believes that capitalism is you know, just a bad thing. And it's kind of scary to watch. I mean, you mentioned Biden talking about gas stations and the messaging from this White House on the gas beating up on gas stations.

I mean this should be like, you know, beating up on Delhi's and Bodegas for the price for the price of Eggs. It's like, well, if it's gone up everywhere else, guess what, it's going to go up with them too. But here he is. Here is his tweet. My message to the company is running gas stations and setting prices at the pump is simple. This is a time of war and global peril. Bring down the price you are charging at the pump to reflect the cost you're paying

for the product, and do it now? Does the president not understand that a business has to make a profit or else it goes out of business? Like? Is he so stupid? And I actually I wonder because I've always thought Joe Biden was dumb, and actually Democrats used to admit that he's just not a smart guy. He's never been a smart man. But he's kind of like an actor. He says the required lines, he looks the part. And so he was a center from Delaware, right, who cares?

But maybe he is so stupid that he thinks a business can just charge what they actually pay for the product to consumers and still be a business. I like that all these Twitter users started writing to like Lamborghini and Chanel and saying like, bring down the price of your product right now? You know in a joking passion attendance tweet, I'm in for some chanel, you know, price reductions. Joe Biden can make that happen for us. But yeah, it's it's it's as if he doesn't understand that oil

is sold on the global market. It is not something that the individual gas station at the end of your block sets the price on. It is not something that they can control and absolute these and you know, where were they when nobody was driving, when nobody was flying, and these gas stations were not making money. I mean, when the oil companies were not making money. It wasn't

quite as much quite a concern at that point. And it's just again, it's like baffling to watch this administration make these calls and have these tweets, because it really shows an administration adrift and really with no bearings of

what's actually happening. Who you know, it's funny. I've talked to Clay on this about radio a lot on our radio show, and it's I do think it's instructive here because as much as I disagreed with a lot of I'm pretty much all of Obama administration policy, but you know, I thought they were wrong on things. There were some people in that administration, at the senior levels in that White House who I would admit were smart. I think they were wrong, but they were smart and had some

degree of competence and capability. I just think they were pursuing the wrong policies in this Biden white House. I actually I think it's really the b team. And I'm wondering, you know, do you do you see anybody here? You go, you know that person. That person would be apart from whether you agree with them, could be in any presidential administration. Like I feel like this is this is like the streams who never do the reading for the class and

they're making all the they're making all the decisions. Do you mean our vice president here? Yeah? Absolutely, I think that they're I think none of them have done the reading and they always come off it's sort of unprepared. Again, I think when you when you talk about the economy and you don't have any care about what the people

are going through. I mean, we saw this a lot with Jen Saki when she was just she'd make comments like, oh, the tragedy of the treadmill or all the other comments about just inflation or people not being able to get the items that they need. There's just there's no connection to the American people where they understand our pain. I think you're absolutely right. With the Obama administration, at least you felt like when things were not going their way,

that they were aware of it. This administration just pretends it's not happening. It seems delusional art up. Yeah, it seems like they're really delusion. By the way, you mentioned this. The Chinese state affiliated media saw the Biden tweet. The China Daily EU bureau chief tweeted back at the president. Now US president finally realized that capitalism is all about exploitation. He didn't believe this before. That's pretty awesome. I gotta say, it's just it's it's scary, and this is what we're

what we're dealing with. And you know, Trump got a lot of criticism when he was president about us being mocked on the world stage. I mean, this is worse than a lot of the mockery that the Trump administration received. I don't like the Chinese state media pointing out that our president doesn't seem to understand the capitalism is the best system to have ever existed. And you know, it's just it's again. It's scary to watch and I am genuinely baffled by the behavior of this administration on the

world stage. Yeah, Mark, Whit's always on point. Thanks for joining us. Where are you creat is now? It's fifth month and the administration has begun to talk endgame. We'll have more on that with the senior fellow at the Foundation for Defensive Democracy, Bill Roggio, coming up. But I want to talk to you about protecting your most valuable asset, your home. I don't know if you saw this, but there was a recent story about an Arizona real estate agent and found out the home she lived in was

for sale. Problem was, she wasn't actually selling her home. She was the victim of home title fraud, a devastating crime happening all over the country. According to the expert at home Title Lock, the crime is incredibly profitable and hard to detect. An identity thief simply creates a fake title transfer for your home and refiles as the new owner. Then you can take out loans on your home or sell it. Typical identity theft services don't cover you neither.

There's homeowners insurance. Home title lock does home tutle Louck puts a barrier around your home's title. The instant they detect anyone champer with your home's title, they help shut it down and help get your home back in your name. So here's what you should do. But at hometuttle loock dot com. Read the testimonials from FBI agents and government officials. Then register your address to see if you're already a

victim and don't even know it. When you protect your home, tell him Buck sent you to get thirty three days of protection. Home titlelock dot com again. That's home titlelock dot com. Bill Roggio up next, Stay with us. The war in Ukraine is now in its fifth month, and any hope of a quick resolution to the conflict has vanished. Last week, President Biden announced get another eight hundred and twenty million dollar aid package to the embattled nation, even

as the administration itself is tempering expectations. Last week, US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haynes laid out three scenarios for how the conflict could end. Some far less optimistic than the US had initially hoped for. You were to bring some more insight, A senior fellot the Foundation for Defensive democracies, Bill Rogio, Bill, always good to see it.

Thanks for being with us, Thanks for having me bub All right, so before we get to the scenarios laid out by d and I Haines, what are things looking like right now on the ground in Ukraine? Not a lot of reporting about it. Yeah, there's the Russians took control of the duties the Chunk and Seferdines, so they've essentially consolidated control full control of Luhan Province. That's one of the two provinces that make up the don Bas region,

the other Janettes. That's the Russians are on the move there. You know, Look, we keep hearing that. You know, the Russians don't have morale, they're losing equipment, they're losing men at a rapid case, and yet they're still advancing on the ground. Today they're advancing towards a small city called Severesk, and they're moving to look to take on the last

two major cities in Dante Province. Whether the Ukrainians them or not, I think after what we witnessed this Russian offenses in the last two months, it's grinding, but it's effective. It's brutally effective. This is what I affected them to do in Kiv, and they tried to do a lightning assault and it seems the Russians debris organize. The reporting has become from Ukraine on the Ukrainian side has become

a lot more grim, a lot. It was very hopeful two months ago after the Battle of Kiev, and now things now that we're talking, you know again, you have the National Director of Intelligence talking about something we discussed that months ago, about these three scenarios and that two of them are not very good. So now let's look at these scenarios that have been laid out in this I think it was a was it a leaked assessment bill that everyone's reporting on now or at least some

assessment the government has um? What can you tell us about that? Yeah, you know, that's I'm not sure how this came out. I thought it was publicum. But yet basically the Director of National Security arbro Haines said that, you know, look AT's three things, that there's three outcomes here. The first could be the Russians can break through and take even more territory in Ukraine, and I think that's what we're seeing now. Everyone thought they were going to

hold the Russians at Saint Paris. Once that front broke, the Russians advanced a pretty significant amount of territory. The advanced ten miles in seven in several days, and that you know, that might not seem alike a lot, but in this type of war and on the battlefield, that's a significant considering the fighting. So that's the first scenario

that the Russians make a game. The second scenario is that this thing turns into a World War One type scale, and then the third scenarios that the Ukrainians can drive out the questions. I think that third scenario really has been shelved at this point based on what you, as

sufficients are saying. I never thought that that was very realistic given the Russian military capabilities, and I think we're seeing the first and second scenarios being more like the Ukrainians are start taking significant losses one hundred to two hundred soldiers a day killed, up to five hundred wounded. These aren't just these are the Ukrainians best troops and they're giving up ground and taking significant casualties. I don't think they're fighting very smart, and that's why that first

option the Russian breakthrough the Russian takeovers in territory. This is the one again. We were warning about this what one to two months ago, Buck and people were just pooh pooing this as being impossible. But now it is a possibility. And in what ways are the Ukrainians most mismatched here militarily? And early on there was a lot

of talk about air strikes and artillery range. Is that still Are those still the primary areas where the Ukrainians are you having a hard time even withstanding this Russian offensive And basically, given that they're fighting on their home turf, we're giving them a lot. They've got a lot of guns, right, They've got a lot of shoulder fired missiles, and they've been getting military support from not just America, but many countries. How are the Russians able to continue to grind on

and take more territory? Where is the mismatch? The mismatched primarily is an artillery for the person foremost, as you mentioned, the secondary in the air. The Russians have negated the Ukrainians in the air. The Ukrainians used of uads. That's that was very effective in the beginning, But now the Russians have been countered this using their air defense more effectively, but the Ukrainians are seeing their outmatched by ten to fifteen the one depending on what part of the front.

In artillery, now, the US is supplying artillery systems, but the problems are is that some of these artillery systems aren't compatible with what the Ukrainians use, the old Soviet weapons systems. They're having supply issues. The Russians are firing at least ten to one shells so and then the Ukrainians are starting to have problems with effective combat units.

They're losing some of their best fighters, some of their best soldiers are starting to get ground down and starting to see reports of units taking forty fifty, sixty to eighty percent casualties. That is not sustainable. These are the casualties that people were saying the Russians were taking at the beginning. The Ukrainians are now starting to take these casualties. When you put all this together, this is why that

elapse scenario. And look, I don't think the Russians could advance all the way to the border west of the border of Poland, but they could advance that river, which I think was their initial goal about taking kid and

taking all the territory east of the Deniper River. I think this is this is a possibility now, something that we have to consider in the western You think they made because I've been saying this since February, that they're just going to cut the country in half and take the eastern part of it and just say you guys can have the rest is Do you think that's what

they're heading toward? Yeah? Absolutely, Buck, I said, I felt as well, they would leave a rump Ukrainian state that is weakened, UM, that is divided, and the Russians can have um, you know, have a client state on you know again west and east of the Deniper River. I think that is I always think that was the goal. I don't think they help they can up fully up rain.

And what is the Biden administration doing in the background here to try to bring this conflict because it feels like right now it just goes on into the Russians get what they want? I mean, is the reason that we don't hear more about a possible solution to this

through deploys. See that the Russians have now decided they're not stopping no matter what until they get that bisected Ukraine mean is that do we know what Putin's has Putin stated what his goal is and do we know what Biden is offering on behalf of the Western countries aligned as Ukraine's allies here to try to stop the conflict. Now, the President, Biden and other Western leaders have said this

is a decision the Ukrainians must make. But in the background, I think they are trying to push for a solution. But the problem is that the Russians don't want a political solution. They want to I believe, to split the state. They said they want to take a control of the don Bos, liberate those areas, get rid of the Nazi elements, and demilitarize the Ukrainians. That would be leaving a rump

state as we think about earlier. But the Ukrainians themselves are saying they're going to fight until they drive the Russians out of all of Ukraine. So both sides are nowhere near considering negotiating, and I wouldn't trust the Russians negotiate either. This is this is a situation. This is why I think unless the Russians achieve a dramatic breakthrough and they're able to take significant amount of territory give forcing the Ukrainians to leaving them with no choice but

to see the ground. I think this could be either a lengthy conflict or prolonged conflict. I just don't see the Ukrainians being able to drive the Russians out, not in the near to mid term. I mean, if you had to, if you had to make an assessment, is this war still going on a year from now, I

think it may be yes. I think if I have been making an assessment, unless there is a Russian significant Russian breakthrough and a collapse, I think, given what we witnessed this last five months, that it's very likely that this war will be grinding on for the next year. And look Europe and even here in the United States, they're starting to see the Ukraine fatigue and that plays

a Roman to this as well. It could either extend this work or could bring it to a quick close if the Western countries decide to cut down or even stop providing aid to Bill. Thanks for being with us man, go to see it. It was a pleasure, bucket and agree on. Senator Elizabeth Warren is taking aim at crisis pregnancy centers, claiming that they're used to trick women into not getting abortions. I mean she actually said that. We'll have more on this with the host of Counterculture on

the Epic Times, Danielle Desuza in a moment. As we've reported on this program before, pro life establishments around the country, including churches and chrisis pregnancy centers, are being vandalized all over the United States and seems nobody is being held

accountable for it. According to a report in The Daily Signal, six days after the FBI announced a formal investigation into a series of attacks against churches and pro life organizations, the agency seems to be falling through but apparently has made no arrests. If that wasn't enough, Senator Elizabeth Warren is now attacking crisis pregnancy centers as well, claiming they're fooling pregnant women into not getting abortion, seriously saying that join me now to discuss the Danielle de sus a

host of Counterculture with Danielle de Susa. Danielle, good to see you, hi, Buck, thanks for having me. So let's just start with this SoundBite of Elizabeth Warren that I, you know, there are the things that I would talk about that our differences of politics. And then there are things that seem like differences of whether a person understands and lives with basic morality and has a soul. And this,

for me, finds itself more in the second category. Here's Elizabeth Warren saying that, first of all, she thinks all crisis pregnancy centers should be shut down in her state of Massachusetts. And why why here in Massachusetts, these so called crisis pregnancy centers out number genuine abortion clinics by three to one. They are giving it over to people who wish them hard, and that has to stop. We

need to put a stop to that in Massachusetts right now. People, I mean, there's so much they're people who wish them harm, she says, of crisis pregnancy centers that do things like give counseling, get baby formula, baby clothes, bring together family members to teach them about how to be helpful with the baby. I mean that that wishes them harm, apparently exactly. I mean, these crisis pregnancy centers actually give people oftentimes

free medical care, free ultrasounds, free checkups. But yet the people who wish them harm aren't the crisis pregnancy centers. It's actually people like Elizabeth Warren and Planted Parenthood that not only wish the baby harm, of course, but actually the woman harm. They oftentimes don't want her to know what is happening in the pregnancy. They don't want her to know what's happening in the womb, and so they bait and switch. She's talking about. Isn't what the crisis

pregnancy centers are doing, it's what Plant Parenthood does. They basically say, we're all about you know, we're all we're all about parenthood, We're all about these other services, when in reality they use that to bring women in and then actually give them abortions. So they're the ones who are pulling this bait and switch tag and are also

using this and then harm the same women. Yes, and also is fascinating because for years, Danielle, we know that the Planned Parenthood talking point has been that abortions are only three percent of the services they provide, and they'll often say, well what about you know, people say what about mamograms? It turns out Planned parent who doesn't do mamograms, they can they can suggest essentially to somebody where to

go to get a mammogram. But now that abortion isn't getting the same kind of federal funding, and abortion isn't getting the same kind of legal support from the make believe constitutional right. Why are I mean, if only three percent of your activities as a business involve something, why are places? Why are Planned Parenthood's closing down? You know, I think that's a really good point. Plan Parenthood have been closing down. They've been dropping like flies all over

the country. We've even seen these abortion bands coming into place in many states. And you're the left keeps saying things like, oh, abortion is so popular, rovi waight is so popular. Well, actually it's not popular. That's why so many of these states want restrictions, and that's why so many of these states that are closing down these Planned parenthoods because Plant Parenthood has nothing to offer these women

if not abortion. That was their primary service, that was their main service, and anything that they would add to that was really just an add on service. So Planned Parenthood closing is actually a good thing, and it'll be great if we actually don't send federal funding to Planned Parenthood, but perhaps instead send it to some crisis pregnancy centers

that actually help women's help. And there's a surge in these companies, by the way, that we've all seen that are touting their abortion travel benefits, which is it's remarkable when you find out, you know, Dick Sporting Goods for examples, saying, don't worry, we'll give you thousands of dollars to travel

to go get an abortion. Some people pointing out also to make everyone really apart from, of course, the morality of abortion itself, it should make people really uncomfortable that it seems that these companies are much faster to talk about how much they want to help you will get abortions than they are to help with maternity leave and provide assistance for actual motherhood. But here's a Fox forty headline, if you use your company's abortion travel benefits, will your

boss find out? There are so many of these companies that are talking about their abortion travel benefits, I think that they may also start to realize one it's a story. It seems strange that they're so dedicated toward this, especially

in companies that aren't necessarily thought of as work. But also if they're going to be paying people to travel across state lines, it's kind of like they're asking for this to be handled at the federal level by Congress, which may have different implications than they think it will, right, And you know, you brought up this question of will your employer know whether or not you use these funds

to travel it's get an abortion. Well, why is it that they're saying, Oh, no, that's your rights of privacy, We don't need to know that. Here's the money. You're just going to get reimbursed for this. But yet they want to know how many shots you've gone, whether you've gotten a vaccine, they want to know all these other things. Was about your personal health, but yet they don't want to know about this. And as you mentioned, they do want these women to get abortions because they don't want

to have to pay for maternity leave. They don't want women to actually have families, have a life outside of work. They basically want them to grow up and live in cubicles their whole lives so that that kind of provides their meeting and life. Basically, work is the only thing that they care about. And yet these companies know that this is actually quite harmful to women, just sending them across state lines. They're just going to fly them to

places like New York to get abortions there. I mean, this is This is something that I think we thought of before this happened. You know, this abortion tourism, the idea of having like a Disneyland being like an abortion clinic and people go there and they're they're flown there on a trip. It really is just a new concept. I think. Here's a guy, Harvey Cotton from the Ropes and Gray law firm that our team pulled this from.

Talking about how the abortion benefits will work. This guy stated, just like your employer doesn't know if you're going to the doctor for treatment of any other medical condition, they wouldn't be a to find out what you've been reimbursed for travel to seek an abortion in a state where it's legal. So I had to This benefit work through the medical plan is so important. This could turn into a bit of a fight, I think as well. Over

is this a mandatory benefit now? Right? And remember because of Obamacare, we've all gotten used to this, this very heavy handed federal Well, this must be covered by all plans. Are all plans all across the country is supposed to cover abortion even though abortion is illegal in some states? Yeah, Well, some states are even passing laws saying that you can't

actually help someone else obtain an abortion like Texas. So I don't know where that's going to go as far as the legal ramifications of that, but no, I mean, I think this idea of making it so that you know, this is now required to be part of insurance and so on people, that's almost another thing that then we have to deal with trying to get rid of. But I think if that happened, I don't think it would be upheld at all. Then Yelle always appreciate the respective.

Thanks for being with us. Thank you. An Arizona congressional candidate recently released an ad in which he takes on the Ku Klux Klan with an AAR fifteen. You've got to see this. We've got video for you and quick hits. Stay with us. Arizona congressional candidate Jerome Davis shows why he believes he needs a thirty round magazine and California Governor Gavin Newsom is under fire for you get another striking piece of hypocrisy. We have those stories and kits.

Let's get right to it now. Usually congressional ads are pretty boring. Usually congressional ads you watch them and you go, come on, what's this really supposed to do? Who's going to care about this one? And you get into the oh, did this guy really say this, or did he really stand or did gal you know stand for that whatever? Right? Sometimes, though, the ad is so creative that it becomes a bit of a cultural moment to me, if you will, and

goes viral and a lot of people see it. And I think that may be the case here with Jerome Davis. He's running for Congress in Arizona, and he is clearly a supporter of the Second Amendment. And as you know, there's this ongoing debate about how because gun grabbers, leftists, democrats, they want to tell you you can't have now. I don't think the criminals care what we say about magazine limitations, of course, but the law abiding are told you can't have a ten round magazine or a fifteen or a

thirty round magazine. You can only have a five round magazine. How long before they say you can only have a one at a time, you know, a one at a time breach loading rifle of something. I mean, it's ridiculous, right, I mean, this is where we are flint lock pistols only. This is crazy. JEROMEE. Davis, though, made this ad he's running for Congress, and he says, look, you might need thirty rounds because a situation like this. Amocrats like to say that no one needs in AAR fifteen for self defense,

that no one could possibly need all thirty rounds. But when this rifle is the only thing standing between your family and a dozen angry Democrats in clan hoods, you just might need that semi automatic in all thirty rounds. There, you have it right. You know, there was a Fourth of July weekend just happened, and there was a lot of tension, of course on the mass shooting that occurred in Highland Park and then also the shootings that occurred

in other major cities. So those are the biggest news stories, and rightly so. But if you see some of the stuff that was going on with these Independence Day celebration over the weekend of Independence Day, I should say that this stuff has nothing to do with Independence Day. This people taking an opportunity to blow things up and create mayhem and get away with bad behavior. Here is a group of youths in Minneapolis who just rolled and drove

around attacking people with fireworks on the street. I mean, one woman was walking a dog she was targeted to directly watch this come you don't want Christmas Love. And there's Gavin Newsom vacationing in Montana. A new controversy's arising from Governor Gavin Newsom's holiday trip with his family. Newsom is on vacation in Montana. According to Cala Matters, Montana is one of twenty two states California has banned state funded travel too because of anti LGBTQ policies. Let's be clear.

Gavin Newsom, in an act of typical lib virtue signaling, says no one is allowed to go to Montana because he says it's anti LGBTQ. And by the way, it's let's be clear, it's LGBTQI A plus for Gavin Newsom's purposes and everyone else's. Let's be very clear on that. One can't leave out the extra letters because that would be non inclusive. Gavin Newsom, though, travel to Montana, and he doesn't want state employees to go there. So it's

good for Gavin Newsom on vacation. That's cool, but it's not okay for state employees to go there for any reason because it's so bigoted. The whole state of Montana, punish the whole state and twenty two states. California says, you can't have stayed fund to travel to California. Live insanity all concentrated in that one state. It's not good. That's up for tonight's hold the line. The no Spin news of Bill o'reiley is next fieldside